Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Optimal environmental and culture conditions allow the in vitro coexistence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in stable biofilms

Abstract

The coexistence between species that occurs in some infections remains hard to achieve in vitro since bacterial fitness differences eventually lead to a single organism dominating the mixed culture. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus are major pathogens found growing together in biofilms in disease-affected lungs or wounds. Herein, we tested and analyzed different culture media, additives and environmental conditions to support P. aeruginosa and S. aureus coexistence in vitro. We have unraveled the potential of DMEM to support the growth of these two organisms in mature cocultured biofilms (three days old) in an environment that dampens the pH rise. Our conditions use equal initial inoculation ratios of both strains and allow the stable formation of separate S. aureus microcolonies that grow embedded in a P. aeruginosa biofilm, as well as S. aureus biofilm overgrowth when bovine serum albumin is added to the system. Remarkably, we also found that S. aureus survival is strictly dependent on a well-characterized phenomenon of oxygen stratification present in the coculture biofilm. An analysis of differential tolerance to gentamicin and ciprofloxacin treatment, depending on whether P. aeruginosa and S. aureus were growing in mono- or coculture biofilms, was used to validate our in vitro coculture conditions.

Introduction

Most chronic infections occur due to the inherent capacity of some bacterial pathogens to grow in biofilms1. Although they have been historically investigated as monoculture events, some infection-associated biofilms are currently recognized to be mainly polymicrobial and involve synergistic interactions that often worsen the disease outcome2,3.

Polymicrobial biofilms can develop greater antimicrobial resistance than single-species biofilms4. The way bacteria are distributed and interact with each other or with the host fluctuates depending on the environment5,6. For instance, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, in addition to forming large mushroom-shaped biofilm structures in vitro, can behave differently and form different bacterial arrangements in vivo. Clusters or aggregates perfectly arranged and determined by the different bacteria that are able to grow concurrently are more likely to occur during the establishment and persistence of the infection. Therefore, there is an intrinsic effect of the surrounding environment on the way microbes behave and establish their connections3.

Regarding human pathogenesis, cystic fibrosis (CF) is a model example of how bacterial interactions within biofilms can modulate the outcome of the disease, thus playing a critical role in the patient’s wellbeing7. CF is a lethal genetic disease characterized by the production of abnormal secretions in different organs8. Lungs especially are affected by CF. In the lung, a thick and dense mucus builds up over the pulmonary epithelium, converting it into the perfect niche for bacterial colonization and growth9,10. CF-affected lungs contain changing gradients of oxygen, nutrients and pH, which together provide a heterogeneous environment that favors the coexistence and proliferation of a wide range of microbial species and, consequently, exacerbating the progression of the disease9. P. aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus are two major pathogens commonly isolated from CF-affected airways and sputum. Although S. aureus usually colonizes the lung epithelium during childhood and P. aeruginosa is more likely to be acquired in the transition to adult life, both microorganisms have been detected coexisting and synergistically contributing to the disease severity11,12. A similar scenario is found in infected wounds, where both bacterial species can often be found infecting simultaneously13. Despite the knowledge that both organisms can grow in unison in vivo, it remains difficult to mimic the conditions that sustain this close relationship in vitro.

The discovery of the culture conditions able to maintain mixed P. aeruginosa and S. aureus simultaneous growth in vitro has become a scientific hotspot, and several studies can be found in the bibliography addressing the interactions of these microorganisms. In their attempt to elucidate the principles of the coexistence of these species, some studies have used a higher inoculation ratio of S. aureus vs P. aeruginosa to establish the mixed biofilm or introduced the latter once the S. aureus biofilm has been established14. Equal inoculation ratios of both microorganisms have also been tested; however, coexistence under these conditions did not last longer than 24 h or only information related to the mixed biofilm biomass (not from each organism independently within the cocultured biofilm) can be found in the literature15,16,17. Some researchers used P. aeruginosa supernatant to evaluate its impact on the coculture system18,19,20, while other studies were based on wound models21,22.

Our study focused on deciphering the optimal coculture conditions and environmental requisites that would allow the simultaneous and stable growth of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus in mixed biofilms over time. We reasoned that the achievement of a stable in vitro coculture biofilm, able to grow with balanced populations of both organisms and to remain for an extended period of time, would be useful to understand the pathophysiology associated with the interaction of these two-species and for generating optimized chemotherapies to treat such biofilm-related diseases. Therefore, we developed a combination of coculture conditions that enable the stable formation of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus mixed biofilms on different abiotic surfaces. The coculture biofilms were formed using equal initial bacterial inoculation ratios and grew stably for up to three days of testing in an environmental background that dampens the pH rise. Furthermore, we provide evidence that S. aureus survival during coculture biofilm growth with P. aeruginosa is strictly dependent on oxygen diffusion. To validate the combination of the coculture conditions and environmental prerequisites identified, we treated the mixed biofilms with known antibiotics to confirm differences in antibiotic tolerance depending on whether the strains were growing in mono- or coculture biofilms.

Results

Testing and analyzing P. aeruginosa and S. aureus balanced population co-growth in different culture media

The culturing conditions able to block the antagonistic relationship between P. aeruginosa and S. aureus in vitro have yet to be discovered. As shown in Fig. 1a-LB, when both bacterial strains are grown together in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium, P. aeruginosa tends to dominate the culture and compromise S. aureus survival in the system (at 28 h). As our goal was to achieve balanced and stable P. aeruginosa and S. aureus mixed growth, selection of the bacterial strains to use was thought to be crucial to accomplish our objective. In this study, we used the P. aeruginosa PA14 strain together with the S. aureus Newman strain. This pair of microorganisms has been used in other polymicrobial studies15,18,23,24; hence, we considered them suitable for use in our study.

Figure 1
figure1

Time-course planktonic and biofilm growth of P. aeruginosa PA14 and S. aureus Newman in LB, SCFM2, TSB and DMEM. (a-d) log10 CFUs/mL of each bacterial strain during planktonic growth in coculture at the time of initial inoculation and after 12, 24, 36 and 48 h of incubation at 37 °C with shaking. (e-h) log10 CFUs/well of PA14 and Newman strains during coculture biofilm growth on 96-well polystyrene plates over 72 h of static incubation at 37 °C. Three independent experiments were performed for both experiments, and error bars indicate the standard error of the mean from the representative triplicate. Statistical significance between log10 CFUs/mL and between log10 CFUs/well at the different time points is indicated with an asterisk (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; and ****p < 0.0001).

LB, tryptic soy broth (TSB), Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) and synthetic cystic fibrosis sputum medium 2 (SCFM2) were tested as a base to develop a medium that maintains the coexistence and growth of both organisms over time. Thus, mixed cultures of PA14 and Newman strains and the respective CFUs were analyzed after 0, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h of incubation. For PA14-Newman planktonic cultures grown in LB and SCFM2, a significant decrease in S. aureus Newman CFUs/mL (p < 0.05) was detected during the initial 24 h of incubation with no CFUs counted after 24–36 h post-initial inoculation (Fig. 1a,b - LB and SCFM2). In contrast, TSB and DMEM maintained S. aureus Newman survival at ~105 CFUs/mL over the 48 h with no significant changes detected after 12 h (p > 0.05; Fig. 1c,d - TSB and DMEM). PA14 growth was stable and maintained at ~1010–1011 CFUs/mL in the different media tested except for SCFM2, in which the strain reached maximal growth at ~109 CFUs/mL (Fig. 1 - planktonic).

Since P. aeruginosa and S. aureus are commonly found in chronic infections promoted by biofilm formation11, this type of growth was examined next. Coculture biofilm growth was assessed in independent 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates after 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 h (Fig. 1 - biofilm). Mixed biofilms grown in LB and SCFM2 showed similar patterns for PA14 and Newman strains in planktonic growth. However, while Pseudomonas maintained a constant number of biofilm-forming CFUs during the 72 h checked, the presence of Newman in the mixed biofilm progressively decreased, and by 48 h no S. aureus CFUs were detected in the cocultured biofilm (Fig. 1e,f - LB and SCFM2). Similar to the results obtained in the planktonic experiments, coculture growth in TSB or DMEM enhanced S. aureus survival in the mixed biofilm. However, while TSB supported Newman growth at ~106 CFUs/well for 36 h of incubation, S. aureus survival dropped by 48 h, with no countable CFUs detected from that time onward (Fig. 1g - TSB). In contrast, DMEM promoted constant Newman growth (~105–104 CFUs/well) in the mixed biofilm during the initial 48 h analyzed, with a slight decrease to ~102 CFUs/well after 60 h of incubation; no countable CFUs were detected only after 72 h (Fig. 1h - DMEM). Although significantly increased viability of S. aureus was detected when coculture biofilm was growing in DMEM, percentage numbers of the organism within the mixed biofilm did not vary among the media used (Supplementary Table S1). PA14 levels within the mixed biofilm were similar among the four media tested, with ~107–108 CFUs counted per well during the 72 h of the course of the experiment (Fig. 1 - biofilm).

The physiochemical environment where microbes grow can influence the bacterial distribution in the community3. Furthermore, pH homeostasis is critical to maintaining the integrity of all living cells25,26. Therefore, we next thought it important to examine the pH change during the coculture biofilm growth in the different media tested. The pH was evaluated at the initial establishment of the biofilms in microtiter plates at 37 °C and after 24, 48 and 72 h. Differences in pH changes were found depending on if biofilms were grown in monoculture (Supplementary Fig. S1) or coculture (Fig. 2). As shown in Fig. 2, the pH rapidly increased when biofilms were grown in LB, SCFM2 or TSB, reaching pH 8.7–8.8 by 48 h of incubation when growing in coculture. However, in DMEM, the pH was reduced and measured 0.5–1 lower, (p < 0.001) compared to that of the other media during the 72 h tested. This rapid increase of pH was not observed when both organisms were grown in monoculture biofilms (Supplementary Fig. S1). In that case, pH tended to be maintained or acidified (especially for S. aureus monoculture biofilms), during the 72 h examined.

Figure 2
figure2

pH evolution during coculture biofilm growth in different culture media. The plot shows the pH measurements of the different supernatant phases of P. aeruginosa PA14 and S. aureus Newman coculture biofilms grown in LB, TSB, SCFM2 and DMEM. Measurements were performed at the time of initial inoculation (0 h) and after 24, 48 and 72 h of incubation at 37 °C. Statistical significance of the pH measured in DMEM at different time points compared to the pH measured in the other media at the same time points is denoted with asterisks (***p < 0.001).

Taken together, these results indicate that DMEM has the highest potential to maintain S. aureus survival over time when grown together with P. aeruginosa.

Optimizing P. aeruginosa and S. aureus coculture conditions

Several conditions have been described to influence P. aeruginosa and S. aureus fitness. Accordingly, we next looked for molecules or additives to supplement the DMEM with the aim of increasing Newman survival in the mixed biofilm. Therefore, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH; 0.2 mM), adenosine monophosphate (AMP; 10 mM), bovine serum albumin (BSA; 5% w/v) and L-arginine (L-arg; 0.4% w/v) were chosen to be tested for the ability to compromise P. aeruginosa pathogenesis (AMP, BSA and L-arg), influence S. aureus fitness (BSA) and combat oxidative stress (NADPH)16,21,27,28,29.

To evaluate the effect of the different additives, mixed biofilms were grown in independent microtiter plates in DMEM supplemented with NADPH, BSA, AMP or L-arg (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table S2) for 72 h at 37 °C, and the respective biofilm-forming CFUs were counted on selective agar plates. Generally, no major differences were detected in PA14 growth (CFU/well) within the coculture biofilm with any of the additives used compared to nonsupplemented DMEM (Fig. 1h - DMEM). Furthermore, P. aeruginosa CFUs/well were ~107–108 at all time-points and conditions checked (Fig. 3). A different scenario was observed with the S. aureus strain. Although all additives tended to maintain stable S. aureus Newman levels of ~106–107 CFUs/well during the initial 24 h (Fig. 3), the NADPH- or AMP-supplemented medium (Fig. 3a,c) did not enhance S. aureus growth after 36–48 h of incubation compared to nonsupplemented medium and by 60 h, no Newman CFUs were counted within the mixed biofilm in these two incubatory conditions. In contrast, coculture incubation in DMEM + BSA or DMEM + L-arg promoted sustained S. aureus CFU numbers of ~105–106 during the initial 48 h of the experiment, and these numbers decreased only after 60 h of incubation. Significantly, while in the presence of BSA, S. aureus CFUs were ~104 CFUs/well after 72 h of incubation; the L-arg condition showed a gradual decrease in the viability of the cocci, with ~102 CFUs/well counted at the end of the experiment (Fig. 3b,d). Remarkably, all additives increased the S. aureus cell percentage within the mixed biofilm if compared to that calculated in coculture biofilms grown in unsupplemented DMEM (Supplementary Table S1), with percentages calculated ~11–25% of the total mixed biofilm (Supplementary Table S2).

Figure 3
figure3

Effect of NADPH, BSA, AMP and L-arg on extending S. aureus survival during coculture biofilm growth with P. aeruginosa. Coculture biofilms were grown in vitro on 96-well polystyrene plates for 72 h in static conditions at 37 °C. The different graphs show biofilm cells of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus log10 CFUs/well during biofilm growth in DMEM supplemented with NADPH at 0.2 mM (a), BSA at 5% w/v (b), AMP at 10 mM (c) and L-arg at 0.4% w/v (d) after 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 h. Conditions were tested in triplicate, and bars represent the mean of three independent experiments. The standard error of the mean is included in the plots. Significant differences between PA14 and Newman CFUs/well at the different incubation times are indicated by asterisks (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; and ****p < 0.0001).

Oxygen diffusion within PA14-Newman mixed biofilms plays a key role in maintaining balanced bacterial populations

The next step was to evaluate other environmental parameters that could influence the coculture biofilm during in vitro growth. Since oxygen competition between P. aeruginosa and S. aureus has been described to compromise the viability of the latter in a CF model15, this parameter was next assessed in our system.

We next aimed to identify the position inside the well where PA14-Newman biofilm growth occurred and to detect possible differences when compared to monoculture biofilm growth. Crystal violet staining of 48 h-old biofilms confirmed that the bacterial biofilm growth was limited to the air-liquid interphase (ALI) area of the microplate well (Fig. 4a). These results indicate that the CFU values determined in Fig. 3 come from cocultured biofilms formed in the ALI area of the microtiter plate. OD570 measurements revealed that PA14 forms a larger monoculture than the S. aureus strain. Interestingly, no additive effect was observed in the PA14 biofilm during coculture biofilm growth with S. aureus (Supplementary Fig. S2).

Figure 4
figure4

Balanced P. aeruginosa PA14 and S. aureus Newman populations growing in a coculture biofilm is dependent on the air availability. Total PA14 and Newman biomass grown in monoculture or coculture biofilms and stained with crystal violet. (a) Pictures show the biofilm growth of monoculture and coculture biofilms in the air-liquid interphase area (ALI area) of a 96-well plate. A zoomed image highlighting a region of interest of each biofilm is included in the figure. (b) Schematic representation of the coverslip position within the well during incubation of the PA14-Newman coculture biofilm immersed in the medium or in the ALI area. (c) Biofilm biomass staining of PA14 and Newman mono- and coculture biofilm growth over a coverslip immersed or in the ALI area. The length of the stained area in the coverslip is included on the plot. (d,e) PA14-Newman coculture biofilms grown in the ALI area or immersed in DMEM (control) and DMEM + NADPH, BSA, AMP and L-arg. (d) Confocal images of the mixed biofilms at the different time points were taken at 63X magnification, PA14 is shown in blue (DAPI) and Newman in green (CFTM-488A). A representative image of each biofilm from three independent experiments. (e) Plots show the different log10 value of PA14 and Newman CFUs covering each coverslip after 3 days of incubation. The results show the mean of three independent experiments with the corresponding standard error of the mean. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) compared to the relative bacterial control condition is indicated by an asterisk (*) over each bar.

To further investigate the role of oxygen during coculture biofilm formation, we changed the in vitro microplate model to use coverslips. Thus, to analyze the immersed biofilm growth, the coverslip was placed in the bottom of the well of a 6-well plate and completely submerged in the medium. To assess the biofilm growing in the ALI area, the coverslip was positioned to line the well wall (see schematic representation in Fig. 4b). Crystal violet staining of 48 h-old biofilms revealed no significant differences between immersed biofilms, with similar intense violet staining detected between the mono- and cocultured biofilms (Fig. 4c). However, clear differences were observed between biofilms grown in the ALI area. While the PA14 monoculture biofilm showed more intense violet staining than the Newman monoculture biofilm, greater biofilm coverage of the coverslip was observed with the S. aureus strain (Fig. 4c). Measurement of the stained biofilms revealed that the Newman monoculture biofilm covered 7.5 mm of the coverslip, in contrast to the 6 mm covered by the PA14 monoculture biofilm. An intensive violet-stained band of 3 mm was detected in the middle of a greater coverage area of 7.5 mm when both organisms were grown in unison (Fig. 4c).

Coculture viability was next analyzed to assess the coexistence of both organisms within the mixed biofilm depending on the proximity to the medium surface during growth. Since increased coculture biofilm was obtained in the presence of NADPH, BSA, AMP and L-arg in 96-well plates (Fig. 3), these additives were also included in the experiment. After three days of incubation, a greater presence of S. aureus was observed by confocal microscopy when biofilms were grown in the ALI area compared to when they were grown completely immersed in the medium (Fig. 4d). Increased growth of S. aureus in the ALI area was also confirmed by CFU counting (Fig. 4e). In the nonsupplemented DMEM (control) and DMEM + NADPH conditions, the S. aureus strain appeared to be dispersed over the glass, whereas in DMEM + BSA, DMEM + AMP and DMEM + L-arg, the strain emerged embedded in aggregates within the PA14 biofilm (Fig. 4d - ALI area). In the validation of the results obtained in Fig. 3, significantly increased numbers of the Newman strain were counted in the mixed biofilms incubated in DMEM including the different additives (Fig. 4d). A different scenario was observed when biofilms were grown immersed in the medium, wherein PA14 completely covered the different coverslips, and the Newman strain was barely detected (Fig. 4d - Immersed). Only Newman CFUs counted in the mixed biofilm grown in DMEM + BSA showed a significant increase relative to the control condition (p < 0.05), although the levels were drastically reduced compared to those counted in the ALI area (Fig. 4e). Interestingly, the addition of L-arg to the system resulted in a more dispersed PA14 biofilm formation compared to that visualized with the other additives (Fig. 4d - L-arg).

Overall, these results confirm that although different additives increase S. aureus survival during mixed biofilm growth with P. aeruginosa, biofilm formation in the ALI area is fundamental to achieving this enhanced survival of S. aureus.

A gradient of dissolved oxygen in the coculture biofilm system explains the differential bacterial growth

Different oxygen concentrations across the culture system may explain differential bacterial growth within the coculture biofilm. To validate this hypothesis, the dissolved oxygen concentration during biofilm incubation was measured in different areas of interest using an oxygen microsensor system (Fig. 5, Supplementary Fig. S3). Thus, the oxygen consumption rates in the area immediately above the immersed biofilm (ALI area) and in the medium surface (top position) were measured and analyzed over time (Fig. 5a). Additionally, a spatial oxygen profile was also measured in the medium immediately after the bottom area became depleted of oxygen (Fig. 5b). The microsensor measurements reflected a gradual decrease in the oxygen content from 5.5 (80% of the dissolved oxygen) to 0 mg/L in the initial 80 min when the PA14-Newman combined biofilm was growing completely immersed in the medium (Fig. 5a, green line). However, sensor placement in the ALI area (Fig. 5a, red line) confirmed a maintained oxygen concentration of 5.5 mg/L during these initial 80 min. Progressive oxygen consumption was detected after that time point, reaching 1 mg/L (20% of the dissolved oxygen) by 110 min from the initial incubation. Interestingly, the oxygen concentration was sustained at 1 mg/L for approximately 50 additional minutes before decreasing to 0.5 mg/L (6% of the dissolved oxygen). The oxygen levels were then maintained at 0.5 mg/L without reaching complete depletion. A different result was obtained when the sensor was placed close to the medium surface (top position; Fig. 5a-blue line). In this position, and comparable to the ALI area, a sustained concentration of 5.5 mg/L was measured during the initial 80 min of incubation. However, in this case, a linear oxygen decrease occurred immediately after that time point, reaching 0 mg/L after 125 min (Fig. 5a). Analysis of the oxygen stratification at different depths revealed that most of the medium in which the coculture biofilm was growing was oxygen-free. This area showed 0 mg/mL oxygen and accounted for the initial 3 mm of the medium depth. Only the area closest to the surface, the first 1 mm, revealed oxygen content and showed a progressive increase that reached 6.5 mg/L (95% of the dissolved oxygen) at the medium surface (Fig. 5b).

Figure 5
figure5

Differences in oxygen concentration depending on the position in the well where PA14 and Newman are cocultured and growing. Dissolved oxygen concentration (DO) was determined in the different areas of interest in the PA14 and Newman in vitro coculture biofilm model. (a) Plot shows the DO (mg/L; ppm) given by the optical fiber microsensor, depending on the position placed in the coculture system: top, immersed and in the ALI area. A schematic showing the approximate position of each measurement is included in the plot. The equivalence of significant DO values to the percentage of dissolved oxygen saturation (gray numbers) is provided as a reference. (b) DO at different depths of the culture well after the immersed area reached a DO of 0 mg/L (approximately 85 min of incubation). An interpretation of the oxygenation states across the different layers is provided on the right: 1, humid air (the oxygen value is a result of the saturation of the sensor); 2, oxygenated interphase; and 3, anaerobic culture.

These results may suggest that, given the proximity to the surface, the ALI area would not reach oxygen depletion and would be able to maintain some oxygen content even though it would be a low percentage of the dissolved oxygen.

DMEM supports P. aeruginosa and S. aureus balanced coculture biofilm growth and stabilization over time

To reinforce the potential of our developed DMEM culture conditions in forming and preserving P. aeruginosa-S. aureus mixed biofilms, we established a continuous-flow biofilm. Continuous-flow biofilms are the closest approximation known for the growth of biofilms with similar physical, chemical and biological heterogeneity as those naturally formed in vivo30.

After three days of continuous flow, we confirmed that only DMEM was able to sustain stable growth of both populations in the biofilm. Mixed biofilms grown in TSB (Fig. 6a) or TSB supplemented with BSA (Fig. 6b) did not show any growth or increase in S. aureus survival within the coculture system compared to those in DMEM (Fig. 6c,d,f). Biomass evaluation using the COMSTAT 2 software determined that when the experiment was performed in TSB, P. aeruginosa accounted for 90% of the coculture biofilm, while S. aureus accounted for only 10% of the system. The addition of BSA to TSB barely increased S. aureus growth, and its presence in the coculture biofilm was calculated to be 15% in this incubatory condition (Fig. 6f). However, coculture biofilms grown in DMEM or DMEM + BSA revealed an increased presence of S. aureus when they were visualized with a confocal microscope (Fig. 6c,d). In general, we observed that both strains did not grow mixed together but independently and well distributed in the flow-cell channel. Interestingly, while microcolonies of S. aureus were detected growing embedded in the PA14 biofilm in unsupplemented DMEM (Fig. 6c), a thick and compact layer of S. aureus was visualized covering the P. aeruginosa biofilm when BSA was added to the flow system (Fig. 6d). COMSTAT 2 software revealed that this dense layer of Newman biofilm had an average thickness of 12.50 μm, whereas the P. aeruginosa biofilm growing the beneath S. aureus was 6.73 μm thick.

Figure 6
figure6

Balanced and stable P. aeruginosa PA14 and S. aureus Newman strain populations within a three-day-old mixed biofilm grown in continuous flow. PA14 and Newman were grown simultaneously in a continuous-flow biofilm in TSB (a), TSB + BSA (b), DMEM (c) and DMEM + BSA (d) for three days. At the indicated time point, the biomass growing over the different channels was stained with DAPI (blue, PA14) and CFTM-488A (green, Newman) and visualized using confocal microscopy. The figure shows the composite of the sum of the slices (Z Stack), with the respective orthogonal views, and the 3D representation of each mixed biofilm formed using both ImageJ and ZEN software. Mixed biofilms were tested in triplicate, and a representative image from those taken at magnifications of 40X and 63X is shown. A region of interest (ROI), including the different microscope projections and representations, is also presented in the figure. Red arrows indicate PA14 and Newman strains within the mixed biofilm. (e) Schematic representations of the cocultured biofilm depending on growth in DMEM or DMEM + BSA from the previous confocal microscope Z-stacks and orthogonal views. P. aeruginosa is represented in blue, and S. aureus is represented in green. (f) Table shows the percentage of blue Pseudomonas and green Staphylococcus present in the different cocultured biofilms calculated from an average of 5–15 different microscope stacks using the COMSTAT 2 and ImageJ software.

The orthogonal views, 3D representations and evaluation of the different regions of interest (ROIs) of the coculture biofilms were next analyzed to assess how bacterial populations were distributed within the mixed biofilm system. Our experimental approach confirmed the presence of S. aureus microcolonies growing in clusters within PA14 biofilms during growth with DMEM (Fig. 6c). Two schematic drawings are presented in Fig. 6e to clearly show how bacterial populations are distributed within the coculture biofilm during growth in DMEM and DMEM + BSA. Enumeration of these microcolonies revealed an average growth of approximately 65–90 of cells per bacterial aggregate, with a maximum count of approximately 150 of Newman cells (Supplementary Fig. S4). These image analyses also verified that S. aureus biofilm growth occurred on top of the P. aeruginosa biofilm, which was particularly evident during incubation with DMEM + BSA (Fig. 6d,e). These results are in agreement with those presented in Fig. 4. Therefore, both bacterial species maintain separate growth and distribution in coculture biofilms. Biomass evaluation revealed balanced growth of both bacterial populations of 35% and 65% for Newman and PA14, respectively, during incubation in DMEM (Fig. 6f). However, and confirming the confocal microscopy observations, a greater percentage of the S. aureus Newman population was measured in DMEM + BSA, accounting for 70% of the total coculture system (Fig. 6f).

The continuous-flow biofilm confirmed that DMEM favors the coexistence of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus in mixed biofilms. Furthermore, we also detected how the addition of BSA changed the architecture of the biofilm by increasing S. aureus proliferation and identified different spatial distributions of the strains in the biofilm.

Oxygen stratification within the coculture biofilm is a key modulator of PA14 and Newman coexistence

We next wanted to verify the existence of an oxygen-stratified environment in the continuous-flow biofilm that may influence S. aureus survival and stable growth alongside P. aeruginosa. Oxygen diffusion within the biofilm was evaluated with the assumption that fresh and oxygenated medium was added continuously in the system (6.5 mg/mL oxygen measured with the oxygen microsensor).

Orthogonal views of the coculture biofilm grown in the flow-cell channel confirmed the clear distribution of the S. aureus biofilm on top of P. aeruginosa in the area closest to the medium surface (Fig. 7a). Consequently, we next wanted to validate the presence of an oxygen gradient that could be crucial for Newman survival in the mixed biofilm, and a key modulator of the bacterial distribution detected. To probe different oxygen concentrations within the coculture system, the continuous-flow biofilm was analyzed using the Hypoxia Probe dye. The key attribute of this dye is that its fluorescence is quenched by oxygen, so the lower the oxygen concentration is, the greater the red fluorescence signal emitted by the stained cells, thus allowing the detection of an anaerobic environment. Red-light emission (hypoxia) through the different layers of the coculture biofilm confirmed the bright fluorescence during the initial 4 μm of biofilm thickness that gradually decreased across the bacterial community. Red fluorescence was barely detected in the more superficial biofilm layers, thus confirming aerobic conditions in that area (Fig. 7b). Additionally, pixel intensity analysis of the hypoxic region (red) corroborated that red emission peaked around the initial 2 μm of the biofilm depth. Furthermore, the PA14-Newman biomass was also quantified in this continuous-flow biofilm. P. aeruginosa PA14 (blue) displayed a maximum peak intensity at 3 μm of the biofilm depth, corresponding to the more anaerobic region of the biofilm, with fluorescence extending to a thickness of 10 μm. S. aureus Newman (green) clearly showed a pixel intensity curve shifted to higher and more oxygenic biofilm layers (Fig. 7b). Green intensity measurements confirmed that S. aureus was barely detectable in the initial 3 μm of the mixed biofilm (coinciding with the anoxic part of the biofilm); the intensity increased, achieving a maximum and extended peak at 6–9 μm of depth, with fluorescence emission extending to 14–10 μm of the biofilm thickness.

Figure 7
figure7

Oxygen stratification within the cocultured biofilm determines the spatial distribution of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus and their coexistence. (a) XZ-orthogonal view of a P. aeruginosa and S. aureus coculture biofilm grown in DMEM + BSA (see Fig. 6d). The image shows the separate position of Newman and PA14 within the 16 μm-biofilm and the possible oxygen gradient present in the system. (b) Graph shows the average pixel intensities of PA14 (blue) and Newman (Green) biomasses (plotted on the upper Y-axis) compared to the oxygen-related red intensity (plotted on the lower Y-axis) along the different thicknesses (μm) of a 3-day-old cocultured biofilm in flow. Pixel intensity averages were calculated from ten different images using ImageJ software. Included in the figure, is a sequential set of micrographs showing the red fluorescence emission given by the hypoxia probe through the different biofilm layers, indicating the oxygen stratification present along the thickness of the continuous-flow cocultured biofilm. Intense red emission relates to the hypoxic environment through the different biofilm depths (μm), from the bottom to the surface, additionally indicated with a schematic of the oxygen gradient present in the system.

Taken together, these results demonstrate that the coculture biofilm formed in continuous flow also displays oxygen stratification across the different biofilm layers. P. aeruginosa growth occurred across the deepest layers of the biofilm, where less oxygen content was detected, while S. aureus biofilm growth was quantified closer to the biofilm surface, corresponding to the most oxygenated area.

Antibiotic resistance of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus is critically increased during coculture biofilm growth

Biofilm-associated infections have historically been treated as single-species events. Nevertheless, some of these infections are now known to be composed of multiple combinations of bacteria, involving complex interactions that can influence their fitness and antibiotic tolerance2,4. The demonstration of altered antibiotic susceptibilities of PA14 and Newman when grown in coculture biofilms was thought to be necessary to validate the combination of coculture conditions and environmental prerequisites identified in this study. Even though in DMEM + BSA condition presence of S. aureus within the mixed biofilm grown in microtiter plates was detected also after 72 h of coculture growth, we chose to evaluate the antimicrobial tolerance after 48 h since according to Fig. 3b, at that time-point Newman’s CFUs in the coculture biofilm were counted 100−fold higher than at 72 h. Hence, 48 h-old PA14 and Newman mono- and coculture biofilms were treated with ciprofloxacin (Cpx) and gentamicin (Gm). The respective biofilm-forming CFUs were subsequently counted on selective agar. The antibiotics and the range of concentrations used were chosen according to their reported minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and their usage in treating both bacterial infections4,31. The experiment was performed in a 96-well microtiter plate and included BSA since it was the additive that showed the greatest potential for maintaining the stable growth of both bacterial populations in vitro.

Bacterial CFUs that remained viable within the mono- and the coculture biofilms after the antibiotic treatment were enumerated (Supplementary Table S3), and the percentages of viable CFUs that persisted in each biofilm after the different treatments, compared to each untreated biofilm, were subsequently calculated (Fig. 8). The Minimum Biofilm Eradication Concentration (MBEC) of each antibiotic against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus mono and coculture biofilms was also calculated (Table 1). Crystal violet staining of control wells confirmed that the mature biofilm grew in the ALI area of the well (data not shown). A similar behavioral pattern was observed in both organisms after the respective antibiotic treatments; however, S. aureus revealed a much greater benefit of growing in coculture than P. aeruginosa, since its viability during both treatments increased exponentially when grown in coculture with P. aeruginosa. As for P. aeruginosa, the bacterium exhibited 38-, 68- and 390-fold higher tolerance to Gm treatment in coculture than in monoculture biofilm growth for concentrations of 0.5, 1 and 2 μg/mL, respectively, (Fig. 8a - graph PA14%) and 7- and 27.5-fold increased to Cpx treatment used at concentrations of 0.5 and 1 μg/mL (Fig. 8b - graph PA14%). The MBEC determinations (Table 1) confirmed that Gm treatment at ≥0.5 and ≥4 μg/mL and Cpx treatment at ≥0.5 and ≥2 μg/mL cleared PA14 from the mono- and coculture biofilms, respectively (Fig. 8a,b -graph PA14%). The percentage calculations revealed that growing S. aureus in coculture enhanced its capacity to persist in the presence of Gm >1000-fold, at a concentration of 0.5 μg/mL, and >470-fold at 1 μg/mL (Fig. 8a - graph Newman%). A similar pattern was detected for Cpx treatment; within a coculture biofilm with P. aeruginosa, the viability of Staphylococcus increased 400-fold when the antibiotic was used at 0.5 μg/mL and >468-fold when it was used at 1 μg/mL (Fig. 8b - graph Newman%). Only doses ≥2 μg/mL of Gm or Cpx cleared S. aureus from the mixed biofilm. In contrast, treatments with 0.5 μg/mL with any of the antibiotics used was sufficient to clear S. aureus from a 48 h-old monoculture biofilm (Fig. 8a,b - graph Newman% and Table 1). When these high concentrations were used, the viability of the S. aureus strain was drastically reduced.

Figure 8
figure8

P. aeruginosa PA14 and S. aureus Newman coculture biofilms induce enhanced tolerance to antibiotic treatment compared to monoculture biofilms. After 48 h, matured mono- and cocultured PA14 and Newman biofilms grown in microtiter plates were treated with 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 and 8.0 μg/mL gentamicin (a) and 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 μg/mL ciprofloxacin (b) for 15 h. Symbols in the plots represent the remaining percentage of CFUs of each strain in the biofilm after different antibiotic treatments compared to the relative untreated biofilm. Each graph shows the percentages of PA14 and Newman CFUs compared according to whether the biofilms were grown in mono- or coculture. Percentages were calculated according to the bacterial CFUs counted on selective agar plates after different antimicrobial treatments (Supplementary Table S3). Analysis of the statistical significance between the calculated percentages of bacterial CFUs that remained in the cocultured biofilm (after each antibiotic treatment) and those calculated in the monocultured biofilms revealed significance with p < 0.0001 in all cases.

Table 1 MBEC values of gentamicin and ciprofloxacin antibiotics against P. aeruginosa PA14 and S. aureus Newman in monoculture or coculture biofilms.

Comparisons between the percentages of the viable P. aeruginosa and S. aureus CFUs in the coculture biofilm after the antibiotic treatments to those calculated in the monoculture biofilms revealed significance in all cases (p < 0.001). These results confirm the increased antibiotic tolerance of P. aeruginosa PA14 and S. aureus Newman strains when grown in a mixed biofilm rather than in a monoculture biofilm, thus validating the coculture conditions established in this study.

Discussion

Biofilm-associated infections are currently a critical worldwide threat32,33,34. The increasing emergence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria and the knowledge that some of these infections are polymicrobial challenge the antimicrobial chemotherapy to administrate and aggravates the disease outcome2,35,36. P. aeruginosa and S. aureus are two major pathogens commonly found growing together in intricate biofilms in disease-affected lungs11 or wounds13. Herein, we have unraveled the potential of DMEM to sustain a P. aeruginosa PA14 and S. aureus Newman combined biofilm for up to three days in vitro and identified BSA as a valuable and critical additive that significantly increases S. aureus survival and growth in the coculture system. Remarkably, we also demonstrated the importance of continuous oxygen diffusion in limiting S. aureus survival and keeping the growth of both bacterial populations balanced, highly influencing their distribution in the coculture biofilm. Furthermore, using our developed coculture conditions, we confirmed that the antimicrobial susceptibilities of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus differ depending on whether they are growing in monoculture or coculture in biofilms.

Among the different media evaluated (LB, TSB and SCFM2), DMEM was the greatest at controlling S. aureus survival during simultaneous growth (planktonic and biofilm) with P. aeruginosa. DMEM is a rich culture medium used in routine cell culture experiments, which contains numerous amino acids, vitamins, and inorganic salts, among other components37. Remarkably, the D-glucose concentration in this medium is 17.5 mM, which is greater than the usual 0.2% (11.1 mM) added to LB or TSB medium in routinely used biofilm formation protocols38,39,40, or the 3 mM present in the SCFM2 medium41. In healthy people, glucose concentration in the airway surface liquid (ASL) is 0.4 mM, 12 times lower than blood glucose42,43. However, lung inflammation, caused by diseases such as CF or chronic airway inflammation, increases glucose flux through the epithelial cell membrane, raising 10–12 times the glucose concentration in the ASL. Different studies have described how increased glucose levels in ASL promote bacterial lung infection42,44,45. Furthermore, diabetes affected-people have wound healing issues and increased risk of infection due to an impaired host defence46. Glucose is not the preferred carbon source of P. aeruginosa47 but is the preferred carbon source of S. aureus, which exhibits preferential uptake of this sugar, especially during infection48. Therefore, it is plausible to hypothesize that S. aureus could benefit from the high glucose concentration in DMEM and grow without competition for the substrate. Additionally, a differential planktonic growth pattern was detected in S. aureus Newman depending on whether the bacterium was grown in DMEM or TSB (Supplementary Fig. S5). In DMEM, S. aureus grew rapidly and achieved late-exponential/stationary phase, with growth maintained during the course of the experiment. However, in TSB, the strain exhibited the usual bacterial growth curve with lag, exponential and stationary phases. This result indicates increased efficiency of S. aureus growth in DMEM, especially during the initial stage of growth, which we hypothesize could be beneficial during simultaneous biofilm growth with P. aeruginosa to rapidly form a microcolony after initial attachment, thus providing defense against Pseudomonas49. S. aureus growth in firmly packed microcolonies during coculture biofilm growth with P. aeruginosa PAO1 has been previously seen by Yang and coworkers50. In our study, this microcolony formation may also be facilitated by the increased concentration of NaCl present in the DMEM formulation (120 mM), which is >3-fold higher than in LB, TSB or SCFM2 and has been seen to stimulate biofilm aggregation and growth51,52. The concentration of glutamine present in DMEM (2.5 mM) may also affect the coexistence of both microorganisms by diminishing the specific competition for this amino acid, as a nitrogen and energy source, which has been recently reported to occur early during coculture53.

Significantly, DMEM contains HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid; 15 mM), which is considered a “good buffer” for its limited effect on biochemical reactions and for being chemically and enzymatically stable, among other properties54. The buffering properties of HEPES were evident in the growing coculture biofilms, and the pH rise was dampened compared to that measured in the other media (Fig. 2). pH homeostasis is critical to maintaining the integrity of cytoplasmic proteins in all living cells, and their optimal pH fluctuates in a narrow range of 7.4–7.825,26. Although SCFM2 contains 3-morpholinopropanesulfonic acid, it failed to maintain the pH levels in the coculture. This synthetic CF medium was developed based on CF sputum that contained high concentrations of P. aeruginosa41, which may explain why SCFM2 did not support S. aureus viability in the system. Additionally, a factor increasing the perturbation of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus coexistence in this fluctuating pH environment is the production of different proteases by P. aeruginosa in an alkaline environment of pH 8. In particular, the P. aeruginosa staphylolytic protease LasA possesses optimal activity at approximately pH 8.555,56,57.

DMEM supplementation with BSA and L-arginine increased S. aureus viability throughout the 72 h of coculture biofilm growth with P. aeruginosa. Although coculturing the biofilm in DMEM + L-arg increased the Newman biofilm-forming CFUs, confocal microscopy revealed an altered coculture biofilm architecture, with disaggregated clumps covering the coverslip (Fig. 4d), which is consistent with the phenotype promoted by L-arginine that has been seen in other biofilm communities58,59,60. Thus, we conclude that among the additives tested, BSA possesses the greatest potential to increase S. aureus viability and maintain the population balance in a well-engineered coculture biofilm with P. aeruginosa. Subsequent experiments in flow-cell biofilms corroborated the effect of BSA in increasing S. aureus survival and growth during mixed biofilm formation with P. aeruginosa (Fig. 6d). Although albumin has been described to diminish P. aeruginosa killing of S. aureus in wounds by binding and sequestering Pseudomonas quorum sensing molecules21, which is also likely what occurred in our model, we also believe albumin has a direct effect on S. aureus viability, although further experiments are needed to confirm this hypothesis. Albumin is the main plasma protein and a carrier of numerous molecules, such as metals and other ions, bilirubin, amino acids, fatty acids, enzymes, and hormones61. With an unknown mechanism, it is known that the presence of this protein in the culture medium enhances S. aureus growth exponentially, possibly by scavenging traces of protein-bound nutrients62,63,64. Therefore, we suggest that albumin could play a direct role in inducing prompt microcolony formation by increasing the proliferation rate of S. aureus in a hostile environment with P. aeruginosa. Furthermore, although expression of different virulence factors of Pseudomonas has detected increased during coculture growth with S. aureus (e.g. LasA protease or pyocyanin production)53, some staphylococcal factors (e.g. the Panton-Valentin leukocidin protein) have been also observed during these coculture conditions, which may be playing a role also in competing with the Pseudomonas65.

Remarkably, in this study, we demonstrate an important role for oxygen in achieving continuous and stable coculture biofilms of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. We also observed a differential distribution of the bacterial populations depending on the oxygen content in the surrounding environment. Lungs are not entirely aerobic, especially those affected by CF, in which the thick mucus present in the airways generates diverse oxygen content between pulmonary regions, thus enhancing the heterogeneity of microbes able to proliferate and persist at the same site66,67,68. Oxygen diffusion also mediates the different spatial distribution of bacteria in wounds; hence, P. aeruginosa has been found deeper in the tissue than S. aureus, which grows predominantly at the wound surface13. Pseudomonas is able to grow in anaerobic conditions in the presence of nitrates, which are included in the DMEM formulation. S. aureus encodes a set of genes required for growth either aerobically or anaerobically69,70; however, aerobic respiration is preferred by S. aureus during monoculture growth. Despite these metabolic preferences, during simultaneous growth with P. aeruginosa, oxygen competition between organisms drives S. aureus to shift to fermentative metabolism. This metabolic shift is also triggered by the expression of siderophores, phenazines and other exoproducts (i.e., 2-heptyl-4-hydroxyquinoline N-oxide (HQNO) production) by Pseudomonas that compromise S. aureus viability15,71. In our model, increased S. aureus Newman survival was detected when the coculture biofilms were grown in the ALI area, either in a 96-well plate or over coverslips, rather than during complete medium immersion. Furthermore, we confirmed the existence of an oxygen gradient across the medium depth during biofilm growth, with a continuous micro-oxygenated phase at the medium surface (corresponding to the ALI area). Therefore, we hypothesize that persistent oxygen diffusion at the ALI area of the coculture system increases S. aureus survival within the mixed biofilm by diminishing the oxygen competition between the organisms and the subsequent production of P. aeruginosa molecules that eventually kill S. aureus.

The public health concern about biofilm-associated diseases is linked to the altered antimicrobial susceptibilities that these communities present36. Unoptimized therapies and variations in the antibiotic concentration across the biofilm layers promote the development of resistance since bacteria are usually exposed to subinhibitory concentrations of the antimicrobial4. Exacerbating the problem is the fact that these biofilms tend to be composed of multiple species, with different fitness values and high levels of cooperative and synergistic interactions that are often detrimental to the host2,4. For instance, the simple addition of P. aeruginosa supernatant to S. aureus Newman biofilms has been seen to be sufficient to increase the tolerance of S. aureus to a wide range of antibiotics, such as vancomycin, tobramycin and oxacillin18. Furthermore, it has been seen that continuous exposure of S. aureus to P. aeruginosa HQNO promotes the formation of antibiotic-resistant small colony variants of the bacterium, enhancing its resistance to aminoglycosides23. P. aeruginosa and S. aureus showed enhanced tolerance to gentamicin and ciprofloxacin antibiotics when they were grown in coculture biofilms (Fig. 8). Hence, we believe that the use of the conditions revealed in this study allows the stable formation of P. aeruginosa PA14 and S. aureus Newman coculture biofilms involving the intricate and interspecific relations responsible for influencing the antimicrobial tolerance of each strain.

In summary, in this study, we elucidated the potential of DMEM for P. aeruginosa and S. aureus in vitro coculture. Additionally, we have discovered that supplementing DMEM with BSA and providing continuous oxygen diffusion allows the formation of a mature mixed biofilm with stable populations of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. This study provides useful insights about the establishment of a P. aeruginosa and S. aureus combined biofilm in vitro, which we believe would be of help for the study of phenotypes derived from this clinically challenging bacterial cooperation as well as for optimizing the antimicrobial therapy used to treat these infections.

Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 wild type72 and Staphylococcus aureus Newman (ATCC 13420) were used throughout this study, although S. aureus ATCC 12600 and ATCC 29213 were also initially tested. Overnight cultures (O/N) were performed aerobically at 37 °C in Luria-Bertani medium (LB; Scharlab, S.L., Barcelona, Spain) and in tryptic soy broth (TSB; Scharlab, S.L.) for the PA14 and Newman strains, respectively.

P. aeruginosa PA14 and S. aureus Newman coculture medium conditions

LB, TSB, synthetic cystic fibrosis sputum medium 2 (SCFM2), prepared as previously described41, and Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium/nutrient mixture F-12 (DMEM; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachussetts) were tested. When required, reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH; 0.2 mM), adenosine monophosphate (AMP; 10 mM), bovine serum albumin (BSA; 5% w/v) and L-arginine (0.4% w/v) were added to the medium. O/N cultures of PA14 and Newman strains were washed twice with 1X phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH = 7.4). To prepare the initial mixed bacterial suspension, each strain was inoculated at a final optical density λ = 550 nm (OD550) of 0.05 for planktonic experiments, and an OD550 of 0.10 for biofilm experiments.

Planktonic coculture growth

Mixed bacterial suspensions in a final volume of 20 mL were incubated aerobically at 37 °C with vigorous shaking (200 rpm). At given time points, each planktonic culture was serially diluted in 1X PBS and plated on LB agar (Scharlab, S.L.) to count P. aeruginosa CFUs, and tryptic soy agar (TSA; Scharlab, S.L.) supplemented with 7.5% (w/v) NaCl to selectively count S. aureus CFUs73.

Coculture biofilm growth under static conditions

Static P. aeruginosa PA14-S. aureus Newman mixed biofilm growth was tested on (i) plastic and (ii) glass surfaces:

  1. (i)

    Plastic surface: 200 μl of each mixed bacterial suspension was inoculated in triplicate in 96-well polystyrene plates with a flat bottom (Corning; Sigma-Aldrich, San Luis, Missouri) and incubated at 37 °C without shaking. At different time points, the planktonic phase was removed, and each well was washed three times with 1X PBS. The biofilm phase formed over the wall of each well was removed using a pipette tip, and the triplicates were mixed together. For CFU quantification, each biofilm cell suspension was placed in an ultrasonic bath (USC100T, VWR) for 5 min and subsequently vortexed for 30 seconds, to help dispersing the biofilm. Bacterial suspensions were then serially diluted in 1X PBS and plated on selective agar as described for planktonic growth. Separately, the biofilm mass formed inside the well was stained with 0.1% (w/v) crystal violet, and the biomass (OD570) was determined as previously described74.

  2. (ii)

    Glass surface: 18 × 18 mm coverslips (Menzel-Gläser, Thermo Fisher Scientific) were placed in a 6-well polystyrene plate with lid (Dd biolab, Barcelona, Spain), and each well was filled with 3 mL of the PA14-Newman bacterial suspension. The coverslip was positioned completely immersed in the bacterial suspension or only half immersed. The half immersion, with the air-liquid interphase (ALI) area, was achieved by placing the coverslip at a 45° angle against the wall of the well (see Fig. 4b). Unattached cells were removed after three hours of incubation, and 3 mL of fresh medium was subsequently added again. This procedure was repeated every 12 h during the course of the experiment. At the given time points, the coverslip, covered with the established mixed biofilm, was gently washed with PBS. To determine bacterial CFUs, biofilm-forming cells were scraped off the coverslip, and serial dilutions were plated on selective agar plates as described above. In addition, the biomass of the PBS-washed coverslip was stained with crystal violet or with different dyes for confocal microscopy as described below.

pH measurements

The pH of the supernatant phase of each PA14 and Newman monoculture and coculture biofilm was measured using a GLP 21 pH meter (Crison®, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona). For this experiment, biofilms were grown in a volume of 3 mL in 6-well polystyrene plates. pH measurements were taken in triplicate for each culture medium and time point, directly in the microplate well where the biofilm was growing.

Confocal laser scanning microscopy and image analysis

To differentially stain P. aeruginosa PA14 and S. aureus Newman, a Bacterial Viability and Gram Stain kit (Biotium, Fremont, California) was used following the manufacturer’s instructions. This kit uses the cell membrane differences between gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria to differentially stain each species. Briefly, the kit combines DAPI to stain the bacterial DNA blue with CFTM-488A-wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) to bind, specifically, the N-acetylglucosamine present in the peptidoglycan of the cell wall in gram-positive bacteria. Consequently, P. aeruginosa PA14 will be stained blue, and S. aureus Newman will be stained green. To detect bacterial cells growing in different oxygen concentrations, we used the phosphorescent light-emitting iridium complex Hypoxia Probe (Organogenix; Bionova científica, Barcelona, Spain) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Stained bacteria were imaged using a Zeiss LSM 800 confocal laser scanning microscope (CSLM, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), and images were analyzed with ImageJ and ZEN (Zeiss software).

Assessment of the oxygen concentration in the coculture system

The coculture biofilm was established as described above but using lids for the 6-well plates with small holes drilled in the desired locations. After the addition of fresh medium, the plate was transferred to equipment for oxygen measurement described in Supplementary Fig. S3. The dissolved oxygen was measured using an Oxymicro Fiber-Optic Sensor System (World Precision Instruments) connected to a micro-optode oxygen sensor in a syringe-type housing (PreSens, Regensburg, Germany); the needle of the housing crossed the lid of the plate, and the optical fiber was placed using the plunger at the desired location. All measurements were compensated with temperature using a temperature probe placed directly above the culture plate.

Micro-optodes were calibrated using temperature-compensated measurements of water saturated with air (100% air saturation, 8.25 mg/L at 25 °C and 1 atm) and a 10 g/L solution of sodium dithionite (0% O2).

Coculture biofilm incubated in a continuous-flow system

The P. aeruginosa and S. aureus mixed bacterial suspension (each strain at OD550 = 0.10) was inoculated in a three-channel flow-cell (DTU Systems biology, Technical University of Denmark). Media was pumped at a constant flow rate of 42 μl per minute and channel using an Ismatec ISM 943 pump (Ismatec, Wertheim, Germany), as previously described75. After 3 days of growth, biofilms were stained with the Bacterial Viability and Gram Stain kit or with the Hypoxia Probe and observed by confocal microscopy. Images were generated, and biomass was calculated using ImageJ and COMSTAT 2 software75. Percentage of S. aureus in the coculture biofilm was calculated taking the pixels given by S. aureus-CFTM-488A (channel 0) from the pixels given by the total DAPI staining (channel 1). P. aeruginosa percentage in the coculture biofilm was subsequently obtained by subtracting the percentage of S. aureus coverage from the total biofilm (100%).

Antimicrobial treatments and minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) calculations

P. aeruginosa PA14 and S. aureus Newman 48 h coculture biofilms in 96-well polystyrene plates were treated with gentamicin sulfate (Panreac AppliChem, Castellar del Vallès, Spain) at concentrations of 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 μg/mL and with ciprofloxacin hydrochloride (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, Michigan) at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 μg/mL to investigate possible alterations on antibiotic tolerance depending if they were cultured in mono or in coculture biofilms. Furthermore, different MBEC were also calculated according to the treatment concentration that eradicated ≥99% of the biofilms76. After 15 h of incubation with antibiotics, biofilms were washed with 1X PBS and scraped off each well and subsequently sonicated and vortexed as previously detailed. Serial dilutions were then plated on selective agar plates.

Statistics

Differences in bacterial CFUs/mL and CFUs/well between time points or strains were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software. To compare the significance between the percentages of bacterial CFUs that remained in the coculture biofilm after gentamicin and ciprofloxacin treatment compared to those calculated in the monoculture biofilms, we used the χ2 test77.

References

  1. 1.

    Bjarnsholt, T., Ciofu, O., Molin, S., Givskov, M. & Hoiby, N. Applying insights from biofilm biology to drug development - can a new approach be developed? Nat Rev Drug Discov 12, 791–808, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd4000 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Murray, J. L., Connell, J. L., Stacy, A., Turner, K. H. & Whiteley, M. Mechanisms of synergy in polymicrobial infections. J Microbiol 52, 188–199, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-014-4067-3 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Stacy, A., McNally, L., Darch, S. E., Brown, S. P. & Whiteley, M. The biogeography of polymicrobial infection. Nat Rev Microbiol 14, 93–105, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2015.8 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Algburi, A., Comito, N., Kashtanov, D., Dicks, L. M. & Chikindas, M. L. Control of Biofilm Formation: Antibiotics and Beyond. Appl Environ Microbiol 83, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02508-16 (2017).

  5. 5.

    Baas Becking, L. G. M., Canfield, D. E., Sherwood, D. & Stuip, M. Baas Becking’s: geobiology, or, introduction to environmental science (Wiley Blackwell, 2016).

  6. 6.

    Fuhrman, J. A. Microbial community structure and its functional implications. Nature 459, 193–199, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08058 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Goss, C. H. & Burns, J. L. Exacerbations in cystic fibrosis. 1: Epidemiology and pathogenesis. Thorax 62, 360–367, https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2006.060889 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kreda, S. M., Davis, C. W. & Rose, M. C. CFTR, mucins, and mucus obstruction in cystic fibrosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2, a009589, https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a009589 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Yang, L., Jelsbak, L. & Molin, S. Microbial ecology and adaptation in cystic fibrosis airways. Environ Microbiol 13, 1682–1689, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02459.x (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Puchelle, E., Bajolet, O. & Abely, M. Airway mucus in cystic fibrosis. Paediatr Respir Rev 3, 115–119 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hauser, A. R., Jain, M., Bar-Meir, M. & McColley, S. A. Clinical significance of microbial infection and adaptation in cystic fibrosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 24, 29–70, https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00036-10 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hotterbeekx, A., Kumar-Singh, S., Goossens, H. & Malhotra-Kumar, S. In vivo and In vitro Interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus spp. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7, 106, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00106 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Fazli, M. et al. Nonrandom distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in chronic wounds. J Clin Microbiol 47, 4084–4089, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01395-09 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Woods, P. W., Haynes, Z. M., Mina, E. G. & Marques, C. N. H. Maintenance of S. aureus in Co-culture With P. aeruginosa While Growing as Biofilms. Front Microbiol 9, 3291, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03291 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Filkins, L. M. et al. Coculture of Staphylococcus aureus with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Drives S. aureus towards Fermentative Metabolism and Reduced Viability in a Cystic Fibrosis Model. J Bacteriol 197, 2252–2264, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00059-15 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Limoli, D. H. et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Alginate Overproduction Promotes Coexistence with Staphylococcus aureus in a Model of Cystic Fibrosis Respiratory Infection. MBio 8, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00186-17 (2017).

  17. 17.

    Wijesinghe, G. et al. Influence of Laboratory Culture Media on in vitro Growth, Adhesion, and Biofilm Formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Med Princ Pract 28, 28–35, https://doi.org/10.1159/000494757 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Orazi, G. & O’Toole, G. A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Alters Staphylococcus aureus Sensitivity to Vancomycin in a Biofilm Model of Cystic Fibrosis Infection. MBio 8, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00873-17 (2017).

  19. 19.

    Alves, P. M. et al. Interaction between Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa is beneficial for colonisation and pathogenicity in a mixed biofilm. Pathog Dis 76, https://doi.org/10.1093/femspd/fty003 (2018).

  20. 20.

    Orazi, G., Ruoff, K. L. & O’Toole, G. A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Increases the Sensitivity of Biofilm-Grown Staphylococcus aureus to Membrane-Targeting Antiseptics and Antibiotics. MBio 10, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01501-19 (2019).

  21. 21.

    Smith, A. C. et al. Albumin Inhibits Pseudomonas aeruginosa Quorum Sensing and Alters Polymicrobial Interactions. Infect Immun 85, https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00116-17 (2017).

  22. 22.

    DeLeon, S. et al. Synergistic interactions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro wound model. Infect Immun 82, 4718–4728, https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.02198-14 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hoffman, L. R. et al. Selection for Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variants due to growth in the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 19890–19895, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606756104 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Baldan, R. et al. Adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Cystic Fibrosis airways influences virulence of Staphylococcus aureus in vitro and murine models of co-infection. PLoS One 9, e89614, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089614 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Padan, E., Bibi, E., Ito, M. & Krulwich, T. A. Alkaline pH homeostasis in bacteria: new insights. Biochim Biophys Acta 1717, 67–88, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2005.09.010 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Krulwich, T. A., Sachs, G. & Padan, E. Molecular aspects of bacterial pH sensing and homeostasis. Nat Rev Microbiol 9, 330–343, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2549 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zhu, Y. et al. Staphylococcus aureus biofilm metabolism and the influence of arginine on polysaccharide intercellular adhesin synthesis, biofilm formation, and pathogenesis. Infect Immun 75, 4219–4226, https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00509-07 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Sheng, L. et al. Interkingdom adenosine signal reduces Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogenicity. Microb Biotechnol 5, 560–572, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7915.2012.00338.x (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Deng, X. et al. Steady-state hydrogen peroxide induces glycolysis in Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 196, 2499–2513, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01538-14 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Stewart, P. S. & Franklin, M. J. Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms. Nat Rev Microbiol 6, 199–210, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1838 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Amirkia, V. D. & Qiubao, P. The Antimicrobial Index: a comprehensive literature-based antimicrobial database and reference work. Bioinformation 5, 365–366 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Parsek, M. R. & Singh, P. K. Bacterial biofilms: an emerging link to disease pathogenesis. Annu Rev Microbiol 57, 677–701, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090720 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Malyshkin, A. P. Chronic infections: causes and possible approach to treatment. Research Journal of Infectious Diseases 2, https://doi.org/10.7243/2052-5958-2-3 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sadekuzzaman, M., Yang, S., Mizan, M. F. R. & Ha, S. D. Current and Recent Advanced Strategies for Combating Biofilms. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 14, 491–509, https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12144 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wolcott, R., Costerton, J. W., Raoult, D. & Cutler, S. J. The polymicrobial nature of biofilm infection. Clin Microbiol Infect 19, 107–112, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.04001.x (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Del Pozo, J. L. Biofilm-related disease. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 16, 51–65, https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2018.1417036 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Dulbecco, R. & Freeman, G. Plaque production by the polyoma virus. Virology 8, 396–397 (1959).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Sambrook, J. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual (Third edition. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, [2001] ©2001, 2001).

  39. 39.

    Mc, C. N. Laboratory tests in the diagnosis of brucellosis. Am J Public Health Nations Health 39, 866–869 (1949).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    O’Toole, G. A. Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay. J Vis Exp, https://doi.org/10.3791/2437 (2011).

  41. 41.

    Turner, K. H., Wessel, A. K., Palmer, G. C., Murray, J. L. & Whiteley, M. Essential genome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis sputum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112, 4110–4115, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419677112 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Mallia, P. et al. Role of airway glucose in bacterial infections in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol 142, 815–823 e816, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2017.10.017 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Baker, E. H. & Baines, D. L. Airway Glucose Homeostasis: A New Target in the Prevention and Treatment of Pulmonary Infection. Chest 153, 507–514, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.031 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Brennan, A. L. et al. Airway glucose concentrations and effect on growth of respiratory pathogens in cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros 6, 101–109, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2006.03.009 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Pezzulo, A. A. et al. Glucose depletion in the airway surface liquid is essential for sterility of the airways. PLoS One 6, e16166, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016166 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Abu-Ashour, W., Twells, L. K., Valcour, J. E. & Gamble, J. M. Diabetes and the occurrence of infection in primary care: a matched cohort study. BMC Infect Dis 18, 67, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-2975-2 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Rojo, F. Carbon catabolite repression in Pseudomonas: optimizing metabolic versatility and interactions with the environment. FEMS Microbiol Rev 34, 658–684, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00218.x (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Vitko, N. P., Grosser, M. R., Khatri, D., Lance, T. R. & Richardson, A. R. Expanded Glucose Import Capability Affords Staphylococcus aureus Optimized Glycolytic Flux during Infection. MBio 7, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00296-16 (2016).

  49. 49.

    Lister, J. L. & Horswill, A. R. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: recent developments in biofilm dispersal. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4, 178, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2014.00178 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Yang, L. et al. Pattern differentiation in co-culture biofilms formed by Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 62, 339–347, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2011.00820.x (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Lim, Y., Jana, M., Luong, T. T. & Lee, C. Y. Control of glucose- and NaCl-induced biofilm formation by rbf in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 186, 722–729 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Rode, T. M., Langsrud, S., Holck, A. & Moretro, T. Different patterns of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus under food-related stress conditions. Int J Food Microbiol 116, 372–383, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.02.017 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Tognon, M., Kohler, T., Luscher, A. & van Delden, C. Transcriptional profiling of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus during in vitro co-culture. BMC Genomics 20, 30, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5398-y (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Good, N. E. et al. Hydrogen ion buffers for biological research. Biochemistry 5, 467–477 (1966).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Harjai, K. et al. Effect of pH on production of virulence factors by biofilm cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 50, 99–102 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Kessler, E., Safrin, M., Olson, J. C. & Ohman, D. E. Secreted LasA of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a staphylolytic protease. J Biol Chem 268, 7503–7508 (1993).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Duan, K. & Surette, M. G. Environmental regulation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 Las and Rhl quorum-sensing systems. J Bacteriol 189, 4827–4836, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00043-07 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kolderman, E. et al. L-arginine destabilizes oral multi-species biofilm communities developed in human saliva. PLoS One 10, e0121835, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121835 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Borriello, G., Richards, L., Ehrlich, G. D. & Stewart, P. S. Arginine or nitrate enhances antibiotic susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50, 382–384, https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.50.1.382-384.2006 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Jakubovics, N. S. et al. Critical roles of arginine in growth and biofilm development by Streptococcus gordonii. Mol Microbiol 97, 281–300, https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.13023 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Peters, T. Jr. Serum albumin. Adv Protein Chem 37, 161–245 (1985).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Cheng, A. G., Missiakas, D. & Schneewind, O. The giant protein Ebh is a determinant of Staphylococcus aureus cell size and complement resistance. J Bacteriol 196, 971–981, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01366-13 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    de Chateau, M., Holst, E. & Bjorck, L. Protein PAB, an albumin-binding bacterial surface protein promoting growth and virulence. J Biol Chem 271, 26609–26615 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Dekio, S. & Jidoi, J. Effect of serum albumin on growth of Staphylococcus aureus in synthetic tissue culture medium. J Dermatol 10, 505–508 (1983).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Miller, C. L. et al. Global transcriptome responses including small RNAs during mixed-species interactions with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiologyopen 6, https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.427 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Lambiase, A., Catania, M. R. & Rossano, F. Anaerobic bacteria infection in cystic fibrosis airway disease. New Microbiol 33, 185–194 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Worlitzsch, D. et al. Effects of reduced mucus oxygen concentration in airway Pseudomonas infections of cystic fibrosis patients. J Clin Invest 109, 317–325, https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI13870 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Filkins, L. M. & O’Toole, G. A. Cystic Fibrosis Lung Infections: Polymicrobial, Complex, and Hard to Treat. PLoS Pathog 11, e1005258, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005258 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Fuchs, S., Pane-Farre, J., Kohler, C., Hecker, M. & Engelmann, S. Anaerobic gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 189, 4275–4289, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00081-07 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Crespo, A., Gavalda, J., Julian, E. & Torrents, E. A single point mutation in class III ribonucleotide reductase promoter renders Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 inefficient for anaerobic growth and infection. Sci Rep 7, 13350, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14051-2 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Voggu, L. et al. Microevolution of cytochrome bd oxidase in Staphylococci and its implication in resistance to respiratory toxins released by Pseudomonas. J Bacteriol 188, 8079–8086, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00858-06 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    He, J. et al. The broad host range pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14 carries two pathogenicity islands harboring plant and animal virulence genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 2530–2535 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Chapman, G. H. The significance of sodium chloride in studies of staphylococci. J Bacteriol 50, 201–203 (1945).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Cendra Mdel, M., Juarez, A. & Torrents, E. Biofilm modifies expression of ribonucleotide reductase genes in Escherichia coli. PLoS One 7, e46350, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046350 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Crespo, A., Blanco-Cabra, N. & Torrents, E. Aerobic Vitamin B12 Biosynthesis Is Essential for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Class II Ribonucleotide Reductase Activity During Planktonic and Biofilm Growth. Front Microbiol 9, 986, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00986 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Macia, M. D., Rojo-Molinero, E. & Oliver, A. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in biofilm-growing bacteria. Clin Microbiol Infect 20, 981–990, https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12651 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Pearson, K. On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed tohave arisen from random sampling. Philosophical Magazine 302, 157–175 (1900).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by grants to E.T. from the La Caixa Foundation, Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (MINECO/FEDER) (BIO2015-63557-R and RT12018-098573-B-100), the CERCA programme/Generalitat de Catalunya (2017 SGR01079) and the Catalan Cystic Fibrosis association. L.P. is thankful to the Generalitat de Catalunya for its financial support through the FI program (2015-FI-B-00817).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.C. and E.T. designed the study. M.C., N.B.-C. and L.P. performed the experiments. All authors analyzed the data. M.C. and E.T. wrote the paper. All authors revised and approved the final version of the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Maria del Mar Cendra or Eduard Torrents.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cendra, M.d.M., Blanco-Cabra, N., Pedraz, L. et al. Optimal environmental and culture conditions allow the in vitro coexistence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in stable biofilms. Sci Rep 9, 16284 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52726-0

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing