Introduction

In recent years, pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with gas tamponade has become the standard treatment for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs)1,2,3. The principle of gas tamponade is that the gas closes the retinal beaks and prevents the vitreous fluid from entering through breaks into the subretinal space4,5. Therefore, a proper postoperative position should be maintained after PPV with gas tamponade so that the gas can adequately cover the retinal breaks until the retina is well attached.

The postoperative position after PPV with gas tamponade, particularly for inferior breaks, remains controversial. At present, a strict prone position is recommended6,7,8,9,10,11 to prevent postoperative complications, such as pupillary block, intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation/iris capture, and IOL/cornea touch. However, some patients may experience difficulty in maintaining a strict prone position for medical or physical conditions12,13,14. In addition, Martinez-Castillo et al. reported that PPV alone, with no prone position in the postoperative period, achieves a high reattachment rate without severe postoperative complications in the management of pseudophakic RRDs due to inferior retinal breaks15. We have previously demonstrated using magnetic resonance imaging that intraocular gas may cover the peripheral retina better in the supine position than in the prone position16. However, sitting and lateral positions are also used postoperatively. In addition, intraocular gas decreases with time after surgery, and the intraocular gas makes the contact angle to the retina that affects retinal gas coverage5. Therefore, determining how much area the gas covers in the target retina after PPV with gas tamponade is difficult, and no previous reports have examined changes in retinal gas coverage based on the intraocular gas volume and positions.

Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) analysis is suitable to observe the distribution of gas and fluid considering the physical properties, such as contact angles and surface tensions. Angunawela et al. reported on fluid shear stresses using CFD software on the retinal wall in a model eye after vitrectomy and gas tamponade in relation to eye and head movements17. However, no previous report has examined changes in retinal gas coverage based on the intraocular gas volume and positions using fluid analysis. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate how the retinal gas coverage changes due to the intraocular gas volume and positions using fluid analysis as well as to demonstrate the appropriate postoperative positions after PPV with gas tamponade for RRDs based on the gas volume and the location of breaks.

Methods

Computational eye model

A computer model of a pseudophakic eye was designed using three-dimensional (3D) modeling software (3D Builder; Microsoft Corporation, WA, USA). The model eye was simplified to a sphere, with the anterior 2.5 mm portion of the sphere removed to best reflect the vitreous cavity of a pseudophakic eye18, and separated at 1:30, 4:30, 7:30, and 10:30 into four quadrants (Fig. 1). The majority of human eyes with RRDs have an axial length of > 24 mm, therefore, we used 24-mm, 25-mm, 26-mm, and 31-mm diameter sphere for analysis. The maximum vertical and horizontal linear dimensions of the eyeball have been shown to be linearly related to axial length19. Hence, when changing the axial length of the eye, the simplified model with the anterior 2.5 mm part removed was maintained, and its overall diameter was proportionately increased or decreased. We then defined the position of the ora serrata of the superior, nasal, temporal, and inferior retina as per the anatomical differences as 7.4 mm, 5.5 mm, 6.9 mm, and 6.7 mm posterior to the simulated limbus, respectively. Next, we defined the equator, according to the vortex vein ampullae, as 6.5 mm posterior to the ora serrata in each retinal area20. Therefore, the anterior retina to the equator, where retinal tears are usually found21, was separated into four parts: superior, nasal, inferior, and temporal (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
figure 1

The 24-mm eye model of a pseudophakic eye and resting positions. (A) Supine; (B) sitting, (C) prone with closed eyes, (D) prone, (E) lower temporal, and (F) lower nasal positions.

Direction of the eye model

Figure 1A–F shows resting positions of the 24 mm eye model, which represents the postoperative body positions. We have previously reported that even if patients superficially maintain a strict prone position with eyes closed, the mean supraduction angle (°) of the eyeball to the perpendicular line is positive (16.1°)16. Therefore, six resting positions of the eyeball examined were as follows:

  1. 1.

    Supine: The direction of the eyeball is 90° upward from the horizontal line

  2. 2.

    Sitting: The direction of the eyeball is parallel to the horizontal line

  3. 3.

    Prone with closed eyes: The supraduction angle of the eyeball to the perpendicular line is 16.1°

  4. 4.

    Prone: The direction of the eyeball is 90° downward from the horizontal line

  5. 5.

    Lower temporal: The eyeball was rotated 90° from the sitting position, such that the temporal retina was on the horizon side

  6. 6.

    Lower nasal: The eyeball was rotated 90° from the sitting position, such that the nasal retina was on the horizon side

Calculating the wettability of the surface

CFD software (PHOENICS; Concentration Heat and Momentum Ltd, London) was used to calculate the wettability of the surface of the eye model using cut cell method, with different gas volumes from 10 to 90%, in increments of 10% to the vitreous cavity. The cut cell method is developed particularly for improving the calculation accuracy of diagonally arranged objects. In this method, the intersection of the outline and mesh of the arranged object are investigated, and the area and volume in which the fluid flows are calculated. When friction occurs, the friction force is given by vector-decomposing the intersection coordinates in the direction of the solid inclination. The water properties were as follows: temperature, 37 °C; density, 998.23 kg/m3; kinematic viscosity, 1.006E−6 m2/s; and volume expansion rate, 1.18E−4 1/K. We used air properties as the tamponade gas and they were as follows: temperature, 37 °C; density, 1.1892 kg/m3; kinematic viscosity, 1.544E−05 m2/s; and volume expansion rate, 3.41E−3 1/K. The air–water–retina interface was characterized by a surface tension of 0.072 N/m and a contact angle of 38.8°5. A pressure relief point was set in the gas, and the surface wettability of the eye model was calculated as the SURN variable, which represents the volume fraction of the water on the eye model and was shown diagrammatically as surface contour.

Measurement of gas cover rates of the retina

Figure 2 shows the process of measuring the gas cover rate. The surface contour of the SURN variable and the wireframe of the eye model are displayed simultaneously, and the gas covered retinal area where the SURN was 0.0 was measured using 3D modeling software (Blender 2.80). The gas cover rate was calculated as (the gas covered area) / (the total area of the retina at each quadrant) × 100% in the supine, sitting, lower nasal, lower temporal, prone with closed eyes, and prone positions.

Figure 2
figure 2

Process of measuring the gas cover rate of the inferior retina in the prone position with closed eyes with 90% gas to the vitreous cavity. (A) The surface contour of the SURN variable and wireframe of the eye model are displayed simultaneously. (B) The retinal area covered by the gas where the SURN is 0.0, and (C) the total retinal area was measured.

Results

Gas cover rate in each retinal area

Superior retina

Table 1 show the gas cover rates of the superior retina of 24-, 25-, 26-, and 31-mm eye model, respectively. In the sitting position, the gas cover rate was 100% until the gas volume was reduced to 10% in all models. In the supine position, the gas cover rate was 100% until the gas volume was reduced to 70% in all models. In the prone with closed eyes position, the gas cover rate was maintained at 100% until the gas volume was reduced to 80% in all models. In the lateral position, the gas cover rate was maintained at 100% until the gas volume was reduced to 90% in all models. In the prone position, the gas cover rate was maintained at 100% until the gas volume was reduced to 90% in 24-mm model and 80% in 25-, 26- and 31-mm models, respectively.

Table 1 Gas cover rates of the superior retina of 24-, 25-, 26- and 31-mm eye models.

Nasal retina

Table 2 show the gas cover rates of the nasal retina of 24-, 25-, 26-, and 31-mm eye model, respectively. In the lower temporal position, the gas cover rate was 100% until the gas volume was reduced to 10% in all models. In the supine position, the gas cover rate was 100% until the gas volume was reduced to 60% in all models. In the sitting and prone positions, the gas cover rate was maintained at 100% until the gas volume was reduced to 90% in all models. In the prone with closed eyes position, the gas cover rate was < 100%, despite the gas volume being 90%. In the lower nasal position, the gas cover rate was already 0%, despite the gas volume being 90% in all models.

Table 2 Gas cover rates of the nasal retina of 24-, 25-, 26- and 31-mm eye models.

Temporal retina

Tables 3 show the gas cover rates of the temporal retina of 24-, 25-, 26-, and 31-mm eye model, respectively. In the lower nasal position, the gas cover rate was 100% until the gas volume was reduced to 10% in all models. In the supine position, the gas cover rate was 100% until the gas volume was reduced to 70%. In the sitting and prone positions, the gas cover rate was maintained at 100% until the gas volume was reduced to 90% in all models. In the prone with closed eyes position, the gas cover rate was < 100%, despite the gas volume being 90% in all models. In the lower temporal position, the gas cover rate was already 0%, despite the gas volume being 90% in all models.

Table 3 Gas cover rates of the temporal retina of 24-, 25-, 26- and 31-mm eye models.

Inferior retina

Tables 4 show the gas cover rates of the inferior retina of 24-, 25-, 26-, and 31-mm eye model, respectively. In the supine position, the gas cover rate was 100% until the gas volume was reduced to 70% in all models. In the prone and lateral positions, the gas cover rate was 100% until the gas volume was reduced to 90% in all models. In the prone with closed eyes position, the gas cover rate was already 75% in 24-mm model and < 60% in 25-, 26-, and 31-mm models, respectively, although the gas volume was 90%. In the sitting position, the gas cover rate was already 0%, despite the gas volume being 90% in all models.

Table 4 Gas cover rates of the inferior retina of 24-, 25-, 26- and 31-mm eye models.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate using fluid analysis to show how the retinal gas cover rate changes due to the intraocular gas volume and positions. Our results demonstrate that if retinal breaks were located anterior to the equator, the prone position may not provide an adequate gas coverage for the retina. In contrast, if breaks are limited to the inferior retina anterior to the equator or if multiple breaks are located in two or more quadrants anterior to the equator, the supine position maintains a 100% gas cover rate in all retinal breaks for longer than other positions. Although the potential postoperative complications caused by the supine position require careful attention, our result may contribute to better surgical outcomes of RRDs, a reduction in the duration of the postoperative prone position and may reduce the patients’ discomfort after PPV with gas tamponade for RRDs.

