Recent increase in catastrophic tropical cyclone flooding in coastal North Carolina, USA: Long-term observations suggest a regime shift

Abstract

Coastal North Carolina, USA, has experienced three extreme tropical cyclone-driven flood events since 1999, causing catastrophic human impacts from flooding and leading to major alterations of water quality, biogeochemistry, and ecological conditions. The apparent increased frequency and magnitudes of such events led us to question whether this is just coincidence or whether we are witnessing a regime shift in tropical cyclone flooding and associated ecosystem impacts. Examination of continuous rainfall records for coastal NC since 1898 reveals a period of unprecedentedly high precipitation since the late-1990’s, and a trend toward increasingly high precipitation associated with tropical cyclones over the last 120 years. We posit that this trend, which is consistent with observations elsewhere, represents a recent regime shift with major ramifications for hydrology, carbon and nutrient cycling, water and habitat quality and resourcefulness of Mid-Atlantic and possibly other USA coastal regions.

Introduction

Since the late-1990’s, coastal North Carolina (NC), USA has been impacted by 36 tropical cyclones, with three recent storms resulting in 2-percent or less annual exceedance levels flood events in the NC coastal plain: At Kinston, NC, Hurricane Floyd (1999) was rated a 2-percent exceedance level flood1. Based on the rating scale used to assess flooding from Floyd, the most recent Hurricane Florence (2018) also resulted in a 2-percent annual exceedance level year flood1. Peak flow following Hurricane Matthew (2016) resulted in a 0.8-percent annual exceedance level flood in Kinston, NC2. This recent apparent increased frequency of extreme events has led us to question whether this is just a coincidence or whether it may reflect the predicted2,3 increased frequency of extreme precipitation in a warming climate4,5,6. In addition to their devastating societal and economic impacts, storms associated with this increased frequency are having major ramifications for carbon and nutrient cycling in coastal estuaries and thus represent “hot moments” in coastal biogeochemistry7. In fact, recent work shows that these extreme events caused unprecedented nutrient- and organic matter-laden freshwater discharges to nutrient-sensitive receiving coastal waters, including the USA’s 2nd largest estuarine complex and a key fishery and recreational resource, the Albemarle-Pamlico Sound (APS) (Fig. 1), which drains ~ 40% of North Carolina’s and 10% of Virginia’s coastal plain regions via 5 major rivers8,9.

Figure 1
figure1

NASA/USGS Landsat images of coastal North Carolina centered on the Neuse River Estuary and lower Pamlico Sound. Top figure shows the system prior to passage of Hurricane Florence on 15 September, 2018. Bottom image shows the same region after the storm, highlighting the export of colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM) from land into coastal waters. Image courtesy NASA and the US Geological Survey.

In order to quantitatively assess the hydrologic and biogeochemical impacts of the recent rise in these extreme events, we examined freshwater discharge, nutrient (focusing on the algal growth-limiting nutrient, nitrogen) and organic carbon inputs as well as water column salinity, pH and dissolved oxygen associated with tropical cyclones that impacted a key sub-estuary of the APS, the Neuse River Estuary (NRE), as well as western Pamlico Sound (PS), using a 25 year long space-time intensive water quality monitoring program, ModMon10. Results were evaluated in the context of a 120 year record of frequency and intensity of tropical cyclones and the rainfall each delivered to this region. Overall, our analysis indicates that; 1) we are experiencing a regime shift in the intensity and quantity of rainfall associated with these events, and 2) this shift has led to unprecedented large loads of nutrients and orgenic matter with major implications for biogeochemical cycling, primary production and overall water quality conditions in the receiving APS and adjacent coastal waters. Furthermore, our observations are consistent with similar observations elsewhere and with predicted hydrologic, nutrient and carbon flux changes taking place in a warming climate1,2,3,4,5,6.

Materials and Methods

Study site: neuse river estuary-pamlico sound (NRE-PS)

The NRE is the second largest tributary of APS in terms of freshwater discharge (Figs 1 and 2). Its watershed is comprised of managed forests and rapidly expanding animal and row-crop agricultural operations. Upstream, the Raleigh-Durham-Research Triangle area has experienced rapid population growth. Nutrient (nitrogen and phosphorus) inputs are dominated by non-point sources (80%) associated with these expanding human activities. This has led to accelerating eutrophication, including nuisance algal blooms, hypoxia, and food web changes11,12. Changes in the landscape fueling eutrophication are also reflected in organic matter loading to NRE13.

