Social environment modulates investment in sex trait versus lifespan: red deer produce bigger antlers when facing more rivalry

Abstract

Theory predicts that the plastic expression of sex-traits should be modulated not only by their production costs but also by the benefits derived from the presence of rivals and mates, yet there is a paucity of evidence for an adaptive response of sex-trait expression to social environment. We studied antler size, a costly and plastic sex trait, and tooth wear, a trait related to food intake and longevity, in over 4,000 male Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) from 56 wild populations characterized by two contrasting management practices that affect male age structure and adult sex-ratio. As a consequence, these populations exhibit high and low levels of male-male competition for mating opportunities. We hypothesized that males under conditions of low intra-sexual competition would develop smaller antlers, after controlling for body size and age, than males under conditions of high intra-sexual competition, thus reducing energy demands (i.e. reducing intake and food comminution), and as a consequence, leading to less tooth wear and a concomitant longer potential lifespan. Our results supported these predictions. To reject possible uncontrolled factors that may have occurred in the wild populations, we carried out an experimental design on red deer in captivity, placing males in separate plots with females or with rival males during the period of antler growth. Males living with rivals grew larger antlers than males living in a female environment, which corroborates the results found in the wild populations. As far as we know, these results show, for the first time, the modulation of a sexual trait and its costs on longevity conditional upon the level of intra-sexual competition.

Introduction

The expression of many sex-traits is plastic and responds to individual- and population-specific reaction norms1,2,3,4,5,6. There is evidence for many species that environmental factors (e.g. resource availability) affect body condition and the expression of sex-traits, such as signals and weapons1,7,8,9,10,11. Condition-dependence theory relies on the relative value of energy costs, because costs of producing traits are expected to be lower for individuals in good condition as compared to those in poor condition12,13,14,15. But also, in a sexual selection context, rivals and potential mates in the social environment strongly influence the benefits associated with trait expression, so that trait investment should respond in a trade-off fashion depending on the costs but also on the benefits of trait development. One example of this in the inter-sexual selection context is that male zebra finches invest more in coloring their beaks when there are females to receive the signal16. For intra-sexual competition, the challenge hypothesis2 applied this idea to testosterone production relative to the probability of winning contests, which may be related to sex-trait expression17,18,19,20. However, trait development may depend on other costs and benefits not necessarily linked to testosterone production21. Thus, testing how individuals modulate sex-trait expression to maximize fitness gains under a particular social environment relative to the associated costs in maintenance and survival remains a challenge.

Deer antlers are plastic traits that are grown and discarded every year, represent a considerable percentage of an animal’s skeletal mass, and their production is highly energy-demanding22. There is evidence that indicates that deer with more worn teeth relative to age grow larger antlers23 and have a larger skeletal body size24,25, which suggests that tooth wear is a proxy of food intake investment. But at the same time, because teeth in deer cannot be replaced or repaired during the animal’s life, tooth wear becomes a proxy of animal lifespan26,23,24,25,26,27,28. Under this scenario, a social environment that favours male-male competition for mating partners is expected to lead to deer producing larger antlers, but at a cost of shortening life expectancy, because tooth duration is compromised by tooth wear.

According to theory, we should expect red deer antlers to be smaller, either when their bearer is in poor condition (condition-dependence), or when the fitness return related to antler size increase is low due to the presence of few male rivals competing for potential mates. Though there is some evidence for the positive relationship between body size or condition and antler size in support for the condition-dependence hypothesis in red deer8, no study has assessed the role of social environment (intra-sexual competition at population level).

Here we study antler size in relation to the level of male-male competition in red deer populations in Southern Spain, controlling for body size and age, and the effect on tooth wear, a trait related to lifespan. We used populations that presented variation in the number of male competitors relative to potential mates, which was reflected in actual population differences in intra-sexual competition29,30. In addition, we undertook an experimental design, in which males were controlled for age, body size and faecal hormone metabolites (testosterone and cortisol, see Methods), and were exposed to two social environments during the period of antler growth: no male-male competition, that is, one male living in a female group; and male-male competition, consisting of single-sex male group (we refer to HC for social environments with high male-male competition and LC for low competition ones, either in natural or captive deer experiment, see Methods). We hypothesised that males under conditions of low intra-sexual competition would develop smaller antlers, and hence experience lower food energy costs that would be reflected in less tooth wear, after controlling for body size and age, in comparison to males under higher intra-sexual competition.

Results

Natural experiment

Age structure in HC and LC populations

Male mean age was greater in HC than in LC populations. In HC the mean age of culled males was 4.51 yr (range = 2–11 yr, 1st – 3rd quartiles = 3–6, n = 2024), against 2.61 yr in LC (range = 2–9 yr, 1st – 3rd quartiles = 2–3, n = 2177; F1, 40.67 = 78.06, p < 0.0001, Fig. 1a). The proportion of males older than 2 yr, estimated from direct counts, corroborated that the age structure of males in HC populations were biased to older age in comparison with LC populations (males older than 2 yr in HC = 50.7% vs. LC = 16.9%, F1, 27.5 = 30.85, p < 0.0001).

Figure 1
figure1

Kernel density of the age structure of shot red deer males (a) and females (b) from HC and LC populations. Vertical lines are the predicted mean age calculated using mixed linear models (see Methods). Graphics were carried out using the generic function plot in R96.

There were no significant differences in the age structure of culled hinds between HC and LC. Their age ranged between 1 and 15 years (1st – 3rd quartiles = 2–6, predicted mean for HC = 4.29, n = 1286; predicted mean for LC = 4.55, n = 1209; F1, 22.58 = 1.52, p = 0.231, Fig. 1b).

Habitat assessment of areas occupied by HC and LC populations did not reveal any significant difference in habitat quality (Habitat quality index: HC = 258.2; LC = 273.6; F1, 13.97 = 0.94, p = 0.347).

Antler size and body weight in HC and LC populations

Males differed in body weight (BW) between HC and LC populations. The predicted maximum body weight in HC populations was 114.8 kg against 108.3 kg in LC populations, while in females the predicted maximum body weight in both types of populations was more similar (81.1 kg and 78.7 kg, respectively) (Table 1, Fig. 2). The rates of weight change with age were faster in males than in females in HC and LC populations, and within males, the body weight of LC populations decreased faster once body weight peaked. Males of LC populations reached their predicted prime body weight at 6 years old in comparison with 8 yr of age in HC populations. Females’ body weight peaked at 8 yr of age in LC populations and at 9 yr in HC populations, with very little variation across age between populations (Fig. 2). The model explained 64% of the variance by the fixed effects (R2LMM(m), Table 1) and 77% (R2LMM(c), Table 1) by the combined fixed and random effects. The standard deviation of the random effects indicates that there was more variation in body weight attributed to differences between populations than that due to variation between hunting seasons.

Table 1 Coefficients of the linear mixed-effects model on body weight (kg) for males and females from populations with two levels of male sexual competition for mates (i.e. social environment: high competition: HC; low competition: LC; reference level HC), controlling for population, hunting season and culling date (DOY: day of year, see Methods).
Figure 2
figure2

Predictions from model in Table 1 of body weight against age in males and females from populations with two levels of male-male competition for mating opportunities (high competition: HC; low competition: LC). Graphic was generated using the generic function plot in R96.

For males of the same age and body size (as indicated by mandible length), those of HC populations had significantly greater antler length, on average 3.6 cm, than those of LC populations (Table 2; Fig. 3). Variation in antler length was greater between populations than between hunting seasons, as indicated by the standard deviation of the random effects (Table 2). Random and fixed effects together explained 80% of the variation in antler length.

Table 2 Coefficients of the linear mixed-effects model on antler beam length (cm) against age (yr) controlling for mandible length (ML, a proxy of body size, see Methods) in red deer males from populations with two levels of male sexual competition for mates in social environment (high competition: HC; low competition: LC; reference level HC).
Figure 3
figure3

Predictions from model in Table 2 of antler beam length in males from populations with two levels of male-male sexual competition for mating opportunities (high competition: HC; low competition: LC). Graphic was generated using the generic function plot in R96.

Trophy-size biased selection of two-year-old males was not stronger in LC compared with HC, since an analysis of variance of type III on the terms of the mixed linear model clearly indicated that the interaction between population type and age was not significant (F1, 1510.8 = 0.003, p = 0.957). Mandible length was not included in the final model as it was not significant, but the output of a full model that included mandible length and its interactions with age and HC/LC population type was consistent with this result. The predicted antler beam length for males of 2 and 3 years of age in HC and LC populations using model in Table 2 are shown in Fig. 4.

Figure 4
figure4

Predicted means of antler length (cm, ± se) of 2 and 3 year-old males in estates with high (HC) and low (LC) male-male competition for mating opportunities. Graphic was generated using the generic function plot in R96.

Molar height, a measure inversely related to tooth wear, decreased with age in both sexes of HC and LC populations, and in general, the rate of tooth wear decreased as age increased (Table 3, Fig. 5). In both types of population, females had a very similar rate of tooth wear, but in males the pattern of tooth wear across age differed significantly between HC and LC populations (Table 3, Fig. 5). That is, in LC populations males’ rate of tooth wear decreased after 5 years of age, while the rate of tooth wear in males of HC populations was constant across age (Fig. 5), and males of HC populations had the lowest values of molar height among sexes and HC and LC populations, after controlling for age. The partitioning of the variance in tooth wear within the random effects, as indicated by the standard deviation of the random effects (Table 3), indicated that populations explained more variation than hunting seasons. The model explained a significant contribution of the variance of the data, 75% by the fixed effects (R2LMM(m), Table 3), and 79% (R2LMM(c), Table 3) by the combined fixed and random effects.

Table 3 Coefficients of the linear mixed-effects model on molar height (mm) (a proxy of tooth wear, see Methods) against age in red deer males and females from populations with two levels of male sexual competition for mates in social environment (high competition: HC; low competition: LC; reference level HC).
Figure 5
figure5

Predictions from model in Table 3 of molar height (a proxy of tooth wear) against age for males and females from populations with two levels of male-male competition for mating opportunities (high competition: HC; low competition: LC). (reference shot day was fixed at 26th September). Graphic was generated using the generic function plot in R96.

Antler length was negatively related to molar height after controlling for the effects of age and mandible length (Table 4, Fig. 6). That is, for animals of the same age and similar body size, those with a greater tooth wear had larger antlers, and this effect was stronger in males of HC than in LC populations, especially for older animals (Table 4, Fig. 6). The contribution of the random effect population explained more than twice the amount of variance attributable to hunting season, as indicated by the random effects standard deviation (Table 4). The model explained 70% of the variance by the fixed effects (R2LMM(m), Table 4) and 83% (R2LMM(c), Table 4) by the combined fixed and random effects.

Table 4 Coefficients of the linear mixed-effects model on antler beam length (in cm) against molar height (MH) controlling for mandible length (ML, a proxy of body size, see Methods) and age in red deer males from populations with two levels of male sexual competition for mates in social environment (high competition: HC; low competition: LC; reference level HC).
Figure 6
figure6

Predictions from model in Table 4 of antler beam length against molar height (a proxy of tooth wear) from populations with two levels of male-male competition for mating opportunities (high competition: HC; low competition: LC) at two arbitrary ages of 2 and 5 years old (mandible length, a proxy of body size, was fixed at its mean value). Graphic was generated using the generic function plot in R96.

Captive deer experiment

As was hypothesised, the social environment of low male-male competition depressed antler growth after controlling for herbaceous quality (NDVI index, see Methods), previous antler and body weight (Model A, estimate = −16.27, p = 0.035, Table 5). Out of these controlling terms only antler size of the previous year was positively associated with antler size (estimate = 0.95, p < 0.001, Table 5). The variance explained by the random effect year was not significant. The model explained a significant amount of the variance of the system (R2LMM(c) = 0.88, R2LMM(m) = 0.74). The prediction of the effect of social environment on antler size when all other fixed effects were fixed to their mean values was 437 cm (se = 12.3) in the high intra-sexual competition environment, and 421 cm (se = 12.4) in the low competition environment (Fig. 7).

Table 5 Coefficients of a linear mixed model (Model A) on red deer antler size (cm) against NDVI, previous antler (size of the antler grown in the previous season, cm), body weight (BW, kg) and social environment (high-low intra-sexual competition; reference level = high competition) and year as random effect. p (> Chi2): probability of tests of random-effect terms in the model, each term is removed and REML-likelihood ratio tests computed. R2LMM(m) marginal variance accounted for the fixed effects; R2LMM(c) conditional variance accounted for random and fixed effects.
Figure 7
figure7

Predictions and standard errors on antler size of red deer males exposed to social environments of high and low male-male competition using Model A in Table 5. Graphic was generated using ggplot299.

The results of the models that incorporated faecal levels of testosterone (Model T, Table 6) and cortisol (Model C, Table 7) produced consistent results with those of Model A. In Model T, the low competition environment had a negative effect on antler size (estimate = −158.61, p = 0.003, Table 6) and males with big antlers in the previous season were also likely to have grown big antlers in the actual season (estimate = 1.1, p = 0.001). The estimates of the effect of testosterone level previous and post exposure to the new social environment were negative and significant (pre-testosterone = −0.45, se = 0.161, p = 0.029; post-testosterone = −1.01, se = 0.232, p = 0.004). Post-testosterone had a significant interaction with social environment, as the levels of post-testosterone increased, antler size decreased in the high competition environment but had no effect under the low competition environment (estimate = 1.05, p = 0.006, Table 6). In this model the random effect year explained no variance and that is why R2 marginal and conditional had identical values (R2 = 0.97). There was a non-significant trend for antler size to be associated with high values of NDVI (estimate = 306, p = 0.079) and body weight had no effect on antler size (p = 0.563).

Table 6 Coefficients of a linear mixed model (Model T) on red deer antler size against NDVI, previous antler (size of the antler grown in the previous season, cm), body weight (BW, kg), levels of faecal testosterone before exposure to new social environment (pre-testosterone, ng∙g−1) and after exposure to new social environment (post-testosterone, ng∙g−1) and social environment (high-low intra-sexual competition; reference level = high competition). Other details as in Table 5.
Table 7 Coefficients of a linear mixed model (Model C) on red deer antler size against NDVI, previous antler (size of the antler grown in the previous season, cm), body weight (BW, kg), levels of faecal cortisol before exposure to new social environment (pre-cortisol, ng∙g−1) and after exposure to new social environment (post-cortisol, ng∙g−1) and social environment (high-low intra-sexual competition; reference level = high competition). Other details as in Table 5.

In Model C there was an interaction between social environment and antler size, as faecal levels of cortisol increased, antler size decreased in the high competition environment but there was a trend of increase in the low competition environment (interaction post-cortisol × social environment [low competition], estimate = 0.49, p = 0.001, Table 7). In this model antler growth was positively associated with NDVI (estimate = 427.95, p = 0.022), with previous antler (estimate = 0.8, p < 0.001) and negatively related to body weight (estimate = −0.41, p = 0.038). Year explained a significant amount of the variance (p = 0.011) and the model accounted for a large amount of the variance of the system (R2LMM(c) = 0.98, R2LMM(m) = 0.51).

The faecal levels of cortisol decreased during the experiment (estimate = −415.5, se = 176.9, p = 0.026) but they were not affected by the social environment, as indicated by the non-significant interaction pre-post × social environment (p = 0.656, Table 8). A simplified model in which the non-significant interaction was removed produced predictions of 476 ng∙g−1 and 128 ng∙g−1 of faecal cortisol before and after exposure to the new social environment, respectively.

Table 8 Coefficients of a linear mixed model on faecal cortisol (ng/g) against time when cortisol was measured (pre- and post exposure to new social environment) and social environment (high-low intra-sexual competition; reference level = high competition and post exposure) and year as random effect. Other details as in Table 5.

Discussion

The results clearly indicate that red deer males that experienced social environments with high intra-sexual competition produced larger antlers and wore down their teeth faster than males living in low male-male competition social environments. By contrast, female rates of tooth wear were similar between HC and LC populations, as they were not driven by same type of intra-sexual competition but likely by environmental conditions that were similar across populations. Furthermore, the experimental design demonstrated that the presence of male rivals induced the growth of bigger antlers as compared to the antlers growth of males in the company of only females. Consequently, our results support the hypothesis that a social environment with a high level of male intra-sexual competition promotes the increase of sex-trait expression with detrimental effect to male longevity.

Our study takes advantage of contrasting management practises that create LC and HC population environments. Previous studies, using genetic and behavioural tools, have shown clear differences in the degree of male-male competition30 and the consequences in the transmission of genetic variability to the next generation29 between these two social environments. Our results are also in agreement with the effects of male competition in these same Iberian red deer populations on the dark ventral patch, that may be modulated in the short term by urination, changing its size (Carranza et al., under review) and its chemical constituents31.

Managers may provide supplementary food to these red deer populations, which might introduce confounding effects if supplementation was associated with one of the social environments. However, feed supplementation is occasional, only provided in summer during drought periods and usually in both types of populations32,33. In any case, if environmental conditions differed between populations in our study, either due to natural food resources or management practises, we would expect body condition to respond in LC and HC populations in a similar fashion in both males and females, which was not the case. Males of dimorphic species (9 and references therein), including red deer34, may be more sensitive than females to changes in environmental conditions, but even so, some effect would also apply to females. By contrast, our results show that body weight and tooth wear were similar in females across both types of populations. Additional support to our interpretation comes from the finding that spatial variation in antler length was higher than temporal variation, despite ample evidence that antler size in red deer shows strong inter-annual variation that is weather and density dependent35,36,37,38,39. Moreover, if favourable environmental conditions were the main cause for antlers being larger in HC populations, it would be unlikely that males of these populations would show higher rates of tooth wear, as tooth wear is related to harsh habitat conditions in several species of deer21,40,41,42.

Most evidence on factors influencing trait expression comes from variation in ambient environment affecting individual condition1,3,43. However, it is increasingly supported that the social environment also influences trait expression not only through regulation of hormone levels44,45,46 but by alternative, little known mechanisms, that might decouple the relationship between hormone level and trait expression47,47. Social environment, by means of intraspecific competition, may affect individual condition and hence trait development8,10. However, evidence of the effect of social environment, as perceived by individuals, on trait development is scarce. Some examples are related to dominance behaviour, in particular the reduction of trait expression or signalling by subordinate individuals20,48. McGraw et al.18 demonstrated that aggressive interactions experienced during development led to increased size of male sparrows’ badges (Passer domesticus). Vergara & Martínez-Padilla47 presented an experiment inducing a change in the social environment perceived by red grouse Lagopus lagopus scoticus males. They showed that when testosterone-implanted birds increased their comb size, untreated males living in the treatment area decreased their comb size. The authors hypothesised that untreated males may perceive an increase in the competitive ability of competitors and then act themselves as subordinate. Plasticity in costly traits can allow individuals to reduce investment when traits are less useful. An example for a carotenoid-based sexual signal is the decrease in bill colour investment in male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) when they are kept in an male-only environment as compared to males living with females, since bill colour is a sexual signal directed to females who use it as a trait in mate choice16.

The differences found between our two types of red deer populations may indicate spatial heterogeneity in a landscape of selection intensity5,30. It may be suggested that after sufficient generations of divergent conditions one would expect micro-evolutionary changes49. Alternatively, reaction norms may allow individual males to modulate the phenotypic expression of a single genotype across a range of environments3,4,19,50,51. Continuous hunting exploitation has been reported to produce changes in sex-traits due to the harvesting of animals with the largest trophies52,53,54,55, sometimes with micro-evolutionary consequences56,57. The case presented here could be the first one to show that hunting exploitation leads to a reduction in sex-traits due not to the removal of large trophies themselves but to changes in the population conditions (i.e. structure) that promote males to reduce investment in costly traits. Further research is needed to investigate potential implications of our results, for instance, on reaction-norm thresholds for sex trait development and static allometries58,59, as well as potential micro-evolutionary processes49,57 affecting sex-trait expression and lifespan under contrasting population structures.

Our experimental design on captive deer produced, for two consecutive years, consistent results with the results found in our wild populations, namely, males produced smaller antlers when they lived exclusively with females, but larger antlers in the presence of male rivals. These results also held when our analyses controlled for faecal levels of testosterone and cortisol metabolites.

The relationship between testosterone and some sex traits has proven to be complex and dependent on the social environment (see above), and similarly occurs in the case of antlers. For example, testosterone is expected to be at its lowest level in the annual cycle, when antlers are cast and during antler growth, however it has a positive role in antler ossification25, and a negative relationship has been found between post-rut testosterone levels and antler size60. We also found a negative relationship between antler size and faecal testosterone in samples taken pre- and post the period of antler growth. For post-testosterone, there also was a significant interaction showing that the negative relationship with antler size occurred only in conditions of high male-male competition. Males with larger antlers in HC environment showed low testosterone levels in agreement with the expectation, while variation in antler size and testosterone were higher among LC males. Results for the dark ventral patch in Iberian red deer populations showed a positive relationship between this trait and testosterone, but only in HC populations (de la Peña et al.61) Both results suggest that the relationship between testosterone and sex traits may be weaker when sexual competition is lower, but further research is needed.

We used faecal cortisol as a proxy of chronic stress caused by the social environment, under the prediction that stress could be the cause of smaller antler production. Clearly, the results showed that differences in cortisol between treatment populations were not associated with antler size.

All in all, our results strongly indicate that the contrasting conditions in male age-structure and adult sex-ratio between both types of populations are the most likely cause for the differences found in sex-trait expression in males, and its concomitant effect in tooth wear. These results have important implications not only for the evolutionary theme of sex-trait expression related to the social environment, but also as a driver of sexually dimorphic senescence.

LC and HC populations differed in the rate of tooth wear; tooth depletion has been reported as one main cause of senescence in ungulates23,25,26,28,62,63. We assumed that differences in tooth wear between populations and sexes were not due to differences in enamel and dentine hardness64. It is unlikely that across 56 populations differences in tooth hardness were associated to the management types that produced our two male-male competition environments. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated in Scottish red deer that male and female molars do not differ in enamel and dentine hardness64. Our results suggest differences between populations in sexually dimorphic senescence. We were unable to obtain a large dataset of old males from LC populations, because few males survived beyond middle age due to hunting. However, the differences in the rate of tooth wear indicate that LC males not only invested less in antlers but also experienced delayed tooth depletion compared to HC males.

Sexual selection has increasingly been acknowledged as the main force responsible for sex differences in senescence and longevity in different taxa including ungulates28,65,66,67,68, so the level of intra-sexual competition is expected to affect male senescence. Our data show that males in populations with a female-biased sex ratio, where they can mate from early age but with little intra-sexual competition29,30, experienced delayed senescence, as measured by tooth wear. This is in line with the findings that red deer males that were involved in competition early in life experienced early senescence69. For moose, Alces alces, it has been shown that the mean weight of males living in a strongly female biased population decreased more precociously than that of males living in population with a more even sex ratio, which was interpreted as early senescence70. We also found early peaking and decrease of body weight in our female biased red deer populations, although our results on tooth wear do not suggest that these differences in body weight were related to senescence. Rather, body weight, as well as antler size, are needed for male-male competition and both have consequences in tooth wear and senescence. Therefore, earlier reduction of body weight in a female-biased environment may denote a different strategy rather than a form of male cost potentially related to exhaustion, since it is associated with lower tooth wear, while males in a high-competition environment have to invest in body weight and antler size at the expense of lifespan.

Classic theory predicts that the sex experiencing a higher rate of extrinsic mortality evolves faster aging and reduces its longevity71. Regardless of an insufficient number of generations under current conditions, our results may seem paradoxical with this prediction, since males of LC populations experience very high near-random age-specific mortality rates due to hunting, thus resembling a case of strong extrinsic mortality for males below their prime age33. The maintenance of such conditions in exploited animal populations has led to advanced age at first reproduction and earlier senescence49,72,73,74. Perhaps we should expect earlier senescence in LC populations if there were no differences in male mating strategies and investment in costly sex-traits in both types of populations. However, the lower investment in antlers by LC males with the consequences of decelerated tooth depletion might act in the opposite direction to the former prediction of an earlier senescence due to extrinsic mortality. We may speculate about different processes taking place in these populations. On one hand, early reproduction and higher extrinsic mortality of males in LC populations would favour early senescence under a micro-evolutionary process according to theory71. On the other hand, breeding under conditions of low intra-sexual competition would favour smaller sex-traits with lesser costs involved, thus delaying senescence, in this case under a process of behavioural and physiological plasticity on the basis of reaction norms. The prevalence of the effect in one or the other direction may depend on the micro-evolutionary stage. Hunting areas in Spain have remained under similar conditions to those studied here only over the last 30–40 years. In addition, although fences do restrict deer movement between estates, it is unlikely they are completely gene flow impervious, as suggested by the results of Martínez et al.75 and Pérez-González et al.76. Deer are keen to walk along fences and find holes to slide through, which may prevent genetic isolation and local adaptations77. Thus, we believe that the potential for higher longevity favoured by reduced tooth wear in LC males should likely be the consequence of individual plasticity without any significant role of micro-evolutionary change.

Methods

To test our hypotheses we applied two approaches, (1) a natural experiment comprising measurements of animals legally culled in 56 red deer populations, which can be neatly classified into two levels of male-male competition for mating opportunities, and (2) an experimental design in which captive males were exposed to two social environments, (i) male living exclusively with females, (ii) male living with other males (no females), during the period of antler formation.

Natural experiment

We used information from 6696 (2495 females and 4201 males) Iberian red deer culled on 56 hunting estates (populations) in the centre-west and centre-south of Spain between 1997 and 2009. The size of individual hunting estates ranged between 750 and 3000 Ha, the habitat included mountain ranges covered by Mediterranean shrub (Cistus spp., Erica spp., Arbutus unedo, Phyllirea spp., Genista hirsuta, Lavandula spp.) and trees (Quercus spp., Olea europaea), along with lower, flatter land, and open oak woodland known as ‘dehesa’76. All deer used in this study came from legal game activities, shot under the modality of big game driven hunt, known as Spanish ‘montería’39,75. This type of hunt has been shown to be a good procedure to obtain unbiased samples of deer populations78. These estates were under two contrasting types of management: stock-proof wire mesh fenced estates, versus unfenced grounds in which deer could migrate29,33. Fenced hunting estates focus deer harvesting on adult males. In contrast, in unfenced hunting estates few males are allowed to reach old age, as no hunter risks sparing from culling sub-adult males as they could be shot in adjacent estates if they move out33. In unfenced estates most sub-adults are yearlings, as it is illegal to shoot them33. As a consequence, the sex-ratio and age structure within unfenced populations are strongly biased towards females and young males, compared to fenced estate populations29,33. Therefore, on fenced estates males experienced higher level of intra-sexual competition compared to that on unfenced estates, where virtually all males can mate even if they are sub-adult29,30. We refer to fenced and unfenced estates as populations with high (HC) and low (LC) levels of competition for mating opportunities.

The information used was body weight (BW, intact animal with gut minus blood from bleeding, ± 0.1 kg), fresh right antler beam length (AL, ± 1 cm); mandible length (ML, ± 0.1 cm); thickness of the dentine of first lower molar M1 (molar height, MH, ± 0.1 mm) as a proxy of dental wear;64 sex; age (in years, see below); shooting date and location at estate level. The preparation of the jawbone and sectioning of M1 was carried out following Pérez-Barbería et al.24,25,79 MH was estimated by measuring on a coronal (frontal) section of M1, with the aid of a calliper and a magnifying glass, the thickness of the dentine from the top of the cementum of the radicular pad to the middle point of occlusal surface23,24,64. Tooth wear was assessed as the negative relationship of MH with age24; the advantages of recording MH as dentine height against other measurements of molar height as a proxy of tooth wear is described in Pérez-Barbería et al.25,64,79. Mandible length was measured in the laboratory from the mesial border of the first incisor socket to the vertical part of the ramus, after having removed the flesh at these two points. We used mandible length as a measurement to control for animal size, independent of body condition. Besides, controlling for mandible length also makes it possible for MH to be a reliable proxy of tooth wear as mandible length covariate controls for potential differences in molar size between animals of different size24,25,64. The length of the main beam of the right antler was measured on the animal carcass within a few hours after being shot, from the centre of the lowest outside edge of the burr over the outer side to the most distant point of the main beam. The point of the burr was where the centre line along the outer side of the beam intersected the burr. Measurements of broken antler beams were discarded.

The age in years was estimated by counting the milky-coloured cement layers on the root pad (assuming 1 layer per year of age) of the coronal section of M1, aided by a reflected light microscope80,81. When M1 was missing, or the cement layers were poorly defined, M2 was used and the age in years was estimated as the number of cement layers plus one. This age estimation technique provides an acceptable approximation to the actual age for population studies82.

We collected information of the habitat quality of each estate following the index described in Pérez-González & Carranza29; this information was collected during 2004 and 2005, and we assumed that the relative differences in the index, between fenced and unfenced estates, remained similar across years. This is because this index is mainly based on changes in the mosaic composition of Mediterranean shrub vegetation, which is likely to have changed little during the sampling period of this study. To assess for differences in age structure of fenced and unfenced populations that could account for differences in sexual competition and level of polygyny between both types of populations, we used the age structure of shot deer, and the proportion of males older than 2 years of age from direct counts carried out during 2004 and 2005 rut, as described in29,30,33. The latter was used to corroborate that the age structure of shot deer was not affected by differences in hunting selection between HC and LC populations, as their relative differences held when using direct counts data.

Artificial selection by biased hunting could be a potential cause of differences in antler size between populations. To assess if hunting targeting large antlers could be the cause of smaller antler size in LC estates vs. HC estates, we used the following reasoning and approach. Most males culled in LC estates were 2 years old (see above); if hunters in LC estates aimed to shoot 2 year-old males with large antlers, then, 2 year-old individuals that were not culled should be those with smaller antlers. If this is true, an interaction between age (only 2 and 3 year old deer) and population type (LC, HC) would be expected, with LC 3 year old males having smaller antlers than those of the same age culled in HC estates. To assess this hypothesis, we fitted a mixed linear model with antler length as the response variable and the interaction between type of estate (LC, HC) and age as the fixed effects (only males of 2 and 3 years of age), and as random effects population and hunting season (see below for details on the statistical analyses).

Captive deer experiment

Study area

The experiment was carried out at Lagunes Game Farm (Southern Spain) during 2017 and 2018, using 234 individuals distributed into 7 experimental plots. The experiment was repeated across two consecutive years in order to increase sample size to overcome constraints on the number of animals and plots. We used twenty-four 4 year-old red deer individually marked with ear-tags to enable identification. Eighteen males constituted the high competition (HC) group (control), which was allocated to one of the plots. Six low competition (LC) groups were constituted by one male and between 13 and 21 females in each group allocated randomly to a different plot. The HC group of males resembled a situation with “few” females since there were females in other enclosures separated less than 0.5 km in the farm. Males could not see the females but could likely sense their presence via scent signals from the distance. We avoided keeping females with many rutting males in an enclosure since it would have been unsafe for the females, leading to ethical concerns. This design was appropriate for our purpose of creating a clear difference between HC and LC social environments. A similar experimental arrangement was repeated the second year using a different batch of experimental animals. Groups were moved into the plots in March, just after antlers were cast, and the experiment finished in July when antlers were fully grown and velvet was shed.

Antlers measurements

Because it was not possible to weigh the antlers of live stags, we used a measure of antler size of fully-grown antlers. This measure was computed as the summation of all lengths and perimeters of right and left antlers that are recorded to assess the quality of red deer trophies. These were: perimeter of the pedicle, perimeter of beam between the brow tine and bez tine, perimeter of the beam between bez tine and crown, beam length, brow tine length and bez tine length.

Primary productivity

In order to have an objective measure of the quality of the vegetation in each plot through the experiment, primary productivity was assessed using the Normalized Vegetation Difference index (NDVI), which has been widely used as a proxy of quality and quantity food resources in ungulates83,84,85. NDVI was calculated using QGIS86 and images from Landsat8 provided by Copernicus Global Land Service with a 30×30 spatial resolution, corrected by atmospheric perturbation using Dark Object Subtraction in the semi-automatic classification plugging87. Finally, as a proxy of quality and availability of browse and grazing plants within plot and experimental year, all NDVI values available and with less than 20% cloudiness were averaged from April to July (2017: 07 April, 24 April, 09 May, 10 June, 26 June, 12 July, 28 July; 2018: 26 April, 13 June, 29 June, 31 July).

Faecal steroid hormones

Faecal grab sampling was conducted on individual deer from the rectus at the beginning and end of the experiment (March and July). Faecal samples were processed to quantify the metabolite levels of testosterone and cortisol (Iberian red deer88; roe deer Capreolus capreolus89,90,91. Frozen faecal samples were dried and milled. A solution of 2 ml of phosphate buffer and 2 ml of 80% methanol were added to 0.5 g of faecal material and the mixture was vortexed. Samples were on a shaker for 16 h, the solvent was decanted and the supernatant was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 30 min. Faecal metabolite hormone levels were determined using a commercial enzyme immunoassay kit (testosterone: DEMEDITEC DEH3388; cortisol: DEMEDITEC DE1559). For simplicity we refer to testosterone and cortisol throughout the text meaning faecal metabolites of these hormones.The testosterone intra-assay coefficient of variation was 10.8% and inter-assay 10.6%. The cortisol intra-assay coefficient of variation was 9.2% and inter-assay 10.2%. Standard dose-response curves were constructed by plotting the binding percentage against the standard hormone concentrations. The results were expressed as nanograms per gram of faecal dry matter.

Ethical statement

All our methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The experimental protocol was approved in agreement between the Wildlife Research Unit at the University of Cordoba and Lagunes Farm. Lagunes Game Farm complied with the Spanish animal welfare legislation, it was daily attended by qualified personnel and a veterinary looked after the animals regularly. Ear tagging, body weight monitoring and faecal grab sampling were procedures that did not require animal experimentation license as they were carried out as standard farming activities to assess animal health and condition. Data obtained for this study derived from normal farming activities.

Statistical analysis

Natural experiment

We used linear mixed-effects regression models to predict the responses of beam antler length, body weight, molar height and habitat quality, against a number of predictors, and their meaningful interactions, in LC and HC populations, and controlling for population and hunting season (October to February) as random sources of variation. Generalised additive mixed linear models GAM92 were used in an explorative stage of analysis to corroborate that regression smoothers with basis of modest size were appropriated to model the data. Consequently, age and mandible length were fitted as orthogonal quadratic terms in mixed linear models because of their simplicity when testing for interactions in comparison with GAM functions with basis of modest size. Besides, the quadratic function is a convenient representation of many life history traits related to body condition that increase with age until they reach a peak and decrease in the last stages of life25,93. As body weight is a condition-dependent variable affected by the time of year when the animal was shot, we fitted two complementary circular functions as covariates to account for changes in body weight across the hunting season, following the approach used in Pérez-Barbería et al.24. The circular functions were sine DOY and cosine DOY, where DOY was the day of the year in which the animal was shot. For practical reasons (i.e. starting of the hunting season) we arbitrary fixed 26th of September at DOY = 1, changing the starting reference point does not affect the results of the analysis.

The age structure of males and females in HC and LC populations were plotted as kernel densities (i.e. similar to a continuous histogram), using the Gaussian function as smoothing kernel. On these plots we superimposed the predicted mean age for HC and LC populations calculated by separate mixed linear models for each sex, with populations as fixed effects and hunting season as random effect.

Normality and homoscedasticity were verified. We used bivariate plots of the terms in the models and plots of fitted values against residuals in order to detect mistakes in our records. Some odd values could be identified as typing mistakes and were corrected in the database, and fourteen odd records were removed from the dataset94. The full models were simplified using backward elimination by removing the non-significant fixed-effects terms, one at a time, following the principle of marginality (i.e. the highest order interactions were tested first and if they were significant, then the lower order effects were not tested for significance). Backward elimination was based on p-values in favour of information theory approaches, like ΔAIC or BIC69, as successfully used in Pérez-Barbería et al.24,25. The coefficients of the final models were calculated using Restricted Maximum Likelihood REML70, and the degrees of freedom in the estimate of the coefficients of the mixed linear models followed Satterthwaite’s approximation95, since in linear mixed-effects models, determining the “correct” value of degrees of freedom in the estimate of the coefficients is meaningless92,94. The variance explained by the models was represented as R2 marginal (variance accounted for by the fixed effects; R2 LMM(m)) and R2 conditional (variance accounted for by random and fixed effects; R2 LMM(c)), following a method developed for linear mixed-effects models 94 and used in Pérez-Barbería et al.24,25. All analyses and graphics were conducted in R software96, mainly using lme497, lmerTest95 and mgcv98 packages.

Captive deer experiment

We modelled the response of antler growth to social environment (LC vs. HC) using three independent linear mixed regression models. The first model (Model A) fitted as fixed effects social environment, body weight (BW), NDVI and antler size of the antler grown in the previous season (previous antler), and year as a random effect. Previous antler was included in the model as it was expected that males potential to produce big antlers remained across their life independent on the environmental conditions. BW was fitted in the model to account for a positive relationship between animal size and antler size, although we expected this relationship to be weak as all animals were of the same age and the differences in body weight were small as they were drawn from the main herd following a criterion of similar body size. A second model (Model T) was the same as Model A, adding two new terms, the faecal levels of testosterone when the animals were deployed in the plots (pre-testosterone) and at the end of the antler growth period (post-testosterone), together with the interaction post-testosterone × social environment. We kept to a minimum the number of interactions in the model to avoid overparameterization as the sample size was small. A third model (Model C) was fitted as Model T but replacing faecal testosterone with faecal cortisol. Models A, T and C were used to predict antler size after animals were exposed to the new social environment, and the predictions were plotted on the condition of the fixed effects set to their mean values (only shown for Model A). Models were fitted using the R software packages described in Natural experiment above.

References

  1. 1.

    Andersson, M. B. Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences - sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40, 804–816 (1986).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wingfield, J., Hegner, R., Dufty, A. & Ball, G. The challenge hypothesis - theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. American Naturalist 136, 829–846 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Cotton, S., Fowler, K. & Pomiankowski, A. Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis? Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 271, 771–783 (2004).

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Schlichting, C. D. Hidden Reaction Norms, Cryptic Genetic Variation, and Evolvability. Year in Evolutionary Biology 2008 1133, 187–203 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cornwallis, C. K. & Uller, T. Towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25, 145–152 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Piersma, T. & Gils, J. A. van. The Flexible Phenotype: A Body-Centred Integration of Ecology, Physiology, and Behaviour. (OUP Oxford, 2010).

  7. 7.

    Kotiaho, J. S. Costs of sexual traits: a mismatch between theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Biological Reviews 76, 365–376 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Mysterud, A., Meisingset, E., Langvatn, R., Yoccoz, N. G. & Stenseth, N. C. Climate-dependent allocation of resources to secondary sexual traits in red deer. Oikos 111, 245–252 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bonduriansky, R. The evolution of condition-dependent sexual dimorphism. American Naturalist 169, 9–19 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Vanpe, C. et al. Antler size provides an honest signal of male phenotypic quality in roe deer. American Naturalist 169, 481–493 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Vergara, P., Mougeot, F., Martinez-Padilla, J., Leckie, F. & Redpath, S. M. The condition dependence of a secondary sexual trait is stronger under high parasite infection level. Behavioral Ecology 23, 502–511 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zahavi, A. Mate Selection - Selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology 53, 205–214 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zahavi, A. Cost of honesty - further remarks on handicap principle. Journal of Theoretical Biology 67, 603–605 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Grafen, A. Biological signals as handicaps. Journal of Theoretical Biology 144, 517–546 (1990).

    MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Johnstone, R. Sexual selection, honest advertisement and the handicap principle - reviewing the evidence. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 70, 1–65 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Gautier, P. et al. The presence of females modulates the expression of a carotenoid-based sexual signal. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62, 1159–1166 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Moss, R. et al. Aggressiveness and dominance in captive cock red grouse. Aggressive Behavior 5, 59–84 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    McGraw, K. J., Dale, J. & Mackillop, E. A. Social environment during molt and the expression of melanin-based plumage pigmentation in male house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 53, 116–122 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Cornwallis, C. K. & Birkhead, T. R. Plasticity in reproductive phenotypes reveals status-specific correlations between behavioral, morphological, and physiological sexual traits. Evolution 62, 1149–1161 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Karubian, J., Lindsay, W. R., Schwabl, H. & Webster, M. S. Bill coloration, a flexible signal in a tropical passerine bird, is regulated by social environment and androgens. Animal Behaviour 81, 795–800 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Vergara, P. & Martinez-Padilla, J. Social context decouples the relationship between a sexual ornament and testosterone levels in a male wild bird. Hormones and Behavior 62, 407–412 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Goss, R. J. Deer Antlers: Regeneration, Function and Evolution. (Academic Press, 2012).

  23. 23.

    Carranza, J., Mateos, C., Alarcos, S., Sanchez-Prieto, C. B. & Valencia, J. Sex-specific strategies of dentine depletion in red deer. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 93, 487–497 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Pérez-Barbería, F. J. et al. The influence of habitat on body size and tooth wear in Scottish red deer (Cervus elaphus). Canadian Journal of Zoology 93, 61–70 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Pérez-Barbería, F. J. & Carranza, J. & Sánchez-Prieto, C. Wear Fast, Die Young: More Worn Teeth and Shorter Lives in Iberian Compared to Scottish Red Deer. Plos One 10, e0134788 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Loe, L. E. et al. Increased effect of harsh climate in red deer with a poor set of teeth. Oecologia 147, 24–30 (2006).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Loe, L. E., Mysterud, A., Langvatn, R. & Stenseth, N. C. Decelerating and sex-dependent tooth wear in Norwegian red deer. Oecologia 135, 346–353 (2003).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Carranza, J., Alarcos, S., Sanchez-Prieto, C. B., Valencia, J. & Mateos, C. Disposable-soma senescence mediated by sexual selection in an ungulate. Nature 432, 215–218 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Pérez-González, J. & Carranza, J. Female-biased dispersal under conditions of low male mating competition in a polygynous mammal. Molecular Ecology 18, 4617–4630 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Pérez-González, J. & Carranza, J. Female aggregation interacts with population structure to influence the degree of polygyny in red deer. Animal Behaviour 82, 957–970 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    de la Peña, E., Martín, J. & Carranza, J. The intensity of male-male competition may affect chemical scent constituents in the dark ventral patch of male Iberian red deer. PLOS ONE 14, e0221980 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Pérez-González, J., Barbosa, A. M., Carranza, J. & Torres-Porras, J. Relative Effect of Food Supplementation and Natural Resources on Female Red Deer Distribution in a Mediterranean Ecosystem. Journal of Wildlife Management 74, 1701–1708 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Torres-Porras, J., Carranza, J., Pérez-González, J., Mateos, C. & Alarcos, S. The tragedy of the commons: unsustainable population structure of Iberian red deer in hunting estates. European Journal of Wildlife Research 60, 351–357 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Post, E., Langvatn, R., Forchhamer, M. C. & Stenseth, N. Environmental variation shapes sexual dimorphism in red deer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96, 4467–4471 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Schmidt, K. T., Stien, A., Albon, S. D. & Guinness, F. E. Antler length of yearling red deer is determined by population density, weather and early life-history. Oecologia 127, 191–197 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kruuk, L. E. B. et al. Antler size in red deer: Heritability and selection but no evolution. Evolution 56, 1683–1695 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Loe, L. E. et al. Climate predictability and breeding phenology in red deer: timing and synchrony of rutting and calving in Norway and France. Journal of Animal Ecology 74, 579–588 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Weladji, R. B. et al. Sexual dimorphism and intercorhort variation in reindeer calf antler length is associated with density and weather. Oecologia 145, 549–555 (2005).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Torres-Porras, J., Carranza, J. & Pérez-González, J. Selective culling of Iberian red deer stags (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) by selective monteria in Spain. European Journal of Wildlife Research 55, 117–123 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Nussey, D. H. et al. The relationship between tooth wear, habitat quality and late-life reproduction in a wild red deer population. Journal of Animal Ecology 76, 402–412 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Veiberg, V. et al. The ecology and evolution of tooth wear in red deer and moose. Oikos 116, 1805–1818 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kubo, M. O. & Yamada, E. The Inter-Relationship between Dietary and Environmental Properties and Tooth Wear: Comparisons of Mesowear, Molar Wear Rate, and Hypsodonty Index of Extant Sika Deer Populations. Plos One 9, (2014).

  43. 43.

    Andersson, M. B. Sexual Selection. (Princeton University Press, 1994).

  44. 44.

    Wingfield, J. & Hahn, T. Testosterone and territorial behavior in sedentary and migratory sparrows. Animal Behaviour 47, 77–89 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Oliveira, R. F. Social modulation of androgens in vertebrates: Mechanisms and function. in Advances in the Study of Behavior, Vol 34 (eds. Slater, P. J. B. et al.) vol. 34 165–239 (2004).

  46. 46.

    Cristobal-Azkarate, J., Chavira, R., Boeck, L., Rodriguez-Luna, E. & Veal, J. J. Testosterone levels of free-ranging resident mantled howler monkey males in relation to the number and density of solitary males: A test of the challenge hypothesis. Hormones and Behavior 49, 261–267 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Burmeister, S. S. & Wilczynski, W. Social context influences androgenic effects on calling in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea). Hormones and Behavior 40, 550–558 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Sotchell, J. M. & Dixson, A. F. Changes in the secondary sexual adornments of male mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx) are associated with gain and loss of alpha status. Hormones and Behavior 39, 177–184 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Allendorf, F. W. & Hard, J. J. Human-induced evolution caused by unnatural selection through harvest of wild animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 9987–9994 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Rowe, L. & Houle, D. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 263, 1415–1421 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    West-Eberhard, M. J. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. (OUP USA, 2003).

  52. 52.

    Pelletier, F., Festa-Bianchet, M. & Jorgenson, J. T. Data from selective harvests underestimate temporal trends in quantitative traits. Biology Letters 8, 878–881 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Festa-Bianchet, M., Pelletier, F., Jorgenson, J. T., Feder, C. & Hubbs, A. Decrease in Horn Size and Increase in Age of Trophy Sheep in Alberta Over 37 Years. Journal of Wildlife Management 78, 133–141 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Chiyo, P. I., Obanda, V. & Korir, D. K. Illegal tusk harvest and the decline of tusk size in the African elephant. Ecology and Evolution 5, 5216–5229 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Pérez-Barbería, F. J. & Robles, L. Does hunting affect horn morphology in the Cantabrian chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica parva)? in Cantabrian chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica parva): conservation and population management (eds. Pérez-Barbería, F. J. & Palacios, B.) 396–414 (Ministry of Environment, Spain, 2009).

  56. 56.

    Coltman, D. W. et al. Undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting. Nature 426, 655–658 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Proaktor, G., Coulson, T. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. Evolutionary responses to harvesting in ungulates. Journal of Animal Ecology 76, 669–678 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Bonduriansky, R. & Day, T. The evolution of static allometry in sexually selected traits. Evolution 57, 2450–2458 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Cassidy, E. J., Bath, E., Chenoweth, S. F. & Bonduriansky, R. Sex-specific patterns of morphological diversification: evolution of reaction norms and static allometries in neriid flies. Evolution 68, 368–383 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Malo, A. F. et al. What does testosterone do for red deer males? Proc Biol Sci 276, 971–980 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    de la Peña, E., Martín, J., Barja, I. & Carranza, J. Testosterone and the dark ventral patch of male red deer: the role of the social environment. The Science of Nature 107, 18, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-020-01674-1 (2020)..

  62. 62.

    Fortelius, M. Ungulate cheek teeth: developmental, functional and evolutionary interrelations. Acta Zoologica Fennica 180, 1–76 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Skogland, T. Tooth Wear by Food Limitation and Its Life-History Consequences in Wild Reindeer. Oikos 51, 238–242 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Pérez-Barbería, F. J. Tooth wear as a practical indicator of sexual differences in senescence and mastication investment in ecology studies. Ecological Indicators 103, 735–744 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Promislow, D. E. L. Costs of Sexual Selection in Natural-Populations of Mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 247, 203–210 (1992).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Liker, A. & Szekely, T. Mortality costs of sexual selection and parental care in natural populations of birds. Evolution 59, 890–897 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Carranza, J. & Pérez-Barbería, F. J. Sexual selection and senescence: Male size-dimorphic ungulates evolved relatively smaller molars than females. American Naturalist 170, 370–380 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Graves, B. M. Sexual selection effects on the evolution of senescence. Evolutionary Ecology 21, 663–668 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Murtaugh, P. A. In defense of P values. Ecology 95, 611–617 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Nakagawa, S. & Schielzeth, H. A general and simple method for obtaining R^2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4, 133–142 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Williams, G. C. Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11, 398–411 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Kuparinen, A. & Merila, J. Detecting and managing fisheries-induced evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22, 652–659 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Fenberg, P. B. & Roy, K. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of size-selective harvesting: how much do we know? Molecular Ecology 17, 209–220 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Heino, M. & Dieckmann, U. Detecting fisheries-induced life-history evolution: An overview of the reaction-norm approach. Bulletin of Marine Science 83, 69–93 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Martínez, J. G., Carranza, J., Fernández-García, J. L. & Sánchez-Prieto, C. B. Genetic variation of red deer populations under hunting exploitation in southwestern Spain. Journal of Wildlife Management 66, 1273–1282 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Pérez-González, J., Frantz, A. C., Torres-Porras, J., Castillo, L. & Carranza, J. Population structure, habitat features and genetic structure of managed red deer populations. European Journal of Wildlife Research 58, 933–943 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Slatkin, M. Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236, 787–792 (1987).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Martı́nez, M., Rodrı́guez-Vigal, C., Jones, O. R., Coulson, T. & Miguel, A. S. Different hunting strategies select for different weights in red deer. Biology Letters 1, 353–356 (2005).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Pérez-Barbería, F. J. et al. The influence of habitat on body size and tooth wear in Scottish red deer (_Cervus elaphus_). Canadian Journal of Zoology 93, 61–70 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Mitchell, B. Determination of age in scottish red deer from growth layers in dental cement. Nature 198, 350–351 (1963).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Mitchell, B. Growth layers in dental cement for determining the age of red deer (_Cervus elaphus_ L.). J.Anim.Ecol. 36, 279–293 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Pérez-Barbería, F. J., Duff, E. I., Brewer, M. J. & Guinness, F. E. Evaluation of methods to age Scottish red deer: the balance between accuracy and practicality. Journal of Zoology 294, 180–189 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Villamuelas, M. et al. The Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) as a proxy for diet quality and composition in a mountain ungulate. Ecological Indicators 61, 658–666 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Pettorelli, N. et al. Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends In Ecology & Evolution 20, 503–510 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Hamel, S., Garel, M., Festa‐Bianchet, M., Gaillard, J.-M. & Côté, S. D. Spring Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) predicts annual variation in timing of peak faecal crude protein in mountain ungulates. Journal of Applied Ecology 46, 582–589 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    QGIS Development Team 2009. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. http://qgis.osgeo.org. (2009).

  87. 87.

    Congedo, L. Semi-Automatic Classification Plugin Documentation. (2009).

  88. 88.

    de la Peña, E. et al. The immune challenge of mating effort: steroid hormone profile, dark ventral patch and parasite burden in relation to intrasexual competition in male Iberian red deer. Integr Zool https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12427 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Escribano-Avila, G. et al. Testing Cort-Fitness and Cort-Adaptation hypotheses in a habitat suitability gradient for roe deer. Acta Oecologica 53, 38–48 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Iglesias-Merchan, C. et al. A new large-scale index (AcED) for assessing traffic noise disturbance on wildlife: stress response in a roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) population. Environ Monit Assess 190, 185 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Horcajada-Sánchez, F., Escribano-Ávila, G., Lara-Romero, C., Virgós, E. & Barja, I. The effect of livestock on the physiological condition of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) is modulated by habitat quality. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52290-7 (2019).

  92. 92.

    Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. Generalized Additive Models. Statistical Science 1, 297–310 (1986).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J. A. Generalized Linear Models. vol. second (Chapman & Hall, 1989).

  94. 94.

    Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J. & Bates, D. M. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 390–412 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, B. & Christensen, R. H. B. lmerTest: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 2, 0–29 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. v. 3.4.1. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. (2017).

  97. 97.

    Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1–48 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Wood, S. N. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R, Second Edition. (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2017).

  99. 99.

    Wickham, H. Ggplot2 Elegant graphics for data analysis (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2009).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Lagunes Game Farm made possible the realization of the experiment on captive deer. JPB was granted by the University of Córdoba with a visiting professor contract during part of the realization of this study. We thank Marco Apollonio and anonimous reviewers for constructive comments on the manuscript. Project CGL2016-77052-P from Spanish Ministry of Science contributed to financial support.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.C., S.A., J.P.G., J.T.P., C.S.P., J.V., L.C., E.D.l.P., J.M.S., A.F., A.M. contributed to field work, data collection and sample management; J.P.B. carried out the statistical analyses; I.B. and E.D.l.P. made the analyses of faecal hormones; M.M.R. contributed with management and data in captive experiment; J.C., J.P.B., C.M., J.P.G. conceived the study and J.C., J.P.B. drafted the manuscript. J.C. coordinated the research team. All authors revised the text and gave final approval for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Carranza.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carranza, J., Pérez-Barbería, J., Mateos, C. et al. Social environment modulates investment in sex trait versus lifespan: red deer produce bigger antlers when facing more rivalry. Sci Rep 10, 9234 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65578-w

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing