Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Hydrogen peroxide can be a plausible biomarker in cyanobacterial bloom treatment


The effect of combined stresses, photoinhibition, and nutrient depletion on the oxidative stress of cyanobacteria was measured in laboratory experiments to develop the biomass prediction model. Phormidium ambiguum was exposed to various photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) intensities and phosphorous (P) concentrations with fixed nitrogen concentrations. The samples were subjected to stress assays by detecting the hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) concentration and antioxidant activities of catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD). H2O2 concentrations decreased to 30 µmol m−2 s−1 of PAR, then increased with higher PAR intensities. Regarding P concentrations, H2O2 concentrations (nmol L−1) generally decreased with increasing P concentrations. SOD and CAT activities were proportionate to the H2O2 protein−1. No H2O2 concentrations detected outside cells indicated the biological production of H2O2, and the accumulated H2O2 concentration inside cells was parameterized with H2O2 concentration protein−1. With over 30 µmol m−2 s−1 of PAR, H2O2 concentration protein−1 had a similar increasing trend with PAR intensity, independently of P concentration. Meanwhile, with increasing P concentration, H2O2 protein−1 decreased in a similar pattern regardless of PAR intensity. Protein content decreased with gradually increasing H2O2 up to 4 nmol H2O2 mg−1 protein, which provides a threshold to restrict the growth of cyanobacteria. With these results, an empirical formula—protein (mg L−1) = − 192*Log((H2O2/protein)/4.1), where H2O2/protein (nmol mg−1) = − 0.312*PAR2/(502 + PAR2)*((25/PAR)4 + 1)*Log(P/133,100), as a function of total phosphorus concentration, P (µg L−1)—was developed to obtain the cyanobacteria biomass.


Cyanobacteria blooms often produce toxic metabolites and are harmful to other organisms as well as humans. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is often endorsed to reduce cyanobacterial abundance and organic pollutants as it is more effective in application with cyanobacteria compared to other phytoplankton1,2. Various experimental approaches have been completed in wastewater treatment, such as advanced oxidation processes, investigation of the degradation of aniline, and evaluation of kenaf fibers and water reservoirs by biological methods3,4,5,6. However, H2O2 is also produced by other factors. First, H2O2 is generated photochemically from dissolved chromophoric organic materials exposed to UV, and H2O2 distribution was observed in natural lakes7,8,9. At the same time, H2O2 is biologically produced in cells exposed to environmental stresses, including metal ion toxicity, salinization, temperature, PAR conditions, eutrophication, allelopathy, and pathogens. However, its contribution to the total concentration is unknown.

Under a stress environment, endogenous reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, including superoxide, hydroxyl radicals, and H2O2 concentration exceeds its scavenging capacity10,11,12. ROS are essential for growth regulation and signaling mechanisms in photosynthetic organisms13,14. Those organisms, in turn, are capable of controlling excess ROS production with their inherent scavenging enzymes and non-enzymatic components13,15. Accumulation of excessive ROS inside cells causes harmful impacts on cyanobacteria, such as disrupting cellular homeostasis, causing membrane lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, enzyme inhibition, and DNA and RNA damages. It also affects the photosynthetic apparatus, leading to cell mortality as the concentration exceeds the threshold value16.

Cyanobacteria are sensitive to even a minor change in light intensity as they usually expose relatively weak light; thus, even moderate solar radiation may cause stress17. The collection of solar energy at photosystem II (PSII) in the thylakoid membrane results in the oxidation of water molecules and reduction of plastoquinone, a molecule involved in the electron transport chain. The produced electrons are transported to PSI, where they are consumed in the synthesis of carbohydrates. However, an overabundance of solar energy results in the generation of ROS, including superoxide radicals, as the energy transfer rate is limited due to the underutilization of energy absorbed by the PSII antenna complex in the PSII reaction center15,18,19,20. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) catalyzes superoxide radicals into H2O2 before being detoxified into water by antioxidant activities21. However, the high oxidation potential of ROS can lead to the destruction of proteins, which otherwise recover the photosystem activities22. Thus, excessive solar radiation inhibits the proliferation of cyanobacteria. Similarly, the shortage of nutrient conditions, including P and nitrogen (N), is identified as a dominant stressor that suppresses the growth of cyanobacteria23. P is an important macronutrient to plankton growth in many ways. It makes rigid structures in cell walls, membranes, and nucleic acids by making covalent links between monomers. It is also involved in cell metabolism directly by storing energy as polyphosphate bodies in plankton cells24. The absolute concentrations of P and N and the stoichiometric ratio of these elements often play an important role in plankton growth in lakes25. N:P mass ratio varies between 240 and 0.5, depending on the variation of P concentration in lakes26. When the mass ratio of N:P exceeds 10, P is considered as the limiting factor. On the other hand, when N:P less than 10, N becomes the limiting factor on phytoplankton growth, including cyanobacteria in freshwater bodies27. Hence, both surplus and deficiency of nutrients could cause significant alternations in cyanobacteria biomass and cellular stress. The combined effect of various abiotic stresses on the production rate is often reported28,29. Some combinations inhibit growth due to the contradicting impacts of stressors; however, a significant reduction of biomass is also reported as caused by simultaneous exposure to multiple stressors compared to a single stress source30. Hence, excessive radiation stress combined with a shortage of P and N nutrients could generate huge cellular stress and cyanobacterial growth inhibition.

The concentration of H2O2 and the activity of antioxidant enzymes are some of the biomarkers employed in stress detections. The role of H2O2 in plants and how they respond to environmental stress has been a focus throughout the literature31,32,33, suggesting a potential to develop ROS-based strategies for predicting cyanobacterial bloom formation and H2O2 concentrations34. Thus, this research was designed to study the (1) effects of the PAR regime and P concentrations on cyanobacteria stress, particularly endogenous H2O2 concentrations, under the condition of naturally produced H2O2 from organic matter, (2) combined effects of the PAR regime and P concentrations on H2O2 concentrations, and (3) relationship between H2O2 concentrations and antioxidant enzyme activities of cyanobacteria, aiming at the possibility of applying H2O2 concentrations as a proxy to detect stress intensity in algal management and the contribution rate of the biological H2O2 production rate in the treatment.


The effect of PAR intensity and phosphorous concentration on H2O2 concentration

Variations in protein contents of cyanobacterial cultures (mg L-1), grown under different PAR intensity levels with different P concentrations, are shown in Fig. 1. Figure 2 indicates the H2O2 concentration variations (nmol L-1) for different PAR intensity levels and each P concentration level. Vertical bars indicate standard deviation. Higher protein content was obtained when PAR exposure was lower than 50 µmol m−2 s−1. In a PAR intensity range between 0 and 30 µmol m−2 s−1, the H2O2 concentration declined from 50 to 150 nmol L−1 at dark condition, with increasing PAR. With a PAR intensity between a 30 and 200 µmol m−2 s−1 range, the protein content was slightly reduced (R2 = − 0.06, p > 0.1), while the H2O2 concentration significantly increased (R2 = 0.73, p < 0.001, and 0.910, 0.720, 0.92, 0.92 and 0.16 for 1000, 100, 10, 1.0, 0.1 μg L−1 of P concentration, respectively), regardless of the P concentration. The variational trend of H2O2 concentration per protein (nmol mg-1) is shown in Fig. 3 with respect to the PAR intensity. Regardless of the P concentration, it declined with low PAR intensities to 30 µmol m−2 s−1 of PAR intensity and then increased with a decreasing enhancement rate. At values higher than 50 µmol m−2 s−1 PAR, no significant difference was obtained in the variational trend of the H2O2 per protein with respect to PAR. The increasing trend of H2O2 per protein with PAR intensity is mainly attributed to the increasing trend of H2O2 concentration rather than the reduction of protein content. H2O2 per protein was generally lower with a higher P concentration (p < 0.03). H2O2 per protein, measured as high as 0.2 up to 2.0 nmol mg−1 with 10–200 µmol m−2 s−1of PAR intensities, declined with a higher P concentration uniquely except for 20 μmol m-2 s-1 (Fig. 4).

Figure 1
figure 1

Protein content for different PAR intensity levels and for each phosphorus concentration level. Vertical bars indicate standard deviation.

Figure 2
figure 2

H2O2 concentration for different PAR intensity levels and for each phosphorus concentration level. Vertical bars indicate standard deviation.

Figure 3
figure 3

H2O2 content per protein for different PAR intensity levels and for each P concentration level . Vertical bars indicate standard deviation.

Figure 4
figure 4

H2O2 content per protein for different P concentration level and for each PAR intensity level. Vertical bars indicate standard deviation. Dotted lines show the approximate relation for each light intensity.

Antioxidant activities with respect to H2O2 concentration per protein

SOD activity per protein was uniquely proportionate to H2O2 per protein (Fig. 5). The approximate relation is shown by the diagonal line, where the H2O2 protein-1 (nmol mg−1) = 0.276(min)*SOD (nmol mg−1 min−1), (R2 = 0.950, p < 0.01).

Figure 5
figure 5

Relation between SOD activity and H2O2 concentration for different P concentration level. The approximate relation is shown by the diagonal line.

CAT activity per protein is shown as a function of H2O2 concentration per protein, separately shown by each P concentration in Fig. 6. For each P concentration level, CAT activity per protein linearly increased with the H2O2 protein-1. The increasing rate was higher based on PAR intensity (18.73 CAT H2O2-1, R2 = 0.573 for 1000 µg L−1, 13.82 CAT H2O2-1, R2 = 0.977 for 100 µg L−1; 12.89 CAT H2O2-1, R2 = 0.793 for 10 µg L−1; 14.53 CAT H2O2-1, R2 = 0.949 for 1 µg L−1; and 9.22 CAT H2O2-1, R2 = 0.766, for 0.1 µg L−1), and the proportional coefficient was found to have a significant positive correlation with the logarithmic scale of the P concentration (p < 0.01).

Figure 6
figure 6

Relation between H2O2 concentration and CAT activity for different P concentration levels. Dotted lines indicate the approximate lines for each P concentration.

On the other hand, for each PAR intensity level, CAT activity did not have significant positive correlation with the P concentration level.


The effect of biologically produced H2O2 on the suppression of cyanobacterial blooms

The artificial endorsement of H2O2 has a high potential to suppress cyanobacterial blooms with less effect on other organisms compared to other controlling methods35,36,37,38,39. Previous researchers obtained the lethal H2O2 dosage for cyanobacteria by laboratory incubations under different H2O2 concentrations; cyanobacterial chlorophyll declined to nearly half after an 18 h incubation with approximately 30 µmol L−1 of H2O21,40 or after a 4 h incubation with 100 µmol L−1 of H2O22 H2O2 delayed fluorescence decay with 0.1 µmol of H2O2 L−17. At the same time, the Fv/Fm value substantially declined with 100 µmol of H2O2 L−141, and dead cells increased with 275 µmol of H2O2 L−139. Cyanobacteria were in a lethal condition1,2 and sub-lethal at concentrations exceeding 50 µmol of H2O2 L−139. All previous experimental results reveal that cyanobacterial biomass is degraded with higher H2O2 concentrations; however, the H2O2 concentration threshold varies widely from 1 to 1000 µmol L−1. In the present study, we used protein content as an indicator of biomass rather than the chlorophyll content of Phormidium ambiguum cells because chlorophyll-a can be expressed on a protein basis42. However, the decreasing trend of protein content, which was seen with the Chl-a concentration, was also observed with H2O2 concentrations.

Natural H2O2 formation has been identified in aquatic ecosystems as photolysis of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) exposed to UV7,43,44. Then it is reported that the H2O2 production varies with the nutrient content of the water body. However, the H2O2 concentration of these waters was in the magnitude of µmol L−18,34,45. The comparison of these results indicates that the photolysis of organic carbon in natural water only is not sufficient to control cyanobacterial biomass.

H2O2 is also produced biologically and is accumulated in cells subject to high levels of environmental stress. In the present study, UV was limited. Accordingly, measured H2O2 was considered a biologically produced component in cells or cell surfaces, which was then released into the ambient water. In the present experiment, protein content was measured as a reference of the biomass of cyanobacteria. Cell biomass is two to three times larger with protein content46.

As the buoyancy of the cells is nearly neutral, the H2O2 content per protein, ~ 1 mmol of H2O2 kg−1, was generated and contained in the cell before release. This constitutes more or less the same level of the lethal H2O2 concentration in water.

The protein content in water declined with an increasing H2O2 concentration per protein up to 2 nmol mg−1 protein (Fig. 7). It was nearly same as the lethal level of the previous studies35,39. A higher protein level was not observed with higher H2O2 concentration levels in the present study. The growth of cyanobacteria is suppressed by the generation of higher H2O2 levels.

Figure 7
figure 7

Relation between H2O2 concentration per protein and protein content in waterfor different P concentration levels. Lethal level of cyanobacteria in the previous reports35,39 are shown for comparison.

The lethal H2O2 concentration obtained here corresponds well with about 16 µmol of H2O2 g−1 FW of a threshold condition to grow Egeria densa in natural water33, considering the weakness of cyanobacteria to H2O2 rather than other plant species35.

The possible indicator of environmental stress and the effect of combined stress factors

The accumulation of ROS is reported to augment in parallel fashion to increased abiotic stress47,48,49. In the present experiment, two types of abiotic stresses, phosphorous deficiency and high or low PAR intensities, were applied with different intensities of each.

Though H2O2 is produced under normal environmental conditions, its production is accelerated under high stress intensity. In natural water, cyanobacteria often suffer from a shortage of N and P. Stoichiometrically, the ratio of the N and P of cyanobacterial cells is approximately 16:150. Waters with an N:P ratio of < 15 are most susceptible to cyanobacterial dominance51,52. In the present experiment, the P concentration was changed with the fixed amount of an N concentration of 3000 µg L−1. Thus, the P concentration becomes restrictive, except for 1000 µg L−1 in the present study’s conditions. A significant increasing trend was observed in H2O2 per protein with a decreasing P concentration. The deficiency of essential nutrients may increase oxidative stress and then deteriorate the growth rate of cyanobacteria.

Under all tested P concentrations, H2O2 per protein content decreased with increasing PAR intensity until 30 µmol m−2 s−1, taking the lowest value there, then grew at higher PAR intensities, though the increasing rate gradually decreased. The enhanced production of H2O2 under prolonged low PAR conditions has not been sufficiently studied, though superoxide production in dark conditions is reported26. With submerged macrophytes, Egeria densa, the H2O2 concentration was the lowest empirically under the prolonged exposure of a PAR intensity level of approximately 60 µmol m−2 s−133,53. The H2O2 concentration increased both with decreasing or increasing PAR intensities. However, the underlying mechanisms are unknown.

The increasing H2O2 concentration per protein over 30 µmol m−2 s−1 of PAR intensity is attributed to the excessive harvesting of PAR energy17,18. In the thylakoid membrane, electrons are produced by solar energy and transmitted to plastoquinone in PSII, which are partially accepted for carbon dioxide fixation. More electrons are generated when exposed to higher levels of solar radiation. Consequently, the photoinhibition of photosystem-II (PS-II) is induced, leading to oxidative damage because of the generated ROS such as superoxide, hydroxyl radicals, and H2O2. It damages cellular components, such as the D1 protein, which otherwise mends the damaged photosynthesis apparatus18.

The process comprises the direct reduction of O2 by PS-I, resulting in singlet oxygen production followed by superoxide, which is converted to H2O2 by the activities of the enzyme SOD. In the present study, H2O2 per protein was proportionate with SOD activity, generating H2O2 from superoxide. CAT activity was far higher than other major antioxidant activities to decompose H2O2 and linearly increased with H2O2 concentration.

Though SOD and CAT activities demonstrated different dependencies on PAR intensity levels and the P concentration, their activities were evaluated by the single function with H2O2 per protein. A steady H2O2 concentration is sustained by balancing the generated H2O2 with different types of stresses and these antioxidant activities as a single function of H2O2 content per protein.

In natural water, cyanobacteria are exposed to various abiotic stresses that enhance oxidative stress, producing H2O2, which may deteriorate cyanobacterial biomass. A significant negative correlation was recognized for protein content with respect to the H2O2 concentration (n = 90, R2 = − 0.712, p < 0.01), irrespective of stress types.

The production rate of H2O2 is not necessarily cumulative for different types of abiotic stresses28,30. However, the H2O2 concentration was enhanced with increasing PAR intensity and decreasing phosphorus concentration, respectively, and the enhancement of the H2O2 concentration was independent of each other (p < 0.01). The total H2O2 per protein is empirically given as the sum of H2O2 produced by the intensity of each stress component at least as a practical use level. Thus, the total H2O2 concentration is approximately provided by the sum of the H2O2 concentration attributed to each stress. The same trend was obtained for submerged macrophytes33,53. Consequently, a potential for using the H2O2 concentration to estimate cyanobacterial biomass exists.

The estimation of H2O2 concentrations produced by cyanobacteria under abiotic stresses

For the application of the empirically obtained results to practical use in the prediction of algal blooms in the environment where PAR and P concentrations are restricted factors for growth, the trend of the H2O2 per protein (nmol mg−1) is obtained as a function of PAR (µmol m−2 s−1) and the P concentration, P (µg L−1), as formulated by:

$${\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}}_{2} {\text{/protein}} = - 0.312*{\text{PAR}}^{2} {/}\left( {50^{2} + {\text{PAR}}^{2} } \right)*\left( {\left( {25{\text{/PAR}}} \right)^{4} + 1} \right)*{\mathrm{Log}}\left( {{\text{P/}}133{,}100} \right)$$

where 0.1 µg PL−1 < P < 1000 µg PL−1, 30 µmol m−2 s−1 < PAR, and protein represents the amount of protein in mg L−1.

The relationship is shown in Fig. 8. The simulated results of the H2O2 protein−1 by Eq. (1) compared with experimental results and a significant similarity was obtained (R2 = 0.953, p = 0.012, for 1000 µg L−1, R2 = 0.696, p = 0.0065 for 100 µg L−1; R2 = 0.927, p = 0.023 for 10 µg L−1; R2 = 0.982, p = 0.00289 for 1 µg L−1; R2 = 0.024, and p = 0.024 for 0.1 µg L−1).

Figure 8
figure 8

The simulated results of H2O2/protein by Eq. (1) compared with experimental results.

The protein content (mg L−1) is shown in Fig. 9. The simulated results of protein content by Eq. (2), as a function of H2O2 per protein, was shown to possess significant negative correlation (R2 = − 0.675, p < 0.01), which is empirically formulated by:

$${\text{protein}} = - 192*{\text{Log}}(({\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}}_{2} {\text{/protein}}){/}4.1)$$

(R2 = − 0.71, p < 0.01).

Figure 9
figure 9

The simulated results of protein content.

With Eqs. (1) and (2), protein content is estimated as a function of PAR and the P concentration.

The estimated protein contents are denoted in Fig. 9. Protein content in water for different P concentration levels (mg L−1) and for each PAR intensity level (µmol m−2 s−1). The concentration uniquely increased with increasing P concentrations.

