Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The inducible chemical-genetic fluorescent marker FAST outperforms classical fluorescent proteins in the quantitative reporting of bacterial biofilm dynamics


To increase our understanding of bacterial biofilm complexity, real- time quantitative analyses of the living community functions are required. To reach this goal, accurate fluorescent reporters are needed. In this paper, we used the classical fluorescent genetic reporters of the GFP family and demonstrated their limits in the context of a living biofilm. We showed that fluorescence signal saturated after only a few hours of growth and related this saturation to the reduction of oxygen concentration induced by bacterial consumption. This behaviour prevents the use of GFP-like fluorescent proteins for quantitative measurement in living biofilms. To overcome this limitation, we propose the use of a recently introduced small protein tag, FAST, which is fluorescent in the presence of an exogenously applied fluorogenic dye, enabling to avoid the oxygen sensitivity issue. We compared the ability of FAST to report on biofilm growth with that of GFP and mCherry, and demonstrated the superiority of the FAST:fluorogen probes for investigating dynamics in the complex environment of a living biofilm.


Bacterial biofilms are confined, three-dimensional communities of adherent microbes. They display an outperforming specific lifestyle, which raises a number of fundamental and practical questions drawing interest from various disciplines1,2,3,4,5,6. Molecular biology advances have pointed out hundreds of genes that are up- or down-regulated in biofilm-dwelling cells compared to their planktonic counterparts7,8. Moreover, no biofilm-specific gene has been identified so far9, suggesting that the key properties of biofilms might emerge from the subtle interplay between the unique physico-chemical environment of the cells within the biofilm and the elicited biological responses. In addition, a central feature of biofilms is their structural, chemical and biological heterogeneity at the microscale10,11, a property reflexively interrelated with the multiple gradients of nutrients, metabolites, oxygen and others molecules or ions present in a biofilm. Therefore, biofilm description relying on data averaging on the whole population is blurred and the clarification of the mechanisms behind the development of thriving adherent bacterial communities requires spatially-resolved approaches. Thus, biofilm quantitative descriptors of both gene expression and physico-chemical parameters should be probed with a spatial resolution allowing to take into account the biofilm heterogeneity and its implications for the biofilm growth. The advances in genetically encoded fluorescent proteins12 led to the development of fluorescence microscopy approaches for biofilm imaging13. Providing in principle molecular specificity, temporal and spatial resolution in living cells, the popular green fluorescent protein (GFP) and its variants have been broadly used for two decades now to monitor gene expression, label specific strains14,15,16,17,18,19,20, or measure specific functions in living biofilms21,22,23,24,25. However, quantitative analysis and studies in biofilms may be hampered by the sensitivity of the fluorescence of fluorescent proteins to oxygen level. Indeed, the final step of the chromophore maturation, which confers the ability to fluoresce to the protein, involves an oxygen-dependent dehydrogenation step requiring a minimal level of molecular oxygen26,27. Meanwhile, into biofilms, the spatio-temporal distribution of O2 which results from the balance of intermingled diffusion and consumption processes, is heterogeneous, poorly characterized and very dependent on the environmental conditions and the biofilm stage.

In this paper, we present the quantitative investigation of the spatio-temporal fluorescence profiles of two fluorescent proteins, GFP and mCherry, constitutively expressed in biofilms of Escherichia coli grown under controlled fluid flow. We show that both GFP and mCherry exhibit fluorescence kinetics quickly becoming inconsistent with the cell biomass development. By contrast, the spatio-temporal fluorescence profiles appeared to closely match the oxygen shortage that arises as the biofilm develops.

To circumvent this problem, we tested the ability of a new small protein tag, FAST (Fluorescence-Activating and absorption-Shifting Tag), to report linearly on gene expression in oxygen-deficient biofilms. Engineered by directed evolution, FAST holds its fluorescence from the dynamic and fully reversible binding of a small synthetic fluorogenic chromophore (so-called fluorogen)28. This process involves no oxidation step, allowing to anticipate no influence of the oxygen concentration on the fluorescence levels. By monitoring the spatio-temporal distribution of GFP and FAST fluorescence in the same biofilm growing under flow, we showed that the signal of the two proteins displays remarkably distinct spatial distributions and kinetics soon after biofilm starts to grow. Our findings also showed that in a mature biofilm FAST reports biomass spatial heterogeneity while GFP does not. Compared to micro-optical density measurements (µOD), previously shown to linearly report biofilm growth in a limited range of values29, FAST fluorescence outperformed µOD saturation, exhibiting an exponential increase well beyond µOD signal inflexion. Using fluorogens with different spectral properties, we achieved biofilm labelling at distinct wavelengths and obtained similar results in experiments with the red fluorescent protein mCherry.

Altogether, our results demonstrate that the highly heterogeneous spatial and temporal distribution of oxygen in the biofilm strongly affects the fluorescence of classical GFP-like fluorescent proteins and therefore severely impaired the quantitative in situ measurement and interpretation of gene expression within living biofilms. The recently developed small protein tag, FAST28, which fluoresces in the presence of an exogenously applied fluorogenic dye, offers an outstanding answer to this issue, enabling accurate measurement of gene expression in biofilms, irrespectively of the oxygen gradients.


Spatio-temporal distribution of GFP fluorescence does not linearly report on gene expression

To quantitatively evaluate the spatio-temporal distribution of the most classical genetic reporter—GFP—in the confined environment of an adherent bacterial community, we grew a biofilm of E. coli cells constitutively expressing the pilus F that promotes biofilm formation and the fluorescent protein GFP (GFPmut3) in a PDMS channel continuously supplied with growth medium at a flow rate of 1 mL/h. The growing biofilm was monitored by collecting bright field and fluorescence images at a frequency of 12 images per hour (1 image every 5 min). As previously shown, the bright field images can be converted in microscopic optical density (µOD) values, which linearly reported cell biomass29. GFP fluorescence intensity (IGFP) and µOD were derived from the image stack reporting the first 24 hours of the biofilm growth. For each image (Fig. 1A), the mean values of intensity were averaged either over the whole field of view — Rfull — or over smaller regions of interest (ROIs) located on the edge or in the centre of the channel, so called Redge and Rcentre as shown in Fig. 1B. Our first striking observation was that IGFP and µOD kinetics, which initially overlapped, strongly diverged after 5 hours of growth of the biofilm. While IGFP curve saturated, µOD kept on increasing (Figs 1C and S1). Interestingly, the IGFP kinetics strongly depended, both in shape and intensity, on the localization of the ROI with respect to the channel edge (Figs 1C and S1). To better characterize this behavior, we plotted IGFP as a function of µOD (Fig. 2) for two ROIs, one at the edge and one in the centre of the channel. We observed that IGFP deviation to linearity occurred for µOD values decreasing by four-fold from the edge to the centre of the channel. Our observations indicated that above a given biofilm development point, the amount of fluorescent proteins synthesized by cells no longer matched the number of cells reported by the µOD, contrarily to what is expected from a protein produced by a constitutively expressed gene. This discrepancy appears more strongly and quickly when the cells are further away from the edge of the channel while, under the hydrodynamical conditions used, no significant difference in biomass amount was measured between the edge and the centre of the channel. This suggested that an environmental parameter asymmetrically distributed in the channel affected the reporter fluorescence.

Figure 1

GFP fluorescence intensity in a living biofilm of E. coli displays unexpected spatial gradients and kinetics. (A) Brightfield (upper panel) and fluorescence (lower panel) images of an E. coli biofilm at the channel side wall vicinity after 24 hours growth under a continuous 1 ml/h nutrient flow. (B) Sketch of the square (1 mm × 1mm) PDMS channel, 3 cm length mounted on a microscope stage for real time imaging of biofilm light transmission and fluorescence. A 330 \(\times \) 430 µm2 field of view is imaged using a 20\(\times \) objective. Defined regions of interest, Redge, Rfull and Rcentre are taken as shown in the bottom panel. (C) Plot of the fluorescence mean intensity per pixel kinetics (left axis) of the ROIs: Redge (bright green), Rfull (pale green) and Rcentre (grey) optical density together with the microscopic optical density, µOD = ln (I0/I) (right axis) of the ROI Rfull (dashed blue line). Bottom panel shows a zoom of the first ten hours with the same colour code. For the sake of clarity, only the µOD curve corresponding to a Rfull type ROI is shown. µOD curves from Redge or Rcentre, essentially superimposable to Rfull ones, are shown in Fig. S1 (Suppplementary Information) which also gives the statistical dispersion of fluorescence and µOD curves coming from distinct experiments.

Figure 2

GFP fluorescence relation to biomass displays strong spatial heterogeneity. Fluorescence intensity is plotted as a function of the microscopic optical density, µOD for the channel edge (bright green line) and centre (grey line) ROIs. Dashed lines indicate the fluorescence versus biomass linearity domains for the two ROIs and point to the corresponding µOD values. The ROIs are defined as indicated in Fig. 1.

To better understand the temporal variation of the fluorescence, we measured the evolution of fluorescence in two concentric ROIs of different sizes in the middle of the channel as shown in Fig. 3. The smaller ROI was drawn around an initial cluster of a few cells and the larger one contained a higher number of cells distributed over several clusters within the ROI. Then, we considered the mean fluorescence from each ROI, i.e. the total fluorescence divided by the number of pixels. Interestingly, the fluorescence intensity of the two ROIs displayed very distinct regime changes after about 12 hours of biofilm growth. The signal from the small ROI exhibited a steep fluorescence decrease while the one from the larger ROI remained essentially constant. In the meantime, the µOD signal in the considered ROI increased exponentially, in agreement with the 3D growth of the biofilm. This behaviour indicated that, at the critical time \({\tau }_{c}\) of the fluorescence regime change, the mean fluorescence of single cells decreased while the total fluorescence of the cell population remained constant. In other words, after the time \({\tau }_{c}\), a dilution phase starts where new fluorescent proteins are no longer produced, the daughter cells sharing then fluorescent proteins synthesized in the initial regime (the production phase). So, the fluorescence of the small ROI decreased due to the spread of the initial cluster lineage beyond the limit of the ROI and the dilution of the fluorescent proteins, produced before the time \({\tau }_{c}\), out of the small ROI. Meanwhile the larger ROI, which contained the descendant cells of these initial clusters, displayed a constant global pool of fluorescent proteins although diluted within an increasing number of cells.

Figure 3

Biofilm growth kinetics displays a critical point where fluorescent protein production stops. (A) Images of a field of view, located in the middle of channel of an E. coli MG1655-gfp-F biofilm, taken at 6; 10; 16 and 20 hours after biofilm initiation (upper row) and showing both the cell fluorescence and the drawing of two types of ROIs of different size, the small one (red) and the larger one (cyan). The lower row sketches the principle of the small versus large ROI comparison — the small ROI being overpassed during the biofilm growth while the large one contains all the cells descending from the initial cluster lineage. (B) GFP fluorescence (left axis) kinetics is shown for the small (red curve) and large (cyan curve) ROIs together with µOD signals (dark grey for the small ROI and light grey for the large ROI). The fluorescence intensity per pixel is averaged over the considered ROI. Data from different sets of ROIs are shown in supplementary Fig. S1 attesting the statistical accuracy of the observation.

GFP fluorescence in a growing biofilm is strongly impacted by the heterogeneous O2 concentration

At that stage, we made the hypothesis that the GFP fluorescence in the biofilm was strictly controlled by a threshold level of molecular oxygen below which the final oxidation step of the GFP chromophore maturation did not occur. We hypothesized that, when the biofilm grows and the cell oxygen consumption increases, the level of oxygen in the channel decreases below the threshold required for effective GFP fluorescence maturation. To test this hypothesis, we measured the spatial distribution of oxygen in a mature biofilm after approx. 20 hours of growth using micelles functionalized with fluorescent Ruthenium complex displaying oxygen-dependent fluorescence lifetime.

Biofilms were incubated with Ruthenium micelles and imaged by fluorescence lifetime microscopy (Fig. 4A) to derive oxygen spatial distribution (Fig. 4B) in the region extending from the edge to the centre of the channel. Control experiment performed in the absence of biofilm exhibited homogeneous O2 distribution in the whole channel (SI, Fig. S2). Then, we compared the O2 spatial distribution displayed in the presence of biofilm with that of IGFP and µOD measured under the same conditions (Fig. 4C,D). We found that IGFP and O2 spatial distributions displayed similar profiles with both high fluorescence and high oxygen levels close to the edge of channel (Fig. 4B,E) and low levels at the centre of the channel. In the meantime, cell biomass displayed no significant gradient from the edge to the centre of the channel (Fig. 4D,E). The O2 gradient was consistent with the expected permeability of PDMS to oxygen. This was further confirmed by observing biofilms grown in glass channels with O2-impermeable edges, in which a uniform low level of fluorescence was observed in the channel (SI, Fig. S3).

Figure 4

Within the living biofilm, the steep lateral gradient of GFP fluorescence matches the lateral gradient of oxygen concentration. (A) Fluorescence lifetime image of a mature biofilm of E. coli MG1655-gfp-F, grown during 20 hours, continuously supplied with a 1 ml/h medium flow containing Ruthenium micelles at a final Ruthenium concentration of 8 µM. The field of view extends from the edge to the centre of the channel and captures 500 µm of the channel length and captures a biofilm layer 7 ± 2 µm thick close to the bottom of the channel. The colour bar is in nanoseconds. (B) Spatial molar oxygen concentration distribution as extracted from the lifetime image by averaging 3 contiguous lines of pixels for Ruthenium micelles alone (grey dots) or in the presence of the biofilm (red dots). (C,D) shows the spatial distribution of the GFP fluorescence (C) and µOD (D) for an equivalent biofilm with the graph (E) of the values taken on each image along the same y line on these two images.

Surprisingly, these results showed that after 20 hours of growth, colonization has expanded evenly over the channel, independently of the O2 access suggesting that the biofilm growth was not affected by O2 shortage. However, biomass transport and rearrangements during biofilm development could also account for this smooth topography.

These results emphasize the complexity of interpreting GFP fluorescence in a growing biofilm, due to the strong dependence of the fluorescence intensity on oxygen concentration, itself depending, in the biofilm, on local cell concentration and on the distance to the main oxygen sources in the considered devices, typically close to the edge of the channel for PDMS devices but also close to the channel connectors for devices made of materials with lower permeability to O2 such as for example glass or polystyrene30. Therefore, the fluorescence intensity is inconsistent with the biomass, unlike expected for a reporter under the control of a constitutive promoter. The O2 requirement for dehydrogenating the α, ß bond of the protein Tyr-66 residue during GFP fluorescence maturation has been pointed out early by Tsien, who indicated that the protein could not be used in obligate anaerobes27. Here, we show that GFP fails to fluoresce when the oxygen level of the environment drops below a threshold which is quickly achieved in a growing biofilm.

mCherry fluorescence also exhibits a severe non-linearity in a growing biofilm

To generalize our statement, we examined the fluorescence kinetics in a growing biofilm expressing the red fluorescent protein mCherry derived from Discosoma sp. Red (DsRed) fluorescent protein. As for GFP, mCherry expression was under the control of the promoter PR, an E. coli constitutive promoter, allowing to obtain expression that varies as cell biomass. In parallel channels, we initiated the growth of biofilms with cells expressing GFP and mCherry, respectively. We monitored fluorescence and µOD signal kinetics along the biofilm growth and plotted for both reporters the variation of the fluorescence amplitude as a function of the µOD derived from the same images (Fig. 5). We found that mCherry fluorescence also levelled off early in the biofilm development and that this saturation occurred for values of µOD as low as 0.03 while GFP fluorescence remained strictly co-linear up to µOD equal to 0.085. This result was in agreement with the larger sensitivity of mCherry to O2 shortage due to the two oxidation steps involved in the maturation of mCherry chromophore.

Figure 5

mCherry fluorescence saturates prior to GFP along the biofilm development. Variation of the fluorescence of mCherry versus GFP on parallel biofilms grown from E. coli MG1655-F-FAST-mCherry (red curve) and MG1655-gfp-F-FAST (green curve) under the same conditions. Fluorescence intensity per pixel is averaged over a central identical position in each channel. The dashed arrows indicate the fluorescence regime change and the corresponding values of µOD.

We concluded that fluorescent proteins relying on a O2-dependent chromophore maturation could not be used as quantitative tracers in living bacterial biofilms, in which the level of oxygen is low and heterogeneous.

FAST outperforms GFP and mCherry in the complex environment of a living biofilm

To circumvent the oxygen dependence of classical fluorescent proteins, we tested FAST, a new fluorescent marker recently developed for labelling fusion proteins in living cells and organisms. FAST is a protein of 14 kDa engineered from the photoactive yellow protein (PYP) from Halorhodospira halophila to bind and activate the fluorescence of synthetic fluorogenic analogues of hydroxybenzylidene rhodanine (HBR). Because they fluoresce only when immobilized within FAST (because of conformational locking), HBR analogues do not exhibit nonspecific fluorescence in cells, enabling to detect FAST without the need for washing. FAST was shown to be functional in various expression systems including bacteria. As its fluorescence depends only on the interaction of the protein with its cognate fluorogen, FAST is fluorescent – provided that the fluorogen is present – whatever the oxygen level. In addition, an important feature of FAST is the ability to tune its emission colour from green-yellow to orange-red by changing the applied fluorogen, providing an experimental versatility not encountered with GFP-like fluorescent proteins. In a first set of experiments, we built a biofilm with MG1655-gfp-F cells transformed to constitutively express both GFP and FAST (see Materials and Methods). We supplied the fluorogen HBR-3,5-DOM at 2 µM in the biofilm growth medium to form an orange-red fluorescent FAST detected in the ‘red’ channel (593/40 nm) while GFP fluorescence was collected in the ‘green’ channel (536/25 nm), having first checked that the presence of the fluorogenic dye did not altered bacteria growth rate (SI, Fig. S4) and that no background fluorescence was induced in the biofilm by the fluorogens in the absence of FAST expression (SI, Fig. S4). The expression of FAST and GFP, monitored in the same biofilm, displayed quite distinct fluorescence kinetics (Fig. 6). GFP signal saturated after approx. 5 hours growth while FAST fluorescence increased exponentially up to 20 hours. In between, µOD signal levelled off after 13 hours of growth as expected due to the saturation of the detection for µOD values above 0.5. Interestingly, within the first 5 hours of the biofilm development, the three signals increased exponentially with the same kinetic constant, 0.39 ± 0.02 h−1, showing parallel report of biomass and fluorescence over this initial time period (Fig. 6 insert).

Figure 6

FAST-HBR-3,5-DOM, glowing in red, outperforms both GFP and µOD signal in a living biofilm. GFP (green line) and FAST-HBR-3,5-DOM (red line) fluorescence kinetics shown together with µOD (dashed blue line) signal all obtained from the analysis of a central ROI of the same biofilm of E. coli MG1655-gfp-F-FAST. All the curves have been normalized to unit at time t = 5 h. The adjustment of the experimental curves to exponential increases are shown as dotted lines of the same colour as the data lines. The insert shows a zoom of the GFP signal with the exponential adjustment of the µOD and FAST-HBR-3,5-DOM kinetics.

We also examined the efficiency of the FAST protein in combination with another fluorogen, HBR-2,5-DM which emits in the green channel. We tested FAST:HBR-2,5-DM against mCherry, using MG1655-F cells transformed to constitutively express a mCherry-FAST fusion (see Materials and Methods). We grew biofilms in the presence of 2 µM HBR-2,5-DM in the medium flow and we collected time-lapse fluorescence and µOD images. mCherry and FAST fluorescence signals (Fig. 7A) diverged early during biofilm development as expected from the results displayed above regarding the dissimilarity between mCherry and GFP saturation stages (see Fig. 5). FAST:HBR-2,5-DM complex behaved quite similarly to FAST:HBR-3,5-DOM, increasing exponentially for several hours after mCherry saturation point. Fluorescence images acquired using exposure times enabling the capture of the whole FAST:HBR-2,5-DM fluorescence dynamics show the colour shift induced by mCherry saturation (Fig. 7B and movie S1) whereas FAST:fluorogen exhibits photophysical properties comparable to mCherry (Supplementary Information, Table S1).

Figure 7

FAST, glowing in green with HBR-2,5-DM, early outperforms m-Cherry in a living biofilm. (A) mCherry (red line) and FAST-HBR-2,5-DM (green line) fluorescence intensity kinetics from a growing E. coli MG1655-F expressing the FAST-mCherry fusion protein. The signal on the graph has been normalized to unit at time t = 2 h which corresponds to mCherry saturation time. The insert shows a zoom in of the first five hours of the biofilm growth. (B) Overlay of mCherry and FAST fluorescence images collected of different times of the biofilm growth. Image acquisition time in each channel was chosen to capture the whole signal dynamics inducing a striking colour switch from the mCherry red emission, dominating the signal in the first 2 hours of the growth, to the yellow-green emission of FAST which largely overpasses mCherry’s after a few hours of growth.

We conclude that the FAST:fluorogen complexes are efficient and accurate reporters in the heterogeneous and low-O2 context of a growing biofilm.

As FAST enabled quantitative fluorescence measurements beyond the development limits imposed by µOD signal saturation, it also provided a longer time scale to determine biofilm cell biomass growth rate. We made this analysis for several characteristic edge and centre regions using exponential adjustment of the FAST fluorescence intensity versus time curves, \({{I}_{{FAST}}={I}_{0}e}^{{kt}}\) to derive k, the biofilm growth rate. Figure 8 shows the plot of k for the different ROIs together with the saturation value of GFP at the same location which reflected the amplitude of the lack of O2 as shown above. Interestingly, we observed that O2 shortage which caused GFP fluorescence failure did not affect biofilm growth rate (Fig. 8). This means that the reduction of oxygen concentration, although blocking oxygen-sensitive reactions such as those controlling GFP or mCherry fluorescence, does not alter significantly biofilm growth.

Figure 8

Biofilm growth rate is not affected by the local concentration of oxygen. (A) Biofilm growth rates derived from exponential adjustment of the FAST kinetics in an E. coli MG1655-gfp-F-FAST growing biofilm (grey bars, right axis) together with the saturation value of GFP fluorescence at the distinct channel locations. (B) Channel positions sketch.

Discussion and Conclusions

Bacterial biofilm research currently goes through a rapid-fire expansion due to the diversity and the complexity of the questions raised by such a living community and its tremendous impact on our human lives and natural environment. Here, we focus our attention on real time optical imaging of biofilms with the aim of observing the dynamics of the adherent community in situ with a high spatio-temporal resolution. In this context, quantitative microscopy is essential and very promising, but raises the issue of accurate reporting. This study interrogated the use of genetically encoded fluorescent reporters of the GFP family to image living biofilm. We show that GFP and mCherry exhibit high sensitivity to the local level of oxygen. This oxygen sensitivity, which prevents the use of GFP-like fluorescent proteins under anaerobic conditions as originally reported by Tsien and co-workers, is experienced for an O2 level threshold rapidly reached under the concentrated and confined conditions of a growing biofilm, even under continuous flow. This leads to a spatial distribution of fluorescence intensities that depend on both the number of fluorescent cells and the local O2 concentration but also on the history of cells involving the number of cell divisions or biomass transport processes.

We show here results obtained with GFP and mCherry, although we also observed similar behaviours using YFP, Venus or mKate2 (data not shown). This O2-dependence is critical given that O2 distribution within a living bacterial biofilm depends a lot on the biofilm growth conditions such as the geometry of the setup, the O2 permeability of the device material, the flow rate which controls the amount of advected O2 but also all the conditions that will impact cell division rate and consequently cell consumption of O2 such as growth medium or temperature. The topography of the biofilm development also plays a role. Thus, oxygen distribution is hardly predictable in such complex systems. Nevertheless, considering the bacterial O2 consumption given in Riedel et al.31 for an exponentially growing population of E. coli, i.e. 1.7 × 106 molec./s and an O2 medium concentration equal to 3 × 1022 molec./m3, we can calculate that the O2 contained in a cubic micro-volume of 100 µm side length in equilibrium with an atmospheric pressure of O2 or at the contact of a PDMS interface itself in equilibrium with atmosphere32, is fully consumed in less than 2 s by 104 bacterial cells, which corresponds to a 20 µm thick layer of cells at a 20% volume fraction on a 100 µm side square. Besides, using an O2 diffusion coefficient in water of 3 × 10−9 m2/s, it can also be evaluated that the characteristic time for an O2 molecule to leave the 100 µm side cubic micro-volume is about 6 s. This emphasizes the high degree of O2 consumption by the bacteria in the confined environment of a growing biofilm, in agreement with the severe gradient of O2 observed in the channel for a mature biofilm. It is also worthwhile to consider the amount of O2 advected by the flow working at 1 ml/h. Using the same O2 concentration and consumption values as above, it can be shown that the 1013 molec./s contributed by the flow in the whole channel are fully consumed by a mature biofilm, underlining the micro-aerobic environment that should be expected in a millifluidic channel impermeable to gas such as a glass channel but also the key role of the oxygen diffusing by the channel wall in a PDMS device. However, it should also be kept in mind that bacterial oxygen consumption is expected to fluctuate a lot depending on many environmental and physiological parameters.

Therefore, quantitative interpretation of the fluorescence intensity of GFP and its homologs is not possible in a living biofilm. We propose here an alternative approach based on FAST, a small inducible chemical-genetic fluorescent marker composed of a protein part interacting reversibly with an exogenously applied fluorogenic chromophore that is non-fluorescent until labelling occurs. Fluorescence arises from the conformational locking of the fluorogenic chromophore within the binding cavity of FAST28,33,34. This unique fluorescence activation mechanism does not require molecular oxygen, making FAST a very good candidate for imaging proteins and cells in low-O2 environments. We demonstrate here that the FAST:fluorogen complexes efficiently labelled the biofilm, the small fluorogenic dyes diffusing freely and quickly in the biofilm. FAST allowed the reporting of exponential bacterial biofilm growth in flow at development stages where both GFP or mCherry fluorescence signal plateaued or decayed for hours. The ability to vary FAST colour changing the applied fluorogen opens exciting possibilities for various combinations with classical proteins. Indeed, beyond the measurement of a given gene expression per se, using the FAST system in combination with colour-complementing prototypical FP should allow real time monitoring of O2 variations in ratio mode. Moreover, assuming effectively that below a given O2 concentration threshold, no more fluorescent protein is produced and the cells are sharing the pre-existing pool could allow one to deduce the number of cell division number occurring locally by considering the FAST/FP fluorescence ratio to calculate the FP dilution factor.

Other families of non-prototypical genetically encoded proteins have emerged in the recent years35. Although O2-independent, due to their fluorogen-activated fluorescence, they show little irrigation of the microbe imaging field compared to the iconic GFP and none has been implemented in biofilm characterizations to the best of our knowledge. The LOV family proteins36,37,38 which fluoresce upon flavin binding detain photophysical properties, interesting for metallic ions or oxygen singlet biosensing but potentially restrictive for gene reporting, which possibly explains its limited spread. UnaG, a recently discovered protein39 from the Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica, fluoresces upon bilirubin binding in an O2-independent mechanism. Starting to be used in mammals as a hypoxia reporter and serum bilirubin sensor40, it might also offer an interesting tool for biofilm investigations.

The work we present here aims at stressing the absolute necessity to implement, in quantitative imaging studies dedicated to biofilms, fluorescent reporters displaying robust fluorescence whatever the local O2 level in order to be able to use the fluorescence signal as an accurate reporter of the protein expression level. We show that this is not the case for the classical FPs such as GFP because of their oxygen-dependent fluorescence and we propose an alternative method based on the system FAST that we successfully implemented in an E. coli biofilm. Further developments of multicolour orthogonal tag:fluorogen pairs should enable the study of multispecies biofilms.

Materials and Methods

Plasmids, strains and fluorogens


pAG87pR and pAG101pR were engineered from pAG87 and pAG101 described in Plamont et al.28 to replace T7 promoter with the lambda promoter pR for the expression of FAST and FAST-mCherry fusion in E. coli (details in SI). FAST is a variant of the photoactive yellow protein (PYP) containing the mutations C69G, Y94W, T95M, F96I, D97P, Y98T, Q99S, M100R, T101G28.


We used an E. coli MG1655-F strain carrying a non-conjugative F pilus plasmid to promote biofilm formation41 and its fluorescent variant, MG1655-gfp-F carrying gfp-mut3 gene inserted on the chromosome under the control of the lambda-promoter pR. These strains were transformed with pAG101pR and pAG87pR, respectively, providing MG1655-F-FAST-mCherry which expressed the FAST-mCherry fusion protein and MG1655-gfp-F-FAST which expressed GFP and FAST proteins separately (details in SI).


FAST fluorescence was activated using synthetic fluorogenic analogues of hydroxybenzylidene rhodanine (HBR) prepared as previously described28,34. We used HBR-2,5-DM (4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethylbenzylidene rhodanine) that fluoresces green light under blue light excitation when bound to FAST and HBR-3,5-DOM (4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxybenzylidene rhodanine), that fluoresces red light under green light excitation when bound to FAST.

Microfabrication and biofilm

Millifluidic device

Millifluidic polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) channels of 30 mm in length, 1 mm in width and height were micro-fabricated and bound to glass coverslips using oxygen plasma activation of the surfaces. Stainless steel connectors (0.013″ ID and 0.025″ OD) and microbore Tygon tubing (0.020″ ID and 0.06″ OD) supplied by Phymep (France) were used to connect fluid flow as described into more details previously29. The medium was pushed into the channels at a controlled rate using syringe pumps. When specifically required, we also used square glass capillaries, 800-µm internal-side (Composite Metal Services, Shipley, UK).

Biofilm growth

All cultures were performed from LB agar plate colonies grown overnight in LB medium at 37 °C in an agitated Erlenmeyer flask in the presence of 7.5 µg/ml tetracycline, then diluted in M63B1 minimal medium supplemented with 0.4% glucose to provide an exponentially growing culture with an OD600 equal to 0.2 after a few hours incubation at 37 °C. Biofilm growth was then initiated by injecting — approx. 3 × 106 cells — of exponentially growing cells with an optical density at 600 nm equal to 0.2 in the channel and allowing static settlement for 90 min before starting culture medium flow at 1 ml/h and imaging bacterial development in the channel. The whole experiment was thermostated at 37 °C.



We used an inverted NIKON TE300 microscope equipped with motorized x, y, z displacements and shutters. Images were collected using a 20× S plan Fluor objective, NA 0.45 WD 8.2–6.9. Bright field images were collected in direct illumination (no phase). Fluorescence acquisitions were performed using either the green channel filters for GFP and FAST:HBR-2,5-DM (Ex. 482/35, DM 506 Em. FF01-536/40) or the red ones for mCherry and FAST:HBR-3,5-DOM (Ex 531/40 nm DM 562 Em. 593/40). This last filter set corresponds to a compromise enabling to detect both HBR-3,5 and mCherry on the same optical path although not capturing the optimal excitation and emission wavelengths. Excitation was performed using a LEDs box (CoolLed pE 4000).

Image acquisition

We used a Hamamatsu ORCA-R2 EMCCD camera for time-lapse acquisitions of 1344 × 1024 pixels images with 12 bits grey level depth (4096 grey levels) and captured an xy field of view of 330 µm × 430 µm. Bright field and fluorescence images were usually collected for 24 hours at the frequency of 12 frames per hour. Excitation LEDs were set at a 50% power level and exposure times were 50 ms or 500 ms for the green emissions and 800 ms for the red emissions.

Image analysis

Image intensity per pixel averaged on defined regions of interest (ROIs) was collected using the NIKON proprietary software NIS. The data sheets edited by NIS were next exported to Matlab for further analysis of the biofilm development kinetics and growth parameters determination. Microscopic optical density (µOD) was derived from transmitted light images according to µOD = ln (I0/I), where I0 is the intensity (averaged gray level per pixel) recorded on a channel filled with medium only and I the intensity recorded on a channel containing a growing biofilm29, the presence of which attenuates incident light transmission. Fluorescence intensities were subtracted for their respective background using the contribution to the fluorescence intensity of a channel of medium in the absence of bacteria.

All curves are representative of three independent replicates. The statistical dispersion of the data is given in Fig. S1 where equivalent data coming from distinct positions and distinct experiments are shown. When numerical values are presented, they are given with a confidence interval which is the standard deviation of three equivalent measurements.

Oxygen measurement

FLIM imaging

Lifetime images were acquired using a wide field frequency domain fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FD-FLIM) setup, and a single plane illumination (SPIM) obtained using a beam expander and a cylindrical lens 45 mm of focal length. The thickness of the illuminated plane was determined to be 7 ± 2 µm in the object plane of the microscope. The setup was equipped with a 445 nm laser diode module and an intensified CCD camera that can both be modulated synchronously from 0.1 to 200 MHz. Fluorescence lifetime was derived from the phase shift and relative modulation of the fluorescence sample when compared with a reference sample of known lifetime — here a hypericin solution, 3 ns lifetime.

Oxygen probe

Dissolved O2 was measured by quenching a Ruthenium complex (Ruthenium–tris(4,7- diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline) dichloride (Ru(dpp)); Fluka) encapsulated in micelles of (1,2-Dipalmitoyl–sn-Glycero-3-Phosphoethanolamine-N[Methoxy(Poly-ethylene glycol)-2000] (DMPC-PEG2000) phospholipids; Avanti. The encapsulation of the Ru(dpp) complex in the micelles42 yields it biocompatible whereas free Ru(dpp) is strongly toxic for cells. Ru–micelles were added to the millifluidic channels with or without biofilm at a concentration of 8 μM for fluorescence lifetime imaging. Oxygen level was converted from fluorescence lifetime values using the Stern-Volmer relation43 and values of the quenching constant and of the zero-oxygen lifetime equal to 4.33 × 104 M−1 and 3809 ns, respectively.


  1. 1.

    Watnick, P. & Kolter, R. Biofilm, city of microbes. J Bacteriol 182, 2675–2679 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lopez, D., Vlamakis, H. & Kolter, R. Biofilms. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2 (2010).

  3. 3.

    Hall-Stoodley, L. & Stoodley, P. Evolving concepts in biofilm infections. Cell Microbiol 11, 1034–1043 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S. & Greenberg, E. P. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284, 1318–1322 (1999).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Flemming, H. C. et al. Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life. Nat Rev Microbiol 14, 563–575 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Persat, A. et al. The mechanical world of bacteria. Cell 161, 988–997 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Schembri, M. A., Kjaergaard, K. & Klemm, P. Global gene expression in Escherichia coli biofilms. Mol Microbiol 48, 253–267 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wood, T. K. Insights on Escherichia coli biofilm formation and inhibition from whole-transcriptome profiling. Environ Microbiol 11, 1–15 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lazazzera, B. A. Lessons from DNA microarray analysis: the gene expression profile of biofilms. Curr Opin Microbiol 8, 222–227 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Stewart, P. S. & Franklin, M. J. Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms. Nat Rev Microbiol 6, 199–210 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Koo, H., Allan, R. N., Howlin, R. P., Stoodley, P. & Hall-Stoodley, L. Targeting microbial biofilms: current and prospective therapeutic strategies. Nat Rev Microbiol (2017).

  12. 12.

    Giepmans, B. N., Adams, S. R., Ellisman, M. H. & Tsien, R. Y. The fluorescent toolbox for assessing protein location and function. Science (New York, N.Y) 312, 217–224 (2006).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Neu, T. R. et al. Advanced imaging techniques for assessment of structure, composition and function in biofilm systems. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 72, 1–21 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hoiby, N., Bjarnsholt, T., Givskov, M., Molin, S. & Ciofu, O. Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms. Int J Antimicrob Agents 35, 322–332 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Moller, S. et al. In situ gene expression in mixed-culture biofilms: evidence of metabolic interactions between community members. Appl Environ Microbiol 64, 721–732 (1998).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Christensen, B. B. et al. Establishment of new genetic traits in a microbial biofilm community. Appl Environ Microbiol 64, 2247–2255 (1998).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bridier, A., Briandet, R., Bouchez, T. & Jabot, F. A model-based approach to detect interspecific interactions during biofilm development. Biofouling 30, 761–771 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Klausen, M., Aaes-Jorgensen, A., Molin, S. & Tolker-Nielsen, T. Involvement of bacterial migration in the development of complex multicellular structures in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Mol Microbiol 50, 61–68 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Sanchez-Vizuete, P. et al. Identification of ypqP as a New Bacillus subtilis biofilm determinant that mediates the protection of Staphylococcus aureus against antimicrobial agents in mixed-species communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 81, 109–118 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Vidakovic, L., Singh, P. K., Hartmann, R., Nadell, C. D. & Drescher, K. Dynamic biofilm architecture confers individual and collective mechanisms of viral protection. Nat Microbiol (2017).

  21. 21.

    Andersen, J. B. et al. gfp-based N-acyl homoserine-lactone sensor systems for detection of bacterial communication. Appl Environ Microbiol 67, 575–585 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sternberg, C. et al. Distribution of bacterial growth activity in flow-chamber biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 65, 4108–4117 (1999).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Rybtke, M. T. et al. Fluorescence-based reporter for gauging cyclic di-GMP levels in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl Environ Microbiol 78, 5060–5069 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kim, M. K., Ingremeau, F., Zhao, A., Bassler, B. L. & Stone, H. A. Local and global consequences of flow on bacterial quorum sensing. Nat Microbiol 1, 15005 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Nair, H. A., Periasamy, S., Yang, L., Kjelleberg, S. & Rice, S. A. Real Time, Spatial, and Temporal Mapping of the Distribution of c-di-GMP during Biofilm Development. J Biol Chem 292, 477–487 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Heim, R., Prasher, D. C. & Tsien, R. Y. Wavelength mutations and posttranslational autoxidation of green fluorescent protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91, 12501–12504 (1994).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Tsien, R. Y. The green fluorescent protein. Annu Rev Biochem 67, 509–544 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Plamont, M. A. et al. Small fluorescence-activating and absorption-shifting tag for tunable protein imaging in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113, 497–502 (2016).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Thomen, P. et al. Bacterial biofilm under flow: First a physical struggle to stay, then a matter of breathing. PLoS ONE 12, e0175197 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ochs, C. J., Kasuya, J., Pavesi, A. & Kamm, R. D. Oxygen levels in thermoplastic microfluidic devices during cell culture. Lab Chip 14, 459–462 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Riedel, T. E., Berelson, W. M., Nealson, K. H. & Finkel, S. E. Oxygen consumption rates of bacteria under nutrient-limited conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 79, 4921–4931 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Shiku, H. et al. Oxygen Permeability of Surface-modified Poly(dimethylsiloxane) Characterized by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. Chemistry Letters 35, 234–235 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Li, C. et al. Design and characterization of red fluorogenic push-pull chromophores holding great potential for bioimaging and biosensing. Org Biomol Chem 14, 9253–9261 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Li, C. et al. Dynamic multicolor protein labeling in living cells. Chem Sci 8, 5598–5605 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Rodriguez, E. A. et al. The Growing and Glowing Toolbox of Fluorescent and Photoactive Proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 42, 111–129 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Buckley, A. M., Petersen, J., Roe, A. J., Douce, G. R. & Christie, J. M. LOV-based reporters for fluorescence imaging. Curr Opin Chem Biol 27, 39–45 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Drepper, T. et al. Reporter proteins for in vivo fluorescence without oxygen. Nat Biotechnol 25, 443–445 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Drepper, T. et al. Flavin mononucleotide-based fluorescent reporter proteins outperform green fluorescent protein-like proteins as quantitative in vivo real-time reporters. Appl Environ Microbiol 76, 5990–5994 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kumagai, A. et al. A bilirubin-inducible fluorescent protein from eel muscle. Cell 153, 1602–1611 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Erapaneedi, R., Belousov, V. V., Schafers, M. & Kiefer, F. A novel family of fluorescent hypoxia sensors reveal strong heterogeneity in tumor hypoxia at the cellular level. EMBO J 35, 102–113 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ghigo, J. M. Natural conjugative plasmids induce bacterial biofilm development. Nature 412, 442–445 (2001).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Douarche, C., Buguin, A., Salman, H. & Libchaber, A. E. Coli and oxygen: a motility transition. Phys Rev Lett 102, 198101 (2009).

  43. 43.

    Sud, D., Zhong, W., Beer, D. G. & Mycek, M. A. Time-resolved optical imaging provides a molecular snapshot of altered metabolic function in living human cancer cell models. Opt Express 14, 4412–4426 (2006).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The work was supported in part by a grant from French Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR-15-CE02-0001-01 ACToP).

Author information




A.M., P.T., H.J., F.S. and N.H. performed experiments, J.F.C., C.D. C.L. and M.A.P. provided experiment material, A.G., P.T. and N.H. designed experiments and supervised the work N.H. wrote the manuscript text. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nelly Henry.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Monmeyran, A., Thomen, P., Jonquière, H. et al. The inducible chemical-genetic fluorescent marker FAST outperforms classical fluorescent proteins in the quantitative reporting of bacterial biofilm dynamics. Sci Rep 8, 10336 (2018).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links