Abstract
We report the first observation of room temperature spontaneous electric polarization in an electronic ferroelectric material, a YbFe2O4 single crystal. The observation was based on second harmonic generation (SHG), a nonlinear optical process. Tensor analysis of the SHG signal revealed that this material has a polar charge superstructure with Cm symmetry. This result settles the long-term discussion on the uncertainty about electronic ferroelectric properties, including the charge order structure. We present a complete picture of the polar charge ordering of this material via consistent results from two different characterization methods. The SHG signal shows the same temperature dependence as the superlattice signal observed in neutron diffraction experiments. These results prove ferroelectric coupling to electron ordering in YbFe2O4, which results in electronic ferroelectricity which is enabled by the real space ordering of iron cations with different valences. The existence of electronic ferroelectricity holds promise for future electronics technologies where devices run a thousand times faster than frequency of the present CPU (a few gigahertz) embedded in smartphones, etc.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Ferroelectric materials have been the basis of electronics technologies and are widely used in modern electronic devices1. Essentially, the ferroelectric phenomenon is caused by a spontaneous electric polarization that originates from the spontaneous displacement of polar ions. Thus, ferroelectrics function via the collective motion of ions, i.e., optical phonons and their freezing process. With the development of modern electronics technology, the operating frequency of ferroelectrics must be increased and their driving electric field reduced to realize high-speed and low-energy devices. Additionally, conventional phonon-driven ferroelectrics must overcome the fatigue effects that arise from repeated polarization reversals and ferroelectricity degradation2,3.
In 2005, a novel type of ferroelectric material was proposed in which the spontaneous polarization mainly originates from the polar ordering of electrons rather than ionic atoms. Such materials are called “electronic ferroelectrics”4,5 and are expected to exhibit unique ferroelectric characteristics such as a low coercive field, excellent durability, and an ultrafast response6. In general, the kinetic energy required for an electron system is less than that for a phonon system. Therefore, if an electron-driven polarization mechanism for electronic ferroelectrics is confirmed, it might enable new technologies for high-speed and ultralow energy electronics without the inherent fatigue effects of conventional ferroelectrics.
Two-dimensional rare-earth ferrites RFe2O4 (R = Yb, Lu, Y, etc.) have been proposed as candidates for such electronic ferroelectrics. These RFe2O4 materials have the polar ordering of divalent and trivalent iron cations, Fe2+ and Fe3+, meaning that polarization switching can only be realized by electronic motion4,7. LuFe2O4 has exhibited charge ordering of Fe2+ and Fe3+ below TCO ~ 330 K and ferromagnetic iron spin order was observed below TN ~ 245 K in the doubly-stacked iron triangular layers called “W-layers”4,5. The interrelated electrical and magnetic properties arising from the strongly-correlated iron electrons constitute a research topic in condensed matter physics and materials science. From the perspective of ferroelectric physics, a pyroelectric current driven by a cooling electric field, a large dielectric constant, and spontaneous polarization, were reported for the first time in 20054.
These findings indicated that the ferroelectric behavior of these materials is related to the charge ordering of Fe2+ and Fe3+ within the W-layers4,7. This implied that not only LuFe2O4 but also other rare-earth ferrites could be considered an electronic ferroelectric, wherein the electrons in the iron cations and the valence superstructure play an important role in the origin of spontaneous electric polarization. Thus, electronic ferroelectrics are expected to exhibit novel ferroelectric functions different from conventional ferroelectrics.
Some interesting characteristics of these materials have been reported. For example, their small bandgap of approximately 300 meV was found to be caused by electron hopping in the W-layers7,8. Ultrafast disruption of the charge ordering by light was also reported11. These results showed that these materials have potential application in novel ferroelectric or optical devices, where polarization switching in a low coercive field and ultrafast responses via electron hopping can be utilized. Thus, RFe2O4 materials have attracted much attention as prototypes of electronic ferroelectrics arising from charge ordering at room temperature4,9.
These observations of the favorable electronic ferroelectric properties of RFe2O4 triggered a resurgence of studies on these rare-earth ferrites. Therefore, the crystal structure and ferroelectricity of LuFe2O4 were critically re-examined. However, the high electrical conductivity due to electron hopping in RFe2O48,9 made the usual experimental methods for studying ferroelectrics difficult (see Supplementary Fig. S1). Ferroelectric properties are typically measured based on the electric field dependence of the polarization, the so-called P–E loop observation. In the case of RFe2O4, the high electrical conductivity prevents these typical P–E loop measurements10,11. Even if a P–E loop can be observed, the possibility of the banana curve12 or dielectric breakdown13 cannot be dismissed. Furthermore, de Groot et al.14,15 conducted X-ray diffraction measurements and, based on bond valence sum analysis, suggested that the iron ordering had inversion symmetry between the W-layers. Moreover, they suggested that LuFe2O4 belongs to the C2/m space group and further estimated that LuFe2O4 is neither polar nor ferroelectric.
Another experimental challenge to consider when working with these materials is the difficulty of achieving the correct oxide chemistry in rare-earth ferrites16,17,18,19. It has recently been shown that the charge order structure and, therefore, the electrical and magnetic properties in these materials are highly sensitive to the stoichiometry of not only the oxygen but also the iron content20. For example, the superlattice reflection rule of 1/3 1/3 Lh in hexagonal coordinates, which characterizes the order parameter of the iron charge ordering, is highly dependent on the quality of the crystal or the chemical stoichiometry of RFe2O4. In particular, Fujiwara et al. demonstrated that the Fe sites in RFe2O4 crystals are prone to cause atomic deficiency, and compensation for iron evaporation during crystal growth is essential to obtain the stoichiometric crystal of YbFe2O420. A subsequent X-ray diffraction measurement of this stoichiometric YbFe2O4 crystal showed that its Laue group has "2/m" symmetry based on the extinction rule of superlattice spots21, which is consistent with de Groot’s results mentioned above14,15. Figure 1a displays the YbFe2O4 monoclinic unit cell derived from analysis of the observed diffraction extinction rule of the charge ordering. However, even under these considerations, three possible space groups exist, i.e., Cm (polar), C2 (polar), and C2/m (nonpolar), as depicted in Fig. 1b. Therefore, some uncertainty regarding the mechanism of electronic polarity in YbFe2O4 still exists.
The purpose of this report is to present the first evidence of the polar charge order structure of YbFe2O4 for the stoichiometric YbFe2O4 single crystal based on second harmonic generation (SHG) spectroscopy. SHG is a second-order nonlinear effect that can be used to determine whether a crystal possesses inversion symmetry. In addition, this method of optically investigating the charge-ordered state is an ideal non-electric current approach that can sense the states of electrons with small perturbation22. We further discuss the relationship between the polar structure and iron charge ordering, which is essential for understanding electronic ferroelectric nature of YbFe2O4. We also consider the temperature dependence of SHG and neutron diffraction.
Results
Figure 2b,c show the SHG dependence on the optical polarization angle (θ) of the incident laser pulse. The angle θ is defined as the angle between the incident optical polarization direction and the bm-axis. 0° and 90° correspond to the bm- and am-axes, respectively, in the monoclinic coordinates of the charge superstructure, as shown in Fig. 2a. The analyzer is positioned after the crystal and oriented along the am-axis in Fig. 2b and along the b-axis in Fig. 2c. In both configurations, the θ dependence shows four clear leaves, with the directions of each leaf coinciding with the bm- and am-axes of the charge superstructure in monoclinic coordinates. These results are the first evidence of the polar structure of the YbFe2O4 crystal. As such, the C2/m symmetry proposed in a previous report23 can be excluded.
One may question whether the SHG signal obtained in the reflection configuration in Fig. 2a originates from the crystal surface instead of the W-layers. A finite SHG signal at 90° is observed, as shown in Fig. 2b (the surface SHG is forbidden in the Sin–Sout configuration), whereas the minimum signal is at 0° in Fig. 2c (the surface SHG is allowed in the Pin–Pout configuration). These results indicate that the surface SHG is negligible compared to the observed signal for this measurement, meaning that the results obtained represent the polarization behavior W-layers of the material.
We analyzed this θ dependence based on the second-order nonlinear susceptibility (χ(2)) deduced from the crystal symmetry24. In general, the second-order nonlinear polarization (PNL) is described as PNL = χ(2):EE, where E is the electric field of the incident light, and the SHG intensity is proportional to |PNL|2. As previously indicated, X-ray diffraction analysis suggests that the possible space groups without inversion symmetry are Cm or C2 in the monoclinic structure21. However, in space group C2, the symmetry requires the polarization to be along the bm-axis, which does not account for the observed θ dependence of the SHG in Fig. 2. Thus, we analyze Fig. 2b,c based on the only remaining possible space group, Cm. For this symmetry, the contracted tensor of χ(2) (di,j) is described as follows:
The am- and bm-axis coordinates for the representation of χ(2) are displayed in the inset of Fig. 2a. Under these conditions, the generated PNL of the crystal is PaNL(θ) \(\propto\) d11E2cos2θ + d12E2sin2θ. Further, PbNL \(\left( \theta \right){ } \propto\) 2d26E2sinθ cosθ where PaNL and PbNL are the am- and bm-axis components of PNL, respectively, extracted using the analyzer (see Fig. 2a). The red lobes in Fig. 2b,c show the analysis results based on fitting with the Cm symmetry. These results strongly indicate that the YbFe2O4 space group belongs to Cm with polarization in the (010)m plane. According to the fitting analyses, we can estimate the ratio among some of the χ(2) components (i.e., d11:d12:d26 = 1:−1.1:1.2).
The final experimental question to discuss is the relationship between the breaking of the inversion symmetry and the iron ordering in the W-layers. Figure 3b presents a contour plot of the neutron diffraction at 390 K and 440 K in the stoichiometric YbFe2O4 crystal near 1/3 1/3 L + 1/2h, where L is an integer in hexagonal coordinates. Some streaks, labeled Al 111, Al 200, and Al 220, are due to diffraction from the aluminum sample case. At 390 K, distinct superlattice structures are observed at 1/3 1/3 L + 1/2h, indicating the real-space Fe2+ and Fe3+ ordering in the W-layers25. At 440 K, in contrast, the profiles become rod-like in the [0 0 1]h direction. This indicates dimensional crossover of the iron ordering, i.e., suppression of the charge order correlation between the W-layers. The long-range ordering of the Fe cations within these layers is maintained at this elevated temperature, though.
To investigate the temperature dependence of the c-axis correlations in more detail, we evaluated the peak widths of the superlattice reflections. Figure 3a shows the temperature dependence of the inverse observed peak widths (red lines) for the 1/3 1/3 13.5h signal profile, together with the SHG intensities (blue circles). Γ, the correlation length along the c-axis, shows a sudden decrease above 400 K due to the aforementioned suppression of the charge order coherence length between the W-layers. The blue circles show the temperature dependence of the SHG signal generated from the (00L)h plane. The SHG intensity exhibits a minor change between 300 and 400 K and then abruptly decreases above 400 K, similar to the temperature dependence of Γ. This result shows that the SHG signal is correlated with the coherence length of the charge ordering along the [001]h of the iron layers, rather than with the crystal symmetry itself.
To understand this behavior, we consider the origin of the temperature dependence of the SHG signal according to the dimensional crossover of the charge ordering. For Cm symmetry, polarization exists within the (010)m plane. As such, the decrease in Γ above 400 K indicates suppression of the coherence length in the polar region that generates an SHG signal from each W-layer. This suppression causes partial cancelation of the polarization due to the random orientations of the polarization along the [001]h, as shown in the schematics of Fig. 3a, even though the ordering pattern hardly changes23. Thus, the suppression of the c-axis correlation reduces the SHG intensity. Notably, as the temperature increases to 450 K, the SHG signal persists, whereas the [001]h correlation is largely suppressed. In YbFe2O4, the penetration depth of 3.1 eV light is approximately 50 nm based on an optical measurement26. The residual SHG signal implies not only that the cancelation of the SHG signal is imperfect within the penetration depth but also that the correlation of the charge ordering in the (001)h plane is still robust at higher temperatures of approximately 500 K.
Discussion
Now that we understand the relationships between charge order structure and SHG intensity in this material, we present a complete picture of the electronic ferroelectric YbFe2O4 crystal structure and ordering patterns for the first time. In Fig. 4a, we summarize the crystal structure and the Fe2+ and Fe3+ ordering pattern in YbFe2O4 based on the monoclinic Cm symmetry, which was proven by the SHG signal and the 1/3 1/3 Lh superlattice peaks observed in the neutron diffraction pattern. In the depicted structure, Fe2+ (black circles) and Fe3+ (gray circles) coexist uniformly within the W-layers, resulting in a polar structure. Assuming fixed point charges as in the atomic positions of Fig. 1, we can estimate the magnitude of the spontaneous electric polarization to be 12.9 μC/cm2 in YbFe2O4.
As presented in Fig. 1b, for Cm symmetry polarization exists within the (010)m plane with its direction tilted away from the [001]h. According to the point charge model, the tilted angle deviation from the c-axis can be estimated as 16.5°, shown using yellow arrows in Fig. 4a,b. The direction of this polarization is potentially switchable, but only by electron hopping within the W-layers. Applying an external electric field along the [001]h causes polarization due to the charge imbalance between Fe2+ and Fe3+. As a result, the polarization direction switches in the (010)m, as shown by the yellow arrows in Fig. 4c. In contrast to ordinary ferroelectrics, this can be achieved without a structural change. This could facilitate the implementation of novel ferroelectric functions, for example, polarization or polarized domain reversal with less fatigue.
Conclusion
In summary, we report the first evidence of the polar structure of a stoichiometric YbFe2O4 crystal based on SHG spectroscopy and neutron diffraction. From the polarization analysis of the SHG signal, the point group (Cm) and the charge order structure were uniquely determined.
Furthermore, a decrease in the SHG intensity was observed above approximately 400 K. This temperature corresponds to the dimensional crossover of the charge order estimated via the neutron diffraction measurements, indicating that this SHG signal originated from the real-space Fe2+ and Fe3+ ordering. Thus, RFe2O4 materials can be considered electronic ferroelectrics driven by the electron order, without any structural phase transition. These results could possibly enable novel ferroelectric properties such as a low coercive field, excellent durability with low fatigue, and an ultrafast optical response.
Method
A single crystal was synthesized using the floating melting method. Fe2O3 (5N, Rare Metallic Co., Ltd.) and Yb2O3 (4N, Nippon Yttrium Co., Ltd.) were used as raw materials. To synthesize the sample, 10% excess Fe2O3 was added to the Yb2O3 to obtain a stoichiometric crystal. The growth rate and melting temperature were 5 mm/h and 1600 °C, respectively, in a CO/CO2 atmosphere. The stoichiometry of the synthesized sample was evaluated via X-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF) and thermo gravity analysis (TGA). The Fe/Yb ratio of the sample was estimated from the integral intensity of the Fe-Kα and Yb-Lα fluorescence line. The ratio of fluorescence intensity had been calibrated with standard samples that were a mixture of Fe2O3 and Yb2O3 powders. The error of the calibration line was estimated at less than 0.2%. TGA was obtained from DSC7300 (Hitachi High-Tech Co., Ltd.) under a dynamic flow of dry air (200 ml/min) and the sample was annealed 650 °C (8 h). The sample and reference (α-Al2O3) was pre-annealed in 120 °C (2 h) in Ar gas atmosphere to remove moisture. The result of XRF and TGA are shown in Table 1. This result was consistent with those reported in Ref.20. No impure phases were confirmed in the powder X-ray diffraction pattern using Ulutima IV (RIGAKU Co., Ltd.). The extinction rule for the X-ray diffraction observation of the crystal was observed with four-axis diffractometor HUBAR-512 with Mo–Kα and control software SPEC was used to measure the Bragg spots mapping. (003)h, (009)h, (110)h and (101)h spots were used to calculate UB matrix. These X-ray diffractions were measured at room temperature (RT). This protocol is almost the same as that in Ref.24.
Using a diamond cutter ((010)m and (100)m) and cleavage ((001)h), the fabricated crystal was cut into dimensions of 3 × 3 × 1 mm3, in which the largest plane was the (001)h. Subsequent SHG measurements were performed on this ac plane. Figure 2a shows a schematic representation of the experimental setup used for the SHG measurements. A regenerative amplified mode-locked Ti:sapphire laser system QUANTRONIX INTEGRA (pulse width of 150 fs, repetition rate of 1 kHz, and photon energy of 1.55 eV) was used as the light source. The crystal was irradiated with the laser pulse and the SHG pulse signal produced by the crystal was detected using a high pass filter. During the measurement process, the incident pulse polarization was manipulated using a half-wave plate. The SHG signal was measured in the polarization direction along [010]m (Fig. 2b) and [100]m (Fig. 2c) using the analyzer. To investigate the temperature dependence of the SHG signal, the crystal was set in a vacuum within a cryostat (Oxford MicrostatHe).
Neutron diffraction was performed at the WOMBAT beamline, ANSTO. The reciprocal space of h h lh was observed with a 2-dimensional neutron detector. The sample crystal was 3 mm in diameter and 15 mm in length. The incident wavelength was 2.41 Å, and the beam size was 15 mm (horizontally) and 30 mm (vertically). The magnetism was confirmed to be almost the same as that of the SHG sample. Based on the scattering angle 2θ, the sample rotation angle with respect to the incident beam, ω, and the intensity were recorded and processed. The diffracted intensity was summed along the H −H 0 h direction in reciprocal space (corresponding to the height of the 2D detector) to amplify the signal intensity. The reciprocal map of the HH0h–00Lh slice was processed from these data using LAMP software28. The details of neutron diffraction of stoichiometric YbFe2O4 are described in Ref.23.
References
Scott, J. F. Applications of modern ferroelectrics. Science 315, 954–959 (2007).
Yoo, I. K. & Desu, S. B. Mechanism of fatigue in ferroelectric thin films. Phys. Status Solidi A 133, 565–573 (1992).
Duiker, H. M. et al. Fatigue and switching in ferroelectric memories: Theory and experiment. J. Appl. Phys. 68, 5783–5791 (1990).
Ikeda, N. et al. Ferroelectricity from iron valence ordering in the charge-frustrated system LuFe2O4. Nature 436, 1136–1138 (2005).
Ishihara, S. Electronic ferroelectricity and frustration. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 79, 011010 (2010).
Itoh, H. et al. Ultrafast melting of charge ordering in LuFe2O4 probed by terahertz spectroscopy. J. Luminescen. 133, 149–151 (2013).
Ikeda, N. et al. Charge frustration and dielectric dispersion in LuFe2O4. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 1526–1532 (2000).
Brooks, C. M. et al. The adsorption-controlled growth of LuFe2O4 by molecular-beam epitaxy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 132907 (2012).
Ikeda, N., Kohn, K., Kito, H., Akimitsu, J. & Siratori, K. Dielectric relaxation and hopping of electrons in ErFe2O4. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 63, 4556–4564 (1994).
Park, J. Y., Park, J. H., Jeong, Y. K. & Jang, H. M. Dynamic magnetoelectric coupling in “electronic ferroelectric” LuFe2O4. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 152903 (2007).
Nagata, T. et al. Spontaneous polarization in YbFe2O4. Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 052901 (2017).
Scott, J. F. Ferroelectrics go bananas. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 20, 021001 (2007).
Cao, S. et al. Nonlinear transport properties and Joule heating effect in charge ordered LuFe2O4. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 102102 (2011).
Groot, J. D. et al. Charge order in LuFe2O4: An unlikely route to ferroelectricity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 187601 (2012).
Angst, M. et al. Charge order in LuFe2O4: Antiferroelectric ground state and coupling to magnetism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 227601 (2008).
Mori, S. et al. Effect of oxygen vacancies on charge ordered structure in YFe2O4-δ. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 47, 7595 (2008).
Horibe, Y., Ikeda, N., Yoshii, K. & Mori, S. Direct observation of low-temperature superstructure in spin-and charge-frustrated ferrite YFe2O4−δ. Phys. Rev. B 82, 184119 (2010).
Bourgeois, J. et al. Evidence of oxygen-dependent modulation in LuFe2O4. Phys. Rev. B 85, 064102 (2012).
Hervieu, M. et al. Oxygen storage capacity and structural flexibility of LuFe2O4+x (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.5). Nat. Mater. 13(1), 74–80 (2014).
Fujiwara, K. et al. Iron vacancy effect on the magnetization of YbFe2O4. Trans. Mater. Res. Soc. Jpn. 41, 139–142 (2016).
Fujiwara, K. et al. Possible charge order structure of stoichiometric YbFe2O4. Ferroelectrics 512, 85–91 (2017).
Yamamoto, K. et al. Strong optical nonlinearity and its ultrafast response associated with electron ferroelectricity in an organic conductor. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 074709 (2008).
Fujiwara, K. et al. Stabilization of spin and charge ordering in stoichiometric YbFe2O4. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 044701 (2019).
Authier, A. International Tables for Crystallography Volume D: Physical Properties of Crystals Ch. 1.7 (International Union of Crystallography, Chester, 2013).
Yamada, Y., Kitsuda, K., Nohdo, S. & Ikeda, N. Charge and spin ordering process in the mixed-valence system LuFe2O4: Charge ordering. Phys. Rev. B 62, 12167 (2000).
Yu, H. & Okimoto, Y. Unpublished.
Momma, K. & Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272–1276 (2011).
Richard, D., Ferrand, M. & Kearley, G. J. Analysis and visualisation of neutron-scattering data. J. Neutron Res. 4, 33–39 (1996).
Acknowledgments
The authors thank T. Umanodan, T. Ishikawa, K. Kakurai, and W. T. Lee for their technical assistance. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP 19H01827, JP 18J10004, and JP 18H05208.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.F., Y.O., and N.I. conceived this investigation. The single-crystal samples were prepared by K.F., Y.F., and R.S. The XRD patterns of the single crystals were measured by K.F. and Y. Okuda. K.Y., H.Y., S.K., and Y. O. conducted nonlinear spectroscopy and analyzed the obtained SHG data. K.F., Y.O., and N.I. cowrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and revised the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Fujiwara, K., Fukada, Y., Okuda, Y. et al. Direct evidence of electronic ferroelectricity in YbFe2O4 using neutron diffraction and nonlinear spectroscopy. Sci Rep 11, 4277 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83655-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83655-6
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.