The cellular growth rate gradually decreased with light intensity54, and the growth rate of cyanobacteria reached a maximum at 30–50 µmol m−2 s−155 . P. ambiguum prefers relatively low light intensity at ~ 18 µmol m−2 s−156  . The diagram seems to provide reasonable results.


The endogenous H2O2 concentration is an effective tool to detect the stress level of cyanobacteria. Both PAR regimes and P concentration shortages are shown to enhance H2O2 concentrations in cyanobacterial cultures.

H2O2 per protein content declines in low PAR conditions and increases when exposed to higher PAR intensity levels while generally increasing as the P concentration decreases. H2O2 per protein for combined stresses is given by the sum of the amount produced by each stress. Protein content decreases uniquely following the value of H2O2 per protein in a cyanobacterial culture. Then the H2O2 per protein exceeds the threshold value, cyanobacteria will decline. As a result, cyanobacterial cell will lyse leading to death. Cyanobacterial cell biomass can easily be regulated by this way.

The prediction model was developed for the protein content to design management criteria for excessive cyanobacterial blooms in freshwaters.


Culture and incubation

Phormidium ambiguum, an odor-forming benthic cyanobacterial species, was obtained from the National Institute of Studies (NIES), Japan. The strain was cultured and acclimatized for 30 days in an autoclaved BG 11 medium57, maintained at 20 °C under controlled PAR conditions with white fluorescent light, having flux of 20 µmol m−2 s−1 in a light-and-dark cycle of 12 h:12 h. The cultures were manually shaken twice a day. Cells were subcultured by diluting with new BG 11 medium as needed.

Experimental procedure

After 30 days, well-grown cyanobacterial cells were collected by centrifugation, washed once with distilled water, and then re-suspended in modified BG 11 media. All experiments were conducted by using incubators (MIR-254, Sanyo, Tokyo, Japan) with a nutrient level of BG-11 medium consisting of NaNO3 17.6 mM, K2HPO4 0.2296 mM, MgSO4.7H2O 0.0146 µM, Na2CO3 0.0189 µM, Citric acid 0.0031 µM, Ferric ammonium citrate 0.0023 µM, EDTA (Na2 salt) 0.0297 µM, H3BO3 4.6253 μM, MnCl2.4H2O 0.9145 µM, ZnSO4.7H2O 0.0765 µM, Na2MoO4.2H2O 0.1611 µM, CuSO4.5H2O 0.0316 µM, and Co(NO3)2.6H2O 0.0023 µM in 1 L of deionized water58, adjusted for N and P concentrations, respectively, at 3000 µg L−1 of nitrogen and 0.1, 1.0, 10, 100, and 1000 µg L−1 of P. Six different PAR intensities—namely, 10, 20, 30, 50, 100 and 200 µmol m−2 s−1—by white fluorescent light (Toshiba, Japan) and VBP-L24-C2 PAR source (Valore, Kyoto, Japan) were used with 12 h:12 h PAR and dark cycle. The PAR intensities were measured using a quantum sensor (EKO Instruments Co., Ltd., Japan) and adjusted uniformly in the media. The temperature was kept constant (20 °C) throughout the experiment. At 12:00, after 7 days, samples were taken for the subsequent stress response analysis. Collected samples were subjected to bioassays that are described later.


Total soluble protein content analysis

Total soluble protein concentration was determined using the same method mentioned in57 with minor modifications. Cyanobacterial cells were extracted from 1 mL of culture media by centrifugation at 4 °C for 10 min at 10,000 rpm, and the pellet was washed once with distilled water. Then, the cell pellet was subjected to a freeze–thaw cycle. Total soluble protein was extracted using a 0.5 M NaOH solution, and the extraction was centrifuged at 4 °C for 20 min at 10,000 rpm. The supernatant was used as crude protein extract, and the protein content was quantitatively analyzed with the aid of a Coomassie Bradford protein assay kit. Crude protein extract was stained with Coomassie (G-250) dye and incubated for 10 min at room temperature, and then the absorbance was measured at 595 nm using a UV–Vis spectrometer (Shimazu, Japan). Protein content was determined using a known concentration series of Albumin.

Stress assay

H2O2 assay

Cellular H2O2 contents were estimated according to the titanium chloride method 59. A total of 750 μL of 0.1% titanium chloride in 20% H2SO4 (v/v) was then added to initiate the reaction. The optical absorption after 1 min was measured at 410 nm using a spectrophotometer (UVmini-1240). However, the absorption at 410 nm includes the effect of other soluble compounds60,60,62. Thus, the H2O2 concentration was calculated from the slopes of the standard curve obtained from known H2O2 concentrations, which was offset derived by the intercept absorption rate with zero H2O2 concentration samples61. The results were compared with those of the e-FOX method and a suitable agreement was obtained62.

CAT assay

The CAT activity was measured by reacting 15 µL of 750 mM H2O2, 920 µL of potassium phosphate buffer, and 65 µL of extract supernatant. Optical absorption was measured at 240 nm using UV mini-1240. The measurements were recorded every 20 s for 3 min, and CAT activity was calculated using an extinction coefficient of 39.4 mM−1 cm 63. The scavenging rate of H2O2 by enzyme extract per minute was defined as unit of CAT activity per mg of total soluble protein.

APX assay

For the APX assay, the reaction mixture contained 100 µL of enzyme extract, 200 µL of 0.5 mM ascorbic acid in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), and 2 mL of 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) mixed with 60 µL of 1 mM H2O2. The decrease in absorbance at 290 nm was recorded every 20 s for 3 min. The APX activity was calculated using an extinction coefficient of 2.8 mM−1 cm−164.

SOD assay

Total SOD activity was determined by using methods as described by65. The reaction mixture contained 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 0.66 mM EDTA, 10 mM methionine, 33 µM NBT, 0.0033 mM riboflavin and 50 µL cyanobacterial enzyme extract. The reaction was allowed to proceed under fluorescent illumination. After that, the absorbance of the reaction mixture was read at 560 nm. One unit of SOD activity was defined as the number of enzymes required to cause 50% inhibition of the NBT photo-reduction. The results were expressed as unit of SOD activity per mg of total soluble protein.


Variance (ANOVA) and the bivariate analysis were used and Pearson’s correlation method was followed to evaluate the relationship among parameters. Statistical analyses were performed with the help of IBM SPSS V25.

H2O2 concentrations showed correlations with increasing PAR intensities and decreasing P concentrations independently. The fitted curve patterns were different for each PAR intensity or each P concentration.

Therefore, the most fitted curves of H2O2 concentration with respect to P concentration, and with respect to PAR intensity, 30–200 µmol m−2 s−1, were obtained for each PAR intensity, and the P concentration, 0.1–1000 mg L−1, respectively. Then, the effect of PAR intensity and P concentration on the H2O2 concentration was estimated.

The variance (ANOVA) and the bivariate analysis were used and Pearson’s correlation method was followed to evaluate the relationship among parameters. Statistical analyses were performed with the help of IBM SPSS V25.


  1. Barrington, D. J. & Ghadouani, A. Application of hydrogen peroxide for the removal of toxic cyanobcteria and other phytoplankton from waste water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 4(23), 8916–8921 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lurling, M., Meng, D. & Fassen, E. L. Effects of hydrogen peroxide and ultrasound on biomass reduction and toxin release in cyanobacterium, Microcytis aeruginosa. Toxins 6(12), 3260–3281 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghime, D. & Ghosh, P. Advanced oxidation processes: A powerful treatment option for the removal of recalcitrant organic compounds. In Advanced Oxidation Processes-Applications, Trends, and Prospects (IntechOpen, 2020).

  4. Rahdar, S., Igwegbe, C. A., Ghasem, M. & Ahmadi, S. Degradation of aniline by the combined process of ultrasound and hydrogen peroxide (US/H2O2). MethodsX 6, 492–499 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Derakhshan, Z. et al. Evaluation of kenaf fibers as moving bed biofilm carriers in algal membrane photobioreactor. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 152, 1–7 (2018).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shekoohiyan, S. et al. Performance evaluation of cyanobacteria removal from water reservoirs by biological method. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 7(17), 1729–1734 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper, W. J., Zika, R., Petasne, R. G. & Plane, J. M. Photochemical formation of hydrogen peroxide in natural waters exposed to sunlight. Environ. Sci. Technol. 22, 1156–1160. (1988).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cooper, W. J., Lean, D. R. S. & Carey, J. H. Spatial and temporal patterns of hydrogen peroxide in lake waters. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 46, 1227–1231. (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cory, R. M. et al. Seasonal dynamics in dissolved organic matter, hydrogen peroxide, and cyanobacterial blooms in Lake Erie. Front. Mar. Sci. (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Caverzan, A. et al. Plant responses to stresses: Role of ascorbate peroxidase in the antioxidant protection. Genet. Mol. Biol. 35(4), 1011–1019 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma, P., Jha, A. B., Dubey, R. S. & Pessarakli, M. Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful conditions. J. Bot. 2012, 1–26 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ugya, A. Y., Imam, T. S., Li, A., Ma, J. & Hua, X. Antioxidant response mechanism of freshwater microalgae species to reactive oxygen species production: A mini review. J. Chem. Ecol. 36(2), 174–193 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rastogi, R. P., Singh, S. P., Häder, D.-P. & Sinha, R. P. Detection of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by the oxidant-sensing probe 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate in the cyanobacterium Anabaena variabilis PCC 7937. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 397(3), 603–607 (2010).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Foyer, C. H. Reactive oxygen species, oxidative signaling and the regulation of photosynthesis. Environ. Exp. Bot. 154, 134–142 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gill, S. S. & Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 48(12), 909–930 (2010).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma, Z. & Gao, K. Spiral breakage and photoinhibition of Arthrospira platensis (Cyanophyta) caused by accumulation of reactive oxygen species under solar radiation. Environ. Exp. Bot. 68(2), 208–213 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Welkie, D. G. et al. A hard day’s night: Cyanobacteria in diel cycles. Trends Microbiol. 27(3), 231–242 (2019).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Latifi, A., Ruiz, M. & Zhang, C. C. Oxidative stress in cyanobacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 33(2), 258–278 (2009).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lea-Smith, D. J., Bombelli, P., Vasudevan, R. & Howe, C. J. Photosynthetic, respiratory and extracellular electron transport pathways in cyanobacteria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Bioenerg. 1857(3), 247–255 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Raja, V., Majeed, U., Kang, H., Andrabi, K. I. & John, R. Abiotic stress: Interplay between ROS, hormones and MAPKs. Environ. Exp. Bot. 137, 142–157 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Asada, S., Fukuda, K., Oh, M., Hamanishi, C. & Tanaka, S. Effect of hydrogen peroxide on the metabolism of articular chondrocytes. Inflamm. Res. 48(7), 399–403 (1999).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nishiyama, Y. & Murata, N. Revised scheme for the mechanisms of photoinhibition and its application to enhance the abiotic stress tolerance of the photosynthetic machinery. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98(21), 8777–8796 (2014).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mikula, P., Zezulka, S., Jancula, D. & Marsalek, B. Metabolic activity and membrane integrity changes in Microcystis aeruginosa—New findings on hydrogen peroxide toxicity in cyanobacteria. Eur. J. Phycol. 47(3), 195–206 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Huisman, J. & Hulot, F. D. Population dynamics of harmful cyanobacteria. In Harmful Cyanobacteria, 143–176 (Springer, 2005).

  25. Bergström, A. K. The use of TN:TP and DIN:TP ratios as indicators for phytoplankton nutrient limitation in oligotrophic lakes affected by N deposition. Aquat. Sci. 72(3), 277–281 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Downing, J. A. & McCauley, E. The nitrogen: Phosphorus relationship in lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 37(5), 936–945 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Horne, A. J. & Goldman, C. R. Limnology Vol. 2 (McGraw-Hill, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mittler, R. Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends Plant Sci. 11(1), 15–19. (2006).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Saints, M., Diaz, P., Monza, J. & Borsani, O. Heat stress results in loss of chloroplast Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase and increased damage to Photosystem II in combined drought-heat stressed Lotus japonicus. Physiol. Plant 140(1), 46–56. (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Suzuki, N., Rivero, R. M., Shulaev, V., Blumwald, E. & Mittler, R. Abiotic and biotic stress combinations. New Phytol. 203(1), 3–43. (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Asaeda, T. & Barnuevo, A. Oxidative stress as an indicator of niche-width preference of mangrove Rhizophora stylosa. For. Ecol. Manag. 432, 73–82 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Asaeda, T., Senavirathna, M. D. H. J., Vamsi Krishna, L. & Yoshida, N. Impact of regulated water levels on willows (Salix subfragilis) at a flood-control dam, and the use of hydrogen peroxide as an indicator of environmenal stress. Ecol. Eng. 127, 96–102 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Asaeda, T., Senavirathna, M. D. H. J. & Vamsi Krishna, L. Evaluation of habitat preferance of invasive macrophyte Egeria densa in different channel slopes using hydrogen peroxide as an indicator. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 422. (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Diaz, J. & Plummer, S. Production of extracellular reactive oxygen species by phytoplankton: Past and future directions. J. Plankton Res. 40(6), 655–666 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Drábková, M., Admiraal, W. & Maršálek, B. Combined exposure to hydrogen peroxide and PAR selective effects on cyanobacteria, green algae, and diatoms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41(1), 309–314 (2007).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bouchard, J. N. & Purdie, D. A. Effect of elevated temperature, darkness and hydrogen peroxide treatment on oxidative stress and cell death in the bloom-forming toxic cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. J. Phycol. 47(6), 1316–1325 (2011).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Leunert, F., Eckert, W., Paul, A., Gerhardt, V. & Grossart, H. P. Phytoplanktonic response to UV-generated hydrogen peroxide from natural organic matter. J. Plankton Res. 36(1), 185–197. (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang, B. et al. Optimization method for Microcystis bloom mitigation by hydrogen peroxide and its stimulative effects on growth of chlorophytes. Chemosphere 228, 503–512 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Foo, S. C., Chapman, I. J., Hartnell, D. M., Turner, A. D. & Franklin, D. J. Effects of H2O2 on growth, metabolic activity and membrane integrity in three strains of Microcystis aeruginosa. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27(31), 38916–38927 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Barrington, D. J., Reichwaldt, E. S. & Ghadouani, A. The use of hydrogen peroxide to remove cyanobacteria and microcystins from waste stabilization ponds and hypereutrophic systems. Ecol. Eng. 50, 86–94 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Drábková, M., Matthijs, H., Admiraal, W. & Maršálek, B. Selective effects of H2O2 on cyanobacterial photosynthesis. Photosynthetica 45(3), 363–369 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Marsac, N. T. D. Occurrence and nature of chromatic adaptation in cyanobacteria. J. Bacteriol. 130(1), 82–91 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Garcia, P. E., Queimalinos, C. & Dieguez, M. C. Natural levels and photo-production rates of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in Andean Patagonian aquatic sysyems: Influence of the dissolved organic matter pool. Chemosphere 217, 550–557 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Herrmann, R. The daily changing pattern of hydrogen peroxide in New Zealand surface waters. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 15(5), 652–662 (1996).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Spoof, L. et al. Elimination of cyanobacteria and microcystins in irrigation water—Effects of hydrogen peroxide treatment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27(8), 8638–8652. (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Lopez, C. V. G. et al. Protein measuremements of microalgae and cyanobacterial biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 101(19), 7587–7591 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Vesterkvist, P. S. M., Misiorek, J. O., Spoof, L. E. M., Toivola, D. M. & Meriluoto, J. A. O. Comparative cellular toxicity of hydrophilic and hydrophobic microcystins on Caco-2 cells. Toxins 4(11), 1008–1023 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Preece, E. P., Hardy, F. J., Moore, B. C. & Bryan, M. A review of microcystin detections in estuarine and marine waters: Environmental implications and human health risk. Harmful Algae 61, 31–45 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Pham, T.-L. & Utsumi, M. An overview of the accumulation of microcystins in aquatic ecosystems. J. Environ. Manag. 213, 520–529 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Goldman, J. C., McCarthy, J. J. & Peavey, D. G. Growth rate influence on the chemical composition of phytoplankton in oceanic waters. Nature 279(5710), 210–215 (1979).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Paerl, H. W., Fulton, R. S. 3rd., Moisander, P. H. & Dyble, J. Harmful freshwater algal blooms, with an emphasis on cyanobacteria. Sci. World. J. 1, 76–113 (2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Xie, L., Xie, P., Li, S., Tang, H. & Liu, H. The low TN:TP ratio, a case or result of Microcystis blooms?. Water Res. 37(9), 2073–2080 (2003).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Asaeda, T., Rashid, M. H. & Schoelynck, J. Tissue hydrogen peroxide concentration can explain the invasiveness of aquatic macrophytes: A modeling perspective. Front. Environ. Sci. 8, 292 (2021).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Hesse, K., Dittman, E. & Borner, T. Consequences of impaired microcystin production for light-dependent growth and pigmentation of Microcystis aeruginosa PCC 7806. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 37(1), 39–43 (2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Tilzer, M. M. Light‐dependence of photosynthesis and growth in cyanobacteria: Implications for their dominance in eutrophic lakes. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 21(3), 401-412 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Iwase, S. & Abe, Y. Identification and change in concentration of musty-odor compounds during growth in blue–green algae. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 8(1), 27–33 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Abeynayaka, H. D. L., Asaeda, T. & Kaneko, Y. Buoyancy limitation of filamentous cyanobacteria under prolonged pressure due to the gas vesicle collapse. Environ. Manag. 60(2), 293–303 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. Rippka, R., Deruelles, J., Waterbury, J. B., Herdman, M. & Stanier, R. Y. Generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria. Microbiology 111(1), 1–61 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Jana, S. & Choudhuri, M. A. Glycolate metabolism of three submersed aquatic angiosperms during ageing. Aquat. Bot. 12, 345–354 (1982).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Veljovic-Jovanovic, S., Noctor, G. & Foer, C. H. Are leaf hydrogen peroxide concentrations commonly overestimated? The potential influence of artefactual interference by tissue phenolics and ascorbate. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 40, 501–507 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Cheeseman, J. M. Hydrogen peroxide concentrations in leaves under natular conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 57(10), 2435–2444 (2006).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Queval, G., Hager, J., Gakiere, B. & Noctor, G. Why are literature data for H2O2 contents so variable? A discussion of potential difficulties in the quantitative assay of leaf extracts. J. Exp. Bot. 59(2), 135–146. (2008).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Aebi, H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 105, 121–126 (1984).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Nakano, Y. & Asada, K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 22(5), 867–880 (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Ahmad, P., Jaleel, C. A., Salem, M. A., Nabi, G. & Sharma, S. Roles of enzymatic and non enzymatic antioxidants in plants during abiotic stress. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 30(3), 161–175 (2010).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was financially supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (19H02245) and the Fund for the Promotion of Joint International Research (18KK0116) of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



T.A. contributed to the design of the experiment, analyses, and writing the manuscript. M.R. contributed to the revision of the manuscript. H.D.L.A. carried out the experiment and writing the experiment part.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takashi Asaeda.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asaeda, T., Rahman, M. & Abeynayaka, H.D.L. Hydrogen peroxide can be a plausible biomarker in cyanobacterial bloom treatment. Sci Rep 12, 12 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing