Abstract
A study was conducted to analyze fungal diversity in the roots of acid lime (Citrus aurantifolia) collected from Oman, a semi-arid country located in the South Eastern part of the Arabian Peninsula. MiSeq analysis showed the Ascomycota and Sordariomycetes were the most abundant phylum and class in acid lime roots, respectively. Glomeromycota, Basidiomycota and Microsporidia were the other fungal phyla, while Glomeromycetes and some other classes belonging to Ascomycota and Basidiomycota were detected at lower frequencies. The genus Fusarium was the most abundant in all samples, making up 46 to 95% of the total reads. Some fungal genera of Arbuscular mycorrhizae and nematophagous fungi were detected in some of the acid lime roots. Analysis of the level of fungal diversity showed that no significant differences exist among groups of root samples (from different locations) in their Chao richness and Shannon diversity levels (Pā<ā0.05). Principle component analysis of fungal communities significantly separated samples according to their locations. This is the first study to evaluate fungal diversity in acid lime roots using high throughput sequencing analysis. The study reveals the presence of various fungal taxa in the roots, dominated by Fusarium species and including some mycorrhizae and nematophagous fungi.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Plants depend on soil microorganisms for recycling nutrients, while soil microbes rely on plants for their energy requirements. Plants release their photosynthesis products and root exudates into soil and by this way they enhance microbial growth rates and assembly1. For example, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi produce a substance called glomalin that improves soil structure, stabilizes soil aggregates and prepares more favorable structure for root growth2. Different plant genotypes and cultivars can be favorable for various saprophytic and pathogenic microorganisms2,3.
Fungi have a wider geographical distribution compared to plants and other organisms4. Among soil microbial community, fungi take place after bacteria as the second most abundant group of soil microbiota. Some fungi are responsible for decomposing plant residues and organic materials by releasing enzymes which breakdown all these material to absorbable form for fungi. Improving soil structure and aeration is another role of the soil fungi. Some of them may form mutualistic relationship with plant and help the plant to uptake more nutrients5.
The term endophytic fungi refers to systemic symbiotic fungi that occupy living plant tissues without causing any pathogenic effect. Depending on host species and fungi, endophytes play different ecological roles in different fields such as protecting their host against herbivores, pathogenic organisms and drought stress. They can also increase nitrogen uptake and stimulate root growth6,7,8,9,10. Endophytes are capable of enhancing plant growth and resistance by different mechanisms such as nitrogen fixation, increasing phosphorus uptake and production of plant hormones and siderophores.
Acid lime (Citrus aurantifolia) is an important crop in different parts of the world. Total production of acid limes reached 17 million tons in 201611. In Oman, acid lime is among the top four fruit crops in terms of production. The cultivation system in most parts of the country is traditional, where different crops are grown in the same farm, with date palms, acid limes and mangoes being common in most farms12.
Studies of the fungal species associated with roots of different crops is an important step towards understanding the roles played by fungi in the roots. Several studies addressed fungal root endophytes in various crops9,13,14,15,16. However, studies on fungi associated with citrus roots are very limited17,18,19. In addition, studies on fungi associated with roots of acid limes are even more limited to only few studies on mycorrhizae and pathogenic fungi19,20,21. Lack of knowledge in this area makes it difficult to understand the roles played by fungi in the root system of acid limes.
Detection of fungi in plant roots has long relied on culture-based techniques13,21,22,23,24. However, these techniques have been limited by their inability to recover obligate fungi, creating a gap in knowledge about the various fungal species associated with the root system. Illumina MiSeq technique has provided a powerful tool for the analysis of fungal communities in different substrates and plant tissues. It is able to detect culturable and non-culturable fungal communities25,26,27,28.
The aim of this study was to study fungal communities associated with roots of acid lime in five locations in Oman using MiSeq analysis. The study will help come up with a list of potential fungal taxa present in the roots and how they vary over locations.
Results
Diversity estimates
The observed OTUs ranged from 14 to 80. Chao1 richness estimates of the 17 samples obtained from five locations in Oman showed that values range from 14 to 85 for the 17 individual samples (Supplementary Fig.Ā S1). The mean values from each of the five locations ranged from 28 to 61, with no significant differences between the locations in richness estimates (Pāā¤ā0.5; Supplementary Fig.Ā S1). Shannon estimates ranged from 0.1 to 1.6 for individual samples and 0.3 to 1.2 among the five main locations, with no significant differences between locations in Shannon estimates (Pāā¤ā0.5; Supplementary Fig.Ā S2). The lack of significant differences was mainly due to the high variation among samples obtained from the same location.
Fungal Classes and Genera
Acid lime roots were mainly dominated by fungal communities belonging to Ascomycota phylum. Glomeromycota, Basidiomycota and Microsporidia were also present but at lower frequencies. The most dominant class across all groups was Sordarioymcetes, making up over 90% of three groups (2, 3, and 5) and 76% of group 4 and 46% of group 1. Glomeromycetes was the second most common followed by unknown classes from Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. The remaining classes were present at low frequencies (Fig.Ā 1). Comparison across groups from different locations showed that most groups of root samples share the same classes.
The genus Fusarium was the most abundant in all samples, present at frequencies of 46 to 95% in the samples. Glomus and Trichocladium were the two other abundant genera in group 1. Arthrobotrys and an unknown genus belonging to Basidiomycota were abundant to some extent in groups 3 and 4, respectively. Other genera included Alternaria, Aspergillus, Penicillium, Myrothecium, Podospora and others (Fig.Ā 2).
Analysis of fungal community composition
Fungal community analysis using principle coordinate analysis (Supplementary FigsĀ S3āS5) of the 17 samples based on weighted UniFrac distances, unweighted UniFrac distances and Bray-Curtis analysis showed the separation of the samples into different groups. Unweighted analysis separated most members of root groups into locations from which they were collected. This was supported by the significant level of separation among groups using ADONIS (Pā=ā0.0010). However, ADNOIS analysis showed that neither weighted UniFrac analysis (Pā=ā0.1460), nor Bray-Curtis analysis (Pā=ā0.2670) separated members of the different groups based on locations from which they were collected.
Discussion
Limited studies in the past addressed fungal infections and endophytes in the roots of acid limes (C. aurantifolia). Lasiodiplodia species, Neoscytalidium dimidiatum and Fusarium species were common on acid lime roots12,21,29. A study by Michel-Rosales and ValdƩs19 and Reddy, et al.20 revealed colonization of C. aurantifolia roots with several arbuscular mycorrhizae. Mycorrhizae is common in the roots of several citrus species and it contributes to enhancing tolerance of citrus plants to drought, salinity, high temperature and diseases17,18,30,31,32. A part from lime, a study on other Citrus species using MiSeq analysis revealed association of several fungal taxa with Citrus unshiu roots33. Our study is the first to use MiSeq for the characterization of fungal communities in acid lime roots and the first to provide a quantitative analysis of fungal communities in acid lime roots.
Findings from our study revealed that the most dominant phylum in the roots is Ascomycota, made up mainly of the Sordariomycetes class and the Fusarium genus. Ascomycota is a large phylum of fungi, and its high presence in acid lime roots is not unexpected. Fusarium has been reported previously from roots of several citrus species21,34. However, the high dominance of Fusarium in acid lime roots is surprising. The results showed that in several roots, 95% of the root fungi are mainly Fusarium. This not only true in one place, but even in places which are apart from each other by more than 300 Km. This could be related to the fact that Fusarium growth rate is usually higher compared to several fungal species35,36. In addition, Fusarium species are well known to produce several toxic compounds which limit growth of other fungal species37,38, thus giving Fusarium a chance to dominate. However, a future study might be required to understand the reasons behind the dominance of Fusarium in acid lime roots.
Other fungal genera were detected in the acid lime roots. However most of the detected fungi were saprophytic and they are possibly endophytes interacting with the root system of acid limes. These included Penicillium, Aspergillus, Glomus, Dactylella, Arthrobotrys and Rhizophagus. Glomus and Rhizophagus are large genera of arbuscular mycorrhizae, commonly found associated with several plant species including citrus18,19,30,39. They help in nutrient absorption and alleviating drought and salinity stresses. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are common in plant roots and they enhance and modulate plant growth and tissue nutrient content which lead to an increase in their survival rates under various stressful conditions2,40,41,42. They can also provide bioprotection against biotic and abiotic stresses such as pathogens, pests, drought, salinity42,43,44.
Findings from the study revealed the presence of Dactylella and Arthrobotrys. These are genera of fungi with many species attacking and killing nematodes45,46,47,48,49. Penicillium and Aspergillus are weak and saprophytic fungal genera. They have been reported to interfere with the growth of other fungal pathogens13,14,50,51.
Weighted UniFrac distances and Bray-Curtis analysis showed that none of the two analyses separated the 17 acid lime samples according to places from which they were collected. This indicates that the samples do not show differences in the level of fungal diversity (weighted UniFrac) or according to their phylogenetic relationships (Bray-Curtis). On the other hand, unweighted UniFrac distances separated most samples according to the locations from which they were collected. Separation of samples based on Unweighted UniFrac distances gives an indication that fungal communities in each place are different to some extent from fungal communities from other places. The effects of location on the type of fungal taxa has been observed in other studies with other crops52,53.
MiSeq was able to recover some of the fungal genera which are usually uncultureable on synthetic media. These included Glomus and Zopfiella30,32,54. MiSeq is a powerful tool in the analysis of fungal communities, and it has been used previously for the detection and estimation of fungal diversity in several plant roots, leaves and stems52,54,55,56.
This study is the first high throughput sequencing approach that provides analysis of fungal diversity in acid lime roots. It shows the dominance of Fusarium in acid lime roots and the presence of several genera containing beneficial fungi. Future studies should investigate the reasons behind the dominance of Fusarium. In addition, the frequency of recovery of some fungal taxa was low. However, the roles played by such taxa cannot be ignored and future studies are required on the roles played by the different taxa in the root system of acid limes.
Methods
Collection of samples
The study addressed fungal communities associated with roots of acid lime trees grown in five locations in Oman, 20ā300 Km apart (Fig.Ā 3). Two to four random acid lime-growing farms were selected from each location (totalā=ā17). Root samples (3ā10āmm thickness x 40ā50āmm length) were collected from the top 30ācm of soil level of 6ā8-year-old acid lime trees. Only apparently healthy root segments with no visual disease symptoms were collected. Roots were collected from three places around each acid lime tree, within 50ā100ācm of the trunk. Root samples from each tree were placed in a separate sterile plastic bag. Samples were then transferred to Sultan Qaboos University and preserved at ā80āĀ°C. Roots were processed within five days of collection under sterile conditions.
DNA extraction
Firstly, root samples were washed thoroughly using sterile distilled water to get rid of excess soil particles. Then, root samples were cut into 5ā10āmm segments and ground using liquid nitrogen. DNA extraction from the ground root samples was done following the CTAB method of Doyle and Doyle57. The ground root samples were mixed with CTAB extraction buffer and the mixture was incubated at 65āĀ°C for 10āmin and immediately placed on ice for 10āmin. An equal amount of phenol: chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) was added to each tube and mixed gently. The tubes were centrifuged and the previous step was repeated. Then 0.6 volume of isopropanol and 0.3āM NaAc (pH 5.2) was added to the supernatant and placed at ā20āĀ°C overnight. Samples were then centrifuged and the supernatant were discarded. The DNA pellets were washed twice with 70% ethanol followed by air-drying at room temperature. The DNA pellet was dissolved in 50āĀµl sterilized distilled water and stored at ā80āĀ°C until used. DNA concentration and quality were measured using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA).
Illumina MiSeq analysis
The 17 DNA samples were subjected to Illumina MiSeq analysis (MISeq ITS1 assay; 10āK). Firstly, samples were amplified using the forward primer constructed from Illumina i5 sequencing primer (TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG) and the ITS1F primer (CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA)58 and the reverse primer constructed from Illumina i7 sequencing primer (GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG) and ITS2aR primer (GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC)52,59. The PCR reaction mixture consisted of DNA, 1āĀµl of each 5āĀµM primer and Qiagen HotStar Taq master mix (Qiagen Inc, Valencia, California). The reaction conditions included denaturation at 95āĀ°C for 5āmin, followed by 25 cycles of denaturation at 94āĀ°C for 30āsec, annealing at 54āĀ°C for 40āsec, and extension at 72āĀ°C for 1āmin (final for 10āmin). Then a second PCR was conducted using the Illumina Nextera PCR primers and the same conditions, except for doing using 10 cycles52.
The amplified products were pooled and the size selection of each pool was done in two rounds. This was followed by quantification using the Quibit 2.0 fluorometer (Life Technologies) followed by loading on an Illumina MiSeq (Illumina, Inc. San Diego, California)60.
Bioinformatic Analysis
The coverage of the Illumina MiSeq was 10000ā20000 reads. Samples were assembled into OTU clusters at 97% identity using the USEARCH61 algorithm and then aligned using the UPARSE algorithm62 against a database of high quality ITS sequences from GenBank. Then a phylogenetic tree was constructed in Newick format from a multiple sequence alignment of the OTUs in MUSCLE63,64 and generated in FastTree65. Redundant sequences of the same species were removed. Fungi were classified at the appropriate taxonomic levels using trimmed taxa. The percentage of sequences assigned to each phylogenetic level were individually analyzed for each pooled sample providing relative abundance information within and among the individual samples.
The generated data were analyzed using the R software by generating a rarefaction curve plot of the number of OTUs versus the number of sequences66. Richness and Shannon Diversity indices were determined as explained by Kazeeroni and Al-Sadi67. Fungal community structure was analyzed using weighted UniFrac distances, unweighted UniFrac distances and Bray-Curtis analysis. Then differences in fungal diversity among groups from different locations were analyzed using āPermutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance Using Distance Matricesā function ADONIS68,69,70.
Availability of Data
All data underlying this publication are available in the manuscript.
References
Igiehon, N. O. & Babalola, O. O. Biofertilizers and sustainable agriculture: exploring arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 101, 4871ā4881, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8344-z (2017).
Lipson, D. A. & Kelley, S. T. In Ecology and the Environment 177ā204 (2014).
Dias, A. C. F. et al. Interspecific variation of the bacterial community structure in the phyllosphere of the three major plant components of mangrove forests. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 43, 653ā660, https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-83822012000200030 (2012).
HernĆ”ndez-Restrepo, M. et al. Phylogeny of saprobic microfungi from Southern Europe. Studies in Mycology 86, 53ā97, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2017.05.002 (2017).
Win, J. et al. In Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology Vol. 77, 235ā247 (2012).
Khan, A. L. et al. Endophytic fungi from frankincense tree improves host growth and produces extracellular enzymes and indole acetic acid. PLoS ONE 11, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158207 (2016).
Chhabra, S. & Dowling, D. N. In Functional Importance of the Plant Microbiome: Implications for Agriculture, Forestry and Bioenergy 21ā42 (2017).
Hussin, S., Khalifa, W., Geissler, N. & Koyro, H. W. Influence of the root endophyte Piriformospora indica on the plant water relations, gas exchange and growth of Chenopodium quinoa at limited water availability. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 203, 373ā384, https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12199 (2017).
KotilĆnek, M. et al. Fungal root symbionts of high-altitude vascular plants in the Himalayas. Scientific Reports 7, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06938-x (2017).
Li, L. et al. Plant growth-promoting endophyte Piriformospora indica alleviates salinity stress in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 119, 211ā223, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.08.029 (2017).
FAO. FAOSTAT, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC/visualize (2017).
Al-Sadi, A. M. et al. Population genetic analysis reveals diversity in Lasiodiplodia species infecting date palm, Citrus, and mango in Oman and the UAE. Plant Disease 97, 1363ā1369 (2013).
Yuan, Y. et al. Potential of endophytic fungi isolated from cotton roots for biological control against verticillium wilt disease. PLoS ONE 12, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170557 (2017).
Khan, A. L. & Lee, I. J. Endophytic Penicillium funiculosum LHL06 secretes gibberellin that reprograms Glycine max L. growth during copper stress. BMC Plant Biology 13, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-13-86 (2013).
Zhang, X., Shi, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, W. & Lou, K. Isolation, identification and insecticidal activity of endophyte from Achnatherum inebrians. Wei sheng wu xue bao=Acta microbiologica Sinica 50, 530ā536 (2010).
Kageyama, S. A., Mandyam, K. G. & Jumpponen, A. In mycorrhiza: State of the Art, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Eco-Function, Biotechnology, Eco-Physiology, Structure and Systematics (Third Edition) 29ā57 (2008).
Wang, P. et al. Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in red tangerine (Citrus reticulata Blanco) rootstock rhizospheric soils from hillside citrus orchards. Pedobiologia 56, 161ā167, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2013.03.006 (2013).
Ortas, I. In Advances in Citrus Nutrition 333ā351 (2012).
Michel-Rosales, A. & ValdĆ©s, M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of lime in different agroecosystems of the dry tropics. Mycorrhiza 6, 105ā109, https://doi.org/10.1007/s005720050114 (1996).
Reddy, B., Bagyaraj, D. J. & Mallesha, B. C. Selection of Efficient VA Mycorrhizal Fungi for Acid Lime. Indian Journal of Microbiology 36, 13ā16 (1996).
Al-Sadi, A. M., Al-Ghaithi, A. G., Al-Fahdi, N. & Al-Yahyai, R. Characterization and pathogenicity of fungal pathogens associated with root diseases of citrus in Oman. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 16, 371ā376 (2014).
Al-Mazroui, S. S. & Al-Sadi, A. M. 454 pyrosequencing and direct plating reveal high fungal diversity and dominance by saprophytic species in organic compost. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 18, 98ā102, https://doi.org/10.17957/ijab/15.0068 (2016).
Al-Mazroui, S. S. & Al-Sadi, A. M. Highly variable fungal diversity and the potential occurrence of plant pathogenic fungi in potting media, organic fertilizers and composts originating from 14 countries. Journal of Plant Pathology 97, 529ā534, https://doi.org/10.4454/jpp.v97i3.033 (2015).
Al-Sadi, A. M., Al-Alawi, Z. A., Deadman, M. L. & Patzelt, A. Etiology of four foliar and root diseases of wild plants in Oman. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 36, 517ā522, https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2014.965219 (2014).
Vasar, M. et al. Increased sequencing depth does not increase captured diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza 27, 761ā773, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-017-0791-y (2017).
Schmidt, P. A. et al. Illumina metabarcoding of a soil fungal community. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 65, 128ā132, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.014 (2013).
David, A. S., Seabloom, E. W. & May, G. Disentangling environmental and host sources of fungal endophyte communities in an experimental beachgrass study. Molecular Ecology 26, 6157ā6169, https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14354 (2017).
Sun, J., Zhang, Q., Li, X., Zhou, B. & Wei, Q. Apple Replant Disorder of Pingyitiancha Rootstock is Closely Associated with Rhizosphere Fungal Community Development. Journal of Phytopathology 165, 162ā173, https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.12547 (2017).
Al-Sadi, A. M., Al-Masoodi, R. S., Al-Ismaili, M. & Al-Mahmooli, I. H. Population structure and development of resistance to hymexazol among Fusarium solani populations from date palm, citrus and cucumber. Journal of Phytopathology 163, 947ā955, https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.12397 (2015).
Wu, Q. S., Srivastava, A. K., Zou, Y. N. & Malhotra, S. K. Mycorrhizas in citrus: Beyond soil fertility and plant nutrition. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 87, 427ā443 (2017).
Melo, K. G. P., Da Silva, A. R. & Yano-Melo, A. M. Can citrus varieties affect the soil fungi community? Comunicata Scientiae 7, 167ā174, https://doi.org/10.14295/CS.v7i2.1763 (2016).
Zarei, M. & Paymaneh, Z. Effect of salinity and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and some physiological parameters of Citrus jambheri. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 60, 993ā1004, https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2013.853289 (2014).
Sun, P., Zhang, Y. C., Shen, Y. L., Feng, C. Q. & Wu, Q. S. Identification of fungal community in citrus rhizosphere by ITS gene sequencing. Biotechnology 16, 85ā91, https://doi.org/10.3923/biotech.2017.85.91 (2017).
Walker, G. E. & Morey, B. G. Effects of chemicals and microbial antagonists on nematodes and fungal pathogens of citrus roots. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 39, 629ā637 (1999).
Raza, W. et al. Success evaluation of the biological control of Fusarium wilts of cucumber, banana, and tomato since 2000 and future research strategies. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 37, 202ā212, https://doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2015.1130683 (2017).
Bekker, T. F., Kaiser, C. & Merwe, R. v. d. & Labuschagne, N. In-vitro inhibition of mycelial growth of several phytopathogenic fungi by soluble potassium silicate. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 23, 169ā172 (2006).
Crutcher, F. K. et al. Microbial Resistance Mechanisms to the Antibiotic and Phytotoxin Fusaric Acid. Journal of Chemical Ecology 43, 996ā1006, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-017-0889-x (2017).
Luz, C., Saladino, F., Luciano, F. B., MaƱes, J. & Meca, G. Occurrence, toxicity, bioaccessibility and mitigation strategies of beauvericin, a minor Fusarium mycotoxin. Food and Chemical Toxicology 107, 430ā439, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2017.07.032 (2017).
Shahsavar, A. R., Refahi, A., Zarei, M. & Aslmoshtaghi, E. Analysis of the effects of Glomus etunicatum fungi and Pseudomonas fluorescence bacteria symbiosis on some morphological and physiological characteristics of Mexican lime (Citrus aurantifolia L.) under drought stress conditions. Advances in Horticultural Science 30, 39ā45 (2016).
Van Geel, M., Ceustermans, A., Van Hemelrijck, W., Lievens, B. & Honnay, O. Decrease in diversity and changes in community composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in roots of apple trees with increasing orchard management intensity across a regional scale. Molecular Ecology 24, 941ā952, https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13079 (2015).
Bagyaraj, D. J. Mycorrhizal Fungi. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy 2, 415ā428 (2014).
Barea, J. M. et al. Ecological and functional roles of mycorrhizas in semi-arid ecosystems of Southeast Spain. Journal of Arid Environments 75, 1292ā1301, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.06.001 (2011).
Heilmann-Clausen, J. et al. A fungal perspective on conservation biology. Conservation Biology 29, 61ā68, https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12388 (2015).
Smith, S. & Read, D. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. (2008).
Kim, D. G., Lee, J. H. & Kim, H. O. An unrecorded species of nematode-trapping fungus, Dactylella pseudoclavata in Korea. Plant Pathology Journal 23, 210ā211, https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.2007.23.3.210 (2007).
Elshafie, A. E., Al-Mueini, R., Al-Bahry, S. N. & Alkindi, A. Y. Nematophagous and non-nematophagous fungi belonging to the genera Arthrobotrys and Dactylella from soils in Oman. Kuwait Journal of Science and Engineering 32, 57ā72 (2005).
Elshafie, A. E., Al-Bahry, S. N. & Ba-Omar, T. Nematophagous fungi isolated from soil in Oman. Sydowia 55, 18ā32 (2003).
AĆÆt Hamza, M. et al. Diversity of nematophagous fungi in Moroccan olive nurseries: Highlighting prey-predator interactions and efficient strains against root-knot nematodes. Biological Control 114, 14ā23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.07.011 (2017).
Elshafie, A. E. et al. Diversity and trapping efficiency of nematophagous fungi from Oman. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 45, 266ā270 (2006).
Gao, J. et al. Production and characterization of cellulolytic enzymes from the thermoacidophilic fungal Aspergillus terreus M11 under solid-state cultivation of corn stover. Bioresource Technology 99, 7623ā7629, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.02.005 (2008).
Ting, A. S. Y. & Jioe, E. In vitro assessment of antifungal activities of antagonistic fungi towards pathogenic Ganoderma boninense under metal stress. Biological Control 96, 57ā63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.02.002 (2016).
Al-Balushi, I., Bani-Uraba, M., Guizani, N., Al-Khusaibi, M. & Al-Sadi, A. M. Illumina MiSeq sequencing analysis of fungal diversity in stored dates. BMC Microbiology 17, 72 (2017).
Abed, R. M. M., Al-Sadi, A. M., Al-Shehi, M., Al-Hinai, S. & Robinson, M. D. Diversity of free-living and lichenized fungal communities in biological soil crusts of the Sultanate of Oman and their role in improving soil properties. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 57, 695ā705, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.07.023 (2013).
Huang, X. et al. Illumina MiSeq investigations on the changes of microbial community in the Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cubense infected soil during and after reductive soil disinfestation. Microbiological Research 181, 33ā42, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2015.08.004 (2015).
Yao, Q. et al. Three years of biochar amendment alters soil physiochemical properties and fungal community composition in a black soil of northeast China. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 110, 56ā67, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.03.005 (2017).
Liu, L., Liu, Y., Hui, R. & Xie, M. Recovery of microbial community structure of biological soil crusts in successional stages of Shapotou desert revegetation, northwest China. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 107, 125ā128, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.12.030 (2017).
Doyle, J. J. & Doyle, J. L. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small amount of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemcial Bulletin 19, 11ā15 (1987).
Gardes, M. & Bruns, T. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes ā application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology 2, 113ā118 (1993).
White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. In PCR protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications (eds M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, & T. J. White) 315ā322 (Academic Press, 1990).
Ruff, S. et al. Methane seep in shallow-water permeable sediment harbors high diversity of anaerobic methanotrophic communities, Elba, Italy. Frontiers in Microbiology 7, 374, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00374 (2016).
Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460ā2461 (2010).
Edgar, R. C. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nature Methods 10, 996ā998 (2013).
Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32, 1792ā1797 (2004).
Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 5, 1 (2004).
Price, M., Dehal, P. & Arkin, A. FastTree 2-approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. Plos One 5, e9490 (2010).
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2011).
Kazeeroni, E. A. & Al-Sadi, A. M. 454-pyrosequencing reveals variable fungal diversity across farming systems. Frontiers in Plant Science 7, 314, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00314 (2016).
Oksanen, J. et al. VEGAN: Community Ecology Package. R package version 1, 17ā18 (2011).
Hartmann, M., Frey, B., Mayer, J., MƤder, P. & Widmer, F. Distinct soil microbial diversity under long-term organic and conventional farming. ISME Journal 9, 1177ā1194, https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.210 (2015).
Moll, J. et al. Spatial distribution of fungal communities in an arable soil. Plos One 11, e0148130 (2016).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank growers for help in the collection of samples. Thanks to Jeremy Wilkinson for his help in data analysis. Financial support to the study from Sultan Qaboos University and Oman Animal and Plant Genetic Resources Center are highly appreciated (EG/AGR/CROP/16/01 and IG/AGR/CROP/16/03).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.M.A. planned the study, E.A.K. processed samples, A.M.A. and E.A.K. analyzed results, A.M.A. wrote the manuscript and A.M.A. and E.A.K. approved the final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisherās note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articleās Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the articleās Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Al-Sadi, A.M., Kazerooni, E.A. Illumina-MiSeq analysis of fungi in acid lime roots reveals dominance of Fusarium and variation in fungal taxa. Sci Rep 8, 17388 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35404-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35404-5
Keywords
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.