Abstract
Photonic curing has shown great promise in maintaining the integrity of flexible thin polymer substrates without structural degradation due to shrinkage, charring or decomposition during the sintering of printed functional ink films in milliseconds at high temperatures. In this paper, single-step photonic curing of screen-printed nickel (Ni) electrodes is reported for sensor, interconnector and printed electronics applications. Solid bleached sulphate paperboard (SBS) and polyethylene terephthalate polymer (PET) substrates are employed to investigate the electrical performance, ink transfer and ink spreading that directly affect the fabrication of homogeneous ink films. Ni flake ink is selected, particularly since its effects on sintering and rheology have not yet been examined. The viscosity of Ni flake ink yields shear-thinning behavior that is distinct from that of screen printing. The porous SBS substrate is allowed approximately 20% less ink usage. With one-step photonic curing, the electrodes on SBS and PET exhibited electrical performances of a minimum of 4 Ω/sq and 16 Ω/sq, respectively, at a pulse length of 1.6 ms, which is comparable to conventional thermal heating at 130 °C for 5 min. The results emphasize the suitability of Ni flake ink to fabricate electronic devices on flexible substrates by photonic curing.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Printing technologies and functional inks have been integrated to produce printed electronic devices and circuits on thin, lightweight and flexible materials in a timely and cost-effective manner1,2,3,4,5. The additive nature of printing that is free from acid etchants or wet processing chemicals assists in reducing the production steps and waste generation in comparison to conventional manufacturing for the fabrication of electronics6,7,8,9,10. In printed electronics, metallic inks containing precious or base elements can be deposited on papers, polymers, ceramics, metals or fabrics in a layer-by-layer manner by printing and then sintered to improve or bring out their electrical functionality11,12. The functionality of the printed ink layer is directly influenced by the complex interactions between the printing method; substrate characteristics, such as surface energy, wettability, topography, smoothness/roughness, absorbency; and ink characteristics, such as particle shape and size, rheology, surface tension and solid content13.
Ink spreading, drying mechanisms and the interface quality between the substrate and ink also affect the homogeneity of the printed ink and thickness14. Wettability is one of the quality parameters of substrates that occurs when an ink meets the surface of the substrate. The two intersect at an angle depending on the ink and substrate types, called the contact angle, which can be altered by surface treatments or the choice of materials to improve wettability14. A certain time is required for inks to wet substrates, called wetting time, which is strongly influenced by the flow properties of the inks, spreading of the ink drop and penetration into porous substrates through capillary flow mechanisms15. If the substrate is coated, laminated or saturated, penetration occurs by the diffusion mechanism16,17. Exploring the wettability mechanism significantly affects the decisions on the ink and substrate compatibility, printing method and postprinting process choices as well as profitability18,19.
Postprinting processes include ink drying and sintering steps that decompose the binder, an ink vehicle and additives that keep metal particles dispersed and stabilized in a formula2, 20. Conventional drying systems for metallic inks require processing times that range from minutes to hours at high temperatures and adversely affect heat-sensitive substrates with low glass-transition temperatures21. Photonic light irradiation has been reported to show great promise to sinter metallic inks at high temperatures in milliseconds while maintaining the integrity of flexible polymer and paper substrates without structural degradations such as caused by charring or decomposition22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35. The rapid high heat generated during photonic curing is dissipated via thermal conduction at the interface of the substrate using the thermal mass of the substrate22. In the process, neck formation phenomena occur between metallic particles and cause grain growth of particles; then, pores are removed, and a dense continuous conductive layer is achieved36,37,38,39.
Metallic particles for electronics inks have largely been limited to precious metals such as gold (Au), platinum (Pt) and silver (Ag) or base metals such as copper (Cu), which enable a wide range of applications, including sensors, solar panels, batteries, light sources and wearable electronics40,41,42,43,44. In recent years, Ni has evoked significant interest both in academia and industry for a wide variety of applications due to its high temperature coefficient of resistance (TCR) and sensitivity, electrical and thermal conductivity, resistance to oxidation-corrosion, mechanical strength and magnetic behavior that cannot be replaced by other common precious noble metals45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52. The applications of Ni vary from multilayer ceramic capacitors and interconnectors to optical antennas and magnetic sensors, switches and actuators53. Its TCR and sensitivity have shown great promise, especially in resistance temperature detector (RTD) sensor applications54. The metals used in RTD applications in general are Au, Pt and Ag and Cu. Among these, Pt is the most commonly used metal in RTD applications due to its high accuracy; however, it is expensive and suffers from a low response and TCR value55,56. Similarly, Au and Ag are expensive and have low TCR values57,58. The usage of Cu is limited since it is prone to oxidation at low temperatures59. Ni, on the other hand, has the highest sensitivity and TCR relative to the other metals36.
Ni particles are usually spherical in shape. However, different particle sizes, size distributions and morphologies can be obtained by changing the parameters of the chemical reaction process, such as temperature, reaction time and reactant concentration60. The shape of metal particles impacts the structural properties and performance of the functionally printed ink layer61. Therefore, the curing process requires optimization depending on the chemical composition of the particles along with their size, distribution, shape, and degree of agglomeration62. Altering the curing process by changing the temperature, time, or pressure (ambient vs. inert) can cause significant variation in the performance for the same material due to the change in grain boundaries and specific surface area of metal particles36,63. Moreover, when the active component of an ink differs from traditional powders, such as flake-shaped metal particles, it requires higher temperatures than spherical particles61. It is essential to carefully optimize the curing parameters in accordance with the material properties to achieve optimum functionality. The only study found on photonic curing of Ni film in the literature was based on spherical particles deposited via spin coating on a PI substrate by a two-step sintering process64. In this study, single-step photonic curing is reported for screen-printed Ni flake particles on SBS paperboard and PET film. The wettability of the substrates was also characterized to investigate the effect of porous and nonporous substrates on the electrical properties of Ni ink as well as ink transfer and the amount of ink usage.
Experimental procedure
Ink rheology and the structure of Ni particles and substrates
The rheology of the Ni flake ink paste prototype (Metalon HPN-DEV 79–89-66; NovaCentrix: Austin, TX) was assessed using an AR 200 dynamic stress rheometer (TA Instrument: New Castle, DE) in a 20 mm 2° cone-parallel plate geometry. The shear rate of the steady-state flow test was varied from 0.1 to 1000 s−1 at 23 °C. A temperature ramp test was conducted using a Peltier plate from 20 to 60 °C at a constant shear rate of 100 s−1. The composition of the ink reported by NovaCentrix was 50 to 90% (w/w) nickel, 2 to 15% diethylene glycol monobutyl ether, 0 to 20% isopropyl alcohol and a propriety binder. The solid content level was 62%.
The Ni flake ink sample was placed in ~ 25 ml of nanopure water and placed in a sonicator for 15 min to form a suspension. A glass stir bar was used to place a drop of the suspension on acetate film for drying. The particle shape was imaged using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) (Fujifilm: Greenwood, SC).
An FTA200 (First Ten Angstrom; Portsmouth, VA) video system with FTA32 software was employed to measure the wettability of substrates using the water sessile drop method under ambient conditions. The surface of substrates was characterized with a Contour GT-K vertical scanning 3D optical white light interferometer microscope (Bruker Corp.: Billerica, MA) by using the published conditions65 and with a MultiMode 8 Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) using a Nanoscope V Controller (Bruker Corp.: Billerica, MA). A total of 100 × 100 µm scans were acquired in contact mode, while 10 × 10 µm scans were acquired in tapping mode. 2D and 3D height images were plotted to show the relative roughness. The thickness of the substrates and Ni ink films was measured with a digital thickness gauge (Technidyne: New Albany, IN).
Digital file creation and screen printing of Ni electrodes
The pattern was designed in Adobe InDesign software with dimensions of 1.5 × 1.5 cm. A precut serigraphy emulsion (Chromaline: Duluth, MN) was applied on 165 threads per inch water wetted mesh and dried for 24 h. The plastic backing of the emulsion was peeled off, and the positive transparent film was placed on the emulsion and exposed to UV light for 1 min (Lawson, St. Louis, MO). Unexposed nonimaged areas were cleaned using pressurized water and dried for an hour at room temperature. Ni ink was printed on PET (Melinex ST506; DuPont: Chester, VA) and SBS (C2S, 144-lb., 10 pt.; International Paper: Chicago, IL) with a 45° angle squeegee stroke and sintered upon printing (Fig. 1). The substrates were weighed before and after printing using a Vibra CG electronic balance (0.0001 g; Shinko Denshi Co. Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan) to calculate the Ni ink usage.
Photonic curing procedure
A PulseForge 1200 (NovaCentrix: Austin, TX) photonic curing equipment was employed to investigate the optimum curing settings for printed Ni ink on both substrates. A factorial experiment was designed by varying the pulse length from 1.0 to 1.6 ms in steps of 200 µs. The system was calibrated before the trials using its bolometer. The voltage, web speed and overlap settings were kept constant at 450 V (V), 20 feet/minute and 2 at once through mode, respectively. The overlap factor represents the average number of pulses that are received by the substrate66. The total exposure energy was varied between 4.8 and 6.8 J/cm2. Photonic light was generated from a flashlamp with wavelengths ranging from 200 to 1500 nm. The thermal profile of the curing conditions was simulated using the SimPulse software of the curing equipment.
Printed Ni ink film characterization
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (EVO MA-15, Carl Zeiss SMT Ltd.: Pleasanton, CA) was used to image the printed Ni film surface, particle shape and microstructure. A 4-point probe source meter (Model 2400; Keithley: Cleveland, OH) was used to measure the electrical properties of the printed conductive patterns. The Haldor Topsøe geometrical factor method was used to calculate sheet resistance (Ω/sq) based on the printed line width and length67,68 for the volume resistivity calculations (Ωm). Transmission and reflectance of the printed Ni ink film was measured with a spectrometer that emits light in the UV and visible spectrum range (DT2000, StellarNet, Inc.: Tampa, Florida).
Results and discussions
During the screen printing process, ink paste is exposed to various regimes of shear forces, while the squeegee stroke pushes it through the screen mesh onto the substrate4,14. The low shear rate of 0.1 reciprocal seconds (1/s) corresponds to the ink paste at rest on the screen plate mesh before printing, while the high shear rates between 100 and 1000 1/s simulate the ink transfer assisted by the squeegee stroke65. At high shears, a several orders of magnitude drop in ink viscosity is expected for the ink to become more fluid to complete the ink transfer during printing65. Ni flake ink yields the expected low viscosity of 1000 Pa.s at high shear rates and a high viscosity of 1 Pa.s at low shear rates, as depicted in the steady-state rheology flow diagram in Fig. 2a; thus, ink can flow through the screen mesh to realize ink transfer. The FE-SEM images in Fig. 3 show that the majority of Ni particles averaged 3 µm ± 1, with a few outliers at 9 µm ± 4. The flake-shaped particles have no particular order in the suspension. When the shear force is applied, the flake particles start aligning in the direction of shear and exhibit less resistance to flow. When the shear is increased, the particles display typical shear-thinning flow, which is a distinct screen printing ink behavior65. To further understand the ink material, the rheology was measured at increased temperatures while the shear rate was kept constant at 100 s−1. Figure 2b shows that the viscosity not only decreases from 12 to below 4 Pa.s when the temperature is varied from 20 to 60 °C but also starts to experience a phase transition at approximately 35 °C. The shear thinning and phase change with increasing temperature suggest that Ni ink is a nematic liquid crystal material with a clear first-order phase transition behavior69.
One of the main principles of homogeneous ink film formation on substrates is proper wettability14. The contact angle measurements presented in Fig. 4 reveal the wettability behavior of the substrates. The test liquid angle decreases when spreading on porous SBS, while it stays stable on nonporous PET over time. The liquid volume data confirm the decrease in the angle on SBS due to spreading since the liquid volume stays stable over time. When inks are applied on porous substrates, the soluble chemical compounds in the ink formulation, called vehicles, dissolve in the coating during ink leveling and spreading16. The spreading and diffusion add more pressure to break the liquid-bridge-type structure that occurs during lifting of the tensioned mesh from the substrates in screen printing (Fig. 5)70. This would enable quicker ink release from the mesh, which leads to a decrease in the amount of ink usage for SBS.
Figure 6 shows 3D profilometry surface images of the substrates. Using this vertical scanning interferometry, the root mean square surface roughness is measured to be 17 nm ± 2 for PET and 1009 nm ± 10 for SBS, presenting a two orders of magnitude difference. In Figs. 7 and 8, AFM measurements both in contact and tapping mode also show that the PET surface is significantly smoother than the SBS surface. Bright particles in the phase images in Fig. 9 indicate the presence of filler material in the substrates. With AFM, the roughness is measured to be 12 nm ± 3 for PET and 176 nm ± 44 for SBS. The significant difference in the SBS roughness between the 3D profilometry and AFM methods is due to the length of the measurement scale of AFM71, while the interferometry scans depend on focus adjustment of the fringe contrast72.
The SEM micrographs recorded from the printed samples at 100 × and 1000 × magnification are shown in Fig. 10 and reveal the microstructure of the Ni ink surface and the cross-sections. The images confirm the flake morphology of Ni particles as well as nonporous PET and porous SBS structures in the cross-section images. The coating layer on both sides of SBS that significantly improves the surface smoothness is also visible in the cross-section images. Using the digital gauge, the thicknesses of PET and SBS are measured to be 126 µm ± 1 and 252 µm ± 4, respectively. The higher standard deviation of SBS is attributed to a Poisson distribution, and the rough and porous paper microstructure containing open spaces, voids and pores is due to the cellulosic fibers and fillers73. The Ni ink film thickness is measured to be 52 µm ± 4 on PET and 36 µm ± 5 on SBS. The average ink weight is found to be 0.11 g ± 0.02 on PET and 0.09 g ± 0.01 on SBS, indicating that ~ 20% ink reduction is achieved by SBS. This result supports the previous findings that nonporous polymer substrates lead to higher ink usage than porous paper substrates4,65. A higher ink film thickness means more ink usage during production, which adds to the cost of electronic fabrication.
The working mechanism of photonic curing relies on the surface absorption of the printed Ni film heat-up and the thermal mass of substrates for cooling the heated printed ink layer by thermal conduction22. Figure 11 presents the optical transmission and reflectance spectra (300–1000 nm) of the printed Ni flake ink on both PET and SBS substrates. Photonic light emitted by the curing equipment also ranges from the mid-UV to near IR light region (300–1000 nm). Figure 11a demonstrates that the printed Ni layers are nearly 0% transparent over the defined spectral range on both PET and SBS substrates. The reflectance spectra of the printed Ni on both PET and SBS (Fig. 11b) demonstrate that approximately 3–5% of the incident light is reflected back in both cases, indicating that a vast majority (up to 97%) of the light was absorbed by the printed Ni.
Three conditions are reported for the optimum photonic curing of functional ink layers: xf < xs, tp < τs, and τf < tp, where xf and xs represent the ink film thickness and substrate thickness, τf and τs represent the thermal equilibration time of the ink film and substrate, and tp represents a short pulse of intense pulsed light duration, respectively22. The thermal equilibration time of the materials is estimated using the formula in Eq. (1), where cp is the specific heat (W s/kg K), ρ is the density (kg/m3), x is the ink thickness (µm) and K is the thermal conductivity (W/m K)22.
Tables 1 and 2 show the thermal equilibration time estimations and transient curing conditions, respectively, and the agreement between the thickness of the ink, substrates and peak processing temperatures satisfying the conditions for optimal photonic curing for all the experimental levels. After photonic curing, the lowest sheet resistance is found to be 4 Ω/sq on SBS and 16 Ω/sq on PET at a pulse length of 1.6 ms (6.8 J/cm2) (Fig. 12). The printed Ni resistance is found to be one order of magnitude lower than its noncured value and two orders of magnitude lower than the PET values. The results are comparable to those of conventional thermal heating at 130 °C for 5 min65. The Ni flake resistance values in this work are found to be one order of magnitude higher than the spherical particles of 5–500 nm on SBS and one to two orders of magnitude lower on SBS and PET, respectively, than the 50 nm particles (Table 3)64. The volume resistivity is calculated to be 1.4 × 10–4 Ωm for SBS and 8.3 × 10–2 Ωm for PET. The reason for the higher resistance and deviation observed with the PET sample is blistering formation caused by either moisture in the ink or partial vaporization due to the high working temperature (Fig. 13)74. The reduced surface quality and increased resistivity caused by blistering would be resolvable by applying a calendering process at higher nip to restore the quality and connectivity between the Ni particles75. The nip impression applies a high pressure in the z-direction such that the compression causes the functional material to experience plastic and viscoelastic deformations to induce alignments of the Ni particles in the ink layer and increase the contact between Ni particles. Thus, it improves surface quality by decreasing ink film roughness and increasing conductivity75.
The rapid high heating of the ink film occurs in such a short interval of time that the heat is effectively dissipated before reaching the back side of the substrate. When the temperature on the back of the substrate extends above a critical level at thermal equilibrium, such as the dimensional stability, ignition or shrinkage temperature, the integrity of the substrates may be lost. Figure 13 presents the simulation of the experimental sintering procedure using the SimPulse software. The data show that the light absorbed by Ni yields higher local temperatures of PET when light energy was applied at 1.0 ms (4.8 J/cm2) and 1.6 ms (6.8 J/cm2) pulse lengths, respectively. The heat generated on the ink film surface starts transferring to the PET substrate, and the temperature at the interface, 20 µm depth of PET (blue line), and back side of the substrate (green line) rise to a temperature below 250 °C where PET loses mechanical flexibility and starts to crack41. Thanks to the instantaneous nature of photonic curing, the time spent at the processed temperature is on the order of milliseconds, preventing an effect that would lead to a change in the physical properties of PET. In the case of SBS, the short pulse of light heats the surface of printed Ni ink to a temperature between ~ 500 and 650 °C. However, at the interface, the 20 µm depth of SBS only reaches 225 °C at equilibrium, which is below the ignition temperature (233 °C) and displays no deformation (Fig. 14). It must be noted that bulk Ni properties are employed during simulation. The properties of the Ni ink composite can be different from the pure material and lead to different peak temperatures during the process.
Conclusions
In this work, we investigate the one-step photonic curing of a screen-printed Ni flake ink prototype on nonporous PET and porous SBS substrates for printed electronics applications. The flow rheology of Ni flake ink exhibits shear thinning behavior, which is the desired property for screen printing processing. The rheology at different temperatures revealed that the Ni ink prototype is a nematic liquid crystal. The characterization of the wettability behavior of substrates that controls the amount of ink transfer shows that ~ 20% less ink usage is achievable by using the porous substrate. Equivalent electrical performance is obtained from the Ni electrodes on both substrates despite the two orders of magnitude difference in surface roughness. The optimum sintering condition that provides the lowest resistance is achieved at a 1.6 ms pulse duration that corresponds to an energy of 6.8 J/cm2 and is comparable to the results gained from conventional thermal heating at 130 °C for 5 min. A minimum sheet resistance of 4 Ω/sq on SBS and 16 Ω/sq on PET is obtained, which is suitable for sensor applications.
References
Khan, Y. et al. A new frontier of printed electronics: Flexible hybrid electronics. Adv. Mater. 32, 1905279 (2019).
Zhang, T., Asher, E. & Yang, J. A new printed electronics approach eliminating redundant fabrication process of vertical interconnect accesses: Building multilayered circuits in porous materials. Adv. Mater. Technol. 3, 1700346 (2018).
Mitra, K. Y. et al. Fully inkjet-printed thin-film transistor array manufactured on paper substrate for cheap electronic applications. Adv. Electron. Mater. 3, 1700275 (2017).
Altay, B. N. Development and characterization of nano nickel-based conductive inks for flexographic printing of electronics and new interpretations of surface energies of solids. Ph.D. Dissertation 2018, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
Trudeau, C. et al. Inkjet-printed flexible active multilayered structures. MRS Adv. 2(18), 1015–1020 (2017).
Altay, B. N., Bolduc, M., Cloutier, S.G. Sustainable advanced manufacturing of printed electronics: An environmental consideration. in Green Energy and Environment, 2020. [Online First], IntechOpen, https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91979. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/online-first/sustainable-advanced-manufacturing-of-printed-electronics-an-environmental-consideration
Maddipatla, D., Narakathu, B.B., Ali, M.M., Chlaihawi, A.A., Atashbar, M.Z. Development of a novel carbon nanotube based printed and flexible pressure sensor. Sensors Appl. Symposium 2017, IEEE, 1–4.
Ali, M. M. et al. Printed strain sensor based on silver nanowire/silver flake composite on flexible and stretchable TPU substrate. Sens. Actuators A 274, 109–115 (2018).
Turkani, V. S., Maddipatla, D., Narakathu, B. B., Bazuin, B. J. & Atashbar, M. Z. A carbon nanotube based NTC thermistor using additive print manufacturing processes. Sens. Actuators A 279, 1–9 (2018).
Chlaihawi, A. A., Narakathu, B. B., Emamian, S., Bazuin, B. J. & Atashbar, M. Z. Development of printed and flexible dry ECG electrodes. Sens. Bio-Sens. Res. 20, 9–15 (2018).
Grau, G. & Subramanian, V. Fully high-speed gravure printed, low-variability, high-performance organic polymer transistors with sub-5 V operation. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2, 1500328 (2016).
Grau, G., Kitsomboonloha, R., Swisher, S. L., Kang, H. & Subramanian, V. Printed transistors on paper: Towards smart consumer product packaging. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24(32), 5067–5074 (2014).
Smook, G. A. Handbook for Pulp and Paper Technologists (Angus Wilde Publications, Vancouver, 1997).
Hernandez-Sosa, G. et al. Rheological and drying considerations for uniformly gravure-printed layers: Towards large-area flexible organic light-emitting diodes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 3164–3171 (2013).
Sarah, K. & Ulrich, S. Short timescale wetting and penetration on porous sheets measured with ultrasound, direct absorption and contact angle. RSC Adv. 8, 12861 (2018).
Scott, W. E. & Trosset, S. Properties of Paper: An Introduction (TAPPI Press, Atlanta, 1989).
Lamminmäki, T. T., Kettle, J. P., Puukko, P. J. T., Ridgway, C. J. & Gane, P. A. C. Short timescale inkjet ink component diffusion: An active part of the absorption mechanism into inkjet coatings. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 365, 222–235 (2012).
Willmann, J., Stocker, D. & Dörsam, E. Characteristics and evaluation criteria of substrate-based manufacturing. Is roll-to-roll the best solution for printed electronics? The best solution for printed electronics?. Organ. Electron. 15(7), 1631–1640 (2014).
Davis, R. H. The impact of cost on profitability in the printing industry; Printing Industry of America, Center for Print Economics and Management, 2017.
Cardenas, J. A. et al. Impact of morphology on printed contact performance in carbon nanotube thin-film transistors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1805727 (2019).
Rager, M. S., Aytug, T., Veith, G. M. & Joshi, P. Lot-thermal-budget photonic processing of highly conductive Cu interconnects based on CuO nanoinks: Potential for flexible printed electronics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 2441–2448 (2016).
Schroder, K. Mechanisms of photonic curing™: Processing high temperature films on low temperature substrates. Technical Proceedings of the NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Expo, NSTI-Nanotech 2011, 220–223.
Chung, W.-H., Hwang, H.-J., Lee, S.-H. & Kim, H.-S. In situ monitoring of a flash light sintering process using silver nano-ink for producing flexible electronics. Nanotechnology 24, 035202 (2013).
Niittynena, J. et al. Alternative sintering methods compared to conventional thermal sintering for inkjet printed silver nanoparticle ink. Thin Solid Films 556, 452–459 (2014).
Akhavan, V., Schroder, K., Pope, D., Farnsworth, S. Processing thick-film screen printed metalon CuO reduction ink with PulseForge tools. Retrieved from https://www.novacentrix.com/sites/default/files/pdf/Novacentrix%20Tech%20Coatings%200313_final.pdf, in April 2019.
Schroder, K. A., McCool, S. C. & Furlan, W. R. Broadcast photonic curing of metallic nanoparticle films. Nanotech 3, 198–201 (2006).
Akhavan, V., Schroder, K., Farnsworth, S. Photonic curing of inkjet printed films. Handbook of Industrial Inkjet Printing: A Full System Approach, Wiley-VCHVerlagGmbH&Co.KGaA (2018).
Ding, S. et al. One-step fabrication of stretchable copper nanowire conductors by a fast photonic sintering technique and its application in wearable devices. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 6190–6199 (2016).
Araki, T. et al. Cu salt ink formulation for printed electronics using photonic sintering. Langmuir 29, 11192–11197 (2013).
Hwang, H.-J., Joo, S.-J. & Kim, H.-S. Copper nanoparticle/multiwalled carbon nanotube composite films with high electrical conductivity and fatigue resistance fabricated via flash light sintering. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 25413–25423 (2015).
Oh, S.-J. et al. Newly designed Cu/Cu10Sn3 core/shell nanoparticles for liquid phase-photonic sintered copper electrodes: Large-area, low-cost transparent flexible electronics. Chem. Mater. 28, 4714–4723 (2016).
Polino, G. et al. Photonic flash sintering of ink-jet-printed back electrodes for organic photovoltaic applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 2325–2335 (2016).
Kim, Y.-H. et al. Flexible metal-oxide devices made by room-temperature photochemical activation of sol–gel films. Nature 289, 128–132 (2012).
Park, J. H. et al. Plasmonic-tuned flash Cu nanowelding with ultrafast photochemical-reducing and interlocking on flexible plastics. Adv. Func. Mater. 27(29), 1701138 (2017).
Park, J. H. et al. Flash-induced stretchable Cu conductor via multiscale-interfacial couplings. Adv. Sci. 5(11), 1801146 (2018).
Turkani, V. S. et al. Nickel based RTD fabricated via additive screen printing process for flexible electronics. IEEE Access 99, 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2904970 (2019).
Zhang, Y. & Zhang, J. Sintering phenomena and mechanical strength of nickel based materials in direct metal laser sintering process—a molecular dynamics study. J. Mat. Res. 31(15), 2233–2243 (2016).
Xu, J. et al. Molecular dynamics simulation of Ni nanoparticles sintering process in Ni/YSZ multi-nanoparticle system. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 9663–9672 (2013).
Guillot, M. J. Modeling thermal stress in thin films produced by photonic curing. Thin Solid Films 594, 156–161 (2015).
Polat, E. O. et al. Graphene-enabled optoelectronics on paper. ACS Photon. 3, 964–971 (2016).
Bolduc, M., Trudeau, C., Beaipré, P., Cloutier, S. G. & Galarneau, P. Thermal dynamics effects using pulse-shaping laser sintering of printed silver inks. Sci. Rep. 8, 1418 (2018).
Vervust, T., Buyle, G., Bossuyt, F. & Vanfleteren, J. Integration of stretchable and washable electronic modules for smart textile applications. J. Text. Inst. 103(10), 1127–1138 (2012).
Leenen, M. A. M., Arning, V., Thiem, H., Steiger, J. & Anselmann, R. Printable electronics: Flexibility for the future. Phys. Stat. Sol. 206, 588–597 (2009).
Gupta, A. A., Arunachalam, S., Cloutier, S. G. & Izquierdo, R. Fully aerosol-jet printed, high-performance nanoporous ZnO ultraviolet photodetectors. ACS Photon. 5, 3923–3929 (2018).
Lockett, V., Hartman, A., Gustafson, J., Lowenthal, M., Ray, W. Patent Appl. US20140183421. 2014, USA.
Li, D., Sutton, D., Burgess, A., Graham, D. & Calvert, P. D. Conductive copper and nickel lines via reactive inkjet printing. J. Mater. Chem. 19, 3719–3724 (2009).
Kamikoriyama, Y., Sawamoto, H., Horiuchi, M. Nickel Ink. Patent No. US8012378. 2011,USA.
Sharma, M. K. et al. Flame-driven aerosol synthesis of copper–nickel nanopowders and conductive nanoparticle film. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 13542–13551 (2014).
Applied Nanotech. Ni-IJ70–30 Nanonickel ink. Retrieved from http://www.appliednanotech.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/ANI-Ni-IJ70-30_30June2016_Xe.pdf in April 2020.
Setoodeh, A. R., Attariani, H. & Khosrownejad, M. Nickel nanowires under uniaxial loads: A molecular dynamics simulation study. Comput. Mater. Sci. 44(2), 378–384 (2008).
Nam, V. B. et al. Highly stable Ni-based flexible transparent conducting panels fabricated by laser digital patterning. Adv. Func. Mater. 29(8), 1806895 (2019).
Shin, J. et al. Wearable temperature sensors: Sensitive wearable temperature sensor with seamless monolithic integration. Adv. Mater. 32(2), 1905527 (2020).
Paeng, D. et al. Laser-induced reductive sintering of nickel oxide nanoparticles under ambient conditions. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 6363–6372 (2015).
Turkani, V. S. et al. Nickel based printed resistance temperature detector on flexible polyimide substrate. Proc. IEEE Sens. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2018.8589549 (2018).
Kim, J., Kim, J., Shin, Y. & Yoon, Y. A study on the fabrication of an RTD (resistance temperature detector) by using Pt thin film. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 18(1), 61–66 (2001).
Lee, C.-Y. & Lee, G.-B. Micromachine-based humidity sensors with integrated temperature sensors for signal drift compensation. J. Micromech. Microeng. 13(5), 620 (2003).
Ahn, C. H. et al. Direct fabrication of thin film gold resistance temperature detection sensors on a curved surface using a flexible dry film photoresist and their calibration up to 450°C. J. Micromech. Microeng. 23(6), 065031 (2013).
Ali, S., Hassan, A., Bae, J., Lee, C. H. & Kim, J. All-printed differential temperature sensor for the compensation of bending effects. Langmuir 32(44), 11432–11439 (2016).
Lenglet, M. et al. Low temperature oxidation of copper: The formation of CuO. Mater. Res. Bull. 30(4), 393–403 (1995).
Roselina, N. R. N., Azizan, A., Hyie, K. M., Jumahat, A. & Bakar, M. A. A. Effect of pH on formation of Nickel Nanostructures through chemical reduction method. Proc. Eng. 2013(68), 43–48 (2013).
Cronin, H. M., Stoeva, Z., Brown, M., Shkunov, M. & Silva, S. R. P. Photonic curing of low-cost aqueous silver flake inks for printed conductors with increased yield. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 21398–21410 (2018).
Yang, X. et al. Effect of the different shapes of silver particles in conductive ink on electrical performance and microstructure of the conductive tracks. J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Electron. 23, 1980–1986 (2012).
Miyake, K., Hirata, Y., Shimonosono, T. & Sameshima, S. The effect of particle shape on sintering behavior and compressive strength of porous alumina. Materials 11, 1137 (2018).
Park, S. & Kim, H. Flash light sintering of nickel nanoparticles for printed electronics. Thin Solid Films 550, 575–581 (2014).
Altay, B. N. et al. Impact of substrate and process on the electrical performance of screen printed nickel electrodes: Fundamental mechanism of ink film roughness. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 1(12), 7164–7173 (2018).
Schroder, K. A., Martin, K. M., Jackson, D. K., McCool, S. C. Method and apparatus for curing thin films on low-temperature substrates at high speeds. U. S. Patent 8,410,712 B2, Apr. 2, 2013.
Siegfried, E. A new parameter based on graphene for characterizing transparent, conductive materials. Carbon 47(12), 2936–2939 (2009).
Vuorinen, T. et al. Printable, transparent, and flexible touch panels working in sunlight and moist environments. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24(40), 6340–6347 (2014).
Rai, G. & Jain, D. Recent characterization and applicability of polymorphism: Liquid crystal. Int. J. Pharmac. Sci. Rev. Res. 4(3), 129–134 (2010).
Kapur, N., Abbott, S. J., Dolden, E. D. & Gaskell, P. H. Predicting the behavior of screen printing. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packaging Manuf. Technol. 3(3), 508–515 (2013).
Dubuc, B., Zucker, S. W., Tricot, C., Quiniou, J. F. & Wehbi, D. Evaluating the fractal dimension of surfaces. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 425, 113–127 (1989).
Cheny, J., Claypole, T. C., Gethin, D. T. (2006). Measurement of the ink release from the anilox roll. Proceedings of the Technical Association of the Graphic Arts, TAGA, 395–408.
Pal, L., Joyce, M. K. & Fleming, P. D. A simple method for calculation of the permeability coefficient of porous media. Tappi J. 5, 9 (2006).
Gagliardi, M. & Paggi, M. Multiphysics analysis of backsheet blistering in photovoltaic modules. Sol. Energy 183, 512–520 (2019).
Fleming, P. D., Joyce, M. K., Rebros, M., Al-Said, D., Hrehorova, E., Stoops, M. Development of in-line printing press calendering station. Proceedings of NIP 26 2010, Austin, 657.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Kurt Schroder and Dr. Dave Pope from NovaCentrix for providing the Ni ink and the insightful guidance during experiments; J. Creswell and Dr. Thang Nguyen from Fujifilm for providing the FE-SEM images of Ni ink; Jerome Jourdan from BASF for providing the the SEM images of printed Ni ink; Dr. Margaret Joyce for her intellectual contribution and supervision; and Dr. Bahadir Ozan Aktas, Somaiieh Yousefi and Luis F. Gerlein for reviewing the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.N.A. designed and performed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. V.S.T. performed part of the experiments and wrote part of the manuscript; all authors discussed the results and edited the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Altay, B.N., Turkani, V.S., Pekarovicova, A. et al. One-step photonic curing of screen-printed conductive Ni flake electrodes for use in flexible electronics. Sci Rep 11, 3393 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82961-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82961-3
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.