Article | Open | Published:

A new caudipterid from the Lower Cretaceous of China with information on the evolution of the manus of Oviraptorosauria

Scientific Reportsvolume 9, Article number: 6431 (2019) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Caudipteridae is a basal clade of Oviraptorosauria, all known species from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota of northeastern China. They were one of the first feathered dinosaur groups discovered, and possessed avian-like pennaceous remiges and rectrices. Their discovery provided significant information on early oviraptorosaurian evolution and the origins of birds and feathers. Here we describe a new caudipterid species Xingtianosaurus ganqi gen. et sp. nov. from the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation of Liaoning Province, China. This new taxon differs from other caudipterids by a small pleurocoel close to the dorsal edge of the lateral surface of the dorsal vertebrate centrum, a humerus longer than the scapula, a proportionally long ulna, a relatively small radiale angle, and a relatively short metacarpal I. The phylogenetic results shows X. ganqi is an early diverging caudipterid. It exhibits a mosaic morphology, providing new morphological information on early manual evolution of Oviraptorosauria, and giving new light on the evolution of radiale angle among Coelurosauria.

Introduction

Oviraptorosauria is a group of unusual maniraptoran theropods from North America and East Asia1. Since the first oviraptorosaur had been found2, all known oviraptorosaurs were found in Late Cretaceous deposits, until Caudipteridae was reported3. So far, Caudipteridae is only reported from the Lower Cretaceous Jehol Group of western Liaoning, China, which is famous for feathered dinosaurs4. So far, three species have been assigned to this family, including Caudipteryx zoui, Caudipteryx dongi and Similicaudipteryx yixianensis3,5,6,7,8. Caudipteridae are early diverging oviraptorosaurs with several primitive features such as teeth in the premaxilla, an unfused mandibular symphysis, and a pubic peduncle dorsoventrally longer than the ischiadic peduncle, which shed light on the early evolution of Oviraptorosauria. Many features, like the unfused dentaries, short tail, and specialized two-fingers manus, make caudipterids an unusual taxon among Oviraptorosauria.

The new species reported here, Xingtianosaurus ganqi gen. et sp. nov., is from the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation of Wangjiagou (Yixian County, western Liaoning, China). This new theropod shows a mosaic of plesiomorphic and apomorphic morphological features on its manus and sternal plates. Its discovery fills the morphological gap between caudipterids and other oviraptorosaurs.

Result

Systematic palaeontology

Oviraptorosauria Barsbold, 1976

Caudipteridae Zhou et Wang, 2000

Xingtianosaurus gen. nov

Etymology: XingTian, a Chinese deity recorded in Shanhaijing who continued to fight even after his head had been cut off, in reference to the skull-less holotype; saurus, Greek for lizard.

Type species: Xingtianosaurus ganqi

Diagnosis: A caudipterid dinosaur distinguished from other caudipterid taxa by the following combination of characters: small pleurocoel close to the dorsal edge of the lateral surface of the dorsal vertebral centrum, humerus longer than the scapula, proportionally long ulna (as long as humerus), relatively small radiale angle (39°, compared to >48° in other oviraptorosaurs with known radiale angle), extremely short metacarpal I (<40% length of the metacarpal II), small ligament pits on the manual phalanges.

Xingtianosaurus ganqi sp. nov.

Etymology: Ganqi, the weapon of Xingtian recorded in Shanhaijing.

Holotype: IVPP (Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology) V13390 (Fig. 1). A partial skeleton, missing the skull, cervical vertebrae, anterior dorsal vertebrae and coracoids.

Figure 1
Figure 1

The holotype of Xingtianosaurus ganqi gen. et sp. nov. (IVPP V13390). (a) Photograph. (b) line drawing. Scale bar: 100 mm. cdv, caudal vertebrate; dv, dorsal vertebrate; fe.l left femur; fe.r, right femur; fi.l left fibula; fi.r, right fibula; gas, gastralia; hu.l left humerus; hu.r, right humerus; il.l, left ilium; is.l left ischium; mcI.l left metacarpal I; mcI.r, right metacarpal I; mcII.l left metacarpal II; mcII.r, right metacarpal II; mcIII.l left metacarpal III; mcIII.r, right metacarpal III; mtI.l left metatarsal I; mtI.r, right metatarsal I; mtII.l left metatarsal II; mtII.r, right metatarsal II; mtIII.l left metatarsal III; mtIII.r, right metatarsal III; mtIV.l left metatarsal IV; mtIV.r, right metatarsal IV; mtV.l left metatarsal V; ph3d32.r, right phalanx II-3; ph3d3.r, right phalanx III-3; ph3d4.r, right phalanx III-4; pu, pubis; ra.l left radius; ra.r, right radius; sca.l, left scapula; st, sternum; ti.l left tibia; ti.r, right tibia; ul.l left ulna; ul.r, right ulna. (Photograph by Gao Wei, drawing by R.Q).

Locality and horizon: Wangjiagou, Yixian County, Liaoning Province. The Dakangpu Bed (same horizon to Dawangzhangzi Bed) of Yixian Formation, Lower Cretaceous (Fig. 2).

Figure 2
Figure 2

Sketch map and stratigraphic column showing the locality and horizon of Xingtianosaurus ganqi gen. et sp. nov. The stratigraphic column is redrawn from Wang & Zhou4, with the recently zircon U-Pb ages of Lujiatun and Jianshangou Bed from Yang et al.44 (Drawing by R.Q).

Diagnosis: As for the genus.

Description

Only three centra of the dorsal vertebrae could be observed in lateral view. A small oval pleurocoel is present close to the dorsal edge of the lateral surface of the centrum (Fig. 3a), different from pleurocoel absent in Caudipteryx or the deep pleurocoel in Similicaudipteryx7 and derived oviraptorosaurs9,10,11. The anteroposterior length of the centrum is slightly longer than its height. The ventral margin shows a constriction. Based on the preserved chevrons, at last 18~19 caudals are preserved on Xingtianosaurus ganqi. Because the distal most caudals are not preserved, the certain number of caudal vertebrate and whether the distal caudals fused into a pygostyle, as in Similicaudipteryx7 and Nomingia9, is unknown. As in other oviraptorosaurs, an obvious transition point is absent1. The ratio between the length and height of the vertebrae gradually increases from proximal to distal. However, on the distal most preserved caudals, this ratio is reduced. The long and slender prezygapophyses of middle caudals extend anteriorly, and are longer than the half length of the corresponding centrum. The postzygapophyses are much shorter than the prezygapophyses, and only slightly extend past the posterior articular faces of the centra. The first six chevrons are dorsoventrally elongated and flattened mediolaterally. The middle chevrons are distinctly shortened in height. All chevrons with a preserved distal end show an anterior expansion, which creates a boot-shaped end. As in Nomingia9, the proximal end of each chevron is divided into three prominent processes. The anterior and posterior processes articulated with the previous and succeeding centrum respectively, and the middle process inserts between the two centra. The dorsal ribs are scattered. The neck separating the capitulum and tuberculum has a concave dorsal margin.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Some postcranial skeleton of Xingtianosaurus ganqi (IVPP V13390). (a) dorsal vertebrae; (b) sternum and left scapula; (c) right scapula. Scale bar: 10 mm. (d–h) Comparison of sternum among oviraptorosaurs. (not scaled): (d) Caudipteryx; (e) Xingtianosaurus; (f) Khaan; (g) Citipati; (h) Apatoraptor. Abbreviations: h, humerus; pl, pleurocoel; sc, scapula; st, sternum. (Photograph by Gao Wei, drawing by R.Q).

The scapular blade is straight and strap-like (Fig. 3b), unlike the slightly bowed scapula of Similicaudipteryx7. It is shorter than the humerus, in contrast to other oviraptorosaurs1 but similar to paraves12. The lateral surface of shaft is strongly concave, making a sharp rim at the dorsal and ventral margins. This concavity extends nearly to the distal end and has a round posterior margin. The dorsal and ventral margins of the scapula are subparallel at mid-shaft and distinctly expanded at the distal end. The distal end is slightly rugose, for the attachment of M. deltoideus scapularis13. The acromion is not as prominent as other oviraptorosaurs outside of Caudipteryx1. It projects anteriorly and slightly dorsally (Fig. 3c).

One sternal plate is preserved but is mostly covered by other bones. It is more than 25% length of femur. This ratio is more similar to oviraptorids such as Khaan11 and Citipati14, rather than the small sternum of C. zoui (20.69%)6 and C. dongi (16.45%)5. The anterior margin of the sternum is slightly convex for articulation with the coracoid. The sternum bears anterolateral and xiphoid process as Oviraptoridae11,14 (Fig. 3e–g) and Caenagnathidae15 (Fig. 3h), unlike the two oval sternal plates in Caudipteryx3,5 (Fig. 3d). The differences between the sternum of Xingtianosaurus and Caudipteryx are unlikely to be the result of ontogeny for the following reasons: the sternum of Caudipteryx is connected with the sternal ribs, with no space for the existence of cartilage3,5; and the fusion of the centra and neural arches, the well-ossified wrist and ankle bones, absence of pits and grooves on the surface of bones indicate the adult nature of Caudipteryx3,5. The sternum of Xingtianosaurus has a wrinkled surface for attachment of M. pectoralis13.

As in caudipterids, the humerus is half the length of the femur. The humeral head is pronounced and domed at its proximal end. The deltopectoral crest is broken but extends less than one-third of the shaft. The internal tuberosity is located in nearly the same plane as the humeral head and extends a short distance. All that can be said about the distal end is that is slightly expanded and has a nearly round lateral condyle. The ulna is subequal in length to the humerus, which differs from most maniraptors but is shared with some avialae16. The olecranon process is weakly developed and smaller than the coronoid processes. The shaft bows posteriorly, which is a synapomorphy of Maniraptora17. The distal end shows no dorsoventral expansion, and is almost as wide as the mid-shaft, in contrast to a pointed end in Khaan11 and Anzu18. The radius is slightly bowed anteriorly, this condition could also be seen in some derived oviraptorosaurs11,14 but is usually absent in Caudipteridae. The shaft expands in width distally from about 40% of the way from the proximal end.

There are three carpals preserved in extensor view (Fig. 4). The radiale is wedge-shaped in dorsal view. It is relatively large, similar in size to the semilunate carpal. The radiale angle19 is about 39°. This angle is much smaller than other oviraptorosaurs including Caudipteryx, but similar to some deinonychosaurids19. There is a small carpal locates between the ulna and radius, articulating with the radiale and metacarpal II, but it is hard to determine whether it is the ulnare or intermedium. As in other oviraptorosaurs11,15,20 except Heyuannia21,22, the proximal surface of the semilunate carpal is not strongly convex as paraves. The distal surface covers the entire proximal end of metacarpal I and half of metacarpal II. Metacarpal I is slightly more robust than metacarpal II and less than 40% of the length of the second (Fig. 4). This ratio is smaller than any known oviraptorosaurs (except Gigantoraptor23) where it is approximately 50% in derived species and larger than 40% in Caudipteridae. The proximal end has a slightly concave articular surface for contacting with the semilunate carpal, different from the nearly flat surface of other oviraptorosaurs. The shaft of metacarpal I contacts tightly with metacarpal II for almost its whole length, whereas in Machairasaurus the distal end of metacarpal I is bended and separated from metacarpal II20. The distal articular surface is ginglymoid and slightly rotated, making phalanx I-1 point medially when in flexion. The collateral ligament pits are absent on the distal end. The shaft of metacarpal II is nearly straight and the proximal surface is nearly flat. On the distal end, the collateral ligament pit is relatively small and dorsally located. Metacarpal III is more than 90% length of the metacarpal II. The shaft of metacarpal III is compressed with a groove on the medial surface for contact with metacarpal II. The proximal end is bended medially and does not reach the proximal end of metacarpal II. Phalanx I-1 is the longest phalanx and has a weakly concave proximal articular surface as other caudipterids. In contrast, derived oviraptorosaurs always have a deep concave surface5,6,11,14,20,24,25. Phalanx II-1 is preserved, and it also has a weakly concave articular surface. On all phalanges with a preserved distal end, ligament pits are small and dorsally located. This condition is more similar to derived oviraptorosaurs, while Caudipteridae have a large circular ligament pit near the center. Almost all non-ungual phalanges of digit III are taphonomically missing except the penultimate phalanx on right hand. The shaft of this phalanx is very slender with a relatively large and circular ligament pit. All unguals are strongly curved with a prominent flexor tubercle. The proximodorsal lip is absent.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Photograph (a) and line drawing (b) of manus of Xingtianosaurus ganqi (IVPP V13390). Abbreviations: ra, radiale; se, semilunate carpal; ul, ulnare. Scale bar: 10 mm. (Photograph by Gao Wei, drawing by R.Q).

The ilium is badly preserved (Fig. 5). The anteroventral process does not extend further than the pubic peduncle, unlike in Caudipteryx (IVPP V12430)6. The cuppedicus fossa is well-developed, with a somewhat arched ventral margin, unlike the nearly straight margin in Caudipteryx (IVPP V12430)6 and Nemegtomaia10 but similar to those of C. dongi, Similicaudipteryx7 and derived oviraptorosaurs. The pubic peduncle slightly bends anteroventrally, indicating a propubic condition. In contrast to most maniraptors except Similicaudipteryx7, the pubic peduncle is constricted at the base and expands anteroposteriorly at the distal ends. Pubis is approximately 86% length of the femur as in Caudipteridae5,6. This ratio is about 90% in Caenagnathidae26,27 and nearly 100% in Oviraptoridae11,28,29. The ratio between pubic symphysis to pubis is 57% (Fig. 5), similar to Similicaudipteryx7, but larger than 50% in Caudipteryx5,6 and Microvenator26. This ratio in most caenagnathoids with known pubic symphysis is larger than 60%11,23,28. The ischium is plate-like. The dorsal margin is strongly bowed anteriorly. As in other oviraptorosaurs, a large triangular obturator process is located at mid-shaft of ischium. The lateral surface of obturator process is concave for the attachment of M. adductor femoris 130. The dorsal margin of the obturator process is thickened.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Photograph (a) and line drawing (b) of pelvic girdle of Xingtianosaurus ganqi (IVPP V13390). Abbreviations: il, ilium; is, ischium; pu, pubis. Scale bar: 50 mm. (Photograph by Gao Wei, drawing by R.Q).

The femoral shaft is bowed anteriorly in lateral view. The proximal end of the femur is broken and it is difficult to observe any details. There is no fourth trochanter. The tibia is approximately 125% the femoral length. On the posterior surface, the lateral and medial condyle are well-developed and slightly point upwards. Both condyles are large and round, and are separated by a shallow groove. A pronounced fibular crest is preserved on the lateral surface of tibia, about 26% of the way down the shaft of the tibia from the proximal end. This ratio is shorter than Gigantoraptor and Khaan. The mid-shaft of tibia is compressed lateromedially but the distal end expands to be plate-like. The tibia is not fused with the astragalus. The medial surface of fibula is concave for contact with the lateral condyle of tibia. The tubercle for the insertion of M. iliofibularis is not obvious, but is located a quarter way down the shaft. As in other neotheropods, the concavity turns into a narrow groove along the medial surface of fibula14,31,32,33. The groove expands below the iliofibularis tubercle, offering an attachment for the interosseous membrane between tibia and fibula.

The distal tarsals are not fused with the metatarsals. Metatarsal I is strongly reduced, and located three-quarters of the way down metatarsal II. Metatarsal III is the longest, then II and IV, respectively. The proximal end of metatarsal II expands both anteroposteriorly and transversely. Most of the shaft is straight, but the distal quarter is bent medially. Metatarsal III is strongly compressed along more than half of its length. The proximal end of metatarsal III is slightly anteroposterior expanded. The anterior and posterior margins are subparallel to be strap-like, with no obvious proximal constriction, which is seen in Chirostenotes, Leptorhynchos or some troodontids34. Because the proximal end of metatarsal II and IV are not articulated, whether a true arctometatarsal exists is doubtful. The lateral margin of metatarsal IV is constricted to make a sharp ridge. The metatarsal V extends less than one-third of length of metatarsal III, and its shaft is bowed. Metatarsal II to IV bear large and deep ligament fossae on the distal end. The joints of all non-ungual phalanges bear shallow or no ginglymous articular surface. On the distal end of each phalanx there is a deep ligament fossa on both sides. Each phalanx is longer than the distal one, except the fourth phalanx of digit IV, as an adaptation for terrestrial locomotion35. The pedal unguals are only slightly curved. A vascular groove extends from proximal end to the tip near the mid-line on both sides, whereas it is more ventrally locates in Caudipteryx (IVPP V12430).

Some imprints and fragments of pennaceous feathers are preserved posterior to the forearm and metacarpals (Fig. 4a). The feathers are perpendicular to the ulna and covered the distal half of the forearm. The attachment of remiges is different from known Caudipteryx specimens, which possess pennaceous feathers only on the metacarpals3,5,6. Details of the plumage are hard to verify because of the bad preservation.

Systematics of Xingtianosaurus ganqi

Because the skull is not preserved, we first investigated the systematic position of Xingtianosaurus ganqi by adding it to a coelurosaurian matrix36 (Fig. 6a). The analysis produced 74 most parsimonious trees of 3374 steps (Consistency Index = 0.32, Retention Index = 0.776). The result supports its location at the base of Oviraptorosauria, close to Caudipteryx. This position is consistent with the primitive morphological features: the tail is proportionally short with fewer than 26 caudals; the humerus is relatively short, about half the length of the femur; metacarpal I is shorter than 50% length of the second; the proximal articular surface of manual phalanx I-1 is slightly concave; and the proximal portion of metatarsal III is compressed transversely.

Figure 6
Figure 6

(a) Evolution of the radiale angle in coelurosaurian dinosaur. The phylogeny is from the 50% majority rule tree of the first analysis. The radiale angle of Guanlong, Huaxiagnathus, Caudipteryx, Deinonychus, Eoconfuciusornis is from Sullivan et al.19; The line drawings of the radiale of Guanlong, Caudipteryx, Deinonychus, Eoconfuciusornis are redrawn from Sullivan et al.19; Huaxiagnathus is redrawn from Hwang et al.45; Alxasaurus is redrawn from Russel & Dong46. All line drawings are not to scale. (b) The strict consensus tree of oviraptorosauria and the evolution of the radiale angle in oviraptorosaurian dinosaur. The line drawings of Hagryphus is redrawn from Zanno & Sampson25; Khaan is redrawn from Balanoff & Norell11; Machairasaurus is redrawn from Longrich et al.20; Jiangxisaurus is redrawn from Wei et al.42. All line drawings are not to scale. (Drawing by R.Q).

In order to determine the relationship of Xingtianosaurus ganqi gen. et sp. nov. relative to other oviraptorosaurs, we conducted a phylogenetic analysis using an oviraptorosaurian data metrics modified from combination of Osmólska et al.1, Lamanna et al.18, and Funston & Currie15. The analysis results in 2 most parsimonious trees of 581 steps (Consistency Index = 0.513, Retention Index = 0.691). The strict consensus of the most parsimonious trees confirms that Xingtianosaurus ganqi belongs to Caudipteridae (Fig. 6b). In this result, Caudipteridae is only supported by one character: Preacetabular process expanded ventrally well below the level of the dorsal acetabular margin (character 138). However, this analysis gives less information about the relationship between Caudipteryx, Similicaudipteryx and Xingtianosaurus ganqi, which are recovered in a polytomy.

Discussion

Manus evolution in oviraptorosauria

Caudipteryx can be easily distinguished from other oviraptorosaurs by its bizarre manual characters:5,6 a strongly reduced manual digit III with only two short phalanges whose combined length is slightly longer than half the length of phalanx manual II-1; a large ligament pit on the manual phalanges; and an only shallowly concave proximal articular surface of manual phalanx I-1. The hand of Xingtianosaurus ganqi provides important information that reduces the morphological gap between Caudipteryx and other oviraptorosaurs. As in Caudipteryx, the proximal articular surface of phalanx I-1 in Xingtianosaurus ganqi is weakly concave, but it shares with derived oviraptorosaurs a relatively small ligament pit. Unlike Caudipteryx, but like all other oviraptorosaurs, the manus of Xingtianosaurus ganqi preserves three unguals. The large two belong to digit I and II, while the relatively small one belongs to digit III. Although the full digit III is not preserved, the remaining bones are slender, as in other oviraptorosaurs.

The study of the hand of Xingtianosaurus ganqi also gives new understanding of the evolution of hand of oviraptorosaurs (Fig. 7). In both Caudipteridae and Caenagnathidae, the combined length of manual phalanx II-1 and II-2 is 1.5 times longer than metacarpal II. But the second digit of Xingtianosaurus ganqi is relatively shorter than the combined length of phalanx II-1 and II-2 is about 1.1 times longer than metacarpal II, closer to the ratio of Oviraptoridae, except “Ingeniinae”. This indicates that the primitive condition in Oviraptorosauria is non-ungual phalanges of the second digit subequal in length to metacarpal II. The elongated conditions in Caudipteridae and Caenagnathidae are independently evolved.

Figure 7
Figure 7

The major changes of oviraptorosaur manus. (a) Protarchaeopteryx; (b) Xingtianosaurus; (c) Caudipteryx; (d) Elmisaurus; (e) Hagryphus; (f) Citipati; (g) Heyuannia. (a) is redrawn from Ji & Ji47; (c) is redrawn from Zhou et al.6; (d) is redrawn from Zanno & Sampson25; (e) is redrawn from Osmólska24; (f) is redrawn from Clark et al.14; (g) is redrawn from Easter41. The line drawings are not to scale. (Drawing by R.Q).

Some studies have regarded Caudipteryx as a kind of secondarily flightless avian37,38,39 according to some features shared with birds, such as the third manual digit strongly reduced, the propatagium on the forelimb, and the absence of a supracetabular crest of ilium. The features of the manus of Xingtianosaurus indicate the specialized hand of Caudipteryx is derived from other oviraptorosaurs. In addition, the absence of a supracetabular crest can be found not only in Caudipteryx and paraves, but also in many oviraptorosaurs and some non-pennaraptoran coelurosaurs such as Huaxiagnathus (Compsognathidae)40. A propatagium is existence on forelimb of Microraptor38, and is not a synapomorphy of avians. These result support Caudipteryx as a true dinosaur, rather than a flightless avian.

Radiale angle evolution in oviraptorosauria

The radiale angle was first proposed as a useful character by Sullivan et al.19 (Fig. 6a). It is the angle between the articular surface for the radius and semilunate carpal, and it is related to the flexibility of the manus. A large radiale angle is an osteological correlate of a greater range of abduction of the manus. In Coelurosauria, a small radiale angle is the primitive state and it becomes enlarged in maniraptorans. The enlarged radiale angle of maniraptorans means not only a more flexible manus, but also a capability to protect long plumage on their forearm.

Sullivan et al.19 interpreted the radiale angle in oviraptorosaur as unusually large, even greater than basal Avialae. This is because the oviraptorosaur taxon Sullivan et al. chose to represent the entire group is Caudipteryx, which has a radiale angle of 76°. To verify the condition of the radiale angle in Oviraptorosauria, we measured other oviraptorosaurs with a well-preserved radiale. Only angles measured from a radiale preserved in the three-dimension or two-dimensional radiale with at least partially exposed articular surface are reliable. The result shows that the radiale angle is 93° in Hagryphus (Caenagnathidae), 62° in Khaan, 49° in Machairasaurus (Oviraptoridae). Thus, all measurements of the radiale angle of oviraptorosaurs are relatively larger than other non-avian maniraptorans. But it should be noted that Caudipteryx is an extremely specialized species, and the other measured species are derived, so they do not adequately represent the basal condition of Oviraptorosauria. As a primitive species, the radiale angle of Xingtianosaurus is more representative of the basal condition. Its low radiale angle coincides with the evolutionary trend of radiale angle increase in Coelosauria (Fig. 6b). This measurement indicates, like many other characters such as toothless jaws, short nasals, and a rod-like jugal bar28, a large radiale angle similar to birds evolved independently in derived oviraptorosaurs.

Most oviraptorosaurs with preserved radiales show a large angle. But the radiale of derived “Ingeniinae” is quite different from other oviraptorosaur groups21,22,41,42. Their radiale is small, less than one-third of the size of the semilunate carpal in Heyuannia and even less than one-fourth in Jiangxisaurus, whereas radiale is larger than half the size of the semilunate carpal in other oviraptorosaurs. The radiale of “Ingeniinae” is quadrilateral, rather than wedge-shaped like in most maniraptorans. The function of the manus in these dinosaurs may be changed from other theropods.

Methods

The phylogenetic analysis of Coelurosauria is from a large recently published data matrix34 (853 characters and 153 taxa). The oviraptorosaurian matrix (252 characters and 39 taxa) is modified from combination of Osmólska et al.1, Lamanna et al.18, and Funston & Currie15, with 3 added characters as following:

251. Ratio of width of metacarpal III to metacarpal II: more than 0.5 (0); less than 0.5 (1).

252. Ligament pit on manual phalanges: small and dorsally located (0); large and covering most distal end (1).

253. Proximal articular surface of first phalanx of digit I: slightly concave (0); obviously concave (1).

We analyzed both datasets with Tree Analysis Using New Technology (TNT) version 1.143. The coelurosaurian analysis used the “New Technology” search options, with sectorial search, ratchet, tree drift and tree fusion, recovering a minimum tree length in 10 replicates. In oviraptorosaurian analysis, we used traditional search with tree bisection-reconnection (TBR) swapping algorithm with random seeds of 1,000 and 1,000 replicates, saving ten trees per replication.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Osmólska, H., Currie, P. J. & Brasbold, R. Oviraptorosauria. In The Dinosauria. 2nd edn (eds Weishampel, D., Dodson, P., & Osmólska, H.) 165–183 (University of California Press, 2004).

  2. 2.

    Osborn, H. F. Three new theropoda, Protoceratops zone, central Mongolia. American Museum Novitates 144, 1–12 (1924).

  3. 3.

    Ji, Q., Currie, P. J., Norell, M. A. & Ji, S. Two feathered dinosaurs from northeastern China. Nature 393, 753–761 (1998).

  4. 4.

    Wang, X. L. & Zhou, Z. H. Mesozoic Pompell. In The Jehol Biota (ed Chang, M. M., Chen, P. J., Wang, Y. Q., et al.) 19–36 (Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publication, 2003).

  5. 5.

    Zhou, Z. H. & Wang, X. L. A new species of Caudipteryx from the Yixian Formation of Liaoning, northeast China. Vertebrata PalAsiatica 38, 111–127 (2000).

  6. 6.

    Zhou, Z. H., Wang, X. L., Zhang, F. C. & Xu, X. Important features of Caudipteryx— evidence from two nearly complete new specimens. Vertebrata PalAsiatica 38, 243–254 (2000).

  7. 7.

    He, T., Wang, X. L. & Zhou, Z. H. A new genus and species of caudipterid dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous Jiufotang Formation of western Liaoning, China. Vertebrata PalAsiatica 46, 178–189 (2008).

  8. 8.

    Xu, X., Zheng, X. T. & You, H. L. Exceptional dinosaur fossils show ontogenetic development of early feathers. Nature 464 (7293), 1338–1341 (2010).

  9. 9.

    Barsbold, R., Osmólska, H., Watabe, M., Currie, P. J. & Tsogtbaatar, K. A new oviraptorosaur (dinosaur, theropod) from Mongolia: the first dinosaur with a pygostyle. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 45, 97–106 (2000).

  10. 10.

    Lü, J. C., Tomida, Y., Azuma, Y., Dong, Z. M. & Lee, Y. N. New oviraptorid dinosaur (Dinosauria: Oviraptorosauria) from the Nemegt Formation of southwestern Mongolia. Bulletin of the National. Museum, Tokyo, Series C 30, 95–130 (2004).

  11. 11.

    Balanoff, A. M. & Norell, M. A. Osteology of Khaan mckennai (Oviraptorosauria: Theropoda). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 372, 1–77 (2012).

  12. 12.

    Turner, A. H., Makovicky, P. J. & Norell, M. A. A review of dromaeosaurid systematics and paravian phylogeny. Bulletin of American Museum of Natural History 371, 1–206 (2012).

  13. 13.

    Jasinoski, S. C., Russell, A. P. & Currie, P. J. An integrative phylogenetic and extrapolatory approach to the reconstruction of dromaeosaur (Theropoda: Eumaniraptora) shoulder musculature. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 146, 301–344 (2010).

  14. 14.

    Clark, J. M., Norell, M. A. & Chiappe, L. M. An oviraptorid skeleton from the late Cretaceous of Ukhaa Tolgod, Mongolia, preserved in an avian-like brooding position over an oviraptorid nest. American Museum Novitates 3265, 1–36 (1999).

  15. 15.

    Funston, G. F. & Currie, P. J. A new caenagnathid (Dinosauria: Oviraptorosauria) from the Horseshoe Canyon Formation of Alberta, Canada, and a reevaluation of the relationships of Caenagnathidae. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 36, de1160910 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Zhou, Z. H. & Zhang, F. C. A long-tailed, seed-eating bird from the Early Cretaceous of China. Nature 418, 1754–1756 (2002).

  17. 17.

    Gauthier, J. Saurischian monophyly and the origin of birds. Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences 8, 1–55 (1986).

  18. 18.

    Lamanna, M. C., Sues, H. D., Schachner, E. R. & Lyson, T. R. A new large-bodied oviraptorosaurian theropod dinosaur from the Latest Cretaceous of Western North America. PLoS ONE 9, e92022 (2014).

  19. 19.

    Sullivan, C., Hone, D. W., Xu, X. & Zhang, F. C. The asymmetry of the carpal joint and the evolution of wing folding in maniraptoran theropod dinosaurs. Proceedings Biological Sciences 277(1690), 2027–2033 (2010).

  20. 20.

    Longrich, N. R., Currie, P. J. & Dong, Z. M. A new oviraptorid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Upper Cretaceous of Bayan Mandahu, Inner Mongolia. Palaeontology 53, 945–960 (2010).

  21. 21.

    Funston, G. F., Mendonca, S. E., Currie, P. J. & Barsbold, R. Oviraptorosaur anatomy, diversity and ecology in the Nemegt Basin. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.10.023 (2018).

  22. 22.

    Lü, J. C. Oviraptorid dinosaurs from Southern China. Beijing: Geological Publishing House 1–200 (2005).

  23. 23.

    Xu, X., Tan, Q. W., Wang, J. M., Zhao, X. J. & Tan, L. A gigantic bird-like dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of China. Nature 447, 844–847 (2007).

  24. 24.

    Osmólska, H. Coossified tarsometatarsi in theropod dinosaurs and their bearing on the problem of bird origins. Palaeontologia Polonica 42, 79–95 (1981).

  25. 25.

    Zanno, L. E. & Sampson, S. D. A new oviraptorosaur (Theropoda; Maniraptora) from the Late Cretaceous (Campanian) of Utah. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 25, 897–904 (2005).

  26. 26.

    Makovicky, P. J. & Sues, H.-D. Anatomy and phylogenetic relationships of the theropod dinosaur Microvenator celer from the Lower Cretaceous of Montanta. American Museum Novitates 3240, 1–27 (1998).

  27. 27.

    Lamanna, M. C., Sues, H. D. & Schachner, E. R. A new large-bodied oviraptorosaurian theropod dinosaur from the latest Cretaceous of western North America. Plos One 10, e0125843 (2014).

  28. 28.

    Lü, J. C., Yi, L. P., Zhong, H. & Wei, X. F. A new oviraptorosaur (Dinosauria: Oviraptorosauria) from the Late Cretaceous of Southern China and its paleoecological implications. PLoS ONE 8, e80557 (2013).

  29. 29.

    Xu, X. et al. A new oviraptorid from the Upper Cretaceous of Nei Mongol, China, and its stratigraphic implications. Vertebrata PalAsiatica 51, 85–101 (2013).

  30. 30.

    Carrano, M. T. & Hutchinson, J. R. Pelvic and hindlimb musculature of Tyrannosaurus rex (Dinosauria: Theropoda). Journal of Morphology 53, 207–228 (2002).

  31. 31.

    Charig, A. J. & Milner, A. C. Baryonyx walkeri, a fish-eating dinosaur from the Wealden of Surrey. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum. Geology 53, 11–70 (1997).

  32. 32.

    Brochu, C. A. Osteology of Tyrannosaurus rex: insights from a nearly complete skeleton and high-resolution computed tomographic analysis of the skull. Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Memoir 7, 1–138 (2003).

  33. 33.

    Madsen, J. H. Jr. Allosaurus fragilis: a revised osteology. Utah Geological Survey Bulletin 109, 1–161 (1976).

  34. 34.

    Snively, E., Russell, A. P. & Powell, G. L. Evolutionary morphology of the coelurosaurian arctometatarsus: descriptive, morphometric and phylogenetic approaches. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 142, 525–553 (2004).

  35. 35.

    Hopson, J. A. Ecomorphology of avian and nonavian theropod phalangeal proportions: Implications for the arboreal versus terrestrial origin of bird flight. In New Perspectives on the Origin and Early Evolution of Birds (eds Gauthier, J. & Gall, I. F.) 211–235 (Yale University Press, 2001).

  36. 36.

    Brusatte, S. L., Lloyd, G. T., Wang, S. C. & Norell, M. A. Gradual assembly of avian body plan culminated in rapid rates of evolution across the dinosaur-bird transition. Current Biology 24, 2386–2392 (2014).

  37. 37.

    Maryańska, T., Osmólska, H. & Wolsan, M. Avialan status for Oviraptorosauria. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 47, 97–116 (2002).

  38. 38.

    Feduccia, A. & Czerkas, S. A. Testing the neoflightless hypothesis: Propatagium reveals flying ancestry of oviraptorosaurs. Journal of Ornithology 156(4), 1067–74 (2015).

  39. 39.

    Feduccia, A. Cretaceous Reverie: Review of Birds of Stone: Chinese Avian Fossils from the Age of Dinosaurs by Luis M. Chiappe and Meng Qingjin. Open Ornithology. Journal 11(1), 27–33 (2018).

  40. 40.

    Gianechini, F. A., Makovicky, P. J., Apesteguía, S. & Cerda, I. Postcranial skeletal anatomy of the holotype and referred specimens of Buitreraptor gonzalezorum Makovicky, Apesteguía and Agnolín 2005 (Theropoda, Dromaeosauridae), from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia. PeerJ 6, e4558 (2018).

  41. 41.

    Easter, J. A new name for the oviraptorid dinosaur “Ingeniayanshini (Barsbold, 1981; preoccupied by Gerlach, 1957). Zootaxa 3737, 184–190 (2013).

  42. 42.

    Wei, X. F., Pu, H. Y., Xu, L., Liu, D. & Lü, J. C. A new oviraptorid dinosaur (Theropoda: Oviraptorosauria) from the Late Cretaceous of Jiangxi Province, southern China. Acta Geologica Sinica 87, 899–904 (2013).

  43. 43.

    Goloboff, P. A., Farris, J. S. & Nixon, K. C. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24, 774–786 (2008).

  44. 44.

    Yang, W., Li, S. G. & Jiang, B. Y. New evidence for Cretaceous age of the feathered dinosaurs of Liaoning: zircon U–Pb SHRIMP dating of the Yixian Formation in Sihetun, northeast China. Cretaceous Research 28, 177–182 (2007).

  45. 45.

    Hwang, S. H., Norell, M. A., Ji, Q. & Gao, K. Q. A large compsognathid from the Early Cretaceous Yixian Formation of China. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 2, 13–30 (2004).

  46. 46.

    Russell, D. A. & Dong, Z. M. The affinities of a new theropod from the Alxa Desert, Inner Mongolia, People’s Republic of China. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 30, 2107–2127 (1993).

  47. 47.

    Ji, Q. & Ji, S. A. Protarchaeopterygid bird (Protarchaeopteryx gen. nov.)—fossil remains of archaeopterygids from China. Chinese. Geology 238, 38–41 (1997).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank L. Xiang [Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences(CAS)] for the preparation of this specimen. TNT was provided by the Willi Hennig Society. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41688103, 41572020), the Strategic Priority Research Program (B) of CAS (XDB18000000).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100044, China

    • Rui Qiu
    • , Xiaolin Wang
    • , Qiang Wang
    •  & Ning Li
  2. CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing, 100044, China

    • Rui Qiu
    • , Xiaolin Wang
    • , Qiang Wang
    •  & Ning Li
  3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    • Rui Qiu
    •  & Xiaolin Wang
  4. School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China

    • Jialiang Zhang
  5. College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China

    • Yiyun Ma

Authors

  1. Search for Rui Qiu in:

  2. Search for Xiaolin Wang in:

  3. Search for Qiang Wang in:

  4. Search for Ning Li in:

  5. Search for Jialiang Zhang in:

  6. Search for Yiyun Ma in:

Contributions

X.-L.W. and R.Q. designed the research plan. X.-L.W., R.Q., Y.-Y.M., Q.W. and N.L. performed analysis. X.-L.W., R.Q., J,-L.Z, Y.-Y.M. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed and commented on the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaolin Wang.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42547-6

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.