Degenerately doped ZnO is seen as a potential substitute to the ubiquitous and expensive Sn doped In2O3 as a transparent electrode in optoelectronic devices. Here, highly conductive and transparent Ga doped ZnO thin films were grown via aerosol assisted chemical vapor deposition. The lowest resistivity (7.8 × 10−4 Ω.cm) and highest carrier concentration (4.23 × 1020 cm−3) ever reported for AACVD grown ZnO: Ga was achieved due to using oxygen poor growth conditions enabled by diethylzinc and triethylgallium precursors.
Zinc oxide (ZnO) is a large bandgap semiconducting material with optoelectronic properties that is often used as a transparent conducting oxide (TCO) electrode in photovoltaic devices and flat panel displays1,2. TCOs are materials that display both high visible light transparency (>80%) and low electrical resistivity (<10−3 Ω.cm). Some of the many advantages of ZnO over the more commonly used tin doped indium oxide (ITO) and fluorine doped tin oxide (FTO) are that it is relatively inexpensive and earth abundant1,3,4. Furthermore, ZnO is known to show higher light transmittance and higher resistance to the hydrogen plasma that is often used in the preparation of silicon based photovoltaic devices5,6.
ZnO in the pure form is generally too resistive for TCO applications and requires donor dopants such as Al or Ga on Zn sites and/or F on O sites. Such doping results in shallow donor states below the ZnO conduction band minima that are ionized at room temperature to increase carrier concentration and therefore reduce electrical resistivity. The most widely used dopant for ZnO is Al and practical resistivities between 2–3 × 10−4 Ω.cm have often been achieved1,3,4. However due to the small ionic size of Al3+ (0.39 Å) in the four-coordination, it is rather mobile hence leading to stability issues7. Also with Al as a dopant, the enthalpy of formation for Al2O3 is strongly negative (−17.27 eV) and the likelihood of forming electrically inactive Al2O3 secondary phase is very high3,8. Ga2O3 on the other hand has a less negative formation enthalpy (−11.29 eV) and a larger ionic radius (0.47 Å) compared to Al therefore potentially making it a more stable and efficient donor dopant3,8. In literature, ZnO: Ga thin films have been prepared via both physical and chemical techniques9,10. Gomez et al. have shown ZnO: Ga films with 8 × 10−3 Ω.cm resistivity by spray pyrolysis deposition on glass11. Recently, Szabo et al. have shown ZnO: Ga thin films grown using atomic layer deposition on GaN substrates at 300 °C with resistivities in 10−4 Ω.cm order12. Radio-frequency sputtering was used by Fortunato et al. to produced Ga doped films with ~2.8 × 10−4 Ω.cm13. Gordon et al. used atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition with diethyl zinc, triethyl gallium and water to synthesise films with the optimal film having a sheet resistance of 3.6 Ω.□−1, given that the film was 660 nm thick, this corresponds to a resistivity of ~2.4 × 10−4 Ω.cm6. Aerosol assisted chemical vapor deposition (AACVD) has also been used to grow ZnO: Ga films with zinc acetylacetonate hydrate as the Zn source and either gallium acetylacetonate14,15,16,17 or gallium chloride18 as the Ga source. All the AACVD grown films had, however limited success due to resistivities typically in the 10−2 Ω.cm order15,16,17,18.
In this paper, we have overcome such issues previously related to ZnO:Ga films grown via AACVD by using, for the first time, diethyl zinc, triethyl gallium and methanol as precursors. The oxygen poor growth conditions allowed by the use of these precursors has enabled, we believe with the support of previous computational studies, the formation of low resistive thin films19. The AACVD synthesized films in this study showed ZnO:Ga with 7.9 × 10−4 Ω.cm resistivity and >80% visible light transmittance. The sheet resistance was 17.6 Ω.□−1, which is comparable to commercially available and widely used TEC 15 (Rsh = ~15 Ω.□−1) by NSG20,21. The achievement, for the first time, of such low resistive ZnO: Ga films via AACVD is important as AACVD is an ambient pressure, scalable and highly tunable technique that has industrial importance used for the fabrication of wide variety of thin film materials22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30.
Results and Discussion
Gallium doped ZnO thin films were produced on glass substrates via AACVD at 450 °C by using a toluene solution of ZnEt2 and GaEt3 with methanol as the oxygen source. The films were highly transparent to visible light and well adhered to the substrate, passing the Scotch tape test and scratch tests by a stainless steel scalpel31. The films were resistant to damage from solvents of differing polarity but were damaged by exposure to acid solutions. They were highly stable in air and showed no deterioration in electrical or optical properties.
The concentration of Ga in the films, determined via energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), was 0, 1.0, 5.0, 8.0 at.% when 0, 2.5, 5, 10 mol.% of GaEt3 relative to Zn was used in the precursor solution, respectively. This compares well with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis of the films’ surface that showed Ga concentrations to be 0, >1, 5, 10 at.%, therefore suggesting homogenous distribution of the Ga dopant throughout the film with little bulk or surface segregation.
Peak fitting of the XPS data for the Zn and Ga 2p transitions was carried out to determine their oxidation states (Fig. 1). The Zn 2p3/2 peak was typically centered between 1021.4–1021.5 eV and matching well with literature reports for Zn2+ for all films32. The Ga 2p peaks for Zn0.99Ga0.01O was visible (Fig. 1b) but too small to be quantified, however for the Zn0.95Ga0.05O and Zn0.92Ga0.08O films, the 2p3/2 peak was at 1117.5 eV, corresponding to literature values for Ga3+ 33.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) showed all films matched only the hexagonal wurtzite structure of ZnO (JCPDS 36-1451) (Fig. 2). The Bragg reflections were observed at 31, 34, 36, 47, 56 and 63 °, belonging to the (100), (002), (101), (102), (110) and (103) planes of polycrystalline ZnO34. Modeling of these peaks using the Le Bail method showed there was a contraction and a linear decrease in the ZnO unit cell volume as the concentration of Ga increased in the films (Table 1). This gives evidence for successful substitutional doping of Ga into ZnO as the larger four coordinate Zn2+ (0.60 Å) is replaced by smaller Ga3+ (0.47 Å) ions.
The texture coefficient was calculated using the XRD data to determine the degree of preferred orientation in the ZnO films. The nominally undoped film showed a preference for the  direction and a lack of growth in the ,  and  relative to the standard pattern. Upon doping to 1 at.% with Ga, the XRD pattern showed preference in the  direction with growth in the  and  directions suppressed. This change was also reflected in the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images (Fig. 3a,b). The morphology of the nominally undoped ZnO film was composed of closely packed rounded clusters ∼100 nm in diameter. In general, the film appeared dense, pinhole free and relatively flat which is somewhat typical of undoped ZnO. At 1 at.% doping the morphology undergoes a dramatic change to show irregular facets (grains) between 300–500 nm wide protruding from the substrate, likely due to growth in the  as seen from the XRD. This surface structure has previously been reported for cation doped ZnO systems grown via CVD and PVD techniques and is attributed to growth along the low energy c-axis direction perpendicular to the substrate that is associated to the  or  directions35,36. This highly textured ZnO is ideal as an electrode for solar cell applications, in particular for amorphous and microcrystalline cells where light scattering and trapping enhances overall efficiency37. Further doping to 5 and 8 at.% showed a change back to a flatter morphology with the surface made up of ∼100 nm (5 at.%) and ∼100–500 nm (8 at.%) rounded features protruding only slightly form the substrate (Fig. 3c,d). Texture coefficient calculations for these two films looked similar and showed that preference for the  direction had weakened with now a strong preference for the  direction.
Side-on SEM imaging was used to determine the film thicknesses (see Supporting Information Fig. S1) to be 400, 400, 450 and 600 nm for the 0, 1, 5, 8 at.% Ga doped films, respectively. These values were used with Hall measurement data to determine the electrical properties of the films.
Hall effect measurements identified all the films as n-type (Table 2). The carrier concentration for the undoped ZnO film was 1.36 × 1020 cm−3, which is high for an undoped ZnO but not unusual, particularly for films grown from ZnEt2, and is generally attributed to adventitious hydrogen3,35,38,39. As the concentration of Ga goes up to 1, 5 and 8 at.%, the carrier concentration increases to 2.96 × 1020, 4.23 × 1020 and 6.55 × 1020 cm−3 respectively due to the donation of one electron for every Zn2+ in the ZnO matrix replaced by Ga3+. The doping efficiency was calculated to determine the amount of electrically active Ga in the films by calculating the ratio of the carrier density (minus carrier density in the nominally undoped ZnO) to the Ga concentration. For the 1 at.% film the doping efficiency was 33% but for the higher Ga containing samples the doping efficiency falls to >1%, suggesting much of the Ga in these films is in the form of electrically inactive Ga2O3 (see Fig. 2) possibly around the ZnO grains (Fig. 3)40. This follows, as the enthalpy of formation for Ga2O3 is quite negative at −11.29 eV compared to that of ZnO (−3.63 eV)8. Another likely possibility is self-compensation through acceptor defects, such as Zn vacancies (VZn), and complex donor-acceptor defects, such as GaZn-VZn and GaZn-Oi3,19.
This increase in carrier concentration with dopant amount results in a reduction in both the resistivity and carrier mobility (Table 2). The resistivity falls from 2.14 × 10−3 Ω.cm for the undoped sample to 1.40 × 10−3 Ω.cm and 7.9 × 10−4 Ω.cm for the 1 and 5 at.% before rising again to 1.24 × 10−3 Ω.cm (8 at.%). The resistivity increases observed for the 8 at.% film despite an increase in carrier concentration, was due to a more than 2-fold drop in the carrier mobility from 18.7 (5 at.%) to 7.7 (8 at.%) cm2 V−1 s−1. This decrease, along with the general reduction in Hall mobility observed for the ZnO and ZnO: Ga films was primarily due to ionized impurity scattering, which is know to be the limiting scattering mechanism for degenerately doped ZnO at carrier concentrations between 1020–1021 cm−3 4.
The sheet resistance – a measure often quoted by TCO manufacturers – was 17.6 Ω.□−1 for the film with 5 at.% Ga (Table 2)20,21. This represents a 3-fold reduction in sheet resistance compared with the undoped ZnO film and is comparable to commercially available FTO samples (NSG TECTM 15)20,21.
The optical properties of the thin films were tested across the UV, visible and near infrared (NIR) wavelengths (Fig. 4a). For all films the transmittance to visible light (400–700 nm) was >80%, making them highly suitable for TCO applications. Reflectivity of the films to visible light was low (>20%). For the undoped and 1 at.% Ga film, transmittance across 700–2500 nm remains relatively high. A gradual decrease in transmittance (and corresponding increase in reflectance) was observed indicating that the plasma edge is well into the infrared due to the relatively low (1.36 × 1020 and 2.96 × 1020 cm−3 for 0 and 1 at.%) conduction electron density, similar to what is found in literature5. For the 5 and 8 at.% ZnO: Ga films the plasma edge appears at 1445 and 1407 nm, respectively, as a result of their higher carrier concentration. The plasma edge wavelength is an important factor along with the optical band gap in determining the optical window of a TCO material. At wavelengths below the plasma edge and up to the band gap the materials conduction electrons cannot respond and therefore the material is transparent. Above the plasma edge wavelength, the TCO is able to reflect and absorb incident radiation similar to what was observed here.
The optical band gaps of the nominally undoped and ZnO: Ga films were estimated via the Tauc plot (Fig. 4b) to be 3.25, 3.31, 3.55 and 3.52 eV for the 0,1, 5, 8 at.% Ga doped films, respectively. The increase in the band gap with carrier concentration follows the expected Moss-Burstein band shift3,41.
From the optoelectronic results presented above, it is clear that the low resistivity and optical enhancements of the ZnO films presented in this study are essentially due to increase in carrier concentration as a result of donor doping with Ga3+. Compared to the previous four examples of AACVD grown ZnO: Ga found in literature, the resistivites reported here are typically 1-fold and sometimes 2-fold lower (Table 2)15,16,17,18. This is a consequence of our films having a higher carrier concentration compared to literature at similar Ga at.% in the films. We believe our films have such higher carrier densities due to our synthetic procedure utilizing oxygen poor grown conditions as a result of oxygen free precursors such as ZnEt2 and GaEt3 with only methanol as the oxygen source. Whereas previous reports have used [Zn(C5H7O2)2.H2O] and [Ga(C5H7O2)3] or GaCl3 along with methanol, leading to oxygen rich growth conditions. This theory is supported by computational studies by Demchenko et al. on the defect chemistry of ZnO: Ga which showed that the donor-acceptor complex GaZn-VZn defect, under oxygen rich growth conditions, has low formation energies compared to the principle donor defect GaZn, therefore leading to charge compensation and lower carrier densities (x1019 cm−3 order) in ZnO: Ga19. Possibly explaining the poor carrier concentration and resisitivity results seen by Binions et al. and Carmalt et al. Demchenko’s density functional theory calculations also found that under oxygen poor ZnO: Ga conditions the formation energy of GaZn-VZn complex is much higher than that of the donor GaZn hence giving rise to high carrier concentrations19.
ZnO: Ga films were prepared by AACVD from the reaction of ZnEt2 and GaEt3 at 450 °C. The electrical resistivity of the nominally undoped film was 2.14 × 10−3 Ω.cm but was reduced to 1.4 × 10−3, 7.9 × 10−4 and 1.25 × 10−3 Ω.cm when Ga concentration was 1, 5 and 8 at.%. The low resistivities observed for ZnO: Ga films here is attributed, possibly, to the O-poor growth conditions that allowed minimization of charge compensation from donor-acceptor complex defects. Optical transparency in the visible wavelengths was above 80% for all the films therefore making the films highly suitable for TCO applications.
Gallium doped zinc oxide thin films were deposited on SiO2 barrier coated float glass. All depositions were carried out under Nitrogen gas (≥99.9% from BOC) at a flow rate of 1.0 L min−1 and a temperature of 450 °C. Precursors were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used as received. The solvents were purchased from Fischer Scientific; toluene was stored under alumina columns and dried with anhydrous engineering equipment and the methanol was dried by distillation over magnesium turnings. The films were deposited using a two-pot AACVD system. An undoped zinc oxide film was produced from one pot containing 0.50 g diethylzinc (15 wt% in toluene) in approx. 20 mL dry toluene and the second pot holding approx. 25 mL dry methanol. ZnO: Ga films were deposited by adding the required mol.% of triethylgallium (2.0 M in toluene) to the diethylzinc and toluene mixture. An aerosol mist of the precursor solutions were created using a piezoelectric device, which was transported to and mixed in a Y-joint before entering the reactor through a baffle. The baffle was water cooled. The depositions lasted between 25–35 minutes. The films were cooled under a flow of nitrogen to room temperature before being removed from the reactor. The films were transparent and colourless and were handled and stored in air.
The elemental composition in the bulk of the films were calculated using energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) or/and wavelength dispersive X-ray (WDX) spectroscopy. EDX and WDX were carried out using the JEOL JSM-6301F field emission and Phillips ESEM, respectively. The Zn and Ga at.% were obtained from the Zn-Kα line (8638 eV), Ga-Kα (1487 eV) and F-Kα (676.8 eV) X-ray emission lines.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed using a Thermo Scientific к-Alpha spectrometer fitted with a monochromatic Al-Kα (0.834 nm, 1486.6 eV) source. Survey scans were collected in the range 0–1100 eV (binding energy) at a pass energy of 200 eV. Higher resolution scan was recorded for Ga (2p) at a pass energy of 20 eV. For depth profiling, an argon ion gun was used. The peaks were modeled using CasaXPS software and the peak positions were calibrated to carbon (284.5 eV).
X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed using a modified Bruker-Axs D8 diffractometer with parallel beam optics equipped with a PSD LynxEye silicon strip detector to collect diffracted X-ray photons. This instrument generates X-rays using a Cu source with Cu Kα1 and Cu Kα2 radiation of wavelengths 1.54056 and 1.54439 Å, respectively, emitted with an intensity ratio of 2:1, a voltage of 40 kV, and current of 30 mA. The incident beam angle was kept at 1° and the pattern was collected in the angular range 10 < 2θ < 66° with a step size of 0.05° counted at 4 s/step. The lattice parameters were calculated from X-ray diffraction data using the software GSAS and EXPGUI via the Le Bail refinement.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to determine the surface morphology and calculate film thickness. The JEOL JSM-6700F and JEOL JSM-6301F Field Emission instruments were used for top down and side on configuration, respectively, at an accelerating voltage of 10 KeV.
UV/Vis/Near IR transmittance and reflectance spectra were taken using the Perkin Elmer Lambda 950 UV-vis/IR spectrometer over a wavelength range of 320–2500 nm with an air background. The band gap was calculated from transmittance and reflectance data using the Tauc plot method.
Hall effect measurements were carried out on an Ecopia HMS-3000 using the Van der Pauw configuration to determine the resistance (ρ), free carrier concentration (n) and mobility (μ). Samples of 1 cm2 were prepared and silver paint (Agar Scientific) was used to form ohmic contacts. The samples were subjected to an input current of 1 mA and a calibrated magnetic field of 0.58 T.
Minami, T. Transparent conducting oxide semiconductors for transparent electrodes. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 20, S35–S44 (2005).
Lewis, B. G. & Paine, D. C. Applications and Processing of Transparent Conducting Oxides. MRS Bull. 25, 22–27 (2000).
Ellmer, K. & Bikowski, A. Intrinsic and extrinsic doping of ZnO and ZnO alloys. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 49, 413002 (2016).
Minami, T. New n-type transparent conducting oxides. MRS Bull. 25, 38–44 (2000).
Gordon, R. G. Criteria for choosing transparent conductors. MRS Bull. 25, 52–57 (2000).
Hu, J. & Gordon, R. G. Atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition of gallium doped zinc oxide thin films from diethyl zinc, water, and triethyl gallium. J. Appl. Phys. 72, 5381–5392 (1992).
Dixon, S. C., Scanlon, D. O., Carmalt, C. J. & Parkin, I. P. N-Type doped transparent conducting binary oxides: An overview. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 4, 6946–6961 (2016).
Walsh, A., Da Silva, J. L. F. & Wei, S.-H. Multi-component transparent conducting oxides: progress in materials modelling. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 23, 334210 (2011).
Ginley, D. S. & Bright, C. Transparent conducting oxides. MRS Bull. 25, 15–18 (2000).
Chalker, P. R. et al. Atomic layer deposition of Ga-doped ZnO transparent conducting oxide substrates for CdTe-based photovoltaics. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vacuum, Surfaces, Film. 31, 01A120 (2013).
Gomez, H., Maldonado, A., Olvera, M., de la, L. & Acosta, D. R. Gallium-doped ZnO thin films deposited by chemical spray. Sol. energy Mater. Sol. cells 87, 107–116 (2005).
Szabó, Z. et al. Atomic layer deposition and annealing of Ga doped ZnO films. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 101, 95–102 (2019).
Fortunato, E. et al. Highly stable transparent and conducting gallium-doped zinc oxide thin films for photovoltaic applications. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 92, 1605–1610 (2008).
Waugh, M. R., Hyett, G. & Parkin, I. P. Zinc oxide thin films grown by aerosol assisted CVD. Chem. Vap. Depos. 14, 366–372 (2008).
Chen, S., Nuruzzaman, N., Parkin, I. P. & Binions, R. Temperature and Thickness Dependent Growth Behaviour and Opto-electronic Properties of Ga-doped ZnO Films Prepared by Aerosol Assisted Chemical Vapour Deposition. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 17174–17182 (2014).
Chen, S., Carraro, G., Barreca, D. & Binions, R. Growth and electro-optical properties of Ga-doped ZnO films prepared by aerosol assisted chemical vapour deposition. Thin Solid Films 584, 316–319 (2015).
Chen, S. et al. Aerosol assisted chemical vapour deposition of Ga-doped ZnO films for energy efficient glazing: effects of doping concentration on the film growth behaviour and opto-electronic properties. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 13039–13049 (2015).
Potter, D. B. et al. Al□, Ga□, and In□doped ZnO thin films via aerosol assisted CVD for use as transparent conducting oxides. Phys. status solidi 213, 1346–1352 (2016).
Demchenko, D. O. et al. Impurity complexes and conductivity of Ga-doped ZnO. Phys. Rev. B 84, 75201 (2011).
Pilkington NSG. NSG TEC datasheet. NSG TEC datasheet (2019).
Noor, N. & Parkin, I. P. Enhanced transparent-conducting fluorine-doped tin oxide films formed by Aerosol-Assisted Chemical Vapour Deposition. J. Mater. Chem. C 1, 984–996 (2013).
Marchand, P., Hassan, I. A., Parkin, I. P. & Carmalt, C. J. Aerosol-assisted delivery of precursors for chemical vapour deposition: expanding the scope of CVD for materials fabrication. Dalton Trans. 42, 9406–22 (2013).
Sathasivam, S. et al. Single Step Solution Processed GaAs Thin Films from GaMe3 and t BuAsH2 under Ambient Pressure. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 7013–7019 (2016).
Sathasivam, S. et al. Solution Processing of GaAs Thin Films for Photovoltaic Applications. Chem. Mater. 26, 4419–4424 (2014).
Marchand, P. et al. A single-source precursor approach to solution processed indium arsenide thin films. J. Mater. Chem. C 4, 6761–6768 (2016).
Hou, X. & Choy, K. L. Processing and Applications of Aerosol-Assisted Chemical Vapor Deposition. Chem. Vap. Depos. 12, 583–596 (2006).
Singh, K. K. et al. High efficiency thin film transistor device with gallium arsenide layer (2014).
Chadwick, N. P. et al. Photo-activity and low resistivity in N/Nb Co-doped TiO 2 thin films by combinatorial AACVD. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 407–415 (2016).
Chadwick, N. et al. Combinatorial aerosol assisted chemical vapour deposition of a photocatalytic mixed SnO2/TiO2 thin film. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 5108–5116 (2014).
Li, S. et al. Efficiently texturing hierarchical superhydrophobic fluoride-free translucent films by AACVD with excellent durability and self-cleaning ability. J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 17633–17641 (2018).
Mittal, K. L. Adhesion Measurement of Thin Films. Electrocompon. Sci. Technol. 3, 21–42 (1976).
Chen, M. et al. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and auger electron spectroscopy studies of Al-doped ZnO films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 158, 134–140 (2000).
Park, S. M., Ikegami, T. & Ebihara, K. Effects of substrate temperature on the properties of Ga-doped ZnO by pulsed laser deposition. Thin Solid Films 513, 90–94 (2006).
Cho, S. et al. Photoluminescence and ultraviolet lasing of polycrystalline ZnO thin films prepared by the oxidation of the metallic Zn. Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 2761–2763 (1999).
Bhachu, D. S., Sankar, G. & Parkin, I. P. Aerosol assisted chemical vapor deposition of transparent conductive zinc oxide films. Chem. Mater. 24, 4704–4710 (2012).
Shan, F. K. et al. Blueshift of near band edge emission in Mg doped ZnO thin films and aging. J. Appl. Phys. 95, 4772–4776 (2004).
Krč, J., Zeman, M., Kluth, O., Smole, F. & Topič, M. Effect of surface roughness of ZnO: Al films on light scattering in hydrogenated amorphous silicon solar cells. Thin Solid Films 426, 296–304 (2003).
Janotti, A. & Van de Walle, C. G. Native point defects in ZnO. Phys. Rev. B 76, 165202 (2007).
McCluskey, M. D. & Jokela, S. J. Defects in zno. J. Appl. Phys. 106, 10 (2009).
Dixon, S. C. et al. Transparent conducting n-type ZnO:Sc-synthesis, optoelectronic properties and theoretical insight. J. Mater. Chem. C 5, 7585–7597 (2017).
Edwards, P. P., Porch, A., Jones, M. O., Morgan, D. V. & Perks, R. M. Basic materials physics of transparent conducting oxides. Dalt. Trans. 2995–3002 (2004).
EPSRC are thanked for a studentship (S.D.P.) and for Grants No. EP/L017709 and EP/N01572X/1 (S.S). NSG are thanked for the glass substrates.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Ponja, S.D., Sathasivam, S., Parkin, I.P. et al. Highly conductive and transparent gallium doped zinc oxide thin films via chemical vapor deposition. Sci Rep 10, 638 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-57532-7
This article is cited by
ZnO nanostructures for photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue: effect of different anodization parameters
Journal of the Korean Ceramic Society (2022)
Influence of the secondary absorption and the vertical axis scale of the Tauc’s plot on optical bandgap energy
Journal of Optics (2022)
Effect of zirconium doping on ZnO nanostructured thin films and the enhanced ammonia gas sensing activity
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics (2022)
Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society (2022)
Structural and electrical point of view on addressing the organisation of the constituting domains in DC magnetron sputtered AZO films
Journal of Materials Science (2022)