Figure 2
figure2

Locations of ModMon Neuse River Estuary and western Pamlico Sound sampling stations and the location of greater Pamlico Sound estuarine system in coastal North Carolina.

The receiving waters of the APS have a surface area of 5,335 km2 and drain five major watersheds (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Roanoke, Chowan, and Pasquotank Rivers). These watersheds cover an area ~80,000 km2, total freshwater discharge of 21 km3 yr−1, and drain about 40% of North Carolina’s and 10% of Virginia’s surface area. Because tidal exchange with the coastal Atlantic Ocean is restricted to three narrow inlets, the APS has a relatively long water residence time of ~1 yr14; this provides suspended algae (phytoplankton) and vascular plants ample time to assimilate nutrients, resulting in high productivity per unit nutrient input. These characteristics are key to the PS serving as a highly productive nursery, supporting ~80% of US mid-Atlantic commercial and recreationally caught finfish and shellfish species11. However, it also makes the system sensitive to nutrient-over enrichment, resultant eutrophication and nuisance algal blooms12,15. The long residence time also enables ample time for photochemical and/or microbial degradation of organic matter16.

Monitoring and sampling

Biogeochemical and water quality data were obtained from the long-term ModMon monitoring programs in the NRE and western PS10. ModMon is a collaborative University - State of North Carolina (NC-Dept. of Environmental Quality-DEQ), and UNC-Chapel Hill Institute of Marine Sciences (IMS) program (http://paerllab.web.unc.edu/projects/modmon/), initiated in 1994. Sampling consisted of twice monthly visits to 11 mid-river stations along the estuarine portion of NRE (Fig. 2), including vertical profiles with collections of near-surface and near-bottom water for physical-chemical-biological parameters. Monthly samples were also collected at nine stations in the western PS as part of the ModMon program starting in 2000 (Fig. 2). Profiles of temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen were made at 0.5 m depth intervals using YSI 6600 multi-parameter water quality sondes (Yellow Springs Inc, Yellow Springs, Ohio). Sondes were calibrated prior to each sampling trip according to the YSI User’s Manual.

Samples for nutrient and organic matter concentrations and phytoplankton biomass were collected along the ModMon transect in the NRE from 1994 through 2018, and in the western PS from 2000 through 2018. Water samples were collected at the surface (0.2 m depth) and bottom (0.5 m above bottom) using a non-destructive diaphragm pump, dispensed into 4 L polyethylene bottles, and returned for processing within 4 h of collection to the laboratory at the UNC-CH Institute of Marine Sciences, Morehead City (IMS).

Nutrient and carbon analyses

Nutrient measurements included: total dissolved nitrogen (TDN), nitrate plus nitrite (NOx = NO3 + NO2), ammonium (NH4+), soluble reactive phosphate (SRP), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), particulate organic carbon (POC), and particulate nitrogen (PN). Dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) was calculated as NO3 + NO2 + NH4+. Dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) was computed by difference as TDN – DIN. Details on sample preparation and processing are in17. Filtrates were analyzed for dissolved N forms and SRP with a Lachat/Zellweger Analytics QuickChem 8000 flow injection autoanalyzer using standard protocols (Lachat method numbers 31-107-04-1-C, 31-107-06-1-B, and 31-115-01-3-C, respectively)17. Particulate organic carbon (POC) and nitrogen (PON) were measured on seston collected on pre-combusted GF/F filters, analyzed by high-temperature combustion using a Costech ECS 4010 analyzer18. DIC and DOC were measured on a Shimadzu Total Organic Carbon Analyzer (TOC-5000A)19.

Phytoplankton biomass

Chlorophyll a (Chl-a) was measured for near-surface and near-bottom samples by filtering 50 mL of NRE water onto GF/F filters. Filters were frozen at −20 °C and subsequently extracted using a tissue grinder in 90% acetone17. Chl-a of extracts was measured using the non-acidification method of Welschmeyer20, on a Turner Designs Trilogy fluorometer calibrated with pure Chl-a standards (Turner Designs, Sunnyvale, CA).

Freshwater discharge, and material loading

Daily average Neuse River discharge was measured by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) at Fort Barnwell (USGS 02091814), and divided by 0.69 to account for ungaged downstream inputs17. Daily Neuse River loads of carbon and nutrient forms were estimated using Weighted Regressions on Time Discharge and Season (WRTDS)21,22, based on daily average discharge and concentrations measured by ModMon (or NC DEQ for total N and total P) at the head of the estuary (Fig. 2). Half-window widths of the tricube weight function for seasonality, time, and discharge were set to default values of 6 months, 7 years, and 2 natural log units, respectively21.

A long term record of precipitation events in the Neuse River basin at Kinston, NC was assembled from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Cooperative Observer Network sites 314684 (1 September 1899 to 15 June 2017) and site 314689 (15 June 2017 to 5 December 2018). Data from 1 May 1919 to 29 November 1923 were not available. Precipitation events were defined as daily precipitation greater than 4.85 cm, the 99th percentile of daily precipitation. Consecutive days of rainfall greater than 4.85 cm were considered the same event and assigned to the day the event began. Precipitation events were ascribed to tropical cyclones when a precipitation event was coincident with the passage of a tropical cyclone within 240 km (150 miles) of Kinston, NC as determined by 6 h storm advisories recorded in the National Hurricane Center’s HURDAT2 database. Quantile regressions were constructed for the 90th and 50th quantiles of cyclone related precipitation against time. 95% confidence intervals on slopes for the quantile regressions were determined by 1000 rounds of bootstrapping. A long term record (1 May 1930 to 8 December 2018) of high river flow events for the Neuse River was assembled from the USGS gage at Kinston, NC (USGS gage 02089500). High flow events were those during which the daily average flow was greater than 390 m3 s−1, the 99th percentile of daily average flow. Consecutive days of flow greater than 390 m3 s−1 were considered the same event and summed from the day the event began to determine the total event discharge. Discharge events were ascribed to tropical cyclones when a discharge event followed within a seven-day period the passage of a tropical cyclone within 240 km (150 miles) of Kinston, NC. Discharge was regulated by Falls Lake dam from 1982 to the present.

Results and Discussion

Extreme rainfall associated with recent tropical cyclones

A conservative estimate of the probability of receiving two 2-percent annual exceedance level floods and one 0.8-percent annual exceedance level flood in a span of two decades can be calculated, assuming independence of these events. The probabilities of these flow levels not being exceeded are 0.98 and 0.992. The probability of three such events occurring in a twenty-year period is

$${\rm{P}}=(1\,-\,{0.98}^{20})\,\ast \,(1\,-\,{0.98}^{20})\,\ast \,(1\,-\,{0.992}^{20})=0.016$$

With less than a 2% chance of three such events occurring in a twenty-year period23, either North Carolina has been very unlucky, or the historical record used to define the storm statistics is no longer representative of the present climatic regime. This analysis suggests that the occurrence of three extreme floods resulting from high rainfall tropical cyclone events in the past 20 years is a consequence of the increased moisture carrying capacity of tropical cyclones due to the warming climate4,6,24,25,26.

While we do not offer a full attribution analysis, which may be conducted in a variety of ways including numerical modeling that replicates the events27,28, our observations are consistent with observations elsewhere and with predicted changes in a warming climate2,3,4,5,6. Moreover, rather than attributing a particular event to global warming, we should consider whether a warming climate made these events more likely, which our records suggest is the case for coastal NC. For example, increased precipitation in other US coastal areas subject to tropical cyclones (e.g., coastal Texas from Hurricane Harvey in 2017)29,30,31 and increased hurricane activity since 197030 have been attributed to global warming. Factors potentially driving the increased precipitation include; (1) greater heat content of ocean waters, which not only fuels storm intensity but also increases precipitation29, (2) a decrease in tropical cyclone forward movement32 providing more opportunity for heavy precipitation over a particular area, (e.g. Harvey and Florence), (3) an observed poleward migration of tropical cyclones33, perhaps making coastal NC more vulnerable than in the past, and (4) an increase in tropical cyclone intensity in the satellite era34.

Fortunately, North Carolina has a well-kept continuous record of tropical cyclone landfalls and associated rainfall since 1898, which we investigated in order to further test the hypothesis that we have recently entered a regime shift of increased extreme rainfall and associated flooding. Three periods of elevated cyclone activity were noted; the first in the early 1900’s (~1910), then during the 1950’s and most recently since the mid-1990’s (Fig. 3A). However, six of the seven highest precipitation events, four of the six due to tropical cyclones, have occurred in the past 20 years. Both the median and 90% quantile of precipitation from cyclone-related extreme precipitation events have increased significantly over the past century (Fig. 3B), and a more rapid increase in the 90% quantile reflects the recent occurrence of those six very high precipitation events. In addition, these events have been accompanied by record freshwater discharge to the NRE (Fig. 3C). The rank of the total event discharge in Fig. 3 does not necessarily correspond to its rank in peak flow. For example, total event discharge following Hurricanes Floyd (1999) and Florence (2018) were significantly higher than following Hurricane Matthew (2018) which had the highest instantaneous peak flows and flood stage. Part of this result was due to continued heavy rainfall following hurricanes Floyd (including Hurricane Irene) and Florence, and following Florence was also due to retention and slow release of flood waters through Falls Lake dam upstream from the NRE.

Figure 3
figure3

(A) Time series of high precipitation events at Kinston, NC from 1899 to 2018. (B) 50th and 90th quantile regressions of cyclone related precipitation against time. 95% confidence intervals of slopes, m, shown in parentheses. (C) Total volumetric discharge for high flow events at Kinston, NC (USGS gage 02089500) from 1 May 1930 to 8 December 2018.

Biogeochemical and water quality impacts

The most recent extreme precipitation events each have delivered up to 100 cm of rainfall to coastal watersheds; often accounting for 30–45% of the average annual rainfall8. The floodwaters resulting from Hurricane Florence (~14 September, 2018) completely “freshened” the entire NRE, leaving only an oxygen poor salt wedge downstream at its mouth, near the entrance to Pamlico Sound (Fig. 4). The floodwaters contained extremely high loads of organic matter35, dominated by dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) as well as nutrients, specifically the growth-limiting nutrient nitrogen36, shown here as NOx, (Fig. 5). In addition to depressing salinity throughout the NRE, the floodwater nutrient load fueled phytoplankton production and subsequent algal blooms (as chlorophyll a), which were promoted after the flow rates (and hence flushing) decreased, enabling phytoplankton biomass to build up in the estuary (Fig. 6). Phytoplankton blooms and associated hypoxia often continued for days to weeks after a storm had passed.

Figure 4
figure4

Downstream and vertical gradients of key water quality parameters (salinity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, and turbidity) in the Neuse River Estuary, NC before and after Hurricane Florence, which made landfall on 14 September, 2018. The downstream transect covers from the historic upstream extent of salt water instrusion downstream to Pamlico Sound.

Figure 5
figure5

Time series of loads of major forms of organic carbon (Dissolved organic carbon-DOC) and nitrogen (NOx, Dissolved organic nitrogen-DON) to the Neuse River Estuary.

Figure 6
figure6

Time series of river flow at Streets Ferry Bridge and contour plots showing the time series of downstream distributions of salinity and chlorophyll a in the Neuse River Estuary.

Analysis of C:N content of the dissolved and particulate organic matter entering the NRE (Fig. 7) indicated that a vast proportion of the DOM have quite high C:N ratios (>20), consistent with terrigenously-derived sources that were evident from satellite images of the NC coast (Fig. 1). Degradation of this terrigenous DOM by a combination of sunlight and bacteria may have kept the Pamlico Sound as a net CO2 source to the atmosphere in the weeks following Hurricane Matthew35. In contrast, POM had C:N ratios <10 (Fig. 7), indicating authochtonous sources, most likely phytoplankton production, in this eutrophic estuary. Sustained primary production has the potential to modulate CO2 dynamics by creating a CO2 sink18,35.

Figure 7
figure7

Time series of molar C:N ratios for the dissolved and particulate organic matter fractions in surface waters of the Neuse River Estuary from 2016 to 2018. Each date shows data from down the entire estuary.

Thus, evidence is accumulating that we may also be seeing changes to the “system state” of coastal waters in terms of their ability to capture or release CO237,38. Such changes caused by an increased frequency of extreme storm events are ostensibly reorganizing coastal carbon cycles38. For example, flood waters reaching the inner shelf of the Gulf of Mexico have resulted in extensive degradation of terrestrial organic matter and the return of that carbon as CO2 to the atmosphere38. Further, the biogeochemistry of coastal waters is inextricably linked to their water quality9,15. Floodwater-associated nutrients have been shown to promote harmful algal blooms (HABs) in these systems39. Floodwaters contain contaminants and runoff from urban and agricultural land use13, and due to the high organic load, flood waters are often hypoxic when they enter an estuary, which was evident in the %DO values < 40% in the upper NRE following each storm (Fig. 4). Additionally, high freshwater inflows reduce vertical mixing and “trap” denser salt water causing extensive hypoxia in bottom waters extending throughout the estuary (Fig. 4). These hypoxic events can last weeks to months and provide the ingredients for massive finfish and shellfish kills, as well as an abrupt increase in fish disease36,40

Losses suffered by coastal communities from these events can be catastrophic. All of the aforementioned biogeochemical effects have severe economic and societal implications for fisheries, tourism, and real-estate, and have raised concerns about coastal resiliency and sustainability. In North Carolina alone, Hurricane Floyd in 1999 caused fisheries losses of US$6 million and overall economic (tourism, property and business damage and losses, agriculture and silviculture) amounted to US$2 billion41.

While the hydrologic, nutrient and carbon inputs attributable to Florence (Sept.–Nov. 2018) are yet to be fully tallied, the rainfall associated with this event was roughly equivalent to Matthew, in 2016. Like Floyd and Matthew, Florence’s floodwaters led to “freshening” and expanding hypoxic zones in the APS system (Fig. 4), as well as massive pulses of carbon overflowing from the APS into coastal waters, as viewed from space (Fig. 1), with effects that can linger for months after a storm35.

Conclusions

Considering these extreme precipitation events and their hydrologic and biogeochemical consequences in totality, it is clear that they are unparalleled in the past 120+ years of recorded tropical cyclones in coastal North Carolina (Fig. 3). The potential exists for receiving waters globally to undergo unprecedented perturbations to nutrient and carbon cycling, fisheries habitat and sustainability due to increasing frequency of extreme precipitation events; all of which are still to be determined. With roughly 40% of the world’s population within 100 km of the coast, development inland, as well as along the coastline, will exacerbate the perturbations caused by this type of regime shift42. We stress that stakeholders, state and federal governments need to better prepare for the acute as well as cumulative water quality, fisheries resource and overall socio-economic effects of this recently-documented rise in catastrophic flooding associated with elevated tropical storm activity.

References

  1. 1.

    Weaver, J. C., Feaster, T. D. & Gotvald, A. J. Magnitude and frequency of rural floods in the Southeastern United States, through 2006—Volume 2, North Carolina: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5158, 111 p. (2009).

  2. 2.

    Musser, J. M., Watson, K. M. & Gotvald, A. J. Characterization of peak streamflows and flood inundation at selected areas in North Carolina following Hurricane Matthew, October 2016. United States Geological Survey. Open-File Report 2017–1047. Version 2.0, August 2017. 24 pp. (2017).

  3. 3.

    Easterling, D. R., Kunkel, K., Arnold, J., Knutson, T. & Wehner, M. F. Precipitation change in the United States. In: Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume I [Wuebbles, D. J., D. W. Fahey, K. A. Hibbard, D. J. Dokken, B. C. Stewart, T. K. Maycock (eds)]. Global Change Research Program, Washington, D. C., USA, pp. 207–230, https://doi.org/10.7930/J0H993CC (2017).

  4. 4.

    Kossin, J. P. et al. Extreme storms. In: Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume I [Wuebbles, D. J., D. W. Fahey, K. A. Hibbard, D. J. Dokken, B. C. Stewart, T. K. Maycock (eds)]. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, D. C., USA (2017).

  5. 5.

    Seneviratne, S. I., Nicholls, N., Easterling, D., Goodess, C. M. & others, Ch. 3: Changes in climate extremes and their impacts on the natural physical environment. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Field, C. D., Barros, V., Stocker, T. F., Dahe, Q. and others (Eds), Cambridge University Press, 109–230 (2012).

  6. 6.

    Wuebbles, D., Meehl, G., Hayhoe, K. & others. CMIP5 climate model analyses: Climate extremes in the United States. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 95, 571–583 (2014).

  7. 7.

    McClain, M. E. et al. Biogeochemical hot spots and hot moments at the interface of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Ecosystems 6, 301–312 (2003).

  8. 8.

    Bales, J. D. Effects of Hurricane Floyd inland flooding, September–October 1999, on tributaries to Pamlico Sound, North Carolina. Estuaries 26, 1319–1328 (2003).

  9. 9.

    Paerl, H. W. et al. Two decades of tropical cyclone impacts on North Carolina’s estuarine carbon, nutrient and phytoplankton dynamics: Implications for biogeochemical cycling and water quality in a stormier world. Biogeochemistry 141, 307–332 (2018).

  10. 10.

    Neuse River Estuary Modeling and Monitoring Program for the Neuse River Estuary, ModMon, http://paerllab.web.unc.edu/projects/modmon/. Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Institute of Marine Sciences, Morehead City, NC (2019).

  11. 11.

    Copeland, B. J. & Gray, J. Status and Trends Report of the Albemarle-Pamlico Estuary (ed. By Steel, J.), Albemarle-Pamlico Estuarine Study Report 90–01. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. (1991).

  12. 12.

    Paerl, H. W., Valdes, L. M., Joyner, A. R. & Winkelmann, V. Phytoplankton Indicators of Ecological Change in the Nutrient and Climatically-Impacted Neuse River-Pamlico Sound System, North Carolina. Ecological Applications 17, 88–101 (2007).

  13. 13.

    Osburn, C. L., Handsell, L. T., Peierls, B. L. & Paerl, H. W. Predicting Sources of Dissolved Organic Nitrogen to an Estuary from an Agro-Urban Coastal Watershed. Environmenatal Science & Technology 50, 8473–8484 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Pietrafesa, L. J. et al. The Physical Oceanography of Pamlico Sound. UNC Sea Grant Publication UNC-WP-86-5, 125pp. (1996).

  15. 15.

    Paerl, H. W. & Peierls, B. L. Ecological Responses of the Neuse River–Pamlico Sound Estuarine Continuum to a Period of Elevated Hurricane Activity: Impacts of Individual Storms and Longer Term Trends. American Fisheries Society Symposium 64, 101–116 (2008).

  16. 16.

    Moran, M. A., Sheldon, W. M. & Zepp, R. Carbon loss and optical property changes during long‐term photochemical and biological degradation of estuarine dissolved organic matter. Limnology and Oceanography 45, 1254–1264 (2000).

  17. 17.

    Peierls, B. L., Hall, N. S. & Paerl, H. W. Non-monotonic responses of phytoplankton biomass accumulation to hydrologic variability: a comparison of two coastal plain North Carolina estuaries. Estuaries and Coasts 35, 1376–1392 (2012).

  18. 18.

    Crosswell, J. R., Wetz, M. S., Hales, B. & Paerl, H. W. Air-water CO2 fluxes in the microtidal, seasonally-stratified Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina. Journal of Geophysical Research 117, C08017, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC007925 (2012).

  19. 19.

    Arar, E. J., Budde, W. L. & Behymer, T. D. Methods for the Determination of Chemical Substances in Marine and Environmental Matrices. EPA/600/R-97/072. National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, O. H. (1997).

  20. 20.

    Welschmeyer, N. A. Fluorometric analysis of chlorophyll a in the presence ofchlorophyll b and pheopigments. Limnology and Oceanography 39, 1985–1992 (1994).

  21. 21.

    Hirsch, R. M. & De Cicco, L. User guide to Exploration and Graphics for RivEr Trends (EGRET) and data Retrieval: R packages for hydrologic data. Tech. Rep. Techniques and Methods book 4, ch. A10, US Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/04/a10/ (2014).

  22. 22.

    Hirsch, R. M., Moyer, D. L. & Archfield, S. A. Weighted regressions on time, discharge, and season (WRTDS), With an application to Chesapeake Bay river inputs. Journal of the American Water Research Association 46, 857–880 (2010).

  23. 23.

    England, J. F. Jr. et al. Guidelines for determining flood flow frequency. Bulletin 17C: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 4, chap. B5, 148, https://doi.org/10.3133/tm4B5 (2018).

  24. 24.

    Allan, R. P. & Soden, B. J. Atmospheric warming and the amplification of precipitation extremes. Science 321, 1481–1484 (2008).

  25. 25.

    Asadieh, B. & Krakauer, N. Y. Global trends in extreme precipitation: climate models versus observations. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 19, 877–891 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Lehmann, J., Coumou, D. & Frieler, K. Increased record-breaking precipitation events under global warming. Climatic Change 132, 501–515 (2015).

  27. 27.

    Hulme, M. Attributing weather extremes to climate change. Progress in Physical Geography 38, 499–511, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133314538644 (2014).

  28. 28.

    National Academy of Sciences, Attribution of Extreme Weather Events in the Context of Climate Change. The National Academies Press, 186 pp. (2016).

  29. 29.

    Trenberth, K. E., Cheng, L., Jacobs, P., Zhang, Y. & Fasullo, J. Hurricane Harvey links to ocean heat content and climate change adaptation. Earth’s Future 6, 730–744, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF000825 (2018).

  30. 30.

    Emanuel, K. Assessing the present and future probability of Hurricane Harvey’s rainfall. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.171622114 (2017).

  31. 31.

    Risser, M. D. & Wehner, M. F. Attributable human-induced changes in the likelihood and magnitude of the observed extreme precipitation during Hurricane Harvey. Geophysical Research Letters 44(12), 457–12,464, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075888 (2017).

  32. 32.

    Kossin, J. P. A global slowdown of tropical-cyclone translation speed. Nature 558, 104–107, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0158-3 (2018).

  33. 33.

    Woollings, T., Gregory, J. M., Pinto, J. G., Reyers, M. & Brayshaw, T. Response of the North Atlantic storm track to climate change shaped by ocean atmosphere coupling. Nature Geosciences 5, 313–317, https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1438 (2012).

  34. 34.

    Kishtawal, C. M., Jaiswal, N., Singh, R. & Niyogi, D. Tropical cyclone intensification trends during the satellite era (1986 – 2010): Geophysical Research Letters 39 (L10810), https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051700 (2012).

  35. 35.

    Osburn, C. L., Rudolph, J. C., Paerl, H. W., Hounshell, A. G. & Van Dam, B. R. Lingering carbon cycle effects of Hurricane Matthew in North Carolina’s coastal waters. Journal of Geophysical Research. 46, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082014. (2019).

  36. 36.

    Paerl, H. W. et al. Ecological response to hurricane events in the Pamlico Sound System, NC and implications for assessment and management in a regime of increased frequency. Estuaries and Coasts 29, 1033–1045 (2006).

  37. 37.

    Bianchi, T. S. et al. Enhanced transfer of terrestrially derived carbon to the atmosphere in a flooding event. Geophysical Research Letters 40, 116–122 (2013).

  38. 38.

    Bauer, J. E. et al. The changing carbon cycle of the coastal ocean. Nature 504, 61 (2013).

  39. 39.

    Hall, N. S. et al. Environmental factors contributing to the development and demise of a toxic dinoflagellate (Karlodinium veneficum) bloom in a shallow, eutrophic, lagoonal estuary. Estuaries and Coasts 31, 402–418 (2008).

  40. 40.

    Adams, S. M., Greeley, M. S., Law, J. M., Noga, E. J. & Zelikoff, J. T. Application of multiple sublethal stress indicators to assess the health of fish in Pamlico Sound following extensive flooding. Estuaries 26, 1365–1382 (2003).

  41. 41.

    General Assembly of North Carolina, Extra Session 1999. Session Law 1999–463 and Extra Session House Bill 2. Raleigh, North Carolina (1999).

  42. 42.

    Neumann, B., Vafeidis, A. T., Zimmerman, J. & Nicholls, R. J. Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding–a global assessment. PLoS One, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118571 (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the assistance of T. Clerkin, J. Braddy, B. Abare, R. Sloup, students and technicians that participated in field and laboratory work supporting this publication. Rainfal data were obtained with the assistance of C. Davis and W. Robinson at the North Carolina Climate Office, NC State University, Raleigh, NC. This research was funded by US National Science Foundation Projects 0825466, 0812913, 1338606, 1705972, 1706009, The North Carolina Dept. of Environmental Quality and National Fish and Wildlife Federation (Project 53916: ModMon Program), the Lower Neuse Basin Association, NC Sea Grant and the UNC Water Resources Research Institute.

Author information

H.W.P., N.S.H., A.G.H., R.A.L., C.L.O. and J.B. wrote the main manuscript text and N.S.H., C.L.O., and K.L.R. contributed graphics.

Correspondence to Hans W. Paerl.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.