Pol μ ribonucleotide insertion opposite 8-oxodG facilitates the ligation of premutagenic DNA repair intermediate

Çağlayan, Melike

doi:10.1038/s41598-020-57886-y

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 22 January 2020

Pol μ ribonucleotide insertion opposite 8-oxodG facilitates the ligation of premutagenic DNA repair intermediate

Melike Çağlayan¹

Scientific Reports volume 10, Article number: 940 (2020) Cite this article

1010 Accesses
5 Citations
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

DNA polymerase (pol) μ primarily inserts ribonucleotides into a single-nucleotide gapped DNA intermediate, and the ligation step plays a critical role in the joining of noncomplementary DNA ends during nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) for the repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) caused by reactive oxygen species. Here, we report that the pol μ insertion products of ribonucleotides (rATP or rCTP), instead of deoxyribonucleotides, opposite 8-oxo-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG) are efficiently ligated and the presence of Mn²⁺ stimulates this coupled reaction in vitro. Moreover, our results point to a role of pol μ in mediating ligation during the mutagenic bypass of 8-oxodG, while 3′-preinserted noncanonical base pairs (3′-rA or 3′-rC) on NHEJ repair intermediates compromise the end joining by DNA ligase I or the DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complex.

Processing of a single ribonucleotide embedded into DNA by human nucleotide excision repair and DNA polymerase η

Article Open access 26 September 2019

Structural basis for proficient oxidized ribonucleotide insertion in double strand break repair

Article Open access 20 August 2021

Structural basis of DNA synthesis opposite 8-oxoguanine by human PrimPol primase-polymerase

Article Open access 29 June 2021

Introduction

The concentration of ribonucleoside triphosphates (rNTPs) in the intracellular nucleotide pool is higher than that of deoxyribonucleotides (dNTPs), and the insertion of ribonucleotides into genomic DNA can hinder replication and transcription^1,2,3,4. DNA polymerase (pol) μ, which lacks proofreading activity, inserts both dNTPs and rNTPs in a template-dependent manner during nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) in the repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) that are generated by ionizing radiation or reactive oxygen species as well as endogenous DNA metabolic processes^5,6,7,8,9. Pol μ displays the lowest discrimination for the sugar moiety of the nucleic acid strand and shows a normal active site geometry lacking a ‘steric gate’ amino acid side chain compared to those of other X family DNA polymerases with greater discrimination, such as pol β^{10,11,12,13,14}. Pol μ contributes to the general error-prone bypass of certain types of DNA lesions, such as 8-oxo-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG)^{15,16,17,18,19}. Very recently, the precatalytic ternary complex structure of the pol μ active site in lesion bypass of a template 8-oxodG has been shown²⁰. Almost all DNA polymerases prefer magnesium (Mg²⁺) over the other divalent metal ions for catalysis, and manganese (Mn²⁺) is considered to be a metal mutagen^21,22,23,24. It has been shown that pol μ is activated at physiological Mn²⁺ concentrations in vitro, and the unusual Mn²⁺ preference of pol μ improves the efficiency of NHEJ with increased ribonucleotide insertion rate²⁵. Recently, the noncanonical mechanism of ribonucleotide insertion into a single-nucleotide gapped NHEJ repair intermediate by pol μ favoring Mn²⁺ over Mg²⁺ has been reported²⁶.

As the favored pathway for DSB repair, classical NHEJ involves protein-protein interactions between several components of the repair machinery^27,28,29. In this process, the recognition and processing of broken DNA ends require the Ku 70/80 heterodimer in conjunction with the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit, the DNA ligase IV/X-ray cross complementing protein 4 (XRCC4) complex, and Artemis³⁰. During this process, pol μ, which fills gaps by nucleotide insertion, is known to play an important role in resolving DSBs^31,32. The impact of the ligation step on NHEJ fidelity and the significance of DNA ligase IV in sensing diverse strand breaks after ionizing radiation have also been reported^33,34. Our previous work revealed that pol μ Watson-Crick-like dG:dT insertion facilitates the ligation of strand break repair intermediates, suggesting the accommodation of the coupled reaction by pol μ and DNA ligase during NHEJ³⁵, similar to the well-known substrate channeling mechanism in which DNA repair intermediates are transferred in a highly coordinated manner during the base excision repair (BER) pathway^36,37. Recently, it has been proposed in a triple strand break reaction model that the ribonucleotides primarily inserted by pol μ promote ligation during the repair of chromosome breaks in vivo³⁸.

In this study, we investigated the impact of pol μ ribonucleotide vs deoxyribonucleotide insertion into a model DSB repair substrate with a single-nucleotide gap as well as the effect of the metal ion (Mg²⁺ vs Mn²⁺) on ligation by DNA ligase I or the DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complex. We showed that the pol μ ribonucleotide insertion products of rATP and rCTP opposite 8-oxodG or dG are efficiently ligated, and the presence of Mn²⁺ stimulates this coupled reaction in vitro. Moreover, the ligation of the nicked substrate with preinserted ribonucleotides (3′-rA or 3′-rC opposite 8-oxodG or dG) is compromised by subtle changes in the structure of the DNA ends. Overall, the results indicate a significant role of ribonucleotide insertion and the requirement of pol μ for efficient ligation of the NHEJ repair intermediate during the coupled double-strand break repair.

Results

Ligation of pol μ deoxyribonucleotide vs ribonucleotide insertion products during mutagenic bypass of template 8-oxodG

To understand the ligation of the repair intermediates by DNA ligase after pol μ-mediated deoxyribonucleotide vs ribonucleotide insertion, we first measured dNTP (dATP or dCTP) vs rNTP (rATP or rCTP) insertion coupled with ligation in a reaction mixture containing pol μ and DNA ligase I or the DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complex (Supplementary Scheme 1). For this purpose, we used the model end joining DNA substrate with a single-nucleotide gap and a template 8-oxodG (Supplementary Table 1).

We observed that pol μ dATP or dCTP insertion opposite 8-oxodG confounds the ligation and results in ligation failure (Fig. 1A, lanes 2–5 and 6–9), as revealed by the time-dependent (10–60 sec) change in the formation of the 5′-adenylate product, i.e., AMP addition to the 5′-end of the substrate (Fig. 1C,D) obtained in a coupled BER assay (Fig. 1B). For longer time points (0.5–10 min), we obtained both ligation and a stable amount of ligation failure products after pol μ dATP and dCTP insertions opposite 8-oxodG in a coupled reaction including DNA ligase I or the DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complex (Supplementary Fig. 1). On the other hand, the repair intermediate with a 3′-ribonucleotide inserted by pol μ bypassing 8-oxodG is efficiently ligated. In this case, pol μ rATP and rCTP insertions opposite 8-oxodG enabled ligation (Fig. 2A), and only ligation products were observed (Fig. 2B).

Impact of Mg²⁺ vs Mn²⁺ on the ligation of pol μ ribonucleotide insertion products during mutagenic bypass of 8-oxodG

We next tested the idea that Mn²⁺, known as a mutagenic metal ion that improves the efficiency of NHEJ, might enable the more efficient ligation of the pol μ ribonucleotide insertion products²⁵. For this purpose, the effect of Mg²⁺ vs Mn²⁺ on pol μ rATP or rCTP insertion coupled with ligation was evaluated.

In the presence of Mg²⁺, as described above, we obtained the ligation products after pol μ rATP and rCTP insertions (Fig. 2A,B). Similarly, in the presence of Mn²⁺, the products of pol μ insertion of rATP (Fig. 2C, lanes 2–7) or rCTP (Fig. 2C, lanes 8–13) opposite 8-oxodG were efficiently ligated (Fig. 2D). However, in this case, the ligation products were slightly higher and accumulated at the earliest time point (30 sec), in contrast to the appearance of ligation products at later time points (3–10 min) in the presence of Mg²⁺ (Supplementary Fig. 2). Similarly, we obtained ligation of pol μ rATP (Fig. 3A, lanes 2–7) and rCTP (Fig. 3A, lanes 8–13) insertions opposite 8-oxodG by the DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complex (Fig. 3B). No significant difference was observed in the amount of ligation products between DNA ligase I vs the DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complex (Supplementary Fig. 3).

To further understand the stimulatory effect of Mn²⁺ on pol μ ribonucleotide insertion coupled with ligation as described above, we repeated these coupled reactions for the early incubation time points (10–60 sec). For both pol μ rATP:8-oxodG (Fig. 4A, lanes 2–5 vs 6–9) and rCTP:8-oxodG (Fig. 4B, lanes 2–5 vs 6–9) insertions, the amounts of ligation products were ~5-fold higher in the presence of Mn²⁺ than in the presence of Mg²⁺ (Fig. 4C,D). These results suggest a stimulatory role of Mn²⁺ in the channeling of the pol μ ribonucleotide insertion products from pol μ to the next DNA ligation step.

We also examined the ribonucleotide insertions into a single-nucleotide gap with a template 8-oxodG in a reaction mixture including pol μ alone (Supplementary Scheme 2) and obtained the differences in the insertion efficiency of rATP and rCTP in the presence of Mg²⁺ vs Mn²⁺ (Supplementary Fig. 4). These results showed that the ligation products observed in the coupled reactions including both pol μ and DNA ligase (Fig. 2) are due to the insertions by pol μ favoring Mn²⁺ over Mg²⁺ and their subsequent conversion to ligation products at the same time points of the reaction incubations. In the control reactions, we also confirmed the efficient conversion of the correct pol μ dNTP insertion products, i.e., dATP opposite dT and dCTP opposite dG to complete ligation products (Supplementary Fig. 5).

Role of NHEJ structural elements and mutagenic bypass of 8-oxodG on the ligation of pol μ ribonucleotide insertion products

It has been reported that the recruitment of the NHEJ complex at DNA ends during DSB repair requires the presence of pol μ and DNA ligase IV in complex with XRCC4, and the BRCT (BRCA1 C Terminus) domain of pol μ stabilizes the complex formation and promotes ligation independent of its gap-filling activity^32,39,40. To further investigate the channeling of the ribonucleotide insertion products from pol μ to DNA ligase, we used the full-length pol μ and performed the coupled reactions in the presence of the DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complex and Mn²⁺. Similarly, the results showed ligation of pol μ rATP (Fig. 5A, lanes 2–7) and rCTP (Fig. 5A, lanes 8–13) insertions and a time-dependent increase in the amounts of the products (Fig. 5B). However, the comparison of the coupled reactions revealed an enhanced ligation in the presence of the full-length pol μ including BRCT domain for both insertions (Fig. 5C,D). These findings suggest a coordinated hand off or interplay between pol μ and DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complex in the multiprotein NHEJ complex for efficient ligation in the presence of ribonucleotides incorporated into DNA (Supplementary Model 1).

Moreover, to understand the impact of pol μ mutagenic bypass of 8-oxodG on ligation, we also used a single-nucleotide gapped DNA substrate with an undamaged guanine base (dG) at a template position (Supplementary Table 1) and compared the ligation efficiency of the pol μ ribonucleotide insertion products opposite 8-oxodG vs dG in the presence of Mn²⁺. The results revealed that the products of pol μ rATP:dG (Fig. 6A,C, lanes 2–7) and rCTP:dG (Fig. 6A,C, lanes 8–13) are efficiently ligated by DNA ligase I (Fig. 6B) and the DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complex (Fig. 6D). Similarly, no significant difference was observed in the amount of ligation products between the DNA ligases (Supplementary Fig. 6). Interestingly, the comparison of the ligation products after pol μ rATP and rCTP insertion opposite 8-oxodG vs dG also shows no significant difference between the template bases (Supplementary Figs. 7 and 8). These results suggest that the pol μ active site can accommodate both 8-oxodG and dG in a similar way that enables the channeling of the ribonucleotide mismatch-containing repair intermediate from pol μ to DNA ligase for its efficient ligation. We also confirmed differences in the pol μ insertion efficiency of rATP and rCTP into a single-nucleotide gap with a template dG in the reaction mixture including pol μ alone (Supplementary Fig. 9).

Comparison of pol β-mediated ribonucleotide insertion coupled with ligation

It has been shown that pol β can perform inefficient ribonucleotide insertion (~4 orders of magnitude less than dNTPs) during BER, and unlike pol µ, the enzyme undergoes large conformational changes in protein subdomains upon dNTP binding or catalysis^41,42,43. Moreover, the role of pol β in NHEJ has been reported⁴⁴.

In this study, we also tested the effect of pol β ribonucleotide insertion opposite 8-oxodG on ligation as described above for pol µ. We obtained the pol β insertion products of rATP:8-oxodG (Fig. 7A,C, lanes 3–7) and rCTP:8-oxodG (Fig. 7A,C, lanes 9–13) in the presence of Mg²⁺ or Mn²⁺ that were not completely ligated by DNA ligase I (Fig. 7B,D). There were ~5- and ~7-fold differences in the amount of ligation products between the coupled reactions including pol β vs pol μ in the presence of Mg²⁺ and Mn²⁺, (Supplementary Figs. 10 and 11), respectively. This inefficient channeling of the ribonucleotide-containing repair intermediate from pol β to DNA ligase could be due to differences in the mechanism of sugar discrimination between these DNA polymerases during the bypass of 8-oxodG.

Effect of 3′-preinserted ribonucleotides on the efficiency of DNA ligation

We are also interested in examining the ligation of the repair intermediates with 3′-preinserted ribonucleotides in the presence of Mn²⁺ by DNA ligase alone (Supplementary Scheme 3). The nicked DNA substrates used here mimic the products of DNA polymerase-mediated ribonucleotide insertions and include 3′-rA or 3′-rC opposite 8-oxodG or dG (Supplementary Table 1).

We first tested the ligation efficiency of the nicked repair intermediates with 3′-rA or 3′-rC opposite 8-oxodG by DNA ligase I and the DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complex. DNA ligase I was able to join the 3′-rA and 3′-rC ends (Fig. 8A, lanes 2–7 and 9–14, respectively) opposite 8-oxodG, as indicated by the time-dependent changes in the amounts of the ligation products (Fig. 8B). On the other hand, the DNA ligase IV/XRCC1 complex did not show similar activity for the nicked substrates with 3′-rA:8-oxodG (Fig. 8C, lanes 2–7) and 3′-rC:8-oxodG (Fig. 8C, lanes 9–14), and the amount of ligation products was lower (Fig. 8D). The comparison of the ligation products indicated an ~4- to 6-fold difference between the DNA ligases tested in this study (Supplementary Fig. 12).

We then examined the specificity of the DNA ligases for the ligation of repair intermediates with preinserted 3′-rA or 3′-rC opposite dG. Interestingly, a significant difference (~40-fold more ligation products) in the mismatch specificity of DNA ligase I was observed for the repair intermediates with 3′-rC:dG (Fig. 9A, lanes 2–7) vs 3′-rA:dG (Fig. 9A, lanes 9–14). In both mismatches, products of ligation and ligation failure appeared simultaneously (Fig. 9B). On the other hand, the DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complex showed almost no activity against the nicked substrates with 3′-rC:dG (Fig. 10A, lanes 2–7) and 3′-rA:dG (Fig. 10A, lanes 9–14), although a negligible amount of ligation failure products accumulated at later incubation time points (Fig. 10B). The comparison of the ligation products indicated a significant difference in the end joining ability of DNA ligase I vs the DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complex for the nicked substrates with 3′-rC:dG or 3′-rA:dG (Supplementary Fig. 13). The results suggest that the DNA ligases tested in this study could be compromised by subtle changes in the noncanonical base pairs at the 3′-end or template base of the nicked repair intermediate. Our results indicated that the presence of 8-oxodG (Fig. 8), instead of dG (Figs. 9 and 10), at the template position resulted in complete ligation with no failure. This could be due to the differences in the substrate and mismatch specificity of the DNA ligases and their end-joining ability of the non-canonical base pairs that mimic the nicked products of mismatch insertions by an error-prone DNA polymerase.

In the control reaction with the nicked DNA substrate containing 3′-preinserted correct base pairs, i.e., 3′-dA opposite dT and 3′-dC opposite dG, we confirmed the ligation over incubation time of the reaction by DNA ligase I or the DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complex (Supplementary Fig. 14).

The presence of pol µ mediates the ligation of ribonucleotide-containing NHEJ repair intermediates

Based on the observations described above, we finally compared the efficiency of ligation between the coupled reactions including pol µ and DNA ligase and the ligation assays containing DNA ligase alone. Overall, the results revealed that the amount of ligation products in the coupled reactions (i.e., ligation after pol µ rATP or rCTP insertion into a single-nucleotide gapped DNA substrate with template 8-oxodG or dG) was higher than the amount of products in the ligation assays (i.e., ligation of the nicked DNA substrate with preinserted 3′-rA or 3′-rC opposite template 8-oxodG or dG), as shown in the black bar graphs in Figs. 11–14. The degree of difference in the amount of ligation products varied depending on the type of template base or DNA ligase used in this study, as summarized in Supplementary Table 2. Overall comparisons indicate that the insertion of ribonucleotides (rATP or rCTP) into DNA by pol μ is necessary for the ligation step and thus NHEJ to occur efficiently in vitro. On the other hand, the results also suggest that differences in the ligation efficiency of ribonucleotide-containing repair intermediates could be due to the distinct sugar and mismatch discrimination mechanisms of pol µ and DNA ligase, respectively, depending on the architecture of the DNA ends during NHEJ.

Discussion

The pool imbalance between the intracellular concentrations of rNTPs and dNTPs makes it challenging for RNA and DNA polymerases to select their correct sugar substrates^1,2. Since the sugar-phosphate backbone of RNA is much more prone to strand breakage than that of DNA, potentially resulting in the accumulation of strand breaks, ribonucleotide insertion by DNA polymerases during replication and repair can constitute a major threat to genome stability^3,4. The family X DNA polymerases, pol β, λ and μ, can incorporate rNTPs during the BER and NHEJ repair pathways with varying sugar selectivity^10,11. These polymerases with no proofreading activity have also been shown to function in the translesion synthesis of oxidative DNA lesions such as 8-oxodG in an error-prone manner^{15,16,17,18,19,20}. As a major oxidative base modification in DNA, 8-oxodG has a characteristic known as dual coding potential (in either the anti or syn conformation) that enables this base to form a correct base pairing with cytosine or a mispairing with adenine⁴⁵. NHEJ, including several components of the repair machinery such as pol μ and the DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complex, encounters this lesion in clusters at DNA strand break termini; however, the impact of pol μ ribonucleotide insertion during the translesion synthesis of 8-oxodG on the downstream ligation step of the repair pathway is unknown. Mn²⁺, as a mutagenic metal ion, is known to reduce DNA polymerase fidelity, and pol μ has a strong preference for Mn²⁺ over Mg²⁺ for its various activities, such as ribonucleotide insertion^21,22,23,24. Moreover, it has been shown that physiological concentrations of Mn²⁺ and ribonucleotides enhance NHEJ with the cost of increased ribonucleotide insertion²⁵. However, much less is known about the impact of the mutagenic metal ion on pol μ ribonucleotide insertion coupled with ligation during the NHEJ pathway.

We therefore investigated the ligation efficiency of pol μ ribonucleotide (rATP or rCTP) insertion products in the presence of a divalent ion (Mg²⁺ or Mn²⁺) using a model NHEJ repair substrate with a template 8-oxodG in the coupled double-strand break repair catalyzed by pol μ and DNA ligase and compared it with that of the ligation reaction by DNA ligase alone in vitro. Our results indicated that pol μ stabilizes the insertion products of ribonucleotides (rATP or rCTP) over the insertion products of deoxyribonucleotides (dATP or dCTP) opposite 8-oxodG or dG, allowing their efficient channeling to the next ligation step, which enables DNA ligase to function on the resulting nicked repair intermediate. On the other hand, the DNA ligases tested in this study (DNA ligase I and DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complex) are compromised by noncanonical base pairings at the 3′-ends of the repair intermediates. The difference in our findings between a coupled reaction including pol µ and DNA ligase and the ligation reaction including DNA ligase alone (Figs. 11–14) revealed that the presence of ribonucleotides inserted by pol µ bypassing 8-oxodG is required for the efficient ligation of the repair intermediates in vitro. Our results demonstrate that pol µ ribonucleotide insertion during the translesion synthesis of 8-oxodG coupled with ligation could be a promutagenic event leading to genomic instability by NHEJ (Supplementary Model 1). Further research, that is, structure/function studies, will be necessary to enhance our understanding of the role of pol µ in the mutagenic potential of ribonucleotides embedded in genomic DNA. Similarly, in vivo studies will be required to understand the biological consequences of ribonucleotide incorporation in the oxidative stress-induced damage response during NHEJ in cells.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Oligodeoxyribonucleotides with and without a 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM) label were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies. Single-nucleotide gapped and nicked DNA substrates (Supplementary Table 1) were prepared as described previously^35,46. The deoxyribo- and ribonucleoside triphosphate solutions (dATP or rATP and dCTP or rCTP) were obtained from GE Healthcare.

Protein purifications

Human DNA polymerases, namely, full-length (Met1-Ala494) pol μ, the catalytic domain (Pro132-Ala494) of pol μ, and full-length pol β, were purified as described^35,46,47,48. Briefly, the proteins were overexpressed in Rosetta2 (DE3) cells overnight at 16 °C. The cells were sonicated and lysed at 4 °C in lysis buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 500 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, and cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche). The cell lysates were then clarified by centrifugation. The soluble proteins were bound to glutathione 4B sepharose resin (GE Healthcare) at 4 °C, and the polymerases were eluted by TEV cleavage overnight at 4 °C. The proteins were then purified by size exclusion chromatography (Superdex 200 16/60) followed by ion exchange (MonoQ HR 5/5) chromatography (GE Healthcare). The final proteins were dialyzed and concentrated in buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8:0), 100 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, and 1 mM DTT. Recombinant full-length human DNA ligase I was purified as previously described^36,38,47. Briefly, the protein was expressed in Rosetta2 (DE3) cells at 37 °C, and the cells were grown overnight at 16 °C. After cell lysis by sonication at 4 °C in lysis buffer containing 40 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 200 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, and cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche) and clarification by centrifugation, the His-tagged protein was loaded onto a HisTrap HP column (GE Healthcare) and purified by elution with an increasing imidazole gradient (0–500 mM) at 4 °C, then subsequently loaded onto a HiTrap Q HP column (GE Healthcare) and eluted with NaCl. For all purified proteins used in this study, the final enzyme samples were concentrated, frozen in dry ice, and stored in aliquots at −80 °C.

Coupled reaction assay

The repair assays that enable the measurement of deoxyribonucleotide or ribonucleotide insertion coupled with ligation (Supplementary Scheme 1) were performed under steady-state conditions in vitro as described previously^35,46. The single-nucleotide gapped DNA substrates with a template 8-oxodG or dG are presented in Supplementary Table 1. The reaction mixture contained 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1 mM DTT, 1 mM ATP, 100 µgml⁻¹ BSA, the single-nucleotide gapped DNA substrate (500 nM), 100 µM rNTP (rATP or rCTP) or dNTP (dATP or dCTP), and MgCl₂ (10 mM) or MnCl₂ (1 mM) in a final volume of 10 µl. The reaction was initiated by the addition of the preincubated enzyme mixture, including DNA polymerase (pol μ or pol β, 100 nM) and DNA ligase (DNA ligase I or DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complex, 100 nM). The reaction mixtures were then incubated at 37 °C for the times indicated in the figure legends. The reaction products were mixed with an equal amount of gel loading buffer (95% formamide, 20 mM EDTA, 0.02% bromophenol blue, and 0.02% xylene cyanol) and then separated by electrophoresis on an 18% polyacrylamide gel as described previously^35,46. The gels were scanned with a Typhoon PhosphorImager (Amersham Typhoon RGB), and the data were analyzed with ImageQuant software. The control coupled reactions for pol μ correct base insertions (dATP:dT and dCTP:dG) were performed as described above.

Nucleotide insertion assay

The nucleotide insertion assays (Supplementary Scheme 2) were performed under steady-state conditions in vitro as described previously^35,46. The single-nucleotide gapped DNA substrates with a template 8-oxodG or dG are presented in Supplementary Table 1. The reaction mixture contained 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1 mM DTT, 1 mM ATP, 100 µgml⁻¹ BSA, the single-nucleotide gapped DNA substrate (500 nM), 100 µM rNTP (rATP or rCTP) and MgCl₂ (10 mM) or MnCl₂ (1 mM) in a final volume of 10 µl. The reaction was initiated by the addition of pol μ, and the reaction mixtures were then incubated at 37 °C for the time points indicated in the figure legends. The reaction products were mixed with an equal amount of gel loading buffer (95% formamide, 20 mM EDTA, 0.02% bromophenol blue, and 0.02% xylene cyanol) and then separated and analyzed as described above.

Ligation assay

The ligation assays (Supplementary Scheme 3) were performed under steady-state conditions in vitro as described previously^35,46. The nicked DNA substrates with 3′-preinserted ribonucleotides (3′-rA or 3′-rC) opposite 8-oxodG or dG are presented in Supplementary Table 1. The reaction mixture contained 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1 mM DTT, 1 mM ATP, 100 µgml⁻¹ BSA, the nicked DNA substrate (500 nM) and MgCl₂ (10 mM) or MnCl₂ (1 mM) in a final volume of 10 µl. The experiments were initiated with the addition of DNA ligase (DNA ligase I or DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complex, 100 nM). The reaction mixture was incubated at 37 °C until the time points indicated in the figure legends and then stopped by mixing with an equal volume of loading dye. The reaction products were analyzed as described above. Control ligation assays with nicked DNA substrates, including correct base pairs (3′-dA:dT and 3′-dC:dG), were performed as described above.

References

Klein, H. L. Genome instabilities arising from ribonucleotides in DNA. DNA Repair 56, 26–32 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Potenski, C. J. & Klein, H. L. How the misincorporation of ribonucleotides into genomic DNA can be both harmful and helpful to cells. Nuc. Acids Res. 42, 10226–10234 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sassa, A., Yasui, M. & Honma, M. Current perspectives on mechanisms of ribonucleotide incorporation and processing in mammalian DNA. Genes Environ. 41, 3 (2019).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yao, N. Y., Schroeder, J. W., Yurieva, O., Simmons, L. A. & O’Donnell, M. E. Cost of rNTP/dNTP pool imbalance at the replication fork. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 12942–12947 (2013).
Article ADS PubMed Google Scholar
Khanna, K. K. & Jackson, S. P. DNA double-strand breaks: signaling, repair and the cancer connection. Nat. Genet. 27, 247–254 (2001).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Ma, Y., Lu, H., Schwarz, K. & Lieber, M. R. Repair of double-strand DNA breaks by the human nonhomologous DNA end joining pathway: the iterative processing model. Cell Cycle 4, 1193–1200 (2005).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Chayot, R., Montagne, B. & Ricchetti, M. DNA polymerase μ is a global player in the repair of non-homologous end-joining substrates. DNA Repair 11, 22–34 (2012).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
McElhinny, S. A. & Ramsden, D. A. Polymerase μ is a DNA-directed DNA/RNA polymerase. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 2309–2315 (2003).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Chayot, R., Danckaert, A., Montagne, B. & Ricchetti, M. Lack of DNA polymerase μ affects the kinetics of DNA double-strand break repair and impacts on cellular senescence. DNA Repair 9, 1187–1199 (2010).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Brown, J. A. et al. A novel mechanism of sugar selection utilized by a human X-family DNA polymerase. J. Mol. Biol. 395, 282–290 (2010).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Brown, J. A. & Suo, Z. Unlocking the sugar ‘steric gate’ of DNA polymerases. Biochemistry 50, 1135–1142 (2011).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Moon, A. F. et al. Structural accommodation of ribonucleotide incorporation by the DNA repair enzyme polymerase μ. Nuc. Acids Res. 45, 9138–9148 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ruiz, J. F. et al. Lack of sugar discrimination by human pol μ requires a single glycine residue. Nuc. Acids Res. 31, 4441–4449 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Moon, A. F. et al. Sustained active site rigidity during synthesis by human DNA polymerase μ. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 253–260 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Covo, S., Blanco, L. & Livneh, Z. Lesion bypass by human DNA polymerase μ reveals a template-dependent, sequence-independent nucleotidyl transferase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 859–865 (2004).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Dominguez, O. et al. DNA polymerase μ, homologous to TdT, could act as a DNA mutator in eukaryotic cells. EMBO J. 19, 1731–1742 (2000).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Havener, J. M. et al. Translesion synthesis past platinum DNA adducts by human DNA polymerase μ. Biochemistry 43, 1777–1788 (2003).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ruiz, J. F. et al. DNA polymerase μ, a candidate hypermutase? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 356, 99–109 (2001).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. Lesion bypass activities of human DNA polymerase μ. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 44582–44587 (2002).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Kaminski, A. M. et al. Unexpected behavior of DNA polymerase μ opposite template 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′-guanosine. Nuc. Acids Res. 47, 9410–9422 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Sirover, M. A. & Loeb, L. A. Infidelity of DNA synthesis in vitro: screening for potential metal mutagens or carcinogens. Science 194, 1434–1436 (1976).
Article ADS PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Goodman, M. F., Keener, S., Guidotti, S. & Branscomb, E. W. On the enzymatic basis for mutagenesis by manganese. J. Biol. Chem. 258, 3469–3475 (1983).
PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Beckman, R. A., Mildvan, A. S. & Loeb, L. A. On the fidelity of DNA replication: manganese mutagenesis in vitro. Biochemistry 24, 5810–5817 (1985).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Hays, H. & Berdis, A. J. Manganese substantially alters the dynamics of translesion DNA synthesis. Biochemistry 41, 4771–4778 (2002).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Martin, M. J., Ortiz-Garcia, M. V., Esteban, V. & Blanco, L. Ribonucleotides and manganese ions improve non-homologous end joining by human pol μ. Nuc. Acids Res. 41, 2428–2436 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Chang, Y. K. et al. Human DNA polymerase μ can use a nancanonical mechanism for multiple Mn²⁺-mediated functions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 8489–8502 (2019).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Waters, C. A., Strande, N. T., Wyatt, D. W., Pryor, J. M. & Ramsden, D. A. Nonhomologous end joining: a good solution for bad ends. DNA Repair 17, 39–51 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Lieber, M. R. The mechanism of human nonhomologous DNA end joining. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 1–5 (2008).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Martin, M. J. & Blanco, L. Decision-making during NHEJ: a network of interactions in human pol μ implicated in substrate recognition and end-bridging. Nuc. Acids Res. 42, 7923–7934 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kuhfittig-Kulle, S. et al. The mutagenic potential of non-homologous end joining in the absence of the NHEJ core factors Ku70/80, DNA-PKcs and XRCC4-LigIV. Mutagenesis 22, 217–233 (2007).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Davis, B., Havener, J. M. & Ramsden, D. A. End-bridging is required for pol μ to efficiently promote repair of noncomplementary ends by nonhomologous end joining. Nuc. Acids Res. 36, 3085–3094 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Mahajan, K. N., McElhinny, S. A., Mitchell, B. S. & Ramsden, D. A. Association of DNA polymerase μ with Ku and Ligase IV: Role for pol μ in end-joining double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 5194–5202 (2002).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Waters, C. A. et al. The fidelity of the ligation step determines how ends are resolved during nonhomologous end joining. Nat. Commun. 5, 4286 (2014).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Conlin, M. P. et al. DNA Ligase IV guides end-processing choice during nonhomologous end joining. Cell Rep. 20, 2810–2819 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Çağlayan, M. & Wilson, S. H. Pol μ dGTP mismatch insertion opposite T coupled with ligation reveals a promutagenic DNA intermediate during double strand break repair. Nat. Commun. 9, 4213 (2018).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Çağlayan, M. & Wilson, S. H. Oxidant and environmental toxicant-induced effects compromise DNA ligation during base excision DNA repair. DNA Repair 35, 85–89 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Çağlayan, M. Interplay between DNA polymerases and DNA ligases: Influence on substrate channeling and the fidelity of DNA ligation. J. Mol. Biol. 31, 2068–2081 (2019).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pryor, J. M. et al. Ribonucleotide incorporation enables repair of chromosome breaks by nonhomologous end joining. Science 361, 1126–1129 (2018).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Ramden, D. A. Polymerases in nonhomologous end joining: Building a bridge over broken chromosomes. Antioxid. Redox Signal 14, 2509–2019 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Tseng, H. M. & Tomkinson, A. E. A physical and functional interaction between yeast Pol4 and Dnl4-Lif1 links DNA synthesis and ligation in nonhomologous end joining. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 45630–45637 (2002).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Crespan, E. et al. Impact of ribonucleotide incorporation by DNA polymerases β and λ on oxidative base excision repair. Nat. Comm. 7, 10805 (2016).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, N. A., Beard, W. A. & Wilson, S. H. DNA polymerase β ribonucleotide discrimination. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 24457–24465 (2010).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Pelletier, H., Sawaya, M. R., Wolfle, W., Wilson, S. H. & Kraut, J. A Structural basis for metal ion mutagenicity and nucleotide selectivity in human DNA polymerase β. Biochemistry 35, 12762–12777 (1996).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Ray, S. et al. DNA polymerase beta participates in DNA end-joining. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 242–255 (2018).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Kamiya, H. Mutagenic potentials of damaged nucleic acids produced by reactive oxygen/nitrogen species: approaches using synthetic oligonucleotides and nucleotides: survey and summary. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 517–531 (2003).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Çağlayan, M., Horton, J. K., Stefanick, D. F. & Wilson, S. H. Oxidized nucleotide insertion by pol β confounds ligation during base excision repair. Nat. Commun. 8, 14045 (2017).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Beard, W. A. & Wilson, S. H. Purification and domain-mapping of mammalian DNA polymerase beta. Methods in Enzymology 262, 98–107 (1995).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Howes, T. R. L. et al. Structure-activity relationships among DNA ligase inhibitors: Characterization of a selective uncompetitive DNA ligase I inhibitor. DNA Repair 60, 29–39 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

The purified protein human DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complex and the plasmid expression vector for human DNA ligase I were generous gifts from Alan E. Tomkinson (University of New Mexico). The plasmid expression vectors for the human DNA polymerase β (full-length) and DNA polymerase μ (hPol μ Δ2 truncated catalytic domain) were from Samuel H. Wilson and Lars Pedersen (NIEHS/NIH), respectively. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Grant 4R00ES026191.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
Melike Çağlayan

Authors

Melike Çağlayan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The author (MELIKE CAGLAYAN) designed the project, performed the experiments, and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melike Çağlayan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Çağlayan, M. Pol μ ribonucleotide insertion opposite 8-oxodG facilitates the ligation of premutagenic DNA repair intermediate. Sci Rep 10, 940 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-57886-y

Download citation

Received: 21 October 2019
Accepted: 07 January 2020
Published: 22 January 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-57886-y

This article is cited by

Structures of LIG1 that engage with mutagenic mismatches inserted by polβ in base excision repair
- Qun Tang
- Mitchell Gulkis
- Melike Çağlayan
Nature Communications (2022)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.