Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A comprehensive portrait of Y-STR diversity of Indian populations and comparison with 129 worldwide populations

Abstract

India, known for its rich cultural, linguistic and ethnic diversity, has attracted the attention of population geneticists to understand its genetic diversity employing autosomal, Y-chromosomal and mitochondrial DNA markers. Y-chromosomal short tandem repeats (Y-STRs) are useful in understanding population substructures and reveal the patrilineal affinities among populations. Previous studies on Indian populations based on Y-STR markers were either limited to restricted number of markers or focused on few selected populations. In this study we genotyped 407 unrelated male individuals from 12 states in India employing the suite of Y-STRs present in PowerPlex Y23 (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). These populations clustered genetically close to each other irrespective of their geographic co-ordinates and were characterized primarily by R1a, H and L haplogroups. Interestingly, comparison with 129 worldwide populations showed genetic affinity of the Indian populations with few populations from Europe and Levantine. This study presents the first pan-Indian landscape of 23 Y-STRs and serves as a useful resource for construction of an Indian Y-STR database.

Introduction

The male-specific human Y chromosome follows a strict mode of paternal inheritance and major portion comprises the non-recombining region (NRY). Y-chromosome is also widely acknowledged for its utility in providing one of the highest resolution tools for studying human population genetics owing to the aforementioned features of uniparental inheritance and non-recombining nature1. Y-chromosomal markers provide interesting insights into the past demographic events of a population as illustrated by several studies examining the patrilineal affinities among different world populations, including India2,3,4.

Contemporary human populations in India exhibit rich social, cultural and linguistic diversity. Multiple archeological, palaeoanthropological, linguistic and genetic studies highlight India as an interesting vault of ancient genetic pool5,6. It is believed that the genetic diversity exhibited by Indian populations may be because India along with other regions of South Asia served as an important corridor for ancient human migrations7. Genealogical studies have discerned that the Indian subcontinent was not only a recipient but also a donor of the genetic material to the world6. A report by Indian Genome Variation Consortium suggests that though India harbors higher genetic diversity compared to various worldwide populations, Indian populations exhibit low levels of genetic differentiation8. In the past, several studies have already addressed the genetic affinities among Indian populations employing autosomal markers9,10 and the uniparentaly inherited molecular markers located on mitochondria and Y-chromosome11,12.

Y-chromosomal studies in various populations of India show that the few Y-haplogroups (group of similar haplotypes derived from a common ancestor) were autochthonous in nature and dated back to the late Pleistocene epoch (e.g. haplogroups H, L1, F, C)6,13. However, few haplogroups (e.g. haplogroup J) that were reported to be frequent in India are also traced to outside of the Indian sub-continent3. Studying the Indian population history has always been a challenging task owing to its past demographic events and the complex organization of the extant human populations. Although, studies based on autosomal data reported a North to South genetic cline for non-tribal Indian populations9,14; other studies with Y-chromosomal markers were unable to corroborate such a cline3,11,15. Y-chromosome based worldwide comparisons of Indian populations showed their closest affinities with some European populations3.

In addition to playing an instrumental role in elucidating human population history; Y-STR markers were also widely used to study patrilineal diversity in various populations16,17,18. However, similar studies in Indian populations were confined to small restricted groups of India, which do not truly represent the genetic diversity possessed by them17,19. To the best of our knowledge, a comprehensive analyses representing populations from widely distributed geographical regions of India has not been attempted earlier employing 23 set of Y-STRs. In this study, we have genotyped 407 samples sourced from 12 different states (administrative provinces) representing North, South, East and West India using a multiplex of 23 Y-STR loci present in PowerPlex Y23 (PPY23) (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) system, to infer genetic relationship among the populations from different regions of the country. Our results show that these populations illustrated a closer genetic relationship among themselves, irrespective of their geographic distance. Moreover, while investigating the genetic relationship with populations from other regions of the world20, these populations interestingly showed greater genetic affinity with few populations from Europe and Levantine. Additionally, since this chemistry was reported to be forensically potent in various worldwide populations20,21; this panel was evaluated to gauge its forensic efficacy in Indian populations as well. This study apart from providing a comprehensive picture of Y-STR-based diversity of Indian populations, would also be of great utility for the development of a Y-STR database for forensic investigation purposes in India.

Results and Discussion

Molecular diversity

In order to obtain an estimate of molecular genetic diversity for the target STRs in Indian populations, we calculated genetic diversity (GD) values (a measure of the polymorphism at a locus) for each locus incorporated in the panel. After discarding four samples due to presence of more than one allele, we observed a total of 397 unique profiles with four haplotypes present in duplicates and one in triplicate which can be visualized through minimum spanning network (MSN) plot depicted in Supplementary Fig. S1. The GD for all the loci were exceeding 0.55, except for the DYS391 locus (Supplementary Fig. S2). Locus-wise analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) showed that the majority of the genetic variation was observed within the populations (95.4%).

Population-specific analysis

Y-STR allelic distribution among the target populations

To evaluate the distribution of Y-STR alleles, GD of the panel was calculated separately for each of the 12 populations. Higher values of GD (≥0.64) were observed for each of the populations indicating the polymorphic nature of the panel of markers (Supplementary Fig. S3) and would be highly informative for these populations. This was in agreement with the previous reports wherein this panel had shown high genetic diversity17,19. Even though the populations were sourced from 12 different geographic locations in India, this set of STRs in PPY23 system did not show much variation in allelic distribution across the populations (RST~0.02).

Genetic relationship among populations

The principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot based on the pairwise Nei’s genetic distance among the 12 populations showed small genetic distance among them (Fig. 1). As can be seen from the plot, individuals from KA, MH, WB, RJ, UP and JH (the acronyms are expanded in Supplementary Table S1), although were sourced from geographically distant locations, clustered together in the plot. No significant correlation was observed between geography and the genetic distance (Fig. 1), an observation which corroborated our earlier findings based on autosomal STRs22. This was also supported by regression and correlation analysis based on pairwise geographic and genetic distance (RST). Only 3.6% of the variation based on genetic distance could be explained by geographic distance, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.07). The correlation between geographic distance and genetic distance was also low (0.22) and statistically insignificant. Even after grouping the locations on the basis of geographic regions, none of the populations were found to be isolated as evident from the spatial analysis of AMOVA (SAMOVA), wherein only a small genetic variance was observed among the groups (FCT~0.02) (viz., North, West, East and South).

Figure 1
figure 1

Plot to visualize PCoA based on genetic relationship between the populations from different bio-geographical regions of India. X and Y axes represent Coordinate 1 and 2, respectively and explain 39.42 and 26.32 percentage of total variance respectively. More than 60% of the variance was explained by the two coordinates. Each of the 12 populations occupied their relative position on the plot. As can be gleaned from the plot all the populations were observed to be in close proximity with each other irrespective of their geographic affiliations. The abbreviations are explained in Supplementary Table S1.

Similarly, discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) (Supplementary Fig. S4), which helps to visualize the differentiation between groups23 was used to assess the pattern of clustering in the Indian populations. It was observed that not only individuals belonging to the same geographic region were closely spaced in their individual cluster, but each of the 12 clusters were also closely overlapping and occupying central position in the plot. Thus, based on the 23 Y-STRs, only a subtle genetic variation was observed between populations. Previous studies had suggested a genetic cline from North to South for non-tribal populations in India9, however the same was not observed with the current set of Y-chromosome markers, which also corroborates the finding of Mondal et al.3.

Haplogroup studies

221 out of 357 individuals were assigned to haplogroups based on 23 Y-STRs using Whit-Athey’s algorithm. A total of 14 haplogroups (R1a, H, L, Q, J2b, J2a1 x J2a1-bh, J2a1b, J1, G2a, I2a (xI2a1), R1b, E1b1b, E1b1ba and T) were observed in this study, whereas 7 other haplogroups (viz., G2c, I1, I2a1, I2a (xI2a1), I2b1, J2a1h and N) mentioned in the haplogroup assigning tool were not observed in these samples. R1a (51.5%), H (16.2%) and L (15.8%) were the major haplogroups present throughout the country and accounted for more than three-fourths of the Y lineages. Figure 2 shows the proportion of haplogroups observed in North, West, South and East India. The abundance of these three haplogroups is also shown in the Network analysis (Supplementary Fig. S5) and their geographic distribution across the country is illustrated in Supplementary Fig. S6.

Figure 2
figure 2

Haplogroup prediction using Whit Athey’s haplogroup predictor tool. Each of the pie chart represents proportion of haplogroups present in different biogeographic regions of the country i.e. North, West, South and East India. R1a, H and L haplogroups were found to be predominantly present in the country compared to the other haplogroups.

The occurrence of R1a was observed to decrease from north to south, while the haplogroup L displayed the opposite trend. In contrast to R1a and L haplogroups, haplogroup H was found to be distributed uniformly across the country. In a previous study, clades of R1a, J2, H and R2 were observed to be centered in North, Northwest, South and East India, respectively and R haplogroup and its clades were amongst the most frequent Y lineages found throughout India, East Europe and Central Asia24. R1a haplogroup is reported to be the most frequent haplogroup present in Eurasia6,25 and was also observed to be the most abundant in all the major geographic regions of India in this study.

The proportion of individuals representing haplogroup L was comparatively more (15.2%) in South India. Haplogroup L is thought to be associated with the expansion of farming12 and is known to be widely distributed in North Eurasia and in some Siberian groups26, with lower representation in populations of Europe, Middle East and East Asia25. Haplogroup H, which was suggested to be restricted mainly to Indian subcontinent11,25, was observed in 16.2% of individuals in the current study (Fig. 2). Considering the high diversity of haplogroup H in South Asia and its preponderance in India; the Indian subcontinent was proposed as the probable origin for this haplogroup11,15. The undifferentiated Q* haplogroup was reported at a low frequency in India and Pakistan25. In this study, haplogroup Q was present in approximately 5% of the samples but was absent in the populations from South India (Fig. 2).

Haplogroups J2b and J2a1 x J2a1-bh were the most prominent among the other branches of J2 in the Indian populations observed in the current study. The presence of J2 clades in India was suggested primarily due to the demic diffusion from West Asia11,24 whereas the occurrence of J1 haplogroup is believed to be rare4 and its presence was mainly attributed to the paternal gene pool contribution during Islamic expansion from Iranians and/or Arabians in the past27. Haplogroups J2a1b and J1 were represented by only one individual in the present study. G2a, another rare haplogroup was observed in only 3 individuals (1.3%) and was absent in individuals from western and eastern parts of India. Since these haplogroups were based on predictor algorithm, caution has to be exercised while drawing interpretations based on these tools. Nevertheless, the use of large number of STRs (>17 loci), which was the case in this work, is able to provide a reasonable estimate of haplogroup prediction28, as is being supported by earlier studies based on Y-chromosomal STRs29.

Comparison with other populations

Our study compared populations representing four geographic regions from India, with 129 populations across the world which were reported previously20. The multidimensional scaling (MDS) plot (Supplementary Fig. S7, abbreviations explained in Supplementary Table S2) and its magnified portion (for ease of readability) (Supplementary Fig. S8) portray the genetic affinities of populations examined in this study with the 129 populations worldwide. We observed that the Indian populations in this study were in close proximity to the other Indian populations studied in the past (Gujarati Indians in Texas, Indians in Singapore, South-Indian (Tamils)). We also observed few other populations to be genetically closer to Indian populations viz., Italy (Calabria), Barnaya-Hungary (Romani), London-UK (British-Asians), Lebanon, Iraq, Bolivia (Mestizo), Panama, Hungary (Budapest), Bolivia (Native-Americans), Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania (Vilnius).

Our findings are in agreement with previous anthropological and linguistic reports supporting genetic similarity of Romanis and Indians30,31. In fact, the north-western region of India is believed to be the most probable region of origin of Romanis32,33. Previous genome-wide scans revealed that the Romanis are genetically close to Indians34, whereas the genetic closeness of Indians and British-Asians from London-UK can be attributed to the common ethnicity of the samples in these two populations. As the Levant countries are strategically located at the cross-roads of Africa, Eurasia and South Asia, they might have witnessed the ancient migration of humans out of Africa35. The genetic affinity of populations belonging to Lebanon and Iraq from the Levant region to Indian populations may be attributed to their geographic proximity, which is also supported by an earlier study35, wherein the authors had used Y-chromosome haplotypes as molecular tools to reveal relationship between populations of Arabian peninsula and South Asia. The populations from India in this study interestingly also showed proximity to the populations from Italy, Panama, Bolivia (Native Americans) and Baltic (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) populations as well, which needs further investigations involving Y-SNPs and other ancestry informative markers to better understand the significance of this finding.

To examine the genetic relationship of the populations tested in the current study with the Indian populations reported previously in Y Chromosome Haplotype Reference Database (YHRD), MDS analysis was performed, which showed very low genetic distance between them. Further, RST based genetic relationship with other neighboring as well as few European countries was visualized in the heatmap presented in Supplementary Fig. S9. In agreement with previous observations and expectedly, the Indian populations from this study were closer to the other Indian populations studied previously as well as populations from Bangladesh and Pakistan. The genetic affinities of Indian populations with few European populations could be attributed to the higher mutation rates of the STRs (that is further accentuated by the inclusion of two rapidly mutating Y-STRs in the PPY23 system), which might have resulted in similar distribution of Y-STR alleles in different populations as a result of identity-by-state (IBS) rather than being inherited from a common ancestor following identity-by-descent (IBD)18,36.

Forensic applicability in Indian populations

On a different perspective, the utility of the 23 Y-STR chemistry for its forensic applicability in India populations was also investigated. High haplotype diversity (HD) (0.9948793876) and discrimination capacity (DC) (0.98511166253) values demonstrated its informativeness in the Indian populations. As expected, this panel exhibited a low combined match probability (CMP) (0.00264578799), which was comparable to the previously published reports17,19.

Allelic distribution of the six newly incorporated Y-STRs, which were introduced in PPY23 system and were not part of the previous panel of 17 Y-STRs (AmpFlSTR Yfiler, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) are shown in Supplementary Fig. S10. The DYS481 locus showed the highest number of alleles and microvariants but the distribution of alleles was not uniform. The DYS549 locus was observed to be the least polymorphic marker among all the six newly incorporated STRs. DYS570 and DYS576 loci showed greater polymorphism with a more uniform distribution of alleles, which make them highly informative.

Conclusion

Here, we report a detailed Y-STR analysis of Indian samples contributing to enlarge the knowledge on the genetic landscape of India. PCoA, SAMOVA and DAPC analysis substantiated a closer genetic affinity among the populations in India. Though Athey’s algorithm was reported to be efficient for prediction of haplogroups as compared to other available tools37, SNP-based analysis would increase the resolution and accuracy of the predicted haplogroup assignment. In agreement with previous studies, a higher proportion of R1a, H and L haplogroups was observed in Indian populations. The data in this study deepens the panorama of Y-chromosomal diversity in Indian populations, and will be useful for comparison with other populations in future studies. The Y-STR panel was found to be equally efficient in all the populations and can be employed irrespective of their geography in India. The data obtained from this study would be of great use for statistical calculations of random match frequency estimates for forensic case-work analysis. This study represents the first comprehensive analysis of Indian populations with 23 Y-STRs, turning available data of great interest not only to the broad field of population genetics but also to the community of forensic geneticists.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection and DNA isolation

After receiving the written informed consent from 407 unrelated adult male volunteers from 12 different states belonging to four major geographical regions of India, saliva samples were collected in an unstimulated fashion in sterile tubes containing 2 mL of lysis buffer as described previously22,38. The geographical locations from where the samples were collected are shown in Supplementary Fig. S11 and Table S1. This study was approved by the Institutional Bioethics Committee of the Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics (CDFD) and all the protocols pertaining to sample collection were according to the approved guidelines. The saliva sample tubes were sealed and transported to the laboratory at room temperature for DNA extraction using the salt precipitation method as described previously22,38.

Y-STR markers and genotyping protocols

Individuals were genotyped for 23 Y-STR markers incorporated in PowerPlex Y23 (PPY23) system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The Y-STRs were amplified according to the manufacturer’s instructions in a GeneAmp 9700 thermal cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) followed by capillary electrophoresis on the ABI Prism 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and data was analyzed using the GeneMapper ID version 3.2.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The control DNA 2800M was genotyped for quality control purposes. A certificate for quality assurance was obtained from the Department of Forensic Genetics at the Charite´–Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany, which is a mandatory criterion for submitting the Y-STR data to the YHRD. The data was submitted to YHRD and 12 accession numbers were obtained, which are mentioned in Supplementary Table S1.

Statistical analyses

Four samples that were found to be biallelic at few loci were discarded and further analyses were performed on the remaining 403 samples. Allele and haplotype frequencies were calculated by counting method. GD (GD = \(\frac{n}{(n-1)}(1-\sum _{i}{p}_{i}^{2})\), where n is the total number of samples and pi is the frequency of i-th allele) and HD (HD = \(\frac{n}{(n-1)}(1-\sum _{i}\,{{h}_{i}}^{2})\), where hi is the haplotype frequency) were calculated as per previous reports2,20. MSN was generated using poppr39 package implemented in R v3.1.2 to visualize the number of unique and redundant haplotypes. Arlequin40 was used to perform locus-wise AMOVA. For comparison of the genetic distance among the current populations as well as with that of the other populations reported in YHRD, DYS385a/b locus and the samples with micro-variants were omitted. GenALEx v6.541,42 was used to assess the molecular diversity of the Y-STR panel and to test the performance of the panel in each population. PCoA (based on the pairwise Nei’s genetic distance), to visualize genetic relationship among the populations was performed using GenALEx. Poppr package in R v3.1.2 was also used to perform DAPC.

AMOVA based on RST and MDS was performed using YHRD-based online tool (http://www.yhrd.org) to infer the genetic relationship among populations. To test whether there was any association between the genetic and geographic distances among these populations, SAMOVA was performed43. RST values derived from pairwise comparison with other populations of the world were also inferred employing the YHRD tool. To investigate if the population substructure affects the Y-STR distribution, the geographic locations were considered as its representative and regression analysis was performed using the geographic distance between sampling locations as a covariate for the genetic distance (pairwise RST). The correlation between the geographic distance and the RST across all pairs of populations was also tested using R v3.1.2. Further, MDS plots were drawn using the sammon function from MASS package implemented in R v3.1.2 to visualize the genetic relationship between the populations in the current study with those reported earlier. Individuals were assigned respective haplogroups derived from Y-STRs using Whit Athey’s haplogroup predictor44. As recommended in the instructions for users in the Whit Athey’s haplogroup predictor tool’s website, minimum score and minimum probability to assign an individual to a particular haplogroup was set to 40 and 95 percent, respectively.

Median joining (MJ) networks for Y-STR haplotypes within specific Y-haplogroups were constructed using the software NETWORK 5.0.0.145. The network analyses were carried out for the three most abundant lineages observed in this study. The variance at each locus for the haplogroups was calculated in the whole dataset using R v3.1.2. The weights assigned to each locus were inversely proportional to the observed variance as reported previously46. Briefly, weights for a range of variance were assigned as follows: for variance 0.0–0.2, weight = 10; for variance 0.2–0.4, weight = 8; for variance 0.4–0.6, weight = 6; for variance 0.6–0.8, weight = 4 and for variance >0.8, weight = 2. To view the spatial distribution of the major haplogroups, Surfer15 of Golden Software (Golden Software Inc., Golden, Colorado) was used to generate iso-frequency maps. To investigate the forensic applicability of the multiplex in the Indian populations, the sum of squared haplotype frequencies was calculated to obtain CMP of the panel of markers. DC i.e. the ratio between the number of unique haplotypes to the total number of haplotypes was calculated.

References

  1. Jobling, M. A. & Tyler-Smith, C. Human Y-chromosome variation in the genome-sequencing era. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18, 485–497, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2017.36 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bian, Y. et al. Analysis of genetic admixture in Uyghur using the 26 Y-STR loci system. Sci. Rep. 6, 19998, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19998 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Mondal, M. et al. Y-chromosomal sequences of diverse Indian populations and the ancestry of the Andamanese. Hum. Genet. 136, 499–510, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-017-1800-0 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh, S. et al. Dissecting the influence of Neolithic demic diffusion on Indian Y-chromosome pool through J2-M172 haplogroup. Sci. Rep. 6, 19157, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19157 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Misra, V. N. Prehistoric human colonization of India. J. Biosci. 26, 491–531 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Trivedi, R. et al. Genetic Imprints of Pleistocene Origin of Indian Populations: A Comprehensive Phylogeographic Sketch of Indian Y-Chromosomes. Int. J. Hum. Genet. 8, 97–118, https://doi.org/10.1080/09723757.2008.11886023 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Majumder, P. P. The human genetic history of South Asia. Curr. Biol. 20, R184–187, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.053 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Indian Genome Variation Consortium. Genetic landscape of the people of India: a canvas for disease gene exploration. J. Genet. 87, 3–20 (2008).

  9. Reich, D., Thangaraj, K., Patterson, N., Price, A. L. & Singh, L. Reconstructing Indian population history. Nature 461, 489–494, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Moorjani, P. et al. Genetic evidence for recent population mixture in India. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 93, 422–438, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.07.006 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sengupta, S. et al. Polarity and temporality of high-resolution Y-chromosome distributions in India identify both indigenous and exogenous expansions and reveal minor genetic influence of Central Asian pastoralists. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 78, 202–221, https://doi.org/10.1086/499411 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thanseem, I. et al. Genetic affinities among the lower castes and tribal groups of India: inference from Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA. BMC Genet. 7, 42, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-7-42 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. ArunKumar, G. et al. Population Differentiation of Southern Indian Male Lineages Correlates with Agricultural Expansions Predating the Caste System. PLoS ONE 7, e50269, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050269 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Basu, A., Sarkar-Roy, N. & Majumder, P. P. Genomic reconstruction of the history of extant populations of India reveals five distinct ancestral components and a complex structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 1594–1599, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1513197113 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Cordaux, R. et al. Independent origins of Indian caste and tribal paternal lineages. Curr. Biol. 14, 231–235, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.01.024 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dogan, S. et al. Overview of European population clustering based on 23 Y-STR loci. Genetika 47, 901–908, https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1503901D (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gao, T. et al. Phylogenetic analysis and forensic characteristics of 12 populations using 23 Y-STR loci. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 19, 130–133, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.07.006 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferri, G. et al. Y-STR variation in Albanian populations: implications on the match probabilities and the genetic legacy of the minority claiming an Egyptian descent. Int. J. Legal Med. 124, 363–370, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0432-x (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jain, T., Shrivastava, P. & Trivedi, V. B. Genetic portrait of Majhi tribe of Chhattisgarh, India based on 15 autosomal STRs and 23 Y-STRs. Int. J. Legal Med. 131, 113–114, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1421-5 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Purps, J. et al. A global analysis of Y-chromosomal haplotype diversity for 23 STR loci. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 12, 12–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.04.008 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Nunez, C. et al. Highly discriminatory capacity of the PowerPlex® Y23 System for the study of isolated populations. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 17, 104–107, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.04.005 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh, M. & Nandineni, M. R. Population genetic analyses and evaluation of 22 autosomal STRs in Indian populations. Int. J. Legal Med. 131, 971–973, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1525-y (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jombart, T., Devillard, S. & Balloux, F. Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet. 11, 94, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-94 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Sahoo, S. et al. A prehistory of Indian Y chromosomes: evaluating demic diffusion scenarios. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 103, 843–848, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507714103 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Karafet, T. M. et al. New binary polymorphisms reshape and increase resolution of the human Y chromosomal haplogroup tree. Genome Res. 18, 830–838, https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.7172008 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Karafet, T. M. et al. High levels of Y-chromosome differentiation among native Siberian populations and the genetic signature of a boreal hunter-gatherer way of life. Hum. Biol. 74, 761–789 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Eaaswarkhanth, M. et al. Traces of sub-Saharan and Middle Eastern lineages in Indian Muslim populations. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 18, 354, https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2009.168 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Athey, W. Comments on the article, “Software for Y haplogroup predictions, a word of caution”. Int. J. Legal Med. 125, 901–903; author reply 905–906 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0459-z (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Toscanini, U. et al. Charting the Y-chromosome ancestry of present-day Argentinean Mennonites. J. Hum. Genet. 61, 507–513, https://doi.org/10.1038/jhg.2016.3 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Marushiakova, E. & Popov, V. Gypsies (Roma) in Bulgaria: P. Lang (1997).

  31. Fraser, A. M. The gypsies: Wiley-Blackwell (1995).

  32. Turner, R. L. The position of Romani in Indo-Aryan. Gypsy Lore Society Monographs (1927).

  33. Nagy, M. et al. Searching for the origin of Romanies: Slovakian Romani, Jats of Haryana and Jat Sikhs Y-STR data in comparison with different Romani populations. Forensic Sci. Int. 169, 19–26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.07.020 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Moorjani, P. et al. Reconstructing Roma history from genome-wide data. PLoS ONE 8, e58633, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058633 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Jones, R. J., Tay, G. K., Mawart, A. & Alsafar, H. Y-Chromosome haplotypes reveal relationships between populations of the Arabian Peninsula, North Africa and South Asia. Ann. Hum. Biol. 44, 738–746, https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460.2017.1384508 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mahal, D. G. & Matsoukas, I. G. Y-STR Haplogroup Diversity in the Jat Population Reveals Several Different Ancient Origins. Front. Genet. 8, 121, https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2017.00121 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Petrejcikova, E. et al. Y-SNP analysis versus Y-haplogroup predictor in the Slovak population. Anthropol. Anz. 71, 275–285, https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-5548/2014/0368 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Miller, S. A., Dykes, D. D. & Polesky, H. F. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 1215 (1988).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Kamvar, Z. N., Tabima, J. F. & Grünwald, N. J. Poppr: an R package for genetic analysis of populations with clonal, partially clonal, and/or sexual reproduction. PeerJ 2, e281, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.281 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Excoffier, L. & Lischer, H. E. L. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 10, 564–567, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Peakall, R. & Smouse, P. E. genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6, 288–295, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Peakall, R. & Smouse, P. E. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research–an update. Bioinformatics 28, 2537–2539, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Dupanloup, I., Schneider, S. & Excoffier, L. A simulated annealing approach to define the genetic structure of populations. Mol. Ecol. 11, 2571–2581, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01650.x (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Athey, T. W. Haplogroup Prediction from Y-STR Values Using a Bayesian-AlleleFrequency Approach. J. Genet. Geneal. 2, 34–39 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bandelt, H. J., Forster, P. & Rohl, A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 37–48, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026036 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Cai, X. et al. Human Migration through Bottlenecks from Southeast Asia into East Asia during Last Glacial Maximum Revealed by Y Chromosomes. PLoS ONE 6, e24282, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024282 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Promega Corporation (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) for providing the PowerPlex Y23 reagents. We acknowledge Devinder Kumar for his help in sample collection. We are grateful towards all the volunteers for providing samples for this study. This research work was supported by the core grants of the Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics, India. M.S. was the recipient of Junior and Senior Research Fellowships of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India, towards the pursuit of a Ph.D. degree at the Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.R.N. conceived and designed the study, analyzed the data and contributed significantly towards writing the manuscript. M.S. and A.S. collected the samples and isolated DNA. M.S. carried out the experiments, performed data analysis and wrote the manuscript. A.S. helped in analysis of data and writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madhusudan R. Nandineni.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, M., Sarkar, A. & Nandineni, M.R. A comprehensive portrait of Y-STR diversity of Indian populations and comparison with 129 worldwide populations. Sci Rep 8, 15421 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33714-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33714-2

Keywords

  • Indian Population
  • PowerPlex Y23 (PPY23)
  • Genetic Closeness
  • Y Chromosome Haplotype Reference Database (YHRD)
  • Discriminant Analysis Of Principal Components (DAPC)

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing