Abstract
The iron antimonide FeSb2 possesses an extraordinarily high thermoelectric power factor at low temperature, making it a leading candidate for cryogenic thermoelectric cooling devices. However, the origin of this unusual behavior is controversial, having been variously attributed to electronic correlations as well as the phonon-drag effect. The optical properties of a material provide information on both the electronic and vibrational properties. The optical conductivity reveals an anisotropic response at room temperature; the low-frequency optical conductivity decreases rapidly with temperature, signalling a metal-insulator transition. One-dimensional semiconducting behavior is observed along the b axis at low temperature, in agreement with first-principle calculations. The infrared-active lattice vibrations are also symmetric and extremely narrow, indicating long phonon relaxation times and a lack of electron-phonon coupling. Surprisingly, there are more lattice modes along the a axis than are predicted from group theory; several of these modes undergo significant changes below about 100 K, hinting at a weak structural distortion or phase transition. While the extremely narrow phonon line shapes favor the phonon-drag effect, the one-dimensional behavior of this system at low temperature may also contribute to the extraordinarily high thermopower observed in this material.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
FeSb2 crystallizes into an orthorhombic structure with two formula units per unit cell, as shown in Fig. 1(a). Despite this simple structure, there are two moieties of FeSb2 crystals, those with a putative metal-insulator transition (MIT) in which the dc conductivity along the b axis first increases below room temperature, reaching a broad maximum at about 80–100 K, before decreasing dramatically as the temperature is further reduced1, and a second class of materials without a MIT in which the dc conductivity immediately begins to decrease as the temperature is lowered1,2,3,4, as shown in Fig. 1(b), for the two types of crystals examined in this work. Both classes of materials have a high thermoelectric power factor at low temperature; however, it is extraordinarily high in the materials with a MIT1. The thermoelectric efficiency is given by the dimensionless figure of merit ZT = σS2T/κ, where σ, S, T, and κ are the conductivity, Seebeck coefficient, temperature, and thermal conductivity, respectively; the thermoelectric power is simply S2σ; in FeSb2 the Seebeck coefficient may be as high as \(S\simeq -\,45\) mV K−1 at low temperature, resulting in the highest power factor ever recorded2. In general, there are two strategies for increasing ZT; reduce κ or increase the power factor S2σ. However, because the source of this large thermoelectric response is not entirely understood, with electronic correlations1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, as well as the phonon-drag effect11,12,13,14,15, having been proposed, it is not clear which approach offers the best chance of success. The complex optical properties yield information about both the electronic and vibrational properties of a material, and can offer insights into the origin this unusual behavior. The real part of the optical conductivity is particularly useful as it yields information about the gapping of the spectrum of excitations in systems with a MIT, and in the zero-frequency limit, the dc conductivity is recovered, σ1(ω → 0) ≡ σdc, allowing comparisons to be made with transport data. Furthermore, the infrared-active transverse-optic modes at the center of the Brillouin zone may be observed in σ1(ω) as resonances superimposed upon an electronic background (or antiresonances if strong electron-phonon coupling is present). The optical properties of FeSb2 have been previously examined in the a-b planes6 and along the c axis7, revealing a semiconducting response at low temperature and evidence for electron-phonon coupling.
Results
Crystals of FeSb2 have been prepared by the usual methods16,17. The reflectance of several single crystals, with and without a MIT, has been measured over a wide frequency range (\(\simeq 3\) meV to 4 eV) at a variety of temperatures for light polarized along the a, b, and c axes18 (Supplementary Fig. S1). Only naturally-occurring crystal faces have been examined, although after an initial measurement the c axis face was polished to remove some surface irregularities. Polishing broadens the lattice mode(s), but does not otherwise affect the optical properties. After the optical measurements were completed, the samples were dismounted and the dc resistivity, ρdc, was measured using a standard four-probe technique1 [the dc conductivity, \({\sigma }_{dc}=\mathrm{1/}{\rho }_{dc}\), is shown along the b axis in Fig. 1(b)].
While the reflectance is a tremendously useful quantity, it is a combination of the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric function, and as such it is not necessarily intuitive or easily understood. It is much simpler to examine the real part of the optical conductivity, determined from a Kramers-Kronig analysis of the reflectance19, shown in the infrared region along the a, b, and c axes Figs. 2(a), (b), and (c), respectively; the insets show the conductivity over a much wider frequency range. Interestingly, the temperature dependence of the reflectance for crystals with and without an MIT is identical in the infrared region (shown for light polarized along the b axis in Supplementary Fig. S2). Consequently, the low-frequency optical conductivity in Fig. 2 never shows the initial increase with decreasing temperature that is seen in the dc conductivity in samples with a MIT; instead, the low-frequency optical conductivity decreases with temperature along all three lattice directions, suggesting that no MIT is present. The apparent dichotomy between the temperature dependence of the dc resistivity and the optical conductivity in crystals with an MIT [Figs. 1(b) and S2(a)] indicates that the dc transport properties are being driven by an impurity band that is sufficiently narrow so that its response falls below our lowest measured frequency.
At room temperature, the real part of the optical conductivity may be described by a simple Drude model with Fano-shaped Lorentz oscillators to describe possible electron-phonon coupling20,
where the first term denotes the (Drude) free carriers, with the square of the plasma frequency \({\omega }_{p}^{2}=4\pi n{e}^{2}/{m}^{\ast }\) and scattering rate 1/τ, where n and m* are the carrier concentration and effective mass, respectively. The second term is a summation of oscillators with position ωj, width γj, strength Ωj, and (dimensionless) asymmetry parameter \(1/{q}_{j}^{2}\), that describe the vibrations of the lattice or bound excitations (interband transitions); \({Z}_{0}\simeq 377\) Ω is the impedance of free space, yielding units for the conductivity of Ω−1 cm−1. In the 1/q2 → 0 limit a symmetric Lorentzian profile is recovered; however, as 1/q2 increases the line shape becomes increasingly asymmetric. The real part of the optical conductivity along the a and c axes at 295 K, shown in Figs. 2(a) and (c), respectively, are similar, with \({\sigma }_{dc}\equiv {\sigma }_{1}(\omega \to 0)\simeq 1400\) Ω−1 cm−1. Along the b axis the optical conductivity at room temperature is higher, with \({\sigma }_{dc}\simeq 1900\) Ω−1 cm−1 [Fig. 2(b)]. Fits to the optical conductivity at 295 K describe the data quite well and yield \({\omega }_{p}\simeq 7690\), 6770 and 6480 cm−1, and \(\mathrm{1/}\tau \simeq 800\), 400 and 490 cm−1 along the a, b, and c axes, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S3); the optical conductivity along the b axis at room temperature is shown in Fig. 3(a). This anisotropy suggests that m* is slightly lower along the a axis, and that the larger value for σdc along the b axis is a consequence of a lower scattering rate (Supplementary Table 1). As Fig. 2 indicates, the Drude component begins to decrease rapidly in strength below room temperature, along all three directions, with a commensurate loss of spectral weight (the area under the conductivity curve) that is transferred from low to high frequency6. The Drude model may be used to track the temperature dependence of ωp and 1/τ down to about 75 K, below which the free-carrier response becomes too small to observe in our measurements. The Drude expression for the dc conductivity, \({\sigma }_{dc}=2\pi {\omega }_{p}^{2}\tau /{Z}_{0}\), decreases rapidly as the temperature is lowered, suggesting that the transport may be described by an activation energy Ea using the Arrhenius equation,
where Ea = Eg/2. Transport measurements typically identify two gaps in FeSb2, \({E}_{g}\simeq 5\) meV below about 20 K, and \({E}_{g}\simeq 26-36\) meV in the 50−100 K temperature range1,2,3,4. The Arrhenius relation describes the temperature dependence of σdc along all three lattice directions quite well (see Supplementary Fig. S4), and yields values for the transport gap of \({E}_{g}\simeq 20.6\), 19.5 and 24.8 ± 2 meV along the a, b, and c axes, respectively, in good agreement with the high-temperature values for the transport gap.
Discussion
While the Drude model with Fano-shaped Lorentz oscillators is able to reproduce the temperature-dependence of the optical conductivity along the a and c axes reasonably well, it fails to describe the sharp feature that develops along the b axis at low temperature. This step-like feature is the signature of a van Hove singularity in the density of states. The asymmetric profile in the real part of the low-temperature optical conductivity resembles the \(\mathrm{1/}\sqrt{\omega }\) singularity response observed in one-dimensional semiconductors,
where ξ = β2/(1 − β2), \(\gamma =\pi [\mathrm{1/2}{\beta }^{2}-1]\), and \(\tilde{\omega }=\omega /2{\rm{\Delta }}\) where 2Δ is the semiconducting optical gap, and β is the sine-Gordon coupling constant21. When this functional form is taken in linear combination with several Lorentzian oscillators, the optical conductivity is reproduced quite well with σ0 = 1730 Ω−1 cm−1, 2Δ = 614 cm−1, and β = 0.75, as shown in Fig. 3(b), clearly establishing the one-dimensional nature of the optical properties. The estimate for 2Δ along the b axis considerably larger than Eg; however, it should be noted that the optical determination of 2Δ probes only direct transitions between bands due to low momentum transfer. If the material has a direct gap, then the optical and transport gaps should be similar, \({E}_{g}\simeq 2{\rm{\Delta }}\); however, in indirect-gap semiconductors, phonon-assisted transitions typically result in \({E}_{g} < 2{\rm{\Delta }}\).
The observation of one-dimensional behavior in this material is of particular importance as it has been argued that lowered dimensionality may increase the value of the Seebeck coefficient22,23,24. Electronic structure calculations can provide insight into the optical properties of a material. However, density functional theory (DFT) predicts a metallic rather than a semiconducting ground state12, indicating that a more sophisticated approach is required. Consequently, first principle calculations have been performed using a linearized quasiparticle self-consistent GW and dynamical mean field theory (LQSGW + DMFT) approach25,26,27 (details are provided in the Supplementary Information). Figure 4 shows the low-energy quasiparticle band structure near the K point (0.26b* + 0.28c*) where the direct bandgap is a minimum. Here b* and c* are the reciprocal lattice vectors along the b and c axes. Around the K point, the calculation shows direct bandgap of \(\simeq 80\) meV, which is in a good agreement with the semiconducting optical gap of \(2{\rm{\Delta }}\simeq 76\) meV. In addition, low-dimensional behavior is observed near the K point; along the a* direction, quasiparticle bands for the conduction and valence electrons are almost flat, as illustrated by the quasiparticle band in Fig. 4(b). In contrast, the quasiparticle bands are dispersive along the b* and c* directions shown in Figs. 4(c) and (d). The fact that DMFT is necessary to generate a low-dimensional quasiparticle spectral function that is consistent with the semiconducting ground state indicates that electronic correlations are an essential ingredient in understanding the anisotropic optical and transport properties of FeSb2.
We now turn our attention to the equally interesting behavior of the infrared-active lattice modes. FeSb2 crystallizes in the orthorhombic Pnnm space group, where c is the short axis [Fig. 1(a)]. The irreducible vibrational representation is then \({{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{irr}=2{A}_{g}+2{B}_{1g}+{B}_{2g}+{B}_{3g}+2{A}_{u}+{B}_{1u}+3{B}_{2u}+3{B}_{3u}\), of which only the B1u, B2u and B3u modes are infrared-active along the c, b, and a axes, respectively6. The temperature dependence of the real part of the optical conductivity has been projected onto the wave number versus temperature plane using the indicated color scales in Figs. 5(a), (b), and (c) for light polarized along the a, b, and c axes, respectively. The vibrations have been fit using oscillators with a Fano profile superimposed on an electronic background at 295 and 5 K (Supplementary Figs. S5, S6, and S7). The frequencies of the lattice modes at the center of the Brillouin zone and their atomic characters have also been calculated using first principles techniques and are in good agreement with previous results28,29 (details are provided in the Supplementary Information); the comparison between theory and experiment is shown in Table 1.
The behavior of the lattice modes are remarkable in several ways. Along the a, b, and c axes the vibrations have line widths that are up to an order of magnitude smaller than the previously reported values6,7; at low temperature all the modes are extremely sharp and several have line widths of less than 1 cm−1, a result that has also been observed in some Raman-active modes30. The narrow line widths imply long phonon lifetimes (\({\tau }_{j}\propto \mathrm{1/}{\gamma }_{j}\)) and mean-free paths, consistent with the suggestion of quasi-ballistic phonons11,15, which affect S through the phonon-drag effect where the phonon current drags the charge carriers, giving rise to an additional thermoelectric voltage31,32,33. In addition, while several of the infrared-active vibrations were previously reported to have a slightly asymmetric profile at high temperature6,7, in this work all the line shapes appear to be symmetric (\(1/{q}_{j}^{2}\simeq 0\)), indicating that electron-phonon coupling is either very weak or totally absent. The single B1u mode along the c axis, and the three B2u modes along the b axis, shown in Figs. 5(c) and (b), respectively, increase in frequency (harden) with decreasing temperature, and are in excellent agreement with the calculated values (Table 1). The behavior of the lattice modes along the a axis in Fig. 5(a) are dramatically different. At room temperature the three modes observed at \(\simeq 121\), 243, and 254 cm−1 are in good agreement well with the calculated values for the B3u modes at 125, 252, and 260 cm−1, respectively; however, a fourth reasonably strong mode at 191 cm−1 is also observed that is considerably broader than the other vibrations. As the temperature is reduced the mode at 191 cm−1 actually decreases slightly in frequency, while the remaining modes harden. Below about 100 K, the mode at \(\simeq 191\) cm−1 vanishes and a new, very strong mode appears at \(\simeq 220\) cm−1, while at the same time the modes at 243 and 254 cm−1 both shift to slightly higher frequencies; the mode at 121 cm−1 shows no signs of any anomalous behavior [Fig. 5(a) and Fig. S5]. The fate of the 191 cm−1 mode is uncertain; however, it is unlikely that it has evolved into the 220 cm−1 mode due to the large difference in oscillator strengths (Table 1). It is also unlikely that this is a manifestation of the B1u mode, which has a comparable frequency, because that feature does not display the unusual temperature dependence of the mode observed along the a axis, nor is there any evidence of it along the b axis. The dramatic change in the nature of the lattice modes along the a axis at precisely the temperature where the resistivity begins to increase dramatically suggests there is a weak structural distortion or phase transition.
To conclude, the temperature dependence of the optical and dc transport properties of single crystals of FeSb2, both with and without a MIT, have been examined over a wide temperature and spectral range, along all three lattice directions. While the temperature dependence of the optical properties are essentially identical in the two types of crystals, the dc transport properties are dramatically different. This dichotomy can be explained by the presence of a sample-dependent impurity band that lies below the optical measurements. The optical conductivity in both types of crystals reveals an anisotropic response at room temperature, and singular behavior at low temperature along the b axis, demonstrating a one-dimensional semiconducting response with \(2{\rm{\Delta }}\simeq 76\) meV, in agreement with ab inito calculations. The lattice modes along the b and c axes have symmetric profiles which narrow and harden with decreasing temperature, and their positions are in good agreement with first principles calculations. However, along the a axis there is an extra mode above 100 K; below this temperature the resistivity increases rapidly and the high-frequency vibrational modes undergo significant changes that hint a weak structural distortion or transition. Transport studies along this direction may shed light on the nature of this peculiar behavior. Although electron-phonon coupling is apparently either very weak or totally absent in this material, the fact that DMFT is required to reproduce the semiconducting ground state and anisotropic response indicates that electronic correlations play an important role in the optical and transport properties. While the extremely narrow phonon line shapes support the phonon-drag explanation of the high thermoelectric power, electronic correlations and the low-dimensional behavior along the b axis may also enhance the Seebeck coefficient22,23,24, making it likely that both contribute to the extremely high thermopower observed in FeSb2.
Methods
The temperature dependence of the absolute reflectance was measured at a near-normal angle of incidence using an in situ evaporation method18 over a wide frequency range on Bruker IFS 113v and Vertex 80v spectrometers. In this study mirror-like as-grown faces of single crystals have been examined. After an initial measurement, the c-axis face was determined to have a minor surface irregularity, so it was was polished and remeasured. Polishing broadens the lattice mode somewhat, but the electronic properties were not affected. The temperature dependence of the reflectance was measured up to \(\simeq 1.5\) eV, while polarization studies were conducted up to at least 3 eV. The complex optical properties were determined from a Kramers-Kronig analysis of the reflectance19. The Kramers-Kronig transform requires that the reflectance be determined for all frequencies, thus extrapolations must be supplied in the ω → 0,∞ limits. In the metallic state the low frequency extrapolation follows the Hagen-Rubens form, \(R(\omega )\propto 1-\sqrt{\omega }\), while in the semiconducting state the reflectance was continued smoothly from the lowest measured frequency point to \(R(\omega \to \mathrm{0)}\simeq 0.64\) and 0.68 along the a and c axes, respectively, and \(\simeq 0.74\) along the b axis. The reflectance is assumed to be constant above the highest measured frequency point up to \(\simeq 8\times {10}^{4}\) cm−1, above which a free electron gas asymptotic reflectance extrapolation R(ω) ∝ 1/ω4 is employed34.
References
Jie, Q. et al. Electronic thermoelectric power factor and metal-insulator transition in FeSb2. Phys. Rev. B 86, 115121 (2012).
Bentien, A., Johnsen, S., Madsen, G. K. H., Iversen, B. B. & Steglich, F. Colossal Seebeck coefficient in strongly correlated semiconductor FeSb2. EPL 80, 17008 (2007).
Sun, P., Oeschler, N., Johnsen, S., Iversen, B. B. & Steglich, F. Thermoelectric properties of the narrow-gap semiconductors FeSb2and RuSb2: A comparative study. Journal of Physics. Conference Series 150, 012049 (2009).
Sun, P., Oeschler, N., Johnsen, S., Iversen, B. B. & Steglich, F. Narrow band gap and enhanced thermoelectricity in FeSb2. Dalton Trans. 39, 1012–1019 (2010).
Petrovic, C. et al. Kondo insulator description of spin state transition in FeSb2. Phys. Rev. B 72, 045103 (2005).
Perucchi, A., Degiorgi, L., Hu, R., Petrovic, C. & Mitrović, V. F. Optical investigation of the metal-insulator transition in FeSb2. Eur. Phys. J. B 54, 175–183 (2006).
Herzog, A. et al. Strong electron correlations in FeSb2: An optical investigation and comparison with RuSb2. Phys. Rev. B 82, 245205 (2010).
Figueira, M. S., Silva-Valencia, J. & Franco, R. Thermoelectric properties of the Kondo insulator FeSb2. Eur. Phys. J. B 85, 203 (2012).
Fuccillo, M. K., Gibson, Q. D., Ali, M. N., Schoop, L. M. & Cava, R. J. Correlated evolution of colossal thermoelectric effect and Kondo insulating behavior. APL Mater. 1, 062102 (2013).
Sun, P. et al. Highly dispersive electron relaxation and colossal thermoelectricity in the correlated semiconductor FeSb2. Phys. Rev. B 88, 245203 (2013).
Takahashi, H. et al. Colossal Seebeck effect enhanced by quasi-ballistic phonons dragging massive electrons in FeSb2. Nature Commun. 7, 12732 (2016).
Tomczak, J. M., Haule, K., Miyake, T., Georges, A. & Kotliar, G. Thermopower of correlated semiconductors: Application to FeAs2 and FeSb2. Phys. Rev. B 82, 085104 (2010).
Pokharel, M. et al. Phonon drag effect in nanocomposite FeSb2. MRS Commun. 3, 31–36 (2013).
Liao, B., Lee, S., Esfarjani, K. & Chen, G. First-principles study of thermal transport in FeSb2. Phys. Rev. B 89, 035108 (2014).
Battiato, M., Tomczak, J. M., Zhong, Z. & Held, K. Unified Picture for the Colossal Thermopower Compound FeSb2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 236603 (2015).
Petrovic, C. et al. Anisotropy and large magnetoresistance in the narrow-gap semiconductor FeSb2. Phys. Rev. B 67, 155205 (2003).
Bentien, A., Madsen, G. K. H., Johnsen, S. & Iversen, B. B. Experimental and theoretical investigations of strongly correlated FeSb2−xSnx. Phys. Rev. B 74, 205105 (2006).
Homes, C. C., Reedyk, M., Crandles, D. A. & Timusk, T. Technique for measuring the reflectance of irregular, submillimeter-sized samples. Appl. Opt. 32, 2976–2983 (1993).
Dressel, M. & Grüner, G. Electrodynamics of Solids (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001).
Homes, C. C., Dai, Y. M., Schneeloch, J., Zhong, R. D. & Gu, G. D. Phonon anomalies in some iron telluride materials. Phys. Rev. B 93, 125135 (2016).
Controzzi, D., Essler, F. H. L. & Tsvelik, A. M. Optical Conductivity of One-Dimensional Mott Insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 680–683 (2001).
Hicks, L. D. & Dresselhaus, M. S. Thermoelectric figure of merit of a one-dimensional conductor. Phys. Rev. B 47, 16631(R) (1993).
Kim, R., Datta, S. & Lundstrom, M. S. Influence of dimensionality on thermoelectric device performance. J. App. Phys. 105, 034506 (2009).
Rhyee, J.-S. et al. Peierls distortion as a route to high thermoelectric performance in In4Se3−δ crystals. Nature 459, 965–968 (2009).
Choi, S., Kutepov, A., Haule, K., van Schilfgaarde, M. & Kotliar, G. First-principles treatment of Mott insulators: linearized QSGW + DMFT approach. Quantum Materials 1, 16001 (2016).
For the GW part of the LQSGW + DMFT scheme, the code FlapwMBPT was used (http://scgw.physics.rutgers.edu).
Kutepov, A. L., Oudovenko, V. S. & Kotliar, G. Linearized self-consistent quasiparticle GW method: Application to semiconductors and simple metals. Comp. Phys. Commun. 219, 407–414 (2017).
Miao, R. et al. First-principles study on the lattice dynamics of FeSb2. Solid State Commun. 152, 231–234 (2012).
Lazarević, N. et al. Lattice dynamics of FeSb2. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24, 255402 (2012).
Lazarević, N., Popović, Z. V., Hu, R. & Petrovic, C. Evidence for electron-phonon interaction in Fe1−x M xSb2 (M = Co and Cr; 0 ≤ x ≤ 0.5) single crystals. Phys. Rev. B 81, 144302 (2010).
Geballe, T. H. & Hull, G. W. Seebeck Effect in Germanium. Phys. Rev. 94, 1134–1140 (1954).
Herring, C. Theory of the Thermoelectric Power ofSemiconductors. Phys. Rev. 96, 1163–1187 (1954).
Weber, L. & Gmelin, E. Transport properties of silicon. Appl. Phys. A 53, 136–140 (1991).
Wooten, F. Optical Properties of Solids (Academic Press, New York, 1972).
Holseth, H. & Kjekshus, A. Compounds with the Marcasite Type Crystal Structure. IV. The Crystal Structure of FeSb2. Acta Chem. Scand. 23, 3043–3050 (1968).
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to T. Besara and T. Siegrist for confirming the crystal orientation. The authors would like to acknowledge useful discussions with T. M. Rice, A. Tsvelik, T. Valla, R. Yang, and I. Zaliznyak. Research supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences as part of the Computation Material Science Program through the Center for Computational Material Spectroscopy and Design, and the Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering under Contract No. DE-SC0012704.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.C.H. supervised the project, performed the phonon calculations, made the optical measurements on FeSb2, and wrote the manuscript. Q.D. and C.P. synthesized single crystals of FeSb2 and performed transport measurements. W.H.B., S.C. and G.K. performed ab initio calculations and helped prepare the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Homes, C.C., Du, Q., Petrovic, C. et al. Unusual electronic and vibrational properties in the colossal thermopower material FeSb2. Sci Rep 8, 11692 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29909-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29909-2
This article is cited by
-
Magnetic and 57Fe Mössbauer Studies of Fe1 − xMnxSb2 system (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.2)
Hyperfine Interactions (2023)
-
Vacancy defect control of colossal thermopower in FeSb2
npj Quantum Materials (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.