Young species of cupuladriid bryozoans occupied new Caribbean habitats faster than old species


The breadth of habitat occupied by a species, and the rate at which a species can expand into new habitats has important ecological and evolutionary consequences. Here we explore when extant species of free-living cupuladriid bryozoans expanded into new benthic Caribbean habitats that emerged during the final stages of formation of the Isthmus of Panama. Habitat breadth was estimated using the abundances of over 90,000 colonies in ten cupuladriid species, along with the ecological and sedimentary characteristics of the samples in which they occurred. Data reveal that all species expanded their habitat breadths during the last 6 Myr, but did so at a different tempo. ‘Young’ species - those that originated after 5 Ma - expanded relatively quickly, whereas ‘old’ species - those that originated before 9 Ma - took a further 2 Myr to achieve a comparable level of expansion. We propose that, like invasive species, young species are less restrained when expanding their habitat breadths compared to older well-established species. Understanding the mechanism causing this restraint requires further research.


Species habitat breadth, or the suite of environments or resources that a species utilizes1,2, has important implications for the ecology and evolution of a species and its communities3,4. For example, species with wide habitat breadths (otherwise known as niche generalists) have larger geographic ranges5 resulting in lower probabilities of extinction6,7,8,9, and habitat breadth will dictate a species’ response to human-driven changes such as habitat degradation and fragmentation, and climate warming10.

The habitat breadth of a species is a consequence of its environmental tolerances11, the strength of interspecific competition12,13,14 and the availability of appropriate habitat within the geographic range of the species’ dispersal ability15. This is akin to the association-based niche breadth concept3, otherwise known as the environmental realised niche, climatic niche, Grinnellian niche or scenopoetic ecological niche16. Much work has explored the role that niche breadth has on fitness, population structure, diversification, and cladogenesis3. However, only a few studies have explored stasis and change in the breadth of habitat of species over their age-ranges using the fossil record. High quality fossil records based on replicated samples with stratigraphic resolutions of less than half a million years (Myr) can provide insights into the stability and evolution of habitat breadths within taxa over times of biogeographic and environmental change17,18,19,20,21.

Slow formation of the Isthmus of Panama over ~25 Myr22 constricted and then severed the seaway connection between the Tropical Eastern Pacific and the Southwest Caribbean (SWC), culminating in the formation of the Isthmus in the late Pliocene23,24. The shoaling Isthmus blocked the mostly eastwardly currents that caused upwelling waters to diminish in the SWC25, shutting-off a major supply of dissolved nutrients25,26 and causing Caribbean planktonic primary productivity to decline27,28. This major oceanographic reorganisation and resultant shifts in environment and coastal ecology led to an expansion in the types of benthic shelf habitats in the SWC. Before ~4 Ma, the SWC was dominated by upwelling waters and terrestrial-derived, muddy, organic-rich sediments, low in carbonate and little to no coral or coralline algae25,29,30. After ~4 Ma coral reefs flourished and carbonate deposition increased rapidly across the Caribbean, yet the muddy, organic-rich and low-carbonate sediments continued to exist in tandem. As a result, a wider gamut of habitat types existed in a ‘patchwork’ setting after 4 Ma to the present day25,29. This expansion of the types of habitats available to benthic organisms is thought to have played an important role in the diversification of Caribbean marine life during the Plio-Pleistocene25,31,32,33,34.

In this study, we use an exhaustive collection of fossil and Recent free-living cupuladriid bryozoans (Fig. 1) to explore how and when the habitat breadths of species responded to the expansion of habitat types over the last 6 Myr in the SWC. Cupuladriid bryoozans are well-suited for this investigation because (a) they are abundant and fairly diverse35, (b) zooidal and colony characters permit robust identification to species36,37, (c) different species adopt dissimilar colony and zooidal morphologies which dictate how colonies interact with the benthos, move over and through sediments, and resist burial38, and presumably because of this (d) distributions of modern cupuladriid species are partitioned along sedimentological and biotic variables of the benthos variables38,39 and such variables can can be measured in the fossil record. We measure habitat breadth of cupuladriid species using the relative and sample intensity-corrected abundances of colonies along sedimentological and biotic gradients of the benthos in which they are found. Our findings suggest that habitat breadths of cupuladriid species are considerably dynamic over time and that the ability to take advantage of new habitat is defined by the age of the species.

Figure 1

Examples of cupuladriid bryozoans and their morphology. Top, whole colonies of Cupuladria biporosa showing typical disc-like colony form with a sexually-produced colony (left) and a clonal colony (right). Bottom, marginal autozooids and vibracula of C. biporosa (left) and Discoporella bocasdeltoroensis (right). Scale bar = 500 µm. Images courtesy of Paul. D. Taylor.


Our analysis of over 90,000 colonies from ten extant species of cupuladriid bryozoans comes from a well-sampled collection of Recent and fossil cupuladriids (Table 1, Fig. 2). Distributions of % carbonate, % coral and % mud in the same samples from where the cupuladriids were collected reveals all these variables expanded after 4 Ma25 (see Supplementary Fig. S1). Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA), based upon the relative abundances of cupuladriid species in samples and constrained by the same environmental variables, show that time-binned-species scores expanded substantially after 4 Ma (Fig. 3). We estimate the habitat breadth of each cupuladriid species in each of the three time bins using a Hypervolume index and Tolerance values from CCA40, both of which are independent of sampling intensity or sample size (see material and methods for further information). These two measures reveal similar patterns through time, and suggest that all ten cupuladriid species increased their habitat breadths substantially over the last 6 Myr (Fig. 4). The timing of this expansion was, however, different in ‘old’ and ‘young’ species. Young species that originated after 5 Ma expanded their habitat breadths between 4 and 2 Ma whereas well-established species older than 8 Ma expanded their habitat breadths after 2 Ma.

Table 1 Numbers of colonies of the 10 commonest cupuladriid species used in this study in samples over three time-bins.
Figure 2

Rarefaction curves for the ten commonest cupuladriid species from fossil and Recent samples in the southwestern Caribbean grouped in three time-bins. Shaded area represent 95% Confidence Intervals. Calculated using EstimateS87.

Figure 3

Changes in ecological space of cupuladriid bryozoans over the last 6 Myr in the southwestern Caribbean. Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA)40,85 of sample scores (dots) based on the relative abundances of species of cupuladriid colonies in bulk samples (fossil) and dredges (Recent). The CCA is constrained by the variables % calcium carbonate, % mud and % coral in samples, all of which expanded after ~4 Ma. Samples are grouped into 2 Myr bins.

Figure 4

Expansion of habitat breadths of cupuladriid species in the southwestern Caribbean over the last 6 myr. Estimates of habitat breadth are split into old species (top), young species (middle) and averages of old and young species (bottom). Old species originated before 8 Ma and young species after 5 Ma. We calculated two estimates of cupuladriid habitat breadth - CCA Tolerances (aka RMSTOL40,85) (left) and Hypervolume index (right).


Evidence suggests that some plants and animals maintain static habitat breadths over geological time scales. Beech trees in Europe, for example, moved south and north in sync with growing then retreating glaciers during the Pleistocene41, and similar patterns of ‘habitat-tracking’42 have been well-documented in many different groups, especially under times of rapid environmental fluctuations43,44. Fixed habitat breadths through the life trajectory of species, otherwise known as environmental niche stasis, is an assumption of many evolutionary models and most species distribution models used when predicting future responses45,46. Our findings show that habitat breadths of cupuladriid bryozoans can be dynamic over a species’ age-range, and that older species may be more restrained in their ability to expand into new habitats.

This finding may appear contradictory because geographic range is usually a good predictor of habitat breadth, and young species, whose geographic ranges are narrow, should therefore have smaller habitat breadths compared to well-established, widely-distributed and abundant older species. Nevertheless, young species have been shown to be able to rapidly increase their geographic ranges and abundances following origination47,48 implying that habitat breadths could also exhibit similar spatio-temporal patterns. Ecological divergence can also be rapid when closely related (i.e. young) sister species are sympatric49,50. And while older species may be more widespread, their well-established, large populations may be less able to escape from established roles and defined environmental tolerances because of high gene flow. This inability to take advantage of newly available habitat is termed niche conservatism15,51 caused by higher fitness of individuals in the original source habitat compared to the fitness of individuals that spread into new habitats45. Thus, while species with larger populations may have a greater potential to exploit new habitat by virtue of being widespread, they may be limited in doing so. Our data support this scenario, and it is interesting to note that estimated habitat breadths of older species, while slower to respond initially, eventually overtook their younger congenerics to achieve wider niche breadths in the last 2 Myr (Fig. 4).

There are alternative explanations for the patterns observed. One is that expansion into new habitats could have been restricted in old species because of cumulative limiting interactions with other biota. Theory suggests that new species will experience relatively lower levels of competition and other potentially limiting biotic interactions such as parasitism, and may therefore be less fettered relative to older species. This goes some way to explain why invasive species can often expand both their realised and fundamental niches in their invasive ranges3. In the SWC, competition from other filter feeding organisms may have declined 4-2 Ma when widespread extinction of benthic marine taxa resulted in a loss of 30–100% of benthic mollusc, bryozoan and coral species in the Caribbean Plio-Pleistocene24,25,32,52,53,54,55. Although cupuladriid species do partition their habitats between species, there is much overlap in the habitat breadths of cupuladriid species38, most likely because competition is diffuse in soft-bottomed shelf environments. It therefore seems unlikely that competition for either space or food would have declined in shelf habitats during the regional extinction, suggesting that competition may not have been a mechanism for the patterns observed.

Two further potential explanatory mechanisms that deserve mentioning relate to the reproductive life histories of the cupuladriid bryozoan species themselves. First, clonal reproduction is the dominant mode in ‘old’ species whilst in ‘young’ species it is sexual52. Both theoretical and experimental studies suggest that sexual populations are able to adapt more rapidly to new and variable environments56,57,58. An important reason is that sex can restructure allelic combinations and epistatic interaction in genomes, thus generating more variability in fitness, which should allow populations to rapidly exploit new niches or adapt to changing environments57,59. Thus, younger cupuladriid species may have had a higher propensity of adaptation given their higher rates of sexual reproduction. One approach to explore this hypothesis would be to observe if the taxa that reproduce only sexually (e.g. molluscs) also differ in their rates of habitat breadth in young and old lineages.

The second mechanism relates to dispersal ability, which is predicted to be positively correlated with rate of range expansion in species60. Populations of cupuladriids that clone (i.e. predominantly older species) will have a lower dispersal ability than cupuladriids that reproduce sexually via larvae (i.e. the predominantly ‘young’ species). Could the new habitats simply have taken longer to colonise by older clonal species? This seems particularly unlikely given the length of time available (millions of years) and the fact that even heavily clonal species always have some level of sexual reproduction52. Moreover, habitat breadth is correlated with geographic spread presumably because wider tolerance facilitates successful dispersal, and not the other way around.

Our results suggest that younger species are less restrained in their ‘ability’ to take advantage of new habitat compared to older closely-related species, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. One fundamental problem in interpreting these findings is that it is currently impossible to resolve if the observed expansion of habitat breadths by cupuladriid species represents a change in the fundamental or the realized niche61. A shift in the realised niche would implicate competition and other biotic interactions, suggesting that ‘old’ species are less competitive than ‘young’ species. Alternatively, shifts to the fundamental niche would suggest that young species may experience less niche conservatism than ‘older’ species, or invoke another evolutionary mechanism. One roadblock is that the fossil record is, by definition, the realised niche. Nevertheless, that realised niche should expand and contract in distinct ways at distinct times if the process(es) driving the patterns are intrinsic or extrinsic, biotic or abiotic. For example, Stigall17 explored niche evolution vs. niche stasis in Late Ordovician brachiopods. The study found remarkable stability in species’ niches during times of environmental stability, even though new species were originating, which should be expected to increase competition. Strong shifts in niches were observed only when sea levels began to fluctuate, implicating abiotic rather than biotic drivers in niche evolution. Further research like this that carefully explores the interactions of environmental change, biodiversity and habitat breadths, coupled with measures of the fundamental niche through the use of extant species with excellent fossil records should be insightful.

Our evidence supports the conclusion that like geographic range and abundances of a species, habitat breadth of a species can vary over the age-range of a species, as predicted given the three traits are often deeply interrelated on both long and short time scales51,62. However, the three traits are all too often considered intrinsic properties of a species that are invariable over a species’ age-range, and this is demonstrably not the case17,47,48,63. Unlike geographic range and abundance, the breadth of habitat of a species does not start and end at zero along a species’ trajectory. A newly formed species will be armed with most of the environmental tolerances of its immediate ancestor population (although presumably not its ancestor species); if habitat breadth started at zero, the species would not exist. As such, geographic range may only be a good predictor of habitat breadth of a species1,5,6,64 during the middle portion of a species’ age-range.


Data support the conclusion that species’ habitat breadths can be dynamic over the age-range of a species and that the speed at which new habitats can be exploited can differ across even closely related species. We find evidence that the age of a species (amount of time since origination) may be negatively related to the tempo at which new habitats can be successfully colonised, with younger species being less fettered than their older congenerics because of stronger niche conservatism in more established populations. However, limitations of the fossil record and a poor understanding of the extent of competition in benthic soft-bottomed communities makes interpretation challenging.

Material and Methods

Cupuladriid bryozoans

The Cupuladriidae are a family of cheilostome bryozoans abundant in shelf habitats today across the tropics35,39,65 with an excellent fossil record52,66,67. Unlike most bryozoans, their disc-shaped colonies (Fig. 1) are free-living, resting on the surface of sandy or silty seafloors where their lophophores can filter feed39,65. They are able to use their setae to maneuver over the seafloor and dig themselves out if smothered in sediment38,68. This remarkable life mode appears to confer great advantage as they are often the only epibenthic filter feeders on the soft-bottomed tropical shelf habitats and can be found in densities of several thousand per square metre in such environments35,69. The reproduction of new colonies occurs by aclonal (presumably sexual) reproduction through the production of short-lived39,65 larvae that settle from the plankton to form new colonies, or by clonal fragmentation or fission of previously established colonies66,67,70. Rates of clonal reproduction vary greatly across species35,66, even when apparently closely related52. Cupuladriids are able to control the rate at which they clone through the robustness of their colony architecture. This can be as simple as creating thick or thinly calcified colonies, or more complex specialised approaches to induce self-cloning (e.g. auto-fragmentation and colony budding)38,39,66,67,70,71. This variation in reproductive life history approach is well-preserved in the skeletons of cupuladriids67, offering an unrivalled opportunity to directly measure the life histories of individuals, assemblages and species over deep time using the fossil record52,66.


We compiled the occurrences and abundances of the ten commonest species of extant cupuladriid bryozoans in the SWC over the past ~10 Myr (Table 1). Data were derived from a collection of approximately 150,000 fossil and Recent cupuladriid colonies52. Recent collections were made with dredge samples in shelf and shallow slope sediments along the Caribbean coast of Central America from 1995 to 2006. Fossil collections were made with bulk samples (ranging in mass from ~8–10 kg each) from fossiliferous Neogene shelf and shallow slope sediments on the Caribbean slopes of Panama and Costa Rica. See Coates et al.72,73 and Collins and Coates74 for details on geographic and stratigraphic distributions of Neogene fossiliferous sections in the SWC.

Fossiliferous bulk samples were disaggregated by soaking in Glauber’s Salt75. Both fossil bulk and dredge samples were sieved with a 2 mm mesh, dried, sorted and picked for cupuladriid colonies. Ages of fossil samples are median values of minimum and maximum ages based on microfossils from the sample or interpolated from ages of samples stratigraphically above and below72,73,76,77,78,79,80,81. Samples used in this study are the same as those reported in O’Dea and Jackson52; see therein for further information on collection methods, and ages of fossiliferous samples. Material is housed in the Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History, USA and at the Naos Marine Laboratory, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama.

Taxonomy and ages of species

Cupuladriid colonies were classified using the rich morphological characters preserved in their calcium carbonate skeletons (Fig. 1) according to methods described in Herrera-Cubilla et al.36,37 which can effectively discriminate to species, as confirmed with molecular sequence data31,36,37,82. The ten extant cupuladriid species used in this study are those with the most abundant fossil records through the time of interest (Table 1)52.

First occurrences (FO) of species ranged from 12.6 to 4.25 Ma (Table 1). Species whose FO was before 8 Ma are considered ‘old’ and species whose FO was after 5 Ma are considered ‘young’. The quality of the marine fossil record in the SWC is excellent after 6 Ma and sampling intensifies after 6 Ma (Fig. 2). FOs of ‘old’ species are therefore likely to to be older whereas FOs of ‘young’ are likely to be robust. This is corroborated by estimated ages of diversification from molecular phylogenetic analysis31. For example, the two ‘old’ species Cupuladria surinamensis Cadée, 1975 and C. biporosa (Canu & Bassler, 1923) are estimated to have split in the middle Miocene (~15 ma), whereas ‘younger’ species such as Discoporella scutella, D. peltifera, and C. incognita are all estimated to have diverged in the Pliocene31. The close alignment of the FO’s with estimated ages of lineages from molecular phylogenetic analysis and the intensity of sampling, and the quality of the fossil record (Fig. 2) support our designations of ‘old’ and ‘young’ species.

Estimating habitat breadths

Of the 24 extinct and extant species of cupuladriid reported in O’Dea and Jackson52 we estimated the habitat breadths of the ten commonest extant species (Table 1). We analysed a total of 90,535 colonies collected from 283 samples spanning the last 6 Ma (Table 1). Time bins were constructed as 6-4, 4-2 and 2-0 Ma, and samples assigned to time bins based upon their median age, as determined from the oldest and youngest age estimates from occurrences of planktonic foraminifera and nannoplankton taxa and magnetostratigraphy72.

Cupuladriid occurrences and distributions are tightly controlled by benthic habitat type38,83,84. We therefore describe the environmental conditions of samples in which cupuladriids occurred by focussing on sedimentary and benthic ecological characteristics, all of which were measured directly from the same samples, or adjacent samples from the same sections. Measurements made were % carbonate (loss of CaCO3 through HCL digestion) and % mud (<63 µm) fraction content of the samples and the % coral component of all skeletal weight in the samples. Percent carbonate and % mud fraction values were determined from the mean of triplicate analyses for Recent dredge samples, or individual analyses for fossil samples. Percent coral weight in total skeletal weight was calculated from samples by sieving at 2 mm and picking all coral material. Depth was measured for Recent samples and estimated for fossil samples using microfossil analysis72,80, and was used as a covariate in the CCA analysis. See25 for details on the collection of environmental measures and estimates.

Two techniques were used to estimate habitat breadths occupied by cupuladriid species in each time bin: Approach 1. CCA Tolerance. The root mean square standard deviation derived from the sample scores across the first four axes of a single Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) (aka. Tolerance or RMSTOL40) has been frequently used as a measure of habitat breadth. CCA was performed using CANOCO85 based upon the relative abundances of time-binned-species in samples and constrained by the habitat variables described above for each sample. The RMSTOL value for each time-binned-species was used as an estimate of habitat breadth. For further information of the calculation of RMSTOL and its use as an estimate of habitat breadth see40,86. Approach 2. Hypervolume index. The product of the coefficient of variances (CV) of all time-binned species’ abundances along the three habitat variables. Species abundance distributions were corrected for varying sampling intensities along said gradients by creating 10 bins for each variable and dividing the abundance of each species in each bin by the total number of samples taken in each bin. CV’s were used instead of standard deviations to standardize variances for differences in the means of habitat variables. The resulting value is akin to Hutchinson’s hypervolume61.

The two estimates of habitat breadth are semi-independent; CCA Tolerance uses relative abundances of species in samples and the Hypervolume Index uses absolute abundances corrected for sampling intensity.

Data availability

Raw data used in this study is available in the Online Supplementary Information.


  1. 1.

    Slatyer, R. A., Hirst, M. & Sexton, J. P. Niche breadth predicts geographical range size: a general ecological pattern. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1104–1114 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Gaston, K. J., Blackburn, T. M. & Lawton, J. H. Interspecific abundance-range size relationships: an appraisal of mechanisms. J. Anim. Ecol. 66, 579 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sexton, J. P., Montiel, J., Shay, J. E., Stephens, M. R. & Slatyer, R. A. Evolution of Ecological Niche Breadth. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 48, 183–206 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jackson, S. T. & Overpeck, J. T. Responses of plant populations and communities to environmental changes of the late Quaternary. Paleobiology 26, 194–220 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Brown, J. H. On the Relationship between Abundance and Distribution of Species. Am. Nat. 124, 255–279 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Heim, N. A. & Peters, S. E. Regional environmental breadth predicts geographic range and longevity in fossil marine genera. PLoS One 6, e18946 (2011).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Finnegan, S. et al. Extinctions. Paleontological baselines for evaluating extinction risk in the modern oceans. Science 348, 567–570 (2015).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Payne, J. L. & Finnegan, S. The effect of geographic range on extinction risk during background and mass extinction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 10506–10511 (2007).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kammer, T. W., Baumiller, T. K. & Ausich, W. I. Species longevity as a function of niche breadth: Evidence from fossil crinoids. Geology 25, 219 (1997).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Guisan, A. & Zimmermann, N. E. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Modell. 135, 147–186 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hutchinson, G. E. Homage to Santa Rosalia, or why are there so many kinds of animals? Am. Nat. 93, 145–159 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hardin, G. The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131, 1292–1297 (1960).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Pianka, E. R. Evolutionary Ecology. (Eric R. Pianka, 1978).

  14. 14.

    O’connor, R. J., Boaden, P. J. S. & Seed, R. Niche breadth in Bryozoa as a test of competition theory. Nature 256, 307–309 (1975).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Peterson, A. T. & Townsend Peterson, A. Ecological niche conservatism: a time-structured review of evidence. J. Biogeogr. 38, 817–827 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Soberón, J. & Nakamura, M. Niches and distributional areas: concepts, methods, and assumptions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(Suppl 2), 19644–19650 (2009).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Stigall, A. L. Using ecological niche modelling to evaluate niche stability in deep time. J. Biogeogr. 39, 772–781 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Dudei, N. L. & Stigall, A. L. Using ecological niche modeling to assess biogeographic and niche response of brachiopod species to the Richmondian Invasion (Late Ordovician) in the Cincinnati Arch. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 296, 28–43 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Malizia, R. W. & Stigall, A. L. Niche stability in Late Ordovician articulated brachiopod species before, during, and after the Richmondian Invasion. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 311, 154–170 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Malizia, R. W. Analyzing Niche Stability in Late Ordovician Articulated Brachiopod Species During the Richmondian Invasion (2011).

  21. 21.

    Walls, B. J. & Stigall, A. L. Analyzing niche stability and biogeography of Late Ordovician brachiopod species using ecological niche modeling. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 299, 15–29 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Farris, D. W. et al. Fracturing of the Panamanian Isthmus during initial collision with South America. Geology 39, 1007–1010 (2011).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Jackson, J. & O’Dea, A. Timing of the oceanographic and biological isolation of the Caribbean Sea from the tropical eastern Pacific Ocean. Bull. Mar. Sci. 89, 779–800 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    O’Dea, A. et al. Formation of the Isthmus of Panama. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600883 (2016).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    O’Dea, A. et al. Environmental change preceded Caribbean extinction by 2 million years. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 5501–5506 (2007).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Jain, S. & Collins, L. S. Trends in Caribbean Paleoproductivity related to the Neogene closure of the Central American Seaway. Mar. Micropaleontol. 63, 57–74 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kirby, M. X. & Jackson, J. B. C. Extinction of a fast-growing oyster and changing ocean circulation in Pliocene tropical America. Geology 32, 1025 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Allmon, W. D. Nutrients, temperature, disturbance, and evolution: a model for the late Cenozoic marine record of the westernAtlantic. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 166, 9–26 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Leonard-Pingel, J. S., Jackson, J. B. C. & O’Dea, A. Changes in bivalve functional and assemblage ecology in response to environmental change in the Caribbean Neogene. Paleobiology 38, 509–524 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Klaus, J. S. & Budd, A. F. Comparison of Caribbean coral reef communities before and after Plio-Pleistocene faunal turnover: analyses of two Dominican Republic reef sequences. Palaios 18, 3–21 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Jagadeeshan, S. & O’Dea, A. Integrating fossils and molecules to study cupuladriid evolution in an emerging Isthmus. Evol. Ecol. 26, 337–355 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Smith, J. T., Travis Smith, J. & Jackson, J. B. C. Ecology of extreme faunal turnover of tropical American scallops. Paleobiology 35, 77–93 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Budd, A. F. & Johnson, K. G. Origination preceding extinction during late Cenozoic turnover of Caribbean reefs. Paleobiology 25, 188–200 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Schwartz, S. A., Budd, A. F. & Carlon, D. B. Molecules and fossils reveal punctuated diversification in Caribbean ‘faviid’ corals. BMC Evol. Biol. 12, 123 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    O’Dea, A., Herrera-Cubilla, A., Fortunato, H. & Jackson, J. Life history variation in cupuladriid bryozoans from either side of the Isthmus of Panama. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 280, 145–161 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Herrera-Cubilla, A., Dick, M. H., Sanner, J. & Jackson, J. B. C. Neogene Cupuladriidae of tropical America. I: Taxonomy of Recent Cupuladria from opposite sides of the Isthmus of Panama. J. Paleontol. 80, 245–263 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Herrera-Cubilla, A., Dick, M. H., Sanner, J. & Jackson, J. B. C. Neogene Cupuladriidae of tropical America. II: taxonomy of recent Discoporella from opposite sides of the Isthmus of Panama. J. Paleontol. 82, 279–298 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    O’Dea, A. Relation of form to life habit in free-living cupuladriid bryozoans. Aquat. Biol. 7, 1–18 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Winston, J. E. Life histories of free-living bryozoans. Natl. Geogr. Res. 4, 528–539 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Leps, J. & Smilauer, P. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. (Cambridge University Press, 2003).

  41. 41.

    Huntley, B., Bartlein, P. J. & Prentice, I. C. Climatic control of the distribution and abundance of beech (Fagus L.) in Europe and North America. J. Biogeogr. 16, 551 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Eldredge, N. et al. The dynamics of evolutionary stasis. Paleobiology 31, 133–145 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Coope, G. R. Late Cenozoic Fossil Coleoptera: Evolution, Biogeography, and Ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10, 247–267 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Valentine, J. W. & Jablonski, D. Fossil communities: compositional variation at many time scales. Species diversity in ecological communities. In Species Diversity in Ecological Communities (eds Rickleffs, R. E. & Schluter, D.) 341–349 (University of Chicago Press, 1993).

  45. 45.

    Pearman, P. B., Guisan, A., Broennimann, O. & Randin, C. F. Niche dynamics in space and time. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 149–158 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Nogués-Bravo, D. Predicting the past distribution of species climatic niches. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 18, 521–531 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Liow, L. H. & Stenseth, N. C. The rise and fall of species: implications for macroevolutionary and macroecological studies. Proc. Biol. Sci. 274, 2745–2752 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Foote, M. Symmetric waxing and waning of marine invertebrate genera. Paleobiology 33, 517–529 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Anacker, B. L. & Strauss, S. Y. The geography and ecology of plant speciation: range overlap and niche divergence in sister species. Proc. Biol. Sci. 281, 20132980 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Pitteloud, C. et al. Climatic niche evolution is faster in sympatric than allopatric lineages of the butterfly genus. Proc. Biol. Sci. 284 (2017).

  51. 51.

    Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. D. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. (Oxford University Press, USA, 1998).

  52. 52.

    O’Dea, A. & Jackson, J. Environmental change drove macroevolution in cupuladriid bryozoans. Proc. Biol. Sci. 276, 3629–3634 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Johnson, K. G., Jackson, J. B. C. & Budd, A. F. Caribbean reef development was independent of coral diversity over 28 million years. Science 319, 1521–1523 (2008).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Di Martino, E., Jackson, J. B. C., Taylor, P. D. & Johnson, K. G. Differences in extinction rates drove modern biogeographic patterns of tropical marine biodiversity. Sci. Adv. 4, eaaq1508 (2018).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Todd, J. A. et al. The ecology of extinction: molluscan feeding and faunal turnover in the Caribbean Neogene. Proc. Biol. Sci. 269, 571–577 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Otto, S. P. & Barton, N. H. Selection for recombination in small populations. Evolution 55, 1921–1931 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Goddard, M. R., Godfray, H. C. J. & Burt, A. Sex increases the efficacy of natural selection in experimental yeast populations. Nature 434, 636–640 (2005).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Becks, L. & Agrawal, A. F. The evolution of sex is favoured during adaptation to new environments. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001317 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection: A Complete Variorum Edition. (Oxford University Press, 1930).

  60. 60.

    Lester, S. E., Ruttenberg, B. I., Gaines, S. D. & Kinlan, B. P. The relationship between dispersal ability and geographic range size. Ecol. Lett. 10, 745–758 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Hutchinson, G. E. Population studies: Animal ecology and demography. Bull. Math. Biol. 54, 695–695 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Jackson, J. B. C. Biogeographic consequences of eurytopy and stenotopy among marine bivalves and their evolutionary significance. Am. Nat. 108, 541–560 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Jernvall, J. & Fortelius. Maintenance of Trophic Structure in Fossil Mammal Communities: Site Occupancy and Taxon Resilience. Am. Nat. 164, 614 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Gaston, K. J. & Blackburn, T. M. Pattern and process in macroecology. (Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2000).

  65. 65.

    Cook, P. L. & Chimonides, P. J. A Short History of the Lunulite Bryozoa. Bull. Mar. Sci. 33, 566–581 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Håkansson, E. & Thomsen, E. Asexual propagation in cheilostome Bryozoa: evolutionary trends in a major group of colonial animals. in Evolutionary patterns: growth, form and tempo in the fossil record. (ed. Jackson, J. B. C., Lidgard, S., McKinney F. K. (eds)) 326–347 (The University of Chicago Press, 2001).

  67. 67.

    O’Dea, A., Jackson, J. B. C., Taylor, P. D. & Rodríguez, F. Modes of reproduction in recent and fossil cupuladriid bryozoans. Palaeontology 51, 847–864 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Håkansson, E. & Winston, J. Interstitial bryozoans: Unexpected life forms in a high energy environment. in Bryozoa: Ordovician to Recent (eds Nielsen, C. & Larwood, G.) 125–134 (1985).

  69. 69.

    McKinney, F. K. & Jackson, J. B. C. Bryozoan Evolution. (University of Chicago Press, 1991).

  70. 70.

    O’Dea, A. Asexual propagation in the marine bryozoan Cupuladria exfragminis. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 335, 312–322 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Marcus, E. D. B.-R., Du Bois-Reymond Marcus, E. & Marcus, E. On some Lunulitiform bryozoa. Sao Paulo, Brazil, Univ. Fac. Filos., Cien. Letr., Bol. Zool. 24, 281 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Coates, A. G., Aubry, M.-P., Berggren, W. A., Collins, L. S. & Kunk, M. J. Early Neogene history of the Central American arc from Bocas del Toro, western Panama. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 115, 271–287 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Coates, A. G. et al. Closure of the Isthmus of Panama: The near-shore marine record of Costa Rica and western Panama. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 104, 814–828 (1992).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    A Paleobiotic Survey of Caribbean Faunas from the Neogene of the Isthmus of Panama. 357, (Bulletins of American Paleontology, 1999).

  75. 75.

    Surlyk, F. Morphological adaptations and population structures of the Danish Chalk brachiopods (Maastrichtien, Upper Cretaceous). Biol. Skr. Dan. Vid. Selsk. 19, 1–57 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Coates, A. G., Collins, L. S., Aubry, M.-P. & Berggren, W. A. The Geology of the Darien, Panama, and the late Miocene-Pliocene collision of the Panama arc with northwestern South America. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 116, 1327–1344 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Coates, A. G., McNeill, D. F., Aubry, M.-P., Berggren, W. A. & Collins, L. S. An Introduction to the Geology of the Bocas Del Toro Archipelago, Panama. Caribb. J. Sci. 3, 374–391 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Collins, L. S., Budd, A. F. & Coates, A. G. Earliest evolution associated with closure of the Tropical American Seaway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 6069–6072 (1996).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Klaus, J. S., McNeill, D. F., Budd, A. F. & Coates, A. G. Neogene reef coral assemblages of the Bocas del Toro region, Panama: the rise of Acropora palmata. Coral Reefs 31, (191–203 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Jackson, J. B. C., Todd, J. A., Fortunato, H. M. & Jung, P. Diversity and assemblages of Neogene Caribbean Mollusca of lower Central America. In A paleobiotic survey of Caribbean faunas from the Neogene of the Isthmus of Panama (ed. Laurel, S. & Collins, A. G. C.) 193–230 (Bulletins of American Paleontology, 1999).

  81. 81.

    Collins, L. S., Coates, A. G., Berggren, W. A., Aubry, M.-P. & Zhang, J. The late Miocene Panama isthmian strait. Geology 24, 687 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Dick, M. H., Herrera-Cubilla, A. & Jackson, J. B. C. Molecular phylogeny and phylogeography of free-living Bryozoa (Cupuladriidae) from both sides of the Isthmus of Panama. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 27, 355–371 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Cook, P. L. Notes on the Cupuladriidae (Polyzoa, Anasca). Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. Bot. 13, 151–187 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Lagaaij, R. Cupuladria canariensis (Busk)—portrait of a bryozoan. Palaeontology 6, 172–217 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    ter Braak, C. J. F. & Šmilauer, P. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). (Biometris, Wageningen., 2002).

  86. 86.

    Green, R. H. A Multivariate Statistical Approach to the Hutchinsonian Niche: Bivalve Molluscs of Central Canada. Ecology 52, 543–556 (1971).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Colwell, R. K. et al. Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation and comparison of assemblages. J. Plant Ecol. 5, 3–21 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Jeremy B. C. Jackson supported many aspects of this work. Walton A. Green gave helpful statistical advice. Paul D. Taylor provided the SEM’s in Fig. 1. We are indebted to Felix Rodriguez, Yadixa del Valle, Anthony Coates, Javier Jara, Amalia Herrera, Oris Solis, Gisele Laino, Janice Chen, Luis D’Croz, Graciela Quijano, Betzy Rovero, Tania Romero, Beth Okamura, Travis Smith, and the crew of the R/V Urraca for help in the field and laboratory. Steve Hageman gave very constructive criticism on the manuscript, as did one anonymous reviewer. Permits to collect were given by the Ministerio de Comercio e Industrias and Ministerio de Ambiente de Panamá. The Secretaría Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología e Innovación (SENACYT), the Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (SNI) de SENACYT, NSF (EAR03-45471 and EAR13-25683), Smithsonian Institution, STRI, National Geographic Society’s Exploration Grants and Mr. Josh Bilyk all kindly supported the study financially.

Author information




A.O. and S.J. conceived the study. A.O., B.D.-G. and S.J. collected material. A.O., B.D.-G., B.F. and S.J. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron O’Dea.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Dea, A., De Gracia, B., Figuerola, B. et al. Young species of cupuladriid bryozoans occupied new Caribbean habitats faster than old species. Sci Rep 8, 12168 (2018).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.