Abstract
Miniaturized optical spectrometers providing broadband operation and fine resolution have an immense potential for applications in remote sensing, noninvasive medical diagnostics and astronomy. Indeed, optical spectrometers working in the midinfrared spectral range have garnered a great interest for their singular capability to monitor the main absorption fingerprints of a wide range of chemical and biological substances. Fouriertransform spectrometers (FTS) are a particularly interesting solution for the onchip integration due to their superior robustness against fabrication imperfections. However, the performance of current onchip FTS implementations is limited by tradeoffs in bandwidth and resolution. Here, we propose a new FTS approach that gathers the advantages of spatial heterodyning and optical path tuning by thermooptic effect to overcome this tradeoff. The high resolution is provided by spatial multiplexing among different interferometers with increasing imbalance length, while the broadband operation is enabled by fine tuning of the optical path delay in each interferometer harnessing the thermooptic effect. Capitalizing on this concept, we experimentally demonstrate a midinfrared SiGe FTS, with a resolution better than 15 cm^{−1} and a bandwidth of 603 cm^{−1} near 7.7 μm wavelength with a 10 MZI array. This is a resolution comparable to stateoftheart onchip midinfrared spectrometers with a 4fold bandwidth increase with a footprint divided by a factor two.
Introduction
Photonics integration in the midInfrared (midIR) spectral range, and more specifically in the fingerprint region between 5 and 20 μm wavelength has garnered a great interest due to its immense potential for applications in spectroscopy and sensing. The unique vibrational and rotational resonances of molecules at these wavelengths can be used to univocally discern and quantify the molecular composition of a broad variety of gases, liquids or solids, with application in environmental monitoring^{1}, astronomy^{2}, hazard detection^{3}, industrial process control^{4} and noninvasive medical diagnostics^{5,6}. While commercial midIR spectrometers currently available are often based on an assembly of discrete elements^{7}, onchip photonic integration offer key advantages to develop fast, lowcost, lowpower consumption, highreliability and high performances systems.
A myriad of integrated spectroscopic systems has been demonstrated, based on dispersive devices such as array waveguide gratings (AWG)^{8,9}, echelle grating^{10,11} or Fourier transform spectroscopy^{12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22}. Onchip Fourier transform spectrometers (FTS) implement simple yet effective calibration algorithms that compensate phase and amplitude impairments, thereby providing a superior robustness against fabrication imperfections, compared to dispersive counterparts. Current onchip FTS rely on one of the three following operation schemes: i) stationary wave interferometry (SWI), ii) static spatial heterodyne spectroscopy (SHS), and iii) scanning interferometry. In SWI an stationary wave pattern is generated by the interference of two counter or copropagating waves^{13,17}. This interference pattern is diffracted offchip and monitored by an array of photodetectors. The resolution of this approach is seriously limited by practical constraints in the photodetector array, e.g. minimum pitch size. In static SHS, an array of interferometers with linearly increasing optical path delays is implemented to yield a spatial interferogram that allows onchip spectral detection without any moving parts^{12,14,15,16,21}. SHSbased devices can easily implement remarkably large optical path delays which resulted in unprecedented resolutions^{14}. In addition, multiaperture SHS exhibit an increased optical throughput (Jacquinot advantage), which is key for some spectroscopy applications^{12}. However, their bandwidth is limited by the minimum optical path difference among consecutive interferometers. Achieving a fine resolution (large optical delay) and broadband operation (small optical delay step) requires an unpractical large number of interferometers. Integrated scanninginterferometrybased spectrometers implement the same approach as bulk optics Michelson interferometers, i.e. the scanning of the optical path delay within the interferometer. In the integrated approach, the scanning of the path difference is achieved by an external tuning which changes either the length or the optical properties of the optical path. A highresolution spectrometer based on scanning interferometry has recently been demonstrated based on a discrete set of optical path differences dynamically selected by optical switches^{20}. Nevertheless, the bandwidth of this device is still limited by the minimum implementable optical path difference. The thermooptic effect has also been used to scan the optical path delay of single interferometers^{18,19,22}. However, the resolution of these devices is limited by the maximum achievable optical delay. Finally, theoretical studies predicted that the bandwidth or resolution of the spectrometer could be improved by an array of thermallytuned filters^{23}.
Here, we propose and experimentally demonstrate an alternative approach that gathers in a simple but effective way the advantages of spatial heterodyning and optical path tuning by thermooptic effect to overcome the bandwidthresolution tradeoff in conventional counterparts. The proposed approach, depicted in Fig. 1(a), implements an array of MachZehnder interferometers (MZI) with a linearly increasing optical path length difference (ΔL) and a common thermal tuned length L_{H} in each one. The optical delay in in each MZI is changed by applying a thermal shift with a waveguide heater. The output interferogram is formed by recording the output of each interferometer for different temperatures. The resolution of the system is mainly governed by the maximum optical path length difference (ΔL_{max}), while the bandwidth is determined by the minimum thermallyinduced optical path delay (\({L}_{H}\,\Delta {n}_{g}(T)\)). This way, fine resolution and broad operation can be achieved without the need for a large number of interferometers, overcoming the major limitation of conventional SHSbased devices. Based on this new approach, we have implemented a midIR spectrometer with Gerich SiGe waveguides, experimentally showing a bandwidth of 603 cm^{−1} with a resolution below 15 cm^{−1}. Stateoftheart onchip FTS resolution in the midinfrared is thus obtained with a 4fold bandwidth increase.
Results
Working principle of FTS based on thermallytuned spatial heterodyning
The theory and operational principle of integrated spatial heterodyne Fourier transform spectrometers (SHFTS) have been reported previously by Florjanczyk et al.^{12}. In a typical configuration, a SHFTS is composed of a MZI array with path difference changing by a constant increment across the device.
In this work we propose to generate path delays through a combination of MZI arm length differences together with thermal tuning of the optical path in each MZI. For this purpose, the mathematical model of the MZI array is generalized to the thermallytuned MZI array. As it is later detailed in Methods section, the resolution δσ and bandwidth, also referred as free spectral range (FSR_{σ}), are given by:
where γ_{max} is the maximal optical path delay difference between MZI arms, γ_{step} is the sampling interval of the optical path delay difference, n_{g} is the group index of the guided optical mode, \(\Delta {n}_{g,T,max}\) is the highest group index change due to thermal tuning, ΔL_{max} is the largest arm length unbalance in the MZI array, N_{T} is the number of different temperatures applied and N_{L} is the number of MZIs in the array. The largest optical path delay difference γ_{max} is achieved when the highest temperature change is applied through the heating length L_{H} and thus producing the largest group index change \(\Delta {n}_{g,T,max}\) in the most unbalance MZI of the array, i.e. when the length difference between both arms is ΔL_{max}. According to NyquistShannon theorem, the FSR is inversely proportional to two times the sampling interval γ_{step} (Eq. (2)). It means that the smaller is the sampling interval, the larger is the bandwidth of the SHFTS. Generally speaking, the thermallyinduced phase shift is much lower that the maximal phase shift due to MZI path difference, thus \(\Delta {L}_{max}\,{n}_{g}\gg {L}_{H}\,\Delta {n}_{g,T,max}\). Therefore, the resolution of the thermallytuned FTS is very close to the one of classical FTS, and mainly depends on the path difference of the most unbalanced MZI in the MZI array. On the other hand, the FSR can be largely improved in thermallytuned FTS. Indeed, the main advantage of introducing thermal tunability in the MZI array is to break the fundamental tradeoff between FSR, resolution and number of MZI, by improving the spectrometer FSR keeping reasonable number of MZI in the array. The fundamental relation FSR = δσN_{L}/2 in classical FTS is thus replaced by FSR = δσN_{T}N_{L}/2 in thermallytuned FTS, where the number of MZI (N_{L}) is now multiplied by the number of different temperature N_{T} used in the measurement, considering γ points equally spaced.
In order to evaluate the implementation of thermallytuned FTS, first we consider a uniform sampling of the optical path delay as illustrated in Fig. 1(b). Since much larger path delays are obtained through MZI arm difference length compared to thermal tuning, thermal tuning will be used to sample the spectral region between the transmission peaks of consecutive MZI with different arm lengths. In the following, ΔL_{step} is the incremental change of path difference across the MZI array and \(\Delta {n}_{g,T,step}\) is the incremental change of the group index, related to the incremental change of temperature ΔT_{step} induced by the heater, following the relation \(\Delta {n}_{g,T,step}=\frac{\partial {n}_{g}}{\partial T}\Delta {T}_{step}\). Since for the midinfrared wavelength range the thermooptic coefficient can be considered constant with the wavelength^{24}, this incremental change of the group index can be also considered constant, too. If we also consider that the first MZI is balanced and, for simplicity, that the temperature varies only for positive values from \(\Delta T=0\) to \(({N}_{T}1)\,\Delta {T}_{step}\) for all MZI, γ is thus taking \({N}_{T}\times {N}_{L}\) different equally spaced values from \({\gamma }_{min}=0\,{\rm{m}}\) to \({\gamma }_{max}=({N}_{L}\mathrm{1)}\,{n}_{g}\,\Delta {L}_{step}+({N}_{T}\mathrm{1)}{L}_{H}\,\Delta {n}_{g,T,step}\).
Considering a uniform sampling of the optical path delay, we can finally deduce the relation between the \(\Delta {n}_{g,T,step}\), ΔL_{step} and N_{T} as expressed in Eq. (3), where the next temperature increment would correspond with the next MZI with no thermal tuning applied.
ΔT_{step} and the maximal temperature variation ΔT_{max} are then also given by Eqs (4) and (5).
Furthermore, it can be noted that as it is the case for classical FTS, thermallytuned FTS can suffer of deviations from the ideal design due to phase errors, but these errors can be eliminated by a proper calibration procedure^{14}. Instead of using a cosine transform, a spectral retrieval method is used based on a set of linear equations and on the measurement of the transfer matrix of the spectrometer. To this end, the transfer matrix T is first built by scanning the input wavelength within the spectral range of the spectrometer while recording the output of each MZI. The output of all MZI is also recorded for each temperature. With all these measurements a \({N}_{T}{N}_{L}\times M\) matrix is obtained, where M is the number of different measured wavelengths. When an unknown signal is set as the input spectrum, the measured interferogram is given by \(I({\gamma }_{k})=S\times T\), where S is the input spectrum. Therefore, it is possible to retrieve any unknown input spectrum S by multiplying the measured interferogram by T^{+}, the pseudoinverse of T^{16}. Moreover, as it is later demonstrated in this work, with this method it is even possible to retrieve a nonuniform sampled spectrum. It must be also pointed out that other procedures such as ElasticD1 method^{20} or l1norm minimization^{25} can be applied to enhance the performance of the retrieval process.
MidIR SiGe FTS based on thermallytuned spatial heterodyning
Up to now, most of the onchip FTS demonstrations have used the silicononinsulator (SOI) platform, which provides a mature technology compatible with nearinfrared and shortwaveinfrared (SWIR) wavelength range. Thus, stateoftheart integrated SHFTS have shown operation mainly at 1.55 μm^{14,18,20} and in the SWIR spectral region, below 4 μm wavelength. However, the development of photonic platforms dedicated to longer MIR wavelengths has recently witnessed a burst of research activity^{26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37}. Germaniumrich silicongermanium (Gerich SiGe) has emerged as a promising integrated platform exhibiting a wide transparency range^{38}. A linearly graded SiGe layer allows a smooth transition between pure silicon and Gerich material that minimizes the threading dislocation density due to lattice mismatch, while confining the optical mode in the upper part of the waveguide by refractive index gradient. The recent experimental demonstration of a MIR SHFTS^{21} provides a promising departing point to develop new deep MIR spectroscopic systems. In that previous work an experimental resolution better than 15 cm^{−1} was obtained with a FSR of 132 cm^{−1}. Interestingly, the operating frequency range was much larger as it reached 800 cm^{−1}. All these compelling features make the Gerich SiGe an excellent platform for developing a broadband thermallytuned midIR FTS. As a main objective we target to increase the device FSR, without degrading the resolution nor increasing the device area.
To demonstrate the advantage and viability of the thermallytuned FTS, we consider first a device similar to the one reported by Q. Liu et al.^{21}, where broadband operation was demonstrated (800 cm^{−1}), but the device was limited by its FSR. We will numerically evaluate the advantage of thermallytuning this device and demonstrate its performance enhancement. Therefore, an array of 10 MZI is considered (9 unbalanced and 1 balanced MZI), with ΔL_{step} of 18.8 μm, which means half of the devices reported by Q. Liu et al.^{21}, but with a 3 mmlong heater located in the shortest arm of each MZI. In terms of thermo optic coefficient, as the optical mode is confined in Gerich SiGe materials, the thermooptic coefficient of Ge is used, and it is considered constant within the operational wavelength range with a value of \(4.1\times {10}^{4}\,{K}^{1}\). Indeed, the variation is estimated to be lower than \(0.1\times {10}^{4}\,{K}^{1}\) in the wavelength rang of interest, i.e. from 5.5 to 8.5 μm^{24}.
To see the benefits of including a thermal tuning we plot in Fig. 2 the retrieval process of a monochromatic input centered at 1434 cm^{−1} (shown as a black arrow), in a 551 cm^{−1} bandwidth (5.6 μm to 8.1 μm) for different cases. Both the interferogram and retrieved spectrum are shown. Figure 2(a,e) illustrate the classical SHSbased FTS without thermal tuning. In this case the FSR is 74 cm^{−1}, meaning that when trying to retrieve a signal in 551 cm^{−1}, different repetitions of the input signal are obtained in the retrieved signal, in both sides of the different Littrow lines, that are separated by twice the FSR. In Fig. 2(b,c,f,g), the thermal tuning is implemented using a uniform sampling of the optical path delay. ΔT_{max} calculated using Eq. (5) with a maximum thermal increase of 54 K, which is an achievable value^{33}. ΔT_{step} has thus been calculated using Eq. (4) for N_{T} = 4 and 9.
Interestingly, the increase of the FSR when N_{T} increases is clearly seen, and a proper retrieval is obtained for \({N}_{T}=9\), with a calculated of FSR of 603 cm^{−1}.
Going further with this approach, instead of a discrete cosine transform this system can be seen as a generic linear transformation. Thus, it is possible to leverage the pseudoinverse matrix method, or any other similar method that enables the user to reverse a linear transformation, to obtain any unknown input signal spectrum even in the case on nonlinear variations of γ. Therefore, it is possible to properly retrieve the input signal spectrum even if the optical delay is not sampled uniformly.
To demonstrate such property, in the last reported example (Fig. 2(d,h)), a nonlinear γ sampling is tested. N_{T} is still equal to 9, as in the previous case, but ΔT_{max} and thus ΔT_{step} are reduced in comparison with the theoretical values. In this example \(\Delta {T}_{step}=0.4\,K\) and \(\Delta {T}_{max}=3\,K\).
As it can be seen from Fig. 2(h), even with such a nonuniform sampled setting it is possible to properly retrieve an input spectrum in a wavelength range from 5.6 to 8.1 μm (551 cm^{−1}), while the resolution is not affected.
To illustrate this operation, the retrieval of the input spectrum shown in Fig. 3(a) is evaluated for \({N}_{T}=9\) and for both a linear and nonlinear γ sampling. The theoretical normalized transformation matrix reported in Fig. 2(c,d) are used for the calculation. This input signal is formed by 2 narrow peaks separated by the theoretical resolution (13.4 cm^{−1}), and with halfwidth at halfmaximum corresponding to half of the theoretical resolution (6.7 cm^{−1}). A broader signal with different levels is also considered on the right side of the spectrum, to check the behavior of the system with different power levels. The interferogram of the thermallytuned FTS is calculated using such input signal spectrum and then the pseudoinverse matrix method is used to retrieve the input signal spectrum. This retrieved spectrum is reported in Fig. 3(b,c). This method clearly shows the capability to retrieve the broad signals amplitudes, as well as to distinguish the narrow peaks separated by the spectral resolution, within a wavelength range as broad as 551 cm^{−1} and potentially up to 603 cm^{−1}. Interestingly there is almost no difference between the retrieved signals using the linear and nonlinear sampling of γ.
In the previous examples the temperature increase has been set to only one arm of the MZI (the shortest in this example). Nevertheless, it is also possible to apply a temperature increment to both arms (longest and shortest arm) in a coordinate way, potentially getting the same linear increase of the optical path, but with a maximum temperature to be achieved on the chip divided by 2, i.e. 27 K in this case.
Experimental results
In Fig. 4(a) we can see the characterization setup schematic, where a tunable pulsed Quantum Cascade Laser (QCL) is coupled in and out of the the sample by aspherical lenses in freespace configuration. The midIR laser has a monochromatic linewidth below 1 cm^{−1} by datasheet specifications, which means that measured resolution will not be affected by the laser linewidth. Then, the output signal is collected by a Mercury Cadmium Telluride (MCT) broadband detector (PD), being the output signal amplified by a lockin amplifier triggered with laser frequency (100 KHz). A midIR camera and a flipping mirror are used to ensure a correct coupling. In Fig. 4(b) the general overview of the tested sample structure is shown. The MZI array is based on a 4 μm width and 4 μm etching depth waveguides. A 1by2 MultiMode Interferometer (MMI) is used as splitter and combiner, as shown in Fig. 4(c). Gold contacts are placed next to the shortest MZI arm with two wide squared pads in order to facilitate the probe contact to induce thermal tuning (Fig. 4(d)).
The thermallytuned FTS has been evaluated experimentally using a 10 MZI array with an ΔL_{step} of 18.8 μm. The theoretical resolution and FSR of such 10 MZI array without any thermaltuning are 14.6 cm^{−1} and 74 cm^{−1} respectively. Heaters have been added in the shortest arm of each MZI. A maximum temperature variation of 3 K has been applied on each MZI, which is much smaller than \(\Delta {T}_{\max }=54\,K\) (deduced from Eq. (5)) to have a uniform sampling of the optical path delay. Moreover, due to technological issues the first 3 MZIs got damaged and are missing for this experiment. Thus, both the builtin phase variation in the MZI array and the temperature variation in each MZI create nonuniform sampling of the path delay.
Thermallytuned FTS proof of concept thus relies on a 7 MZIarray, with nonuniform optical path delay sampling, where ΔL increases uniformly from 56.4 μm to 169.2 μm with 18.8 μm increase. Interestingly, the flexibility and robustness of the thermallytuned FTS operation even with such nonuniform path delay sampling will be shown in the following.
As a first step, the transfer matrix is measured from 7.3 to 8.1 μm wavelength (135 cm^{−1}), with a 10 nm step and for \({N}_{T}=9\) points of temperature in each MZI, from ΔT = 0 to 3 K. Measurements have been done in TE polarization. The measured transmission matrix is plotted on Fig. 5.
Based on the measured transfer matrix, signal reconstruction method has thus been applied for a monochromatic input centered at different wavelengths and represented as a black arrow in Fig. 6. A gaussian apodization window has been used to reduce truncation ripples.
The performance enhancement of the signal retrieval using the temperature scanning of the optical paths is clearly seen in Fig. 6. First, without temperature scanning the FSR is 74 cm^{−1}, which is lower than the measured window spectral width. A repetition of the input signal is thus obtained symmetrically to the Littrow line. In comparison, the use of the thermal tuning allows an increase of the FSR up to 603 cm^{−1}, which is much larger than the measured window and the signal spectrum can be correctly retrieved for the different cases. Furthermore, the thermal tuning approach yields a substantial increase in the signaltonoise ratio, achieving a SNR of 7 dB. This improvement can be explained from the point of view of discrete Fourier transform and Parsival theorem. When a rectangular window is applied, as it is the case in our FTS, the expected frequencydomain squared power of a narrowband signal is proportional to the number of sampling points, while the square magnitude of the noise process remains constant^{39}. Our approach increases the number of sampling points of the optical path delay by a factor of N_{T} (9 in the reporting case), thereby increasing the signaltonoise ratio. Finally, the linewidth of the retrieved signal, and thus the resolution, without thermal tuning is degraded by the poor SNR. Then, the SNR enhancement in the thermal tuning case also lead to a linewidth reduction form 15 cm^{−1} to 5 cm^{−1}.
Discussion
It has been demonstrated in this work that it is possible to harness the thermooptic effect to enhance the performance of onchip FTS mainly improving the FSR. According to the NyquistShannon theorem, the FSR is inversely proportional to two times the sampling interval (γ_{step}). Here we propose to perform coarse sampling by MZI arm length unbalance and fine sampling by thermooptical tuning of the path delay. This way we can achieve ultrawideband retrieval capability, obviating the need of large number of MZIs. Interestingly, this effect can be used either to increase FTS performances or to reduce the number of MZI in the array to achieve given specifications, thus reducing the device footprint, or even both at the same time. With this approach it is thus possible to overcome or relax the scalability problem. Furthermore, since the method relies on a linear transformation which makes use of the pseudoinverse matrix to retrieve the input spectrum, it has been shown that nonuniform sampling of the optical path delay can be used, thus reducing the required temperature variation and total power consumption.
Here, a midIR onchip FTS with a resolution of 13.4 cm^{−1} was considered. The use of the thermal tuning allowed to increase the FSR up to 603 cm^{−1}. This corresponds to more than 4times enhancement of the FSR in comparison with the device reported by Q. Liu et al.^{21} with a reduction of the footprint by a factor of two, while keeping the theoretical resolution performance under 15 cm^{−1}. We also foresee the possibility of using more performing retrieval algorithms, like elastic net method to retrieve the input spectrum.
In conclusion, these results provide to the best of our knowledge, the first experimental demonstration of onchip MIR Gebased FTS exploiting both spatial heterodyning and temperature tuning. The device resolution and FSR can be seamlessly designed by either thermally tuning or by the choice of the number of Mach–Zehnder interferometers. The maximum temperature increase or number of MZIs needed in the SHFTS can be further improved taking profit of pseudoinverse retrieval or any other linear transformation method, and the resolution can also be enhanced by exploiting advanced numerical techniques, such as compressivesensing, developed for FTS working in the nearinfrared, at 1.55 μm wavelength^{25}. Finally, the onchip integration of sensing circuits with the FT spectrometer could pave the way for future demonstration of robust, highresolution, and costeffective multitarget spectrometers covering an ultrawideband of the fingerprint wavelength range.
Methods
Fabrication and characterization
The device fabrication has been carried out by electronic lithography and Inductively Coupled Plasma etching. This process was used to demonstrate a first approach of FTS in midIR regime up to 8.5 μm and was reported by Q. Liu et al.^{21}. Then, a set of electrodes has been placed in the MZI, next to its shortest arm. Gold electrodes have been deposited by liftoff process.
The chip characterization has been carried out in a free space setup, using a tunable external cavitybased QCL. The optical beam is coupled into and out of the chip by a pair of aspherical lenses. Even though the device can carry both polarizations, it has been characterized on TE polarization. To set the thermal tuning, a current source equipment has been placed in the setup and connected to the chip by a pair of DC probes. In order to retrieve the simulated input spectrum, the MoorePenrose inverse has been carried out in the pseudoinverse matrix method.
Thermal tuning
The thermal tuning was first characterized by measuring the transmission of each MZI as a function of the dissipated power in the heater. The transmission of a MZI with ΔL = 150.4 μm is reported in Fig. 7 as a function of the wavelength, for dissipated powers from 0 to 1.5 W. The dissipated power has been obtained by measuring the current applied on the device as function of the applied voltage. To achieve such thermal tuning, a 3.3 mmlong heater is placed next to the optical waveguide. The tracked phase variation centered at 7.9 μm and the temperature variation inside the MZI waveguide deduced from the measurements are both reported in Fig. 8(a,b). The thermooptic coefficient of the optical mode \(\frac{\partial {n}_{g}}{\partial T}\) is supposed to be equal to the thermooptic coefficient of Ge, assumed to be \(4.1\times {10}^{4}\,{K}^{1}\).
An average heater efficiency of 2 K/W is deduced from the slope of the curve. This is the first demonstration of an active tuning on the graded Gerich SiGe waveguide platform. The efficiency is quite low, but the sample design was not optimized to enhance heater performance. For example, the distance between the optical mode center and the metallic ribbon was set to 12 μm, as a conservative design to avoid any influence on optical losses in this first thermaltuning demonstration. Further improvement of the heater design is envisioned to enhance the heater efficiency. Interestingly, despite a moderate heater efficiency, it is possible to achieve πphase shift using a 3.3 mm heater length, as shown in Fig. 8(b).
Mathematical analysis
For simplification, the mathematical analysis will be developed for a N MZI array with 1by2 MMI as splitter and combiner, but the analysis can be further generalized using any kind of multiport splitting/combining device. The optical path delay difference (γ) in an asymmetric thermallytuned MZI can be written as in Eq. (6).
where ΔL is the MZI arm length difference, n_{eff} is the mode effective index, \(\Delta {n}_{eff,T}\) is the thermally induced effective index variation of the optical mode and L_{H} is the heater length (considering uniform temperature change along the heater length^{40}). The effective index variation obtained by thermal tuning depends on the thermooptic coefficient \((\frac{\partial {n}_{eff}}{\partial T})\) of the optical mode and on the temperature variation (ΔT) following:
The classical MZI array model can then be generalized to the thermallytuned FTS by substituting \({n}_{eff}(\lambda )\Delta L\) by γ. The main relations are reported below.
Assuming lossless, perfectly balanced 50:50 splitters and combiner, the output power spectrum of a MZI \({p}_{out}(\sigma ,\gamma )\) is given by Eq. (8), where \(\sigma ={\lambda }^{1}\) is the wavenumber, and \({p}_{in}(\sigma )\) is the input spectral power.
Considering a broadband photodetector with flat wavelength response, we can write the measured MZI output power as in Eq. (9), where P_{in} is the integrated input power at the MZI^{12}.
In the following, the measured output power of the MZI will be described by the interference term \(I(\gamma )\), which can be easily obtained from measured \({P}_{out}(\gamma )\) as \(I(\gamma )=2{P}_{out}(\gamma ){P}_{in}\). The measured interference term is related to the input power density by:
In practical implementation of thermallytuned FTS, the spatial interferogram is discretized at \(N={N}_{T}\times {N}_{L}\) equally spaced values of \({\gamma }_{k}\mathrm{(0}\le {\gamma }_{k}\le {\gamma }_{max})\), where N_{L} is the number of different MZI corresponding to different path lengths (from 0 to \({n}_{eff}\Delta L({N}_{L}1)\) and N_{T} is the number of measurements at different temperatures for each MZI. Similar to reported by Florjanczyk et al.^{12}, it can be shown that it is possible to retrieve the input spectrum \({p}_{in}(\widehat{\sigma })\) from the measured interferogram \(I({\gamma }_{k})\) using a discrete Fourier cosine transform (Eq. (11)). To simplify the notation, the values of \({\gamma }_{i,j}\) are set in a row of \({N}_{T}{N}_{L}\) elements (γ_{k}, k = 0, …, N_{T}N_{L} − 1), concatenating each MZI at different temperatures. Moreover, because of the periodicity of the FTS transfer function which is described by its free spectral range (FSR), the wavenumber is shifted according to the Littrow line as \(\widehat{\sigma }=\sigma {\sigma }_{L}\)^{12}.
The FTS performance is given by the signal retrieval resolution (δσ) and free spectral range (FSR). The FSR is related with the space between γ_{i} and the resolution by \({\gamma }_{max}\). Following a similar procedure reported by Florjanczyk et al.^{12}, δσ and \(FS{R}_{\sigma }\) (in wavenumber unit) of the thermallytuned FTS are given in Eqs (1) and (2), where \(\Delta {n}_{eff,T,max}\) is the maximal effective index variation induced by the heater and \(\Delta {L}_{max}=\Delta L({N}_{L}\mathrm{1)}\). Interestingly they can be compared with the ones of classical FTS given by Eqs (12) and (13).
Since the thermooptic coefficient can be considered constant with the wavelength^{24}, it can be noted that in previous equations the effective index variation respect to the wavelength remains constant with the temperature.
References
 1.
Michel, A. P. et al. LongPath Quantum Cascade Laser–Based Sensor for Methane Measurements. Journal of Atmos. and Oceanic Technology 33, 2373–2384 (2016).
 2.
Labadie, L. & Wallner, O. Midinfrared guided optics: a perspective for astronomical instruments. Optics Express 17, 1947–1962 (2009).
 3.
Chang, Y. C. et al. Cocaine detection by a midinfrared waveguide integrated with a microfluidic chip. Lab Chip 12, 3020–3023 (2012).
 4.
Reich, G. Nearinfrared spectroscopy and imaging: Basic principles and pharmaceutical applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 57, 1109–1143 (2005).
 5.
Rehman, S., Movasaghi, Z., Darr, J. A. & Rehman, I. U. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopic Analysis of Breast Cancer Tissues; Identifying Differences between Normal Breast, Invasive Ductal Carcinoma, and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast. Applied Spectroscopy Reviews 45, 355–368 (2010).
 6.
Depciuch, J. et al. Application of Raman Spectroscopy and Infrared Spectroscopy in the Identification of Breast Cancer. Applied Spectroscopy 70, 251–263 (2016).
 7.
Company. Thermo fisher scientific. Webpage: www.thermofisher.com.
 8.
Vasiliev, A. et al. Integrated SilicononInsulator Spectrometer With Single Pixel Readout for MidInfrared Spectroscopy. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 24, 1–7 (2018).
 9.
Kyotoku, B. B., Chen, L. & Lipson, M. Subnm resolution cavity enhanced microspectrometer. Optics Express 18, 102–107 (2010).
 10.
Roelkens, G. et al. MidIR heterogeneous silicon photonics. Proc. SPIE 8993, 899316 (2014).
 11.
Muneeb, M. et al. Demonstration of Silicononinsulator midinfrared spectrometers operating at 3.8 μm. Optics Express 21, 11659–11669 (2013).
 12.
Florjańczyk, M. et al. Multiaperture planar waveguide spectrometer formed by arrayed MachZehnder interferometers. Optics Express 15, 18176–18189 (2007).
 13.
Le Coarer, E. et al. Wavelengthscale stationarywave integrated Fouriertransform spectrometry. Nature Photonics 1, 473 (2007).
 14.
Velasco, A. V. et al. Highresolution Fouriertransform spectrometer chip with microphotonic silicon spiral waveguides. Optics Letters 38, 706–708 (2013).
 15.
Coutant, O., De Mengin, M. & Le Coarer, E. Fabry–Perot optical fiber strainmeter with an embeddable, lowpower interrogation system. Optica 2, 400–404 (2015).
 16.
Nedeljkovic, M. et al. Midinfrared silicononinsulator Fouriertransform spectrometer chip. IEEE Photon. Technology Letters 28, 528–531 (2016).
 17.
Nie, X., Ryckeboer, E., Roelkens, G. & Baets, R. Cmoscompatible broadband copropagative stationary Fourier transform spectrometer integrated on a silicon nitride photonics platform. Optics Express 25, A409–A418 (2017).
 18.
Souza, M. C., Grieco, A., Frateschi, N. C. & Fainman, Y. Fourier transform spectrometer on silicon with thermooptic nonlinearity and dispersion correction. Nature Communications 9, 665 (2018).
 19.
Zheng, S., Chen, Y., Cai, H., Gu, Y. & Liu, A. Highresolution and Largebandwidth Onchip Microring Resonator Cavityenhanced Fouriertransform Spectrometer. In CLEO: App. and Tech., ATh4O–2 (2018).
 20.
Kita, D. M. et al. Highperformance and scalable onchip digital Fourier transform spectroscopy. Nature. Communications 9, 4405 (2018).
 21.
Liu, Q. et al. Integrated broadband dualpolarization Gerich SiGe midinfrared Fouriertransform spectrometer. Optics Letters 43, 5021–5024 (2018).
 22.
Soref, R. A., De Leonardis, F., Passaro, V. M. N. & Fainman, Y. OnChip Digital FourierTransform Spectrometer Using a ThermoOptical Michelson Grating Interferometer. Journal of Lightwave Technology 36, 5160–5167 (2018).
 23.
Soref, R. A., De Leonardis, F. & Passaro, V. M. N. Scanning SpectrometeronaChip Using ThermoOptical SpikeFilters or VernierComb Filters. Journal of Lightwave Technologies 37, 3192–3200 (2019).
 24.
Frey, B. J., Leviton, D. B. & Madison, T. J. Temperaturedependent refractive index of silicon and germanium. Proc. SPIE 6273, 62732J (Orlando, FL, United States, 2006).
 25.
Podmore, H. et al. Demonstration of a compressivesensing Fouriertransform onchip spectrometer. Optics Letters 42, 1440–1443 (2017).
 26.
He, L. et al. Loss reduction of silicononinsulator waveguides for deep midinfrared applications. Optics Letters 42, 3454–3457 (2017).
 27.
Hansen, M. G. et al. Robust, frequencystable and accurate midIR laser spectrometer based on frequency comb metrology of quantum cascade lasers upconverted in orientationpatterned GaAs. Optics Express 21, 27043–27056 (2013).
 28.
Gilles, C., Orbe, L. J., Carpintero, G., Maisons, G. & Carras, M. Midinfrared wavelength multiplexer in InGaAs/InP waveguides using a Rowland circle grating. Optics Express 23, 20288–20296 (2015).
 29.
Lin, H. et al. Demonstration of highQ midinfrared chalcogenide glassonsilicon resonators. Optics Letters 38, 1470–1472 (2013).
 30.
GutierrezArroyo, A. et al. Optical characterization at 7.7 μm of an integrated platform based on chalcogenide waveguides for sensing applications in the midinfrared. Optics Express 24, 23109–23117 (2016).
 31.
Penadés, J. S. et al. Suspended silicon waveguides for longwave infrared wavelengths. Optics Letters 43, 795–798 (2018).
 32.
Malik, A. et al. GermaniumonSilicon MidInfrared Arrayed Waveguide Grating Multiplexers. IEEE Photon. Technology Letters 25, 1805–1808 (2013).
 33.
Malik, A. et al. GeonSi and GeonSOI thermooptic phase shifters for the midinfrared. Optics Express 22, 28479–28488 (2014).
 34.
Yang, M. et al. MidIR supercontinuum generated in lowdispersion GeonSi waveguides pumped by subps pulses. Optics Express 25, 16116–16122 (2017).
 35.
Sinobad, M. et al. Midinfrared octave spanning supercontinuum generation to 8.5 μm in silicongermanium waveguides. Optica 5, 360–366 (2018).
 36.
Barritault, P. et al. Design, fabrication and characterization of an AWG at 4.5 μm. Opt. Express 23, 26168–26181 (2015).
 37.
Brun, M. et al. Low loss SiGe graded index waveguides for midIR applications. Opt. Express 22, 508–518 (2014).
 38.
Ramirez, J. M. et al. Graded SiGe waveguides with broadband lowloss propagation in the mid infrared. Opt. Express 26, 870–877 (2018).
 39.
Harris, F. J. On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform. Proceedings of the IEEE 66, 51–83 (1978).
 40.
Lanlan, G., Jiang, W., Chen, X. & Chen, R. Thermooptically Tuned Photonic Crystal Waveguide SilicononInsulator Mach–Zehnder Interferometers. IEEE Photon. Technology Letters 19, 342–344 (2007).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 (No. 639107  INsPIRE). The fabrication of the device has been performed in the Platforme de MicroNanoTechnologie/C2N, which is partially funded by the “Conseil Général de l’Essone”. This work was partly supported by the french RENATECH network.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
M.M.B. developed the theoretical model and data analysis. J.F., A.B., E.T. and G.I. carried out the epitaxial growth. Q.L., V.V. and X.L.R. fabricated the structures. J.M.R. and M.M.B. performed the measurements. M.M.B., C.A.R., L.V. and D.M.M. discussed the results and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
MontesinosBallester, M., Liu, Q., Vakarin, V. et al. Onchip Fouriertransform spectrometer based on spatial heterodyning tuned by thermooptic effect. Sci Rep 9, 14633 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s4159801950947x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Further reading

Dual Tunable MZIs StationaryWave Integrated Fourier Transform Spectrum Detection
Sensors (2021)

Design and Simulation Investigation of Si3N4 Photonics Circuits for Wideband OnChip Optical Gas Sensing around 2 µm Optical Wavelength
Sensors (2021)

Tunable Optical Properties of 2D Materials and Their Applications
Advanced Optical Materials (2021)

Midinfrared supercontinuum generation in a lowloss germaniumonsilicon waveguide
APL Photonics (2021)

Modelling of a miniature midIR thermooptic spectrometer on chip based on a GaAs/In0.49Ga0.51P waveguide platform
Optics Communications (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.