Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Bisphenol A Regulates Sodium Ramp Currents in Mouse Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons and Increases Nociception

Abstract

17β-Estradiol mediates the sensitivity to pain and is involved in sex differences in nociception. The widespread environmental disrupting chemical bisphenol A (BPA) has estrogenic activity, but its implications in pain are mostly unknown. Here we show that treatment of male mice with BPA (50 µg/kg/day) during 8 days, decreases the latency to pain behavior in response to heat, suggesting increased pain sensitivity. We demonstrate that incubation of dissociated dorsal root ganglia (DRG) nociceptors with 1 nM BPA increases the frequency of action potential firing. SCN9A encodes the voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.7, which is present in DRG nociceptors and is essential in pain signaling. Nav1.7 and other voltage-gated sodium channels in mouse DRG are considered threshold channels because they produce ramp currents, amplifying small depolarizations and enhancing electrical activity. BPA increased Nav-mediated ramp currents elicited with slow depolarizations. Experiments using pharmacological tools as well as DRG from ERβ−/− mice indicate that this BPA effect involves ERα and phosphoinositide 3-kinase. The mRNA expression and biophysical properties other than ramp currents of Nav channels, were unchanged by BPA. Our data suggest that BPA at environmentally relevant doses affects the ability to detect noxious stimuli and therefore should be considered when studying the etiology of pain conditions.

Introduction

Bisphenol A (BPA) is an endocrine-disrupting chemical that acts as a xenoestrogen, among other mechanisms of action1. BPA is produced in large quantities in the manufacture of polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins and it is released from common household materials, including polycarbonate plastics, the lining of food cans and thermal paper, which may explain why 93% of the U.S. population presented measurable amounts of BPA in their urine2. BPA exposure has been associated with several hormone-related diseases, including obesity and diabetes, female and male reproductive alterations, hormone-sensitive cancers, thyroid hormone level disruption and important alterations of the nervous system3.

One important effect of BPA on the nervous system, which remains poorly understood, is the alteration of pain sensation. Behavioral in vivo studies reported that male and female rats perinatally treated with 40 μg/kg/day BPA (an environmentally relevant dose orally administered) presented increased pain sensitivity or hyperalgesia4, indicating that nociceptive neurons may be altered. As reported in this previous study, BPA increased the frequency with which animals lick an area of the body injured by a formalin injection. This is probably a supraspinal-mediated response involving opioid circuits of the limbic system; however, a direct action of BPA on nociceptors could also be involved. In female rats, the ability of BPA to increase estradiol plasma levels in female rats could have contributed to the effects. In a multibehavioral in vivo model of migraine, treatment of adult ovariectomized rats with 500 μg/kg/day BPA (intraperitoneally administered) exacerbates migraine-like behavior, including locomotor activity, light and sound aversion and grooming (indicating facial allodynia). Importantly, alongside these symptoms of nociceptive hypersensitivity, trigeminal neurons showed an increased mRNA expression of estrogen receptors, extracellular signal–regulated kinases (ERK1/2) and Nav1.8 encoding Na+ channels5. However, 500 μg/kg/day of BPA intraperitoneally administered may not be considered an environmentally relevant dose6. As a conclusion, although BPA seems to be involved in altered nociception, no study has yet investigated the BPA effects on nociceptors in vitro at doses that are relevant to human exposure.

Numerous studies on both animals and humans have demonstrated that the natural hormone 17-β estradiol (E2) regulates pain sensitivity and plays a role in gender differences7. A series of studies have unveiled at least five molecular mechanisms involved in this E2 effect. Firstly, an increased glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor expression and phosphorylation in spinal neurons processing visceral nociception8. Secondly, regulation of P2X2-mediated peripheral pain by acting on estrogen receptors α (ERα) and GPR30 receptors expressed in primary afferent neurons through the cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-protein kinase A (PKA)-ERK1/2 intracellular pathway9. Thirdly, potentiation of acid-sensing ion channels in DRG neurons via an ERα and ERK1/2 signaling pathway10 Fourthly, upregulation of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) channels via E2-induced genomic and nongenomic mechanisms11 and fifthly, upregulated the expression of voltage-gated sodium channels Nav1.7, probably through ERα12. Therefore, given that E2 affects pain behavior, it is interesting to further characterize the actions of BPA, acting as a xenostrogen, on pain. Indeed previous results of our group have shown that BPA acts as a potent estrogen within the 1–100 nM range in excitable cells, e.g., pancreatic β-cells, via extranuclear estrogen receptors ERα and ERβ13,14. In pancreatic β-cells, BPA acts through extranuclear ERα and ERβ to modify the shape of action potentials as well as electrical activity which result from altered expression and biophysical properties of voltage-gated calcium-channels15. Other changes to ion channel activity have been observed in response to BPA, although normally using high doses within the 10–100 µM range16,17,18,19.

In the present study, we show that adult male mice treated with 50 μg/kg/day BPA for 8 days presented increased pain sensitivity to heat. To understand how BPA exacerbated pain sensation, we isolated DRG neurons and studied their electrical activity. We found that 1 nM BPA increased the frequency of action potential firing of DRG neurons in response to current injection by increasing the magnitude of Nav ramp currents. Furthermore, the natural hormone E2 (1 nM) increased the magnitude of ramp current to a similar extent. Nav1.7 sodium channels play a pivotal role in initiating action potentials in response to depolarization of sensory neurons by noxious stimuli20, and loss-of-function mutations of the underlying gene, SCN9A, provoke an inability to feel pain21. In contrast, gain-of-function mutations of SCN9A cause severe pain disorders such as inherited erythromelalgia and paroxysmal extreme pain disorder22. The effect of BPA on Nav ramp currents reported here was mediated by the activation of the estrogen receptor ERα in a pathway involving phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K).

Results

BPA treatment increases thermal nociception

To analyze if BPA had an action on pain sensitivity in vivo, we used adult mice treated with subcutaneous injection of either 50 µg/kg/day BPA or vehicle for 8 days. We observed that the latency to the onset of the pain response following exposure to a metallic hot plate at 50 °C decreased in BPA-treated animals (Fig. 1). One day post-treatment, the delay was 14.3 ± 1.1 s, n = 10 for BPA exposure, compared to 20.7 ± 2 s, n = 10 for controls (p < 0.05; Fig. 1). This BPA-induced reduction was maintained for 4 days after the end of the treatment (Fig. 1). It should be noted that the vehicle on its own caused a small reduction in the latency of the pain response, as previously reported, thus BPA exerted an action in addition to this effect23.

Figure 1
figure1

BPA treatment enhances the thermal nociception. Bar graphs showing the average latency of pain reflexes using the hot plate at a fixed temperature of 50 °C in control animals (black bars, n = 10) and animals treated with subdermal injection of BPA (50 µg/kg/day, blue bars, n = 10) for 8 days. Control animals were injected with the same volume of vehicle as the BPA group each day (100 μL of corn oil). Data are represented as the mean ± s.e.m (N = 20 animals). One-way ANOVA for repeated measures: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ns, not significant. (1 day post: p = 0.046; 4 day post: p = 0.007; 7 day post: p = 0.073; 10 day post: p = 0.27).

BPA increases excitability in dorsal root ganglion neurons

To study whether BPA directly affects sensory neurons, we performed current-clamp studies in small-diameter DRG neurons (<30 μm) incubated with 1 nM BPA or vehicle for 24–48 h. BPA had no significant effect on input membrane resistance, input membrane capacitance or action potential amplitude (control, 987 ± 111 MΩ, n = 26 vs BPA, 838 ± 81 MΩ, n = 21; control, 12.0 ± 0.6 pF, n = 26 vs BPA, 11.1 ± 1.1 pF, n = 21; control, 107.3 ± 3.1 mV, n = 26 vs BPA, 97.8 ± 3.8 mV, n = 21, respectively). In contrast, the resting membrane potential of neurons exposed to BPA was depolarized by 5 mV (control, −56.5 ± 1.5 mV, n = 26 vs BPA, −51.5 ± 1.8 mV, n = 21; *p < 0.05). We therefore measured the threshold current required to elicit an action potential using a series of 1 s duration current injections, increasing in final amplitude by 10 pA between each successive stimulus. Representative responses of control and BPA-treated neurons to different current inputs are illustrated in Fig. 2A–F. There was a marked reduction of approximately 38% of the current threshold for single action potential generation in BPA-treated neurons (control, 52.7 ± 6.3 pA, n = 26 vs BPA, 20.0 ± 3.7 pA, n = 21; ***p < 0.0001; Fig. 2G). In addition, although the frequency of action potential firing at the threshold current was similar in both groups (control, 1.16 ± 0.07 Hz, n = 26 vs BPA, 1.55 ± 0.27 Hz, n = 21; Fig. 2H), an injection of +80 pA elicited three times the number of action potentials in BPA compared to vehicle treated neurons (10.8 ± 1.8 Hz, n = 21 for BPA vs 3.2 ± 0.8 Hz, n = 26 for control; ***p < 0.001; Fig. 2I). Similar differences in the frequency of action potential firing were observed for a larger current injection (control, 4.1 ± 1.1 Hz, n = 26 vs BPA, 11.0 ± 1.8 Hz, n = 21; **p < 0.001; Fig. 2J).

Figure 2
figure2

BPA treatment increases excitability in DRG neurons. Representative voltage traces from small dorsal root ganglion neurons in current-clamp experiments in control conditions (A–C; black traces) and in the presence of 1 nM BPA for 24–48 h (D–F; blue traces) in response to different levels of current injection (threshold, +80 and +100 pA). (G) Bar graph showing the average current threshold (pA) for action potential firing in control (n = 26 cells, black bar) and in 1 nM BPA-treated neurons (n = 21 cells, blue bar). (H) Bar graph showing the average frequency of action potential firing (Hz) at current threshold injection in control (n = 26 cells, black bar) and in 1 nM BPA-treated neurons (n = 21 cells, blue bar). (I) Bar graph showing the average frequency of action potential firing (Hz) at +80 pA current injection in control (n = 26 cells, black bar) and in 1 nM BPA-treated neurons (n = 21 cells, blue bar). (J) Bar graph showing the average frequency of action potential firing (Hz) at +100 pA current injection in control (n = 26 cells, black bar) and in 1 nM BPA-treated neurons (n = 21 cells, blue bar) Data are represented as the mean ± s.e.m (N = 8 animals). Student’s t-test: **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ns, not significant. (G: p = 0.0001, t = 4.197, df = 45; H: p = 0.22, Mann-Whitney U = 211.0; I: p < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney U = 72.50; J: p = 0.001, t = 3.495, df = 41).

Nav1.7, Nav1.8 and Nav1.9 mRNA expression are unaffected by BPA

The Nav1.7 channel is expressed in the peripheral nervous system, is sensitive to tetrodotoxin (TTX)24,25 and plays a key role in initiating action potentials in nociceptive neurons26. In addition to Nav1.7, also Nav1.8 and Nav1.9 are expressed in peripheral neurons and have been linked to pain pathways27.

To examine whether Nav1.7, Nav1.8 and Nav1.9 expression in DRG neurons were affected by BPA, we measured their mRNA levels by quantitative RT-PCR in DRG neurons treated with 1 nM BPA or vehicle for 24–48 h. The results indicate that 24–48 h of 1 nM BPA treatment did not affect voltage-dependent sodium channel gene transcription (Fig. 3A–C).

Figure 3
figure3

BPA treatment does not affect the expression of sodium channels or the amplitude of TTX-sensitive or Nav1.8 currents in DRG neurons. (A–C) Bar graphs showing the relative expression of Scn9a (Nav1.7), Scn10a (Nav1.8) and Scn11a (Nav1.9), respectively (in control neurons (black bars) and BPA-treated neurons (blue bars). The mRNA expression of the sodium channels was analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR and was normalized by housekeeping gene Hprt. The results were obtained from three different preparations of dissociated DRG neurons from 6 male mice (experiments performed in duplicate). (D–F) Representative voltage-clamp current recordings showing TTX-sensitive plus Nav1.8 currents, Nav1.8 currents and TTX-sensitive currents, respectively. To obtain isolated TTX-sensitive currents, Nav1.8 currents were subtracted from TTX-sensitive plus Nav1.8 currents. See Methods section for a detailed explanation. Insets in the top of panels D and E show the voltage protocol used. Only the currents obtained with test pulses (−80 to +50 mV, 5 ms) are shown. Calibration bars in (D) apply to (E,F). (G,H) Representative relationship between sodium currents density (J, sodium currents normalized to cell size in pF) and the voltage of the test pulse in control (black circles) and 1 nM BPA-treated cells (blue circles) for TTX-sensitive and Nav1.8 currents, respectively. (I,J) Average peak current density in control cells (black bar; n = 18 cells) and 1 nM BPA-treated cells (blue bar; n = 16 cells) obtained from J-V relationships for TTX-sensitive and Nav1.8 currents, respectively. Data are represented as the mean ± s.e.m (N = 11 animals). Student’s t-test: ns, not significant. (A; p = 0.17, t = 1.448, df = 12. B; p = 0.13, t = 1.607 df = 12; C; p = 0.81, t = 0.244 df = 12).

In addition, we measured the mRNA levels of TRPA1 and TRPV1 in DRG neurons treated with 1 nM BPA, because these TRP channels mediate pain28. The expression of these TRP channels also remained unchanged by BPA treatment (Supplemental Fig. 1).

Amplitude of sodium currents is unaffected by BPA

To study whether BPA functionally affect Nav currents independently of transcriptional effects, we recorded voltage-gated sodium currents using the patch-clamp technique in the whole-cell configuration of small-diameter DRG neurons (<30 μm). Cell size was measured using average capacitance29 which was 14.6 ± 1.5 pF for vehicle (n = 18) and 13.8 ± 1.1 pF for BPA-treated group (n = 16). Based on their size, this group of neurons is preferentially nociceptive26,30,31. As mentioned above, sodium channels Nav1.7, Nav1.8 and Nav1.9 were expressed in peripheral neurons. To measure the amplitude of TTX-sensitive sodium currents, including a large amount of Nav1.7 current, but probably with some Nav1.6 current, we combined two electrophysiological protocols32. Briefly, an I–V curve family of TTX-sensitive and Nav1.8 (TTX-resistant) currents was recorded using a holding potential of −80 mV, which inactivates Nav1.9 channels33. Because some of the TTX-sensitive current is also inactivated at −80 mV, a long prepulse of 500 ms at a potential of −120 mV was applied to remove the fast inactivation of TTX-sensitive currents, yet maintaining Nav1.9 inactivation33. This produced an estimation of the total Na+ current produced by TTX-sensitive and Nav1.8 (Fig. 3D). To reveal the TTX-sensitive current in isolation, a family of currents was recorded using a prepulse of 500 ms to −50 mV, which inactivated the TTX-sensitive current while leaving the Nav1.8 current intact (Fig. 3E). Then, we subtracted Nav1.8 currents (Fig. 3E) from TTX-sensitive + Nav1.8 currents (Fig. 3D) to only visualize TTX-sensitive currents (Fig. 3F). When normalized sodium currents (pA/pF; JNa+) were represented vs voltage pulse, we observed no significant differences between BPA-treated and vehicle-treated DRG neurons, either for TTX-sensitive or Nav1.8 currents (Fig. 3G,H, respectively, representative J-V curves). The threshold activation voltage and the voltage of the peak current were not affected by BPA (Fig. 3G,H), nor was the average peak current densities of either the TTX-sensitive currents or Nav1.8 channels (Fig. 3I,J, respectively).

BPA increased the amplitude of Nav ramp currents

The biophysical properties of Nav1.7 make it well-suited for low frequency firing of nociceptive C-fibers because it produces rapidly activating and inactivating currents, yet displays a slow recovery from inactivation. It is of note that Nav1.7 is characterized by a slow closed-state inactivation, allowing the channel to produce a ramp current in response to small, slow depolarizations, such as the receptor potentials generated by the by the pain mediators prostaglandins, histamine, ATP and serotonin. The ramp current evoked with the receptor potential depolarizes the cell and increases the probability that the neuron will reach the threshold and fire action potentials26,34. Hence, we investigated whether 1 nM BPA directly affected the biophysical properties of Nav currents. Neither the fast inactivation nor the recovery from inactivation were affected by BPA (see Fig. 4A,B). However, 1 nM BPA increased the Nav ramp current in response to a ramp of 600 ms duration from −100 to +20 mV (Fig. 4C). The average ramp current measured at the peak increased from the control level of 1.76 ± 0.25% of Itrans, n = 18 to 4.46 ± 1.03% of Itrans, n = 16 for BPA; *p < 0.05; Fig. 4D). This effect was similar when the natural hormone 17β-estradiol was used at 1 nM instead of BPA (Fig. 4E).

Figure 4
figure4

BPA increases the amplitude of Nav ramp currents in DRG neurons. (A) Average relationship between normalized sodium currents (I/Imax) evoked with the test pulse (−10 mV, 5 ms) and the voltage of the prepulse (−140 to −10 mV, 500 ms) for the measurement of the steady-state fast inactivation in control (black circles, n = 18 cells) and 1 nM BPA-treated neurons (blue circles, n = 16 cells). Inset shows the entire voltage protocol (bottom) and the current recorded with the test pulse (−10 mV, 5 ms). (B) Average relationship between the recovery from inactivation of sodium currents induced by two identical voltage steps (−80 to −10 mV, 10 ms; measured as a percentage) and the time between these two pulses (∆t, in ms) in control (black circles, n = 18 cells) and 1 nM BPA-treated neurons (blue circles, n = 16 cells). Inset shows the voltage protocol (bottom) and the currents recorded with the two pulses when ∆t = 20 ms. (C) Representative recording showing the Nav ramp current in response to a voltage ramp of 600 ms duration from −100 to +20 mV in a control (black trace) and a 1 nM BPA-treated neuron (blue trace). (D) Bar graph showing the average Nav ramp currents in control (n = 18 cells, black bar) and 1 nM BPA-treated neurons (n = 16 cells, blue bar) for 24–48 h. (E) Bar graph showing the average Nav ramp currents in control (n = 5 cells, black bar) and 1 nM 17-β estradiol (E2) (n = 5 cells, green bar) for 24–48 h. Ramp currents in (C–E) are expressed as a percentage of the peak of the transient Nav current. Data are represented as the mean ± s.e.m (N = 5 animals, same animals employed in Fig. 3). (A,B) Student’s t-test: not significant for all points tested. Student’s t-test: *p < 0.05. (D; p = 0.01, t = 2.610, df = 32. E; p = 0.04, t = 2.57, df = 6).

BPA-increased Nav ramp currents involve estrogen receptor ERα

DRGs express estrogen receptors ERα and ERβ35. We sought to investigate whether they had a role in the action of BPA on Nav ramp currents. When DRG neurons were incubated with a specific agonist of ERα, propyl pyrazole triol (PPT, 1 nM), the ramp current was statistically increased (control, 2.18 ± 0.6% of Itrans, n = 5 vs PPT, 5.2 ± 1.07% of Itrans, n = 5; *p < 0.05; Fig. 5A). Furthermore, BPA had no effect of the ramp current in the presence of a specific antagonist of ERα, methyl-piperidino-pyrazole (MPP, 100 nM), (MPP, 2.62 ± 0.64% of Itrans, n = 8 vs MPP + BPA, 3.24 ± 0.85% of Itrans, n = 8; Fig. 5B). The incubation of DRG neurons with MPP alone had no effect on ramp currents (compare control in Fig. 5A with MPP alone in Fig. 5B). These experiments strongly suggest that ERα rather than ERβ is responsible for the effect of BPA on Nav ramp currents. The lack of contribution of ERβ was further supported by the lack of effect of a specific agonist of ERβ, diarylpropionitrile (DPN, 1 nM) on the ramp currents(control, 2.64 ± 1.2% of Itrans, n = 5 vs DPN, 2.44 ± 0.97% of Itrans, n = 5; Fig. 5C). Furthermore, 1 nM BPA in the presence of a specific antagonist of ERβ, phenyltrifluoromethyl pyrazolopyrimidine (PHTPP, 10 μM), increased ramp currents (PHTPP, 0.44 ± 0.13% of Itrans, n = 6 vs PHTPP + BPA, 2.45 ± 0.71% of Itrans, n = 13, *p < 0.05; Fig. 5D). As the Nav ramp current values in the presence of the PHTPP were considerably reduced in comparison to the ramp current values in the rest of the experiments, we wanted to further confirm the lack of participation of ERβ, and the contribution of ERα, in the effect of BPA on Nav ramp currents. To do this, we used DRG neurons from ERβ−/− mice. Incubation of DRG neurons from ERβ−/− male mice with 1 nM BPA increased the ramp current to a similar extent as in wild-type animals (control, 2.02 ± 0.71% of Itrans, n = 9 vs BPA, 7.43 ± 1.79% of Itrans, n = 9, *p < 0.01; Fig. 5E). Moreover, the ramp currents of DRG neurons from ERβ−/− male mice incubated with the vehicle (control in Fig. 5E) had similar ramp currents to vehicle-treated DRG neurons from wild-type animals (controls in Figs 4D, 5A,C).

Figure 5
figure5

BPA enhances ramp currents through ERα/PI3K signaling pathway. (A) Bar graph showing the average Nav ramp currents in control DRG neurons (n = 5 cells, black bar) and in the presence of the specific ERα agonist propyl pyrazole triol (PPT, 1 nM) (n = 5 cells, light gray bar). (B) Bar graph showing the average Nav ramp currents in the presence of the specific ERα antagonist methyl-piperidino-pyrazole (MPP, 100 nM) (n = 8 cells, black bar) and in the presence of MPP and 1 nM BPA (n = 8 cells, blue bar) in DRG neurons. (C) Bar graph showing the average Nav ramp currents in control (n = 5 cells, black bar) and in the presence of the specific ERβ agonist diarylpropionitrile (DPN, 1 nM) (n = 5 cells, dark-gray bar) in DRG neurons. (D) Bar graph showing the average Nav ramp currents in the presence of the specific ERβ antagonist phenyl trifluoromethyl pyrazolo pyrimidin (PHTPP, 10 μM) (n = 6 cells, black bar) and in the presence of PHTPP and 1 nM BPA (n = 13 cells, blue bar) in DRG neurons. (E) Bar graph showing the average Nav ramp currents in control (n = 9 cells, black bar) and in the presence of 1 nM BPA (n = 9 cells, blue bar) in DRG neurons from ERβ−/− mice. (F) Bar graph showing the average Nav ramp currents in control DRG neurons (n = 11 cells, black bar), in the presence of 1 nM BPA (n = 10 cells, blue bar), in the presence of 1 nM BPA and 100 nM wortmannin (n = 14 cells, gray bar), in the presence of 100 nM wortmannin alone (n = 12 cells, white bar), in the presence of 1 nM BPA and 10 µM PD98059 (n = 10 cells, blue bar) and in the presence of 10 µM PD98059 alone (n = 5 cells, pink bar) in DRG neurons. Ramp currents in all panels are expressed as a percentage of the peak of the transient Nav current. Data are represented as the mean ± s.e.m (N = 11 animals). Panels (A-E): Student’s t-test: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ns, not significant. (A; p = 0.02, t = 2.747, df = 8. B; p = 0.54, t = 0.62 df = 14; C; p = 0.88, t = 0.14 df = 8; D; p = 0.03, t = 2.27 df = 16; E; p = 0.005, t = 3.281 df = 15). Panel (F): one-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak; **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. (control vs 1 nM BPA: p = 0.003, t = 3.72; 1 nM BPA vs 1 nM BPA + 100 nM WORT: p = 0.02, t = 2.95; 1 nM BPA + 10 µM PD98059 vs 10 µM PD98059; p = 0.02, t = 2.92; control vs 10 µM PD98059: p = 0.50, t = 0.67; control vs 1 nM BPA + 10 µM PD98059; p = 0.02, t = 2.66).

Potentiation of Nav ramp currents by BPA involves phosphoinositide 3-kinase

ERα acts outside the nucleus through activation of PI3K and extracellular signal–regulated kinases (ERK1/2) signaling pathways, among others36,37,38. In pancreatic β-cells, ERα-mediated actions involved these two kinases15,39. To investigate whether PI3K plays a role in the potentiation of Nav ramp currents by BPA, we measured the ramp currents in DRG neurons incubated with 1 nM BPA in the presence or absence of the broad-spectrum PI3K inhibitor wortmannin (100 nM). We observed that the BPA-induced potentiation of the ramp currents was strongly reduced by wortmannin (control, 1.50 ± 0.49% of Itrans, n = 11 vs BPA, 4.16 ± 0.71% of Itrans, n = 10; **p < 0.01 and BPA vs wortmannin + BPA, 2.17 ± 0.36% of Itrans, n = 14; **p < 0.01; Fig. 5F), while wortmannin itself had no effect on the ramp currents (1.49 ± 0.34% of Itrans, n = 12, Fig. 5F). Furthermore, the effects of BPA on resting membrane potential and firing frequency (see above) were abolished in the presence of wortmannin (Supplemental Fig. 2). This result indicates that the potentiation of Nav ramp currents by BPA involves PI3K. ERK1/2 has also been observed to induce phosphorylation of Nav and modulation of its gating properties, thereby contributing to the regulation of DRG neuron excitability40. We therefore assessed the involvement of this cellular pathway in the action of BPA on Nav ramp currents. However, incubation of DRG neurons with the specific ERK1/2 inhibitor 2-(2-Amino-3-methoxyphenyl)-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one (PD98059, 10 μM) had no effect on the BPA-induced potentiation of the ramp currents (control, 2.02 ± 0.42% of Itrans, n = 9 vs PD98059 + BPA, 4.68 ± 0.96% of Itrans, n = 10; *p < 0.05; PD98059, 1.21 ± 0.33% of Itrans, n = 5 vs PD98059 + BPA, 4.68 ± 0.96% of Itrans, n = 10; *p < 0.05, Fig. 5F). It should be noted that PD98059 itself had no effect on the ramp currents (PD98059, 1.21 ± 0.33% of Itrans, n = 5 vs control, 2.02 ± 0.42% of Itrans, n = 9; ns, Fig. 5F).

Discussion

Exposure to bisphenol A, an endocrine-disrupting chemical, has been linked to several diseases, including disruption of the nervous system3. Evidence points to a role of BPA at environmentally relevant doses of 40 μg/kg/day in increasing the perception of noxious stimuli4 and under high exposures such as 5 mg/kg/day41 and 500 μg/kg/day5. The findings described here indicate that subcutaneous injection of BPA, at the tolerable daily intake recommended by the US EPA (50 µg/kg/day), increased the sensitivity to thermal pain in mice treated for eight days using the hot-plate test at a temperature of 50 °C. This exacerbated pain behavior may involve a direct action of BPA on sensory neurons or an effect on the central nervous system, or both. Our results using DRG neurons exposed in vitro to 1 nM BPA indicate that primary sensory neurons are indeed directly affected by BPA exposure, although we cannot rule out an effect on supraspinal neuronal circuits involved in pain processing, as reported elsewhere4. The fact that in the vehicle-treated group (control) a decrease in the latency to pain response was observed, suggests a habituation to the test, as observed previously23. Furthermore, in the days post-treatment that can be observed in Fig. 1 (days 1, 4, 7 and 10 post) no vehicle or BPA was injected to the animals, allowing for a full washout of the compound and confirming the interpretation that the augmented response to pain was dependent on BPA presence. It should be noted that the hot-plate test in the present study did not assess the pain threshold nor use other thermal pain tests, such as the tail-flick response or other assessments of nociceptive mechanical stimuli. Therefore, the fact that the in vivo effect of BPA was only assessed with the hot-plate test at a fixed temperature must be considered as a limitation of our study. More extensive future studies of such actions of BPA would be worthwhile to assess pain responses other than thermal pain.

A central observation in the present study is that a concentration of BPA typically found in human blood (1 nM)42,43 altered the slow closed-state inactivation voltage-gated Nav channels in cultured primary neurons. The consequence of this effect is to enhance ramp currents in response to small depolarizations and thereby action potential generation, a fundamental role of voltage-gated sodium channels in excitable cells. Genetic, structural and functional studies have shown that the Nav1.7 subunit is a major contributor to pain perception26. The fact that 1 nM BPA increases the Nav ramp currents in DRG neurons, including Nav1.7, implies that the amplification of weak stimuli to reach the threshold for firing action potentials is increased in the neurons bearing Nav channels. As a consequence, the excitability of these neurons is augmented, and then the transmission of the pain signal will be facilitated. This would mechanistically explain our results in in vivo experiments in which the thermal pain behavior was increased by BPA injection.

Regarding the rationale of BPA dosing levels, we have selected 50 μg/kg/day for in vivo experiment and 1 nM for in vitro experiments, as these doses are within the range of human exposure and employed in many studies13,42,44,45. We have recently published that BPA affects the electrical activity of the excitable pancreatic β–cell in a non-monotonic dose-response relationship, with 1 nM BPA being the most effective concentration15. In addition, in a previous paper of our group, we reported an effect of 1 nM BPA on ion channel gating in pancreatic β–cells from human islets14. For these reasons, we feel that the selected doses in the present study are appropriate for a first description of the molecular mechanisms of BPA action in pain signaling.

Although the current work is based upon murine studies, it should be noted that the pharmacokinetics of BPA is similar between mice and humans, with comparable serum-conjugated BPA levels over the 24 h period after BPA administration46. It could be argued that oral administration is a more relevant route of exposure to compare with human exposure, however previous work has shown that subcutaneous exposure represents a better means of ensuring a ratio of serum conjugated vs unconjugated BPA within the range observed in human studies6. Nevertheless, the correlation between BPA dose administered and average serum concentration achieved is not exempt from controversy and remains under study in our laboratory.

As outlined above, small DRG neurons express Nav1.8 and Nav1.9 in addition to Nav1.7. Although Nav1.8 produces most of the current underlying the depolarizing phase of action potential47, a contribution of Nav1.8 to ramp currents has also been reported48. However, this contribution of Nav1.8 occurs preferentially in human DRG neurons in comparison with rodent species48. Nav1.6 and Nav1.3 channels can also produce a response to slow ramplike stimuli49,50,51. However, Nav1.3 channels present a slow inward current separated by two peaks. The first one corresponds to the window current predicted by the overlap of the voltage-dependent activation with the fast inactivation and thus it occurs around −40 mV. The second peak occurs at more depolarized potentials (−20 mV) and it appears to be relatively insensitive to closed-state inactivation52. In our present study, only one peak of the ramp current is observed and occurs at −30 mV, ruling out a role for Nav1.3. In addition, Nav1.3 channels are expressed only in DRG neurons after nerve injury47. Nav1.6 is highly expressed in large DRG neurons while small DRG neurons express low mRNA levels of this sodium channel53. Moreover, the ramp currents generated by Nav1.6 channels are smaller than Nav1.7 ramp currents51. For these reasons, we believe that the effect of BPA on ramp currents of mice DRG small neurons in our study occurs mainly through Nav1.7 channels, although we cannot rule out a small contribution of other sodium channels to ramp currents.

Several reports have shown that estradiol upregulates Nav1.7 and other voltage-gated sodium channels in sensory neurons of DRG54, human embryonic stem cell–derived sensory neurons55 and trigeminal ganglia12. This implies a contribution of estradiol to hyperalgesia through a genomic action. In contrast, environmentally relevant doses of BPA did not alter the expression of voltage-gated Nav1.7, Nav1.8 or Nav1.9 sodium channels in the present study. Instead, BPA alters the ramp currents of Nav, most likely acting outside of the cell nucleus through activation of PI3K. Several kinases have been reported to be implicated in the regulation of the biophysical properties of Nav1.7, as PKA and PKC56, ERK1/2 MAP kinase40 and tyrosine kinase57. Hence, it is tempting to speculate that PI3K may phosphorylate Nav channels altering their gating properties. When BPA acts in its classical manner, that is as a transcription factor via estrogen response elements, it behaves as a weak estrogen, since its binding activity to ERα and to ERβ is over 1000–10,000-fold lower than that of estradiol58,59,60. Indeed, BPA has less efficiency in the activation of ER and recruits lower amounts of transcriptional coregulators in comparison to estradiol, probably due to weaker binding interactions of BPA with ERα61. However, an increasing number of studies during the last twenty years have demonstrated that BPA can elicit cellular and physiological effects with the same potency as estradiol, within the nanomolar range to which humans are exposed44,45,62,63. These low-dose effects can be explained by the fact that BPA elicits rapid responses via nonclassical estrogen-triggered pathways45,64,65,66,67,68. Relevant to our findings, stimulation with estrogens increases ERα-mediated PI3K activity independently of gene transcription36 and estradiol can regulate the epithelial sodium channel via a rapid nongenomic mechanism involving the activation of the PI3K signaling pathway69. Although it has been reported that E2 can also modulate the activity of several ion channels through signaling pathways involving ERK1/29,10, our results with the specific blocker of ERK1/2 (PD98059) indicate that this enzyme is not involved in the action of BPA on Nav ramp currents in DRG neurons. The acute application of 1 nM BPA (7.7 ± 0.8 min) to eight DRG neurons, had no effect on sodium channel ramp currents, indicating that BPA was not exerting a rapid action on sodium channel ramp currents (results not shown). It is possible that BPA is altering the expression of genes other than sodium channels, for example the PI3K gene, through nonclassical estrogen-triggered pathways, and further experiments are required to address this hypothesis. In summary, therefore, the effect of BPA on Nav ramp currents in DRG neurons must be mediated by nonclassical activation of ERα and subsequent activation of PI3K, similar to some of the reported effects of estradiol (Fig. 6).

Figure 6
figure6

Cellular model of the potentiation of Nav1.7 ramp currents in DRG neurons by 1 nM BPA. Binding of BPA to ERα activates PI3K, which in turn modulates Nav1.7 channels to increase ramp currents. Inhibition of ERα by MPP or PI3K by wortmannin abolished the effect of BPA. However, ERβ is not implicated in potentiation of Nav1.7 ramp current by BPA in DRG neurons, as DPN had no effect and BPA in the presence of PHTPP had effect.

The fact that our results with BPA are reproduced with 17β-estradiol at the same dose, 1 nM, indicates, a nonclassical action in the enhancement of Nav ramp currents. This estrogenic action may contribute to a greater prevalence in women of a number of pain conditions, including temporomandibular disorder, irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia, and migraine70,71, and also help explain why women exhibit also lower pain thresholds72.

The voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.7 is expressed in the peripheral nervous system and has a principal role in the pathophysiology of pain26,73. Nav1.7 is present not only in nociceptors within the dorsal root ganglia but also in sympathetic ganglion neurons25, myenteric neurons74, olfactory neurons75 and pancreatic endocrine cells76,77. Hence, a gain of function of this channel induced by BPA could affect not only pain signaling but also autonomous sympathetic functions, such as the control of blood vessel caliber and gastrointestinal function. Indeed, a case report indicates that occupational exposure to BPA as a consequence of facsimile paper production was responsible for inducing the condition of erythema, due to dilated blood vessels and dermatitis78. BPA at a no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL: 5 mg/kg/d), has also been reported to influence intestinal barrier function and gut nociception41. Furthermore, it has been proposed that mutations of Nav1.7 in human pancreatic β-cells may increase susceptibility to development of diabetes via β-cell injury79.

Gain-of-function mutations in SCN9A, which encodes the voltage-gated Nav1.7 channel, produce inherited erythromelalgia80 and paroxysmal extreme pain disorder81. Erythromelalgia is characterized by the combination of recurrent burning pain, warmth and redness of the extremities, and the mutations in SCN9A shift the voltage-dependence of Nav1.7 activation in a hyperpolarized direction, increase ramp currents and slow deactivation. Interestingly, these alterations in the biophysical properties of NaV1.7 produce hyperexcitability of DRG neurons and hypoexcitability of sympathetic neurons82. It is tempting to speculate that the effects of BPA on pain shown in our present results and on erythema78 could be induced by a BPA action on Nav1.7 ramp currents in both neuronal types. As a result of the biophysical characteristics of Nav1.7 channels, some of the gain-of-function mutations of this channel depolarize the resting potential by ~5 mV without a concomitant effect on the input resistance of the neuron83. Our results with BPA on DRG neurons produced the same result, suggesting again that the effects of BPA can be explained by a gain of function on Nav1.7 ramp currents.

The main mode of action of BPA is as an agonist of estrogen receptors, although antiandrogenic actions and antagonism of thyroid hormone receptors have been reported84,85. In our present work, the action of BPA was mediated through activation of ERα, as it was mimicked by the specific agonist of ERα PPT. BPA in the presence of the specific antagonist of ERα MPP had no effect, and the action of BPA was present in DRG neurons from ERβ−/− male mice. These results indicate that the effect of BPA on Nav ramp currents was mediated by ERα with no contribution of ERβ and suggest that the effect of the high concentration of PHTPP, a specific antagonist of ERβ, used in the experiment shown in Fig. 5D probably had some unspecific effect. Although the estrogen receptor GPR30 is also expressed in DRG neurons86, the effect of 17β-estradiol through GPR30 is known to inhibit pain9. Thus, if BPA is able to activate GPR30 this may limit the extent of the observed increase in nociception and merits future work.

In the present study, we have investigated the action of BPA in biological events at molecular and cellular signaling levels, leading to the adverse outcome of altered pain response in the whole animal. According to our results, an increase in Nav ramp currents induced by 1 nM BPA through ERα-PI3K activation leads to a higher spike firing and then to an increased pain sensitivity. Our results in this particular work followed an Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) conceptual framework87. We have investigated the action of BPA in biological events at molecular and cellular signaling levels, leading to the adverse outcome of altered pain response in the whole animal.

In summary, the present study extends our knowledge on the effects of BPA on adult neurons. We demonstrate that BPA at environmentally relevant doses affects the ability to detect noxious stimuli, which is essential for the survival of organisms. The nociceptive response to a thermal stimulus is increased in mice treated with BPA at the current safety level set by the US Environmental Protection Agency (50 µg/kg/day). Furthermore, incubation of dorsal root ganglia sensory neurons with 1 nM BPA for 24–48 h alters voltage-gated Nav ramp currents and increases excitability in mouse DRG neurons through the ERα-PI3K pathway. These results should be considered when studying the etiology of pain conditions.

Methods

Animals and treatment

Adult male C57BL6 mice aged 3–4 months were used. In order to avoid hormonal fluctuation of estrus cycle we decided to use male mice in this study. This allowed us to prevent possible interactions with BPA because of higher estradiol levels in females and to reduce variability. Animals were purchased from Servicio de Experimentación Animal (SEA), Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche (Elche, Spain). Animals were housed (5 mice/cage) in type III cage of polycarbonate plastic (Tecniplast), 530 cm2. We used new cages to avoid BPA release as much as posible on heat-treated hardwood bedding, under environmental conditions of 22 °C, and a light cycle of 12 h (8:00 am to 8:00 pm). Mice were maintained on 2014 Teklad Global 14% Protein Rodent Maintenance Diet (Harlan Laboratories, Barcelona, Spain), which was free of alfalfa and soybean meal, with ad libitum access to food and tap water. The composition of the diet is as follows: crude protein, 14.3%; fat, 4%; carbohydrate, 48%; crude fiber, 4.1%; neutral detergent fiber, 18%; ash, 4.7%; energy density, 2.9 kcal/g (12.1 kJ/g); calories from protein, 20%; calories from fat, 13%; and calories from carbohydrate, 67%. ERβ−/− mice were generated as described elsewhere88 and were supplied originally by the laboratory of Jan-Ake Gustafsson. All genetically modified animals and wild types were from the same supplier and the same colony (C57BL6), which is grown in Servicio de Experimentación Animal (SEA), Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche. Experimental procedures were reviewed and approved by the institutional committee for animal care and use of the Universidad de Alicante (UA-2017-06-29) and all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Animals were treated humanely and with regard for alleviation of suffering. For behavioral testing (see below) BPA was dissolved in tocopherol-stripped corn oil and administered subcutaneously for 8 days in a volume of 100 µL. The daily dose used was 50 µg/kg/day. Control animals received a daily dose of vehicle. For patch clamp experiments, dorsal root ganglia (DRG) were extracted from untreated mice. In these experiments, BPA or vehicle (DMSO 0.000004% v/v) were applied only in vitro after DRG extraction, during DRG neurons culture (see below).

Behavioral testing

We used constant-temperature hot-plate measurements (World Precision Instruments, FL). This equipment consisted of a metal plate heated to a preset temperature and a Plexiglass observation chamber. The applied temperature was 50 °C, well above the noxious heat threshold. The holding accuracy of the apparatus is ±0.1 °C as indicated by the manufacturer. We measured the reflex latency of the withdrawal reaction, consisting in paw shaking, licking or escape behavior, such as a jump (whichever came first). Mice were habituated to the test apparatus for at least 30 min before testing on each test day and three repeated tests were performed in this period. 20 mice were used for this test, 10 mice treated with BPA and 10 mice treated with vehicle. A cut-off for maximal exposure to the hot plate was set at 45 s89. The reflex latency values were in the range of observed elsewhere89,90 ≈20 s. An increase in latency was considered analgesia, while a decrease in latency was regarded as hyperalgesia.

Primary DRG culture

Previously described culture methods for DRG neurons in adult male mice were used91,92. Briefly, 36 male C57BL6 mice were sacrificed using carbon dioxide before confirmation of death, rather than cervical dislocation, as the latter may damage cervical DRG. One culture was generated per mouse. Usually, 6–9 wells were obtained from each culture and a maximum of 3 neuronal recordings were obtained from each well. For the experiments with ERβ−/− 3 mice were used. The vertebral column was quickly removed and dissected in ice-cold Hanks’s balanced sodium salt (Sigma Aldrich, Spain). All DRGs from cervical to sacral segments in both sides of the spinal cord were rapidly removed and enzymatically digested at 37 °C for 15–16 min in INCmix solution containing 900 UI/ml collagenase type XI and 3 mg/ml dispase (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific). After washing with fresh, enzyme-free DRG medium, single neurons were obtained by gentle agitation through a Pasteur pipette. The dissociated DRG neurons were plated into 3.5-cm culture dishes and incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in the presence of 1 nM BPA or vehicle (control) for 24–48 h. For the experiments with 1 nM 17-β estradiol (E2), the same protocol was employed.

Patch-clamp recordings

A total of 226 small-diameter (<30 μm) DRG neurons were used for voltage and current-clamp recordings within 24–48 h in culture with 1 nM BPA. This includes 18 neurons from ERβ−/− mice and 10 neurons for experiments with 1 nM E2. Cells devoid of processes were selected to avoid space-clamp problems. Patch pipettes were pulled from borosilicate capillaries (World Precision Instruments, FL) using a Flaming/Brown micropipette puller P-97 (Molecular Devices, CA) and heat-polished at the tip using an MF-830 microforge (Narishige, Japan). Electrodes had a resistance of 1–3 MΩ when filled with the pipette solution. For voltage-clamp recording, pipette solutions contained (in mM): 140 CsF, 10 NaCl, 4 Mg-ATP, 0,4 Na-GTP, 1 EGTA, 10 HEPES, 5 Glucose, pH 7.30 (adjusted with CsOH). For current-clamp experiments, pipette solutions contained (in mM): 140 KCl, 10 NaCl, 4 Mg-ATP, 0,4 Na-GTP, 10 HEPES, 5 Glucose, pH 7.30 (adjusted with KOH). For voltage-clamp recordings, the extracellular solution contained the following (in mM): 70 NaCl, 70 Choline Chloride, 3 KCl, 1 MgCl2 * 6H2O, 1 CaCl2, 20 TEA-Cl, 5 CsCl2, 0.1 CdCl2, 10 HEPES, 10 Glucose, pH 7.4 (adjusted with NaOH). For current-clamp experiments, the extracellular solution contained (in mM): 140 NaCl, 3 KCl, 2.4 CaCl2, 10 HEPES, 10 Glucose, pH 7.4 (adjusted with NaOH). Propyl pyrazole triol (PPT, 1 nM) was used as a specific agonist of ERα and methyl-piperidino-pyrazole (MPP, 100 nM) as a specific antagonist of ERα. Diarylpropionitrile (DPN, 1 nM) was used as a specific agonist of ERβ and phenyltrifluoromethyl pyrazolopyrimidine (PHTPP, 10 μM) as a specific antagonist of ERβ. Wortmannin (100 nM) was used as a broad-spectrum PI3K inhibitor. 2-(2-Amino-3-methoxyphenyl)-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one (PD98059, 10 μM) was used as a specific ERK1/2 inhibitor. PPT, MPP, PHTPP, Wortmannin, PD98059 and DPN were obtained from Tocris Cookson Ltd (Avonmouth, United Kingdom). 17-β estradiol used in Fig. 4 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Madrid, Spain).

Whole-cell recordings in voltage-clamp mode were performed with an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Molecular Devices, CA). Data were collected via Digidata 1320 A/D converter (Molecular Devices, CA) at 50 kHz and filtered at 5 kHz. Voltage and current errors were minimized with 80–90% series resistance compensation and linear leak currents, and capacitance artifacts were subtracted out using the P/6 method. The amplitude of TTX-sensitive sodium channels was estimated via two activation protocols. An I–V curve family of TTX-sensitive plus Nav1.8 currents were evoked by a series of depolarizing steps from −80 to +50 mV (in increments of 5 mV) at a holding potential of −80 mV, which inactivates Nav1.9 channel activity. Because some of the TTX-sensitive current is also inactivated at this voltage, a prepulse of 500 ms to −120 mV was applied to remove the fast inactivation of these currents, although the inactivation of Nav1.9 persists over this time. This produced an estimation of the total sodium current in the neuron minus the Nav1.9 current. To reveal the TTX-sensitive current in isolation, a family of currents was recorded using a prepulse of 500 ms to −50 mV before the activating pulse in order to inactivate the TTX-sensitive current while leaving the Nav1.8 current intact. This family of currents could then be subtracted from the total current in the neuron to view only the TTX-sensitive currents32. Ramp currents are expressed as a percentage of the ramp current amplitude in relation to the Nav maximum transient peak current evoked with the protocol explained above for each neuron.

Real-time PCR

Three different preparations of dissociated DRG neurons from 6 male mice were treated with BPA (1 nM) or vehicle for 24–48 h (measurements performed in duplicate). RNA was extracted using a commercial kit (RNeasy Micro kit, Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA (0.5 μg) was reverse-transcribed using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Quantitative PCR (RT-PCR) assays were performed using a CFX96 Real Time System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Amplification reactions were carried out in medium containing 200 nM of each primer, 1 μl cDNA, and 1x IQTM SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad). Hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (Hprt) was used as the normalization gene. (RT-PCR primers, see Supplementary Fig. 3).

Samples were subjected to the following conditions: 3 min at 95 °C, 40 cycles (5 s at 95 °C, 5 s at 60 °C, and 10 s at 72 °C), and a melting curve of 65–95 °C. Genes were considered as positively amplified when the Ct values were lower than 35 (Ct cut-off value = 35 cycles). The resulting values were analyzed with CFX Manager Version 1.6 (Bio-Rad) and are expressed as the relative expression with respect to control values (2−ΔΔCT)93.

Statistical analysis

For statistical analysis, GraphPad Prism (GraphPad software, Inc., CA), Sigmaplot 12.0 (Systat Software, Inc.) or SPSS 22.0 software (Statistical Package for Social Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA) were used. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. To assess differences between exposure groups, we used unpaired Student’s test. When data did not pass the parametric test, the Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis test was used. In Fig. 1 a one-way ANOVA for repeated measures was applied to assess the differences between treatments (vehicle and BPA), as well as any interactions between data of one treatment. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons using Bonferroni’s test were carried out when a 0.05 level of significance was obtained. Values of P < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. In Fig. 5F, we used one-way ANOVA followed by the Holm-Sidak test to compare control group vs the rest of experimental groups.

References

  1. 1.

    Wetherill, Y. B. et al. In vitro molecular mechanisms of bisphenol A action. Reprod Toxicol 24, 178–198 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Calafat, A. M., Ye, X., Wong, L. Y., Reidy, J. A. & Needham, L. L. Exposure of the U.S. population to bisphenol A and 4-tertiary-octylphenol: 2003-2004. Environ Health Perspect 116, 39–44 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gore, A. C. et al. EDC-2: The Endocrine Society’s Second Scientific Statement on Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals. Endocr Rev 36, E1–E150 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Aloisi, A. M. et al. Exposure to the estrogenic pollutant bisphenol A affects pain behavior induced by subcutaneous formalin injection in male and female rats. Brain Res 937, 1–7 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Vermeer, L. M., Gregory, E., Winter, M. K., McCarson, K. E. & Berman, N. E. Exposure to bisphenol A exacerbates migraine-like behaviors in a multibehavior model of rat migraine. Toxicol Sci 137, 416–427 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Vom Saal, F. S. et al. Bisphenol A (BPA) pharmacokinetics with daily oral bolus or continuous exposure via silastic capsules in pregnant rhesus monkeys: Relevance for human exposures. Reprod Toxicol 45, 105–116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2014.01.007 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Amandusson, A. & Blomqvist, A. Estrogenic influences in pain processing. Front Neuroendocrinol 34, 329–349 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tang, B., Ji, Y. & Traub, R. J. Estrogen alters spinal NMDA receptor activity via a PKA signaling pathway in a visceral pain model in the rat. Pain 137, 540–549 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lu, Y. et al. 17beta-estradiol rapidly attenuates P2X3 receptor-mediated peripheral pain signal transduction via ERalpha and GPR30. Endocrinology 154, 2421–2433 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Qu, Z. W. et al. 17beta-Estradiol Enhances ASIC Activity in Primary Sensory Neurons to Produce Sex Difference in Acidosis-Induced Nociception. Endocrinology 156, 4660–4671 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Payrits, M. et al. Estradiol Sensitizes the Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 1 Receptor in Pain Responses. Endocrinology 158, 3249–3258 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bi, R. Y. et al. Estradiol upregulates voltage-gated sodium channel 1.7 in trigeminal ganglion contributing to hyperalgesia of inflamed TMJ. PLoS One 12, e0178589 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Alonso-Magdalena, P. et al. Bisphenol-A acts as a potent estrogen via non-classical estrogen triggered pathways. Molecular and cellular endocrinology 355, 201–207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2011.12.012 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Soriano, S. et al. Rapid insulinotropic action of low doses of bisphenol-A on mouse and human islets of Langerhans: role of estrogen receptor beta. PLoS One 7, e31109, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031109 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Villar-Pazos, S. et al. Molecular mechanisms involved in the non-monotonic effect of bisphenol-a on ca2+ entry in mouse pancreatic beta-cells. Sci Rep 7, 11770 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Soriano, S. et al. Effects of Bisphenol A on ion channels: Experimental evidence and molecular mechanisms. Steroids 111, 12–20 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Asano, S., Tune, J. D. & Dick, G. M. Bisphenol A activates Maxi-K (K(Ca)1.1) channels in coronary smooth muscle. British journal of pharmacology 160, 160–170, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00687.x (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Deutschmann, A., Hans, M., Meyer, R., Haberlein, H. & Swandulla, D. Bisphenol A inhibits voltage-activated Ca(2+) channels in vitro: mechanisms and structural requirements. Molecular pharmacology 83, 501–511, https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.112.081372 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wang, Q. et al. Inhibition of voltage-gated sodium channels by bisphenol A in mouse dorsal root ganglion neurons. Brain Res 1378, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2011.01.022 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Dib-Hajj, S. D., Cummins, T. R., Black, J. A. & Waxman, S. G. Sodium channels in normal and pathological pain. Annu Rev Neurosci 33, 325–347 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Cox, J. J. et al. An SCN9A channelopathy causes congenital inability to experience pain. Nature 444, 894–898, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05413 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Drenth, J. P. & Waxman, S. G. Mutations in sodium-channel gene SCN9A cause a spectrum of human genetic pain disorders. The Journal of clinical investigation 117, 3603–3609, https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI33297 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gamble, G. D. & Milne, R. J. Repeated exposure to sham testing procedures reduces reflex withdrawal and hot-plate latencies: attenuation of tonic descending inhibition? Neuroscience letters 96, 312–317 (1989).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Sangameswaran, L. et al. A novel tetrodotoxin-sensitive, voltage-gated sodium channel expressed in rat and human dorsal root ganglia. J Biol Chem 272, 14805–14809 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Toledo-Aral, J. J. et al. Identification of PN1, a predominant voltage-dependent sodium channel expressed principally in peripheral neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94, 1527–1532 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Dib-Hajj, S. D., Yang, Y., Black, J. A. & Waxman, S. G. The Na(V)1.7 sodium channel: from molecule to man. Nat Rev Neurosci 14, 49–62 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Momin, A. & Wood, J. N. Sensory neuron voltage-gated sodium channels as analgesic drug targets. Current opinion in neurobiology 18, 383–388, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2008.08.017 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Jardin, I. et al. TRPs in Pain Sensation. Front Physiol 8, 392 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Golowasch, J. et al. Membrane capacitance measurements revisited: dependence of capacitance value on measurement method in nonisopotential neurons. Journal of neurophysiology 102, 2161–2175, https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00160.2009 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Harper, A. A. & Lawson, S. N. Conduction velocity is related to morphological cell type in rat dorsal root ganglion neurones. J Physiol 359, 31–46 (1985).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Harper, A. A. & Lawson, S. N. Electrical properties of rat dorsal root ganglion neurones with different peripheral nerve conduction velocities. J Physiol 359, 47–63 (1985).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Rush, A. M. et al. Contactin regulates the current density and axonal expression of tetrodotoxin-resistant but not tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium channels in DRG neurons. Eur J Neurosci 22, 39–49 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Cummins, T. R. et al. A novel persistent tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium current in SNS-null and wild-type small primary sensory neurons. J Neurosci 19, RC43 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Cummins, T. R., Howe, J. R. & Waxman, S. G. Slow closed-state inactivation: a novel mechanism underlying ramp currents in cells expressing the hNE/PN1 sodium channel. J Neurosci 18, 9607–9619 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bennett, H. L., Gustafsson, J. A. & Keast, J. R. Estrogen receptor expression in lumbosacral dorsal root ganglion cells innervating the female rat urinary bladder. Auton Neurosci 105, 90–100 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Simoncini, T. et al. Interaction of oestrogen receptor with the regulatory subunit of phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase. Nature 407, 538–541 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Migliaccio, A., Castoria, G. & Auricchio, F. Src-dependent signalling pathway regulation by sex-steroid hormones: therapeutic implications. The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology 39, 1343–1348, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2006.12.009 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Levin, E. R. & Hammes, S. R. Nuclear receptors outside the nucleus: extranuclear signalling by steroid receptors. Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology 17, 783–797, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2016.122 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Alonso-Magdalena, P. et al. Pancreatic insulin content regulation by the estrogen receptor ER alpha. PLoS One 3, e2069, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002069 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Stamboulian, S. et al. ERK1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylates sodium channel Na(v)1.7 and alters its gating properties. J Neurosci 30, 1637–1647 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Braniste, V. et al. Impact of oral bisphenol A at reference doses on intestinal barrier function and sex differences after perinatal exposure in rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 448–453 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Vandenberg, L. N. et al. Urinary, circulating, and tissue biomonitoring studies indicate widespread exposure to bisphenol A. Environ Health Perspect 118, 1055–1070, https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901716 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Vandenberg, L. N., Chahoud, I., Padmanabhan, V., Paumgartten, F. J. & Schoenfelder, G. Biomonitoring studies should be used by regulatory agencies to assess human exposure levels and safety of bisphenol A. Environ Health Perspect 118, 1051–1054, https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901717 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Nagel, S. C. et al. Relative binding affinity-serum modified access (RBA-SMA) assay predicts the relative in vivo bioactivity of the xenoestrogens bisphenol A and octylphenol. Environ Health Perspect 105, 70–76 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Nadal, A. et al. Nongenomic actions of estrogens and xenoestrogens by binding at a plasma membrane receptor unrelated to estrogen receptor alpha and estrogen receptor beta. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97, 11603–11608 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Taylor, J. A. et al. Similarity of bisphenol A pharmacokinetics in rhesus monkeys and mice: relevance for human exposure. Environ Health Perspect 119, 422–430, https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002514 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Dib-Hajj, S. D. & Waxman, S. G. Diversity of composition and function of sodium channels in peripheral sensory neurons. Pain 156, 2406–2407, https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000353 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Han, C. et al. Human Na(v)1.8: enhanced persistent and ramp currents contribute to distinct firing properties of human DRG neurons. Journal of neurophysiology 113, 3172–3185, https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00113.2015 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Cummins, T. R. & Waxman, S. G. Downregulation of tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium currents and upregulation of a rapidly repriming tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium current in small spinal sensory neurons after nerve injury. J Neurosci 17, 3503–3514 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Cummins, T. R. et al. Nav1.3 sodium channels: rapid repriming and slow closed-state inactivation display quantitative differences after expression in a mammalian cell line and in spinal sensory neurons. J Neurosci 21, 5952–5961 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Herzog, R. I., Cummins, T. R., Ghassemi, F., Dib-Hajj, S. D. & Waxman, S. G. Distinct repriming and closed-state inactivation kinetics of Nav1.6 and Nav1.7 sodium channels in mouse spinal sensory neurons. J Physiol 551, 741–750, https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2003.047357 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Estacion, M. & Waxman, S. G. The response of Na(V)1.3 sodium channels to ramp stimuli: multiple components and mechanisms. Journal of neurophysiology 109, 306–314, https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00438.2012 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Black, J. A. et al. Spinal sensory neurons express multiple sodium channel alpha-subunit mRNAs. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 43, 117–131 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Hu, F. et al. 17beta-Estradiol regulates the gene expression of voltage-gated sodium channels: role of estrogen receptor alpha and estrogen receptor beta. Endocrine 41, 274–280 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Greaves, E., Grieve, K., Horne, A. W. & Saunders, P. T. Elevated peritoneal expression and estrogen regulation of nociceptive ion channels in endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99, E1738–1743 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Cantrell, A. R. & Catterall, W. A. Neuromodulation of Na+ channels: an unexpected form of cellular plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci 2, 397–407, https://doi.org/10.1038/35077553 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Li, Y. et al. Nav1.7 is phosphorylated by Fyn tyrosine kinase which modulates channel expression and gating in a cell type-dependent manner. Mol Pain 14, 1744806918782229, https://doi.org/10.1177/1744806918782229 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kuiper, G. G. et al. Interaction of estrogenic chemicals and phytoestrogens with estrogen receptor beta. Endocrinology 139, 4252–4263 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Andersen, H. R. et al. Comparison of short-term estrogenicity tests for identification of hormone-disrupting chemicals. Environ Health Perspect 107(Suppl 1), 89–108 (1999).

    MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Fang, H. et al. Quantitative comparisons of in vitro assays for estrogenic activities. Environ Health Perspect 108, 723–729 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Li, Y. et al. Differential in Vitro Biological Action, Coregulator Interactions, and Molecular Dynamic Analysis of Bisphenol A (BPA), BPAF, and BPS Ligand-ERalpha Complexes. Environ Health Perspect 126, 017012 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Steinmetz, R., Brown, N. G., Allen, D. L., Bigsby, R. M. & Ben-Jonathan, N. The environmental estrogen bisphenol A stimulates prolactin release in vitro and in vivo. Endocrinology 138, 1780–1786, https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.138.5.5132 (1997).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Nadal, A. et al. Extranuclear-initiated estrogenic actions of endocrine disrupting chemicals: Is there toxicology beyond paracelsus? The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology 176, 16–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.01.014 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Quesada, I. et al. Low doses of the endocrine disruptor bisphenol-A and the native hormone 17beta-estradiol rapidly activate transcription factor CREB. FASEB journal: official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 16, 1671–1673, https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.02-0313fje (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Alonso-Magdalena, P. et al. Low doses of bisphenol A and diethylstilbestrol impair Ca2+ signals in pancreatic alpha-cells through a nonclassical membrane estrogen receptor within intact islets of Langerhans. Environ Health Perspect 113, 969–977 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Vinas, R. & Watson, C. S. Bisphenol S disrupts estradiol-induced nongenomic signaling in a rat pituitary cell line: effects on cell functions. Environ Health Perspect 121, 352–358, https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205826 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Alyea, R. A. & Watson, C. S. Differential regulation of dopamine transporter function and location by low concentrations of environmental estrogens and 17beta-estradiol. Environ Health Perspect 117, 778–783, https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0800026 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Jeng, Y. J. & Watson, C. S. Combinations of physiologic estrogens with xenoestrogens alter ERK phosphorylation profiles in rat pituitary cells. Environ Health Perspect 119, 104–112, https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002512 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Qi, D. et al. 17beta-estradiol suppresses lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury through PI3K/Akt/SGK1 mediated up-regulation of epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) in vivo and in vitro. Respir Res 15, 159 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Gupta, S., McCarson, K. E., Welch, K. M. & Berman, N. E. Mechanisms of pain modulation by sex hormones in migraine. Headache 51, 905–922, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.01908.x (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Artero-Morales, M., Gonzalez-Rodriguez, S. & Ferrer-Montiel, A. TRP Channels as Potential Targets for Sex-Related Differences in Migraine Pain. Frontiers in molecular biosciences 5, 73, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2018.00073 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Riley, J. L. 3rd, Robinson, M. E., Wise, E. A., Myers, C. D. & Fillingim, R. B. Sex differences in the perception of noxious experimental stimuli: a meta-analysis. Pain 74, 181–187 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Yang, Y., Mis, M. A., Estacion, M., Dib-Hajj, S. D. & Waxman, S. G. NaV1.7 as a Pharmacogenomic Target for Pain: Moving Toward Precision Medicine. Trends Pharmacol Sci 39, 258–275 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Muroi, Y. et al. Selective silencing of Na(V)1.7 decreases excitability and conduction in vagal sensory neurons. J Physiol 589, 5663–5676 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Weiss, J. et al. Loss-of-function mutations in sodium channel Nav1.7 cause anosmia. Nature 472, 186–190 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Gopel, S., Kanno, T., Barg, S., Galvanovskis, J. & Rorsman, P. Voltage-gated and resting membrane currents recorded from B-cells in intact mouse pancreatic islets. J Physiol 521(Pt 3), 717–728 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Braun, M. et al. Voltage-gated ion channels in human pancreatic beta-cells: electrophysiological characterization and role in insulin secretion. Diabetes 57, 1618–1628 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Akita, H., Washimi, Y., Akamatsu, H., Fukui, Y. & Matsunaga, K. Erythema-multiforme-like occupational contact dermatitis due to bisphenol A. Contact Dermatitis 45, 305 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Hoeijmakers, J. G., Faber, C. G., Merkies, I. S. & Waxman, S. G. Channelopathies, painful neuropathy, and diabetes: which way does the causal arrow point? Trends Mol Med 20, 544–550 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Yang, Y. et al. Mutations in SCN9A, encoding a sodium channel alpha subunit, in patients with primary erythermalgia. Journal of medical genetics 41, 171–174 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Dib-Hajj, S. D. et al. Paroxysmal extreme pain disorder M1627K mutation in human Nav1.7 renders DRG neurons hyperexcitable. Mol Pain 4, 37 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Rush, A. M. et al. A single sodium channel mutation produces hyper- or hypoexcitability in different types of neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 8245–8250, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0602813103 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Han, C. et al. Functional profiles of SCN9A variants in dorsal root ganglion neurons and superior cervical ganglion neurons correlate with autonomic symptoms in small fibre neuropathy. Brain 135, 2613–2628 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Moriyama, K. et al. Thyroid hormone action is disrupted by bisphenol A as an antagonist. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87, 5185–5190 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Lee, H. J., Chattopadhyay, S., Gong, E. Y., Ahn, R. S. & Lee, K. Antiandrogenic effects of bisphenol A and nonylphenol on the function of androgen receptor. Toxicol Sci 75, 40–46 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Lu, C. L. et al. Estrogen rapidly modulates 5-hydroxytrytophan-induced visceral hypersensitivity via GPR30 in rats. Gastroenterology 137, 1040–1050, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2009.03.047 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Ankley, G. T. et al. Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment. Environmental toxicology and chemistry 29, 730–741, https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.34 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Krege, J. H. et al. Generation and reproductive phenotypes of mice lacking estrogen receptor beta. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95, 15677–15682 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Bajic, D. et al. Cannabinoid Receptor Type 1 in the Brain Regulates the Affective Component of Visceral Pain in Mice. Neuroscience 384, 397–405, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.05.041 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Nissen, N. I. et al. Augmenting the antinociceptive effects of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor activity through lynx1 modulation. PLoS One 13, e0199643. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199643 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Shields, S. D. et al. Sodium channel Na(v)1.7 is essential for lowering heat pain threshold after burn injury. J Neurosci 32, 10819–10832 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Sleigh, J. N., Weir, G. A. & Schiavo, G. A simple, step-by-step dissection protocol for the rapid isolation of mouse dorsal root ganglia. BMC Res Notes 9, 82 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Maria Luisa Navarro and Salomé Ramon for their excellent technical assistance and Martyn Mahaut-Smith for editing the English language. The authors’ laboratories are funded by the Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), BFU2017-86579-R (A.N.) and Generalitat Valenciana, PROMETEOII/2015/016 (A.N.). CIBERDEM is an initiative of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III. J.-A. G. was supported by a fellowship from the A. Welch Foundation (Grant E-0004).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.S., M.G.-R., L.M., P.A.-M., J.M.-P. performed, analyzed experiments and prepared Figures 1–6. A.N., J.M.-P. and S.S. designed the experiments. All authors contributed to the discussion and reviewed and edited the manuscript. A.N., J.M.-P. P.A.-M., E.F. and S.S. wrote the manuscript. A.N. and J.M.-P. supervised the work. A.N. is its guarantor.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sergi Soriano or Juan Martinez-Pinna.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soriano, S., Gil-Rivera, M., Marroqui, L. et al. Bisphenol A Regulates Sodium Ramp Currents in Mouse Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons and Increases Nociception. Sci Rep 9, 10306 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46769-6

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing