Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Atomic force microscopy analysis of native infectious and inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virions

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 is an enveloped virus responsible for the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Here, single viruses were analyzed by atomic force microscopy (AFM) operating directly in a level 3 biosafety (BSL3) facility, which appeared as a fast and powerful method to assess at the nanoscale level and in 3D infectious virus morphology in its native conformation, or upon inactivation treatments. AFM imaging reveals structurally intact infectious and inactivated SARS-CoV-2 upon low concentration of formaldehyde treatment. This protocol combining AFM and plaque assays allows the preparation of intact inactivated SARS-CoV-2 particles for safe use of samples out of level 3 laboratory to accelerate researches against the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, we illustrate how adapted BSL3-AFM is a remarkable toolbox for rapid and direct virus analysis based on nanoscale morphology.

Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as a new zoonotic coronavirus in late 2019 in Wuhan, China, and rapidly spread worldwide, causing a global pandemic1,2. SARS-CoV-2 is an enveloped single strand ( +) RNA virus with a surface layer of glycoprotein spike (S) forming a crown-like structure. The genome is packaged into a spherical, basket-like ribonucleoprotein RNP complex by the nucleocapsid protein (N)3. Two other structural proteins are associated with the viral envelope: membrane (M) and envelope (E). Cellular entry of SARS-CoV-2 depends on the binding of the S glycoprotein to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which is a specific cellular receptor located on the surface of the host cell4,5. The viral envelope has been proposed as being highly dynamic, with the hinges of S hinges allowing significant rotational movements6,7.

We focused here on characterizing native and inactivated SARS-CoV-2 morphology at the nanoscale using BSL3 based Atomic Force Microscopy. This virus being classified as a hazard group 3 pathogen, it must be studied and manipulated in level 3 biosafety laboratory. Therefore, well-controlled virus inactivation methods are needed to transfer virus samples from containment level 3 to a standard laboratory, to facilitate research that does not require infectious viruses. Inactivation of viral particles can be achieved in many ways, like the application of heat, alcohol, peroxide, radiation, fixatives, or detergents, and have been described for SARS-CoV-28,9 and SARS-CoV10,11, a previous coronavirus that spread in 2002–2003. However, published experimental data that demonstrate SARS-CoV-2 inactivation keeping intact particles are lacking, which can be necessary for applications and diagnosis requiring non-infectious particles keeping a native morphology. Therefore, we investigated methods allowing the inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 virions while maintaining their morphology. Herein, we focused on formaldehyde (FA) fixation, which is well established in histology and electron microscopy12. Unlike glutaraldehyde, which can cause aggregates, buffered FA has been shown to preserve virus morphology13, and its virucidal efficiency is very well documented, e.g., in vaccination programs14,15. SARS-CoV-2 virions were analyzed on a customized bio-Atomic Force Microscope (Bio-AFM) operating in BSL3. Atomic force microscopy is a unique technique that enables imaging of biological samples in their native liquid environment at the molecular scale. This technique has been widely used for virus imaging16,17, including recent studies on SARS-CoV-2 in liquid18 and in air19. In AFM, the sample does not require to be fixed, coated, or stained, which allowed us to image at high resolution, in 3D, native and inactivated hydrated viral particles in buffer, without any further treatment of the sample. As a result, we identified conditions for FA-based inactivation of SARS-CoV2 particles which maintain their physical integrity, while being non-infectious. Moreover, we demonstrate that modern bio-AFM is of great power for probing the structure of native and inactivated viruses at the nanoscale within minutes.

Results

We first controlled that the virus isolate was SARS-CoV-2 by revealing the presence of the M, N, and S viral proteins in infected cell lysates using immunoblots, by quantitative RT-PCR targeting the E gene overtime on the cell culture supernatant, and by imaging fixed infected cells by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) (Supplementary Figure S1). One can see that the infected cells are producing SARS-CoV-2. Native infectious SARS-CoV-2 from the clarified infected cell supernatant were then directly visualized by AFM using a force-curve based imaging mode, after smooth adsorption of the sample on an appropriate AFM surface (mica or glass coverslip). Viruses did not adsorb on freshly cleaved mica or glass coverslip (not shown), but were found to bind very quickly (2–3 min) on poly-l-lysine coated mica or glass coverslips coated with an alkyl silane to make them hydrophobic20. Virus adsorption on poly-l-lysine coated mica surface showed SARS-CoV-2 virions as roughly spherical or ellipsoidal particles (Fig. 1), consistent with previous electron microscopy and AFM studies. Surprisingly, a fraction of the viral particles appeared embedded in a network of thin filamentous structures adhering to the surface (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Figure S2), in addition to free particles, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 particles could be released from the infected culture cells as viral “packages” containing tethered particles. As seen by Kiss et al., the AFM images showed “bald” native viral particles with a blurred, smooth surface, without clear S trimers protruding from the viral surface, even from viruses directly imaged from cell supernatant. This has been attributed to the high mobility of spikes and their rapid motion on virus surface, which thus evade the AFM cantilever tip18. We also consider that virion movements on the mica surface during adsorption could break the long spike proteins. Virions adsorbed on the hydrophobic surface showed equivalent topographical structure and the method did not help to resolve S trimers (Fig. 1c). On this surface, however, images based on the slope of the force-distance curve for an applied force of 1 nN showed particles with a donut-shape, hollowed out in the center and displaying a crown of increased stiffness in the range of 10–20 pN/nm (Fig. 1c), similar to the stiffness measured by indentation18. This supports the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 is easily deformable and that the ribonucleoprotein complex, made of N and the viral RNA, contributes little to the viral mechanics. TEM observation of the virus-producing cells confirmed unambiguously the typical structure of coronavirus particles, containing granular densities corresponding to the viral nucleoprotein and showing protruding spikes S proteins incorporated into the viral lipid envelope22 (Fig. 1d). The mean central height of the virions (Fig. 1e) ranged from 45 to 140 nm on both surfaces, with a mean height of 89 nm ± 19 nm (Fig. 1f), consistent with viral particle diameters in the literature measured by AFM18 and very close from the 91 ± 11 nm value obtained by cryo-electron tomography for SARS-CoV-26 and for other coronaviruses21, which are ranging from 50 to 150 nm. By TEM, dehydrated particles show diameters distribution in the range from 40 to 95 nm (mean 61 nm ± 10 nm) , in good accordance with AFM measurement of on SARS-CoV-2 fixed with 5% glutaraldehyde18 and the known ≈ 25% shrinkage of samples with the dehydration procedure used here for TEM sample preparation23.

Figure 1
figure1

Native infectious SARS-CoV-2 virions imaged by AFM (a) Topographic image and 3D projection of native infectious SARS-CoV-2 virions adsorbed on a poly-l-lysine (PLL)-coated mica surface using quantitative imaging (QI) mode AFM in buffer. (b,c) Zoom-in view of SARS-CoV-2 virions adsorbed on poly-l-lysine-coated mica (b) or glass coverslips coated with an alkyl silane (c) (scale bars: 50 nm). In (c) height and stiffness images acquired in QI mode on individual virions are shown. (d) Example of a TEM image of fixed infected VeroE6 cells producing SARS-CoV-2 that can be seen as spherical particles studded with S trimers (see arrows). (e) Examples of topographical profile plots measured along the horizontal diameter of viral particles. (f) Virion diameter distribution of infectious SARS-CoV2 samples imaged by AFM in liquid (height profile, n = 190 objects) and compared to fixed samples imaged by TEM (n = 319 objects).

We then examined and compared virus inactivation using FA and heat, to identify a condition keeping structurally intact SARS-CoV-2 particles. Upon heat or FA treatments, followed by ultra-filtration, viral particles were analyzed directly by AFM for nanoscale morphology (compare Fig. 2a for WT with no treatment with Fig. 2b with treatments) and by plaque assays for infectivity (Table 1, Supplementary Figure S3). SARS-CoV-2 incubated at 58 °C for 30 min was successfully inactivated (Table 1), as described for other coronavirus10,11. AFM analysis of heated viruses showed severely damaged particles that have lost their spherical shapes (Fig. 2b). On the other hand, we observed complete inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 after incubation at 20 °C for 30 min with 0.5%, 1%, 2%, or 3.6% FA (see Table 1) evaluating infectivity by plaque assays (Supplementary Figure S3). AFM analysis of FA-treated viruses showed unaltered particles with a shape and height similar to the untreated control upon 0.5% or 1% FA treatment (Fig. 2b), while the higher percentage dramatically damaged viral particles, whose morphology is then similar to the samples heated to 58 °C, i.e. a loss of spherical shape and an altered average height (Fig. 2c–e). FA-fixation did not reveal the S glycoprotein as seen by others and the protrusions of the FA-treated virions did not correspond to S spikes18. As shown previously10,13, the FA inactivation effect was temperature-dependent and was strongly reduced at 4 °C. Indeed, SARS-CoV-2 was still infectious for a lower concentration of 0.1% FA with incubation at 4 °C (Table 1, Supplementary Figure S3). Altogether, these results show that SARS-CoV-2 at a concentration of 1–2 × 106 PFU/ml is inactivated at 20 °C using 0.5% or 1% FA for 30 min at RT, without major loss of virus physical integrity. In contrary, keeping the virus at 4 °C in buffer, or up to 48 h at 20 °C, has no incidence on its infectious titer (Table 1) indicating a strong stability of SARS-CoV2 particles in buffer (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Figure S2).

Figure 2
figure2

SARS-CoV-2 inactivation monitored by topographic imaging using QI mode AFM in buffer. (a) Native infectious, control SARS-CoV-2 sample kept for 30 min at room temperature. (b) Virus particles inactivated with 1% and 2% FA for 30 min at 20 °C, or incubated at 58 °C for 30 min. Scale bars are 50 nm. The color gradient for Z scale is the same for all AFM panels. (c) Topographical profile plots measured along the dotted lines in the lower panel in (a). (d) 3D projection of the particles in the lower panel (a). (e) Distribution of the topographical maximal height of treated and untreated SARS-CoV-2 particles (control n = 39; 1% FA n = 40; 2% FA n = 43; 58 °C n = 39). P values are indicated and were computed by using two-sided independent t tests and comparing the results to those for the untreated sample.

Table 1 Efficiency of SARS-CoV-2 inactivation by FA in relation to temperature and incubation time.

In conclusion, in front of the urgent need to perform researches on SARS-CoV-2 to fight COVID-19, the inactivation methods described here can contribute to transfer the virion from the confined laboratory to the lower biosafety class laboratory in an inactivated, non-infectious, form preserving viral morphology. We also show that a low percentage of FA treatment allows retaining the physical integrity of the particles albeit non-infectious. High-resolution AFM analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in buffer also demonstrates its ability to provide direct and fast qualitative information on infectious virus morphology and proves to be a method of choice for analyzing viral preparations with exceptional precision and rapidity.

Materials and methods

Virus and cell culture

VeroE6 cells (African green monkey kidney cells) were obtained from ECACC and maintained in Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The strain BetaCoV/France/IDF0372/2020, was supplied by the National Reference Center for Respiratory Viruses hosted by Institut Pasteur (Paris, France) and headed by Pr. Sylvie van der Werf. The human sample from which strain BetaCoV/France/IDF0372/2020 was isolated has been provided by Dr. X. Lescure and Pr. Y. Yazdanpanah from the Bichat Hospital, Paris, France. Moreover, the BetaCoV/France/IDF0372/2020 strain was supplied through the European Virus Archive goes Global (EVAg) platform, a project that has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the grant agreement No 653316. For supplementary Fig. S3 (panel d) we used a SARS-CoV-2 strain isolated from CPP Ile de France III, no. 2020-A00935-34 and CRB Collection of the University Hospital of Montpellier, France (https://www.chu-montpellier.fr). Both virus strains were propagated in VeroE6 cells with DMEM containing 2.5% FBS at 37 °C with 5% CO2 and were harvested 72 h post-inoculation. Virus stocks were stored at − 80 °C.

Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)

RNAs from mock-infected or infected (MOI = 0.001) cell culture supernatant were extracted using the Nucleospin Dx Virus RNA purification kit (Macherey–Nagel). Then qRT-PCR was performed in triplicate as described24, using primers targeting the E gene of SARS-CoV-2 (E_Sarbeco-F ACAGGTACGTTAATAGTTAATAGCGT; E_Sarbeco-R ATATTGCAGCAGTACGCACACA) and Luna Universal One-Step qRT-PCR Kit (New England Biolabs) on a Roche Light Cycler 480. The calibration of the assay was performed with a nCoV-E-Sarbeco-Control Plasmid (Eurofins Genomics).

Western blot

VeroE6 cells were infected for 2 h with SARS-CoV-2 (MOI = 0.001). 96 h post infection, cells were washed twice in PBS, detached with versen, pelleted at 250 × g for 6 min, and lysed in RIPA buffer. Total protein concentration was calculated using a Bradford protein assay kit. 20 µg of total cell lysates were diluted in Laemmli buffer and proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE on 8% (for S-protein) and 10% (for M- and N-protein) acrylamide gels. Gels were transferred to PVDF membrane using wet transfer with Tris–glycine-methanol buffer. Membranes were washed in TBS, blocked with 5% milk in TBS-T for 30 min and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibody specific for spike (Gentex, cat# GTX632604), N-protein (Gentex, cat# GTX632269) or M-protein (Tebu, cat# 039100-401-A55), all three diluted at 1:1000 in TBS-T. After washing with 5% milk in TBS-T, the membranes were incubated with HRP conjugated anti-mouse antibodies for N and S protein, and with HRP conjugated anti-rabbit antibody for M protein for 2 h at room temperature, washed again in TBS-T, incubated with ECL reagent (Amersham cat#RPN2236) and imaged using a Chemidoc Imager (Biorad).

Virus inactivation

All inactivation conditions were performed with a starting viral stock of 1–2 × 106 plaque-forming units/ml (PFU/ml). Heat inactivation was performed by incubating 100 μl of SARS-CoV-2 stock at 58 °C for 30 min. Formaldehyde inactivation was performed by incubating 90 µl of virus supplied by 10 × FA-Hepes (0.5 M) at 4 °C or RT (20 °C) for 30 min, 2 h or up to overnight at 4 °C depending on the conditions described in Table 1. Samples of Fig. 2 and Supplementary Figure S3 (panels b,c “column washed”) were complemented with PBS up to 5 ml and washed using a centrifugal concentrator (Microsep advance 100KDa MWCO, Pall corporation) at 1000×g at 4 °C for 5 min. Samples were washed 4 times by filling again the concentrator with 5 ml of PBS and repeating the centrifugation. The last centrifugation was processed until 200 µl remained, the virus sample was collected and stored at 4 °C for one night before plaque assays. Samples of Supplementary Figure S3 (panel d “ultracentrifuged”) were diluted into 4 ml PBS after FA inactivation, loaded over a 20% sucrose cushion-TNE, and ultracentrifuged at 100.000×g for 1 h on a SW55ti Beckman rotor. Viral samples were resuspended in 20 µl DMEM and stored at −80 °C. Virus inactivation were monitored in plaque assay on a monolayer of VeroE6 cells (3.5 × 105 cells/well), using 200 µl of virus solution. Samples were serially diluted and the PFU/mL values were determined using crystal violet coloration and subsequent scoring the amounts of wells displaying cytopathic effects.

Atomic force microcopy

Freshly cleaved muscovite mica sheets (V1 grade, Ted Pella, Inc.) were glued on a glass slide, coated for 10 min at 20 °C with 0.1% poly-L-lysine (Sigma), rinsed with 3 ml of buffer A (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5 and NaCl 100 mM) and dried with a N2 flux. A plastic O-ring (JPK Instruments) was then glued on the glass slide to assemble a small liquid cell. Virus samples were diluted four-fold in buffer A and 200 µL were deposited on the mica to allow passive virus adsorption. The liquid cell was completed with 200 µl of buffer A before imaging. Glass coverslips coated with hexamethyldisilazane (HDMS, Sigma) were prepared according to20 and AFM imaging was performed using a coverslip holder adapted to the AFM (Bruker) using the same procedure as for poly-l-Lysine coated mica. AFM imaging was performed at room temperature on a NanoWizard IV atomic force microscope (JPK Instruments-Bruker, Berlin, Germany) mounted on an inverted optical microscope (Nikon Instruments, Japan) and operating in a BSL3 laboratory. The modifications of the Bio-AFM included an additional sealing of the AFM scanner head, protection of electronic parts, and a specific machining (smoothing) of the metallic elements (object holder, cantilever) avoiding sharp edges. Topographic imaging was performed in quantitative imaging (QI) mode, which is a force-curve-based imaging mode, using BL-AC40TS-C2 cantilevers (mean cantilever spring constant kcant = 0.09 N/m, Olympus). Before each experiment, the sensitivity and spring constant (thermal noise method) of the cantilever were calibrated. The applied force was kept at 150 pN and a constant approach/retract speed of 10 µm/s (z range of 100 nm). For Fig. 1c, the applied force was raised to 1 nN and a constant approach/retract speed of 1 µm/s. Images were flattened with a polynomial/histogram line-fit with the JPK data processing software. Low-pass Gaussian and/or median filtering was applied to remove minor noise from the images. The Z-color scale in all images is given as relative after processing, with the offset being kept the same within each of the figures to emphasize the structural features. Particle height analysis was carried out using the height (measured) channel of the QI mode, which corresponds to the height at 80% of the setpoint force determined on the reference F-D curve. Height was calculated as the topographical maximal central height on each virion using the section tool of the analysis software, and the histogram tool of the z channel values using a 300 × 300 nm area for each particle.

Transmission electron microcopy

VeroE6 cells were infected with 1 × 106 PFU of SARS-CoV-2 for 24 h. Cells were fixed with 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in PHEM buffer and post-fixed in osmium tetroxide 1% / K4Fe(CN)6 0,8%, at room temperature for 1 h for each treatment. The samples were then dehydrated in successive ethanol baths (50/70/90/100%) and infiltrated with propylene oxide/EMbed812 mixes before embedding. 70 nm ultrathin cuts were made on a PTXL ultramicrotome (RMC, France), stained with OTE/lead citrate and observed on a Tecnai G2 F20 (200 kV, FEG) TEM at the Electron Microscopy Facility MRI-COMET, INM, Plate-Forme Montpellier RIO Imaging, Biocampus, Montpellier.

References

  1. 1.

    Wu, F. et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 579, 265–269 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hu, B., Guo, H., Zhou, P. & Shi, Z.-L. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-00459-7 (2020).

  3. 3.

    Yao, H. et al. Molecular architecture of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Cell 183, 730-738.e13 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Walls, A. C. et al. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell 181, 281-292.e6 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Zhou, P. et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 579, 270–273 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ke, Z. et al. Structures and distributions of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins on intact virions. Nature 588, 498–502 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Turoňová, B. et al. In situ structural analysis of SARS-CoV-2 spike reveals flexibility mediated by three hinges. Science 370, 203–208 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Patterson, E. I. et al. Methods of Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 for downstream biological assays. J. Infect. Dis. 222, 1462–1467 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Storm, N. et al. Rapid and complete inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 by ultraviolet-C irradiation. Sci. Rep. 10, 22421 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Darnell, M. E. R., Subbarao, K., Feinstone, S. M. & Taylor, D. R. Inactivation of the coronavirus that induces severe acute respiratory syndrome, SARS-CoV. J. Virol. Methods 121, 85–91 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Rabenau, H. F. et al. Stability and inactivation of SARS coronavirus. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 194, 1–6 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fox, C. H., Johnson, F. B., Whiting, J. & Roller, P. P. Formaldehyde fixation. J. Histochem. Cytochem. https://doi.org/10.1177/33.8.3894502 (1985).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Möller, L. et al. Evaluation of virus inactivation by formaldehyde to enhance biosafety of diagnostic electron microscopy. Viruses 7, 666–679 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Barteling, S. J. & Woortmeyer, R. Formaldehyde inactivation of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Conditions for the preparation of safe vaccine. Arch. Virol. 80, 103–117 (1984).

  15. 15.

    Salk, J. E. & Gori, J. B. A review of theoretical, experimental, and practical considerations in the use of formaldehyde for the inactivation of poliovirus. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 83, 609–637 (1960).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kuznetsov, Y. G. & McPherson, A. Atomic force microscopy in imaging of viruses and virus-infected cells. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 75, 268–285 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kiss, B. et al. Single-particle virology. Biophys. Rev. 12, 1141–1154 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kiss, B., Kis, Z., Pályi, B. & Kellermayer, M. S. Z. Topography, spike dynamics, and nanomechanics of individual native SARS-CoV-2 virions. Nano Lett. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04465 (2021).

  19. 19.

    Celik, U. et al. Interpretation of SARS-CoV-2 behaviour on different substrates and denaturation of virions using ethanol: An atomic force microscopy study. RSC Adv. 10, 44079–44086 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Roos, W. H. How to perform a nanoindentation experiment on a virus. Methods Mol. Biol. 783, 251–264 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Neuman, B. W. et al. Supramolecular architecture of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus revealed by electron cryomicroscopy. J. Virol. 80, 7918–7928 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Neuman, B. W. & Buchmeier, M. J. Chapter one—Supramolecular architecture of the coronavirus particle. in Advances in Virus Research (Ziebuhr, J. ed.) Vol. 96 1–27 (Academic Press, 2016).

  23. 23.

    Mollenhauer, H. H. Artifacts caused by dehydration and epoxy embedding in transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Res. Tech. 26, 496–512 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Corman, V. M. et al. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill. 25 (2020).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Olivier Moncorgé, Dr Caroline Goujon and Dr Raphaël Gaudin from The Institut de Recherche en Infectiologie de Montpellier (IRIM) for initial advices in virus production and plaque assay setup. We also thank Torsten Müller from Bruker-JPK for his support. We are grateful to Dr Edouard Tuaillon and Dr Vincent Foulongne for provision of the SARS-CoV-2 strain from the Centre de Ressources Biologiques collection of the University Hospital of Montpellier, France, and to Dr Monsef Benkirane (IGF, Montpellier, France) for providing the first amplification of this virus on VeroE6 cells. This study was supported by the CNRS and Montpellier University through a Montpellier Université d’Excellence (MUSE) support. The BSL3-AFM was funded by the REDSAIM project (Montpellier Université).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N.G., M.H. and C.C.B., performed viral stock amplification, purification and titer; M.H. did viral infection, plaque assays and calculate titer; D.M. and S.L. set up and performed virus inactivation protocols, S.L. performed AFM imaging and analysis; A.N. and C.C. performed TEM imaging; P.M. performed infectious cell lysates and immunoblots; P.M., A.N., and S.L. setup and performed qRT-PCR; S.L. and D.M. edit the figures and wrote the manuscript, D.M. raise funding and direct the study.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sébastien Lyonnais or Delphine Muriaux.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lyonnais, S., Hénaut, M., Neyret, A. et al. Atomic force microscopy analysis of native infectious and inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virions. Sci Rep 11, 11885 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91371-4

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing