Article | Open | Published:

An Electroencephalography Bioassay for Preclinical Testing of Analgesic Efficacy

Scientific Reportsvolume 8, Article number: 16402 (2018) | Download Citation


We present a multimodal method combining quantitative electroencephalography (EEG), behavior and pharmacology for pre-clinical screening of analgesic efficacy in vivo. The method consists of an objective and non-invasive approach for realtime assessment of spontaneous nociceptive states based on EEG recordings of theta power over primary somatosensory cortex in awake rats. Three drugs were chosen: (1) pregabalin, a CNS-acting calcium channel inhibitor; (2) EMA 401, a PNS-acting angiotensin II type 2 receptor inhibitor; and (3) minocycline, a CNS-acting glial inhibitor. Optimal doses were determined based on pharmacokinetic studies and/or published data. The effects of these drugs at single or multiple doses were tested on the attenuation of theta power and paw withdrawal latency (PWL) in a rat model of neuropathic pain. We report mostly parallel trends in the reversal of theta power and PWL in response to administration of pregabalin and EMA 401, but not minocycline. We also note divergent trends at non-optimal doses and following prolonged drug administration, suggesting that EEG theta power can be used to detect false positive and false negative outcomes of the withdrawal reflex behavior, and yielding novel insights into the analgesic effects of these drugs on spontaneous nociceptive states in rats.


More than 15% of adults in the United States suffer from chronic pain1. Ineffective therapies and narrow therapeutic windows of available drugs2 are contributing to the opioid epidemic3. The scant success rate of drug development is partly attributed to poor translatability of analgesic efficacy in pre-clinical models, which is based predominantly on behavioral assays. Of these, the most commonly-used are withdrawal reflexes that are qualitative and suffer from a poor temporal resolution. Even when operant behaviors4 and other types are considered5,6, their relevance to brain states underlying nociception and pain assessment in the clinic is not direct nor at times evident7. Hence, there is an emerging interest in novel methods that measure stimulus-independent ‘spontaneous’ pain in an observer-independent manner, especially methods that could be applied to humans. One such approach with a promising translational potential is cortical theta power using quantitative electroencephalography (EEG)8.

Earlier studies suggested that resting state EEG oscillations in the theta band are enhanced in neurogenic pain patients and attenuated after therapeutic thalamic lesions9,10. Our laboratory was first in reverse-translating these findings to animal models in order to elucidate the mesoscale neural networks underlying pain-induced theta oscillations. In a series of studies, we showed that oscillations within the low frequency theta (4–8 Hz) band are enhanced in various rodent model of pain using spectral analysis of the local field potential11, electrocorticography12, and EEG13. We also demonstrated that pain-induced theta power is reversed upon spontaneous resolution of pain and attenuated following administration of analgesics at effective doses12,13. Furthermore, we demonstrated a causal relation between pain-induced theta power, sensory behavior and micro-scale unitary activity in thalamus14, and proposed a hypothetical framework of cortical hierarchy mediating pain processing15. Other laboratories have since used low frequency oscillations in the context of pain assessment in rodent models16,17. For example, Chang et al. demonstrated that theta oscillations can be evoked by transient nociceptive stimuli, are developmentally regulated starting at (but not prior to) postnatal day 21, and manifest during adulthood in the paw incision mouse model16.

Here, we use EEG theta power to monitor spontaneous nociceptive states in rats and to measure the anti-nociceptive effects of a compound with known analgesic effects in humans (pregabalin), and other drugs with promising (EMA401) or inconclusive results (minocycline) in clinical trials. (1) Pregabalin is a CNS-acting calcium channel inhibitor and first line medication for several chronic pain conditions2. (2) EMA 401 is a PNS-acting angiotensin II type 2 receptor (AT2R) antagonist with promising Phase 2 clinical trial results18. Several small-molecule AT2R antagonists are known to have anti-nociceptive effects in rodent pain models. To date, only EMA401 has been shown to have analgesic effects in clinical trials after 3 weeks of daily oral administration18. EMA300, an analog to EMA401, has been reported to have cumulative efficacy on hypersensitivity induced in a rodent neuropathy model19. However, the equivalent optimal dose of EM401 in rats is unknown. (3) Minocycline is a CNS-acting glial inhibitor with mixed results in animal and human studies. According to the literature, the anti-nociceptive effects of 40 mg/kg (i.p.) minocycline manifest upon prophylactic, but not prolonged treatment in the CCI rat model20,21. However, prolonged treatment with minocycline (p.o.) at 80 mg/kg has been shown to reverse mechanical allodynia in a rat model of painful diabetic neuropathy22,23. Moreover, the analgesic efficacy of minocycline in human studies is inconclusive, even at relatively high doses24,25,26,27.

Hence, we hypothesized that pain-induced theta power is attenuated only upon administration of a given drug at a therapeutically effective dose. Doses were determined based primarily on published data in equivalent rodent models and administration routes. Otherwise, we performed pharmacokinetic studies and determined sub-therapeutic and supra-therapeutic doses according to cited clinical studies.

We report parallel trends in the reversal of theta power and paw withdrawal latency (PWL) in response to analgesic administration of pregabalin and EMA 401, but not minocycline. We also note divergent trends at non-optimal doses and following prolonged drug administration. Our results highlight the utility of EEG theta power as an interdisciplinary bioassay for the screening of analgesic efficacy in pre-clinical animal models.


Experimental design and control experiments

A total of 67 rats were used. Experimental timeline is shown in Fig. 1A. All rats underwent chronic implant of EEG electrodes with relatively stable recordings throughout the study (Fig. 1B). Figure 1C shows representative EEG waveforms during epochs of awake, resting states under naïve and CCI conditions from the same animal. As we previously reported12, rats with CCI showed higher power in the theta range [4–8] Hz compared to naïve. To evaluate these observations quantitively, power spectral densities (PSD) were computed for the time intervals shown, resulting in mean theta power values (Fig. 1C).

Figure 1
Figure 1

(A) Experimental timeline. Rats first undergo implantation of EEG electrodes and allowed one week for post-operative recovery. Second, seven days after EEG implant, EEG recording (~15 min sessions) is followed immediately by behavioral testing (Naive group), then CCI. For testing the analgesic effects of drugs at any given day after CCI (i.e. CCI d7, 11 or 14), EEG and behavioral data are collected prior to, and at several time points after, drug administration. (B) EEG implant procedure. (C) Representative examples of EEG waveforms from naïve and CCI conditions in the same rat. EEG waveforms were down sampled to 250 Hz and bandpassed between 4 and 8 Hz (theta band). Power spectral density was generated using Fast Fourier transform and mean theta power was computed between 4–8 Hz. (D) Time-dependent increase in theta power and decrease in PWL after CCI. (E) Correlation between theta power and PWL (r2 = 0.02, p = 0.31). Data are represented as the ratio of CCI d14 relative to Naive. (F) Vehicle treatments (i.p., p.o.) had no effect on theta power or PWL 0.5 h after administration. Data are represented as the ratio of vehicle treatment relative to CCI d14.

All rats receiving CCI developed a significant and time-dependent increase in resting state theta power and a sustained decrease in PWL beginning at day 7 until day 14 after CCI, but not sham CCI surgery (for theta power n = 6 rats in CCI sham, 10 in CCI d7, and 39 in CCI d14; for PWL n = 4 rats in CCI sham, 13 in CCI d7, and 39 in CCI d14; Fig. 1D), suggesting successful reproduction of the neuropathic pain model and confirming our previous findings11,12,13.

Although both theta power and PWL values reliably predict nociceptive states in rats with CCI (i.e. increased theta power and decreased PWL, Fig. 1E, lower right quadrant), no significant correlation between these two measures was found (r2 = 0.02, p = 0.31, n = 67 rats).

In preparation for the drug efficacy experiments, control experiments were performed to rule out confounding variables or adverse effects of animal handling and drug administration. Results showed that neither intraperitoneal (5% Tween 80 in saline, 3 mL/kg) nor oral (0.5% methyl cellulose, 5 mL/kg) vehicle treatment modulated theta power or PWL in rats at day 14 after CCI (n = 5 rats in i.p. group and n = 4 rats in p.o. group; Fig. 1F).


The optimal dose for pregabalin was based on a previous study whereby we showed that 10 mg/kg of pregabalin (i.p.) attenuated pain-induced theta power and PWL in rats at day 14 after CCI13. To further determine the sub-optimal and supra-optimal doses relative to clinical data, we performed a titration PK study. Pregabalin was administered at 3 and 100 mg/kg (i.p.). Pregabalin plasma concentration has been reported to have good linearity28. When comparing our study with a previous report29, plasma concentration at 30 min (matching the time point of EEG recording and behavioral testing in this study) showed good linearity at doses of 3 and 100 mg/kg (n = 3 rats per group; Supplemental Fig. 1A). Comparing these rat pregabalin PK data to published human data30,31,32,33,34,35, 10 mg/kg administration in rats [11.3 (4.9) μg/mL] represented as mean or geomean (% coefficient of variation), the same hereafter] corresponded to Cmax in humans between 300 and 600 mg/day [6.39 (20) and 11.4 (17) μg/mL, respectively]31, which are considered to be well within the range of effective analgesic doses in many clinical trials36 (Supplemental Fig. 1A and Table 1). A 3 mg/kg dose in rats [3.29 (14) μg/mL] corresponded to the Cmax value of 150 mg/day in humans [3.18 (21) μg/mL]31, a dose with an efficacy considered as insufficient or subtle35,36. Rat plasma concentrations at 30 mg/kg [33.0 (5.4) μg/mL] corresponded to slightly higher than steady state level of 600 mg/day in humans (0.244–18.6 μg/mL, represented as range)33. On the other hand, 100 mg/kg in rats [99.3 (20) μg/mL] exceeded published reports in human studies. Based on these data, we characterized 3, 10, 30 and 100 mg/kg of pregabalin in rats (i.p.) as sub-therapeutic, therapeutic (i.e. optimal), supra-therapeutic and overdose, respectively, according to clinical standards (Table 1).

Table 1 Drug dose in rat relative to therapeutic window in humans.

We then evaluated the effects of 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg pregabalin (i.p.) on theta power and PWL in rats at d14 after CCI. Pregabalin significantly attenuated theta power in rats with CCI only at the therapeutic dose of 10 mg/kg (0.83 ± 0.12 relative to CCI), but not the sub-therapeutic or supra-therapeutic dose of 3 and 30 mg/kg (0.91 ± 0.11, and 1.24 ± 0.29, respectively; n = 7 rats; Fig. 2A). Interestingly, pregabalin significantly enhanced PWL at all doses (1.42 ± 0.10, 1.54 ± 0.08, and 1.47 ± 0.14 at 3, 10 and 30 mg/kg, respectively, relative to CCI).

Figure 2
Figure 2

(A) The efficacy of pregabalin was analyzed 0.5 h after i.p. administration, whereby 10 mg/kg pregabalin attenuated CCI-induced theta power. Mean theta was represented as the ratio of CCI + pregabalin relative to CCI. Pregabalin reversed PWL at all single-doses tested. Arrows indicate inconsistent results between PWL and theta power (i.e. false positives). (B) The efficacy of EMA401 was analyzed 0.5 hr after p.o. administration, which attenuated theta power and increased PWL after single dose administration. (C) Daily administration for 7 consecutive days starting at d7 CCI, however, had a short-lasting effect on theta power for the first 5 days but a sustained reversal effect on PWL. Arrow indicates inconsistent result between PWL and theta power (i.e. false positive). (D) Single administration of minocycline (80 mg/kg, p.o.) at d14 after CCI had no effects on theta power or PWL. (E) The same dose of minocycline (80 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly attenuated theta power at d7 after CCI but not PWL, while having no effects on subsequent days following consecutive daily treatment starting d7 CCI. Arrow indicates inconsistent result between PWL and theta power (i.e. false negative).


EMA401 was administered in rats at 1 and 10 mg/kg (p.o.) and plasma concentration 30 min after 10 mg/kg dose in rats [1.59 (70) μg/mL] was determined to be comparable to clinical data [1.01 (65) μg/mL] (n = 3 rats per group; Supplemental Fig. 1B and Table 1)18. We also confirmed that the distribution of EM401 was peripherally restricted (data not shown), as previously reported37. In addition, we investigated EMA401’s exposure after daily administration (once/day for 7 days), which was found to be not cumulative. Considering the similar affinity of EMA401 to both human and rat AT2R38, we therefore characterized 10 mg/kg (p.o.) as therapeutic dose for EMA401 (Table 1).

We then evaluated the effects of single administration of 10 mg/kg EMA401 (p.o.) on theta power and PWL in rats at d14 after CCI, which resulted in a significant attenuation of theta power (0.71 ± 0.13 relative to CCI) and increase in PWL (1.26 ± 0.11 relative to CCI; n = 6 rats; Fig. 1B). Upon daily administration of 10 mg/kg (p.o.) starting at d7 after CCI, however, the reversal effects on theta power were significant at d7 and d11 but not at d14 after CCI (0.76 ± 0.07, 0.77 ± 0.08, and 0.87 ± 0.12 at day 7, 11 and 14, respectively; n = 6 rats; Fig. 1C), suggesting short-acting effects with regards to resting state nociception, whereas PWL showed significant and cumulative anti-hyperalgesic effects throughout 7 days of treatment (1.60 ± 0.19, 2.13 ± 0.28, and 2.27 ± 0.30 at days 7, 11 and 14, respectively).


Considering the toxicity of prolonged systemic (i.p.) minocycline relative to the reduced exposure following oral (p.o.) administration, we chose to test the efficacy of single and daily administrations of 80 mg/kg (p.o.) on theta power and PWL. Results show that single administration of minocycline at d14 after CCI had no effects on theta power (0.96 ± 0.13) or PWL (1.08 ± 0.10) relative to CCI (n = 5 rats; Fig. 2D).

Earlier administration of minocycline at d7 after CCI significantly attenuated theta power (0.71 ± 0.06), however, minocycline’s efficacy was short-lasting and non-significant at later time points after daily administration (0.95 ± 0.11 and 1.37 ± 0.45 at day 11 and 14, respectively) (n = 7 rats on d7 and d11 CCI and 5 on d14 CCI; Fig. 2E). With regards to PWL, minocycline had no effect at any day throughout the daily treatment regimen (0.91 ± 0.05, 1.00 ± 0.08 and 0.94 ± 0.04 at day 7, 10 and 14, respectively).


In spite of our increased knowledge of the biology, physiology and neural circuits of pain, little success has been achieved recently in developing new analgesic agents. Pain assessment is a key step in the regulatory process which, regrettably, continues to be based on qualitative criteria reported by the patient (visual analogue scale or VAS) and evoked reflex behaviors in response to acute stimuli in animal models39,40. Whereas stimulus-independent behavioral paradigms have been recently proposed (grimace scales5, conditioned place preference41, burrowing42, brain imaging43), those tend to be low throughout, subjective and lack the temporal resolution necessary for real-time measurement of spontaneous nociceptive states.

In this study, we present evidence for the positive identification of analgesic efficacy in a rat model of neuropathic pain using a novel EEG theta power assay for the quantitative assessment of spontaneous nociceptive states. We also present data showing the high sensitivity of theta power in detecting false positive and false negative outcomes of the common hyperalgesia test. Three drugs belonging to different families of agents were selected: (1) pregabalin: a CNS target which has a recognized clinical utility as pain therapeutic; (2) EMA401: a PNS target with promising clinical trial results; (3) minocycline: a glial target with inconclusive efficacy (Table 2).

Table 2 Summary of analgesic efficacy.

Single-dose treatment with pregabalin (i.p.) attenuated theta power only when administered at the equivalent therapeutic dose in humans, whereas a sub-therapeutic dose was ineffective and a supra-therapeutic dose resulted in a paradoxical increase in theta power, suggesting potential side effects such as drowsiness which is known to enhance slow wave EEG44,45. With regards to behavioral results, pregabalin at all doses reversed PWL to the same level, revealing the ability of theta power to detect putative false positive outcomes based on the PWL test. These results are consistent with clinical data, whereby a sub-therapeutic dose of pregabalin (150 mg/day, corresponding to 3 mg/kg in our study) is effective in reversing allodynia but not spontaneous pain according to the VAS35. Pregabalin is known to have anticonvulsant, analgesic and anti-anxiety properties with variable effects on network synchrony over widespread brain regions46. Of note, pregabalin has been reported to enhance theta power in chronic pain patients47. In that study, mean theta power was computed across all EEG electrodes, unlike our focus on S1 in this study. Importantly, the pregabalin dose in the human study was vaguely accounted for (“dose as tolerated”). This is especially concerning since we clearly show here that the effects of pregabalin on EEG are dose-dependent with a tendency for a paradoxical increase in theta at higher doses.

Single-dose treatment with EMA401 (p.o.) reversed both theta power and PWL. Prolonged treatment with EMA401 at the same therapeutic dose, however, had a short-lasting analgesic efficacy measured by EEG and a cumulative effect on withdrawal behavior. In support of our behavioral results, single doses of EMA200, EMA300, and EMA400 (i.p.), which are structurally related to EMA401, have been shown to result in dose-dependent anti-allodynic effects in rats with CCI38. It was later reported that EMA300 also confers analgesic properties measured by mechanical allodynia and thigmotactic behaviors in a rat model of antiretroviral toxic neuropathy19. Interestingly, the anti-allodynic effects were preserved after prolonged exposure to EMA300 over 3 consecutive days. Our results with regards to prolonged treatment effects on theta power, however, are inconsistent with those of a human study whereby orally administered EMA401 was effective in reducing VAS in patients with postherpetic neuralgia after 3 weeks of treatment, but not before, at a dose of 100 mg/kg twice-daily18. This might be attributed to model or species differences, suggesting a previously unknown mechanism of action of EMA401 worth exploring in future studies (see48 for a review of EMA401’s developmental program).

Minocycline (p.o.), whose analgesic efficacy is controversial or subtle in clinical studies24,25,26,27, did not reverse theta power induced during the chronic phase of CCI, but showed subtle attenuation of theta power at an early phase, an effect that was short-lasting upon daily exposure at the same dose. Interestingly, minocycline was reported to be ineffective in ameliorating VAS in patients with neuropathic pain24, consistent with the lack of an effect on theta power during the later stage CCI in this study. In support of our behavioral results, daily minocycline treatment (80 mg/kg once/day, p.o.) for 3 weeks started four weeks after induction of diabetes has been shown to attenuate mechanical allodynia while failing to produce significant changes in PWL in a rat model of peripheral diabetic neuropathy22. Importantly, it has also been shown that PWL and mechanical allodynia are attenuated when minocycline is administered preemptively prior to CCI (up to 40 mg/kg, i.p.), but not at a later chronic stage21. Therefore, theta power is able to detect putative false negative results generated by the PWL test during the early phase of CCI, revealing possible new mechanism of actions for minocycline and glial inhibition in the early phase of neuropathic pain following nerve injury.

In general, the ability to detect false positive or false negative outcomes is crucial to the drug development process. The incorrect assertion of analgesic activity of an agent may arise for several reasons, including the behavioral paradigm in question. To minimize such likelihood, several controls have been recommended, including the concurrent comparisons of a given novel compound with standard, well-characterized agents, consideration of dose-response curves for a side effect profile, detailed pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis, and time-dependent effects upon repeated exposure49. Our study incorporates most of these recommendations in the experimental design. A few cases in point illustrating the importance of false analgesic activity are the disappointing clinical trial outcomes of presumably promising drug candidates such as CB2 agonist, NK-1 receptor antagonist50 and FAAH inhibitor51, despite strong evidence for efficacy in pre-clinical studies using behavioral tests, including thermal hyperalgesia52,53. Interestingly, thermal hyperalgesia continues to be considered as a primary outcome for the testing of pregabalin’s efficacy in neuropathic pain models including CCI54,55.

Although finer temporal resolution at sub-second scales of theta power can be obtained, recording of EEG longer than continuous 30 min was not feasible in our study because EEG recording had to be interrupted to perform behavioral testing. This limitation can be overcome in future studies that do not involve stimulus-dependent behavioral paradigms. Moreover, we do not imply that EEG theta power is the ultimate pre-clinical bioassay. For instance, theta power in this study was measured over S1, which is thought to mediate the detection and localization of pain56,57. For other dimensions of the pain experience, for example those that are processed by deep brain structures (amygdala, insula, etc.), EEG would not be a suitable approach and behavioral paradigms such as conditioned place preference or burrowing might be more appropriate. Ultimately, a combination of electrophysiological (EEG), behavioral and possibly fluidic (blood, saliva) biomarker assays might provide a more comprehensive assessment of pain. Because the analgesics in this study were not administered to naive rats, their modulatory effects on normal theta power cannot be ascertained. Overall, waveforms recorded via EEG electrodes placed over S1 cannot be assumed to be generated exclusively from S1. However, we have previously reported that intracortical recordings from S1 layer IV show increased theta power in rats with CCI11. Further refinement of recording techniques using high density systems would be needed to more accurately localize the generators of pain-evoked EEG theta.

Our group previously demonstrated that spontaneous states of nociception correlate with increased theta power11,12,13, whereas a transient interruption of theta oscillations corresponds to a time-locked attenuation of hypersensitivity14. Furthermore, we showed that theta can be induced in healthy humans subjected to a moderately painful cold-water immersion test58. Accordingly, we presented a unifying framework for the hierarchical processing of nociceptive information at the cellular and network levels15. Collectively, and in light of evidence presented in this study, we conclude that EEG theta power is a reliable bioassay for testing analgesic efficacy in pre-clinical animal models of pain.


Experimental animals

Adult (200–300 g) male Sprague Dawley rats (Harlan Laboratories, South Easton, MA) were housed under a 12-hour light/dark cycle in a temperature and humidity-controlled environment. Food and water were given ad libitum. All the methods were carried out in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations and experiments were approved by the Rhode Island Hospital Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Electrode implant

These procedures were performed under anesthesia (isoflurane, 2–3.5%). The head was fixed in a stereotaxic apparatus, and skull was exposed after a small skin incision. A stainless steel screw electrode (0–80 ga 1/8 inch, impedance = 0.6 Ω; component Supply Company, Fort Meade, FL) was placed over intact skull (i.e. epicranially) corresponding to primary somatosensory cortex or S1 contralateral to nerve injury (Bregma −2, 2 mm lateral). Minimal craniotomies were used to place 3 stabilization screws (corresponding to Bregma +1.4, 2 mm bilaterally and Bregma −4.8 mm, midline). The EEG screw was threaded with a silver wire and attached to a female miniature pin connector (A&M Systems, Sequim, WA). All screws were anchored to the skull chronically using dental acrylic (Fig. 1B). Signal reference was provided by a silver wire permanently threaded to the skin at the back of the neck.

Chronic constriction injury (CCI)

The sciatic nerve was exposed unilaterally after skin incision at the mid-thigh level and blunt dissection of the biceps under deep anesthesia (isoflurane, 3%). Four chromic gut ligatures were tied loosely around the nerve 1 mm apart, and the overlying muscles and skin were closed in layers with 4–0 Ethilon sutures. A minor modification was introduced, consisting of loose ligatures, to minimize nerve damage and deafferentation. Rats with this slightly modified CCI procedure gradually develop typical signs of sensory hypersensitivity associated with neuropathic pain, such as guarding the affected hind paw and thermal hypersensitivity. These signs last longer than 2 weeks after CCI, as we previously demonstrated11,12,13. For CCI sham surgery, the sciatic nerve was similarly exposed but not ligated.

Electrophysiological recording

Pin connectors from EEG electrode was tethered to preamplifier headstage leading to a multichannel amplifier (iso-DAM8A; WPI Inc, Sarasota, FL). EEG waveforms were amplified (DAM80; World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL). Then, data were lead to a processing system (micro 1401mkII; Cambridge Electronic Design, CED, Cambridge, United Kingdom) and analyzed offline using Spike 2 (CED). Rats were allowed to move freely during EEG recording in Plexiglas chambers. After 15 minutes of acclimation, EEG recording was performed. Each EEG recording session was 3 to 5 minutes per animal. EEG waveforms were recorded at a sampling frequency of 16.7 kHz, and then down-sampled off-line to 250 Hz. Only data during awake resting periods (defined as alertness but idle with no locomotor behavior) were further analyzed. Potentials generated due to vigorous myogenic activity (such as scratching) were excluded from analysis. These artifacts can be easily identified on the basis of monitoring the animal’s behavior, voltage amplitude, and spectral frequency typically >30 Hz, and they were further corroborated using an automated artifact detection algorithm recently developed in our laboratory (Supplemental Fig. 3)59.

Power spectra density (PSD)

Fast Fourier transform was used to convert EEG waveform from the time domain to the frequency domain. Power values were generated in 27 frequency bins between 3 and 30 Hz. Awake resting periods were selected and Fast Fourier transformed, then average PSD was calculated. Mean PSD theta was computed between 4 and 8 Hz (Fig. 1C). Each ‘period’ was a continuous interval between 7 and 20 seconds, and 3–5 periods were averaged to obtain one value for mean theta per condition.

Thermal hyperalgesia

EEG recording was performed first for ~10 min during resting states (no stimulation). The rat was then untethered from the EEG leads and placed in the behavioral apparatus for 15 min acclimation, followed by 5 min PWL testing. Thermal sensitivity of the hindpaw was assessed by measuring the latency of the withdrawal reflex in response to a radiant heat source (Paw withdrawal stimulator, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, SD). A radiant heat source (4.7 A) was applied to the plantar surface of the hind paw. Paw withdrawal latencies (PWL) in response to 4 thermal stimulations were averaged for each paw. Stimulations to each paw were separated by at least 2 minutes intervals.

Analgesic treatments and drug used

Pregabalin was dissolved in 5% Tween 80 (Sigma Aldrich) in saline formulated for intraperitoneal (i.p.) delivery of 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg in a volume of 3 mL/kg. EMA401 and minocycline (Sigma Aldrich) were suspended in 0.5% methyl cellulose solution (Wako) for oral administration (p.o.) of 10 mg/kg and 80 mg/kg respectively, in a volume of 5 mL/kg.

Pharmacokinetics (PK) studies

Rats (n = 3 per group) were intraperitoneally treated either with 3 or 100 mg/kg of pregabalin, or orally either with 1 or 10 mg/kg of EMA401, or 80 mg/kg of minocycline. At 0.5, 1, and 2 hours after treatment, approximately 150 µL of blood was collected from the jugular vein using a heparinized syringe with a needle. Blood samples were then centrifuged at 1700 g at 4 °C for 10 minutes. Plasma samples were then separated and stored at −20 °C until analysis. Five or 10 μL of plasma samples were diluted with 300 μL of deproteinization solution containing internal standards (5 nM buspirone, 20 nM tolbutamide, 10 nM reserpine in acetonitorile/methanol = 9: 1) and shaken for 5 minutes at room temperature, and centrifuged at 1000 g for 15 minutes. Then, the supernatant was analyzed by LC-MS/MS (Xevo TQ-S Tandem Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry, Waters) for quantification of pregabalin. Data analysis were performed with MassLynx Mass Spectometry Software and TargetLynx Application manager (Waters).

Statistical analysis

Values regarding theta power and PWL are reported as mean ± SEM and then converted to ratio relative to naive or CCI values for standardized representation of the data. One sample t-test was used for comparison between naïve and CCI, and paired t-test was used for comparison between CCI and after treatment in the same animals, respectively. Values regarding drug plasma concentration are reported as geomean (% of covariance) or range. Correlation analysis was used to compare EEG with PWL values. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and denoted by asterisk (*) in figures.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Kennedy, J., Roll, J. M., Schraudner, T., Murphy, S. & McPherson, S. Prevalence of persistent pain in the U.S. adult population: new data from the 2010 national health interview survey. The journal of pain: official journal of the American Pain Society 15, 979–984 (2014).

  2. 2.

    Finnerup, N. B. et al. Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet. Neurology 14, 162–173 (2015).

  3. 3.

    Skolnick, P. & Volkow, N. D. Re-energizing the Development of Pain Therapeutics in Light of the Opioid Epidemic. Neuron 92, 294–297 (2016).

  4. 4.

    Sufka, K. J. Conditioned place preference paradigm: a novel approach for analgesic drug assessment against chronic pain. Pain 58, 355–366 (1994).

  5. 5.

    Langford, D. J. et al. Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse. Nature methods 7, 447–449 (2010).

  6. 6.

    Vrinten, D. H. & Hamers, F. F. ‘CatWalk’ automated quantitative gait analysis as a novel method to assess mechanical allodynia in the rat; a comparison with von Frey testing. Pain 102, 203–209 (2003).

  7. 7.

    Mogil, J. S. Animal models of pain: progress and challenges. Nature reviews. Neuroscience 10, 283–294 (2009).

  8. 8.

    Malver, L. P. et al. Electroencephalography and analgesics. British journal of clinical pharmacology 77, 72–95 (2014).

  9. 9.

    Sarnthein, J., Stern, J., Aufenberg, C., Rousson, V. & Jeanmonod, D. Increased EEG power and slowed dominant frequency in patients with neurogenic pain. Brain: a journal of neurology 129, 55–64 (2006).

  10. 10.

    Stern, J., Jeanmonod, D. & Sarnthein, J. Persistent EEG overactivation in the cortical pain matrix of neurogenic pain patients. NeuroImage 31, 721–731 (2006).

  11. 11.

    LeBlanc, B. W. et al. T-type calcium channel blocker Z944 restores cortical synchrony and thalamocortical connectivity in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Pain 157, 255–263 (2016).

  12. 12.

    Leblanc, B. W., Lii, T. R., Silverman, A. E., Alleyne, R. T. & Saab, C. Y. Cortical theta is increased while thalamocortical coherence is decreased in rat models of acute and chronic pain. Pain 155, 773–782 (2014).

  13. 13.

    LeBlanc, B. W., Bowary, P. M., Chao, Y. C., Lii, T. R. & Saab, C. Y. Electroencephalographic signatures of pain and analgesia in rats. Pain 157, 2330–2340 (2016).

  14. 14.

    LeBlanc, B. W. et al. Thalamic Bursts Down-regulate Cortical Theta and Nociceptive Behavior. Scientific reports 7, 2482 (2017).

  15. 15.

    Saab, C. Y. & Barrett, L. F. Thalamic Bursts and the Epic Pain Model. Front Comput Neurosci 10, 147 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Chang, P., Fabrizi, L., Olhede, S. & Fitzgerald, M. The Development of Nociceptive Network Activity in the Somatosensory Cortex of Freely Moving Rat Pups. Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991) 26, 4513–4523 (2016).

  17. 17.

    Choi, S., Yu, E., Hwang, E. & Llinas, R. R. Pathophysiological implication of CaV3.1 T-type Ca2+ channels in trigeminal neuropathic pain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113, 2270–2275 (2016).

  18. 18.

    Rice, A. S. C. et al. EMA401, an orally administered highly selective angiotensin II type 2 receptor antagonist, as a novel treatment for postherpetic neuralgia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial. Lancet (London, England) 383, 1637–1647 (2014).

  19. 19.

    Smith, M. T., Lau, T., Wallace, V. C., Wyse, B. D. & Rice, A. S. Analgesic efficacy of small-molecule angiotensin II type 2 receptor antagonists in a rat model of antiretroviral toxic polyneuropathy. Behav Pharmacol 25, 137–146 (2014).

  20. 20.

    Nazemi, S., Manaheji, H., Zaringhalam, J., Sadeghi, M. & Haghparast, A. Post-injury repeated administrations of minocycline improve the antinociceptive effect of morphine in chronic constriction injury model of neuropathic pain in rat. Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior 102, 520–525 (2012).

  21. 21.

    Zarei, M., Sabetkasaei, M. & Moini-Zanjani, T. Paradoxical effect of minocycline on established neuropathic pain in rat. EXCLI journal 16, 229–235 (2017).

  22. 22.

    Amorim, D. et al. Minocycline reduces mechanical allodynia and depressive-like behaviour in type-1 diabetes mellitus in the rat. Behavioural brain research 327, 1–10 (2017).

  23. 23.

    Vonder Haar, C. et al. Comparison of the effect of minocycline and simvastatin on functional recovery and gene expression in a rat traumatic brain injury model. Journal of neurotrauma 31, 961–975 (2014).

  24. 24.

    Sumitani, M. et al. Minocycline Does Not Decrease Intensity of Neuropathic Pain Intensity, But Does Improve Its Affective Dimension. Journal of pain & palliative care pharmacotherapy 30, 31–35 (2016).

  25. 25.

    Martinez, V. et al. The efficacy of a glial inhibitor, minocycline, for preventing persistent pain after lumbar discectomy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Pain 154, 1197–1203 (2013).

  26. 26.

    Vanelderen, P. et al. Effect of minocycline on lumbar radicular neuropathic pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial with amitriptyline as a comparator. Anesthesiology 122, 399–406 (2015).

  27. 27.

    Syngle, A., Verma, I., Krishan, P., Garg, N. & Syngle, V. Minocycline improves peripheral and autonomic neuropathy in type 2 diabetes: MIND study. Neurological sciences: official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology 35, 1067–1073 (2014).

  28. 28.

    Vartanian, M. G. et al. Activity profile of pregabalin in rodent models of epilepsy and ataxia. Epilepsy research 68, 189–205 (2006).

  29. 29.

    Lau, W. et al. A back translation of pregabalin and carbamazepine against evoked and non-evoked endpoints in the rat spared nerve injury model of neuropathic pain. Neuropharmacology 73, 204–215 (2013).

  30. 30.

    Buvanendran, A., Kroin, J. S., Kari, M. & Tuman, K. J. Can a single dose of 300 mg of pregabalin reach acute antihyperalgesic levels in the central nervous system? Regional anesthesia and pain medicine 35, 535–538 (2010).

  31. 31.

    Chew, M. L. et al. Pregabalin controlled-release pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers: analysis of four multiple-dose randomized clinical pharmacology studies. Clinical drug investigation 34, 627–637 (2014).

  32. 32.

    Chew, M. L. et al. Pharmacokinetics of pregabalin controlled-release in healthy volunteers: effect of food in five single-dose, randomized, clinical pharmacology studies. Clinical drug investigation 34, 617–626 (2014).

  33. 33.

    Dworkin, R. H. et al. Pregabalin for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology 60, 1274–1283 (2003).

  34. 34.

    Randinitis, E. J. et al. Pharmacokinetics of pregabalin in subjects with various degrees of renal function. Journal of clinical pharmacology 43, 277–283 (2003).

  35. 35.

    Richter, R. W. et al. Relief of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy with pregabalin: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The journal of pain: official journal of the American Pain Society 6, 253–260 (2005).

  36. 36.

    Freeman, R., Durso-Decruz, E. & Emir, B. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of pregabalin treatment for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: findings from seven randomized, controlled trials across a range of doses. Diabetes care 31, 1448–1454 (2008).

  37. 37.

    Anand, U. et al. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor (AT2 R) localization and antagonist-mediated inhibition of capsaicin responses and neurite outgrowth in human and rat sensory neurons. European journal of pain (London, England) 17, 1012–1026 (2013).

  38. 38.

    Smith, M. T., Wyse, B. D. & Edwards, S. R. Small molecule angiotensin II type 2 receptor (AT(2)R) antagonists as novel analgesics for neuropathic pain: comparative pharmacokinetics, radioligand binding, and efficacy in rats. Pain Med 14, 692–705 (2013).

  39. 39.

    Cobos, E. J. & Portillo-Salido, E. “Bedside-to-Bench” Behavioral Outcomes in Animal Models of Pain: Beyond the Evaluation of Reflexes. Curr Neuropharmacol 11, 560–591 (2013).

  40. 40.

    Deuis, J. R., Dvorakova, L. S. & Vetter, I. Methods Used to Evaluate Pain Behaviors in Rodents. Front Mol Neurosci 10, 284 (2017).

  41. 41.

    King, T. et al. Unmasking the tonic-aversive state in neuropathic pain. Nat Neurosci 12, 1364–1366 (2009).

  42. 42.

    Andrews, N., Harper, S., Issop, Y. & Rice, A. S. Novel, nonreflex tests detect analgesic action in rodents at clinically relevant concentrations. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1245, 11–13 (2011).

  43. 43.

    Upadhyay, J. et al. Imaging drugs with and without clinical analgesic efficacy. Neuropsychopharmacology 36, 2659–2673 (2011).

  44. 44.

    Arnin, J. et al. Wireless-based portable EEG-EOG monitoring for real time drowsiness detection. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2013, 4977–4980 (2013).

  45. 45.

    Jodicke, J. et al. Separation of low-voltage EEG-activity during mental activation from that during transition to drowsiness. Brain Topogr 26, 538–546 (2013).

  46. 46.

    Siok, C. J., Taylor, C. P. & Hajos, M. Anxiolytic profile of pregabalin on elicited hippocampal theta oscillation. Neuropharmacology 56, 379–385 (2009).

  47. 47.

    Graversen, C. et al. The analgesic effect of pregabalin in patients with chronic pain is reflected by changes in pharmaco-EEG spectral indices. British journal of clinical pharmacology 73, 363–372 (2012).

  48. 48.

    Keppel Hesselink, J. M. & Schatman, M. E. EMA401: an old antagonist of the AT2R for a new indication in neuropathic pain. J Pain Res 10, 439–443 (2017).

  49. 49.

    Yaksh, T. L., Woller, S. A., Ramachandran, R. & Sorkin, L. S. The search for novel analgesics: targets and mechanisms. F1000Prime Rep 7, 56 (2015).

  50. 50.

    Sindrup, S. H., Graf, A. & Sfikas, N. The NK1-receptor antagonist TKA731 in painful diabetic neuropathy: a randomised, controlled trial. European journal of pain (London, England) 10, 567–571 (2006).

  51. 51.

    Huggins, J. P., Smart, T. S., Langman, S., Taylor, L. & Young, T. An efficient randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial with the irreversible fatty acid amide hydrolase-1 inhibitor PF-04457845, which modulates endocannabinoids but fails to induce effective analgesia in patients with pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee. Pain 153, 1837–1846 (2012).

  52. 52.

    Kinsey, S. G. et al. The CB2 cannabinoid receptor-selective agonist O-3223 reduces pain and inflammation without apparent cannabinoid behavioral effects. Neuropharmacology 60, 244–251 (2011).

  53. 53.

    Gonzalez, M. I., Field, M. J., Hughes, J. & Singh, L. Evaluation of selective NK(1) receptor antagonist CI-1021 in animal models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics 294, 444–450 (2000).

  54. 54.

    Chen, S. R., Xu, Z. & Pan, H. L. Stereospecific effect of pregabalin on ectopic afferent discharges and neuropathic pain induced by sciatic nerve ligation in rats. Anesthesiology 95, 1473–1479 (2001).

  55. 55.

    Goyal, S., Singla, S., Kumar, D. & Menaria, G. Comparison of the Effects of Zonisamide, Ethosuximide and Pregabalin in the Chronic Constriction Injury Induced Neuropathic Pain in Rats. Annals of medical and health sciences research 5, 189–196 (2015).

  56. 56.

    Uhelski, M. L., Davis, M. A. & Fuchs, P. N. Pain affect in the absence of pain sensation: evidence of asomaesthesia after somatosensory cortex lesions in the rat. Pain 153, 885–892 (2012).

  57. 57.

    Vierck, C. J., Whitsel, B. L., Favorov, O. V., Brown, A. W. & Tommerdahl, M. Role of primary somatosensory cortex in the coding of pain. Pain 154, 334–344 (2013).

  58. 58.

    Levitt, J., Choo, H. J., Smith, K. A., LeBlanc, B. W. & Saab, C. Y. Electroencephalographic frontal synchrony and caudal asynchrony during painful hand immersion in cold water. Brain research bulletin 130, 75–80 (2017).

  59. 59.

    Levitt, J. et al. Automated detection of electroencephalography artifacts in human, rodent and canine subjects using machine learning. J Neurosci Methods 307, 53–59 (2018).

Download references


This work was funded by an investigator-initiated grant from Asahi KASEI Pharma Corp.

Author information


  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA

    • Suguru Koyama
    • , Brian W. LeBlanc
    • , Kelsey A. Smith
    • , Catherine Roach
    • , Joshua Levitt
    • , Muhammad M. Edhi
    •  & Carl Y. Saab
  2. Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

    • Suguru Koyama
    • , Brian W. LeBlanc
    • , Kelsey A. Smith
    • , Catherine Roach
    • , Joshua Levitt
    • , Muhammad M. Edhi
    •  & Carl Y. Saab
  3. Laboratory for Pharmacology, Asahi KASEI Pharma Corporation, Shizuoka, Japan

    • Suguru Koyama
    • , Mai Michishita
    • , Takayuki Komatsu
    •  & Satoru Yoshikawa
  4. Laboratory for Safety Assessment & ADME, Asahi KASEI Pharma Corporation, Shizuoka, Japan

    • Okishi Mashita
    •  & Aki Tanikawa


  1. Search for Suguru Koyama in:

  2. Search for Brian W. LeBlanc in:

  3. Search for Kelsey A. Smith in:

  4. Search for Catherine Roach in:

  5. Search for Joshua Levitt in:

  6. Search for Muhammad M. Edhi in:

  7. Search for Mai Michishita in:

  8. Search for Takayuki Komatsu in:

  9. Search for Okishi Mashita in:

  10. Search for Aki Tanikawa in:

  11. Search for Satoru Yoshikawa in:

  12. Search for Carl Y. Saab in:


S.K. and C.S. analyzed data and wrote the manuscript; S.K., B.L., K.S., C.R., M.E. performed behavioral and E.E.G. studies; J.L. performed E.E.G. artifact detection; M.M., T.K., O.M., A.T., S.Y. performed P.K. studies.

Competing Interests

B.L., K.S., C.R., J.L., M.E. and C.S. declare no competing interests. S.K., M.M., T.K., O.M., A.T. and S.Y. are employed by Asahi KASEI Pharma Corp.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl Y. Saab.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history






By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.