Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Effects of PM10 on mortality in pure COPD and asthma-COPD overlap: difference in exposure duration, gender, and smoking status

Abstract

We investigated the effects of particulate matter (PM) on mortality in patients diagnosed with asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) or ‘pure COPD’. Subjects from the National Health Insurance Service–National Sample Cohort of Korea, who were aged 40 years or above and had newly diagnosed COPD since 2009 were selected. Finally, 6,313 patients were enrolled and divided into ‘pure COPD’ and ACO groups. Average PM10 exposure data were obtained using Kriging interpolation from 2001 to 2013. Hazard ratios(HR) were estimated using a time-varying Cox regression model. Exposure to PM10 for 1, 3, and 6 months was associated with an increase in non-accidental mortality in the entire COPD group, especially the ACO group. When a stratified analysis of 3-month exposure was performed by sex, the highest HR was found in women with ACO (HR = 1.153; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.121, 1.185). A stratified analysis according to smoking status showed that ACO patients had the highest HR among never smokers (HR = 1.151; 95% CI; 1.124, 1.178). Average exposure to PM10 was associated with non-accidental mortality in patients with COPD, especially those diagnosed with ACO. In addition, the adverse effects of PM10 exposure are more severe in women and never-smokers.

Introduction

Ambient particulate matter (PM) is a mixture of thousands of components. When inhaled or otherwise entered the human body, the PM can deposit in the alveoli of the lungs and trigger local inflammation, which in turn can lead to systemic inflammation1. Previous studies demonstrated that compared with direct bronchodilators, anti-inflammatory medications can be used to ameliorate the asthmatic symptoms associated with PM with greater efficacy2. Direct experimental evidence of inflammation induced by PM, and modulating effects of inflammation-associated genes and pathways, have also been reported. PM is often categorized based on the aerodynamic diameter of the particles. The PM10 used in our study is particulate matter with a diameter of 10 micrometers or less. Previous studies have reported that substances such as changes in fraction of exhaled nitric oxide, exhaled hydrogen sulfide levels, and IL-8 concentrations in the nasal lavage fluid as respiratory inflammatory biomarkers related to particular matters3. Meanwhile, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by chronic airway inflammation, which may coexist with or without asthma. Airway inflammation affects the pathogenesis of both COPD and asthma; however inflammatory cells detected in both diseases and their prognosis differ4,5. Patients who were previously known to exhibit severe asthma and did not respond effectively to asthma medication, or patients with COPD who underwent frequent exacerbations associated with airway hyper-responsiveness represent case of asthma and COPD overlap (ACO)6. Therefore, patients with ACO are thought to be susceptible to PM10 because COPD and asthma exhibit overlapping features and are more frequently exacerbated. Many studies have shown that patients with ACO were more likely to manifest higher levels of comorbidities than patients diagnosed with only COPD7. An estimated 3.1 million deaths are attributed to PM exposure, accounting for 3.1% of global disability-adjusted life years lost worldwide in 20108. Previous studies focused on the effect of PM on mortality rates of patients with COPD, not ACO. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of mortality associated with average PM10 exposure (1, 3, 6, and 12 months) for short- and long-term periods in COPD patients. The study analyzed the differences in mortality between ‘pure COPD’ and ACO associated with ambient PM exposure, and identified the subgroups within the ACO group who were more vulnerable to PM exposure.

Materials and Methods

Source of data and study design

We used the National Health Insurance Service–National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC) database, a population-based cohort from 2002 to 2013, established by the NHIS in South Korea9. A sample population of 1,025,340 subjects was randomly selected and followed up until 2013. The NHIS-NSC contains the results of biannual health checkups and health care utilization. The enrolled population included, subjects aged 40 to 89 years (N = 291,518) who responded to a questionnaire, especially concerning a smoking habit. We sought individuals who had not been diagnosed with COPD prior to entering the cohort and also intended to use the data monitored from 2008 on which the reliability of the exposure data was secured. Therefore, the study subjects included individuals who were newly diagnosed with COPD based on the International Code of Diseases (ICD)-10 (J42.x-44.x except J430) from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2013, and who were prescribed one or more COPD medications at least twice per year [long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), long-acting beta-2 agonist (LABA), inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), ICS plus LABA (ICS + LABA), short-acting muscarinic antagonist (SAMA), short-acting beta-2 agonist (SABA), or theophylline]10. During 2002–2008, patients diagnosed with COPD or who died for any reason, were excluded. Also excluded were those who were not diagnosed with COPD or died in an accident between 2009 and 2013. Finally, subjects with COPD were divided into a pure COPD group and an ACO group. The ACO group was defined by the criteria for COPD and asthma diagnosis. Asthma was defined by the J45.x or J46 criteria based on ICD-10 and treatment with one or more asthma medications at least twice per year from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2013 [LAMA, LABA, ICS, ICS + LABA, SAMA, SABA, theophylline, leukotriene antagonist (LTRA), systemic corticosteroids, or systemic beta agonist]10 (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
figure1

Study design (a) Flow diagram of the study design (b) Study design over time. NHIS DB = National Health Insurance Service database. COPD = chronic obstructive lung disease.

The study was approved by the institutional review board of Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (IRB number: EUMC 2018-04-061). This study was performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Also the need for participants’ informed consent was waived by the ethics review board.

Measurement of particular matter 10 (PM10) exposure

The exposure level of PM10 at each subject’s residence was predicted using the Kriging modeling method. Kriging modeling was conducted between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2013, based on daily exposure data of PM10 measured by beta-ray absorption methods at 38 national air monitoring centers located at three regions in Korea. The monthly pollutant levels for each place (place unit: dong) for PM10 were predicted based on the levels recorded on the monitors. A method known as ordinary block kriging, was conducted using the Geostatistical Analyst extension of ArcGIS (ArcMap, version 9.0; ESRI Inc., Redlands, WA, USA) with 0.170 km × 0.170 km grids to partition each dong and each month. Each block kriging was predicted used kriging with a regular grid and the values within each block were averaged. The quality of the predicted values was evaluated using cross-validation. The technique was repeated to remove each monitoring station one at a time. In addition, the concentration at each missing station (removed earlier) was estimated using the concentration levels detected on the other monitors. The observed concentrations at the monitoring sites were compared with the values predicted by kriging, as described previously11. Cohort data used in this study included patient address, which was matched with PM10 monitoring site address to predict the patient’s PM10 concentration. To determine the average effect of PM10 exposure on mortality in phases, the average exposures for PM10 were analyzed based on an average of 12 months, 6 months, 3 months and 1 month before the event (Fig. 2).

Figure 2
figure2

Particular matter (PM)10 exposure model.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics of subjects are expressed as a number (%) or mean and standard deviation. We used a time-varying Cox regression model, with calendar time as the underlying time scale, to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for non-traumatic mortality12,13. All person-months were followed up until non-traumatic death or the end of 2013, whichever came first. To select covariates for inclusion in adjusted models, we performed a literature search in order to identify the risk factors associated with PM10 exposure, COPD, ACO, or non-traumatic death [sex, age, smoking status, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and household income levels]. We then conducted subgroup analyses stratified by sex and smoking status, which are strong confounders in patients with pure COPD and ACO. All statistical analyses were carried out using SAS statistical software version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Characteristics of subjects and PM10 distribution

The baseline characteristics of a total of 6,313 subjects are presented in Table 1. The pure COPD group constituted 50.5% of the total number of subjects and the rest belonged to the ACO group. The mean follow-up period of the study subjects was 4.9 years and 53.6% were men. The average PM10 exposures (1, 3, 6, and 12 months) did not differ between pure COPD and ACO. The 3-month values were the lowest in each group.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study subjects.

Total non-accidental mortality analysis

In the Cox regression analysis, aHRs for each 10-μg/m3 increment in PM10 after a 12-month average exposure was 1.011(95% CI, 0.994–1.027) in total COPD patients, which was borderline significant statistically. When mortality was analyzed for exposure in the recent 6 months, aHRs were 1.124 (95% CI, 1.106–1.142) for the pure COPD group, 1.125 (95% CI, 1.108–1.143) for the ACO group, and 1.123 (95% CI, 1.111–1.135) for all COPD subjects, all of which were statistically significant. After exposure for the last 3 months, aHRs were 1.116 (95% CI, 1.100–1.131) in the pure COPD group and 1.124 (95% CI, 1.109–1.140) in the ACO group. Based on the shortest period of exposure, 1-month, aHRs were 1.017 (95% CI, 0.998–1.036) for the pure COPD group and 1.026 (95% CI, 1.007–1.046) for the ACO group (Table 2, Fig. 3). Mortality associated with the average 3-month exposure is shown in Fig. 3. The 3-month exposure-associated mortality showed the largest difference in statistically significant mortality associated with PM10 exposure.

Table 2 Hazard ratios for death according to PM10 exposure duration.
Figure 3
figure3

Effect of particular matter on mortality in the whole cohort over a 3-month PM10 exposure. COPD = chronic obstructive lung disease, ACO = asthma-COPD overlap.

Subgroup analysis of non-accidental mortality

In the mortality analysis, we found that sex and smoking status were interacted with PM10 concentrations, respectively (P = 0.0001 for sex, P = 0.0525 for never smoker vs. once smoker, and P = 0.1367 for never smoker vs. former smoker vs. current smoker, respectively). Therefore, stratified analysis was performed by sex and smoking status. The mortality for PM10 exposure was analyzed for each group (pure COPD and ACO) according to each period (1, 3, 6 and 12 months), and aHRs for each period showed similar patterns for each group (Table 3). Subgroup analysis also showed that the effect of average exposure over 3 months was the most significant among the groups.

Table 3 Hazard ratios for death stratified by sex according to PM10 exposure duration.

In women, the aHRs for each 10-μg/m3 increment in PM10 after a 3-month average exposure were 1.124 (95% CI, 1.081–1.169) for pure COPD, and 1.153 (95% CI, 1.121–1.185) for ACO (Table 3 and Fig. 4). When aHRs were analyzed in stratified subgroups according to smoking habit, the results were 1.103 (95% CI, 1.075–1.131) for pure COPD and 1.151(95% CI, 1.124–1.178) for ACO in never smokers. However, in former smokers, they were 1.166 (95% CI, 1.098–1.237) for pure COPD and 1.150 (95% CI, 1.088–1.215) for ACO. In current smokers, aHRs were 1.137 (95% CI, 1.111–1.164) for pure COPD and 1.124 (95% CI, 1.097–1.152) for ACO (Tables 47 and Fig. 5). Additionally, in once smokers including former and current smokers, aHRs were 1.136 (95% CI, 1.114–1.159) for pure COPD and 1.116 (95% CI, 1.095–1.138) for ACO (Supplementary Table S1 and Fig. S1).

Figure 4
figure4

Effect of particular matter on mortality stratified by sex over a 3-month PM10 exposure. COPD = chronic obstructive lung disease, ACO = asthma-COPD overlap.

Table 4 Hazard ratios for death stratified by smoking status according to PM10 exposure duration (12 months).
Table 5 Hazard ratios for death stratified by smoking status according to PM10 exposure duration (6 months).
Table 6 Hazard ratios for death stratified by smoking status according to PM10 exposure duration (3 months).
Table 7 Hazard ratios for death stratified by smoking status according to PM10 exposure duration (1 month).
Figure 5
figure5

Effect of particular matter on mortality stratified by smoking status over a 3-month PM10 exposure. COPD = chronic obstructive lung disease, ACO = asthma-COPD overlap.

Discussion

In this national study, we found that average exposure to PM10 at various periods (1, 3, 6 or 12 months) increased the risk of death in patients with COPD, particularly ACO. When stratifying the total COPD group, mortality according to the concentration of PM10 in the ACO group was greater than that of PM10 in pure COPD. Since this is not a direct comparison between the two groups (pure COPD vs. ACO), it cannot be concluded that the ACO patients has a higher mortality rate than pure COPD. However, death for ACO patients can be said to be more affected by PM10 under all exposure periods. Six month of exposure had the most significant impact on mortality. However, the difference in mortality between pure COPD patients and ACO patients was the greatest during the 3-month exposure period. A comprehensive analysis based on 3-month exposure was based on stratification according to sex and smoking status. Higher aHRs were found in women in the ACO group and the never-smoker ACO group. However, among smokers, patients with pure COPD manifested a higher risk of death compared with patients with ACO. Among smokers, the risk of death was higher in former smokers than in current smokers.

Previous epidemiologic studies have suggested that PM10 affects acute or chronic COPD mortality. A systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that outdoor air pollution increases morbidity and mortality in COPD patients14. In this study, acute exposure was associated with increased COPD mortality and chronic PM exposure resulted in a 10% increase in mortality. Also, a mortality study15 in COPD patients was conducted over an average period of 12-months of PM10 exposure based on hospital data in 34 US cities. The study revealed significant associations, with a HR of 1.11 (95% CI: 1.06–1.15) for 10-μg/m3 increase in PM10 during the same year. In the distributed lag model, the sum of PM exposure effects during the four years (same year and 3 preceding years) showed a HR for mortality of 1.22 (95% CI: 1.17–1.27). The mortality for a 1-year average exposure reported in this study differed from our study results, probably due to the differences in the methods used to calculate the mean PM exposure. In their study, all of the annual mean concentrations of the same year were included similar to those exposed to death, but our study used, only the average exposure from the day of the event until a year ago. The effect of PM10 on total mortality in COPD patients was evaluated in a number of studies investigating short-term exposure, which mainly assessed daily exposure (within 7 days of the lag day)16,17,18. Very few studies investigated the long-term exposure, involving an average exposure for 1 to 4 years19,20. However, this study reported the effects of average exposure at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, to evaluated the effects of short-term and long-term exposure, continuously.

In this study, the effect of PM10 concentration on mortality in ACO and COPD patients was not statistically significant following long-term exposure (12 months), but was statistically significant during short-term exposure (1,3, and 6 months), respectively. This effect may be attributed to the existence of several confounding factors such as seasonality during the period to account for the relationship between the average concentration of PM and deaths among the subjects in 1 year. However, aHRs was statistically significant during the one-month exposure period only in the ACO group, which is likely to have been more sensitive to recent PM10 exposures because ACO patients exhibit airway hyper-responsiveness compared with pure COPD patients. Further, a study of the natural history of COPD suggested that mortality peaks during the 3-month period following the onset of severe exacerbation21. Similarly, our study showed a statistically significant increase in mortality following average exposure over a 3-month period. Thus, in order for PM10 to influence the mortality associated with COPD, the increase in mortality may be strongly associated with statistically significant exposure over the specific time period.

Although epidemiological studies have suggested that PM affects the mortality of COPD patients, in-depth epidemiological outcomes in patients with ACO have yet to be reported. ACO was defined by a joint project of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) committee and the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) committee in 20144. ACO patients tend to manifest respiratory symptoms more frequently than those diagnosed with pure COPD probably due to airway hyper-responsiveness6,22. Therefore, the mortality associated with PM10 exposure is also expected to differ between patients with pure COPD and ACO. In the Danish cohorts (Diet, Cancer, and Health cohort, 1993–1997), the total mortality was higher among participants with ACO (25.9 per 1,000 person-years) than in those with asthma or COPD alone (7.9 [P < 0.001] and 23.1 [P < 0.01] per 1,000 person-years, respectively)23.

The recent increase in PM concentration due to environmental pollution can aggravate symptoms more often in respiratory patients. Dyspnea reduces daily activity in patients and can cause muscle weakness and contraction, including respiratory muscles, which in turn induces breathing difficulties, resulting in increased mortality24. This study showed that women with ACO showed a high risk of death associated with PM10 exposure, which suggests that physiological dynamics in women, such as relatively low muscle mass may contribute to the vicious cycle.

In terms of smoking status, the PM10 effect on mortality was observed to be greatest among former smokers compared with never and current smokers. These findings can be misleading suggesting that smoking cessation has a negative effect. In fact, former smokers often quit smoking due to health problems. Therefore, they are likely to be vulnerable to smoking and at a high risk for smoking-related illness or death25,26,27. Conversely, current smokers are likely to be relatively resistant to the harmful effect of smoking, often called healthy smoker effect. In addition, cigarette smoking may contribute more to centrilobular emphysema and less to airway remodeling, and the smoke biomass mainly causes airway remodeling rather than emphysema28. These results suggest that the effect of PM on lung function may differ from the effects of smoking. Therefore, the relationship between smoking status and the effect of PM on ACO and pure COPD is complex.

Our study was the first of its kind conducted to examine the mortality risk associated with PM10 exposure in patients with ACO and pure COPD. In addition, the CCI reflected the health status affecting mortality. Nevertheless, this study has several limitations. Data on PM2.5, which was recently identified as an important factor affecting mortality with PM, could not be used for analysis because they were not gathered during the study period. Although mortality due to PM10 in patients with COPD may be attributed to several other factors, the study established the most simplified model. Therefore, we will analyze the effects of CVD, lung cancer, and other conditions, which play a major role, in future studies. Further, COPD and ACO diagnoses were established according to ICD-10 and prescriptions, and not based on clinical diagnosis. Nevertheless, these COPD and ACO definitions are commonly used in other studies based on health insurance claims data not only in Korea but also in Taiwan and the United States, and these studies might reflect the real-world scenario including health care utilization. In addition, our study is more valuable than the other studies using these data because we used precise information such as household income, smoking history, and body mass index from biennial health screenings in our analysis.

Conclusion

Average exposure to PM10 was associated with non-accidental mortality in patients with COPD, especially ACO. In addition, the adverse effects of PM10 exposure on non-accidental death in ACO were greater among women and in never-smokers. It is imperative to evaluate the high-risk groups and the underlying physiological mechanisms associated with the impact of air pollution on health. Since PM exposure has been reported to induce reactive oxygen species production and inflammation in the respiratory system, it is necessary to determine whether nutrient supplements such as antioxidants can actually reduce individual’ susceptibility to air pollution in COPD patients. Thus, in accordance with the precautionary principle, these results can be used as a basis for a policy to reduce the emissions of air pollution in order to improve the respiratory health of individuals.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the National Health Insurance Service–National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC) but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of the National Health Insurance Service–National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC).

References

  1. 1.

    Balbi, B. et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage, sputum and exhaled clinically relevant inflammatory markers: values in healthy adults. Eur Respir. J. 30, 769–781, https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00112306 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Delfino, R. J., Zeiger, R. S., Seltzer, J. M. & Street, D. H. Symptoms in Pediatric Asthmatics and Air Pollution: Differences in Effects by Symptom Severity, Anti-inflammatory Medication Use and Particulate Averaging Time. Environmental Health Perspectives 106, 751–761 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Wu, W., Jin, Y. & Carlsten, C. Inflammatory health effects of indoor and outdoor particulate matter. J Allergy Clin Immunol 141, 833–844, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2017.12.981 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Tochino, Y., Asai, K., Shuto, T. & Hirata, K. Asthma-COPD overlap syndrome-Coexistence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma in elderly patients and parameters for their differentiation. J Gen Fam Med 18, 5–11, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.2 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cosio, B. G. et al. Defining the Asthma-COPD Overlap Syndrome in a COPD Cohort. Chest 149, 45–52, https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.15-1055 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wurst, K. E., Kelly-Reif, K., Bushnell, G. A., Pascoe, S. & Barnes, N. Understanding asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome. Respir Med 110, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2015.10.004 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Alshabanat, A., Zafari, Z., Albanyan, O., Dairi, M. & FitzGerald, J. M. Asthma and COPD Overlap Syndrome (ACOS): A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis. PloS one 10, e0136065, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136065 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lim, S. S. et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet 380, 2224–2260, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61766-8 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Cheol Seong, S. et al. Data Resource Profile: The National Health Information Database of the National Health Insurance Service in South Korea. Int J Epidemiol 46, 799–800, https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw253 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Rhee, C. K. et al. Medical utilization and cost in patients with overlap syndrome of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. COPD 11, 163–170, https://doi.org/10.3109/15412555.2013.831061 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Leem, J. H. et al. Exposures to air pollutants during pregnancy and preterm delivery. Environmental health perspectives 114, 905–910, https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8733 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hurley, M. A. A reference relative time-scale as an alternative to chronological age for cohorts with long follow-up. Emerg Themes Epidemiol 12, 18–18, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-015-0043-6 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Griffin, B. A., Anderson, G. L., Shih, R. A. & Whitsel, E. A. Use of alternative time scales in Cox proportional hazard models: implications for time-varying environmental exposures. Stat Med 31, 3320–3327, https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5347 (2012).

    MathSciNet  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Song, Q., Christiani, D. C., Wang, X. & Ren, J. The global contribution of outdoor air pollution to the incidence, prevalence, mortality and hospital admission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11, 11822–11832, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111111822 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zanobetti, A., Bind, M. A. & Schwartz, J. Particulate air pollution and survival in a COPD cohort. Environ Health 7, 48, https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-7-48 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Braga, A. L., Zanobetti, A. & Schwartz, J. The lag structure between particulate air pollution and respiratory and cardiovascular deaths in 10 US cities. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 43, 927–933 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Tellez-Rojo, M. M., Romieu, I., Ruiz-Velasco, S., Lezana, M. A. & Hernandez-Avila, M. M. Daily respiratory mortality and PM10 pollution in Mexico City: importance of considering place of death. Eur Respir J 16, 391–396 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wordley, J., Walters, S. & Ayres, J. G. Short term variations in hospital admissions and mortality and particulate air pollution. Occup Environ Med 54, 108–116 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Miri, M. et al. Mortality and morbidity due to exposure to outdoor air pollution in Mashhad metropolis, Iran. The AirQ model approach. Environ Res 151, 451–457, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.07.039 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Naess, O., Nafstad, P., Aamodt, G., Claussen, B. & Rosland, P. Relation between concentration of air pollution and cause-specific mortality: four-year exposures to nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter pollutants in 470 neighborhoods in Oslo, Norway. Am J Epidemiol 165, 435–443, https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwk016 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Suissa, S., Dell’Aniello, S. & Ernst, P. Long-term natural history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: severe exacerbations and mortality. Thorax 67, 957–963, https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201518 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Postma, D. S. & Rabe, K. F. The Asthma-COPD Overlap Syndrome. N Engl J Med 373, 1241–1249, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1411863 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Baarnes, C. B., Andersen, Z. J., Tjonneland, A. & Ulrik, C. S. Incidence and long-term outcome of severe asthma-COPD overlap compared to asthma and COPD alone: a 35-year prospective study of 57,053 middle-aged adults. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 12, 571–579, https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S123167 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wüst, R. C. I. & Degens, H. Factors contributing to muscle wasting and dysfunction in COPD patients. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2, 289–300 (2007).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Becklake, M. R. & Lalloo, U. The ‘healthy smoker’: a phenomenon of health selection? Respiration; Int. Rev. Thoracic. Dis. 57, 137–144, https://doi.org/10.1159/000195837 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Le Moual, N., Kauffmann, F., Eisen, E. A. & Kennedy, S. M. The healthy worker effect in asthma: work may cause asthma, but asthma may also influence work. Am. J. Respir. Criti. Care Med. 177, 4–10, https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200703-415PP (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Li, C.-C., Matthews, A. K., Dong, X. & Simon, M. The Influence of Smoking Status on the Health Profiles of Older Chinese American Men. J. Am. Geriatr. Soci. 67, S577–S583, https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15889 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Sin, D. D. Asthma-COPD Overlap Syndrome: What We Know and What We Don’t. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 80, 11–20, https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2017.80.1.11 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by 2017 Young Medical Science Reseacher Grants from Ewha Womans University College of Medicine.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yu Min Lee, Jin Hwa Lee, Eun Hee Ha and Hawn-Cheol Kim wrote the main manuscript text. Additionally, Yu Min Lee and Hawn-Cheol Kim prepared data for exposure.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eunhee Ha.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, Y.M., Lee, J.H., Kim, HC. et al. Effects of PM10 on mortality in pure COPD and asthma-COPD overlap: difference in exposure duration, gender, and smoking status. Sci Rep 10, 2402 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59246-2

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing