Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Global implication of mesoproterozoic (~ 1.4 Ga) magmatism within the Sette-Daban Range (Southeast Siberia)

Abstract

Mesoproterozoic period included several global tectonic events like break-up of Nuna and formation of Rodinia. However, although Siberia is a significant piece of both supercontinents, Mesoproterozoic time is marked by quiescence of magmatic and tectonic activity in it. We report here a mafic dyke (named Gornostakh dyke) in the southeastern Siberian Craton dated at 1419 ± 32 Ma by LA-ICPMS U–Pb geochronology of apatite. The dyke has tholeiitic compositions with high MgO and alkaline content, low-Ti, and arc-like trace element pattern. Due to the absence of subduction tectonics in the study area, geochemical data could be attributed to a significant contribution from metasomatically enriched subcontinental lithospheric mantle previously modified by subduction processes. That kind of composition is common for low-Ti dykes of intraplate flood basalt provinces similar to, for example, Permian–Triassic Siberian large igneous province (LIP). Paleogeographic reconstructions suggest that Siberia was connected to Laurentia and Baltica and their reconfiguration interrupts a prolonged tectonic quiescence in the Siberian Craton from ca. 1.88 Ga reflecting a transition from Nuna to Rodinia configuration. The mafic magmatism on 1419 Ma on the southeastern margin of the Siberian Craton together with coeval extensional tectonics observed in the structure of the Sette-Daban ridge proposes a hypothetical LIP which may be a direct consequence of the beginning of this transition.

Introduction

Mesoproterozoic is included in the time period which is called the Boring Billion (1.70–0.75 Ga)1,2, which was marked by an absence of glacial deposits and Sr anomaly in the seawater record, lack of massive sulfide volcanic-hosted deposits and iron formations, lack of orogenic gold3. The paucity of new passive continental margins and abundance of unusual dry magmas such as A-type granites and anorthosites in Mesoproterozoic are discussed in terms of ‘lid tectonic’ hypothesis4. According to the paleomagnetic reconstructions in Mesoproterozoic, all of the continents were assembled into the supercontinent Nuna (Columbia) which were reassembled to Rodinia at the end of Mesoproterozoic e.g.5,6,7,8,9, and reference within. Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs) and regional mafic dyke swarms as a component of LIPs act as a significant fingerprint for supercontinental reconstructions and their presence indicates tectonic markers of intracratonic crustal extension associated with deep-Earth dynamic processes such as mantle plumes, subduction (back-arc extension), and rifting during supercontinent break-up10,11,12,13.

Outcrops of Paleoproterozoic or early Mesoproterozoic crust in Siberia are restricted to isolated exposures of basement inliers and surrounding areas or lower Mesoproterosoic sediment cover of foreland Verkhoyansk fold-and-thrust belt (FTB). The largest dyke swarms or extensive sills are located within the basement inlier in Anabar uplift and Olenek uplift and their surrounding areas, and Sette-Daban range of Verkhoyansk FTB (with ages ~1500 Ma and 1000–950 Ma, respectively14,15). The period of 1400–1300 Ma is marked by a few mafic intrusions across the Siberian craton: 1382 ± 2 Ma Chieress dyke cut the Mesoproterozoic sediment cover of the eastern slope of Anabar uplift16, 1385 ± 30 Ma mafic dykes cut the Mesoproterozoic sediments on the Udzha uplift17, Listvyanka and Goloustnaya dykes exposures in the south margin of the Siberian craton – 1350 ± 6 Ma and 1338 ± 3 Ma, respectively18 and reference within.

Another poorly dated north-trending dolerite dyke at south Verkhoyansk FTB was explored. This dyke cuts the lower Mesoproterozoic sediments (Lower Riphean according to the Russian stratigraphic nomenclature). The age of this dyke was estimated as ca. 1.34 Ga using Sm-Nd isochron19. We report here a new U-Pb age on apatite (1420 Ma), Nd-isotopes, and major and trace element geochemistry for this dolerite dyke to constrain mantle source and a possible link of this magmatic event with continental reconstruction in Mesoproterozoic.

Regional geology and sample description

The eastern part of the Siberian craton is separated from the Verkhoyansk FTB by a set of thrusts. The southernmost part of the Verkhoyansk FTB is widely known as the South Verkhoyansk segment20. The study area is located in the western part of this segment, within the Sette-Daban Range (Fig. 1).

Within the Sette-Daban area, the basement is totally covered by Mesoproterozoic to Jurassic sedimentary succession. Meso- and Neoproterozoic rocks are exposed in the hanging walls of major thrusts which specifies the predominant structural style as imbricate thrust sheets. From the south to the north several thrusts pinch out, forming the wide Gornostakh Anticline with a gentle (10°–15° dip angle) west limb and a much steeper (40°–50° dip angle) east limb (Fig. 1).

The Meso- and Neoproterozoic succession contains several kilometer-scale distinctive siliciclastic-carbonate cycles that are generally separated from each other by unconformities or erosional surfaces and are divided into the following six widely recognized units: the Uchur, Aimchan, Kerpyl, Lakhanda, Uy and Yudoma Groups21. A detailed description of the sedimentary succession of the Sette-Daban region has been presented in several papers, but the important thing for this study is that only Uchur Group is estimated as lower Mesoproterozoic in age, whereas others have middle Mesoproterozoic to Ediacarian ages22 and reference within. The outcrops of the lower Mesoproterozoic succession (Uchur Group) are limited to isolated exposures within the Verkhoyansk FTB and represented by two locations: in the core of the Gornostakh Anticline and in the hanging wall of the northern branch of the Kyllakh Thrust (Ebeke-Khayata Range, see on Fig. 1). The only angular unconformity (with angle ~20°) in the Mesoproterozoic sequence is observed between the Uchur and Aimchan Groups, and it reflects the only Mesoproterozoic extension deformation event in the region21.

Three major mafic magmatic events are recognized in the Sette-Daban: 1000–950 Ma Sette-Daban event, 440–450 Ma Suordakh event and 370–360 Ma Yakutsk-Vilyui LIP15,23,24 (Fig. 2). Gornostakh dyke analyzed in this study according to the geological maps crosscuts only the sediments of the Uchur Group in the core of the Gornostakh Anticline. A preliminary Sm-Nd isochron age of the Gornostakh dyke with the relatively large analytical error is 1339 ± 59 Ma19. If correct, this age suggests another mafic magmatic event in the area and the lack of exposure of the lower Mesoproterozoic sedimentary rocks in the Sette-Daban allows considering the Gornostakh dyke as a unique intrusion for assessing the nature of the lower Mesoproterozoic magmatism in the region.

The field sampling site was targeted using 1:200 000 geological maps of the USSR, sheet P-53-XXIV25. The dolerite sample was collected from the western slope of the Svetly Creek valley, approximately 7 km from its confluence with the Belaya River (Fig. 2). Dyke has no bedrock exposure but does have concentrations of large boulders of dolerite forming a north-trending line, which is shown on maps as a dyke. Due to the lack of exposed contacts, the width of the dyke are unknown, but estimated roughly as 15-20 meters. All rocks are relatively fresh, and weathering forms a thin pale brown crust which is developed along with fractures (Fig. 3).

The sample is dolerite with intergranular ophitic to sub-ophitic texture, comprising 50–55% plagioclase, 40–45% clinopyroxene, up to 0.5% quartz and 4–5% opaque minerals (ilmenite) and trace apatite grains (Fig. 4). The sample is moderately altered with uralitic alteration of pyroxene and variable moderate sericitization of plagioclase. Most of clinopyroxene grains have been affected by alteration (80% of the grain volume) and are present in the form of relics broken by cracks or pseudomorphisms, completely overgrown by chlorite and amphibole. Amphibole grows from near grain boundaries to pervasive alteration of the entire grain into a mixture of colorless actinolite-tremolite and greenish-brown xenomorphic grains of hornblende. Plagioclase (andesine №35–37) preserves original polysynthetic twinning and the entire volume of grains is permeated with a thin aggregate of saussurite and thin needles of actinolite-tremolite. Opaque minerals appear as subhedral to euhedral grains of ilmenite variable in size (0.1–2 mm) in groundmass and also as extremely fine-grained masses within altered pyroxene and along grain boundaries. Accessory apatite grains form thin prisms and needles up to 0.5 mm in size.

Figure 1
figure1

Simplified geological and sample location map of the central part of Sette-Daban Range and surrounding areas (after20,25, simplified and modified).

Figure 2
figure2

Geological setting of the central part and eastern limb of the Gornostakh Anticline (Belaya River area) and location of sampled dolerite dyke in this study (geology after25, modified and simplified). Ca 450 Ma sills (Suordakh event) from24.

Figure 3
figure3

(A) A view of the sample location, looking NNW. (B) Dolerite sample N595.

Figure 4
figure4

Photomicrograph of sample N595 (Gornostakh dyke). (A) Transmitted polarized light. (B) Cross-polarized light. Pl = plagioclase, Cpx = clinopyroxene, Amf = amphibole, Chl = chorite, Ilm = ilmenite.

U–Pb geochronology and geochemistry methodologies

Heavy mineral fractions were extracted at the Centre of Geodynamics and Geochronology at the Institute of the Earth's Crust Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Therefore patite grains were employed for U-Pb dating, which was performed at the University of Tasmania (Hobart, Australia) by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICPMS) using an Agilent 7900 quadrupole mass-spectrometer connected to a 193 nm Coherent Ar-F excimer laser and Resonetics S155 ablation cell26,27. Details of the procedure are provided in the Supplementary File along with the full analytical dataset.

The isotopic study was done at the Institute of Geology and Geochronology of the Precambrian, Russian Academy of Sciences. Accuracy at 2σ level of 147Sm/144Nd and 143Nd/144Nd ratio measurements was 0.5% and 0.005%, correspondently. 143Nd/144Nd ratios were reported relative to the value of 0.511860 for the La Jolla standard. During the period of this study, the weighted average of nine La Jolla Nd-standard runs yielded 0.511852±8 (2σ, n=10) for the 143Nd/144Nd ratio after normalization of the 146Nd/144Nd ratio to 0.7219.

Results

LA-ICPMS U–Pb geochronology

A typical apatite grains were used for the U-Pb dating. The apatite grain was large enough to employ 30 µm diameter laser ablation spots to grain regions free of mineral and melt inclusions. On the Tera-Wasserburg diagram, the analyzed apatite grains are discordant and form a pronounced regression line that intercepts in the lower part with the concordia at 1419 ± 32 Ma (Fig. 5). The trace element composition of apatite can be used to clarify the initial composition of magma, which has been shown in numerous studies28,29 and reference within. The multi-elemental spectra in the studied apatite indicate the closeness of the trace element composition of the grains. A characteristic feature of those apatite grains is the presence of pronounced Sr and Eu negative anomalies, which are typical for apatite from mafic igneous rocks.

Figure 5
figure5

Tera-Wasserburg concordia diagram for the dated apatite grains (on left). Weighted mean age is presented with 1 s error. In discussion we used 2 s error. Chondrite normalized rare earth elements spectra for analyzed apatite grains (on right). Grey field denotes to a typical range of apatite REE compositions from mafic host rocks29. Raw data presented in supplementary file.

Geochemistry

Major and trace element data for the studied sample N595 are presented together with temporally closest 1385 Ma Udzha dyke from northern Siberia and 1340 Ma Listvyanka dykes from Irkutsk Promontory17,18.

The sample of Gornostakh dolerite display relatively high MgO (9.83 wt%) and Al2O3 (15.4 wt%), moderate SiO2 (45.6 wt%), FeOt (11.1 wt%) and CaO (7.86 wt%), and low-Ti content (1.25 wt%) (Table 1). The sample has moderate total alkalis (Na2O + K2O = 3.9 wt%) and Na2O/K2O ratio of 2.27. The sampled dyke is classified as alkaline basalt on the TAS diagram (Fig. 6A30,31) and plots transitional between tholeiitic and calc-alkaline series on the AFM diagram (Fig. 6B30). The chondrite-normalized rare earth element pattern (Fig. 6C) shows moderate enrichment of light REE (LREE) with LaN/YbN=3.28 where LREE profile is flat with LaN/SmN=1.24 slightly higher than the average values of N-MORB and lower than average values of E-MORB, whereas the heavy REE (HREE) profiles shows gentle slope with TbN/YbN=1.81. The primitive mantle-normalized trace element patterns (Fig. 6D) show depletion of high field strength elements (HFSE) with prominent negative Nb-Ta and slightly negative Zr-Hf and Ti anomalies and enrichment in Pb, Rb and Ba.

Table 1 Major, trace element and isotope data for the sample N595.
Figure 6
figure6

(A) Total alkali-silica (TAS) plot after31 with alkaline-sub-alkaline boundary after30. Purple field the ca. 1340 Ma from Listvanka dykes from18, 1385 Ma Udzha dyke from58. (B) AFM plot after30. (C) Chondrite and (D) primitive mantle normalised multi-element plots for Gornostakh (N595), Udzha dyke58 and Listvyanka dykes18. OIB = ocean island basalt after46 NMORB = mid ocean ridge basalt and EMORB = enriched MORB after59.

The Gonstostakh dyke sample was analyzed for Nd isotopes. The corresponding initial εNd1420Ma value shows a slightly negative value (\(-\) 0.1), which is much lower than the inferred for the depleted mantle, suggesting involvement of an enriched reservoir (crustal component or enriched subcontinent lithospheric mantle).

Discussion

The age of mafic (or alkaline ultramafic) rocks is a key for supercontinent reconstructions and global correlation of ancient mafic magmatic activity worldwide32,33. Within Siberia mafic magmatism within an uncertainty of 1420 ± 30 Ma age for the Gornostakh dyke is currently unknown in the Sette-Daban or elsewhere in Siberia. The temporally closest magmatic events within the Siberia are the ca 1384–1386 Ma Chieress and Udzha dyke in its northern part16,17, the ca. 1350 Ma Listvyanka and Goloustnaya dykes18 and reference within in its south part and the 1490–1500 Ma Kuonamka LIP within north Siberia14. On a global scale, the 1.42 Ga Gornostakh dolerites may be compared directly with contemporaneous components in different blocks, including Baltica34, Laurentia32,35,36,37, Congo38,39 and West African40 cratons, and craton Yilgarn41.

Mantle sources

Evaluation of mobility of major and trace elements during alteration or metamorphism can be assessed using Zr, Nb, and Y, e.g.42,43. Despite moderate growth of secondary minerals in dolerite of the dyke, the Zr/TiO and Nb/Y ratios (68 and 0.19) correspond to subalkaline basalts according to classification by42 indicating that immobile trace elements (Nb, Y, Zr, Ta, Th, REE) were unaffected by post-magmatic processes and reflect the primary composition of magma. The Gornostakh dyke displays arc-like geochemical characteristics, including depletion of HFSE, enrichment of LILE, and unradiogenic initial Nd isotopes, which may have been conferred either by crustal contamination or derived from the metasomatically enriched source, or both44,45. Significant crustal contamination appears unlikely, which is supported by primitive mantle-like trace element ratios of Nb/Ta (17.0) and Zr/Sm (23.7) ratios (primitive mantle: Nb/Ta=17.39, and Zr/Sm=25.2346). This is supported further by La/Sm (1.9) and Sm/Nd (0.31) ratios, and relatively high Mg# (61.3), while crustal material is characterized by high La/Sm and low Sm/Nd relative to rocks sourced from the asthenospheric mantle. Nonetheless the dyke displays arc-like trace element signatures such as the depletion of HFSE and enrichment of LILE, and low Ti. However, subduction also appears unlikely according to paleotectonic reconstructions, which displays intra-plate tectonic setting of the region and absence of active margins around the Siberia. These characteristics may also be attributed to Earth deep volatile cycling47 or partial melting of SCLM (sub-continental lithospheric mantle) enriched by ancient recycled components due to subduction processes44,45 or low continental crust delamination48. Based on the above geochemical and paleotectonic evidence, we prefer an interpretation where the predominant source of the dyke is an enriched SCLM previously modified by subduction processes.

The sloped HREE pattern of the Gornostakh dyke (Tb/Ybn=1.81, La/Smn=1.24) indicates that partial melting likely occurred on the border of the spinel and garnet stability fields (~90 km) with a low degree of partial melting suggesting that there has not occurred lithosphere extension or delamination beneath and near the eastern margin of the Siberian craton before 1420 Ma. The younger Sette-Daban mafic sills at ca 1000 Ma49 were emplaced through the same SCLM because they were sampled in areas where they outcrop close to each other. Whereas those intrusions have similar primitive mantle-normalized (arc-like) profiles they have significantly higher εNd(t) values of +4.4 to +6.8 than the Gornostakh dyke and shallower spinel-bearing melting source, suggesting that their source involved a higher proportion of depleted mantle with less contribution from the enriched component due to crustal extension. The enriched LREE, LILE and isotopic compositions of both the Gornostakh and ca. 1000 Ma Sette-Daban intrusions could have been produced through interaction between asthenospheric mantle and metasomatically enriched regions within the SCLM that formed during ancient subduction events.

Tectonic setting of the Siberia at 1420 Ma

Precambrian mafic magmatism, typically as dykes, commonly is interpreted as continental rifting and as a consequence possible break-up of the supercontinent or advocated as plume-related or both. Typically, episodes of mafic magmatism in the continental record related to extensional tectonics, but there are some examples of dykes interpreted as the development of active margin tectonics (e.g. 1.3–1.2 Ga dykes in Southwest Fennoscandian Shield50, and 1.39 Ga in West Australia41). These mafic intrusions may represent extension as a reflection of convergent and collisional tectonics and characterize by high alkalinity (presumably potassic) and island-arc trace element signatures, e.g.51, while continental rift-related mafic intrusions possess OIB or E-MORB trace element characteristics. At the same time, arc-like trace element profile are typical for low-Ti basalts from Phanerozoic LIPs, which commonly related to plume-lithosphere interaction (e.g.45,52) or to deep water and fluid recycling due to ongoing subduction47 – in both cases those LIPs could be a reason for continental break-up (e.g. Central Atlantic) or not (e.g. Karoo), regardless of their geodynamic causes. Thus, dyke swarms could be associated with plate-margin related processes or deep mantle geodynamics and not entirely with a continental break-up2.

The Mesoproterozoic are considered as a period of relative tectonic quiescence in southeastern Siberia, characterized by the formation of extensive intra-cratonic basins with subsequent changing to a passive margin setting in the Neoproterosoic along the eastern margin of the craton. Paleogeographic reconstructions at ca. 1400 Ma suggest that the Laurentia, Baltica, and Siberia (Fig. 7) composed the Nuna supercontinent core5,8,9, though some paleoreconstructions assumes that there be a gap between Siberia and Laurentia in the Paleo- Mesoproterozoic6. Nuna’s lifespan is a highly debated topic in literature and there are at least two contrasting points of view. Roberts2 overviewed this issue and based on several pieces of evidence, such as passive margin low abundance53 and continental growth rate suggested that Nuna break-up had started at ca. 1.3 Ga and then fragments of Nuna reamalgamated to produce Rodinia at ca. 1.1–0.9 Ga. Others based on paleomagnetic and geological studies have argued that the interior of the supercontinent was affected by extension between 1.6 and 1.3 Ga, and finally, break-up took place around 1.3 Ga5,54,55,56. In any case, most of the authors pointed the similarity between Nuna and Rodinia configuration and have suggested a lack of large-scale movement during the supercontinental fragmentation and assembly5.

Towards the Siberia margin, there are few dykes recognized in the age interval 1.42 to 1.35 Ga including studied Gornostakh dyke, Chieress, Udzha, and Listvyanka dykes, and on the adjacent to Siberia – Laurentia and Baltica (Fig. 7). Since according to paleogeographical reconstructions Siberia was juxtaposed to Laurentia by the south margin and to Baltica by the southeastern margin, the active margin tectonic setting for mafic magmatism is considered unlikely. Thus, the arc-like chemical composition of the Gornostakh dyke, is considered as a feature of LIP, and flood basalt province could be proposed at ca. 1.4 Ga on the southeastern Siberian craton. Assuming Siberia – Baltica connection Gornostakh magmatism could be associated with 1.39 Ga Mashak LIP in the southeast of Baltica34. Siberia – Laurentia connection is attributable mainly to close in age igneous provinces from Greenland (Zig-Zag Dal and Midsommersø sills and flood basalts35), western Laurentia (Hart River sills37), and Aillik Bay olivine lamproites36. The widespread magmatism in Laurentia-Siberia-Baltica (and adjacent cratons) in the period of 1.42 -- 1.35 Ga is also advocated by the presence of low-Ti basalts with negative Nb anomalies among the dykes and sills mentioned above (Udzha paleorift, Hart River sills and Midsommersø sills), some of which have strong subduction trace elements signatures (e.g. Aillik Bay lamproites) that were ascribed to storage in the peri-cratonic metasomatized mantle lithosphere as a vestige of a Paleoproterozoic collisional event36. At the same time, such widespread intracontinental magmatic activity could be initiated by extensional tectonic, which conforms to several paleo-reconstructions5,34,37. The western Laurentia magmatic event dated at 1382 Ma from the study of the Hart River sills is interpreted as a manifestation of rifting of Australia from Laurentia37. In southeastern Siberia, the magmatism is supposed slightly earlier from Gornostakh dyke on Siberia (1420 Ma) and Mashak igneous province on Baltica (1386-1390 Ma)34. The last one could be interpreted as beginning extension with futher rifting, which could be supported by the Mesoproterosoic extension deformation event on Sette-Daban reflected in structural unconformity between Uchur and Aimchan groups. From the other side, the link between Baltica and Laurentia (including Siberia) up to about 1270 Ma is one of the best established paleomagnetic constraints57 therefore Sette-Daban extensional tectonics could be related to the failed breakup between Siberia and Baltica at 1420 Ma. To futher testing this hypothesis and determine the timing of the rifting episodes in eastern Siberia and reassembling Nuna to Rodinia further geochemical, isotopic, and paleomagnetic data across the spatial range of dykes within supercontinent remains to be investigated.

Figure 7
figure7

Tectonic assemblage map of core of Nuna to time if initial early Mesoproterozoic breakup events (ca. 1400) after5,7 with magmatic events ca 1400–1350 Ma. Ages of magmatic events from: Gl and Lv18, Ch16, Ud17, M34, AB36, BD8, MZ and VL35, HR37.

Conclusions

A unique mafic dyke discovered ca. 1419 Ma, here named the Gornostakh dyke has been identified in the southeastern margin of Siberian Craton using in situ LA-ICPMS U-Pb dating of apatite.

Current models for the Siberian Craton infer a magmatic and tectonically quiescent period between ca. 1.88 Ga and 1.3 Ga but indirect evidence from the other margins of the craton supports beginning intraplate magmatic activity which could be related to the transition from Nuna to Rodinia configuration. Obtained U-Pb age of the Gornostakh dyke is complementary to Chieress and Udzha dykes from north Siberia suggesting that the 1400-1380 Ma LIP is widespread in the Siberia craton. The minimum sedimentation age of the Uchur Group is constrained as Lower Mesoproterozoic (1419 Ma), while the previous estimate is on the 1339 Ma. The extension deformation event in Sette-Daban, which is reflected by angular dipping of Uchur Group layers is contemporaneous with the observed magmatic event. Paleogeographic reconstructions suggest that Gornostakh magmatism together with observed deformations could reflect extensional tectonics with failed attempting Baltica-Siberia break-up at 1420 Ma.

Preliminary geochemical analysis indicates that the dyke has tholeiitic compositions with arc-like trace elements profile with a significant contribution from metasomatically enriched subcontinental lithosphere previously modified by subduction processes. Altogether with paleotectonic reconstructions which indicate a lack of active margin tectonics in the area, the geochemical data of dyke composition indicates that the low-Ti Gornostakh dyke is the remnant of the large igneous province.

References

  1. 1.

    Holland, H. D. The oxygenation of the atmosphere and oceans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 361, 903–915 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Roberts, N. M. W. The boring billion? - Lid tectonics, continental growth and environmental change associated with the Columbia supercontinent. Geosci. Front. 4, 681–691 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Cawood, P. A. & Hawkesworth, C. J. Earth’s middle age. Geology 42, 503–506 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Stern, R. The Mesoproterozoic Single-Lid Tectonic Episode: Prelude to Modern Plate Tectonics. GSA Today 30, 4–10 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Evans, D. A. D. & Mitchell, R. N. Assembly and breakup of the core of Paleoproterozoic – Mesoproterozoic supercontinent Nuna. Geology 39, 443–446 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Pisarevsky, S. A., Elming, S. Å., Pesonen, L. J. & Li, Z. X. Mesoproterozoic paleogeography: Supercontinent and beyond. Precambr. Res. 244, 207–225 (2014).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zhang, S. et al. Pre-Rodinia supercontinent Nuna shaping up: A global synthesis with new paleomagnetic results from North China. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 353–354, 145–155 (2012).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ernst, R. E. et al. Long-lived connection between southern Siberia and northern Laurentia in the Proterozoic. Nat. Geosci. 9, 464–469 (2016).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Meert, J. G. & Santosh, M. The Columbia supercontinent revisited. Gondwana Res. 50, 67–83 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Condie, K. C. Supercontinents and superplume events: Distinguishing signals in the geologic record. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 146, 319–332 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Li, Z.-X. & Zhong, S. Supercontinent–superplume coupling, true polar wander and plume mobility: Plate dominance in whole-mantle tectonics. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 176, 143–156 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    McHone, G. J., Anderson, D. L., Beutel, E. K. & Fialko, Y. A. Giant dikes, rifts, flood basalts, and plate tectonics: A contention of mantle models. Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 388, 401–420 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ernst, R. E. Large Igneous Provinces (Cambridge University Press, 2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139025300

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ernst, R. E. et al. The 1501 Ma Kuonamka Large Igneous Province of northern Siberia: U-Pb geochronology, geochemistry, and links with coeval magmatism on other crustal blocks. Russ. Geol. Geophys. 57, 653–671 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Rainbird, R. H. et al. U-Pb geochronology of Riphean sandstone and gabbro from southeast Siberia and its bearing on the Laurentia-Siberia connection. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 164, 409–420 (1998).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ernst, R. E., Buchan, K. L., Hamilton, M. A., Okrugin, A. V. & Tomshin, M. D. Integrated paleomagnetism and U-Pb geochronology of Mafic dikes of the Eastern Anabar Shield Region, Siberia: Implications for mesoproterozoic paleolatitude of Siberia and comparison with Laurentia. J. Geol. 108, 381–401 (2000).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Malyshev, S. et al. Geodynamic Significance of the Mesoproterozoic Magmatism of the Udzha Paleo-Rift (Northern Siberian Craton) Based on U-Pb Geochronology and Paleomagnetic Data. Minerals 8, 555 (2018).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Donskaya, T. V. et al. Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of Mesoproterozoic Dykes of the Irkutsk Promontory, Southern Part of the Siberian Craton. Minerals 8, 545 (2018).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Khudoley, A. K. et al. Mesoproterozoic to Neoproterozoic Evolution of the Siberian Craton and Adjacent Microcontinents: An Overview with Constraints for a Laurentian Connection. in Proterozoic Geology of Western North America and Siberia (eds. Link, P. K. & Lewis, R. S.) vol. 86 209–226 (SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology, 2007).

  20. 20.

    Prokopiev, A. V. & Deikunenko, A. V. Deformation structures of the fold-thrust belts. in Tectonic, Geodynamic and Metallogeny of the Sakha Republic (Yakutia) (eds. Parfenov, L. M. & Kuzmin, M. I.) 156–198 (In Russian) (MAIK Nauka/Interperiodica, 2001).

  21. 21.

    Semikhatov, M. A. & Serebryakov, S. N. Siberian Hypostratotype of Riphean (Nauka Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Khudoley, A. K. et al. Proterozoic supercontinental restorations: Constraints from provenance studies of Mesoproterozoic to Cambrian clastic rocks, eastern Siberian Craton. Precambr. Res. 259, 78–94 (2015).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kiselev, A. I., Ernst, R. E., Yarmolyuk, V. V. & Egorov, K. N. Radiating rifts and dyke swarms of the middle Paleozoic Yakutsk plume of eastern Siberian craton. J. Asian Earth Sci. 45, 1–16 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Khudoley, A. K. et al. Late ordovician mafic magmatic event, Southeast Siberia: Tectonic implications, LIP interpretation, and potential link with a mass extinction. Minerals 10, 1108 (2020).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Starnikov, A. I. State Geological Map of the Russian Federation, Scale 1:200,000; Sheet P-53-XXX; Maya Series. (1993).

  26. 26.

    Chew, D. M., Sylvester, P. J. & Tubrett, M. N. U-Pb and Th–Pb dating of apatite by LA-ICPMS. Chem. Geol. 280, 200–216 (2011).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Thompson, J. et al. Matrix effects in Pb/U measurements during LA-ICP-MS analysis of the mineral apatite. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 31, 1206–1215 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Belousova, E. A., Griffin, W. L., O’Reilly, S. Y. & Fisher, N. I. Apatite as an indicator mineral for mineral exploration: trace-element compositions and their relationship to host rock type. J. Geochem. Explor. 76, 45–69 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    O’Sullivan, G., Chew, D., Kenny, G., Henrichs, I. & Mulligan, D. The trace element composition of apatite and its application to detrital provenance studies. Earth Sci. Rev. 201, 103044 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Irvine, T. N. & Baragar, W. R. A. A Guide to the Chemical Classification of the Common Volcanic Rocks. Can. J. Earth Sci. 8, 523–548 (1971).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Le Maitre, R. W. et al. Igneous Rocks: A Classification and Glossary of Terms. Igneous Rocks: A Classification and Glossary of Terms, Edited by R. W. Le Maitre and A. Streckeisen and B. Zanettin and M. J. Le Bas and B. Bonin and P. Bateman, pp. 252. ISBN 0521619483. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, January 2005. (Cambridge University Press, 2002).

  32. 32.

    Ernst, R. E., Wingate, M. T. D., Buchan, K. L. & Li, Z. X. Global record of 1600–700 Ma Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs): Implications for the reconstruction of the proposed Nuna (Columbia) and Rodinia supercontinents. Precambr. Res. 160, 159–178 (2008).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ernst, R. E., Bleeker, W., Söderlund, U. & Kerr, A. C. Large Igneous Provinces and supercontinents: Toward completing the plate tectonic revolution. Lithos 174, 1–14 (2013).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Puchkov, V. N. et al. The ca. 1380Ma Mashak igneous event of the Southern Urals. Lithos 174, 109–124 (2013).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Upton, B. G. J. et al. The Mesoproterozoic Zig-Zag Dal basalts and associated intrusions of eastern North Greenland: mantle plume-lithosphere interaction. Contrib. Miner. Petrol. 149, 40–56 (2005).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Tappe, S. et al. Craton reactivation on the Labrador Sea margins: 40Ar/39Ar age and Sr–Nd–Hf–Pb isotope constraints from alkaline and carbonatite intrusives. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 256, 433–454 (2007).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Verbaas, J. et al. Rifting of western Laurentia at 1.38 Ga: The Hart River sills of Yukon, Canada. Lithos 316–317, 243–260 (2018).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ernst, R. E. et al. Mesoproterozoic intraplate magmatic ‘barcode’ record of the Angola portion of the Congo Craton: Newly dated magmatic events at 1505 and 1110Ma and implications for Nuna (Columbia) supercontinent reconstructions. Precambr. Res. 230, 103–118 (2013).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zi, J.-W., Rasmussen, B., Muhling, J. R., Maier, W. D. & Fletcher, I. R. U-Pb monazite ages of the Kabanga mafic-ultramafic intrusions and contact aureoles, central Africa: Geochronological and tectonic implications. GSA Bull. 131, 1857–1870 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Söderlund, U. et al. Reply to Comment on “U–Pb baddeleyite ages and geochemistry of dolerite dykes in the Bas-Drâa inlier of the Anti-Atlas of Morocco: Newly identified 1380Ma event in the West African Craton” by André Michard and Dominique Gasquet. Lithos 174, 101–108 (2013).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Stark, J. C. et al. 1.39 Ga mafic dyke swarm in southwestern Yilgarn Craton marks Nuna to Rodinia transition in the West Australian Craton. Precambr. Res. 316, 291–304 (2018).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Winchester, J. A. & Floyd, P. A. Geochemical discrimination of different magma series and their differentiation products using immobile elements. Chem. Geol. 20, 325–343 (1977).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Polat, A., Hofmann, A. & Rosing, M. Boninite-like volcanic rocks in the 3.7–3.8 Ga Isua greenstone belt, West Greenland: Geochemical evidence for intra-oceanic subduction zone processes in the early Earth. Chem. Geol. 184, 231–254 (2002).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Puffer, J. H. Contrasting high field strength element contents of continental flood basalts from plume versus reactivated-arc sources. Geology 29, 675 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Pearce, J. A., Ernst, R. E., Peate, D. W. & Rogers, C. LIP printing: Use of immobile element proxies to characterize Large Igneous Provinces in the geologic record. Lithos 392–393, 106068 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Sun, S. S. & McDonough, W. F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: Implications for mantle composition and processes. Geol. Soc. Spec. Pub. 42, 313–345 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Ivanov, A. V. & Litasov, K. D. The deep water cycle and flood basalt volcanism. Int. Geol. Rev. 56, 1–14 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Meissner, R. & Mooney, W. Weakness of the lower continental crust: a condition for delamination, uplift, and escape. Tectonophysics 296, 47–60 (1998).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Savelev, A. D., Malyshev, S. V., Savatenkov, V. M., Ignatov, D. D. & Kuzkina, A. D. Meso-neoproterozoic mafic sills along the South-Eastern Margin of the Siberian Craton, SE Yakutia: Petrogenesis, tectonic and geochemical features. Minerals 10, 805 (2020).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Söderlund, U. et al. U-Pb baddeleyite ages and Hf, Nd isotope chemistry constraining repeated mafic magmatism in the Fennoscandian Shield from 1.6 to 0.9 Ga. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 150, 174–194 (2005).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Ivanov, A. V. et al. Shoshonitic magmatism in the Paleoproterozoic of the south-western Siberian Craton: An analogue of the modern post-collision setting. Lithos 328–329, 88–100 (2019).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Jourdan, F. et al. Major and trace element and Sr, Nd, Hf, and Pb isotope compositions of the Karoo large igneous province, Botswana - Zimbabwe: Lithosphere vs Mantle Plume Contribution. J. Petrol. 48, 1043–1077 (2007).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Bradley, D. C. Passive margins through earth history. Earth Sci. Rev. 91, 1–26 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Li, Z. X. et al. Assembly, configuration, and break-up history of Rodinia: A synthesis. Precambr. Res. 160, 179–210 (2008).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Rogers, J. J. W. & Santosh, M. Configuration of Columbia, a mesoproterozoic supercontinent. Gondwana Res. 5, 5–22 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Zhao, G., Sun, M., Wilde, S. A. & Li, S. A Paleo-Mesoproterozoic supercontinent: assembly, growth and breakup. Earth Sci. Rev. 67, 91–123 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Buchan, K. L. Reprint of “Key paleomagnetic poles and their use in Proterozoic continent and supercontinent reconstructions: A review”. Precambr. Res. 244, 5–22 (2014).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Gladkochub, D. P. et al. The Mesoproterozoic Udzha paleorift (Northern Siberian Craton): New data on age of basites, straigraphy, and microphytology. Dokl. Earth Sci. 425, 371–377 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Gale, A., Dalton, C. A., Langmuir, C. H., Su, Y. & Schilling, J. G. The mean composition of ocean ridge basalts. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 14, 489–518 (2013).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by funding from the Russian Science Foundation (Project No. 19-77-10048).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.M and A.I conceptualization, funding acquisition and original draft preparation, A.K. geology background, sample providing and original draft preparation, V.K and M.K. conducted the U-Pb dating, A.M. analysed the results, O.L. petrography description. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergey V. Malyshev.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malyshev, S.V., Ivanov, A.V., Khudoley, A.K. et al. Global implication of mesoproterozoic (~ 1.4 Ga) magmatism within the Sette-Daban Range (Southeast Siberia). Sci Rep 11, 20484 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00010-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00010-5

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing