Joubert syndrome (JS) is an inherited ciliopathy characterized by a distinctive cerebellar and brain stem malformation which is known as the “molar tooth sign” on axial brain images, hypotonia, and developmental delay. Approximately 25–30% of patients with JS have kidney disease and many of them progress to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). However, there are few reports on the outcomes of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in patients with JS and ESKD. In this study, we clarified the clinical features, treatment, and outcomes of patients with JS who underwent RRT. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records and clinical characteristics of 11 patients with JS who underwent RRT between June 1994 and July 2019. Data are shown as the median (range). Gene analysis was performed in 8 of the 11 cases, and CEP290 mutations were found in four patients, two had TMEM67 mutations, one had a RPGRIP1L mutation, and one patient showed no mutation with the panel exome analysis. Complications in other organs included hydrocephalus in two cases, retinal degeneration in eight cases, coloboma in one case, liver diseases in four cases, and polydactyly in one case. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) was introduced in seven cases, with a median treatment duration of 5.4 (3.4–10.7) years. Hemodialysis was performed using arteriovenous fistula in two cases, and kidney transplantation was performed 9 times in eight cases. Only one of the grafts failed during the observation period of 25.6 (8.2–134.2) months. The glomerular filtration rate at the final observation was 78.1 (41.4–107.7) mL/min/1.73 m2. The median age at the final observation was 13.4 (5.6–25.1) years, and all patients were alive except one who died of hepatic failure while on PD. Any type of RRT modality can be a treatment option for patients with JS and ESKD.
Joubert syndrome (JS) is a predominantly autosomal recessive ciliopathy characterized by a distinctive cerebellar and brain stem defect which is known as the molar tooth sign (MTS), hypotonia, and developmental delay1. JS was first reported in 1969 as a disorder based on neurological features, such as temporary hyperpnea, eye movement abnormalities, cognitive dysfunction, and cerebellar vermis hypoplasia2. The incidence of JS is reported to be 1:80,000–1:100,0001. Primary cilia abnormalities are considered to be the main cause. In addition to the neurological manifestations, symptoms also appear in the eyes, liver, kidneys, and skeleton3. It has been reported that 25–30% of patients with JS have kidney diseases, such as polycystic kidney disease and nephronophthisis4,5,6, which progress to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). To date, there are few reports regarding renal replacement therapy (RRT) for JS patients who progressed to ESKD. Here, we report the clinical features, treatment, and outcomes of 11 patients with JS who underwent RRT.
Patients’ clinical characteristics
Table 1 shows the patients’ clinical characteristics. The male-to-female ratio was 8:3, and sibling cases (patient numbers 2a and 2b) were included. Of the 8 patients who underwent genetic analysis, gene mutations in CEP290, TMEM67, and RPGRIP1L were found in four patients, two patients, and one patient, respectively. We did not identify any mutation in the 172 genes analyzed with panel exome sequencing in the remaining one patient.
The specific type of kidney disease was classified as an overlap phenotype of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease and nephronophthisis (ARPKD-NPHP) in five patients and nephronophthisis (NPHP) in five patients. The remaining patient had a polycystic left kidney and an ectopic right kidney. Complications in other organs included hydrocephalus in two patients, retinal degeneration in eight, coloboma in one, liver disease in four, and polydactyly in one. The four patients with CEP290 gene mutations showed retinal degeneration, and the two patients with TMEM67 gene mutations had liver diseases. Developmental tests showed that seven patients had profound developmental delay, one had moderate delay, and three had mild delay. The four patients with CEP290 gene mutations had profound developmental delay, while the two patients with TMEM67 gene mutations had mild developmental delay. The median age at ESKD was 7.4 years (range 1.8–15.3) for all patients. The age at ESKD for the seven patients with profound developmental delay was 6.1 (1.8–11.3) years old, a younger age than the 10.3 (6.8–15.3) years for the patients with moderate/mild developmental delay, although there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups (Fig. 1a). In addition, the height and weight of the patients in the profound group tended to be lower compared with those of the patients in the moderate/mild group at the time of ESKD (Fig. 1b, c).
The treatment decision made for the first RRT was as follows (Table 1): three patients (patient number 5, 7, 9) of the four patients with moderate/mild developmental delay underwent preemptive living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT), while one (number 4) underwent peritoneal dialysis (PD). Six (numbers 1, 2a, 2b, 3, 6 and 10) of the seven patients with profound developmental delay underwent PD, and the remaining patient (number 8) underwent preemptive LDKT. As shown in Fig. 1, there was a tendency to select PD over preemptive kidney transplantation for young and small children and those with profound developmental delay. All patients were alive at the latest observation except for one who died of hepatic failure due to hepatic fibrosis while undergoing PD (Table 1).
Outcomes of renal replacement therapy
Figure 2 shows the clinical course of RRT in each case. The median age at the last observation was 13.4 years (range 5.6–25.1). PD was introduced as the first RRT for seven patients, and the median PD duration was 5.4 years (range 3.4–10.7). Two of the seven patients underwent deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT), and two underwent DDKT after transitioning from PD to hemodialysis. The remaining three patients continued undergoing PD. The incidence of bacterial peritonitis was 0.07 cases/person-year in our patients. Three patients (numbers 3, 6 and 10) experienced recurrent catheter exit site infection. Hemodialysis was introduced as the second RRT for two due to ultrafiltration failure with the PD therapy. They underwent maintenance dialysis using an arteriovenous fistula in the outpatient clinic without significant complication during hemodialysis, although one of the patients required occasional sedation.
Three patients have not yet undergone kidney transplantation. Patient 2b is currently registered on the waiting list for DDKT. Preparations for LDKT are currently underway for patient 6. However, the patient’s indication for kidney transplantation still needs to be carefully evaluated because she has severe comorbidities and requires management with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt for her hydrocephalus. In the case of patient 10, kidney transplantation was not performed because of liver complications, and he eventually died of hepatic failure at the age of 13.4 years.
Table 2 shows the results of the nine kidney transplantations in eight patients. The median age at the time of transplantation was 12.6 (6.8–22.3) years. DDKT was performed in 5 operations with four patients (number 1, 2a, 3, and 4), and LDKT was performed in four patients (number 5, 7, 8, and 9). The immunosuppressive regimen consisted of basiliximab, methylprednisolone, a calcineurin inhibitor, and mycophenolate mofetil in all cases13. The median observation period after transplantation was 25.6 (8.2–134.2) months, and all grafts survived except for the first kidney transplant in patient 1 who underwent the initial DDKT at the age of 12 years, although he required transplant nephrectomy within 2 days because of transplant kidney artery thrombosis. The patient continued maintenance hemodialysis for the following 10 years until he underwent the second DDKT. Since then, the patient has been well managed. Patient 7 experienced acute T-cell mediated rejection at on day 48 postsurgery but improved with steroid pulse therapy. The patient also had a bacterial urinary tract infection and adenovirus nephritis. During the first year after transplantation, one patient experienced cytomegalovirus disease, and three patients presented cytomegalovirus infection requiring antiviral therapy. The overall incidence of infection was 0.75 cases/person-year. The median estimated glomerular filtration rate at the time of the final observation was 78.1 (range 41.4–107.7) mL/min/1.73 m2.
Few reports have been published on patients with JS and ESKD. In 2017, Fleming et al. retrospectively reviewed 97 patients with JS and reported 29 patients with JS and kidney disease6. Of the 13 patients with ESKD, 11 underwent kidney transplantation, but the details of the clinical course were not provided. To our knowledge, ours is the first report to describe the clinical features, treatment, and outcomes of patients with JS who underwent RRT.
Thirty-five genes have been identified as responsible for JS. Among them, CEP290, NPHP1, AHI1, OFD1, RPGRIP1L, CC2D2A, TMEM67, TMEM216, TMEM138, and TMEM237 have been reported to be associated with kidney disease1, 6, 14, 15. Studies have also reported that the frequency of responsible genes varies by race, with TMEM216 mutation occurring most often in Ashkenazi Jews16, C5orf42 in the Dutch17, and C5orf42, CC2D2A, NPHP1, and TMEM231 in French Canadians18. Suzuki et al. performed genetic analysis in 30 JS families and reported that mutations in CEP290 and TMEM67 were common among Japanese families12. The major phenotypes in our patients were consistent with those in previous reports indicating that the CEP290 mutation is correlated with retinal degeneration and kidney disease, TMEM67 is correlated with liver disease, and RPGRIP1L is correlated with kidney disease1. Furthermore, Fleming et al. reported that in 13 cases of ESKD, there were six cases with TMEM67 mutations and four with CEP290 mutations6. Taken together, these findings suggest that CEP290 and TMEM67 mutations are common in patients with JS and ESKD.
PD was more frequently selected as the initial RRT for the patients with profound developmental delay, whereas preemptive LDKT was often selected for the patients with moderate/mild developmental delay (Table 1). The age at ESKD tended to be younger in the patients with profound developmental delay than in those with moderate/mild developmental delay. The anthropometric measurements at the time of ESKD suggested that patients with profound developmental delay were smaller than those with moderate/mild developmental delay (Fig. 1). The selection of initial RRT can be affected by the age and anthropometric measurements at ESKD and the level of developmental delay.
In this study, PD was introduced in seven cases, while hemodialysis was introduced in two cases during the overall clinical course. PD and hemodialysis were performed without major complications in most of the patients. There have been several case reports regarding the introduction of dialysis to patients with JS and ESKD. Assadi reported on a patient with JS who was started on PD at 10 days of age, was changed to hemodialysis at 14 months due to refractory bacterial/fungal peritonitis, and who underwent DDKT at 2 years of age19. Sonmez et al. also reported on two patients with JS and ESKD, one of whom was administered hemodialysis at 5 years of age, while the other was administered PD at 22 months of age. Their RRT was continued without problem until the ages of nine and four years, respectively20. In our case series, the seven patients who underwent PD were generally well managed, although one patient developed peritonitis. The incidence of PD-related peritonitis has been reported in many countries, and the frequency varies depending on the PD population. Pirano et al. compiled several reports and reported that the incidence of PD-related peritonitis was 0.06–1.66 cases/person-year overall21. The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines state that the overall incidence of PD-related peritonitis is 0.18–0.2 cases/person-year22. In our study, the incidence of PD-related peritonitis in the patients with JS was 0.07 cases/person-year, which is comparable to that of other populations. PD was therefore considered an acceptable therapeutic option for patients with JS and ESKD. Two cases who underwent hemodialysis were well managed, while one case required occasional sedation. Hemodialysis might be a possible RRT for selected patients with JS and ESKD.
To date, there have been no detailed reports on kidney transplantation in patients with JS6. In our study, eight patients underwent kidney transplantation. Only one of the grafts failed, and graft function was well preserved during the median observation period of 25.6 months. One patient experienced transplant kidney artery thrombosis immediately after DDKT, leading to graft loss; however, the course of the secondary transplant has been uneventful. One patient experienced a rejection episode that improved with treatment. The incidence of infection was 0.75 cases/person-year during the first year of transplantation in our study. The incidence of infectious diseases during the first year of transplantation in 890 pediatric patients who underwent kidney transplantation from 2002 to 2015 in Japan was 0.79 cases/person year, which was equivalent to our results23. This finding indicates that kidney transplantation could be a feasible treatment option for patient with JS and ESKD. However, we need to carefully evaluate the systemic complications, such as hydrocephalus requiring a ventriculoperitoneal shunt or hepatic failure, when considering the indication for kidney transplantation.
Our study’s limitations include the fact that it was a retrospective study and that it involved a small number of cases due to the low incidence of the disease. The analysis was conducted at a tertiary care facility where most cases were referred for RRT, and patients with JS and ESKD who did not undergo RRT were not included in this study. Analyzing the indication for RRT is therefore beyond the scope of our study. Further studies with more cases are needed to confirm the validity and safety of each RRT modality and evaluate the genotype–phenotype correlation in patients with JS and ESKD. In conclusion, for patients with JS and ESKD, any type of RRT modality can be a treatment option.
From June 1994 to July 2019, we clinically diagnosed patients with JS at the Department of Pediatric Nephrology in the Tokyo Women’s Medical University and the Department of Pediatrics in Gunma University, Japan. This study included 11 patients with JS who underwent RRT. Study enrollment required a clinical diagnosis of JS based on the pathognomonic MTS in the brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)6. Patient information included sex, genetic mutation, kidney ultrasound findings, hypertension before ESKD, type of kidney disease, presence/absence of hydrocephalus/retinal degeneration/coloboma/liver disease/polydactyly, level of developmental delay, intelligence quotient, age at ESKD, height/weight at ESKD, type of initial RRT, and RRT outcomes. Specific types of kidney disease were classified into NPHP, ARPKD-NPHP, and others. NPHP was defined as normal-or small-sized kidney with hyperechogenicity, loss of corticomedullary differentiation, and/or cystic lesions at corticomedullary junction on a kidney ultrasound6. ARPKD-NPHP is considered to present with refractory hypertension or kidney swelling before kidney dysfunction6. Liver disease was defined by elevated liver enzyme levels and/or increased echogenicity of the liver and/or splenomegaly on abdominal ultrasounds and/or the findings of congenital hepatic fibrosis confirmed by liver biopsy6. Retinal degeneration was based on typical findings during a retinal examination after pupil dilation6. Developmental delay was assessed using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) where 50–70 is considered mild, 35–49 is considered moderate, 20–34 is considered severe, and < 20 or cases in which WISC testing is not possible due to severe developmental delay is considered profound7. Post-transplant infections were defined as those that required hospitalization. Cytomegalovirus infection was defined as the virus isolation or the detection of viral proteins (antigens) or nucleic acid in any body fluid or tissue specimen regardless of symptom. Cytomegalovirus disease was defined as cytomegalovirus infection with attributable symptoms, such as fever, malaise, leukopenia, and/or thrombocytopenia, or that exhibited organ or tissue damage8. We calculated the estimated glomerular filtration rate using the revised Schwartz formula for patients aged 17 years or younger9 or the mean of values from the revised Schwartz formula and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula for patients aged 18–26 years10, 11. For the statistical analysis, we employed the Mann–Whitney U test.
No organs were procured from prisoners and all transplantations were performed at Tokyo Women’s Medical University and Gunma University, Japan.
Eight of the 11 cases underwent gene analysis, six of which underwent whole-exome sequencing (WES) at Yokohama City University. One case underwent WES at Kanagawa Children’s Medical Center. The remaining case underwent panel exome sequencing of 172 genes associated with congenital abnormalities of the kidney and urinary tract and nephronophthisis-related ciliopathies at Kobe University. For WES, a Genome Analyzer IIx sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA), Hiseq 2000, or 2500 platform (Illumina) was employed as previously described12.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tokyo Women’s Medical University and Gunma University (approval number: 4654-R, HS2019-237). Gene analysis was performed with the consent of the individuals or guardians. All research was performed in accordance with relevant guidance and regulations. Comprehensive written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants and/or guardians included this study.
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Melissa, P. & Ian, G. Joubert syndrome—GeneReviews®—NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/books/NBK1325/.
Joubert, M., Eisenring, J. J., Robb, J. P. & Andermann, F. Familial agenesis of the cerebellar vermis: a syndrome of episodic hyperpnea, abnormal eye movements, ataxia, and retardation. J. Child Neurol. 14, 554–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/088307389901400902 (1999).
Romani, M., Micalizzi, A. & Valente, E. M. Joubert syndrome: congenital cerebellar ataxia with the molar tooth. Lancet Neurol. 12, 894–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70136-4 (2013).
Saraiva, J. M. & Baraitser, M. Joubert syndrome: a review. Am. J. Med. Genet. 43, 726–731. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320430415 (1992).
Bachmann-Gagescu, R. et al. Joubert syndrome: a model for untangling recessive disorders with extreme genetic heterogeneity. J. Med. Genet. 52, 514–522. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103087 (2015).
Fleming, L. R. et al. Prospective evaluation of kidney disease in Joubert syndrome. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 12, 1962–1973. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.05660517 (2017).
ICD-10 Version:2016. https://icd.who.int/browse10/2016/en.
Kotton, C. N. et al. The third international consensus guidelines on the management of cytomegalovirus in solid-organ transplantation. Transplantation 102, 900–931. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002191 (2018).
Schwartz, G. J. et al. New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 20, 629–637. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2008030287 (2009).
Levey, A. S. et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann. Intern. Med. 150, 604–612. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006 (2009).
Ng, D. K. et al. Combination of pediatric and adult formulas yield valid glomerular filtration rate estimates in young adults with a history of pediatric chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 94, 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2018.01.034 (2018).
Suzuki, T. et al. Molecular genetic analysis of 30families with Joubert syndrome. Clin. Genet. 90, 526–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.12836 (2016).
Miura, K. et al. Individualized concept for the treatment of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease with end-stage renal disease. Pediatr. Transplant. 24, e13690. https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.13690 (2020).
Sayer, J. A. et al. The centrosomal protein nephrocystin-6 is mutated in Joubert syndrome and activates transcription factor ATF4. Nat. Genet. 38, 674–681. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1786 (2006).
Utsch, B. et al. Identification of the first AHI1 gene mutations in nephronophthisis-associated Joubert syndrome. Pediatr. Nephrol. 21, 32–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-005-2054-y (2006).
Edvardson, S. et al. Joubert syndrome 2 (JBTS2) in Ashkenazi Jews is associated with a TMEM216 mutation. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 86, 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.12.007 (2010).
Kroes, H. Y. et al. Joubert syndrome: genotyping a Northern European patient cohort. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 24, 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2015.84 (2016).
Srour, M. et al. Joubert syndrome in French Canadians and identification of mutations in CEP104. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 97, 744–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.09.009 (2015).
Assadi, F. Lack of NPHP2 mutations in a newborn infant with Joubert syndrome-related disorder presenting as end-stage renal disease. Pediatr. Nephrol. 22, 750–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-006-0412-z (2007).
Sönmez, F. et al. Development of end-stage renal disease at a young age in two cases with Joubert syndrome. Turk. J. Pediatr. 56, 458–461 (2014).
Piraino, B. et al. ISPD position statement on reducing the risks of peritoneal dialysis-related infections. Perit. Dial. Int. 31, 614–630. https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2011.00057 (2011).
Li, P. K. I. S. P. D. et al. Update on prevention and treatment. Perit. Dial. Int. 36(481–508), 2016. https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2016.00078 (2016).
Hattori, M. et al. Outcomes of pediatric ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantations from 2002 to 2015: an analysis of the Japanese kidney transplant registry. Transplantation 102, 1934–1942. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002259 (2018).
We would like to thank Dr. Eihiko Takahashi (Department of Nephrology, Kanagawa Children’s Medical Center), Dr. Kenji Kurosawa (Division of Medical Genetics, Kanagawa Children’s Medical Center), Dr. Naoya Morisada, Dr. Kandai Nozu, and Professor Kazumoto Iijima (Department of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine) for their gene analysis. We would also like to thank Enago (www.enago.jp) for the English language review.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Takagi, Y., Miura, K., Yabuuchi, T. et al. Any modality of renal replacement therapy can be a treatment option for Joubert syndrome. Sci Rep 11, 462 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80712-4
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.