Article | Open | Published:

# Dependence and Homeostasis of Membrane Impedance on Cell Morphology in Cultured Hippocampal Neurons

## Abstract

The electrical impedance of cell membranes is important for excitable cells, such as neurons, because it strongly influences the amount of membrane potential change upon a flow of ionic current across the membrane. Here, we report on an investigation of how neuronal morphology affects membrane impedance of cultured hippocampal neurons. Microfabricated substrates with patterned scaffolding molecules were used to restrict the neurite growth of hippocampal neurons, and the impedance was measured via whole-cell patch-clamp recording under the inhibition of voltage-dependent ion channels. Membrane impedance was found to depend inversely on the dendrite length and soma area, as would be expected from the fact that its electrical property is equivalent to a parallel RC circuit. Moreover, we found that in biological neurons, the membrane impedance is homeostatically regulated to impede changes in the membrane area. The findings provide direct evidence on cell-autonomous regulation of neuronal impedance and pave the way towards elucidating the mechanism responsible for the resilience of biological neuronal networks.

## Introduction

In the central nervous system, response of neurons to an oscillatory input varies depending on the signal frequency1,2,3,4,5,6,7. This electrical property is governed by the impedance spectra of the neuronal cell membrane and plays a crucial role in determining the preference of neurons and their networks to operate at a certain frequency. It is also related to the generation of field potential rhythms that are involved in the neural information processing7,8.

The frequency characteristics of neurons are determined by the interaction of active and passive properties within the plasma membrane3,9. For the former, membrane currents mediated by the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels and the M-type K+ channels have been identified as the molecular mechanism that endows frequency selectivity to neurons2,9,10,11,12,13,14,15. In the stellate cells in the entorhinal cortex, for example, the currents cause the neurons to respond largest to oscillating inputs around 5–15 Hz, which correspond to the theta-band range16,17,18. In pyramidal neurons, which are the major neuron in the hippocampus and the neocortex, the persistent Na+ current counteracts with M-current, and membrane impedance Zm exhibit either a less distinct resonance at low frequencies (1–5 Hz) or no resonance at resting potentials10,15,16,17,19.

The passive property of the membrane is defined by the leak conductance and the lipid bilayer acting as the resistive and capacitive components, respectively. Considering that the passive property is equivalently modelled as a parallel RC circuit, perturbation in cell morphology and membrane area would pose substantial change in neuronal impedance. Despite this effect, neuronal morphology fluctuates during development and in mature brains via, e.g., formation/elimination of synaptic spines20 and dendritic arbors21. Irregularity in neuronal size and morphology have been reported in patients and in animal models of several neurological disorders, including autism and epilepsy22,23,24. However, it is still unclear how cell morphology affects Zm, which is partly due to the lack of an experimental platform that permits direct investigation of this effect.

Here, we report on an experimental study of the effect of cell morphology on impedance spectra, with a particular focus on the passive membrane property. This work is grounded on the surface engineering technique that permits the extrinsic control of the neurite outgrowth of cultured neurons at a single cell resolution25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32. Membrane impedance, as measured by whole-cell patch-clamp recording, is compared between neurons with and without growth control at identical days in vitro (DIV). Conductance-based simulations were used to theoretically examine the underlying biophysical mechanisms.

## Results

### Neuronal micropatterning

Glass coverslips for culturing neurons were fabricated by microcontact printing29,30,31,32. Briefly, cleaned glass coverslips were first coated with agarose to produce a cytophobic surface, and a cell-adhesive ink, consisting of an extracellular matrix protein gel and poly-lysine, was stamped using a microstructured polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) stamp (Fig. 1a,b). Dissociated rat hippocampal neurons were then plated on and cultured on the patterned glass coverslip. Approximately 90% of the cells in the hippocampal cultures are the pyramidal neurons33. As illustrated in Fig. 1c, micropatterns consisted of a circular island (25 μm in diameter), from which four lines emerged forming a cross, one 100 μm long and three 20 μm long, and they were aligned with a minor gap of 10 μm that axons could surpass31. At 7 and 16 DIV, the cell morphology and Zm were characterized by immunostaining and whole-cell patch-clamp recordings, respectively. Neurons that were grown on a conventional poly-lysine coated coverslip for identical periods were prepared as a control sample, and the effect of restricting dendrite length and arborization was compared between the patterned and unpatterned neurons.

Figure 1d shows the development of rat hippocampal neurons on micropatterned substrates. Cell bodies preferentially settled on the circular island, and neurites grew on the line patterns. As the cultures matured, axons became elongated onto distant patterns. In contrast, most of the dendrites that grew on the short pathways did not grow any further. In the unpatterned neurons, dendrites elongated freely without restrictions (Fig. 1e).

Figure 2 summarizes the soma area and the total dendritic length of each neuron, which were evaluated from fluorescence micrographs of neurons stained with a somatodendritic marker, MAP2. A significant difference in both parameters was confirmed between the patterned and unpatterned neurons. Thus, the morphological confinement via micropatterning effectively reduced the total surface area of the cell membrane. Note that axons have less influence on Zm due to their high axial resistance (see the Simulation results. section).

### Electrophysiological measurements

Next, in order to evaluate the effect of morphological confinement on Zm and its dependence on the age of the culture, we performed patch-clamp recordings on patterned and unpatterned neurons (Fig. 3a). In each recording, a chirp current that consisted of a sinusoidal wave with a constant amplitude (50 pA), and a time-varying frequency (0.1–100 Hz) was applied under the current-clamp mode with a current injection to maintain the membrane potential (Vm) at −70 mV. A typical voltage response is shown in Fig. 3b, in which the amplitude decreases with increasing frequency. The frequency response curve was then obtained by calculating the ratio of the Fourier transform of the voltage response to that of the input current. Tetrodotoxin (TTX; 1 μM), a voltage-gated Na+ channel blocker, and 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX; 10 μM), an AMPA-type glutamatergic receptor blocker, were added to the external solution during all recordings to suppress the generation of action potentials and synaptic transmissions, respectively. Addition of TTX has been reported to have minor influence on Zm in the absence of spikes15. CNQX is also expected to have little influence on Zm, because its target channel is a ligand-gated channel that is usually closed unless glutamate is bound to it.

In order to verify that the membrane property is linear and is dominated by the passive mechanisms near Vm = −70 mV, we first analysed the current-voltage relationship of hippocampal neurons in the presence of TTX and CNQX. For both the unpatterned (Fig. 3c) and patterned (Fig. 3d) neurons, the current-voltage relationship was found to be linear near the resting potential, in the range of −40 mV to −90 mV (Fig. 3c,d, right panels). The slope of the curve, corresponding to the DC conductance of the membrane, increased when the amplitude of the step potential exceeded −40 mV, which was most likely due to the activation of voltage-gated channels (Fig. 3c,d, left panels). This range, however, is beyond what is analysed in the current manuscript.

We further analysed the voltage-dependence of the membrane impedance by comparing impedance magnitudes, |Zm|, at various Vm in the range of −40 mV to −90 mV. As summarized in Fig. 3e, the low-pass filtering property in the range of 10 Hz to 90 Hz was unaffected by Vm. In contrast, |Zm| at each frequency was found to increase with Vm indicating a contribution of voltage-gated conductances in determining |Zm|. This trend is consistent with previous literature on recordings of pyramidal neurons in hippocampal slice preparations15. This increase in |Zm| with Vm abolished when voltage-gated K+ channels were blocked by tetraethylammonium (TEA; 14 mM) (Fig. 3f). At Vm = −70 mV, however, the effect of TEA on |Zm| was insignificant at all frequencies. The latter result suggests that the voltage-gated K+ conductance plays a minor role in determining Zm near this membrane potential. In sum, the above experiments justify that the membrane property near Vm = −70 mV in the presence of TTX and CNQX is dominated by the passive membrane property.

Comparison of impedance spectrum in patterned and unpatterned neurons is summarized in Fig. 3g,h. Intriguingly, despite the morphological confinement that reduced the total area of the cell membrane, the difference in |Zm| of patterned and unpatterned neurons were statistically insignificant for the case of 7 DIV neurons (Fig. 3g). This effect was also observed even in the presence of TEA, suggesting that the effect is independent of voltage-gated K+ conductance (Fig. 3g, inset). The contribution of HCN channels should be minor since Zm was measured at Vm = −70 mV9,15. The influence of voltage-gated Ca2+ currents should also be minor since it is negligibly small at Vm < −30 mV34. At 16 DIV, |Zm| of the unpatterned neurons was found to be statistically lower than that of the patterned neurons at 10–50 Hz, but the decrease was limited to merely ~30% (Fig. 3h).

The phase angle of Zm for the patterned and unpatterned neurons are shown in the lower panels of Fig. 3g,h. The negative phase shift indicates that the impedance is capacitive. The result is in agreement with previous electrophysiological recordings of hippocampal pyramidal neurons9 and computational modelling of passive neurons12,35. No significant difference in the phase profile was observed between the patterned and unpatterned cultures at both 7 and 16 DIV.

### Simulation results

In order to theoretically investigate the effect of cell morphology on Zm, we prepared multi-compartmental models for the patterned and unpatterned neurons at 7 and 16 DIV (Fig. 4a,b). A representative neuron with a morphology closest to the average values was selected and used as the model for each experimental condition (see Methods and Table 1). Since the voltage-gated Na+ channel and the glutamatergic receptor were pharmacologically blocked in experiments, only the passive properties, which include the specific membrane resistance (Rm = 10 kΩ cm2), specific membrane capacitance (Cm = 1 μF cm−2), and specific axial resistance (Ra = 150 Ω cm), were inserted in the model membrane. Due to its small diameter that increases the axial resistance, axon length does not substantially influence Zm (Fig. 4c), as compared to dendrites. Therefore, we set the axon length to a constant value for all models and focused on the effect of soma and dendrite morphology.

Figure 4d,e show the frequency response curves obtained from the patterned and unpatterned neuron models. The low-pass characteristics that were observed in the patch-clamp experiments were also confirmed in the simulations. This indicates that the spectral properties are supported by the passive property of the neuronal cell membrane, which can be equivalently modelled with an RC parallel circuit.

Notably, although the general trend was consistent, the change in |Zm| due to morphological confinement was quantitatively different in the experimental data and the simulation. The ratio of |Zm| of patterned and unpatterned neurons are summarized in Fig. 4f. Since the specific resistance of the cell membrane assumed in the model directly influences |Zm|, we evaluated the effect of geometrical confinement based on the ratio at 10 Hz. In biological neurons, morphological confinement had no significant effect on |Zm| in the 7 DIV neurons and caused 1.5-fold increase in the 16 DIV neurons. To the contrary, morphological confinement resulted in 2.4- and 4.9-fold increase in the 7 and 16 DIV neuron models, respectively.

This result suggests that in biological neurons, Zm is homeostatically regulated to impede a minor perturbation in cell morphology. When the perturbation is substantially large, e.g., in the case of patterned and unpatterned neurons at 16 DIV, the size effect exceeds the regulatable range, and |Zm| is subjected to change (see Fig. 3h).

### Functional role of neuronal membrane impedance

Finally, we demonstrate how the difference in Zm can affect the function of a neuron in a network. Here, |Zm| of two neurons at 16 DIV were measured in advance (Fig. 5a), and a current which mimicked the excitatory post-synaptic current was then applied to the same neurons. When an ionic or electrical current I is delivered to a neuron, the change in Vm is given by Zm·I. Therefore, the amount of inputs necessary for Vm to increase above the threshold voltage and the neuron to fire an action potential is critically dependent on Zm.

A comparison of the patterned and unpatterned neurons revealed that the voltage response of the patterned neuron was larger for an identical input. In the case shown in Fig. 5b, the input triggered an action potential in the patterned (high-impedance) neuron, whereas this was not observed in the unpatterned (low-impedance) neuron. Since neurons are threshold units, a minor difference in the voltage response substantially affects the neuron’s behaviour, especially at Vm near the threshold. From the viewpoint of neural computation, the values of neuronal Zm thus determine the number of synaptic inputs necessary for a neuron to send an output signal. Considering that low-impedance neurons have a large dendritic field, such neuron is electrically and morphologically optimized as an integrator of a large number of inputs (Fig. 5c). In contrast, high-impedance neurons would be an optimal relay element that sends output responding to a small number of inputs.

## Discussion

In this study, we employed micropatterned substrates to geometrically confine cultured hippocampal neurons and studied the effect of morphological constraint on Zm that determines the input-output relation of neurons. Comparison of the electrophysiological data obtained from cultured hippocampal neurons with multi-compartmental neuron models showed that Zm of biological neurons is homeostatically regulated to impede minor perturbations in cell morphology.

The molecular mechanism behind the homeostatic regulation of Zm remains to be solved. Since the experiment was performed under activity-independent conditions and that homeostasis was observed on different culture days, a persistent change in the cell membrane, such as a change in leak-channel conductance, should underlie this phenomenon. One possible mechanism is that the density of leak channels is increased in the case of the confined culture. Another possible factor is the influence of mechano-gated K+ channels36,37,38,39. TREK-1 (TWIK-related K+ channel) channel, which belongs to a subclass of two-pore-domain of K+ channels, is extensively expressed in the entire cell membrane of hippocampal pyramidal neurons39. Morphological confinement could induce a constant stress on the cell membrane and increase the open probability of the TREK-1 channel, which results in a decrease in |Zm|. Lipid composition affects specific capacitance of bilayer lipid membranes40, which can result in a perturbation of |Zm|, but the range of variation in specific capacitance is rather small to describe the homeostatic regulation solely on this mechanism.

Under a physiological condition, the passive (low-pass) membrane property interacts with active conductance governed by voltage-gated ion channels, such as the HCN channel6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14 and the M-type K+ channel10,15, which act as high-pass filters. In subpopulations of neurons, such as the regular spiking and intrinsic bursting neurons in the neocortex2, stellate cells in the entorhinal cortex16,17, and a small fraction (~20%) of hippocampal pyramidal neurons15, the high-pass filtering property is significantly strong, and the neuronal membrane is endowed with a band-pass filtering property that regulate rhythmic activity in the neuronal network. The passive membrane impedance also influences the function of such band-pass neurons, thus the mechanism presented here represents a potentially general strategy for tuning the network function and dynamics in the nervous system.

In summary, we provided direct evidence that biological neurons bear a cell-autonomous mechanism for homeostatically retaining Zm when cell morphology is subjected to a minor deviation. We also found that |Zm| changes in a size-dependent manner when the deviation is large. This influences the neuron’s function as a coincidence detector, or the “quorum” of neuronal firing. Since this property strongly affects the spontaneous activity patterns41,42 and noise-sensitivity of neuronal networks, it would be of great interest to examine the influence Zm modification on the spatiotemporal patterns of network activity. Development of a patterning method that permits a graded control of dendritic lengths and soma sizes would assist further research in this direction, as well as in elucidating the underlying mechanism of Zm homeostasis. Not only during development but also in mature brains, neurons are subjected to a constant perturbation in membrane area. The homeostatic mechanism presented in this study would help neuronal networks to operate resiliently under such perturbations.

## Methods

### Microcontact printing

The procedure of microcontact printing used to fabricate the patterned substrate has been described previously31. Briefly, glass coverslips were fully cleaned by ultrasonication in 100% ethanol for 5 min, rinsed three times in Milli-Q grade water, and treated in an air-plasma for 60 s (Yamato PM100). Several dots of paraffin wax (Sigma P3558) were then placed at the periphery of the coverslip to provide a ~0.5 mm spacing between the coverslip and glial feeder layers during cell culturing. The substrate was then coated with 0.2% agarose (Sigma A9918), dried overnight, and sterilized under UV light for 30 min. PDMS stamps were cleaned by ultrasonication in 100% ethanol for 5 min, dried in air, and the surface of the stamps were then coated with a protein ink solution. The ink solution consisted of 50 μg mL−1 poly-D-lysine hydrobromide (Sigma P0899) and extracellular matrix gel (Sigma E1270; 1:100 dilution) in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s Medium (Gibco 10569-010). After drying the protein ink, the PDMS stamps was pressed against the agarose-coated glass coverslips using a single-axis micromanipulator.

### Cell culture

All experiments were approved by the Center for Laboratory Animal Research at Tohoku University and were performed in accordance with the University’s guidelines. Timed-pregnant Sprague Dawley rats were obtained from Charles River Laboratories Japan, and hippocampal neurons were dissociated from embryonic day 18 pups. The neurons were plated on the patterned glass coverslips at a density of 7.0 × 103 cells cm−2 in the neuronal plating medium [5% fetal bovine serum (Gibco 16140-071) and 0.55% glucose in minimum essential medium (MEM; Gibco 11095-080)]. After 3 h, the coverslip was flipped upside-down and transferred to a 60-mm dish with an astrocyte feeder layer containing 4 mL of N-2 culture medium [10% N2 supplement, 0.5 mg mL−1 ovalbumin (Sigma A2512), and 10 mM HEPES in MEM]. After 4 DIV, 1 mL of Neurobasal medium [2% B-27 supplement (Gibco 17504-044) and 1% GlutaMAX-I (Gibco 35050-061) in Neurobasal medium (Gibco 21103-049) containing 1 μM cytosine arabinoside] was added to each culture dish. At 8 DIV, 2 mL of the culture medium was replaced with a conditioned Neurobasal medium.

### Immunocytochemistry

Neurons were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/4% sucrose solution for 15 min at 37 °C, permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100, and blocked with 0.5% fish skin gelatin at 7 and 16 DIV26. The following antibodies were used: anti-SMI312 (BioLegend 837904, mouse IgG1/IgM, 0.5 μg mL−1), anti-MAP2 [Abcam ab5392, chicken polyclonal IgY (IgG), 2.5 μg mL−1], Alexa 488-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG1 (Molecular Probes A21121, 2 μg mL−1), and Alexa 568-labeled goat anti-chicken IgG (Molecular Probes A11041, 8 μg mL−1).

### Electrophysiology

Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings (HEKA EPC-10) were performed at 7 and 16 DIV. The extracellular solution for the recording contained (in mM): 140 NaCl, 2.4 KCl, 10 HEPES, 10 glucose, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2 (pH 7.4). To block any voltage-dependent Na+ currents and glutamatergic neurotransmission, 1 μM TTX (Latoxan L8503) and 10 μM CNQX (Sigma C127) were added to the solution. In some experiments, 14 mM TEA (Wako 206-04501) was additionally included in the extracellular solution to block voltage-dependent K+ currents. Borosilicate micropipettes (Sutter BF 150-86-10) were pulled by a micropipette puller (Sutter P-97) immediately before each recording. The intracellular solution contained (in mM): 146.3 KCl, 0.6 MgCl2, 4 ATP-Mg, 0.3 GTP-Na, 5 U mL−1 creatine phosphokinase, 12 phosphocreatine, 1 EGTA, 17.8 HEPES (pH 7.4). Signals were sampled at 20 kHz and filtered with 10 kHz and 2.9 kHz Bessel filters. Recordings were performed at room temperature.

The current-voltage relationship of neurons were obtained by first clamping Vm at −70 mV and then applying test pulses of −90 mV to +40 mV (duration, 500 ms). The mean evoked current of the last 50 ms, offset by the membrane current before stimulation, was analysed. To obtain membrane impedance spectra, a sinusoidal current, iin, with a constant amplitude of 50 pA, a linear or exponential frequency span of 0.1–100 Hz, and a duration of 50 s was applied to neurons under the current-clamp mode. Precisely, iin of a linear chirp input is given by:

$${i}_{{\rm{in}}}=a\,\sin [2\pi ({f}_{0}+\frac{k}{2}t)t],$$
(1)

where a = 50 pA is the amplitude, and $$k=({f}_{1}-{f}_{0})/T$$ is the rate of frequency increase with f0 = 0.1 Hz, f1 = 100 Hz, and T = 50 s. Correspondingly, iin of an exponential chirp input is given by:

$${i}_{{\rm{i}}{\rm{n}}}=a\,\sin [\frac{2\pi {f}_{0}}{{\rm{l}}{\rm{n}}(k)}({k}^{t}-1)].$$
(2)

Unless otherwise noted, the membrane potential was set to −70 mV with current injection. The discrete Fourier transforms of iin and the voltage response (vout), which we denote I and V, respectively, were then obtained using the FFT function implemented in Python-NumPy. The magnitude and argument (or phase) of I and V were then:

$$|X|=\sqrt{X\cdot {X}^{\ast }},$$
(3)
$$\text{arg}(X)={\tan }^{-1}(\frac{{\rm{Im}}[X]}{{\rm{Re}}[X]}),$$
(4)

where X is either I or V, $$|\,\cdot \,|$$ the magnitude, * the complex conjugate, arg$$(\,\cdot \,)$$ the argument, and Re[X] and Im[X] are the real and imaginary parts of X, respectively. Finally, the magnitude and the phase of impedance (Zm) were derived by:

$$|{Z}_{{\rm{m}}}|=\frac{|V|}{|I|},$$
(5)
$$\text{arg}({Z}_{{\rm{m}}})=\text{arg}(V)-\text{arg}(I).$$
(6)

The data are presented by taking an arithmetic average over ± 0.2 Hz around 10, 20, …, 90 Hz. Values in the range of 50 ± 0.1 Hz were eliminated from the analysis in order to filter out possible AC power noise.

For applying synaptic current to neurons, the current-clamp amplifier was driven by an analogue signal from a computer running the Real-Time Experimental Interface43. The synaptic current at time t, isyn(t), was calculated from the following equation:

$${i}_{{\rm{syn}}}(t)={g}_{{\rm{syn}}}(t)\cdot [{V}_{{\rm{m}}}(t)-{E}_{{\rm{syn}}}],$$
(7)
$${g}_{{\rm{s}}{\rm{y}}{\rm{n}}}(t)={g}_{max}\cdot \frac{t}{\tau }\cdot \exp (-\frac{t-\tau }{\tau }),$$
(8)

where gsyn is the synaptic conductance, Vm the membrane potential of the recorded neuron, Esyn the reversal potential of an excitatory synapse (20 mV), $${g}_{{\rm{\max }}}$$ the maximum synaptic conductance (20 nS) and τ the membrane time constant (10 ms).

### Simulation

The neuron model was implemented in the NEURON software44 and was used to theoretically investigate the morphology-dependence of Zm. A multi-compartmental neuron model consisting of a soma attached to an axon and dendrites were prepared. The models of the patterned and unpatterned neurons at 7 and 16 DIV were constructed to mimic the soma and dendritic morphology of biological neurons, which were determined by tracing the immunostained sample. Soma was represented with a cylinder having identical values of diameter and height, which were 16.9 μm (7 DIV patterned), 20.9 μm (7 DIV unpatterned), 26.7 μm (16 DIV patterned), and 42.5 μm (16 DIV unpatterned). Dendrites were represented with 2 μm-diameter cylinders with varying lengths as summarized in Table 1. For modelling axons, the length of cylindrical compartment was kept constant to be 500 μm for all neuron models unless otherwise noted, and the diameter was set to be 0.5 μm. The specific membrane capacitance, specific membrane resistivity, specific axial resistance were set to be 1 μF cm−2, 10 kΩ cm2, and 150 Ω cm, respectively. The values of the parameters were based on previous literature reports on the hippocampal neuron model11,45. A chirp current with an amplitude of 50 pA, a linear frequency span of 0.1–100 Hz, and a duration of 100 s was injected to the models, and the impedance spectra was obtained as described in the previous section.

### Data availability

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## References

1. 1.

Izhikevich, E. M., Desai, N. S., Walcott, E. C. & Hoppen-Steadt, F. C. Bursts as a Unit of Neural Information: Selective Communication via Resonance. Trends Neurosci. 26, 161–167 (2003).

2. 2.

Hutcheon, B., Miura, R. M. & Puil, E. Subthreshold Membrane Resonance in Neocortical Neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 76, 683–697 (1996).

3. 3.

Hutcheon, B. & Yarom, Y. Resonance, Oscillation and the Intrinsic Frequency Preferences of Neurons. Trends Neurosci. 23, 216–222 (2000).

4. 4.

Gulledge, A. T., Kampa, B. M. & Stuart, G. J. Synaptic Integration in Dendritic Trees. J. Neurobiol. 64, 75–90 (2005).

5. 5.

Blankenburg, S., Wu, W., Lindner, B. & Schreiber, S. Information Filtering in Resonant Neurons. J. Comput. Neurosci. 39, 349–370 (2015).

6. 6.

Watanabe, H., Tsubokawa, H., Tsukada, M. & Aihara, T. Frequency-Dependent Signal Processing in Apical Dendrites of Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Cells. Neuroscience 278, 194–210 (2014).

7. 7.

Womelsdorf, T., Valiante, T. A., Sahin, N. T., Miller, K. J. & Tiesinga, P. Dynamic Circuit Motifs Underlying Rhythmic Gain Control, Gating and Integration. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1031–1039 (2014).

8. 8.

Colgin, L. L. Mechanisms and Function of Theta Rhythms. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 36, 295–312 (2013).

9. 9.

Zemankovics, R., Káli, S., Paulsen, O., Freund, T. F. & Hájos, N. Differences in Subthreshold Resonance of Hippocampal Pyramidal Cells and Interneurons: The Role of h-Current and Passive Membrane Characteristics. J. Physiol. 588, 2109–2132 (2010).

10. 10.

Hu, H., Vervaeke, K. & Storm, J. F. Two Forms of Electrical Resonance at Theta Frequencies, Generated by M-Current, h-Current and Persistent Na+ Current in Rat Hippocampal Pyramidal Cells. J. Physiol. 545, 783–805 (2002).

11. 11.

Narayanan, R. & Johnston, D. Long-Term Potentiation in Rat Hippocampal Neurons is Accompanied by Spatially Widespread Changes in Intrinsic Oscillatory Dynamics and Excitability. Neuron 56, 1061–1075 (2007).

12. 12.

Narayanan, R. & Johnston, D. The h Channel Mediates Location Dependence and Plasticity of Intrinsic Phase Response in Rat Hippocampal Neurons. J. Neurosci. 28, 5846–5860 (2008).

13. 13.

Marcelin, B. et al. h Channel-Dependent Deficit of Theta Oscillation Resonance and Phase Shift in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. Neurobiol. Dis. 33, 436–447 (2009).

14. 14.

He, C., Chen, F., Li, B. & Hu, Z. Neurophysiology of HCN Channels: From Cellular Functions to Multiple Regulation. Prog. Neurobiol. 112, 1–23 (2014).

15. 15.

Vera, J., Alcayaga, J. & Sanhueza, M. Competition between Persistent Na+ and Muscarine-Sensitive K+ Currents Shapes Perithreshold Resonance and Spike Tuning in CA1 Pyramidal Neurons. Front. Cell Neurosci. 11, 00061 (2017).

16. 16.

Erchova, I., Kreck, G., Heinemann, U. & Herz, A. V. M. Dynamics of Rat Entorhinal Cortex Layer II and III Cells: Characteristics of Membrane Potential Resonance at Rest Predict Oscillation Properties near Threshold. J. Physiol. 560, 89–110 (2004).

17. 17.

Schreiber, S., Erchova, I., Heineman, U. & Herz, A. V. M. Subthreshold Resonance Explains the Frequency-Dependent Integration of Periodic as Well as Random Stimuli in the Entorhinal Cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 408–415 (2004).

18. 18.

Heys, J. G., Giocomo, L. M. & Hasselmo, M. E. Cholinergic Modulation of the Resonance Properties of Stellate Cells in Layer II of Medial Entorhinal Cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 104, 258–270 (2010).

19. 19.

Bitzenhofer, S. H. et al. Layer-Specific Optogenetic Activation of Pyramidal Neurons Causes beta-gamma Entrainment of Neonatal Networks. Nat. Commun. 8, 14563 (2017).

20. 20.

Kasai, H., Fukuda, M., Hayashi-Takagi, A. & Noguchi, J. Structural Dynamics of Dendritic Spines in Memory and Cognition. Trends. Neurosci. 33, 121–129 (2010).

21. 21.

Hickmott, P. W. & Steen, P. A. Large-Scale Changes in Dendritic Structure during Reorganization of Adult Somatosensory Cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 140–142 (2005).

22. 22.

Luikart, B. W. et al. Pten Knowckdown In Vivo Increases Excitatory Drive onto Dentate Granule Cells. J. Neurosci. 31, 4345–4354 (2011).

23. 23.

Jacot-Descombes, S. et al. Decreased Pyramidal Neuron Size in Brodmann Areas 44 and 45 in Patients with Autism. Acta Neuropathol. 124, 67–79 (2012).

24. 24.

LaSarge, C. L. & Danzer, S. C. Mechanisms Regulating Neuronal Excitability and Seizure Development Following mTOR Pathway Hyperactivation. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 7, 18 (2014).

25. 25.

Yamamoto, H. et al. In-Situ Guidance of Individual Neuronal Processes by Wet Femtosecond-Laser Processing of Self-Assembled Monolayers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 163701 (2011).

26. 26.

Yamamoto, H. et al. Differential Neurite Outgrowth is Required for Axon Specification by Cultured Hippocampal Neurons. J. Neurochem. 123, 904–910 (2012).

27. 27.

Scott, M. A., Wissner-Gross, Z. D. & Yanik, M. F. Ultra-Rapid Laser Protein Micropatterning: Screening for Directed Polarization of Single Neurons. Lab Chip 12, 2265–2276 (2012).

28. 28.

Tomba, C. et al. Geometrical Determinants of Neuronal Actin Waves. Front. Cell Neurosci. 11, 86 (2017).

29. 29.

Offenhäusser, A. et al. Microcontact Printing of Proteins for Neuronal Cell Guidance. Soft Matter 3, 290–298 (2007).

30. 30.

Zhu, G., Du, L., Jin, L. & Offenhäusser, A. Effects of Morphology Constraint on Electrophysiological Properties of Cortical Neurons. Sci. Rep. 6, 23086 (2016).

31. 31.

Yamamoto, H. et al. Unidirectional Signal Propagation in Primary Neurons Micropatterned at a Single-Cell Resolution. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 043703 (2016).

32. 32.

Kim, W. R., Jang, M. J., Joo, S., Sun, W. & Nam, Y. Surface-Printed Microdot Array Chips for the Quantification of Axonal Collateral Branching of a Single Neuron in vitro. Lab Chip 14, 799–805 (2014).

33. 33.

Craig, A. M. & Banker, G. Neuronal Polarity. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 267–310 (1994).

34. 34.

Zhang, Q.-Y. et al. Stiff Substrates Enhance Cultured Neuronal Network Activity. Sci. Rep. 4, 6215 (2014).

35. 35.

Aspart, F., Ladenbauer, J. & Obermayer, K. Extending Integrate-and-Fire Model Neurons to Account for the Effects of Weak Electric Fields and Input Filtering Mediated by the Dendrite. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1005206 (2016).

36. 36.

Besana, A., Robinson, R. B. & Feinmark, S. J. Lipids and Two-Pore Domain K+ Channels in Excitable Cells. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 77, 103–110 (2005).

37. 37.

Sigurdson, W. J. & Morris, C. E. Stretch-Activated Ion Channels in Growth Cones of Snail Neurons. J. Neurosci. 9, 2801–2808 (1989).

38. 38.

Hervieu, G. J. et al. Distribution and Expression of TREK-1, a Two-Pore-Domain Potassium Channel, in the Adult Rat CNS. Neuroscience 103, 899–919 (2001).

39. 39.

Honoré, E. The Neuronal Background K2P Channels: Focus on TREK1. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 251–261 (2007).

40. 40.

Garten, M. et al. Whole-GUV Patch-Clamping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 328–333 (2017).

41. 41.

Soriano, J., Martinez, M. R., Tlusty, T. & Moses, E. Development of Input Connections in Neural Cultures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 13758–13763 (2008).

42. 42.

Orlandi, J. G., Soriano, J., Alvarez-Lacalle, E., Teller, S. & Casademunt, J. Noise Focusing and the Emergence of Coherent Activity in Neuronal Cultures. Nat. Phys. 9, 582–590 (2013).

43. 43.

Patel, Y. A. et al. Hard Real-Time Closed-Loop Electrophysiology with the Real-Time eXperiment Interface (RTXI). PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005430 (2017).

44. 44.

Carnevale, N. T. & Hines, M. L. The NEURON Book (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006).

45. 45.

Narayanan, R. & Johnston, D. Calcium Store Depletion Induces Persistent Perisomatic Increases in the Functional Density of h Channels in Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 104, 1020–1033 (2010).

## Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the Research Fellowships for Young Scientists (R.M.) and the Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (No. 15K17449) (H.Y.) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and by the CREST Program from the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JPMJCR14F3) (A.H.I.).

## Author information

### Author notes

• Hideaki Yamamoto

Present address: WPI-AIMR, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan

• Michio Niwano

Present address: Kansei Fukushi Research Institute, Tohoku Fukushi University, 6-149-1 Kunimigaoka, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 989-3201, Japan

### Affiliations

1. #### Research Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8577, Japan

• Ryosuke Matsumura
• , Takeshi Hayakawa
• , Michio Niwano
•  & Ayumi Hirano-Iwata
2. #### Frontier Research Institute for Interdisciplinary Sciences, Tohoku University, 6-3 Aramaki-aza Aoba, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8578, Japan

• Hideaki Yamamoto
3. #### Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Fukuoka University, 8-19-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan

• Shutaro Katsurabayashi
4. #### WPI-Advanced Institute for Materials Research (WPI-AIMR), Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8577, Japan

• Ayumi Hirano-Iwata

### Contributions

R.M. and H.Y. conceived and designed the project. M.N. and A.H.I. supervised the project with inputs from S.K. R.M. and T.H. performed the experiments and simulations. R.M. and H.Y. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript.

### Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hideaki Yamamoto.