Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Targeting poor proteasomal function with radioiodine eliminates CT26 colon cancer stem cells resistant to bortezomib therapy

Subjects

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that tumor response to conventional bortezomib (BTZ) treatment is enhanced by targeted radiotherapy of resistant cancer stem cells (CSCs) that have characteristically poor proteasome function. This was accomplished by augmenting 131I uptake through expression of a sodium-iodide symporter (NIS) fusion protein that accumulates in cells with low proteasome activity. The NIS gene fused with the C-terminal of ornithine decarboxylase degron (NIS-cODC) was cloned. Stably expressing CT26/NIS-cODC cells and tumorsphere-derived CSCs were evaluated for NIS expression and radioiodine uptake. CT26/NIS-cODC cells implanted into mice underwent PET imaging, and tumor-bearing mice were treated with BTZ alone or with BTZ plus 131I. CT26/NIS-cODC cells accumulated NIS protein, which led to high radioiodine uptake when proteasome activity was inhibited or after enrichment for stemness. The cell population that survived BTZ treatment was enriched with CSCs that were susceptible to 131I treatment, which suppressed stemness features. Positron emission tomography and uptake measurements confirmed high 124I and 131I uptake of CT26/NIS-cODC CSCs implanted in living mice. In CT26/NIS-cODC tumor-bearing mice, whereas BTZ treatment modestly retarded tumor growth and increased stemness markers, combining 131I therapy suppressed stemness features and achieved greater antitumor effects. The NIS-cODC system offer radioiodine-targeted elimination of CSCs that are tolerant to proteasome inhibition therapy.

Introduction

A major challenge in cytotoxic cancer therapies is that not all tumor cells demonstrate equivalent sensitivity. Therefore, after cytotoxic drugs succeed in eliminating the bulk of the tumor, the limit of their effectiveness is met, and the surviving population propagates to drive cancer relapse1. Crucial contributors to this phenomenon are cancer cells with stemness properties that have preferential resistance to chemotherapeutics2,3.

Tumor relapse occurs through pre-existing resistant clones4,5,6, although oncogenic mutations induced by the cytotoxic agents might also contribute7. The recognition of a special tumor cell population that shares characteristics with normal stem cells is changing our perspective of cancer therapy8. These cancer stem cells (CSCs) are resistant to a variety of chemotherapeutics and have the capacity to self-renew and differentiate into all tumor cell types during relapse2. Therefore, improvement in cancer therapy crucially requires novel techniques that specifically target treatment-tolerant CSCs.

An emerging strategy in anticancer drug development is targeting essential tumor-supportive cellular machinery9, which includes regulations of division rate, transporter expression, and proteasomal activity. Differentiated tumor cells have high proteasome activity10,11 to help eliminate onco-suppressive proteins12, which is exploited by pharmacological proteasome inhibition for treatment13,14. Indeed, the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (BTZ) has shown encouraging results in treating multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma15,16. However, the clinical efficacy of proteasome inhibitors to treat solid tumors has been disappointing thus far17.

A previous study showed that proteasome inhibitors can destroy the bulk of a tumor, but they cannot eliminate drug-resistant CSCs that exhibit self-renewal18. In contrast to the bulk of tumor cells, CSCs, which have the capacity to propagate tumors and resist treatment, have poor proteasome function19,20,21,22,23,24,25. Downregulated proteasome activity could be a prerequisite for stabilizing the proteins required to maintain stem cell traits in these cells. In other words, BTZ can eliminate the bulk of tumor cells, which depend on high proteasome activity, but the surviving portion is likely to be composed of CSCs with poor proteasome function. New strategies to eliminate treatment-resistant cells are therefore needed to improve the efficacy of proteasome inhibitors, and a unique opportunity may be provided by eroding the advantages of perturbed proteasome function.

Our group recently demonstrated that the sodium iodine symporter (NIS) fused to the C-terminus of the ornithine decarboxylase (cODC) degron (NIS-cODC) instigates high levels of radioiodine uptake into cancer cells under proteasome suppression26. In this study, we hypothesized that the NIS-cODC system could be implemented to enable 131I-based therapeutic elimination of CSCs that contribute to resistance to BTZ treatment.

Results

CT26/NIS-cODC cells accumulate NIS and take up radioiodine under proteasome inhibition

The proteasome activity of CT26 cells that constitutively overexpress NIS-cODC (CT26/NIS-cODC cells) was completely suppressed in the presence of 100 nM BTZ (Fig. 1A). In these cells, NIS protein was undetectable at baseline but markedly increased to 63.9 ± 4.4-fold of controls under BTZ exposure (P < 0.005; Fig. 1B). This contrasted with CT26 cells, wherein NIS expression was undetectable regardless of BTZ exposure (Fig. 1B). Similarly, 125I uptake was low in CT26/NIS-cODC cells at baseline but was substantially increased to 332.0 ± 29.8% of controls in the presence of BTZ (P < 0.001; Fig. 1B).

Figure 1
figure1

CT26/NIS-cODC cells increase NIS accumulation and radioiodine uptake under proteasome suppression. (A) Fluorometric assays of proteasome activity in cells under 36 h exposure to 100 nM BTZ. (B) Western blots and quantified band intensities of NIS expression normalized to β-actin bands (left) and 125I uptake (right) in CT26 and CT26/NIS-cODC under BTZ exposure (36 h at 100 nM, left; 16 h at 200 nM, right). Blots are cropped with single blot parts separated by space. For full length blot pictures, see supplement Fig. 1. Bars are mean ± SD of duplicate samples expressed as fold of controls (left) or mean ± SD of triplicate samples expressed as % of controls (right). **P < 0.01, P < 0.005, P < 0.001 compared to control CT26 cells. BTZ: bortezomib; NIS: sodium-iodide symporter.

CT26/NIS-cODC cells enriched for stemnesss accumulate NIS and have high radioiodine uptake

CT26/NIS-cODC cells efficiently formed tumorspheres after 10 days of culture on an ultra-low attachment plate in CSC selection medium (Fig. 2A). Tumorspheres of CT26 cells that constitutively express ZsGreen-cODC (CT26/ZsGreen-cODC cells) were highly fluorescent in the absence of BTZ, indicating inherently low proteasome activity (Fig. 2A). Tumorsphere-derived CT26/NIS-cODC cells displayed a complete abrogation of proteasome activity (Fig. 2B) and a 4.6 ± 0.1-fold increase of CD133 expression compared with monolayer-grown cells (P < 0.001; Fig. 2A), indicating enrichment for CSCs. These cells demonstrated a 59.0 ± 3.3-fold increase of NIS expression (P < 0.001; Fig. 2A) and high 125I uptake that reached 406.4 ± 24.5% of that of monolayer-grown control cells (P < 0.001; Fig. 2B). Furthermore, unlike monolayer-grown cells, the CSCs did not demonstrate a further increase of 125I uptake by BTZ exposure.

Figure 2
figure2

CT26/NIS-cODC CSCs have intrinsically low proteasome activity with high NIS accumulation and radioiodine uptake. (A) CT26 /NIS-cODC cells efficiently form tumorspheres (TS; left top); and TS of CT26/ZsGreen cells display increased fluorescence (left bottom). Western blots for CD133 and NIS in CT26/NIS-cODC cells grown as monolayers (non-TS) or as TS. Blots are cropped with single blot parts separated by space. For full length blot pictures, see supplement Fig. 2. Bars are the mean ± SD of band intensities normalized to β-actin from triplicate samples expressed as fold of non-TS controls. (B) Fluorometric assays of proteasome activity in CT26/NIS-cODC cells at baseline (left); and radioiodine uptake in cells at baseline or under BTZ exposure (16 h at 200 nM; right). Bars are the mean ± SD of uptake from triplicate samples expressed as % controls. **P < 0.01, P < 0.001 compared to non-TS controls. CSC: cancer stem cell; BTZ: bortezomib; N.S.: not significant.

The lack of further increase of 125I uptake by BTZ treatment in tumorsphere-derived CT26/NIS-cODC cells is explained by their enrichment for CSCs, which have inherently low proteasome activity as confirmed in Fig. 2B. Low proteasome activity would suppress proteasomal degradation of cODC fused NIS protein, thereby negating any additional increase of NIS-cODC accumulation by the proteasome inhibitor BTZ. Hence, NIS-cODC accumulation and 125I uptake was high in CT26/NIS-cODC cells with little difference between baseline and after BTZ treatment.

CT26/NIS-cODC cell populations that survive BTZ treatment are enriched with CSCs

Survival of monolayer grown CT26/NIS-cODC cells was dose-dependently reduced by BTZ treatment, reaching 87.7 ± 0.7% and 67.9 ± 1.2% of the untreated level after 3 days of treatment with 25 nM and 50 nM BTZ, respectively. The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) for BTZ was 91.6 nM (Fig. 3A). Cells that survived 7 days of treatment with 50 nM (freshly replaced every 2 days) were considered BTZ-resistant. When the cells tolerant to BTZ treatment were evaluated for stemness properties, western blots showed that CD133 expression was increased to 182.6 ± 8.8% of the baseline level (P < 0.001; Fig. 3B). In FACS assays, these cells showed a 2.7 ± 0.2-fold increase in Aldefluor positivity (P < 0.001) reaching 19.9 ± 1.4% from 7.5 ± 1.6% at baseline (Fig. 3B). In Efluxx-ID Green assays, a slight left shift with a small increase of stain-negative cells was observed (1.2 ± 0.2% vs. 2.5 ± 0.3%, P = 0.004; Fig. 3C), indicating slightly greater MDR1-mediated dye efflux. Furthermore, limiting dilution assays revealed that the number of tumorspheres formed from seeding 1,000 cells increased markedly, from 7.0 ± 0.8 to 27.2 ± 2.9 (P < 0.001; Fig. 3D). The minimum number of cells required for tumorsphere formation decreased from 100 cells for the untreated group to 10 cells for the BTZ-resistant group (Fig. 3D).

Figure 3
figure3

BTZ treatment of CT26/NIS-cODC cells result in a surviving fraction enriched for stemness. (A) The log concentration response curve for CT26/NIS-cODC cells survival after 84 h treatment with graded doses of BTZ. The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) was determined from nonlinear regression curve fitting. Data are the mean ± SD of triplicate samples expressed as % control. (B) Western blots for CD133 (left) and FACS analysis of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity (right) in CT26/NIS-cODC cells that survived 7-day treatment with 50 nM BTZ. Blots are cropped with single blot parts separated by space. For full length blot pictures, see Supplement Fig. 3. Bars are mean ± SD obtained from triplicate samples of % band intensities normalized to β-actin bands (left) or proportion of ALDH-positive cells (right). (C) Efluxx-ID FACS analysis of p-glycoprotein-mediated dye efflux in CT26/NIS-cODC cells that survived BTZ treatment as above. (D) Limiting dilution assays for TS formation in CT26/NIS-cODC cells that survived BTZ treatment as above. Bars are the mean ± SD of the TS count of quadruplicate samples. **P < 0.01, P < 0.001 compared to controls.

131I treatment augments the therapeutic efficacy of BTZ and suppresses cancer stemnesss

We next investigated whether 131I therapy would enhance tumor treatment by eliminating BTZ-tolerant CSCs. We first showed that 131I alone did not influence CT26/NIS-cODC cell survival (Fig. 4A). This is because without tumorsphere formation or BTZ treatment, CT26/NIS-cODC cells have high proteasome activity that does not allow NIS-cODC accumulation. Since the culture medium was changed to fresh media at 9 h after I-131 was added, the level of radiation delivered to the cell interior would have been quite limited without cellular 131I uptake through NIS.

Figure 4
figure4

131I potentiates BTZ treatment efficacy and suppresses stemness properties in vitro. (A) Effects of 131I alone (48 h) on CT26/NIS-cODC cell viability. Bars are the mean ± SD of % survival from triplicate samples. (B) Survival of CT26/NIS-cODC cells after treatment with graded doses of BTZ with and without added 131I therapy. Data are the mean ± SD of the % survival from triplicate samples. P < 0.001 compared to treatment with the same dose of BTZ alone. (C) Western blots for CD133, ALDH3A1, and SOX2 expression in CT26/NIS-cODC cells after 11 days of repeated treatment every 3 days with 25 nM BTZ alone or BTZ plus 131I (single injection at day 6). Blots are cropped with single blot parts separated by space. For full length blot pictures, see supplement Fig. 4. Bars are the mean ± SD of % band intensities normalized to β-actin bands obtained from duplicate samples. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, P < 0.005, P < 0.001 compared to controls. ALDH3A1: Aldehyde dehydrogenase 3A1; SOX2: sex determining region Y-box 2.

In contrast, adding 131I to cells receiving BTZ treatment further suppressed survival in a dose-dependent manner. Thus, the surviving fraction that was decreased to 67.9 ± 1.3% of controls by 50 nM BTZ alone was further reduced to 47.3 ± 1.2% and 38.4 ± 0.7% of controls (both P < 0.001) by adding 50 and 100 μCi of 131I, respectively (Fig. 4B).

CD133 and ALDH3A1 expression increased slightly with BTZ treatment alone, to 131.2 ± 8.9% and 141.4 ± 2.5% of controls, respectively (Fig. 4C). However, when 131I was added to BTZ treatment, there were markedly reductions of CD133 protein to 26.7 ± 4.0%; ALDH3A1 protein to 36.3 ± 7.4%; and SOX2 protein to 20.2 ± 2.8% of controls (Fig. 4C).

CT26/NIS-cODC cells enriched for stemness have high radioiodine uptake in vivo

Prior to tumor model experiments, we confirmed that tumorsphere-derived CSCs have increased radioiodine uptake in living bodies. This was accomplished by implanting the cells into thighs of normal mice followed by intravenous 124I injection and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging. The resulting images displayed focal increased radioiodine uptake in regions containing tumorsphere-derived CT26/NIS-cODC CSCs but not in regions with monolayer-grown CT26/NIS-cODC cells (Fig. 5A). Immunohistochemistry confirmed abundance of cancer cells staining strongly positive for NIS protein in the former but not in the latter tissues (Fig. 5A). Region-of-interest analysis confirmed greater target-to-background count ratios for regions containing CSCs compared with those containing monolayer-grown cells (1.78 ± 0.17 vs. 1.09 ± 0.19; P < 0.01; Fig. 5B). Ex vivo measured radioactivity counts accredited to the implanted cells showed similar results (438.1 ± 118.7% vs. 100.0 ± 45.0%; P < 0.01), and linear regression analysis verified that the PET-based in vivo measurements reliably assessed the level of radioiodine uptake by the implanted cells (Fig. 5B).

Figure 5
figure5

Implanted CT26/NIS-cODC CSCs have increased radioiodine uptake in vivo. (A) Coronal and transaxial tomograms of 124I PET/CT images from a representative mouse injected with CT26/NIS-cODC cells obtained from monolayers (top; arrowhead) or TS (left; arrow). Immunohistochemistry of NIS expression in thigh tissues injected with cells from monolayers or TS are also shown (right). (B) Ex vivo-measured cell-origin relative 124I (top, left) and 131I counts (top, right). Bars are the mean ± SD of values from mice implanted with cells in either thighs (n = 4 each for 124I and 131I data). PET image—based target-to-background count ratios (bottom, left). Bars are the mean ± SD of values from four mice implanted with cells in either thighs. The linear correlation between the in vivo and ex vivo measurements is also shown (bottom, right). **P < 0.01 compared to monolayer grown cells. PET/CT: positron emission tomography/computed tomography; TS: tumorsphere.

Repeat experiments in a separate group of mice using 131I instead of 124I demonstrated that ex vivo 131I counts accredited to the implanted cells was significantly higher at 357.9 ± 134.8% for regions containing tumorsphere-derived CT26/NIS-cODC CSCs compared to regions containing monolayer-grown CT26/NIS-cODC cells (P < 0.01). This result is highly consistent with that obtained using 124I.

131I therapy potentiates the efficacy of BTZ treatment against CT26/NIS-cODC tumors

When mice were treated with BTZ alone, non-transformed CT26 tumors responded with a slight retardation of growth with a tumor volume of 2,953.4 ± 944.0 mm3 by day 18 compared to 3,661.2 ± 590.0 mm3 for controls (Fig. 6A). In these animals, adding a single intravenous dose of 131I at 7 days of BTZ treatment did not further reduce tumor size (2,613.9 ± 517.8 mm3; Fig. 6A).

Figure 6
figure6

131I potentiates BTZ treatment efficacy and suppresses stemness in tumor-bearing mice. (A) Growth of CT26 tumors in mice treated with BTZ alone (n = 4) or BTZ plus 131I (n = 4) compared to vehicle-injected animals (n = 3). (B) Growth of CT26/NIS-cODC tumors in mice treated with 131I alone (n = 8), BTZ alone (n = 7) or BTZ plus 131I (n = 8), compared to vehicle-injected animals (n = 7). The weights of mice after tumor removal are also shown. All data are the mean ± SD of tumor volume. P < 0.005, P < 0.001, compared to vehicle-treated controls. (C) Western blots for CD133 (left) and ALDH3A1 expression (right) in residual CT26/NIS-cODC tumors after treatment with vehicle (n = 7), BTZ (n = 7), or BTZ plus 131I (n = 8). Blots are cropped with single blot parts separated by space. For full length blot pictures, see supplement Fig. 5. Bars are the mean ± SD of % band intensities normalized to β-actin bands. **P < 0.01, P < 0.005, P < 0.001, compared to vehicle-treated controls. BTZ: bortezomib; ALDH3A1: Aldehyde dehydrogenase 3A1.

In mice bearing CT26/NIS-cODC tumors, treatment with 131I alone for 28 days did not reduce tumor size compared to that of control mice. Treatment with BTZ alone for 28 days decreased the tumor to 3,235.0 ± 678.2 mm3, compared with 6,234.7 ± 2,113.5 mm3 for the controls (P < 0.005; Fig. 6B). In these animals, a single intravenous dose of 131I in addition to BTZ further suppressed tumor volume to 1,212.8 ± 848.2 mm3 on day 28 (P < 0.001 compared to the BTZ alone; Fig. 6B). Body weight at the end of treatment did not differ between the CT26 tumor-bearing groups and was slightly lower in the BTZ plus 131I group for CT26/NIS-cODC tumor-bearing mice (Fig. 6A,B).

Cancer stemness in vivo is increased by BTZ alone but is suppressed by combining 131I therapy

Evaluation of cancer stemness properties in residual tumor tissue after treatment with BTZ alone revealed increased CD133 expression to 188.7 ± 26.7% (P < 0.001) and ALDH3A1 expression to 146.5 ± 24.7% of controls (P < 0.005; Fig. 6C). However, a single intravenous dose of 131I in addition to BTZ significantly decreased these stemness markers. Hence, CD133 expression was suppressed from 188.7 ± 26.7% to 48.4 ± 21.4% of controls (P < 0.001) and ALDH3A1 expression was suppressed from 146.5 ± 24.7% to 72.2 ± 10.6% of controls (P < 0.001; Fig. 6C).

Discussion

Treatment resistance remains a serious limitation to our ability to conquer colon cancer27,28. Colon tumors contain individual cancer cells that display variable tolerance to chemotherapeutic agents. Hence, initially minor clones that have greater tolerance to the drugs become dominant and promote tumor regrowth29. The functional heterogeneity of colon cancers is principally determined by a distinct population of cells with stemness properties30,31. Thus, any strategy to cure colon cancer will require a method for specific targeting and the elimination of drug-resistant CSCs.

CSCs differ from the bulk of differentiated cancer cells that have high proteasome activity by having inherently poor proteasome function. This is demonstrated in living cells by specialized protein sequences that are recognized by the proteasomal system for elimination. An example is the well-established cODC degron that undergoes rapid ubiquitin-independent proteasomal degradation. Therefore, cODC sequence-fused proteins are promptly destroyed in cells with normal proteasomal activity but are stable and accumulate in cells with poor proteasome function. In a pioneering work, Vlashi and coworkers constructed and stably expressed a ZsGreen-cODC fusion gene in glioma and breast cancer cells. Increased fluorescent signals allowed the in vitro identification and in vivo tracking of CSCs23. The construct also identified CSCs originating from the pancreas, prostate, brain, head and neck, cervix, and lung20,22,32,33,34. Furthermore, the construct showed that breast cancer cells with low proteasome activity produced larger tumors and had more metastatic spread in mice35.

In this study, we linked the cODC sequence to the NIS gene to produce a fusion protein that accumulates under poor proteasome function and promotes the intracellular transport of radioiodine for targeted CSC therapy. Blocking proteasome activity of CT26 colon cancer cells stably expressing the NIS-cODC construct resulted in substantial accumulation of NIS protein that was undetectable at baseline because they underwent proteasomal degradation. Our group previously showed that this property of the NIS-cODC system can be exploited for imaging of CT26 tumors under proteasomal inhibition with 124I PET26. In the present study, CT26 CSCs were found to have intrinsically low proteasome activity even at baseline. Several malignancies harbor a small subset of CSCs with low proteasomal activity23, and possible mechanistic links have been identified36. CT26/ZsGreen-cODC cells in tumorspheres showed high fluorescence and CT26/NIS-cODC CSCs from tumorspheres showed high NIS protein accumulation. The latter cells had high radioiodine uptake at baseline that was even greater than that of monolayer grown cells under proteasomal suppression. These results confirm that CT26/NIS-cODC CSCs have high radioiodine-avidity due to inherently poor proteasome function.

When CT26/NIS-cODC cells were treated with BTZ for a week, most of the cells were eradicated but there was a small population that remained viable. This is consistent with the notion that cancer cells with low proteasome activity have a propensity to survive treatment and subsequently drive tumor regrowth. For instance, ZsGreen-cODC expression from low proteasome activity has been associated with treatment resistance in malignant cells of the prostate33, cervix34, bone37, and head and neck30. Recently, colorectal cancer cells displaying low proteasome activity were associated with stem-like properties and radio-chemoresistance38. The link between poor proteasome activity and treatment resistance extends to responses to BTZ, which was previously demonstrated in head and neck39 and papillary thyroid CSCs40. Also, a new-generation proteasome inhibitor called NPI-0052 failed to eradicate the CSC population in glioblastoma xenografts41. Furthermore, lymphoma cells with stemness properties resisted BTZ treatment, whereas the drug suppressed clonogenic activity after the cells had differentiated42. Together, these findings indicate that CSCs contribute to BTZ resistance, presumably because they are less dependent on protein degradation for survival than differentiated cancer cells.

Cancer stemness require stabilization of proteins that regulate the pluripotency network19,43. Slow protein turnover by proteasomal downregulation prevents the degradation of proteins required for stemness. In this study, CT26 cells that survived BTZ treatment displayed increased expression of CD133, a surface marker highly expressed on CSCs from various origins including colon cancer44. BTZ-resistant CT26 cells also showed increased activity of ALDH, an intracellular detoxifying enzyme highly expressed in stem cells and CSCs45. P-glycoprotein activity was only slightly increased in these cells, consistent with the notion that BTZ is a poor substrate for p-glycoprotein and that this transporter does not play a large role in BTZ resistance. Importantly, these cells displayed substantially greater tumorsphere-forming capacity. Together, these findings reveal that cancer cells that survive BTZ treatment are enriched with CSCs that have intrinsically poor proteasome function and are insensitive to suppressed protein turnover. In addition to simply selecting for CSCs, proteasome inhibition might even contribute to the acquisition of this phenotype43. This points to the importance of novel strategies to eliminate resistant CSCs for the success of proteasome inhibitor therapy.

Perturbed proteasome function that contributes to proteasome inhibitor resistance also offers a unique and attractive opportunity to specifically eliminate treatment-resistant CSCs. As an example, CSCs that expressed the cODC degron fused to the thymidine kinase gene could be targeted by treatment with ganciclovir, which abrogated sphere formation in vitro and caused regression of xenotransplants in vivo24. NIS, a selective transmembrane carrier for iodide, not only allows imaging via γ-emitting radioiodine46 but also allows the elimination of target cells via β-emitting 131I47. NIS provides a versatile system for targeting cells in living bodies because it does not deter basic cell physiology or elicit an immune response in vivo. It is not a foreign protein but is normally expressed in only a few tissues. Furthermore, various radioiodine substrates for NIS-mediated uptake are already widely applied for clinical use and are readily available without any radiochemical synthesis46,47.

In our in vitro experiments, treating CT26/NIS-cODC cells with 131I plus BTZ suppressed cell survival to a significantly greater degree than BTZ alone. Furthermore, the stemness markers ALDH3A1 and CD133 were increased by treatment with BTZ alone but were substantially decreased when 131I therapy was added. The stemness marker SOX2 was also substantially reduced by 131I plus BTZ treatment. These results indicate that 131I therapy eliminates CSCs that survive BTZ treatment but accumulate NIS protein because of low proteasome activity.

Before performing 131I therapy in tumor-bearing mice, we first confirmed that CT26/NIS-cODC CSCs are radioiodine avid in living bodies by comparing 124I uptake after implantation in mice. Because CSCs become greatly outnumbered by differentiated cancer cells over time, imaging was performed on the day of implantation for this experiment. PET imaging confirmed high 124I uptake in CT26/NIS-cODC CSCs but not ordinary CT26/NIS-cODC cells. The accuracy of PET-based assessment of uptake was confirmed by correlation with ex vivo measured uptake. This confirmed that CT26/NIS-cODC CSCs have stabilized NIS accumulation that instigates high radioiodine uptake in living bodies.

Finally, we investigated the therapeutic capacity of the NIS-cODC system in tumor-bearing mice. Treatment with BTZ alone produced only modest growth retardation in both CT26 and CT26/NIS-cODC tumors. Addition of 131I therapy during BTZ treatment further suppressed the growth of CT26/NIS-cODC tumors but not CT26 tumors. Furthermore, tumor expression of stemness markers, which increased after treatment with BTZ alone, decreased significantly when 131I therapy was added.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that radioiodine targeted elimination of CSCs is an efficient strategy to overcome tumor resistance to BTZ therapy. This can be accomplished by stabilization and accumulation NIS-cODC fusion protein via poor proteasome activity, which is a biologic characteristic of CSCs.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and preparation of stably expressing cell lines

CT26 mouse colon cancer cells (ATCC, #CRL-2638, USA) were maintained in RPMI (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Serana, Germany) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco Laboratories, USA) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere. CT26 cells that constitutively expressed NIS-cODC or ZsGreen-cODC fusion protein were prepared as previously described26). Briefly, the cells were infected with pQCXIN retroviral particles containing the NIS-cODC or ZsGreen-cODC sequences, and single-cell clones with stable expression (CT26/NIS-cODC or CT26/ZsGreen-cODC cells) were selected with geneticin (Gibco Laboratories). Because the cODC sequence is a target for ubiquitin-independent degradation by the 26S proteasome, the accumulation of NIS-cODC instigates radioiodine uptake and identifies cells with poor proteasome function. Similarly, accumulation of ZsGreen-cODC identifies cells with poor proteasome activity by emitting green fluorescence. All cell lines were routinely tested for mycoplasma.

Proteasome activity assay

Cells in 6-well plates (1.2 × 106) were washed and collected by scraping with 0.5% NP-40 in distilled water. After incubation for 30 min at − 20 °C and centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, the proteasome activity in the supernatants was measured with a fluorometric assay kit (Bio Vision, CA). Briefly, cell extracts were mixed with 100 μl of assay buffer and 1 μl of Suc-LLVY-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (Suc-LLVY-AMC) substrate. Fluorescence was measured at 350 nm excitation and 440 nm emission wavelengths in a microplate reader at 37 °C for 30 min. Proteasome activity was measured as the rate increase in fluorescent signals caused by Suc-LLVY-AMC degradation26.

CSC enrichment through tumorsphere formation and limiting dilution assays

Cells were enriched for cancer stemness using tumorsphere formation. Briefly, cells were grown on an ultra-low attachment culture plate (Corning, NY) in CSC selection medium. The selection medium was prepared in a DMEM/F12 base that contained 0.4% bovine serum albumin, B27 supplement (Gibco Laboratories), 5 μg/ml bovine insulin, 4 μg/ml heparin, 20 ng/ml fibroblast growth factor 2, and 20 ng/ml epidermal growth factor. Tumorspheres were efficiently formed under this condition and were grown for 10 days, with fresh medium provided every 2 to 3 days.

Tumorsphere-forming capacity was evaluated by limiting dilution assays. After dilution, 1, 10, 100, and 1,000 cells were seeded and cultured under the sphere formation conditions listed above. After 10 days, the number of tumorspheres was counted under a microscope.

Cellular radioiodine uptake measurement

Monolayer cells were incubated for 1 h with 74 kBq of 125I (Perkin Elmer, MA) added to the culture medium in 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Cells were rapidly washed twice with cold PBS, lysed with 0.1N NaOH, and measured for cell-bound radioactivity on a γ-counter (Wallac). Uptake levels were normalized to the protein content of each sample26. For tumorsphere radioiodine uptake measurement, tumorspheres were collected and digested with trypsin-EDTA for 10 min at 37 °C. Single cells were washed and seeded on a Matrigel-coated 24-well culture plate with RPMI medium containing 20% FBS. Control cells did not undergo tumorsphere formation but were seeded under identical conditions. 48 h after the cell seeding, the radioiodine uptake experiment was carried out as described above.

In vitro therapy and sulforhodamine B (SRB) survival assay

Cells on a 96-well plate were treated with BTZ (Calbiochem, MA) by adding the drug to the culture medium. For radioiodine therapy, 50 μCi or 100 μCi of 131I was added to the medium in each well, and the medium was replaced with fresh medium after 9 h of incubation at 37 °C.

The surviving cell content was measured using SRB assays48. Briefly, treated and untreated cells were fixed with 10% (wt/vol) trichloroacetic acid at 4 °C and stained with SRB dye (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min. Excess dye was removed by repeated washing with 1% (v/v) acetic acid. Protein-bound dye was eventually dissolved in 10 mM Tris base solution and subjected to spectrophotometric measurement of absorbance at 510 nm on a microplate reader.

Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity assay

ALDH activity was measured with an Aldefluor assay kit (Stemcell Tech, BC, Canada) according to the manufacturer’s manual49. Cells were resuspended in Aldefluor assay buffer containing 1 μM Aldefluor dye. ALDH activity was blocked with 15 μM of the selective inhibitor DEAB. After incubation at 37 °C for 30 min, cells were washed with assay buffer, and 10,000 cells were analyzed on a FACS Calibur flow cytometer with CellQuest software (Becton-Dickinson, NJ).

P-glycoprotein activity assay

The activity of p-glycoprotein-mediated drug efflux was assessed by Efluxx-ID Green assays (ENZO Life Sciences, Lȍrrach, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol50. Briefly, cells harvested by trypsinization were pre-incubated for 5 min at room temperature in PBS containing 2% FBS. The buffer contained 20 μM verapamil, an MDR1 inhibitor, in DMSO or DMSO (vehicle). After Efluxx-ID Green dye was added, the cells were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Then, 10,000 cells per sample underwent FACS analysis on a Calibur flow-cytometer using CellQuest software (Becton-Dickinson, NJ). Efluxx-ID Green was excited at 490 nm, and fluorescent emissions were detected at 514 nm.

PET imaging and radioiodine uptake measurements of implanted cancer cells

Before performing murine tumor model experiments, we evaluated whether stem-like cancer cells absorbed increased radioiodine in living bodies. For this experiment, CT26/NIS-cODC cells were prepared by trypsinization of tumorspheres followed by the stabilization of cells in culture medium at 37 °C for 30 min before implantation. Normal BALB/c male 5 weeks aged mice (Orient bio, Korea) who had not received BTZ treatment (n = 4) were injected with cells with and without CSC enrichment on the right and left thigh, respectively. After 30 min, the animals were injected with 13.0 MBq of 124I, and PET/CT images were acquired 1 h later. Quantitative analysis of the radioiodine uptake on PET images was performed using the tumor-to-background (shoulder region) ratio as an index of uptake.

Immediately after PET imaging, the animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, and thigh tissue injected with tumor cells and shoulder tissue were extracted, weighed, and measured for 124I activity. For ex vivo quantification, 124I counts attributable to cancer cells were calculated using the following formula. Counts from cancer cells = total thigh tissue counts—background tissue counts. The latter was estimated from shoulder tissue counts corrected for weight (the thigh-to-shoulder muscle weight ratio). The resulting count from cancer cells per weight of target tissue was finally divided by the count per weight of shoulder tissue to obtain the relative radioactive count ratio as an index of cancer cell uptake.

This experiment was repeated in a separate group of 5 week-old normal male BALB/c mice (n = 4) under the same conditions but using 131I instead of 124I. Cells were prepared and injected into thigh muscles of the mice and 131I of 5.5 MBq was intravenously injected 30 min later. Tissues were then extracted, weighed, and 131I attributable to cancer cells were calculated as above.

Mouse xenograft model and treatment

Tumor models were prepared in BALB/c male 5 weeks aged mice (Orient bio, Korea) by subcutaneous injection of 3.2 × 106 non-transformed CT26 cells or CT26/NIS-cODC cells into the right shoulder region. After 4 days, animals with early tumors of similar sizes were randomly divided into treatment groups: DMSO vehicle group (n = 3 for CT26; n = 7 for CT26/NIS-cODC), 131I alone group (n = 8 for CT26/NIS-cODC), BTZ alone group (n = 4 for CT26; n = 7 for CT26/NIS-cODC), and BTZ plus 131I treatment group (n = 4 for CT26; n = 8 for CT26/NIS-cODC). BTZ was intraperitoneally injected (2 mg/kg) three times per week for 28 days. 131I treatment was given as a single 800 μCi dose by intravenous injection 11 days after cancer cell injection. Mice were assessed for body weight and tumor size at the time of each BTZ treatment. After the end of treatment, the mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Tumor tissues were excised, and the weight of the mice after tumor removal was measured. All animal experiments were in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the appropriate institutional committee.

Immunoblotting

Immunoblotting was performed as previously described26. Cultured cells and tumor tissues were lysed with cold protein extraction solution (PRO-PREP; Intron, Korea) and T-PER tissue protein extraction solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific), respectively, that contained a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma Aldrich). After protein assays, 30 μg of samples were separated by electrophoresis on a 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel, followed by transfer to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5% nonfat milk in Tris-buffered saline and polysorbate-20 for 1 h at room temperature and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies against NIS (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, #sc-134515), β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-47778), CD133 (abcam, #ab16518), ALDH3A1 (abcam, #ab76976), or SOX2 (abcam, #ab92494). The membranes were then incubated for 1 h at room temperature with a secondary anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Cell Signaling, #7074) for NIS, CD133, ALDH3A1, and SOX2 or a secondary anti-mouse IgG antibody (Cell Signaling, #7076) for β-actin. Immune reactive proteins were detected by chemiluminescence, and band intensities were quantified on a GS-800 densitometer using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA).

Immunohistochemistry staining

Immunohistochemistry staining of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues was performed as previously described26. After micro-sectioning at 4 μm thickness, the sections underwent heat-induced antigen retrieval for 3 min in EDTA buffer (pH 9.0; Dako, Carpinteria, CA). Sectioned slides were then incubated overnight with anti-human NIS (1:100 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, #sc-134515) at 4 °C. This was followed by incubation with HRP-labeled polymer-conjugated secondary antibodies against rabbit IgG (Dako) for 30 min at room temperature. A color reaction was induced using a ready-to-use 3,3′-diaminobenzidine substrate-chromogen solution (Dako) for 5 min, followed by washing with distilled water. Finally, sections were lightly counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin for 30 s before dehydration and mounting.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± SD. The significance of differences between groups was analyzed by two-tailed unpaired student’s t-tests for two groups and ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc tests for three or more groups. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Ethical approval

All animal experiments were performed according to the National Institutes of Health Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Samsung Medical Center.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. 1.

    Hussain, S. et al. Cancer drug resistance: a fleet to conquer. J. Cell Biochem. 120, 14213–14225 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Dean, M. Cancer stem cells: implications for cancer causation and therapy resistance. Discov. Med. 5, 278–282 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Steinbichler, T. B. et al. Therapy resistance mediated by cancer stem cells. Semin. Cancer Biol. 53, 156–167 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lee, M. C. et al. Single-cell analyses of transcriptional heterogeneity during drug tolerance transition in cancer cells by RNA sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, E4726–E4735 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kurtova, A. V. et al. Blocking PGE2-induced tumor repopulation abrogates bladder cancer chemoresistance. Nature 517, 209–213 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kim, C. et al. Chemoresistance evolution in triple-negative breast cancer delineated by single-cell sequencing. Cell 173, 879–893 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hata, A. N. et al. Tumor cells can follow distinct evolutionary paths to become resistant to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition. Nat. Med. 22, 262–269 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Reya, T., Morrison, S. J., Clarke, M. F. & Weissman, I. L. Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature 414, 105–111 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Dobbelstein, M. & Moll, U. Targeting tumour-supportive cellular machineries in anticancer drug development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 13, 179–196 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chen, L. & Madura, K. Increased proteasome activity, ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, and eEF1A translation factor detected in breast cancer tissue. Cancer Res. 65, 5599–5606 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Loda, M. et al. Increased proteasome-dependent degradation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27 in aggressive colorectal carcinomas. Nat. Med. 3, 231–234 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Oren, M. & Kotler, E. p53 mutations promote proteasomal activity. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 833–835 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Nalepa, G., Rolfe, M. & Harper, J. W. Drug discovery in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 5, 596–613 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Adams, J. The proteasome: a suitable antineoplastic target. Nat Rev Cancer. 4, 349–360 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Robak, T. et al. Bortezomib-based therapy for newly diagnosed mantle-cell lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 944–953 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Richardson, P. G. et al. A phase 2 study of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 2609–2617 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Roeten, M. S. F., Cloos, J. & Jansen, G. Positioning of proteasome inhibitors in therapy of solid malignancies. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 81, 227–243 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kirshner, J. et al. A unique three-dimensional model for evaluating the impact of therapy on multiple myeloma. Blood 112, 2935–2945 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Voutsadakis, I. A. Proteasome expression and activity in cancer and cancer stem cells. Tumour Biol. 39, 1010428317692248 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lagadec, C. et al. Tumor cells with low proteasome subunit expression predict overall survival in head and neck cancer patients. BMC Cancer 14, 152 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lagadec, C. et al. Survival and self-renewing capacity of breast cancer initiating cells during fractionated radiation treatment. Breast Cancer Res. 12, R13 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Pan, J., Zhang, Q., Wang, Y. & You, M. 26S proteasome activity is down-regulated in lung cancer stem-like cells propagated in vitro. PLoS ONE 5, e13298 (2010).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Vlashi, E. et al. In vivo imaging, tracking, and targeting of cancer stem cells. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 101, 350–359 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Vlashi, E. et al. Targeted elimination of breast cancer cells with low proteasome activity is sufficient for tumor regression. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 141, 197–203 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lenos, K. J. & Vermeulen, L. Cancer stem cells don’t waste their time cleaning-low proteasome activity, a marker for cancer stem cell function. Ann. Transl. Med. 4, 519 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lee, J. H. et al. Reporter PET images Bortezomib treatment-mediated suppression of cancer cell proteasome activity. Sci. Rep. 8, 12290 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Paldino, E., Tesori, V., Casalbore, P., Gasbarrini, A. & Puglisi, M. A. Tumor initiating cells and chemoresistance: which is the best strategy to target colon cancer stem cells?. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 859871 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kozovska, Z., Gabrisova, V. & Kucerova, L. Colon cancer: cancer stem cells markers, drug resistance and treatment. Biomed. Pharmacother. 68, 911–916 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kreso, A. et al. Variable clonal repopulation dynamics influence chemotherapy response in colorectal cancer. Science 339, 543–548 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    O’Brien, C. A., Pollett, A., Gallinger, S. & Dick, J. E. A human colon cancer cell capable of initiating tumour growth in immunodeficient mice. Nature 445, 106–110 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Yeung, T. M., Gandhi, S. C., Wilding, J. L., Muschel, R. & Bodmer, W. F. Cancer stem cells from colorectal cancer-derived cell lines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 3722–3727 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Adikrisna, R. et al. Identification of pancreatic cancer stem cells and selective toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents. Gastroenterology 143, 234–245 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Donna, D. L., Lagadec, C. & Pajonk, F. Radioresistance of prostate cancer cells with low proteasome activity. Prostate 72, 868–874 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hayashi, K. et al. Visualization and characterization of cancer stem-like cells in cervical cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 45, 2468–2474 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Stacer, A. C. et al. Imaging reporters for proteasome activity identify tumor- and metastasis-initiating cells. Mol. Imaging 14, 414–428 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lagadec, C. et al. The RNA-binding protein Musashi-1 regulates proteasome subunit expression in breast cancer- and glioma-initiating cells. Stem Cells 32, 135–144 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Tamari, K. et al. Identification of chemoradiation-resistant osteosarcoma stem cells using an imaging system for proteasome activity. Int. J. Oncol. 45, 2349–2354 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Munakata, K. et al. Cancer stem-like properties in colorectal cancer cells with low proteasome activity. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 5277–5286 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Song, J., Chang, I., Chen, Z., Kang, M. & Wang, C. Y. Characterization of side populations in HNSCC: highly invasive, chemoresistant and abnormal Wnt signaling. PLoS ONE 5, e11456 (2010).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Giuffrida, R. et al. Resistance of papillary thyroid cancer stem cells to chemotherapy. Oncol. Lett. 12, 687–691 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Vlashi, E. et al. Differential effects of the proteasome inhibitor NPI-0052 against glioma cells. Transl. Oncol. 3, 50–55 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Brennan, S. K. et al. Mantle cell lymphoma activation enhances bortezomib sensitivity. Blood 116, 4185–4191 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Banno, A. et al. Downregulation of 26S proteasome catalytic activity promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Oncotarget 7, 21527–21541 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kim, Y. S., Kaidina, A. M., Chiang, J. H., Yarygin, K. N. & Lupatov, A. Y. Cancer stem cell molecular markers verified in vivo. Biochem. Moscow Suppl. Ser. B 11, 43–54 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Armstrong, L. et al. Phenotypic characterization of murine primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells isolated on basis of aldehyde dehydrogenase activity. Stem Cells 22, 1142–1151 (2004).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Park, J. W. et al. Imaging early fate of cancer stem cells in mouse hindlimbs with sodium iodide symporter gene and I-124 PET. Mol. Imaging Biol. 18, 748–757 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Jung, K. H., Paik, J. Y., Ko, B. H. & Lee, K. H. Mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling enhances sodium iodide symporter function and efficacy of radioiodide therapy in nonthyroidal cancer cells. J. Nucl. Med. 49, 1966–1972 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Vichai, V. & Kirtikara, K. Sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay for cytotoxicity screening. Nat. Protoc. 1, 1112–1116 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Park, J. W. et al. ATP-binding cassette transporters substantially reduce estimates of ALDH-positive cancer cells based on aldefluor and AldeRed588 assays. Sci. Rep. 9, 6462 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Lebedeva, I. V., Pande, P. & Patton, W. F. Sensitive and specific fluorescent probes for functional analysis of the three major types of mammalian ABC transporters. PLoS ONE 6, e22429. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022429 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2019R1A2C2007455).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.H.L. and J.H.L. designed the experiments and analyzed the data. J.H.L., J.W.P., and K.H.J. carried out the experiments. K.H.L., J.H.L., and K.H.J. interpreted the data. S.H.M and Y.S.C. performed the image analyses. K.H.L. and J.H.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors read, provided feedback on, and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyung-Han Lee.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, J.H., Jung, KH., Park, J.W. et al. Targeting poor proteasomal function with radioiodine eliminates CT26 colon cancer stem cells resistant to bortezomib therapy. Sci Rep 10, 14308 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71366-3

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links