Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Reduced calorie diet combined with NNMT inhibition establishes a distinct microbiome in DIO mice


Treatment with a nicotinamide N-methyltransferase inhibitor (NNMTi; 5-amino-1-methylquinolinium) combined with low-fat diet (LD) promoted dramatic whole-body adiposity and weight loss in diet-induced obese (DIO) mice, rapidly normalizing these measures to age-matched lean animals, while LD switch alone was unable to restore these measures to age-matched controls in the same time frame. Since mouse microbiome profiles often highly correlate with body weight and fat composition, this study was designed to test whether the cecal microbiomes of DIO mice treated with NNMTi and LD were comparable to the microbiomes of age-matched lean counterparts and distinct from microbiomes of DIO mice maintained on a high-fat Western diet (WD) or subjected to LD switch alone. There were minimal microbiome differences between lean and obese controls, suggesting that diet composition and adiposity had limited effects. However, DIO mice switched from an obesity-promoting WD to an LD (regardless of treatment status) displayed several genera and phyla differences compared to obese and lean controls. While alpha diversity measures did not significantly differ between groups, beta diversity principal coordinates analyses suggested that mice from the same treatment group were the most similar. K-means clustering analysis of amplicon sequence variants by animal demonstrated that NNMTi-treated DIO mice switched to LD had a distinct microbiome pattern that was highlighted by decreased Erysipelatoclostridium and increased Lactobacillus relative abundances compared to vehicle counterparts; these genera are tied to body weight and metabolic regulation. Additionally, Parasutterella relative abundance, which was increased in both the vehicle- and NNMTi-treated LD-switched groups relative to the controls, significantly correlated with several adipose tissue metabolites’ abundances. Collectively, these results provide a novel foundation for future investigations.


Obesity remains a poorly-controlled, global public health problem1,2,3. First-line obesity treatments include lifestyle intervention (e.g., low-calorie diets) and behavioral modification therapies4,5 since approved obesity medications have limited efficacy and commonly have side effects6. A novel target for next-generation obesity medications is nicotinamide N-methyltransferase (NNMT)7,8,9,10,11, an enzyme central to cellular metabolism and energy homeostasis12. The use of NNMT inhibitors as a potential obesity treatment has been investigated preclinically8,9,13, and observational clinical data suggests that increased NNMT expression and activity correlate with increased incidence of Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and risk of obesity, respectively10,11. In proof-of-concept studies, NNMT inhibitors (NNMTis) have demonstrated promise as potential treatments for obesity and obesity-related metabolic comorbidities (e.g., T2D, fatty liver)8,9,13. However, the role of the microbiome in NNMTi-mediated weight loss is yet to be elucidated.

Understanding how the microbiome is involved in establishing, maintaining, and reversing obesity has been an active area of research14,15,16, and has included studies investigating links between the microbiome and obesity-related comorbidities such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)17,18. For example, individuals with NAFLD exhibit increased intestinal permeability and prevalence of small intestine bacterial overgrowth, and these factors are associated with the severity of hepatic steatosis19. Additionally, recent studies have identified bacterial DNA in human and mouse adipose tissues20,21. Increased intestinal permeability is facilitated by a high-fat diet (HFD)22, and may allow for bacterial translocation from the gut to adipose tissue23. Since adipose tissue is responsive to endotoxins, bacterial translocation may provide a mechanism whereby the gut microbiome can modulate the adipose metabolome (for review, Kruis et al., 201423) and consequently exacerbate obesity and its related comorbidities.

We recently reported that NNMTi treatment combined with a low-fat, or lean, diet (LD) returned systemic adiposity and liver pathologies of obese animals to the adiposity and liver pathology levels of LD controls. LD alone, however, failed to improve obesity-linked liver pathologies13. Given that both diet composition and adiposity can each substantially impact the gut microflora in obese mice24, we conducted a secondary endpoint study using animals given the same series of diets to test the hypothesis that NNMTi treatment combined with LD, but not LD alone, shifts the cecal microbiome profile of obese animals to be similar to age-matched LD controls that were never given a high-fat diet. This study used the NNMTi 5-amino-1-methylquinolinium (5A-M1Q), since our lab has set precedence using this probe molecule for proof-of-concept studies8.

Additionally, the microbiomes in these treatment groups were compared to both age-matched lean and obese controls. Moreover, given the potential links between adipose tissue metabolism and the gut microbiome, correlations between the cecal microbiome and adipose tissue metabolites were examined. Collectively, this study provides a solid foundation for future exploration into the impact of NNMTi-and diet-mediated changes to the gut microbiome in obese and lean populations, as well as future targets to investigate mechanistically with NNMTi treatment.



Animal experiments were performed with adherence to all national and local guidelines and regulations, the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals25, and the ARRIVE guidelines, and with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at The University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB). Male, 18-week-old C57BL/6J mice, maintained on a 60% high-fat diet (HFD; 60 kcal% fat, 20 kcal% carbohydrate, 20 kcal% protein, Research Diets, Inc. OpenSource Diets formula D12492; DIO mice, JAX cat no. 380050) or a low-fat (lean) diet (LD; 10 kcal% fat, 70 kcal% carbohydrate, 20 kcal% protein, Research Diets, Inc. OpenSource Diets formula D12450B; DIO control mice, JAX cat no. 380056) from 6 to 18 weeks of age, and co-housed with counterparts on the same diet, were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). Upon arrival at UTMB, the 18-week-old mice were single-housed and provided ad libitum access to water and a Western diet (WD; 45 kcal% fat, 35 kcal% carbohydrate, 20 kcal% protein, Research Diets, Inc. OpenSource Diets formula D12451) or, if they were previously on an LD, they were maintained continued on LD (termed lean control mice). Mice were maintained in one controlled colony room, kept at 21–23 °C and 45–50% humidity with a 12-h light–dark cycle (lights on 6 a.m.–6 p.m. Central Standard Time [CST]). Cages were exchanged for new sanitized cages filled with irradiated bedding every 2 weeks. Water was changed weekly. Up to two pieces of enrichment were included in each cage.

The DIO mice were randomized into three treatment groups balanced by baseline body weight and body composition (fat and lean mass) measures. Two of the three groups were transitioned from WD to LD for 5 days before the start of the study. All mice received 2 days of 10 mL/kg body weight sterile saline subcutaneous injections before beginning the treatment phase to allow for acclimation to the handling and stress associated with injections. Control groups of mice were maintained on LD or WD and given sham (10 mL/kg body weight sterile saline) injections throughout the study (termed LD/LD-V, or LD control, and WD/WD-V, or WD control, groups; n = 6–8 mice/group). One group of mice that were switched from WD to LD received these same sterile saline injections for the remainder of the study (termed the WD/LD-V group; n = 8), while a second group received 5A-1MQ treatment at 32 mg/kg of active pharmaceutical ingredient (injections of 4 mg 5A-1MQ monochloride salt/mL sterile saline dosed at 10 mL/kg body weight) after being switched from WD to LD (termed the WD/LD-T group; n = 8). Subcutaneous injection was chosen as 5A-1MQ specifically has poor oral bioavailability in mice, a phenomenon that does not occur in rats26. This dose was chosen based on a previous dose-escalation study and subsequent work demonstrating its efficacy to drive weight loss in a short period of time8. Study design, and diet and treatment groups are diagrammed in Fig. 1a. Daily doses were given between approximately 4–6 PM CST. Food intake and body weight were measured twice weekly. Body composition was determined weekly with an EchoMRI 4in1-500 Body Composition Analyzer (EchoMRI Whole Body Composition Analyzer; EchoMRI LLC, Houston, TX, USA). Injection volumes were calculated using the most recently recorded animal weight and adjusted weekly; for more details, see Sampson et al., 202113. Mice were euthanized in a non-fasted state over 2 days during their sleep cycle; six animals from the LD control, WD control, and WD/LD-V groups and five animals from the WD/LD-T group were euthanized the first day. The remaining two LD/LD-V, two WD/LD-V, and three WD/LD-T mice were euthanized 2 days later. One individual per group was euthanized before addressing the next animal in each group to render differences arising from the time of day at euthanization (e.g., cecal mass changes resulting from differences in time post-food consumption) comparable across all groups.

Figure 1
figure 1

Diet and NNMTi treatment status substantially altered body weight and fat mass. a After weaning, mice were placed on a high-fat diet (HFD, 60% fat) for 12 weeks, transitioned to Western diet (WD, 45% fat) for 4 weeks, and then randomized to WD or to lean diet (LD, 10% fat) and vehicle (-V) or NNMTi treatment (-T) with 5-amino-1-methylquinolinium (5A-1MQ) for approximately 7 weeks prior to study termination and cecal sample collection; a control group remained on LD throughout the study. b,c Body weight and fat mass were significantly different between the diet-induced obesity model and the lean control group at study start (22.5 weeks of age); at the end of the study, body weight and fat mass were lower in the WD/LD-V group than the WD/WD-V control group, and in the NNMTi-treated group these measures were even lower and statistically indistinguishable from the LD/LD-V control group when a correction for multiple comparisons was not run (n = 6–8). Graphs depict mean + /− SEM; unless specified, multiple comparisons were significant before and after FDR correction (p < 0.05 and q < 0.05); further statistical details can be found in Supplementary Table S2. *, significantly different from all other groups for that study day; a, significantly different from the lean control group (LD/LD-V); b, significantly different from the obese control group (WD/WD-V); c, significantly different from vehicle-treated mice switched from WD to LD (WD/LD-V); d, significantly different from 5A-1MQ-treated mice switched from WD to LD (WD/LD-T); v, p > 0.05 but q < 0.05.

Cecal samples

Cecal weight was measured since the weight of this portion of the intestine appears to be highly influenced by the microbiome (e.g., certain antibiotic treatments dramatically increase cecal weight27,28,29,30,31 but not the colon27). Cecal samples were collected at euthanization, then flash-frozen and stored at − 80 °C. DNA was not isolated from the first two samples collected in the LD/LD-V group, and the first sample collected in each of the other respective groups, due to the use of saline to flush the cecum (after weighing) during early collection (therefore, n = 25 cecal samples). BGI (Yantian District, Shenzhen, China), an established contract research organization, isolated DNA from the remaining cecal samples and generated a metagenomic 16s rDNA amplicon library. Fusion primers with dual-indexed PCR adapters were used to generate the construct library, and short fragments were removed with AMPure beads. DNA concentration was determined with a Qubit dsDNA BR Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Sequencing, data processing, and analysis parameters

The study's primary aim was to determine whether 5A-1MQ treatment in combination with a switch from WD to LD rendered the intestinal microbiome comparable to that of mice continuously maintained on LD, and distinct from that of DIO mice switched to LD but given saline injections or mice maintained continuously on WD. Microbiome 16S V1-V3 rRNA gene sequencing, alignment, and initial filtering were performed by BGI. Sequencing was performed using a HiSeq 2500 (Illumina), with a read length of 300 bp paired-end reads and at least 25,000 tags per sample. Reads with an average quality < 20 over a 25 bp sliding window were truncated (phred algorithm32,33), and the trimmed reads with < 75% of their original length were removed along with their respective pair. Additionally, reads contaminated by the adapter (reads with ≥ 15 bases overlapping between the reads and the adapter with up to 3 bases mismatching), reads with ambiguous bases, and reads with ≥ 10 identical consecutive bases were removed along with each of their respective paired reads. Cleaned reads were assigned to their corresponding samples by requiring 0 base mismatches to the barcode sequences, as determined by in-house (BGI) scripts. For paired-end reads, a consensus sequence was created using Fast Length Adjustment of SHort reads34 (v1.2.11) with minimal overlapping length (15 bp) and a mismatching ratio of the overlapped region ≤ 0.1; paired-end reads not meeting this criteria were removed. Combining the paired-end reads with the tags based on overlapping regions generated 3,360,747 tags identified in total for all samples, with an average of 134,429 tags/sample. Sequences with less than four consecutive bases matching the tags at the 3′ end and > 2 mismatches in the bases for the remaining part of the primer were removed, and this resulted in a total of 3,332,352 tags, averaging 133,294 tags/sample with an average length of 481 bp.

These sequences were then run through an R script (Supplementary Materials, bash_DADA2 + IDTAXA_workflow_Illumina-PairedEnd_V1V3.R) which trimmed reverse reads to 260 bp, removed forward reads exceeding a maximum expected error of three, and truncated reverse reads exceeding a maximum expected error of six. Filtered reads were then paired-end merged again, and chimeras and non-bacterial sequences were discarded from the data. Paired-end FASTQ files were then run through the DADA2 pipeline (v1.8) to generate an amplicon sequence variant (ASV) table and assign taxonomy. DECIPHER (v2.6.0) was used to align sequences, and FastTree (v2.1.3) was used to generate a phylogenetic tree.

Two analyses were performed to determine the species comprising the genera. The first method used a Basic Local Alignment Search Tool Nucleotide (BLASTn; v2.7.1; script in Supplementary Materials Scripts .zip file, BLASTn Query) search35,36; this assigned the best hit for each of the ASVs and then provided the percentage of identical matches between the sequence of interest and the top hit as well as an e-value (i.e., the number of expected hits with a similar quality that could be found by chance). Unfortunately, the e-value is affected by the database size and several gaps and mismatches could be present without dramatically influencing the e-value. Consequently, a second method, Bayesian Latent Class Analysis-based Taxonomic Classification (BLCA; Python v3;; accessed November 25, 2020; script in Supplementary Materials Scripts .zip file, BLCA), was used that output bootstrap confidence intervals determined using Bayesian posterior probability and weighing the similarity between database hits relative to the query sequence. In this second approach, higher similarity resulted in greater weight and, consequently, greater contribution to taxonomic assignment. The species results of these two methods were cross-compared and a result was only considered definitive if it was identified using both methodologies.

The BIOM file output from the DADA2 pipeline and the DECIPHER-aligned FastTree phylogenetic tree were input into QIIME (v1.9.1) and the scripts in the Supplementary Materials (QIIME Scripts compilation) were used to establish the alpha diversity metrics of Chao1 richness estimate, Simpson’s evenness measure E, Shannon diversity index H, Simpson’s diversity index, and Faith’s phylogenetic diversity metric (whole tree) as well as the beta diversity measures of unweighted and weighted UniFrac analyses (the latter of which factors in ASV abundance37) and Bray–Curtis dissimilarity analysis. Principle coordinates analyses (PCoAs) were generated based on the distance and dissimilarity matrices.

From the ASV table (Supplementary Table S1), sums of ASVs within each respective phylum or genus for each sample were calculated to establish the abundance of each phylum or genus per sample. The sums of the number of unique ASVs per sample were compared across groups, with the unclassified sequences excluded for the observed ASVs; this was used to estimate richness. Relative abundance of each phylum or genus was calculated in each sample by dividing the abundance of the respective phylum or genus by the sum of the abundances of all phyla or genera for that sample, then multiplying by 100 to generate a percentage. K-means clustering was performed on the genera relative abundance data using the R script in the Supplementary Materials Scripts .zip file (KMScript), and clusters were plotted. The number of clusters was determined using the sum of squared estimate of errors curve.


Statistics were run using GraphPad Prism (v7.05) unless specified otherwise. For the relative abundance data, phyla and genera data were first transformed by adding 1e−13 to each sample. Subsequently, for these data as well as the alpha diversity analyses, each treatment group (within each phylum or genus for the relative abundance data) was analyzed for normal distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test) and the data across groups were tested for homoscedasticity (Brown–Forsythe test). Data were log10 transformed if they were non-normally distributed and/or heteroscedastic. Alpha diversity analyses did not require the initial 1e−13 transformation as all values were > 0. Data that remained non-normally distributed and/or heteroscedastic after log transformation were analyzed (not log-transformed, but still 1e−13-transformed) with a Kruskal–Wallis test, while normally distributed and homoscedastic data were analyzed with a one-way ANOVA, performed on the log-transformed data as necessary. Datasets that included a group demonstrating zero variance between samples were analyzed non-parametrically. Significant ANOVA/Kruskal–Wallis test results were then followed with post-hoc testing, which underwent the two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger and Yekutieli correction for multiple comparisons. Because a large number of comparisons were performed on the relative abundance data, main effect results from these analyses also underwent a Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple comparisons, and instances where a result was significant after this correction have been duly noted. For the beta diversity analyses, an analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) was performed on each of the distance/dissimilarity matrices to establish whether observed clustering by treatment group was statistically significant.

In addition to the analyses on the relative abundance data mentioned above, taxa were summarized using the Python script labeled QIIME Scripts compilation in the Supplementary Materials Scripts .zip file. The tabular data were processed with the Huttenhower lab’s linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) tool via the Galaxy module (v1.0)38. LEfSe analysis provided a secondary measure to establish differences between treatment groups in addition to the one-way ANOVA/Kruskal–Wallis tests performed on each genus/phylum. LEfSe is known to reduce false positives and can highlight biological consistency across subclasses, while the Kruskal–Wallis test used alone can achieve a lower false-negative rate compared to LEfSe38. For the LEfSe analysis, an alpha of 0.05 was set for the Kruskal–Wallis tests among classes, and per-sample normalization was performed to bring the sum of the values to 1 M. The log10 LDA score threshold was set to 2.0, and all classes were compared against all other classes for multi-class analysis.

Development of a tool for correlational analyses

Since a secondary aim of this study was to examine potential relationships between the cecal microbiome and adipose tissue metabolome, a Python (v3.8) tool, which used modules from SciPy39, was created to expedite the correlational analyses between the cecal microbiome and the previously-published epididymal white adipose tissue (EWAT) metabolome13. The tool followed the decision tree in Supplementary Fig. S1. It used a Shapiro–Wilk test to assess normality and an F-test to assess homoscedasticity, and attempted log-transformation to resolve any lack thereof40. This novel tool, termed the Spearman’s-Pearson’s Decider, which expedited the processes needed to decide between a parametric or non-parametric analysis, is freely available at GitHub (; script and ReadMe in Supplementary Materials Scripts .zip file under Spearmans_Pearsons_Decider and ReadMe for Spearmans_Pearsons_Decider, respectively). An assumption of parametric analyses that was not tested by the tool was a lack of outliers; this was not included in the tool since the definition of outliers is subjective. However, outliers were analyzed for these correlations using the interquartile range (IQR) method; quartiles were computed in Microsoft Excel and the upper range for outliers was set at quartile 3 + (1.5 × the IQR), and the lower range was set at quartile 1 − (1.5 × the IQR). Outliers were then removed, and the data were run through the Spearman’s-Pearson’s Decider again. Finally, the correlation coefficient for each combination of genus and metabolite with outliers was compared to the coefficient without outliers for the same combination; correlation coefficients that changed > 0.2 were noted as being influenced by the presence of outliers; however, these results were not excluded from corrections for multiple comparisons or the heat map generated with the data. Benjamini–Hochberg false-discovery rate corrections (set to 5%) were applied to the results with and without outliers individually.

For each analysis, the statistical test used and n for each group are found in Supplemental Tables 2, 3, or 5; all tests were two-tailed and α = 0.05 for each analysis. When comparisons were made, all relevant treatment groups were included.


Body weight, fat mass, and cecal mass

As expected, obese mice (maintained on an HFD followed by WD) had significantly higher body weights than mice continuously maintained on LD. However, the body weight of 5A-1MQ-treated obese mice (WD/LD-T group), which was indistinguishable from the other DIO groups at study start, was indistinguishable from the lean control (LD/LD-V) group at study completion (results with FDR correction; study timeline, Fig. 1a; body weight results Fig. 1b, Supplementary Table S2). Fat mass followed the same pattern. All mice that were subjected to an HFD had a higher fat mass compared to the LD control group at the start of the study. Importantly, at study completion, 5A-1MQ-treated mice had a lower fat mass than the obese WD controls and their vehicle-treated counterparts and were not significantly different (with FDR correction) from the LD control mice (Fig. 1c; Supplementary Table S2). Cecal mass did not significantly differ between groups (Supplementary Table S2).

Alpha diversity

Several alpha diversity measures were analyzed since bacterial evenness and richness can be incorporated to varying degrees in different measures41. Bacterial richness measured by the unique ASV counts observed did not significantly differ between treatment groups (Fig. 2a). Additionally, no differences between treatment groups were identified using Simpson’s evenness measure E (Fig. 2b) or when richness and evenness were combined in the Shannon–Wiener Diversity Index H (Fig. 2c). No significant differences between treatment groups were observed using the Chao1 richness estimate42, which accounts for ASV rareness in the richness measure (Supplementary Fig. S2). Furthermore, there were no differences between treatment groups for Simpson’s Diversity Index (Supplementary Fig. S2) or phylogenetic diversity as measured by Faith’s formula applied to the whole phylogenetic tree (Supplementary Fig. S2). Although the mean values for each of the alpha diversity measures were often largest for the 5A-1MQ-treated group switched from WD to LD relative to all other groups (Fig. 2; Supplementary Fig. S2), this trend did not rise to the level of statistical significance.

Figure 2
figure 2

Alpha diversity measures did not differ significantly across treatment groups, and unweighted UniFrac beta diversity analysis exhibited partial clustering by treatment group. Observed unique ASV count (a), Simpson’s Evenness Measure E (b), and Shannon Diversity Index H (c) were all statistically indistinguishable between groups; graphs depict mean + /− SEM. Unweighted UniFrac analysis is presented as a PCoA (d–f) and exhibits distinct clustering, with a large separation of the LD control group from the other groups.

Beta diversity

Beta diversity was determined using the unweighted UniFrac, weighted UniFrac, and Bray–Curtis dissimilarity measures. PCoAs were generated using the distance matrices from unweighted (Fig. 2d-f) and weighted (Supplementary Fig. S2) UniFrac analyses and Bray–Curtis dissimilarity analysis (Supplementary Fig. S2). These graphs suggested that there may be, at least some degree of, clustering by treatment group. Consequently, ANOSIM testing was also performed, which showed that clustering by treatment group was significant in each of the diversity measures (unweighted UniFrac: R value = 0.369, p = 0.0010; weighted UniFrac: R value = 0.190, p = 0.0240; Bray–Curtis: R value = 0.165, p = 0.0060).


Six distinct phyla were identified in the cecal microbiomes, but not all were present in each sample. Sequences that could not be definitively assigned to a phylum were labeled “unclassified” (Fig. 3a; Supplementary Table S3). Of these seven groups, the Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia phyla demonstrated a significant main effect of treatment group on relative abundance after Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons, while Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria demonstrated significant main effects of treatment group on relative abundance before Benjamini–Hochberg correction. Post-hoc comparisons showed that the Firmicutes phylum’s relative abundance was significantly higher in WD control mice compared to mice in the vehicle- and 5A-1MQ-treated groups switched from WD to LD (Fig. 3b). In contrast, Proteobacteria relative abundance was significantly higher in both the vehicle- and 5A-1MQ-treated groups switched from WD to LD, compared to both the LD and WD control groups (Fig. 3c). Verrucomicrobia relative abundance was significantly higher in vehicle-treated mice switched from WD to LD compared to both the LD and WD control groups (Fig. 3d). Actinobacteria showed a significantly greater relative abundance in WD control mice compared to all other groups (Fig. 3e). Finally, Bacteroidetes relative abundance was significantly increased in 5A-1MQ-treated mice switched from WD to LD relative to WD control mice (Fig. 3f), and its relative abundance was lowest in WD control mice compared to all other groups.

Figure 3
figure 3

Microbial phyla exhibit dramatic shifts predominantly mediated by diet switch as opposed to diet composition. (a) Relative abundance for each of the phyla identified in the mouse cecal samples as well as the remaining sequences which could not be assigned (unclassified). (b–d) Three bacterial phyla demonstrated significant differences following Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons: Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia. (e–f) Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes both demonstrated significant differences before (but not after) Benjamini–Hochberg correction. (g) The ratio of Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes was significantly lower in the WD/LD-T mice compared to those maintained on WD, and there was a trend for a similar effect in the WD/LD-V mice. Graphs depict mean + /− SEM; unless specified, multiple comparisons were significant before and after FDR correction (p < 0.05 and q < 0.05); further statistical details can be found in Supplementary Table S3. a, significantly different than the lean control group (LD/LD-V); b, significantly different than the obese control group (WD/WD-V); ^, p < 0.05 but q > 0.05.

The ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes is a commonly-studied change with an increase often linked to HFD consumption/obesity in mice43,44 and humans45,46 (for review, see John and Mullin, 201647). In the current study, the ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes was significantly higher in WD control mice compared to both groups of mice transitioned from WD to LD (Fig. 3g). Although there was a clear trend for a higher Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio in the WD control group relative to the LD control group, this difference did not rise to the level of statistical significance. On average, the Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio for the WD control group was more than 2-fold greater than the groups that ended the study on LD.


Fifty-nine bacterial genera were definitively identified in the cecal samples. Sequences which could not be unambiguously assigned to a genus were labeled “unclassified” (Fig. 4a; Supplementary Table S3). The most abundant genus was Ileibacterium, a relatively novel genus of the Firmicutes phylum48. Consistent with the distribution of Firmicutes in the cecal samples, the relative abundance of Ileibacterium was highest in the WD controls (average relative abundance 68%), second highest in the LD controls (average relative abundance 51%), and lowest in the vehicle- and 5A-1MQ-treated mice switched from WD to LD (average relative abundances of 40% and 41%, respectively).

Figure 4
figure 4

Microbial genera exhibited distinct effects of 5A-1MQ treatment and diet switch. (a) Relative abundance of the genera identified in the mouse cecal samples; sequences which could not be assigned (unclassified) were pooled with sequences composing less than 5% of any given mouse’s microbial genera only to simplify the graph. (b–e) Average relative abundance of the most interesting genera demonstrating significant differences between groups; the remaining genera can be found in Supplementary Figure S3. Graphs depict mean + /− SEM; unless specified, multiple comparisons were significant before and after FDR correction (p < 0.05 and q < 0.05); further statistical details in Supplementary Table S3. a, significantly different than the lean control group (LD/LD-V); b, significantly different than the obese control group (WD/WD-V); c, significantly different than vehicle-treated mice switched from WD to LD (WD/LD-V); ^p < 0.05 but q > 0.05.

Significant main effects of treatment group (prior to Benjamini–Hochberg correction since none were significant after correction, although the necessity of correction for multiple comparisons in exploratory analyses remains unresolved49) were observed for the unclassified group and ten classified genera, namely, Acetatifactor, Akkermansia, Erysipelatoclostridium, [Eubacterium] coprostanoligenes group, Family XIII UCG-001, Lactobacillus, Parasutterella, Ruminiclostridium 6, Ruminococcaceae UCG-004, and Ruminococcaceae UCG-009. Akkermansia relative abundance was significantly higher in the vehicle-treated group switched from WD to LD compared to both the WD and LD control groups (Fig. 4b). Erysipelatoclostridium relative abundance was significantly greater in the vehicle-treated group switched from WD to LD relative to all other groups (before FDR correction, Fig. 4c). Uniquely, Lactobacillus relative abundance was dramatically higher in the 5A-1MQ-treated group switched from WD to LD compared to all other groups (Fig. 4d, statistically significantly different from LD controls and vehicle-treated mice switched from WD to LD). Parasutterella relative abundance was significantly higher in both the vehicle- and 5A-1MQ-treated groups switched from WD to LD relative to the LD and WD control groups (Fig. 4e). Acetatifactor relative abundance was greater in 5A-1MQ-treated mice switched from WD to LD compared to WD (without FDR correction) and LD controls (Supplementary Fig. S3). The relative abundance of the [Eubacterium] coprostanoligenes group was greater in both the vehicle- and 5A-1MQ-treated groups switched from WD to LD compared to the LD control group (Supplementary Fig. S3). Similarly, the relative abundance of Family XIII UCG-001 was greater in the vehicle-treated (before FDR correction) and 5A-1MQ-treated groups switched from WD to LD compared to the LD control group (Supplementary Fig. S3).

Since Ruminiclostridium 6 was only observed in the LD control group, it was unsurprising that its relative abundance was significantly greater in this group compared to all other experimental groups (Supplementary Fig. S3). Ruminococcaceae UCG-004 was only present in the LD and WD control groups, with similar average relative abundances in both groups; however, the only statistically significant difference was between the LD control group and both groups switched from WD to LD, regardless of their treatment (Supplementary Fig. S3). In contrast, Ruminococcaceae UCG-009 was present in all experimental groups, and exhibited significantly greater relative abundance in both the LD control group and the 5A-1MQ-treated group switched from WD to LD compared to the WD control group (both significant before FDR correction; Supplementary Fig. S3). Finally, the relative abundance of sequences that could not be assigned to a defined genus was significantly higher in vehicle- and 5A-1MQ-treated mice switched from WD to LD relative to the WD control group (the former before FDR correction only; Supplementary Fig. S3).


Several ASVs mapped with high confidence directly to a specific species (Supplementary Table S4), with considerably more species mapped using the BLASTn method compared to the BLCA method. Both methods generated the same species assignments for 60 ASVs, whereas 11 ASVs were mapped to dissimilar species by the different methods. Importantly, all ASVs within six of the genera mapped to identical species when analyzed by both methods. For Erysipelatoclostridium, every ASV mapped to [Clostridium] cocleatum. The only ASV identified as Lactococcus mapped to Lactococcus lactis. All ASVs for Parasutterella mapped to Parasutterella excrementihominis. Every ASV for Romboutsia mapped to Romboutsia ilealis; the only ASV identified for Staphylococcus mapped to Staphylococcus xylosus, and the only ASV found for UBA1819 mapped to Ruthenibacterium lactatiformans. In six instances, ASVs that had not been assigned a genus by DECIPHER mapped consistently to a genera and species across the BLASTn and BLCA methods; the majority (i.e., four) of these ASVs mapped to Dubosiella newyorkensis while the remaining two ASVs mapped to Romboutsia ilealis.

Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe)

LEfSe, which highlights biological consistency across subclasses38, identified (log10 LDA score > 2.0) many of the same genera and phyla noted as significant (p < 0.05) by one-way ANOVA/Kruskal–Wallis tests (i.e., the phyla Verrucomicrobia, Proteobacteria, and Firmicutes; the genera Akkermansia, [Eubacterium] coprostanoligenes group, Erysipelatoclostridium, and Ruminococcaceae UCG-009). These calculations (Fig. 5) attest to the excellent rigor and reproducibility of the one-way ANOVA/Kruskal–Wallis analyses of microbiome differences between treatment groups. While the majority of the analyses herein focused on the largest taxonomic rank below bacteria (phylum) and the smallest taxonomic rank this data could reasonably assign (genus), the LDA helped demonstrate how changes to the smallest rank resulted in dramatic shifts at the level of the largest rank below bacteria. Importantly, the LDA maintained the nearest taxonomic distinction, unlike the analyses that pooled together unclassified organisms.

Figure 5
figure 5

LEfSe strongly supported the results of the one-way ANOVA/Kruskal–Wallis tests. (a) Microbial classes identified in the LEfSe analysis as having a log10 LDA score > 2.0; each of the (non-“other”) phyla and genera identified by LEfSe was also identified as having a main effect (p < 0.05) of group in the one-way ANOVA/Kruskal–Wallis analyses. (b) The cladogram shows the relatedness of the phyla and genera findings; written labels begin with the highest class (phylum) in the outermost layer and end with the lowest class (genus) in the innermost layer. This figure was generated using the Huttenhower lab's Galaxy module ( for LEfSe v1.0102.

Supporting the above data analyses, the LDA demonstrated that the Verrucomicrobia, Proteobacteria, and Firmicutes phyla had large effect sizes, suggesting that these particular phyla play a dominant role in differentiating the treatment groups from one another. The largest median was observed for Verrucomicrobia in the vehicle-treated group switched from WD to LD (WD/LD-V group), for Proteobacteria in the 5A-1MQ-treated group switched from WD to LD (WD/LD-T group), and for Firmicutes in the WD control (WD/WD-V) group (Fig. 5a). For classified genera (those not labeled “other” in the LEfSe analysis) in the microbiome, the largest effect sizes were observed in Akkermansia, [Eubacterium] coprostanoligenes group, Erysipelatoclostridium, Family XIII-UCG-001, Parasutterella, Ruminococcaceae UCG-009, Acetatifactor, and Lactobacillus (Fig. 5a), suggesting that the relative abundances in these genera are critical characteristics differentiating the treatment groups. Akkermansia, [Eubacterium] coprostanoligenes group, and Erysipelatoclostridium had the largest medians in the vehicle-treated group transitioned from WD to LD (WD/LD-V group), while Family XIII-UCG-001, Parasutterella, Ruminococcaceae UCG-009, Acetatifactor, and Lactobacillus had the largest medians in the 5A-1MQ-treated group transitioned from WD to LD (WD/LD-T group) (Fig. 5a).

When these LEfSe results were plotted as a cladogram (Fig. 5b), it became clearer that the treatment group with the largest median in a given class (e.g., genus) with a log10 LDA score > 2.0 was often consistent with the hierarchical class directly above it, if that class also had a log10 LDA score > 2.0. Additionally, the cladogram highlighted the large variety of microbes identified within the Firmicutes phyla, which was much greater than the microbe variation found in the other phyla. Finally, the cladogram (in addition to Supplementary Table S1) clearly illustrated that the unclassified genera fell within multiple orders/families; thus, analysis of pooled unclassified genera has severe limitations.

K-means clustering

Five clusters were used for k-means clustering, per the results of the sum of squared estimate of errors curve, on the ASV relative abundance data with clustering by animal (n = 25). The two largest clusters contained 18 and 4 animals (Fig. 6). The latter cluster contained exclusively 5A-1MQ-treated animals switched from WD to LD (the WD/LD-T group), representing ~ 60% of all WD/LD-T animals. The other three treatment groups were represented approximately equally in the largest cluster, with a maximum of one animal per treatment group outside the cluster; however, the largest cluster included only two mice from the 5A-1MQ-treated group switched from WD to LD. The lack of substantial overlap between these two predominant clusters suggests that the WD/LD-T group has a distinct pattern of ASV relative abundances in its microbiome compared to the other treatment groups.

Figure 6
figure 6

K-means clustering of the ASV relative abundance data by animal resulted in two primary clusters, one of which exclusively contained 5A-1MQ-treated mice transitioned from WD to LD (the WD/LD-T group). Cluster 1 contained only one vehicle-treated mouse transitioned from WD to LD (WD/LD-V). Cluster 2 contained four 5A-1MQ-treated mice transitioned from WD to LD (WD/LD-T), while Cluster 3 contained five LD control mice (LD/LD-V), five WD control mice (WD/WD-V), six WD/LD-V mice, and two WD/LD-T mice. Cluster 4 contained one LD/LD-V mouse and Cluster 5 contained one WD/LD-T mouse. Collectively, k-means clustering supported the conclusion that 5A-1MQ treatment elicits a unique ASV profile relative to the other treatment groups.

Linkage between the cecal microbiome and adipose tissue metabolome

The relative abundance of a large number of microbial genera correlated with EWAT metabolite abundances. A total of 10,200 calculations were performed (in replicate, with and without outliers included) to identify potential links between microbiome genera and EWAT metabolites, and 439 genera-metabolite correlations were identified as statistically significant (p < 0.05, without Benjamini–Hochberg correction and with outliers excluded; Supplementary Table S5). A heat map of this data was generated using only the genera and metabolites that had previously demonstrated significant main effects of treatment group (Fig. 7); in total, 9 genera (including the unclassified group) and 38 metabolites met these criteria (metabolites published in Sampson et al., 202113). Of note, the relative abundance of the Parasutterella genus, which was significantly enriched in both the vehicle- and 5A-1MQ-treated animals transitioned from WD to LD compared to both the WD and LD control groups, was observed to be significantly correlated (either positively or negatively) with 30 EWAT metabolites, both with and without outliers included.

Figure 7
figure 7

Correlations between the epididymal white adipose tissue metabolome and the microbiome strongly suggest that cecal Parasutterella abundance is linked to the abundance of many adipose metabolites. Significant correlations between genera and metabolites that demonstrated significant main effects of treatment group (significant prior to Benjamini–Hochberg correction) were used to generate a heat map colored by correlation coefficient. The data used to generate the heat map removed outliers by both metabolite and genus. Thus, the n varied per correlation. Correlations from the data including outliers can be found in Supplementary Table S5. Eu., Eubacterium.


Effective interventional treatments are critically needed to address ever-increasing rates of global obesity and obesity-linked comorbidities. NNMTi-treatment offers a promising therapeutic approach to address this unmet need8,9,13. There is growing evidence that the microbiome may be critical for establishing, maintaining, and reversing obesity14,15,16, and that both diet composition and adiposity each contribute to modulation of the mouse gut microbiome profile49. Consequently, it is important to understand how the microbiome responds to NNMTi-focused obesity treatments.

Multiple mechanisms may interrelate NNMTi treatment with the microbiome. Since NNMT is expressed in adipose, hepatic, and gut tissues50,51,52, and these tissues heavily cross-talk with the gut microbiome53,54,55, NNMTi treatment or its resulting weight loss effects8,9 may modulate the microbiome. Additionally, the NNMT substrate nicotinamide12 is metabolized by the microbiome56,57, and thus NNMTi may modulate substrate availability, potentially influencing microbial metabolic capacity to drive the NNMTi-mediated weight loss.

Given these potential mechanisms, this study was designed to test the hypothesis that DIO mice restored to the weight and adiposity of LD controls through NNMTi treatment and LD switch13 have a similar microbiome profile to mice continuously maintained on LD. Interestingly, we observed that the cecal microbiome of previously-obese animals returned to the lean state through NNMTi treatment and LD switch was distinct from the cecal microbiome of continuously lean control animals. Although we expected the largest microbiome differences to occur in the lean control group relative to the obese control group, we found that the diet-switched groups exhibited a greater number of differences from the control groups than the control groups did from one another. Importantly, this proof-of-concept study showed that the relative abundance of Lactobacillus, a genus associated with weight loss58, was uniquely increased and Erysipelatoclostridium was distinctly decreased in mice given 5A-1MQ treatment and an LD switch compared to mice switched to LD and given vehicle treatment. Erysipelatoclostridium is a member of the Erysipelotrichaceae family, which has been linked to obesity and related metabolic issues59.

The distinct microbiome profile of 5A-1MQ-treated mice was also supported by k-means clustering. Furthermore, the relative abundance of Akkermansia, a genus positively associated with improvements in obesity-related metabolic issues60, was increased in the vehicle-treated group that underwent diet switch relative to the WD control group, suggesting a potential for distinct microbiome-mediated mechanisms of weight loss subsequent to diet switch from those of diet switch in combination with 5A-1MQ treatment. However, the relative abundance of the genus Parasutterella, commonly decreased by HFD61, was increased in both the 5A-1MQ- and vehicle-treated mice switched from WD to LD, and the abundance of Parasutterella in all mice exhibited several correlations the EWAT metabolome. This may suggest that Parasutterella changes are linked to the diet switch or the series of diets the animals have experienced in their lifetime. A summary of these key results is found in Fig. 8 (graphic generated by ADW using creative commons- and Adobe-licensed images and PowerPoint).

Figure 8
figure 8

Key results summary. This figure was generated using a combination of open-source images, purchased Adobe stock photos, and PowerPoint.

In the present study, the cecal microbiome differed significantly across treatment groups, despite tightly controlling for several variables known to alter the microbiome in rodents. For example, parameters that have been shown in other studies to alter cecal and fecal microbiomes (e.g., vendor source62,63) were consistent across experimental groups in this study. Importantly, animals were singly housed to eliminate the exchange and cross-contamination of intestinal microbiomes, a factor that potentially biases studies with group-housed animals by minimizing microbiome variations for co-housed animals within a cohort. Unfortunately, singly housing is not commonly reported. For instance, the majority (58%) of mouse microbiome studies published in 2018–2019 did not report the number of mice per cage, and less than 20% of studies reported using singly-housed animals64. While singly-housed animals may experience stress that impacts metabolism, body weight, and adiposity65,66,67,68,69, the singly-housed animals in this study were treated identically (to the best of the experimenter’s ability) to minimize and equalize stress across all animals and reduce confounding variables.

Alpha diversity measures, calculated using several distinct methods, did not significantly differ between treatment groups. However, groups switched from WD to LD (WD/LD-V, WD/LD-T) tended to show greater alpha diversity compared to the control groups (WD/WD-V and LD/LD-V), which was not surprising since these animals experienced the most diet transitions with variable nutrient resources during their lifetime. Furthermore, this trend toward increased alpha diversity in the obese groups placed on an LD that had consequently experienced weight loss aligns with clinical observations, where low gene richness has been associated with increased adiposity, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia70 while increased gene richness has been observed following dietary intervention in obese and overweight individuals71.

Singly-housing animals, which prevents inter-animal coprophagy, reduces beta diversity of the microbiome compared to stressful (chronic subordinate colony) co-housing conditions72. Furthermore, decreased bacterial richness has been linked to high carbohydrate73 and high-fat/low-protein concentrations74, as found in the lean and Western diets, respectively, the latter result only in old-aged rats74. However, irrespective of whether ASV abundance was weighted in the analysis, beta diversity analyses revealed distinct clustering by treatment group. The LD control group was particularly distinct from the other groups in the unweighted UniFrac and Bray–Curtis dissimilarity analyses’ plots, suggesting that animals exposed to the same diet at an early age in life diet develop similar microbiome profiles that persist even after an acute change in diet.

Microbiome differences were greater between the two groups switched from WD to LD (i.e., WD/LD-V and WD/LD-T) and the two diet control groups (i.e., LD/LD-V and WD/WD-V) compared to the microbiome differences observed between the lean (LD/LD-V) and obese (WD/WD-V) control groups. Importantly, the various diets contained identical fiber and protein content and varied primarily by the percentage of fat- and carbohydrate-derived kilocalories. Although dietary fiber has been associated with microbiome changes75, this is unlikely to account for the microbiome changes observed herein since fiber content was the same across diets. It is likely that the larger number of statistically significant changes to the microbiome observed in the groups switched from WD to LD reflects their more numerous exposures to different diets, longitudinal changes in dietary exposure, the stress associated with diet switch, the negative energy state achieved by treatment and/or diet-driven weight loss, or a combination of these factors, but it may also be related to differences in terminal body weight and fat mass since both adiposity and diet composition have been shown to modulate the mouse gut microbiome profile.

The finding of Ileibacterium as the most abundant cecal microbiome genus in every experimental group is relatively novel and may reflect experimental factors such as diet, housing conditions, and mouse strain. Mice from a different substrain and vendor, but fed similar lean and high-fat diets to this study, showed a predominance of the family Erysipelotrichaceae, of which Ileibacterium is a genus, in their cecal microbiomes76. Future studies using varied diets are needed to determine whether the predominance of Ileibacterium in the cecal microbiome holds pathological relevance.

One of the commonly reported microbiome differences between obese/HFD-fed animals and lean controls is an increased Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio43,44. However, this ratio was not significantly different between this study’s obese and lean control groups. Several technical reasons may explain our distinctive findings, including differences in the microbiome sampling site, the limited n per group, singly housing mice, or the use of highly similar lean, Western, and high-fat diets which systematically exchanged fat content with carbohydrate content. Supporting a dominant role for diet composition in establishing the Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio, previous work has shown that mice maintained on a high-fat diet had a similar cecal Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio to those maintained on a high-carbohydrate diet77. This suggests that long-term maintenance on an LD rich in carbohydrates may confound some of the microbiome differences commonly reported between mice on HFDs and those on lean control diets which contain fewer carbohydrates.

Previous work has reported relatively increased Firmicutes and Proteobacteria and decreased Bacteroidetes in mice on an HFD, regardless of concomitant obesity (weight gain was minimized using a RELMβ knockout mouse78)78,79. These microbiome changes reversed rapidly, however, when the obese mice were returned to a normal, lean diet79. Similarly, in the current study, DIO mice from both groups that were switched from WD to LD exhibited higher Bacteroidetes and significantly lower Firmicutes relative abundances compared to DIO mice maintained on WD (WD controls; WD/WD-V). In contrast, DIO mice in both groups switched from WD to LD each had significantly increased Proteobacteria relative abundance (represented solely by the genus Parasutterella) compared to both the WD and the LD controls, suggesting that Proteobacteria relative abundance may be largely influenced by stress or the differences in net energy expenditure (or associated body weight changes) caused by the diet switch. Since decreased Parasutterella relative abundance may accompany increased stress80,81, the increased Parasutterella relative abundance that occurred in this study following diet switch likely arose from the weight loss-mediated negative energy state. Providing support for a causal link between a negative energy state and increased Parasutterella abundance, a rat model of obesity, which showed similar Parasutterella relative abundances in animals maintained on HFD and those maintained on normal chow but exhibited a treatment-induced increase in Parasutterella relative abundance, displayed a negative correlation between Parasutterella and body weight82. Our results also align with a previous observation that resveratrol treatment is associated with Parasutterella blooming in stool samples; both NNMT and resveratrol modulate Sirtuin 1 (Sirt1) activity83,84, and resveratrol83 and 5A-1MQ increase Parasutterella abundance, suggesting a potential causal link.

Parasutterella colonization has been shown to alter tryptophan, tyrosine, and xanthine metabolism in mouse cecal samples61. In this study, significant positive correlations were observed between tryptophan, tyrosine, and xanthine abundances in the EWAT and the relative abundance of Parasutterella in the cecal microbiome (Supplementary Table S5, outliers removed). Whether this observation is solely the consequence of translocation of Parasutterella bacteria from the intestine to the EWAT or driven by more indirect mechanisms such as bacterially-produced metabolites85 is yet to be determined. However, the large number of significant correlations noted in this study between Parasutterella relative abundance and EWAT metabolites strongly supports the relevance of this genus to the EWAT metabolome.

Groups switched from WD to LD had a greater average relative abundance of Verrucomicrobia (represented solely by the genus Akkermansia). In this genus, the relative abundance of the vehicle-treated group transitioned from WD to LD was significantly higher than both the lean and obese control groups. The Akkermansia species muciniphila has been shown to alter glucose and lipid metabolism as well as intestinal immunity86, to strengthen the integrity of the enterocyte monolayer to possibly improve intestinal barrier integrity87, and to improve glucose tolerance and reduce visceral adipose tissue inflammation in mice fed an HFD88. Cecal levels of Akkermansia muciniphila have been strongly correlated with physiological metrics including glycemia and insulinemia89, and Akkermansia has correlated negatively with obesity-related measures90 and has been implicated in DIO prevention91,92. 5A-1MQ-treated mice switched from WD to LD (WD/LD-T) showed a rather reduced relative abundance of Akkermansia compared to vehicle-treated DIO animals switched from WD to LD (WD/LD-V), suggesting a unique microbiome mechanism associated with weight loss in the vehicle-treated group switched from WD to LD compared to the 5A-1MQ-treated group that underwent the same diet switch.

5A-1MQ-treated mice switched from WD to LD were particularly distinct from mice in the other groups when k-means clustering was applied to the ASV relative abundance data. This result may have been driven by Erysipelatoclostridium and Lactobacillus, the only two microbial genera that significantly differed between the 5A-1MQ-treated and the vehicle-treated mice both switched from WD to LD. The relative abundance of Erysipelatoclostridium was increased in vehicle-treated mice that underwent the WD to LD switch (WD/LD-V) relative to the two control groups (LD/LD-V and WD/WD-V) but was not increased in 5A-1MQ-treated mice that underwent the same diet switch (WD/LD-T). Cecal levels of Erysipelatoclostridium abundance have been positively correlated with dyslipidemia93, and a report that WD decreased the relative abundance of Erysipelatoclostridium and that the abundance of Erysipelatoclostridium negatively correlated with obesity-related indices90 may partially explain our observation that decreased levels of Erysipelatoclostridium were present in the 5A-1MQ-treated group and the WD control group relative to the vehicle-treated group switched from WD to LD.

Unlike Erysipelatoclostridium, Lactobacillus was significantly and dramatically increased in 5A-1MQ-treated mice switched from WD to LD relative to their vehicle-treated counterparts and the LD control group. Several Lactobacillus species require nicotinamide or nicotinic acid for growth94; these metabolites are components of the NAD+ salvage pathway that are directly upstream of NNMT12. In addition, nicotinamide, the primary NNMT substrate95,96, is broken down by Lactobacillus arabinosis into nicotinic acid and ammonia56. Nicotinic acid is then assimilated into Lactobacillus arabinosis during growth97. We have previously demonstrated an increased nicotinamide:nicotinic acid ratio in the adipose tissues of 5A-1MQ-treated DIO mice13. NNMTi-mediated changes to the availability of nicotinamide/nicotinic acid in conjunction with the presence of moderate amounts of Lactobacillus may promote a positive feedback loop further increasing the abundance of Lactobacillus. Human studies using Lactobacillus as a probiotic have often demonstrated decreased body weight and/or body fat in a strain-dependent manner (for a review of human studies, see Crovesy et al., 201758), suggesting that the NNMTi-and-LD-mediated changes to Lactobacillus relative abundance may be critical to NNMTi-mediated weight loss. Lactobacillus-mediated weight loss may be brought about, at least in part, by changes to lipid absorption and triglyceride synthesis, since orally-administered Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG reduces intestinal lipid absorption and the expression of triglyceride synthesis-related genes in mice98. Previous work has shown that the abundance of Lactobacillus reuteri (normalized to a control group) decreases during the onset of obesity and remains suppressed even after dieting in mice99, which parallels our observations that vehicle-treated diet-switched mice had lower levels of Lactobacillus than the 5A-1MQ-treated mice, the latter of which also demonstrated greater weight loss.

Although fundamental 5A-1MQ and LD-mediated changes to the microbiome were identified, this work is similar to many current studies where further investigations will clarify if changes in the microbiome are causative or associative100. Furthermore, this study’s robust design is not without limitations. Singly-housed rodents may have increased adiposity101 and, moreover, singly-housed mice in standard caging can engage in coprophagy of their own feces that may impact their cecal microbiome102. Changes to the microbial phyla and genera observed in the 5A-1MQ-treated group switched from WD to LD could have been driven by additive, synergistic, or independent mechanisms relative to those induced by diet switch alone, which could not be determined with the current study design that lacked a group treated with 5A-1MQ and maintained on WD. Since the first-line intervention for obesity is typically lifestyle change(s)4, this study purposefully combined LD switch with 5A-1MQ treatment; the effects of 5A-1MQ treatment on the microbiome of animals maintained continuously on LD or WD have yet to be determined. Additionally, the specificity of these results to the NNMTi 5A-1MQ and the dosage used herein also require further evaluation. Finally, although the correlations between the metabolome and microbiome were established using robust statistical analyses, there was limited statistical power and there are also limitations to the statistical approaches used herein (e.g., log transformation to resolve non-normal distribution and/or heteroscedasticity103). Nonetheless, this work has identified novel findings that support future studies to determine whether microbiome changes are contingent upon the combination of both NNMTi and LD switch and mediated through direct NNMTi-driven mechanisms or through indirect mechanisms such as weight or fat loss8,13.

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during this study are included in the Supplementary files.


  1. 1.

    Blüher, M. Obesity: Global epidemiology and pathogenesis (in Eng). Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 15(5), 288–298. (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    N. R. F. C. (NCD-RisC). Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: A pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19·2 million participants (in Eng). Lancet 387(10026), 1377–1396. (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    N. R. F. C. (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults (in Eng). Lancet 390(10113), 2627–2642. (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Pilitsi, E. et al. Pharmacotherapy of obesity: Available medications and drugs under investigation (in Eng). Metabolism 92, 170–192. (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Jensen, M. D. et al. "2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society (in Eng). Circulation 129(25 Suppl 2), S102–S138. (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Carter, R., Mouralidarane, A., Ray, S., Soeda, J. & Oben, J. Recent advancements in drug treatment of obesity (in Eng). Clin. Med. (Lond.) 12(5), 456–460. (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kraus, D. et al. Nicotinamide N-methyltransferase knockdown protects against diet-induced obesity (in Eng). Nature 508(7495), 258–262. (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Neelakantan, H. et al. Selective and membrane-permeable small molecule inhibitors of nicotinamide N-methyltransferase reverse high fat diet-induced obesity in mice (in Eng). Biochem. Pharmacol. 147, 141–152. (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kannt, A. et al. A small molecule inhibitor of Nicotinamide N-methyltransferase for the treatment of metabolic disorders (in Eng). Sci. Rep. 8(1), 3660. (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kannt, A. et al. Association of nicotinamide-N-methyltransferase mRNA expression in human adipose tissue and the plasma concentration of its product, 1-methylnicotinamide, with insulin resistance (in Eng). Diabetologia 58(4), 799–808. (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Liu, M. et al. Serum N(1)-methylnicotinamide is associated with obesity and diabetes in Chinese (in Eng). J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 100(8), 3112–3117. (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Pissios, P. Nicotinamide N-Methyltransferase: More than a vitamin B3 clearance enzyme (in Eng). Trends Endocrinol Metab 28(5), 340–353. (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sampson, C. M. et al. Combined nicotinamide N-methyltransferase inhibition and reduced-calorie diet normalizes body composition and enhances metabolic benefits in obese mice. Sci. Rep. (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ejtahed, H. S. et al. Worldwide trends in scientific publications on association of gut microbiota with obesity (in Eng). Iran J. Basic Med. Sci. 22(1), 65–71. (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Baothman, O. A., Zamzami, M. A., Taher, I., Abubaker, J. & Abu-Farha, M. The role of gut microbiota in the development of obesity and diabetes (in Eng). Lipids Health Dis. 15, e108. (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Harley, I. T. & Karp, C. L. Obesity and the gut microbiome: Striving for causality (in Eng). Mol. Metab. 1(1–2), 21–31. (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kolodziejczyk, A. A., Zheng, D., Shibolet, O. & Elinav, E. The role of the microbiome in NAFLD and NASH (in Eng). EMBO Mol. Med. 11(2), e9302. (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sharma, M. et al. The riddle of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Progression from nonalcoholic fatty liver to nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (in Eng). J. Clin. Exp. Hepatol. 5(2), 147–158. (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Miele, L. et al. Increased intestinal permeability and tight junction alterations in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (in Eng). Hepatology 49(6), 1877–1887. (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Massier, L. et al. Adipose tissue derived bacteria are associated with inflammation in obesity and type 2 diabetes (in Eng). Gut 69(10), 1796–1806. (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lluch, J. et al. The characterization of novel tissue microbiota using an optimized 16S metagenomic sequencing pipeline (in Eng). PLoS ONE 10(11), e0142334. (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Rohr, M. W., Narasimhulu, C. A., Rudeski-Rohr, T. A. & Parthasarathy, S. Negative effects of a high-fat diet on intestinal permeability: A review (in Eng). Adv. Nutr. 11(1), 77–91. (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kruis, T., Batra, A. & Siegmund, B. Bacterial translocation—Impact on the adipocyte compartment (in Eng). Front. Immunol. 4, e510. (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ravussin, Y. et al. Responses of gut microbiota to diet composition and weight loss in lean and obese mice (in Eng). Obesity (Silver Spring) 20(4), 738–747. (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    C. National Research, R. Institute for Laboratory Animal, and P. National Academies, Eds. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th ed, 220 (National Academies Press, 2011).

  26. 26.

    Awosemo, O. et al. Development & validation of LC-MS/MS assay for 5-amino-1-methyl quinolinium in rat plasma: Application to pharmacokinetic and oral bioavailability studies (in Eng). J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 204, 114255. (2021).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Aguilera, M., Vergara, P. & Martínez, V. Stress and antibiotics alter luminal and wall-adhered microbiota and enhance the local expression of visceral sensory-related systems in mice (in Eng). Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 25(8), e515–e529. (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bush, T. G. et al. Fulminant jejuno-ileitis following ablation of enteric glia in adult transgenic mice (in Eng). Cell 93(2), 189–201. (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Muller, P. A. et al. Microbiota modulate sympathetic neurons via a gut-brain circuit (in Eng). Nature 583(7816), 441–446. (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hung, L. Y. et al. Antibiotic exposure postweaning disrupts the neurochemistry and function of enteric neurons mediating colonic motor activity (in Eng). Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 318(6), G1042–G1053. (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Simpson, S. et al. Depletion of the microbiome alters the recruitment of neuronal ensembles of oxycodone intoxication and withdrawal (in Eng). eNeuro 7(3), e1–e17. (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ewing, B., Hillier, L., Wendl, M. C. & Green, P. "Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment (in Eng). Genome Res. 8(3), 175–185. (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ewing, B. & Green, P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities (in Eng). Genome Res. 8(3), 186–194. (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Magoč, T. & Salzberg, S. L. FLASH: Fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies (in Eng). Bioinformatics 27(21), 2957–2963. (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool (in Eng). J. Mol. Biol. 215(3), 403–410. (1990).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Altschul, S. F. et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs (in Eng). Nucleic Acids Res. 25(17), 3389–3402. (1997).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lozupone, C. & Knight, R. UniFrac: A new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities (in Eng). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71(12), 8228–8235. (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Segata, N. et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation (in Eng). Genome Biol. 12(6), R60. (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python (in Eng). Nat. Methods 17(3), 261–272. (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Curran-Everett, D. Explorations in statistics: The log transformation (in Eng). Adv. Physiol. Educ. 42(2), 343–347. (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    DeJong, T. M. A comparison of three diversity indices based on their components of richness and evenness. Oikos 26, 222–227. (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Chao, A. Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand. J. Stat. 11(4), 265–270 (1984).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ley, R. E. et al. Obesity alters gut microbial ecology (in Eng). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102(31), 11070–11075. (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Bisanz, J. E., Upadhyay, V., Turnbaugh, J. A., Ly, K. & Turnbaugh, P. J. Meta-analysis reveals reproducible gut microbiome alterations in response to a high-fat diet (in Eng). Cell Host Microbe 26(2), 265-272.e4. (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Ley, R. E., Turnbaugh, P. J., Klein, S. & Gordon, J. I. Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity (in Eng). Nature 444(7122), 1022–1023. (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Koliada, A. et al. Association between body mass index and Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in an adult Ukrainian population (in Eng). BMC Microbiol. 17(1), e120. (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    John, G. K. & Mullin, G. E. The gut microbiome and obesity (in Eng). Curr. Oncol. Rep. 18(7), e45. (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Cox, L. M. et al. Description of two novel members of the family Erysipelotrichaceae: Ileibacterium valens gen. nov., sp. nov. and Dubosiella newyorkensis, gen. nov., sp. nov., from the murine intestine, and emendation to the description of Faecalibaculum rodentium (in Eng). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 67(5), 1247–1254. (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Streiner, D. L. & Norman, G. R. Correction for multiple testing: Is there a resolution? (in Eng). Chest 140(1), 16–18. (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Riederer, M., Erwa, W., Zimmermann, R., Frank, S. & Zechner, R. Adipose tissue as a source of nicotinamide N-methyltransferase and homocysteine (in Eng). Atherosclerosis 204(2), 412–417. (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Uhlen, M. et al. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 347(6220), 419. (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    NNMT. The Human Protein Atlas. (accessed 10/4/2021, 2021).

  53. 53.

    Xiao, H. & Kang, S. The role of the gut microbiome in energy balance with a focus on the gut-adipose tissue axis (in Eng). Front. Genet. 11, 297. (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Vajro, P., Paolella, G. & Fasano, A. Microbiota and gut-liver axis: their influences on obesity and obesity-related liver disease. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 56(5), 461–468. (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Di Ciaula, A. et al. Liver steatosis, gut-liver axis, microbiome and environmental factors. A never-ending bidirectional cross-talk. J. Clin. Med. 9(8), 2648. (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Hughes, D. E. & Williamson, D. H. The deamidation of nicotinamide by bacteria (in Eng). Biochem. J. 55(5), 851–856. (1953).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Shats, I. et al. Bacteria boost mammalian host NAD metabolism by engaging the deamidated biosynthesis pathway. Cell Metab. 31(3), 564-579.e7. (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Crovesy, L., Ostrowski, M., Ferreira, D. M. T. P., Rosado, E. L. & Soares-Mota, M. Effect of Lactobacillus on body weight and body fat in overweight subjects: A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials (in Eng). Int. J. Obes. (Lond.) 41(11), 1607–1614. (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Kaakoush, N. O. Insights into the role of erysipelotrichaceae in the human host (in Eng). Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 5, 84. (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Payahoo, L., Khajebishak, Y. & Ostadrahimi, A. Akkermansia muciniphila bacteria: A new perspective on the management of obesity: An updated review. Rev. Med. Microbiol. 30(2), 83–89. (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Ju, T., Kong, J. Y., Stothard, P. & Willing, B. P. Defining the role of Parasutterella, a previously uncharacterized member of the core gut microbiota (in Eng). ISME J. 13(6), 1520–1534. (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Hirayama, K., Endo, K., Kawamura, S. & Mitsuoka, T. Comparison of the intestinal bacteria in specific pathogen free mice from different breeders (in Eng). Jikken Dobutsu 39(2), 263–267. (1990).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Hufeldt, M. R., Nielsen, D. S., Vogensen, F. K., Midtvedt, T. & Hansen, A. K. Variation in the gut microbiota of laboratory mice is related to both genetic and environmental factors (in Eng). Comp. Med. 60(5), 336–347 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Basson, A. R. et al. Artificial microbiome heterogeneity spurs six practical action themes and examples to increase study power-driven reproducibility (in Eng). Sci. Rep. 10(1), e5039. (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Motoyama, K. et al. Isolation stress for 30 days alters hepatic gene expression profiles, especially with reference to lipid metabolism in mice (in Eng). Physiol. Genom. 37(2), 79–87. (2009).

    MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Zhuravliova, E. et al. Social isolation in rats inhibits oxidative metabolism, decreases the content of mitochondrial K-Ras and activates mitochondrial hexokinase (in Eng). Behav. Brain Res. 205(2), 377–383. (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Sun, M. et al. Metabolic effects of social isolation in adult C57BL/6 mice (in Eng). Int. Sch. Res. Notices 2014, e690950. (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Nonogaki, K., Nozue, K. & Oka, Y. Social isolation affects the development of obesity and type 2 diabetes in mice (in Eng). Endocrinology 148(10), 4658–4666. (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Kaji, T. & Nonogaki, K. Contribution of central SGK-1 to the acute phase responses of mice to social isolation (in Eng). Front. Biosci. (Elite Ed.) 2, 1355–1361. (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Le Chatelier, E. et al. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers (in Eng). Nature 500(7464), 541–546. (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Cotillard, A. et al. Dietary intervention impact on gut microbial gene richness (in Eng). Nature 500(7464), 585–588. (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Reber, S. O. et al. Immunization with a heat-killed preparation of the environmental bacterium Mycobacterium vaccae promotes stress resilience in mice (in Eng). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113(22), e3130–e3139. (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Mefferd, C. C. et al. A high-fat/high-protein, atkins-type diet exacerbates (in Eng). mSystems 5(1), e00765-19. (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Lee, S. M., Kim, N., Yoon, H., Nam, R. H. & Lee, D. H. Microbial changes and host response in F344 rat colon depending on sex and age following a high-fat diet (in Eng). Front. Microbiol. 9, e2236. (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Morrison, K. E., Jašarević, E., Howard, C. D. & Bale, T. L. It’s the fiber, not the fat: significant effects of dietary challenge on the gut microbiome (in Eng). Microbiome 8(1), e15. (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    De Minicis, S. et al. Dysbiosis contributes to fibrogenesis in the course of chronic liver injury in mice (in Eng). Hepatology 59(5), 1738–1749. (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Roopchand, D. E. et al. Dietary polyphenols promote growth of the gut bacterium Akkermansia muciniphila and attenuate high-fat diet-induced metabolic syndrome (in Eng). Diabetes 64(8), 2847–2858. (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Hildebrandt, M. A. et al. High-fat diet determines the composition of the murine gut microbiome independently of obesity (in Eng). Gastroenterology 137(5), 1716-24.e1–2. (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Zhang, C. et al. Structural resilience of the gut microbiota in adult mice under high-fat dietary perturbations (in Eng). ISME J. 6(10), 1848–1857. (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Sun, L. et al. Fluoxetine ameliorates dysbiosis in a depression model induced by chronic unpredicted mild stress in mice (in Eng). Int. J. Med. Sci. 16(9), 1260–1270. (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Wang, S. et al. Antibiotic-induced microbiome depletion is associated with resilience in mice after chronic social defeat stress (in Eng). J. Affect. Disord. 260, 448–457. (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Lv, X.-C., Guo, W.-L., Li, L., Yu, X.-D. & Liu, B. Polysaccharide peptides from Ganoderma lucidum ameliorate lipid metabolic disorders and gut microbiota dysbiosis in high-fat diet-fed rats. J. Funct. Foods (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Hong, S. et al. Nicotinamide N-methyltransferase regulates hepatic nutrient metabolism through Sirt1 protein stabilization (in Eng). Nat. Med. 21(8), 887–894. (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Hou, X., Rooklin, D., Fang, H. & Zhang, Y. Resveratrol serves as a protein-substrate interaction stabilizer in human SIRT1 activation (in Eng). Sci. Rep. 6, 38186. (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Lundgren, P. & Thaiss, C. A. The microbiome-adipose tissue axis in systemic metabolism (in Eng). Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 318(4), G717–G724. (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Naito, Y., Uchiyama, K. & Takagi, T. A next-generation beneficial microbe (in Eng). J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr. 63(1), 33–35. (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Reunanen, J. et al. Akkermansia muciniphila adheres to enterocytes and strengthens the integrity of the epithelial cell layer (in Eng). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81(11), 3655–3662. (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Shin, N. R. et al. An increase in the Akkermansia spp population induced by metformin treatment improves glucose homeostasis in diet-induced obese mice (in Eng). Gut 63(5), 727–735. (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Schneeberger, M. et al. Akkermansia muciniphila inversely correlates with the onset of inflammation, altered adipose tissue metabolism and metabolic disorders during obesity in mice (in Eng). Sci. Rep. 5, e16643. (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Zhang, C., Wu, W., Li, X., Xin, X. & Liu, D. Daily supplementation with fresh Angelica keiskei juice alleviates high-fat diet-induced obesity in mice by modulating gut microbiota composition (in Eng). Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 63(14), e1900248. (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Anhê, F. F. et al. Triggering Akkermansia with dietary polyphenols: A new weapon to combat the metabolic syndrome? (in Eng). Gut Microbes 7(2), 146–153. (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Anhê, F. F. et al. A polyphenol-rich cranberry extract protects from diet-induced obesity, insulin resistance and intestinal inflammation in association with increased Akkermansia spp. population in the gut microbiota of mice (in Eng). Gut 64(6), 872–883. (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Gui, L. et al. ω-3 PUFAs alleviate high-fat diet-induced circadian intestinal microbes dysbiosis (in Eng). Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 63(22), e1900492. (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Ohtsu, E., Ichiyama, A., Nishizuka, Y. & Hayaishi, O. Pathways of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide biosynthesis in nicotinic acid or nicotinamide requiring microorganisms (in Eng). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 29(5), 635–641. (1967).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Alston, T. A. & Abeles, R. H. Substrate specificity of nicotinamide methyltransferase isolated from porcine liver (in Eng). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 260(2), 601–608. (1988).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Cantoni, G. L. "Methylation of nicotinamide with soluble enzyme system from rat liver (in Eng). J. Biol. Chem. 189(1), 203–216 (1951).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    McIlwain, H., Stanley, D. A. & Hughes, D. E. The behaviour of Lactobacillus arabinosus towards nicotinic acid and its derivatives (in Eng). Biochem. J. 44(2), 153–158. (1949).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Jang, H. R. et al. A protective mechanism of probiotic Lactobacillus against hepatic steatosis via reducing host intestinal fatty acid absorption (in Eng). Exp. Mol. Med. 51(8), 1–14. (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Thaiss, C. A. et al. Persistent microbiome alterations modulate the rate of post-dieting weight regain (in Eng). Nature 540(7634), 544–551. (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Olesen, S. W. & Alm, E. J. Dysbiosis is not an answer (in Eng). Nat. Microbiol. 1, e16228. (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Schiavone, S. et al. Visceral fat dysfunctions in the rat social isolation model of psychosis (in Eng). Front. Pharmacol. 8, e787. (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Bogatyrev, S. R., Rolando, J. C. & Ismagilov, R. F. Self-reinoculation with fecal flora changes microbiota density and composition leading to an altered bile-acid profile in the mouse small intestine (in Eng). Microbiome 8(1), e19. (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Feng, C. et al. Log-transformation and its implications for data analysis (in Eng). Shanghai Arch. Psychiatry 26(2), 105–109. (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We wish to thank our collaborators (Drs. Stanton McHardy and Hua-Yu Leo Wang) at the Center for Innovative Drug Discovery, University of Texas San Antonio for the synthesis and supply of scaled batches of 5-amino-1-methylquinolinium. We wish to acknowledge the Rodent In Vivo Assessment core (directed by Dr. Kelly Dineley) and Animal Resource Center at UTMB for the resources provided for the animal studies. We would like to thank Dr. Catherine Sampson, Sierra Miller, Kehinde Ogunseye, and Erika Main for help with technical aspects of this study, Dr. Jonathan Hommel for guidance in the original study design, and Dr. Heidi Spratt for advice regarding the statistical analyses. This work was funded by: TS (Baylor College of Medicine, U01-AI24290, P01-AI152999, NINR R01-NR013497, and NIDDK P30-DK56338), SJW (NIDDK 1R41DK119052-01 and NIA P30-AG024832 [PI: E. Volpi]), and HN (DoD, PR180216).

Author information




A.D.W. wrote the manuscript, collected the samples, and performed the physiological, diversity, relative abundance, and LEfSe analyses; Q.W. generated the .biom file and processed the data for species; J.W. wrote the Spearman’s-Pearson’s Decider program; A.E. wrote the KM analysis script; H.N., T.S., and S.W. assisted with experimental design and interpretation of the data. All authors contributed edits to the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stan Watowich.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

SJW is the founder of Ridgeline Therapeutics, HN is a paid employee of Ridgeline Therapeutics and, since manuscript submission, ADW has also become a paid employee of Ridgeline Therapeutics. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dimet-Wiley, A., Wu, Q., Wiley, J.T. et al. Reduced calorie diet combined with NNMT inhibition establishes a distinct microbiome in DIO mice. Sci Rep 12, 484 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing