Authentication of Garcinia fruits and food supplements using DNA barcoding and NMR spectroscopy

Abstract

Garcinia L. (Clusiaceae) fruits are a rich source of (−)-hydroxycitric acid, and this has gained considerable attention as an anti-obesity agent and a popular weight loss food supplement. In this study, we assessed adulteration of morphologically similar samples of Garcinia using DNA barcoding, and used NMR to quantify the content of (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone in raw herbal drugs and Garcinia food supplements. DNA barcoding revealed that mostly G. gummi-gutta (previously known as G. cambogia) and G. indica were traded in Indian herbal markets, and there was no adulteration. The content of (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone in the two species varied from 1.7% to 16.3%, and 3.5% to 20.7% respectively. Analysis of ten Garcinia food supplements revealed a large variation in the content of (−)-hydroxycitric acid, from 29 mg (4.6%) to 289 mg (50.6%) content per capsule or tablet. Only one product contained quantifiable amounts of (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone. Furthermore the study demonstrates that DNA barcoding and NMR could be effectively used as a regulatory tool to authenticate Garcinia fruit rinds and food supplements.

Introduction

Globalization in the trade of herbal products and an expanding commodity market have resulted in widespread consumption of medicinal plants as drugs, cosmetics and food supplements, both in developing and developed countries1,2. Quality, safety and efficacy of herbal medicines are key requirements for public health and a major concern for regulatory authorities3. In India, herbal raw materials for the herbal industry are predominately harvested from wild populations4 .Unsustainable harvest of medicinal plants from the wild can lead to severe ecological consequences, including reduced plant populations, habitat destruction, loss of genetic diversity, and local extinction of species5. India is the second largest exporter of medicinal plants and exports mainly in the form of dried plant products4. Several reports suggest that only 10% of medicinal plants traded in India are being cultivated2,4. Growing commercial demands for raw drug products increases the incentive for adulteration and substitution in the medicinal plants trade, and such adulteration can threaten consumer health, damage consumer confidence, and generally lower the trade value of such products1.

Garcinia L. (Clusiaceae) is a genus of evergreen polygamous trees and shrubs comprising 400 species with a pantropical distribution6. Many Garcinia species in tropical Asia, Southern Africa and Northern Australia are locally used, and the edible fruits are of interest worldwide, as well as having potential implication on the economy of local communities7. Thirty-five species occur in India, of which 17 species are reported from the Western Ghats7. Garcinia fruits are widely collected and commercially exploited for their medicinal value, and the fruit rinds of Garcinia gummi-gutta (L.) Roxb. (syn. Garcinia cambogia (Gaertn.) Desr.) are traditionally used to treat constipation, piles, rheumatism, edema, irregular menstruation and intestinal parasites, and are also used as a food flavoring agent and preservative8. The fruit rinds of Garcinia indica (Thouars) Choisy are traditionally used to treat rheumatic pains, bowel complaints, hemorrhoids, ulcers, inflammations, sores, dermatitis, dysentery, to prevent hyperhidrosis, and are an important culinary agent, as well9. In India, G. gummi-gutta and G. indica are the predominant Garcinia species occurring in the Western Ghats, and these are locally traded as Kodampuli and Kokum, respectively (Fig. 1). These species are traded throughout India and exported to other countries as raw drugs, juices and extracts7. Several other species, such as G. morella (Gaertn.) Desr., G. cowa Roxb. ex Choisy, G. mangostana L., G. kydia Roxb., G. lanceifolia Roxb. and G. pedunculata Roxb. ex Buch.-Ham, are also traditionally used and traded for various culinary and medicinal purposes7. The trade analysis of Garcinia species suggests that the demand for the dried fruit rinds (raw drugs) and its value-added products are increasing4,7.

Figure 1
figure1

Places of collections of Garcinia raw drug samples in South India.

Garcinia fruits are a rich source of (−)-hydroxycitric acid, anthocyanins and polyisoprenylated benzophenone derivatives like garcinol, camboginol, guttiferones and xanthochymol10. (−)-Hydroxycitric acid, often abbreviated HCA in commercial products and advertisements, has gained considerable attention as a promising anti-obesity agent, and commercial Garcinia extracts claiming a high content of (−)-hydroxycitric acid are popular food supplements worldwide11. In human and animal studies, (−)-hydroxycitric acid has been reported to effectively curb appetite, suppress food intake, increase the rates of hepatic glycogen synthesis, reduce fatty acid synthesis and lipogenesis and decrease body-weight gain12. However, contradictory results have been reported, suggesting that (−)-hydroxycitric acid can cause only short-term weight loss, the magnitude of the weight loss effect is small, and the clinical relevance is uncertain13. The safety related to the intake of extracts with a high content of (−)-hydroxycitric acid is also uncertain14.

A common problem in herbal products highlighted in recent media reports and in scientific literature, is adulteration in high value raw drugs and finished products15,16,17. The underlying reasons for such adulterations may be due to confusion as morphologically similar material identified by vernacular names in different languages enters the chain of commercialization18, lack of authentic raw plant material19, and also adulteration for financial gain20. Adulteration may be considerable, given that there is no regulatory tool for quality control, no strict commercial testing for authentication of herbal products, and a lack of authentication along the value chains for highly traded medicinal plants21.

Value chain research focuses on the nature of the relationships among the various participants involved in the chain and on the implications of these relationships for development21. The demand for medicinal herbs or herbal products is growing at the rate of 15–25% annually21. Surprisingly, only a limited number of studies exist with the focus on value chains for herbal medicines22. Understanding and establishing the value chains and trade network for herbal medicines may reflect the reasons for the variation in quality of a particular herbal drug.

To authenticate herbal medicines, different tools for identification are available depending on the plant species and processes involved. These range from straightforward morphological or microscopic identification of plant parts to more advanced genetic or chemical approaches23. Among molecular identification tools, DNA barcoding has been successfully used in detecting and quantifying adulteration in raw herbal trade of a variety of medicinal plants. However, the application of the technique is often constrained by the inability to extract good quality DNA from raw herbal materials ranging from simple dried leaves to powdered plant parts, for subsequent PCR-based amplification of DNA barcode markers19. Alternatively, spectroscopic methods such as NMR can be used for the analysis of chemical compounds in complex mixtures such as plant extracts, pharmaceuticals and herbal preparations24. NMR spectroscopy is highly reproducible, robust and inherently quantitative without the need for prior chromatographic separation of multiple components. The technique has been used for detection, identification and quantitative determination of adulterants in weight loss food supplements24,25. Combining DNA barcoding with spectroscopic methods for authentication of herbal medicines increases the resolution in species identification and analysis of mixtures19.

In this study, the specific objectives were: (1) to understand the value chain of Garcinia species based herbal products; (2) to assess the extent of adulteration in Garcinia species in the herbal raw drug trade of Southern India using DNA barcoding; (3) to quantify the principle organic acids, (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone, in Garcinia raw herbal drugs using NMR spectroscopy; and (4) to identify and quantify (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone in food supplements that claim to contain Garcinia extract, using NMR spectroscopy.

Materials and Methods

Raw drug trade analysis

Informal semi-quantitative interviews were conducted in villages of Sirsi (Fig. 1), which is one among the five forest divisions of Uttara Kannada district in Western Ghats of India. Total forest area of Sirsi is 1737 km2, and the natural vegetation of Sirsi can be broadly divided into four different categories of forests, viz. tropical evergreen, semi-evergreen, moist deciduous and dry deciduous26. Twenty farmers were interviewed about the number of Garcinia species available in their region, how many species they collected for trade, and the amounts and which plant parts they collected. They were also asked if they used any post-harvest techniques to process the fruits and if they graded the fruits based on different qualities.

Collection of authenticated Biological Reference Material

Forty-one taxonomically validated herbarium vouchers from eleven species of Garcinia L. were collected from the Western Ghats and Northeast India, (Supplementary Table S1). The collected samples were identified using morphological keys in The Flora of India27 as well as by Dr. Srikanth Gunaga, taxonomist at College of Forestry, University of Agricultural Sciences (Sirsi). Nomenclature follows The Plant List (The Plant List, 2013 http://www.theplantlist.org). For each of the species, herbarium specimens were prepared and deposited at the Herbarium of the Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Bangalore (Supplementary Table S1). These taxonomically authenticated samples are referred to as Biological Reference Material (BRM). The BRM was used to amplify and sequence DNA barcodes for three regions: the nuclear ribosomal nrITS and the chloroplast markers psbA-trnH and rbcL.

Raw drug trade samples

Raw drug samples were obtained from major raw drug markets in Southern India (Figs 1 and 2). During interviews with vendors we elicited data for all known vernacular and trade names of Garcinia species (Supplementary Table S2), but we found that only Kodampuli (G. gummi-gutta) and Kokum (G. indica) were traded. One hundred grams of dried fruit rinds were purchased from each shop, totally 21 shops, and the obtained samples were vouchered as Herbal Authentication Service (HAS) with all the necessary details of shops and place of collection and deposited in the herbarium of ATREE, Bangalore (Supplementary Table S3). A chain of custody protocol ensured that samples were not mixed from the time of collection to DNA extraction and NMR spectroscopic analysis. Although most of the raw drugs collected were dried fruit rinds, they had retained significant morphological features of the fruits.

Figure 2
figure2

(a) Raw drug samples collected as Kodampuli and Kokum from the raw drug markets of southern India. (b) Garcinia gummi-gutta fruit. (c) Garcinia indica fruit.

Purchase of Garcinia herbal products

Ten herbal products that included either G. gummi-gutta or G. indica were purchased in pharmacies in India (5), Romania (1), and via e-commerce from United States (2), Norway (1), and Sweden (1). According to the label information, five products contained G. gummi-gutta (syn. G. cambogia), two products contained G. indica, and three products contained G. gummi-gutta, among other ingredients. An overview of the samples including label information, but not the producer/importer name, lot number, expiration date or any other information that could lead to the identification of that specific product is presented in Supplementary Table S4.

DNA barcoding and validation of trade samples

DNA was extracted from the leaf tissues of BRM (n = 11 species with 2–5 individuals in each species) using a previously described protocol28. Extracted DNA was quantified, and polymerase chain reactions were performed to amplify nrITS, psbA-trnH and rbcL using specific primers following standard protocols19,29 (Supplementary Table S5). The amplified products of nrITS, psbA-trnH and rbcL were sequenced on an automated ABI 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, CA, United States) by Shrimpex Biotech, Chennai, India.

The obtained DNA sequence chromatograms were visualized and edited to remove ambiguous base calls and primer sequences using BioEdit v.5.0.630. The sequences of nrITS, psbA-trnH and rbcL were deposited in NCBI GenBank and the accession numbers for all the BRM samples are given in Supplementary Table S1. Each species sequence was used as a query sequence in a BLASTn search. Along with the best match sequences in BLASTn search, the available DNA sequences for nrITS and rbcL of Indian Garcinia species were downloaded in FASTA format from GenBank and included in the analysis. No psbA-trnH sequences for these Indian Garcinia species were found (Supplementary Table S1). Interspecific and intraspecific genetic distances were calculated in PAUP* v.4.0b.1031 using K2P model, as well as the number of parsimony characters per marker. A Maximum Likelihood tree was generated using RAxML32 available through the Cipres Web Portal (http://www.phylo.org)33. RAxML analyses were run with default parameters for the three markers separately, and Clusia species (Clusiaceae) were chosen as outgroup. Further, in order to test the possibilities of concatenating the three markers, incongruence between the nuclear and plastid markers were tested using incongruence length difference test (ILD) in PAUP* v.4.0b.1031, and also trees were visually evaluated whether there are any conflicting topologies in the gene trees, defined as ML bootstraps >85 on nodes.

In order to authenticate identities of the herbal raw drug samples procured as Kodampuli and Kokum, genomic DNA was isolated using a DNA extraction protocol optimized for Garcinia species28 and amplified for nrITS and sequenced as described above. A single-locus Maximum Likelihood tree was constructed using both the herbal raw drug samples nrITS sequences and the nrITS BRM barcode library using RAxML32 available through the Cipres Web Portal (http://www.phylo.org)33 (Fig. 3).

Figure 3
figure3

Maximum Likelihood tree (RAxML) of biological reference material of Garcinia species and Garcinia raw drug market samples using nrITS region.

Preparation of Garcinia fruit samples and food supplements for NMR analysis

Due to the highly hygroscopic nature of Garcinia fruits, the market samples of Kodampuli (n = 18) and Kokum (n = 6) were freeze-dried using an Alpha 1–4 LD plus laboratory freeze dryer (Martin Christ GmbH, Osterode am Harz, Germany) for 24 hours and then pulverized in a commercial blender (Waring Commercial, New Hartford, CT, United States). Aliquots of ca. 1 g, accurately weighed, of fruit powder were extracted with Milli-Q water at 120 °C using an Accelerated Solvent Extraction system (ASE350 Solvent Extractor, Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, United States). Three grams of diatomaceous earth (Dionex) was mixed with the Garcinia fruit powder aliquots and loaded in 100 ml steel cartridges. The cartridges were fitted on to the system and exhaustive extraction was performed with three cycles. Preheating time was 5 min, static extraction per cycle was 5 min and the extraction was carried out under a pressure of ca. 1500 PSI (10 MPa). The extracts from each cycle was combined, and water was evaporated at 60 °C using a rotary evaporator (RV 10 Basic Rotavapor with vacuum controller, IKA-Werke GmbH & Co. KG, Staufen, Germany). Further the extract was dried by freeze-drying, yielding 462.2–772.3 mg (45.7–76.6%) of water extract.

For Garcinia food supplements analysis, the capsules were opened and their contents removed (7 capsules), whereas tablets were ground to powder (3 tablets). One to two grams of each food supplement was accurately weighed (Supplementary Table S4) and extracted (extraction yield was 0.8758–1.1854 g (53.8–98.3%)). Extraction and NMR analysis were carried out using the same methodology as for the Garcinia water extracts.

Apart from water extracts of fruit rinds and food supplements, methanol extracts of Garcinia food supplements and Garcinia fruit rind powder were prepared following a modified protocol34 in order to understand whether polyisoprenylated xanthones can be used as marker compounds for identification. Briefly, aliquots of capsule contents, powdered tablets or fruit rind powder were weighed into 2 ml Eppendorf tubes. CD3OD (1.5 ml) was added and the samples were vortexed for 1 min. The samples were then ultrasonicated for 20 minutes at room temperature before centrifugation at 1000 g for 30 minutes. To the supernatant was added 0.1% TFA and the acidified samples were transferred to NMR tubes for analysis.

NMR quantification of (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone

1H NMR spectra of Garcinia water extracts and food supplement extracts were acquired for quantitative analysis on a Bruker AVII400 (Bruker GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany) instrument equipped with a 5 mm BBOF probe and operating at a frequency of 400 MHz at 298 K, and with number of scans = 128. A reference solvent solution was prepared containing 2.0 mg/ml maleic acid (internal reference) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, United States) and 0.1% 3-(trimethylsilyl) propionic 2,2,3,3-d4 acid sodium salt (TSP) (Sigma-Aldrich) in D2O (Sigma-Aldrich). For NMR analysis, extracts were dissolved in 500 µl of the NMR reference solvent solution under vortex agitation, giving a final concentration of 20 mg/ml of extract, and analyzed in triplicate. The pH of all Garcinia water extracts was measured to have a pH of 2 in the NMR solutions. For the Garcinia food supplement extracts, the NMR sample solutions were adjusted to a pH of 2 by adding trifluoroacetic acid-d (Sigma-Aldrich), which ensures that the carboxylic acid functional groups are in the protonated state and gives consistent shift values for (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone. Shift positions are relative to the TSP signal at δ 0.0 ppm.

The concentrations of (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone were measured by comparing the NMR peak areas of selected protons of (−)-hydroxycitric acid (δ ca. 3.17 ppm, H-3a) and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone (δ ca. 3.29 ppm, H-4a) with those of the internal reference (δ 6.37 ppm). The area of each peak is directly proportional to the number of corresponding nuclei. The percentages of (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone in the samples were calculated using the following equation, P (Sample) = (I(a) × N(ir) × M(a) × m(ir) × P(ir))/(I(ir) × N(a) × M(ir) × m(sample)), where I(a) and I(ir) are the areas of the analytes ((−)-hydroxycitric acid/(−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone) and the internal reference, N(ir) and N(a) are the number of protons contributing to the signal of the internal reference (2 protons) and the analytes (1 proton each for (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone), M(a) and M(ir) are the molecular weights of (−)-hydroxycitric acid (208.12 g/mol) and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone (190.11 g/mol) and the internal reference (116.07 g/mol), m(ir) and m(sample) is the mass of the internal reference (1 mg) and mass of the sample aliquot (10 mg), P(ir) is the purity of the internal reference (99.94%). The areas were measured by using the MNova v. 7.1.2 program (http://mestrelab.com/). In order to evaluate the NMR quantification method, test solutions containing Garcinia water extract in NMR reference solvent solution (0.18 to 40 mg/ml) were prepared and measured in triplicates. The S/N ratios were measured to determine Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantification (LOQ)35, and linearity over the concentration range was also calculated.

Data accessibility

GenBank (NCBI) [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank] Accession numbers of nucleotide sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

Results and Discussion

Interviews with Garcinia collectors

The interviews with farmers from Western Ghats revealed that people predominantly collected G. gummi-gutta and G. indica from the wild, with quantities of Garcinia fruits up to 15 to 20 kg per day. Fruits are the traditionally used plant part of Garcinia, but during the interview we noticed that resin from the trees was also locally collected36. Apart from these two species, G. morella was collected for culinary purposes and domestic consumption. The other Garcinia species such as G. mangostana and G. cowa, which grow sparsely in the area, were locally traded based on their seasonal availability. Farmers commented that not all trees produce fruits, and distinguished between “male” and “female” trees of Garcinia species. The preliminary understanding from the survey is that there is limited added value for Garcinia trade at the farmers end. However, people do process the fruit post-harvest and tend to sell seedless fruits, which fetch a higher price than the fruits with seeds. In the case of G. indica, the juice is extracted from the fruits by several small and large-scale industries.

DNA barcoding of Garcinia raw drugs

In recent years, a number of medicinal plants have been shown to be adulterated with other low cost plant materials15. Contamination in herbal products presents a potential health risk for consumers23. In the present study, DNA barcoding was used to analyze the extent of adulteration in herbal raw drug trade of Garcinia species. The first step in analyzing the presence of adulteration was the construction of a taxonomically authenticated BRM DNA barcode library for Garcinia species. This was assembled in order to provide a reliable DNA library of reference samples, to authenticate the herbal raw drug samples. A single-locus approach was used to delineate nine species collected from Western Ghats and two species from Northeast India based on genetic divergence of three regions (i.e., nrITS, psbA-trnH and rbcL) using the Kimura 2-Parameter model (Table 1). rbcL and psbA-trnH exhibited the lowest mean interspecific distance (0.023 and 0.129, respectively); in contrast, nrITS exhibited the highest mean interspecific distance (0.153). Similarly, the mean intraspecific distance for nrITS was 0.037, which was significantly lower than the mean interspecific distance. In the case of psbA-trnH and rbcL, the mean intraspecific distance was 0.011 and 0.037 respectively, showing that rbcL was not a suitable marker because that the interspecific distance, 0.023 is lower than the intraspecific distance, 0.037, and that psbA-trnH was considerably better with a significant mean inter- and intraspecific genetic distance (0.129 and 0.037 respectively) (Table 1). nrITS had the most parsimony-informative characters with 278 characters. Similarly psbA-trnH and rbcL had 198 and 70 respectively (Table 1). The ILD test revealed significant incongruence between the nuclear and plastid markers (P > 0.01), and the visual inspection of phylogenetic trees suggests a topology conflict among the three markers, therefore the three matrices were not concatenated and single-locus trees were utilized for further analyses.

Table 1 Evaluation of the three DNA barcode regions used for Garcinia species.

Authentication of herbal products has been a major challenge due to the fact that chemical studies have documented high content variability of active ingredients of medicinal plants due to geographic conditions and also variability among products from diverse manufacturers of supplements16. Conventional techniques such as organoleptic analysis and microscopy are also limited for species authentication in herbal products37. There are a number of studies that have assessed adulteration in medicinal plants in raw drug trade and also have identified ingredients added in finished herbal products using DNA barcoding15,38,39,40.

However, a major limitation of Sanger DNA barcoding is the inability to distinguish constituent species in multi-ingredient herbal products20,41. Several comprehensive reviews on DNA-based authentication of botanicals have highlighted the merits and limitations of Sanger based DNA barcoding23,37,42. In this study, it is evident from the single-locus phylogenetic trees that nrITS and the psbA-trnH spacer are more suitable barcode regions for Indian Garcinia species than rbcL (Supplementary Figs S1, S2, and S3).

Tree-based methods are advantageous over sequence similarity based methods like BLAST that require a decision on a threshold at which a sequence is considered to belong to a certain taxon, which could be subjective and may be applicable to certain taxa but not to others43. In tree-based methods, a clear advantage is that no cut-off value is necessary if the query sequence is considered to belong to a certain taxon, and if it is found in the same clade consisting of a reference sequences for that particular taxon38. In addition distance based methods (e.g., BLAST) have a tendency to produce false positive identifications if the reference sequences are not available in databases, whereas taxonomic identification based on tree-based methods are not as sensitive to incomplete databases and avoid false positive identification43. Supplementary Figs S1 and S2 of nrITS and psbA-trnH illustrate the clear grouping within Garcinia species with well supported bootstrap values, whereas rbcL on the other hand shows poor resolution in delineating the Garcinia species, and that can be explained by the low genetic divergence within this marker (Supplementary Fig. S3).

In order to authenticate the raw drugs traded as Kodampuli and Kokum, the marker nrITS was utilized due to its high amplification success rate from raw drugs (100%), whereas we were unable to amplify the chloroplast markers from the DNA isolated from the raw drug samples. Similarly, it was observed that the PCR amplification success rate in reference samples was 100% for nrITS compared to psbA-trnH (79%) and rbcL (93%) (Table 1). Analyses of nrITS sequences of Kodampuli and Kokum along with BRM barcode library revealed that there was no adulteration in the species (Fig. 3), and also that the morphological characters of fruits aided in the authenticity verification of collected raw drug samples from the market (Fig. 2). This was also apparently due to the absence of taxonomic complexities in fruit morphological characters of Kodampuli and Kokum44.

A prerequisite for DNA-based molecular analysis of herbal products is the isolation of good quality DNA23. In this study, the yield of isolated DNA from the Garcinia food supplements ranged from 0.05 to 1 ng/ml. Plant DNA can also be removed or degraded during the manufacturing process of herbal products: extensive heat treatment, irradiation, ultraviolet light exposure, filtration, extractive distillation or supercritical fluid extraction all affect DNA yield and integrity23.

NMR quantification method in Garcinia fruits

1H NMR was used to quantify the (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone content in raw herbal drugs of Garcinia species. The chemical formulas for (−)-hydroxycitric acid with the (2 S,3 S) configuration and its lactone form are shown in Fig. 4a. The (−)-hydroxycitric acid content was directly measured from areas of characteristic signals in the proton spectra of the water extracts (Fig. 4b). Limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) is the lowest concentration of an analyte in a sample which can be detected and quantified, respectively, for which the selected signals exhibit the minimal required S/N ratio. Table 2 shows LOD values of 0.06 and 0.04 mg/ml, and LOQ values of 0.13 and 0.20 mg/ml for (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone respectively. Supplementary Fig. S4 shows NMR spectra of Garcinia fruit extracts in different concentrations with the resulting changes in signal intensities for (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone.

Figure 4
figure4

(a) Chemical structures of (−)-hydroxycitric acid (1), (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone (2) and maleic acid (3). (b) 1H NMR spectrum of Garcinia gummi-gutta (voucher no. HAS429) extract.

Table 2 Method validation data for quantification of (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone.

The 1H NMR spectrum of the water extract of G. gummi-gutta HAS429 depicted in Fig. 4b clearly shows the presence of characteristic signals from (−)-hydroxycitric acid (1). The 1H NMR signals for H-1 appear as two closely spaced doublets at δ 3.07 ppm (d, J = 16.6 Hz) and 3.16 ppm (d, J = 16.6 Hz), while H-3 appears as a singlet at δ 4.45 ppm. In the same spectrum the H-4 protons in (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone (2) give rise to two doublets at δ 2.92 ppm (d, J = 18.0 Hz) and 3.29 ppm (d, J = 18.0 Hz), H-2 gives a singlet at δ 5.00 ppm. The two vicinal protons of the internal standard maleic acid (3) give rise to the singlet at δ 6.37 ppm. However, a slight variation in the characteristic signals of (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone within triplicates of each sample and between samples was observed (relative standard deviation < 0.03). These variations in chemical shifts values are possibly due to minor pH differences or interactions with other molecules in the extracts.

Though no prior sample clean-up after extraction was necessary in order to quantify the (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone content in the Garcinia fruit extracts, it was observed that the extracts are rich in sugar compounds (Fig. 4b & Supplementary Fig. S5). Table 3 shows the percentage of (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone (mass fraction) in the dried fruits of Kodampuli and Kokum raw drugs. The content of (−)-hydroxycitric acid in the dried Kodampuli fruits varied from 3.9% to 10.3% with an average of 7.9% and the content of (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone varied from 7.4% to 19.1% with an average of 13.1%. On the other hand, the content of (−)-hydroxycitric acid in the dried Kokum fruits varied from 1.7% to 7.6% with an average of 4.3% and the content of (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone varied from 3.5% to 11.7% with an average of 7.8%. Since the equilibrium state of (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone in the Garcinia fruits is not known, the total content of the acid and the lactone was calculated. The total average content of (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone in Kodampuli was 21.0% while the total content in Kokum was 12.1%. As far as we know, this is the first time that 1H NMR has been used for the quantification of (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone. Gas chromatography45, high performance liquid chromatography46, and capillary zone electrophoresis47 have previously been used to quantify the hydroxycitric acid and hydroxycitric acid lactone content in Garcinia fruits and food supplements. HPLC with UV detection at 210–220 nm is commonly used today and has replaced the more laborious GC methods12,48. A challenge with HPLC is to obtain a good resolution between the organic acids and their lactones in Garcinia. There are examples showing no discrimination between (−)hydroxycitric acid and the lactone or methods that suffer from poor resolution46,49,50. Another challenge is the low selectivity at 210 nm, therefore sample preparation may be needed to remove co−eluting interfering substances46,49,50. Compared to these methods, quantitative NMR (qNMR) currently employed has the advantage of being rapid (less than 8 minutes needed for 128 scans) with no need for additional cleanup of extracts or derivatization. NMR makes it possible to detect of all kind of organic molecules in the same sample, as long as they are soluble in the NMR solvent, and is also highly reproducible with little instrument-instrument variation; in addition it is non-invasive and non-destructive51.

Table 3 (−)-Hydroxycitric acid, and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone content (%) of Garcinia gummi-gutta (Kodampuli) and Garcinia indica (Kokum) fruit rinds using 1H NMR for quantification (*Garcinia indica samples).

In previous studies, using an HPLC method, a (−)-hydroxycitric acid content of G. gummi-gutta of 16–18% was reported, and the leaves and rinds of G. indica were found to contain 4.1–4.6% and 10.3–12.7%, respectively, whereas only trace amounts of (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone was reported46,50. For G. cowa, the (−)-hydroxycitric acid content was found to be 1.7, 2.3 and 12.7%, respectively in the fresh leaves, fruits and dried rinds48. These overlaps between the total content of (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone in Garcinia species suggest that these organic acids should not be used as marker compound to distinguish between Garcinia species.

Seasonal and geographic variations in chemical composition have been reported for a number of medicinal plants52,53, and also chemical variability along the value chains, harvesting pressure, harvest time, collection of immature plant parts etc., have been reported to influence the composition and concentration of plant constituents54,55,56. The variation in the concentration of (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone in Kodampuli and Kokum raw drugs can be explained since the raw drugs were obtained from different geographic locations of South India (Fig. 1), and concentration of organic acids can also vary based on the harvest time, as has been shown in other fruits57,58. The raw drugs stocked in the herbal markets are normally obtained from a single source or from collectors of a specific region. Enquiries with the traders indicated that supplies are made usually by wholesale agents who in turn obtain raw drugs from sub-agents and collectors, and it is likely that the collectors get the Kodampuli and Kokum from across the Western Ghats of India. This could explain the variation in the concentration of (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone in the studied Garcinia fruits.

Validation of Garcinia food supplements

G. cambogia (syn. G. gummi-gutta) or unspecified Garcinia extracts rich in (−)-hydroxycitric acid are examples of food supplements freely available in pharmacies, health food stores, and via the internet without any regulations and quality control. In order to authenticate the validity of Garcinia products, ten Garcinia food supplements were randomly purchased via e-commerce and pharmacies (Supplementary Table S4). One of the major challenges with the authentication of Garcinia food supplements is the lack of processing information. The majority of the supplements were not labeled with the solvent used for extraction, and thus the composition of the extracts was difficult to predict, and it is not obvious if they contain water-soluble consituents such as hydroxycitric acid or lipophilic compounds like garcinol and camboginol. The content of (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone in the Garcinia supplements is shown in Table 4, and compared with the labeled contents. Product 1 and 5, labeled to contain 500 mg and 525 of extract with 60% HCA, were found to contain only 36 ± 2.9 mg (5.5%) and 29 ± 1.9 mg (4.6%) (−)-hydroxycitric acid, respectively. The other eight products contained more reasonable amounts of (−)-hydroxycitric acid compared to their labeled ingredients (59–289 mg (12.8–50.5%) per capsule or tablet). In comparison the analyzed G. gummi-gutta fruit rind water extracts were found to contain 32% of (−)-hydroxycitric acid and its lactone on average, and the average content found for G. indica water extracts was 19%. A previous study utilizing capillary zone electrophoresis concluded that one sample out of five did not contain G. atroviridis Griff extract as claimed on the label47. On the contrary, a study utilizing HPLC revealed no adulteration among G. gummi-gutta and G. indica commercial products59 and another study using HPLC revealed that G. gummi-gutta commercial products contained 51–55% of (−)-hydroxycitric acid with small quantities of tartaric, citric, and malic acids49. From quantitative NMR analysis of water extracts obtained from the supplements, it was found that five products contained both (−)-hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone. Among these, only one product contained quantifiable amounts of (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone, whereas (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone was missing or only present in trace amounts in the remaining products (Table 4 & Supplementary Fig. S6). The absence of (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone in the supplements with Garcinia extracts might be due to the extraction method employed60.

Table 4 (−)-Hydroxycitric acid, and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone content in Garcinia food supplements used in the study.

1H NMR spectra of G. indica and G. gummi-gutta (syn. G. cambogia) fruit rind methanol extracts showed characteristic signals from polyisoprenylated xanthones (garcinol or camboginol). Signals from aromatic protons at δ 6.7, 7.0 and 7.2 ppm and unsaturated tertiary methyls groups at δ 1.5–1.7 ppm were observed61,62. These signals were also observed in product no. 6, labeled to contain both G. cambogia extract (250 mg) and powder of fruit rinds and leaves (350 mg), while methanol extracts of the other supplements did not give rise to signals from garcinol or camboginol. These signals were not present in spectra of the fruit rind or herbal supplement water extracts. Thus, garcinol or camboginol, which are likely not present in the Garcinia commercial extracts, should not be used as authentication compounds for Garcinia supplements.

Conclusions

In this study, we used DNA barcoding and 1H NMR spectroscopy to authenticate Garcinia fruits and food supplements. 1H NMR is useful for qualitative and quantitative analysis of constituents in medicinal plants and herbal products24. However, NMR has, so far, not received a wider application in the official food supplements testing and medicine control laboratories than other chromatographic methods, mostly because the NMR technique was judged to be complicated and instruments too expensive25. However, several improvements in instrumentation during the last decade have made NMR available for routine applications25. In the future, a metabolomic approach using NMR would be useful for large-scale analysis of Garcinia food supplements and this study has shown that qNMR is a fast and sensitive enough method for the quantification of (−)-hydroxycitric acid content. Several studies have advocated the use of DNA barcoding in herbal product authentication and pharmacovigilance19,23,29,63 due to its cost effectiveness and ability to identify plant species. In this study, DNA barcoding was used to demonstrate that there was no adulteration or substitution of Garcinia species in major herbal markets of south India. These results show the usefulness of DNA barcoding and 1H NMR spectroscopy for use in complementing traditional methods of quality control for consumer safety, and demonstrates that DNA barcoding can be used as a screening method for the identification of Garcinia species in herbal trade, and NMR for detection and quantification of hydroxycitric acid and (−)-hydroxycitric acid lactone in Garcinia fruits and food supplements.

Our 1H NMR results suggest that in order to increase consumer confidence by advocating and promoting a higher standard of quality in herbal products, there is an urgent need to study food supplements derived from traditional medicinal plants.

References

  1. 1.

    Srirama, R. et al. Species adulteration in the herbal trade: causes, consequences and mitigation. Drug Saf 40, 651–661 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Marichamy, K., Kumar, N. Y. & Ganesan, A. Sustainable development in exports of herbals and Ayurveda, Siddha, Unani andHomeopathy (Ayush) in India. Sci Park Res J 1, 23218045 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on safety monitoring of herbal medicines in pharmacovigilance systems. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland (2004).

  4. 4.

    Ved, D. K. & Goraya, G. S. Demand and supply of medicinal plants in India. NMPB, New Delhi & FRLHT, Bangalore, India (2007).

  5. 5.

    Yesson, C. et al. DNA barcodes for Mexican Cactaceae, plants under pressure from wild collecting. Mol Ecol Resour 11, 775–783 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Seetharam, Y. Diversity of androecium and pollen grains in the genus Garcinia L. and its bearing on geographical distribution and evolution. Proc Indian Acad Sci: Plant Sci 99, 107–115 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Gunaga, S. et al. Mapping diversity, density and distribution of Garcinia species in the Western Ghats, India. In Vasudeva, R., Janagoudar, B., Reddy, B., Sthapit, B. & Singh, H. P. (eds) Garcinia Genetic Resources: linking diversity, livelihood and managementt., College of Forestry, Sirsi, KA, India, pp 1–8, (2010).

  8. 8.

    Semwal, R. B., Semwal, D. K., Vermaak, I. & Viljoen, A. A comprehensive scientific overview of Garcinia cambogia. Fitoterapia 102, 134–148 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Baliga, M. S., Bhat, H. P., Pai, R. J., Boloor, R. & Palatty, P. L. The chemistry and medicinal uses of the underutilized Indian fruit tree Garcinia indica Choisy (kokum): A review. Food Res Int 44, 1790–1799 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hemshekhar, M. et al. An overview on genus Garcinia: phytochemical and therapeutical aspects. Phytochem Rev 10, 325–351 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Yamada, T., Hida, H. & Yamada, Y. Chemistry, physiological properties, and microbial production of hydroxycitric acid. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 75, 977–982 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Jena, B. S., Jayaprakasha, G. K., Singh, R. P. & ` of (−)-hydroxycitric acid from Garcinia. J Agric Food Chem 50, 10–22 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Onakpoya, I., Hung Shao, K., Perry, R., Wider, B. & Ernst, E. The use of Garcinia extract (hydroxycitric acid) as a weight loss supplement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. J Obes, 509038 (2011).

  14. 14.

    Bakhiya, N. et al. Phytochemical compounds in sport nutrition: Synephrine and hydroxycitric acid (HCA) as examples for evaluation of possible health risks. Mol Nutr Food Res 61, 1601020 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Coghlan, M. L. et al. Deep sequencing of plant and animal DNA contained within Traditional Chinese Medicines reveals legality issues and health safety concerns. PLoS Genet 8, 436–446 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Raclariu, A. C. et al. Veronica officinalis product authentication using DNA metabarcoding and HPLC-MS reveals widespread adulteration with Veronica chamaedrys. Front Pharmacol 8, 378 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Raclariu, A. C. et al. Comparative authentication of Hypericum perforatum herbal products using DNA metabarcoding, TLC and HPLC-MS. Sci Rep 7, 1291 (2017).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ouarghidi, A., Powell, B., Martin, G. J., De Boer, H. & Abbad, A. Species substitution in medicinal roots and possible implications for toxicity of herbal remedies in morocco. Econ Bot 66, 370–382 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Santhosh Kumar, J. U. et al. DNA barcoding and NMR spectroscopy-based assessment of species adulteration in the raw herbal trade of Saraca asoca (Roxb.) Willd, an important medicinal plant. Int J Legal Med 130, 1457–1470 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ivanova, N. V., Kuzmina, M. L., Braukmann, T. W. A., Borisenko, A. V. & Zakharov, E. V. Authentication of herbal supplements using next-generation sequencing. PLoS One 11, e0156426 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Booker, A., Johnston, D. & Heinrich, M. Value chains of herbal medicines–research needs and key challenges in the context of ethnopharmacology. J Ethnopharmacol 140, 624–633 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bussmann, R. W. et al. Peril in the market-classification and dosage of species used as anti-diabetics in Lima, Peru. Ethnobiol Ethnomed 9, 1 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    de Boer, H. J., Ichim, M. C. & Newmaster, S. G. DNA barcoding and pharmacovigilance of herbal medicines. Drug Saf 38, 611–620 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hachem, R. et al. Proton NMR for detection, identification and quantification of adulterants in 160 herbal food supplements marketed for weight loss. J Pharm Biomed Anal 124, 34–47 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Monakhova, Y. et al. 1H NMR screening of pharmacologically active substances in weight‐loss supplements being sold online. Lebensmittelchemie 66, 147–150 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Rai, N. D. & Uhl, C. F. Forest product use, conservation and livelihoods: the case of Uppage fruit harvest in the Western Ghats, India. Conservat Society 2, 289 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Gamble, J. S. Flora of the Presidency of Madras, (1915). Adlard & Son, London, UK.

  28. 28.

    Asish, G. R., Parthasarathy, U. & Nithya, N. G. Standardization of DNA isolation and PCR parameters in Garcinia spp for RAPD analysis. Indian J Biotechnol 9, 424–426 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Seethapathy, G. S. et al. Assessing product adulteration in natural health products for laxative yielding plants, Cassia, Senna, and Chamaecrista, in Southern India using DNA barcoding. Int J Legal Med 129, 693–700 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hall, T. A. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41, 95–98 (1999).

  31. 31.

    Swofford, D. L. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 4.0 b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA (2003).

  32. 32.

    Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Miller, M. A., Pfeiffer, W. & Schwartz, T. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees” in Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), New Orleans, LA, USA. pp 1–8 (2010).

  34. 34.

    Kim, H. K., Choi, Y. H. & Verpoorte, R. NMR-based metabolomic analysis of plants. Nature protocols 5, 536 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    European Medicines Agency. ICH topic Q2(R1) Validation of analytical procedures: Text and methodology. EMEA Document CPMP/ICH/381/95. EMEA, London 1995.

  36. 36.

    Parthasarathy, U. & Nandakishore, O. P. Garcinia bark exudates - an important phytochemical source. Curr Sci 110, 1617–1619 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Smillie, T. J. & Khan, I. A. A comprehensive approach to identifying and authenticating botanical products. Clin Pharmacol Ther 87, 175–186 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kool, A. et al. Molecular identification of commercialized medicinal plants in southern Morocco. PLoS One 7, e39459 (2012).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Shanmughanandhan, D., Ragupathy, S., Newmaster, S. G., Mohanasundaram, S. & Sathishkumar, R. Estimating herbal product authentication and adulteration in India using a vouchered, DNA-based biological reference material library. Drug Saf 39, 1211–1227 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Raja, H. A., Baker, T. R., Little, J. G. & Oberlies, N. H. DNA barcoding for identification of consumer-relevant mushrooms: A partial solution for product certification? Food Chem 214, 383–392 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Wilkinson, M. J. et al. Replacing Sanger with Next Generation Sequencing to improve coverage and quality of reference DNA barcodes for plants. Sci Rep 7, 46040 (2017).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Parveen, I., Gafner, S., Techen, N., Murch, S. J. & Khan, I. A. DNA barcoding for the identification of botanicals in herbal medicine and dietary supplements: strengths and limitations. Planta Med 82, 1225–1235 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ross, H. A., Murugan, S. & Li, W. L. Testing the reliability of genetic methods of species identification via simulation. Syst Biol 57, 216–230 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Parthasarathy, U. & Nandakishore, O. Morphological characterisation of some important Indian Garcinia species. Dataset Papers Sci, 823705 (2014).

  45. 45.

    Lowenstein, J. M. & Brunengraber, H. Hydroxycitrate. Meth Enzymol 72, 486–497 (1981).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Jayaprakasha, G. K. & Sakariah, K. K. Determination of organic acids in leaves and rinds of Garcinia indica (Desr.) by LC. J Pharm Biomed Anal 28, 379–384 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Muensritharam, L., Tolieng, V., Chaichantipyuth, C., Petsom, A. & Nhujak, T. Capillary zone electrophoresis for separation and analysis of hydroxycitric acid and hydroxycitric acid lactone: application to herbal products of Garcinia atroviridis Griff. J Pharm Biomed Anal 46, 577–582 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Jena, B. S., Jayaprakasha, G. K. & Sakariah, K. K. Organic acids from leaves, fruits, and rinds of Garcinia cowa. J Agric Food Chem 50, 3431–3434 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Jayaprakasha, G. K. & Sakariah, K. K. Determination of (−) hydroxycitric acid in commercial samples of Garcinia cambogia extract by liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. J Liq Chromatogr Rel Technol 23, 915–923 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Jayaprakasha, G. K. & Sakariah, K. K. Determination of organic acids in Garcinia cambogia (Desr.) by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 806, 337–339 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kruk, J. et al. NMR techniques in metabolomic studies: A quick overview on examples of utilization. Applied magnetic resonance 48, 1–21 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Bajpai, V. et al. Chemometric based identification and validation of specific chemical markers for geographical, seasonal and gender variations in Tinospora cordifolia stem using HPLC‐ESI‐QTOF‐MS analysis. Phytochem Anal 28, 277–288 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Muller-Riebau, F. J., Berger, B. M., Yegen, O. & Cakir, C. Seasonal variations in the chemical compositions of essential oils of selected aromatic plants growing wild in Turkey. J Agric Food Chem 45, 4821–4825 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Booker, A. et al. Chemical variability along the value chains of turmeric (Curcuma longa): a comparison of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and high performance thin layer chromatography. J Ethnopharmacol 152, 292–301 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Remorini, D. et al. Effect of rootstocks and harvesting time on the nutritional quality of peel and flesh of peach fruits. Food Chem 110, 361–367 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Pandey, A. K. & Shackleton, C. M. The effect of harvesting approaches on fruit yield, embelin concentration and regrowth dynamics of the forest shrub, Embelia tsjeriam-cottam, in central India. Forest Ecol Manage 266, 180–186 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Liu, H. F., Wu, B. H., Fan, P. G., Li, S. H. & Li, L. S. Sugar and acid concentrations in 98 grape cultivars analyzed by principal component analysis. J Sci Food Agric 86, 1526–1536 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Raffo, A., Paoletti, F. & Antonelli, M. Changes in sugar, organic acid, flavonol and carotenoid composition during ripening of berries of three seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) cultivars. Eur Food Res Technol 219, 360–368 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Jamila, N. et al. Identification and quantification of adulteration in Garcinia cambogia commercial products by chromatographic and spectrometric methods. Food Addit Contam Part A 33, 1751–1760 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Majeed, M., Badmaev, V. & Rajendran, R. Potassium hydroxycitrate for the suppression of appetite and induction of weight loss. US Pat. 5(783), 603 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Mantelingu, K. et al. Specific inhibition of p300-HAT alters global gene expression and represses HIV replication. Chem Biol 14, 645–657 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Bakana, P. et al. Structure and chemotherapeutical activity of a polyisoprenylated benzophenone from the stem bark of Garcinia huillensis. J Ethnopharmacol 21, 75–84 (1987).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Sgamma, T. et al. DNA barcoding for industrial quality assurance. Planta Med 83, 1117–1129 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (Grant number: No.BT/IN/ ISTP-EOI/2011). The first author of the paper acknowledges the Norwegian PhD School of Pharmacy’s research stay abroad grant. The NMR laboratory at the Chemistry Department, University of Oslo, Norway is acknowledged for the spectrometer facilities. GR acknowledges the Royal Norwegian Embassy grant for travel grant to Norway. We also acknowledge Anusha Bhat N, College of Forestry, University of Agricultural Sciences, Sirsi, India for the help in collection of samples and for her assistance in the laboratory. We thank Berit Smestad Paulsen and members of de Boer Lab for their constructive comments to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.S.S., H.W., H.D.B., R.U.S., G.R. conceived the experiment. G.S.S. carried out molecular and phytochemical lab work. M.T. and H.W. developed phytochemical method, and M.T., G.S.S., K.E.M. were involved in phytochemical lab work. G.S.S., J.U.S., S.V.G., R.V. were involved in plant collection and interviewing the farmers. G.S.S. wrote the manuscript, and all authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Gudasalamani Ravikanth or Helle Wangensteen.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seethapathy, G.S., Tadesse, M., Urumarudappa, S.K.J. et al. Authentication of Garcinia fruits and food supplements using DNA barcoding and NMR spectroscopy. Sci Rep 8, 10561 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28635-z

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.