Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been explored in many critical cellular processes, including proliferation and apoptosis. The purpose of this study was to detect the biological function and regulation of miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p in gastric cancer (GC). Here, we demonstrated that miR-99b-5p/203a-3p were downregulated in both GC tissues and cell lines. MiR-99b-5p/203a-3p overexpression reduced GC cell proliferation and cell cycle progression in vitro. Notably, we combined bioinformatics tools with biological validation assays to demonstrate that insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) is a direct co-target and functional mediator of miR-99b-5p/203a-3p in GC cells. Mechanistically, the AKT pathway, which is downstream of IGF-1R, is essential for the functional roles of miR-99b-5p/203a-3p in GC cells. Taken together, our data revealed that IGF-1R is a direct co-target of miR-99b-5p/203a-3p, and miR-99b-5p/203a-3p may function as tumor suppressive miRNAs by negatively regulating IGF-1R expression in GC cells.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant diseases and the second cause of cancer mortality worldwide1,2. Despite of the multiple advances in clinical and experimental cancer treatment, the prognosis of GC remains poor, with a terrible 5-year survival. Numerous studies have shown that the progression of GC might be a multistep process, involving the interaction between oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes3,4. Consequently, a better understanding of molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways is indispensable for identification of therapeutic targets for GC.
MiRNAs are a class of highly conserved (18–23 nucleotides), non-coding RNAs that modulate target genes expression through binding to 3′-untranslated regions (3′UTR) of mRNAs, which may result in mRNA degradation and translational repression5,6. MiRNAs play a significant role in regulation of biological processes, including cellular apoptosis, proliferation and differentiation7,8,9. Many reports have suggested that more than half of the miRNAs are located in cancer-related genomic regions and have been identified as oncogenes or tumor suppressors, suggesting that lots of miRNAs contribute to the progression of human cancers10,11,12.
MiR-99b belongs to the members of the miR-125a-let-7e cluster and has been reported to be involved in the differentiation, migration and proliferation of cancer cells. Studies have shown that miR-99b may function as modulators within a complex network of factors regulating TGF-β induced breast epithelial to mesenchymal transition13. Moreover, miR-99b inhibits cervical cancer cell invasion and proliferation by targeting mTOR signaling pathway14. MiR-203, is located on chromosome 14q32.33, which plays an important role in the regulation of human cancers. For example, miR-203a regulates proliferation and migration by targeting glycogen synthase kinase-3β in renal cell carcinoma15. In GC, aberrant expression of miRNAs, such as miR-338-3p and miR-145, has been shown to regulate tumor process by targeting downstream genes16,17. However, the role of miR-99b-5p/203a-3p and their cellular signaling pathway in GC are less reported and need further study.
Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) is a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase that primarily activated by IGF1 and IGF218,19,20. Activated IGF-IR triggers numerous downstream signaling cascades, including mitogen-activated proteins Kinase (MAPK) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT signaling pathways that regulate carcinogenic transformation and growth of cancer cells21,22,23. Previous studies have implicated that IGF-1R was related to tumor regulation in many cancers, such as pancreatic cancer24, breast cancer25,26, lung cancer27 and hepatocellular carcinoma28. While some research has been carried out on miRNAs regulating IGF-1R expression, few studies have reported the relationship between miR-99b-5p/203a-3p and IGF-1R in GC.
Here, we investigated the roles of miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p in GC, which might play as suppressors, and demonstrated that IGF-1R was a co-target of miR-99b-5p/203a-3p to regulate the AKT signaling pathway. Hence, our findings facilitate better understanding of the miRNAs network control mechanism in the progression of GC.
Results
MiR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p are downregulated in GC
To determine whether miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p were aberrantly expressed in GC, we re-analyzed RNA-seq data that was downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas website (TCGA) and found that miR-99b and miR-203a levels were lower in GC tissues than in normal tissue controls (P < 0.01) (Fig. 1A). We then performed qRT-PCR analysis in a set of 30 GC tissues and 30 matched adjacent normal gastric tissues. Significantly, a remarkable decrease of miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p expression was observed in the GC tissues compared with that in the matching non-tumor tissues. Based on the miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p expression levels measured by RT-qPCR, the 30 patients were divided into low (<1) and high (>1) miR-99b-5p/203a-3p expression groups according to the non-tumor tissues using the relative quantification. (Fig. 1C). The correlation between clinicopathologic factors and miR-99b-5p/203a-3p levels was examined in GC samples as shown in Table 1. The data showed that the expression was not associated with gender (P = 0.227/0.227), age (P = 0.169/ 0.612), lymphatic metastasis histology (P = 0.499/0.501), TNM stage (P = 0.543/0.743) and histology (P = 0.213/0.103), probably owing to the limited number of samples. In addition, as shown in Fig. 1B, the survival time was significantly longer in patients with miR-203a-high expression than that in patients with miR-203a-low expression (P < 0.05). However, the survival time did not differ between miR-99b-high and miR-99b-low expression.
To investigate miR-99b-5p/203a-3p function in vitro, we examined their expression in two GC cell lines. As shown in Fig. 1D, SGC-7901 and MKN-45, were characterized with lower expression of miR-99b-5p/203a-3p in mRNA levels compared with the immortalized gastric epithelial cell lines (GES-1) (P < 0.05). Together, these data reveal that the downregulation of miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p may be involved in GC development.
Overexpression of miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p inhibit proliferation of GC cells
To study the biological role of miR-99b-5p/203a-3p in tumor cells, cell growth was evaluated by MTT and colony formation assays. GC cells were transfected with pre-miR-99b or pre-miR-203a plasmid and controls. The transfection efficiency was monitored with GFP-labeled oligo, and an average of 80% efficiency was observed (Supplementary Fig. 1). Successful increase of miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p expression in GC cells was confirmed by qRT-PCR (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2A).
MTT and colony formation assays showed that significant inhibition of cell proliferation in the miR-99b or miR-203a transfected cells compared with the control vector (P < 0.05, Fig. 2B,C). To further address whether the observed changes in proliferation were due to cell cycle and apoptosis, PI staining assay was used. Overexpression of miR-99b-5p/203a-3p repressed cell cycle arrest at G1-S in GC cells (Fig. 2D) and induced cell apoptosis (Fig. 2E).
To further explore the possible molecular mechanisms of miR-99b-5p/203a-3p arrested cell cycle and resulting apoptosis, we detected the expression of cell cycle related regulators and apoptosis-related proteins. After overexpression of miR-99b-5p/203a-3p in GC cells, the results of western blot analysis demonstrated that miR-99b-5p/203a-3p expression reduced the expression of cyclin D1, CDK4/6 (Fig. 2D) and Bcl-2 (Fig. 2F), as well as upregulated Bax. Together, these findings indicate that miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p may act as tumor suppressors in GC.
Inhibition of miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p promote proliferation of GC cells
To investigate the antiproliferative role of miR-99b-5p/203a-3p in SGC-7901 and MKN-45 cells, we eliminated endogenous miR-99b-5p/203a-3p in cells by using their inhibitors. The expression of miR-99b-5p/203a-3p was significantly decreased in GC cells after transfection of their inhibitors (P < 0.05, Fig. 3A). Downregulation of miR-99b-5p/203a-3p resulted in slightly increased cell viability, colony formation and a slight difference in cell cycle and apoptosis, which may be due to the low expression of endogenous miR-99b-5p/203a-3p in GC cells (Fig. 3B–E).
In addition, downregulation of miR-99b-5p/203a-3p increased the expression of cyclin D1, CDK4/6 (Fig. 3D) and Bcl-2 (Fig. 3F), as well as decreased Bax expression. These results demonstrate that miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p regulate the proliferation, cell cycle and cell apoptosis of GC cells.
IGF-1R is a co-target of miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p
To further explore the underlying mechanisms by which miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p exert their functional effects on GC, we used RegRNA to search for potential downstream targets of these two miRNAs (Supplementary Fig. 2). As shown in Fig. 4A, IGF-1R was selected for some binding sites both of miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p, which was observed in the 3′UTR of IGF-1R mRNA. Then, we performed luciferase reporter assay containing wild (WT) and mutated (MUT) IGF-1R 3′UTR. When co-transfected with IGF-1R 3′UTR, miR-99b and miR-203a showed a significant reduction of IGF-1R. In addition, the luciferase activity was unaffected by the miR-99b-mut and miR-203a-mut, indicating that miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p may suppress gene expression through their binding sequences at the IGF-1R 3′UTR (Fig. 4B).
Moreover, we found that the IGF-1R level was overexpressed in GC tissues than compared to normal tissue controls from TCGA database (P < 0.01). Kaplan-Meier survival curves are shown in Fig. 4C (P > 0.05). We then performed qRT-PCR in a set of 30 primary GC tissues and 30 paired non-tumor gastric tissues from the same patients and found that IGF-1R was upregulated in GC tissues. Meanwhile, miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p levels were inversely correlated with IGF-1R expression by qRT-PCR assay. Likewise, the same results IGF-1R mRNA and protein overexpressed in MKN-45/SGC-7901 cell lines, in which both miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p were downregulated (Fig. 4D). The analysis of the relationship between IGF-1R expression level and clinical features of GC patients is shown in Table 1.
In addition, qRT-PCR and western blot analysis showed that pre-miR-99b-5p/203a-3p markedly reduced, whereas miR-99b-5p/203a-3p inhibitors increased the mRNA and protein expression of IGF-1R and the phosphorylation of AKT (P-AKT) at serine 473. However, there is no difference with the total AKT expression (Fig. 4E,F). Together, these findings strongly suggested that miR-99b-5p/203a-3p regulated IGF-1R-AKT signaling pathway by targeting the IGF-1R 3′UTR in the development of GC.
IGF-1R is involved in miR-99b-5p/203a-3p regulated cell proliferation in GC cells
To evaluate whether IGF-1R was implicated in the antitumor effects of miR-99b-5p/203a-3p in GC, we performed loss-of-function studies by transfection IGF-1R siRNA in MKN-45 and SGC-7901 cells (P < 0.05, Fig. 5A). We found that cell proliferation and colony formation (Fig. 5B,C) were significantly decreased after IGF-1R downregulation. Furthermore, silencing of IGF-1R increased the proportion of GC cells in S-phase and induced cell apoptosis (P < 0.05, Fig. 5D,E), following the same trend as overexpression of miR-99b-5p/203a-3p. In addition, IGF-1R knockdown markedly inhibited the expression of IGF-1R, P-AKT, Cyclin A2, CDK2, and Bcl2, and it promoted Bax expression (Fig. 5F). These results demonstrated that silencing of IGF-1R and overexpressing of miR-99b-5p/203a-3p shared similar effects in GC cells.
To further explore that miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p inhibited tumor progression through targeting IGF-1R, we constructed rescue experiments and co-transfected of si-IGF-1R and anti-miR-99b-5p/203a-3p or their controls in GC cells. Silencing of IGF-1R in GC cells partly rescued the cells from the effects of anti-miR-99b-5p/203a-3p on regulation of IGF-1R expression (Fig. 6A–E). These findings provided additional evidence that miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p exhibited tumor suppressor role by directly targeting IGF-1R.
Discussion
MiRNAs have been regarded as critical regulators in cancer-related processes29,30. Increasing evidence have demonstrated that tumor-targeting therapies using miRNAs is becoming a novel diagnostic and therapeutic tool31. miR-223, miR-21 and miR-218 have been identified as novel potential biomarkers for gastric cancer detection. In previous studies, miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p have been reported to be involved in several cancers32,33,34. For example, miRNA-99b-5p suppresses liver metastasis of colorectal cancer by down-regulating mTOR, and miR-203a suppresses cell metastasis and angiogenesis through VEGFR by targeting HOXD3 in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells35,36. Besides, Liu W et al. have reported that downregulation of miR-203a by promoter methylation contributes to the invasiveness of gastric cardia adenocarcinoma. However, the underlying mechanisms responsible for decreased expression of miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p in GC remain to be determined.
In the present study, we observed that miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p were markedly down-expressed in GC tissues and cell lines, which is consistent with the analysis of TCGA. However, the overlap between nontumoral and tumor tissues may be because a large difference in the number of groups. Functionally, based on gain- or loss-of-function assays, our study showed that miR-99b-5p/203a-3p suppressed the cell growth and colony formation, leading to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in GC cells. Moreover, exogenous miR-203a-3p expression inhibited cell proliferation by decreasing its viability and inhibiting its colony forming capacity more efficiently than miR-99b-5p. In addition, miR-99b-5p/203a-3p altered the expression of the apoptosis/cell cycle-related proteins, including Bcl-2, Bax, CDK4/6, and CyclinD1. Therefore, these results suggest that miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p functioned as tumor suppressors for the cell growth in GC. To this end, validation by in vivo assays is needed for further research.
To further determine the mechanisms and target mRNAs that were responsible for the suppressive role of miR-99b-5p/203a-3p, we observed that IGF-1R was a target gene of these two miRNAs. Previous studies have showed that IGF-1R is frequently overexpressed in human myeloma37, oral squamous cell carcinoma38 and breast cancer39,40,41,42 and that lots of miRNAs coordinate to regulate IGF-1R at multiple levels43,44. There were also two reasons for choosing IGF-1R. Firstly, IGF-1R was a co-target gene of miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p. Secondly, in our previous study that miR-302b-3p suppresses cell proliferation by targeting IGF-1R in GC44.
In this study, using bioinformatic analyses and a luciferase reporter assay, we confirmed that IGF-1R as a direct co-target gene of miR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p. However, there is no significant inverse correlation between miR-99b-5p/203a-3p and IGF-1R, may be due to the limited number of GC tissue samples. Both mRNA and protein of IGF1R were significantly decreased in miRNAs overexpression group when compared to controls in GC cells. In contrast, we used siRNA to knockdown the expression of IGF-1R and showed that silencing IGF-1R inhibited the cell proliferation and induced cell apoptosis, which is similar to the effect of miR-99b-5p/miR-203a-3p overexpression in GC cells. Interestingly, silencing of IGF-1R in GC cells partly rescued the cells from the effects of anti-miR-99b-5p/203a-3p on regulation of IGF-1R expression and cell proliferation. These results strongly suggested that miR-99b-5p/203a-3p suppress the expression of IGF1R through directly targeting its 3′UTR.
Numerous studies showed that activation of the AKT signaling pathway was essential to the development and progression of cancer. Notably, IGF-1R exerted its function by activating the AKT signaling pathway followed by activation of target genes. In this study, we found that AKT signal pathway was suppressed by miR-99b-5p/203a-3p. Additionally, knockdown of IGF-1R by siRNA could induce similar inhibitory effects with miR-99b-5p/203a-3p on IGF-1R and AKT signal pathway.
In summary, our study showed that aberrant expression of miR-99b-5p/miR-203a-3p could affect cell proliferation of GC cells, probably through IGF-1R and its downstream signal pathway. We hope that our findings for the miR-99b-5p/203a-3p/IGF-1R/AKT signaling pathway will provide valuable information for the development of therapies against GC.
Materials and Methods
Gastric tissue samples and cell lines
Human GC tissue samples were obtained from patients undergoing surgical gastric resection at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University and People’s Hospital of Shannxi Province. The matched non-tumorous tissues were taken from at least 5 cm distance from the edge of tumor tissues. To protocol used in the study was in accordance with the approved guidelines by the ethics committee, Xi’an Jiaotong University, and informed consent was obtained from all individuals. No patients (UICC I-II stages) received preoperative chemo- or radiotherapy before surgery. For UICC III and IV stages, patients agreed to be adjuvant with intraperitoneal chemotherapy to achieve better therapeutic effects. In addition, SGC-7901, MKN-45 and GES-1 cell lines were grown in RPMI-1640 medium (Thermo Scientific HyClone, USA) supplemented with 10% Biological Industries (BI), 10 mg/ml streptomycin (1% P/S) and incubated at 37 °C under a 5% CO2 condition.
RNA extraction and qRT-PCR
Total RNA was prepared from the GC cells and gastric tissues using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) following the manufacturer’s instruction. The RNA was quantified with a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (USA). Using PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit and SYBR Premix Ex Taq II Kit were purchased from TAKARA (Japan) for the detection of mature miRNAs expression and mRNA expression. The relative expression levels of IGF-1R and miR-99b-5p/203a-3p were respectively normalized to β-actin and U6. PCR was performed by IQ-5TM Real-Time PCR System (Bio-Rad, USA). IGF-1R-specific primers were as follows: forward 5′-TTTCCCACAGCAGTCCACCTC-3′; reverse 5′-AGCATCCTAGCCTTCTCACCC-3′. The relative expression levels were calculated by using the 2−ΔΔCt method. All reactions were run in triplicate and all experiments were conducted 3 times.
Plasmids, siRNA and transfection
For construction of miR-99b-5p (pre-miR-99b), miR-203a-3p (pre-miR-203a) expression vectors and control vector were synthesized with oligo-nucleotides and cloned in between the EcoR I and Hind III sites of the pcDNA6.2TM-GW/EmGFP vector (Invitrogen). The miR-99b-5p/203a-3p inhibitors and IGF-1R siRNA were purchased from Gene-Pharma (China). The vector sequences are listed in Supplemental Table 1. For transient transfection, Polyplus reagent (jetPRIME™ Transfection Reagent, Strasbourg, France) was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Dual-luciferase assay
The 3′UTR of human IGF-1R mRNA was constructed with synthetic oligo-nucleotides and cloned in between the Sac I and Xho I sites of the pmirGLO Dual-luciferase miRNA target expression vector (Promega). HEK293 cells were seeded in 96-well plate and allowed to settle for ~12 h. MiR-99b-5p or miR-203a-3p was co-transfected with the pmirGLO-IGF-1R-3′-UTR-WT or pmirGLO-IGF-1R-3′-UTR-WUT vector into HEK293 cells, respectively. The pmirGLO vector was used as control signals. Then, cells were measured at 24 h after transfection using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, USA).
Cell proliferation assay
3000 GC transfected cells were transferred to each well of a 96-well plate. At 24 h, 48 h and 72 h after transfection, cell proliferation was measured by the (3–4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Cells were stained with 0.5 mg/ml sterile MTT (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 4 h and incubated at 37 °C, and then, the medium was discarded, and an extra 150 μl DMSO (Sigma–Aldrich) was added. Cell viability was measured at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h after transfection using FLUOstar OPTIMA (BMG) at 490 nm absorbance.
Colony formation assay
For the assessment of colony formation, transfected GC cells were seeded in 6-well plates with 1000 cells/well in triplicate and incubated for 1–2 weeks. Then, the plates were washed with PBS and stained with 0.5% crystal violet for 20 minutes. After washing 3 times, the number of colonies was counted by taking pictures from Bio-Rad.
Cell cycle and cell apoptosis analysis
Cells were cultured in 6-well plates with 2 × 105 cells/well in triplicate and transfected for 48 h, which were then collected and washed with PBS two times and fixed with 70% ethanol at 4 °C overnight. Then, cells were treated with RNase A and propidium iodide (PI) according to KGI Cell Cycle Detection Kit (China). After incubation, the cells were assayed by flow cytometry (Becton, USA). For cell apoptosis analysis, after 48 h transfection, cells were analyzed with Annexin-V FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit (Invitrogen, USA) and examined by using flow cytometer; the data were examined by ModFit software.
Western blot
Total protein was harvested from GC cells using RIPA buffer (Wolsen, China) after 48 h transfection and 20 μg of isolated protein lysates were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membrane (Millipore, USA). The membranes were probed with the following primary antibodies: IGF-1R, AKT, phospho-AKT (Ser473), CCND1, CDK4/6, CDK2, Bcl-2 and Bax (Cell Signaling Technology, diluted 1/1,000) overnight at 4 °C. The expression levels of above proteins were standardized to human β-actin using a mouse mAb anti-β-actin antibody. Then, the membranes were incubated with the HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG antibody (ZSGB-BIO, China). The blots were scanned, and the band density was measured using the Quantity One imaging software.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the PASW Statistics 17.0 software (SPSS, USA). Each experiment was repeated at least three times. Independent sample Student’s t-test was used if the quantitative data between groups show normal distribution. If not consistent with the normal distribution, using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between two indices. The relationship between miR-99b-5p/203a-3p/IGF-1R expression level and clinical parameters was calculated by the χ2-test. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Change history
17 January 2023
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-27961-1
References
Rugge, M., Fassan, M. & Graham, D. Y. Epidemiology of gastric cancer. Springer International Publishing 23–34 (2015).
Kosaka, T. et al. Long‐term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: A single‐center retrospective study. Digestive Endoscopy 26, 183–19 (2014).
Fukagawa, T. et al. A prospective multi-institutional validity study to evaluate the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of pathological stage III gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 1–6 (2017).
Smyth, E. C. et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology 27, v38–v49 (2016).
Jayawardena, T. M. et al. MicroRNA-Mediated In Vitro and In Vivo Direct Reprogramming of Cardiac Fibroblasts to Cardiomyocytes Novelty and Significance. Circulation research 110, 1465–1473 (2012).
Aldridge, S. & Hadfield, J. Introduction to miRNA profiling technologies and cross-platform comparison. Next-Generation MicroRNA Expression Profiling Technology: Methods and Protocols 19–31 (2012).
Wang, Y. et al. miR-294/miR-302 promotes proliferation, suppresses G1-S restriction point, and inhibits ESC differentiation through separable mechanisms. Cell reports 4, 99–109 (2013).
Liu, X. et al. MicroRNA-196a promotes non-small cell lung cancer cell proliferation and invasion through targeting HOXA5. BMC cancer 12, 348 (2012).
Png, K. J. et al. A microRNA regulon that mediates endothelial recruitment and metastasis by cancer cells. Nature 481, 190–194 (2012).
Pereira, D. M. et al. Delivering the promise of miRNA cancer therapeutics. Drug discovery today 18, 282–289 (2013).
Chen, Y., Gao, D. Y. & Huang, L. In vivo delivery of miRNAs for cancer therapy: challenges and strategies. Advanced drug delivery reviews 81, 128–141 (2015).
Iorio, M. V. & Croce, C. M. MicroRNA dysregulation in cancer: diagnostics, monitoring and therapeutics. A comprehensive review, EMBO molecular medicine 4, 143–159 (2012).
Wang, L., Chang, L. & Li, Z. miR-99a and-99b inhibit cervical cancer cell proliferation and invasion by targeting mTOR signaling pathway. Medical oncology 31, 934 (2014).
Turcatel, G. & Rubin, N. El-Hashash A. MIR-99a and MIR-99b modulate TGF-β induced epithelial to mesenchymal plasticity in normal murine mammary gland cells. PloS one 7, e31032 (2012).
Hu, G., Lai, P. & Liu, M. miR-203a regulates proliferation, migration, and apoptosis by targeting glycogen synthase kinase-3β in human renal cell carcinoma. Tumor Biology 35, 11443–11453 (2014).
Guo, B. et al. miR-338-3p suppresses gastric cancer progression through a PTEN-AKT axis by targeting P-REX2a. Molecular Cancer Research 12, 313–321 (2014).
Xu, Q. et al. MiR-145 directly targets p70S6K1 in cancer cells to inhibit tumor growth and angiogenesis. Nucleic acids research 40, 761–774 (2012).
Delafontaine, P., Song, Y. H. & Li, Y. Expression, regulation, and function of IGF-1, IGF-1R, and IGF-1 binding proteins in blood vessels. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 24, 435–444 (2004).
Ulanet, D. B. et al. Insulin receptor functionally enhances multistage tumor progression and conveys intrinsic resistance to IGF-1R targeted therapy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 10791–10798 (2010).
Lin, Y. et al. SUMO-modified Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 Receptor (IGF-1R) Increases Cell Cycle Progression and Cell Proliferation. Journal of cellular physiology (2017).
Villanueva, J. et al. Acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors mediated by a RAF kinase switch in melanoma can be overcome by cotargeting MEK and IGF-1R/PI3K. Cancer cell 18, 683–695 (2010).
Wan, X. et al. Rapamycin induces feedback activation of Akt signaling through an IGF-1R-dependent mechanism. Oncogene 26, 1932–1940 (2007).
Lobato, G. C. et al. Metformin impacts IGF-1R/Akt signaling and energy metabolism in lung adenocarcinoma (2016).
Farhana, L. et al. Upregulation of miR-150* and miR-630 induces apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells by targeting IGF-1R. PloS one 8, e61015 (2013).
Santen, R. J. et al. Estrogen signals via an extra-nuclear pathway involving IGF-1R and EGFR in tamoxifen-sensitive and-resistant breast cancer cells. Steroids 74, 586–594 (2009).
Chang, C. et al. The metabolic regulator ERRα, a downstream target of HER2/IGF-1R, as a therapeutic target in breast cancer. Cancer cell 20, 500–510 (2011).
Yeo, C. D. et al. Inhibiting IGF-1R attenuates cell proliferation and VEGF production in IGF-1R over-expressing EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer cells. Experimental Lung Research 1–9 (2017).
Xu, Y. et al. MicroRNA-122 confers sorafenib resistance to hepatocellular carcinoma cells by targeting IGF-1R to regulate RAS/RAF/ERK signaling pathways. Cancer letters 371, 171–181 (2016).
Hummel, R., Hussey, D. J. & Haier, J. MicroRNAs: predictors and modifiers of chemo- and radiotherapy in different tumour types. Eur J Cancer 46, 298–311 (2010).
Shibuya, H., Iinuma, H., Shimada, R., Horiuchi, A. & Watanabe, T. Clinicopathological and prognostic value of microRNA-21 and microRNA-155 in colo-rectal cancer. Oncology 79, 313–320 (2011).
Iorio, M. V. & Croce, C. M. MicroRNAs in cancer: small molecules with a huge impact. J Clin Oncol 27, 5848–5856 (2009).
Otsubo, T. et al. MicroRNA-126 inhibits SOX2 expression and contributes to gastric carcinogenesis. PLoS One 6, e16617 (2011).
He, K. et al. miRNA-99b-3p functions as a potential tumor suppressor by targeting glycogen synthase kinase-3β in oral squamous cell carcinoma Tca-8113 cells. International journal of oncology 47, 1528–1536 (2015).
Wang, L. et al. EGR1 mediates miR-203a suppress the hepatocellular carcinoma cells progression by targeting HOXD3 through EGFR signaling pathway. Oncotarget 7, 45302–45316 (2016).
Li, W. et al. miRNA-99b-5p suppresses liver metastasis of colorectal cancer by down-regulating mTOR. Oncotarget 6, 24448 (2015).
Wang, L. et al. HOXD3 targeted by miR-203a suppresses cell metastasis and angiogenesis through VEGFR in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells[J]. Scientific reports 8, 2431 (2018).
Chng, W., Gualberto, A. & Fonseca, R. IGF-1R is overexpressed in poor-prognostic subtypes of multiple myeloma. Leukemia 20, 174–176 (2005).
Alajez, N. M., Shi, W. & Wong, D. Lin28b promotes head and neck cancer progression via modulation of the insulinlike growth factor survival pathway. Oncotarget 3, 1641–1652 (2012).
Wu, J. et al. Light at night activates IGF-1R/PDK1 signaling and accelerates tumor growth in human breast cancer xenografts. Cancer research 71, 2622–2631 (2011).
Vivanco, I. & Sawyers, C. L. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase–AKT pathway in human cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer 2, 489–501 (2002).
Hossain, F. et al. Abstract P5-07-06: A novel non-canonical Notch1-IKKα-mTORC2-AKT pathway maintains survival in triple negative breast cancer cells and cancer stem-like cells (2017).
Jia, C. Y. et al. MiR-223 suppresses cell proliferation by targeting IGF-1R. PloS one 6, 11 (2011).
Wang, B., Wang, H. & Yang, Z. MiR-122 inhibits cell proliferation and tumorigenesis of breast cancer by targeting IGF1R. PLoS One 7, 10 (2012).
Guo, B. et al. MicroRNA-302b-3p suppresses cell proliferation through AKT pathway by targeting IGF-1R in human gastric cancer. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry 42, 1701–1711 (2017).
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the scientific research and sharing platform construction project of Shaanxi Province (Grant NO. 2015FWPT-14), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant NO. 2016M602801), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant NO. 0811/1191320073), and Shaanxi natural science basic research project (Grant NO. 2017JM8112).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Zhenzhen Wang and Zhenghao Zhao involved in study designation, experimental operation, data analysis and drafting the manuscript. Yang Yang involved in sample collection, analysis and interpretation of data. Mai Luo and Min Zhang constructed the plasmids. Xiaofei Wang and Liying Liu performed a database analysis. Ni Hou and Qingqing Guo involved in revising the manuscript. Tusheng Song, Guo Bo and Chen Huang involved in obtaining funds for the study, study designed, interpretation of data and critically revising the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Z., Zhao, Z., Yang, Y. et al. MiR-99b-5p and miR-203a-3p Function as Tumor Suppressors by Targeting IGF-1R in Gastric Cancer. Sci Rep 8, 10119 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27583-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27583-y
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.