The contact angle between a given tamponade gas and the retinal surface depends on the interactions of three phases: gas, retina, and fluid. It has been reported that the mean contact angle measured for air bubble against the retina in the fluid was 38.8°5. In the current study, fluid analysis, considering the contact angle, and the surface tension allowed the gas cover rates of the retina to be calculated more accurately. The existence of a contact angle and meniscus leads to a reduction in the gas cover rate for a given volume of gas (Fig. 3).

Figure 3
figure 3

Surface contour in the prone with closed eyes position, with 90% gas to the vitreous cavity. (A) From the side view. The gray translucent blockage represents the water object set to have a 10% volume to the vitreous cavity before fluid analysis. The surface contour represents after analysis. (B) Enlarged image of (A). The black arrows indicate the initial height of the water before analysis, and the white arrows indicate the line where the SURN is 0.0, which indicates complete coverage by the gas after analysis. The existence of surface tension and contact angle cause the line of the SURN = 0.0 to rise above the initial water level, which leads to a reduction in the gas cover rate of the retina.

Yoon et al. reported that the adhesive force was transiently reduced after laser photocoagulation of the retina, but increased beyond normal, and remained twice that of normal between 3 days and 4 weeks22. These findings indicate that all retinal breaks should be closed with the intraocular gas after PPV with gas tamponade until the strength of the adhesion by photocoagulation sufficiently prevents retinal redetachment. In the current study, all gas cover rates in each quadrant in prone position were < 100% when the gas volume was 80%. Furthermore, we have previously reported that if patients were superficially maintained in a strict prone position, the supraduction angle (°) of the eyeball to the perpendicular line was positive (16.1°; range, 6.3–29.9)16. In the current study, in the prone with closed eyes position, the gas cover rates of the nasal and temporal retinas were < 100%, despite the intraocular gas volume being 90%. Surprisingly, the gas cover rate of the inferior retina in the prone with closed eyes position was < 80%, despite the intraocular gas volume being 90%. Martinez-Castillo et al. reported that only 14.4% cases presented with a vitreous cavity that was filled ≥ 90% by air or gas at the 1 and 3 days postoperative days after PPV with air or gas tamponade for RRDs15. Therefore, if the location of the breaks are limited to either superior, nasal, or temporal, the most appropriate position is sitting, lower temporal, and lower nasal, respectively. However, in the supine position, the gas cover rates of the superior, nasal, and temporal retina were maintained at 100% until the intraocular gas volume was 70%, 60%, and 70% in all models, respectively. Therefore, the supine position may be appropriate for better gas coverage for the retina as the second choice of the position in cases where the breaks are localized at either the superior, nasal, or temporal retina. In addition, if the breaks are limited to the inferior retina anterior to the equator or if multiple breaks are in two or more quadrants anterior to the equator, the supine position may provide 100% gas cover rate in all retinal breaks for longer than other positions.

The supine position may cause some postoperative complications, such as pupillary block, anterior chamber shallowing, and IOL dislocation/iris capture. Furthermore, Shiragami et al. demonstrated that the immediate prone or facedown position after PPV with gas tamponade may prevent the retina from postoperative retinal translocation if the retinal detachment was large or if macular detachment was present6. In contrast, the postoperative facedown position reported for only 2 h prevents retinal translocation after PPV with gas tamponade for RRDs23. In addition, Otsuka et al. reported no significant difference in postoperative complications between patients with RRDs in a prone position and those in a prone position on the day of surgery followed by the supine position24. Therefore, considering these reports as well as our results, patients with RRDs should take a strict prone or facedown position immediately following PPV with gas tamponade and maintain their position on the day of surgery. This should be followed by maintaining the appropriate position, including supine position as above on the basis of the location of breaks and the intraocular gas volume until the gas volume decreases to 70% in the vitreous cavity.

This study has some limitations. High myopia has been reported to have an irregular shape25; however, because this study involves simulation using a 3D eye model, irregular-shaped eyes could not be analyzed. This study did not consider eyeball movement, such as rotation, adduction, and abduction, as the simulation is of a stationary 3D eye model. Moreover, we considered that only one bubble was observed in the vitreous cavity and did not consider the case of multiple bubbles. Often a computer model needs a physical model for verification, which has not been performed in this study. Gas properties used in this study were of air, but clinically, different types and concentrations of gases (SF6, C2F6, and C3F8) other than air are used to treat RRD eyes. This study only considered the location of retinal breaks, not the extent of retinal detachment.

In conclusion, we demonstrated that the supine position may provide 100% gas cover rate for all retinal breaks longer than other positions when the breaks are limited to the inferior retina or multiple breaks are in two or more quadrants anterior to the equator. Although complications occurring due to the supine position should be considered, our result may contribute to better surgical outcomes of RRDs and reduced duration of a strict prone position that leads to reduced patient discomfort after PPV with gas tamponade for RRDs.