Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Comprehensive and Systematic Analysis of Gene Expression Patterns Associated with Body Mass Index

Abstract

Both genetic and environmental factors are suggested to influence overweight and obesity risks. Although individual loci and genes have been frequently shown to be associated with body mass index (BMI), the overall interaction of these genes and their role in BMI remains underexplored. Data were collected in 90 healthy, predominately Caucasian participants (51% female) with a mean age of 26.00 ± 9.02 years. Whole blood samples were assayed by Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array. We integrated and analyzed the clinical and microarray gene expression data from those individuals to understand various systematic gene expression patterns underlying BMI. Conventional differential expression analysis identified seven genes RBM20, SEPT12, AX748233, SLC30A3, WTIP, CASP10, and OR12D3 associated with BMI. Weight gene co-expression network analysis among 4,647 expressed genes identified two gene modules associated with BMI. These two modules, with different extents of gene connectivity, are enriched for catabolic and muscle system processes respectively, and tend to be regulated by zinc finger transcription factors. A total of 246 hub genes were converted to non-hub genes, and 286 non-hub genes were converted to hub genes between normal and overweight individuals, revealing the network dynamics underlying BMI. A total of 28 three-way gene interactions were identified, suggesting the existence of high-order gene expression patterns underlying BMI. Our study demonstrated a variety of systematic gene expression patterns associated with BMI and thus provided novel understanding regarding the genetic factors for overweight and obesity risks on system levels.

Introduction

Obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m2, is an increasingly prevalent public health concern worldwide. Obesity is associated with several health problems including diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer that increase morbidity and mortality1,2,3. Thus, thousands of studies have been conducted to identify the biological mechanisms underlying obesity in order to identify potential causes of the disease and find methods to mitigate its burden.

Genetics methods exploring biological mechanisms of obesity have utilized multiple molecular methods/techniques including single-gene mutations, transgenic and knockout mouse models, quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping, association mapping, and gene expression signatures4,5,6,7. Recently, several genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with obesity4,8,9,10,11, among which 97 genetic loci were associated with BMI and 49 loci were associated when waist-to-hip ratio was adjusted for BMI8,10. Although these studies have helped identify individual mutations and loci associated with BMI, the relevant biological function of these genetic variants is not fully understood.

Leveraging regulatory relationships in system-level gene expression data can highlight biological pathways implicated in obesity and offer further insights into the biological function of these genetic variants. Recent studies have demonstrated that whole-blood transcriptome profiles are valid biological data for weight status and thus provide a more parsimonious method to investigate the functional genomics of obesity, wherein both genes and pathways are included12,13,14,15. To this end, we generated and integrated gene expression data of venous blood samples and clinical data for 90 individuals. As a convention and validation, we utilized differential expression analysis to detect individual genes responsible for obesity risk. Then, we studied system-level gene expression patterns. We used Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) to detect gene modules (groups of co-expressed genes) that could potentially interact to mediate increases in weight. We utilized gene connectivity analysis to understand network property changes associated with overweight risks. Lastly, we applied three-way gene interaction analysis to depict the sophisticated gene relationships that may contribute to increased weight. Together this study provides a better understanding of genetic factors in overweight and obese phenotypes through the study of networks, pathways, interactions, and regulation of weight-related genes.

Materials and Methods

Design and setting

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and the Office of Human Subjects Research at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data from participants in a natural history protocol (Clinicaltrial.gov #NCT00824941) conducted at the Hatfield Clinical Research Center, NIH were included. All research activities were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The exclusion criteria of the parent outpatient study included individuals with any known organic disease (e.g., endocrine, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, renal, neurologic, or gynecological pathology). Underweight participants were also excluded. Normal weight, overweight, and obese participants were eligible for inclusion in the study. Participants provided written informed consent during outpatient visits from February 2009 to July 2017. Anthropometric measures (height and weight) and blood samples were collected from fasting participants during the same visit.

Sample demographics and clinical variables

This study included healthy participants (n = 90) from the parent study (predominately Caucasian, 51% female, mean age 26.00 ± 9.02 years). Detailed baseline demographic characteristics were noted previously16. In this study, we divided participants into three genetic-ancestry categories: Caucasian (n = 46), African American (n = 23) and other (n = 21), where Asian and other ethnic groups were categorized as “other”.

Clinical data were collected from the Clinical Research Information System. Weight was measured in triplicate and then averaged; height was measured in duplicate and then averaged. The average height and weight were used to determine BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. A trained registered nurse completed whole-body air displacement plethysmography (BOD PODTM), which determines body fat percent, on all patients. Intra-abdominal height, a measure from the highest abdominal point to the spine in centimeters while the patient is supine, was calculated via ultrasound. Intra-abdominal height was measured without applying pressure to the ultrasound probe. Venous blood samples were sent to the Department of Laboratory Medicine for evaluation of routine cardiovascular laboratory values including fasting glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, high density lipoprotein (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL), and serum insulin. There were a total of nine missing values in the clinical trait data. Missing values were excluded from related statistics.

Classification of weight status

We classified weight-status for each person as “normal” weight or “overweight.” We found that the three ethnic groups of this study had very different median BMIs (Caucasian: 24.83; African American: 29.51; and other: 23.46). If we used the conventional criteria of BMI greater than 25 to define overweight, population structures were very different between normal and overweight groups (Supplementary Fig. S1), which could cause differential expression analysis to be confounded by ethnic differences. Thus, we used ethnic-specific BMI cutoffs, which were the median BMI of each ethnic group, to define overweight. The cohort was thus divided into 43 normal weight and 41 overweight individuals that had very similar population structures (Supplementary Fig. S1). Table 1 shows comparisons of demographic and clinical characteristics between normal weight and overweight individuals.

Table 1 Comparison of clinical characteristics between normal weight and overweight individuals.

RNA isolation, amplification, microarray data processing, and annotation

Details on methods were published in detail previously16. In short, blood samples were collected in PAXgeneTM RNA (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Total RNA was extracted and purified using an RNA PAXgene kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Samples in which total RNA passed quality control criteria were used for microarray. All samples were assayed by Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array. Quality control and data preprocessing were performed as previously noted16. Then, microarray expression data were normalized using quantile normalization. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) indicated that batch effects existed between the two batches (Supplementary Fig. S2). Therefore, the Combat software17 was implemented to remove the batch effects in the microarray expression data. PCA indicated that batch effects had been successfully removed (Supplementary Fig. S2).

Sample size estimation

The sample size needed to perform differential expression analysis was evaluated using the SSPA Bioconductor package18,19. Twenty samples (10 normal and 10 overweight samples) were randomly selected from the cohort to estimate power versus sample size.

Differential expression analysis

Differential expression analysis between normal weight and overweight individuals was performed using the Limma Bioconductor package20.

Evaluation of expressed genes

A total of 13,276 genes were ranked according to their average expression levels. Top ranked genes were more likely to be expressed. According to a study on gene expression profiles, over 91 human and mouse tissues, 30~40% genes, were estimated to be expressed in any tissue21. In this study, we assumed that 35% (4,647) genes were expressed.

Constructing gene co-expression networks

Gene co-expression networks were constructed using the WGCNA package22. The 4,647 expressed genes over the 84 individuals were included in the analysis. The scale-free property of the network was visualized (Supplementary Fig. S3). We chose a soft power of 6, which was the lowest power for which the scale-free topology fit index curve flattens out upon reaching a high value. Then, one-step network construction and module detection were performed, with the following parameters: TOMType = “unsigned”, minModuleSize = 10, reassign Threshold = 0, and mergeCutHeight = 0.25. The hierarchical clustering dendrogram was then successfully generated (Supplementary Fig. S4).

Computing gene connectivity

Topology similarity23 was used to measure the similarity between gene expression profiles. We used the WGCNA package to generate the topological matrix for the 4,647 expressed genes. To compute within-module gene connectivity, 99% percentile of the topology overlap matrix11 based on the 4,647 expressed genes was computed and used as the cutoff for determining whether two genes are connected. Note that within-module gene connectivity reflects how a gene is connected to other genes within the module, while it is possible that that gene is also connected to several external genes.

To compute gene connectivity changes between normal and overweight gene networks, we first computed TOMs based on the 4,647 expressed genes within normal and overweight gene networks respectively. Then, the 99% percentile of the TOM was computed in each network and used as the cutoff to define gene connection in that network. All 4,647 expressed genes were included to compute gene connectivity (connection to itself was excluded). Assuming that a gene’s connectivity is C1 in network 1 and C2 in network 2, change of gene connectivity between the two networks is defined as:

$${\rm{\Delta }}C=\frac{{C}_{2}-{C}_{1}}{{C}_{2}+{C}_{1}+s}$$

where s is a pseudo count of gene connectivity, which is 45.47, the average gene connectivity in this study.

Functional properties of BMI-associated modules

Functional enrichment analysis was performed using the GOStats Bioconductor package24. Only over-representation was assessed via the hypergeometric test. To evaluate enrichment of differentially expressed genes, all 13,276 genes were used as the genomic background. To evaluate enrichment of co-expression gene modules, the 4,647 expressed genes were used as the genomic background. P-values were adjusted by the BH approach25.

Canonical pathway analyses were generated through the use of IPA (QIAGEN Inc., https://www.qiagenbioinformatics.com/products/ingenuity-pathway-analysis)26 on 157 genes within the “black” module and 35 genes within the lightcyan module. These networks received a score based on the number of genes involved in a network. Top networks and their network functions were also analyzed for each module. As a complimentary approach to IPA, we used Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING)27 to examine predicted protein-protein interactions (PPIs). We inputted the 157 genes in the “black” module and the 35 genes in the lightcyan module (same genes inputted into IPA). The genes within each module were mapped into PPI networks.

Regulatory motif analysis

Over-represented transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) and TFBS families in DNA sequences of gene co-expression modules were identified using the oPOSSUM-3 web server28. The 4,647 expressed genes were used as the background genes. JASPAR core profiles (i.e., all vertebrate profiles) were used, with a minimum specificity of 8 bits. TFBS search parameters were set as: conservation cutoff: 0.60; matrix score threshold: 85%; amount of upstream/downstream sequence: 2000/2000; number of results to return: top 20 results; sorted by Z-score.

Three-way gene interaction analysis

Three-way gene expression analysis was performed using the xSyn software29. The cutoff of tree height was set to 0.02. The 4,647 expressed genes were sorted in descending order of conditional entropy with weight status. The top 100 genes were selected for detection of three-way gene interactions.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the National Institutes of Health. Clinicaltrial.gov # NCT00824941.

Accession numbers

Microarray data can be found on Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession number GSE109597.

Results

Study data

This nested case-controlled analysis included ancestrally diverse (46 Caucasians, 23 African Americans, and 21 from other ancestral groups) participants were recruited to a natural history protocol (Clinicaltrial.gov #NCT00824941) conducted at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Hatfield Clinical Research Center. Fasting biological samples and questionnaires were collected from outpatient participants.

A total of 21 clinical variables were assessed, including height, weight, BMI, body fat, cortisol level, insulin level, glucose level, cholesterol level, triglycerides level, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoproteins (LDL), level of C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), IgG, IgA, IgM, IgE, Intra-Abdominal Fat (IAF), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Missing clinical data were imputed. In this study, obesity risk was approximated by Body Mass Index (BMI).

Whole-blood samples of the 90 participants were assayed for genome-wide expression profiles using the Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 microarray (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). After removing outlier samples (see Methods), we kept 84 samples for analysis. Expression profiles of 13,276 genes were then generated (see Methods). Potential batch effects were assessed and corrected (see Methods). Distributions of gene expression levels indicated that outlier samples did not exist (Supplementary Fig. S5). We further assessed whether microarray data could be significantly affected by gender, geographic ancestry, or age through PCA, and found that the first and second principal components were not significantly correlated with gender, race, or age, while the third principal component was significantly correlated only with gender (Supplementary Fig. S6 and Table S1). This analysis indicates that for most (if not all) of the analyzed genes, gender, race, nor age affect gene expression levels.

Differential expression analysis

We asked whether there are differential expressed (DE) genes between normal and overweight individuals. To this end, we first assessed whether a total of 84 individuals were sufficient for detecting DE genes. We used randomly selected 20 samples to draw a plot between power and sample size in each group (Fig. S7), which suggested that with 84 samples available, power is expected to be around 0.55. This power was very modest, and thus we decided to use all samples from different races rather than samples from a single ancestral group for the DE analysis. To ensure that potential DE genes reflected different weight phenotypes rather than population structures, 43 normal weight and 41 overweight individuals, with very similar population structures, were distinguished by a special approach relying on genetic-ancestry specific BMI cutoffs (see Methods).

To avoid a decrease in statistical power, we considered that it was not necessary to include gender, race, or age as covariates of DE analysis, because including more variables would reduce power for the same sample size, or more samples would be needed to reach the same power. There may be several genes whose expression levels were associated with gender, race, or age. However, if the overall variables required adjustment, we would expect that they would be significantly associated with the first or second principal component of the microarray data, however, we have shown that none were associated in the previous section (Supplementary Fig. S6 and Table S1). Then, we assessed whether weight status was a major variable affecting the microarray data. We found weight status was not associated with the first or second principal component of the microarray data (Supplementary Fig. S8, p-values: 0.27 or 0.64, F-test). Next, we used the q-value software15, a more sensitive approach, to assess DE genes between normal and overweight individuals. The default plot of the q-value software (Fig. 1) shows that there is a two-fold density peak within the smallest p-value range (i.e., <0,04), suggesting that there are indeed DE genes. However, the q-value curve goes up quickly in that range, confirming a modest power. Equally speaking, although the number of DE genes was estimated at 13,276 × (1–0.804) = 2602, it was difficult to accurately detect them due to high False Discovery Rate (FDR).

Figure 1
figure1

P-value distribution shown with local FDR and q-value levels. P-values were generated by the limma software, and then fed into the qvalue software.

Next, we used the LIMMA software to identify DE genes between normal and overweight individuals. The model matrix defined the weight status as the only factor variable, in addition to the intercept. With a FDR-adjusted p-value cutoff of 0.1, seven genes were found to be differentially expressed, RBM20, SEPT12, AX748233, SLC30A3, WTIP, CASP10, and OR12D3 (Table 2). A volcano plot is provided to display significance versus fold-changes (Supplementary Fig. S9).

Table 2 Differential expressed genes between normal and overweight individuals.

Genetic variants of RBM20 are associated with dilated cardiomyopathy such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction both in humans and in animal models30,31. Mutations of RBM20 gene are known to cause cardiomyopathies because RBM20 regulates circular RNA production from the Titin (TTN) gene31,32. Several studies have documented how individuals with obesity are at higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease27,33. This finding suggests that those with obesity may have an increased expression of RBM20 that increases their risk for cardiovascular disease.

SEPT12 encodes for Septin 12, plays a role including cytokinesis, exocytosis, and membrane dynamics. SEPT12 is involved in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) related networks, and mutations of this gene have been associated with infertility in men34,35. Studies have increasingly pointed to obesity and associated comorbidities as potential contributors to AD pathophysiology, suggesting that higher BMI and obesity are linked to cognitive decline, brain atrophy, reduced white matter and integrity of the blood-brain barrier, and elevated risk for late-onset AD36. Likewise, obesity has been shown to impact male fertility function and molecular composition37.

WTIP is transcribed into Wilms tumor 1 protein (WTIP), which is a scaffold protein that is involved in multiple cellular processes including cytoskeletal organization, cell differentiation, and proliferation38. The WTIP molecule plays an important role in kidney-cell remodeling39. Modulation of WTIP can lead to the kidney-cell scarring (e.g., focal segmental glomerulosclerosis) that is characteristic in diabetes mellitus40,41. Thus, alterations to WTIP may be associated with obesity associated comorbidities, including diabetes42.

CASP10 encodes a protein from the caspase family that is involved in cell apoptosis and survival43. Sequential activation of caspases is an important regulation step within the execution phase of cell apoptosis. Alterations in DNA methylation of the CASP10 gene have been found in pancreatic B cells of people with diabetes mellitus44,45. Polymorphisms and mutations in this gene are also associated with different types of cancer46. This suggests that both genetic and epigenetic modifications of the CASP10 gene may have an important translation implication in diabetes and cancer, which are common comorbid conditions associated with obesity.

Lastly, Olfactory receptor family 12 subfamily D member 3 (OR12D3) is a gene that codes for proteins involved in sensory perception of smell. The olfactory receptor proteins are members of a large family of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) arising from single coding-exon genes. Olfactory receptors share transmembrane domain structures with many neurotransmitter and hormone receptors to recognize and G protein-mediated transduce odorant signals47. The OR12D3 gene has been associated with several carcinomas such as stomach cancer, endometrial cancer, and liver cancer48. Together these differentially expressed genes encode proteins involved in cellular regulation whose mutations are associated with disease processes that are often associated with obesity, including cancer and cardiovascular disease.

Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA)

Diseases such as obesity can result from dysregulation of gene networks. To more comprehensively understand the gene expression mechanisms underlying weight status, we conducted Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA). To reduce noise in the networks, we selected 35% (4,647) top expressed genes for analysis. The gene co-expression networks were constructed, resulting in 21 gene modules (Fig. 2A). The sizes of these gene modules range from 13 to 1218 genes, with a median size of 103 genes. We further related these gene modules to the 21 clinical variables. Interestingly, we identified two gene modules responsible for the weight, BMI, systolic and diastolic traits - the “black” and “lightcyan” modules (Fig. 2A). The “black” and “lightcyan” modules have 157 and 35 genes respectively. (Supplementary Table S2). We found that in these modules, gene module memberships are highly correlated with gene significance for BMI (Fig. 2B), which enabled us to further prioritize these genes according to gene module memberships (Supplementary Table S2). Note that it appears that the “lightyellow” module is negatively correlated with BMI. However, this module has only 18 genes, and there is no correlation between module memberships and gene significance. Thus, we believed that this negative correlation may not be real.

Figure 2
figure2

Detection of gene modules associated with clinical traits. (A) Matrix of gene module-trait relationships. Each matrix element contains a correlation value between a gene module’s eigenvector (y-axis) and a clinical trait (x-axis) and its corresponding P-value and is colored according to the correlation. Explanation of the traits: BMI: body mass index, BF: body fat, IAF: intra-abdominal fat. (B) Module memberships are significantly correlated with gene significance for BMI in “black” and “lightcyan” modules.

Functional properties of BMI-associated modules

Next, we investigated the functional characteristics of these two BMI-associated gene modules. Within the “black” module, we found multiple groups of genes coding for biological functions. The top gene (the most interconnected gene) found in the WGCA “black” module was BCL2L1 (B-cell lymphoma-2-like protein 1) (Supplementary Table 2). The BCL2 (B-cell lymphoma-2) family of genes are known to play a major role in apoptosis, and their levels are correlated with BMI and inflammation49. The proapoptotic state found in obesity is correlated with insulin signaling, suggesting it can play a role in insulin resistance50. Furthermore, the BCL2 family proteins have the potential to affect multiple mechanisms of cardiac damage, including ischemia, calcium dysregulation, and oxidative stress via apoptotic changes51. This is consistent with the biological function of genes within the black module (e.g., BCL2L1, EPOR, BNIP3L, BRAF, and GADD45A). These genes regulate cellular response to stress, and dysregulation of this important biological function may result in the inflammation observed in obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer52. Other groups of genes within the “black” module (e.g., BCL2L1 SKP1, FBX09, USP12, and RNF4) also participate in cellular catabolism, which if disrupted (as is seen in our high BMI group), can have pathological metabolic sequelae that are observed across the above-mentioned comorbid conditions and cancer.

Another salient group of genes (i.e., EPOR, BCL2L1, FBXO7, SCNA, APP, PINK1) within the “black” module have been associated with neuron apoptotic processes. In animal studies, beta-amyloid peptides such as APP (amyloid beta precursor protein) was shown to enhance SNCA (-synuclein) accumulation leading to neuronal deficits in a transgenic mouse model linking neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease53. In addition, FBX07 immunoreactivity in -synuclein have been associated with Parkinson’s disease and multiple system atrophy54. A recent study showed that loss of PINK1 (PTEN-induced putative kinase 1 (PINK1), a regulatory protein that is highly expressed in the brain) inhibits apoptosis by upregulating α-synuclein in inflammation-sensitized mouse brains suggesting that loss of PINK1 may play a novel protective role of inflammation in the brain55. There is ample evidence in both animal and human studies demonstrating that obesity is a risk factor for Alzheimer’s Disease, suggesting that the chronic low-grade systemic inflammation seen in obesity leads to neuroinflammation56,57,58. However, the association of Parkinson’s disease-risk and obesity remains debatable59,60, warranting more research.

The top gene within the “lightcyan” module was the SPARC (secreted protein acid and rich in cysteine) gene. This gene modulates tissue physiology and alters cell-ECM interaction, cell proliferation, and cell migration61. Its role in regulating wound healing, angiogenesis, tumorogenesis, and inflammation is consistent with its positive correlation to diabetes and cardiovascular disease61. Other genes within the “lightcyan” module, which interact with SPARC to modulate wound healing, include PPKAR2B (protein kinase cAMP type II subunit beta), TREML1 (triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell like 1), and vinculin. Mutations in these genes may also lead to vascular disease, cardiomyopathy, and dementia/neurodegeneration62,63, respectively. Thus, both of the most interconnected genes of the “black” and “lightcyan” modules and other genes within these two models are known to play a key role in obesity and other pathogenic processes leading to diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and neurodegeneration.

We also performed GO biological process and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis using the Gostat software24, with a p-value cutoff of 0.01. The results (Supplementary Table S3) show that the “black” module is mainly enriched for catabolic processes and Wnt signaling pathway, while the “lightcyan” module is mainly enriched for muscular system, cell migration/motility and vasculature development. Analysis of top 20 over-representative transcription factor binding sites (Supplementary Table S4) suggested that only four transcription factors – FEV, HLF, RREB1 and ZNF354C – were shared between the two gene modules, however, zinc finger transcription factors are the major family in both gene modules.

IPA identified significant networks in the “black” and “lightcyan” modules (Fig. 3A,B)26. We identified eleven gene networks in the black module, which had scores between 2 to 47. Gene networks in the “black” module had associated network functions including cell morphology, cancer, inflammatory responses, and neurological disease. Top canonical pathways included iron homeostasis, nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2) NRF2-mediated Oxidative Stress Response, and glutamine biosynthesis. Four gene networks were found in the “lightcyan” module with scores of 40, 19, 14, and 1. Gene networks in the “lightcyan” module were associated with cancer, cell-to-cell signaling, cellular morphology, and smooth muscle. Top canonical pathways included breast cancer regulation endocytosis signaling, integrin signaling, tight-junction signaling, Sertoli cell junction, Integrin-linked kinase signaling, and clathrin-mediated endocytosis signaling.

Figure 3
figure3

Gene coexpression networks in BMI-associated modules. Every node depicts a gene and lines represent a coexpression relationship. (A) Gene coexpression networks of the “black” module. (B) Gene coexpression networks of the lightcyan module. The figure was generated through the use of IPA (QIAGEN Inc., https://www.qiagenbio-informatics.com/products/ingenuity-pathway-analysis).

The “black” module analysis found 150 modes, 165 edges, and a PPI enrichment value of <1.0e-16. The proteins that were closely associated with other proteins included, RNF41, RNF14, SKP1, UBE2H, and NS FBXO9. These proteins are known to be associated with pathways including regulation mitophagy, TOR signaling, and ubiquitin-dependent catabolic processes (Fig. 4A). The “lightcyan” PPI had 33 nodes, 15 edges, and a PPI enrichment value of 6.6e-05. Proteins with high PPIs included, ITGB5, MYLK, and VCL. These proteins are involved in antigen processing and presentation of exogenous peptides, virus receptor activity, aorta smooth muscle tissue morphogenesis, and platelet aggregation (Fig. 4B).

Figure 4
figure4

Protein-protein interactions in BMI-associated modules. Each node denotes a gene and each line indicates a protein-protein interaction. (A) Protein-protein interactions in the “black” module. (B) Protein-protein interactions in the lightcyan module.

Gene connectivity analysis

Gene connectivity measures the number of genes that a gene is connected to. Hub genes are frequently believed to be more functionally important than peripheral genes. Here we adopted a customized approach to determine whether two genes were connected – their topology similarity should be greater than 0.99 quartile of topology overlap matrix (see Methods). We computed the within-module gene connectivity for the “black” and “lightcyan” modules. Visualization of gene connectivity (Fig. 5) suggests that the genes in the “black” module are more inter-connected than the “lightcyan” module. Only 40% of the 35 genes in the “lightcyan” module are interconnected, while 66% are interconnected in the “black” module. We further sorted the genes within these two modules by importance according to gene connectivity (Supplementary Table S5). This ranking is similar to that of the gene module membership.

Figure 5
figure5

Network visualization of the gene modules associated with weight traits. Each node denotes a gene, and each line indicates that two genes have a topology similarity greater than 0.99 quantile. Note that genes not connected based on our criteria are not displayed.

Next, we evaluated potential gene connectivity changes between normal and overweight individuals. Genes that are converted from hub to peripheral genes or from peripheral genes to hub genes are more likely to perform important roles in development of obesity. Weighted gene co-expression networks within normal and overweight individuals respectively were constructed based on the 4,647 expressed genes. Then, we used 0.99 quantile of topology overlap matrix to define the two genes’ connection in normal and overweight networks respectively. Subsequently, we applied a formula to compute gene connectivity changes (see Methods). We then used gene connectivity change >0.5 to define nonhub genes being converted to hub genes in overweight individuals, and gene connectivity change <−0.5 to define hub genes being converted to nonhub genes in overweight individuals. We identified 246 hub genes that were converted to nonhub genes and 286 nonhub genes that were converted to hub genes in overweight individuals (Supplementary Table S6). However, functional significance analysis indicated that there was no enriched GO biological process term in these genes. This analysis suggests that a considerable number of genes are differentially connected between normal and overweight individuals, shedding some light on the network dynamics underlying human weight.

Three-way gene interaction analysis

We investigated whether there were more sophisticated gene expression patterns underlying human weight. To this end, we considered three-way gene interactions, defined as two gene expression profiles being clustered in different space locations. These highly synergistic genes would be under the control of a third gene (i.e., gene X)29 and could have differential expression or outlier differential expression associated with weight status. We utilized the xSyn software for this analysis. We computed the top 100 genes with the highest conditional entropy. We then searched the 100 genes for gene pairs with synergy greater than 0.9. Lastly, we assessed whether any gene pairs associations could be attributed to a third control gene. We identified a total of 28 three-way gene interactions (Supplementary Table S7). We then randomly chose a three-way gene interaction for visualization (Fig. 6). This analysis suggests complicated high-order gene interactions that may contribute to the genetic mechanisms affecting human weight.

Figure 6
figure6

Visualization of a 3-way gene interaction underlying the microarray data. “.” represents downregulation of gene X whereas “+” represents upregulation of gene X. Clusters tend to be filled with the same status of gene X, and thus, an optimal synergy is achieved. The gene X shows differential expression between downregulation and upregulation statuses.

Discussion

Gene expression data can offer key information for understanding the genetic mechanisms underlying increases in body weight and obesity. In this study we identified 7 differentially expressed genes, RBM20, SEPT12, AX748233, SLC30A3, WTIP, CASP10, and OR12D3. These genes code for proteins that play an important biological function, including cellular apoptosis, cytoskeletal organization, and olfaction. Alteration of these genes can result in pathological processes leading to diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, or dementia. We found that three (AX748233, CASP10, and OR12D3) out of the seven DE genes can be found to be differentially expressed under different weight status in external data (Supplemental Fig. S10). It is well known that the repeatability of microarray experiments is low due to different experimental designs, protocols, population structures, systematic errors, etc.64. However, this also suggests that new experiments are still desired to achieve deep understanding of the genetic mechanisms for body weight and obesity. A combination of DE analysis and a variety of network analyses were not performed previously, so this study has provided many new insights.

Genes and protein interactions identified through IPA and STRING also contributed to the investigation of the role of these genes in gene networks and biological processes. Genes and protein networks within the “black” module were involved in cellular regulatory processes, and many were associated with tumor formation and multiple forms of cancer. Further supporting previously identified sub-networks of genes associated with cancer and cellular proliferation through network modelling65. Genes in the lightcyan module were associated with cellular and tissue structure, cancer, and cardiovascular biological processes. This suggests that BMI-associated genes closely interact in gene networks that are involved in the pathologic pathways of comorbid conditions (i.e., cancer and cardiovascular disease) that have been linked to obesity. These data are in line with previously discussed functions of differentially expressed genes in overweight/obese individuals. Further research should determine the relationship, directionality, and interaction of these obesity-related genes with cardiovascular disease and cancer-related genes.

Hybrid approaches that incorporate both genetic expression and enrichment analyses offer further insight into the functional significance of genes within complex biological pathways. Previous studies implemented limited analysis approaches. Based on differential expression and enrichment analyses, we found that the expression of seven genes was significantly correlated with body weight, some of which were previously reported in another study14. In addition, another study found that “ribosome,” “apoptosis,” and “oxidative phosphorylation” pathways were associated with obesity and were identified as pathway-specific predictors for obesity66.

Hybrid approaches with more advanced enrichment analyses provide a more complete understanding of the functional significance of genes. A recent study by implemented hybrid approaches using differential expression and enrichment analyses13 reported 32 genes and 3 pathways associated with BMI. They emphasized enrichment of NF-kappa B pathways in the 32 DE genes. However, only 2 (6.3%) DE genes were related to NF-kappa B pathways, and therefore the role of NF-kappa B pathways is not fully understood. Using WGCNA analysis, they identified a module of 68 genes associated with BMI. Those genes were thought to be related to a variety of biological processes, while each biological process contained only two or three genes (≤4.4%).

In the current study, we incorporated a robust hybrid method that identified more relationships between genes and their function within catabolic processes. We found that up to 43 (27.4%) of the 157 genes in the “black” module were related to catabolic processes (compared to ≤4.4% found by Wang et al.13. Thus, our study offers a more complete understanding of the functional role of differentially expressed genes in metabolic processes. Since it is well established that metabolic processes play a role in increased weight and obesity10,67,68, this information is key in identifying potential contributors to overweight and obese phenotypes.

In this study, we demonstrated that complex high-order gene interactions could also play a role in the genetic mechanisms underlying overweight and obese phenotypes. To our knowledge, this is the first paper to show high-order gene interactions in overweight and obese phenotypes. With improvement of computation capacity and development of intelligent approaches, high-order interactions will be investigated more frequently and successfully, providing new avenues toward fully understanding the genetics of increased weight and obesity. Although, a comprehensive analysis of microarray data was conducted in this study, gene expression is only one layer of genetic information. We previously showed that the combination of gene expression and SNP data could generate relatively better outcomes for predicting BMI16. Thus, future studies should integrate multiple layers of genetic and epigenetic data to better understand the role of genes and environmental factors in predicting risk for increased weight and obesity.

Future research should also re-examine gene co-expression of BMI-related genes across different tissues. In the current study, blood was collected to extract gene expression data. Although studies suggest there is comparability of genomic information derived from blood samples compared to other tissues, the correspondence between peripheral blood and tissues of interest is not fully understood69,70. A recent review of gene-expression across obesity relevant tissues found diverse BMI-related genes across tissues and tissue specific patterns70. Thus, studies utilizing animal tissue and human tissue (from existing tissue banks) are needed to examine the gene co-expression patterns identified in this study across other metabolic and obesity-related tissues. This would offer a more complete understanding of the functional role of genes and may help identify target tissues to study and treat obesity.

Conclusions

In this study, we integrated gene expression and clinical data of 90 healthy individuals to investigate the genetic mechanisms of overweight and obesity. A variety of computational approaches were applied to generate comprehensive and systematic gene expression insights into human weight. We identified seven differentially expressed genes associated with BMI. Using WGCNA, we found two modules significantly associated with BMI. The two modules displayed different connectivity and functional significance features and were frequently regulated by zinc finger family transcription factors. The major module was enriched for catabolic genes, which is consistent with other studies highlighting the roles of metabolic genes in the etiology of overweight and obesity. We also profiled the genes switching hub status between normal and overweight individuals, as well as three-way gene interactions associated with weight status. Our analyses have generated comprehensive and systematic insights into gene expression mechanisms underlying BMI and have highlighted complex high-order interactions that should be further explored in in future studies.

Data Availability

Dataset available in supplement. Additional data available upon request from senior author hendersw@mail.nih.gov upon request.

References

  1. 1.

    Arroyo-Johnson, C. & Mincey, K. D. Obesity Epidemiology Worldwide. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 45, 571–579, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gtc.2016.07.012 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Caballero, B. The global epidemic of obesity: an overview. Epidemiol Rev 29, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxm012 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mokdad, A. H. et al. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA 289, 76–79 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Singh, R. K., Kumar, P. & Mahalingam, K. Molecular genetics of human obesity: A comprehensive review. Comptes rendus biologies 340, 87–108, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2016.11.007 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Shabana & Hasnain, S. Obesity, More than a ‘Cosmetic’ Problem. Current Knowledge and Future Prospects of Human Obesity Genetics. Biochem Genet 54, 1–28, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-015-9700-2 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Albuquerque, D., Stice, E., Rodriguez-Lopez, R., Manco, L. & Nobrega, C. Current review of genetics of human obesity: from molecular mechanisms to an evolutionary perspective. Mol Genet Genomics 290, 1191–1221, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-015-1015-9 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Xia, Q. & Grant, S. F. The genetics of human obesity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1281, 178–190, https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12020 (2013).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Akiyama, M. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies 112 new loci for body mass index in the Japanese population. Nature genetics 49, 1458–1467, https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3951 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Goodarzi, M. O. Genetics of obesity: what genetic association studies have taught us about the biology of obesity and its complications. The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology 6, 223–236, https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(17)30200-0 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Locke, A. E. et al. Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology. Nature 518, 197–206, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14177 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Shungin, D. et al. New genetic loci link adipose and insulin biology to body fat distribution. Nature 518, 187–196, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14132 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Croteau-Chonka, D. C. et al. Gene Coexpression Networks in Whole Blood Implicate Multiple Interrelated Molecular Pathways in Obesity in People with Asthma. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) 26, 1938–1948, https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22341 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wang, W. et al. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis of expression data of monozygotic twins identifies specific modules and hub genes related to BMI. BMC Genomics 18, 872, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4257-6 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Berisha, S. Z., Serre, D., Schauer, P., Kashyap, S. R. & Smith, J. D. Changes in whole blood gene expression in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes following bariatric surgery: a pilot study. PLoS One 6, e16729, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016729 (2011).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Storey, J. D. & Tibshirani, R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 9440–9445, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1530509100 (2003).

    MathSciNet  CAS  Article  MATH  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Joseph, P. V., Wang, Y., Fourie, N. H. & Henderson, W. A. A computational framework for predicting obesity risk based on optimizing and integrating genetic risk score and gene expression profiles. PLoS One 13, e0197843, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197843 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Johnson, W. E., Li, C. & Rabinovic, A. Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. Biostatistics 8, 118–127, https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxj037 (2007).

    Article  MATH  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    van Iterson, M. et al. Relative power and sample size analysis on gene expression profiling data. BMC Genomics 10, 439, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-439 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    van Iterson, M., van de Wiel, M. A., Boer, J. M. & de Menezes, R. X. General power and sample size calculations for high-dimensional genomic data. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 12, 449–467, https://doi.org/10.1515/sagmb-2012-0046 (2013).

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ritchie, M. E. et al. Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res 43, e47, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv007 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Su, A. I. et al. Large-scale analysis of the human and mouse transcriptomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 4465–4470, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.012025199 (2002).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Langfelder, P. & Horvath, S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 559, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-559 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zhang, B. & Horvath, S. A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 4, Article17, https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1128 (2005).

  24. 24.

    Falcon, S. & Gentleman, R. Using GOstats to test gene lists for GO term association. Bioinformatics 23, 257–258, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl567 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Benjamini, Y., Drai, D., Elmer, G., Kafkafi, N. & Golani, I. Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behav Brain Res 125, 279–284 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kramer, A., Green, J., Pollard, J. Jr. & Tugendreich, S. Causal analysis approaches in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Bioinformatics 30, 523–530, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt703 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Van Gaal, L. F., Mertens, I. L. & De Block, C. E. Mechanisms linking obesity with cardiovascular disease. Nature 444, 875–880, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05487 (2006).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kwon, A. T., Arenillas, D. J., Worsley Hunt, R. & Wasserman, W. W. oPOSSUM-3: advanced analysis of regulatory motif over-representation across genes or ChIP-Seq datasets. G3 (Bethesda) 2, 987–1002, https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.112.003202 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bandyopadhyay, B., Chanda, V. & Wang, Y. xSyn: A Software Tool for Identifying Sophisticated 3-Way Interactions From Cancer Expression Data. Cancer Inform 16, 1176935117728516, https://doi.org/10.1177/1176935117728516 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Brauch, K. M. et al. Mutations in ribonucleic acid binding protein gene cause familial dilated cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 54, 930–941, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.038 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Guo, W. et al. RBM20, a gene for hereditary cardiomyopathy, regulates titin splicing. Nature medicine 18, 766–773, https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2693 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Khan, M. A. et al. RBM20 Regulates Circular RNA Production From the Titin Gene. Circulation research 119, 996–1003, https://doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.116.309568 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Despres, J. P. & Lemieux, I. Abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome. Nature 444, 881–887, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05488 (2006).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kuo, Y. C. et al. SEPT12 mutations cause male infertility with defective sperm annulus. Human mutation 33, 710–719, https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22028 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Miyamoto, T. et al. Male infertility and its causes in human. Advances in urology 2012, 384520, https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/384520 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Profenno, L. A., Porsteinsson, A. P. & Faraone, S. V. Meta-Analysis of Alzheimer’s Disease Risk with Obesity, Diabetes, and Related Disorders. Biological Psychiatry 67, 505–512, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.02.013 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Palmer, N. O., Bakos, H. W., Fullston, T. & Lane, M. Impact of obesity on male fertility, sperm function and molecular composition. Spermatogenesis 2, 253–263, https://doi.org/10.4161/spmg.21362 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Sedor, J. R., Madhavan, S. M., Kim, J. H. & Konieczkowski, M. Out on a LIM: chronic kidney disease, podocyte phenotype and the Wilm’s tumor interacting protein (WTIP). Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 122, 184–197 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kim, J. H., Mukherjee, A., Madhavan, S. M., Konieczkowski, M. & Sedor, J. R. WT1-interacting protein (Wtip) regulates podocyte phenotype by cell-cell and cell-matrix contact reorganization. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 302, F103–115, https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00419.2011 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Barisoni, L., Schnaper, H. W. & Kopp, J. B. Advances in the biology and genetics of the podocytopathies: implications for diagnosis and therapy. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine 133, 201–216, https://doi.org/10.1043/1543-2165-133.2.201 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Qian, J. et al. Association between CASP8 and CASP10 polymorphisms and toxicity outcomes with platinum-based chemotherapy in Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The oncologist 17, 1551–1561, https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0419 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Zhang, J. et al. WTIP interacts with BRCA2 and is essential for BRCA2 centrosome localization in cervical cancer cell. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294, 1311–1316, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4176-9 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Goepel, F., Weinmann, P., Schymeinsky, J. & Walzog, B. Identification of caspase-10 in human neutrophils and its role in spontaneous apoptosis. J Leukoc Biol 75, 836–843, https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.0703317 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Johnson, J. S. & Evans-Molina, C. Translational implications of the beta-cell epigenome in diabetes mellitus. Translational research: the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine 165, 91–101, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2014.03.002 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Volkmar, M. et al. DNA methylation profiling identifies epigenetic dysregulation in pancreatic islets from type 2 diabetic patients. The EMBO journal 31, 1405–1426, https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.503 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Zhu, S. et al. Genetic alterations in caspase-10 may be causative or protective in autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome. Hum Genet 119, 284–294, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-006-0138-9 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Volz, A. et al. Complex transcription and splicing of odorant receptor genes. J Biol Chem 278, 19691–19701, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M212424200 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Amadou, C. et al. Co-duplication of olfactory receptor and MHC class I genes in the mouse major histocompatibility complex. Hum Mol Genet 12, 3025–3040, https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddg317 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Siddiqui, W. A., Ahad, A. & Ahsan, H. The mystery of BCL2 family: Bcl-2 proteins and apoptosis: an update. Archives of toxicology 89, 289–317, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-014-1448-7 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Tinahones, F. J. et al. Caspase induction and BCL2 inhibition in human adipose tissue: a potential relationship with insulin signaling alteration. Diabetes care 36, 513–521, https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0194 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Gustafsson, A. B. & Gottlieb, R. A. Bcl-2 family members and apoptosis, taken to heart. American journal of physiology. Cell physiology 292, C45–51, https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00229.2006 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Chovatiya, R. & Medzhitov, R. Stress, inflammation, and defense of homeostasis. Mol Cell 54, 281–288, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.03.030 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Masliah, E. et al. Beta-amyloid peptides enhance alpha-synuclein accumulation and neuronal deficits in a transgenic mouse model linking Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 12245–12250, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.211412398 (2001).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Zhao, T. et al. FBXO7 immunoreactivity in alpha-synuclein-containing inclusions in Parkinson disease and multiple system atrophy. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 72, 482–488, https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0b013e318293c586 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Zhu, J. et al. Loss of PINK1 inhibits apoptosis by upregulating alpha-synuclein in inflammation-sensitized hypoxic-ischemic injury in the immature brains. Brain Res 1653, 14–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2016.10.009 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Alford, S., Patel, D., Perakakis, N. & Mantzoros, C. S. Obesity as a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease: weighing the evidence. Obes Rev 19, 269–280, https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12629 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Anstey, K. J., Cherbuin, N., Budge, M. & Young, J. Body mass index in midlife and late-life as a risk factor for dementia: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Obes Rev 12, e426–437, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00825.x (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kivipelto, M. et al. Obesity and vascular risk factors at midlife and the risk of dementia and Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 62, 1556–1560, https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.62.10.1556 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Roos, E. et al. Body mass index, sitting time, and risk of Parkinson disease. Neurology 90, e1413–e1417, https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005328 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Wang, Y. L. et al. Body Mass Index and Risk of Parkinson’s Disease: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies. PLoS One 10, e0131778, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131778 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Kos, K. & Wilding, J. P. SPARC: a key player in the pathologies associated with obesity and diabetes. Nature reviews. Endocrinology 6, 225–235, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2010.18 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Schmidt, M. L., Lee, V. M. & Trojanowski, J. Q. Analysis of epitopes shared by Hirano bodies and neurofilament proteins in normal and Alzheimer’s disease hippocampus. Lab Invest 60, 513–522 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Zysset, D. et al. TREM-1 links dyslipidemia to inflammation and lipid deposition in atherosclerosis. Nat Commun 7, 13151, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13151 (2016).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Ioannidis, J. P. A. et al. Repeatability of published microarray gene expression analyses. Nature genetics 41, 149, https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.295, https://www.nature.com/articles/ng.295#supplementary-information (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Robinson, J. M. & Henderson, W. A. Modelling the structure of a ceRNA-theoretical, bipartite microRNA-mRNA interaction network regulating intestinal epithelial cellular pathways using R programming. BMC Res Notes 11, 19, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3126-y (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Ghosh, S. et al. Gene expression profiling in whole blood identifies distinct biological pathways associated with obesity. BMC Med Genomics 3, 56, https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-3-56 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Smemo, S. et al. Obesity-associated variants within FTO form long-range functional connections with IRX3. Nature 507, 371–375, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13138 (2014).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Jacquemont, S. et al. Mirror extreme BMI phenotypes associated with gene dosage at the chromosome 16p11.2 locus. Nature 478, 97–102, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10406 (2011).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Tylee, D. S., Kawaguchi, D. M. & Glatt, S. J. On the outside, looking in: a review and evaluation of the comparability of blood and brain “-omes”. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 162B, 595–603, https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.32150 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Hao, R. H. et al. Gene expression profiles indicate tissue-specific obesity regulation changes and strong obesity relevant tissues. Int J Obes (Lond) 42, 363–369, https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2017.283 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all research participants in the study. We gratefully thank the staff of the Clinical Center of NIH, and Dr. Kong Chen, Director of Human Energy & Body Weight Regulation Core, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). We appreciate the comments on manuscript from Dr. Joan Austin. Support provided by the National Institute of Nursing Research (to WAH, 1ZIANR000018-01-07 and to PVJ 1ZIANR000035-01); Office of Workforce Diversity, National Institutes of Health to PVJ. Rockefeller University Heilbrunn Nurse Scholar Award to PVJ. RJL received Postdoctoral Intramural Research Training Award, National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services to PVJ and RJL.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P.V.J.: study concept and design, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data and manuscript development. Y.W.: contributed to microarray data analysis, pathway analysis, interpretation and manuscript development. R.J.L.: analysis and interpretation of data and manuscript development, L.X.: manuscript development. WAH: study supervision, administrative, intellectual contributions, editing, and revising of manuscript. All of the authors have approved the final submitted draft of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wendy A. Henderson.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joseph, P.V., Jaime-Lara, R.B., Wang, Y. et al. Comprehensive and Systematic Analysis of Gene Expression Patterns Associated with Body Mass Index. Sci Rep 9, 7447 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43881-5

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing