Abstract
Wound healing is characterized by cell and extracellular matrix changes mediating cell migration, fibrosis, remodeling and regeneration. We previously demonstrated that chick fetal wound healing shows a regenerative phenotype regarding the cellular and molecular organization of the cornea. However, the chick corneal stromal structure is remarkably complex in the collagen fiber/lamellar organization, involving branching and anastomosing of collagen bundles. It is unknown whether the chick fetal wound healing is capable of recapitulating this developmentally regulated organization pattern. The purpose of this study was to examine the three-dimensional collagen architecture of wounded embryonic corneas, whilst identifying temporal and spatial changes in collagen organization during wound healing. Linear corneal wounds that traversed the epithelial layer, Bowman´s layer, and anterior stroma were generated in chick corneas on embryonic day 7. Irregular thin collagen fibers are present in the wounded cornea during the early phases of wound healing. As wound healing progresses, the collagen organization dramatically changes, acquiring an orthogonal arrangement. Fourier transform analysis affirmed this observation and revealed that adjacent collagen lamellae display an angular displacement progressing from the epithelium layer towards the endothelium. These data indicate that the collagen organization of the wounded embryonic cornea recapitulate the native macrostructure.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Open wounds or excessive scarring arise from genetic disorders or as a result of traumatic burns or injury. Such aberrations in tissue represent a devastating source of morbidity to patients and a tremendous financial burden to the healthcare system1,2,3. Over 10 million people worldwide suffer from corneal blindness as a result of ocular trauma and infection4,5, whereas the total annual cost for anti-scarring treatments is estimated at $12 billion6. While today’s treatments including revision surgeries, generally restore structural integrity, they still struggle to overcome the natural barriers of basic wound repair process and are unable to support scarless wound healing. The promise of regenerative medicine, founded on its potential and ability to regenerate and replace tissue defects, trauma and diseases, is limited by lack of knowledge on the mechanistic basis and control between regeneration and repair. The reasons for this knowledge gap are multi-faceted, yet originating by the lack of a reliable and reproducible regenerative model, particularly for tissues with low regenerative capacities like cornea.
Tissue regeneration is a dynamic process by which damaged tissue architecture and function is restored to its normal state via cellular proliferation, differentiation, and synthesis of extracellular matrix (ECM) that matches unaffected tissue. Repair refers to a fibroproliferative response that heals damaged tissue by excessive deposition and accumulation of interstitial matrix proteins, which leads to scar formation, pathological fibrosis and loss of tissue function7. Scarring is, thus, a result of a reparative wound healing mechanism, disparate from the regenerative mechanism. Besides adverse aesthetic considerations and disfigurement, extensive scarring often leads to significant loss of tissue functionality, reduced quality of life and enhanced susceptibility to infection. For example, during dysfunctional healing in the skin, uncontrolled synthesis and remodeling of ECM promotes sustained inflammation, decreases tissue elasticity and reduces the natural barrier function of skin8. In the liver, fibrosis results in accumulation of toxins as the organ’s ability to regenerate itself and function is impaired9. In the cornea, scarring and fibrosis diminishes corneal transparency and leads to vision impairment and blindness10.
The optimal outcome of wound healing process is a regenerative wound with new tissue that is indistinguishable from the surrounding tissue. However, it is often the delicate balance between regeneration and repair that defines the result and the functionality of the tissue. While the basic mechanisms underlying the highly orchestrated wound healing process are well understood, the factors and key regulatory steps underpinning the fine-tuning of this process towards regenerative or repair (or both) pathways remain unknown11,12,13. Our understanding of factors that direct wounds to regenerate and restore normal tissue homeostasis as opposed to progressing to a chronic inflammatory and fibrotic disorder is limited. Thus, one of the major challenges of regenerative medicine is to gain knowledge that will foster the control between regeneration and repair.
Fetal wounds have the intrinsic ability to heal with a regeneration of normal tissue structure without scarring14,15. This scarless wound healing phenotype occurs across species but is age dependent16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23. An important goal of wound healing research has been to identify the cellular and molecular mechanisms that control scarless wound healing. A number of potential factors have been attributed to the scar-free regeneration of fetal wounds, including a distinct and reduced inflammatory response24,25,26,27 and a coordinated synthesis and remodeling of ECM16. Ferguson and colleagues demonstrated that transforming growth factor beta 3 (TGFβ3) is a key regulator of the scarless phenotype29,30,31,32. Other studies posit that the differences between scar-free healing in fetal wounds and scar-forming healing in adult wounds is related to the ECM composition and to the cell–matrix interactions26,27,28.
Collagen is the main component of tissue ECM and it plays an important role in maintaining tissue function and structural integrity. Previous studies on wound healing have brought attention to quantitative aspects of the collagen and identified differences in the ratios of collagens and in the regulation of collagen synthesis between fetal and adult wounds33,34,35. Whilst collagen fibrillogenesis is arguably one of the most important underlying mechanisms which separate scarless fetal from fibrotic adult wound repair, the regeneration of collagen and its organization after injury may be of greater importance. The organization of collagen in scarless wounds and scars is radically different, with fibrotic connective tissues lacking an organized collagen matrix20,36. The strength of a scar has also been shown to correlate with the covalent cross-linking of collagen37,38,39.
In the field of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine in ophthalmology, the biggest obstacle is identifying the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms controlling regeneration versus repair. Although there are a number of clinical models that are used to evaluate the mechanisms of adult corneal wound healing, there are no models for regeneration, or recapitulation of corneal morphogenesis40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48. The chick cornea is anatomically and physiologically similar to the human cornea, characterized by a highly organized collagen network49. Although the embryonic chick cornea has been widely used to study the basis for the development of a highly organized matrix, essential for optical transparency and tissue biomechanical properties, little attention has been paid to its usage as a model for corneal regeneration50,51,52. Our previous studies, have shown that the embryonic chick cornea possess an intrinsic potential to regulate keratocyte differentiation, to restore proper innervation and rapid ECM reconstruction leading to non-fibrous restoration of the cornea53. Considering collagen remodeling and organization is fundamental in scarless wound healing, we asked if collagen architecture in regenerating embryonic chick corneas exhibit the normal collagen structure and morphology found in undamaged developing corneas.
In this study, we investigate the three-dimensional (3D) collagen architecture at various time points during scar-free wound healing in the embryonic chick cornea. We found that the collagen macrostructure in regenerated embryonic wounded corneas emulates the collagen architecture of the normal adult cornea49. Taken together, these findings combined with previous studies53, show that the cellular, molecular and matrix organization is efficiently recapitulated during wound healing in the embryonic chick cornea. Given the inherent difficulties in investigating fetal scarless wound healing, the embryonic chick cornea represents an excellent model to study regenerative repair. Elucidating the events and key factors that orchestrate scar-free regeneration will undoubtedly aid the development of future therapies that facilitate a healing response closer to the scarless phenotype.
Materials and methods
Chick embryos
Fertilized White Leghorn chick eggs were obtained from Texas A&M Poultry Center (College Station, TX, USA) and prepared according to previous protocol54. All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Rice University. All animal studies were conducted in accordance with the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology statement for the use of animals for ophthalmic and vision research.
Wounding of the embryonic corneas
Fertilized chick eggs were incubated at 38 °C in a humidified incubator and a series of in ovo manipulations were carried out at embryonic day (E) 5 in order to remove the extra embryonic membranes54. This facilitates exposure of the embryo and access to the right eye at E7. Corneas were wounded using a micro-dissecting knife (30° Angled Micro-Dissecting Knife; Fine Science Tools, Foster City, CA) as previously described53. Briefly, an incision that traversed the corneal epithelium, basement membrane and anterior stroma was made across the diameter of the cornea (Fig. 1A). Such linear wounds widen to approximately one third of the corneal surface as the developing eye increases in size53. Three drops of Ringer’s solution containing penicillin (50 U/mL) and streptomycin (50 µg/mL) were added to embryos following wounding, and the eggs were sealed and re-incubated to obtain corneas at desired stages of wound healing. The left unwounded corneas served as control for each of the wounded corneas.
Corneal tissue preparation
Embryos with wounded corneas were collected at 3, 5, 8, 9, 10 and 11 days post wounding (dpw). Following decapitation, eyes were collected in Ringer’s solution and fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.2. Corneas were dissected from the surrounding scleral tissue, mounted on glass coverslips with 50% glycerol in PBS (v/v) and imaged en face for whole-mount imaging. For cross-section imaging, corneas were embedded in 10% low melting point agarose (NuSieve GTG; Lonza, Rockland, ME, USA) as previously described52. A schematic representation of the wounded embryonic cornea, the tissue orientation, and imaging approaches is illustrated in Fig. 1. Tissue sections of approximately 300 µm thick were cut using a vibratome (Campden Instruments Ltd.) and imaged. The wounded corneas were grouped according to the different phases of the wound healing process; early (3–5 dpw), mid (8–9 dpw) and late (10–11 dpw) healing. At least three wounded and unwounded (control) corneas were analyzed in each group.
Second harmonic generation (SHG) microscopy
Second harmonic generation (SHG) microscopy was used to investigate the 3D organization of collagen fibrils in the wounded embryonic corneal stroma. Whole-mount and vibratome sections were imaged on a Zeiss LSM 510 (LSM 510; Carl Zeiss Inc, Thornwood, NY, USA) and a Chameleon femtosecond laser (Chameleon, Coherent Incorporated, Santa Clara, CA, USA) tuned to 820 nm. Forward and backward scattered signals were acquired using the transmitted light detector with a 430 SP filter and a band pass filter, 390/465, respectively. The samples were imaged from the epithelial surface towards the endothelial surface, using a 2 µm z-axis step size intervals to generate 3D stacks, at a resolution of 512 × 512 pixels per image and with a lateral resolution of 0.44 µm per pixel. All settings were kept constant throughout the experiments.
Fast Fourier transform (FFT) analysis and 3D reconstruction
Collagen orientation was assessed by Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) analysis, which displays the predominant direction of collagen55,56,57,58. For each image plane, the FFT was generated, assembled together into a new dataset, and manually segmented. 3D reconstructed models (Figs. 2B, 5E,E′, 6B) were generated using Amira 6.4 image analysis software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK; https://www.thermofisher.com/co/en/home/industrial/electron-microscopy/electron-microscopy-instruments-workflow-solutions/3d-visualization-analysis-software/amira-life-sciences-biomedical.html).
Results
Irregular corneal stromal collagen fiber organization during the early phase of wound healing
In our previous study, we demonstrated that embryonic wounded corneas display nonfibrotic regeneration by exhibiting minimal keratocyte activation, rapid matrix regeneration and complete innervation53. Since collagen synthesis and subsequent organization of collagen fibers highly influence the fate of the healing wounds58,59,60,61, we hypothesized that the wounded embryonic corneas recapitulate the normal stromal collagen architecture.
The chick corneal stroma is built upon a remarkable collagen orthogonal/rotation paradigm49,52. In particular, it is composed of orthogonally aligned collagen which displays a characteristic angular displacement (rotation) through the anterior-mid stroma49,52. Here, we used SHG microscopy to examine the 3D collagen architecture in wounded embryonic corneas as the intrinsic nature of SHG imaging allows specific visualization of collagen and thus, precise measurement of its orientation62,63. This is more clearly shown in Fig. 2, which demonstrates stromal collagen organization at E16 using SHG microscopy. The orthogonal organization of collagen with angular displacement in the lamellar orientations at 10 µm and 40 µm depth is shown in en face SHG imaging (Fig. 2A). Segmentation and 3D rendering of the 2D FFT stack of collagen demonstrates the predominant collagen orientation throughout the corneal stroma (Fig. 2B). Each spoke illustrates the predominant orientation of each lamellae within that plane, while the chiral pattern highlights the angular displacement of collagen within the corneal stroma. SHG signal within cornea cross-sections is only detected when the collagen lamellae are aligned along the imaging plane (Fig. 2C, arrowheads). Therefore, regions within cornea cross-sections with low SHG signal indicate collagen fiber orientation that is rotated out of the imaging plane (Fig. 2C, asterisks). Because the collagen lamellae in the chick corneal stroma are orthogonal and display an angular displacement, longitudinally sectioned collagen fibers within corneas show a predominant banded SHG signal (Fig. 2C, arrowheads), while orthogonally arranged lamealle show a weak SHG signal (Fig. 2C, asterisks).
Our previous investigations into the collagen fibril macrostructure during chick corneal development indicated that the complex collagen organization observed in adult corneas begins at E10, evident by the deposition of rotated collagen in the anterior stroma52. During development, the collagen lamellae display increased angular displacement at a greater level of stromal depth, resulting in two banded SHG signal patterns when viewed in cross-section. In our initial experiments, we wanted to determine how the corneal wounds altered the stroma by examining the 3D organization of collagen during early stages of wound healing (3–5 dpw; n = 4) by SHG microscopy. At 3 dpw, we observed a thin irregular collagen network in the central and mid-central stromal regions of the wound (Fig. 3A), which was strikingly different from the single banded SHG collagen signal of the stage-matched control (Fig. 3B, arrowhead). Surprisingly, we also observed that the irregular collagen network extended into the unwounded peripheral region of the cornea (Fig. 3A, asterisk). Cross-sectional SHG imaging did not display any banded SHG signal pattern, supporting the premise that at 3 dpw the collagen lamellae in the wound and surrounding regions show no angular displacement. Irregularly arranged collagen fibers were also observed in the stroma of the wounded cornea at 5 dpw, but they appeared bigger than those observed at 3 dpw (Fig. 3C, Supplementary Video 1). Unlike 3 dpw wounds, organization of collagen fibers in the periphery of 5 dpw wounds were similar to the two bands of SHG signal in stage-matched control, which denotes angular displacement of collagen49,52. In addition, contrary to control where the SHG bands appeared closer together in the anterior stroma, the second band appeared much deeper in the stroma of the wounded cornea (Fig. 3D, arrowheads). In the mid wound healing phase (8–9 dpw; n = 3), we observed disrupted collagen fiber organization in the region immediately adjacent to the corneal epithelium (Fig. 3E, asterisk). However, towards the periphery of the wound, the collagen fibers became integrated into the normal collagen bundles (Fig. 3E, arrowheads). Two SHG bands were detected in the stroma of both the wounded and stage-matched control corneas (Fig. 3E,F, arrowheads), indicating similar angular displacement of collagen. Nevertheless, the second SHG band in the wounded cornea was in the posterior stroma, opposed to the mid stroma localization in the control cornea. This finding indicates that while there are some stromal regions with disrupted collagen fibers, overall, the corneal stroma at 9 dpw is characterized by a rotational collagen lamellar organization. At the late wound healing phase (10–11 dpw; n = 3), no fragmentation or disorganization of collagen was observed. Instead, sections of 10 dpw, showed two SHG signal bands within the corneal stroma, similar to the stage-matched controls (Fig. 3G,H, arrowheads). This pattern is consistent with the complex structural organization of collagen, consisting of orthogonal lamellae with an angular displacement, in the anterior-mid stroma. Combined, our results indicate that the disrupted organization of collagen fibers in the wound re-organize during wound healing until the collagen macrostructure in the corneal stroma recapitulates the normal collagen architecture.
Transition from random to uniaxial and biaxial collagen organization during corneal wound healing
To further examine the collagen organization during embryonic corneal wound healing, we took through-focus SHG image stacks extending from the epithelial layer towards the endothelial layer. SHG signals taken en face enable the detection of the major orientation of the collagen based on imaging of the directionality of each layer in combination with the FFT analysis55,56,57,58.
Re-epithelialization of the embryonic corneal wounds begins after 5 dpw, and it is followed by re-establishment of normal staining patterns of stromal ECM proteins in the wound region53. To determine whether the organization of collagen fibers followed a similar pattern during wound healing, we analyzed their arrangement between 8 and 9 dpw (n = 3). By 8 dpw, the network of collagen fibers in the wounded area was drastically different from that observed during the early time points of wound healing. While a small degree of randomness and irregularity was observed in the central wound area, the network of collagen fibers was mostly unidirectional at different stromal depths (Fig. 4A–C, white arrowheads) (Supplementary Video 2). This pattern of organization suggests that the collagen fibers bridge the wound cleft. Occasionally, thin longitudinally oriented collagen fibers were observed in the central wound bed (Fig. 4A–C, red arrowheads). At the mid-central region of the wound, the SHG signal appeared stronger for the collagen oriented across the wound than along the wound (Fig. 4D–F, Supplementary Video 3). In the unwounded peripheral region, we observed collagen architecture with the characteristic orthogonal/rotated organization (Fig. 4G–I), reminiscent of the stage-matched control at E15 (Fig. 4A′–C′, Supplementary Video 4). At 9 dpw, the collagen fiber network in the wound changed from uniaxial into biaxial orientation. The anterior stromal region, adjacent to the overlying epithelium, at the central corneal wound, was characterized by an irregular collagen network as shown by the en face, SHG images and their corresponding FFT analysis (Fig. 5A,B,E Supplementary Video 5). Interestingly, below this region, the collagen fiber network was biaxially oriented and displayed an orthogonal lamellar orientation (Fig. 5C–E), corresponding to that of stage-matched control (Fig. 5A′–E′, Supplementary Video 6).
Orthogonal collagen architecture with an angular displacement in re-epithelialized embryonic corneal wounds
Previously, we showed that wounded embryonic corneas are fully re-epithelialized and showed no apparent fibrosis by 11 dpw53. To determine whether the collagen organization returned to normal following re-epithelialization of wounded embryonic corneas, we performed SHG analysis on 10 and 11 dpw corneas (n = 3) that were fully re-epithelialized. At 10 dpw, the collagen orientation is orthogonal through the entire stroma and displays an angular displacement between adjacent lamellae, suggesting normal remodeling of collagen fiber organization associated with stromal regeneration (Fig. 6). In agreement with this finding, an orthogonal/rotated collagen fibril structural paradigm throughout the corneal stroma was also observed at 11 dpw, reminiscent of the stage-matched control at E18, indicating that during the remodeling phase of wound healing, the collagen fibers were organized in a manner to mimic normal collagen tissue architecture (Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary Videos 7 and 8).
In our recent developmental studies of the embryonic chick cornea, a detailed analysis of collagen angular displacement from E8 to E19 showed that the angular displacement between adjacent collagen lamellae begins to first appear on E10 and gradually increases with development, showing about 193.4° by E1952. To better define the angular displacement of collagen and to obtain an additional quantitative measure of the level of collagen organization throughout the corneal stroma, we calculated the angular displacement in fiber directionality between adjacent lamellae at the different phase of the wound healing process. Table 1 presents the lamellar orthogonality, the degree of collagen angular displacement during the mid and late corneal wound healing phases, as well as the percentage of the rotated stroma over total stromal thickness during corneal development. No angular displacement of collagen fibers was evident at 8 dpw. The first collagen angular displacement between adjacent lamellae in the anterior stroma was observed at 9 dpw and averaged 39.41 ± 26.62°. From 9 to 11 dpw, a gradual increase in the amount of collagen angular displacement was noted; so that by 11 dpw the collagen fibers showed an angular displacement of 103.16 ± 19.21°. While the collagen angular displacement is slightly less than that measured for normal embryonic corneas in our previous studies, a similar collagen angular displacement between control and wounded eyes was observed. The reduced rotation in the current study might be due to environmental changes as a result of the embryonic manipulations required for exposing the E7 embryos in ovo. Nevertheless, the percentage of rotated stroma over the total stromal thickness increases as the cornea heals and is similar between wounded and control (71.80 ± 2.98% depth). Taken together, our results show that the organization of collagen fibers in the center of the healed wounds and throughout the corneal stroma recapitulate the normal collagen macrostructure of stage-matched unwounded corneas.
Discussion
Compromised wound healing, including chronic wounds, represent a substantial burden on patients and the health system1,2,3. The balance between regeneration and tissue repair is detrimental for the restoration of tissue architecture and function after injury. Although tissue repair may restore the damaged tissue and prevent infection, it may also result in scar formation and other structural abnormalities that impair organ function. In the cornea, damage or infection often leads to fibrotic scarring, loss of transparency, and ultimately blindness4,5. Despite the increased knowledge of the biology of wound healing cascade in adult corneas39,40,41,45,46,64,65,66,67,68,69,70 and other tissues18,24,36, the underlying mechanisms and factors modulating the healing response in a manner favorable to regeneration have yet to be fully elucidated. The lack of sufficient regenerative models in tissues and organs with limited or no regeneration capacity, like cornea, is one of the biggest obstacles in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering.
The remarkable regenerative capacity of embryonic tissues has led to the identification of key players involved in scar-free healing16,17,18,19,25,30,31,32,33. The extent to which collagen synthesis, deposition, and organization takes place during wound healing highly influences the outcome and the severity of scar tissue formation20,23,34,35,36,37,38,39. Our previous studies showed that the embryonic chick cornea exhibits a nonfibrotic regeneration phenotype53. Thus, we sought to determine if the structural organization of collagen in regenerating embryonic chick corneas matches the native collagen tissue architecture. To address this, we evaluated the organization of collagen fibers in the wounded embryonic corneas at different time points following injury.
To our knowledge, we report for the first time, that the collagen macrostructure of the healed embryonic chick corneal wounds recapitulates the collagen architecture of late-stage embryonic corneas. Most importantly, these data establish the embryonic chick cornea as a valuable regeneration model and as a potential means for uncovering key factors that impact tissue regeneration over tissue repair and scar formation.
During the early phase of the wound healing response, thin collagen fibers that lack any organization were observed at the central and mid-central wound regions. This irregular network of thin collagen fibers is likely associated with the first phase of wound healing, where fibroblasts proliferate and migrate into the wound area and secrete de novo ECM, including collagen59. According to previous studies, the deposition of a loosely, irregular collagen network can be associated to the random organization of myofibroblasts that migrate on top of the wound bed70. Additionally, in evaluating the collagen content during wound healing, previous studies showed a high ratio of collagen III to total collagen in the interfibrillar space within the matrix, at the early stage of wound healing33,34,35. Based on this observation, it is possible that deposition of collagen III may lead to a loose thin disorganized collagen network similar to the arrangement noted during the early stages of wound healing in this study. Taking into account that collagen fibers are the primary load-bearing components of connective tissues, the presence of a thick irregular collagen network may also be associated with the mechanical properties of the wounded tissue, particularly, the low values of tensile strength during the early days, consistent with previous studies58,59.
Our results also indicate that as the synthesis and deposition of collagen increased, the orientation pattern of collagen fibers in the wounded corneal stroma drastically changed. Initially, the thin, irregular fibers were organized into a uniaxial collagen network bridging the wound cleft, likely correlating with wound contraction as measured by the reduction in wound gap at this time point during wound healing53. The preferential uniaxial orientation of collagen fibers across the short axis of the wound suggest that the collagen organization during healing may influence and play an important role in wound contraction. Thus, the collagen fibers may act as a bridge between the wound edges and provide resistance to tensile force. This notion is supported by previous studies which demonstrated that the arrangement of actin microfilament bundles by myofibroblasts oriented across the short axis of the wound provide the force necessary to contract the wound69,71,72. Taken together, these findings suggest that cell–matrix interactions, cell contractility, and possibly other internal and external forces in the wound region, may contribute to healing by inducing wound contraction.
In later stages of the cornea remodeling and regeneration, the macrostructure of collagen in the wound is characterized as a biaxial network, with collagen lamellae orthogonally oriented in the wound area. It should be noted that at this point, collagen lamellae are more compact and also begin to display angular displacement at the posterior region of the wound. This orthogonal collagen architecture is thought to guide and orient the newly deposited collagen. Since the mechanical strength of the wound develops with increasing time post wounding59,60, it is possible that remodeling and organization of collagen, along with levels of crosslinking and other molecules in the ECM at the wound, may additionally define the biomechanical properties of regenerating corneas. In support of this concept, the development of collagen angular displacement at the wound plays a critical role in controlling mechanical stiffness, as illustrated by our previous studies of the macrostructure of collagen in the chick corneal stroma49,52.
By 10 dpw, the organization of collagen lamellae detected throughout the regenerative region resembles that of normal unwounded corneal stroma. Collagen plays a fundamental role in defining the structure, function and biomechanical properties of the cornea49. The orthogonally organized collagen with the characteristic angular displacement of the lamellae at the anterior-mid stroma are likely involved in restoring the strength, integrity, and function of the repaired tissue73,74,75. Stromal cells have been frequently noted to influence collagen orientation76,77,78,79,80,81 and they are likely to also influence collagen remodeling during wound healing. It should be further noted that other ECM proteins including fibronectin, tenascin, and perlecan, are equally remodeled during the restoration of normal tissue architecture53. In support of this statement, Kivanany et al. recently reported the importance of cell-ECM mechanical interactions in aligned collagen deposition and organization during corneal wound healing70.
Despite our inability to distinguish between the native collagen from new collagen secreted post wounding, we uncovered important new insights into the 3D spatial and temporal organization of collagen during wound healing. Our results showed that the collagenous fibrillar matrix appeared to be initially organized at the mid-central wound region, then subsequently to the central wound. As the healing process takes place, collagen remodels into a normal orthogonal/rotated pattern extended from the posterior to the anterior central wound area. This further advocates that the ECM patterning and organization during the important phases of remodeling and regeneration of the healing cascade may contribute to scar-free, nonfibrotic regeneration of wounded embryonic corneas. This patterning of collagen matrix remodeling suggests an interdigitation of collagen fibers in the wound region and the surrounding tissue, which may crucially affect the wound strength and subsequent nonfibrotic wound healing. This is in agreement with previous studies which demonstrated the effects of chemoattractant gradients on fibroblasts and collagen reorientation during dermal wound healing82,83,84,85,86.
Tissue homeostasis and wound healing are intrinsically linked to the tissue’s structure and biomechanical properties87. In a clinical setting, the corneal biomechanical properties have been frequently noted to play a critical role in the wound healing following corneal refractive surgery and subsequently influence the predictability and visual outcomes88,89. Given that depth-dependent structural differences within the corneal stroma correspond to different biomechanical properties90,91,92,93, variations in the wound healing response among deeper wounds should also be reflected. Our data evaluating perforated corneas at 8 dpw revealed excessive accumulation of irregular collagen fibers throughout the corneal stroma, with occasional areas devoid of any collagen (Supplementary Figure 2, Supplementary Video 9), characteristic of fibrotic tissue deposition64. SHG imaging of fibrotic corneal wounds indicated that the disorganized fibrotic collagen fibers were interspaced with clusters of cells (Supplementary Figure 2, Supplementary Video 9), which are not observed in the sparsely populated stroma of normal corneas49. This advocates that under fibrotic conditions, and specifically, following corneal perforation the regenerative capacity of the embryonic cornea is lost. Hence, more comprehensive insight into the importance of wound size and depth in determining healing outcomes is needed to develop potential wound healing therapies. Furthermore, it is not yet known how the topography of the wound may impact the underlying cellular and biological activity and final healing outcome. Although biophysical and topographical cues have been increasingly recognized as key players modulating the biochemical signaling patterns associated with cell differentiation, secretion, and organization of ECM may also be involved94,95,96.
A prominent challenge in regenerative medicine is to improve wound healing repair and regeneration in adults. Research using animal model systems promises to pave the way towards more efficient and effective clinical treatments that will entice the healing and regenerative capacity of human tissues97,98,99. Embryos disclose the way to efficient repair, and the chick cornea represents an opportune model system in which the transition from fetal research to regenerative healing may be revealed97,98,99. It is important to keep in mind that despite the potential of this system to provide valuable information on the molecular and cellular mechanisms that permit scar-free wound healing, there are several differences between fetal and adult wound healing100 that need to be fully exploited. It is likely that tissue damage in the embryo entices repair that recapitulates morphogenesis, and the embryonic wound represents a unique milieu with distinct morphogenetic signals that are absent during adult tissue repair100. This concept is strengthened by recent developmental studies in zebrafish and mouse which showed that molecular cues that govern cell migration during inflammation are essential for the normal migration of germ cells101,102,103. One emphasis of future research using this model system are comparative studies between different wound healing and regeneration competence, as well as comparing healing and regeneration during embryogenesis and postnatal development. Previous studies indicated that injured adult chick corneas displayed stereotypical wound healing responses, like epithelial regeneration, neuronal re-innervation, cell proliferation and secretion of ECM molecules involved in healing50. In addition, the adult chick cornea was identified as an outstanding animal model to study the wound healing cascade following refractive surgery104. Nonetheless, there is a lack of information regarding collagen regeneration and organization following corneal wound healing in the adult chick cornea, and thus further investigations are needed to address these gaps in the field of tissue regeneration and repair. A detailed understanding of wound healing during development and maturation will provide a perceptive of how to better control the tissue’s healing and regenerative capacity.
In conclusion, the present study reports a novel finding that chick embryonic wound healing has the ability to fully recapitulate the normal 3D collagen architecture of the cornea. Given the inherent difficulties of other embryonic wound healing models, in terms of high rates of mortality and premature uterine contraction during fetal surgery, the embryonic chick cornea is an excellent and reproducible model which can serve as the primer for understanding the mechanisms controlling tissue regeneration versus repair. In addition, a detailed morphologic description of chick corneal development is already established, which allows for direct comparison with regenerating corneas. Our previous work showed that the chick corneal embryonic wounds undergo rapid regeneration leading to nonfibrotic restoration of the cornea, and therefore can serve as a model of efficient collagen synthesis and remodeling during corneal regeneration. Future investigations should be aimed at elucidating the impact of wound size, depth and location, as well as the cell–matrix interactions on the healing process. Clearly understanding the biomechanical, cellular and molecular factors that control regeneration versus repair has both clinical and scientific implications as it can lead to development of novel therapeutics, in a market of high and unmet medical need.
References
Brown, B. C., McKenna, S. P., Siddhi, K., McGrouther, D. A. & Bayat, A. The hidden cost of skin scars: quality of life after skin scarring. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 61, 1049–1058 (2008).
Asuku, M. E., Ibrahim, A. & Ijekeye, F. O. Post-burn axillary contractures in pediatric patients: a retrospective survey of management and outcome. Burns 34, 1190–1195 (2008).
Aarabi, S., Longaker, M. T. & Gurtner, G. C. Hypertrophic scar formation following burns and trauma: new approaches to treatment. PLoS Med. 4, e234 (2007).
Pascolini, D. et al. 2002 global update of available data on visual impairment: a complication of population-based prevalence studies. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 11, 67–115 (2004).
Whitcher, J. P., Srinivasan, M. & Upadhyay, M. P. Corneal blindness: a global perspective. Bull. World Health Organ. 79, 214–221 (2001).
Sen, C. K. et al. Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair Regen. 17, 763–771 (2009).
Atala, A., Irvine, D. J., Moses, M. & Shaunak, S. Wound healing versus regeneration: Role of the tissue environment in regenerative medicine. MRS Bull. 35, 1–22 (2010).
Wynn, T. A. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. J. Pathol. 214, 199–210 (2008).
Pinzani, M. Pathophysiology of liver fibrosis. Dig. Dis. 33, 492–497 (2015).
Cintron, C., Schneider, H. & Kublin, C. Corneal scar formation. Exp. Eye Res. 11, 251–259 (1973).
Tomasek, J. J., Gabbiani, G., Hinz, B., Chaponnier, C. & Brown, R. A. Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodeling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 349–363 (2002).
Li, J., Chen, J. & Kirsner, R. Pathophysiology of acute wound healing. Clin. Dermatol. 25, 9–18 (2007).
Gurtber, G. C., Werner, S., Barrandon, Y. & Londaker, M. T. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature 453, 314–321 (2008).
Burrington, J. D. Wound healing in the fetal lamb. J. Pediatr. Surg. 6, 523–528 (1971).
Rowlatt, U. Intrauterine wound healing in a 20 week human fetus. Virchows Arch. A Pathol. Anat. Histol. 381, 353–361 (1979).
Lorenz, H. P. et al. Scarless wound repair: a human fetal skin model. Development 114, 253–259 (1992).
Yannas, I. V., Kwan, M. D. & Longaker, M. T. Early fetal healing as a model for adult organ regeneration. Tissue Eng. 13, 1789–1798 (2007).
Krummel, T. M. et al. Fetal response to injury in the rabbit. J. Pediatr. Surg. 22, 640–644 (1987).
Carter, R., Sykes, V. & Lanning, D. Scarless fetal mouse wound healing may initiate apoptosis through caspase 7 and cleavage of PARP. J. Surg. Res. 156, 74–79 (2009).
Beanes, S. R. et al. Confocal microscopic analysis of scarless repair in the fetal rat: defining the transition. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 109, 160–170 (2002).
Harsum, S., Clarke, J. D. W. & Martin, P. A reciprocal relationship between cutaneous nerves and repairing skin wounds in the developing chick embryo. Dev. Biol. 238, 27–39 (2001).
Lorenz, H. P., Whittby, D. J., Longaker, M. T. & Adzick, N. S. Fetal wound healing. The ontogeny of scar formation in the non-human primate. Ann. Surg. 217, 391–396 (1993).
Longaker, M. T. et al. Studies in fetal wound healing, VI. Second and early third trimester fetal wounds demonstrate rapid collagen deposition without scar formation. J. Pediatr. Surg. 25, 63–68 (1990).
Cowin, A. J., Brosnan, M. P., Holmes, T. M. & Ferguson, M. W. Endogenous inflammatory response to dermal wound healing in the fetal and adult mouse. Dev. Dyn. 212, 385–393 (1998).
Hopkinson-Woolley, J., Hughes, D., Gordon, S. & Martin, P. Macrophage recruitment during limb development and healing in the embryonic and fetal mouse. J. Cell Sci. 107, 1159–1167 (1994).
Larson, B. J., Longaker, M. T. & Lorenz, H. P. Scarless fetal wound healing: a basic science review. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 126, 1172–1180 (2010).
Bullard, K. M., Longaker, M. T. & Lorenz, H. P. Fetal wound healing: current biology. World J. Surg. 27, 54–61 (2003).
Lorenz, H. P., Lin, R. Y., Longaker, M. T., Whitby, D. J. & Adzick, N. S. The fetal fibroblast: the effector cell of scarless fetal skin repair. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 96, 1251–1259 (1995).
Armstrong, J. R. & Ferguson, M. W. J. Ontogeny of the skin and the transition from scar-free to scarring phenotype during wound healing in the pouch young of a marsupial Monodelphis domestica. Dev. Biol. 169, 242–260 (1995).
Whitby, D. J. & Ferguson, M. W. J. Immunohistochemical localization of growth factors in fetal wound healing. Dev. Biol. 147, 207–215 (1991).
Occleston, N. L., Laverty, H. G., O’Kane, S. & Ferguson, M. W. J. Prevention and reduction of scarring in the skin by transforming growth factor beta 3 (TGFβ3): from laboratory discovery to clinical pharmaceutical. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 19, 1047–1063 (2008).
Whitby, D. J. & Ferguson, M. W. J. The extracellular matrix of lip wounds in fetal, neonatal and adult mice. Development 112, 651–668 (1991).
Burd, D. A. R., Longaker, M. T., Adzick, N. S., Harrison, M. R. & Ehrlich, H. P. Fetal wound healing in a large animal model: the deposition of collagen is confirmed. Brit. J. Plast. Surg. 43, 571–577 (1990).
Smith, L. T., Holbrook, K. A. & Madri, J. A. Collagen types I, III, and V in human embryonic and fetal skin. Am. J. Anat. 175, 507–521 (1986).
Sandberg, M., Miakela, J. K., Multimaki, P., Vuorio, L. & Vuorio, E. Construction of a human pro t I(III) collagen cDNA clone and localization of type III collagen expression in human fetal tissues. Matrix. 9, 82–91 (1989).
Van Zuijlen, P. P. M. et al. Collagen morphology in human skin and scar tissue: no adaptations in response to mechanical loading at joints. Burns 29, 423–431 (2003).
Hallok, G. C., Rice, D. C., Merkel, J. R. & DiPaolo, B. R. Analysis of collagen content in the fetal wound. Ann. Plast. Surg. 21, 310–315 (1988).
Knight, K. R. et al. Collagen content of uninjured skin and scar tissue in foetal and adult sheep. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 74, 583–591 (1993).
Cintron, C., Hassinger, L. C., Kublin, C. L. & Cannon, D. J. Biochemical and ultrastructural changes in collagen during corneal wound healing. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 65, 13–22 (1978).
Jester, J. V., Petroll, W. M., Barry, P. A. & Cavanagh, H. D. Expression of alpha-smooth muscle (alpha-SM) actin during corneal stromal wound healing. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 36, 809–819 (1995).
Jester, J. V., Barry-Lane, P. A., Petroll, W. M., Olsen, D. R. & Cavanagh, H. D. Inhibition of corneal fibrosis by topical application of blocking antibodies to TGF beta in the rabbit. Cornea 16, 177–187 (1997).
Saika, S. et al. Role of lumican in the corneal epithelium during wound healing. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 2607–2612 (2000).
Kamma-Lorger, C. S. et al. Collagen ultrastructural changes during stromal wound healing in organ cultured bovine corneas. Exp. Eye Res. 88, 953–959 (2009).
Tripoli, N. K., Cohen, K. L. & Proia, A. D. Cat keratoplasty wound healing and corneal astigmatism. J. Refract. Corneal Surg. 8, 196–203 (1992).
Stepp, M. A. et al. Defects in keratinocyte activation during wound healing in the syndecan-1-deficient mouse. J. Cell Sci. 115, 4517–4531 (2002).
Pal-Ghosh, S., Pajoohesh-Ganji, A., Brown, M. & Stepp, M. A. A mouse model for the study of recurrent corneal epithelial erosions: alpha9beta1 integrin implicated in progression of the disease. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45, 1775–1788 (2004).
Aldavood, S. J. et al. Effect of acetylcysteine on experimental corneal wounds in dogs. Ophthalmic Res. 35, 319–323 (2003).
Gronkiewicz, K. M. et al. Development of a novel in vivo corneal fibrosis model in the dog. Exp. Eye Res. 143, 75–88 (2016).
Koudouna, E. et al. Evolution of the vertebrate corneal stroma. Prog. Retinal Eye Res. 64, 65–76 (2018).
Ritchey, E. R., Code, K., Zelinka, C. P., Scott, M. A. & Fischer, A. J. The chicken cornea as a model of wound healing and neuronal re-innervation. Mol. Vis. 17, 2440–2454 (2011).
Young, R. D. et al. Three-dimensional aspects of matrix assembly by cells in the developing cornea. PNAS 111, 687–692 (2014).
Koudouna, E. et al. Cell regulation of collagen fibril macrostructure during corneal morphogenesis. Acta Biomater. 79, 96–112 (2018).
Spurlin, J. W. III. & Lwigale, P. Y. Wounded embryonic corneas exhibit nonfibrotic regeneration and complete innervation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54, 6334–6344 (2013).
Spurlin, J. & Lwigale, P. Y. A technique to increase accessibility to late-stage chick embryos for in ovo manipulations. Dev. Dyn. 242, 148–154 (2013).
Russ, J. C. Processing images in frequency space. In The Image Processing Handbook (ed. Russ, J. C.) 283–346 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1995).
de Vries, H. J. et al. Dermal organization in scleroderma: the fast Fourier transform and the laser scatter method objectify fibrosis in nonlesional as well as lesional skin. Lab Invest. 80, 1281–1289 (2000).
van Zuijlen, P. P. et al. Morphometry of dermal collagen orientation by Fourier analysis is superior to multi-observer assessment. J. Pathol. 198, 284–291 (2002).
Oxlund, H., Christensen, H., Seyer-Hansen, M. & Andreassen, T. T. Collagen deposition and mechanical strength of colon anastomoses. J. Surg. Res. 66, 25–30 (1996).
Doillon, C. J., Dunn, M. G., Bender, E. & Silver, F. H. Collagen fiber formation in repair tissue: development of strength and toughness. Collagen Relat. Res. 5, 481–492 (1985).
Bailey, A. J., Sims, T. J., LeLouis, M. & Bazin, A. Collagen polymorphism in experimental granulation tissue. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 66, 1160–1165 (1975).
Ehrlich, H. P. et al. Morphological and immunohistochemical differences between keloid and hypertrophic scar. Am. J. Pathol. 145, 105–113 (1994).
Chen, X., Nadiarynkh, O., Plotnikov, S. & Campagnola, P. J. Second harmonic generation microscopy for quantitative analysis of collagen fibrillar structure. Nat. Protoc. 7, 654–669 (2012).
Campagnola, P. J. et al. Three-dimensional high-resolution second-harmonic generation imaging of endogenous structural proteins in biological tissues. Biophys. J. 82, 493–508 (2002).
Farid, M. et al. Detection of corneal fibrosis by imaging second harmonic-generated signals in rabbit corneas treated with mitomycin C after excimer laser surface ablation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 10, 4377–4383 (2008).
Hassel, J. R., Cintron, C., Kublin, C. & Newsome, D. A. Proteoglycan changes during restoration of transparency in corneal scars. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 222, 362–369 (1983).
Wilson, S. E. et al. The corneal wound healing response: cytokine-mediated interaction of the epithelium, stroma, and inflammatory cells. Prog. Retinal Eye Res. 20, 625–637 (2001).
Matsubara, M., Girard, M. T., Kublin, C. L., Clinton, C. & Fini, M. E. Differential roles for two gelatinolytic enzymes of the matrix metalloproteinase family in the remodeling cornea. Dev. Biol. 147, 425–439 (1991).
Sundarraj, N. et al. Proteoglycan distribution during healing of corneal stromal wounds in chick. Exp. Eye Res. 67, 433–442 (1998).
Petroll, W. M., Cavanagh, H. D., Barry, P., Andrews, P. & Jester, J. V. Quantitative analysis of stress fiber orientation during corneal wound contraction. J. Cell Sci. 104, 353–363 (1993).
Kivanany, P. B., Groser, K. C., Tippani, M., Su, S. & Petroll, W. M. Assessment of corneal stromal remodeling and regeneration after photorefractive keratectomy. Sci. Rep. 8, 12580 (2018).
Majno, G., Gabbiani, G., Hirschel, B. J., Ryan, G. B. & Statkov, P. R. Contraction of granulation tissue in vitro: similarity to smooth muscle. Science 173, 548–550 (1971).
Ehrlich, H. P. & Hunt, T. K. Collagen organization critical role in wound contraction. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle).. 1, 3–9 (2012).
Muller, L., Pels, E. & Vrensen, G. The specific architecture of the anterior stroma accounts for maintenance of corneal curvature. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 85, 437–443 (2001).
Bergmanson, J. P., Horne, J., Doughty, M. J., Garcia, M. & Gondo, M. Assessment of the number of lamellae in the central region of the normal human corneal stroma at the resolution of the transmission electron microscope. Eye Contact Lens 31, 281–287 (2005).
Meek, K. M. & Knupp, C. Corneal structure and transparency. Prog. Retinal Eye Res. 49, 1–16 (2015).
Flynn, B. P., Saeidi, N., Liles, M. & Dimarzio, C. A. Mechanical strain stabilizes reconstituted collagen fibrils against enzymatic degradation by mammalian collagenase matrix metalloproteinase 8 (MMP-8). PLoS ONE 5, e12337 (2010).
Jester, J. V. et al. Corneal keratocytes: in situ and in vitro organization of cytoskeletal contractile proteins. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 35, 730–743 (1994).
Eastwood, M., Mudera, V. C., McGrouther, D. A. & Brown, R. A. Effect of precise mechanical loading on fibroblast populated collagen lattices: morphological changes. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 40, 13–21 (1998).
Guido, S. & Tranquillo, R. T. A methodology for the systematic and quantitative study of cell contact guidance in oriented collagen gels. Correlation of fibroblast orientation and gel birefringence. J. Cell Sci. 105, 317–331 (1993).
Kim, A., Lakshman, N. & Petroll, W. M. Quantitative assessment of local collagen matrix remodeling in 3-D culture: the role of Rho kinase. Exp. Cell Res. 312, 3683–3692 (2006).
Karamichos, D., Lakshman, N. & Petroll, W. M. Regulation of corneal fibroblast morphology and collagen reorganization by extracellular matrix mechanical property. Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 48, 5030–5037 (2007).
McDougall, S., Dallon, J., Sherratt, J. & Maini, P. Fibroblast migration and collagen deposition during dermal wound healing: mathematical modelling and clinical implications. Philos. Trans. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 364, 1385–1405 (2006).
Ferguson, M. W. J. & O’Kane, S. Scar-free healing: from embryonic mechanisms to adult therapeutic intervention. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 359, 839–850 (2004).
Taya, Y., O’Kane, S. & Ferguson, M. W. J. Pathogenesis of cleft palate in TGF-b3 knockout mice. Development 126, 3869–3879 (1999).
Dallon, J. C., Sherratt, J. A., Maini, P. K. & Ferguson, M. W. J. Biological implications of a discrete mathematical model for collagen deposition and alignment in dermal wound repair. IMA J. Math. Appl. Med. Biol. 17, 379–393 (2000).
Dallon, J. C., Sherratt, J. A. & Maini, P. K. Modeling the effects of transforming growth factor-b on extracellular matrix alignment in dermal wound repair. Wound Repair Regen. 9, 278–286 (2001).
Gurtner, G. C. et al. Improving cutaneous scar formation by controlling the mechanical environment: large animal and phase I studies. Ann. Surg. 254, 217–225 (2011).
Roberts, C. Biomechanics of the cornea and wavefront-guided laser refractive surgery. J. Refract. Surg. 18, S589–S592 (2002).
Dupps, W. J. & Wilson, S. E. Biomechanics and wound healing in the cornea. Exp. Eye Res. 83, 709–720 (2006).
Winkler, M. et al. Nonlinear optical macroscopic assessment of 3-D corneal collagen organization and axial biomechanics. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 8818–8827 (2011).
Randleman, J. B., Dawson, D. G., Grossniklaus, H. E., McCarey, B. E. & Edelhauser, H. F. Depth-dependent cohesive tensile strength in human donor corneas: implications for refractive surgery. J. Refract. Surg. 24, S85–S89 (2008).
Kohlhaas, M. et al. Biomechanical evidence of the distribution of cross-links in corneas treated with riboflavin and ultraviolet A light. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 32, 279–283 (2006).
Scarcelli, G. et al. Brillouin microscopy of collagen crosslinking: noncontact depth-dependent analysis of corneal elastic modulus. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54, 1418–1425 (2013).
Guo, X. et al. Morphological characterization of organized extracellular matrix deposition by ascorbic acid-stimulated human corneal fibroblasts. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 48, 4050–4060 (2007).
Saeidi, N. et al. Disorganized collagen scaffold interferes with fibroblast mediated deposition of organized extracellular matrix in vitro. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 109, 2683–2698 (2012).
Zareian, R. et al. Human corneal fibroblast pattern evolution and matrix synthesis on mechanically biased substrates. Tissue Eng. 22, 1204–1217 (2016).
Redd, M. J., Cooper, L., Wood, W., Stramer, B. & Martin, P. Wound healing and inflammation: embryos reveal the way to perfect repair. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. 359, 777–784 (2004).
Degen, K. E. & Gourdie, R. G. Embryonic wound healing: a primer for engineering novel therapies for tissue repair. Birth Defects Res. C Embryo Today 96, 258–270 (2012).
Jingjing, L., Siwei, Z. & Enrique, A. The cellular and molecular mechanisms of tissue repair and regeneration as revealed by studies in Xenopus. Regeneration 3, 198–208 (2016).
Martin, P. & Parkhurst, S. M. Parallels between tissue repair and embryo morphogenesis. Development 131, 3021–3034 (2004).
Doitsidou, M. et al. Guidance of primordial germ cell migration by the chemokine SDF-1. Cell 111, 647–659 (2002).
Knaut, H., Werz, C., Geisler, R. & Nusslein-Volhard, C. A zebrafish homologue of the chemokine receptor Cxcr4 is a germ-cell guidance receptor. Nature 421, 279–282 (2003).
Molyneaux, K. A. et al. The chemokine SDF1/CXCL12 and its receptor CXCR4 regulate mouse germ cell migration and survival. Development 130, 4279–4286 (2003).
Fowler, W. C., Chang, D. H., Roberts, B. C., Zarovnaya, E. L. & Proia, A. D. A new paradigm for corneal wound healing research: the white leghorn chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus. Curr. Eye Res. 28, 241–250 (2004).
Acknowledgements
Supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Grant—BBSRC Grant, BBSRC BB/M025349/1 (AJQ), the NIH NEI EY024600 (JVJ), EY027048 (PYL), T32 EY710220 (JS), and Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc. The Skirball Program in Molecular Ophthalmology. The authors would like to thank Yilu Xie for their support with this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.L. and J.V.J. conceived and supervised the research project. E.K., J.S., and A.B. performed the experiments and the data analysis. P.L., J.V.J. and A.J.Q. provided personnel, environmental and financial support. All authors read, reviewed and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Koudouna, E., Spurlin, J., Babushkina, A. et al. Recapitulation of normal collagen architecture in embryonic wounded corneas. Sci Rep 10, 13815 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70658-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70658-y
This article is cited by
-
BMP3 inhibits TGFβ2-mediated myofibroblast differentiation during wound healing of the embryonic cornea
npj Regenerative Medicine (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.