Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics of Group B Streptococcus from Pregnant Women and Diseased Infants in Intrapartum Antibiotic Prophylaxis Era in Taiwan

Abstract

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is one of the most important pathogens for neonates. This study included 69 invasive GBS diseases in neonates, including 7 early-onset disease (EOD), 55 late-onset disease, and 7 very-late-onset disease from 2013 to 2017. A significant reduction of EOD after the deployment of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) in 2012 was observed. A previously-recognized hypervirulent clone GBS III ST17, accounting for 68% of the overall infections and 71% of the meningitis, was identified among the 69 cases. A novel GBS Ia ST890 emerged, becoming the fourth most common clone. Overall 96% of the invasive GBS infections were caused by serotypes Ia, Ib, and III. We collected 300 GBS isolates from vagina of the healthy pregnant women in 2014 and 2017. The serotype distribution of the maternal colonization isolates was VI (35%), III (21%), V (15%), Ib (13%) and Ia (11%) in 2014, and VI (32%), III (22%), V (16%), Ia (16%), and Ib (8%) in 2017. The most common sequence types were ST1 (32%), ST12 (22%), and ST23 (15%). Serotype diversity of maternal colonization strains did not change between 2014 and 2017. The study provides useful information in surveillance of GBS disease in the era of IAP.

Introduction

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) often colonizes the gastrointestinal and genital tract of 15–40% of pregnant women, and can cause GBS infection in neonates and young infants1,2. GBS infection in infants includes sepsis, pneumonia, meningitis, bacteraemia, or focal infections, and can translate to significant mortality3,4. GBS infections, according to timing, are further divided into early-onset (EOD; birth to 6 days), late-onset (LOD; 7 to 89 days), and very-late-onset disease (VLOD; older than 3 months of age). Although the implementation of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), the incidence of EOD declined from 1.8 to 0.24 cases per 1000 live births, whereas the incidence of LOD has remained between 0.3 and 0.4 per 1000 live births in the United States5. GBS infections remain a burden of neonatal sepsis worldwide that estimation of EOD incidence was 0.41 per 1000 live births, LOD incidence was 0.26, case fatality risk (CFR) was 8.4%6. In Taiwan, according to a previous cohort study involving 5 medical centres and 6 regional hospitals, maternal GBS colonisation was around 20%, and the mean incidence of GBS disease was 1.1 per 1000 live births. The CFR was 8.4% for EOD diseases and 3.8% for LOD7.

GBS based on capsular polysaccharide can be classified into 10 serotypes (Ia, Ib, and II through IX). The serotype distribution of GBS varies in different geographic regions. The overall GBS infections were most commonly caused by Ia, Ib, II, III, and V which accounted for more than 85% of the serotypes. In Taiwan, IAP was introduced in 2010 and GBS screening for all pregnant women was introduced in 2012. However, much remains unknown about the distribution of the serotypes and genotypes of maternal GBS colonisation isolates, and those of invasive GBS diseases isolates in infants in the era of IAP. This study was carried out to fill this information gap.

Results

Clinical manifestations of invasive GBS disease in infants

From January 2013 to June 2017, there were 68 infants with 69 episodes of invasive GBS diseases, and their clinical manifestations are shown in Table 1. Among these GBS infections, 7 (10%) were EOD, 55 (80%) were LOD, and 7 (10%) were VLOD. One infant got GBS sepsis at the age of 18 days and 32 days, respectively. Among 7 infants with EOD, three were premature infants with unknown maternal GBS status; another four full-term infants were born with negative maternal GBS screens. Interestingly, one mother had initially negative GBS carriage at 35-week pregnancy, but become positive after rechecking maternal GBS carriage because we found that her 38-week baby developed EOD at two days old. Among 7 infants that had VLOD, 4 infants were younger than 6 months of age. Comparing the EOD to LOD invasive GBS disease, although not statistically significant, there were more premature infants in the EOD group (42.9% vs. 14.5%, P = 0.099). Infants with EOD were more prone to develop respiratory failure (71.4% vs. 3.2%, P < 0.001), whereas infants with LOD invasive GBS disease were more prone to have fever (94.5% vs. 28.6%, P < 0.001). Only 42.9% of infants with EOD had leukocyte abnormality, and 28.6% had CRP elevations. Similarly, only 25.5% and 23.6% of infants with LOD had leukocyte abnormality and CRP elevation, respectively. Neither leukocyte abnormality nor elevation of CRP level on the initial hemogram test can be reliably used to identify invasive GBS diseases. Twelve infants developed meningitis, though only seven episodes of meningitis were culture-proven. Other 5 meningitis cases were judged based on positive GBS antigen and pleocytosis in cerebrospinal fluid analysis. Clinical characterizations of infants with and without meningitis were compared in Table 2. Infants who developed meningitis were more likely to manifest altered level of consciousness (66.7% vs. 33.9%, P = 0.018), seizure (50% vs. 24.6%, P < 0.001), and CRP elevation (91.7% vs. 45.6%, P = 0.004). Only one infant who developed early-onset GBS sepsis and meningitis (not culture-proved) died.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of invasive GBS infections.
Table 2 Clinical characteristics of invasive GBS infections with and without meningitis.

Serotypes of clinical isolates

The serotype distributions of invasive GBS infections are shown in Fig. 1. Among all GBS infections, GBS III (74%) was the most predominant clone, followed by Ia (15%), Ib (7%), VI (3%), and V (1%). According to the onset timing of the diseases, GBS III (57%) and Ib (43%) caused EOD, whereas GBS III (82%), Ia (15%), Ib (2%), and V (2%) accounted for LOD, and GBS III (29%), Ia (29%), VI (29%), and Ib (14%) contributed to VLOD. The molecular characteristics of invasive GBS diseases are summarized in Table 3 and Supplementary Fig. S1. The most common sequence types were ST17 (68%), ST23 (9%), and ST12 (7%). A hyper-virulent clone, GBS III ST17, accounted for 68% of the invasive GBS infections. Next, GBS Ia ST23 and GBS Ib ST12, each accounted for 7% of GBS infections. A novel clone GBS Ia ST890 emerged as the fourth common pathogen and caused 4% of the invasive GBS diseases. Notably, the two genotypes of LOD invasive isolates were not identified in maternal GBS colonisation. One was GBS III ST578, and the other was allelic profile identified from GBS III (new 3) which was not registered before. In clinical manifestations, five of seven (71%) culture-proved meningitis cases were caused by GBS III ST17, one was by GBS III ST19, and the other was by GBS Ia ST23. Furthermore, the infant who had GBS infections at 18 days and 32 days of age showed GBS III ST17, and the infant who died was infected with GBS Ib ST12.

Figure 1
figure1

Serotype distribution of invasive GBS isolates in infants. The colors representing different serotypes are shown on the right-side color scheme, and the numbers in the color bar represent the percentage of serotypes for the disease shown at the bottom. EOD: early-onset disease, LOD: late-onset disease, VLOD: very-late-onset disease.

Table 3 Microbiological characteristics of invasive GBS isolates in infants and colonizing GBS isolates in pregnant women.

Maternal GBS colonization

The molecular characteristics of maternal GBS colonisation is shown in Fig. 2 and Table 3. In 2014, the five most common colonizing GBS clones in pregnant women were VI (53/150, 35%), III (32/150, 21%), V (22/150, 15%), Ib (20/150, 13%), and Ia (16/150, 11%). In 2017, the leading colonizing GBS clone in pregnant women was VI (48/150, 32%), followed by III (33/150, 22%), V (24/150, 16%), Ia (24/150, 16%), and Ib (12/150, 8%). There was no notable variation in serotype distributions between 2014 and 2017. Unlike invasive GBS strains in infants, the colonized strains in pregnant women had more genetic diversity, and the most common sequence types were ST1 (32%), ST12 (22%), and ST23 (15%). Two allelic profiles identified from GBS VI (new 1) and GBS III (new 2) were not registered before. There was no difference in genotype distribution between 2014 and 2017.

Figure 2
figure2

Serotype distribution of GBS strains colonizing in pregnant women. (A) GBS isolated from 150 pregnant women in 2014; and (B) GBS isolated from 150 pregnant women in 2017.

Discussion

In our study, only 7 (10%) GBS disease belonged to EOD in the era of IAP in Taiwan. This is compatible to the result from a recent cohort study in Taiwan, showing that after screening of 9,535 pregnant women and their live born neonates from 2011 to 2016, the incidence rate of EOD declined from 2.8 cases per 1000 live births (%) to nearly zero in 2016, but the LOD incidence rate remained approximately 0.7% before and after the maternal GBS screening8. Notably, 17.4% of all GBS diseases, including 42.9% of EOD, 14.5% of LOD and 14.3% of VLOD, were contributed by prematurity birth. Because GBS screening of pregnant women was performed between 35–37 weeks of gestation, prematurity has become a significant risk factor to develop EOD with an OR 4.22 (95% CI 2.04–8.73) in Taiwan8. Indeed, in a nationwide surveillance by the Centers for Disease Control of and Prevention of United States from 2005 to 2014, incidence of GBS EOD was an order of magnitude higher among infants <1500 g or infants <34 weeks of gestational age compared with infants born at term9.

Early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis is extremely challenging due to the lack of accurate biomarkers, nonspecific signs and symptoms, and involvement of all organs and systems10,11,12,13. We found that infants with EOD are prone to develop respiratory failure requiring intubation and ventilator support. Unlike 94.5% infants with LOD GBS infections that presented with fever, less than 30% of the infants with EOD had fever. These clinical features are similar to those of previous large cohort studies7,8. In another large cohort study on 389 infants with EOD from the National Institutes of Health in the U.S., 310 (80%) infants were symptomatic, and 297 (76%) infants had respiratory distress14. Moreover, we found that the white blood cell count and CRP level were not reliable biomarkers for invasive GBS infections for both EOD and LOD. These clinical and laboratory characters made it hard to early differentiate neonatal sepsis from other systemic illness. Highly alert for high risk infants and early intervention is still crucial to prevent neonatal sepsis. On the other hand, infants with sepsis who had CRP elevation, as well as altered level of consciousness, and seizures, should raise a suspicion for meningitis.

In Taiwan, few studies reported serotype distributions of invasive GBS disease in infants. A small study enrolled 54 children with GBS disease in southern Taiwan from 1991 to 2002, wherein serotypes were screened for 34 isolates (3 isolates of EOD, 18 isolates of LOD, and 13 isolates of VLOD), and GBS III emerged as the most common serotype accounting for 56% of the isolates15. One recent study included 8 colonizing isolates and 126 (17 from young infants) invasive isolates in central Taiwan from 2007 to 2010, GBS VI was the leading cause of EOD, and GBS III was more found in LOD infants16. In our recent study, GBS Ia and GBS III were the most predominant clones of EOD before the era of IAP17. However, in this study, EOD was caused by GBS III (57%) and GBS Ib (43%). The GBS III, Ia, and Ib accounted for 96% of invasive GBS infections. The contribution of GBS Ia, Ib and III in Taiwan was higher than the worldwide average, but similar to that in Japan. According to one meta-analysis of serotype prevalence including 6500 bacterial isolates, the worldwide serotype distribution was GBS III (61.5%), Ia (19.1%), Ib (5.7%), V (6.7%), II (3.9%) and IV (1.1%)6. In a nationwide surveillance study from 2011 to 2015 in Japan, 132 isolates from 445 infants with invasive GBS infections were serotyped, and GBS III (63, 48%), Ia (48, 36%), and Ib (13, 10%) were responsible for 94% of the pathogens determined18. This suggests that a trivalent GBS vaccine targeting Ia, Ib, and III will have a good cost-benefit ratio and could prevent 96% of invasive GBS diseases in Taiwan.

In our study, a hyper-virulent clone GBS III ST17, accounted for 68% of invasive GBS diseases and 71% of culture-proven meningitis. However, it only accounted for 7% of maternal GBS colonisation. Previous MLST studies have identified a hyper-virulent GBS clonal complex 17 (CC17)19, exclusively comprised of ST17 and ST291. ST17 differs from ST291 by a single nucleotide polymorphism in pheS, one of the seven housekeeping genes used for sequence typing; however, the remaining six loci are the same in the two STs. ST17 belonging to serotype GBS III has been reported to cause both EOD and LOD, including neonatal meningitis, while ST291 belonging to serotype GBS IV is strongly associated with EOD, arthritis and septicemia19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26. Recent studies also reveal the increasing frequency of GBS IV and a novel GBS IV clone defined by CC17 hyper-virulent lineage in Taiwan (2010), France (2012), United States (2013), and Portugal (2014)19,26,27,28. There are few reports on the MLST of GBS in Taiwan. Tien et al. collected fifty isolates of invasive GBS from 2001 to 2004 and analysed them by MLST and found that the most invasive clones in adults belonging to ST1 (CC1) and serotype V, and those in infants belonged to ST17 (CC17) and serotype III26. This is the first study on the MLST of invasive GBS isolates in Taiwan. Our study showing a low rate of maternal colonization but high invasive diseases reflects high transmission ability and the hyper-virulence of ST17. Another report from Portugal also indicated that GBS Ia ST23 or ST24 have enhanced potential for invasive diseases, especially EOD23. In our study, GBS Ia ST23 and GBS Ib ST12 were the second most common pathogens, and each contributed to 7% of the invasive GBS diseases.

There has no information about the serotype distribution of maternal GBS colonisation in Taiwan before. Previous studies reported that the rate of maternal GBS colonisation was not changed and was kept around 20% in the past decade in Taiwan7,8,13,29. However, high maternal GBS colonization with GBS VI as the most common serotype in Taiwan is quite different from that observed in the other Western Pacific countries. Maternal GBS colonisation was around 8% in Korea with GBS III (43.8%) being the most prevalent clone, and 8.2% in Japan with GBS VIII (27–36%) being the most prevalent clone30,31. In China, the maternal GBS colonisation rate varied from 7.1% in Beijing, 8.2% in Dongguan, 21.8% in Hong Kong, and 32.2% in Dongying; GBS III was the predominant serotype32,33,34. In Malaysia, the predominant colonizing GBS serotype was GBS VI (30%, including non-pregnant adults)35. In India, the rate of GBS colonisation was 15%, where GBS III (22.2%), II (20%), and V (20%) were the most common36. In Europe, the maternal GBS colonisation rate varied from 6.5% to 36%, whereas GBS III was predominant, ranging from 24% to 33.2%37. In the U.S., the maternal colonisation rate was estimated to be 26%, with the most frequent serotypes being Ia (26.3%) and III (21.4%)38. Regarding genotypes, previous studies reported that GBS VI ST1 has emerged as a significant pathogen for adults in Taiwan11,39,40. In our study, GBS Ib ST12 (22%) was the most common colonizing clone, followed by GBS VI ST1 (17%), and GBS V ST1 (15%). There was no significant change in maternal serotype distribution between 2014 and 2017 in Taiwan. Notably, GBS VI (ST1) and GBS V (ST1) were rarely found in invasive infections of infants, suggesting that the two clones are less virulent. In our study, GBS VI ST1 (3%) and GBS V ST1 (1%) were found in invasive GBS isolates in infants. Higher genetic diversity of colonizing GBS with different serotypes and genetic characteristics from clinical isolates implies that some colonizing strains with specific characteristics may be less likely to be eradicated by IAP, more adapted to transmission, and thus more pathogenic to newborn infants.

There are two limitations in this study. First, the clinical information was collected retrospectively, and the case number of EOD was small. Second, GBS strains colonizing pregnant women were only randomly selected and examined in 2014 and 2017. However, no great variation of serotypes and genotypes were found in the two groups of isolates, as such we believe that the results remained representative of serotype distribution in the era of IAP in the pregnant women.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that the distribution of serotypes of maternal GBS colonisation strains did not change between 2014 and 2017 in the era of nationwide GBS screening and IAP. GBS VI was the predominant serotype colonizing in pregnant women. However, GBS III ST17, a hyper-virulent clone, was the predominant serotype for both EOD and LOD in infants. A protein or trivalent polysaccharide conjugate vaccine targeting serotypes Ia, Ib, and III might thus protect over 90% cases of invasive GBS disease in Taiwan according to this investigation.

Methods

Patients and bacterial isolates

From January 2013 to June 2017, we collected 69 invasive GBS isolates from the blood of infants with invasive GBS diseases. To compare the colonizing GBS isolates, we also collected 300 GBS isolates from pregnant women at gestational age 35–37 weeks using vaginal swab in 2014 and in 2017. GBS strains were isolated in a selective BBL Lim Broth (Becton, Dickinson and Company, MD, USA) containing Columbia colistin-nalidixic acid to exclude Gram-negative bacteria, followed by GBS identification using microbial MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry system (Bruker Daltonics, Germany)41. The capsular types and genotypes of GBS isolates were identified using a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST), respectively. The clinical manifestations of GBS diseases were reviewed retrospectively. Respiratory failure was defined as the need for intubation and ventilator support. Leukocyte abnormality was defined as white blood cell counts less than 4,000 cells or above 20,000 cells per microliter of blood. C-reactive protein (CRP) elevation was defined as serum CRP levels more than 20 mg/L. Only the first hemogram study was recorded. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (approval numbers: 201507336B0, 201509360B0 and 201601198A3). The informed consent was obtained from all participants, including children under 18 years of age from their parents and/or legal guardians in accordance with the guidelines of the Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs.

Multiplex polymerase chain reaction

A multiplex PCR assay for identifying serotypes Ia to IX of Streptococcus agalactiae developed by Imperi et al. was conducted42. Using a single PCR containing a mixture of 19 primer sets, the assay was used to determine GBS serotypes with the analysis of unique two- or three-band patterns on an agarose gel.

Multilocus sequence typing

Seven housekeeping genes are used for genotyping GBS using the MLST scheme, including adhP (alcohol dehydrogenase gbs0054), pheS (phenylalanyl transfer RNA synthetase), atr (amino-acid transporter protein gbs0538), glnA (glutamine synthetase), sdhA (L-serine dehydratase gbs2015), glcK (glucose kinase gbs0518), and tkt (transketolase gbs0268). An online database (http://pubmlst.org/sagalactiae/)43 is available for assigning allele numbers and sequence types (ST). The eBURST program can be used to group isolates into clonal complexes (CCs), the members of which share at least six of seven MLST loci; otherwise, an ST can be considered a singleton44.

Statistical analysis

All data were recorded and entered into a database. Analyses were performed using SPSS software, v. 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A Student’s t-test, Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, or ANOVA was used when appropriate to compare proportions. All statistical analyses were two-sided, and significance was set at P < 0.05.

References

  1. 1.

    Baker, C. J. & Barrett, F. F. Transmission of group B streptococci among parturient women and their neonates. J. Pediatr. 83, 919–925 (1973).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Schrag, S., Gorwitz, R., Fultz-Butts, K. & Schuchat, A. Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease. Revised guidelines from CDC. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 51, 1–22 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Phares, C. R. et al. Epidemiology of invasive group B streptococcal disease in the United States, 1999-2005. JAMA. 299, 2056–2065 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Berardi, A. et al. Group B Streptococcus late-onset disease: 2003-2010. Pediatrics 131, e361–368, https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-1231 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Verani, J. R., McGee, L. & Schrag, S. J. & Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease–revised guidelines from CDC, 2010. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 59, 1–36 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Madrid, L. et al. Infant group B streptococcal disease incidence and serotypes worldwide: systematic review and meta-analyses. Clin. Infect. Dis. 65, S160–S172, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix656 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Yu, H. W. et al. Group B streptococcal infection in Taiwan: maternal colonization and neonatal infection. Pediatr. Neonatol. 52, 190–195 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cho, C. Y. et al. Group B Streptococcal infection in neonates and colonization in pregnant women: An epidemiological retrospective analysis. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 52, 265–272, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2017.08.004 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Schrag, S. J. et al. Epidemiology of invasive early-onset neonatal sepsis, 2005 to 2014. Pediatrics 138 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hedegaard, S. S., Wisborg, K. & Hvas, A. M. Diagnostic utility of biomarkers for neonatal sepsis–a systematic review. Infect. Dis. (Lond.) 47, 117–124, https://doi.org/10.3109/00365548.2014.971053 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Diaz, M. G. et al. Lack of accuracy of biomarkers and physical examination to detect bacterial infection in febrile infants. Pediatr. Emerg. Care. 32, 664–668 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cortese, F. et al. Early and late infections in newborns: where do we stand? A review. Pediatr. Neonatol. 57, 265–273, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2015.09.007 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Camacho-Gonzalez, A., Spearman, P. W. & Stoll, B. J. Neonatal infectious diseases: evaluation of neonatal sepsis. Pediatr. Clin. North. Am. 60, 367–389, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2012.12.003 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Stoll, B. J. et al. Early onset neonatal sepsis: the burden of group B Streptococcal and E. coli disease continues. Pediatrics. 127, 817–826, https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2217 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wu, C. S. et al. Group B streptococcal infections in children in a tertiary care hospital in southern Taiwan. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 37, 169–175 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lin, H. C. et al. Clonal dissemination of invasive and colonizing clonal complex 1 of serotype VI group B Streptococcus in central Taiwan. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 49, 902–909, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2014.11.002 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lo, C. W. et al. Serotype distribution and clinical correlation of Streptococcus agalactiae causing invasive disease in infants and children in Taiwan. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2017.09.002 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Matsubara, K. et al. Group B streptococcal disease in infants in the first year of life: a nationwide surveillance study in Japan, 2011–2015. Infection. 45, 449–458, https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-017-0995-2 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bellais, S. et al. Capsular switching in group B Streptococcus CC17 hypervirulent clone: a future challenge for polysaccharide vaccine development. J infect dis. 206, 1745–1752, https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jis605 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tazi, A. et al. The surface protein HvgA mediates group B Streptococcus hypervirulence and meningeal tropism in neonates. J Exp Med. 207, 2313–2322, https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20092594 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Manning, S. D. et al. Multilocus sequence types associated with neonatal group B streptococcal sepsis and meningitis in Canada. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47, 1143–1148, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01424-08 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bohnsack, J. F. et al. Population structure of invasive and colonizing strains of Streptococcus agalactiae from neonates of six USAcademic Centers from 1995 to 1999. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46, 1285–1291, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02105-07 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Martins, E. R., Pessanha, M. A., Ramirez, M. & Melo-Cristino, J. Analysis of group B streptococcal isolates from infants and pregnant women in Portugal revealing two lineages with enhanced invasiveness. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45, 3224–3229 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lin, F. Y. et al. Phylogenetic lineages of invasive and colonizing strains of serotype III group B Streptococci from neonates: a multicenter prospective study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44, 1257–1261 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wang, P. et al. Serotype distribution, antimicrobial resistance, and molecular characterization of invasive group B Streptococcus isolates recovered from Chinese neonates. Internat. J. Infect. Dis. 37, 115–118, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2015.06.019 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tien, N. et al. Multilocus sequence typing of invasive group B Streptococcus in central area of Taiwan. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 44, 430–434, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2011.04.013 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ferrieri, P., Lynfield, R., Creti, R. & Flores, A. E. Serotype IV and invasive group B Streptococcus disease in neonates, Minnesota, USA, 2000-2010. Emerg. infect. dis. 19, 551–558, https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1904.121572 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Florindo, C. et al. Epidemiological surveillance of colonizing group B Streptococcus epidemiology in the Lisbon and Tagus Valley regions, Portugal (2005 to 2012): emergence of a new epidemic type IV/clonal complex 17 clone. Euro surveill. 19 (2014).

  29. 29.

    Lee, W. T. & Lai, M. C. High prevalence of Streptococcus agalactiae from vaginas of women in Taiwan and its mechanisms of macrolide and quinolone resistance. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 48, 510–516, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2014.03.002 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lee, B. K. et al. Epidemiology of group B Streptococcus in Korean pregnant women. Epidemiol. Infect. 138, 292–298, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268809990859 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Matsubara, K. et al. Seroepidemiologic studies of serotype VIII group B Streptococcus in Japan. J. Infect. Dis. 186, 855–858 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Lu, B. et al. Epidemiology of Group B Streptococcus isolated from pregnant women in Beijing, China. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 20, O370–373, https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12416 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ji, W. et al. Colonization prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility of Group B Streptococcus in pregnant women over a 6-year period in Dongguan, China. PloS One. 12, e0183083, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183083 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ma, T. W. et al. Prevention of early onset group B streptococcal disease by universal antenatal culture-based screening in all public hospitals in Hong Kong. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 31, 881–887, https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1300649 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Eskandarian, N. et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, serotype distribution and virulence determinants among invasive, non-invasive and colonizing Streptococcus agalactiae (group B Streptococcus) from Malaysian patients. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 34, 579–584, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-014-2265-x (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Chaudhary, M. et al. Group B Streptococcal Colonization Among Pregnant Women in Delhi, India. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 36, 665–669, https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000001514 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Barcaite, E. et al. Prevalence of maternal group B streptococcal colonisation in European countries. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 87, 260–271, https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340801908759 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Campbell, J. R. et al. Group B streptococcal colonization and serotype-specific immunity in pregnant women at delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 96, 498–503 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wang, Y. H. et al. Genetically diverse serotypes III and VI substitute major clonal disseminated serotypes Ib and V as prevalent serotypes of Streptococcus agalactiae from 2007 to 2012. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 49, 672–678, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2015.05.022 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lin, H. C. et al. Identification of a proteomic biomarker associated with invasive ST1, serotype VI Group B Streptococcus by MALDI-TOF MS. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 52, 81–89, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2017.11.007 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Binghuai, L. et al. Use of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for rapid identification of group B Streptococcus on chromID Strepto B agar. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 27, 44–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2014.06.023 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Imperi, M. et al. A multiplex PCR assay for the direct identification of the capsular type (Ia to IX) of Streptococcus agalactiae. J. Microbiol.Methods 80, 212–214, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2009.11.010 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Jolley, K. A. et al. BIGSdb: Scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 595, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-595 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Brzychczy-Wloch, M., Gosiewski, T. & Bulanda, M. Multilocus sequence types of invasive and colonizing neonatal group B streptococci in Poland. Med. Princ. Pract. 23, 323–330, https://doi.org/10.1159/000362368 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants CMRPG3J0211, CMRPG-3F1951, CRRPG3F0082-3, OMRPG3A0031 from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, and grants 105-2314-B-182A-027 and 106-2314-B-182A-093 from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.-C.L. and C.-H.C. conceived of the study, designed the study, received the funding, coordinated the study and drafted the manuscript; J.F.H., R.P.J., C.-L.C., Y.-L.Z. and R.L. participated in the design of the study, collected data from the literature, participated in data analysis, carried out the statistical analyses. All authors gave final approval for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng-Hsun Chiu.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, CC., Hsu, JF., Prasad Janapatla, R. et al. Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics of Group B Streptococcus from Pregnant Women and Diseased Infants in Intrapartum Antibiotic Prophylaxis Era in Taiwan. Sci Rep 9, 13525 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49977-2

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing