Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Repetitive mild head trauma induces activity mediated lifelong brain deficits in a novel Drosophila model

Abstract

Mild head trauma, including concussion, can lead to chronic brain dysfunction and degeneration but the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we developed a novel head impact system to investigate the long-term effects of mild head trauma on brain structure and function, as well as the underlying mechanisms in Drosophila melanogaster. We find that Drosophila subjected to repetitive head impacts develop long-term deficits, including impaired startle-induced climbing, progressive brain degeneration, and shortened lifespan, all of which are substantially exacerbated in female flies. Interestingly, head impacts elicit an elevation in neuronal activity and its acute suppression abrogates the detrimental effects in female flies. Together, our findings validate Drosophila as a suitable model system for investigating the long-term effects of mild head trauma, suggest an increased vulnerability to brain injury in female flies, and indicate that early altered neuronal excitability may be a key mechanism linking mild brain trauma to chronic degeneration.

Introduction

Repetitive head trauma, including mild injuries such as concussion, is a risk factor for developing several neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD)1,2, Parkinson’s disease (PD)3, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)4 and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE)5,6,7,8,9. Although each of these conditions arise from distinct etiologies, they share some common features including abnormal protein deposits3,4,10,11, impaired axonal transport12, swelling13 and retraction14, immune cell activation, and excitotoxicity15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22, which ultimately result in progressive cellular degeneration, cell death, and frank brain atrophy. Symptomatic onset typically appears later in life in each of these aforementioned diseases, yet neurodegeneration is believed to begin years in advance23,24. While repetitive head trauma is a risk factor for developing neurodegeneration, it remains a challenge to provide a causal link between the mechanisms underlying the early injury response and chronic cellular and behavioral sequelae. A more complete understanding of the brain’s response to injury over time will lend new insight towards the development of neuroprotective strategies.

The use of rodent models is a common method to study the basic pathophysiological mechanisms of traumatic brain injury16,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32, but the relatively long rodent lifespan together with the use of surgical procedures for delivering injuries27,33 represent a challenge to investigate the onset and progression of lifelong effects following head trauma. Here, we developed a tractable Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) model that enables lifelong interrogation of specific processes and their downstream cellular and behavioral effects. Fruit flies represent an excellent tractable model organism to dissect fundamental cellular and molecular disease mechanisms, including neurodegeneration34,35,36, while taking advantage of their relatively short lifespan37,38,39,40,41,42 that enables long-term outcome analyses related to head injury exposure. Several fly models have been developed to study traumatic brain injury in Drosophila, but the lack of controlled head-specific impacts may confound neuronal-specific responses43,44,45. Head-specific impact models have recently been developed in which physical head impacts were delivered to the heads of individually restrained flies46,47,48, but no long-term study was carried out to examine the detrimental effects that might develop later in life.

In this study, we devised a novel injury model with high precision and accuracy in delivering repetitive headfirst impacts to a large number (10–15 flies at a time) of awake and unrestrained fruit flies. We then applied this model to investigate novel mechanisms related to repetitive mild head impacts on lifelong function in both sexes. We established that early exposure to repetitive mild head impacts resulted in long-term behavioral dysfunction and brain degeneration, which is more pronounced in female flies. We further investigated an underlying mechanism and identified neuronal activity as a key mediator for mild trauma-induced long-term brain dysfunction. Together, this work provides a causal relationship between the early phase of injury involving neuronal activity and the subsequent chronic degenerative processes.

Materials and methods

Fly husbandry

Flies were maintained at 18 °C (activity-suppressing experiments) or 25 °C, with 60% humidity on a 12-h:12-h light:dark cycle and kept in vials containing fresh fly media consisting of cornmeal, yeast, molasses, agar, p-hydroxy-benzoic acid methyl ester. Vials were changed every 3–4 days using sterile methods. The following stocks were used: w1118 (BDSC 5905), UAS-CaLexA-LUC49 (from K. Abruzzi), OK107-GAL4 (BDSC 854), neuronal synaptobrevin-GAL4 (nSyb-GAL4)50 (from T. Ngo), nSyb-LexA50 (from T. Ngo), LexAop-Shibirets150 (from T. Ngo), Oregon R (BDSC 5) and UAS-Transformer (BDSC 4590). A stable line expressing nSyb > Shibirets1 (LexA > LexAop) was created using the respective aforementioned stocks and used for pan-neuronal activity suppressing experiments. Unless otherwise noted, flies used were progeny from nSyb-LexA males crossed to female w1118. For activity suppressing experiments, injured flies were progeny from nSyb > Shibirets1 stably-expressing males crossed to female w1118.

High-speed video recording and video-assisted startle-induced climbing assay

High-speed video recording of head impacts was acquired using a Phantom Miro M310 high-speed camera controlled by a PC with Phantom Camera Control (PCC) software. Sequences recorded at either 3205 or 4106 frames per second were imported into Image J. Body orientation at impact was measured using the Angle tool.

Startle-induced climbing was assessed using a modified negative geotaxis assay. Flies were placed in vials containing 5% agar. Up to four vials were assayed at the same time, using a custom 3-D Polylactic Acid (PLA) printed rig. For each trial, the rig was lightly tamped three times, and fly movement was recorded using a Panasonic HC-V800 digital video recorder at 60 frames per second. Individual vials from each video were cropped, and the first 10 s were trimmed in Image J and underwent automated fly behavior tracking using id.tracker.ai. All testing took place between ZT 3 and ZT 8 (ZT, Zeitgeber time; lights are turned on at ZT 0 and turned off at ZT 12) and testing occurred between 20 and 22 °C under normal lighting conditions.

Automated fly behavior tracking using idtracker.ai

Automated fly behavior was performed using idtracker.ai, a deep-learning algorithm and software that permits individual tracking of flies. All videos were processed on a Google Cloud Compute Virtual Machine (VM) running a PyTorch Deep Learning VM Instance (c2-deeplearning-pytorch-1-2-cu100-20191005) equipped with an N1-Standard-16 (16 vCPUs, 60 GB memory) machine type, an NVIDIA Tesla T4 GPU, a 100 GB SSD disk and Intel Haswell CPU platform. Subsequent data analysis was performed using custom Matlab scripts.

Immunohistochemistry for detecting neurodegeneration

Whole flies were fixed for 3 h in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.5% Triton-X (PBS-T). The flies were rinsed 4 times for 15 min each with PBS-T and brains were subsequently dissected in PBS-T. Brains were permeabilized overnight in 0.5% PBST at 4 °C with nutation then blocked in 5% normal goat serum (NGS) in PBS-T for 90 min at room temperature with nutation. Brains were stained with DAPI (1:1000; Invitrogen D1306) (nuclear marker) and Alexa Fluor 594 (AF594) phalloidin (1:400, Invitrogen A12381), which binds to filamentous actin and stains the whole-brain parenchyma. Regions devoid of DAPI and phalloidin are considered vacuoles (Supplemental Fig. S1). Stained brains were rinsed 4 × 15 min with PBS-T, followed by one wash in PBS for 90 min and then mounted on glass slides within SecureSeal Imaging Spacers (Grace Bio-Labs, Bend, Oregon, USA) containing SlowFade Gold Antifade mounting medium (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA S36937). Whole-brain imaging was performed using an Olympus FV1000MPE two-photon system equipped with a water immersion objective XLPLN25XWMP (working distance of 2 mm and N.A. of 1.05) to acquire 1 µm thick sections. Image analysis was performed using ImageJ (Fiji) software.

To demonstrate that vacuoles detected using this strategy correspond to neuropil loss, additional confirmatory staining was performed on a subset of brains for the post-synaptic marker with mouse monoclonal α-discs large 1 [1:50; DSHB 4F3] (Supplemental Fig. S1). The secondary antibody was AF-568 labeled goat anti-mouse Ig (1:400; Invitrogen A11031). Alexa Fluor 488 (AF488) phalloidin (1:400, Invitrogen A12379) replaced the use of AF594 phalloidin. Whole-brain imaging of 1 µm thick sections was performed using either an Olympus FV1000MPE two-photon system or a Nikon C2 laser-scanning confocal.

Neuronal activity luciferase reporter

To measure luciferase activity, representative groups of 2–4 OK107 > CaLexA-LUC sham and injured flies were quickly immobilized using CO2, decapitated and heads collected in 100µL 1 × Promega Glo Lysis Buffer (Promega #E2661), and 4–7 independent samples were collected for each treatment group. Fly heads were homogenized using an automated pestle motor mixer (Argos Cat. No. A0001) for 1 min at room temperature, then incubated at room temperature for 1 h, then centrifuged for 10 min at 13.5 k RPM. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube. For luciferase assays, 60 µL of each sample was mixed 1:1 with Steady-Glo Luciferase system (Promega #E2510) following the manufacturer’s protocols, and then added to a white-walled 96-well plate at room temperature and incubated in the dark for 10 min. Luminescence was measured using a BioTek Synergy HTX Multi-Mode Reader.

Data reporting and statistical analysis

No statistical methods were used to determine sample sizes but are consistent with sample sizes similar to those generally employed in the field51. Experimenters were not blinded as almost all data acquisition and analysis was automated. All flies in each vial were administered with the same treatment regimen. For each experiment, the experimental and control flies were collected, treated, and tested at the same time. A Mann–Whitney U test with Bonferroni or Holm correction for multiple comparisons was used for statistical analysis of behavioral data. All statistical analyses were performed using R (R v3.5, [rstatix]). P values are indicated as follows: ****P < 0.0001; ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; and *P < 0.05. For boxplots, lower and upper whiskers represent 1.5 interquartile range of the lower and upper quartiles, respectively; boxes indicate lower quartile, median, and upper quartile, from bottom to top. When all points are shown, whiskers represent range and boxes indicate lower quartile, median, and upper quartile, from bottom to top.

Results

Development of a novel repetitive head impact Drosophila model

To investigate the long-term consequences of repetitive head trauma, we developed a novel repetitive head injury model using Drosophila that accurately and precisely delivers headfirst acceleration-deceleration-mediated head impacts (Fig. 1a). Multiple flies (10–15 flies at a time) are contained within a custom plastic injury vial designed to fit within our injury rig consisting of a cradle that is connected to a pulley system with a specific counterweight. To ensure consistency across injuries, each injury trial consists of pulling the cradle downward to the base of the injury rig, followed by lightly tamping the cradle three times for all the flies to fall to the bottom of the vial before releasing it for upward acceleration. When the cradle, which contains the injury vial with flies suddenly stops at the top, the momentum of the fruit flies continues to propel them upward, where they sustain headfirst impacts against the glass ceiling at the top of the vial (Fig. 1a, Supplemental Video S1). The light tamping is employed for two purposes: (1) to cause all the flies to fall to the bottom so they will travel the same distance before the head impact for consistent impact speed and (2) to allow the flies to orientate in a head-upward posture as part of their startle-induced negative geotactic climbing response. Indeed, our high-speed video recording revealed that many of the flies hit the top ceiling with their heads first, resulting in an impact angle of nearly 90 degrees (anterior–posterior body axis perpendicular to the impact surface, see Fig. 1a). This tailored approach improves upon an existing strategy that delivers traumatic injury to flies within a vial that is accelerated in a circular motion44, which causes the flies to undergo a tumbling motion, thereby prompting subsequent nonspecific impacts sustained to systemic regions of the body other than the head (Fig. 1b) and limiting the head-specific conclusions that can be drawn from this type of injury. With our current impact configuration, we determined using the high-speed video recording that each fly experienced an impact that involves ~ 1 ms of contact at a speed of ~ 4 m/s with the glass ceiling (Fig. 1a, arrows indicate immediately before and after contact between the fly and impact surface; asterisks indicate contact with impact surface). Immediately following headfirst impact, flies fell to the floor of the vial and exhibited a concussive-like behavioral response indicative of neurological injury (Fig. 1c, Supplemental Video S2) whose frequency increases with the number of successive impacts incurred; these behavioral signs include: temporary loss of consciousness and other uncoordinated behavioral responses (Supplemental Video S2). Importantly, flies sustain no gross morphological damage to the head or body following repetitive head impact exposure, indicative of a closed-head injury (Supplemental Fig. S2A). It should be noted that the floor of the vial is coated with a thin elastic silicone layer (2 mm) (SYLGARD, The Dow Chemical) that serves as the cushion to minimize any potential inadvertant damage to falling flies.

Figure 1
figure 1

Development of a novel repetitive head impact Drosophila model. (a) (Top) Diagram of our novel headfirst impact model that utilizes a counterweight pulley system to accelerate a vial of flies upward ultimately resulting in acceleration-deceleration headfirst impacts. To prime proper body orientation, the vial is lightly tamped down, resulting in the natural negative geotactic upwards orientation, after which the vial is release, causing the counterweight to accelerate the vial unidirectionally. The unidirectional movement upwards, together with the priming sequences facilitates headfirst orientation at impact once the vial reaches its maximum height. (Middle) High-speed image sequence showing headfirst movement through impact with the surface of the injury vial (arrows indicate frames immediately before and after contact, which is denoted by red stars, which lasts ~ 1 ms long). (Bottom) Angular histogram comparisons demonstrate more reliable and consistent headfirst impacts and improves upon (b) previously existing strategies which encourage rotational body movement that results in inconsistent head orientation at impact. (c) Immediately following headfirst impacts, flies sustain acute signs of neurological injury, such as temporary loss of consciousness that becomes more prevalent with increasing number of repetitive head impacts. Impact number increases concussive-like events (one-way ANOVA, F (1,89) = 44.26645, P = 2.26e−09). Data represented as mean ± SD, n = 4–8 vials (10 flies per vial) of both male and female flies.

Acute recovery of climbing deficits following minimally lethal repetitive head impacts is sexually dimorphic

To emulate repetitive mild head injury exposure sustained across time, young adult (3 days post-eclosed) male and female flies were subjected to two sessions of repetitive impacts 24 h apart; each session consisting of 15 iterative impacts delivered 10 s apart (Fig. 2a). Repetitively impacted flies exhibited minimal (< 7%) acute mortality following both days of impacts (Fig. 2b), whereas a single head impact generated no acute death (Supplemental Fig. S2B). This degree of mortality is far less than the mortality (20–60%) seen in a commonly employed method used to deliver repetitive head trauma to flies44,52, indicating that our approach delivered a much milder insult (thus considered as “mild head trauma”). Following the injury, flies were rested for 1.5 h before functional recovery testing was performed. This length of recovery time enabled acute recovery from temporary uncoordinated and seizure-like behaviors seen shortly following injury48, and allowed flies to regain postural stability needed to perform the behavioral function assay. To measure acute behavioral deficits following repetitive head impacts, startle-induced climbing was assessed using the negative geotaxis assay (NGA)53,54,55,56, which is a widely used locomotor assay sensitive to age-related decline and neurodegeneration. This assay tests both vestibulomotor and sensorimotor functions which are commonly assessed in traditional mammalian TBI models57,58,59. Flies were placed in plastic vials containing 2 mL of 5% agar at the bottom and subjected to gentle tamping to induce a startle response. Videos were analyzed using an automated python-based tracking software, idtracker.ai60,61, to measure cumulative climbing distance (slope), total (final) and vertical distance traversed in a 10 s span of time following the startle stimulus (Supplemental Video S3). Testing was performed 1.5 h after the first and second sessions of repetitive impacts (“1.5 h” and “25.5 h” with respect to the initial injury), as well as 24 h after each session to assess longer recovery (“24 h” and “48 h” with respect to the initial injury). While injured males showed an initial deficit in climbing after each session that resolved 24 h later, female flies exhibited a progressive climbing deficit that was further exacerbated following the second session of impacts (Fig. 2c,d, Supplemental Fig. S3). 24 h after the second session, a robust difference in climbing behavior was seen between injured sexes, with injured female flies showing a 30% reduction in climbing whereas injured males performed similar to their sham counterparts (Fig. 2e).

Figure 2
figure 2

Acute recovery of climbing deficits following minimally lethal repetitive head impacts is sexually dimorphic. (a) Injury timeline schematic showing that flies are subjected to two sessions of repetitive head impacts (24 h apart). Each session consists of 15 iterative impacts spaced 10 s apart. Behavior and mortality are longitudinally monitored throughout life. (b) Bar graph showing acute survival following repetitive impacts with 95% confidence intervals. n = 56–69 flies per injured group/sex and n = 42–50 flies per sham group/sex. (c) Total cumulative distance traversed during the negative geotaxis assay. Plotted values are median with 95% confidence intervals as shaded regions, (Right) Representative movement tracings from 5 representative flies/group of sham (blue) and injured (orange) flies during the 10 s trial duration at 48 h. Distance units are in body lengths (BL). (d,e) Plotted climbing slope showing that injured females exhibit a progressive decrease that worsens after the second impact session, while injured male flies show active acute recovery 24 h after each session of impacts. Bar plots in (d) correspond to the median relative decrease in climbing performance between injured and sham groups (∆ slope = (Injured Slope-Median Sham Slope)/Median Sham Slope). Plotted values are median with 95% confidence interval error bars in (d,e). Mann–Whitney U test between (d) injured and non-injured groups, with Holm correction and (e) injured female and male performance relative to non-injured, with Bonferroni correction. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, n = 25–35 flies per sex/time/injury group.

Lifelong deficits after early exposure to repetitive mild head impacts

One key advantage of our Drosophila model of mild head trauma is that it enables the monitoring and examination of long-term effects on lifespan and brain structure and function in relatively large cohorts. We thus continued to routinely examine flies following repetitive mild head impacts over their lifespan. We first measured the mortality and found that repetitive head impact exposure resulted in a shortened overall lifespan that was more prominent in female flies (Fig. 3a,b). To determine the effect of repetitive head injury exposure on long-term behavioral function, startle-induced climbing performance was routinely assessed until 98 days (14 weeks) post-injury. Flies subjected to repetitive head injury exposure exhibited long-term climbing deficits that were more profound in female than male flies (Fig. 3c–e, Supplemental Fig. S4). Significant deficits in climbing performance of injured female flies were consistently observed up to 70 days post injury (Fig. 3c,d). During this time period, injured female flies exhibited a greater reduction in climbing ability compared to injured males (Fig. 3e). By 84 days post-injury, female flies from the sham and injury groups exhibited no apparent difference in their climbing performance, which is likely attributed to the severely reduced baseline performance due to aging. On the other hand, male files appear to perform better at these later ages (84- and 98-days), as such, a small difference between injured and sham male flies in climbing performance existed up to 98 days post-injury (Fig. 3c,d, Supplemental Fig. S4). Together, this data demonstrated that early exposure to repetitive mild head trauma disrupts motor functions that lasts over a long period of time and disproportionally impacts female flies.

Figure 3
figure 3

Repetitive head impacts result in a shortened lifespan and long-term behavioral climbing deficits. (a,b) Repetitive head impacts result in a shortened overall lifespan that is significantly different in injured female flies compared to sham injured flies. Kaplan–Meier p-values were determined using the Mantel-Cox log rank test with Bonferroni correction. (c–e) Repetitive head impacts exacerbate age-related climbing deficits that are more pronounced in female flies. Plotted values are median with 95% confidence intervals as shaded regions in (c) or error bars in (b,d) Bar plots in (d) indicate median relative decrease in climbing performance between injured and sham groups (∆ slope = (Injured Slope-Median Sham Slope)/Median Sham Slope). Boxplots in (e) contain individually plotted ∆ slope values with whiskers corresponding to the maximum 1.5 interquartile range. Mann–Whitney U test between (d,e) injured and non-injured groups, with Holm correction: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, n ≥ 22 flies per sex/time/injury group except day 56 (n ≥ 11 flies).

Repetitive head impacts exacerbate age-related brain degeneration

To examine brain pathology related to repetitive head injury exposure, whole-brain gross neurodegeneration was longitudinally assessed by measuring vacuolization; a commonly used measure of neurodegeneration in Drosophila40,62. To measure vacuolization, whole-brains were stained with phalloidin to detect actin-rich neuropil and DAPI to detect nuclei, and imaged using two-photon microscopy. Regions devoid of both DAPI and phalloidin signals were characterized as vacuoles42. Brains from flies subjected to repetitive impacts were processed for neurodegeneration acutely (1.5 h) and chronically (5 weeks) post-injury. Although minimal to no vacuolization existed at the early time point across sexes and injury groups (Supplemental Fig. S5), aged brains exhibited a far greater degree of vacuolization, as measured by the number and area of vacuoles per brain (Fig. 4). Both female and male flies subjected to repetitive head impacts resulted in an increase in neurodegeneration five weeks post-injury relative to sham (Fig. 4a–d), seen as an increase in the overall number of vacuoles per brain (Fig. 4e) and overall area of vacuoles per brain (Fig. 4f).

Figure 4
figure 4

Repetitive head impacts exacerbate age-related neurodegeneration five weeks after injury. (a) Representative max projection of whole-brain slices (1 µm thick) imaged using two-photon microscopy with brain vacuoles (neurodegeneration) depicted as yellow overlays which correspond to regions devoid of DAPI (blue) and phalloidin (red) signal from a (Top) sham injury brain and (Bottom) a repetitively injured brain, captured five weeks following repetitive head impact exposure (2 sessions of 15 impacts). (b) Representative two-photon microscopy slice from white square outline of injured brain in (a) where pathological vacuoles of varying size (enclosed within yellow outline with yellow arrow) are found throughout the midbrain while blue outlines designate physiologically normal holes. (c,d) Representative vacuole outlined in (b) is depicted in (c) as a series of z-stack images and (d) 3-D reconstruction of the vacuole. (e,f) Quantification of (e) vacuole number and (f) vacuole area per brain from sham and repetitively injured brains. Boxplots contain individually plotted values with whiskers corresponding to the maximum 1.5 interquartile range. Within sex differences between sham and repetitive head impact conditions were analyzed with the Mann–Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction. White scale bar = 100 µm, yellow scale bar = 20 µm.

Elevated brain activity by repetitive mild head impacts and the protective effects by acute suppression of neuronal activity are sex-dependent

We next began to explore the mechanisms underlying the development of long-term behavioral and brain dysfunction after repetitive mild head impacts. Emerging evidence indicates that neuronal hyperexcitability plays an important role in a number of neurodegenerative disorders63. Neuronal hyperexcitability has been examined in moderate to severe TBI16,17, but its existence in mild TBI remains poorly understood. We thus investigated if repetitive mild head trauma exposure in Drosophila elicits neuronal activity in vivo. To do so, we measured neuronal activity using a non-invasive in vivo luciferase-based transcriptional indicator of calcium signaling, CaLexA-Luciferase (CaLexA-LUC)49,64 (Calcium-dependent nuclear import of LexA); a Nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT)-LexA chimera whose transcriptional activity is based on the Ca2+-regulated dephosphorylation and nuclear translocation of NFAT which then drives luciferase expression. Pan-neuronal expression of UAS-CaLexA-LUC using the neuronal synaptobrevin-GAL4 (nSyb-GAL4) is weak and sparse51, and in our hands, results in sick and sluggish appearing flies (data not shown). Instead, we measured neuronal activity in an essential midbrain structure, the mushroom body65, using the robust mushroom body driver to express CaLexA-LUC (OK107 > CaLexA-LUC). The mushroom body contains roughly 2% of the total fly brain neurons65 and features a dense organization of projection neurons that communicate with various regions of the fly brain, making it a center for high-level integration of functions related to learning/memory65 and startle-induced climbing66. OK107 > CaLexA-LUC flies were subjected to repetitive impacts (1 session of 30 impacts) and collected for fly head lysate preparation 1.5 h following injury. Bioluminescence (luciferase activity) was measured from collected fly head lysates. Injured female flies exhibited a 20% increase in measured neuronal activity relative to their sham female counterparts, whereas no significant difference was seen between injured and sham male flies (Fig. 5a).

Figure 5
figure 5

Long-term benefit of suppressing acute injury-induced neuronal activity following repetitive head impacts preferentially affects females. (a) Quantification of neuronal activity using mushroom body in vivo calcium monitoring (OK107 > CaLexA-LUC) revealed an acute increase in neuronal activity 1.5 h following repetitive head impact exposure in lysates collected from injured female brains, but not males. Within sex differences between injury and sham were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction, n = 4–7 lysates per group (2–4 fly heads per lysate). ∆ activity = ( (Sample luminescence)- (Median Sham Luminescence))/(Median Sham Luminescence). Boxplots contain individually plotted values with whiskers corresponding to the maximum 1.5 interquartile range. (b) Schematic overview of strategy to conditionally silence neuronal activity using the pan-neuronally expressed temperature-sensitive hypomorphic null allele, Shibire ts1 during the repetitive injury induction period. 18 °C → 31 °C shift conditionally suppresses neuronal activity for 2.5 min during delivery of repetitive head impacts in pan-neuronally shits1-expressing flies (LexA > shits1). (c) Kaplan–Meier survival curves showing that blocking neuronal activity at the time of injury protects against shortened lifespan following injury exposure which preferentially benefits female flies. p-values were calculated using the Mantel-Cox log rank test with Bonferroni correction and correspond to within sex differences between injured LexA only and Shibirets1-containing flies (LexA > shits1). (d,e) Blocking activity protects against (d) acute and (e) chronic climbing deficits related to repetitive head impact exposure that are preferentially found in females. Plotted values in (d,e) are relative median slopes (relative to respective uninjured sham) with 95% confidence interval error bars. Differences in climbing behavior were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test with Holm correction, between injured LexA Only and Shits1-containing flies (LexA > shits1). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

We then took a tailored approach to conditionally suppress neuronal activity at the time of injury, using the temperature sensitive dynamin homologue mutant, shibirets1 (shits1)50,67,68 expressed pan-neuronally (nSyb > shits1). Pan-neuronal expression of shits1 enables conditional suppression of synaptic activity by halting synaptic vesicle release, via interruption of the readily releasable pool of synaptic vesicles, thereby inducing a reversible state of flaccid paralysis50,67,68. Conditional suppression of synaptic activity occurs rapidly when exposed to the non-permissive temperature threshold of 30 °C, which is initially achieved through transfer to a pre-warmed vial and maintained via exogenous heat delivered by a heat lamp.

Control flies expressing either pan-neuronal LexA only (nSyb-LexA) or pan-neuronal shibirets1 (nSyb > shits) flies were injured during two sessions of 15 impacts delivered 24 h apart. During each injury session, flies were subjected to the non-permissive temperature for only the extent of the injury induction period (~ 2.5 min long) (Fig. 5b). Suppression of neuronal activity at the time of injury nearly abolished the acute mortality found in both sexes of injured nSyb-LexA flies and restored normal female lifespan (Fig. 5c). Most interestingly, suppression of neuronal activity at the time of injury restored relative acute female climbing performance compared to nSyb-LexA injured performance, whereas injured nSyb > shits1 males showed no significant improvement compared to injured nSyb-LexA (Fig. 5d; Supplemental Fig. S6). Moreover, long-term climbing performance of injured nSyb > shits1 females better resembled their sham nSyb > shits1 counterparts compared to injured nSyb-LexA flies (Fig. 5e; Supplemental Fig. S7). This finding was most prominent during Days 42–70 post-injury. Interestingly, the long-term relative performance of injured male nSyb > shits1 flies appeared no different than injured nSyb-LexA flies, which may be due to the milder initial climbing deficit seen in injured males (Fig. 3).

We next examined if blocking acute activity at the time of injury is protective against long-term neurodegeneration following repetitive head impacts. Similarly, repetitive head impacts were delivered to nSyb > shits1 flies at the non-permissive temperature and injured nSyb > shits1 flies were processed using the same methods shown in Fig. 4 for vacuole assessment following the aforementioned acute-silencing regimen. Acute silencing of activity at the time of injury was found to substantially reduce the number and size of vacuoles in female brains, while no obvious reduction in injury-induced vacuole formation was found in injured male brains from nSyb > shits1 compared to nSyb-LexA (Fig. 6). Together with the mortality and climbing data, this data suggests that acute aberrant neuronal activity elicited by repetitive head trauma may potentiate long-lasting dysfunction that preferentially affects female flies. In accordance with this finding, blocking acute activity through the expression of the dominant negative transgene, shibirets1 provides long-term neuroprotection against repetitive injuries that preferentially benefits females.

Figure 6
figure 6

Acute suppression of neuronal activity mitigates injury-induced chronic neurodegeneration in a sex-dependent manner. (a–d) Representative max projection of whole-brain slices (1 µm thick) imaged using two-photon microscopy with brain vacuoles (neurodegeneration) depicted as yellow overlays which correspond to regions devoid of DAPI (blue) and phalloidin (red) signal from injured (a) female nSyb-LexA brain, (b) female nSyb > Shits1 brain, (c) male nSyb-LexA brain, and (d) male nSyb > Shits1 brain. White scale bar = 100 µm. (e,f) Boxplot of relative quantification of (e) vacuole number and (f) vacuole area (relative to respective uninjured sham) with whiskers corresponding to the maximum 1.5 interquartile range. Within sex differences between injured nSyb-LexA (LexA Only) and nSyb > Shits1 (LexA > Shits1) were analyzed with the Mann–Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction. White scale bar = 100 µm.

Discussion

An emerging body of evidence demonstrates that a past history of repetitive mild head trauma increases the risk for developing cognitive and motor impairment, and brain degeneration later in life5,6. However, it remains unclear how the early exposure to mild head trauma leads to the development of long-term neurological dysfunction. This is in part due to the challenges using existing animal models for lifelong examination and interrogation of the detrimental effects after injury. In this study, we developed a Drosophila head impact system to investigate the long-term detrimental effects of mild repetitive head trauma and their underlying mechanisms. Our data show that repetitive mild physical impacts delivered to the adult fly head result in acute concussion-like responses and impairments in startle-induced climbing behavior. Importantly, when monitored over an extended period of time (throughout the entire lifespan), the early repetitive head trauma was found to shorten lifespan and elicit a decline in behavior, particularly in female flies. Whole-brain imaging also revealed increased brain degeneration in flies that received early repetitive head trauma. Finally, we provided evidence that neuronal activity plays a critical role in mild head trauma-induced long-term deficits in behavior and brain pathology within female flies.

While fruit flies are anatomically different from human, it has become clear that Drosophila is an excellent model organism to investigate the molecular, cellular, and genetic mechanisms underlying a wide range of human disorders. For example, the use of Drosophila has led to the discovery of novel genes and mechanisms of neurodegeneration36,69,70,71,72,73, including those involved in axonal transection-mediated degeneration, that have been validated by subsequent murine74,75,76 and human studies77. Existing head trauma models have also demonstrated conserved neuropathology in flies that recapitulates human aspects of head trauma8, including frank neurodegeneration48, and other cellular pathologies implicated in chronic traumatic encephalopathy, such as hyperphosphorylation of tau45 and abnormal accumulation of TDP-4378. The findings from our study not only support the use of Drosophila as a model system to study the long-term brain degeneration and dysfunction secondary to environmental insults, but also provide crucial insight into the underlying mechanisms involving excitatory neuronal activity in the development of brain deficits induced by head trauma. Our finding that silencing neuronal activity largely abolishes the long-term detrimental effects on fly behavior and brain pathology is consistent with the emerging view on the involvement of excitotoxicity in a number of neurodegenerative disorders63 including TBI79,80,81. Lastly, our findings also suggest that lifelong injury outcomes are exacerbated in the female flies compared to male flies.

Our newly developed Drosophila head impact model possesses several unique features that distinguish it from other systems. First, the physical impacts are delivered mostly to the heads of awake and unrestrained flies. The headfirst collision of flies to the impact ceiling is achieved in part through the upward body orientation at the start of acceleration due to the innate negative geotactic escape response during which flies orient headfirst against the force of gravity when startled. The aerodynamic body shape of the flies is also believed to contribute to the headfirst impact orientation as we observed mostly headfirst impacts with flies in a coma (data not shown). Second, the headfirst impacts are delivered to a large cohort of flies (10–15 flies at a time), thus increasing the efficiency for investigating the effects on large populations that are essential for analyzing genetic variations and long-term age-dependent changes, the latter of which is made possible by the relatively short overall lifespan of fruit flies. This, together with our non-invasive automated behavioral testing paradigm, is amenable to future high-throughput screening for genetic and environmental modifiers. Third, injury severity, or the impact force sustained by the fly head can be specifically modified by adjusting the hardness of the impact surface. For example, our current glass impact surface, which is a circular glass coverslip, can be replaced with a surface material of different hardness, such as plastic or Styrofoam, which can provide a specific degree of buffering for mimicking the padding of helmets in contact sports. Injury severity can also be adjusted within our system by using different counterweights and heights within the pulley system, resulting in a change in velocity at impact. Therefore, our head impact system has the potential to be utilized in a wide range of studies concerning head trauma that are focused on behavioral, structural, and functional consequences using adult flies of different ages and genetic backgrounds, helping to better understand the risk factors in the development of neurodegeneration and long-term dysfunction after head trauma.

While most affected individuals appear to recover from mild head trauma, the risk for developing long-term deficits in brain function and structure has been documented5. One interesting finding in our study is that female flies were more affected by repetitive head impacts than males. This was seen behaviorally, as a greater reduction in climbing ability relative to sham injured flies, as well as a shortened overall lifespan. The greater persistent functional deficit found in female flies following injury parallels human data from the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) study in which the female sex was associated with decreased six-month functional outcome measured using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)82. A recent cross-sectional human study revealed that females were more likely to report a less favorable health-related quality of life (HRQoL) during the chronic stage of TBI (10 years post-injury)83. Additional evidence demonstrates that young female athletes may take longer to become symptom free following sports-related concussion84. Taken together, this demonstrates sex differences following recovery from TBI and substantiates the importance of using both sexes in preclinical animal models. Interestingly, sex-dependent differences in function (climbing behavior) in fly head injury models has only been examined once prior, in which no differences between sexes were revealed43. However, flies were only measured for 72 h during the post-injury period, and the method for measuring behavior was done using the traditional approach to measure startle-induced climbing performance53,54. To provide greater sensitivity to potential subtle differences in climbing behavior, we used idtracker.ai60, an automated deep-learning tracking algorithm that enables measurement of individual fly performance. Climbing function was measured until 98 days post-injury, which accounted for most of the overall lifespan for flies reared at 18 °C (~ 150 day median survival).

At this moment, the underlying mechanism for the greater vulnerability to mild head trauma for female flies remains unclear. In humans, females are more likely to report mild TBI85, but several biological factors have been proposed to account for sex-dependent differences. For example, gender differences in head-neck anatomy in human can result in greater head acceleration (angular acceleration and displacement) in females compared to males86,87, which may elicit a greater force acted upon the head and thus increase the injury risk found in females87. In Drosophila, female flies are known to have a relatively larger body size compared to males88,89, which may incur a greater impact force and account for worse outcomes following injury. It is also possible that sex-dependent differences in neuroanatomy and gene expression may contribute to the greater vulnerability of females to head injury. To start addressing this possibility, we have performed a preliminary study in which the female specific sex determination gene transformer (tra)89 was expressed in the post-mitotic neurons of the male flies using nSyb-GAL490. When these flies were subjected to two sessions of repetitive impacts (24 h apart; each session = 15 iterative impacts delivered 10 s apart), we found that males expressing the female-specific transformer (nSyb > Tra) performed similarly to their injured nSyb-GAL4 counterparts (Supplemental Fig. S8). This finding suggests that neuroanatomical differences, but not female-specific gene expression in neurons may be responsible for the increased vulnerability to injury seen in female flies. We also noted that male flies expressing transformer (nSyb > Tra) appear to be larger in size comparing to the control (nSy-GAL4 only). The lack of difference in climbing responses after repetitive head impacts between these two groups also argue against the size difference as a major factor contributing to the female vulnerability in head trauma. Clearly, further investigation is needed to fully elucidate the molecular and genetic mechanisms underlying the sexually dimorphic responses to head injury.

Neuroanatomical differences have been suggested to contribute to sexually dimorphic vulnerability to injury in vitro91. In response to mechanical trauma, sudden stretching of the axon can increase membrane permeability, resulting in the temporary loss of ionic homeostasis, an influx of cations and excessive excitatory neurotransmitter release, and subsequent excitotoxicity, metabolic dysfunction, and cell death15,16,17,18,19. Cultured neurons from female human and murine sources contain axons with fewer microtubules per axon, resulting in a thinner axon diameter compared to males91, making it potentially more vulnerable to trauma. Moreover, in response to injury using a cell stretch injury model, female axons exhibited a greater acute influx of calcium compared to males91, which may explain the finding of more persistent deficits in hippocampal synaptic plasticity following mild TBI seen in preclinical data from female rats92. Our study provides corresponding in vivo data demonstrating that repetitive injury elicits acute neuronal activity within the injured female fly brain. Although this surge of excitation is thought to be short-lived, on the scale of minutes to hours93,94, this action may potentiate long-lasting effects on synaptic plasticity and neuronal function and affect the brain’s vulnerability to further injury, however this theory remains untested in part due to the lack of animal models for long-term examination.

Here in this study, we were able to target neuronal activity, specifically neurotransmitter release, at the time of injury using the transgenic temperature-sensitive shibirets1 mutant fly line as a tool to conditionally suppress whole-brain neuronal activity and monitor mortality, lifelong functional deficits, and brain degeneration. Our data provides the first evidence that silencing neuronal activity at the time of injury was able to largely mitigate the long-term detrimental effects of mild repetitive brain trauma in female flies. Together, this supports a mechanism involving synaptic plasticity and neuronal excitability related to chronic trauma-induced degeneration. While the protective mechanism of blocking activity remains unclear, it is likely associated with the downstream mechanisms of hyperexcitability following mechanical injury. The surge of neuronal activity can result in an influx of calcium, and subsequent activation of proteases, caspases, and mitochondrial dysfunction95, which eventually contribute towards cell death and degeneration. Blocking the activity surge during mechanical insults could potentially inhibit the excitotoxicity that would otherwise trigger the long-term cascades related to neurodegeneration and long-term dysfunction. Future work using our system can assess the potential benefit of silencing activity at various timepoints following repetitive injuries to determine the long-term therapeutic window of active rest, which is a commonly prescribed treatment following head injury. Additional work will also longitudinally examine how early repetitive head impact exposure affects neuronal excitability later in life, especially given that increased neuronal excitability is associated with brain aging96, for which injury exposure may accelerate.

Although blocking activity seemed to preferentially benefit injured females to a greater extent than injured males, this may be related to the timing and duration of the activity suppression. Within our current paradigm, neuronal activity suppression was limited to the time of the injury exposure (~ 2.5 min), after which flies were quickly returned to the permissive temperature for the remainder of their lives. Additional strategies could be used within our current system that provide chronic suppression of changes in hyperexcitability using glial cells involved in excitatory neurotransmitter recycling by specifically targeting excitatory neurotransmitter transporters97,98,99. The inability to properly regulate excitability may be related to the loss of excitatory neurotransmitter buffering capacity in glial cells, primarily astrocytes, which have been shown to be perturbed in severe isolated scenarios of head trauma100,101. While this remains to be seen in repetitive mild head trauma exposure, decreased buffering capacity may potentiate chronic changes in hyperexcitability that then result in eventual neuronal degeneration. Interestingly, the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease may involve abnormal changes in glutamatergic buffering, which results in persistent excessive neuronal activation, excitotoxicity and eventual cell death102,103. Activity-dependent changes related to repetitive exposure to trauma may represent an early mechanism that potentiates AD, as well as other neurodegenerative diseases. Additional studies using our tractable injury model can also examine the role of hyperexcitability towards the formation of abnormal protein deposition seen in AD and CTE, including hyperphosphorylated tau and TDP-43 inclusions8,11,104.

Conclusions

This work utilizes a novel Drosophila head impact model to investigate how early exposure to repetitive mild head trauma results in long-term brain dysfunction and degeneration. We find that exposure to repetitive trauma resulted in lifelong brain dysfunction and degeneration that is further exacerbated in female flies. We also uncovered a novel activity-dependent mechanism underlying head trauma-induced long-term brain deficits. The finding that silencing neuronal activity during head impacts can effectively mitigate the development of long-term deficits suggests it as a potential therapeutic target for treating chronic sequalae of repetitive mild head trauma exposure. The basis of this work calls to question whether treating milder, potentially unassuming injuries, should receive greater attention as a means to thwart long-term complications. Understanding the natural course and lifelong implications of head trauma exposure is critically important for developing long-term neuroprotective strategies. We will continue to use our tractable fly model to investigate genetic and environmental factors that affect neurodegeneration secondary to repetitive head trauma exposure and provide insight into the fundamental mechanisms that lead to the progression of lifelong neurological dysfunction.

Data availability

Experimental tools and data are available from the corresponding authors.

Abbreviations

AF:

Alexa Fluor

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

CaLexA:

Calcium-dependent nuclear import of LexA

CPU:

Central processing unit

DAPI:

4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole

GB:

Gigabyte

GPU:

Graphics processing unit

LUC:

Luciferase

nSyb:

Neuronal synaptobrevin

PBS:

Phosphate buffered saline

SD:

Standard deviation

Shits1 :

Shibire temperature-sensitive 1

SSD:

Solid state drive

TBI:

Traumatic brain injury

UAS:

Upstream activator sequence

VM:

Virtual machine

ZT:

Zeitgeber

References

  1. Katsumoto, A., Takeuchi, H. & Tanaka, F. Tau pathology in chronic traumatic encephalopathy and Alzheimer’s disease: Similarities and differences. Front. Neurol. 10, 980 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barnes, D. E. et al. Association of mild traumatic brain injury with and without loss of consciousness with dementia in US Military Veterans. JAMA Neurol. 75(9), 1055–1061 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  3. DeKosky, S. T., Blennow, K., Ikonomovic, M. D. & Gandy, S. Acute and chronic traumatic encephalopathies: Pathogenesis and biomarkers. Nat Rev Neurol 9(4), 192–200 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Little, D. M. et al. Imaging chronic traumatic brain injury as a risk factor for neurodegeneration. Alzheimers Dement 10(3 Suppl), S188–S195 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mackay, D. F. et al. Neurodegenerative disease mortality among former professional soccer players. N. Engl. J. Med. 381(19), 1801–1808 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mez, J. et al. Clinicopathological evaluation of chronic traumatic encephalopathy in players of american football. JAMA 318(4), 360–370 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  7. DeKosky, S. T. & Asken, B. M. Injury cascades in TBI-related neurodegeneration. Brain Inj 31(9), 1177–1182 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  8. McKee, A. C. et al. The first NINDS/NIBIB consensus meeting to define neuropathological criteria for the diagnosis of chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Acta Neuropathol. 131(1), 75–86 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fesharaki-Zadeh, A. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy: A brief overview. Front. Neurol. 10, 713 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Erkkinen, M. G., Kim, M. O. & Geschwind, M. D. Clinical neurology and epidemiology of the major neurodegenerative diseases. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 10(4), 033118 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chiasseu, M., Fesharaki, A., Saito, T., Saido, T. C. & Strittmatter, S. M. Chronic head injury promotes tau and amyloid-beta pathology and accelerates cognitive decline in a humanized knock-in model of Alzheimer’s disease: Developing topics. Alzheimers Dement. 16, e047623 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ma, J., Zhang, K., Wang, Z. & Chen, G. Progress of research on diffuse axonal injury after traumatic brain injury. Neural Plast. 2016, 9746313 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, D. H., Meaney, D. F. & Shull, W. H. Diffuse axonal injury in head trauma. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 18(4), 307–316 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson, V. E., Stewart, W. & Smith, D. H. Axonal pathology in traumatic brain injury. Exp. Neurol. 246, 35–43 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fehily, B. & Fitzgerald, M. Repeated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Potential Mechanisms of Damage. Cell Transplant 26(7), 1131–1155 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Palmer, A. M. et al. Traumatic brain injury-induced excitotoxicity assessed in a controlled cortical impact model. J. Neurochem. 61(6), 2015–2024 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Weber, J. T. Altered calcium signaling following traumatic brain injury. Front. Pharmacol. 3, 60 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yi, J.-H. & Hazell, A. S. Excitotoxic mechanisms and the role of astrocytic glutamate transporters in traumatic brain injury. Neurochem. Int. 48(5), 394–403 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wolf, J. A., Stys, P. K., Lusardi, T., Meaney, D. & Smith, D. H. Traumatic axonal injury induces calcium influx modulated by tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium channels. J. Neurosci. 21(6), 1923–1930 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Karve, I. P., Taylor, J. M. & Crack, P. J. The contribution of astrocytes and microglia to traumatic brain injury. Br. J. Pharmacol. 173(4), 692–702 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Myer, D., Gurkoff, G., Lee, S., Hovda, D. & Sofroniew, M. V. Essential protective roles of reactive astrocytes in traumatic brain injury. Brain 129(10), 2761–2772 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Burda, J. E., Bernstein, A. M. & Sofroniew, M. V. Astrocyte roles in traumatic brain injury. Exp. Neurol. 275, 305–315 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sperling, R. A. et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 7(3), 280–292 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Savica, R., Rocca, W. A. & Ahlskog, J. E. When does Parkinson disease start?. Arch. Neurol. 67(7), 798–801 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Morales, D. M. et al. Experimental models of traumatic brain injury: do we really need to build a better mousetrap?. Neuroscience 136(4), 971–989 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Brody, D. L., Benetatos, J., Bennett, R. E., Klemenhagen, K. C. & Mac Donald, C. L. The pathophysiology of repetitive concussive traumatic brain injury in experimental models; new developments and open questions. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 66, 91–98 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rowe, R. K. et al. Using anesthetics and analgesics in experimental traumatic brain injury. Lab Anim (NY) 42(8), 286–291 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wojnarowicz, M. W., Fisher, A. M., Minaeva, O. & Goldstein, L. E. Considerations for Experimental Animal Models of Concussion. Traumatic Brain Injury, and Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy-These Matters Matter, Front Neurol 8, 240 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  29. de la Tremblaye, P. B. et al. Elucidating opportunities and pitfalls in the treatment of experimental traumatic brain injury to optimize and facilitate clinical translation. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 85, 160–175 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dixon, C. E., Clifton, G. L., Lighthall, J. W., Yaghmai, A. A. & Hayes, R. L. A controlled cortical impact model of traumatic brain injury in the rat. J. Neurosci. Methods 39(3), 253–262 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lighthall, J. W. Controlled cortical impact: A new experimental brain injury model. J. Neurotrauma 5(1), 1–15 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  32. McIntosh, T. et al. Traumatic brain injury in the rat: characterization of a lateral fluid-percussion model. Neuroscience 28(1), 233–244 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ojo, J. O., Mouzon, B. C. & Crawford, F. Repetitive head trauma, chronic traumatic encephalopathy and tau: Challenges in translating from mice to men. Exp. Neurol. 275(Pt 3), 389–404 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chatterjee, S., Sang, T. K., Lawless, G. M. & Jackson, G. R. Dissociation of tau toxicity and phosphorylation: Role of GSK-3beta, MARK and Cdk5 in a Drosophila model. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18(1), 164–177 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Burnouf, S., Gorsky, M. K., Dols, J., Grönke, S. & Partridge, L. Aβ 43 is neurotoxic and primes aggregation of Aβ 40 in vivo. Acta Neuropathol. 130(1), 35–47 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ling, D. & Salvaterra, P. M. Brain aging and Aβ 1–42 neurotoxicity converge via deterioration in autophagy–lysosomal system: a conditional Drosophila model linking Alzheimer’s neurodegeneration with aging. Acta Neuropathol. 121(2), 183–191 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  37. He, Y. & Jasper, H. Studying aging in Drosophila. Methods 68(1), 129–133 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wang, Z. & Jin, Y. Genetic dissection of axon regeneration. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21(1), 189–196 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Duffy, J. B. GAL4 system in Drosophila: A fly geneticist’s Swiss army knife. Genesis 34(1–2), 1–15 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wittmann, C. W. et al. Tauopathy in Drosophila: Neurodegeneration without neurofibrillary tangles. Science 293(5530), 711–714 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jackson, G. R. et al. Human wild-type tau interacts with wingless pathway components and produces neurofibrillary pathology in Drosophila. Neuron 34(4), 509–519 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Coelho, D. S. et al. Culling less fit neurons protects against amyloid-beta-induced brain damage and cognitive and motor decline. Cell. Rep. 25(13), 3661–3673 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Shah, E. J., Gurdziel, K. & Ruden, D. M. Drosophila exhibit divergent sex-based responses in transcription and motor function after traumatic brain injury. Front. Neurol. 11, 511 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Katzenberger, R. J. et al. A Drosophila model of closed head traumatic brain injury. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110(44), E4152–E4159 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Barekat, A. et al. Using Drosophila as an integrated model to study mild repetitive traumatic brain injury. Sci. Rep. 6, 25252 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sun, M. & Chen, L. L. A novel method to model chronic traumatic encephalopathy in Drosophila. J. Vis. Exp. 125, 55602 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Saikumar, J. et al. Inducing different severities of traumatic brain injury in Drosophila using a piezoelectric actuator. Nat. Protoc. 16, 263–283 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Saikumar, J., Byrns, C. N., Hemphill, M., Meaney, D. F. & Bonini, N. M. Dynamic neural and glial responses of a head-specific model for traumatic brain injury in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117(29), 17269–17277 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Guo, F., Chen, X. & Rosbash, M. Temporal calcium profiling of specific circadian neurons in freely moving flies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 114(41), E8780–E8787 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Pfeiffer, B. D., Truman, J. W. & Rubin, G. M. Using translational enhancers to increase transgene expression in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 109(17), 6626–6631 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Gao, X. J. et al. A transcriptional reporter of intracellular Ca(2+) in Drosophila. Nat. Neurosci. 18(6), 917–925 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Katzenberger, R. J. et al. A method to inflict closed head traumatic brain injury in Drosophila. J. Vis. Exp. 100, e52905 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ali, Y. O., Escala, W., Ruan, K. & Zhai, R. G. Assaying locomotor, learning, and memory deficits in Drosophila models of neurodegeneration. J. Vis.. Exp. 49, 2504 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Liu, H. et al. Automated rapid iterative negative geotaxis assay and its use in a genetic screen for modifiers of Abeta(42)-induced locomotor decline in Drosophila. Neurosci. Bull. 31(5), 541–549 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rhodenizer, D., Martin, I., Bhandari, P., Pletcher, S. D. & Grotewiel, M. Genetic and environmental factors impact age-related impairment of negative geotaxis in Drosophila by altering age-dependent climbing speed. Exp. Gerontol. 43(8), 739–748 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Toma, D. P., White, K. P., Hirsch, J. & Greenspan, R. J. Identification of genes involved in Drosophila melanogaster geotaxis, a complex behavioral trait. Nat. Genet. 31(4), 349–353 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Goldstein, L. B. & Davis, J. N. Beam-walking in rats: Studies towards developing an animal model of functional recovery after brain injury. J. Neurosci. Methods 31(2), 101–107 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Hamm, R. J., Pike, B. R., O’Dell, D. M., Lyeth, B. G. & Jenkins, L. W. The rotarod test: an evaluation of its effectiveness in assessing motor deficits following traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma 11(2), 187–196 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Srivastava, A. K. & Cox, C. S. Jr. Pre-Clinical and Clinical Methods in Brain Trauma Research (Springer, New York, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Romero-Ferrero, F., Bergomi, M. G., Hinz, R. C., Heras, F. J. H. & de Polavieja, G. G. idtracker.ai: Tracking all individuals in small or large collectives of unmarked animals. Nat. Methods 16(2), 179–182 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Tinevez, J.-Y. et al. TrackMate: An open and extensible platform for single-particle tracking. Methods 115, 80–90 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Bolkan, B. J. & Kretzschmar, D. Loss of Tau results in defects in photoreceptor development and progressive neuronal degeneration in Drosophila. Dev. Neurobiol. 74(12), 1210–1225 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Dong, X.-X., Wang, Y. & Qin, Z.-H. Molecular mechanisms of excitotoxicity and their relevance to pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 30(4), 379–387 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Masuyama, K., Zhang, Y., Rao, Y. & Wang, J. W. Mapping neural circuits with activity-dependent nuclear import of a transcription factor. J. Neurogenet. 26(1), 89–102 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Aso, Y. et al. The mushroom body of adult Drosophila characterized by GAL4 drivers. J. Neurogenet. 23(1–2), 156–172 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Sun, J. et al. Neural control of startle-induced locomotion by the mushroom bodies and associated neurons in Drosophila. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 12, 6 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Kitamoto, T. Conditional modification of behavior in Drosophila by targeted expression of a temperature-sensitive shibire allele in defined neurons. J. Neurobiol. 47(2), 81–92 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Poodry, C. A. & Edgar, L. Reversible alteration in the neuromuscular junctions of Drosophila melanogaster bearing a temperature-sensitive mutation, shibire. J. Cell Biol. 81(3), 520–527 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Brace, E. & DiAntonio, A. Models of axon regeneration in Drosophila. Exp. Neurol. 287, 310–317 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Collins, C. A., Wairkar, Y. P., Johnson, S. L. & DiAntonio, A. Highwire restrains synaptic growth by attenuating a MAP kinase signal. Neuron 51(1), 57–69 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Xiong, X. et al. Protein turnover of the Wallenda/DLK kinase regulates a retrograde response to axonal injury. J. Cell. Biol. 191(1), 211–223 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Neukomm, L. J., Burdett, T. C., Gonzalez, M. A., Züchner, S. & Freeman, M. R. Rapid in vivo forward genetic approach for identifying axon death genes in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(27), 9965–9970 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Pandey, U. B. & Nichols, C. D. Human disease models in Drosophila melanogaster and the role of the fly in therapeutic drug discovery. Pharmacol. Rev. 63(2), 411–436 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Watkins, T. A. et al. DLK initiates a transcriptional program that couples apoptotic and regenerative responses to axonal injury. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110(10), 4039–4044 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Shin, J. E. et al. Dual leucine zipper kinase is required for retrograde injury signaling and axonal regeneration. Neuron 74(6), 1015–1022 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Osterloh, J. M. et al. dSarm/Sarm1 is required for activation of an injury-induced axon death pathway. Science 337(6093), 481–484 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Tian, R. et al. CRISPR interference-based platform for multimodal genetic screens in human iPSC-derived neurons. Neuron 104(2), 239–255 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Anderson, E. N. et al. Traumatic injury induces stress granule formation and enhances motor dysfunctions in ALS/FTD models. Hum. Mol. Genet. 27(8), 1366–1381 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Barkhoudarian, G., Hovda, D. A. & Giza, C. C. The molecular pathophysiology of concussive brain injury: An update. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 27(2), 373–393 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Guerriero, R. M., Giza, C. C. & Rotenberg, A. Glutamate and GABA imbalance following traumatic brain injury. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 15(5), 27 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Yuen, T. J., Browne, K. D., Iwata, A. & Smith, D. H. Sodium channelopathy induced by mild axonal trauma worsens outcome after a repeat injury. J. Neurosci. Res. 87(16), 3620–3625 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Yue, J. K. et al. Age and sex-mediated differences in six-month outcomes after mild traumatic brain injury in young adults: A TRACK-TBI study. Neurol. Res. 41(7), 609–623 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Rauen, K. et al. Quality of life after traumatic brain injury: A cross-sectional analysis uncovers age-and sex-related differences over the adult life span. GeroScience 43, 263–278 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Berz, K. et al. Sex-specific differences in the severity of symptoms and recovery rate following sports-related concussion in young athletes. Phys. Sportsmed. 41(2), 58–63 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Bazarian, J. J., Blyth, B., Mookerjee, S., He, H. & McDermott, M. P. Sex differences in outcome after mild traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma 27(3), 527–539 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Tierney, R. T. et al. Gender differences in head-neck segment dynamic stabilization during head acceleration. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 37(2), 272–279 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Schneider, K. & Zernicke, R. F. Computer simulation of head impact: Estimation of head-injury risk during soccer heading. J. Appl. Biomech. 4(4), 358–371 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Testa, N. D., Ghosh, S. M. & Shingleton, A. W. Sex-specific weight loss mediates sexual size dimorphism in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE 8(3), e58936 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Rideout, E. J., Narsaiya, M. S. & Grewal, S. S. The sex determination gene transformer regulates male-female differences in Drosophila body size. PLoS Genet. 11(12), e1005683 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Jonson, M., Pokrzywa, M., Starkenberg, A., Hammarstrom, P. & Thor, S. Systematic Aβ analysis in Drosophila reveals high toxicity for the 1–42, 3–42 and 11–42 peptides, and emphasizes N-and C-terminal residues. PLoS ONE 10(7), e0133272 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Dolle, J. P. et al. Newfound sex differences in axonal structure underlie differential outcomes from in vitro traumatic axonal injury. Exp Neurol 300, 121–134 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  92. White, E. R., Pinar, C., Bostrom, C. A., Meconi, A. & Christie, B. R. Mild traumatic brain injury produces long-lasting deficits in synaptic plasticity in the female juvenile hippocampus. J. Neurotrauma 34(5), 1111–1123 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Globus, M. Y. T., Alonso, O., Dietrich, W. D., Busto, R. & Ginsberg, M. D. Glutamate release and free radical production following brain injury: Effects of posttraumatic hypothermia. J. Neurochem. 65(4), 1704–1711 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Lyeth, B. G., Jiang, J. Y., Robinson, S. E., Guo, H. & Jenkins, L. W. Hypothermia blunts acetylcholine increase in CSF of traumatically brain injured rats. Mol. Chem. Neuropathol. 18(3), 247–256 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Giza, C. C. & Hovda, D. A. The new neurometabolic cascade of concussion. Neurosurgery 75, S24–S33 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Zullo, J. M. et al. Regulation of lifespan by neural excitation and REST. Nature 574(7778), 359–364 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Cho, S., Muthukumar, A. K., Stork, T., Coutinho-Budd, J. C. & Freeman, M. R. Focal adhesion molecules regulate astrocyte morphology and glutamate transporters to suppress seizure-like behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(44), 11316–11321 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Kilian, J. G., Hsu, H.-W., Mata, K., Wolf, F. W. & Kitazawa, M. Astrocyte transport of glutamate and neuronal activity reciprocally modulate tau pathology in Drosophila. Neuroscience 348, 191–200 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Duan, S., Anderson, C. M., Stein, B. A. & Swanson, R. A. Glutamate induces rapid upregulation of astrocyte glutamate transport and cell-surface expression of GLAST. J. Neurosci. 19(23), 10193–10200 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Beschorner, R. et al. Expression of EAAT1 reflects a possible neuroprotective function of reactive astrocytes and activated microglia following human traumatic brain injury. Histol. Histopathol. 22(4–6), 515–526 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Landeghem, F. K. V., Weiss, T., Oehmichen, M. & Deimling, A. V. Decreased expression of glutamate transporters in astrocytes after human traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma 23(10), 1518–1528 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Takahashi, K. et al. Restored glial glutamate transporter EAAT2 function as a potential therapeutic approach for Alzheimer’s disease. J. Exp. Med. 212(3), 319–332 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Jacob, C. P. et al. Alterations in expression of glutamatergic transporters and receptors in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 11(1), 97–116 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Tang, S. J. et al. Fyn kinase inhibition reduces protein aggregation, increases synapse density and improves memory in transgenic and traumatic Tauopathy. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 8(1), 1–21 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. Janet Alder, Smita Thakker-Varia and Michael Sayegh for their comments on the manuscript. We also thank Dr. Brian Robinson and Chris Rounds for their technical assistance with Drosophila handling, and Dr. Lauren Stewart at Georgia Institute of Technology for her help with high-speed video recording. Corey Zheng at Georgia Institute of Technology helped with the design and construction of the Pulley impact system as well as the 3-D printing of the impact cradle. Thank you to Teri Ngo (Rubin Lab) and Dr. Kate Abruzzi (Rosbash Lab) for providing fly stocks. This research project would not have taken shape without stimulating discussions with Drs. Dorothy Lerit and Victor Faundez, and other colleagues within the Department of Cell Biology at Emory University.

Funding

This research project was supported in part by research grants from the National Institutes of Health to JQZ (GM083889, R01MH104632) and to KHM (MH107305). This research was also supported in part by Google Cloud’s Academic Research Credits Program to JAB.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.A.B., and J.Q.Z. designed research; J.A.B. and C.Y. performed research; J.A.B., C.Y., A.Y. and J.Q.Z. analyzed data; J.A.B. and J.Q.Z. designed and built the head injury device; J.Q.Z. and K.H.M. supervised research; and J.A.B., C.Y. and J.Q.Z. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Q. Zheng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Video 1.

Supplementary Video 2.

Supplementary Video 3.

Supplementary Video 4.

Supplementary Figures.

Supplementary Information.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Behnke, J.A., Ye, C., Setty, A. et al. Repetitive mild head trauma induces activity mediated lifelong brain deficits in a novel Drosophila model. Sci Rep 11, 9738 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89121-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89121-7

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing