Introduction

The waste water containing organic dyes which cause toxic effects on human health and damage aquatic natural resources. A large amount of organic dyes are being used in food industry1,2,3, leather tanneries4,5,6, pharmaceuticals7,8 and in textile industry9,10,11,12,13.

The oxidation and removal of dyes from wastewater have been investigated by methods like chemical14, photoelectrochemical15, adsorption16,17,18,19,20, membrane technology21,22,23 and advanced oxidation processes24. The electrochemical generation of hydrogen peroxide by oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) for the electrochemical water treatment with subsequent formation of ·OH radical by using electro Fenton has been utilized for water purification and mineralisation for over last three decades25. Currently, Photo Fenton26, Electro Fenton27,28, Photo Electro Fenton29,30 have been employed for the electrochemical synthesis of hydrogen peroxide. It is evident from the literature that it is much needed to develop an inexpensive electrode that may provide better efficiency and employability in terms of performance and reusability. Moderate cost electrodes like RVC have been employed for the electrophoretic deposition of titanate nanosheets (TiNS) for anodic water treatment31. Likewise, low cost electrodes can also be synthesized by using carbon materials for electro Fenton treatment of wastewater containing dyes. Gas diffusion electrodes (GDC) can be an effective alternative electrode for the electroFenton synthesis. GDC modified with nitrogen doped graphene at carbon nanotube electrodes have been reported as effective for the generation of 25 mg dm−3 of H2O2 at an applied potential of − 0.5 V vs. standard calomel electrode (SCE)32. The study to improve GDC modified with Fe (II) catalyst showed about 99% decolorization of methylene blue in 250 min at − 1.0 V vs. Hg/HgSO433. Nitrogen functionalised carbon nanotube cathodes was observed to be useful for complete degradation of methyl orange at − 0.85 V in 60 min29. In this work, hydrogen peroxide production and mineralisation have been studied with the improved GDC electrodes and evaluate the oxidation of Remazol black–B dye in an advanced type of electrochemical cell.

Experimental

Carbon based cloth, namely EC-AC-Cloth-T, was procured from QuinTech Technology, Berlin, Germany. Reagent grade nickel mesh, 0.05 mm thickness (a current collector) acquired from Dexmet Corporation, Wallingford, USA and Carbon black VULCAN® XC72R obtained from Cabot, Boston, USA. Polytetrafuoroethylene (Teflon® PTFE DISP 30) was obtained from DuPont™, UK. Reagent grade Na2SO4, acetone, and KMnO4 were received from Fischer Scientific (Loughborough, UK) while Remazol Black-B and ethanol was obtained from Sigma Aldrich (Gillingham, UK) and employed as received. All aqueous solutions were made by using double distilled water acquired from a distillation equipment provided by SUEZ Water UK (Peterborough, UK), exhibiting resistivity less than 17 MΩ cm at 25 °C.

Synthesis of gas diffusion electrodes

The improved gas diffusion cathodes (GDCs) were made by adopting method previously reported in the literature34. Similarly, GDC comprised of catalytic carbon and Ni mesh for current collector. A paste for catalyst layer was produced from 25 mg carbon black and 125 mg FeCl2. Ultrasonic bath (XUBA3, Grant Instruments, UK) was used to sonicate the mixture of carbon black and FeCl2 for 10 min in 5 wt% Nafion® from Alfa Aesar, UK (D-520 dispersion). The resulting sonicated paste of Nafion, carbon black, and FeCl2 was rolled over 40 mm × 40 mm × 0.4 mm on a piece of carbon cloth pre-treated with 25 wt% PTFE as shown in Fig. 1. The catalyst loading was found around 5 mg cm−2 on the electrode.

Figure 1
figure 1

GDC electrodes geometry and experimental arrangement of the undivided electrochemical flow cell.

Finally, electrode hot-pressed by using Carver 3851-0 Hydraulic Press (Cole Palmer, UK) for 2 min at 140 °C under a pressure of 5 MPa by arranging a 0.02 mm thick nickel mesh (current collector) as a top cover for the layered carbon cloth with carbon black and FeCl2 layer. The GDC electrodes were recovered from the hydraulic press and allowed to spontaneously cool down in air for 10 min.

Characterization of GDC

The characterization of the as prepared GDC electrodes was conducted by employing JEOL JSM-6500F field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) at an accelerating voltage of 10–15 kV. The surface morphology of the carbon black and iron ions catalyst layer carbon cloth and nickel mesh layer were observed by using FESEM.

Electrochemical study

The electrochemical experiments were carried out as our previous studies34 in an undivided advanced type of three electrode electrochemical cell (Fig. 1) by using high-end potentiostat/galvanostat PGSTAT302 N (Metrohm Autolab B.V., Utrecht, Netherlands) and analysed by Nova 1.11. A 0.80 cm2 working electrode made from iron ions modified GDC was deployed. Meanwhile, Pt mesh was employed as counter electrode with SCE (i.e., Hg/HgSO4) as reference electrode. A 0.15 L solution containing 17 ppm of Remazol black-B dye was made in 0.5 mol L3 of Na2SO4 solution as background electrolyte. The electrolysis was conducted at − 0.6 V and − 0.7 V vs. Hg/HgSO4 in an undivided electrochemical batch reactor with oxygen supply (flow rate = 0.1 dm3 min−1) across the gas diffusion electrodes.

A UV–Vis spectrophotometer Hitachi U3010 (Abingdon, UK) was used to measure the absorbance at 597 nm as the peak of Remazol black-B dye. Beer–Lambert law was applied for calibration and calculation of the Remazol black-B concentration. Further, demineralization studies of the Remazol black-B dye were performed using Shimadzu TOC–VCPH TOC detector. Using the standard nonpurgeable organic carbon (NPOC) analysis, TOC values were measured.

Results and discussion

Surface characterization of GDC electrodes

Figure 2A–D exhibits the representative images of the gas diffusion electrodes taken by using FESEM. Figure 2A shows the carbon and catalyst layer, nickel mesh and carbon cloth. Figure 2B depicts the side view of the carbon cloth fibers. Figure 2C shows the top view of the GDC electrodes across the nickel mesh which shows the carbon layer and catalyst layer over the surface of carbon cloth. Figure 2D represents the top view of the carbon and catalyst paste over the carbon cloth. It can be seen that the layer of carbon black and iron ions catalyst were successfully adhered over the carbon cloth surface. The FeCl2 catalyst was transformed into a mixture of FeOCl and Fe2O3 in aqueous solution following the Eqs. (1) and (2)35.

$$4{\text{FeCl}}_{2} + { }2{\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}} + {\text{ O}}_{2} \to { }4{\text{FeOCl }} + { }4{\text{HCl}}$$
(1)
$$4{\text{FeCl}}_{2} + { }4{\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}} + {\text{ O}}_{2} \to { }2{\text{Fe}}_{2} {\text{O}}_{3} { } + { }8{\text{HCl}}$$
(2)
Figure 2
figure 2

SEM pictures of GDC electrodes (A) Over all combination area of GDC electrodes. (B) Carbon cloth side view. (C) Nickel mesh top view. (D) Carbon paste and iron ions side view.

While FeCl2 is soluble in aqueous solution, FeOCl and Fe2O3 have limited solubility in water36. Hence these improved iron ions catalyst based GDC electrodes may provide better performance in comparison to other reported electrodes.

Polarization curve studies for the ORR

The GDC electrodes were mounted in an advanced type of electrochemical batch cell (Fig. 1) to conduct the polarization studies for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). The experiments were conducted in a 0.5 mol dm−3 Na2SO4 at pH 3 by feeding pure oxygen at 0.1 dm3 min−1 across gas diffusion electrodes at scan rate of 10 mVs−1 in range of − 0.1 to − 1.0 V vs. Hg/HgSO4. The dissolved oxygen supplied across the GDC electrodes was electrochemically transformed into hydrogen peroxide via the (ORR) as shown in Eq. (3). However, it has been reported in the literature studies related to ORR that in this process, two side competing reactions also occurs as a secondary reaction37. These two side reactions are shown in Eq. (4) i.e. reduction of hydrogen peroxide to water and hydrogen gas evolution as depicted in Eq. (5):

$${\text{O}}_{2} + 2{\text{H}}^{ + } + { }2{\text{e}}^{ - } \to {\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}}_{2} { }E^\circ = 0.695{\text{ V }}vs.{\text{ SHE }}$$
(3)
$${\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}}_{2} + 2{\text{H}}^{ + } + { }2{\text{e}}^{ - } \to 2{\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O }}E^\circ { } = { }1.763{\text{ V }}vs.{\text{ SHE}}$$
(4)
$$2{\text{H}}^{ + } { } + { }2{\text{e}}^{ - } \to {\text{ H}}_{{2\left( {\text{g}} \right)}} E^\circ { } = { }0.00{\text{ V }}vs.{\text{ SHE}}$$
(5)

Figure 3 showed when the potential was sweep at a scan rate of 10 mVs−1, a steep rise in cathodic current was observed after − 0.5 V vs. Hg/HgSO4. The cathodic polarization curve indicates that the ORR takes place in potential range of − 0.3 to − 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgSO4, this corresponding region for limiting current indicates the optimal cathodic region for the oxygen reduction to hydrogen peroxide. When the potential was sweep and continues to rise above − 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgSO4, the current increases steadily which representing the region of the competing side reactions as indicated by Eqs. (4) and (5).

Figure 3
figure 3

Polarisation curve at GDC electrodes with iron ion for the determination of ORR in a solution containing in 0.5 mol dm–3 Na2SO4 potential sweep rate = 10 mV s−1; temperature: 25 °C, oxygen flowrate 0.1 dm3 min−1.

Hydrogen peroxide concentration accumulation during electrolysis

The generation of hydrogen peroxide during ORR is the most important step during the electroFenton process. The constant potential studies were conducted to measure the accumulation of hydrogen peroxide. The studies were carried out in the potential range of − 0.3 V to − 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgSO4 in a 0.5 mol dm−3 Na2SO4 solution at pH 3. The results were shown in Fig. 4. It can be seen that the concentration of hydrogen peroxide was increased as the cathode potential rise from − 0.3 to − 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgSO4. The results seem to be in agreement with the polarization curve as shown in Fig. 3. So, for the decolorization studies of the Remazol black-B dye the electrolysis at − 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgSO4 seems to be desirable for electro Fenton process.

Figures 4
figure 4

Accumulation of electrogenerated hydrogen peroxide during the electrolysis at different electrode potentials on GDC electrodes (filled square) − 0.3 V vs. Hg/HgSO4, (filled circle) − 0.4 V vs. Hg/HgSO4, (filled triangle) − 0.5 V vs. Hg/HgSO4, (filled inverted triangle) − 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgSO4 in an electrolyte containing in 0.5 mol dm–3 Na2SO4 pH   3 temperature: 25 °C, oxygen flowrate 0.1 dm3 min−1.

Decolorization of Remazol black-B by using iron ions based GDC electrodes

After the successfully generating hydrogen peroxide at − 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgSO4, the decolorization of Remazol black-B dye was performed by applying constant potential electrolysis at − 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgSO4. The oxidation of Reactive Black 5 dye was assisted by powerful oxidizing agent hydroxyl radicals created from the breakup of electrogenerated H2O2 in the presence of Fe3+ and propagated by Fe2+ ions over the surface of GDC electrodes. The generation of hydroxyl radical mechanism at the Fe2+ and Fe3+ based GDC electrodes is depicted in Eqs. (6) and (7)38;

$${\text{Fe}}^{3 + } + {\text{ H}}_{2} {\text{O}}_{2} \to {\text{Fe}}^{2 + } + {\text{H}}^{ + } + {\text{HO}}_{2}^{ \cdot }$$
(6)
$${\text{Fe}}^{2 + } + {\text{ H}}_{2} {\text{O}}_{2} \to {\text{Fe}}^{3 + } + {\text{OH}}^{ - } + ^{ \cdot } {\text{OH }}$$
(7)

A 150 cm3 of electrolyte containing 17 mg dm−3 of Remazol black-B dye and 0.5 mol dm−3 of Na2SO4 at pH  3 was used under constant potential electrolysis at − 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgSO4 with working electrode (GDC), counter electrode (Pt), and reference electrode (Hg/HgSO4). Samples were collected at a regular interval of 10 min for constant potential electrolysis studies.

Figure 5 shows the spectrum obtained from UV spectrophotometer which displayed the absorbance vs. wavelength of the samples withdrawn during electrolysis studies for the decolorization of Remazol black-B dye at a constant potential of − 0.7 V vs. Hg/HgSO4. Initially, the concentration of dye was 17 mg dm−3. The dye spectra at this point was represented by continuous line having 2 absorption peaks, which is the visible spectrum region at 597 nm and the UV spectrum region at 311 nm. The absorbance at a wavelength of 597 nm is related with the azo group (N=N) of Remazol black-B while at a wavelength of 311 nm is related with the aromatic groups34. It can be seen in that after 40 min of electrolysis was sufficient to eliminate the peaks related to azo group and aromatic groups in the spectrum of absorbance vs. wavelength.

Figure 5
figure 5

UV–Vis spectra of samples collected during 50 min electrolysis on an iron ions based GDC electrodes by applying constant potential of − 0.7 V vs. Hg/HgSO4 from a solution containing 17 mg dm−3 Remazol black B dye 0.5 mol dm−3 Na2SO4 as a background electrolyte at 25 °C, oxygen flowrate 0.1 dm3 min−1, pH 3.

In Fig. 6, the effect of temperature and pH on the hydrogen peroxide production was recorded at − 0.7 V vs. Hg/HgSO4 to find the optimum condition. It was found that the production of hydrogen peroxide was optimum at 20 °C in pH 3 solution. High temperature, 40 °C, and high pH (pH > 5) may degrade the hydrogen peroxide hence less concentration was detected39,40. The hydrogen peroxide decomposed into oxygen and hydrogen in which the reaction was highly influenced by temperature, pH, and the use of catalyst. It was also reported that most of the commercial product was kept below pH 5 to preserve the hydrogen peroxide41.

Figure 6
figure 6

Effect of pH on hydrogen peroxide during the electrolysis at different electrode potentials on an iron ions GDC electrodes by applying constant potential of − 0.7 V vs. Hg/HgSO4 in an electrolyte containing in 0.5 mol dm–3 Na2SO4.

Figure 7 displayed the impact of the electrode potential on the decolorization of Remazol black B during the constant potential electrolysis of electrolyte containing 17 mg dm−3 of Remazol black B and 0.5 mol dm−3 Na2SO4 at pH   3. The results showed that the decolorization studies at two potentials − 0.6 and − 0.7 V vs. Hg/HgSO4. The impact of the applied potential on the degradation of Remazol black B is due to the oxygen reduction of hydrogen peroxide species in which the iron ions assist the well-known electro Fenton reaction34,37 by promoting powerful ·OH radical as represented in Eq. (4).

Figure 7
figure 7

Electro Fenton oxidation of Remazol black B dye using (filled square) carbon only at − 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgSO4, and using iron ions based GDC at (filled circle) − 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgSO4, (filled triangle) − 0.7 V vs. Hg/HgSO4.

The Fig. 7 depicted that the dye oxidation seems to be 97% after 50 min at the electrode potential of − 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgSO4. This behaviour is in the agreement with polarization curves results presented in Fig. 3 which shows the region of highest hydrogen peroxide at − 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgSO4. When the decolorization studies were carried out at − 0.7 V vs. Hg/HgSO4, it was observed that the decolorization decreased which obviously means the evolution of side reactions which competes with the oxygen reduction reaction. Since, the electrode was coated with the immobilized iron ions which initiate the classical electro Fenton reaction producing the ·OH radical which attacks the Remazol black-B to breakdown into intermediates. The comparison of the rate constant at different electrode potential displayed that using − 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgSO4 oxidized 97% of the Remazol black-B dye. Some studies related to photo electro Fenton studies exhibited 70% conversion of RB-5 dye42 which seems to be quite lower in comparison to these studies as represented in Table1. Notice that the colour removal of the dye decreased by increasing the applied voltage to − 0.7 V vs. Hg/HgSO4 which caused by the competing secondary reactions occurred over the electrode surface.

Table 1 Comparison of decolorization of Remazol black B dye by other related values from selected literature.

Demineralization of Remazol black-B by using iron ions based GDC electrodes

The TOC abatement studies of Remazol black B dye was conducted to account for the demineralization of dye. For this study, constant potentials at − 0.6 and − 0.7 V vs. Hg/HgSO4 were opted for electro Fenton demineralization of Remazol black B dye. The results are presented in the Fig. 8, it can be observed that degradation of Remazol black-B dye was initiated by the decomposition of electrogenerated H2O2 which in turn produce ·OH radical formed in the presence of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions at the top of Fe-based GDC cathodes. The demineralization of Remazol black-B dye was shown and drop of TOC from 45  to 5 mg dm−3 by performing electrolysis at fixed potential of − 0.7 V vs. Hg/HgSO4 as seen in Fig. 8. Demineralization was decreased while applying potentials at − 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgSO4.

Figure 8
figure 8

Effect of different potentials on demineralization of Remazol black-B dye via TOC measurements vs. electrolysis time by using iron ions based GDC at (filled square) − 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgSO4, (filled circle) − 0.7 V vs. Hg/HgSO4.

This represented that the application of greater constant potential (− 0.7 V vs. Hg/HgSO4) demineralized about 88% of the total organic carbon content present in the solution of Remazol black-B dye as shown in Fig. 8.

The proposed route for the degradation pathway of Remazol black-B is shown in Fig. 9. The proposed route was associated with the breaking of the aromatic heterocyclic chain (azo bond) of Remazol black-B producing transitory intermediates. The intermediates were further converted into benzene amino sulphonic acid in the presence of the ·OH radical by removing R = (CH2)2OSO3Na38. The addition of the ·OH radical to amino benzene sulphonic acid resulted in the generation of phenol molecule by removing the NH2 group. Finally, Remazol black-B dye was transformed into aliphatic acidic compounds, water and carbon dioxide.

Figure 9
figure 9

Degradation mechanism pathway for the oxidation of Remazol black B dye.

Current efficiency and energy consumption for the demineralization of Remazol black-B dye using iron ions based GDC electrodes

The ratio of electric energy employed for electrochemical decomposition reaction to total current passed through the electrochemical process is known as current efficiency.

The following equation is used to measure the current efficiency (CE) for an electrochemical demineralization reaction34:

$${\mathbf{CE}} = \frac{{2.67\left[ {{\mathbf{TOC}}_{0} - {\mathbf{TOC}}_{{\mathbf{f}}} } \right]\user2{ FV}}}{{8\user2{ }\mathop \smallint \nolimits_{{}}^{t} Idt\user2{ t}}} \times 100$$
(8)

where 2.67 is the reported equivalent factor of COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand) to TOC, (TOC0) and (TOCf) related to the TOC (g dm−3) values at the initial and final time of electrolysis respectively, F is the Faraday constant (96,500 C mol−1), V is the volume of the working solution (dm3), 8 is the factor for oxygen equivalent mass (g eq−1), \(\mathop \smallint \limits_{0}^{t} Idt\) overall current passed in an electrochemical demineralization and t is the overall time interval (s) for the electrolysis reaction.

The current efficiency is influenced by TOC abatement analysis, time of electrochemical reaction and total current utilized. Figure 10 shows the current efficiency versus electrolysis time. At − 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgSO4, the current efficiency obtained after 30 min of electrolysis reaction was about 60% and gradually decreased with time to 34% as calculated by using Eq. (8). At − 0.7 V vs. Hg/HgSO4, the highest current efficiency after 30 min of constant potential electrolysis was about 17% and gradually decrease to 3% at the end of electrolysis. The decreasing trends in CE during the electrolysis was due to the difficulty to degrade more aromatic compounds into inorganic compounds, which ultimately produce CO2. However, the appearance of side reactions like hydrogen evolution may lead to less current efficiency at higher applied potential.

Figure 10
figure 10

Current efficiency related to mineralization of Remazol black-B dye calculated from Eq. (9) vs. electrolysis time by using iron ions based GDC at (filled triangle) − 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgSO4, (filled square) − 0.7 V vs. Hg/HgSO4.

The energy consumption, EC, (kWh kg−1TOC) for the electrolysis process was calculated by the equation given below34;

$${\text{EC}} = { }\frac{{E I_{o} \Delta t}}{{100 ({\text{TOC}}_{0} - {\text{TOC}}_{{\text{f}}} ) V}}$$
(9)

where E (V) is the potential at which electrolysis reaction takes place, Io (A) is the current detected during electrolysis reaction. Meanwhile, time of electrolysis is denoted as ∆t (h). (TOC0) and (TOCf) are the TOC (kg dm−3) values at start and at the end of electrochemical reaction respectively and V (dm3) relates with the volume of the electrolyte containing electrochemical species. Likewise, EC increased as forecasted, as it required greater electric energy in an electrolysis process to convert intermediate organic products as a break down compounds of Remazol black -B dye.

After 50 min, the energy consumption calculated using Eq. (9) was about 157 kWh kg−1 TOC at − 0.7 V vs. Hg/HgSO4 as shown in Fig. 11. Note that the energy consumption for decomposition of Remazol black B dye decreased as applied constant potential decreased to − 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgSO4.

Figure 11
figure 11

Energy consumption related to mineralization of Remazol black-B dye calculated from Eq. (9) vs. electrolysis time by using iron ions based GDC at (filled triangle) − 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgSO4, (filled square) − 0.7 V vs. Hg/HgSO4.

Conclusions

In this work an improved GDC electrodes has been produced by rolling a layer of C black with iron ion species for the oxidation of Remazol black B dye. The polarization studies showed − 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgSO4 founds to be feasible for the hydrogen peroxide production. It was demonstrated that 25 mmol dm−3 hydrogen peroxide was produced by ORR in an advanced type of undivided cell by applying an electrode potential of − 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgSO4. GDC containing iron ions can effectively oxidize the Remazol black-B dye with 99% decolorization and demineralization of 88%. The current efficiency (CE) was found to be 17% after 30 min of electrolysis at − 0.7 V vs. Hg/HgSO4. The energy consumption (EC) was 157 kWh kg−1 TOC by applying constant potential difference of − 0.7 V vs. Hg/HgSO4. The results suggested the significance of immobilized iron ions over GDC electrodes for the removal of toxic Remazol black-B dye in an advanced type of 3 electrode electrochemical batch cell.