Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Tailoring of arteriovenous graft-to-vein anastomosis angle to attenuate pathological flow fields


Arteriovenous grafts are routinely placed to facilitate hemodialysis in patients with end stage renal disease. These grafts are conduits between higher pressure arteries and lower pressure veins. The connection on the vein end of the graft, known as the graft-to-vein anastomosis, fails frequently and chronically due to high rates of stenosis and thrombosis. These failures are widely believed to be associated with pathologically high and low flow shear strain rates at the graft-to-vein anastomosis. We hypothesized that consistent with pipe flow dynamics and prior work exploring vein-to-artery anastomosis angles in arteriovenous fistulas, altering the graft-to-vein anastomosis angle can reduce the incidence of pathological shear rate fields. We tested this via computational fluid dynamic simulations of idealized arteriovenous grafts, using the Bird-Carreau constitutive law for blood. We observed that low graft-to-vein anastomosis angles (\(<20^{\circ }\)) led to increased incidence of pathologically low shear rates, and that high graft-to-vein anastomosis angles (\(>40^{\circ }\)) led to increased incidence of pathologically high shear rates. Optimizations predicted that an intermediate  (\(\sim 30^\circ\)) graft-to-anastomosis angle was optimal. Our study demonstrates that graft-to-vein anastomosis angles can significantly impact pathological flow fields, and can be optimized to substantially improve arteriovenous graft patency rates.


Hemodialysis is provided to more than 300,000 Americans annually who have end stage renal disease1. This life-sustaining procedure facilitates removal of circulating metabolic toxins in a patient’s blood stream by diverting arterial flow into a hemodialyzer. The blood is then returned in real-time into the venous circulation1. Arteriovenous grafts are commonly implanted in patients who require hemodialysis to provide direct access to a patient’s arterial and venous blood streams2. Non-autologous polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) arteriovenous conduits are most common, and are anastomosed to an artery at one end and to a vein at the other end. The body of the graft is then tunneled subcutaneously to facilitate percutaneous hemodialysis cannulation in the future3, 4.

One of the major configurations for arteriovenous graft surgical implantation is in the upper arm between the brachial artery (near the elbow) and the axillary vein (near the arm pit)3. Accordingly, brachio-axillary arteriovenous grafts (Fig. 1a) are tunneled in the upper arm to facilitate routine hemodialysis cannulation while the patient is sitting comfortably. The arterial inflow through the brachial artery typically ranges 3 to 5 mm in diameter with a maximum blood flow velocity ranging between 60 cm/s and 100 cm/s5,6. The venous outflow through the axillary vein typically ranges 6 to 10 mm in diameter, and has a mean blood flow velocity of approximately 15 cm/s7. To limit arterial steal (diverting too much arterial blood into the arteriovenous graft), tapered brachio-axillary arteriovenous graft conduits are commonly used in adult patients in clinical practice8,9. These grafts are typically tapered from 4 mm at the graft-to-artery anastomosis to at least 7 mm at the graft-to-venous anastomosis (Fig. 1b)10. The angle of the graft-to-vein anastomosis is typically chosen empirically by the surgeon at the time of implantation, and is mostly based upon geometric intraoperative constraints during graft surgical implantation11.

Despite advances in arteriovenous graft material technology, brachio-axillary grafts failure rates can be as high as 30% within the first 12 months4,12. Arteriovenous graft thrombosis can be problematic if graft patency is not immediately restored, or alternative arteriovenous access placed to facilitate continued hemodialysis. This leads to a high degree of repeated interventions and hemodialysis access placement, which leads to increased overall disease morbidity13. As many as 80% of arteriovenous grafts develop high grade stenoses at the graft-to-vein thrombosis leading to eventual graft thrombosis and loss of hemodialysis access4,14. It is postulated that stenosis at the graft-to-vein anastomosis develops due to pathological flow fields that cause intimal damage15, leading to myointimal hyperplasia16, and eventual activation of circulating clotting factors17,18,19,20,21. Shear strain rates below the threshold of 50 s\(^{-1}\) show increased fibrin deposition that can stimulate coagulation18,22. On the other hand, shear rates elevated above 1000 s\(^{-1}\) can also lead to micro injuries in the vessel wall and lead to platelet aggregation22,23. It is therefore recognized that flow rates within a physiological range are necessary to minimize risk of thrombosis at the graft-to-vein anastomosis and sustain graft patency.

Wall shear stresses at a junction between two connected pipes is strongly impacted by the attachment angle24. In the vasculature, this is especially true, as demonstrated in arteriovenous fistulas (veins that are directly anastomosed to arteries as an autogenous alternative to hemodialysis access)25. In fistulas, the vein-to-artery anastomosis angle can greatly impact pathological flow fields in the vicinity of the arteriovenous anastomosis26,27,28. However, a similar dynamic flow analysis of the problematic graft-to-vein anastomosis in arteriovenous grafts has yet to be conducted. We hypothesized that identifying an optimal range for graft-to-vein anasotmosis angles can potentially decrease the risk of pathological flow fields in this segment of interest, and test this using a series of computational dynamics simulations. Results from our study may ultimately improve arteriovenous graft surgical implantation techniques, and help decrease morbidity associated with hemodialysis access.

Figure 1

(a) Idealized model of a brachio-axillary arteriovenous graft in an adult human. For illustration, streamlines estimated by computational fluid dynamics analysis are shown: red streamlines represent arterial blood flow, and blue streamlines represent venous blood flow. (b) Venous end of the graft demonstrating the beveled hood of the arteriovenous graft-to-vein anastomosis.


We estimated the pulsatile flow fields of blood in a brachio-axillary arteriovenous graft system with a graft in place through pressure-based transient computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. An estimate of the Reynolds number, \(\mathrm {Re}=\rho u D_H/\mu\) prompted us to use a viscous, laminar model. Taking blood density \(\rho\) = 1060 kg/m\(^3\), blood dynamic viscosity of μ = 0.0035 Pa\(\cdot\)s, characteristic length scale \(D_H\) as the arterial diameter of 4 mm, and maximum velocity of  u = 1.5 m/s yielded an estimate of \(\mathrm {Re}\approx 1800\), which is within the laminar flow range.

Physical model and computational mesh

A series of idealized, straight arteriovenous grafts were constructed in commercial CAD software (DesignModeler, ANSYS, Canonsburg, PA) based upon the aforementioned data for typical arterial and venous presentations. In each case, the inner diameter of the artery was 4 mm, and the inner diameter of the vein was 8 mm. The arteriovenous graft was tapered from a 4 mm diameter on the arterial end to a 7 mm diameter on the venous side. These dimensions were chosen to fit both within the range of 3–5 mm for the brachial artery, and within the range of 6–10 mm for the axillary vein. The length of the arteriovenous graft was 150 mm ± 2 mm, depending on the arteriovenous graft-to-vein anastomosis angle. To assess the range of venous anastomosis configurations that may be utilized by a surgeon at the time of implantation, we studied the range of anastomosis major axis sizes that are used in our clinical practice, ranging from a circular anastomosis with a diameter of 7 mm, corresponding to a 90° anastomosis angle, down to an elliptical anastomosis with a major axis of 30 mm, corresponding to an anastomosis angle of 13°. The major axis was defined as the maximum length of a line bisecting the ellipse formed when the cylindrical, conical graft intersected the cylindrical vein. The 7 mm, 8 mm, 10 mm, 15 mm, 25 mm, and 30 mm anastomosis major axis lengths corresponded to graft-to-vein anastomosis angles of 90°, 60°, 45°, 30°, 15°, and 13°, respectively.

For all simulations, the vein length was 72 mm, with the length distal to the graft held at 25 mm and that proximal to the graft ranging from 40 mm to 17 mm depending on the anastomosis angle. This was done to ensure that the proximal and distal sections of the vein were sufficiently long for flow fields to be fully developed before and after the anastomosis, so that regions over which pathological flow rates were observed were fully contained within the model.

Figure 2

The mesh of the idealized arteriovenous model. The smaller diameter cylinder represents the artery, and the larger diameter cylinder represents the vein. The two were connected by an arteriovenous graft. Shown is a model with a 30° graft-to-vein anastomosis angle. The inset is a close up of the venous outlet that provides a representation of the mesh refinement at the boundary layer. The maximum aspect ratio of the boundary layer elements was 10:1. In all simulations, the vein length was 72 mm, with the length distal to the graft held at 25 mm and the length proximal to the graft ranging from 40 mm to 17 mm depending on the anastomosis angle.

A computational mesh on which to estimate flow fields was generated from this model using ANSYS Fluent (ANSYS, Canonsburg, PA). Care was taken to ensure that discretization was not distorted in regions of high curvature and at the edges of the anastomosis. For each simulation, mesh size was refined until convergence was reached. Meshes were refined so as to ensure satisfactory levels of element skewness and orthogonality29. The Blasius solution (Eq. 1) was used as a first order approximation of the maximum height of the boundary layer to aid in meshing the boundary layer30:

$$\begin{aligned} \delta \approx 4.91x/{\sqrt{{\mathrm {Re}}_{x}}} \end{aligned}$$

where \(\delta\) is the boundary layer thickness, x is the distance along the plate, and the \(Re_x\) is the Reynolds number. Convergence for the standard anastomosis models required between 200, 000 and 250, 000 elements (Fig. 2). An inflation mesh was set at the graft wall to ensure complexities at the boundary layer could be resolved. Because the intersection between the graft and the vein was neither the flat plate geometry of the Blasius solution nor the straight tube configuration for its cylindrical equivalent, this was only an approximation, this estimate was used only as an initial approximation, and results were checked to ensure that the boundary layer did not extend beyond the highly refined region. The inflation created a 1 mm area of seven prism elements expanding at a rate of 1.2 at the walls of the artery, vein, and arteriovenous graft (Fig. 2, circular inset). In all cases, the boundary layer size estimated via the Blasius solution proved adequate for this purpose. The maximum aspect ratio of any element was 10:1.

Modeling of blood

Blood was modeled as a non-Newtonian fluid following the Navier-Stokes equation and the incompressible mass continuity equation:

$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{\partial }{\partial t} (\rho u_{i}) + \frac{\partial }{\partial x_{j}} (\rho u_{i} u_{j} + p \delta _{ij} - \tau _{ji} ) = 0 \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{\partial \rho }{\partial t} + \frac{\partial }{\partial x_{i}} (\rho u_{i}) = \frac{\partial u_{i}}{\partial x_{i}} = 0 \end{aligned}$$

in which Einstein notation was used so that \(u_i\) is the velocity vector, \(\tau _{ji}\) is the stress tensor, Kronecker’s delta \(\delta _{ij}\) functions as an identity tensor, and repeated indices imply summation. p is the hydrostatic pressure. Because the flow was incompressible, Eq. (4) was identically satisfied. The Bird-Carreau constitutive law was used to represent the non-Newtonian, pseudo-plastic nature of blood, as is appropriate for oscillatory flow with high Womersley number (\(\alpha =R\sqrt{\omega \rho /\mu }\), in which \(\omega\) represents heart rate, in radians per second, and R is the artery radius)31,32,33:

$$\begin{aligned} \tau _{{ij}}=2\dot{\gamma }_{{ij}}\mu _{{eff} }(\mathrm {De}) \end{aligned}$$

in which the strain rate tensor \(\dot{\gamma }_{{ij}}\) is:

$$\begin{aligned} \dot{\gamma }_{{ij}}=\frac{1}{2} \left( {\frac{\partial u_{i}}{\partial x_{j}}}+{\frac{\partial u_{j}}{\partial x_{i}}} \right) \end{aligned}$$

and effective viscosity changes with the Deborah number, \(\mathrm {De}\):

$$\begin{aligned} {\displaystyle \mu _{{eff} }(\mathrm {De})=\mu _{{\inf } }+(\mu _{0}-\mu _{{\inf } })\left( 1+\left( \mathrm {De}\right) ^{2}\right) ^{\frac{n-1}{2}}} \end{aligned}$$

where n is a constitutive parameter and \(\text{De}= \lambda{\dot{\gamma}}\). Here, \(\lambda\) is the characteristic relaxation time of the blood, and the effective shear strain rate is \(\dot{\gamma }=\sqrt{2I_2}\)32,34, in which \(I_2\) is the second invariant of \(\dot{\gamma }_{{ij}}\). The parameters used are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 Material properties of blood35.

Boundary conditions

The inlet condition for the artery was uniform flow defined by a centerline velocity function. This velocity waveform was based off ultrasound data from the centerline velocity measured in the brachial artery of patients with dialysis access5,36,37,38, and was reconstructed using Gaussian wave fitting39 converted to a Fourier series:

$$\begin{aligned} f(t)={a_0}+\sum _{n=1}^\infty ~a_n \cos \left( {\omega n t}\right) +\sum _{n=1}^\infty ~b_n \sin \left( {\omega n t}\right) \end{aligned}$$

where \(a_n\) and \(b_n\) are curve fit parameters, t is the simulation time, and \(\omega\) is angular frequency. Adjusting this allowed effective control of simulated heart rate. Fitting was done in MATLAB (The Mathworks, Natick, MA) using eight terms. The coefficients and frequency can be found in the Appendix. Figure 3 shows the resulting function that was used as the arterial inlet velocity. The regions of interest for this study were sufficiently downstream from the inlet to ensure a fully developed profile. Specifically upstream of the arteriovenous anastomosis the velocity profile followed a Womersley profile, as is appropriate for cases of high Womersley. For \(\alpha\) greater than 2, inertial forces dominate over viscous forces; in peripheral veins and arteries the Womersley number is between 2 and 340. The volumetric flow rate into the arteriovenous graft was measured to be 700 ml/min, which is within the range of healthy flow rate for an arteriovenous graft41. The venous system does not experience significant pulsatile flow42. The flow from the distal side of the vein to the proximal side of the vein was specified as a constant, centerline velocity of 15 cm/s, as appropriate for flow in the axillary vein43.

Figure 3

Velocity function for the arterial inlet.

Outlet boundary conditions are a well known challenge for vascular flow simulation. Although standard practice is for pipe flow to use pressure outlet conditions29, this fails to account for the downstream effects that are present in the circulatory system. A common approach is therefore to use an outflow boundary condition for simulating vascular systems, especially for arteriovenous grafts44,45. Following National Kidney Foundation KDOQI Clinical Practices41, inflow was distributed so that 90% was sent to the graft and 10% to the distal artery. An outflow boundary condition was also imposed at the proximal end of the vein. No-slip boundary conditions were used along the vessel walls, and vessels were treated as rigid.

Solution procedure

Equations were solved using the ANSYS Fluent CFD solver (ANSYS, Canonsburg, PA). The semi-implicit method for pressure-linked equations (“SIMPLE”) pressure-velocity coupling method was used with second order spatial discretization and first order transient discretization. The pressure-implicit with splitting-operations (“PISO”) method was also used, with second order spatial discretization and transient discretization, with negligible differences in results but with increased computation time.

Hybrid initialization was done by solving Laplace’s equation, \(\nabla ^{2}\varphi =0\), in which \(\varphi\) is a potential function defining the velocity field: \(\mathbf {u} = \nabla \varphi\). Boundary conditions used in the hybrid initialization for the walls, inlets, and outlets of the system were:

$$\begin{aligned}&\left. \frac{\partial \varphi }{\partial n} \right| _{wall} = 0 \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}&\left. \frac{\partial \varphi }{\partial n} \right| _{inlet} = u_{\bot } \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}&\varphi _{outlet}= 0 \end{aligned}$$

For the transient calculation, convergence was achieved with a time step of 0.0025 s for 320 time steps, which enabled simulation of one pulse with high accuracy. 20 iterations or fewer were required at each time step, as is common practice29. Convergence criteria for the continuity, x-velocity, y-velocity, and z-velocity were all set at an absolute tolerance of 0.001.


We defined metrics to quantify the extent and magnitude of pathological shear stresses experienced by the vein walls during a single cardiac cycle. For low shear strain rates, we defined a metric \(\Gamma _{low}\) as the integral of the ratio of area of the vein wall experiencing pathologically low shear strain rates divided by the shear rate over those areas:

$$\begin{aligned} {\Gamma _{low}} = \frac{\dot{\gamma }_{min}}{A_0}\int _{S_{low}} \frac{1}{\dot{\gamma }}dA \end{aligned}$$

where the normalization factor \(\dot{\gamma }_{min}\) = 1 s\(^{-1}\), \(A_0\) is the entire area of the model, and \(S_{low}\) represents the regions of the vein walls over which shear strains rates of \(\dot{\gamma }\le 50\) s\(^{-1}\) were predicted.

For shear high strain rates we defined \(\Gamma _{high}\) as the integral of the ratio of area of the vein wall experiencing pathologically low shear strain rates multiplied by the shear rate over those areas:

$$\begin{aligned} {\Gamma _{high}} = \frac{A_0}{\dot{\gamma }_{max}}\int _{S_{high}} {\dot{\gamma }}dA \end{aligned}$$

where the normalization factor is \(\dot{\gamma }_{max}\)=3000 s\(^{-1}\), and \(S_{high}\) is the regions of the vein walls over which by the shear strain rates of \(\dot{\gamma }\ge 1000\) s\(^{-1}\) were predicted. Note that the length of the vein both proximal and distal to the anastamosis were set in all simulations to be sufficiently long to ensure fully developed flow fields both before and after the graft. While having too short of a vein could affect the measures of flow pathology, having too long of a vein did not, as the region over which pathological flow fields occurred was not expanded by extension of the vein beyond a critical length.


Blood flow entering the axillary vein from a brachio-axillary arteriovenous graft led to perturbations in the laminar venous blood outflow (Fig. 4). To quantify the degree to which blood flow was pathologically perturbed over one heart cycle, the shear rate was recorded at each of the mesh cells on the vein wall for each time point. This is displayed on the color maps that show the distribution of shear rate during one heart beat (Fig. 4). These distributions revealed an important role for the graft-to-vein anastomosis angle in determining the fraction of the vein wall that experienced pathological shear rates.

Figure 4

Maps of the percentage of the vein wall experiencing physiological and pathological shear rates over the course of one heart beat, for a range of anastomosis angles. The maps are separated into three sections: pathologically low wall shear rates (\(0-50\:s^{-1}\)), physiological wall shear rate (\(50-1000\:s^{-1}\)), and pathologically high wall shear rate (\(1000-3000\:s^{-1}\)). Contours represent shear rates over the entire wall area, both distal and proximal to the anastomosis.

Color maps demonstrated that the graft-to-vein anastomosis angle clearly impacted the shear environment of the adjacent vein wall. Additionally, the data demonstrated the extent of how blood entering the vein from the graft was affected by the graft-to-vein anastomosis angle (Fig. 4). For a 90\(^{\circ }\) anastomosis angle, most of the pathological flow fields were in the high shear rate range early in the heart cycle. Conversely, for a 13\(^{\circ }\) graft-to-vein anastomosis angle, very few regions of high shear rates were evident in the early stages of the heart cycle, but pathologically low shear rates were evident midway through the heart cycle. Therefore, the data demonstrate that the graft-to-vein anastomosis angle can clearly impact pathological shear rates at different time intervals in the heart cycle. Note that Figs. 4 and 5 show shear rates over the entire vein wall area, both distal and proximal to the anastomosis.

Figure 5

Cross section of anastomoses at selected times over the course of a heartbeat. Top panel: 0.1 s through the heart beat, which was shown to be a time point of excessive high shear rate for all graft-to-vein anastomosis angles considered. Bottom panel: 0.3 s through the heartbeat, which was shown to be a time point of excessive low shear rate for all graft-to-vein anastomosis angles considered. Contours represent shear rates over the entire wall area, both distal and proximal to the anastomosis.

To further understand how the shear environment was affected by the graft-to-vein anastomosis angle, we plotted flow fields over cross-sections of the anastomoses at the peak of high wall shear rate (0.1 s into the 0.3 s heart beat shown) and at the peak of low wall shear rate (0.1 s into the 0.3 s heart beat shown, Fig. 5). At the peak of high shear rate, 0.1 s into the heart beat, high wall shear rate localized to the distal end of the anastomosis and to the opposite vein wall (displayed in red in Fig. 5). The incidence of this high shear rate decreased with decreasing the graft-to-vein anastomosis angle. At the peak of low shear rate, 0.3 s into the heart beat, low wall shear rates localized on the vein wall just distal to the anastomosis area and opposite to the side of the anastomosis. Therefore, high and low shear rates can impact different anatomical regions along the graft-to-vein anastomosis.

Figure 6

Summary metrics showing the degree to which differing anastomosis designs induced (a) pathologically low shear strain rates over the vein wall over the course of a single cardiac cycle, and (b) pathologically high shear strain rates over the vein wall over the course of a single cardiac cycle. These summary metrics suggested that the fraction of vein wall area experiencing pathologically high shear strain rates diminished with decreasing graft-to-vein anastomosis angle, while that experiencing pathologically low shear strain rates was low for anastomosis angles above 30\(^\circ\).

These summary metrics suggested that the fraction of vein wall area undergoing pathologically high shear strain rates diminished with decreasing the graft-to-vein anastomosis angle, while that undergoing pathologically low shear rates stay low from 90\(^\circ\) to 30\(^\circ\) then increase rapidly (Fig. 6).

These data suggest that a 30\(^\circ\) graft-to-vein anastomosis angle would present the healthiest shear rate environment of the options studied. Increasing the angle of attachment past 30\(^\circ\) leads to a rise in area of the vein wall experience unhealthy high shear rate, and decreasing the angle below 30\(^\circ\) leads to a rise in area of the vein wall experiencing unhealthy low shear rate. Our data demonstrates that the graft-to-vein anastomosis angle of 30\(^\circ\) provided optimal flow fields.


Here we demonstrate that the graft-to-vein anastomosis of a brachio-axillary arteriovenous graft can develop severe pathological flow fields. It is understood that these flow fields are a major contributor to myointimal hyperplasia at the graft-to-vein anastomosis that ultimately lead to stenosis, graft failure, and thrombosis16,18,20,46. In this study we observed that low graft-to-vein anastomosis angles that are \(<20^{\circ }\) caused a substantial increase of pathologically low shear rates. On the other hand, high graft-to-vein anastomosis angles that are \(>40^{\circ }\) caused an increase of pathologically high shear rates. A graft-to-vein anastomosis angle of 30\(^\circ\) provided the most optimal flow fields with minimal incidence of pathological shear rates. Our study findings provide important insights that can impact arteriovenous graft implantation techniques, and potentially decrease graft failure rates and morbidity in patients who receive brachio-axillary graft implants to facilitate hemodialysis4. Future research will explore a the range of optimal graft-to-vein anastomosis angles relative to different diameter axillary vein diameters.

For patients who require chronic hemodialysis, placement of an arteriovenous graft can be a life-saving alternative to an arteriovenous fistula47. Although fistulas are usually the preferred primary method to facilitate hemodialysis access, there are many patients who do not have suitable superficial venous anatomy for fistula placement47,48. Accordingly, in an aging population with a rising incidence of end stage renal disease, the use of arteriovenous grafts is anticipated to continue to increase over the coming years4. However, the 1 year primary patency of arteriovenous grafts varies between 40-57%, and the 1 year secondary patency is between 62 and 78%4,48. Clearly, technical challenges persist in maintaining adequate arteriovenous graft patency, and this is a clear impetus for better characterization of the underlying complicating factors16,22.

The graft-to-vein anastomosis angle at which arteriovenous grafts are surgically implanted are entirely up to the discretion of the operating surgeon4. Depending on the techniques used to subcutaneously tunnel the arteriovenous graft, the patient’s body habitus, and the axillary vein diameter, the graft-to-vein implantation angle can vary significantly from one patient to another. Various studies have explored ways to decrease graft associated thrombotic complications. For example, adjunct therapy with antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy has been used as means to reduce graft thrombosis, but several studies have that does not provide any clinically meaningful benefits and may actually increase the risk of bleeding49,50,51. Other studies have attempted modifications to the graft-to-vein anastomosis to reduce the risk of myointimal hyperplasia and graft thrombosis. For example, a study incorporated a venous cuff at the graft-to-vein anastomosis segment, but this graft modification demonstrated no significant impact on graft patency52. Our study findings suggest that perhaps a fixed and optimized graft-to-vein anastomosis angle may be a novel solution to this ongoing issue. We envision these grafts would be manufactured at pre-set fixed optimized angles, and would be selected and implanted in patients relative to their native axillary vein diameters as a strategy to improve graft primary and secondary patency rates.

We acknowledge there are some limitations associated with our study. While it is a first step in understanding the behavior this fluid system, our simulations were not able to entirely account for all physiological variables that may impact arteriovenous graft flow. Some limitations of this study are that blood flow parameters were held within the physiological range for all simulations, and vein diameters were not varied. Hypertension is a common co-morbidity of diabetes53. Left unregulated, hypertension would be a consideration for the optimization of anastomosis angle as higher or lower flow rates could shift Fig. 6b. However, coexisting diabetes and hypertension is typically managed pharmacologically, with antihypertensives such angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or thiazide diuretics53. Although the size of the vasculature relevant to arteriovenous grafts can vary from patient to patient, the pathologically high and low flow fields were predicted to be localized in all cases to the anastomosis. Because these fields are dominated by the local geometry of the anastomosis rather than by geometry of the vessels, the absolute sizes of the vessels would not be expected to affect the optimization. Lastly, our simulations included blood vessel models that are static. Improving the model to take into account dynamic behaviors of peripheral arteries and veins would further refine our future study findings.


The graft-to-vein anastomosis angle of brachio-axilllary arteriovenous grafts affects pathological flow fields that arise within the adjacent vein. Optimizing the graft-to-vein anastomosis angle can enhance these flow fields, reduce the incidence of pathological shear strain rates, and may ultimately improve graft patency rates among hemodialysis patients.


  1. 1.

    Kharboutly, Z., Deplano, V., Bertrand, E. & Legallais, C. Numerical and experimental study of blood flow through a patient-specific arteriovenous fistula used for hemodialysis. Med. Eng. Phys. 32, 111–118 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Brescia, M. J., Cimino, J. E., Appel, K. & Hurwich, B. J. Chronic hemodialysis using venipuncture and a surgically created arteriovenous fistula. N. Engl. J. Med. 275, 1089–1092 (1966).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Akoh, J. A. Prosthetic arteriovenous grafts for hemodialysis. J. Vasc. Access 10, 137–147 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Huber, T. S., Carter, J. W., Carter, R. L. & Seeger, J. M. Patency of autogenous and polytetrafluoroethylene upper extremity arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses: a systematic review. J. Vasc. Surg. 38, 1005–1011 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Azhim, A. et al. Measurement of blood flow velocity waveforms in the carotid, brachial and femoral arteries during head-up tilt. J. Biomed. Pharm. Eng. 2, 1–6 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Järhult, S. J., Sundström, J. & Lind, L. Brachial artery hyperemic blood flow velocities are related to carotid atherosclerosis. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging 29, 360–365 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Silvetti, M. S. et al. Percutaneous axillary vein approach in pediatric pacing: Comparison with subclavian vein approach. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 36, 1550–1557 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Krueger, U., Huhle, A., Krys, K. & Scholz, H. Effect of tapered grafts on hemodynamics and flow rate in dialysis access grafts. Artif. Organs 28, 623–628 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Dammers, R. et al. Evaluation of 4-mm to 7-mm versus 6-mm prosthetic brachial-antecubital forearm loop access for hemodialysis: results of a randomized multicenter clinical trial. J. Vasc. Surg. 37, 143–148 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lee, S.-W., Smith, D. S., Loth, F., Fischer, P. F. & Bassiouny, H. S. Numerical and experimental simulation of transitional flow in a blood vessel junction. Numer. Heat Transfer A 51, 1–22 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Weiss, H. J., Turitto, V. T. & Baumgartner, H. R. Role of shear rate and platelets in promoting fibrin formation on rabbit subendothelium. Studies utilizing patients with quantitative and qualitative platelet defects. J. Clin. Investig. 78, 1072–1082 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    MacRae, J. M. et al. Arteriovenous access failure, stenosis, and thrombosis. Can. J. Kidney Health Dis. 3, 2054358116669126 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bell, D. D. & Rosental, J. J. Arteriovenous graft life in chronic hemodialysis: A need for prolongation. Arch. Surg. 123, 1169–1172 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kanterman, R. Y. et al. Dialysis access grafts: Anatomic location of venous stenosis and results of angioplasty. Radiology 195, 135–139 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Loth, F. et al. Relative contribution of wall shear stress and injury in experimental intimal thickening at PTFE end-to-side arterial anastomoses. J. Biomech. Eng. 124, 44–51 (2002).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Roy-Chaudhury, P., Sukhatme, V. P. & Cheung, A. K. Hemodialysis vascular access dysfunction: A cellular and molecular viewpoint. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 17, 1112–1127 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bachleda, P. et al. Arteriovenous graft for hemodialysis, graft venous anastomosis closure: Current state of knowledge. minireview.. Biomed. Pap. 159, 027–030 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Shen, F., Kastrup, C. J., Liu, Y. & Ismagilov, R. F. Threshold response of initiation of blood coagulation by tissue factor in patterned microfluidic capillaries is controlled by shear rate. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 28, 2035–2041 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Neeves, K., Illing, D. & Diamond, S. Thrombin flux and wall shear rate regulate fibrin fiber deposition state during polymerization under flow. Biophys. J. 98, 1344–1352 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ruggeri, Z. M. The role of von Willebrand factor in thrombus formation. Thromb. Res. 120, S5–S9 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hsieh, H., Li, N. & Frangos, J. A. Shear stress increases endothelial platelet-derived growth factor mRNA levels. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 260, H642–H646 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sullivan, K. L. et al. Hemodynamics of failing dialysis grafts. Radiology 186, 867–872 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Stalker, T. J., Welsh, J. D. & Brass, L. F. Shaping the platelet response to vascular injury. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 21, 410 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Batchelor, G. An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Qu, J. & Chaikof, E. Prosthetic Grafts. In Rutherford’s Textbook of Vascular Surgery (eds Cronenwett, J. & Johnston, W.) (Elsevier, Amserdam, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Van Canneyt, K. et al. Hemodynamic impact of anastomosis size and angle in side-to-end arteriovenous fistulae: A computer analysis. J. Vasc. Access 11, 52–58 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ene-Iordache, B., Cattaneo, L., Dubini, G. & Remuzzi, A. Effect of anastomosis angle on the localization of disturbed flow in ‘side-to-end’fistulae for haemodialysis access. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 28, 997–1005 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ene-Iordache, B. & Remuzzi, A. Blood flow in idealized vascular access for hemodialysis: A review of computational studies. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 8, 295–312 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    ANSYS. FLUENT 12.0 User’s Guide (Canonsburg, PA: Ansys Inc., 2009).

  30. 30.

    White, F. M. Viscous Fluid Flow (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Johnston, B. M., Johnston, P. R., Corney, S. & Kilpatrick, D. Non-Newtonian blood flow in human right coronary arteries: Transient simulations. J. Biomec. 39, 1116–1128 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Slattery, J. C. Advanced Transport Phenomena (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999).

    MATH  Book  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Tabakova, S., Kutev, N. & Radev, S. Application of the carreau viscosity model to the oscillatory flow in blood vessels. In AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1690, 040019 (AIP Publishing, 2015).

  34. 34.

    Zinani, F. & Frey, S. Galerkin least-squares solutions for purely viscous flows of shear-thinning fluids and regularized yield stress fluids. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 29, 432–443 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Matolcsi, K., Bárdossy, G. & Halász, G. Simulation of saline solution injection into a venous junction. In 5th European Conference of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering 343–346 (Springer, 2011).

  36. 36.

    Wright, S. A. et al. Microcirculatory hemodynamics and endothelial dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 26, 2281–2287 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ko, S. H., Bandyk, D. F., Hodgkiss-Harlow, K. D., Barleben, A. & Lane, I. Estimation of brachial artery volume flow by duplex ultrasound imaging predicts dialysis access maturation.. J. Vasc. Surg. 61, 1521–1528 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Wiese, P. & Nonnast-Daniel, B. Colour Doppler ultrasound in dialysis access. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 19, 1956–1963 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Chen, Y., Zhang, L., Zhang, D. & Zhang, D. Wrist pulse signal diagnosis using modified gaussian models and fuzzy c-means classification. Med. Eng. Phys. 31, 1283–1289 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Elad, D. & Einav, S. Physical and Flow Properties of Blood (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lok, C. E. et al. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for hemodialysis adequacy: 2019 update. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 75, 884–930 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Gelman, S. Venous function and central venous pressure a physiologic story. Anesthesiology 108, 735–748 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ooue, A. et al. Changes in blood flow in conduit artery and veins of the upper arm during leg exercise in humans. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 103, 367–373 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Vignon-Clementel, I. E., Figueroa, C., Jansen, K. & Taylor, C. Outflow boundary conditions for 3d simulations of non-periodic blood flow and pressure fields in deformable arteries. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 13, 625–640 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Van Canneyt, K. et al. A computational exploration of helical arterio-venous graft designs. J. Biomech. 46, 345–353 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Fillinger, M. F. et al. Graft geometry and venous intimal-medial hyperplasia in arteriovenous loop grafts. J. Vasc. Surg. 11, 556–566 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Lok, C. E., et al. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for vascular access: 2019 update. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 75, S1–S164 (2020).

  48. 48.

    Schild, A. F. et al. Arteriovenous fistulae vs. arteriovenous grafts: A retrospective review of 1,700 consecutive vascular access cases.. J. Vasc. Access 9, 231–235 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Dixon, B. S. et al. Effect of dipyridamole plus aspirin on hemodialysis graft patency. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 2191–2201 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Crowther, M. A. et al. Low-intensity warfarin is ineffective for the prevention of PTFE graft failure in patients on hemodialysis: A randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 13, 2331–2337 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kaufman, J. S. et al. Randomized controlled trial of clopidogrel plus aspirin to prevent hemodialysis access graft thrombosis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 14, 2313–2321 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Lemson, M. et al. Effects of a venous cuff at the venous anastomosis of polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for hemodialysis vascular access. J. Vasc. Surg. 32, 1155–1163 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Whalen, K. & Stewart, R. D. Pharmacologic management of hypertension in patients with diabetes. Am. Fam. Physician 78, 1277–1282 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by a Washington University in St. Louis Skandalaris Center Leadership and Entrepreneurship Acceleration Program (LEAP) investigator Award (M. Zayed), by a Society for Vascular Surgery Foundation research investigator Award (M. Zayed), by an American Surgical Association Foundation research fellowship award (M. Zayed), by NIH/NHLBI R41HL150963 (M. Zayed), by the Center for Innovation in Neuroscience and Technology at Washington University in St. Louis (E. Leuthardt), and by National Science Foundation Science and Technology Center for Engineering MechanoBiology (grant CMMI 1548571; G. Genin).

Author information




D.W. performed the simulations. All authors analysed the results and contributed to writing the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guy M. Genin or Mohamed Zayed.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

DW has no competing interests. ECL, GMG, and MAZ have equity in the company Caeli Vascular, Inc. This company specializes in venous thrombectomy devices and does not manufacture or produce arteriovenous grafts.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Williams, D., Leuthardt, E.C., Genin, G.M. et al. Tailoring of arteriovenous graft-to-vein anastomosis angle to attenuate pathological flow fields. Sci Rep 11, 12153 (2021).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links