Abstract
Agriculture, forestry and other land uses are currently the second highest source of anthropogenic greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions. In soil, these gases derive from microbial activity, during carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling. To investigate how Eucalyptus land use and growth period impact the microbial community, GHG fluxes and inorganic N levels, and if there is a link among these variables, we monitored three adjacent areas for 9 months: a recently planted Eucalyptus area, fully developed Eucalyptus forest (final of rotation) and native forest. We assessed the microbial community using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and qPCR of key genes involved in C and N cycles. No considerable differences in GHG flux were evident among the areas, but logging considerably increased inorganic N levels. Eucalyptus areas displayed richer and more diverse communities, with selection for specific groups. Land use influenced communities more extensively than the time of sampling or growth phase, although all were significant modulators. Several microbial groups and genes shifted temporally, and inorganic N levels shaped several of these changes. No correlations among microbial groups or genes and GHG were found, suggesting no link among these variables in this short-rotation Eucalyptus study.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The greenhouse effect is a natural process responsible for the maintenance of Earth’s mean temperature. Greenhouse gases (GHGs) absorb solar radiation and trap it in Earth’s atmosphere, which increases the planet’s heat budget1. Atmospheric increases of 40% in carbon dioxide (CO2), 150% in methane (CH4) and 20% in nitrous oxide (N2O) were observed from 1750 to 20112. The increase in the concentrations of these gases is now causing ecological issues3 and extreme weather and climate events1.
Even though they are lower in atmospheric concentrations, CH4 and N2O have 28 and 265 times the global warming potential of CO2, respectively, in a 100-year period. They contribute, respectively, to approximately 17% and 6% for the positive radiative forcing of the GHG4. N2O also acts as the main ozone-depleting particle in the stratosphere5.
Agriculture, forestry and other land uses represented 23% of global GHG emissions from 2007 to 2016. The emissions during this period consisted of 13% CO2, 44% CH4 and 82% N2O6. Land use change currently contributes to 44% of the GHG emissions in Brazil, mainly through deforestation7. Brazil currently ranks sixth in global emissions8.
The increasing demand on raw material has driven deforestation, which has caused the decrease of 129 million hectares of the global forest area in a 25-year period, especially in South America9. Planted forests are an alternative for this demand, since they supply materials including wood pulp, charcoal, and lumber for industry. In Brazil, planted forests cover 7.83 million hectares. These forests are responsible for 1.3% of the country’s gross income and the planted trees are a stock of approximately 1.7 billion tons of CO2 equivalent. As mandated by Brazilian law, the involved companies conserve 5.6 million hectares of native land, which stocks approximately 2.5 billion tons of CO2 equivalent10.
The genus Eucalyptus comprises approximately 73% of the planted forests in Brazil. They are preferred because of their fast growth, high productivity and adaptation to many regions, as revealed from studies of Eucalyptus silviculture11,12,13. Soils from Eucalyptus plantations behave as atmospheric sinks for CH4 and as sources of CO2 and N2O14,15,16,17,18. However, as they occupy marginal soils, with low fertility (and fertilisation regime) and high acidity, the fluxes could be considered low compared with other ecosystems19. The short-rotation plantation has two growth phases in terms of nutrient demand and cycling: a juvenile phase up to canopy closure and another phase up to harvest20. How the plantation phase affects the dynamics of GHG fluxes is unclear.
Microorganisms play an important role in the emission and removal of GHGs by soils, as they cycle nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) molecules in soil environments21. Soil CH4 is produced under anaerobic conditions by methanogenic archaea and is consumed under aerobic conditions by methanotrophic bacteria22. Release of N2O from soils mainly derives from the escape of this molecule during nitrification or denitrification steps of the N cycle23. Understanding the correlation among specific microbial groups or the abundance of functional genes with underlying abiotic factors (e.g., temperature, humidity, nutrients, vegetation, land cover and land use)24 linked with GHG fluxes could lead to the development of microbial indicators that correctly assess these processes, and development of mitigation options25.
A previous study evaluated how Eucalyptus logging impacts soil microbial communities and GHG fluxes18. Significant changes in soil bacterial community structure and the abundance of specific genes suggested that forestry management interferes with microbial communities in the short-term. However, this study involved a single sampling, and provided no information on the impact in the longer-term. The present study was undertaken to clarify how: i. the growth period, ii. land use change and iii. seasonality impact the GHG fluxes and inorganic N levels in tropical Eucalyptus planted forests. Additionally, we investigate how these variables modulate microbial communities and whether there is a link between the microbial community and the GHG fluxes or the inorganic N levels.
To accomplish these goals, we selected three adjacent areas: a recently logged Eucalyptus forest area with 1-month seedlings (juvenile phase), a fully developed Eucalyptus forest with 6-year old trees near the end of the rotation cycle and a native forest area. We surveyed these areas for 9 months, sampling for GHG and inorganic N levels, and used 16 S rRNA gene sequencing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) of key genes involved in the CH4 and N cycles to examine the research questions. Our hypothesis was that key microbial groups and gene abundances would correlate with GHG fluxes in a 9-month period, and that the land use or the Eucalyptus trees growth phase would recruit specific microbial groups.
Methods
Sampling area
All samplings were performed in an area belonging to the Celulose Nippo-Brasileira (CENIBRA) company, located in Belo Oriente, Minas Gerais State, Brazil (19°18′54′S, 42°23′48′W; 300 m altitude). The company has rotated Eucalyptus plantations in the area since 1960, with a 7 to 9-year period of tree growth before harvesting. The planted seeds are clones of Eucalyptus urograndis, a hybrid from E. grandis and E. urophylla. In compliance with Brazilian law, a section of native forest is maintained inside the company’s area.
The predominant vegetation of the region is the Atlantic forest. The climate is defined as Aw (tropical with a dry winter) according to the Köppen climate classification. The annual mean temperature varies from 22 °C to 27 °C, and the annual mean precipitation varies from 701 to 1,500 mm. The landscape comprises a high slope of 26°. To avoid the effect caused by the differences in relation to the slope, we divided the area into 4 quartiles, perpendicular to the direction of the slope. Samples were taken over the entire length of the second quartile (from top to bottom).
The soil is defined as red-yellow Ferralsol (high metal oxides contents, low fertility, and a medium to a loamy texture). The physical-chemical contents of the soil were previously measured18 (Supplementary Table 1).
Experimental design
To understand both the effects of Eucalyptus establishment and its growth phase (juvenile and adult) as compared to native forest soils, an area undergoing Eucalyptus rotations since 1978 was chosen for study. In 2017, trees in this area were 6-years-old, and approximately half of them were logged and seedlings were planted. The study area was divided into three treatments. The first was an area of adult (6-years-old) Eucalyptus (OE), representing a plantation at its last management year. This area contained 470 trees planted in rows and spaced by 3 × 2.5 m. At the end of the sampling, the trees were 7-years-old and ready to be harvested. At this stage (end of rotation), a large mass of litterfall (organic matter and nutrients) has returned to soil and is mineralized, representing the key process to providing nutrients to the stand.
The second area was young Eucalyptus (YE). It was a 1-month-old seedlings area, planted approximately 1 week after Eucalyptus logging, representing a standard Eucalyptus forest renewal. This area contained 680 seedlings planted in rows and spaced by 3 × 2.5 m. At the end of the sampling, the trees were 10-months-old and approximately 2.5 m height. At this stage, crop residues are the main supplier of nutrients to plants.
The third area was native forest (NF). It was an Atlantic forest remnant maintained by CENIBRA, representing a closer condition to the region’s original state.
To check for temporal shifts, four campaigns for GHG sampling, four for inorganic N content sampling and two for microbiological soil sampling (beginning and end of the period) were performed in March 2017 (summer, wet season; Time 1), June 2017 (fall, dry season; Time 2), September 2017 (winter, dry season; Time 3) and December 2017 (spring, wet season; Time 4) (Supplementary Fig. 1).
GHG quantification
To quantify N2O and CH4 fluxes, five closed static chambers were deployed in each area. The static chamber design was previously described26. The chambers had a steel frame base (40 cm × 60 cm), mounted at a depth of 6 to 7 cm, 20 cm from a randomly chosen Eucalyptus tree, seedling or a NF tree. The base was left in the same position during the whole experiment. Polyethylene lids were attached and sealed to the base with soft rubber and covered with a foam layer and a reflective adherent mantle. The lid of the mounted chamber was approximately 13 cm above the soil surface. A three-way-tap at the lid permitted 30 mL gas samples to be withdrawn from inside the chambers with a polypropylene syringe. The syringe air was transferred to 20 mL chromatography vials that been previously depressurized close to −100 kPa. Sampling was performed 0, 20, 40 and 60 min after chamber closure, always between 8 a.m. and 10 a.m.26.
Gas flux quantification was carried out by gas chromatography using a GC 2014 apparatus (Shimadzu, Japan). Soil N2O and CH4 fluxes were calculated based on analytical curves of standards. The fluxes were used to transform the integrated area of each sample peak into gas concentrations. The flux (F) was calculated as:
where δC/δt is the slope of a linear function fitted to the gas concentration of samples, V is the volume (L) of the chamber, A is the area covered by the chamber in m2, M is the molecular weight and Vm is the molecular volume at the sampling temperature.
Inorganic N quantification
Four soil samples were randomly collected inside the three areas. Collection was done at the beginning and at the end of the sampling campaign to quantify nitrate (NO3−) and ammonium (NH4+) in soil extracts. The mineral N content was extracted from 20 g of fresh soil with 60 mL of 2 M KCl after 1-h of rotary shaking at 220 rpm, and the supernatant was filtered27. The resultant solution was used to determine NO3− by ultraviolet spectrometry and NH4+ by salicylate reaction28. The arithmetic mean of the four values was used for both contents.
Soil samples for microbial analysis
Five soil samples were taken per area in each sampling time approximately 10 cm apart from the different gas flux chambers. Each point was considered as a replicate. At each sampling time a 1.5 cm diameter steel tube probe that had been previously sterilised at 180 °C for 3 h to remove contaminants, especially nucleases, was inserted approximately 7 cm into the soil. Collected soil was deposited in a sterile 50 mL propylene tube, mixed and subdivided into two subsamples. Samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen in the field and maintained until DNA or RNA extraction.
DNA and RNA extraction
DNA was extract from approximately 500 mg of each soil sample using the Fast DNA Spin Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, USA). The DNA was purified using the NucleoSpin Soil Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany) from the sixth step of its extraction protocol, due to residual presence of humic acids after the final step of extraction.
RNA was extracted from approximately 2 g of soil using the RNA Power Soil – Total RNA Isolation Kit (Mobio, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After the RNA extraction, 7 μL were treated with RQ1 RNase-Free DNase (Promega, USA) to remove any DNA contamination.
Nucleic acid purity and concentration was assessed using a NanoDrop 1000 device (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and a Qubit 3.0 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), respectively.
16S rRNA gene sequencing and analysis
DNA extracted from soil samples was examined using 16S rRNA gene sequencing to understand shifts in bacterial communities due to land use, Eucalyptus growth phase, and temporality. Soil samples from time 1 had their sequencing performed as previously described18. Time 4 soil samples were sequenced by the StarSeq Company (www.starseq.com, Germany) on MiSeq equipment using paired-end runs (2 × 250) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. The primers used were 515FB (GTG YCA GCM GCC GCG GTA A)28 and 926 R (CCG YCA ATT YMT TTR AGT TT)29. These primers target the V4-V5 regions of the 16S rRNA gene. Sequencing error tax rate was assessed by the coincident use of the ZymoBIOMICS Microbial Community DNA Standard (Zymo Research, USA) with the samples. The error tax rate from this sequencing was 0.08% per base, as assessed by the positive control.
Bioinformatics analysis were done using Mothur software v. 1.41.330. Forward and reverse paired sequences were grouped into contigs and their barcodes and primers were removed from sequences. Sequences containing ambiguities (N-base) or containing more than 8-mer homopolymers were removed. All sequences presenting inconsistent sizes with what was expected for the amplicon were also removed. Unique sequences were grouped through the unique.seqs command. A virtual PCR was done in the Silva database31 using the 515FB and 926 R primers. The sequences were then aligned with the database. Badly aligned sequences and non-informative columns were eliminated. All sequences were trimmed to fully overlap and unique sequences were again grouped. Pre-clustering of the sequences with a difference threshold of 2 bp was done. The chimeras were checked and removed using the chimera.vsearch command32. Virtual PCR was performed on the Ribosomal Database Project33 using the 515FB and 806RB (GGA CTA CNV GGG TWT CTA AT)34 primers for the V4 hypervariable region (in common among time 1 and 4 sequencings). The resulting reference file was used to classify our sequences using an 80% bootstrap threshold. Sequences from mitochondria, chloroplasts, Eukarya, Archaea and unknown domain were removed. Sequences from our samples that matched those at the negative control were also removed. In addition, OTU clustering was performed with a 3% similarity cutoff and singletons were removed. We normalized all samples based on the size of the smallest one (16,745 sequences) by random subsampling. Rarefaction curves, alpha diversity indexes, relative abundance of taxa, and an OTU distribution matrix were exported from the software.
To assess archaeal community structure, an exact sequence variant (ESV) clustering methodology was carried out using the Deblur algorithm35 in Mothur v1.41.3 during the pre-clustering step. After chimera removal, our sequences were classified according to the RDP database. Sequences from mitochondria, chloroplasts, Eukarya, Bacteria and unknown domain sequences were removed. ESVs from unique sequences were then removed. Because of the low number of sequences after the error correction steps, we had four samples removed at our subsample step (OE1.4, OE3.4, NF1.4, YE2.4; <225 sequences).
Raw sequence data were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) and are available under Bioproject accession numbers PRJNA471919 (time 1) and PRJNA591370 (time 4).
RT and qPCR reactions
The construction of the standard curves and the qPCR reactions of the time 1 samples were performed as previously described18, except for nirS and pmoA genes.
Time 4 samples were analysed by qPCR for the selected genes using the GoTaq qPCR Master Mix (Promega, USA) on extracted DNA, and were quantified with the QuantStudio 3 device (Applied Biosystems, USA) using the SybrGreen excitation setting. The analyses were performed with the QuantStudio Design & Analysis Software v1.4.3 (Applied Biosystems, USA). Each reaction was 12 µL and contained 2 µL DNA, 0.48 µL (0.4 µM) of each primer, 0.24 µL of formamide (2%; for nirS and nirK reactions only), 6 µL of GoTaq qPCR Master Mix (2×) and nuclease-free water to the final volume of 12 µL. All the reactions were performed in triplicate along with a -RT control (without reverse transcription, for RT-qPCR only), eight plasmid dilutions (ranging from 109 to 102 copies), and a no-template control (NTC) in a MicroAmp Optical 96-Well Reaction Plate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The following protocol (fast setting) was used: 95 °C for 20 s; 40 cycles of 95 °C for 3 s, annealing temperature (Supplementary Table 2) for 20 s and 72 °C for 45 s; 95 °C for 1 s, 60 °C for 20 s and 95 °C for 1 s (melting curve analysis). Fluorescence was read during the elongation step of each cycle.
RT-qPCR reactions were done using the GoTaq 2-Step RT-qPCR System kit (Promega, USA) with the same protocol as for qPCR of time 4 samples.
Absolute quantifications based on the standard curve created with the plasmid dilutions were performed. The quantified number of copies were normalised to a nanogram of extracted RNA and to a gram of soil for DNA. Reactions efficiencies were calculated as:
and quantities were normalised as gene/16S ratio to minimize extraction bias.
Statistical analyses
The gene/16S ratios, N2O and CH4 fluxes, NO3− and NH4+ measurements, alpha diversity indexes and relative abundances of bacterial taxa were tested for differences among treatments by two-way analysis of variance (two-way ANOVA) using treatment and time of sampling as independent variables, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. All data were checked for normality of distribution by Shapiro-Wilk’s test and homoscedasticity among treatments by the Levene test. If the data failed both assumptions, a Box-Cox transformation was executed. For GHG and inorganic N plots, the standard error of the mean (SEM) was used instead of the standard deviation (SD). Spearman’s correlations among gene/16S ratios and the 49 most abundant bacterial OTUs (>0.5% relative abundance) with gas fluxes and inorganic N contents were generated and the p-values were Bonferroni corrected.
A non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) ordination was performed from the OTU distribution of treatments with the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index and using GHG fluxes and inorganic N contents as correlating parameters. A two-way permutational multivariate analysis of variance (two-way PERMANOVA) followed by Bonferroni correction for p-values was performed, to test for the impact of time and treatments on OTU distribution. All statistical tests were done using Past3.24 software36.
We then performed a blocked Indicator Species Analysis37 based on the 49 most abundant bacterial OTUs (>0.5% relative abundance) using the following parameters: YE × OE and YE + OE × NF. Only the OTUs that were significantly impacted (p < 0.05) and had an indicator value > 60 are demonstrated. This analysis was conducted with PC-ORD 6.0 software38.
For all boxplots, whiskers represent the minimum and maximum values and box the interquartile range (Q1-Q3, line representing Q2, i.e., the median).
Results
GHG fluxes and inorganic N contents
All areas were CH4 sinks and N2O sources during the year. A statistical difference was evident between the sampling time factor for CH4 and N2O, but not between areas (Fig. 1A,B). Time 2 (June) showed lower net negative CH4 fluxes from the Eucalyptus areas, and a slightly net positive CH4 flux in NF, but without statistical difference to time 4 (December). Times 1 (March) and 3 (September) showed the greatest net negative CH4 fluxes. For N2O fluxes, time 4 had the greatest means (except for YE), with no statistical difference to time 1. Times 2 and 3 had lower net N2O fluxes than the others (although time 2 did not differ from 1), with two events of net negative fluxes.
Regarding the inorganic N contents, NH4+ and NO3−demonstrated differences among treatments and times according to two-way ANOVA (Fig. 2A,B). Soil NH4+ concentrations seemed to increase from time 1 to 4, with times 3 and 4 differing from time 1. YE was statistically different from the other groups. For NO3−, YE had evidently higher values over the other two treatments throughout the year. NF showed higher values than OE. Time 2 showed the higher results, followed by times 3 and 4, which were not statistically different.
Structural profile of microbial communities
A total of 502,350 sequences were obtained after the quality filtering and random subsampling, resulting in 16,745 sequences per sample. Good coverage of our samples was obtained, as evident by the rarefaction curves (Supplementary Fig. 2). We clustered the sequences into 7,754 OTUs (with a 3% dissimilarity threshold). Surprisingly, higher richness (indicated as number of OTUs) and diversity (indicated as Shannon index) values were observed inside Eucalyptus areas (OE and YE) than in the NF area (Table 1). Statistical testing supported the difference in means. No statistically significant difference among Eucalyptus treatments or between times 1 and 4 for richness and diversity were found.
Regarding the bacterial composition at the phylum level, the following taxa were shared among all treatments: Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Planctomycetes, Verrucomicrobia, Chloroflexi, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, candidate division WPS-1, candidate division WPS-2, Gemmatimonadetes, Armatimonadetes and Nitrospirae (ordered by decreasing mean relative abundance among all treatments). Unclassified sequences accounted for 6.49% to 10.62% among treatments. The seven most abundant phyla constituted at least 86.47% of all sequences inside each treatment, and were chosen for the graphical plot (Fig. 3A). Time and land use (NF × OE + YE) in combination influenced the relative abundance of some phyla, including Proteobacteria, Planctomycetes, and Chloroflexi. Verrucomicrobia only differed temporally, and Acidobacteria and Actinobacteria were different among time and seemed to have been impacted by Eucalyptus growth (NF and OE × YE). Firmicutes displayed no statistical difference among treatments. An interaction among factors was found for Acidobacteria.
Twenty-six classes were shared among all treatments. The ten most abundant classes constituted at least 81.05% of the sequences of each treatment (Fig. 3B). Gammaproteobacteria, Gp3, and Betaproteobacteria were influenced only by time. Alphaproteobacteria, Planctomycetia, and Spartobacteria were affected by time and land use (NF × OE + YE). Time and Eucalyptus growth period (NF + OE × YE) differentiated the relative abundance of Actinobacteria and Gp1. Land use alone impacted Ktedonobacteria. Gp2 displayed a difference in OE compared to the other areas. An interaction among factors was found for Gp1, Gp2, Gp3, and Spartobacteria.
According to the nMDS, Eucalyptus areas shared a more similar bacterial community distribution than with NF, despite their high variability (Fig. 4). NF areas showed a lower dispersion among samples, which indicated lower beta-diversity and higher stability compared to Eucalyptus areas. Whereas the NF community structure remained very similar from time 1 to 4, YE samples showed high variability and, at time 4, the difference in structure was more pronounced to OE than it was just after cutting. Two-way PERMANOVA test revealed that both treatment and time factors induced statistical differences among communities, without interaction among the factors. Soil N2O fluxes vector correlated with NF samples, while inorganic N contents correlated with YE.4 area.
A further analysis of the 49 most abundant OTUs (those with a relative abundance of at least 0.5%) using a blocked Indicator Species Analysis (ISA) was performed. These 49 OTUs represented 52% of the global relative abundance. The analysis revealed that 30 OTUs were impacted by land use (NF × OE + YE), with 20 significantly more abundant in NF areas and 10 in Eucalyptus areas. Regarding Eucalyptus growth phase effect (OE × YE), 23 OTUs were impacted, with 17 associated with the OE area and six with the YE area. The affected OTUs and their taxonomical affiliations are represented in Fig. 5A,B. The time effect (growth period) showed a clear pattern at the phylum level, with OE indicators belonging to Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria, while YE indicators belonged to Actinobacteria phylum and to Planctomycetes.
Regarding the Archaeal community analysis, the Nitrososphaera genus represented 96.7% up to 100% of the sequences in all treatments. Archaeal community showed a pattern like the bacterial community, with Eucalyptus areas having a more diverse and rich community than NF area (Supplementary Fig. 3).
To better understand the relationship of prokaryotic community members and our gas and soil monitored variables, Spearman correlations (n = 30) was performed among the 49 more abundant bacterial OTUs and GHG fluxes or inorganic N contents (Table 2). No correlations among the OTUs and GHG were found. Multiple correlations between bacterial OTUs and soil NH4+ and NO3− contents were obtained. Among the positive correlations with both contents, one OTU was assigned as Actinoallomurus genus and one as Actinomycetales order. Three Spartobacteria OTUs negatively correlated with both mineral N forms. Members of the Proteobacteria phylum were all negatively correlated with NH4+, with one Gammaproteobacteria, four Rhizobiales, and one Bradyrhizobium OTU. A Bradyrhizobiaceae OTU was negatively correlated with NO3− content. Two negative and one positive correlations were observed between representatives of the Acidobacteria phylum for NH4+ content. A positive correlation among soil NH4+ and bacterial diversity was also found (Spearman correlation: NH4+ and Shannon index, p < 0.001, r = 0.6).
Functional profiles of microbial communities
RT-qPCR (RNA-based) and qPCR (DNA-based) approaches were used to evaluate the microbial community metabolic activity and potential. We were unable to quantify transcripts for the genes involved in CH4 and N cycles, independent of the treatment or time of sample (detection limit was 102, data not shown). Replicates showed inconsistency in quantification and several non-specific reactions, demonstrated by dissociation curves and gel electrophoresis, despite the good quality of RNA extracts. As an alternative, traditional qPCR was used, which enabled the assessment of the metabolic potential of the samples (Fig. 6).
All qPCRs were specific, as determined by melting curve analysis and gel electrophoresis from the products. Run data are presented in Supplementary Table 3.
Gene quantification showed that the number of copies of 16 S rRNA gene were lower at time 4 than at time 1 (from approximately 1010 to 109 copies; Fig. 6). Ratios of mcrA/16S (methanogenesis), pmoA/16S (methanotrophy), nifH/16S (nitrogen fixation), and nirS/16S and nirK/16S (denitrification) were also impacted by time. The ratios of mcrA/16S and nifH/16S decreased from time 1 to 4, while the ratios of nirS/16S and nirK/16S increased. pmoA/16S increased from time 1 to 4 for the Eucalyptus treatments, but showed a decrease for NF. The treatment factor affected pmoA/16S, AOA/16S (nitrification), nirK/16S, and nosZ/16S (denitrification). pmoA/16S and nosZ/16S ratios were different between Eucalyptus (YE + OE) and NF; AOA/16S had a difference between NF and OE and nirK/16S among NF and YE. No statistical differences among treatments or times for the AOB/16S ratio were detected.
To evaluate if there was a link between gene copy number and the other sampled variables, we tested the number of copies of 16S rRNA gene and gene/16S ratios for correlations with GHG and N contents. Only correlations with N contents were found (Table 3). 16S rRNA gene and nifH/16S ratio negatively correlated with N levels in soil, while nirK/16S positively correlated with N content levels and mcrA/16S ratio negatively correlated with the quantity of NH4+ in soil.
Discussion
Considering all sampling times, the studied soil behaved as a CH4 sink and N2O source, as previously described for Eucalyptus plantations areas14,15,16,17 and tropical forest soils19. N2O fluxes were considerable higher at time 4 (spring; December) in the OE and NF areas. This time point was collected after an extended period of precipitation (Supplementary Fig. 1), which seemed to explain the higher emissions. Time 1 (summer; March), which did not differ statistically from time 4, was during a period of abundant precipitation but not close to a precipitation episode, whereas times 2 and 3 (fall and winter; June and September) were collected during dry periods. CH4 fluxes did not seem to be explained by collected environmental variables. Similar flux patterns for both gases17 and for N2O14,39 have been observed in planted forests. Although not statistically different, the YE area presented a smaller variation in flux in the different sampling times than the other two well-established tree areas. In other studies involving tropical rain forests, logging differentiated the GHG fluxes among sites15,40, probably due to an increase in soil bulk density and a decrease in air-filled spaces (YE displayed higher humidity than other areas in our study). This poorly aerated condition may favour heterotrophic and facultative anaerobic bacteria to produce different reduced derivatives of NO3, as NO2, NO and N2O, not only N2O41.
The lack of statistical difference in terms of GHG dynamics among the studied areas could also be explained by the high variability within treatment. The different land use did not alter most of the soil physical-chemical characteristics (Supplementary Table 1), which can correlate with GHG flux42. The temporal differences of GHG flux are probably the effect of pluviometry, as these soils are poor in nutrients, experience frequent water deficit, are acidic and are high in Al+3, which restricts microbial activity43,44. Increased humidity will increase microbial activity and shift the GHG dynamics.
We observed a near-zero net N2O flux in the NF and OE area at times 2 and 3. Some chambers showed negative fluxes, which have often been reported in the literature, and which is often linked to low NO3− content and low O2 concentrations. As the contribution to N2O uptake, by reduction to N2 through the N2O reductase pathway is short under low supply of NO3, we speculate that under YE, where the nitrate concentration in soil is high and the emissions of N2O is also low, others factors are inhibiting the denitrification process or stimulating the N2O uptake, such as the change ratio of NO3 and N2O in soil profile and changes in anoxic microsite (soil structure) or even abiotic reactions of N2O45,46,47 (Flechard et al., 2005; Chapuis-Lardy et al., 2007; Chalk and Smith, 2020). The nitrous oxide reductase gene quantified by qPCR (Fig. 6) is clear higher in YE than OE (but not different), inside of each season, what in part could explain lower emissions of N2O, as cited above. Even without statistic difference, the nirK copies involved in nitrite reduction to NO should justify partially the low emissions of N2O, and probably higher of NO. The regulation mechanisms of this process are still unclear, despite of some advances46.
Higher inorganic N levels are expected in recently logged sites due to the decomposition of the organic matter of roots and tree residues. The NO3− levels in soil are especially enriched in logged soils40,48. The lack of appreciable root depth that enables contact with and consumption of NO3− might have contributed to the high levels throughout the sampling period. We found no correlations among GHG and inorganic N content in soils, despite the description of the correlation in other studies16,17,49,50.
Higher bacterial richness and diversity were observed in Eucalyptus areas, indicating that land use change increased these indexes. Surprisingly, this trend was observed before deforestation events51,52,53, suggesting that the alpha diversity of microbial communities increases as an adaptive response to soil disruption. We did not observe changes in alpha diversity after a 9-month period, which agrees with the theory that soil disturbance effects can persist for a long period52,54. We also suggest another theory, in which, paradoxically, areas of Eucalyptus monoculture areas harbour a more diverse microbiome when compared to the nearby Atlantic forest, probably due to plant selection or higher primary productivity55,56,57, since these areas have undergone Eucalyptus rotations since 1978.
Alpha diversity was previously described to be a negative indicator of land use effect, due to its high temporal variability58. However, presently the alpha diversity values were consistent, implicating alpha diversity as a good indicator to differentiate the Eucalyptus areas from NF. The land use effect over alpha diversity was also supported in another study53. It is important to highlight that higher alpha diversity does not necessarily imply more functional diversity in the ecosystem. In a recent study, although land use change seemed to increase 16S rRNA gene diversity, functional gene diversity was decreased in pastures compared to primary and secondary forests59.
Phyla composition from all treatments resembled those found in a variety of soils, including Cerrado soils60, Eucalyptus monoculture and in mixed plantations with Acacia mangium56, grasslands61, forests51,53,62, agricultural soils53,58, and even samples from Central Park in New York City63. Most phyla seem to temporally vary in abundance53,58,64, as soil is a complex environment that seasonally shifts in many attributes65,66. However, the region of study did not vary greatly in terms of temperature during the year, and displayed very distinct patterns in terms of pluviometry, which may explain the slight variances in relative abundances and community structure over time.
A recent meta-analysis included 17 studies that addressed the conversion from forest to agriculture. The findings indicated that the abundances of Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria relative are higher in natural forest soils, while Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Firmicutes showed higher abundance in agricultural soils67. Alpha diversity showed an average increase ratio of 1.17 ± 1 fold due to land use change. We observed that Proteobacteria and Chloroflexi followed this trend. However, for Acidobacteria and Actinobacteria, OE behaved just as NF, and no differences were observed for Firmicutes. The considerable differences observed with Verrucomicrobia at times 1 and 4 were due to the near-absence of Spartobacteria class sequences at time 4.
We detected differences in beta-diversity among treatments and between times 1 and 4. Yet, land use (Eucalyptus plantation) seemed to impact beta-diversity more than did time and planting renewal. Both land use and management have been associated with differences in beta-diversity68,69, while land use alone affected beta-diversity in other studies, despite the time of sampling or land management53,54,58. Plant selection of the microbial community, fertilization history of Eucalyptus areas, soil disruption by harvesting, and differences in soil attributes could be linked to the variation in beta-diversity. It is also interesting that, after a 9-month period, YE samples were further to OE in the ordination, suggesting that it takes an even longer time for the YE microbial community to adapt to the OE structure.
Nitrogen content is correlated with many OTUs. Bradyrhizobiaceae is a family in the Rhizobiales order, which is recognized for its genera of nitrogen fixing bacteria (NFB)70, including Bradyrhizobium. Rhizobiales members were negatively correlated with N content and we found that Rhizobiales representatives were enriched in NF and OE in comparison to YE (as also seen in ISA). This is probably due to lower level of mineral N in these areas, increasing the need for higher abundance of NFB species. Actinoallomurus was another bacterial genus that displayed correlation with inorganic N contents. However, all known representatives of Actinoallomurus lack mechanisms to use inorganic N71. Thus, its enrichment is more likely due an indirect factor, such as higher affinity with plants present in YE areas.
It is important to highlight that all correlations must be interpreted cautiously, as they are based on multiple comparisons with data from field experiments, where many conditions cannot be controlled, increasing the chance of spurious correlations.
Presently, RNA-based qPCR was unsuccessful, However, DNA based qPCR was successfully applied. Soil is frequently an oligotrophic environment, leading to a low level of metabolism of the microbial community. This leads to a higher abundance of DNA gene copies over RNA72,73,74. The soil we studied is acidic with high Al3+ levels, is nutrient-poor, and has a water deficit. All these factors inhibit microbial activity. Together, these factors can explain why specific microbial populations could be detected by qPCR but not by RT-qPCR.
We found no correlations among GHG fluxes and gene abundances, even though these correlations have been described16,75. Temporal differences in 16S rRNA gene abundances could be explained by N enrichment (as seen by the negative correlation among 16S rRNA gene and the inorganic N content). Decreases of microbial biomass due to N fertilization have been reported76,77.
Methanotrophic metabolic potential differed by land use. Deforestation in Amazonian soils has been linked to decreases in methanotrophs78 and methane mono-oxygenase genes in these soils59,62,78. Although other studies reported differences in the quantity of the mcrA gene following deforestation62,78, we did not detect alterations in this gene caused by land use change.
We observed average AOA/AOB ratios from 8.3 to 19.9 in treatments. The findings support the description that archaea are the predominant ammonia-oxidizers in acidic soils79. It is interesting to note that our archaeal community was dominated by a single genus, Nitrososphaera, an AOA found abundantly in soils and some freshwater habitats80,81.
We detected an increase in nirS and nirK/16S ratios and a decrease in nifH/16S ratio from time 1 to 4, which could indicate that the community is being restructured in response to higher levels of N in these soils. The nirK/16S ratio positively correlated with higher levels of both NH4+ and NO3−, while nifH correlated negatively, consistent with this theory. Impacts on nosZ abundance by land use change were detected presently and previous studies82,83,84.
In conclusion, although no considerable differences were found among treatments, the growth phase of the young trees changed the GHG dynamics of the Eucalyptus area. Yet, despite Eucalyptus plantations are anthropically established, they showed no difference from the nearby native forest in terms of GHG fluxes in our study. Secondly, Eucalyptus logging substantially increased the inorganic N content of soil, which was constant over the period of our study, but this phenomenon does not drive the N2O emissions, probably by the harsh soil chemical conditions. On other hand, Eucalyptus areas displayed a richer and more diverse microbial community than the nearby Atlantic forest, which was a consistent indicator of this difference through the 9-month period studied. Land use was the main differentiating factor of the microbial community. Most taxa showed a temporal fluctuation in relative abundances, which could be shaped by the inorganic N content in the soils. Time also influenced the abundance of several genes in soils that were examined, some correlated with inorganic N contents,but it was not found correlation among assayed genes and GHG fluxes.
Planted forests in studied region have GHG emissions inhibited by the high acidity and high aluminum saturation in the soil. The decomposition of crop residues, stimulates nitrification in young eucalyptus plantations, but N2O emissions remained low. Changes in the structures of the communities indicated by the quantification of the number of copies of the nirK and nosZ genes, seem to be related to the low N2O emissions. Metanotrophy prevails over methanogenesis in both plantations and natural forests. More productive sites should be studied so that these findings can be generalized.
References
Cubasch, U. et al. Introduction. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ed. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) 119–158, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.007 (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
Hartmann, D. L. et al. Observations: Atmosphere and Surface. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ed. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) 159–254, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.008 (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
Gitay, H., Suárez, A. & Watson, R. Climate Change and Biodiversity. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva (2002).
Myhre, G. et al. Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ed. Change, I. P. on C.) 659–740 (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
Ravishankara, A. R., Daniel, J. S. & Portmann, R. W. Nitrous oxide (N2O): The dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century. Science (80-). 326, 123–125 (2009).
IPCC. Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. In press (2019).
SEEG. Análise das Emissões Brasileiras de Gases de Efeito Estufa e suas implicações para as metas do Brasil - 1970–2018 (2019).
Climate Watch. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, https://www.climatewatchdata.org/ (2018).
Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. How are the world’s forests changing?, http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4808e.pdf (2015).
Brazilian tree industry. Annual report of IBA (indústria brasileira de árvores) (2019).
Du, H. et al. Carbon Storage in a Eucalyptus Plantation Chronosequence in Southern China. Forests 6, 1763–1778 (2015).
Brancalion, P. H. S. et al. Exotic eucalypts: From demonized trees to allies of tropical forest restoration? J. Appl. Ecol. 00, 1–12 (2019).
Gonçalves, J. L. D. M. et al. Integrating genetic and silvicultural strategies to minimize abiotic and biotic constraints in Brazilian eucalypt plantations. For. Ecol. Manage. 301, 6–27 (2013).
Fest, B. J., Livesley, S. J., Drösler, M., van Gorsel, E. & Arndt, S. K. Soil-atmosphere greenhouse gas exchange in a cool, temperate Eucalyptus delegatensis forest in south-eastern Australia. Agric. For. Meteorol. 149, 393–406 (2009).
Livesley, S. J. et al. Soil-atmosphere exchange of greenhouse gases in a Eucalyptus marginata woodland, a clover-grass pasture, and Pinus radiata and Eucalyptus globulus plantations. Glob. Chang. Biol. 15, 425–440 (2009).
Martins, C. S. C., Nazaries, L., Macdonald, C. A., Anderson, I. C. & Singh, B. K. Water availability and abundance of microbial groups are key determinants of greenhouse gas fluxes in a dryland forest ecosystem. Soil Biol. Biochem. 86, 5–16 (2015).
Zhang, K. et al. Impact of nitrogen fertilization on soil-Atmosphere greenhouse gas exchanges in eucalypt plantations with different soil characteristics in southern China. Plos one 12, e0172142 (2017).
Cuer, C. A. et al. Short-term effect of Eucalyptus plantations on soil microbial communities and soil-atmosphere methane and nitrous oxide exchange. Sci. Rep. 8, 15133 (2018).
Dalal, R. C. & Allen, D. E. Greenhouse gas fluxes from natural ecosystems. Aust. J. Bot. 56, 369–407 (2008).
Laclau, J.-P. Nutrient Dynamics throughout the Rotation of Eucalyptus Clonal Stands in Congo. Ann. Bot. 91, 879–892 (2003).
Madsen, E. L. Microorganisms and their roles in fundamental biogeochemical cycles. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 22, 456–464 (2011).
Nazaries, L., Murrell, J. C., Millard, P., Baggs, L. & Singh, B. K. Methane, microbes and models: Fundamental understanding of the soil methane cycle for future predictions. Environ. Microbiol. 15, 2395–2417 (2013).
Signor, D. & Cerri, C. E. P. Nitrous oxide emissions in agricultural soils: a review. Pesqui. Agropecuária Trop. 43, 322–338 (2013).
Oertel, C., Matschullat, J., Zurba, K., Zimmermann, F. & Erasmi, S. Greenhouse gas emissions from soils — A review. Chemie der Erde - Geochemistry 76, 327–352 (2016).
Insam, H. & Wett, B. Control of GHG emission at the microbial community level. Waste Manag. 28, 699–706 (2008).
Alves, B. J. R. et al. Selection of the most suitable sampling time for static chambers for the estimation of daily mean N2O flux from soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 46, 129–135 (2012).
Morais, R. F., Boddey, R. M., Urquiaga, S., Jantalia, C. P. & Alves, B. J. R. Ammonia volatilization and nitrous oxide emissions during soil preparation and N fertilization of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum.). Soil Biol. Biochem. 64, 80–88 (2013).
Parada, A. E., Needham, D. M. & Fuhrman, J. A. Every base matters: assessing small subunit rRNA primers for marine microbiomes with mock communities, time series and global field samples. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 1403–1414 (2016).
Quince, C., Lanzen, A., Davenport, R. J. & Turnbaugh, P. J. Removing noise from pyrosequenced amplicons. BMC Bioinformatics 12(30), 1–18 (2011).
Schloss, P. D. et al. Introducing mothur: Open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 7537–7541 (2009).
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–6 (2013).
Rognes, T., Flouri, T., Nichols, B., Quince, C. & Mahé, F. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4, e2584 (2016).
Cole, J. R. et al. The Ribosomal Database Project: Improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 141–145 (2009).
Apprill, A., McNally, S., Parsons, R. & Weber, L. Minor revision to V4 region SSU rRNA 806R gene primer greatly increases detection of SAR11 bacterioplankton. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 75, 129–137 (2015).
Amir, A. et al. Deblur Rapidly Resolves Single-Nucleotide Community Sequence Patterns. mSystems 2, 1–7 (2017).
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T. & Ryan, P. D. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 4, 1–9 (2001).
Dufrene, M. & Legendre, P. Species assemblages and indicator species: The need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr. 67, 345–366 (1997).
McCune, B. & Mefford, M. J. PC-ORD v. 6.0. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, OR (2010).
Liu, H. et al. Greenhouse gas fluxes from soils of different land-use types in a hilly area of South China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 124, 125–135 (2008).
Yashiro, Y., Kadir, W. R., Okuda, T. & Koizumi, H. The effects of logging on soil greenhouse gas (CO2, CH4, N2O) flux in a tropical rain forest, Peninsular Malaysia. Agric. For. Meteorol. 148, 799–806 (2008).
Davidson, E. A. Fluxes of nitrous oxide and nitric oxide from terrestrial ecosystems. in Microbial Production and Consumption of Greenhouse Gases: Methane, Nitrogen Oxides and Halomethanes (eds. Rogers, J. & Whitman, W.) 219–235 (American Society of Microbiology, 1991).
Weslien, P., Klemedtsson, A. K., Börjesson, G. & Klemedtsson, L. Strong pH influence on N2O and CH4 fluxes from forested organic soils. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 60, 311–320 (2009).
Kunito, T. et al. Aluminum and acidity suppress microbial activity and biomass in acidic forest soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 97, 23–30 (2016).
Illmer, P., Marschall, K. & Schinner, F. Influence of available aluminium on soil micro-organisms. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 21, 393–397 (1995).
Flechard, C. R., Neftel, A., Jocher, M., Ammann, C. & Fuhrer, J. Bi-directional soil/atmosphere N2O exchange over two mown grassland systems with contrasting management practices. Glob. Chang. Biol. 11, 2114–2127 (2005).
Chapuis-Lardy, L., Wrage, N., Metay, A., Chotte, J.-L. & Bernoux, M. Soils, a sink for N2O? A review. Glob. Chang. Biol. 13, 1–17 (2007).
Chalk, P. M. & Smith, C. J. The role of agroecosystems in chemical pathways of N2O production. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 290, 106783 (2020).
Hazlett, P. W., Gordon, A. M., Voroney, R. P. & Sibley, P. K. Impact of harvesting and logging slash on nitrogen and carbon dynamics in soils from upland spruce forests in northeastern Ontario. 39, 43–57 (2007).
Liu, L. & Greaver, T. L. A review of nitrogen enrichment effects on three biogenic GHGs: The CO2 sink may be largely offset by stimulated N2O and CH4 emission. Ecol. Lett. 12, 1103–1117 (2009).
Aronson, E. L., Allison, S. D. & Helliker, B. R. Environmental impacts on the diversity of methane-cycling microbes and their resultant function. Front. Microbiol. 4, 1–15 (2013).
Navarrete, A. A. et al. Soil microbiome responses to the short-term effects of Amazonian deforestation. Mol. Ecol. 24, 2433–2448 (2015).
Crowther, T. W. et al. Predicting the responsiveness of soil biodiversity to deforestation: A cross-biome study. Glob. Chang. Biol. 20, 2983–2994 (2014).
Mendes, L. W. et al. Soil-Borne Microbiome: Linking Diversity to Function. Microb. Ecol. 70, 255–265 (2015).
Jangid, K. et al. Soil Biology & Biochemistry Land-use history has a stronger impact on soil microbial community composition than aboveground vegetation and soil properties. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43, 2184–2193 (2011).
Rachid, C. T. C. C. et al. Intercropped Silviculture Systems, a Key to Achieving Soil Fungal Community Management in Eucalyptus Plantations. Plos one 10, e0118515 (2015).
Pereira, A. P. D. A. et al. Shifts in the bacterial community composition along deep soil profiles in monospecific and mixed stands of Eucalyptus grandis and Acacia mangium. Plos one 12, e0180371 (2017).
Rachid, C. T. C. C. et al. Mixed plantations can promote microbial integration and soil nitrate increases with changes in the N cycling genes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 66, 146–153 (2013).
Lauber, C. L., Ramirez, K. S., Aanderud, Z., Lennon, J. & Fierer, N. Temporal variability in soil microbial communities across land-use types. ISME J. 7, 1641–1650 (2013).
Paula, F. S. et al. Land use change alters functional gene diversity, composition and abundance in Amazon forest soil microbial communities. Mol. Ecol. 23, 2988–2999 (2014).
Rachid, C. T. C. C. et al. Effect of sugarcane burning or green harvest methods on the Brazilian Cerrado soil bacterial community structure. Plos one 8, e59342 (2013).
O’Brien, S. L. et al. Spatial scale drives patterns in soil bacterial diversity. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 2039–2051 (2016).
Kroeger, M. E. et al. New Biological Insights Into How Deforestation in Amazonia Affects Soil Microbial Communities Using Metagenomics and Metagenome-Assembled Genomes. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1–13 (2018).
Ramirez, K. S. et al. Biogeographic patterns in below-ground diversity in New York City’s Central Park are similar to those observed globally. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20141988 (2014).
Lipson, D. A. Relationships between temperature responses and bacterial community structure along seasonal and altitudinal gradients. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 59, 418–427 (2007).
Campbell, C. A. et al. Seasonal trends in soil biochemical attributes: Effects of crop management on a Black Chernozem. Can. J. Soil Sci. 79, 85–97 (1999).
Cain, M. L., Subler, S., Evans, J. P. & Fortin, M.-J. Sampling spatial and temporal variation in soil nitrogen availability. Oecologia 118, 397–404 (1999).
Petersen, I. A. B., Meyer, K. M. & Bohannan, B. J. M. Meta-Analysis Reveals Consistent Bacterial Responses to Land Use Change Across the Tropics. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1–9 (2019).
Rachid, C. T. et al. Physical-chemical and microbiological changes in Cerrado Soil under differing sugarcane harvest management systems. BMC Microbiol. 12, 170 (2012).
Wallis, P. D., Haynes, R. J., Hunter, C. H. & Morris, C. D. Effect of land use and management on soil bacterial biodiversity as measured by PCR-DGGE. Appl. Soil Ecol. 46, 147–150 (2010).
Marcondes de Souza, J. A., Carareto Alves, L. M., de Mello Varani, A. & de Macedo Lemos, E. G. The Family Bradyrhizobiaceae. In The Prokaryotes (eds. Rosenberg, E., DeLong, E. F., Lory, S., Stackebrandt, E. & Thompson, F.) 135–154, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30197-1_253 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014).
Tamura, T., Ishida, Y., Nozawa, Y., Otoguro, M. & Suzuki, K.-I. Transfer of Actinomadura spadix Nonomura and Ohara 1971 to Actinoallomurus spadix gen. nov., comb. nov., and description of Actinoallomurus amamiensis sp. nov., Actinoallomurus caesius sp. nov., Actinoallomurus coprocola sp. nov., Actinoallomurus fulvus s. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 59, 1867–1874 (2009).
Bælum, J. et al. Direct analysis of tfdA gene expression by indigenous bacteria in phenoxy acid amended agricultural soil. ISME J. 2, 677–687 (2008).
Shannon, K. E. M. et al. Effect of nitrate and glucose addition on denitrification and nitric oxide reductase (cnorB) gene abundance and mRNA levels in Pseudomonas mandelii inoculated into anoxic soil. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 100, 183–195 (2011).
Yoshida, M., Ishii, S., Fujii, D., Otsuka, S. & Senoo, K. Identification of Active Denitrifiers in Rice Paddy Soil by DNA- and RNA-Based Analyses. Microbes Environ. 27, 456–461 (2012).
Morales, S. E., Cosart, T. & Holben, W. E. Bacterial gene abundances as indicators of greenhouse gas emission in soils. ISME J. 4, 799–808 (2010).
Lee, K. & Jose, S. Soil respiration, fine root production, and microbial biomass in cottonwood and loblolly pine plantations along a nitrogen fertilization gradient. For. Ecol. Manage. 185, 263–273 (2003).
Fisk, M. C. & Fahey, T. J. Microbial biomass and nitrogen cycling responses to fertilization and litter removal in young northern hardwood forests. Biogeochemistry 53, 201–223 (2001).
Meyer, K. M. et al. Conversion of Amazon rainforest to agriculture alters community traits of methane-cycling organisms. Mol. Ecol. 26, 1547–1556 (2017).
Prosser, J. I. & Nicol, G. W. Archaeal and bacterial ammonia-oxidisers in soil: the quest for niche specialisation and differentiation. Trends Microbiol. 20, 523–531 (2012).
Kerou, M. & Schleper, C. Nitrososphaera. in Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118960608.gbm01294 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2016).
Zhalnina, K. et al. Ca. Nitrososphaera and Bradyrhizobium are inversely correlated and related to agricultural practices in long-term field experiments. Front. Microbiol. 4, 1–13 (2013).
Yu, Y. et al. Effect of land use on the denitrification, abundance of denitrifiers, and total nitrogen gas production in the subtropical region of China. Biol. Fertil. Soils 50, 105–113 (2014).
Ducey, T. F. et al. Soil Physicochemical Conditions, Denitrification Rates, and Abundance in North Carolina Coastal Plain Restored Wetlands. J. Environ. Qual. 44, 1011 (2015).
Lammel, D. R., Nüsslein, K., Tsai, S. M. & Cerri, C. C. Land use, soil and litter chemistry drive bacterial community structures in samples of the rainforest and Cerrado (Brazilian Savannah) biomes in Southern Amazonia. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 66, 32–39 (2015).
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to the staff of CENIBRA for field support and the members of the Microbial Genetics Laboratory (LGM) for the sharing of equipment and expertise. This research was funded by CNPq, Embrapa, Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), and the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB – “Projeto Rural Sustentável”).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study conception and design: C.T.R.C.C., F.C.B., R.A.R.R. and B.J.R.A. Field experiment: J.J.N.S., E.P.S., E.S.F. and C.T.R.C.C. Laboratory analysis: D.A.M. and B.J.R.A. Bioinformatics and statistical analysis: D.A.M. and C.T.R.C.C. Drafting of the manuscript: D.A.M. and C.T.R.C.C. Critical revision: All Authors Financial support: R.A.R.R., B.J.R.A. and C.T.R.C.C.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Monteiro, D.A., Fonseca, E.d.S., Rodrigues, R.d.A.R. et al. Structural and functional shifts of soil prokaryotic community due to Eucalyptus plantation and rotation phase. Sci Rep 10, 9075 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66004-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66004-x
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.