# Retroreflection and diffraction of a Bose–Einstein condensate by evanescent standing wave potential

## Abstract

The characteristic of the angular distributions of accelerated Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) atoms incidence on the surface is designed using the mathematical modeling method. Here, we proposed the idea to study retroreflection and diffraction of a BEC from an evanescent standing wave potential (ESWP). The ESWP is formed by multiple reflections of the laser beam from the surface of the prism under the influence of gravity. After BEC’s reflection and diffraction, the so-called BEC’s density rainbow patterns develop due to the interference which depends on the surface structure which we model with the periodic decaying evanescent field. The interaction of accelerated bosonic atoms with a surface can help to demonstrate surface structures or to determine surface roughness, or to build future high spatial resolution and high sensitivity magnetic-field sensors in two-dimensional systems.

## Introduction

The thermal and quantum fluctuations started to play an important role in ultra-cold atoms at low dimensions, therefore low dimensions got much attention in the past few years1,2,3,4,5,6. Under such circumstances also the influence of gravity has to be taken into account. Atomic mirrors has been constructed to study the influence of reflection and diffraction of atomic beams and cold atomic clouds, these atomic mirrors were made by using repulsive evanescent waves7,8. Cohen–Tannoudji studied a new atomic cavity consisting of a single horizontal concave mirror placed in a gravity, where the gravity acts as a second mirror closing the cavity9,10. In these kind of atomic mirrors, inherent losses of atoms are present due to quantum and thermal fluctuations, whoever the loses can be reduced by using the higher detuning of atomic resonance frequency and evanescent wave11,12.

The dynamics of a quantum particle bouncing on a hard surface under the influence of gravity referred as a quantum bouncing ball (QBB)13, is a notable example of a quantum mechanical system showing collapses and revivals of the QBB, which is a clear signature of quantum interference without classical correspondence14. Lately, this kind of system open the opportunities to study the dynamics of atoms in the modulated evanescent wave (EW), such as localization15,16 or a coherent acceleration17,18 of atoms, strongly depending on the system parameters and on the chosen initial condensations, which is signature of chaos in this kind of system. During the interaction of atoms with surface, a good loading scheme and trap geometry become important for studying the dynamics of the BEC in gravito-optical surface trap (GOST). The experimental group of Rudi Grimm demonstrated both the loading of Cesium atoms19,20 and the subsequent creation of a BEC in a two-dimensional GOST21,22. As the QBB problem was for long time regarded as a main pedagogical interest15,16,17,18, recently many experimental group demonstrated the QBB using cold atoms11,23,24,25 and by owning the formation of a QBB the energy levels of the bouncing neutrons are quantized26. Colombe et al. studied the scheme for loading a $$^{87}$$Rb BEC into a two-dimensional evanescent light trap and observe the diffraction of a BEC in the time domain27,28. Afterwards Perrin et at. studied the diffuse reflection of a BEC from a rough evanescent wave mirror29.

Previously, we have studied the behavior of Cs BEC in a quasi-1D GOST, we developed an analytical approximate solution of GOST and compared with numerical simulations and with Innsbruck experimental data30. The analytical solution of this complicated problem is only possible around GOST minimum harmonic potential30. However, the system gets quite complected when the anharmonicities started to play the role, therefore, it is not possible to solve this research problem analytically. Actually these anharmonicities are an integral part of the system due to its geometry29. In this scientific report, we report reflecting of BEC from counter-propagating evanescent waves, i.e., an evanescent standing wave potential (ESWP). The required optical wave-field can be produced by totally internally reflecting a laser beam at the surface of a refractive medium and then retro-reflecting the light back along its original path as shown in Fig. 1. The evanescent field decreases exponentially in the direction normal to the surface and is modulated sinusoidal along the surface as depicted in Fig. 123.

The underlying two-dimensional model for a BEC in the ESWP trap geometry is explained in “Theoretical model”, where we also provide estimates for experimentally realistic parameters. A detailed study of the reflection and diffraction of the BEC wavepacket is provided in “Dynamics of the BEC”. And, in “Conclusion” we give a brief summary and draw our conclusions. Finally, in “Method and numerical technique” we describe a method and numerical technique in detail.

## Theoretical model

We start working out a two-dimensional model for the dynamics of the BEC in the ESWP. Assuming that both thermal and quantum fluctuations can be neglected, we arrive at a mean-field theory with the two-dimensional time-dependent Gross–Pitaevskii equation (GPE)31

\begin{aligned} i \hbar \frac{\partial }{\partial t}\Psi (x,z,t)=\left\{ -\frac{\hbar ^{2} }{2m} \left( \frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial x^{2}} +\frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial z^{2}} \right) +V(x,z)+G |\Psi (x,z,t)|^{2}\right\} \Psi (x,z,t). \end{aligned}
(1)

On the right-hand side the first term represents the kinetic energy of the atoms with mass m, the last term stands for their two-particle interaction, where its strength $$G= G_{3D}/(a_y \sqrt{2\pi })$$, here $$G_{3D}=N 4 \pi a \hbar ^2/m$$ is related to the s-wave scattering length a, m denotes a mass of the bosons, and $$a_y=(\hbar /m \omega _y )^{1/2}$$ defines the width of the oscillator along the y-axis. For this pancake configuration of the trap potential, we have in mind $$\omega _y>> \omega _{\perp }$$, here $$\omega _y$$ defines the frequency of the trap along the $$y-$$axis and the $$\omega _{\perp }$$ defines the frequency of the radial component, which has to be small enough in order to ensure a quasi two-dimensional setup31. In comparison to a conventional transmission grating, the atomic reflection grating has to achieve two functions: reflection and diffraction. For this purpose, we proposed here an evanescent standing wave potential. A reflection optical potential with a decaying field along the z-direction and a periodic modulation along the x-axis in the presence of gravity. This kind of periodicity can be realized by overlapping two evanescent waves with opposite wave-vectors as shown in Fig. 1. The BEC atoms falling off on this optical potential will experience a reflection of the z-component of their momentum, this reflection is only possible when their kinetic energy does not increase the potential height, this condition helps BEC to avoid to penetrate into the potential. Furthermore, V(xz) in Eq. (1) represents the underlying anharmonic potential energy of our system:

\begin{aligned} V(x,z)=mgz+V_{0}\left[ 1+\eta \cos \left( \nu x\right) \right] e^{-\kappa z}. \end{aligned}
(2)

Here, g represents the gravitational acceleration, and $$V_{0}=\Gamma \lambda ^{3} I_{0} / (8\pi ^{2} c \delta _{3})$$ describes the strength of the evanescent field, where $$\Gamma$$ is the natural line-width of the Cs atoms, $$\lambda$$ defines the wavelength of the EW, $$I_{0}$$ denotes the peak intensity of the EW, and $$\delta _{3}$$ corresponds to the detuning frequency of the hyperfine sub-level $$F=3$$ of the Cs atom band. While, the dimensionless quantity $$\eta$$ is related to the magnitude of the wave vector of the standing wave32, and $$1/ \kappa =\lambda / 4\pi \sqrt{n^{2}\sin ^{2}\beta -1}$$ defines the decay length, where n represents the refractive index of the medium and $$\beta$$ denotes the angle of incidence of the laser beam. When $$\eta \rightarrow 0$$, the leftover anharmonic potential (2) can be approximated around its minimum $${z}^{\mathrm{min}}_{0}=\frac{1}{\kappa }\ln (\frac{V_{0}\kappa }{mg})$$ with the axial frequency $$\omega _{z}=\sqrt{g \kappa }$$. In order to have a concrete set-up in mind, we will use for our analysis the following parameter values which stem from the GOST experiment20,30. We denote the number N of Cs atoms, where the s-wave scattering length amounts to $$a=440~\mathrm {a}_{0}$$ with the Bohr radius $$a_{0}$$. The inverse decay length amounts to $$\kappa =6.67\times 10^{6}~\mathrm {m^{-1}}$$ as the EW is produced by a far-detuned laser with wavelength $$\lambda =852~\mathrm {nm}$$ in a nearly round spot on the surface of the prism with reflective index $$n=1.45$$, and the angle of incidence of the laser light is $$\beta =49.2^{o}$$. The natural line width of the Cs atom is $$\Gamma =2\pi \times 5.3~\mathrm {MHz}$$, the detuning between the hyperfine sub-levels is $$\delta _{3}=2\pi \times 1~\mathrm {GHz}$$, and the peak intensity of the EW amounts to $$I_{0}=9.6 \times 10^{7} ~\mathrm {W/m^{2}}$$, so the strength of the EW is of the order $$V_{0}=0.96\times \mathrm { k_{B}}~\mathrm {K}$$, where $$\mathrm {k_{B}}$$ is Boltzmann’s constant and the axial harmonic frequency amounts to $$\omega _{\perp }=2\pi \times 1.2 ~ \mathrm {kHz}$$.

In the following considerations we assume $$\omega _{y}=2\pi \times 12.0 ~ \mathrm {kHz}$$, which fulfills the quasi two-dimensional condition $$\omega _y>> \omega _\perp$$ for the ESWP experiment. As the BEC does not penetrate very far into the repulsive ESWP, it is hardly influenced by the Van-der-Waals potential, which follows from the above values of the GOST experiment30. In order to do the numerical simulation, we use the dimensionless equation as

\begin{aligned}&i \frac{\partial }{\partial \tilde{t}} \tilde{\Psi } (\tilde{x}, \tilde{z},\tilde{t})\nonumber \\&\quad = \left\{ -\frac{k}{2} \left( \frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial \tilde{x}^{2}} + \frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial \tilde{z}^{2}} \right) +\tilde{z} + \tilde{V_0} \left[ 1+\eta \cos \left( \tilde{\nu } \tilde{x} \right) \right] e^{-\tilde{z}} +\tilde{G} |\tilde{\Psi } \left( \tilde{x}, \tilde{z},\tilde{t} \right) |^{2}\right\} \tilde{\Psi } \left( \tilde{x}, \tilde{z},\tilde{t} \right) , \end{aligned}
(3)

here, we consider dimensional spatial coordinates $$\tilde{z}= \kappa z$$ and $$\tilde{x}= \kappa x$$, the dimensionless time $$\tilde{t}= t (m g)/\hbar \kappa$$ and the two-particle dimensionless interaction strength $$\tilde{G}= N 2 \sqrt{2\pi } \tilde{a} k / \tilde{a}_y$$, here, $$\tilde{a}=a\kappa$$ being a dimensionless s-wave scattering length, $$\tilde{a_y}= a_y \kappa$$ is the dimensionless oscillator length along the y-axis, and $$k= \hbar ^2 \kappa ^3$$/(g m$$^2)$$ defines the dimensionless kinetic energy constant. Additionally, we measure energies in gravitational energy $$m g /\kappa$$ and dimensionless frequency describe as $$\tilde{\omega _z } = \omega _z \hbar \kappa /(m g)$$ and dimensionless strength of the evanescent field represents as $$\tilde{V_{0}}= \kappa V_{0}$$/(mg). By keeping in mind the last experimental values, we have the following dimensionless quantities: the dimensionless s-wave scattering length amounts to $$\tilde{a}=0.033$$, the dimensionless optical decaying strength is given by $$\tilde{V}_{0}=906$$, the dimensionless kinetic energy strength is $$\tilde{k}=0.066$$, the dimensionless radial frequency amounts to be $$\tilde{\omega }_{r}=1.303$$, and dimensionless two-particle interaction yields $$\tilde{G}=0.086$$   N. We have normalized the wavefunction as $$\int | \tilde{\Psi} \left( \tilde{x}, \tilde{z} \right) |^{2} d \tilde{x} d\tilde{z} =1$$. To avoid complexity, we drop all parameter tildes for rest of the manuscript.

## Dynamics of the BEC

Initially, we trapped a BEC in a two-dimensional trap at the top of the mirror as shown in Fig. 1a. Numerically, we achieved this process by letting the initial trapped potential as $$V(x,z)= x^2+(z-z_0)^2$$, here $$z_0=10$$. At the time $$t=0$$, the initial trapping potential is switched off and condensate is released into the previously described standing evanescent potential Eq. (2) and the BEC expands ballistically (interacting gas) in potential. Here, numerically we avoid penetration of atoms into the prism by consider a very high potential for the negative z-axis i.e., $$V(z<0) \rightarrow \infty$$. During the bouncing of the BEC, the atoms experience a weakly confining potential along the x-direction and relatively linear along the z-direction due to the gravitational field.

We demonstrate the diffraction patterns by using simple geometry. In our model, the potential plane is well approximated by a sinusoidal exponentially decaying field, which can be modeled here as a reflective grating for the BEC atoms. For quantum scattering the periodicity interval d leads to Brag scattering for constructive interference

\begin{aligned} n \lambda _{db}= d \sin (\psi ) , \end{aligned}
(4)

with the azimuthal angle $$\psi$$ and the de Broglie wavelength $$\lambda _{db} =(\hbar / (2 m E_0))^{1/2}$$. Above equation describes the angular positions of diffraction spots $$\psi$$ of order n. For small angle approximation $$\sin (\psi ) \approx \psi$$, the Bragg condition is given by $$\triangle \psi \approx \lambda _{db}/d$$, which has been verified experimental for the Fast Atom diffraction33. The azimuthal exit angle $$\psi$$ is associated to the deflection angle $$\theta$$ in the detection plane via $$\tan (\psi ) = \tan (\phi _{in}) \sin (\theta )$$ as shown in Fig. 1c, by using the small angle approximation $$\sin (\psi )= \sin (\theta ) \sin (\phi _{in})$$ the above Eq. (4) takes the form

\begin{aligned} n \lambda _{db\perp }= d \sin (\theta ) , \end{aligned}
(5)

where $$\lambda _{db\perp }= \lambda _{db}/\sin (\phi _{in})\gg \lambda _{db}$$. Here, $$\lambda _{db\perp }$$ defines as a de Broglie wavelength with respect to the dynamics of projectiles in a plane normal to axial strings as shown in Fig. 1c. We notice from Eq. (5) that the azimuthal splitting of diffraction spots $$\triangle \psi$$ for a given de Broglie wavelength $$\lambda _{db}$$ is independent of the incident angle $$\phi _{in}$$. The diffraction spots $$\triangle \psi$$ helps to obtain the periodicity d of the surface potential. The external periodic potential frequency leads to a blazing effect similar to an optical grating, which enhances the intensity of finite diffraction order.

As we already discussed in “Introduction” that the quantum treatment for the retroreflection and diffraction of a Bose–Einstein condensate by standing evanescent wave does not permit analytical solutions, due to the anharmonicity and nonlinear interaction of BEC atoms. Therefore, we tackle this problem by using a numerical technique called time-splitting spectral method34,35,36,37,38, which perfectly depicts the description of the reflection and diffraction phenomenon. Therefore, although in this scientific report, we give up analytical approach, but we obtain a detailed insight into the dynamic process of the BEC. The evolution of the BEC probability density as it approaches the evanescent wave and then gets reflected as shown in Fig. 2a–l. In this special case, the amplitude of a standing wave is zero, therefore, the BEC start bouncing at the exponentially decaying potential. In Fig. 2, at the BEC density graph, additionally we plot a white line that mimics the periodic reflecting potential. The mean position of the BEC exhibits a periodic bouncing as shown in Fig. 2, which is natural as this is the clean case and ideally there are not any impurities present at the prism surface. As we can see that after letting $$\eta =0$$, our proposed model becomes a one-dimensional case as can be seen from Eq. (2), therefore to avoid ballistic expansion of the BEC cloud along the x-axis, we explicitly let a harmonic potential $$x^2/2$$ along the x-axis. If we do not consider the harmonic potential along the x-axis, we notice that we lose all the BEC atoms in the x-axis, therefore to see the retroreflection of the BEC in this special case, we need to let harmonic potential along the x-axis. This way, we record bouncing of the BEC on a hard surface. We notice that the width ($$\sigma _x$$) of the BEC along the x-axis is constant as predicted in Figs. 2 and 6b, this is quite obvious as we know that along the x-axis the potential is harmonic. We would like to mention that the width of the BEC along the x-axis is model by standard deviation.

As we make a small increase in the dimensionless amplitude $$\eta = 0.01$$ of the standing wave as shown in Fig. 3a–l, the BEC temporal density starts to spread during the flight back as can be seen in Fig. 3d–f. This shows that the prism surface is not smooth anymore, therefore the BEC wavepacket spreads, by studying the spread of the BEC we can predict the shape of the surface structure similar to Surface Physics, where many experimentalists use the Fast Atom Diffraction technique to study surface patterns33,39. After the second reflection from the prism, atoms indicate interference maxima and minima of the temporal density of the BEC as shown in Fig. 3l at dimensionless time $$t=60$$. This interesting phenomenon can be explained, the interference patterns are produced by overlapping the part of the BEC wavefunction that is still approaching to the maximum height with the part that is being diffracted previously. These maxima and minima of density wave-packets are quite visible when we further increase the dimensionless amplitude of the standing wave potential, let say $$\eta =0.1$$ as shown in Fig. 4. In the panel Fig. 4c, the BEC wavefunction is interacting with the standing wave antinode at $$x=0$$. In this case, there is a circular wave-front formed around the standing wave antinodes, so some of the portion of the wavefunction is diffracted back earlier as compared to the other portion which still touching the minima of the standing wave. The superposition of the circular wave-fronts with each other generates maxima and minima of the temporal density, the temporal density gets weaker and blurred from the middle as we move far from the standing wave as predicted in Fig. 4f at dimensionless time $$t=30$$. As the BEC wave function further evolves in time, we can see a superposition of four contributions of the BEC wavepacket, as can be seen in the panel (k) of Fig. 4 and a rainbow kind of density structure appears. The rainbow pattern has all the information of the surface structure, thus we see four maxima of the density patterns, therefore we can claim that there are four periodic structures are present at the prism surface.

Interestingly, the BEC wavepacket starts exhibiting the typical Fresnel or near-field features of such functions, these features are very similar to the light when it passes from a diffraction grating. As we increase further the standing wave amplitude to $$\eta =0.9$$ as shown in Fig. 5a–l, the circular wave-fronts of BEC wavepacket reaped around the standing wave antinodes as shown in Fig. 5c. We would like to mention here, our mimicking periodic one-dimensional white potential is not describing the exact Physics of the ESWP as gravity starts playing a very important role, therefore, it is getting hard to mimic a two-dimensional potential (Fig. 1b) as a one-dimensional case. It can be seen from the density rainbow structure as presented in Fig. 5e that end-part of the BEC wavepacket take more time to reflect back as compared to the middle part. The wavefront of the BEC could not find the perfect plan surface instead the surface is quite rough. So by comparing the clean surface case with the dirty periodic surface case, someone can provide a very good estimate of the periodic surface structure. We note that the mean position of the BEC wavepacket along the z-axis is periodic for all the different dimensionless periodic amplitudes as shown in Fig. 6a, however the mean-position of the BEC decrease with every bounce which means the loss of energy as depicted in Fig. 6a. So a natural question arises where does this energy go, in this closed system, we notice that the total energy of the system is conserved however, this decrease in height is happened due to the spread of the wavepacket in the x-axis. We observe that the standard-deviation (width) of the BEC wavepacket along the x-axis increases linearly with time and the growth of the linear curve increase with the increase of the dimensional periodic strength $$\eta$$ as shown in Fig. 6b. For a special case, $$\eta =0$$ the width of the BEC does not increase as the BEC is bounded in the x-axis due to the harmonic confinement, therefore we do not observe any decrease in mean-position of the BEC wavepacket along the z-axis. For $$\eta =0.9$$, the BEC wavepacket losses its coherence due to the loss of a definite phase as it bounces on a quite high periodic potential surface and on every bounce a relative phase is added. Therefore, as the periodic potential strength increases the Quantum decoherence increases and we see quite dull interference patterns as shown in Fig. 5l, thus for high values of $$\eta$$, we can not track any information from these interference patterns.

## Conclusion

In conclusion, we have demonstrated a simple retroreflection and diffraction technique for ultra-cold atoms, where the diffraction patterns can be controlled with the experimental tuneable parameters. We note that the spreading of BEC in the vertical direction is quite arduous. Atoms that originated at the top have a longer bouncing time-period than those started at the center. This effect is quite small during the first few bounces, however, it increases as the number of bounces started to increase. The bright and dark interference fringes can be seen, however, the coherence of the BEC started to lose after few bounces as in very bounce BEC atoms get phase due to path traveling along the z-axis. The prospect of exploitation of the effect of rainbow scattering of the BEC wavepacket to examine the structural features of the surface is examined. Fast Atom Diffraction from surfaces is one of the standard methods for solid surface structures near to the room temperature. However, our technique can be used to find out the surface structures at ultra-cold temperature. Our technique will open new prospects in the field of BEC diffraction and reflection from the prism surface. Nowadays magnetic-field sensors40 are efficient of making measurements with both good field sensitivity and high spatial resolution. For instance, with low sensitivity magnetic force microscopy41 permits investigation of magnetic structures with a spatial resolution in the nanometre range, although atomic magnetometers and SQUIDs facilitate to investigate extremely sensitive magnetic-field measurements, but at low resolution. In this respect, Wildermuth et al. investigated one-dimensional Bose–Einstein condensates in a microscopic field-imaging technique that combines high spatial resolution (within 3 micrometres) with high field sensitivity (300 picotesla)42. Our proposed model findings can help experimentalists to build future high spatial resolution and high sensitivity magnetic-field sensors in two-dimensional systems.

## Method and numerical technique

We derive the Gross–Pitaevskii equation by using the Hamilton principle of least action with the action functional

\begin{aligned} S= \int \int \pounds _{3D} dr dt , \end{aligned}
(6)

where the three-dimensional Lagrangian density is

\begin{aligned} \pounds _{3D} = \frac{i \hbar }{ 2} \left( \psi ^*_t \psi - \psi _t \psi ^* \right) + \frac{\hbar ^2 }{2 m} | \nabla \psi |^2 + V |\psi |^2 + \frac{G_{3D}}{2} |\psi |^4 . \end{aligned}
(7)

The dynamics of two-dimensional condensate can be observed when the longitudinal trap frequency $$\omega _y$$ is much higher than the radial trap frequency $$\omega _r$$. If this condition holds then the condensate wave function can be factorized

\begin{aligned} \psi (r,t)= \phi (y)\psi (x,z,t), \end{aligned}
(8)

where $$\phi (y)= \frac{1}{\pi ^{1/4} a_y^{1/2}} e^{\left[ -y^2/(2 a_y^2) \right] }$$. By substituting Eq. (8) into Eq. (6) and integrate the over y-axis, the effective two-dimensional Lagrangian density

\begin{aligned} \pounds _{2D} = \frac{i \hbar }{ 2} \left[ \psi ^*_t(x,z,t) \psi (x,z,t) - \psi _t(x,z,t) \psi ^*(x,z,t) \right] + \frac{\hbar ^2 }{2 m} |\nabla \psi (x,z,t) |^2 + V |\psi (x,z,t)|^2 + \frac{G_{3D}}{2 a_y \sqrt{2\pi }} |\psi (x,z,t)|^4 . \end{aligned}
(9)

To determine the two-dimensional time-dependent Gross–Pitaevskii equation, we use the Euler–Lagrangian equation

\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial \pounds _{2D}}{\partial \psi ^{*}(x,z,t) } -\frac{\partial }{\partial r} \frac{\partial \pounds _{2D}}{ \frac{\partial \psi ^* (x,z,t)}{\partial r } } -\frac{\partial }{\partial t} \frac{\partial \pounds _{2D}}{ \frac{\partial \psi ^*(x,z,t) }{\partial t } } =0, \end{aligned}
(10)

where, $$r=(x,z)$$. By using the two-dimensional Lagrangian density Eq. (9) and after some algebra, the two-dimensional time-dependent Gross–Pitaevskii equation reads (1)43.

In order to determine the dynamics of the condensate wave function, we solve the two-dimensional time-dependent Gross–Pitaevskii equation (1) in imaginary time numerically by using the split-operator method34,35,36,37,38. It is worthwhile to mention here that we use the imaginary time simulation technique that helps us to find a suitable ground state wave function, for any random initial guess, for a given interaction strength. The ground state wave function then served as an initial condition for the rest of the dynamic cases. In our case, we use initially Gaussian as a guess which by simulating in imaginary time results in a ground state for a specific interaction strength. For numerical simulations, we perform discretization of the dimensionless GP Eq. (3), with space step $$\vartriangle x= \vartriangle z= 0.083$$ and the time step $$dt=0.001$$.

## References

1. 1.

S. Stock, Z. Hadzibabic, B. Battelier, M. Cheneau, and J. Dalibard, Observation of Phase Defects in Quasi-Two-Dimensional Bose-Einstein Condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 190403 (2005).

2. 2.

J. I. Gillen, W. S. Bakr, A. Peng, P. Unterwaditzer, S. Fölling, and M. Greiner, Two-dimensional quantum gas in a hybrid surface trap, Phys. Rev. A 80, 021602 (2009).

3. 3.

E. Vetsch, S. T. Dawkins, R. Mitsch, D. Reitz, P. Schneeweiss, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Nanofiber-Based Optical Trapping of Cold Neutral Atoms, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 18, 1763–1770 (2012).

4. 4.

J. Akram and A. Pelster, Sculpting quasi-one-dimensional Bose-Einstein condensate to generate calibrated matter waves. Phys. Rev. A 93, 023606 (2016).

5. 5.

J. Akram and A. Pelster, Numerical study of localized impurity in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A 93, 033610 (2016).

6. 6.

J. Akram, A distinguishable single excited-impurity in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Laser Physics Letters 15, 025501 (2018).

7. 7.

R. J. Cook and R. K. Hill, An electromagnetic mirror for neutral atoms, Optics Communications 43, 258–260 (1982).

8. 8.

G. J. Liston, S. M. Tan, and D. F. Walls, Quantum dynamics of bouncing atoms in a stable gravitational cavity, Applied Physics B 60, 211–227 (1995).

9. 9.

H. Wallis, J. Dalibard, and C. Cohen-Tannoudji, Trapping atoms in a gravitational cavity, Applied Physics B 54, 407–419 (1992).

10. 10.

H. Wallis, Bose gas in a gravito-optical trap, Quantum and Semiclassical Optics: Journal of the European Optical Society Part B 8, 727–736 (1996).

11. 11.

C. G. Aminoff, A. M. Steane, P. Bouyer, P. Desbiolles, J. Dalibard, and C. Cohen-Tannoudji, Cesium atoms bouncing in a stable gravitational cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3083–3086 (1993).

12. 12.

A. Steane, P. Szriftgiser, P. Desbiolles, and J. Dalibard, Phase Modulation of Atomic de Broglie Waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4972–4975 (1995).

13. 13.

J. Gea-Banacloche, A quantum bouncing ball, American Journal of Physics 67, 776 (1999).

14. 14.

R. Robinett, Quantum wave packet revivals, Physics Reports 392, 1–119 (2004).

15. 15.

F. Saif, I. Bialynicki-Birula, M. Fortunato, and W. P. Schleich, Fermi accelerator in atom optics, Phys. Rev. A 58, 4779–4783 (1998).

16. 16.

J. Akram, K. Naseer, I. Rehman, and F. Saif, Acceleration of Material Waves in Fermi Accelerator, Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2009, 1–8 (2009).

17. 17.

F. Saif, Classical and quantum chaos in atom optics, Physics Reports 419, 207–258 (2005).

18. 18.

J. Akram, K. Naseer, and F. Saif, Controlled acceleration of a modulated quantum bouncer, Journal of Russian Laser Research 30, 157–163 (2009).

19. 19.

Y. B. Ovchinnikov, I. Manek, and R. Grimm, Surface Trap for Cs atoms based on Evanescent-Wave Cooling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2225–2228 (1997).

20. 20.

R.  Grimm, M.  Weidemüller, and Y. B. Ovchinnikov ( Academic Press, 2000) pp. 95–170

21. 21.

P. Domokos and H. Ritsch, Efficient loading and cooling in a dynamic optical evanescent-wave microtrap, Europhys. Lett. 54, 306–312 (2001).

22. 22.

D. Rychtarik, B. Engeser, H.-C. Nägerl, and R. Grimm, Two-Dimensional Bose-Einstein Condensate in an Optical Surface Trap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 173003 (2004).

23. 23.

J. P. Dowling and J.  Gea-Banacloche ( Academic Press, 1996) pp. 1–94

24. 24.

C. V. Saba, P. A. Barton, M. G. Boshier, I. G. Hughes, P. Rosenbusch, B. E. Sauer, and E. A. Hinds, Reconstruction of a Cold Atom Cloud by Magnetic Focusing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 468–471 (1999).

25. 25.

K.  Bongs, S.  Burger, G.  Birkl, K.  Sengstock, W.  Ertmer, K.  Rza̧żewski, A.  Sanpera, and M.  Lewenstein, Coherent Evolution of Bouncing Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3577–3580 ( 1999)

26. 26.

V. V. Nesvizhevsky, H. G. Börner, A. K. Petukhov, H. Abele, S. Baeßler, F. J. Rueß, T. Stöferle, A. Westphal, A. M. Gagarski, and G. A. Petrov, Quantum states of neutrons in the Earth’s gravitational field, Nature 415, 297 (2002).

27. 27.

Y. Colombe, D. Kadio, M. Olshanii, B. Mercier, V. Lorent, and H. Perrin, Schemes for loading a Bose Einstein condensate into a two-dimensional dipole trap, Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics 5, S155–S163 (2003).

28. 28.

Y. Colombe, B. Mercier, H. Perrin, and V. Lorent, Diffraction of a Bose-Einstein condensate in the time domain, Phys. Rev. A 72, 061601 (2005).

29. 29.

H. Perrin, Y. Colombe, B. Mercier, V. Lorent, and C. Henkel, Diffuse reflection of a Bose-Einstein condensate from a rough evanescent wave mirror, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 39, 4649–4658 (2006).

30. 30.

J. Akram, B. Girodias, and A. Pelster, Quasi one-dimensional Bose-Einstein condensate in a gravito-optical surface trap, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 49, 075302 (2016).

31. 31.

M. D. Lee, S. A. Morgan, M. J. Davis, and K. Burnett, Energy-dependent scattering and the Gross-Pitaevskii equation in two-dimensional Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 65, 043617 (2002).

32. 32.

C. H. Ertmer, H. Wallis, N. Westbrook, C. Westbrook, A. Aspect, and W. K. Sengstock, Theory of atomic diffraction from evanescent waves, Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics 69, 277–289 (1999).

33. 33.

A. Schüller, D. Blauth, J. Seifert, M. Busch, H. Winter, K. Gärtner, R. Włodarczyk, J. Sauer, and M. Sierka, Fast atom diffraction during grazing scattering from a MgO(001) surface, Surface Science 606, 161–173 (2012).

34. 34.

W. Bao, D. Jaksch, and P. A. Markowich, Numerical solution of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation for Bose-Einstein condensation, Journal of Computational Physics 187, 318–342 (2003).

35. 35.

D. Vudragović, I. Vidanović, A. Balaž, P. Muruganandam, and S. K. Adhikari, C programs for solving the time-dependent Gross-Pitaevskii equation in a fully anisotropic trap, Comp. Phys. Commun. 183, 2021–2025 (2012).

36. 36.

R. K. Kumar, L. E. Young-S., D.  Vudragović, A.  Balaž, P.  Muruganandam, and S.  Adhikari, Fortran and C programs for the time-dependent dipolar Gross–Pitaevskii equation in an anisotropic trap, Comput. Phys. Commun. 195, 117–128 ( 2015)

37. 37.

V. Lončar, A. Balaž, A. Bogojević, S. Škrbić, P. Muruganandam, and S. K. Adhikari, CUDA programs for solving the time-dependent dipolar Gross-Pitaevskii equation in an anisotropic trap, Comput. Phys. Commun. 200, 406 (2016).

38. 38.

B. Satarić, V. Slavnić, A. Belić, A. Balaž, P. Muruganandam, and S. K. Adhikari, Hybrid OpenMP/MPI programs for solving the time-dependent Gross-Pitaevskii equation in a fully anisotropic trap, Comput. Phys. Commun. 200, 411 (2016).

39. 39.

G. A. Bocan, J. D. Fuhr, and M. S. Gravielle, van der Waals effects on grazing-incidence fast-atom diffraction for H on LiF(001), Phys. Rev. A 94, 022711 (2016).

40. 40.

S. J. BENDING, Local magnetic probes of superconductors, Advances in Physics 48, 449–535 (1999), DOI: 10.1080/000187399243437.

41. 41.

M. R. Freeman, Advances in Magnetic Microscopy, Science 294 (2001), https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1065300.

42. 42.

Wildermuth, S. et al. Microscopic magnetic-field imaging. Nature 435, 440. https://doi.org/10.1038/435440a (2005).

43. 43.

A. M. Kamchatnov, Expansion of Bose-Einstein condensates confined in quasi-one-dimensional or quasi-two-dimensional traps, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 98 908–917 (2004), doi: 10.1134/1.1767557.

## Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge support from China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M640440), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (3206009604), the National Key R&D program of China (2018YFE0125500,2016YFB0401600, and 2017YFC0111500), National Natural Science Foundation of China (61971133,61674029, 61775034, and 51879042), NSFC Research Fund for International Young Scientists (Grant no. 61750110537).

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

J.A.: designed and performed numerical mathematical modeling, analyzed data and co-wrote the paper. K.Q.: co-wrote the paper. L.W.: supervised the research.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javed Akram.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

### Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Akram, J., Qasim, K. & Wei, L. Retroreflection and diffraction of a Bose–Einstein condensate by evanescent standing wave potential. Sci Rep 10, 20674 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77597-8

• Accepted:

• Published: