Abstract
Tunable photonic circuits were demonstrated in the mid-Infrared (mid-IR) regime using integrated TiO2-on-LiNbO3 (ToL) waveguides. The upper waveguide ridge was made by a sputtered TiO2 thin film with broad transparency at λ = 0.4–8 µm and an optimized refractive index n = 2.39. The waveguide substrate is a z-cut single crystalline LiNbO3 (LN) wafer that has strong Pockels effect, thus enabling the tunability of the device through electro-optical (E-O) modulation. A sharp waveguide mode was obtained at λ = 2.5 µm without scattering or mode distortion found. The measured E-O coefficient γeff was 5.9 pm/V approaching γ31 of 8.6 pm/V of LN. The ToL waveguide showed a hybrid mode profile where its optical field can be modified by adjusting the TiO2 ridge height. Our monolithically integrated ToL modulator is an efficient and small footprint optical switch critical for the development of reconfigurable photonic chips.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Mid-IR photonic circuits have attracted a lot of attention because of their application in broadband optical communication and label-free biochemical sensing1,2,3. For the optical network, extending the present operational spectrum from the near-IR into the mid-IR region provides additional optical channels thus improving the data transmission rates4. Specifically, E-O devices capable of fast intensity modulation are essential components for high bit rate optical communication and information processing5. Previous works in mid-IR photonic circuits have been demonstrated in various silicon-based platforms, such as Si-on-insulator, Si-on-sapphire, Si-on-AlN, and pedestal Si6,7. However, silicon has low optical nonlinearity (χ3) and absence of E-O tunability from Pockets and Kerr effects that limit its application for nonlinear frequency conversion and high-speed optical signal modulation8. In addition, the present Si photonics platform utilizes SiO2 as the optical waveguide undercladding, while SiO2 becomes opaque at λ > 4.0 µm9. Thus, Si-on-insulator was unsuitable for broadband mid-IR applications.
Another material option to achieve reconfigurable mid-IR photonics is lithium niobate, a ferroelectric and high nonlinear optical crystal10,11. First, LN is transparent up to λ > 5 μm with a moderate refractive index, n = 2.1812, which grants it versatile roles either as a waveguide cladding or a waveguide core in the mid-IR regime13,14. Second, LN has a high E-O coefficient and a large second-order optical nonlinearity (χ2) so it enables efficient nonlinear light generation and E-O light modulation15,16. Previous studies have shown a LN switch in Near-Infrared (NIR) with a modulation speed exceeding 100 GHz17 and a low Vπ∙L of ∼10 Vcm18, where Vπ∙L is the product of the voltage and the device length to create a π phase difference. In addition, both phase and intensity LN modulators can achieve a high extinction ratio >15 dB, which is significantly better than present Si based photonic devices19. Therefore, LN is an ideal platform for tunable mid-IR photonic circuits.
In this work, we created reconfigurable waveguides that monolithically integrated ferroelectric LN and mid-IR transparent TiO2. From finite difference method (FDM) modeling, the ToL photonic circuits had a hybrid waveguide mode, where its optical field confined in the LN and the TiO2 layers can be optimized by the TiO2 thickness. Unlike the Si-on-LN waveguide that had its optical field dominantly confined in the high refractive index Si, our ToL device was able to confine majority of the lightwave in the ferroelectric LN layer, which is critical to achieve efficient E-O modulation. This is because TiO2 and LN have a lower refractive index contrast, ∆n = 0.21, compared to a ∆n = 1.3 between Si and LN. The ToL waveguide structures were characterized by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Meanwhile, the effective E-O coefficient in mid-IR regime was obtained by measuring the mode intensity variation when an external electrical field E was applied across the waveguide. Hence, the developed ToL platform enables reconfigurable mid-IR photonic circuits desired for broadband optical communication.
Experimental Methods
The detailed device fabrication process is shown in Fig. 1a. First, a negative tone photoresist was patterned on a LN wafer, which defined the waveguide structure. After development, the photoresist had undercut sidewall that will facilitate the lift-off process. Next, a 0.8 µm thick TiO2 film was deposited on the patterned substrate by room temperature RF sputtering. The target was Ti (99.999%) and the gases introduced into the deposition chamber were 36 sccm argon and 4 sccm oxygen. After TiO2 deposition, the photoresist and the TiO2 above were removed by acetone and only the TiO2 ridge waveguide was left on the LN substrate. Applying the same lithography and lift-off steps, 100 nm thick Ti electrodes were deposited on both sides of the TiO2 waveguide. The ToL fabrication avoided delicate and costly processes including ion slicing and wafer bonding utilized in prior LN thin film devices20,21.
The waveguide optical property and the E-O reconfigurability of the ToL were characterized by a testing station shown in Fig. 1b. The light source was a pulsed laser with a wavelength tunable from λ = 2.4 to 3.8 μm and a linewidth of 3 cm−1. It had a 150 kHz pulse repetition rate, 10 nano seconds pulse duration, and 150 mW average power. The probe laser light was first focused into a 9 μm core fluoride fiber using a reflective lens, and then butt-coupled into the waveguide. The fine alignment between the optical fiber and the ToL waveguide was monitored by an upper microscope equipped with a long working distance 10x objective lens. The light emitted from the waveguide back facet was focused by a CaF2 biconvex lens with 25 mm focal length and then captured by a liquid nitrogen cooled 640 × 512 pixel InSb camera. A polarizer was placed before the camera, selecting the polarization of the recorded light signal. Meanwhile, an electric field E was applied across the ToL waveguide using the pair of Ti electrodes that were loaded on the two sides of the TiO2 ridge. The electrodes were connected with a DC power supply through two micro-manipulators. E was determined by the applied voltage, V, of the power supply and the gap width, g, between the pair of electrodes. The waveguide mode intensity was then recorded when the V was swept between 0 and 100 V.
Results and Discussion
The waveguide mode was numerically simulated by the two-dimensional FDM. In the modeling, a 12 μm × 6 μm TM light source was chosen to excite a mode at λ = 2.5 μm since its dimension is close to the 9 μm core mid-IR fiber used in the experiment. The refractive indexes, n, of TiO2 and LN are 2.39 and 2.18, respectively22,23. The mode profile and field intensity confined in the TiO2 and LN layers were modified by adjusting the TiO2 thickness, TTiO2. As shown in Fig. 2a at TTiO2 = 1 µm, a fundamental mode was clearly observed within the TiO2 ridge while a strong evanescent field appeared in the LN cladding layer, which was a characteristic profile belonging to the TM polarization mode24. As TTiO2 decreased to 0.8 µm, the mode center shifted toward the LN layer. A hybrid mode with a strong field existing in both LN and TiO2 layers was revealed. A ToL waveguide with this configuration is capable of efficient E-O modulation, since the optical field was confined in the ferroelectric LN layer and its overlapping with the electric field significantly increased. As TTiO2 decreased to 0.6 µm, no TM waveguide mode was found because the TiO2 layer was too thin to support a TM mode. To better visualize the variation of the optical field when TTiO2 changed, Fig. 2b shows the calculated 1-D intensity profiles parallel to the z direction at y = 0 µm. At TTiO2 = 1 µm, the intensity peak appeared in the center of the TiO2 layer. Meanwhile, the evanescent field in the lower LN cladding was much stronger than in upper air cladding since the LN has a higher refractive index than air. At TTiO2 = 0.80 µm, a hybrid mode was formed and the optical field in the ferroelectric LN layer became stronger, which was critical to achieve low Vπ∙L E-O modulation. On the other hand, at TTiO2 = 0.60 µm, there was no light confinement along the z direction. The TM waveguide mode disappeared since the TiO2 layer was too thin. The optical field distribution factors, ΓLN and ΓTiO2, were defined as the percentages of optical fields found within the LN and the TiO2 layers, respectively. As shown in Table 1 and Fig. 2c, ΓLN increased rapidly from 46.0% to 80.0% while ΓTiO2 decreased from 47.4% to 15.5%, as TTiO2 decreased from 1.0 to 0.60 µm. The optimized TTiO2 was 0.80 µm since it had a large ΓLN and also a sufficient thickness to support the TM waveguide mode. Therefore, optimization of TTiO2 reshaped the intensity distribution of the waveguide mode, leading to a stronger optical field confined within the LN layer. Consequently, this enhanced the interaction between the mid-IR light wave and the electrical field that created high E-O reconfigurability and reduced optical propagation loss.
The optical property of deposited TiO2 thin film was characterized by attenuated total reflection - Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) and the result is displayed in Fig. 3. High transmittance was found over a broad mid-IR spectrum between λ = 2.5 to 8.0 μm. The strong absorption after λ = 8.0 μm is due to the combinations of fundamental vibration modes existing at longer wavelengths, such as the Ti-O stretching and bending vibrations25,26. The results showed that the sputtered TiO2 thin film is a suitable material for mid-IR photonic circuits.
The structure of ToL device was inspected by a SEM equipped with EDS. Figure 4a shows the cross-sectional SEM image of a 10 μm wide and 0.8 μm height TiO2 ridge waveguide sitting on a LN substrate. Two Ti electrodes were loaded on each side of the waveguide. The device has a well-defined ridge structure without cracks or indents on the surface. The sharp waveguide edges reduced the waveguide propagation loss caused by light scattering. In addition, the interface between the TiO2 waveguide and LN layer was well-resolved. No depletion damage was found on the device surfaces or the interface because the waveguide was prepared by a lift-off process instead of an aggressive etching process. EDS with element mapping function was utilized to characterize the device layout and the material composition. As shown in Fig. 4b, the Ti profile identified the TiO2 ridge waveguide in the ToL center and two thin Ti electrodes loaded next to the waveguide. In Fig. 4c, the Nb distribution corresponded to the LN substrate that was underneath the TiO2 waveguide and Ti electrodes. The well-defined waveguide configuration and the high material uniformity avoided the optical loss caused by the variation of refractive indexes.
Figure 5a shows the optical waveguide mode at TTiO2 = 0.80 µm and its transmission at different polarizations. A sharp waveguide mode was clearly observed at λ = 2.5 µm when the polarization angle ϴ at 0° was parallel to the laser TM polarization. No scattering and distortion found in the captured images indicates that our waveguide has flat sidewalls and a smooth interface between the TiO2 and LN layer. As the ϴ rotated from 0° to 90°, the mode intensity dropped sharply indicating the ToL had a waveguide mode with TM polarization. The one-dimensional intensity distribution at different polarizations is drawn in Fig. 5b. The obtained Gaussian-like mode profile is similar to the hybrid mode resolved at Fig. 2b. Figure 5c shows the plot of mode intensity versus the ϴ and its fitting curve. The variation of intensity I with ϴ is consistent with the derived cosine squared function I (ϴ) = I0 cos2 ϴ, where I0 is the light intensity without a polarizer. At ϴ = 0°, a maximum transmission was obtained because the polarization of the waveguide mode was parallel to the axis of the polarizer. On the other hand, at ϴ = 90°, the transmission decreased to zero because the waveguide mode and the polarizer were cross polarized.
E-O analysis was performed by measuring the variation of the mode intensity when an external field was applied across the ToL waveguide. The polarizer was fixed at ϴ = 45° so the initial intensity was half of its maximum found at ϴ = 0°. The electric field E across the waveguide was adjusted between 0 to 7.5 V/µm by tuning the voltage V of the power supply. The transient mode intensity I was recorded and drawn in Fig. 6a. The intensity raised sharply whenever an electrical field was applied. Figure 6b displayed the I-V curve extrapolated from Fig. 5a and the fitting curve derived from the Pockels effect. The experimentally observed linear E-O response can be described by an equation as27,28
The parameter Vπ∙L = 50 V∙cm was found for the ToL waveguide. Through the equation29,30
the γeff was derived as 5.9 pm/V. The resolved γeff was slightly lower than the γ31 of 8.6 pm/V because the waveguide and the electrical field were not strictly parallel to the optical axis of the LN substrate. An even lower Vπ∙L of 7 V∙cm can be achieved if the electrode gap g is narrowed to 3 μm and the waveguide is aligned to the LN y-axis.
Conclusion
Reconfigurable mid-IR photonic circuits were created using a monolithically integrated ToL platform. The device showed smooth waveguide sidewalls and a sharp TiO2 - LN interface because the waveguide was formed through the lift-off process instead of aggressive etching. After adjusting the thickness of the TiO2 layer, a hybrid waveguide mode with a large field confinement can be achieved at TTiO2 = 0.80 µm due to an optimized ∆n of 0.21 between TiO2 and LN. The E-O tunability of the ToL waveguide was then realized by applying the Pockels effect from the LN substrate, where a γeff of 5.9 pm/V, close to γ31, was obtained at λ = 2.5 µm. The ToL waveguides provides efficient E-O modulation covering the mid-IR regime thus enabling broad spectrum optical communication.
References
Hu, T. et al. Silicon photonic platforms for mid-infrared applications. Photonics Res. 5, 417–430 (2017).
Wartewig, S. & Neubert, R. H. H. Pharmaceutical applications of Mid-IR and Raman spectroscopy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 57, 1144–1170 (2005).
Shepherd, K. D. & Walsh, M. G. Infrared Spectroscopy—Enabling an Evidence-Based Diagnostic Surveillance Approach to Agricultural and Environmental Management in Developing Countries. J. Near Infrared Spectrosc. 15, 1–9 (2007).
Matini, R. et al. High-speed digital data transmission using mid-infrared quantum cascade lasers. Electron. Lett 37, 1290–1292 (2001).
Kawanishi, T., Sakamoto, T. & Izutsu, M. High-Speed Control of Lightwave Amplitude, Phase, and Frequency by Use of Electrooptic Effect. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron 13, 79–91 (2007).
Soref, R. Mid-infrared photonics in silicon and germanium. Nat. Photonics. 4, 495–497 (2010).
Penadés, J. S., Khokhar, A. Z., Nedeljkovic, M., Mashanovich, G. Z. & Low-Loss Mid-Infrared, S. O. I. Slot Waveguides. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 27, 1197–1199 (2015).
Jin, T. et al. P. T. Monolithic Mid-Infrared Integrated Photonics Using Silicon-on-Epitaxial Barium Titanate. Thin Films ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 21848–21855 (2017).
Lin, P. T., Singh, V., Cai, Y., Kimerling, L. C. & Agarwal, A. Air-clad silicon pedestal structures for broadband mid-infrared microphotonics. Opt. Lett. 38, 1031–1033 (2013).
Wooten, E. L. et al. A Review of Lithium Niobate Modulators for Fiber-Optic Communications Systems. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron 6, 69–82 (2000).
Lin, Y. Y. et al. Electro-optic periodically poled lithium niobate Bragg modulator as a laser Q-switch. Opt. Lett 32, 545–547 (2007).
Smith, D. S., Riccius, H. D. & Edwin, R. P. Refractive indices of lithium niobite. Opt. Commun 17, 332–335 (1976).
Xia, X., Chen, Q., Tsay, C., Arnold, C. B. & Madsen, C. K. Low-loss chalcogenide waveguides on lithium niobate for the mid-infrared. Opt. Lett 35, 3228–3230 (2010).
Chiles, J. & Fathpour, S. Mid-infrared integrated waveguide modulators based on silicon-on-lithium-niobate photonics. Optica 1, 350–355 (2014).
Weis, R. S. & Gaylord, T. K. Lithium niobate: Summary of physical properties and crystal structure. Appl. Phys. A 37, 191–203 (1985).
Lenzo, P. V., Spencer, E. G. & Nassau, K. Electro-Optic Coefficients in Single-Domain Ferroelectric Lithium Niobate. J. Opt. Soc. Am 56, 633–635 (1966).
Noguchi, K., Mitomi, O. & Miyazawa, H. Millimeter-wave Ti: LiNbO3 optical modulators. J. Lightwave Technol. 16, 615–619 (1998).
Chen, L., Xu, Q., Wood, M. G. & Reano, R. M. Hybrid silicon and lithium niobate electro-optical ring modulator. Optica 1, 112–118 (2014).
Tronev, A., Parfenov, M., Agruzov, P., Ilichev, I. & Shamray, A. Performance Improvement of Lithium Niobate High Extinction Ratio Modulators by Means of Photorefractive Trimming. ACPC, Guangzhou, Guangdong China, Nov (2017).
Wang, C., Zhang, M., Stern, B., Lipson, M. & Lončar, M. Nanophotonic lithium niobate electro-optic modulators. Opt. Express 26, 1547–1555 (2018).
Huang, W.-H., Lin, C.-W. & Wang, W.-S. Electrooptical Modulator Fabricated by Gallium Diffusion in Lithium Niobate. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 20, 1172–1174 (2008).
Devore, J. R. Refractive Indices of Rutile and Sphalerite. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 41, 416–419 (1951).
Zelmon, D. E., Small, D. L. & Jundt, D. Infrared corrected Sellmeier coefficients for congruently grown lithium niobate and 5 mol. % magnesium oxide–doped lithium niobite. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 14, 3319–3322 (1997).
Parriaux, O. & Veldhuis, G. J. Normalized Analysis for the Sensitivity Optimization of Integrated Optical Evanescent-Wave. Sensors J. Light. Technol 16, 573–582 (1998).
Last, J. T. Infrared-Absorption Studies on Barium Titanate and Related Materials. Phys. Rev. 105, 1740–1750 (1957).
Ruppin, R. Infrared Absorption and Ferroelectricity of Small BaTiO3 Crystals. Phys. stat. solidi. (b) 64, 701–707 (1974).
Gjurchinovski, A. Polarization Measurements - A Numerical Approach. Physica Macedonica 52, 69–76 (2002).
Alferness, R. C. & Buhl, L. L. High-speed waveguide electro-optic polarization modulator. Opt. Lett. 7, 500–502 (1982).
Lu, H. et al. Enhanced electro-optical lithium niobate photonic crystal wire waveguide on a smart-cut thin film. Opt. Express. 20, 2874–2981 (2012).
Shi, Y. et al. Low (Sub-1-Volt) Halfwave Voltage Polymeric Electro-optic Modulators Achieved by a Controlling Chromophore Shape. Science. 288, 119–122 (2000).
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding support provided by Texas A&M University Presidential X-Grant and NSF-ERC PATHS-UP Program. Device fabrication and characterization were performed at AggieFab and Materials Characterization Facility (MCF) at Texas A&M University, and the Center for Nanoscale Systems (CNS) at Harvard University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.T.N. performed the device design, fabrication, and characterization. J.Z. completed the data analysis. P.T.L. supervised the research and reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jin, T., Zhou, J. & Lin, P.T. Mid-Infrared Electro-Optical Modulation Using Monolithically Integrated Titanium Dioxide on Lithium Niobate Optical Waveguides. Sci Rep 9, 15130 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51563-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51563-5
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.