In recent years, most biofilm studies have focused on fundamental investigations using multispecies biofilm models developed preferentially in simulated naturally occurring low-nutrient medium than in artificial nutrient-rich medium. Because biofilm development under low-nutrient growth media is slow, natural media are often supplemented with an additional carbon source to increase the rate of biofilm formation. However, there are knowledge gaps in interpreting the effects of such supplementation on the resulting biofilm in terms of structure and microbial community composition. We investigated the effects of supplementation of a simulated freshwater medium with sodium citrate on the resulting structure, bacterial community composition, and microbial network interactions of an early-stage multispecies biofilm model. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of acquired confocal laser scanning microscopy data confirmed that sodium citrate supplementation distinctly increased biofilm biomass. Sequencing data revealed that the microbial community structure of biofilms grown in sodium citrate-supplemented conditions was characterized with increased relative abundance and dominance of Proteobacteria compared with that of biofilms grown in sodium citrate-free conditions. Our findings suggest that the supplementation of a low-nutrient medium with a carbon source in experiments involving multispecies biofilms may lead to structural and compositional biases of the microbial community, causing changes in biofilm phenotype.
Although the use of in vitro monospecies biofilms and nutrient-rich media has been widely applied in the context of fundamental investigations, realistic multispecies biofilm models have gained much attention in recent years. Given that the microbial systems in natural and engineered environments usually comprise consortia of highly diverse microbial communities organized in the form of biofilms, investigations focusing on multispecies biofilms has emerged as a relevant topic for elucidating the behavior of targeted microorganisms within complex systems1,2.
Compared to monospecies biofilm development, the establishment of multispecies biofilm model is a challenging feat, considering the existing complex biological processes linked to their high bacterial diversity3 where various forms of interspecies interactions are involved4. Therefore, simulating multispecies biofilm within a laboratory setting has always been considered an arduous task, which explains why most published studies have opted to investigating monospecies biofilm models or, in the best case, biofilm models involving two to three different species. Nevertheless, one of the caveat of performing in vitro experiments is associated with the choice of growth medium, regardless of which type of monospecies or multispecies biofilm model is being investigated. In situations where the composition of the inoculum is known, an appropriate medium can be selected for optimal biofilm growth. For monospecies biofilms, past studies have shown that biofilm development outcomes are significantly affected by the selected growth medium5,6. In oral biofilm related research, where both monoculture and multispecies biofilm models are typically employed, growth media as well as specific nutrients were also shown to affect growth rate and biofilm composition outcomes7,8,9,10,11,12. More specifically, ecological plaque hypothesis (a hypothesis to explain the relationship between the dental plaque microflora and the host in health and disease, and to identify new strategies for disease prevention) proposed by Marsh assumed that the discrepancy in the microbial composition of oral biofilms impacted by both environmental factors and nutrient availability was found to contribute to the enrichment of disease-associated pathogens13. However, in experiments in which biofilm models constituting a plethora of microorganisms need to be investigated, the growth medium is generally obtained from a nonsterile natural or simulated source14,15.
In experiments involving the use of nonsterile medium, the issue of repeatability or inconsistent biofilm outcomes may arise due to the dynamic chemical conditions of the natural source and the high diversity of initial microorganisms. For instance, the nutrient contents in freshwater environments can be affected by random factors such as weather alteration, seasonal shifts, or anthropogenic activities16,17. Moreover, the speed of biofilm formation may be low in freshwater environments because unlike nutrient-rich media, nonsterile natural media usually contain lower levels of essential nutrients. For example, in nutrient-rich medium, biofilm formation generally occurs within one week, whereas in the natural river medium, at least 15 days are required for the formation of a thin patchy biofilm18.
One strategy commonly used to accelerate biofilm formation in nutrient-poor media is the addition of an organic carbon source. In biofilm experiments using nutrient poor media, sodium citrate or sodium acetate is occasionally supplemented as the sole carbon source for accelerating biofilm development in monospecies biofilm models19,20,21,22 or multispecies consortia23,24,25,26. It is through carbon source supplementation that such studies were able to accelerate biofilm development processes needed for conducting timely quantitative and qualitative biofilm analyses, thereby providing an attractive means for experimental productivity.
Though the addition of substrates, such as sodium citrate, is an ideal way to increase the rate of biofouling, biofilm formation, and biomass level in monospecies models, it is unclear whether such addition is similarly beneficial in multispecies models. In multispecies biofilm models, we hypothesized that the addition of sodium citrate may alter the multispecies community composition as well as its microbial succession. While sodium citrate is likely to accelerate biofilm development in multispecies biofilms, how substrate addition may affect experimental outcomes in terms of biofilm structure and microbial community composition remains unclear, thereby causing potential experimental biases.
There is currently a plethora of various in vitro biofilm models used in the context of environmental or health-related research, however, the selection of either dynamic- or static-forms of systems will ultimately depend on the original conditions the selected model was meant to simulate. While, static biofilm harvesting systems are perhaps the most widely used in research due to their simplicity and other positive attributes12,27,28, they are not ideal in research experiments meant to simulate freshwater environments characterized by continual flow and shear conditions, as well as constant renewal of nutrients. In the present study, we sought to investigate the effects of sodium citrate supplementation on a previously described multispecies biofilm models, using a dynamic simulated irrigation water distribution system29. The structure and microbial community composition of biofilms in the absence and presence of sodium citrate were compared at different time points of their early-stage formation.
Materials and methods
Multispecies biofilm models
Setup of freshwater biofilm models
The setup of a standardized simulated freshwater source and biofilm model has previously been described in detail29 and is schematized in Fig. 1. Briefly, freshwater from a controlled and standardized artificial ecosystem was drawn and directed into two holding tanks 1 and 2. The physicochemical profile and baseline of the artificial freshwater source were monitored throughout the study. Tank 1 functioned as the treatment tank to which sodium citrate was systematically added during biofilm experiment, whereas tank 2 served as the control for freshwater stemming from a healthy ecosystem. Each holding tank was first filled with 5-L aquarium water and connected to an individual Annular Biofilm Reactor (ABR, BioSurface Technologies Corp., Bozeman, MT, US) of 1-L working volume and operated in the recirculation mode. Each ABR could hold up to 40 coupon surfaces made of stainless steel on which biofilms could be harvested for systematic analysis.
For each biofilm system, the freshwater in the holding tank was replaced twice a week as previously described29 to ensure a continuous nutrient supply for biofilm growth in each reactor. In the treatment group, sodium citrate was added to the holding tank at a final concentration of 1 mM immediately following every water replacement event. Biofilms were collected for confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) observation and quantification, as well as genomic DNA extraction, at four time points: days 7, 14, 21, and 28, to investigate the shifts in biofilm structure and microbial succession during the early stages of biofilm formation. Throughout the study, biofilms of less than a month were defined as early-stage biofilms, based on a similar definition proposed by Ngan and Habimana29. The extracted DNA were sent to Novogene for 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing and network analysis. All experiments at selected time points under both control and treatment conditions were repeated three times.
Qualitative and quantitative assessment of biofilms
Biofilm structure was qualitatively assessed from the acquired CSLM (Zeiss LSM 780, Jena, Germany) data. All samples were first stained with 5 mM Syto 9 Green Fluorescent Nucleic Acid Stain (Catalog number: S34854, Thermofisher, Waltham, Massachusetts, United State) without affecting the original biofilm structure. Stained samples were then incubated in a dark box for 30 min. Subsequently, 3D image stacks of random areas of the biofilm samples were created. For biofilm grown in the absence of sodium citrate, an LD Plan-Neofluar 40x/0.6 Korr Ph2 M27 objective lens was used in the acquisition of biofilm stack, via confocal laser scanning microcopy, achieving × 40 magnification. For biofilms supplemented with sodium citrate, an EC Plan-Neofluar 20x/0.50 Ph2 M27 objective was used during CLSM stack acquisitions, achieving × 20 magnification. The rational for using different objectives can be explained by the level of biomass generated by the supplementation of sodium citrate, or lack thereof. We found that the × 40 objective was ideal for acquiring control biofilms stacks, however, the same objective used on biofilm supplemented with sodium citate led to loosing intricate details of the biofilm’s structural properties, which were best observed using a 20 × objective. Three to six 3D stacks were taken for each sample, depending on the sample size, to assure sufficient data for subsequent quantitative analyses.
Qualitative assessments of the biofilms were performed by processing the acquired microscopy data using Fiji software tools (developed by contributors worldwide; the website is hosted by LOCI at the University of Wisconsin-Madison). The quantitative analysis of the microscopy data was performed using the image analysis tool PHLIP running in MATLAB developed by Dr. J. Xavier (https://phlip.sourceforge.net/phlip-ml). The following quantitative parameters were evaluated: total biovolume (µm3), surface coverage (µm2), mean thickness (µm), and biofilm roughness (dimensionless)30. SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics 24.0) was used to performed an analysis of variance for comparing biofilm groups acquired at different time points.
DNA extraction, sequencing, and metagenomic analysis
Genomic DNA (gDNA) of biofilms grown under different conditions and sampled at selected time points were extracted using Quick-DNA Fecal/Soil Microbe Kits (Catalog No. D6010, Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) as previously described29.
All gDNA samples were sent to Novogene (Novogene Bioinformatics Technology, Beijing) for amplicon V3-V4 bacterial sequencing and analyses (Forward primer: 3′-CCTAYGGGRBGCASCAG-5′ , reverse primer: 3′-GGACTACNNGGGTATCTAAT-5′ ). During the transfer, all samples were kept in an isolation box with dry ice to prevent thawing and degradation. An amplicon library with fusion primers (16S V3-V4) was first constructed with dual index and adapters for PCR. Phusion High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) was used for all PCR reactions. As a standard procedure at Novogene (Novogene Bioinformatics Technology, Beijing), PCR products underwent in-house quantification and purification procedures. A TruSeq DNA PCR-free sample preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) was used following the manufacturer’s instruction for generating sequencing libraries, which were then assessed using the Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Scientific) and finally sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2500 platform, generating 250-bp paired-end reads.
The obtained paired-end reads were merged using FLASH31 following the removal of barcodes and primer sequences. Quality filtering was performed on raw reads using specific filtering conditions to obtain high-quality clean reads32 according to the QIIME quality control process33. The obtained effective tags were compared with a reference database (Gold database) using the UCHIME algorithm34 to remove chimeric sequences. Sequence analysis was performed using the UPARSE algorithm35, where sequences with a similarity index of 97% or above were assigned to the same operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Screening for species annotation to obtain a representative sequence for each OTU was performed using the GreenGene Database36 based on RDP Classifier37. The phylogenetic relationships of different OTUs, differences between dominant species in samples (groups), and multiple sequence alignments were analyzed using PyNAST v1.238 against the “Core Set” dataset in the GreenGene database.
Statistical methods including t-test, MetaStat (calculated using R), LEfSe (calculated by LEfSe software), Anosim (performed using R), and MRPP (performed using R) were used to assess the significance of differences in the structure and microbial community composition between the groups. The workflow of data analysis is provided in S1.
Network analysis of features and taxa in each sample was performed using CoNet app 1.1.1 beta39 in Cytoscape 3.6.0 at the following settings: Pearson correlation, Spearman correlation, Bray–Curtis dissimilarity, and Kullback–Leibler dissimilarity were calculated, and the correlation threshold was 0.3. The initial edge selection was set to include the top 100 and bottom 100 scoring edges. Edges supported by less than two metrics were removed. The significance of edges was calculated and renormalized based on 1000 bootstrap iterations, and p values were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple tests. Only edges with p ≤ 0.05 were included in the network.
Qualitative and quantitative assessment of freshwater biofilm models grown in the presence vs absence of sodium citrate
To determine the effect of sodium citrate supplementation on fresh water biofilm structure over a four-week period, biofilms were harvested using two ABR systems run in parallel, one under the presence and another under the absence of sodium citrate (NaCi and control). The results of the qualitative and quantitative analyses of the acquired microscopy data are presented in Fig. 2.
The visualization of 3D reconstructed biofilms (Fig. 2A) revealed distinct outcomes between the sodium citrate-supplemented and sodium citrate-free (control) conditions. Biofilms grown in the presence of sodium citrate were characterized by heterogeneous structures from day 7 to day 28 of the experiment and exhibited completely developed 3D structured masses from day 14. In contrast, Biofilms grown in the absence of sodium citrate were characterized as homogenously spread microcolonies and aggregates that gradually colonized the surface from day 7 to day 28 of the experiment. Quantitative analysis of the microscopy data (Fig. 2A) validated the qualitative observations. Under sodium citrate conditions, the total biovolume was 50 times (p < 0.01) and 100 times (p < 0.01) higher on day 7 and 28 than that on the corresponding days under control conditions, which is 1.6 × 104, and 5.7 × 104 µm3, respectively. Under sodium citrate conditions, surface coverage remained in the range of 12.7 to 14.2 µm2 from day 7 to day 21 before doubling to 29.9 µm2 on day 28. Under control conditions, surface coverage doubled from day 7 to day 14 and gradually increased thereafter. Compared with surface coverage under control conditions, that under sodium citrate conditions was three times and two times higher on day 7 (p < 0.01) and day 28 (p < 0.001), respectively. Biofilm thickness quadrupled from 22 µm on day 7 to 80.3 µm on day 28 under sodium citrate conditions, whereas doubled from 7.1 µm on day 7 to 13.8 µm on day 28 under control conditions. Compared with biofilm thickness under control conditions, that in sodium citrate conditions was significantly higher between days 14 and 28 (p < 0.001). Biofilms grown under sodium citrate conditions exhibited higher average roughness value of 0.7 (p < 0.001) during day 7 to day 28. In contrast, biofilms grown under control conditions exhibited very low roughness values ranging from 0.3 on day 7 to 0.5 on day 28. The raw values of quantitative analysis of each biofilm repeat were plotted as box plots (Supplementary figure 1).
Microbial community profile of freshwater biofilm models grown in the presence vs absence of sodium citrate
The top 10 taxa in different taxonomic ranks were selected to generate distribution histograms of relative abundance. The distribution at the phylum (Fig. 3A) and genus (Fig. 3B) levels are presented in Fig. 3 for biofilms grown in the presence and absence of sodium citrate (NaCi and Control, respectively). The three most abundant prokaryotic phyla (Fig. 3A) were Proteobacteria (70.0%), Bacteroidetes (14.4%), and Firmicutes (5.0%) in biofilms grown under sodium citrate conditions, where Actinobacteria (40.0%), Proteobacteria (35.0%), and Cyanobacteria (7.1%) in those grown under control conditions. The three most abundant genera (Fig. 3B) were Zoogloea (15.4%), Candidatus_Alysiosphaera (12.2%), and Amaricoccus (8.5%) in biofilms grown under sodium citrate conditions, where Mycobacterium (38.7%), Phormidium (3.1%), and Aquabacterium (2.7%) in those grown under control conditions. Changes in the microbial community composition were also observed over the course of the experiment. In biofilms grown under sodium citrate conditions, the relative abundance of the most dominant phylum Proteobacteria decreased from 76.9% on day 7 to 61% on day 14 and then gradually increased to 66.4% on day 21 and 75.0% on day 28 (Fig. 3A). Under control conditions, the relative abundance of the most dominant phylum Actinobacteria increased from 26.6% on day 14 to 56.4% on day 21 (Fig. 3A). Further, under sodium citrate conditions, the relative abundance of the most dominant genus Zoogloea decreased from 35.6% on day 7 to 9% on day 14 and remained stable thereafter until day 28 (Fig. 3B). Under control conditions, the relative abundance of the most dominant genus Mycobacterium decreased from 56.0% on day 21 to 25.6% on day 14 (Fig. 3B). The microbial composition of individual biofilms at phylum level and genus level were presented in Supplementary figure 2 and 3, respectively.
Biofilm community structure analysis of biofilms grown in the presence vs absence of sodium citrate
The microbial community structures were further analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing data to compare the growth between sodium citrate-supplemented and sodium citrate-free conditions. Venn diagram (Fig. 4A) revealed that freshwater biofilms grown under sodium citrate conditions had a more diverse community with 1989 observed species compared with 796 species observed in biofilms grown under control conditions. Alpha-diversity analysis suggested that biofilm grown under sodium citrate conditions presented a significant higher species diversity than that found in control conditions. (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p < 0.05) (Fig. 4B).
Additionally, a principal coordinate analysis was performed to evaluate the separation patterns of the biofilm community structures between the control and NaCi conditions (Fig. 4C). Based on phylogenetically weighted UniFrac distance, all samples of biofilms grown under sodium citrate conditions were clearly clustered into one group along the first principal coordinate and separated from those of biofilms grown under control conditions. The separation pattern was consistent with the α-diversity results, which showed a clear separation of community structures in the tested groups between the sodium citrate-supplemented and sodium citrate-free conditions.
Microbial interaction network analysis of co-occurrence and co-exclusion patterns
The correlation analysis of microbial communities was performed at the phylum level, as shown in Fig. 5. In this figure, the node size is proportional to the relative abundance of each phylum. The edge font is proportional to the number of supported methods that presented significant correlation (p < 0.05). Black and red edges represent positive and negative correlations, respectively. Top 100 and bottom 100 scoring edges were selected. This revealed 22 phyla in each group, exhibiting co-inclusion or co-exclusion with other phyla; of these, 19 phyla were common and three were distinct between sodium citrate conditions (A) and control conditions (B). Compared with biofilms in sodium citrate conditions (average degree = 12), those in control conditions showed a more complex network interconnection with an average of 13.8 (average degree) connections per node. In addition, the network of control conditions showed higher composition of positive correlations (38.2%) compared with the network of sodium citrate conditions (17.4%).
In the interaction network of biofilms grown under sodium citrate conditions, Proteobacteria represented the largest node (indicating that it was the most dominant phylum) with the highest number of co-exclusion interactions (negative degree = 15). In contrast, in the interaction network of biofilms grown under control conditions, Actinobacteria represented the largest node with the highest number of co-exclusion interactions (negative degree = 18), and Proteobacteria represented the second largest node with 11 co-exclusion interactions. Furthermore, the highest number of co-inclusion interactions was shown by the TM6 (Dependentiae) phylum (positive degree = 6) in the interaction network of biofilms grown under sodium citrate conditions and by the Chloroflexi phylum (positive degree = 10) in that of biofilms grown under control conditions.
Sodium citrate and sodium acetate are the most commonly used carbon sources for supplementing natural or artificial low-nutrient media to accelerate the formation of monospecies or multispecies biofilm in laboratory-based biofilm experiments19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26. However, the potential biased effects caused by supplementation with such carbon sources on the structural attributes, microbial community composition, and microbial interaction networks of biofilms remain unexplored. To close this knowledge gap, we investigated the effects of a commonly used carbon source, sodium citrate, on the structure, microbial community composition, and microbial interactions of an early-stage multispecies biofilm model previously described in the context of simulated irrigation water distribution systems29. The results of our analyses revealed that the addition of sodium citrate creates a biased biofilm model in terms of an inconsistent microbial composition that may affect the outcome of the resulting biofilm.
With respect to biofilm biomass accumulation, as expected the supplementation of a nutrient-poor artificial medium with sodium citrate successfully increased the rate of biofilm formation, as indicated by the enhanced 3D biofilm structure. Notably, the total biovolume, mean thickness, and roughness parameters increased significantly in biofilms grown in sodium citrate-supplemented medium. This finding is in accordance with findings in previous studies in which supplementary carbon source could increase microbial biomass40,41. Bester et al.40 revealed that compared to carbon-limited conditions, carbon-replete environments led to 40% increase in planktonic cell yields of Pseudomonas sp. biofilms. Another study showed that carbon sources such as glucose, sucrose and acetate presented a significant enhancement in microalgae growth41.
In particular, comparison of the microbial community profiles of biofilms between sodium citrate-supplemented and sodium citrate-free conditions revealed that the sodium citrate supplementation resulted in experimental bias in the resulting biofilm phenotypes. Sodium citrate supplementation increased the abundance of the Proteobacteria phylum (70.0%) such that it became the most dominant phylum under sodium citrate conditions. This is a phylum of gram-negative bacteria that includes a wide variety of pathogenic genera, such as Salmonella, Vibrio, Helicobacter, Yersinia, Legionellales, and Pseudomonas42. Such a shift in the microbial community structure may be attributable to the fact that some genera under Proteobacteria favor citrate as their sole carbon source such as Salmonella43. This shift also caused significant changes in the microbial network dynamics in terms of increased co-exclusion interactions of Proteobacteria with other phyla, suggesting the potential nutritional advantage to Proteobacteria. Previous studies have described biofilms primarily composed of Proteobacteria, could influence the overall structural attributes, due to their distinct extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and biofilm viscoelastic properties44. In this study, the thickness and roughness of biofilms grown under sodium citrate conditions varied toward the end of the experiment on day 21 and 28, which could be explained by the potential sloughing of the biofilms in the reactor. Sloughing have been demonstrated as one of the distinct models of biofilm dispersal, for biofilm suddenly sheds a portion of its structure especially at a later stage45,46,47. However, whether the sloughing was attributable to both the significant biofilm thickness and shear conditions within the reactor or to the intrinsic viscoelastic property of the biofilms allowing for effortless sloughing still remains unclear and should be investigated in the future.
In sharp contrast, biofilms grown under sodium citrate-free conditions showed less susceptibility to sloughing under experimental shear conditions, indicating that the high abundance of Actinobacteria may have increased the cohesiveness of the biofilm. Previous investigations on Actinobacteria biofilms have revealed that these biofilms are highly adherent and may promote the recruitment of other cells to its structure. In one recent study, Micrococcus luteus, a species of the Actinobacteria phylum, was found to enhance the adhesion of other bacteria to the biofilm48. Two other species of the Actinobacteria phylum, Corynebacterium renale and C. pilosum, are also associated with increased adherence to various bacteria49.
Future studies are clearly warranted to further elucidate the impact of microbial community structure on the viscoelastic property of multispecies biofilms. The observed differences in the microbial community profiles caused by sodium citrate supplementation in low-nutrient media may lead to experimental biases in studies focusing on the structural properties of biofilms or specific microbial communities. In the former case, supplementation with sodium citrate or another carbon source to accelerate the turnover of multispecies biofilm models for testing biofilm mitigation strategies could result in the design or engineering of antifouling features that may be inefficient in natural conditions. As an important feature in many types of biofilms including oral, environmental and medical biofilms50, the viscoelasticity property of biofilms serves a protective role from external stresses in the form of chemical or mechanical challenges51. More specifically, most biofilms in their natural habitats are exposed to external forces applied in a compressive, tensile or shear modes51. Given that biofilm EPS are characterized as a multi-component biological material52,53,54, biofilm developments is influenced in a time-dependent manner with series of shifts in elastic and viscous properties. Since biofilm viscoelasticity properties are closely related to biofilm structure and composition, the present study provides a caveat in which researchers should also consider the effects of nutrient supplementation when studying biofilm viscoelasticity and their related response to induced stresses; and by doing so, avoiding potential biased outcomes.
In a microbial ecological context, the beneficial faster turnover of the biofilm model resulting from carbon source supplementation may cause a serious misrepresentation of the microbial community intended for fundamental investigations. In this study, sodium citrate supplementation significantly decreased the relative abundance of Actinobacteria among other phyla. Such biases may hamper accurate fundamental studies on biofilms, especially multispecies biofilm models, in specific simulated environmental conditions.
Although it is understandable that the use of carbon source to accelerate the time-consuming biofilm formation in experimental models is essential, the results of this study suggest the importance of carefully considering the potential biases caused by carbon source supplementation, as they may significantly affect the experimental results. The potential biases in biofilms grown in supplemented media include shifts in the biofilm structure and microbial composition compared with those in biofilms grown in non-supplemented media.
Our study revealed that adding sodium citrate, a carbon source, to an early-stage multispecies biofilm model significantly affects the biofilm 3D structure, characteristics, bacterial community composition, and network interconnection, thus generating a biased biofilm model for the investigation. The findings provide caveats for investigators intending to accelerate biofilm growth by adding a carbon source in their low-nutrient media for generating multispecies biofilm models.
Raw sequencing reads have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession number PRJNA594465.
Guillonneau, R., Baraquet, C., Bazire, A. & Molmeret, M. Multispecies biofilm development of marine bacteria implies complex relationships through competition and synergy and modification of matrix components. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1960. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01960 (2018).
Gannesen, A. V. et al. Regulation of monospecies and mixed biofilms formation of skin Staphylococcus aureus and Cutibacterium acnes by human natriuretic peptides. Front. Microbiol. 9, 2912. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02912 (2018).
Burmolle, M. et al. Biofilms in chronic infections - a matter of opportunity: monospecies biofilms in multispecies infections. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 59, 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00714.x (2010).
Sanchez-Vizuete, P., Orgaz, B., Aymerich, S., Le Coq, D. & Briandet, R. Pathogens protection against the action of disinfectants in multispecies biofilms. Front. Microbiol. 6, 705. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00705 (2015).
Hancock, V., Witso, I. L. & Klemm, P. Biofilm formation as a function of adhesin, growth medium, substratum and strain type. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 301, 570–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2011.04.018 (2011).
Seneviratne, C. J., Yip, J. W., Chang, J. W., Zhang, C. F. & Samaranayake, L. P. Effect of culture media and nutrients on biofilm growth kinetics of laboratory and clinical strains of Enterococcus faecalis. Arch. Oral Biol. 58, 1327–1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.06.017 (2013).
Marsh, P. D., Williamson, M. I., Keevil, C. W., McDermid, A. S. & Ellwood, D. C. Influence of sodium and potassium ions on acid production by washed cells of Streptococcus mutans ingbritt and Streptococcus sanguis NCTC 7865 grown in a chemostat. Infect. Immun. 36, 476–483 (1982).
Marsh, P. D. et al. The influence of growth rate and nutrient limitation on the microbial composition and biochemical properties of a mixed culture of oral bacteria grown in a chemostat. J. Gen. Microbiol. 129, 755–770. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-129-3-755 (1983).
McKee, A. S. et al. Effect of hemin on the physiology and virulence of Bacteroides gingivalis W50. Infect. Immun. 52, 349–355 (1986).
Bradshaw, D. J., McKee, A. S. & Marsh, P. D. Prevention of population shifts in oral microbial communities in vitro by low fluoride concentrations. J. Dent. Res. 69, 436–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690020301 (1990).
Bradshaw, D. J., Marsh, P. D., Watson, G. K. & Cummins, D. The effects of triclosan and zinc citrate, alone and in combination, on a community of oral bacteria grown in vitro. J. Dent. Res. 72, 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720010301 (1993).
Brown, J. L. et al. Polymicrobial oral biofilm models: simplifying the complex. J. Med. Microbiol. 68, 1573–1584. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001063 (2019).
Marsh, P. D. Microbial ecology of dental plaque and its significance in health and disease. Adv. Dent. Res. 8, 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374940080022001 (1994).
Chenier, M. R. et al. Influence of nutrient inputs, hexadecane, and temporal variations on denitrification and community composition of river biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 575–584. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.72.1.575-584.2006 (2006).
Neu, L., Proctor, C. R., Walser, J.-C. & Hammes, F. Small-scale heterogeneity in drinking water biofilms. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2446–2446. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02446 (2019).
Woodward, G., Perkins, D. M. & Brown, L. E. Climate change and freshwater ecosystems: impacts across multiple levels of organization. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 365, 2093–2106. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0055 (2010).
Khatri, N. & Tyagi, S. Influences of natural and anthropogenic factors on surface and groundwater quality in rural and urban areas. Front. Life Sci. 8, 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/21553769.2014.933716 (2015).
Neu, T. R. & Lawrence, J. R. Development and structure of microbial biofilms in river water studied by confocal laser scanning microscopy. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 24, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.1997.tb00419.x%JFEMSMicrobiologyEcology (1997).
Kroukamp, O., Dumitrache, R. G. & Wolfaardt, G. M. Pronounced effect of the nature of the inoculum on biofilm development in flow systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 6025. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00070-10 (2010).
Wigneswaran, V. et al. Biofilm as a production platform for heterologous production of rhamnolipids by the non-pathogenic strain Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Microb. Cell Fact. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0581-9 (2016).
Habimana, O., Heffernan, R. & Casey, E. Nanofiltration-induced cell death: an integral perspective of early stage biofouling under permeate flux conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 541, 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.004 (2017).
Baek, Y., Yu, J., Kim, S.-H., Lee, S. & Yoon, J. Effect of surface properties of reverse osmosis membranes on biofouling occurrence under filtration conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 382, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.07.049 (2011).
Bucs, S. S., Linares, R. V., van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., Kruithof, J. C. & Vrouwenvelder, J. S. Impact of organic nutrient load on biomass accumulation, feed channel pressure drop increase and permeate flux decline in membrane systems. Water Res. 67, 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.09.005 (2014).
Jackson, L. M. D., Kroukamp, O. & Wolfaardt, G. M. Effect of carbon on whole-biofilm metabolic response to high doses of streptomycin. Front. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00953 (2015).
Araujo, P. A., Kruithof, J. C., Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. & Vrouwenvelder, J. S. The potential of standard and modified feed spacers for biofouling control. J. Membr. Sci. 403, 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.02.015 (2012).
Vrouwenvelder, J. S., Graf von der Schulenburg, D. A., Kruithof, J. C., Johns, M. L. & van Loosdrecht, M. C. Biofouling of spiral-wound nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: a feed spacer problem. Water Res. 43, 583–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.019 (2009).
Tournu, H. & Van Dijck, P. Candida biofilms and the host: models and new concepts for eradication. Int. J. Microbiol. 2012, 845352. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/845352 (2012).
Duckworth, P. F., Rowlands, R. S., Barbour, M. E. & Maddocks, S. E. A novel flow-system to establish experimental biofilms for modelling chronic wound infection and testing the efficacy of wound dressings. Microbiol. Res. 215, 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2018.07.009 (2018).
Ngan, W. Y. & Habimana, O. From farm-scale to lab-scale: the characterization of engineered irrigation water distribution system biofilm models using an artificial freshwater source. Sci. Total Environ. 698, 134025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134025 (2020).
Mueller, L. N., de Brouwer, J. F. C., Almeida, J. S., Stal, L. J. & Xavier, J. B. Analysis of a marine phototrophic biofilm by confocal laser scanning microscopy using the new image quantification software PHLIP. BMC Ecol. 6, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-6-1 (2006).
Magoc, T. & Salzberg, S. L. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27, 2957–2963. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507 (2011).
Bokulich, N. A. et al. Quality-filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from Illumina amplicon sequencing. Nat. Methods. 10, 57–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2276 (2013).
Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods. 7, 335–336. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303 (2010).
Edgar, R. C., Haas, B. J., Clemente, J. C., Quince, C. & Knight, R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27, 2194–2200. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 (2011).
Edgar, R. C. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 10, 996–998. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2604 (2013).
DeSantis, T. Z. et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 5069–5072. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03006-05 (2006).
Wang, Q., Garrity, G. M., Tiedje, J. M. & Cole, J. R. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 73, 5261–5267. https://doi.org/10.1128/Aem.00062-07 (2007).
Caporaso, J. G. et al. PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment. Bioinformatics 26, 266–267. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp636 (2010).
Faust, K. & Raes, J. CoNet app: inference of biological association networks using Cytoscape. F1000Research 5, 1519. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9050.2 (2016).
Bester, E., Kroukamp, O., Hausner, M., Edwards, E. A. & Wolfaardt, G. M. Biofilm form and function: carbon availability affects biofilm architecture, metabolic activity and planktonic cell yield. J. Appl. Microbiol. 110, 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04894.x (2011).
Bhatnagar, A., Chinnasamy, S., Singh, M. & Das, K. C. Renewable biomass production by mixotrophic algae in the presence of various carbon sources and wastewaters. Appl. Energy 88, 3425–3431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.064 (2011).
Madigan, M. & Martinko, J. Brock Biology of Microorganisms 11th edn. (Pearson, Oxford, 2005).
Nataro, J. P., Bopp, C. A., Fields, P. I., Kaper, J. B. & Strockbine, N. A. Escherichia, Shigella, Salmonella. In Manual of Clinical Microbiology (eds Versalovic, J. et al.) 603–626 (ASM Press, Washington, DC, 2011).
Cuecas, A., Cruces, J., Galisteo-López, J. F., Peng, X. & Gonzalez, J. M. Cellular viscosity in prokaryotes and thermal stability of low molecular weight biomolecules. Biophys. J. 111, 875–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2016.07.024 (2016).
Lappin-Scott, H. M. & Bass, C. Biofilm formation: attachment, growth, and detachment of microbes from surfaces. Am. J. Infect. Control. 29, 250–251. https://doi.org/10.1067/mic.2001.115674 (2001).
Stoodley, P. et al. Growth and detachment of cell clusters from mature mixed-species biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 5608–5613. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.67.12.5608-5613.2001 (2001).
Wilson, S., Hamilton, M. A., Hamilton, G. C., Schumann, M. R. & Stoodley, P. Statistical quantification of detachment rates and size distributions of cell clumps from wild-type (PAO1) and cell signaling mutant (JP1) Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 5847–5852. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.70.10.5847-5852.2004 (2004).
Datta, A., Stapleton, F. & Willcox, M. D. P. Bacterial coaggregation and cohesion among isolates from contact lens cases. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 59, 2729–2735. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-23155 (2018).
Ito, H., Ono, E. & Yanagawa, R. Comparison of surface hydrophobicity of piliated and non-piliated clones of Corynebacterium renale and Corynebacterium pilosum. Vet. Microbiol. 14, 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1135(87)90008-3 (1987).
Shaw, T., Winston, M., Rupp, C. J., Klapper, I. & Stoodley, P. Commonality of elastic relaxation times in biofilms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 098102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.098102 (2004).
Peterson, B. W. et al. Viscoelasticity of biofilms and their recalcitrance to mechanical and chemical challenges. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 39, 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuu008 (2015).
Whitchurch, C. B., Tolker-Nielsen, T., Ragas, P. C. & Mattick, J. S. Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation. Science 295, 1487. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.295.5559.1487 (2002).
Flemming, H. C. & Wingender, J. The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 623–633. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2415 (2010).
Koo, H., Falsetta, M. L. & Klein, M. I. The exopolysaccharide matrix: a virulence determinant of cariogenic biofilm. J. Dent. Res. 92, 1065–1073. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513504218 (2013).
The authors acknowledge with gratitude the generous support received from the University Grants Committee for this project (RGC Ref No. 27200917).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Yao, Y., Pu, Y., Ngan, W.Y. et al. Effects of sodium citrate on the structure and microbial community composition of an early-stage multispecies biofilm model. Sci Rep 10, 16585 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73731-8