Abstract
Allophanic tephra-derived soils can sequester sizable quantities of soil organic matter (SOM). However, no studies have visualized the fine internal porous structure of allophanic soil microaggregates, nor studied the carbon structure preserved in such soils or paleosols. We used synchrotron radiation-based transmission X-ray microscopy (TXM) to perform 3D-tomography of the internal porous structure of dominantly allophanic soil microaggregates, and carbon near-edge X-ray absorption fine-structure (C NEXAFS) spectroscopy to characterize SOM in ≤ 12,000-year-old tephra-derived allophane-rich (with minor ferrihydrite) paleosols. The TXM tomography showed a vast network of internal, tortuous nano-pores within an allophanic microaggregate comprising nanoaggregates. SOM in the allophanic paleosols at four sites was dominated by carboxylic/carbonyl functional groups with subordinate quinonic, aromatic, and aliphatic groups. All samples exhibited similar compositions despite differences between the sites. That the SOM does not comprise specific types of functional groups through time implies that the functional groups are relict. The SOM originated at the land/soil surface: ongoing tephra deposition (intermittently or abruptly) then caused the land-surface to rise so that the once-surface horizons were buried more deeply and hence became increasingly isolated from inputs by the surficial/modern organic cycle. The presence of quinonic carbon, from biological processes but vulnerable to oxygen and light, indicates the exceptional protection of SOM and bio-signals in allophanic paleosols, attributable both to the porous allophane (with ferrihydrite) aggregates that occlude the relict SOM from degradation, and to rapid burial by successive tephra-fallout, as well as strong Al-organic chemical bonding. TXM and C NEXAFS spectroscopy help to unravel the fine structure of soils and SOM and are of great potential for soil science studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The secondary clay minerals in soils are the reactive inorganic components that form aggregates in strong association with soil organic carbon (SOC)1,2, and the retention of soil organic matter (SOM) in small pores within soil aggregates has been proven to slow carbon turnover and its rate of decomposition3,4,5. Allophane is an Al-rich nanocrystalline aluminosilicate, formula (1–2)SiO2·Al2O3·(2–3)·H2O, that comprises hollow spherules ~ 3.5 to 5 nm in diameter. It has a very high specific surface area (up to ~ 1200 m2 g−1)6,7,8, enabling allophanic soils derived from tephra (volcanic ash), including Andisols, to adsorb much SOM (including via strong Al-SOM bonding) and to help stablize SOC9,10. The similar but Fe-rich nanocrystalline ferrihydrite, formula Fe5HO8∙4H2O, is also common in Andisols but typically in considerably smaller quantities than allophane unless on basaltic parent tephras2,9. The aggregation of allophane spherules generates fractal porous networks to retain and sequester considerable amounts of SOM which is spatially protected against degradation11,12,13,14,15. Although ferrihydrite likely stabilizes SOM in a similar way to allophane1,2,9, allophane is the main focus of our study.
A distinctive feature of many tephra-derived allophanic soils on stable sites is their multi-layered nature giving rise to pedostratigaphy9,16. Such soils are formed by upbuilding pedogenesis during which soil evolution occurs via topdown processes whilst tephras (including cryptotephras) are concomitantly added to the land/soil surface16,17,18. The thickness and frequency of tephra accumulation (and other factors) determine if developmental or retardant upbuilding, or both, takes place (nomenclature follows Johnson and Watson-Stegner19; Johnson et al.20; Almond and Tonkin21). One of the advantages of tephra layers is that, once identified, they provide isochrons to connect and synchronize sequences and to assign relative or numerical ages using tephrochronology22. Therefore the ages (or age ranges) of buried soils (paleosols) on multiple tephras are able to be dated.
The central North Island of New Zealand has huge stores of buried, allophane-rich paleosols developed on sequences of well-dated tephra beds16,17,23,24,25. The early Holocene of this region was dominated by extensive podocarp-broadleaf forest and warm and wet conditions followed generally by gradual drying and cooling26,27,28,29 with modest climatic fluctuations30. Thus, the slow carbon turnover rate in allophane-rich soils, and the abundance of buried allophanic paleosols on dated tephras in North Island, provide the opportunity to characterize the nature of stabilized SOM preserved in allophanic soils/paleosols in response to changes of environmental and climatic conditions.
Conventional studies of the nature of SOM have relied mainly on chemical extractions31. However, the extractable components could only partially represent the nature of SOM32,33. Modern spectroscopic techniques including 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (pyrolysis-GC/MS), and carbon near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (C NEXAFS) spectroscopy, are used for characterizing SOM34,35,36,37 in order to more closely analyze in situ organic matter by avoiding artefacts derived from the extraction techniques.
Paramagnetic metals in soils interfere with 13C NMR spectroscopy for SOM and thus hydrofluoric acid (HF) has been used to dissolve the majority of soil minerals before such analysis38,39. However, HF treatment results in the loss of water-soluble SOM that is held as organo-mineral complexes39. The investigation of the structural composition of SOM using FTIR spectroscopy is difficult also because of the overlap of absorption bands of organic matter and inorganic soil components40. Instead, C NEXAFS spectroscopy involves promotion of core electrons (in the K shell) to higher orbitals and allows monitoring of the emitted electrons and photons. Other soil components (e.g. clays and water) do not interfere with the analysis of carbon by C NEXAFS spectroscopy5,34,40. Figure 1 illustrates how different functional groups (multiple peaks) of soil humic substances contribute a characteristic spectrum. Kruse et al.36 also nicely documented the assignment of C K-edge XANES (NEXAFS) peak energy positions to C moieties.
Our objectives were to analyze the porous structure of allophanic microaggregates and functional groups of SOM preserved from past environments associated with allophanic (and ferrihydritic) tephra-derived Holocene paleosols to further understand carbon sequestration in Andisols and associated paleosols. We also wanted to evaluate the potential of C NEXAFS spectroscopy for soil evolution studies and paleopedology. From four sites in central North Island, we sampled a series of buried paleosols formed by developmental and/or retardant upbuilding pedogenesis on Holocene tephra layers, all formed under podocarp-broadleaf forest until only ca 700 calendar (cal.) yr ago (when Polynesian arrival led to partial deforestation), their ages established via tephrochronology41. Each paleosol represents an age range from ca 1100 to ca 12,000 cal. yr of pedogenesis (soil formation) at the land surface before burial. Just the organo-clay complexes were analyzed because only the clay fraction has a strong association with SOM and SOC retention in soils1,2, and the preserved SOM is held largely within microaggregates42. We first used high-resolution transmission X-ray microscopy (TXM) to examine the internal structure of the microaggregates to help envisage and explain the preservation of SOM within them. The aggregates were then analyzed by C NEXAFS spectroscopy to resolve the carbonaceous functional groups (also known as carbon speciation) of SOM of various ages, which is the first analysis to be undertaken on sequences of buried allophanic paleosols formed on Holocene tephras of known age.
Materials and methods
Stratigraphy and sampling of paleosols
We selected allophane-rich soil material and paleosols developed almost all on Holocene tephra-fall deposits of both rhyolitic (i.e. with high silica content, ≥ ∼ 70 wt% SiO2) and andesitic (with intermediate silica content, ∼ 50–70 wt% SiO2) composition at four geomorphically-stable sites in central North Island (Fig. 2), two relatively close to the main volcanic sources (= proximal sites) and two farther away (= distal sites). At two sites—Brett Rd, Ashton Dairies Pit—the (now buried) soil on Taupo eruptives is formed on loose (i.e. non-welded), pumiceous Taupo ignimbrite, derived from a pyroclastic flow, rather than fall deposits43.
The multi-layered soils at the two distal sites were formed mainly by developmental upbuilding: Tapapa (formed on a composite of mainly rhyolitic tephras), near Tirau; and Lake Rotoaira (formed on a composite of mainly andesitic tephras), near Turangi and close to Mount Tongariro (Fig. 2). The multi-layered soils at the two proximal sites were formed on rhyolitic tephras via retardant upbuilding: Brett Road and Ashton Dairies Pit, both near Mount Tarawera to the southeast of Rotorua (Fig. 2). Roadside tephra-soil profiles (sections) at Tapapa and Lake Rotoaira were incised ~ 50 cm laterally to remove any modern roadside plant material before sampling; the roadside profile at Brett Rd was incised ~ 1 m laterally; and the profile at Ashton Dairies was in a pit newly excavated using a mechanical digger. The stratigraphy and soil horizonation for each soil profile were established using tephrostratigraphy—see Supplementary Sect. 1—and conventional soil morphological examination (Fig. 3; Soil Survey Staff45 and Soil Survey Staff46). The approximate lengths of time the tephra materials at each site were at, or near, the land surface undergoing weathering and pedogenesis (by topdown soil processes forming soil horizons) before their burial by subsequent tephra(s) are reported in Table 1. These ages, or age ranges, for the paleosols were derived using tephrochronology.
Soil horizons at all sites were tested using the NaF-based allophane test in the field44 to confirm that they were allophanic (samples were later analyzed in the lab for allophane content). In total, 13 samples of buried allophanic soil horizons (paleosols) were collected (Table 1). They were sieved to obtain < 2 mm-size (fine-earth) fractions and stored at 4 °C in the dark for up to one month prior to clay extraction and analyses.
Soil properties and extraction of organo-clay fractions
Soil pH values (solid/solution = 1/2.5) were measured in water following the method of Blakemore et al.50 (Table 1). Allophane contents of soil samples were estimated by oxalate-extractable Fe, Al, and Si as well as pyrophosphate-extractable Al50,51; ferrihydrite contents were estimated from oxalate-extractable Fe multiplied by 1.752. Before extraction of clay fractions, visible root remnants were removed. To obtain clay fractions (particles < 2 µm), each sample was dispersed mechanically by prolonged shaking for 16 h with deionized (DI) water and 2-mm glass beads53, followed by sedimentation of particles > 2 µm according to Stokes’ Law and then suspended clay was extracted via a pipette. Andisols possess strong physical stability, thus size fractionation by shaking may result in incomplete disruption/dispersion of soil aggregate as compared with the sonification method54,55. Therefore, some stable aggregates > 2 µm formed with clay particles might not have been disrupted during shaking and were precipitated during sedimentation, thus we may have underestimated the quantity of clay in the soils we studied. However, the purpose of clay fractionation here was to acquire clay-size particles/aggregates for characterizing the clays and preserved SOM in them, and so any underestimation of clay fractions would be of little consequence.
The clay fractions were frozen quickly with liquid nitrogen and freeze-dried to preserve the nature of organic matter associated with the clay. The freeze-dried (organo-)clays were ground and analyzed in duplicate for total organic carbon (TOC). Although we did not test in this study, the exposure of samples to oxygen and light during all the treatments may have caused minor organic matter degradation thus some vulnerable functional groups in soils might be affected. Analysis of TOC was undertaken using a Leco TruSpec carbon/nitrogen analyzer. The pH values, clay, allophane, and ferrihydrite contents of fine-earth fractions collected from the paleosols are shown in Table 1, together with the TOC contents (of clay fractions) and stratigraphic and age information.
Characterizing internal porous structure of allophane aggregates using TXM
To help envisage and explain the preservation of the SOM identified in the allophanic buried soils/paleosols, we used a synchrotron-based transmission X-ray microscope (TXM) which allows two dimensional (2D) imaging and 3D tomography at tuneable energies from 6 to 11 keV. The experiment was carried out at BL01B1 at the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (NSRRC) in Hsinchu, Taiwan. At the sample position, the expected photon flux is about 7 × 1011 photon/s/200 mA and the focused beam size is about 1 mm × 0.4 mm, and the current beamline allows images and 3D tomography acquisitions with 60-nm spatial resolution56. Many natural allophane microaggregates extracted from the Bw1 horizon of the soil at Tapapa (Fig. 3) were firmly adhered to silicon-free tapes to avoid movement of microaggregates during rotation. All the microaggregates were examined at 1.84 keV for silicon K-edge. 2D micrographs of each microaggregate were generated using TXM with 60 s exposure time to obtain micrographs of high resolution; the 3D tomography datasets were reconstructed based on sequential image frames taken with azimuth angle rotating from − 75° to + 75° to obtain 151 2D micrographs of the microaggregate, with shadow represents the silicate-based clay and the white areas were silicate-free inorganic compounds and pores.
The final 3D virtual structure (video view) of the microaggregate was generated from the tomographic dataset using the software Amira 5.01, Visage Imaging. The image alignment is the important procedure and critical to allow 3D tomography and 3D computed reconstruction. Only images from one microaggregate could be well aligned and thus we present only the 3D tomography and reconstruction of that microaggregate.
Characterizing SOM sequestered by clays using C NEXAFS spectroscopy
C NEXAFS spectra for (organo-) clays and for pure indium foils (as sample carriers) were collected at beamline 24A1 at NSRRC. Typically, to normalize the signals from samples, the total electron yield from each sample is divided by the yield of a clean surface (namely I0) measured concurrently with the sample of interest, but often the C accumulation in the beamlines leads to false I0 signal for C analysis. Beamline 24A1 at NSRRC has a specific system that allows I0 to be obtained by X-ray travelling through a golden grid which had been set up in the beam path in the ionization chamber ahead of the analytical chamber. The golden grid is coated in-situ by ionized gold atoms ejected from a gold stick during a sputtering process before all the experiments are carried out. The signal derived when the beam passes through the just-coated golden mesh is designated to be carbon-free, and the interference of carbon accumulating in the beam path with spectra normalization is therefore eliminated. The beamline 24A1 was used to obtain high-resolution C 1 s X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra and C NEXAFS spectra57,58, indicating that the beamline is free from significant carbon accumulation/contamination and is thus suitable for C X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS).
Fluxes of photons 5 \(\times\) 1011 to 1 \(\times\) 1010 per second were admitted to the chamber, and the beamline produced soft X-rays (energy range < 5 keV) so that the energy was tuneable over 10–1500 eV and allowed a focussed beam size of 0.7 by 0.3 mm. The end station comprised three chambers, including a pre-chamber, a transfer chamber, and a main analytical chamber. The last is under very high vacuum (< 1 ×10–8 torr). For C NEXAFS spectroscopy with high resolution, the beamline grating was set to 400 mm−1, and the positions of two beamline silts were set to − 200 and − 20 on the dial to minimize the light source and focus the beam.
For sample preparation, disposable gloves were worn and tools were cleaned with acetone to avoid carbon contamination from personnel or preparation. An extracted organo-clay fraction from each soil sample was pressed into indium foil (0.5 mm thick, manufactured by Puratronic®, 99.9975%) to be conductive so that the excited electrons could be transmitted from the sample surface to the detector. The surface of indium foil was fully covered with sample to avoid any potential extraneous carbon contribution from the indium foil itself, and the indium foil with attached sample was flattened with clean glass rods. The flattened indium foil containing the sample was attached to a clean sample holder, and the holder was placed into the pre-chamber for degassing for 2 h and then transferred to the main analytical chamber.
The C NEXAFS spectroscopy was performed with the X-ray energy set to increase from 275 to 340 eV with a step of 0.035 eV (2000 dwell points in total, 1 ms dwell time per point), and it took approximately 3 min to obtain one spectrum. Three spectra were collected for each organo-clay sample based on total electron yield and partial electron detection modes with an electron energy analyzer (SPECS PHOBOIS 150). The photon energy was calibrated by setting the position of first valley of I0 collected from every scan to be 284.2 eV that corresponded with the first peak of graphite at 285.5 eV. The replicate C NEXAFS spectra for each sample were merged, processed, baseline-corrected, and normalized using the Athena program, an interface to IFEFFIT (version 1.2.11). The full spectra including post-edge region up to 340 eV were used for normalization (see an example in Supplementary Fig. SM1A). In our study we only present the spectra of total electron yield as they provided better resolution with high electron yield in our case, and we show spectra of samples between 280 and 310 eV because the peaks in this region representing various C functional groups were identified according to the X-ray energies.
Results
Porous internal structure of an allophane microaggregate from soil at Tapapa
The 2D and 3D images of the examined microaggregate are presented in Fig. 4. The dark shadow in Fig. 4 (left) represents the absorption of silicon K-edge and thus the structure of silicate-based clay, and the white areas are the locations of silicate-free compounds (such as ferrihydrite and organo-metal complexes) and pores. The 3D virtual reconstruction of the allophane microaggregate showed that it was highly porous and comprised many sub-microaggregates or nanoaggregates (defined as ≤ 100 nm in diameter: Huang et al.42).
Carbon from indium foil and authentic carbon signal from Beamline 24A1
The C NEXAFS spectrum for indium foil (99.9975% purity, used as sample carrier) showed that carbon from the indium foil was characterized by quinonic and carboxylic/carbonyl functional groups (Supplementary Fig. SM1A), which, despite the safeguards noted earlier (“Characterizing SOM sequestered by clays using C NEXAFS spectroscopy”), could be from the impurities when the indium foil was refined and manufactured or from extraneous carbon adsorbed on the indium foil before use. We further examined other carbonaceous materials, such as biochars and non-allophanic soil materials, and found different carbon functional groups (Supplementary Fig. SM1B,C). Quinonic carbon in particular was not observed in biochar samples, and there was significant loss of carboxylic/carbonyl groups in three samples. Thus, we concluded that the carbon signals from indium foil did not affect the analysis of soil mounted on the surface of indium, and that indium foil was a suitable holder for soil samples. Moreover, the spectra from our allophanic paleosols and from indium foil exhibited different baselines and intramolecular resonances (over the 290–296 eV region) (see Supplementary Fig. SM1A and Fig. 5), and so the carbon signal from samples could not have originated from the indium foil.
Nature of SOM in allophanic clay fractions of Holocene tephra-derived soils/paleosols at the four sites
The clay fractions from allophanic buried soils/paleosols contain 6.5–13.3% TOC. At the developmental upbuilding sites in Tapapa and Rotoaira, we found very similar C functional groups compositionally and proportionally (Fig. 5A,B). The C NEXAFS spectra were mainly characterized by quinonic (284 eV), aromatic (285 eV), and carboxylic/carbonyl (288.5 eV) carbon, although the clay, allophane, and TOC contents of the soils varied markedly (Table 1). The results show that the structures of preserved SOM in clay fractions of paleosols on Holocene tephras of different ages (Fig. 3, Table 1) have remained the same, and that clay and allophane contents, and time, have not significantly affected the constituent functional groups of the SOM adsorbed by clays in these paleosols.
The paleosols at the retardant upbuilding sites, Brett Road and Ashton Dairies Pit, are each developed on the same set of Holocene tephras, including Taupo, Rotoma, and Whakatane tephras. The clay-attached organics in paleosols on each of these tephras at the two sites, despite some podzolic (strongly acidic leaching) soil morphological differences noted earlier (Fig. 3), still have similar spectral characteristics (Fig. 5C), including substantial amounts of carboxylic/carbonyl groups (> 40%) at 288.6 eV and relatively small contributions of quinonic (284.3 eV), aromatic (285 eV), and aliphatic (287.1 eV) groups despite differences in paleosol ages and depths (Fig. 3). As at Tapapa and Lake Rotoaira, these similarities indicate that the structures of preserved SOM in the clay fractions of Holocene paleosols of different ages have remained the same despite the differences in clay and allophane (and ferrihydrite) content and age, and the podzolization evident at Ashton Dairies Pit (Supplementary Sect. 1.3).
Discussion
Adsorptive clays, porous aggregates in allophanic soils/paleosols and upbuilding pedogenesis allow preservation of SOM
Previously the high surface area and the hydroxyl groups of allophane and iron (hydr)oxide (ferrihydrite) in tephra-derived soils and Andisols were considered to be one of the keys for SOM/SOC sequestration59,60,61. Basile-Doelsch et al.61 demonstrated that 83% of the organic matter in a buried tephra-derived soil was associated with such minerals and also they suggested microaggregates of organomineral complexes were preserved. Studies additionally showed that the intermediate-density fraction (where the majority of allophane and ferryhydrite are located in soil) in an Andisol could not explain SOC sorption onto the surface solely and so the role of organo-mineral aggregation was additionally suggested55,62. A later study based on the surface chemistry and adsorption capacity of synthetic allophane spherules showed that only 20% of organic compounds (presented as DNA molecules) were adsorbed on the surface of allophane and almost 80% of the organic compunds were held “physically” within small pores of allophane microaggregates and nanoaggregates42. These studies thus suggest that the nanocrystalline clays govern SOM sequestration in Andisols by both surface sorption and aggregation/entrapment.
The considerable quantaties of allophane in most of the soils/paleosols we studied have contributed to SOM stabilization in the soils. Ferrihydrite, although relatively minor in quantity (Table 1), would also be expected to contribute to SOM sequestration (following Basile-Doelsch, et al.61) because it, like allophane, has a large reactive surface area (up to ~ 500 m2 g−1)9. Our 3D tomography of a microaggregate from the Bw1 horizon of the allophanic soil material at Tapapa further shows the aggregation of clays and the vast internal porous structure within the microaggregate, and such an extent of fractal nano-pores (described as a “nanolabyrinthic” pore distribution with a high degree of tortuosity) allows storage of SOM and decreases SOM bioavailability and carbon turnover rate4,11,42. The synchrotron-based TXM enables the analysis of soil microstructure, but the reconstruction of the structure at nano-scale could be limited because of imperfect image alignment. Thus, the development of better alignment approaches56 may enhance the use of TXM for soil science studies at the molecular/nano-scale range. Ongoing tephra accretion then causes the land surface to rise so that the once-surface horizon becomes more deeply buried and hence increasingly isolated from the modern (surficial) organic cycle. Consequently, the effects of pedogenesis (parent material transformation) become negligible or nil: in the case of incremental, thin tephra/cryptotephra deposition (i.e. developmental upbuilding), the isolation is gradual whereas in the case of sudden thick tephra deposition (i.e. retardant upbuilding) it is abrupt or paroxysmal (these concepts were first described by Taylor63 and Hopkins et al.25; see also Schaetzl and Sorenson64). Although downward leaching of mobile, younger SOM from the surface through the profiles occurs, we contend that such SOM would not be well protected chemically unless it was able to be encapsulated into the nanolabyrinthic pore network, which, however, would be largely occupied by older SOM encased physically during past periods of soil formation that included weathering and dissolution of abundant volcanic glass by hydrolysis (where the proton donor was usually carbonic acid, together with organic acids especially at Ashton Dairies Pit) and the synthesis (neoformation) of the dissolution products to form clays near the soil/land surface65.
Thus, much of the SOM adsorbed and preserved chemically and physically by allophane in clay fractions of the buried paleosols on Holocene tephras in New Zealand is, we suggest, derived mainly from past environments when the organo-allophane micro/nanoaggregates were formed at or close to the (paleo) land surface prior to their burial. This conclusion is supported by the earlier findings on ancient plant DNA extracted from a buried paleosol on Rotoma tephra at the Brett Rd site66.
Similarity of carbon functional groups of SOM in paleosol clay fractions
In our study, the shapes of spectra for SOM in clay fractions showed no significant increase nor decrease in intensity of specific C functional groups between samples, revealing the high similarity of stabilized C in the clay fractions of the allophane-rich buried soil horizon/paleosols. Although Heymann et al.32 showed that the proportions of aromatic C and O-alkyl C in alkaline extracts from soils at different depths could be varied, the SOM in the non-treated clays from our paleosols shows the same carbon functional groups. The predominance of carboxylic/carbonyl carbon in the allophanic soils/paleosols examined in our study may result from (1) a strong association of carboxylic/carbonyl groups of humic substances with Al–OH defects on the surface of allophane by ligand exchange13,59,67, or (2) oxidation of organics and microbial activities in uppermost soil horizons (at the land surface under an active organic regime)68 in the past and before the land surface was buried by new tephra deposits, or both. The regional C NEXAFS spectra over a stable microaggregate selected from a surface horizon of an Andisol also suggested that the microbial-derived amide and carboxylic C were the main forms of C in organo-mineral (nano)complex69. We therefore infer that the SOM originated at or near the land surface during upbuilding pedogenesis.
As soil genesis and hydrolysis-dominated weathering began in a newly-deposited tephra uppermost in the soil profile, allophane (and subordinate ferrihydrite) formed quickly7 and SOM was sequestered on spherules and in nano-pores within microaggregates. As noted above, ongoing tephra deposition (incrementally and/or suddenly) caused the land surface to rise so that horizons formerly at the surface were gradually or suddenly buried and hence over time became increasingly isolated from inputs by the modern organic cycle and near-surface processes. The presence of quinonic carbon, especially sensitive to oxygen and light, is indicative of the exceptionally strong protection of SOM by clays in allophanic paleosols, and attributable both to a tortuous nano-pore network amidst allophane micro-and nanoaggregates that encapsulates and shields the relict SOM from degradation, and to rapid burial by successive tephra-fall deposition. The occlusion, together with rapid burial, would help cut out light (which is unlikely to penetrate beyond ca 10 mm: Tester and Morris70) and thus reduce photodegradation of quinonic carbon by solar irradiance71. The mean rates of tephra accretion at Brett Rd and Ashton Dairies Pit are ~ 25 mm per century, and those at Tapapa and Lake Rotoaira are ~ 5 to 12 mm per century, respectively (after Lowe72), and so, on average, surface horizon components typically would be buried beyond light penetration within just decades. The clay-associated SOM (as expressed by the carbon functional groups) in the paleosols at each of the four study sites thus likely derived from soil processes operating from early to late Holocene and has not been modified by modern surface processes, or by diagenesis, after burial.
An early study in southern Italy also showed no differences in the chemical composition and structure of the humic substances extracted from six paleosols formed on a sequence of pyroclastic deposits dating from ca. 30,000 to 7000 cal. yr BP, despite the difference in age73, and this study concluded that the paleosols appear to be “closed systems from the geochemical point of view”. Similarly, with the use of solid-state NMR spectroscopy, the SOM in 50, 100, 300, 700, and 2000 year-old soils collected from a paddy soil chronosequence in China showed similar compositions of carbon functional groups74. Kleber et al.75 also showed that old, preserved SOM adsorbed by clays does not comprise a particular type of carbon, but a 680-year-old Inceptisol (a weakly developed soil with a Bw horizon: Soil Survey Staff46) sequestered a large proportion of alkyl carbon (aliphatic functional groups) that can be metabolized easily.
Presence of quinone as an indicator of bio-signal preservation in allophanic soils
In comparison with published C NEXAFS spectra for organic matter in other soils or soil aggregates34,75,76, our New Zealand allophanic buried soil horizon/paleosols studied here all contained a distinct amount of quinonic carbon (over 284 eV region). Natural quinones are common constituents of bacterial plasma membranes77,78 and of pigments of chloroplasts79, which are involved in cellular respiration and photosynthesis. Among natural quinones, isoprenoid quinones have been used as taxonomic markers78 and are one of the most important groups of quinones because of their functions. Isoprenoid quinones are composed of a hydrophilic head group and an apolar isoprenoid side chain, giving the molecules a lipid-soluble character80. These quinones are hydrophobic and particularly susceptible to breaking down in well-drained alkaline conditions and are photo-oxidized rapidly in the presence of oxygen and strong light81,82. Naturally, the quinonic ring (an unsaturated ring containing two –C=O groups) undergoes reversible reduction, leading to more stable quinol ring (an unsaturated ring containing two –OH groups)80. Therefore, quinonic carbon is labile and highly susceptible to degradation and transformation in soils, which explains the absence or trace presence only of quinonic carbon in most soils examined in previous studies5,34,76. Hence, the presence of quinonic carbon in some soils has been attributed to its occlusion and thus protection within organo-aggregates—for example, Solomon et al.83 mapped the carbon functional groups of an ultrathin section of a soil microaggregate and showed the quinonic carbon occurred only in the inner and intermediate regions of the aggregate.
The encapsulation of organic matter within labyrinthic pore networks amidst mainly allophane (± ferrihydrite) micro-and nanoaggregates, readily envisaged from the 3D microtomographic image in Fig. 4, allows such organic matter to be occluded and thus remain intact despite strongly acidic leaching and oxidizing conditions at our sites (cf. Chevallier et al.11; Huang et al.66). The good preservation of the bio-signal in allophane-rich soils is evidenced by the presence of quinones in the soils, and thus the allophane-rich paleosol archives are of great potential for future studies in reconstructing past environments via lipid biomarker or ancient DNA analyses.
Conclusions
-
(1)
The synchrotron-based TXM allowed us to obtain the first visualization and reconstruction of the vast network of internal nano-pores, i.e. nanolabyrinthic pore structure, within a microaggregate extracted from tephra-derived allophanic soil material (together with minor ferrihydrite) of Holocene age. This highly porous, tortuous nano-scale network allows carbon to be tightly entrapped, and the ongoing, rapid burial and hence subsurface isolation of the soil horizons (via upbuilding pedogenesis), together help to explain the high SOM sequestration and slow carbon turnover rate in tephra-derived soils (see (3) below for a summary of the mechanism).
-
(2)
The SOM associated with mainly allophanic clay fractions in the buried soil horizon/paleosols, ranging in age from ca 12,000 to 1718 cal. yr BP, was dominated by carboxylic/carbonyl functional groups with subordinated amounts of quinonic, aromatic, and aliphatic groups. All samples from four study sites exhibited similar compositions despite differences in clay and allophane contents, stratigraphic position (depth of burial), age, parent-tephra composition (andesitic versus rhyolitic), rainfall (Lake Rotoaira > Tapapa, Brett Rd, Ashton Dairies), and dominant mode of soil genesis (developmental versus retardant upbuilding). The dominant carboxylic/carbonyl functional groups could be ascribable to close binding between these functional groups and allophane (± ferrihydrite) that is stronger than for other groups.
-
(3)
We envisage that the SOM (as expressed by the carbon functional groups) originated at or near the land surface via upbuilding pedogenesis and weathering dominated by hydrolysis in free-draining tephra layers. As soil genesis began in a newly-deposited tephra bed at the soil/land surface, allophane (± ferrihydrite) was precipitated from weathering-derived solutes2 and formed micro- and nanoaggregates, physically sequestering contemporary SOM from the modern (surficial) organic cycle. Ongoing tephra deposition then caused the land surface to rise so that previous-surface (A) horizons became increasingly divorced from the modern organic cycle through their ever-deepening burial, eventually forming isolated buried soil horizons or paleosols. The SOM in the paleosols at each of the four study sites thus derives from processes operating from early to late Holocene, and not from modern surface processes nor from diagenesis.
-
(4)
In comparison with published C NEXAFS spectra for SOM in other soil materials, our allophanic paleosols contained a distinct amount of quinonic carbon over 284 eV region, indicating strong preservation of bio-signals in these soils. Thus allophanic (± ferrihydrite) paleosol archives are of great potential for paleoecological studies via biomarker (i.e. lipid or DNA) analyses.
-
(5)
Our study suggests that the TXM possesses a great potential for study in soil structure at micro- and nano-scales, and that the C NEXAFS spectroscopy is an important method for evaluating the fine structure of SOM in order to study the persistence and change of SOM in response to environmental change.
Data availability
All the soil chemistry data as well as the TXM tomographic images and C NEXAFS spectra are available.
Abbreviations
- asl:
-
Above sea level
- AP:
-
Ashton Dairies Pit
- BP:
-
Before present (‘present’ is 1950 in the radiocarbon [14C] timescale)
- BR:
-
Brett Rd
- cal.:
-
Calendar or calibrated
- C NEXAFS:
-
Carbon near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure
- DNA:
-
Deoxyribonucleic acid
- DI:
-
Deionized
- FTIR:
-
Fourier transform infrared
- NMR:
-
Nuclear magnetic resonance
- NSRRC:
-
National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center
- Ok:
-
Okareka tephra
- pyrolysis-GC/MS:
-
Pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
- Rk:
-
Rerewhakaaitu tephra
- Rr:
-
Rotorua tephra
- SM:
-
Supplementary materials
- SOC:
-
Soil organic carbon
- SOM:
-
Soil organic matter
- Te:
-
Te Rere tephra
- TXM:
-
Transmission X-ray microscopy
- XAS:
-
X-ray absorption spectroscopy
- XPS:
-
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
- yr:
-
Year(s)
References
Mikutta, R., Kleber, M. & Jahn, R. Poorly crystalline minerals protect organic carbon in clay subfractions from acid subsoil horizons. Geoderma 128, 106–115 (2005).
Churchman, G. J. & Lowe, D. J. Alteration, formation, and occurrence of minerals in soils. In Handbook of Soil Sciences, second edn, Vol. 1: Properties and Processes (eds Huang, P. M., Li, Y. & Sumner, M. E.) 20.21–20.72 (CRC Press (Taylor & Francis), 2012).
Six, J., Elliott, E. T. & Paustian, K. Soil macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation: A mechanism for C sequestration under no-tillage agriculture. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32, 2099–2103 (2000).
Strong, D. T., Wever, H. D., Merckx, R. & Recous, S. Spatial location of carbon decomposition in the soil pore system. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 55, 739–750 (2004).
Arachchige, P. S. P. et al. Sub-micron level investigation reveals the inaccessibility of stabilized carbon in soil microaggregates. Sci. Rep. 8, 16810 (2018).
Theng, B. K. G. & Yuan, G. Nanoparticles in the soil environment. Elements 4, 395–399 (2008).
Parfitt, R. L. Allophane and imogolite: Role in soil biogeochemical processes. Clay Miner. 44, 135–155 (2009).
Iyoda, F. et al. Synthesis and adsorption characteristics of hollow spherical allophane nano-particles. Appl. Clay Sci. 56, 77–83 (2012).
McDaniel, P. A., Lowe, D. J., Arnalds, O. & Ping, C.-L. Andisols. In Handbook of Soil Sciences, second edn, Vol. 1: Properties and Processes (eds Huang, P. M., Li, Y. & Sumner, M. E.) 33.29–33.48 (CRC Press (Taylor & Francis), 2012).
Churchman, G. J., Singh, M., Schapel, A., Sarkar, B. & Bolan, N. Clay minerals as the key to the sequestration of carbon in soils. Clays Clay Miner. 68, 135–143 (2020).
Chevallier, T., Woignier, T., Toucet, J. & Blanchart, E. Organic carbon stabilization in the fractal pore structure of Andosols. Geoderma 159, 182–188 (2010).
Dungait, J. A. J., Hopkins, D. W., Gregory, A. S. & Whitmore, A. P. Soil organic matter turnover is governed by accessibility not recalcitrance. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 1781–1796 (2012).
Matus, F., Rumpel, C., Neculman, R., Panichini, M. & Mora, M. L. Soil carbon storage and stabilisation in andic soils: A review. CATENA 120, 102–110 (2014).
Calabi-Floody, M. et al. Rold of nanoclays in carbon stabilization in Andisols and Cambisols. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 15, 587–604 (2015).
Singh, M. et al. Stabilization of soil organic carbon as influenced by clay mineralogy. Adv. Agonomy 148, 33–84 (2018).
Hewitt, A. E., Balks, M. R. & Lowe, D. J. Allophanic Soils. In The Soils of Aotearoa New Zealand, pp. 21–39 (Springer International Publishing, 2021).
Lowe, D. J. & Palmer, D. J. Andisols of New Zealand and Australia. J. Integr. Field Sci. 2, 39–65 (2005).
Lowe, D. J. & Tonkin, P. J. Unravelling upbuilding pedogenesis in tephra and loess sequences in New Zealand using tephrochronology. In Proceeding of 19th World Congress of Soil Science “Soil Solutions for a Changing World”, Symposium 1.3.2 Geochronological techniques and soil formation. (eds Gilkes, R. J. & Prakongkep, N.) 34–37 (2010).
Johnson, D. L. & Watson-Stegner, D. Evolution model of pedogenesis. Soil Sci. 143, 349–366 (1987).
Johnson, D. L., Keller, E. A. & Rockwell, T. K. Dynamic pedogenesis: New views onsome key soil concepts, and a model for interpreting quaternary soils. Quatern. Res. 33, 306–319 (1990).
Almond, P. C. & Tonkin, P. J. Pedogenesis by upbuilding in an extreme leaching and weathering environment, and slow loess accretion, south Westland, New Zealand. Geoderma 92, 1–36 (1999).
Lowe, D. J. Tephrochronology and its application: A review. Quat. Geochronol. 6, 107–153 (2011).
Pullar, W. A., Birrell, K. S. & Heine, J. C. Named tephras and tephra formations occurring in the central North Island, with notes on derived soils and buried paleosols. N. Z. J. Geol. Geophys. 16, 497–518 (1973).
Hewitt, A. E., Balks, M. R. & Lowe, D. J. Pumice Soils. In The Soils of Aotearoa New Zealand, pp. 179–198 (Springer International Publishing, 2021).
Hopkins, J. L., Lowe, D. J. & Horrocks, J. L. Tephrochronology in Aotearoa New Zealand. N. Z. J. Geol. Geophys. 64, 153–200 (2021).
McGlone, M. S. Holocene pollen diagrams, Lake Rotorua, North Island, New Zealand. J. R. Soc. N. Z. 13, 53–65 (1983).
Newnham, R. M., de Lange, P. J. & Lowe, D. J. Holocene vegetation, climate and history of a raised bog complex, northern New Zealand based on palynology, plant macrofossils and tephrochronology. Holocene 5, 267–282 (1995).
Williams, P. W., King, D. N. T., Zhao, J.-X. & Collerson, K. D. Speleothem master chronologies: Combined Holocene 18O and 13C records from the North Island of New Zealand and their palaeoenvironmental interpretation. Holocene 14, 194–208 (2004).
Jara, I. A., Newnham, R. M., Alloway, B. V., Wilmshurst, J. M. & Rees, A. B. H. Pollen-based temperature and precipitation records of the past 14,600 years in northern New Zealand (37°S) and their linkages with the Southern Hemisphere atmospheric circulation. Holocene 27, 1756–1768 (2017).
Newnham, R. M. et al. Peat humification records from Restionaceae bogs in northern New Zealand as potential indicators of Holocene precipitation, seasonality, and ENSO. Quatern. Sci. Rev. 218, 378–394 (2019).
Baldock, J. A. & Broos, K. Soil organic matter. In Handbook of Soil Sciences, second edn, Vol. 1: Properties and Processes (eds Huang, P. M., Li, Y. & Sumner, M. E.) 11.11–11.15 (CRC Press (Taylor & Francis), 2012).
Heymann, K. et al. Can functional group composition of alkaline isolates from black carbon-rich soils be identified on a sub-100 nm scale?. Geoderma 235–236, 163–169 (2014).
Kyle, M., Haande, S., Sønstebø, J. & Rohrlack, T. Amplification of DNA in sediment cores to detect historic Planktothrix occurrence in three Norwegian lakes. J. Paleolimnol. 53, 61–72 (2015).
Solomon, D., Lehmann, J., Kinyangi, J., Liang, B. & Schäfer, T. Carbon K-edge NEXAFS and FTIR-ATR spectroscopic investigation of organic carbon speciation in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 69, 107–119 (2005).
Buurman, P., Peterse, F. & Almendros Martin, G. Soil organic matter chemistry in allophanic soils: A pyrolysis-GC/MS study of a Costa Rican Andosol catena. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 58, 1330–1347 (2007).
Kruse, J., Eckhardt, K.-U., Regier, T. & Leinweber, P. TG–FTIR, LC/MS, XANES and Py-FIMS to disclose the thermal decomposition pathways and aromatic N formation during dipeptide pyrolysis in a soil matrix. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 90, 164–173 (2011).
Forouzangohar, M. et al. Using the power of C-13 NMR to interpret infrared spectra of soil organic matter: A two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy approach. Vib. Spectrosc. 66, 76–82 (2013).
Parfitt, R. L., Yuan, G. & Theng, B. K. G. A 13C-NMR study of the interactions of soil organic matter with aluminium and allophane in podzols. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 50, 695–700 (1999).
Smernik, R. J. & Oades, J. M. Paramagnetic effects on solid state carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of soil organic matter. J. Environ. Qual. 31, 414–420 (2002).
Lehmann, J. & Solomon, D. Organic carbon chemistry in soils observed by synchrotron-based spectroscopy. In Synchrotron-Based Techniques in Soils and Sediments (eds Singh, B. & Gräfe, M.) 289–312 (Elsevier, 2010).
Lowe, D. J., Blaauw, M., Hogg, A. G. & Newnham, R. M. Ages of 24 widespread tephras erupted since 30,000 years ago in New Zealand, with re-evaluation of the timing and palaeoclimatic implications of the Lateglacial cool episode recorded at Kaipo bog. Quatern. Sci. Rev. 74, 170–194 (2013).
Huang, Y.-T. et al. DNA adsorption by nanocrystalline allophane spherules and nanoaggregates, and implications for carbon sequestration in Andisols. Appl. Clay Sci. 120, 40–50 (2016).
Lowe, D. J. & Pittari, A. The Taupō eruption sequence of AD 232 ± 10 in Aotearoa New Zealand: A retrospection. J. Geogr. (Chigaku Zasshi) 130, 117–141 (2021).
Hewitt, A. E. New Zealand Soil Classification, 3rd edn. Landcare Research Science Series No. 1, 136 pp (Manaaki Whenua Press, 2010).
Soil Survey Staff. Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 12th ed. (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2014).
Soil Survey Staff. Buried soils and their effect on taxonomic classification. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil Survey Technical Note No. 10. http://directive.se.egov.usda.gov/OpenNonWebContent.aspx?content=29749.wba. Accessed 10 Dec 2015 (2011).
Green, B. E. Weathering of Buried Paleosols on Late Quaternary Rhyolitic Tephras, Rotorua Region, New Zealand, Master of Science thesis, The University of Waikato, Hamilton (1987).
Childs, C. W. Weighted mean concentrations of minerals in New Zealand soils. I. Ferrihydrite. N. Z. Soil Bureau Sci. Rep. 81, 28 (1987).
Parfitt, R. L., Pollok, J. A. & Furkert, R. J. Guide Book for Tour I, North Island. In Soil with Variable Charge Conference, Palmerston North, New Zealand. (1980).
Blakemore, L. C., Searle, P. L. & Daly, B. K. Methods for chemical analysis of soils. N. Z. Soil Bureau Sci. Rep. 10A, 102 (1981).
Parfitt, R. L. & Wilson, A. D. Estimation of allophane and halloysite in three sequences of volcanic soils, New Zealand. Catena Suppl. 7, 1–8 (1985).
Parfitt, R. L. & Childs, C. W. Estimation of forms of Fe and Al—A review, and analysis of contrasting soils by dissolution and Moessbauer methods. Soil Res. 26, 289–296 (1988).
Churchman, G. J. & Tate, K. R. Aggregation of clay in six New Zealand soils types as measured by disaggregation procedures. Geoderma 37, 207–220 (1986).
Kaiser, M. & Asefaw Berhe, A. How does sonication affect the mineral and organic constituents of soil aggregates?—A review. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 177, 479–495 (2014).
Wagai, R., Kajiura, M., Asano, M. & Hiradate, S. Nature of soil organo-mineral assemblage examined by sequential density fractionation with and without sonication: Is allophanic soil different?. Geoderma 241–242, 295–305 (2015).
Wang, C. C. Joint iterative fast projection matching for fully automatic marker-free alignment of nano-tomography reconstructions. Sci. Rep. 10, 7330 (2020).
Thomsen, L., Wharmby, M. T., Riley, D. P., Held, G. & Gladys, M. J. The adsorption and stability of sulfur containing amino acids on Cu{531}. Surf. Sci. 603, 1253–1261 (2009).
Chen, C. J. et al. Improvement of lithium anode deterioration for ameliorating cyclabilities of non-aqueous Li-CO2 batteries. Nanoscale 12, 8385–8396 (2020).
Theng, B. K. G., Yuan, G. & Hashizume, H. Clay minerals and polymers: From soils to nanocomposites. Clay Sci. 12, 69–73 (2005).
Hernández, Z. et al. Influence of non-crystalline minerals in the total amount, resilience and molecular composition of the organic matter in volcanic ash soils (Tenerife Island, Spain). Eur. J. Soil Sci. 63, 603–615 (2012).
Basile-Doelsch, I. et al. Mineral control of carbon pools in a volcanic soil horizon. Geoderma 137, 477–489 (2007).
Wagai, R., Kajiura, M. & Asano, M. Iron and aluminum association with microbially processed organic matter via meso-density aggregate formation across soils: Organo-metallic glue hypothesis. Soil 6, 597–627 (2020).
Taylor, N. H. Soil processes in volcanic ash-beds (parts I and II). N. Z. J. Sci. Technol. 14(193–202), 338–352 (1933).
Schaetzl, R. J. & Sorenson, C. J. The concept of “buried” versus “isolated” paleosols: Examples from northeastern Kanasa. Soil Sci. 143, 426–435 (1987).
Hodder, A. P. W., Green, B. E. & Lowe, D. J. A two-stage model for the formation of clay minerals from tephra-derived volcanic glass. Clay Miner. 25, 313–327 (1990).
Huang, Y.-T. et al. A new method to extract and purify DNA from allophanic soils and paleosols, and potential for paleoenvironmental reconstruction and other applications. Geoderma 274, 114–125 (2016).
Yuan, G., Theng, B. K. G., Parfitt, R. L. & Percival, H. J. Interactions of allophane with humic acid and cations. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 51, 35–41 (2000).
Lehmann, J. Near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) spectroscopy for mapping nano-scale distribution of organic carbon forms in soil: Application to black carbon particles. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 19, GB1013 (2005).
Asano, M. et al. In search of a binding agent: Nano-scale evidence of preferential carbon associations with poorly-crystalline mineral phases in physically-stable, clay-sized aggregates. Soil Syst. 2, 32 (2018).
Tester, M. & Morris, C. The penetration of light through soil. Plant Cell Environ. 10, 281–286 (1987).
Rutledge, S., Campbell, D. I., Baldocchi, D. & Schipper, L. A. Photodegradation leads to increased CO2 losses from terrestrial organic matter. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 3065–3074 (2010).
Lowe, D. J. Upbuilding pedogenesis in multisequal tephra-derived soils in the Waikato region. In Proceedings of Australian and New Zealand 2nd Joint Soils Conference, 183–184 (New Zealand Society of Soil Science, 2000).
Calderoni, G. & Schnitzer, M. Effects of age on the chemical structure of paleosol humic acids and fulvic acids. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 48, 2045–2051 (1984).
Zhou, Z. et al. Similarities in chemical composition of soil organic matter across a millennia-old paddy soil chronosequence as revealed by advanced solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Biol. Fertil. Soils 50, 571–581 (2014).
Kleber, M. et al. Old and stable soil organic matter is not necessarily chemically recalcitrant: Implications for modeling concepts and temperature sensitivity. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 1097–1107 (2011).
Wan, J., Tyliszczak, T. & Tokunaga, T. Organic carbon distribution, speciation, and elemental correlations within soil microaggregates: Applications of STXM and NEXAFS spectroscopy. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 71, 5439–5449 (2007).
Lester, R. L. & Crane, F. L. The natural occurrence of coenzyme Q and related compounds. J. Biol. Chem. 234, 2169–2175 (1959).
Collins, M. D. & Jones, D. Distribution of isoprenoid quinone structural types in bacteria and their taxonomic implications. Microbiol. Rev. 45, 316–354 (1981).
Karp, G. C. Photosynthesis and the chloroplast. In Cell and Molecular Biology: Concepts and Experiments (ed Karp, G. C.) 211–254 (Wiley, 2013).
Nowicka, B. & Kruk, J. Occurrence, biosynthesis and function of isoprenoid quinones. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 1797, 1587–1605 (2010).
Green, J., Edwin, E. E., Diplock, A. T. & McHale, D. The conversion of ubiquinone to ubichromenol. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2, 269–271 (1960).
Dunphy, P. J. & Brodie, A. F. The structure and function of quinones in respiratory metabolism. Methods Enzymol. 18, 407–461 (1971).
Solomon, D. et al. Micro- and nano-environments of C sequestration in soil: A multi-elemental STXM–NEXAFS assessment of black C and organomineral associations. Sci. Total Environ. 438, 372–388 (2012).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported mainly by the Marsden Fund Te Pūta Rangahau a Marsden administered through the Royal Society of New Zealand (Royal Society Te Apārangi) for the project “New view from old soils: testing the reconstruction of environmental and climatic change using genetic signals preserved in buried paleosols” (contract UOW1006) to D.J. Lowe, and partly by a University of Waikato doctoral scholarship and The Swedish Research Council Formas Mobility Grant (project number 2019-01668) to D.Y.-T. Huang. Our research was also supported by managers and other staff at beamlines 24A1 and 01B1 at the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (NSRRC) at Hsinchu, Taiwan, whom we gratefully thank for their expertise and help with our project “Characterising DNA and carbon within and between nanoaggregates of allophane in andic soils and paleosols, northern New Zealand” (proposal 2012-2-049). We are also grateful to Prof. Shan-Li Wang and Prof. Zeng-Yei Hseu for providing biochars and non-allophanic soil material, and other support. We thank Anja Moebis for her advice regarding the tephrostratigraphy at the Lake Rotoaira site, and colleagues who helped with sampling including Chris McKinnon, Natasha Jaques, Maria Zammit, Bruce and Triona Williamson, Kerri Lanigan, and Maria Lowe. We especially thank farmers Marcus Pinder and Mike Marti at Ashton Dairies for providing access and for generously excavating a pit for us, and Jan and Barry Goodwin for allowing ongoing access to the Tapapa site on their farm. Brent Green is thanked for allowing us to cite data from his masterate thesis (1987), David Palmer for providing modelled rainfall data, Max Oulton for re-drawing Fig. 1, and Marta Camps Arbestain and Randy Dahlgren for helpful comments on an early version of the article. The editor Youhei Yamashita and two reviewers are thanked for very useful comments that helped us to significantly improve the article. DJL is grateful to Siwan Davies and her tephra group at Swansea University, UK, for supporting his visit in August 2015 during which parts of this paper were initially prepared. The paper is an output of the Commission on Tephrochronology (COT) of the International Association of Volcanism and Chemistry of the Earth’s Interior (IAVCEI).
Funding
This work was supported mainly by the Marsden Fund Te PūtaRangahau a Marsden: contract UOW1006; The Swedish Research Council Formas Mobility Grant: project 2019-01668; NSRRC proposal 2012-2-049; and support from University of Waikato including a partial doctoral scholarship. Open access funding provided by Umeå University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The nature of contribution by the leading author D.Y.-T.H. included sampling, designing and conducting the experiments, data analysis, and writing. D.J.L. substantially contributed to development of project, selected the study sites, and provided detailed information about soil stratigraphy and tephrostratigraphy, supported sampling, and assisted with manuscript writing/editing. G.J.C. contributed to the development of project and experimental design and provided substantial comments particularly on the interactions between clays and SOM/SOC. L.A.S., A.C., and N.J.R provided comments on data analysis and interpretation. N.J.R. also contributed with (sterile) sampling. T.-Y.C. provided fundamental technical support on synchrotron radiation work and comments on the manuscript. The manuscript was revised by all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, D.YT., Lowe, D.J., Churchman, G.J. et al. Characterizing porous microaggregates and soil organic matter sequestered in allophanic paleosols on Holocene tephras using synchrotron-based X-ray microscopy and spectroscopy. Sci Rep 11, 21310 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00109-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00109-9
This article is cited by
-
Surface engineering for ultrapermeable antibacterial conjugated microporous polymer-polyamide composite membranes
Science China Materials (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.