Introduction

Retrobulbar fat surrounds the posterior pole of the eye and optic nerve head in all vertebrates studied to date (Fig. 1A). While adipose tissues in the trunk have been extensively studied, the function and molecular properties of retrobulbar fat are much less well understood, despite the fact that increased volume of retrobulbar fat is a major complication in Graves disease1. Retrobulbar fat in cats is less metabolically active than other adipose tissues2, and is thus not thought to contribute to energy storage and homeostasis. Instead, retrobulbar fat has been proposed to act as both thermal and mechanical insulation, preventing the loss of heat that is needed to sustain retinal and optic nerve function3,4,5 and supporting the globe and other orbital tissues during eye movements6 and trauma7,8,9.

Figure 1
figure 1

Murine retrobulbar orbital fat derives from Wnt1-positive precursors. (A) Schematic illustrating adipose depots included in this study. (B) Immunohistochemistry of cryosection of orbital soft tissue from a Cre-negative, Sun1-GFP mouse reveals absent GFP staining of orbital fat. (C) Immunohistochemistry of cryosection of orbital soft tissue from Wnt1:Cre;Sun1-GFP mice reveals the presence of nuclear GFP signal in orbital fat. Scale bars = 50 μm.

In addition to its role in energy storage, adipose tissue also plays a central role in regulating body temperature10. Recent studies have raised the possibility that orbital fat might also engage in active thermogenesis, although any such function is likely to be species-dependent. White adipose tissue, which comprises the bulk of body fat and primarily serves as a site of energy storage, also acts passively as an insulator to reduce heat loss. Brown adipose tissue, in contrast, undergoes active thermogenesis in response to cold. In mice, retrobulbar fat has been reported to express the brown fat marker Ucp1, and to upregulate Ucp1 expression in a model of Grave’s Disease induced by injection of antibodies to thyrotropin receptor (TSHR)11,12. In hibernating 13-lined ground squirrels, however, retrobulbar fat was reported to histologically resemble brown fat but not express Ucp113. Finally, human retrobulbar fat in both healthy controls and thyroid eye disease patients morphologically resembles white fat14,15.

While this potentially suggests a thermogenic function for retrobulbar fat in mice, this has not been demonstrated, nor have the reasons behind these potential species-specific differences been explored. More generally, several lines of evidence suggest that retrobulbar fat may be intrinsically different from trunk adipose tissue, most notably in the fact that it is unaffected by genetic diseases such as lipodystrophy that compromise the viability or function of better-studied adipose tissues16. The extent to which retrobulbar fat resembles other brown and white fat depots at the molecular level remains unknown for both mice and humans. These intrinsic differences may result from differences in the developmental origin of retrobulbar fat relative to trunk adipose tissues. However, although many other periorbital tissues—such as cranial bones, and periocular mesenchyme—are known to be derived from embryonic neural crest17,18,19, the developmental origin of retrobulbar fat has not been characterized.

In this study, we set out to define the developmental origins of murine retrobulbar fat and transcriptionally profile retrobulbar fat in mice and humans. We find that retrobulbar fat is a neural crest-derived tissue that expresses a small subset of genes that are not detected in trunk fat deposits. In mice, retrobulbar fat resembles interscapular brown fat both histologically and transcriptionally, while in humans, retrobulbar fat resembles white adipose tissue. Histological analysis using a range of mammalian species revealed that retrobulbar fat is brown in rodents, which are typically housed at temperatures below thermoneutrality, but is white in larger animals. We further show that in mice housed at thermoneutral temperature retrobulbar fat shows reduced expression of brown fat markers and histological properties that are intermediate between white and brown fat. We conclude that retrobulbar fat can potentially serve as a site of active thermogenesis in rodents, and that this may help maintain intraocular temperature at levels sufficient for proper visual function.

Results

Mouse orbital fat is derived from embryonic neural crest

We first used genetic fate mapping to determine whether retrobulbar fat arises from neural crest-derived progenitors, using the neural crest-specific Wnt1:Cre transgene18 in combination with the Cre-dependent CAG-lox-stop-lox-Sun1-GFP (Sun1-GFP) transgene20 to irreversibly label neural crest-derived cells. At 9 weeks of age, we observed that GFP expression selectively marked the nuclear envelope of retrobulbar adipocytes in Wnt1:Cre;Sun1-GFP mice but not in Cre-negative, Sun1-GFP littermate controls (Fig. 1B, C), demonstrating that murine orbital fat is derived from Wnt1-expressing neural crest progenitors. In addition, we have performed fate mapping of orbital, epididymal, inguinal, perirenal, retroperitoneal, and interscapular brown fat using Wnt1:Cre; Ai9 mice to demonstrate that other white and brown adipose tissues in the body are not neural crest-derived (Figure S1).

The mouse orbital fat transcriptome closely resembles interscapular brown fat

In order to better understand the function of orbital fat compared to other fat depots, we performed bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) to compare the transcriptomes of mouse orbital fat, interscapular brown fat, and two white fat depots (epididymal fat and inguinal fat) from 9 to 10 week old CD1 male mice. Principal component analysis demonstrates that orbital fat clusters more closely to brown fat than to white fat depots such as epididymal fat and inguinal fat, which in turn both cluster closely to one another (Fig. 2A). Sample-wise correlation likewise shows that orbital fat is more closely related to brown fat than to either epididymal fat or inguinal fat, which are in turn closely related to each other (Fig. 2B). Finally, heat map analysis of gene expression also reveals extensive overlap between epididymal fat or inguinal fat, but minimal overlap between those depots and either brown fat or orbital fat, while brown fat and orbital fat in turn show similar patterns of gene expression (Fig. 2C).

Figure 2
figure 2

Transcriptomic analysis of murine fat depots reveals significant similarity between orbital fat and interscapular brown fat. (A) Principal component analysis of transcriptome data from mouse brown fat (BF), epididymal fat (EF), inguinal fat (IF) and orbital fat (OF) demonstrates that BF and OF segregate more closely to each other than to EF and IF. (B) Sample-wise correlation of transcriptome data from BF, EF, IF and OF demonstrates that transcriptome of OF is more closely correlated with that of BF than with the transcriptomes of EF and IF. (C) Heat map of transcriptome data from mouse BF, EF, IF and OF demonstrates more significant shared gene expression between OF and BF. There is less significant overlap between OF and either EF or IF. Heatmap was created using Matlab 2018. (D) qPCR validates transcriptome data, demonstrating that Cxcl12 transcript variant 2 is enriched in orbital fat (OF) compared to brown fat (BF), epididymal fat (EF), and inguinal fat (IF). ** indicates p < 0.0001 by one-way Anova. (E) qPCR demonstrates that brown fat markers Ucp1, Cidea, and Gdf5 are enriched in murine BF and OF compared to EF and IF. ** indicates p < 0.0001 by one-way Anova. * indicates p = 0.006 by one-way Anova.

To further confirm that retrobulbar fat also expressed genes enriched in brown fat, we also performed qRT-PCR analysis for the brown fat markers Ucp1, Cidea, and Gdf5, and confirmed these genes were indeed strongly enriched in orbital fat relative to white fat, and were expressed at similar levels to those seen in brown fat (Fig. 2D).

Identification of genes selectively expressed in orbital fat

A small number of genes are specifically enriched in orbital fat and not detected in other adipose tissues (Table 1). Since mouse orbital fat constitutes a small portion of the orbital volume, and is enveloped by extraocular muscles which may potentially contaminate dissection, RNA-Seq analysis of extraocular muscles was also performed (Figure S2). We found that the extraocular muscle transcriptome did not cluster near that of orbital fat, and that putative retrobulbar fat-enriched transcripts did not arise as the result of dissection contamination.

Table 1 Genes selectively enriched or depleted in orbital fat relative to other fat depots, as determined by RNA-Seq.

In order to identify genes that are specific to orbital fat, expression levels between the four fat depots and extraocular muscle (FDR < 0.1, fold change > 2) were compared. Nine genes were found to be significantly upregulated in orbital fat compared to the other tissues (Table 1). Two of these—Cxcl12 and Slc16a2—are particularly noteworthy because of potential links to the pathogenesis of Graves disease, in which inflammation and adipogenesis are selectively observed in retrobulbar fat, but not other adipose tissues. Cxcl12 encodes a chemokine that can bind two different receptors, CXCR4 and ACKR3, activating pathways that promote inflammation and that regulate cell proliferation, survival, and migration during development21. Cxcl12 and its receptors are dysregulated in a range of autoimmune disorders22. This analysis identified several genes, including the cytokine Cxcl12 that were selectively enriched in retrobulbar fat relative to other white and brown fat depots. Slc16a2 encodes MCT8, a high-affinity thyroid hormone transporter23. We found that Slc16a2 is expressed in brown, inguinal and epididymal fat depots as well as extraocular muscle, however expression levels are significantly higher in orbital fat (Table 1). We used qPCR to confirm selective enrichment Cxcl12 in retrobulbar fat compared to brown, epididymal and inguinal fats (Fig. 2E). In order to demonstrate that the observed enriched expression of Cxcl12 in orbital fat is the result of selective expression in orbital adipocytes, and not due to expression by other cell types, we performed single-molecule fluorescent in situ hybridization (smFISH) to demonstrate co-expression of Cxcl12 and brown fat marker Prdm16 within orbital adipocytes (Figure S3). We further performed smFISH for the brown fat markers Prdm16 and Ppargc1a to demonstrate that the cells expressing Prdm16 also express other well-established brown fat markers (Figure S3).

Two other retrobulbar fat-enriched genes that we identified have interesting disease associations, Gldn and Serpini1. Gldn is expressed in nodes of Ranvier and pathologic variants of which cause lethal arthrogryposis multiplex congenita24. Serpini1 is a serine protease inhibitor primarily expressed in the central nervous system, pathologic variants of which are associated with progressive myoclonus epilepsy25. Serpini1 has also been described as a tumor suppressor in gastric tumors as well as having a putative role in epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer models26,27. The functions of Gldn and Serpini1 in orbital fat are unknown. Gene loci with unknown functions were also identified. In addition, seventeen genes were demonstrated to be significantly down-regulated in orbital fat compared to the other adipose tissues (Table 1).

Retrobulbar fat is brown in rodents but not in larger mammals

Brown fat is a specialized thermogenic tissue that is present in only a few defined regions in the trunk28, and these findings raised the question of what function brown fat might play in the retrobulbar region. One possibility is that adaptive thermogenesis might serve to maintain the posterior retina and optic nerve head at consistently high temperatures to maintain consistent conditions for neurotransmission, and thus visual function, in the face of low environmental temperatures. Since small mammals such as mice are typically housed below thermoneutral temperatures, where adaptive thermogenesis must take place to maintain normal body temperature, we hypothesized that orbital fat might also be brown in other rodents, but be white in larger animals, whose large eyes make their retinas and optic nerve heads more resistant to the effects of low ambient temperatures.

To test this, we examined hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections of orbital fat obtained from adult hamsters, cats, dogs, sheep, and goats. We observe that orbital adipose tissue of mouse and hamster is brown adipose tissue, while orbital adipose tissue in cat, dog, sheep, and goat are white adipose tissue (Fig. 3). Thermoneutral temperatures for mouse (30 °C) and hamster (25–32 °C) are well above the 22 °C degree temperature at which they were housed29,30. These results thus closely match our prediction, where small animals housed at temperatures below thermoneutral exhibiting brown retrobulbar fat, and larger animals exhibiting white retrobulbar fat.

Figure 3
figure 3

Histologic analysis of orbital fat from different species reveals that brown fat is present in rodent species, but not the other mammals examined. (A) H&E stained section of CD1 mouse orbital fat demonstrates a mixture of cells with small lipid vacuoles interspersed with cells with large, single lipid vacuoles. (B) H&E stained section of hamster orbital fat reveals the presence of adipose cells containing multiple small lipid vacuoles. (C) H&E stained section of cat orbital adipose tissue reveals cells with large lipid vacuoles. (D) H&E stained section of dog orbital fat reveals cells with large lipid vacuoles. (E) H&E stained section of lamb orbital fat reveals cells with large lipid vacuoles. (F) H&E stained section of goat orbital adipose tissue reveals cells with large lipid vacuoles. Scale bars = 50 μm.

Murine orbital adipose tissue undergoes whitening in animals housed at thermoneutral temperatures

In order to determine whether murine orbital adipose tissue is intrinsically brown or whether this property is regulated by environmental temperature, mice were housed at thermoneutral temperature for 4 weeks prior to analysis of orbital and interscapular adipose tissue by H&E staining. Examination of histologic sections of tissue reveals that both the interscapular brown adipose tissue as well as the orbital adipose tissue undergo substantial whitening after thermoneutral adaptation, though some cellular heterogeneity was observed, with histologic features of brown fat retained in a subset of cells (Fig. 4A–C). smFISH demonstrated that Ucp1 expression was substantially reduced in the great majority of cells interscapular brown fat under thermoneutral conditions, as previously reported (Fig. 4D–I)31. Retrobulbar adipocytes likewise showed a reduction in Ucp1 expression (Fig. J–O), consistent with histological data and also showed a reduction in Gdf5 (Fig. 4P–U). A strong reduction in Cxcl12 expression was also noted at thermoneutrality, demonstrating that the expression of genes specifically enriched in retrobulbar adipose tissue, compared to other fat depots, may also be temperature-regulated (Fig. 4P–U).

Figure 4
figure 4

Mouse orbital fat resembles interscapular brown fat after thermoneutral adaptation. (A) H&E section of interscapular brown fat (BF) from CD1 mice housed at 30 °C for 4 weeks demonstrates increased proportion of adipocytes with large lipid droplets characteristic of white adipose tissue. (B) H&E section of orbital fat (OF) from CD1 mouse housed at 30 °C for 4 weeks demonstrates increased proportion of adipocytes with large lipid droplets characteristic of white adipose tissue. (C) H&E section of OF from C57BL/6 mouse housed at 30 °C for 4 weeks demonstrates increased proportion of adipocytes with large lipid droplets characteristic of white adipose tissue. (D-I) smFISH demonstrates decreased Ucp1 expression in interscapular brown fat of mice adapted to thermoneutral temperatures (30 °C) compared to those housed near room temperature (22 °C). E Higher magnification of D. F Higher magnification of E. (H) Higher magnification of G. (I) Higher magnification of H. (J-O) smFISH demonstrates decreased Ucp1 expression in orbital fat of mice adapted to thermoneutral temperatures (30 °C) compared to those housed near room temperature (22 °C). (K) Higher magnification of J. (L) Higher magnification of K. (N) Higher magnification of M. O Higher magnification of N. (P-U) SmfISH demonstrates decreased Gdf5 and Cxcl12 expression in orbital fat of mice adapted to thermoneutral temperatures (30 °C) compared to those housed near room temperature (22 °C). Q Higher magnification of P. (R) Higher magnification of Q. (T) Higher magnification of S. (U) Higher magnification of T. Scale bars = 50 μm.

Human orbital fat is white, but has an expression profile that is distinct from trunk white adipose tissue

Consistent with previous reports and observations in other large mammals, we observe that retrobulbar orbital adipose tissue from healthy human donors resembles white fat, consisting of adipocytes containing a single large lipid droplet (Fig. 5A)14,15. Analysis of RNA-Seq data of prolapsed retrobulbar fat obtained from healthy donors demonstrated that brown fat markers such as UCP1, ZIC1, and DIO2 were expressed at levels comparable to that seen in trunk white adipose tissue32. Overall, however, human orbital fat has a distinct transcriptional profile, expressing previously identified markers of both white and beige fat (Fig. 5B)33,34,35,36, while also expressing orbital fat-enriched markers identified in mouse (Fig. 2). Interestingly, treatment of cultured human orbital fat stem cells derived from both thyroid eye disease patients and healthy controls with bimatoprost, a prostanoid drug associated with prostaglandin-associated periorbitopathy in humans, increases mitochondrial staining and induces expression of UCP1, indicating a possible browning of orbital adipocytes which may contribute to the phenotype of periocular fat atrophy37. Consistent with its expression of a subset of beige adipose markers, human orbital fat thus also displays some capacity for browning in vitro.

Figure 5
figure 5

Human orbital adipose tissue is histologically similar to white fat, but expresses white, beige, and brown fat markers. (A) H&E stained section of human orbital fat reveals cells with large lipid vacuoles. Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Comparison of transcriptome data from human orbital fat to publicly available data from various human samples.

Discussion

In this study, we provide the first complete transcriptomic profiling of murine orbital fat and compare it to other adipose depots to better characterize the tissue, concluding that murine orbital fat most closely resembles brown fat. In addition, we provide evidence that orbital adipose tissue in mammals is derived from neural crest precursors, and provide evidence that neural crest is able to give rise to brown adipose tissue. We have performed comparative anatomy to establish that the presence of brown fat in the orbit is not conserved among mammalian species including cat, dog, goat, sheep, and human orbital fat. We further demonstrate that at thermoneutral temperatures, orbital fat maintains the histologic signature of brown fat, but contains an increased number of white adipocytes.

Though other groups have demonstrated the expression of Ucp1 in mouse orbital adipose tissue, mouse orbital fat has been referred to as both brown and beige fat in the literature12,38,39, with little discussion of the distinction or its functional implications. Brown adipose tissue functions in thermogenesis, and in maintaining core body temperature under low ambient temperature. It is likely that the presence of highly specialized brown fat in the rodent orbit has functional significance. Bony fish and sharks which exhibit cranial endothermy—the ability to maintain elevated brain and eye temperatures—accomplish this using adaptive thermogenesis from specialized muscle cells or a counter-current heat exchanger to maintain elevated temperatures3,4,5,40,41. These specialized tissues are similar to brown fat in mammals in that they have ample blood supply, high mitochondrial content and high content of cytochrome c3.

Increased retinal temperatures allows for faster rates of neurotransmission and potentially improved function42, and in vitro electrophysiology of the swordfish retina has demonstrated improved temporal resolution as measured by the flicker fusion frequency43. Mice housed under standard conditions at 22 °C must expend nearly a third of their energy in maintaining core body temperature, and lower temperatures in the retina and optic nerve result in substantially reduced processing speed and visual acuity42,44. Infrared thermography has demonstrated that the eye or orbit is a thermogenic area, and that orbital thermogenesis is decreased in Ucp1 knockout mice 45. Furthermore, with cold adaptation, eye surface temperatures initially decrease, but recover in a manner that correlates with increased Ucp1 expression46. We hypothesize that brown fat in the rodent orbit serves a similar function to the specialized muscle or countercurrent heat exchanger found in some fish species, and may be important for allowing optimal visual function under low external temperatures.

Methods

Fate mapping of murine fat

The use of animals for these studies was conducted using protocols approved by the Johns Hopkins Animal Care and Use Committee, in compliance with ARRIVE guidelines, and were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

We crossed Wnt1:Cre (Jax stock #003,829, Jackson Labs) mice with Sun1-GFP (Jax Stock #021,039, Jackson Labs) reporter mice to allow fate mapping of neural crest-derived cells in orbit. Six to 9-week old males were perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), decapitated, and the scalp degloved. The skulls were soaked in 4% PFA overnight, washed, and decalcified in 10% EDTA overnight prior to embedding in VWR Clear Frozen Section Compound (VWR, West Chester, PA). Blocks were sectioned at 16 um at stained using rabbit-anti GFP Polyclonal Antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog # A-6455, RRID AB_221570) with Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor 488 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog # A-11034, RRID AB_2576217).

We crossed Wnt1:Cre and Ai9 (Jax Stock #007,909, Jackson Labs) mice to map the developmental origin of other fat depots. Tissue was dissected from orbital fat, brown fat, inguinal fat, epididymal fat, perirenal fat, and retroperitoneal fat depots from Wnt1:Cre;Ai9 mice and fixed in 4% PFA/PBS overnight, washed and placed in 70% ethanol prior to embedding in paraffin. Paraffin-embedded sections brown fat were deparaffinized (5 min × 2 in 100% Xylene, 5 min × 2 in 100% ethanol, 5 min each in 95%, 75%, 50% ethanol and ddH20), and heat-induced antigen retrieval was performed in sodium citrate buffer with 0.05% tween-20, pH 6) for 20 min in 100 °C. Slides were stained using rabbit anti-DsRed antibody (Takara-Bio, catalogue # 632,496), with Donkey anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) Alexa Fluor 555 (Abcam, Ab150074, RRID:AB_2636997).

Transcriptome analysis

Nine-week old CD-1 mice were euthanized and their orbital fat, inguinal, epididymal, and brown fat isolated. RNA was extracted from each fat depot using Trizol and RNeasy mini kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Fat from 5 mice was pooled into each sample. A bioanalyzer was used to perform quality control. cDNA libraries were prepared for samples with RIN > 7 and RNA sequencing performed using Illumina Nextseq500 on three samples per fat depot. The RNA-seq reads were mapped against the mouse reference genome (build 37) using TopHat247. The aligned reads were assembled into transcripts, and gene expression was calculated using Cufflinks48. The expression level of genes was determined based on the value of fragments per kilobase per million (FPKM), which was calculated as the number of fragments mapped to the transcripts of one gene divided by the transcript length and the number of total mapped reads in one sample. The differentially expressed genes were identified using Cufflinks (Fold change > 4, FDR < 0.01)48. Principal component analysis was carried out with the web tool ClustVis49.

Informed consent was obtained for the use of human orbital fat (n = 2) from patients undergoing routine resection of prolapsed orbital fat, which has been shown to be intraconal fat50, using a protocol approved by the Johns Hopkins University Institutional Review Board and following the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. RNA was extracted from each fat depot using Trizol and RNeasy mini kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). RNA-Sequencing libraries were made using stranded Total RNASeq library prep. Libraries were sequenced with Illumina NextSeq500, paired-end read of 75 bp, 50 million reads per library. A bioanalyzer was used to perform quality control. cDNA libraries were prepared for samples with RIN > 6 and RNA sequencing performed using Illumina Nextseq500. Illumina adapters of libraries after sequencing were removed using Cutadapt (v1.18;51) with default parameters. Libraries were then aligned to GRCh38 using STAR (v2.42a;52) with –twopassMode Basic. RSEM (v1.3.1;53) was used for transcript quantification, with rsem-calculate-expression (–forwad-prob 0.5). TPM value from RSEM was used to plot white, beige, or brown adipocytes-enriched markers using ggplot (v3.32).

Thermoneutral adaptation

Six-week old CD-1 and C57BL/6 males were housed at 30 °C for 4 weeks. The mice were then euthanized, and the orbital soft tissues were dissected and fixed in 4% PFA. The tissue was embedded in paraffin and sectioned. Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of paraffin-embedded sections was used to visualize orbital fat, as described54.

Comparative anatomy

Orbital fat from euthanized cat and dog were provided by Simon Petersen-Jones (Michigan State University School of Veterinary Medicine) and fixed in 4% PFA. Male Golden Syrian hamsters housed at room temperature were obtained from Envigo and perfused with 4% PFA at 9–10 weeks of age. Orbital fat was dissected and fixed in PFA overnight. Lamb and goat orbital fat was dissected from animal heads obtained from International Grocery and Halal Meat INC (Baltimore, MD). Human orbital fat specimens submitted were obtained from patients undergoing orbital or peri-ocular surgery under a protocol approved by the Johns Hopkins University Institutional Review Board following the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. H&E staining of paraffin-embedded sections was used to visualize orbital fat54.

Microscopy

Imaging was performed using a Keyence BZ-X710 microscope (Keyence, Osaka, Japan) or Zeiss LSM 700 microscope (ZEISS, Germany).

Quantitative RT-PCR

Whole RNA was extracted from mouse orbital fat samples using RNeasy mini-kits (Qiagen). cDNA was prepared using Superscript III first-strand synthesis kit (ThermoFisher). Quantitative PCR was performed in triplicate using on a … using the following primer sets: PPIA (CAGACGCCACTGTCGCTTT, TGTCTTTGGAACTTTGTCTGCAA), Ucp1 (AGGCTTCCAGTACCATTAGGT, CTGAGTGAGGCAAAGCTGATTT), Cidea (TGACATTCATGGGATTGCAGAC, GGCCAGTTGTGATGACTAAGAC), Gdf5 (CCCATCACACCCCACGAATA, CTCGGTCATCTTGCCCTTTG). PPIA was chosen as a reference gene after comparing the expression of TBP, PPIA, and GAPDH in brown fat, inguinal fat, epididymal fat, and orbital fat using RefFinder55 (https://www.heartcure.com.au/reffinder/). Data were compared using the delta-delta method. One-way ordinary ANOVA of data was performed using Prism (GraphPad).

In situ hybridization

Single-molecule fluorescent in situ hybridization was performed using the following RNAscope probes: Mm-Ucp1 (catalog # 455,411), Mm-Gdf5 (catalog # 407,211), Mm-Cxcl12-C2 (catalog # 422,711-C2), Mm-Ppargc1a-O2-C2 (catalog # 515,871-C2), Mm-Prdm16-C3 (catalog # 584,281-C3) (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Newark, CA) as per smanufacturer’s protocol.