Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Nyctinastic thallus movement in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha is regulated by a circadian clock


The circadian clock coordinates an organism’s growth, development and physiology with environmental factors. One illuminating example is the rhythmic growth of hypocotyls and cotyledons in Arabidopsis thaliana. Such daily oscillations in leaf position are often referred to as sleep movements or nyctinasty. Here, we report that plantlets of the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha show analogous rhythmic movements of thallus lobes, and that the circadian clock controls this rhythm, with auxin a likely output pathway affecting these movements. The mechanisms of this circadian clock are partly conserved as compared to angiosperms, with homologs to the core clock genes PRR, RVE and TOC1 forming a core transcriptional feedback loop also in M. polymorpha.


Rhythmic movements of plant organs were documented already several centuries BC, but the first known experiments searching for the origin of such rhythms were conducted by the French astronomer de Mairan. Working with a sensitive plant (likely Mimosa pudica), he could show that leaves moving in day/night conditions continued to move in constant darkness. During the following centuries, experiments with what Linnaeus later termed “sleep movements” resulted in both the concept of the circadian clock and that of osmotic motors1,2. These so called nyctinastic movements often occur in non-growing tissue and are reversible as in several legumes. The reversible movements involve osmotic motors in the pulvinus organ3, but rhythmic leaf movements can also be growth associated and thus non-reversible. Such rhythms are evident in the movement of leaves in tobacco and cotyledons in Arabidopsis thaliana4,5. The irreversibility of this process is probably due to deposition of new cell wall material and decreased wall extensibility, but tissue expansion likely results from mechanisms in common with those in pulvinus tissue6.

Since the introduction of the concept of a circadian or endogenous biological clock great progress has been achieved in understanding the mechanisms behind such internal rhythms. In plants most of this work has been performed in the flowering plant Arabidopsis7. A working model of the plant circadian clock comprises a self-sustaining oscillator with an approximately 24-hour rhythm resulting mainly from transcriptional and translational feedback loops8. In short, the main components in such models are a set of single MYB domain transcription factors, a family of PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATORs (PRRs), and a few plant specific genes with unknown biochemical function. The early morning phased genes CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) and LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY) encode two MYB-like transcription factors that function mainly as repressors of day- and evening-phased genes9,10,11,12,13. A second sub-family of related MYB-like transcription factors including REVEILLE4 (RVE4), RVE6 and RVE8 has an opposite function, enhancing clock pace through the activation of several core clock genes14,15.

The family of PRR genes comprise five members in Arabidopsis: PRR1, PRR3, PRR5, PRR7 and PRR9. PRR1 is also known as TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1 (TOC1) that together with CCA1 constituted the first conceptual model of the Arabidopsis clock16. The expression of PRR genes ranges from morning to evening, with PRR9 peaking in the morning, PRR5 and PRR7 around noon, and PRR3 and TOC1 around dusk17. PRR proteins are in recent models incorporated as transcriptional repressors of CCA1/LHY and other PRR genes12.

An additional crucial component of the circadian clock in Arabidopsis is the so-called evening complex (EC), that consists of three proteins: EARLY FLOWERING 3 (ELF3), ELF4, and LUX ARRHYTHMO (LUX)18,19,20. In contrast to other clock genes, knockout mutants of the genes coding for these proteins all show an arrhythmic phenotype in Arabidopsis. Previous studies in Arabidopsis have revealed that the EC mainly function as repressors of transcription. Within the circadian clock, the EC repress TOC1, PRR7, PRR9, and LUX during the night21,22,23, and a transcriptional feedback loop is formed through the repression of EC genes by CCA1/LHY20,21,24,25,26. Important components of the Arabidopsis circadian clock also include ZEITLUPE (ZTL), an F-box protein, and GIGANTEA (GI), encoding a large protein with unclear biochemical function27,28.

Homologs of ELF3, ELF4, LUX, PRR3,5,7,9, TOC1, RVE4,6,8, ZTL and GI have been reported in M. polymorpha29. However, a CCA1/LHY homolog is not present in the genome, suggesting that many, but not all, known clock gene families are also present in M. polymorpha.

When searching for rhythmic growth patterns in the liverwort M. polymorpha we discovered that gemmalings (asexually produced plantlets) displayed rhythmic thallus movement. To identify the nature of this movement and clarify the potential involvement of a circadian clock, we studied the function of putative circadian clock genes and their role in controlling the rhythmic movement.


The Marchantia polymorpha circadian clock controls nyctinastic thallus movements

In Arabidopsis, growth rates of both hypocotyls and leaves are rhythmic and under the control of a circadian clock30,31. In our attempts to detect and measure similar rhythmic growth patterns in liverworts, we noticed that young M. polymorpha gemmalings display nyctinastic movements as the lobes of young thalli waves up and down with a 24 hour rhythm in conditions of 12 hour light and 12 hour darkness (neutral days (ND); Fig. 1a,b; Supplementary Video S1). Furthermore, in gemmalings of different accessions these rhythmic movements are maintained in LL (continuous light) conditions with an approximate average period of 26.1–26.5 hours for several days, supporting that they are controlled by a circadian clock (Fig. 1c–e). One key characteristic of circadian rhythms is temperature compensation, i.e., that the free-running period does not change much with ambient temperature. We thus estimated the free-running period of nyctinastic thallus movement at different temperatures. Consistent with circadian regulation, we found no significant difference in period for temperatures ranging from 18 to 24 °C (Fig. 1c).

Figure 1
figure 1

Marchantia polymorpha gemmalings display nyctinastic movements of thallus lobes. (a,b) Wild type gemmaling in through (a) and peak (b) positions, respectively. Gemmalings were grown in a 12 hour light, 12 hour dark photoperiod (neutral days, ND) for five days, after which light was switched to continuous (LL) and imaging was started. (c) Period and amplitude for wild type (Upp10 to 14) at different temperatures. (d–g) Vertical apex region position plotted against time for wild type (Tak1, black) and Mpprrko (gray) (d), wild type (Tak1, black) and Mptoc1ko (gray) (e), wild type (Upp5, black) and Mpluxge-19 (gray) (f), wild type (Upp12) and Mpluxge-9 (gray) (g). Vertical position data of apex region were de-trended using a cubic smoothing spline with 12 degrees of freedom. Data are means ± SE of ten replicate gemmalings.

To further investigate the role of a circadian clock for this movement, we first obtained a more detailed view on the role of MpPRR, MpRVE and MpTOC1 as core circadian clock components. Because transcriptional feedback loops are crucial for angiosperm circadian clocks, we examined temporal expression patterns of these genes using qRT-PCR over a 48 hour period. As previously reported29, MpPRR display rhythmic expression in the wild type in LL conditions (Fig. 2a). In Mptoc1ko mutants, expression of MpPRR was continuously high and arrhythmic, as indicated by highly significant effects of both genotype (G) and genotype x time interaction (GxT) terms in ANOVA (P < 10−11), suggesting that MpTOC1 represses MpPRR. Conversely, expression of MpPRR was low with limited amplitude in Mprveko (P-values for both G and GxT terms were <10−8), indicating that MpRVE promote the expression of MpPRR (Fig. 2a). The rhythmic expression of MpTOC1 in LL is weak, hampering interpretations of changes in its expression in mutant genotypes. Still, the expression of MpTOC1 in wild type, Mpprrko and Mprveko is consistent with an activating role of MpRVE and a repressing role of MpPRR analogous to the role of the Arabidopsis homologs on TOC1 expression (Fig. 2b; both G (P < 10−4) and GxT (P = 0.026) were significant for Mpprrko and G was significant for Mprveko with P = 0.017). Furthermore, in Mpprrko and Mptoc1ko, expression of MpRVE remains high and arrhythmic indicating that MpRVE is repressed by both MpPRR and MpTOC1 (Fig. 2c; P-values for G were less than 10−9 in both cases, while GxT was marginally significant with P = 0.04 and 0.07 for Mpprrko and Mptoc1ko, respectively). These data collectively suggest that MpPRR, MpRVE and MpTOC1 are part of a core transcriptional feedback loop of the M. polymorpha circadian clock, and that knock-out mutants of these genes can be used to study the role of the circadian clock in the control of growth and development.

Figure 2
figure 2

Knockout mutants of MpPRR, MpRVE and MpTOC1 affects each other’s expression. qRT-PCRs measuring expression of M. polymorpha clock genes during two consecutive days of constant light in wild type (Tak1), Mpprrko, Mprveko and Mptoc1ko. Plants were entrained in ND and sampling was conducted every six hours starting 24 hours after switch to LL. Graphs show the average expression of MpPRR (a), MpTOC1 (b) and MpRVE (c) in three replicates of wild type or mutant line for each time point. Green and orange lines combined with filled symbols indicate significantly overall higher or lower expression as compared to wild type (bold line), respectively. Small symbols indicate the value of each replicate.

We then analyzed rhythm movements during constant conditions in knockout mutants of MpPRR and MpTOC1 that we identified as part of core feedback loops in the M. polymorpha circadian clock29 (Fig. 2). In Mpprrko and Mptoc1ko mutants the rhythm is completely lost in LL (Fig. 1d,e). Because mutations of EC members result in an arrhythmic Arabidopsis clock we also created two independent mutant alleles for MpLUX, the single M. polymorpha homolog to the Arabidopsis EC component LUX (Supplementary Fig. S1). The two mutants, Mpluxge-9 and Mpluxge-19, also showed the arrhythmic phenotype in LL observed in the other clock mutants (Fig. 1f,g). These results strongly support that the circadian clock controls “gemmaling waving”, and that estimates of this movement can be used to monitor the M. polymorpha circadian clock.

The circadian clock regulates IAA levels and expression of the auxin biosynthesis gene MpTAA

Most likely, the rhythmic movement is growth related and similar to cotyledon movement in Arabidopsis, suggesting a role for rhythmic auxin production, transport and/or signaling in its control. Available data suggest that most auxin in liverworts such as Lunularia cruciata and M. polymorpha is produced in the apical region and transported basipetally through the midrib region producing an auxin gradient32,33,34,35. To assay temporal auxin biosynthesis patterns, we analysed gene expression of two genes coding for key enzymes in auxin biosynthesis, MpTAA and MpYUC235,36. In wild-type plants a clear circadian expression pattern was observed for MpTAA (Fig. 3a). This pattern was also strongly affected in Mptoc1ko, Mpprrko and Mprveko mutants (Fig. 3a). In Mpprrko and Mptoc1ko, expression was reduced and the rhythm dampened, while a higher expression with dampened amplitude was observed for Mprveko. Highly significant effects of genotype (G) was obtained in ANOVA for all cases (P < 0.003), while P-values for GxT terms were 0.024, 0.009 and 0.053 for Mpprrko, Mprveko and Mptoc1ko, respectively. For MpYUC2 expression in the wild type we could not detect a rhythmic pattern in LL, and only Mprveko showed a slightly higher overall expression level with P = 0.006 for G term (Fig. 3b).

Figure 3
figure 3

MpTAA expression levels as well as levels of free IAA display circadian oscillations that are disrupted in knockout mutants of Marchantia polymorpha clock genes. (a,b) qRT-PCRs measuring expression of M. polymorpha auxin biosynthesis genes during two consecutive days of constant light in wild type (Tak1), Mpprrko, Mprveko and Mptoc1ko. (a) MpTAA expression. (b) MpYUC2 expression. (c) IAA measurements of whole wild type (Upp14) and Mpluxge-9 gemmalings in LL over 32 hours. (d) MpPRR expression in the Mpluxge-9 and Mpluxge-19 lines compared to wild type (Upp1 and Upp5). For qRT-PCR experiments plants were entrained in ND and sampling was conducted every four (d) or six (a,b) hours starting 12 (d) or 24 (a,b) hours after switch to LL. qRT-PCR graphs show the average expression of three replicates of wild type or mutant line (a,b), or four replicates (two for each of the genotypes) (d), for each time point. Green and red lines combined with filled symbols indicate significantly overall higher or lower expression as compared to wild type (bold line), respectively. Small symbols indicate the value of each replicate.

Because MpTAA share expression domain in the apical part of the thallus with MpPRR, MpTOC1 and MpRVE, as well as with other putative clock genes such as MpLUX and MpELF329,35, it seems plausible that the clock could regulate IAA levels at least in part via MpTAA. To test if IAA levels display circadian oscillations we measured free IAA in whole young gemmalings of wild type (Upp14) and the Mpluxge-9 knock-out mutant of MpLUX (Fig. 3c)29. To measure IAA levels, gemmalings were entrained in ND for three days after which material was sampled every four hours during 32 hours (nine time points), starting four hours after switch to LL. Statistical tests with JTK_CYCLE clearly indicate that IAA levels in the wild type are circadian (P = 1.8 × 10−7), while IAA-levels in the Mpluxge-9 mutant are not (P = 0.12) (Fig. 3c). In Arabidopsis, LUX is part of the EC which acts as a repressor of e.g., PRR7/9 as well as TOC121,22,23. To verify that MpLUX regulates MpPRR we analysed MpPRR transcript levels in the Mpluxge-9 and Mpluxge-19 mutants using qRT-PCR. We found a significantly higher expression of MpPRR and also a strongly dampened rhythm in the Mpluxge mutants compared to wild type (Fig. 3d; both G and GxT terms in ANOVA have P < 10−12), supporting a role for the M. polymorpha LUX gene in the control of the transcription of circadian clock genes.

Auxin could be a mediator of circadian control of thallus movements

To further evaluate a role for auxin in nyctinasty, we conducted nyctinastic movement experiments manipulating auxin levels, distribution and response. For chemical treatments, wild-type gemmae were first grown on standard growth medium for five days to allow for initiation of growth and dorsiventral polarity establishment. Actively growing gemmalings were subsequently transferred to media supplemented with the auxin transport inhibitor 2-[4-(diethylamino)]-2-hydroxybenzoyl benzoic acid (BUM)37, or low concentrations of indole 3-acetic acid (IAA).

Low doses of IAA (10 and 100 nM) resulted in a reduced angle of growth and thus a more flattened thallus (Fig. 4a,c). Rhythmic waving was detectable throughout the experiment on mock and 10 nM IAA, but dampened earlier on 100 nM IAA (Supplementary Videos S2–S4). We cannot exclude that this dampening is due to contact with the solid medium (Supplementary Video S4). This dampening hampered statistical analyses of rhythmicity resulting in a very low sample size of rhythmic plants at 100 nM IAA (n = 3). Still, analyses with Spectrum Resampling38 indicated an increased period and RAE with increasing IAA doses (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively).

Figure 4
figure 4

Manipulation of auxin levels, distribution and response affects nyctinastic movements. (a) Gemmalings growing on different concentrations of IAA. (b) Gemmalings growing on different concentrations of BUM. (c) Plot of growth angle change over time for gemmalings growing on different concentrations of IAA. (d) Plot of growth angle over time for gemmalings growing on different concentrations of BUM. Angle was measured as indicated in (a). Plants (a–d) were entrained in ND for three to five days, then transferred to IAA (a,c) or BUM (b,d) for one and three days in ND, respectively, before transfer to LL. (e,f) Average amplitude of nyctinastic movement for various genotypes (e) and for wild type (Upp5) growing on L-Kyn (f). WT (wild type) M (male) and F (female) (e) are of the Australian accession39. Experiments (e,f) were performed using younger gemmalings in (f), which is why the controls are not identical. Graphs (e,f) shows means ± SE of three replicates. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 for two-tailed t-test against control (wild type or mock).

Conversely, an increased growth angle was observed for growth on BUM in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4b,d). The apparent early dampening of rhythmic waving on BUM could be the result of contact between the two lobes due to the high growth angle. Statistical analysis indicated an increased period and RAE but reduced amplitude with increased BUM doses (P < 0.05, P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively).

Even though these chemical treatment data does not show very convincing changes in rhythmicity, an important conclusion is that IAA and BUM have clear opposing effects on growth angle.

To study the effect of reduced auxin levels, we analysed waving in MpSHIpro:iaaL plants. These lines express the bacterial auxin-conjugating enzyme IaaL from a promoter mainly active in the apical notch, that result in plants displaying e.g., slow growth and narrow thalli39. No difference in period of the rhythmic waving, as compared to wild type, was observed for MpSHIpro:iaaL plants (P > 0.75), but the analysed lines displayed a significantly lower amplitude (P < 9.2 × 10−10; Fig. 4e). Growth on high concentrations of the TAA inhibitor L-Kynurenine (L-Kyn; 250 µM) gave a similar result: a significantly reduced amplitude (P < 1.4 × 10−4; Fig. 4f) but no significant change in period (P > 0.09). Similarly, a reduced amplitude but similar period was observed for EF1pro:amiR-MpARF1Mpmir160 plants39 (P > 0.96 and P < 2 × 10−16, for period and amplitude, respectively; Fig. 4e), suggesting that reduced auxin sensitivity also attenuate rhythmic waving. Collectively these results support a role for auxin as an output pathway for the M. polymorpha circadian clock.


In angiosperms the circadian clock regulates a wide range of processes, including those affecting metabolism, growth, abiotic and biotic stress, and various photoperiodic responses (40 and references therein). Our previous work suggests an early acquisition of a complex circadian network in plant evolution, but also important differences in the wiring and function of the M. polymorpha circadian clock29.

One unexpected handle of the M. polymorpha circadian clock is the rhythmic waving of gemmaling thallus lobes. This movement is most likely related to the non-reversible alternating growth of adaxial and abaxial sides of e.g., cotyledons of Arabidopsis4. It has been suggested that this type of nyctinastic movement was ancestral, and that motor cells and pulvini developed later as a means of enhancing leaf movement41. If so, our results suggest an early acquisition of nyctinasty already in the ancestor of bryophytes and seed plants. The cause of this type of alternating growth is poorly known, but may be related to the circadian elongation response of hypocotyls42. This rhythmic elongation involves circadian regulated hormone production, transport and/or signaling43. Auxin is a good candidate for such a hormone in Arabidopsis and also in M. polymorpha. Early studies showed that plants respond differently to applied auxin depending on time of day44, and subsequent experiments revealed that auxin levels oscillate in several species43,45,46. Furthermore, the circadian clock controls many genes that affect auxin synthesis and signaling in Arabidopsis47,48,49.

Our gene expression data suggests that the circadian clock in M. polymorpha regulates the first step of auxin biosynthesis, which might contribute to rhythmic auxin levels primarily in the apical region where MpTAA is expressed and most auxin in M. polymorpha is found35. If auxin levels were to control alternating growth of dorsal and ventral sides we would need to hypothesize a rhythm in dorsal/ventral distribution of the apically produced hormone during the 24-hour cycle. Such a role for auxin in these rhythmic movements is consistent with the results of our manipulations of auxin levels, distribution and response. Application of IAA and BUM had opposite effects on the angle of growth that in turn is directly connected to nyctinastic movements. Assuming that BUM affects ABCB-mediated auxin transport as in Arabidopsis, the increased angle on gemmalings growing on BUM can be interpreted as a result of decreased auxin transport from the ventral to the dorsal side, leading to increased ventral auxin concentration and cell elongation. This hypothesis requires an initial uneven dorsal/ventral auxin distribution, perhaps through a basipetal transport of auxin mainly on the dorsal side. Under this scenario, addition of a significant portion of exogenous auxin (IAA) is expected to result in a more even dorsal/ventral distribution and hence more flat growth (reduced growth angle in our experiments). This is supported by the epinastic growth of gemmalings on high concentrations of auxin or overexpression of the auxin synthesis enzyme MpYUC235,39. Conversely, L-Kyn-treatment, overexpression of IaaL and the use of amiRNA’s to knock down the expression of auxin biosynthesis genes, resulted in hyponastic growth of gemmalings35,39. In our experiments, directly decreasing the amount of active auxin by expressing IaaL or by reducing the function of MpTAA by adding L-Kyn resulted in lowered amplitude of nyctinastic movement, further supporting the role for auxin in these movements.

Our present results support conservation of the function for the M. polymorpha homologs of PRR, TOC1 and RVE, each with only one copy in M. polymorpha (MpPRR, MpRVE and MpTOC1). Each of them seems to be crucial for maintaining a transcriptional feedback loop in constant light conditions. For MpPRR and MpTOC1 we also observed abolished circadian nyctinastic thallus movement, verifying the importance of these genes in generating circadian rhythms in M. polymorpha. The stronger effects of mutating these genes in M. polymorpha, as compared to Arabidopsis, is likely due to the lack of functionally related paralogs in M. polymorpha.

Work on green algae suggest that one homolog of the PRR/TOC1 clade and one of the CCA/LHY/RVE clade constituted the core transcriptional feedback loop in the earliest plants50,51. Our work thus supports a continuous use of pairs of CCA/LHY/RVE clade genes and PRR/TOC1 genes at the core of plant circadian clock networks. However, the exact function of these genes within the network seems to have varied over time, partly due to addition of copies of existing genes or new genes to the network, or even deletion of core clock genes.

The only homolog in the whole CCA1/LHY/RVE clade present in M. polymorpha, MpRVE, belongs to the LCL sub-clade29, as do RVE4, RVE6 and RVE8. Accordingly, the MpRVE gene does not show an early morning expression, nor acute light induction, which is typical of genes in the CCA1/LHY sub-clade29. In addition, our data support a role for MpRVE as transcriptional activator as opposed to the role of CCA1/LHY genes as repressors11,13. Thus, MpRVE seems to have retained a function typical for the LCL subfamily29, despite the loss of the CCA1/LHY gene that is absent in all liverworts.

Our identification of a circadian regulated thallus movement provides a practical and easy to use tool for further studies of the evolution of plant circadian clocks, including the effects of frequent gene duplication and circadian gene loss observed during land plant evolution29,52.


Plant growth and cultivation

Marchantia polymorpha ssp. ruderalis Swedish accessions Uppsala (Upp) 1, 5 and 10 to 14, as well as Australian male and female39, and Takaragaike (Tak) -1 and Tak-2 were grown aseptically on agar solidified Gamborg’s B5 medium53 (PhytoTechnology Laboratories, Lenexa, KS, USA), pH 5.5. Plants were grown under cool white fluorescent light (50–60 µmol photons m−2 s−1) in 16: 8 hour, light: dark cycles at 20 °C or as otherwise stated in the text. Plants were entrained in 12: 12 hour, light: dark cycles at 20 °C.

Gene expression analysis

RNA was extracted using an Rneasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo Fisher) and analysed by qRT-PCR as previously described29. Primers are listed in Supplementary Table S1. MpEF1α, MpACT and MpAPT3 were used for normalization54.

For sampling of RNA we used biological replicates (plants of individual transgenic lines or individual wild type lines), and technical replicates (pools of individually grown plants of the same transgenic line or wild type line). We did one cDNA from each RNA sample. In all sampling we used gemmalings harboring adult tissues, but with no visible gemma cups.

For time series experiments with wild type (Tak1), Mpprrko, Mprveko and Mptoc1ko, three replicate samples of each entity were harvested at six-hour intervals from the second day of LL for two days (in total eight time points). Test of statistically significant expression differences between lines were performed with a linear model in R55 (aov). The model included time, genotype and their interaction.

Analyses of nyctinastic thallus movements

25-well square petri dishes (Fisher Scientific) were filled with Gamborg’s B5 medium, after which half of the medium in each well was removed to allow placement and growth of gemmalings. One gemmaling was placed in each well, and plates were placed vertically in a Sanyo growth cabinet (MLR-350) to allow imaging from the side (see Supplementary Fig. S2). Light was supplied from either cool white fluorescent light (experiments shown in Fig. 1a,b,f,g), or blue and red LEDs (experiments shown in Figs. 1d,e and 4) at 20 °C constant temperature, or at the temperatures indicated in the text. Plants where entrained for three to five days in ND (12: 12 hour, light: dark cycles) before exposure to constant conditions and imaging. Because younger (smaller) gemmalings waves with a higher amplitude than larger plants, the controls in the two experiments presented in Fig. 4e,f cannot be directly compared as we used smaller gemmalings for the L-Kyn experiment (Fig. 4f) than for the IaaL/ARF1 experiment (Fig. 4e). Within experiments all gemmalings were of the same age. For auxin related experiments, plants were exposed to the chemical in ND for one (IAA) or three (BUM) additional days before transfer to LL. Apex region position data was extracted from images using ImageJ56. Images were converted to binary ones and a rectangular selection automatically following the apex region horizontally was used with the command “Analyse Particles” to extract the center of mass in each image. The obtained data on vertical position (relative center of mass of apex region) were de-trended using a cubic smoothing spline with 12 degrees of freedom with the R package smooth.spline. Estimates or circadian period, amplitude and RAE were conducted in MATLAB with a method based on Spectrum Resampling38.

Generation of Mplux ge-9 and -19 mutants

Two gRNAs targeting the coding region of MpLUX in or just upstream of the DNA-binding domain were constructed by annealing oligos CPEP60 + CPEP61 and CPEP62 + CPEP63, respectively57 (listed in Supplementary Table S1). Annealed oligos were inserted into the BsaI site of plasmid pMpGE En0358. The constructs were subsequently cloned into pMpGE010 and pMpGW401, respectively, using GateWay LR cloning. All plasmids were sequenced.

Constructs were introduced into Agrobacterium strain GV3101. M. polymorpha sporelings were transformed essentially as previously described59. Transformed sporelings were plated on selective media: Gamborg’s B5 with 10 μM Hygromycin, 10 μM G418 plus 200 μM Timentin (PhytoTechnology Laboratories, USA).

DNA was extracted from transformed sporelings (generation T1) and their offspring (generation G1 gemmalings) using a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). PCRs to amplify the targeted regions were performed using primers ME486 + ME487. PCR products were purified using a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen) and sequenced.

Quantification of IAA

Wild type (Upp14) and Mpluxge-9 gemmalings were first grown on solid Gamborg’s B5 medium for 10 days in LD 20 °C. Gemmalings were then entrained in ND 20 °C for 3 days before being harvested every four hours over 32 hours (nine time points) sampling five replicates per genotype per time point, starting four hours after switch to LL conditions. Plant material (around 25–30 mg fresh weight) was purified as previously described60, and 500 pg 13C6-IAA internal standard was added to each sample before homogenization and extraction. Free IAA was quantified in the purified samples using combined gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. Halberg, F. [Physiologic 24-hour periodicity; general and procedural considerations with reference to the adrenal cycle]. Int. Z. Vitaminforschung Beih. 10, 225–296 (1959).

    MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pfeffer, W. Osmotische untersuchungen: studien zur zellmechanik. (W. Engelmann, 1877).

  3. Moran, N. Osmoregulation of leaf motor cells. FEBS Lett. 581, 2337–2347 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Engelmann, W., Simon, K. & Phen, C. J. Leaf movement rhythm in Arabidopsis thaliana. Z. Für Naturforschung C 47, 925–928 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Siefritz, F., Otto, B., Bienert, G. P., van der Krol, A. & Kaldenhoff, R. The plasma membrane aquaporin NtAQP1 is a key component of the leaf unfolding mechanism in tobacco. Plant. J. Cell Mol. Biol. 37, 147–155 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wetherell, D. Leaf movements in plants without pulvini. In The Pulvinus: Motor Organ for Leaf Movement (eds. Satter, R. L., Gorton, H. L. & Vogelmann, T. C.) (American Society of Plant Physiologists, 1990).

  7. Sanchez, S. E. & Kay, S. A. The plant circadian clock: From a simple timekeeper to a complex developmental manager. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. a027748, (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Harmer, S. L. The circadian system in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 60, 357–377 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, Z. Y. et al. A Myb-related transcription factor is involved in the phytochrome regulation of an Arabidopsis Lhcb gene. Plant Cell 9, 491–507 (1997).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schaffer, R. et al. The late elongated hypocotyl mutation of Arabidopsis disrupts circadian rhythms and the photoperiodic control of flowering. Cell 93, 1219–1229 (1998).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mizoguchi, T. et al. LHY and CCA1 are partially redundant genes required to maintain circadian rhythms in arabidopsis. Dev. Cell 2, 629–641 (2002).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fogelmark, K. & Troein, C. Rethinking transcriptional activation in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. PLoS Comput Biol 10, e1003705 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kamioka, M. et al. Direct repression of evening genes by CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED1 in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell 28, 696–711 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rawat, R. et al. REVEILLE8 and PSEUDO-REPONSE REGULATOR5 form a negative feedback loop within the Arabidopsis circadian clock. PLOS Genet 7, e1001350 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hsu, P. Y., Devisetty, U. K. & Harmer, S. L. Accurate timekeeping is controlled by a cycling activator in Arabidopsis. eLife 2, e00473 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Alabadı́, D. et al. Reciprocal regulation between TOC1 and LHY/CCA1 within the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Science 293, 880–883 (2001).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsushika, A., Makino, S., Kojima, M. & Mizuno, T. Circadian waves of expression of the APRR1/TOC1 family of pseudo-response regulators in Arabidopsis thaliana: Insight into the plant circadian clock. Plant Cell Physiol. 41, 1002–1012 (2000).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hicks, K. A., Albertson, T. M. & Wagner, D. R. EARLY FlOWERING3 encodes a novel protein that regulates circadian clock function and flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 13, 1281–1292 (2001).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Doyle, M. R. et al. The ELF4 gene controls circadian rhythms and flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 419, 74–77 (2002).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hazen, S. P. et al. LUX ARRHYTHMO encodes a myb domain protein essential for circadian rhythms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10387–10392 (2005).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dixon, L. E. et al. Temporal repression of core circadian genes Is mediated through EARLY FLOWERING 3 in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 21, 120–125 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Helfer, A. et al. LUX ARRHYTHMO encodes a nighttime repressor of circadian gene expression in the Arabidopsis core clock. Curr. Biol. 21, 126–133 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Herrero, E. et al. EARLY FLOWERING4 recruitment of EARLY FLOWERING3 in the nucleus sustains the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell 24, 428–443 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kikis, E. A., Khanna, R. & Quail, P. H. ELF4 is a phytochrome-regulated component of a negative-feedback loop involving the central oscillator components CCA1 and LHY. Plant J. 44, 300–313 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Portolés, S. & Más, P. The functional interplay between Protein Kinase CK2 and CCA1 transcriptional activity is essential for clock temperature compensation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 6, (2010).

  26. Li, G. et al. Coordinated transcriptional regulation underlying the circadian clock in Arabidopsis. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 616–622 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fowler, S. GIGANTEA: a circadian clock-controlled gene that regulates photoperiodic flowering in Arabidopsis and encodes a protein with several possible membrane-spanning domains. EMBO J. 18, 4679–4688 (1999).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Somers, D. E., Schultz, T. F., Milnamow, M. & Kay, S. A. ZEITLUPE Encodes a Novel Clock-Associated PAS Protein from Arabidopsis. Cell 101, 319–329 (2000).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Linde, A.-M. et al. Early evolution of the land plant circadian clock. New Phytol. 216, 576–590 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Nozue, K. et al. Rhythmic growth explained by coincidence between internal and external cues. Nature 448, 358–361 (2007).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dornbusch, T., Michaud, O., Xenarios, I. & Fankhauser, C. Differentially phased leaf growth and movements in Arabidopsis depend on coordinated circadian and light regulation[w]. Plant Cell 26, 3911–3921 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. LaRue, C. D. & Narayanaswami, S. Auxin Inhibition in the liverwort Lunularia. New Phytol. 56, 61–70 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gaal, D. J., Dufresne, S. J. & Maravolo, N. C. Transport of 14C-indoleacetic acid in the Hepatic Marchantia polymorpha. The Bryologist 85, 410–418 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Maravolo, N. C. Polarity and localization of auxin movement in the hepatic, Marchantia polymorpha. Am. J. Bot. 63, 526–531 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Eklund, D. M. et al. Auxin produced by the indole-3-pyruvic acid pathway regulates development and gemmae dormancy in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha. Plant Cell 27, 1650–1669 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bowman, J. L. et al. Insights into land plant evolution garnered from the Marchantia polymorpha genome. Cell 171, 287–304.e15 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim, J.-Y. et al. Identification of an ABCB/P-glycoprotein-specific Inhibitor of auxin transport by chemical genomics. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 23309–23317 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Costa, M. J. et al. Inference on periodicity of circadian time series. Biostat. Oxf. Engl. 14, 792–806 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Flores-Sandoval, E., Eklund, D. M. & Bowman, J. L. A simple auxin transcriptional response system regulates multiple morphogenetic processes in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha. PLOS Genet. 11, e1005207 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Greenham, K. & McClung, C. R. Integrating circadian dynamics with physiological processes in plants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 598–610 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kawaguchi, M. SLEEPLESS, a gene conferring nyctinastic movement in legume. J. Plant Res. 116, 151–154 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Webb, A. A. R. The physiology of circadian rhythms in plants. New Phytol. 160, 281–303 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Jouve, L., Gaspar, T., Kevers, C., Greppin, H. & Degli Agosti, R. Involvement of indole-3-acetic acid in the circadian growth of the first internode of Arabidopsis. Planta 209, 136–142 (1999).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Went, FW & Thimann, KV. Phytohormones. (Macmillan Company, 1937).

  45. Janardhan, KV, Vasudeva, N & Gopel, NH. Diurnal variation of endogenous auxin in arabica coffey. J. Plant Crops 1, 93–95.

  46. Nováková, M. et al. Diurnal variation of cytokinin, auxin and abscisic acid levels in tobacco leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 56, 2877–2883 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Covington, M. F. & Harmer, S. L. The circadian clock regulates auxin signaling and responses in Arabidopsis. PLoS Biol. 5, e222 (2007).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Rawat, R. et al. REVEILLE1, a Myb-like transcription factor, integrates the circadian clock and auxin pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16883–16888 (2009).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Khan, S., Rowe, S. C. & Harmon, F. G. Coordination of the maize transcriptome by a conserved circadian clock. BMC Plant Biol. 10, 126 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Corellou, F. et al. Clocks in the green lineage: comparative functional analysis of the circadian architecture of the picoeukaryote Ostreococcus. Plant Cell 21, 3436–3449 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Troein, C. et al. Multiple light inputs to a simple clock circuit allow complex biological rhythms. Plant J. 66, 375–385 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Holm, K., Källman, T., Gyllenstrand, N., Hedman, H. & Lagercrantz, U. Does the core circadian clock in the moss Physcomitrella patens (Bryophyta) comprise a single loop? BMC Plant Biol. 10, 109 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Gamborg, O. L., Miller, R. A. & Ojima, K. Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res. 50, 151–158 (1968).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Saint-Marcoux, D., Proust, H., Dolan, L. & Langdale, J. A. Identification of reference genes for real-time quantitative PCR experiments in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha. PloS One 10, e0118678 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2016).

  56. Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods,, (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Silva, C. S. et al. Molecular mechanisms of Evening Complex activity in Arabidopsis., (2019).

  58. Sugano, S. S. et al. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing and its application to conditional genetic analysis in Marchantia polymorpha. PLOS ONE 13(10), e0205117 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Ishizaki, K., Chiyoda, S., Yamato, K. T. & Kohchi, T. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of the haploid liverwort Marchantia polymorpha L., an emerging model for plant biology. Plant Cell Physiol. 49, 1084–1091 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Andersen, S. U. et al. Requirement of B2-type cyclin-dependent kinases for meristem integrity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 20, 88–100 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful for the technical support of Kerstin Jeppsson and Yvonne Meyer-Lucht (EBC, Uppsala University), and Roger Granbom (UPSC, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences). Tak-1, Tak-2, Mpprrko, Mptoc1ko and Mprveko plants was a gift from Takayuki Kohchi (Kyoto University, Japan). This study was financed by the Swedish Research Council, VR (projects 621-2014-4514, 2014-05220 and 2016-05180 to KL, UL and DME, respectively), Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning (project CTS17:132 to DME), the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (KAW, 2016.0341 to KL) and the Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems (VINNOVA, 2012-01560 to KL). Open access funding provided by Uppsala University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



U.L. and D.M.E. designed the research; U.L., A.B., S.N.R. and D.M.E. performed research and analyzed data; K.L. measured IAA levels; U.L. and D.M.E. wrote the paper with the input of all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Magnus Eklund.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lagercrantz, U., Billhardt, A., Rousku, S.N. et al. Nyctinastic thallus movement in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha is regulated by a circadian clock. Sci Rep 10, 8658 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing