Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Geographical assignment of polar bears using multi-element isoscapes

## Abstract

Wide-ranging apex predators are among the most challenging of all fauna to conserve and manage. This is especially true of the polar bear (Ursus maritimus), an iconic predator that is hunted in Canada and threatened by global climate change. We used combinations of stable isotopes (13C,15N,2H,18O) in polar bear hair from > 1000 individuals, sampled from across much of the Canadian Arctic and sub-Arctic, to test the ability of stable isotopic profiles to ‘assign’ bears to (1) predefined managed subpopulations, (2) subpopulations defined by similarities in stable isotope values using quadratic discriminant analysis, and (3) spatially explicit, isotopically distinct clusters derived from interpolated (i.e. ‘kriged’) isotopic landscapes, or ‘isoscapes’, using the partitioning around medoids algorithm. A four-isotope solution provided the highest overall assignment accuracies (~80%) to pre-existing management subpopulations with accuracy rates ranging from ~30–99% (median = 64%). Assignment accuracies of bears to hierarchically clustered ecological groups based on isotopes ranged from ~64–99%. Multivariate assignment to isotopic clusters resulted in highest assignment accuracies of 68% (33–77%), 84% (47–96%) and 74% (53–85%) using two, three and four stable isotope groups, respectively. The resulting spatial structure inherent in the multiple stable isotopic compositions of polar bear tissues is a powerful forensic tool that will, in this case, contribute to the conservation and management of this species. Currently, it is unclear what is driving these robust isotopic patterns and future research is needed to evaluate the processes behind the pattern. Nonetheless, our isotopic approach can be further applied to other apex mammalian predators under threat, such as the large felids, providing that isotopic structure occurs throughout their range.

## Introduction

Effective management and conservation of wildlife populations requires an understanding of population structure so that relevant demographic information can be associated with geographic regions1. This is particularly true of wide-ranging apex predators that occur at low densities because, in addition to natural processes and habitat loss, these species are often vulnerable to poaching and illegal trade in animal parts. As a result, these factors have contributed significantly to population declines for many large carnivores2. For polar bears (Ursus maritimus), like any vulnerable but hunted species, determining biologically relevant population boundaries can aid managers in applying sustainable harvest quotas or determine origins of legally and illegally harvested individuals3. Unfortunately, due to their highly dispersed distribution and often secretive behaviors, effective tools to delineate population structure of polar bears and other apex predators has proven elusive.

Use of endogenous markers such as genetic fingerprints and naturally occurring stable isotopes in animal tissues have become an important tool in the study of wildlife conservation and management, including enforcement of legislation for both hunted and endangered species4,5. Other endogenous markers, such as concentrations of trace elements (i.e. Hg, Cu, Se), similarly do not require more than one capture or sampling per individual and so are well suited to population delineation given the existence of underlying spatial structure in these markers. Analyses of fatty acids have also been used to study dietary intake and are commonly applied to polar bears.6 However, the greatest promise to date has been the use of genetic and naturally occurring stable isotopic markers because underlying evolutionary or biogeochemical processes can be extrapolated spatially7. Specifically, stable isotopic compositions of inert tissues such as hair and claws are potentially more powerful tracers of origins if they can be linked to trophic interactions and to spatial isotopic gradients. This is because stable isotopes of C, N, S, H, and O vary due to a variety of biogeochemical processes that occur in food webs and thus often have predictable isotopic compositions8.

Polar bears have a circumpolar distribution with the majority of the global population (~26,000 individuals)9, occurring over vast parts of the Canadian Arctic and sub-Arctic. The species was listed on the United States Endangered Species Act in 2008 and is considered Threatened by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES 2008). In Canada, polar bears were placed on Canada’s Species at Risk Act as Special Concern in 2011, a designation that was reaffirmed in 2018 because of declining populations and their vulnerability to environmental change. This is because polar bears are highly specialized carnivores, using sea ice as a platform to prey primarily on ringed (Pusa hispida) and bearded (Erignathus barbatus) seals. They are thus particularly vulnerable to climate change, which is expected to reduce the total extent and duration of ice cover in the Arctic10,11,12. In Canada, the species is divided into 13 subpopulations based on geography and use by indigenous peoples. Since 1976, regulated subsistence and trophy harvest is permitted in some subpopulations and export of polar bear parts are allowed13. Therefore, for proper management and conservation of this vulnerable species, it is essential to establish sustainable hunting quotas and ensure that effective enforcement of these quotas occur3.

The objective of this study was to determine if values of multiple stable isotopes (13C, 15N, 2H and 18O) in adult polar bear hair sampled from known locations could be used to delineate existing subpopulations or to assign polar bears to geographically distinct isotopic groupings for forensic and management purposes. We reasoned that such an apex predator would reflect any underlying marine-based isoscapes in the Canadian Arctic14 because top-level carnivores should be good integrators of broad-scale isotopic patterns and variance in foodwebs15. In an exploratory manner and without any a priori expectation of the nature of marine isoscapes supporting polar bears, we used three groupings of stable isotopes (1) 13C and 15N, (2) 13C, 15N, 2H, and (3) 13C, 15N, 2H and 18O in polar bear hair collected from discrete locations to determine if analysis of added stable isotopes would increase accuracy of assigning bears to subpopulations or isotopic clusters. We realized that continued use of existing management boundaries would be favored, especially if isotopic information could support their use. However, we also allowed the data to reveal naturally occurring subpopulation clusters that presumably reflect the combination of underlying isoscapes and polar bear physiology and feeding ecology. Finally, we created kriged isotopic surfaces to explore existing underlying patterns for each isotope that would provide the basis for future investigations into the mechanisms driving isotopic patterns in this species.

## Results and Discussion

We collected samples of polar bear hair from nine of the thirteen subpopulations, which comprise a good part of the Canadian Arctic and sub-Arctic (Fig. 1). The measured δ13C, δ15N, δ2H and δ18O values of hair from 1,047 adult (>1 yr) and 164 cub (<1 yr) polar bears are shown in Fig. 2. For both adults and cubs we found considerable isotopic variability among subpopulations (Fig. 2); however, it was evident that cubs generally had higher δ15N and lower δ13C and δ2H values than did adults. Using MANOVA on the four stable isotope value matrix (δ13C, δ15N, δ2H, δ18O), differences in multi-isotope composition between adult and cub polar bears were significant (F1,917 = 96.4, p < 0.001) when controlling for subpopulation. When contrasting differences in single isotopes between ages controlling for subpopulations using ANOVA, δ2H (F1,991 = 221.6, p < 0.001), δ13C (F1,1216 = 52.8, p < 0.001) and δ15N (F1,1217 = 81.48, p < 0.001) were significant, but not δ18O (F1,959 = 1.2, p = 0.28). These isotopic differences between cubs and adults are clearly a result of nursing, which, for polar bears occurs with decreasing frequency up to two years after birth16. During nursing, cubs consume maternal milk rich in low δ13C and δ2H lipids, which contribute to the body water pool and growth of hair protein. Elevated δ15N values in cubs can be attributed to trophic effects as is seen in humans and other mammals17. For this reason, cubs were not included in further statistical analyses. With adult bears, isotope values varied spatially with δ2H and δ13C values generally higher in eastern subpopulations, δ15N values higher in western subpopulations, and δ18O being less variable by subpopulation (Fig. 2).

The polar bear hair isoscapes interpolated via kriging showed considerable patterns across broad geographic regions of the Canadian Arctic (Fig. 3). Values of δ13C had substantial longitudinal and latitudinal structure with the lowest values occurring in the area of Western Hudson Bay (WH) and the western portion of Lancaster Sound (LS) and the highest values occurring in the eastern and northern parts of our study area in Davis Strait (DS), eastern Foxe Basin (FB) and parts of LS (Fig. 3A,B). Polar bear hair δ15N values varied longitudinally with lowest values occurring in the eastern-most regions (Fig. 3C,D). Values of δ2H had a latitudinal gradient with the WH region having the highest values and LS region having the lowest values (Fig. 3E,F). Values of δ18O decreased with latitude and were highest in eastern subpopulations, DS and southern Baffin Bay (BB) (Fig. 3G,H).

We assigned bears to existing management subpopulations using CN, CNH, and CNHO isotopic groupings and then assigned bears to grouped subpopulations based on similarities in stable isotope values with hierarchical cluster analysis. We also used polar bear hair stable isotope values to create spatially explicit isotope clusters from interpolated surfaces of individual isotopes and then assigned bears to those groups in a multivariate assignment. We grouped all adult hair samples from across the Arctic and sub-Arctic over a 25-year period, and although most of our samples were collected from 2005–2008, some samples were from other years so it is possible we incorporated some temporal isotopic variability into our models.

We found that adult polar bear hair stable isotope (δ13C, δ15N, δ2H and δ18O) profiles had considerable spatial structure indicating that environmental isotopic gradients were incorporated into polar bear hair across much of the Canadian Arctic and sub-Arctic. Processes leading to such variation are not well understood or documented but probably reflect a multitude of underlying biogeochemical processes including mixing of isotopically distinct waters, sea-surface temperature differences, carbon sources, and trophic structure18. Despite the large geographic sampling region and substantial within- and between-subpopulation isotopic variability, assignment of bears to grouped subpopulations was surprisingly accurate (Table 1), up to almost 100% in some cases. Assignment accuracy varied among subpopulations with Western Hudson Bay (WH) having the highest assignment accuracy and Foxe Basin (FB) having the lowest (99% with three and four isotopes and 0% with two isotopes, respectively). Overall, however, spatial isotopic structure in hair generally did not match the current subpopulation boundaries well. A similar result was found for the geographic variation in genetic structure of the Canadian polar bear population19. In contrast to the current management boundaries, this interpolation of isotopic data provides an ecologically-based spatial approach to define subpopulations by identifying geographically explicit, isotopically distinct clusters. Furthermore, these results are informative for forensic and ecological applications in that we can use stable isotopic information to investigate polar bear movements and origins.

A four-isotope (13C, 15N, 2H, 18O) approach provided the most accurate solution to assigning bears to subpopulations with the three- and two- isotope combinations consistently providing less accurate solutions (Table 1). Hierarchical clustering of subpopulations resulted in higher assignment accuracies; however, this method relied on grouping individuals from different subpopulations, which substantially lowered the spatial resolution of assignments. Finally, we defined spatially discrete isotopic clusters for polar bear hair that may also be useful for determining origins of bears for forensic or other purposes (Fig. 4). Hierarchical clustering using median values for both the two- (δ13C, δ15N) and three-isotope (δ13C, δ15N, δ2H) matrices resulted in three subpopulation groups including: 1) WH, 2) FB-LS, and 3) BB-DS (Table 1). Using this approach, overall correct assignment to isotopic clusters was highest (84%) for the three isotope cluster compared to the two (68%) and four (74%) isotope cluster (Fig. 4). Overall, subpopulations or regions with lower sample sizes typically had lower accuracy rates for assigning individuals and higher error when the isotope data were spatially interpolated.

Using stable isotope measurements to determine origins of polar bears presents some uncertainty owing to multiple factors. Insufficient sample sizes prevented use of our statistical approaches to some of the subpopulations and low sample sizes apparently resulted in lower assignment accuracies for other subpopulations. Polar bear isotope values may vary temporally depending on prey population cycles, food stress and changes in climate, weather or ocean current patterns. Furthermore, polar bears can have large territories and may travel or disperse across or between some subpopulations20 thereby integrating isotope values and reducing our ability to assign bears to a specific geographic region, although we tried to reduce this effect by using underfur rather than guard hairs in our analyses. Climatic events, such as the El-Niño Southern Oscillation, may also drive inter-annual variation in some isotopes (e.g. 2H and 18O) and although the relative coupling of these isotopes from meteoric water into polar bear tissues is unknown, it is possible that this variation may still have an effect.

Despite these potential complications however, it is clear that using these multi-isotope approaches provide a more biologically defensible method to assign polar bears to geographical regions as a result of their integration of broad baseline isotopic patterns across the Arctic. Primarily, isotopic patterns in the diet of polar bears that are expected to vary regionally, will greatly influence bear isotope values and isotopic subpopulation delineation. Relative differences in consumption of various seal species as well as whales and scavenged foods undoubtedly contributes to spatial isotopic variance among bears. However, broader, environmental isotopic gradients driving foodwebs will be manifested over the range of this species and are yet to be fully understood or described. Ultimately, combining other components, such as genetic markers, pollutants, or additional isotopes (i.e. those of Hg, 34S or 37Cl)21 with these stable isotope methods will refine our ability to determine the spatial structure and the underlying ecology of polar bears across these vast regions. At large spatial scales, similar approaches and isotopic tools may be used for management or for forensic applications involving other large predatory species, particularly those under threat from human activities or climate change.

## Methods

### Hair samples

Adult and cub polar bear hair samples were obtained from archived collections held by the Government of Nunavut and from Environment and Climate Change Canada. Samples were collected from across a large portion of the Canadian Arctic and sub-Arctic in nine of 13 subpopulations: Southern Beaufort Sea (SB), Baffin Bay (BB), Davis Straight (DS), Viscount Melville (VM), Lancaster Sound (LS), Norwegian Bay (NW), Kane Basin (KB), Foxe Basin (FB) and Western Hudson Bay (WH; Table 1; Fig. 1). Samples were typically obtained during mark-recapture surveys or from legally harvested bears from 1992 to 2017; however, sampling effort varied among regions and management subpopulations. Adult bears were aged by analysis of the vestigial premolar during the first capture. Bears that were not aged to year were classified as cub of year (COY), yearling, sub-adult or adult. Some bears were sampled more than once in different years including as a cub and as an adult. Hair samples were collected and stored in plastic bags until analysis for stable isotopes.

Polar bear fur was washed in distilled water using an ultrasonic cleaner, dried, and then cut into small fragments using stainless steel scissors prior to cleaning of surface oils in 2:1 chloroform:methanol. Hair is known to vary isotopically in response to changes in diet during growth, an effect that has been demonstrated for polar bears22. Underfur was thus selectively sampled to minimize within-year or multiyear stable isotopic differences. We then dried and homogenized hair samples by grinding in a ball mill (Retsch model MM-301, Haan, Germany) to yield approximately 1 g of material.

### Isotope analysis

For carbon and nitrogen stable isotope analyses, we weighed 1 mg of ground hair into precombusted tin capsules. Encapsulated hair was combusted at 1030 °C in a Carlo Erba NA1500 or Eurovector 3000 elemental analyser. The resulting N2 and CO2 were separated chromatographcally and introduced to an Elementar Isoprime or a Nu Instruments Horizon isotope ratio mass spectrometer. We used two reference materials to normalize the results to VPDB and AIR: BWBIII keratin (δ13C = −20.18, δ15N =  + 14.31 per mil, respectively) and PRCgel (δ13C = −13.64, δ15N =  + 5.07 per mil, respectively). Within run (n = 5) precisions as determined from both reference and sample duplicate analyses and from QA/QC controls were ± 0.1 per mil for both δ13C and δ15N.

For hydrogen and oxygen isotope analyses, we used the method of Hobson and Koehler23, which results in hydrogen and oxygen isotope measurements from the same pyrolysis. Briefly, 0.35 mg of ground hair was weighed into silver capsules and thermally converted to H2 and CO by reaction with hot glassy carbon at 1400 °C. These gasses were separated chromatographically and introduced by an open split into a Thermo Fisher Delta V isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Bremen, Germany–www.thermofisher.com). To compensate for exchangeable hydrogen, we used the comparative equilibration technique of Hobson and Wassenaar24 to measure the nonexchangeable hydrogen stable isotopic compositions. We used Environment Canada keratin reference standards CBS (EC1:Caribou hoof) and KHS (EC2: Kudu horn) to calibrate sample δ2H (−197 and −54.1 per mil, respectively) and δ18O values (+2.50 and +21.46 per mil, respectively)25. This normalization with calibrated keratins also eliminates any hydrogen isotope measurement bias from production of HCN26 in the glassy carbon reactor as described by Soto et al.27. To minimize any isobaric interferences between the evolved CO and N2, the CF capillary was withdrawn during the elution of N228. The factory-installed 0.6 m 5 Å mol sieve GC column was replaced with a1.5 m column to further separate these two gasses. Based on replicate (n = 5) within-run measurements of keratin standards and long term analyses of a known QA/QC keratin reference (SPK keratin δ2H and δ18O values of −106 and +10.8 per mil, respectively), sample measurement error was estimated at ± 2 per mil for δ2H and ±0.4 per mil for δ18O. Although CBS and KHS are not an exact matrix match for hair, Soto et al.27 have demonstrated that USGS42 and USGS43 hair references can be measured to correct δ2H values using these reference materials.

### Statistical analysis

Polar bear cubs consume mother’s milk during their first year and any time after during which they are with their mother and thus are expected to have different stable isotope values than adult bears, an effect that has been demonstrated for humans and other mammals17. Therefore, we grouped yearling, sub-adult and adults (hereafter ‘adult’) into one group to compare with cub-of-year (hereafter ‘cub’) bears in our analyses. We removed duplicate samples of individual adult bears to avoid potential bias associated with pseudo-replication prior to analysis. We tested for differences in hair stable isotope (δ2H, δ13C, δ15N, δ18O) values of cubs and adult polar bears and controlled for subpopulation using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) using Pillai’s trace statistic. The F-statistic provided in the MANOVA results is the ‘approximate’ value. We also examined differences between adult and cub hair individual isotope values using ANOVA. We found that cubs generally had higher δ15N and lower δ13C and δ2H values than adults (see Discussion) and based on these results, cubs were excluded from further analyses (Fig. 2). For MANOVA and ANOVA analyses, we removed bears from the SB, VM, NB and KB subpopulations because of low sample sizes (n < 20). For comparisons of cub isotope values, we retained samples from WH, LS, BB, FB and DS subpopulations.

To determine the number of subpopulations that could reliably be distinguished using adult polar bear stable isotope values, we applied hierarchical clustering to our dataset. We then conducted quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) with leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV) to the subpopulation groups using the three same isotope combinations as in the previous cluster analysis. The QDA was conducted using the’MASS’ package29 in the R computing environment30. To this end, we first scaled raw isotope data across subpopulations and produced a dissimilarity matrix with the Euclidean distance measure on median scaled isotope (δ13C, δ15N, δ2H, δ18O) values for five subpopulations with sufficient data. We contrasted three hierarchical clustering methods (Ward’s, average, complete) to determine which provided the best clustering structure by assessing correlation between the cophenetic distance and original distance matrices. We determined the optimal number of clusters using the ‘silhouette’ method31 and identified groups visually by assessing the dendrograms for each hierarchical clustering analysis using the R package ‘fpc’.

Isotope data from five subpopulations (LS, WH, FB, BB, DS) were included in the cluster analyses. We did not have enough samples (n < 20) in each of the remaining subpopulations for meaningful statistical analyses. We created interpolated isotopic landscapes (‘isoscapes’) for adult polar bear δ13C, δ15N, δ2H and δ18O values from individual bears and used the resulting isoscapes to derive spatially explicit isotopic clusters. Spatial interpolation methods such as kriging are sensitive to outliers and require that data exhibit stationarity; hence, we examined histograms and removed outlier data for each isotope. Adult polar bear hair isotope data was split into training (70%) and test (30%) sets stratified by subpopulation for isoscape development and subsequent analysis. We used empirical Bayes Kriging (EBK)32 with k-Bessel detrended semivariograms and a maximum of 500 samples with 500 simulations to create separate interpolated surfaces for adult δ13C, δ15N, δ2H and δ18O values using the training data sets. EBK is advantageous over other classical kriging methods because it estimates error in the model by accounting for multiple semivariograms versus a single semivariogram. We created the kriged isoscapes in ArcGIS 10.3 (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA.) and used functions in the ‘raster’ package in the R computing environment33 to crop and resample kriged isoscapes to ensure matching extents, origins and resolutions.

To determine the number of isotope groupings that provided optimal spatial structure, we merged the four kriged isoscapes into three separate matrices (i.e. raster stacks) with the aforementioned combinations of two, three and four isotopes. We subsequently applied the ‘partitioning around medoids’ (PAM) clustering method on each matrix with a minimum of two and a maximum of 10 clusters using the ‘fpc’ package in R v3.5.0. The resulting optimal number of clusters was verified with the average silhouette width and elbow plot methods. To derive spatially explicit, isotopically distinct clusters we used the ‘clustering for large applications’ (clara) algorithm34 on each isotope matrix to assign each cell in the isoscape matrix to a medoid (cluster group). The clara method is similar to PAM but instead of using the entire dataset, it randomly selects a subset of data (i.e. cells in the isoscape matrix) and is thus useful for large datasets. Analyses were conducted with the ‘cluster’ package in R v3.5.0 using Euclidean distance as the dissimilarity measure. To determine the accuracy of assigning polar bears to spatially explicit isotopic clusters based on kriged isoscapes, we used a multivariate assignment technique described in Hobson et al.35.

Stable isotopic compositions are reported in the delta notation:

$$\delta =\frac{{R}_{sample}}{{R}_{std}}-1$$
(1)

where Rsample is the ratio of the rare (heavy) isotope to the common (light) isotope in the sample, such as 2H/H,18O/16O, etc, and Rstd is the corresponding absolute ratio of the standard (VSMOW, VPDB, AIR). Delta values are typically close to zero so that for clarity they are multiplied by1000 and are thus expressed in per mil (‰), or parts per thousand.

## Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during this study will be available at the ECCC open portal repository, https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset?organization=ec or may be obtained from the corresponding author by reasonable request.

## References

1. 1.

Laidre, K. L. et al. Range contraction and increasing isolation of a polar bear subpopulation in an era of sea-ice loss. Ecol. Evol. 8, 2062–2075 (2018).

2. 2.

Wolf, C. & Ripple, W. J. Range contractions of the world’s large carnivores. R. Soc. open Sci. 4, 170052 (2017).

3. 3.

Vongraven, D., Derocher, A. E. & Bohart, A. M. Polar bear research: has science helped management and conservation? Environ. Rev. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2018-0021 (2018).

4. 4.

Chesson, L. A. et al. Applying the principles of isotope analysis in plant and animal ecology to forensic science in the Americas. Oecologia 187, 1077–1094 (2018).

5. 5.

Vander Zanden, H. B., Nelson, D. M., Wunder, M. B., Conkling, T. J. & Katzner, T. Application of isoscapes to determine geographic origin of terrestrial wildlife for conservation and management. Biol. Conserv. 228, 268–280 (2018).

6. 6.

Thiemann, G. W., Iverson, S. J. & Stirling, I. Polar bear diets and arctic marine food webs: Insights from fatty acid analysis. Ecol. Monogr. 78, 591–613 (2008).

7. 7.

Chaousis, S., Leusch, F. D. L. & van de Merwe, J. P. Charting a path towards non-destructive biomarkers in threatened wildlife: A systematic quantitative literature review. Environ. Pollut. 234, 59–70 (2018).

8. 8.

Hobson, K. A. & Wassenaar, L. I. Tracking animal migration with stable isotopes. (Academic Press, 2019).

9. 9.

Wilder, J. et al. Management and Conservation on Polar Bears, 2010–2016. In Polar Bears: Proceedings of the 18th Working Meeting of the IUCN/SSC Polar Bear Specialist Group, 7–11 June 2016, Anchorage, Alaska 207, 151 (2018).

10. 10.

Derocher, A. E., Lunn, N. J. & Stirling, I. Polar bears in a warming climate. Integr. Comp. Biol. 44, 163–176 (2004).

11. 11.

Stirling, I. & Derocher, A. E. Possible impacts of climatic warming on polar bears. Arctic 240–245 (1993).

12. 12.

Regehr, E. V., Lunn, N. J., Amstrup, S. C. & Stirling, I. Effects of earlier sea ice breakup on survival and population size of polar bears in western Hudson Bay. J. Wildl. Manage. 71, 2673–2683 (2007).

13. 13.

Thiemann, G. W., Derocher, A. E. & Stirling, I. Polar bear Ursus maritimus conservation in Canada: an ecological basis for identifying designatable units. Oryx 42, 504 (2008).

14. 14.

Iken, K., Bluhm, B. & Gradinger, R. Food web structure in the high Arctic Canada Basin: evidence from d13C and 15N analysis. Polar Biol. 28, 238–249 (2005).

15. 15.

Kohn, M. J. & J., M. Predicting animal δ18O: Accounting for diet and physiological adaptation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 60, 4811–4829 (1996).

16. 16.

Arnould, J. P. Y. & Ramsay, M. A. Milk production and milk consumption in polar bears during the ice-free period in western Hudson Bay. Can. J. Zool. 72, 1365–1370 (1994).

17. 17.

Jenkins, S. G., Partridge, S. T., Stephenson, T. R., Farley, S. D. & Robbins, C. T. Nitrogen and carbon isotope fractionation between mothers, neonates, and nursing offspring. Oecologia 129, 336–341 (2001).

18. 18.

Pomerleau, C., Nelson, R. J., Hunt, B. P. V., Sastri, A. R. & Williams, W. J. Spatial patterns in zooplankton communities and stable isotope ratios (δ13C and δ15N) in relation to oceanographic conditions in the sub-Arctic Pacific and western Arctic regions during the summer of 2008. J. Plankton Res. 36, 757–775 (2014).

19. 19.

Viengkone, M. et al. Assessing spatial discreteness of Hudson Bay polar bear populations using telemetry and genetics. Ecosphere 9, e02364 (2018).

20. 20.

Viengkone, M. et al. Assessing polar bear (Ursus maritimus) population structure in the Hudson Bay region using SNPs. Ecol. Evol. 6, 8474–8484 (2016).

21. 21.

St. Louis, V. L. et al. Differences in Mercury Bioaccumulation between Polar Bears (Ursus maritimus) from the Canadian high- and sub-Arctic. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 5922–5928 (2011).

22. 22.

Rogers, M. C., Peacock, E., Simac, K., O’Dell, M. B. & Welker, J. M. Diet of female polar bears in the southern Beaufort Sea of Alaska: evidence for an emerging alternative foraging strategy in response to environmental change. Polar Biol. 38, 1035–1047 (2015).

23. 23.

Hobson, K. A. & Koehler, G. On the use of stable oxygen isotope (δ18O) measurements for tracking avian movements in North America. Ecol. Evol. 5 (2015).

24. 24.

Hobson, K. A., Van Wilgenburg, S. L., Wassenaar, L. I. & Larson, K. Linking hydrogen (δ 2h) isotopes in feathers and precipitation: Sources of variance and consequences for assignment to isoscapes. PLoS One 7, e35137 (2012).

25. 25.

Qi, H. & Coplen, T. B. Investigation of preparation techniques for d2H analysis of keratin materials and a proposed analytical protocol. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 25, 2209–2222 (2011).

26. 26.

Nair, S. et al. Isotopic disproportionation during hydrogen isotopic analysis of nitrogen-bearing organic compounds. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 29, 878–884 (2015).

27. 27.

Soto, D. X., Koehler, G., Wassenaar, L. I. & Hobson, K. A. Re-evaluation of the hydrogen stable isotopic composition of keratin calibration standards for wildlife and forensic science applications. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 31 (2017).

28. 28.

Qi, H., Coplen, T. B. & Wassenaar, L. I. Improved online $δ$18O measurements of nitrogen-and sulfur-bearing organic materials and a proposed analytical protocol. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 25, 2049–2058 (2011).

29. 29.

Venables, W. N., Venables, W. N., Ripley, B. D. & Isbn, S. Statistics Complements to Modern Applied Statistics with S Fourth edition by (2002).

30. 30.

R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (2015).

31. 31.

Rousseeuw, P. J. Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 20, 53–65 (1987).

32. 32.

Diggle, P. J. & Ribeiro, P. J. Bayesian Inference in Gaussian Model-based Geostatistics. Geogr. Environ. Model. 6, 129–146 (2002).

33. 33.

Hijmans, R. J. & van Etten, J. Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling. R Package. version 2, 5–2, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02498-9 (2015).

34. 34.

Kaufman, L. & Rousseeuw, P. J. Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis–John Wiley & Sons. Inc., New York (1990).

35. 35.

Hobson, K. A. et al. A multi‐isotope (δ13C, δ15N, δ2H) feather isoscape to assign Afrotropical migrant birds to origins. Ecosphere 3, 1–20 (2012).

## Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) as part of the Three Prong Approach for polar bear conservation and management. Thanks to Elizabeth Peacock and Marcus Dyck (Government of Nunavut) and Nick Lunn and Evan Richardson (ECCC) who provided archived samples from previous studies and for helpful discussions. Chantel Gryba and Gail Grey (ECCC) assisted with sample preparation. We acknowledge Andy Derocher and two anonymous reviewers whose comments and suggestions further improved this work.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

All authors contributed equally to this work. G.K. and K.A.H. conceived the original idea, and K.A.H. oversaw the Nunavut sample acquisitions. G.K. performed the isotope analyses. K.J.K. reduced, consolidated, and analysed the data. G.K. wrote the initial manuscript. All authors discussed the results and implications and commented on and edited the manuscript at all stages.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoff Koehler.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Koehler, G., Kardynal, K.J. & Hobson, K.A. Geographical assignment of polar bears using multi-element isoscapes. Sci Rep 9, 9390 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45874-w