Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Whole genome analysis of extensively drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in Peru


Peru has the highest burden of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in the Americas region. Since 1999, the annual number of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) Peruvian cases has been increasing, becoming a public health challenge. The objective of this study was to perform genomic characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains obtained from Peruvian patients with XDR-TB diagnosed from 2011 to 2015 in Peru. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on 68 XDR-TB strains from different regions of Peru. 58 (85.3%) strains came from the most populated districts of Lima and Callao. Concerning the lineages, 62 (91.2%) strains belonged to the Euro-American Lineage, while the remaining 6 (8.8%) strains belonged to the East-Asian Lineage. Most strains (90%) had high-confidence resistance mutations according to pre-established WHO-confident grading system. Discordant results between microbiological and molecular methodologies were caused by mutations outside the hotspot regions analysed by commercial molecular assays (rpoB I491F and inhA S94A). Cluster analysis using a cut-off ≤ 10 SNPs revealed that only 23 (34%) strains evidenced recent transmission links. This study highlights the relevance and utility of WGS as a high-resolution approach to predict drug resistance, analyse transmission of strains between groups, and determine evolutionary patterns of circulating XDR-TB strains in the country.


Tuberculosis (TB) is a preventable and curable disease and one of the top 10 causes of death in the world1. Resistance to drugs used in the treatment of TB is a major threat to the strategies that are being deployed to control and eliminate the multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB)2,3,4. Both forms of this pathology are becoming more prevalent through the years and require an expensive and prolonged treatment that produces greater morbidity, toxicity and mortality2,5. In 2019, it was reported that 3.3% of new TB cases and 18% of previously treated cases globally were diagnosed with MDR-TB, of which an estimated proportion of 6% (12,350 reported cases) were XDR-TB1. Moreover, XDR-TB has the lowest treatment success rate (39%) compared to other forms of TB2.

In the region of the Americas, XDR-TB is present being Peru the country with the highest burden1. The first Peruvian case of XDR-TB was detected in 19996, and throughout the years the number of cases has progressively increased, adding up to 944 cases until 20177,8. The national distribution of XDR-TB corresponds to the epidemiological situation of TB in the country. Approximately, 85–88% of XDR-TB cases are concentrated in the capital city of Lima and Callao, with the eastern part of Lima being particularly one of the areas with the highest number of cases of this form of TB7,9.

Drug resistance of mycobacterial strains is detected through genotypic or phenotypic laboratory tests that detect the presence of DNA mutations conferring resistance or the growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) in the presence of anti-TB drugs, respectively. However, these methodologies are restricted to the analysis of a limited number of resistance genes or to the slow mycobacterial duplication time, respectively. All of this makes it difficult to obtain complete and rapid results. To determine genetic relationships, analysis of the restriction fragment length polymorphisms of the IS6110 gene (IS6110-RFLP), spacer oligonucleotide typing (Spoligotyping) and mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units-variable number of DNA tandem repeats (MIRU-VNTR) have been used globally. These methodologies have also been applied in Peru for exploration of the genetic diversity of drug resistant TB strains10,11,12. However, the problem using these conventional techniques for genotyping is that they explore polymorphic genetic regions that cover less than 1% of the mycobacterial genome, significantly limiting their power of differentiation between strains that are very close at the genetic level13,14.

Recently, the revolution of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technology and its wider availability have allowed to perform Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) analysis to provide information about speciation, drug resistance prediction and better determination of relatedness for epidemiologic purposes15,16,17. In this way it is possible to obtain a greater amount of information that allows a complete characterization and discrimination of strains with repeated or ambiguous conventional genotypic patterns18,19. However, to date no high-resolution genomic study has been performed on Peruvian XDR-TB strains.

The objective of this study is to characterize the genomic variability of the XDR-TB strains circulating in Peru, using the NGS-based WGS analysis. We performed an approximation of their molecular epidemiology and determined the evolutionary relationships of the XDR-TB Peruvians strains.


Sample collection

MTB strains from hospitals and public health laboratories throughout Peru are sent daily to the National Reference Laboratory for Mycobacteria (NRLM), of the Peruvian National Institute of Health (NIH), for TB confirmation and evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility. A total of 68 XDR-TB strains, according to phenotypic results, stored at NRLM were included in this study. All recovered strains correspond to patients with active pulmonary TB diagnosed between 2011 and 2015. These strains were randomly selected from the entire country.

Ethical statement

Approval for the use and processing of preserved strains was obtained from the Institutional Committee for Research Ethics of the Peruvian NIH (reference number OT-0021-17). Identity of the patients was blinded to the researchers using a dual coding system from this study.

Genotypic and phenotypic confirmation

Cryopreserved MTB strains were inoculated in Middlebrook 7H9 media (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, USA) for seven days. Subsequently, 0.2 mL of 7H9 supernatant was transferred to Lowenstein–Jensen (LJ) medium and incubated for a minimum of three weeks to obtain a moderate development. Genotypic confirmations of resistance against rifampicin and isoniazid were performed using the line probe assay GenoType MTBDRplus v2 (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Phenotypic confirmation was performed using the proportion method (PM) in Middlebrook 7H10 media (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, USA) to assess the resistance to isoniazid (0.2 μg/mL, 1.0 μg/mL), rifampicin (1.0 μg/mL), levofloxacin (1.0 μg/mL), capreomycin (10.0 μg/mL) and kanamycin (5.0 μg/mL). All the work related to the manipulation of live bacteria was carried out in facilities with biosafety level 3 of the NRLM.

DNA extraction and whole genome sequencing

Genomic DNA extractions were performed using the GeneJET Genomic DNA Purification kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) according to manufacturer's recommendations. Double-stranded DNA concentration was quantified using the Qubit dsDNA HS Assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA). Sequencing libraries were prepared using 1 ng of each DNA sample with Nextera XT Library Preparation kit. Whole genome sequencing was carried out at NIH (Lima, Peru) using Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, USA) to generate paired-end sequencing reads.

Bioinformatic analysis

All computational analyses were performed by the bioinformatics department of the NRLM and were entirely set on the ubuntu distribution of Linux.

Purity assessment and quality filtering

Quality evaluation of paired-end reads was performed using FastQC v0.11.9 ( The presence of specific reads for M. tuberculosis complex species was verified with Kraken2 v2.0.7 (MiniKraken2 v2 database)20. Verified paired-end reads were filtered with Trimmomatic v0.3821 using default values and a minimum Phred score of 20. Only filtered paired-end reads (95.6% of total raw reads) were used for downstream analysis.

Assembly, alignment, and variant calling

Filtered paired-end reads were mapped against the H37Rv reference genome (GenBank accession number: NC_000962.3) using BWA v0.7.1722. Identification of duplicate reads and sorting were done with Picard-tools v2.18.25 ( Mapping depth and coverage was determined using samtools v1.923, bedtools v2.29.024 and a custom script in R v3.6.125. For variant call a local realignment of mapped reads was performed using HaplotypeCaller algorithm, implemented in GATK v3.826. A hard-filtering approach was performed with VCFtools v0.1.1627 to select variants with the following criteria: mapping quality ≥ 60, variant depth ≥ 10X and frequency of reads supporting alternate allele ≥ 0.75. Genome positions with missing genotypes (due no coverage of reads or less than 10X depth coverage) in a minimum of 10% of all strains, and variants identified in repetitive regions (PE, PPE and PE-PGRS families) were excluded. Selected variants were annotated using SnpEff v4.3 T28. Concatenated genome-wide Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) sequences were generated for subsequent analysis.

Resistance genetic variants

Resistance-associated genes were analysed to evaluate phenotypic resistance to rifampicin (rpoB, rpoC, rpoA), isoniazid (katG, inhA, mabA, kasA, furA, ndh, mshA, nat and oxyR-ahpC region), levofloxacin (gyrA, gyrB) and second-line injectable drugs (rrs, eis, tlyA). Variant allelic frequency of at least 0.10 was set for these genes. Resistance genetic variants were visually confirmed using the Artemis v18.129. Variants were compared with those reported in the TB Drug Resistance Mutation Database ( and confidence was graded based on the technical guide to resistance-associated mutations reported by the World Health Organization (WHO)30.

Lineage/sublineage and family determination

MTB lineages and sublineages determination was performed with Kvarq v0.12.231 using the set of SNPs proposed by Coll et al.32. MTB families were determined using the in silico detection of 43 unique spacers in the direct repeat locus using SpoTyping v2.033. Then, the presence or absence of this spacers were analysed in the SITVIT2 database ( for the determination of the corresponding ‘Spoligo-International-Type’ (SIT).

Evolutionary analysis

A maximum likelihood phylogenomic tree was built from concatenated genome-wide SNPs using RAxML-NG v0.9.034. A 25 random and 25 parsimony-based starting trees and 1000 standard non-parametric bootstrap replicates were used to assess branch support. A general time-reversible substitution model was selected based on Akaike’s information criterion using jModelTest235. The tree was rooted using a ‘Lineage seven’ strain (SRA ID: ERR181435). An alternative phylogenomic tree was built using additional non-Peruvians 221 XDR-TB strains for an international comparison (Supplementary Table S1).

Transmission clusters determination

Genomic transmission clusters were determined using genome-wide SNPs independently of the epidemiological data. A cut-off value of no more than 10 SNPs distance, pre-established for a high prevalence area36,37,38,39, was used to group the strains into the same recent transmission genetic cluster. SNP distances were obtained from nucleotide pairwise comparisons of all sequenced strains using the R package Ape v5.440. Transmission network was constructed using the SeqTrack41 algorithm from R package Adegenet v2.1.342.


Patient characteristics

68 XDR-TB strains were included. Five (7.4%) strains were obtained from patients diagnosed in 2011, two (2.9%) in 2012, 18 (26.5%) in 2013, 23 (33.8%) in 2014 and 20 (29.4%) in 2015. Likewise, 38 (55.9%) strains were initially obtained from men and the rest from women. Their age ranged from 15 to 78 years with a mean of 36 years (interquartile range 25.3–44.5). 51 (75.0%) cases had received a previous anti-TB treatment (Table 1). 58 (85%) strains belonged to patients from Lima region and Callao province (51 from Lima and 7 from Callao). Regarding the strains of the Lima region, 30 (59%) came from districts of the east zone, 16 (31%) from the centre and north, 3 (6%) from the south, and 2 (4%) from other provinces (Supplementary Fig. S1). In addition, Piura, La Libertad, Loreto, Ancash, Ucayali, Arequipa and Madre de Dios regions had one strain each, while the Ica region had three strains (Supplementary Table S2).

Table 1 Characteristics of patients with XDR-TB.

Sequencing and genome assembly

An average of 935,183 raw sequencing reads per fastq file were obtained. Two fastq files (forward and reverse) were generated for every sample. The minimum, maximum and average genome depth of sequencing obtained were 53X, 153X and 88X, respectively. All strains had reads covering more than 99% of the H37Rv genome (Supplementary Table S2).

Antimicrobial resistance

All strains showed simultaneous phenotypic resistance to rifampicin, isoniazid, and levofloxacin. However, they showed differences in resistance to second-line injectable drugs (Table 1). Discordant results between phenotypic and genotypic methods were found for isoniazid (strain XDR-28) and rifampicin (strain XDR-19) showing resistance results only through the phenotypic method (Supplementary Table S2) and were analysed in another study43. Concerning rifampicin resistance, all strains had resistance mutations located at rpoB gene. From these, 67 (98.5%) were considered high-confident mutations located inside the rifampicin-resistance-determining region (RRDR) of the rpoB gene, while only one strain (1.5%) presented a mutation outside this region (I491F). The most frequent mutations were S450L and D435V. Only one strain had the double mutation H445N + S431R. The isoniazid resistant strains showed mutations in katG and inhA genes. Only one mutation in katG (S315T), three mutations in the promoter region (g-17t, c-15t and t-8c) and one mutation in the coding region (S94A) of inhA were found. There were four strains with double mutation, S315T + c-15t, and one with S315T + t-8c (Table 2). Levofloxacin resistance was predominately caused by mutations occurring in the quinolone-resistance-determining region (QRDR) of gyrA gene and contained nine different mutations, whereas gyrB showed only three. In the gyrA gene, the codon 94 showed the greatest variability (five different mutations). Only two strains presented mutations in both genes. Finally, one strain (1.5%) did not present mutations in either of the two genes. Resistance to kanamycin and capreomycin was driven by mutations occurring at rrs (a1401g, c1402t and g1484t), tlyA (all frame shifts) and eis (c-14t) genes. However, no mutations were detected in two strains for the screened genes. Strains with exclusive resistance to kanamycin only presented the rrs a1401g mutation, whereas two strains had no mutations in any of the three genes analysed. Exclusive resistance to capreomycin was caused by several frameshifts’ mutations occurring in tlyA gene. However, there were three strains with no detected mutations in any of the analysed genes. In general, 96, 85 and 90% (average 90%) of strains had high-confident mutations for resistance to rifampicin, isoniazid and both second-line drugs, respectively (Table 2). Several synonymous and nonsynonymous mutations located in additional resistant-associated genes were evidenced to be present together with the mutations described above (Supplementary Table S3).

Table 2 Resistance-associated mutations in Peruvian XDR-TB strains.

Lineages and evolutionary relationships

Lineage’s analysis determined that 62 (91%) XDR-TB strains belong to the Euro-American Lineage (Lineage 4) and 6 (9%) to the East-Asian Lineage (Lineage 2). 59 strains from Lineage 4 were able to be classified into six sublineages, while three could only be assigned as belonging to lineage 4. All strains from Lineage 2 were represented by sublineage 2.2.1. Five strains of Lineage 2 circulated in the Lima region, while the remaining strain circulated in the province of Callao (Fig. 1).

Figure 1

Lineages and family classification of Peruvian XDR-TB strains. Distribution of lineages, sublineages (A) and genetic families (B) throughout the entire Peruvian territory. The number of XDR-TB strains (n) from each region is specified. The size of the circles was set using the scale ‘Log10 (n + 1)’. Maps were created using QGIS v3.14.15 (

The presence of 18 strains belonging to the LAM family was found (LAM/SIT1355 [n = 10; 14.7%], LAM1/SIT469 [n = 3; 4.4%], LAM5/SIT93 [n = 2; 2.9%], LAM5/SIT1160 [n = 1; 1.5%], LAM9/SIT42 [n = 2; 2.9%]), 16 strains belonging to the Haarlem family (H1/SIT47 [n = 9; 13.2%], H1/SIT62 [n = 1; 1.5%], H3/SIT3001 [n = 6; 8.8%]), 14 strains belonging to the T family (T1/SIT53 [n = 6; 8.8%], T1/SIT219 [n = 2; 2.9%], T1/SIT535 [n = 1; 1.5%], T2/SIT52 [n = 5; 7.4%]), 6 strains belonging to the X family (X3/SIT91 [n = 5; 7.4%], X3/SIT3780 [n = 1; 1.5%]), and 6 (8.8%) strains belonging to the Beijing/SIT1 family. Likewise, the presence of a reduced number of strains with orphan (n = 4; 4%) and unknown (n = 4; 4%) spoligotypes was also observed (Supplementary Fig. S2 and Table S2).

The northern strains of the country belonged to Piura (4.1.1/X3/SIT91; n = 1), La Libertad (; n = 1) and Loreto (4.3.3/Orphan; n = 1). In the centre of the country, the regions of Lima, Ica and the province of Callao showed to contain the greatest genetic diversity with respect to the entire country, with six, three and four sublineages respectively. The rest of the central regions were integrated by Ancash (4.1.1/X3/SIT91; n = 1) and Ucayali (4.3.3/Unknown/222; n = 1). Finally, in the South of the country, strains were found to belong to Arequipa (; n = 1) and Madre de Dios (; n = 1) (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table S2).

The maximum likelihood phylogenomic tree confirmed the lineage and sublineage classification and showed additional subclassification for strains belonging to the same sublineage. Interestingly, no correlation between phylogenomic clades and specific mutations conferring resistance was observed. Spoligotypes with ‘Orphans’ and ‘Unknown’ SITs could be characterized by evolutionary and lineage analysis. Three strains with ‘Unknown’ SITs got aligned within the sublineage 4.3.3 group, showing an evolutionary similarity with members of the H3 family, while the strains with ‘Orphans’ SITs were in the groups belonging to sublineages 4.3.3 (n = 3) and (n = 1) (Supplementary Fig. S3). A close evolutionary relationship was found between strains from Arequipa (XDR-10) and La Libertad (XDR-05), being the only representatives of the sublineage in the entire country and exhibiting an important degree of genomic differentiation with the other strains (Fig. 2). Global evolutionary relatedness showed that Peruvian XDR-TB strains were grouped in different monophyletic clades and had a close relatedness with XDR-TB strains of Lineages 4 and 2 of European countries (Supplementary Fig. S4).

Figure 2

Maximum likelihood phylogenomic tree from 68 genomes of Peruvian XDR-TB strains. The tree was based on 6,076 genome-wide SNPs. More than 74% of nodes presented a support bootstrap ≥ 70%. All nodes outlining the main subdivisions of lineages and sublineages were supported by 100% bootstrap values. Lineages are represented near the tip names. Mutations are represented by filled (presence of mutation) or empty (absence of mutation) icons. The figure was created using iTOL v5 (

Transmission cluster determination

The analysis of pairwise genetic differences showed a high number of strains that differed by large amounts of SNPs. The genetic distance between strains varied from 5 to 1,272 SNPs with an interquartile range of 373 and a median of 772 (Supplementary Fig. S5). The WGS analysis determined that most strains were not related at genetic level with only 23 strains forming part of nine transmission clusters (clustering rate of 34%), each one comprising between two and five strains (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. S6). These clusters consisted mainly of strains from Lineage 4 (91.3%). The largest clusters were integrated by strains of the sublineages 4.3.3 (cluster 5; n = 5) and (cluster 4; n = 4). Clusters 1 (sublineage 4.1.1/X3/SIT91) and 8 (sublineage were integrated by strains with sublineages not present in the other clusters and presented an average distance to the closest cluster of 525 SNPs. The rest of the clusters of Lineage 4 were integrated by strains of sublineages and 4.3.3. Thus, clusters 2 and 4 (sublineage, and 3 (sublineage presented an average distance between them of 123.5 SNPs. While clusters 5, 6 and 7 (sublineage 4.3.3/LAM/SIT1355) presented an average distance between them of 17.5 SNPs. The cluster belonging to Lineage 2 (sublineage 2.2.1/Beijing/SIT1) had a considerable minimum distance of 1198 SNPs with the nearest cluster of Lineage 4 (Fig. 3).

Figure 3

Peruvian XDR-TB strains cluster analysis. (A) Map of the districts of Lima and Callao that contain XDR-TB strains associated in transmission clusters. Barranca is not specified since it is located outside Lima (north side). (B) Inferred transmission network based on pairwise genetic distances. Each node represents one XDR-TB strain. The number of SNPs that separate the different strains within and between clusters is specified. Arrows indicate the potential direction of transmission within clusters. The node numbers are derived from the ‘XDR-#’ format in Fig. 2. Figure 3A was generated with QGIS v3.14.15 ( Figure 3B was generated using R package Igraph v1.2.6 (

All clustered strains came from Lima region (n = 21) and Callao province (n = 2). Regarding the strains of Lima region, 17 belonged to the east zone, one to the centre (in the area bordering the east zone), two to the south zone and one to the provinces (Supplementary Table S4). Regarding the variability of sources of infection, clusters 2 and 6 were composed of strains belonging to a single infection district (Ate and El Agustino, respectively), while the rest of clusters were integrated by at least two districts. The cluster with more members (cluster 5) was integrated by strains from the bordering districts of San Juan de Lurigancho and El Agustino. In the same way, cluster 4 was formed by four strains from the geographically close districts of San Juan de Lurigancho, Santa Anita and La Victoria. The remaining groups consisted of only two strains that came mainly from geographically separate districts (Fig. 3).

Regarding drug resistance, all the strains that made up the same cluster shared the mutations associated with resistance for rifampicin and isoniazid drugs. The strains integrating clusters 1, 2, 3, and 9 (n = 8) shared the rpoB S450L and katG S315T mutations, likewise the strains integrating clusters 5, 6, 7 and 8 (n = 11) shared the rpoB D435V and katG S315T mutations. Finally, the strains in cluster 4 shared the rpoB H445R, katG S315T and inhA c-15t mutations. Regarding resistance to second-line drugs, it was evidenced that not all the strains integrating a single cluster shared the same type of mutations. All the strains integrating clusters 1, 3 and 8 (n = 6) shared the rrs a1401g and gyrA D94G mutations. Similarly, all the strains in cluster 4 had the tlyA V198fs and gyrA A90V mutations. However, clusters 7 and 9 (n = 4) presented variations in resistance mutations only to levofloxacin, cluster 5 (n = 5) presented variations in resistance only to second-line injectables, and clusters 2 and 6 (n = 4) presented variations for both types of drugs (Supplementary Table S4).


In our study, we found that most XDR-TB strains belonged to the Euro-American lineage (Linage 4), in agreement with studies that claim that this lineage is the largest in the world and the more prevalent in America continent. In general, the geographical source of the sequenced samples was representative of XDR-TB affecting the entire country: 85% of the included strains were from Lima and Callao, virtually the same proportion reported by Alarcon7 and Soto9. Another important finding is that there is a high genomic diversity in our XDR-TB strains, based on the large number of sublineages obtained. However, recent transmission clusters were detected only in 34% of the strains analysed.

Concerning the mutations conferring resistance to antituberculosis drugs, currently in Peru, molecular resistance screening for first and second-line antituberculosis drugs is performed by the line probe assays: GenoType MTBDRplus v2 and GenoType MTBDRsl v2. However, these assays only concentrate the analysis on genetic hotspots. Consistent with previous studies, our results indicate that rifampicin resistance is mainly caused by mutations at codons 450, 445 and 435 of rpoB gene44,45,46. We also detected Q432P mutation which has a high confidence grade for rifampicin resistance development and S431R mutation which in turn has insufficient data according to WHO-NGS Technical Guide, despite having been associated with rifampicin resistant phenotypes47. The rifampicin-discordant strain presented the I491F mutation located outside the RRDR. This mutation was previously reported in Peru43 and WHO consider it as a variant with minimum confidence grade30. The isoniazid resistance was predominantly driven by the katG S315T (AGC → ACC) mutation followed by inhA c-15t. The rare variant inhA g-17t was also present in a low frequency in concordance to previous studies16,48. This mutation is indirectly detected by the GenoType MTBDRplus v2. Finally, the isoniazid-discordant strain presented the inhA S94A mutation that is known to confer isoniazid resistance in clinical and experimental studies49, and was also previously identified in Peruvian strains43. Levofloxacin resistance was mainly driven by mutations occurring at gyrA gene. However, it also was detected the gyrB E501D mutation which was previously associated with conferring resistance only to Moxifloxacin or ciprofloxacin50,51, although our results indicate that it also confers resistance to levofloxacin and has never been reported before in Peruvian strains. Strains that did not harbour mutations in either gyrA or gyrB genes suggests the existence of alternatives mechanisms of resistance like alterations in genes related to efflux pumps as well as DNA mimicry52,53,54. The presence of strains showing mutations in both genes was evidenced. A double mutation has previously associated with higher minimum inhibitory concentrations and may be associated with a decreased fitness55, but it could not be determined in this study. All only kanamycin resistant strains exhibited the rrs a1401g mutation which is strongly associated with resistance to high concentrations of kanamycin and amikacin30. Similarly, the simultaneous resistance to kanamycin and capreomycin is associated with high confidence mutations in the rrs gene (a1401g, c1402t and g1484t) associated with cross resistance to both drugs30. However, strains with no mutation at rrs, eis or tlyA genes suggest the presence of additional resistance mechanism like alterations in L10 and L12 genes (for capreomycin resistance)56 and overexpression of whiB7 and efflux pump genes (for kanamycin resistance)57,58. This behaviour has been previously reported in other studies, including Peru59,60.

The analysis of phylogenetic SNPs and spoligotypes evidenced a predominance of Lineage 4 between the XDR-TB strains analysed, which is in accordance with studies that claim that this lineage is the largest in the world and the more prevalent in America continent. The high circulation of XDR-TB strains belonging to the sublineages 4.3.3/LAM, 4.3.3/LAM9,, (n = 18) and (n = 10) are in accordance with the fact that they are considered the most widely distributed sublineages worldwide. Likewise, the presence of the 4.1.1/X3 sublineage was evidenced, which has been observed mainly in America61. The high number of strains belonging to Lineage 4 is a characteristic of America, and can be understood due to the colonization of the American continent by European emigrants (founder effect), which is estimated to have occurred approximately between the years 1466 and 159362. The low frequency of Peruvian XDR-TB strains belonging to Lineage 2 reveals the recent incorporation of this Lineage into the territory. The same behaviour has been reported in countries such as Ecuador and Chile63,64. The proportion of strains belonging to the Beijing family (8.8%) is very similar to what was obtained in previous studies carried out in Peru in the years 2012 (9.3%)65 and in 2014 (9.2%)12. This permanence of the proportion of Lineage 2 strains through the years suggests that in Peru the XDR-TB strains of the Beijing family would not necessarily be associated with greater virulent capacity or drug-resistant factors as previously determined66. Also, our study suggests that until 2015, the XDR-TB strains belonging to Lineage 2 could still be geographically restricted to Lima region and Callao province.

In general, most sublineages, in addition to being present in some regions, were also present in Lima and Callao. This evidence the still existing centralization of the country's political-economic power in Lima and Callao. However, additionally, the appearance of local sublineages was observed such as which was present only in the regions of Arequipa and La Libertad, 2.2.1/Beijing/SIT1 present only in the Lima region and the Callao province, and present only in Madre de Dios. These sublineages of local distribution would suggest the existence of restricted transmission clusters present in these areas, which would include strains with different drug-resistant profiles. Coincidentally, the strains present in the geographically distant regions of La Libertad (northern Peru) and Arequipa (southern Peru) revealed a transmission nexus not so distant between them (only 28 SNPs apart) evidencing the existence of a common genetic ancestor for both regions.

Our results establish that the LAM family was dominant among the Peruvian XDR-TB strains analysed, which is consistent with that evidenced in neighbouring South American countries67,68,69,70,71,72. However, it disagrees with a previous study also carried out on Peruvian XDR-TB strains in which it was established that the dominant family was Haarlem12. One possible reason for this disagreement is that the previous study included strains from previous years (2007–2009) which suggests the possible occurrence of a shift in the prevalence of XDR-TB strain families in Peru over the years. On the other hand, a more recent study carried out on Peruvian MDR-TB strains agrees with our results, establishing the LAM family as the predominant family in Peru73.

The transmission clusters obtained confirm that XDR-TB strains are concentrated on the districts of Lima region which are more associated with poverty, overcrowding and less access to health systems. These demographic variables have already been previously well characterized in studies of Peru and the world, but is not being tackled appropriately74. The uniform composition of mutations associated with resistance to rifampicin and isoniazid drugs in the clusters establish that the transmission of strains in the same cluster possibly occurred initially at the level of MDR-TB strains. However, a deep insight into the clusters revealed a heterogeneous composition within each cluster regarding mutations associated with resistance to second-line drugs. This suggests the de novo emergence of the mutations that led to the XDR-TB phenotype. This discontinuity in the clusters of mutations associated with second-line resistance and the low clustering rate (34%) of strains grouped in recent transmission chains suggest that the main mechanism of acquiring an XDR-TB strain is not through by direct contact, but by failures in the individual treatment of less severe forms of tuberculosis. Furthermore, the large genetic distances observed indicate that XDR-TB strains are related by common remote ancestors, rather than caused by recent transmission events. However, it should be noted that the lack of genomic characterization of all XDR-TB strains circulating in the country, as well as strains isolated from relatives or direct contacts, may lead to the existence of missing links that underestimate the true proportion of recent transmission events in Peruvian community.

The fact that clusters 2, 3 and 4 shared the sublineage (average distance of 123.5 SNPs) and that clusters 5, 6 and 7 shared the 4.3.3/LAM sublineage (average distance of 17.5 SNPs) establishes that Whole genome sequencing showed a higher resolution capacity in Peruvian XDR-TB strains compared to the classic spoligotyping system and the previously proposed barcode system32. However, it is important to have epidemiological information on patients that complements the genomic links, since it is possible that cases with well-established epidemiological links may escape the pre-established cut-off points75.

The study highlights the use of whole genome sequencing in the analysis of XDR-TB strains circulating in Peru. It is shown that the information obtained allows a high-resolution characterization of severe drug-resistant forms of TB. The use of genomic information would allow a complete characterization of drug-resistant mutations affecting MTB strains, as well as elucidate transmission links in high-prevalence communities. Furthermore, the incorporation of this methodology in the routine diagnosis of tuberculosis at the national level would improve the control of tuberculosis and its various drug-resistant forms.


This study highlights the relevance and utility of performing Whole Genome Sequencing as a high-resolution approach to perform genetic analysis of XDR-TB strains circulating in Peru. We performed phylogenomic analysis based on both SNPs and spoligotypes evidencing the predominance of Lineage 4 through XDR-TB strains circulating in Peru. Also, transmission analysis indicates that the main mechanism of acquisition of XDR-TB is through failures in the individual treatment of less severe forms of tuberculosis. Finally, the prediction of resistance, determination of transmission groups, and evolutionary analysis can be effectively evaluated using WGS to improve the understanding of XDR-TB dynamics in these settings and provide precise information to improve control measures of TB in Peru.

Study limitations

The study had the main limitation that only basic epidemiological tracing data were available for all patients whose isolates were included in the study. Likewise, we were not able to sequence all the XDR-TB strains obtained between the years 2011–2015. We only included viable strains recovered from the Peruvian NIH collection. Furthermore, due to the size of the sequencing reads obtained, the reliable genotype of the repetitive regions could not be obtained. This limited the analyses to only SNP-like variants that were not present in these regions. Finally, insertions and deletions (INDELs) were not included in the transmission analyses. It is possible that the omission of these genetic regions and INDEL-like variants could have masked additional genetic diversity in the samples evaluated.

Data availability

All data generated and analysed in the study are included in this article and its supplementary files. Sequencing reads have been submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject ID: PRJNA707145.


  1. 1.

    World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2020. (2020).

  2. 2.

    World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2019. (2019).

  3. 3.

    Günther, G. et al. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Europe, 2010–2011. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 21, 409–416 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Matteelli, A., Roggi, A. & Carvalho, A. C. Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: Epidemiology and management. Clin. Epidemiol. 6, 111–118 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Günther, G. et al. Availability, price and affordability of anti-tuberculosis drugs in Europe: A TBNET survey. Eur. Respir. J. 45, 1081–1088 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bonilla Asalde, C. Situación de la tuberculosis en el Perú: Current status. Acta Méd. Peruana 25, 163–170 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Alarcón, V., Alarcón, E., Figueroa, C. & Mendoza-Ticona, A. Tuberculosis en el Perú: Situación epidemiológica, avances y desafíos para su control. Rev. Peruana Med. Exp. Salud Publ. 34, 299–310 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Rios Vidal, J. Situación de Tuberculosis en el Perú y la respuesta del Estado (Plan de Intervención, Plan de Acción). (2018).

  9. 9.

    Soto Cabezas, M. G. et al. Perfil epidemiológico de la tuberculosis extensivamente resistente en el Perú 2013–2015. Rev. Panam Salud Publ. 44, 1–10 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Barletta, F. et al. Genetic variability of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in patients with no known risk factors for MDR-TB in the North-Eastern part of Lima, Peru. BMC Infect. Dis. 13, 397 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Capcha, A. L. et al. Perfiles genéticos (IS6110) y patrones de resistencia en aislamientos de M. tuberculosis de pacientes con tuberculosis pulmonar Lima Sur Perú. Rev. Peruana Med. Exp. Salud Publ. 22, 4–11 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cáceres, O. et al. Characterization of the genetic diversity of extensively-drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Peru. PLoS ONE 9, e112789 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Brown, T. S. et al. Genomic epidemiology of lineage 4 Mycobacterium tuberculosis subpopulations in New York City and New Jersey, 1999–2009. BMC Genom. 17, 947 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Roetzer, A. et al. Whole genome sequencing versus traditional genotyping for investigation of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis outbreak: A longitudinal molecular epidemiological study. PLoS Med. 10, 12 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Walker, T. M. et al. Whole-genome sequencing to delineate Mycobacterium tuberculosis outbreaks: A retrospective observational study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 13, 137–146 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Walker, T. M. et al. Whole-genome sequencing for prediction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug susceptibility and resistance: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 15, 1193–1202 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gilchrist, C. A., Turner, S. D., Riley, M. F., Petri, W. A. & Hewlett, E. L. Whole-genome sequencing in outbreak analysis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 28, 541–563 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Niemann, S. et al. Genomic diversity among drug sensitive and multidrug resistant isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with identical DNA fingerprints. PLoS ONE 4, e7407 (2009).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Schürch, A. C. et al. The tempo and mode of molecular evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis at patient-to-patient scale. Infect. Genet. Evol. 10, 108–114 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wood, D. E. & Salzberg, S. L. Kraken: Ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. 15, R46 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26, 589–595 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: A flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R. Foundation Statistical Computing, 2019).

  26. 26.

    McKenna, A. et al. The genome analysis toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Cingolani, P. et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff. Fly 6, 80–92 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Carver, T., Harris, S. R., Berriman, M., Parkhill, J. & McQuillan, J. A. Artemis: an integrated platform for visualization and analysis of high-throughput sequence-based experimental data. Bioinformatics 28, 464–469 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    World Health Organization. Technical Guide on Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies for the Detection of Mutations Associated with Drug Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex. (World Health Organization, 2018).

  31. 31.

    Steiner, A., Stucki, D., Coscolla, M., Borrell, S. & Gagneux, S. KvarQ: Targeted and direct variant calling from fastq reads of bacterial genomes. BMC Genom. 15, 881 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Coll, F. et al. A robust SNP barcode for typing Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains. Nat. Commun. 5, 4812 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Xia, E., Teo, Y.-Y. & Ong, R.T.-H. SpoTyping: Fast and accurate in silico Mycobacterium spoligotyping from sequence reads. Genome Med 8, 19 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kozlov, A. M., Darriba, D., Flouri, T., Morel, B. & Stamatakis, A. RAxML-NG: A fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 35, 4453–4455 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R. & Posada, D. jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and high-performance computing. Nat. Methods 9, 772 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Phelan, J. E. et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis whole genome sequencing provides insights into the Manila strain and drug-resistance mutations in the Philippines. Sci. Rep. 9, 9305 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Jabbar, A. et al. Whole genome sequencing of drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from a high burden tuberculosis region of North West Pakistan. Sci Rep 9, 1 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Guerra-Assunção, J. et al. Large-scale whole genome sequencing of M. tuberculosis provides insights into transmission in a high prevalence area. Elife 4, e05166 (2015).

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Guerra-Assunção, J. A. et al. Recurrence due to relapse or reinfection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A whole-genome sequencing approach in a large, population-based cohort with a high HIV infection prevalence and active follow-up. J. Infect. Dis. 211, 1154–1163 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Paradis, E. & Schliep, K. Ape 5.0: An environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics 35, 526–528 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Jombart, T., Eggo, R. M., Dodd, P. J. & Balloux, F. Reconstructing disease outbreaks from genetic data: A graph approach. Heredity 106, 383–390 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Jombart, T. adegenet: A R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24, 1403–1405 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Solari, L., Santos-Lazaro, D. & Puyen, Z. M. Mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates with discordant results for drug-susceptibility testing in Peru. Int. J. Microbiol. 2020, 8253546 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Agapito, J. et al. Caracterización de las mutaciones en el gen rpoβ asociadas a la rifampicina en pacientes con tuberculosis pulmonar. Rev. Peruana Med. Exp. Salud Publ. 19, 117–123 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Sandoval, R., Monteghirfo, M., Salazar, O. & Galarza, M. Resistencia cruzada entre isoniacida y etionamida y su alta correlación con la mutación C-15T en aislamientos de Mycobacterium tuberculosis de Perú. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 52, 36–42 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Farhat, M. R. et al. Rifampicin and rifabutin resistance in 1003 Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 74, 1477–1483 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Miotto, P., Cabibbe, A. M., Borroni, E., Degano, M. & Cirillo, D. M. Role of disputed mutations in the rpoB gene in interpretation of automated liquid MGIT culture results for rifampin susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 56, e01599-e1617 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Sadri, H., Farahani, A. & Mohajeri, P. Frequency of mutations associated with isoniazid-resistant in clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains by low-cost and density (LCD) DNA microarrays. Ann. Trop. Med. Public Health 9, 307 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Shaw, D. J. et al. Disruption of key NADH-binding pocket residues of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis InhA affects DD-CoA binding ability. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–7 (2017).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Ali, A. et al. Whole genome sequencing based characterization of extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Pakistan. PLoS ONE 10, e0117771 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Malik, S., Willby, M., Sikes, D., Tsodikov, O. V. & Posey, J. E. New Insights into fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Functional genetic analysis of gyrA and gyrB mutations. PLoS ONE 7, e39754 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Takiff, H. E. et al. Efflux pump of the proton antiporter family confers low-level fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium smegmatis. PNAS 93, 362–366 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Louw, G. E. et al. A balancing act: Efflux/Influx in mycobacterial drug resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53, 3181–3189 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Hegde, S. S. et al. A fluoroquinolone resistance protein from Mycobacterium tuberculosis that mimics DNA. Science 308, 1480–1483 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Luo, T. et al. Double mutation in DNA gyrase confers moxifloxacin resistance and decreased fitness of Mycobacterium smegmatis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 72, 1893–1900 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Lin, Y. et al. The antituberculosis antibiotic capreomycin inhibits protein synthesis by disrupting interaction between ribosomal proteins L12 and L10. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 2038–2044 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Reeves, A. Z. et al. Aminoglycoside cross-resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis due to mutations in the 5′ untranslated region of whiB7. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 1857–1865 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Sowajassatakul, A., Prammananan, T., Chaiprasert, A. & Phunpruch, S. Overexpression of eis without a mutation in promoter region of amikacin- and kanamycin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical strain. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 17, 33 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Guio, H., Tarazona, D., Galarza, M., Borda, V. & Curitomay, R. Genome analysis of 17 extensively drug-resistant strains reveals new potential mutations for resistance. Genome Announc. 2, e00759-e814 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Sowajassatakul, A., Prammananan, T., Chaiprasert, A. & Phunpruch, S. Molecular characterization of amikacin, kanamycin and capreomycin resistance in M/XDR-TB strains isolated in Thailand. BMC Microbiol. 14, 165 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Stucki, D. et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Lineage 4 comprises globally distributed and geographically restricted sublineages. Nat. Genet. 48, 1535–1543 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Brynildsrud, O. B. et al. Global expansion of Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineage 4 shaped by colonial migration and local adaptation. Sci. Adv. 4, 5869 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Jiménez, P. et al. Identification of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing lineage in Ecuador. Biomedica 37, 233–237 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Meza, P. et al. Presence of Bejing genotype among Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in two centres of the Region Metropolitana of Chile. Rev. Chil. Infectol. 31, 21–27 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Iwamoto, T. et al. Genetic diversity and transmission characteristics of beijing family strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Peru. PLoS ONE 7, e49651 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Sheen, P. et al. Genetic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Peru and exploration of phylogenetic associations with drug resistance. PLoS ONE 8, e65873 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Garzon-Chavez, D. et al. Population structure and genetic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Ecuador. Sci. Rep. 10, 6237 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Machado, L. N. C. et al. First baseline of circulating genotypic lineages of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in patients from the Brazilian borders with Argentina and Paraguay. PLoS ONE 9, e107106 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Lagos, J. et al. Analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotypic lineage distribution in Chile and neighboring countries. PLoS ONE 11, e0160434 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Realpe, T. et al. Population structure among Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Colombia. PLoS ONE 9, e93848 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Verza, M. et al. Genomic epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Santa Catarina, Southern Brazil. Sci. Rep. 10, 12891 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Díaz Acosta, C. C. et al. Exploring the “Latin American Mediterranean” family and the RDRio lineage in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Paraguay, Argentina and Venezuela. BMC Microbiol. 19, 131 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Grandjean, L. et al. Convergent evolution and topologically disruptive polymorphisms among multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Peru. PLoS ONE 12, e0189838 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Zaman, K. Tuberculosis: A global health problem. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 28, 111–113 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Luo, T. et al. Whole-genome sequencing to detect recent transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in settings with a high burden of tuberculosis. Tuberculosis 94, 434–440 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We express our thanks to all staff of the NRLM and to the national network of tuberculosis laboratories, for the routine work in the isolation and identification of different strains that were included in this study. This research was supported by the Peruvian National Institute of Health and the National Program of Innovation for Competitiveness and Productivity (INNOVATE-Peru) under the contract N° 353-PNICP-PIAP-2014 and the Dirección de Investigación-Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (A-189-2021), Lima-Peru.

Author information




Conceptualization: D.S.L., L.S., R.G.G., A.N.V., Z.M.P.; Formal analysis: D.S.L., R.G.G., Z.M.P.; Investigation: D.S.L., L.S., R.G.G., A.N.V., Z.M.P.; Methodology: D.S.L., R.G.G., Z.M.P.; Project administration: Z.M.P.; Original draft preparation: D.S.L., Z.M.P.; Review and editing: D.S.L., L.S., R.G.G., A.N.V., Z.M.P. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zully M. Puyen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santos-Lazaro, D., Gavilan, R.G., Solari, L. et al. Whole genome analysis of extensively drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in Peru. Sci Rep 11, 9493 (2021).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing