# Deep sequencing and automated histochemistry of human tissue slice cultures improve their usability as preclinical model for cancer research

## Abstract

Cancer research requires models closely resembling the tumor in the patient. Human tissue cultures can overcome interspecies limitations of animal models or the loss of tissue architecture in in vitro models. However, analysis of tissue slices is often limited to histology. Here, we demonstrate that slices are also suitable for whole transcriptome sequencing and present a method for automated histochemistry of whole slices. Tumor and peritumoral tissue from a patient with glioblastoma was processed to slice cultures, which were treated with standard therapy including temozolomide and X-irradiation. Then, RNA sequencing and automated histochemistry were performed. RNA sequencing was successfully accomplished with a sequencing depth of 243 to 368 x 106 reads per sample. Comparing tumor and peritumoral tissue, we identified 1888 genes significantly downregulated and 2382 genes upregulated in tumor. Treatment significantly downregulated 2017 genes, whereas 1399 genes were upregulated. Pathway analysis revealed changes in the expression profile of treated glioblastoma tissue pointing towards downregulated proliferation. This was confirmed by automated analysis of whole tissue slices stained for Ki67. In conclusion, we demonstrate that RNA sequencing of tissue slices is possible and that histochemical analysis of whole tissue slices can be automated which increases the usability of this preclinical model.

## Introduction

Cancer constitutes an enormous burden on societies worldwide. Despite achievements, rendering some types of cancer curable, the overall occurrence of cancer is increasing because of growth and aging of populations1. Research on cancer, aiming at the development of new drugs and therapeutic strategies requires models that most closely resemble the in vivo situation in a patient in order to have a predictive value for future treatment. Today, most models are based on (immortalized) cell lines grafted into immunosuppressed animals. Their relevance is further hampered by interspecies limitations between humans and rodents. During the last years, organotypic slice cultures derived from human tissues, including tumors, came into focus as an alternative model2. These models may become a valuable alternative to animal testing not only reducing the numbers of experimental animals but also overcoming interspecies differences. In our group, we have already established slice cultures from human brains3, Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)4,5, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma6, human gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer7, and colorectal carcinoma8. Using these organotypic slice cultures, we tested, for example, effects of heavy ion therapy5, polyethylenimine-based nanoparticles for siRNA delivery9, but also novel nanostructured scaffolds for cultivation4.

A prerequisite to use such models as clinical test system for the outcome of therapy or the selection of the most effective drug for individual patients is an unbiased, fast and automated cell counting approach allowing to start treatment within a couple of days. Moreover, whole transcriptome analysis with and without treatment would be of help for prediction, but also to better understand mechanisms of tumor progression and therapy resistance.

In order to address these two important issues, we focused on GBM slice cultures which maintain their histopathological hallmarks for at least 14 days in vitro5. GBM is the most common primary brain malignancy in adults10 with a median survival of approximately 15 months11,12 despite surgical resection, X-irradiation and chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ). We report that organotypic slice cultures are suitable for automated histological analyses as well as whole transcriptome sequencing, thereby providing an adequate alternative with regard to individualized cancer research and therapy.

## Results

### Tissue integrity is maintained in slice cultures during 13 days of cultivation

In order to see whether cultivation had an influence on tissue integrity, hematoxylin and eosin staining of tissue slices was performed immediately after preparation and after cultivation for 13 days. As can be seen in Fig. 1, the cell density of freshly cut peritumoral brain tissue of zone III (Fig. 1a) decreases after 13 days of cultivation (Fig. 1b). In addition, we observed an increase of apoptotic cells from 1% on day 0 to 17% on day 13 (Fig. 1c, p = 0.034). Despite an obvious loss of cells, this result also indicates that the tissue is maintained to a high degree. In Fig. 1d tumor tissue after 13 days of cultivation is presented. Unfortunately, the amount of material obtained from the patient was very limited. Therefore, we were not able to present a comparison of the tumor tissue from day 13 to day 0. But, it should be noted that we have previously demonstrated that the individual histopathology of tissue cultures derived from glioblastoma is maintained over at least 16 days5.

### RNA obtained from tissue slices is suitable for whole transcriptome sequencing

Next, we asked whether the RNA isolated from treated and untreated tissue slices can be further used for whole transcriptome sequencing. Therefore, RNA was isolated from peritumoral brain (zone III) and GBM tissue (zone I) either treated with TMZ and X-irradiation or left untreated. For each condition, the RNA isolated from three individual slices pooled together was collected in order to have enough material for further analyses and to overcome the tumor’s heterogeneity. Using a Bioanalyzer 2100, the RNA integrity number (RIN) was determined from each sample before and after DNase digestion. The corresponding data are presented in Table 1. The higher the RIN value, the better is the RNA maintenance13. As can be seen in Table 1, all RIN values were ≥ 7 before the DNase digestion which demonstrates a very high RNA quality (Table 1). After DNase digestion, a severe loss of RNA quality was observed as indicated by strongly diminished RIN values (the reason for that is not known, but a contamination of the utilized chemicals with RNase could be excluded in further analyses). This loss of quality was further indicated by a loss of the characteristic peaks of the 18 s and 28 s rRNA in the corresponding chromatograms (Fig. 2). Only the peak of the 5 s rRNA still was clearly distinct (Fig. 2b). Although RNA quality seemed to be insufficient for whole transcriptome sequencing as concluded from the RIN values determined, it should be noted that higher RINs are only necessary for transcriptome sequencing of poly(A) RNA. In our experiments total RNA sequencing was performed which even allows using RNA from FFPE tissue with RINs worse than those presented in our data14,15,16. In fact, next generation sequencing was performed successfully. Library preparation and sequencing resulted in sequencing depths from 243 to 368 x 106 reads per sample. For unknown reasons, this was not the case for one duplicate of treated peritumoral brain tissue (zone III) although respective RIN values were even better than those obtained from other slices (Table 1). Our data clearly demonstrate that whole transcriptome sequencing from slice cultures is possible.

### Technical replicates reveal a high consistency of sequencing data

As described in the preceding paragraph, the whole transcriptome sequencing from RNA isolated from tissue slices was successful. The next question to be answered was how consistent the results were among individual experimental replicates. To this end, the data obtained by separate sequencing experiments from two slice pools (three slices were pooled in each approach) for each condition and tissue type were compared. The linear correlation coefficient R2 of variance-stabilized counts was calculated for each pair (Fig. 3a). For all three sample pairs, the correlation coefficient was close to 1, so that a linear correlation between the duplicates could be assumed. As expected, the variance within the GBM samples was slightly higher than in the peritumoral brain samples (Fig. 3a,d) probably due to high intra-tumor heterogeneity which is well-known for GBM17. The heatmaps (R package “pheatmap” with default parameters) of the pairwise Euclidean distances of variance-stabilized counts show that the sample duplicates cluster together but clearly separate from the other tissue samples and conditions (Fig. 3b,c). The principal component analysis of the variance-stabilized counts confirmed these findings (Fig. 3d,e). The variance between peritumoral brain and GBM tissue was higher (Fig. 3d) than between treated and untreated GBM tissue (Fig. 3e).

### Differential gene expression between peritumoral brain (zone III) and GBM tissue (zone I) and between treated and untreated GBM tissue

By the experiments presented in the preceding paragraphs it could be confirmed that the data obtained by whole transcriptome sequencing are reliable, since expression variation was reproducible between duplicates of two different tissue cultures of the same patient. To gain further insight into differential gene expression between peritumoral brain (zone III) and GBM tissue (zone I) and between treated and untreated GBM tissue, a differential gene expression analysis was done.

A calculation with DESeq2 revealed 4270 significantly differentially (FDR < 0.01) regulated transcripts between untreated peritumoral brain (zone III) and GBM tissue (zone I, Fig. 4a). 1888 of these DEGs were found to be significantly downregulated, and 2382 genes were significantly upregulated in the tumor tissue (zone I) in comparison to the peritumoral brain (zone III, Fig. 4b). The vast majority of all DEGs belonged to the protein-coding fraction of transcripts (Fig. 4c). In addition, known human pseudogenes and non-coding RNAs represented approximately 100 DEGs both in the downregulated and in the upregulated transcripts. A corresponding comparison of untreated versus treated GBM tissue (Fig. 4f) revealed 3470 significantly regulated (FDR < 0.01) transcripts. Here, 2071 DEGs were found to be significantly downregulated and 1399 significantly upregulated in GBM tissue which had been treated in contrast to untreated samples (Fig. 4d,e).

A pathway enrichment analysis by the Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis software tool (Qiagen) revealed that the vast majority of the protein-coding genes which are significant differentially expressed between untreated peritumoral brain and GBM tissue and between untreated and treated GBM tissue are known to be associated with certain diseases and/or biological functions. Tables 2 and 3 show an excerpt of these diseases and functions with the corresponding p-values and the numbers of molecules present in both datasets of differentially expressed protein-coding genes. In peritumoral brain versus GBM tissue, 3040 of the 3280 differentially expressed protein-coding transcripts were found to be associated with the tumorigenesis of tissue (Table 2). 511 transcripts are known to play a role in cellular growth and proliferation (Table 2). In untreated versus treated GBM tissue, 2189 of the 2527 protein-coding transcripts are associated with tumorigenesis of tissue and 778 were found to be associated with cellular function and maintenance (Table 3). Further significantly enriched functions are, among others, cell death, cell and organismal survival, proliferation of tumor cells, progression of cell cycle, and cell-to-cell signaling (Tables 2 and 3).

### Knowledge base analysis of expression data predicts reduced proliferation in slices after treatment which could be confirmed by automated histochemical analysis

In the previous sections it was demonstrated that whole transcriptome sequencing can be performed with tissue slices in order to reveal differences in gene expression. Now it was of interest, whether these data can be used to make predictions about possible physiological responses to treatment that can be confirmed by a second method. Therefore, we performed a knowledge base data analysis using the Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis (IPA®) software tool (Qiagen). An IPA®-generated list of genes which are described to be associated with proliferation of cancer and/or neuronal cells was compared to the significantly regulated transcripts that were found between treated and untreated GBM tissue. The analysis revealed 190 genes that were present in both lists. Further analysis indicated reduced proliferation under treatment conditions (Fig. 5b). Among the most prominent genes we identified down-regulation of MKI67, SPP1, PDGFRA, FGF1, CXCR4, CD44, HGF and KIT under the influence of treatment (Fig. 5a).

In order to confirm a negative effect on proliferation in the tumor slices of this patient under treatment, as predicted by gene expression analysis, we performed immunohistochemistry on paraffin sections derived from slices. For the analysis, a quantitative image analysis was implemented. In the experiment presented in Fig. 6, slices from peritumoral brain (zone III, Fig. 6a) and from GBM tissue (zone I, Fig. 6b) were labeled with an antibody directed against Ki67 (untreated samples are shown as example). Ki67 is a commonly used proliferation marker which is present during G1, S, G2, and mitosis but absent in G0 phase18. In addition, DAPI was used to counterstain nuclei in order to evaluate whether a Ki67-positive signal is indeed localized to a nucleus to prevent counting of unspecific signals. Figures 6a,b show the original pictures recorded by the slide scanner. In a first step, the pixel area of the whole tissue was calculated (gray masks in Fig. 6a’/’’,b’/’’) as well as the DAPI-positive area (Fig. 6a’,b’) representing the nuclei. To determine the proliferation capacity of peritumoral brain (Fig. 6a) and GBM tissue (Fig. 6b), double-positive nuclei were analyzed (Fig. 6a’’,b’’). Consecutive H/E-stained sections of the tissue are shown in Fig. 6a’’’,b’’’ to demonstrate the native condition of the analyzed tissue slices. The automatic quantification revealed a statistically significant decrease of proliferating cells in treated peritumoral brain and GBM tissue compared to the untreated controls (Fig. 6c). Furthermore, GBM tissue has a high nuclei density and a small tissue area, whereas peritumoral brain tissue exhibits a larger tissue area combined with a smaller cellular density (Fig. 6d).

The results of the automated analysis were confirmed by manual analysis. Segmented areas of total tissue and DAPI were highly correlated (R2 = 0.998 and R2 = 0.876, respectively; all p < 0.001) while values for the proliferating area showed moderate correlation (R2 = 0.616, p < 0.001) (Fig. S3).

## Discussion

Despite intense research during the last decades, many cancerous diseases are still associated with a poor prognosis and a low median overall survival, e.g. 14 months for advanced non-small cell lung cancer19, 12 months for advanced gastric cancer20, and 15 months for GBM12. Therefore, the establishment of preclinical models to test newly developed drugs and treatment strategies is an important step in oncological research. As outlined in the introduction, the frequently used animal models often fail because of interspecies differences that impede clinical translation. Cell culture models, on the other hand, are far away from the in vivo situation as tumor tissue can be composed of a bulk of many other cell types aside from tumor cells, e.g. endothelial cells21, pericytes22, tumor-associated immune cells23, and cancer stem-like cells24 which is not reflected by cell culture models. As a more realistic system patient-derived xenograft models have been developed, injecting patient-derived tumor cells into immunodeficient mice25. Thus, the animals generate tumors which are supposed to maintain the original tumor’s biology thereby mimicking the human patient. This is, among others, well described for breast cancer26, non-small cell lung cancer27, or melanoma metastasis28. Besides the great burden for the animals, the production of patient-derived tumors within rodents is a time-consuming method which is therefore unlikely to find its way into a clinical setting with regard to personalized cancer therapy. The immunodeficiency of these mice, which is required to inhibit the rejection of injected human tumor cells29,30 further impedes the successful translation into the clinics.

As an alternative to animal and cell culture models, human tissue slice cultures are now increasingly employed in cancer research2,31,32,33,34,35,36,37. One of the major advantages of tissue slice cultures is the maintenance of the tissue topology and composition of different cell types including immune cells, as represented by microglia which play a crucial role in GBM progression38,39,40. Therefore, slice cultures may reflect the tumor’s heterogeneity far better than conventional cell culture and animal models. Yet, tumor heterogeneity is not only defined by the general presence of different cell types, but also by different characteristics of the tumor cells in different areas of the tissue41. This impedes the reproducibility of such ex vivo experiments and increases the difficulty of successful translation into a clinical setting for human patients. For that reason, the slices obtained from one patient are pooled together and are randomly distributed in triplicates to the membrane inserts. For RNA analysis, these slices are pooled again to diminish the possibility that the differences observed here are just resulting from a different localization within the original tumor.

For histology, single slices are embedded in paraffin and stained individually. In conventional microscopy, only parts of the whole tissue can be recorded and analyzed. Furthermore, most histological analyses are still performed “manually” which is time-consuming and investigator-dependent. In this study, as exemplified by tissue from one GBM patient, we present that whole slices can be recorded and analyzed automatically (Fig. 6). Therefore, it is possible to retrospectively draw conclusions about the extent of heterogeneity in the original tissue. The automation of the histological analysis is time-saving, objective and reproducible. That in turn increases the suitability for a clinical application of this method with regard to individualized cancer therapy. By designing the experiments in duplicate or even triplicate approaches (depending on the available amount of tissue) the results are getting even more reproducible. In addition, the RNA expression analyses presented here were performed in replicates and exhibited a very good correlation and only slight differences within each sample pair (Fig. 3). Therefore, it can be concluded that the random distribution of three slices may be sufficient to depict the intratumoral heterogeneity. Further investigations on more GBM slice cultures are currently being analyzed to confirm this finding and to verify whether this is consistent among patients.

The histological finding of reduced proliferation in treated GBM tissue is consistent with RNA expression data obtained from the same samples. Here, the same treatment-mediated effect was observed (Fig. 5a). Eight genes, which were found to be downregulated in treated compared to untreated GBM tissue and are known to be associated with proliferation of neuronal and/or cancer cells, were chosen for further analysis. This analysis revealed a downregulation of SPP1 which has been shown to be overexpressed in grade IV gliomas and which is related to worse overall survival also in patients with lower-grade glioma42. Some isoforms of SPP1 are in fact known to promote glioma cell invasion43. In addition, we identified a down-regulation of CD44 under treatment (Fig. 5c). This down-regulation may be caused by down-regulation of SPP1 which was shown to increase the synthesis of the CD44 variant CD44v6 in liver cancer cells44. CD44 itself is known as a marker of GBM invasiveness and was shown to promote stem cell-like properties in glioma and to play a role in the mediation of resistance to radiation and chemotherapy with temozolomide45,46. An increased expression of CXCR4 is associated with the recurrence of glioblastoma after radiochemotherapy and could indicate an activation of the CXCL12-CXCR4 pathway representing an alteration in the angiogenic pattern within the tumor47. FGF1 and other members of the FGF family are involved in cell proliferation, differentiation, and migration48. Therefore, down-regulation of these family members is in agreement with the histologically observed decrease of proliferation. At this point, it is also interesting to note that FGF1/FGFR signaling activates Aurora A, a kinase which is involved in the maintenance of the stem cell characteristics of GBM cells49. We further found down-regulation of PDGFRA and c-KIT which is especially interesting as these receptor tyrosine kinases have long been suggested as GBM therapeutic targets50,51. In conclusion, the treatment-induced changes in mRNA expression are in agreement with the histological analysis which demonstrated inhibition of proliferation, as determined by a statistically significant decrease in the Ki67-positive pixel area under treatment (Fig. 6c).

The confirmation of the automatic analysis procedure was done by manual segmentation by three independent observers and both approaches were correlated with each other. A certain divergence of values among the three observers was noticed. While the results for total tissue area were very consistent, there was a notable spread in results for DAPI area which could be attributed to blooming around the stained nuclei. These minimal blooming artifacts appear during image acquisition and have no impact on the automatic analysis. Nevertheless, they proved to be interfering for observers during manual analysis. The large spread for the proliferating area was mainly caused by low signal intensities, poor image contrast and faintly remaining background fluorescence. These factors generally impede manual analysis and observers tend to underestimate threshold values. Overall, there was a very good correlation between manually and automatically obtained results for the total tissue area, which could be easily segmented by the three observers. The comparison of manual and automatic analysis of the DAPI area also showed very good correlation, although a manual under-segmentation was noted. The corresponding comparison of the proliferation area determination exhibited a moderate correlation and results indicated a manual over-segmentation. Values from individual images showed notable dispersion between automatic and manual analysis.

In conclusion, our data, in compliance with former studies4,5,6,7 demonstrate that organotypic slice cultures provide a suitable model for mimicking the in vivo situation within the patient thereby allowing insights into tumor biology that would not be possible by the use of conventional cell culture or animal models. By this means, it helps to reduce the numbers of animals used in cancer research. Furthermore, it may promote the way to individualized cancer medicine which is the current goal for therapeutic approaches. In the future and with the simultaneous development of new drugs it could be conceivable to prepare slice cultures for each patient, test possible chemotherapeutics and assist the physicians concerning the individual treatment strategy2,36,52.

## Material and Methods

### Patient and samples

Glioblastoma tissue was obtained by surgery of a 51 year old male patient diagnosed with primary glioblastoma (GBM, WHO grade IV). Surgery and diagnosis were performed at the Department of Neurosurgery and the Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany, according to the EANO guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of anaplastic gliomas and glioblastoma53. To get surgical access to the MRI contrast-enhanced tumor tissue ( = zone I), also tumor-surrounding brain tissue had to be removed. In the following, we refer to the tumor-surrounding tissue as peritumoral tissue ( = zone III), which is basically normal brain tissue with only very few tumor cells54. Both tissue types were subjected to organotypic tissue slice cultures in duplicates. Tissue acquisition and experimental procedure were approved by the institutional research ethics board (Ethical Review Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Leipzig, #144-2008; registration numbers: IORG0001320, IRB00001750) in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration (https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/). The patient provided written informed consent for experimental usage of his tissue samples and retrospective analysis of the data according to the General Data Protection Regulation of the European Community (https://gdpr-info.eu/).

### Tissue slice preparation

Tissue slices that can be maintained in culture for at least 14 days were prepared using a previously described protocol5. In brief, surgically removed tissue not required for neuropathological diagnostic was transferred to Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Gibco) supplemented with glucose (4.5 g/l, Gibco), fetal calf serum (10%, Biochrom), Glutamax (1%, Gibco) and penicillin/streptomycin (1%, Gibco). Organotypic tissue slices were prepared using a tissue chopper (McIlwain TC752) under sterile conditions (Fig. 7). Before preparation, a razor blade was sterilized by autoclaving. A normal glass pipette as well as a glass pipette with the fine tip broken off and appropriate forceps were autoclaved. The tissue was washed twice with fresh Minimum Essential Medium (MEM, Gibco) and was put on a stack of sterile filter membranes, cut into ~ 350 µm thick slices and transferred into ice-cold MEM. The slices were separated from each other by pipetting up and down with the wide opening of the broken-off glass pipette. Using this pipette they were randomly transferred onto membrane culture inserts (Millipore) in triplicates. The inserts were put into six-well plates equipped with 1 ml medium per well. The culture medium was composed of MEM, 25% Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (with Ca2+ and Mg2+, ThermoFisher Scientific), 10% heat-inactivated horse serum (Gibco), 1% L-glutamine (Gibco), 1% glucose (Mediatech Inc.) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco). The slices were cultivated on a liquid/air interface in a humidified incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 13 days in total. During cultivation, slices were provided with fresh medium every 2 to 3 days.

### Treatment of tissue slices

After 10 days in culture, slices were treated with temozolomide (TMZ, 200 µM). Control slices were incubated with the corresponding amount of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, 0.2% v/v) used as vehicle. 24 hours after initial treatment, slices were X-irradiated (4 Gy) or sham-irradiated (control slices), and provided with fresh TMZ- or DMSO-supplemented medium the other day. For X-irradiation, a 200 kV irradiation machine (Gulmay Medical D3000, Gulmay, Surrey, UK) with a copper filter was used. The dose rate was 1.156 Gy/minute and each sample was irradiated 3.46 minutes to reach the target dose of 4 Gy. After a total treatment time of 72 hours, slices were processed for further analyses (Fig. 7).

### Histology

Slices were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C overnight and washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Slices were dehydrated and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin sections (7 µm) were cut with a sledge microtome and collected on glass slides (3 sections per slide). Hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed to evaluate the tissue maintenance. Photographs were taken with a digital slide scanner (Pannoramic Scan II, 3D HISTECH Ltd., Budapest, Hungary).

For immunological staining, every third slide per condition was dewaxed in xylene and rehydrated in decreasing concentrations of ethanol. Before immunostaining, the slides were pretreated two times for 20 minutes with citrate buffer (pH 6) in a microwave. Slides were washed with PBS and permeabilized/blocked with 0.3% Triton/PBS and 10% normal goat serum for 30 minutes. The primary antibody against Ki67 (MIB1 clone, mouse, 1:100, Dako, code number: M7240) was diluted in 0.3% Triton/PBS with 1% normal goat serum and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The Alexa 568-labeled secondary antibody (goat anti-mouse, 1:800, Gibco, catalog number: A-11004) was diluted in PBS and slides were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. To stain the nuclei, slides were incubated with DAPI (ThermoFisher Scientific) for 15 minutes at room temperature. Slides were thoroughly washed with PBS and aqua dest. and covered with Fluorescence Mounting Medium (Dako) and coverslips. For apoptosis detection, five to six slides per condition were dewaxed as described above. A TUNEL assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Click-iT™ Plus TUNEL Assay, Alexa Fluor™ 594, Invitrogen™, order number C10618). To stain the nuclei, slides were incubated with DAPI, washed, and covered with coverslips as described above.

### Imaging and image analysis

The immunofluorescently stained microscope slides were fully digitized at 20x magnification using a digital slide scanner (Pannoramic Scan II, 3D HISTECH Ltd., Budapest, Hungary) equipped with a quad band (DAPI/FITC/TRITC/Cy5) filter set. DAPI filter was used for blue DAPI channel, FITC filter was used for green tissue autofluorescence channel, and TRITC filter was used for Ki67 channel. Images of the stained tissue slices were exported from slide scanner data sets (Pannoramic Viewer, Version 1.15.4, 3D HISTECH Ldt., Budapest, Hungary) as PNG images with pixel dimensions of 0.325 µm. Some regions in the exported images had to be masked by hand (Adobe Photoshop CS6, Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, USA) in order to remove artifacts (i.e. tissue overlaps, air bubbles, unspecific staining, dirt/fluorescent particles, blooming, etc.). Spectral bleedthrough between different color channels was corrected using the “Spectral Unmixing” plugin for ImageJ (Version 1.51n, http://imagej.hih.gov/ij). Image analysis was performed with Mathematica (Version 11.1, Wolfram Research, Inc., Champaign, IL, USA). Corrected fluorescence images were imported and split into separate color channels. In order to obtain tissue masks (almost entirely represented by DAPI and autofluorescence signals), all images were smoothed with a 5 pixel wide Gaussian filter and binarized using Otsu’s (cluster variance maximization) thresholding method55 prior to color channel separation. DAPI signals within blue image channels were also binarized using Otsu’s thresholding method while proliferation marker (Ki67) signals within red image channels were binarized using Kapur’s (histogram entropy minimization) thresholding method56. Since specific proliferation marker staining can only occur within the nuclei, the binarized DAPI and Ki67 images were multiplied in order to omit unspecific staining outside of nuclei. The resulting masks were further cleared of very small segments (up to 20 pixels) to eliminate specks of fluorescent particles within nuclei. Finally, the areas of total tissue, DAPI and Ki67 masks were determined and ratios were computed. Numbers of analyzed images were as follows: 33 for untreated peritumoral brain tissue, 32 for peritumoral brain treated with TMZ + 4 Gy, 13 for untreated GBM tissue, 8 for GBM tissue treated with TMZ + 4 Gy.

To verify the result of the automated image analysis approach we performed an additional interactive analysis by three independent observers using ImageJ. Corrected fluorescence images were imported and split into separate color channels (DAPI, Ki67, autofluorescence). Subsequently, all color channels were segmented by interactive thresholding. Manually generated masks were imported in Mathematica and analyzed corresponding to the automatically segmented masks. Calculated parameters of the three observers’ segmentations were averaged and ratios were computed.

Tissue slices with apoptosis staining underwent the same imaging and image preprocessing procedures as the microscope slides stained against Ki67, as mentioned above. Apoptosis was captured using the TRITC filter of the digital slide scanner. Spectral unmixing was performed and apoptosis signals within red image channels were bianrized using Kapur’s (histogram entropy minimization) thresholding method. Binarized DAPI and apoptosis images were multiplied in order to omit unspecific staining outside of nuclei. Subsequently, segmented images were inspected and masked by hand if necessary (e.g. vessels, artifacts). Finally, the areas of total tissue, DAPI, and apoptosis masks were determined, ratios were computed, and results were averaged for all slices originating from the same tissue slice.

### RNA sequencing

Total RNA from cultivated tissue slices was isolated using the miRNeasy mini Kit (Qiagen) following the provided manufacturer’s protocol. RNA yield was measured with the Qubit 2.0 instrument (Life Technologies) using the RNA Broad Range Assay. Total RNA amount per sample ranged from 1.5 to 2.9 µg. RNA quality was determined by the Bioanalyzer 2100 using the RNA 6000 Nano-Kit (Agilent Technologies). All samples had RNA integrity numbers of ≥ 7.6 (Table 1, before DNase digestion). RNA was DNase-digested twice using the TURBO DNA free Kit (Ambion®, ThermoFisher Scientific).

For library preparation with the Truseq-Stranded Total RNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina) up to 200 ng RNA per sample were used. A ribosomal RNA (rRNA) depletion step using the Ribo-Zero Gold rRNA Removal Kit (Illumina) was conducted according to the manufacturer’s protocol and – depending on the quality of each sample – a fragmentation was done. Every library was equipped with two barcodes to allow multiplexing of the samples. Concentrations were determined using the Qubit DNA Kit and the DNA quality was detected by the Bioanalyzer 2100 (DNA1000 Kit). According to the average size, which is determined by the Bioanalyzer, and the exact concentration of the samples, the molarity of each library was calculated.

The samples were sequenced at the HiSeq2500 with 2 × 126 bp paired-end reads. 12 pM of DNA were put on the flowcell using one lane per sample. The number of reads obtained was between 243 and 368 × 106 reads per sample, except for one sample (“peritumoral brain TMZ + 4 Gy 2”) with less than 50,000 reads.

### Data analysis and statistics

#### Quality control of obtained deep sequencing data

In order to assess the overall quality of the RNA sequencing for each tissue specimen a subsample of 1 million raw paired-end reads was randomly chosen by fastq-sample v0.0.14 (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/) using default parameters (https://github.com/dcjones/fastq-tools). Each sample was evaluated according to the following criteria using FastQC v0.11.5 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/), FastQ Screen v0.11.1a (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastq_screen/), and self-developed scripts (for details see Supplemental Methods): (i) minimal Illumina Phred Quality Score of 30 reflecting minimal base call accuracy of 99.9%, (ii) no adapter sequence remnants detected, (iii) a negligible number of reads mapped to reference genomes other than human, and (iv) more than 90% of reads mapped to the human reference genome GRCh38/hg38 (Fig. S1). A manually assorted list of human rRNA sequences (see S1 Table for NCBI RefSeq identifiers) was used to calculate the fraction of reads mapping to human rRNA transcripts, resulting in fractions ranging from 17% to 66% (Fig. S2).

All samples except one (“peritumoral brain TMZ + 4 Gy 2”) passed all quality criteria (Figs. S1 and S2). For the remaining samples, a high fraction of reads mapping to rRNA transcripts was observed. However, reads corresponding to endogenous rRNA resulted in a maintainable number of reads. The fraction of high reads mapping antisense to rRNA genes resembled rRNA antisense probes from the rRNA depletion step, and thus do not affect assessment of transcriptome variation (Fig. S2).

#### Differential expression analysis

Differential expression was assessed with negative binomial models by using the R library DESeq2 version 1.10.161 and RStudio version 1.1.44262. Both Samples of the treated peritumoral brain tissue (“peritumoral brain TMZ + 4 Gy”) were excluded from differential expression analysis because minimal number of required sample size was not reached due to sequencing failure of one sample of this group. The linear term for the negative binomial model to obtain significant changes in gene expression between two selected contrasts of interest (untreated peritumoral brain vs. untreated GBM tissue, untreated GBM vs. treated GBM tissue) is:

$$log{\lambda }_{gi}={\beta }_{0}+{\beta }_{1}\cdot grou{p}_{k}$$

with λgi denoting the relative abundance of gene g in sample i. The group parameter groupk reflects a vector specifying the contrasts used for expression variation assessment. It assigns samples to the groups “untreated peritumoral brain” and “untreated GBM tissue” or to the groups “treated GBM” and “untreated GBM”, respectively. For both contrasts, expression variation was assessed for all genes with at least one read count in all regarded samples. Default settings of independent filtering of the DeSeq2 R library were used. All genes with a false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.0163 were classified to be significantly differentially expressed.

#### Ingenuity® pathway analysis (IPA®)

The pathway enrichment analysis was done with the Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis software tool version 44961306 (IPA®, Qiagen). A table containing all the significant differentially expressed transcripts of the protein-coding fraction between treated and untreated GBM samples (2527 transcripts) and between untreated GBM versus peritumoral brain samples (3280 transcripts) was uploaded. A core analysis was run with default parameters based on expression log ratio. To link the histological data to the expression analysis data, a list of genes which are well-known to be associated with the proliferation of cancer and/or neuronal cells, was generated by IPA®. This IPA® list (1678 genes) was compared to the list of significant differentially expressed protein-coding genes between treated and untreated GBM tissue and the number of transcripts present in both lists was calculated. Of the 190 genes which were found in both lists, 7 of the most prominent ones were chosen for further analyses. They were extracted from the list of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between treated and untreated GBM tissue, another core analysis was run with default parameters and the z-score was calculated. The z-score indicates whether an associated disease, function or pathway is predicted to be inhibited or activated under the given expression values64. Figure 5 shows the results of this analysis. Green gene symbols in the figure illustrate the measured downregulation of the gene and blue arrows indicate the inhibition of the corresponding biological function, representing negative z-scores calculated by IPA®.

### Statistical analysis of image quantification data

Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics (version 22; IBM Corp.; Armonk, New York, USA). Data were tested for normal distribution using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Group comparisons were performed using Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc tests to adjust the p-value for multiple comparisons. Correlation analysis of manually and automatically calculated values was performed by computing Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Significance for all tests was set at p < 0.05. Data were expressed as median and interquartile range, boxplots and scatterplots were generated using Mathematica.

## Data availability

The deep sequencing datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available in the GEO repository GSE119102. The histological datasets generated during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

## References

1. 1.

Torre, L. A. et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 65, 87–108, https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21262 (2015).

2. 2.

Halfter, K. & Mayer, B. Bringing 3D tumor models to the clinic - predictive value for personalized medicine. Biotechnology journal, 12, https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201600295 (2017).

3. 3.

Nitsch, R. et al. Human brain-cell death induced by tumour-necrosis-factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). Lancet 356, 827–828, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02659-3 (2000).

4. 4.

Kallendrusch, S., Merz, F., Bechmann, I., Mayr, S. G. & Zink, M. Long-Term Tissue Culture of Adult Brain and Spleen Slices on Nanostructured Scaffolds. Advanced healthcare materials, 6, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201601336 (2017).

5. 5.

Merz, F. et al. Organotypic slice cultures of human glioblastoma reveal different susceptibilities to treatments. Neuro Oncol 15, 670–681, https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/not003 (2013).

6. 6.

Gerlach, M. M. et al. Slice cultures from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a novel test system for drug susceptibility and mechanisms of resistance. Br J Cancer 110, 479–488, https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.700 (2014).

7. 7.

Koerfer, J. et al. Organotypic slice cultures of human gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer. Cancer Med 5, 1444–1453, https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.720 (2016).

8. 8.

Sönnichsen, R. et al. Individual Susceptibility Analysis Using Patient-derived Slice Cultures of Colorectal Carcinoma. Clinical colorectal cancer; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2017.11.002 (2017).

9. 9.

Ewe, A. et al. Optimized polyethylenimine (PEI)-based nanoparticles for siRNA delivery, analyzed in vitro and in an ex vivo tumor tissue slice culture model. Drug delivery and translational research 7, 206–216, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-016-0306-y (2017).

10. 10.

Louis, D. N. et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 131, 803–820, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1 (2016).

11. 11.

Stupp, R. et al. Radiotherapy plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352, 987–996 (2005).

12. 12.

Stupp, R. et al. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10, 459–466 (2009).

13. 13.

Schroeder, A. et al. The RIN. An RNA integrity number for assigning integrity values to RNA measurements. BMC molecular biology, 7, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-7-3 (2006).

14. 14.

Eikrem, O. et al. Transcriptome Sequencing (RNAseq) Enables Utilization of Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Biopsies with Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma for Exploration of Disease Biology and Biomarker Development. PloS one, 11, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149743 (2016).

15. 15.

Zhao, W. et al. Comparison of RNA-Seq by poly (A) capture, ribosomal RNA depletion, and DNA microarray for expression profiling. BMC genomics 15, 419, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-419 (2014).

16. 16.

Yan, J. et al. Association between microRNA-125b expression in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissues and prognosis in patients with melanoma. Oncol Lett 18, 1856–1862, https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10506 (2019).

17. 17.

Bonavia, R., Inda, M.-d-M., Cavenee, W. K. & Furnari, F. B. Heterogeneity maintenance in glioblastoma. A social network. Cancer research 71, 4055–4060, https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0153 (2011).

18. 18.

Gerdes, J. et al. Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. J Immunol 133, 1710–1715 (1984).

19. 19.

Paz-Ares, L. G. et al. PARAMOUNT. Final overall survival results of the phase III study of maintenance pemetrexed versus placebo immediately after induction treatment with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 31, 2895–2902, https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.47.1102 (2013).

20. 20.

Digklia, A. & Wagner, A. D. Advanced gastric cancer. Current treatment landscape and future perspectives. World journal of gastroenterology 22, 2403–2414, https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i8.2403 (2016).

21. 21.

Wesseling, P., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., de Leeuw, H., Ruiter, D. J. & Burger, P. C. Quantitative immunohistological analysis of the microvasculature in untreated human glioblastoma multiforme. Computer-assisted image analysis of whole-tumor sections. J Neurosurg 81, 902–909 (1994).

22. 22.

Cheng, L. et al. Glioblastoma stem cells generate vascular pericytes to support vessel function and tumor growth. Cell 153, 139–152, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.021 (2013).

23. 23.

Whiteside, T. L. The tumor microenvironment and its role in promoting tumor growth. Oncogene 27, 5904–5912, https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2008.271 (2008).

24. 24.

Singh, S. K. et al. Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells. Nature 432, 396–400, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03031 (2004).

25. 25.

Jin, K. et al. Patient-derived human tumour tissue xenografts in immunodeficient mice. A systematic review. Clinical & translational oncology: official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico 12, 473–480, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-010-0540-6 (2010).

26. 26.

Whittle, J. R., Lewis, M. T., Lindeman, G. J. & Visvader, J. E. Patient-derived xenograft models of breast cancer and their predictive power. Breast cancer research: BCR, 17, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-015-0523-1 (2015).

27. 27.

Zhang, X.-c. et al. Establishment of patient-derived non-small cell lung cancer xenograft models with genetic aberrations within EGFR, KRAS and FGFR1. Useful tools for preclinical studies of targeted therapies. Journal of translational medicine, 11, https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-11-168 (2013).

28. 28.

Kageyama, K. et al. Establishment of an orthotopic patient-derived xenograft mouse model using uveal melanoma hepatic metastasis. Journal of translational medicine 15, 145, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-017-1247-z (2017).

29. 29.

Flanagan, S. P. 'Nude', a new hairless gene with pleiotropic effects in the mouse. Genetical research 8, 295–309 (1966).

30. 30.

Bosma, G. C., Custer, R. P. & Bosma, M. J. A severe combined immunodeficiency mutation in the mouse. Nature 301, 527–530 (1983).

31. 31.

Davies, E. J. et al. Capturing complex tumour biology in vitro. Histological and molecular characterisation of precision cut slices. Scientific reports 5, 17187, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17187 (2015).

32. 32.

Göttlich, C. et al. A Combined 3D Tissue Engineered In Vitro/In Silico Lung Tumor Model for Predicting Drug Effectiveness in Specific Mutational Backgrounds. Journal of visualized experiments: JoVE, e53885, https://doi.org/10.3791/53885 (2016).

33. 33.

Jonas, O. et al. An implantable microdevice to perform high-throughput in vivo drug sensitivity testing in tumors. Science translational medicine 7, 284ra57, https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3010564 (2015).

34. 34.

Klinghammer, K., Walther, W. & Hoffmann, J. Choosing wisely - Preclinical test models in the era of precision medicine. Cancer treatment reviews 55, 36–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.02.009 (2017).

35. 35.

Klinghoffer, R. A. et al. A technology platform to assess multiple cancer agents simultaneously within a patient’s tumor (2015).

36. 36.

Naipal, K. A. T. et al. Tumor slice culture system to assess drug response of primary breast cancer. BMC cancer, 16, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2119-2 (2016).

37. 37.

Uhl, F. E. et al. Preclinical validation and imaging of Wnt-induced repair in human 3D lung tissue cultures. The European respiratory journal 46, 1150–1166, https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00183214 (2015).

38. 38.

Markovic, D. S., Glass, R., Synowitz, M., van Rooijen, N. & Kettenmann, H. Microglia Stimulate the Invasiveness of Glioma Cells by Increasing the Activity of Metalloprotease-2. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 64, 754–762, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jnen.0000178445.33972.a9 (2005).

39. 39.

Markovic, D. S. et al. Gliomas induce and exploit microglial MT1-MMP expression for tumor expansion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 12530–12535, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804273106 (2009).

40. 40.

Sliwa, M. et al. The invasion promoting effect of microglia on glioblastoma cells is inhibited by cyclosporin A. Brain 130, 476–489, https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl263 (2007).

41. 41.

Aum, D. J. et al. Molecular and cellular heterogeneity: the hallmark of glioblastoma (2014).

42. 42.

Chen, J. et al. Identification of Secreted Phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1) as a Prognostic Factor in Lower-Grade Gliomas. World Neurosurg 130, e775–e785, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.219 (2019).

43. 43.

Yan, W. et al. Expression pattern of osteopontin splice variants and its functions on cell apoptosis and invasion in glioma cells. Neuro Oncol 12, 765–775, https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noq006 (2010).

44. 44.

Gao, C. et al. Osteopontin-dependent CD44v6 expression and cell adhesion in HepG2 cells. Carcinogenesis 24, 1871–1878, https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgg139 (2003).

45. 45.

Pietras, A. et al. Osteopontin-CD44 signaling in the glioma perivascular niche enhances cancer stem cell phenotypes and promotes aggressive tumor growth. Cell stem cell 14, 357–369, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2014.01.005 (2014).

46. 46.

Brown, D. V. et al. Coexpression analysis of CD133 and CD44 identifies proneural and mesenchymal subtypes of glioblastoma multiforme. Oncotarget 6, 6267–6280, https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.3365 (2015).

47. 47.

Tabouret, E. et al. Recurrence of glioblastoma after radio-chemotherapy is associated with an angiogenic switch to the CXCL12-CXCR4 pathway. Oncotarget 6, 11664–11675, https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.3256 (2015).

48. 48.

Beenken, A. & Mohammadi, M. The FGF family: biology, pathophysiology and therapy. Nature reviews. Drug discovery 8, 235–253, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2792 (2009).

49. 49.

Hsu, Y.-C. et al. Activation of Aurora A kinase through the FGF1/FGFR signaling axis sustains the stem cell characteristics of glioblastoma cells. Exp Cell Res 344, 153–166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2016.04.012 (2016).

50. 50.

Cantanhede, I. G. & Oliveira, J. R. Mde PDGF Family Expression in Glioblastoma Multiforme: Data Compilation from Ivy Glioblastoma Atlas Project Database. Sci Rep 7, 15271, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15045-w (2017).

51. 51.

Pearson, J. R. D. & Regad, T. Targeting cellular pathways in glioblastoma multiforme. Signal transduction and targeted therapy 2, 17040, https://doi.org/10.1038/sigtrans.2017.40 (2017).

52. 52.

Montero, J. et al. Drug-induced death signaling strategy rapidly predicts cancer response to chemotherapy. Cell 160, 977–989, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.042 (2015).

53. 53.

Weller, M. et al. EANO guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of anaplastic gliomas and glioblastoma. The Lancet Oncology 15, e395–e403, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70011-7 (2014).

54. 54.

Eyüpoglu, I. Y. et al. Supra-complete surgery via dual intraoperative visualization approach (DiVA) prolongs patient survival in glioblastoma. Oncotarget 7, 25755–25768, https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8367 (2016).

55. 55.

Otsu, N. A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. 9, 62–66, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 (1979).

56. 56.

Kapur, J. N., Sahoo, P. K. & Wong, A. K. A new method for gray-level picture thresholding using the entropy of the histogram. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 29, 273–285, https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-189X(85)90125-2 (1985).

57. 57.

Schubert, M., Lindgreen, S. & Orlando, L. AdapterRemoval v2: rapid adapter trimming, identification, and read merging. BMC research notes, 9, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1900-2 (2016).

58. 58.

Hoffmann, S. et al. A multi-split mapping algorithm for circular RNA, splicing, trans-splicing and fusion detection. Genome biology 15, R34, https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r34 (2014).

59. 59.

Harrow, J. et al. GENCODE: the reference human genome annotation for The ENCODE Project. Genome research 22, 1760–1774, https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.135350.111 (2012).

60. 60.

Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq–a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 31, 166–169, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 (2015).

61. 61.

Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome biology, 15, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 (2014).

62. 62.

RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R (Boston, MA, 2015).

63. 63.

Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. J R Stat Soc Series B 57, 289–300 (1995).

64. 64.

Krämer, A., Green, J., Pollard, J. & Tugendreich, S. Causal analysis approaches in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 30, 523–530, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt703 (2014).

## Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, Alternatives to animal testing, Project number: 031A579). We gratefully acknowledge the technical help of Rainer Baran-Schmidt. We further thank Judith Leyh and Dr. Peter Wieghofer for critical reading of the manuscript. We thank Dr. Sonja Kallendrusch who kindly provided the photograph of the tissue chopper. We acknowledge support from the German Research Foundation (DFG) and Leipzig University within the program of Open Access Publishing.

## Author information

I.B., F.G., F.R., F.H. and J.M. managed the funding and conceptualization of the project and provided resources. S.H., A.H., N.K. and D.L. conducted the experiments and collected data. S.H., K.W., K.R., M.R., S.-H.P. and C.B. analyzed study data. S.H., K.W., K.R. and D.L. wrote the initial manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Correspondence to Susann Haehnel.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Haehnel, S., Reiche, K., Loeffler, D. et al. Deep sequencing and automated histochemistry of human tissue slice cultures improve their usability as preclinical model for cancer research. Sci Rep 9, 19961 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56509-5