Decellularised skeletal muscles allow functional muscle regeneration by promoting host cell migration

Urciuolo, Anna; Urbani, Luca; Perin, Silvia; Maghsoudlou, Panagiotis; Scottoni, Federico; Gjinovci, Asllan; Collins-Hooper, Henry; Loukogeorgakis, Stavros; Tyraskis, Athanasios; Torelli, Silvia; Germinario, Elena; Fallas, Mario Enrique Alvarez; Julia-Vilella, Carla; Eaton, Simon; Blaauw, Bert; Patel, Ketan; De Coppi, Paolo

doi:10.1038/s41598-018-26371-y

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 30 May 2018

Decellularised skeletal muscles allow functional muscle regeneration by promoting host cell migration

Anna Urciuolo^1,2,7^na1,
Luca Urbani ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4988-552X^1,3,4^na1,
Silvia Perin ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0160-6795¹,
Panagiotis Maghsoudlou¹,
Federico Scottoni ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6796-7919¹,
Asllan Gjinovci¹,
Henry Collins-Hooper⁵,
Stavros Loukogeorgakis¹,
Athanasios Tyraskis¹,
Silvia Torelli¹,
Elena Germinario⁶,
Mario Enrique Alvarez Fallas¹,
Carla Julia-Vilella¹,
Simon Eaton ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0892-9204¹,
Bert Blaauw^2,6,
Ketan Patel⁵ &
…
Paolo De Coppi¹

Scientific Reports volume 8, Article number: 8398 (2018) Cite this article

9624 Accesses
55 Citations
16 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Pathological conditions affecting skeletal muscle function may lead to irreversible volumetric muscle loss (VML). Therapeutic approaches involving acellular matrices represent an emerging and promising strategy to promote regeneration of skeletal muscle following injury. Here we investigated the ability of three different decellularised skeletal muscle scaffolds to support muscle regeneration in a xenogeneic immune-competent model of VML, in which the EDL muscle was surgically resected. All implanted acellular matrices, used to replace the resected muscles, were able to generate functional artificial muscles by promoting host myogenic cell migration and differentiation, as well as nervous fibres, vascular networks, and satellite cell (SC) homing. However, acellular tissue mainly composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) allowed better myofibre three-dimensional (3D) organization and the restoration of SC pool, when compared to scaffolds which also preserved muscular cytoskeletal structures. Finally, we showed that fibroblasts are indispensable to promote efficient migration and myogenesis by muscle stem cells across the scaffolds in vitro. This data strongly support the use of xenogeneic acellular muscles as device to treat VML conditions in absence of donor cell implementation, as well as in vitro model for studying cell interplay during myogenesis.

Human skeletal muscle aging atlas

Article Open access 15 April 2024

CGRP sensory neurons promote tissue healing via neutrophils and macrophages

Article Open access 27 March 2024

Multimodal cell atlas of the ageing human skeletal muscle

Article Open access 22 April 2024

Introduction

Skeletal muscle is the most abundant tissue in the human body and composed of muscle fibres, muscle stem cells, nerves, blood vessels, interstitial cells and ECM. Skeletal muscle regeneration is dependent on SCs, the resident stem cells of muscle located beneath the basal lamina of muscle fibres^1,2,3. Despite having regenerative ability, skeletal muscle is unable to recover when the defect is too extensive (e.g. congenital malformations, traumatic injuries, surgical ablations or degenerative myopathies). As a consequence, skeletal muscle is not able to replace a VML and the result is a modification of the tissue architecture and composition accompanied by fibrosis and subsequent functional impairment or loss⁴. Available approaches to treat VML damages do not allow functional recovery of the damaged muscle⁵. Therefore, there is a great demand for developing new therapeutic strategy for VML.

Recent studies have shown the crucial role played by 3D environment and ECM on regulating stem cells identity and function⁶. Bioengineering approaches have attempted to combine natural/synthetic scaffolds with stem cells and growth factors for application in regenerative medicine⁷. Biomaterials have to replicate the properties of tissue-specific ECM, providing a 3D scaffold where stem cells can preserve their identity, adhere, proliferate, differentiate and generate a cellular 3D structure resembling the tissue of interest. Moreover, it is also important that scaffolds have a good rate of biocompatibility and biodegradability in order to promote progressive replacement with newly formed tissue without inducing any adverse inflammatory response, which could lead to scar tissue formation or scaffold rejection after in vivo implantation⁵. Despite improvement in biomaterials’ fabrication in recent years, there is an unmet need to develop scaffolds that respect all the above characteristics and support the development of functional tissues^8,9. Generation of ECM scaffolds by means of decellularisation eliminates cellular and nuclear content, but maintains biological activity, mechanical integrity and 3D structure of the tissue from which the ECM is derived⁵. Commonly used methods of decellularisation include the use of chemical or enzymatic agents and physical methods such as sonication¹⁰. Acellular scaffolds are biocompatible and are not rejected after allogeneic or xenogeneic transplantation⁵. A number of studies have successfully obtained acellular scaffolds from organs such as trachea¹¹, heart¹², kidney¹³, pancreas^14,15, lung^16,17, liver^18,19 and intestine²⁰. Indeed, some decellularised organs are in clinical use^21,22,23.

Acellular tissues –such as pig urinary bladder ECM, have been clinically used to treat VML conditions²⁴, and only recently acellular skeletal muscle matrices have been tested for the same application in animal model of VML^25,26,27. However, it still remains a matter of discussion whether the final in vivo outcome of acellular tissues can be influenced by the original tissue from which they are derived and by the specific protocol used for the decellularisation^5,28,29,30. Here we investigate the ability of xenogeneic acellular muscles derived with three different perfusion protocols of decellularisation to be used as a device to promote functional muscle regeneration without the implementation of donor cells. We showed that once implanted in a murine model of VML to replace a resected muscle, acellular scaffolds permit the development of an artificial muscle able to contract and generate force. Preservation of ECM components and 3D topology was the sufficient requirement to drive host cells toward scaffold repopulation, which allowed proper muscular stem cell maintenance, cell differentiation and homing, as well as functional tissue formation.

Methods

Animals

All the procedures performed on animals were in accordance with the Home Office and all the experimental protocols were approved by the UK Home Office, Project Licence PPL 70/7622. 250–350 g male or female Sprague Dawley rats were used for acellular muscle preparation. 3–4 months old C57BL/6J mice were used for in vivo scaffold implantation. C57BL/6J mice and transgenic GFP+ or transgenic C57BL/6-(ACTB-EGFP)/J mice were used a source of muscle stem cells (SC) and fibroblasts (FB). Mice were housed in individual cages in an environmentally controlled room (23 °C, 12 h light/12 h dark cycle) and provided food and water ad libitum.

Dissection of rat lower limb

250–350 g rats were used as a source of muscle for decellularisation. Rats were killed by CO₂ inhalation and death confirmed by onset of rigor mortis, the skin was carefully removed from the lower limb, abdomen, and lower back on the side of the desired limb (distally to the ankle does not need to be skinned, and may harm vasculature in doing so). In order to gain access to the iliac vessels, the abdomen was opened and bowels were resected. A 24 G cannula was inserted into the abdominal iliac artery and advanced distally. A suture was placed tightly around the femoral vessels to secure the cannula distal to the reflection of the abdominal wall and the major branches to the genitalia. On the medial aspect, half way between the hip and the knee, large cutaneous branches were also ligated. The leg was dissected from the rest of the body by splitting the pelvis at the pubic symphysis and the sacroiliac joint. Muscles of the lower back and the iliopsoas were dissected, to complete separation, sparing damage to the muscles of the lower limb.

Decellularisation protocols

The three protocols used, based on published studies^{29,30,31,32,33}, were adapted to a perfusion condition and are summarized in Table 1. Perfusion of all solutions was achieved with a peristaltic pump (Rating Plate- iPump i150, iPump) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Optimal cycle number and conditions were determined by assessing DNA removal and preservation of tissue architecture.

Table 1 Summary of the three decellularisation protocols.

Full size table

Latrunculin B protocol (LatB): limbs were perfused with 50 nM latrunculin B (Sigma-Aldrich) in high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Gibco, Life Technologies, USA) for 2 hours at 37 °C. All of the following steps were performed at room temperature; washed with PBS for 30 minutes, 0.6 M potassium chloride (Sigma) for 2 hours, 1.0 M potassium iodide (Sigma) for 2 hours, de-ionized water overnight. The following day salt solutions were repeated, followed by perfusion with DNase-I (Sigma) in 1 M NaCl (Sigma) for 2 hours and overnight de-ionized water wash.

Each cycle of Detergent Enzymatic Treatment (DET) consisted of perfusion with de-ionised water (resistivity 18.2 MΩ/cm) at 4 °C overnight, 4% sodium deoxycholate (Sigma) at room temperature (RT) for 4 hours, wash with PBS for 30 minutes, and 34 kU/ml DNase-I (Sigma) in 1 M NaCl (Sigma) at RT for 3 hours, and a final wash with de-ionized water for 48 hours.

Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate protocol (SDS): limbs were perfused with 0.25% SDS (Sigma) for 72 hours and washed in de-ionized water for 48 hours.

After each decellularisation treatment, muscles of interest were dissected and preserved at 4 °C, in PBS with 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin (P/S - Gibco).

DNA quantification and agarose gel electrophoresis

DNA was extracted from tissues using DNA extraction kit (PureLink Genomic DNA MiniKit, Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA content was estimated using a spectrophotometer (Tecan Infinity), measuring optical densities at 260 nm and 280 nm.

Histology and Immunofluorescence

Samples were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (pH 7.4), dehydrated through an alcohol series, embedded in paraffin and sectioned at a thickness of 5 μm. Tissue slides were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Masson’s trichrome (MT), picrosirius red (PR) or elastin Van Gieson (EVG; all Leica, Raymond A Lamb, BDH Chemicals Ltd) stains. For cryosections (10 μm), samples were fixed in PFA 4% in PBS for 10 mins at room temperature before being processed for the staining. Samples were analysed with an Olympus BX60 light microscope equipped with Olympus DP50 digital camera. Myofibre cross sectional area was calculated on 10x images by using ImageJ software; at least 500 myofibres were evaluated for each sample. For immunofluorescence analysis of acellular muscles, slides were de-paraffinized, antigen retrieval was performed using 10 mM sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0) at 95 °C for 20 minutes, treated with 0.25% Triton X100 for 90 minutes at room temperature, and non-specific antibody binding was blocked with 5% horse serum in PBS for 1 hour at room temperature. Primary antibodies were added and left overnight at 4 °C; antibodies used were rabbit anti rat laminin (Abcam), at a dilution of 1:150; anti rat collagen IV (Abcam), at a dilution of 1:100; anti collagen I (Abcam), at a dilution of 1:100; anti dystrophin (Abcam), at a dilution of 1:200; anti α-dystroglycan (Millipore), at a dilution of 1:200; anti β-dystroglycan (Leica Biosystems), at a dilution of 1:50. Washes were performed in PBS and an Alexa Fluor® 594 Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (Invitrogen) was used as a secondary antibody at a dilution of 1:150. Washes were repeated and a mounting medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, USA) was used to secure the cover-slip. For immunofluorescence analysis of mouse EDL muscles, implants and in vitro repopulated scaffolds, samples were snap frozen and cross-sections or longitudinal sections of 10 μm were prepared. To characterize primary cells, cells were firstly fixed in PFA at 4% in PBS, 5 minutes at room temperature. Cryo-sections or cells were then incubated for 1 hr at room temperature with 10% fetal bovine serum dissolved in PBS 0.1% Triton X100. When mouse antibodies were used for ex vivo samples, MOM kit (Vector laboratories) was used for the blocking step. Samples were then incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight. The following primary antibodies were used: mouse anti-Tubulin β3 (Clone Tuj1) (1:500, Biolegend); rabbit anti-laminin (1:150, Sigma); rabbit anti-von Willebrand factor (1:100, Abcam); rabbit anti-synaptophysin (1:100, Sigma); mouse anti-myosin heavy chain (1:100, R&D); mouse anti-embryonic myosin heavy chain (1:25, Hybridoma Bank); rabbit anti-ki67 (1:80, Abcam); mouse anti-pax7 (1:25, Hybridoma Bank); rabbit anti-α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA, 1:100, Abcam); anti-desmin (1:100; Abcam); anti-vimentin (1:100; Abcam); rabbit anti-MyoD (1:50, Santa Cruz); anti-tcf4 (1:100; Millipore); mouse anti-MyoG (1:50, Abcam). After washings, samples were incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody for 1 hr at room temperature. Secondary antibodies used were anti-mouse (1:200, Invitrogen), anti-rabbit (1:200, Invitrogen), anti-rat (1:200, Sigma). For triple myosin and laminin co-staining, primary antibodies used were: BA-D5 (IgG 2b, 1:100, DSHB supernatant), SC71 (IgG1, 1:100 DSHB, supernatant), BF-F3 (IgM, 1:100 DSHB, purified antibody), anti-laminin (1:100, Sigma-Aldrich), prepared in PBS-BSA 1%. Secondary antibodies were: DyLight 405 labeled goat anti mouse IgG, Fcγ 2b subclass specific (Jackson ImmunoResearch Europe), 1:200, Alexa Fluor 488 labeled goat anti mouse IgG, Fcγ 1 subclass specific (Jackson ImmunoResearch Europe) 1:200, Alexa Fluor 594 of Cy3 labeled goat anti mouse IgM, µ chain specific (Jackson ImmunoResearch Europe) 1:200, Alexa Fluor 647 labeled goat anti rabbit IgG (111-604-144, Jackson ImmunoResearch Europe) diluted in PBS-BSA 1%. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33258 (Sigma) dissolved in secondary antibody mix. When bungarotoxin staining was performed, tetramethylrhodamine conjugate α-bungarotoxin (Invitrogen) was added in the secondary antibody mix. Samples were analysed with a Leica DMI6000B fluorescence microscope with motorized stage or with a Leica SP5 confocal microscope.

Collagen and GAG quantification

Collagen was quantified using a QuickZyme Total Collagen Kit (2B Scientific, UK). Quantity of sulphated glycosaminoglycans (GAG) was measured using a Blyscan GAG Assay Kit (Biocolor, UK).

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Decellularised and fresh samples were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 24 hours at 4 °C, followed by washes in 0.1 M phosphate buffer. The samples were then cut onto segments of approximately 1 cm in length and immersed in a cryoprotective solution of 25% sucrose, 10% glycerol in 0.05 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) for 2 hours, then fast frozen and fractured in a nitrogen slush of approximately −160 °C, replaced in the cryoprotective solution at room temperature and allowed to thaw. The samples were then washed in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), fixed in 1% OsO₄/0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) at 3 °C for 1.5 hours, and washed again in 0.1 M phosphate buffer. Samples were then rinsed in deionized water and dehydrated using ethanol, critical point dried using CO₂ and mounted on aluminium stubs, presenting the fractured surface of the samples. This surface was then coated with a thin layer of Au/Pd (approximately 2 nm) using a Gatan ion beam coater. Images were taken using a Jeol 7401 FEG scanning electron microscope.

For single fresh myofibres, anucleate and seeded ones, were fixed in 4% PFA for 10 minutes, dehydrated through 30, 50, 70, 80, 90, and 100% ethanol solutions (15 minutes for each step) and transferred to a critical point drier (Balzers CPD 030—using liquid carbon dioxide). Dried myofibres were transferred to SEM chucks using microforceps under a light microscope. Thereafter, myofibres were gold-coated using an Edwards S150B sputter-coater and examined using a FEI 600 F scanning electron microscope aided by analysis software for image collection.

Protein extraction and ELISA

ELISAs were performed for VEGF and IGF-I using Quantikine Immunoassay kits (RV00 and MG100 respectively) (R&D systems, USA).

The ELISA was performed according the manufacturer instructions. Optical density was measured using a Fluostar Optima microplate reader (BMG Labtech, Germany) at 450 nm wavelength with a correction wavelength of 570 nm.

Chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) angiogenic assay

Fertilized chicken eggs (Henry Stewart and Co., UK) were used to assess the angiogenic capabilities of the decellularised scaffolds. Eggs were incubated at 37 °C in controlled humidity; on day 3 oval windows of approximately 3 cm in diameter were made in the shell, thus exposing the embryo and CAM vessels. The window was then resealed with tape and replaced in the incubator for a further 5 days. At this point, samples of decellularised scaffolds approximately 1.5 mm side length and square shaped were placed on the CAM between visible branches of vessels. Polyester sections soaked overnight either in a PBS solution or in PBS with 200 ng/mL VEGF were used as negative and positive controls respectively. On day 0, 5 and 7 after implantation the samples were photographed in ovo. The number of blood vessels converging towards the placed tissues was counted blindly by assessors (n = 4), with the mean of the counts being considered. Moreover, cell infiltration and vessels formation into the scaffolds were also assess by staining cryosections with Alexa Fluor® 594 Phalloidin (Molecular Probes, USA) and nuclei with mounting medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, USA).

Extensor digitorum longus (EDL) ablation and scaffold implantation

Mice were anaesthetized using 0.5–3% isoflurane with oxygen via a nose cone. Induction of deep surgical anaesthesia was confirmed by absence of reaction to hind foot pinch. The surgical procedure underwent in aseptic conditions (skin preparation, sterilized instruments, gloves and drapes). It started with a skin incision along the tibia length then going lateral to the proximal edge of the Tibialis Anterior (TA) of the right leg. Subsequently, after the opening of the aponeurosis, TA was gently moved to expose the EDL and the distal tendon of EDL was identified and transected. The EDL was then everted along its whole length and the first anastomosis, between one edge of the scaffold and the native EDL at half a centimetre from the proximal tendon, was made with a non-absorbable Prolene 7–0 suture. A second anastomosis, joining the other edge of the scaffold and distal tendon of native EDL, was made with a Prolene 7-0 suture. The native EDL was then resected between the anastomoses. Finally, the implanted EDL was repositioned in its original anatomic position and the skin wound was closed with Vicryl 6-0 suture. In the control EDL ablation’s mice (sham), the surgical procedure was the same, but no scaffolds were implanted; the native EDL was cut at the distal tendon and half a centimetre from the proximal tendon. Implanted scaffolds were derived from rat EDL acellular muscles, and were finely cut along the major axis to obtain scaffolds of the right size. No movement or space restriction were applied to animals after treatments.

Ex vivo force measurement

Two months after implantation, animals were killed by CO₂ inhalation and cervical dislocation. Implants and EDL muscles of contralateral limbs were dissected and used to measure force production ex vivo. Force production of EDL muscles was determined as described previously³⁴.

Primary cell preparation and culture into acellular muscles

Mice were sacrificed by CO₂ inhalation and cervical dislocation, according to UK legal guidelines. Single myofibres isolated from EDL muscles of three-month old wild-type C57BL/6J mice (wt) were the source of SCs and FBs for seeding into decellularised muscles. Single fibres were isolated from EDL muscles as previously described³⁵. To release SCs from the myofibres, single fibre preparation was then triturated 21 times using an 18 G needle (MicrolanceTM, US) mounted onto a 1 ml syringe, filtered through a 40 µm cell strainer and plated into a 60 × 20 mm culture-dish previously coated with 0.1% gelatine for 2 hours. SCs were cultured and expanded in proliferating medium (DMEM high glucose, 20% HS, 10% FBS, 1% P/S, 1% L-Glu, 1% Chicken Embryo Extract (CEE; Seralab, UK) and 0.5 µl/ml basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF; Sigma) at maximum for 1 passage, and then seeded into the scaffolds (expanded SCs were named MuSCs). FBs were isolated from mouse EDL harvested for single fibres preparation and not used for SC isolation (i.e. discarded tissue derived from the single fibre prep). FBs were expanded in DMEM, 20% FBS, 1% P/S, 1% L-Glu for a minimum of 3 passages before seeding into the scaffolds. Wild type- and GFP-MuSCs for seeding experiments on enucleated fibres were isolated from three-month old wild-type C57BL/6J mice (wt) and transgenic C57BL/6-(ACTB-EGFP)/J mice (GFP), with the expression of the enhanced GFP under the control of chicken beta actin promoter, as described in Pasut et al.³⁶. Hindlimb muscles were dissected and carefully minced. Enzymatic digestion was performed with collagenase-dispase solution (2.5 U/mL) at 37 °C for 12 min. This step was repeated until the tissue was almost entirely digested and appeared as a homogenous solution with no tissue chunks. An equal volume of 10% FBS-DMEM supplemented with pen strep was added and the cell suspension was filtered through a 70 μm filter. After centrifugation at 1800 rpm for 5 min, the supernatant was discarded and cells resuspended in fresh SC growth medium (Ham’s F10 media, 20% FBS, 1% Pens/Strep, 2.5 ng/mL bFGF). Cells were pre-plated in petri dishes coated with 0.01% collagen type I (Corning) for 1 hour and the supernatant transferred in freshly coated petri dishes. This step was repeated other 2 times with pre-plating intervals of 24 hours before using the MuSCs for expansion and seeding. Acellular scaffold for cell seeding measured 8–10 mm length were obtained from decellularised rat hindlimb muscles. MuSCs, FBs or a mix of MuSCs and FBs (70:30) were suspended in a total amount of 5 µl of proliferating medium and injected into the scaffolds under a stereomicroscope and by using an insulin syringe. Cells were either seeded at a density of 1 × 10⁶ cells per scaffold using multiple injections (for long term cultures) or 3 × 10⁵ cells per scaffold with a single injection (for migration assay). Then seeded scaffolds were cultured in cell incubator for 7 or 14 days. During the first two days of culture, samples were cultured in DMED, 20% HS, 10% FBS, 1%P/S, 1% L-Glu, 1% CEE, 0.5 µl/ml bFGF. After 48 hours the medium was changed with DMEM, 2% HS, 1% P/S, 1% L-Glu until the end of the experiment. Single anucleate fibres were isolated from the EDL muscle of decellularised rat hindlimbs. Undamaged EDL muscle was dissected with both tendons intact and incubated with 0.1% collagenase type I in DMEM at 37 °C 5% CO₂ for 2 hours. Using glass pipettes single anucleate fibres were collected and plated out in culture dishes containing PBS. Anucleate myofibres were gently washed in PBS 3 times before seeding or fixation. MuSCs were seeded on single anucleate myofibres in 12-multiwell plates without coating and monitored using phase-contrast microscope systems that harbour controlled-environment chambers maintained at 37 °C, supplemented with 5% CO₂ as previously described³⁷. Single freshly isolated myofibres from wt mouse-EDL muscles were used as control. Myofibres were cultured in wells containing DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 0.5% CEE. Time-lapse video was taken at rate of one frame every 15 minutes for periods of up to 24 hours using an x10 objective. Time-lapse experiments were performed with GFP-MuSCs. In a separate analysis, high power time-lapse microscopy using an x100 objective was carried out, enabling the visualization of cell surface blebbing on single MuSCs. For such analysis, cells were cultured for 24–48 hours, then selected, and subsequently filmed at a rate of one frame per 2 seconds. All image analysis was carried out using ImageJ (version 1.4.3). MuSCs were individually manually tracked using the plugin MTrackJ, and bleb dynamics were quantified using ImageJ. Bleb number was quantified manually on SEM images of cells using Adobe Photoshop version CS2, only SEM images of whole cells were used for quantification. MuSCs differentiation profiles following differing culture conditions were manually assessed using quantification of live images through the Zeiss Axioscope and Axiovision digital camera system. Only cells adherent to the myofibres were considered for the quantification. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t test unless indicated otherwise with a significance level of p < 0.05.

MTT analysis

MTT cell proliferation assay was performed on seeded scaffolds to determine the vitality and proliferation of seeded cells after 7 days of culture using Vybrant® MTT cell proliferation assay kit (Life Technologies; Thermo Fisher scientific). Images of the whole scaffolds were taken with a stereomicroscope (Leica) and then samples were dissolved each in 500 μl of propan-2-olo acid solution overnight in agitation and at room temperature. For MTT quantification, scaffolds were removed and the absorbance of the isopropanol was recorded at 555 nm with a plate reader (Infinite F200, Tecan).

Statistical analysis

For immunofluorescence and immunohistochemical analyses, at least 8 random high-power field areas were considered per each condition analysed. We expressed data as means ± s.e.m. or, where indicated, as means ± s.d. We determined statistical significance by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test or Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s multiple comparison test. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Where not differently specified, n refers to the number of animal/scaffolds analysed.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Results

Intravascular decellularisation of rat hindlimb allowed generation of acellular skeletal muscle tissue

To allow homogenous and good level of decellularisation of thick skeletal muscle tissue from rat hind limb, constant perfusion of decellularising solutions through the muscle vessels was performed²⁶. Acellular scaffolds were created using three different decellularisation protocols: LatB, DET and SDS (Fig. 1a,b). For LatB, one cycle was sufficient to remove the cellular compartment and preserve the ECM structure, whilst three cycles for DET and 72 hours of SDS perfusion were needed to obtain the same level of decellularisation (Supplementary Fig. 1). Treated hind limbs displayed different macroscopic appearance (Fig. 1d). Compared to freshly isolated muscles, DNA content was significantly reduced by all decellularisation protocols (Fig. 1c), a finding confirmed by H&E staining and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). However, both H&E and SEM analyses clearly showed that, among the 3 protocols, acellular muscles displayed different histological characteristics. General tissue structure including myofibres was largely preserved in LatB- and DET-generated samples. In contrast, myofibre content was greatly depleted by SDS treatment leaving mainly the ECM (Fig. 1d).

Native skeletal muscle components were differently preserved among the three decellularisation protocols

To better understand how the three decellularisation protocols affected key proteins of skeletal muscle homeostasis, a series of specific histological staining were performed on cross sections of freshly isolated rat skeletal muscle and LatB-, DET- and SDS-acellular muscles. Masson’s trichrome (MT), picrosirius red (PR) and elastin Van Gieson (EVG) were used to evaluate the nuclei, cytoplasm and ECM maintenance upon decellularisation (Fig. 2a). All the staining confirmed absence of nuclei in decellularised tissues. MT and PR showed that collagen was still present in all acellular muscles. EVG staining showed the maintenance of elastin in all the derived-acellular muscles (Fig. 2a). All decellularised muscles contained significantly less collagen and GAG than freshly isolated muscles (Fig. 2b,c). Examination of specific ECM components revealed the presence of collagen I, collagen IV and laminin (Fig. 2d, and Supplementary Fig. 2). In contrast, specific sarcolemma proteins were differentially preserved depending on the method used for decellularisation. In particular, dystrophin was almost completely lost in all the scaffolds with some fibers still positively stained in LatB- acellular muscles (Supplementary Fig. 2). Instead α- and β-dystroglycans were almost completely lost in DET-decellularised muscles, but partially preserved in those generated by LatB- and SDS (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Acellular scaffolds promoted angiogenesis in vivo and preserved chemokines

We next determined whether acellular muscles would support in vivo angiogenesis using an established CAM assay (Fig. 3a–c). The number of vessels converging towards the decellularised samples DET and SDS was identical to the positive control and higher than the negative control (Fig. 3a,b), with evidence of cell and vessel invasion into the scaffolds (Fig. 3c). ELISA analysis confirmed the presence of relevant chemokines in the decellularised muscles. In particular, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was still detectable in DET- and SDS-acellular muscles, albeit reduced when compared to freshly isolate muscles (Fig. 3d). In contrast, LatB-scaffolds showed complete loss of VEGF (Fig. 3d) and a lower angiogenic effect in the CAM assay. Moreover, all the three decellularised procedures preserved the insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1), despite its amount was reduced when compared to freshly isolated muscles (Fig. 3e).

Acellular scaffolds restore muscle function in a murine model of VML

Support of in vivo muscle regeneration by the acellular muscles was tested using a mouse model of VML³⁷, where the EDL muscles were resected and substituted with either LatB-, DET- or SDS-acellular scaffolds (Fig. 4a,b). All animals survived surgery without complication. Two months after implantation the macroscopic appearance of the site of implantation was free from scar tissue or inflammation (Fig. 4c). As expected³⁰, no new tissue development or muscle regeneration were found between the two edges of the resected EDL in negative control animals (Fig. 4dB). In contrast, in all animals transplanted with decellularised scaffolds, the site of implantation showed tissue regeneration (Fig. 4dC,e). Artificial muscles were of similar size to contralateral untreated EDL muscles and had comparable weights (Fig. 4e,f). To investigate whether the regenerated tissues were functional, ex-vivo force generation analysis was performed. Interestingly, all the artificial muscles were able to contract and generate force with no significant differences observed between the three groups, despite showing partial restoration of muscle strength when compared to contralateral untreated EDL (Fig. 4g,h). Immunofluorescence analysis for the neural marker Tuj1 and bungarotoxin confirmed the presence of the nervous system in the implanted scaffolds two months after implantation (Supplementary Fig. 3), while bungarotoxin and synaptophysin co-staining demonstrated the presence of functional neuromuscular junctions in all implants (Fig. 4i). The percentage of synaptophysin/bungarotoxin double-positive NMJ were comparable in all implanted scaffolds, but significantly lower than untreated contralateral muscles (Fig. 4j). Moreover, histological examination revealed the presence of skeletal muscle tissue in the artificial muscle, and interestingly in the middle and distal regions of the implants (Fig. 5a–d, Supplementary Figs 4–5). Confirmation of muscle regeneration was given by the presence of centrally nucleated myofibres in the implants, which also showed correct deposition of laminin (Fig. 5c,d). The percentage of centrally nucleated fibres was comparable among the 3 implants, with no significant difference determined: LatB 28.76 ± 24.43, DET 19.71 ± 12.33 and SDS 19.38 ± 15.32 (n = 4–6) (Fig. 5e). Interestingly and in contrast to LatB- and DET-implants, mean muscular tissue area was reduced in SDS-implants, when compared to contralateral untreated muscles (Fig. 5d). Connective tissue deposition was evident mostly in the junction between scaffold and native muscle, as well as in the distal portion of the implanted scaffolds (Supplementary Fig. 5). In addition, all the artificial muscles showed clear evidence of vascularization throughout the length of the grafts, with a number of vWF+ vessels comparable to contralateral untreated muscles (Fig. 5g,h).

To investigate if regenerated skeletal muscles properly occurred into artificial muscles, morphometric analysis of fibre cross-sectional area (CSA) was performed. All decellularised scaffolds showed small or large fibres, compared to contralateral untreated muscles (Fig. 5i–k and Supplementary Fig. 6). No difference was observed among LatB-, DET- or SDS-implants regarding the mean CSA of small myofibres, however, LatB-muscles showed an higher mean CSA in bigger myofibres, when compared to DET and SDS-implants (Fig. 5j,k and Supplementary Table 2). Characterization of muscle fibres through myosin heavy chain profiling revealed that LatB-implants supported the development of fibre type 2A at the expenses of fibre type 2B, compared to DET and SDS scaffolds (Fig. 6). LatB-muscles also displayed a significant reduction in the percentage of fibre type 2B, when compared to contralateral untreated muscles (Fig. 6a–c). When myofibre dimension was quantified considering the major axis of the fibres, all the implanted scaffolds showed lower mean length of the major axis compared to contralateral untreated EDL muscles. Nevertheless, myofibres of SDS-implants were significantly “longer” when compared LatB- and DET-implants (Fig. 6d).

With the aim to understand if decellularised scaffold could also promote SCs homing, the number of sublaminal cells expressing the transcription factor paired box protein 7 (Pax7) in respect to the total myofiber number was quantified in LatB-, DET- and SDS-implants and compared to untreated contralateral EDL muscles. The presence of a pool of Pax7⁺ cells under the basal lamina of myofibres was evident in all implanted scaffolds. However, LatB- and DET- implants showed a lower number of Pax7+ cells compared to UNTD muscles and SDS-implants (Fig. 6e,f).

Muscle stem cells can migrate along decellularised single myofibres

Since muscle stem cells (MuSCs) are the major player of muscle regeneration, it is reasonable to speculate that MuSCs can migrate across the scaffolds and be involved in the artificial muscle regeneration. It is also have been showed that MuSCs present on single myofibres migrate and proliferate in vitro^35,38. Therefore, we firstly evaluated the ability of MuSCs to recognise acellular myofibres, migrate and proliferate on their surface in a bi-dimensional in vitro cell culture system. To reach this aim, single fibres isolated from LatB and SDS acellular muscles were seeded with wild-type or GFP⁺ mouse MuSCs in vitro (Fig. 7a). DET was omitted as showing similar structure characteristics to LatB. Single fibres from LatB-acellular muscles were easier to isolated than from to SDS scaffolds, which produced very few intact anucleate fibres (Fig. 7b). Both LatB and SDS single fibres showed distinct appearance compared to those from normal freshly isolated ones, with notches evidencing the previous location of myonuclei (Fig. 7c). Interestingly, murine MuSCs were able to adhere to anucleate myofibres and migrate along their surface (Fig. 7d,f). Migration speed and mechanism (i.e. blebbing)³⁸ were evaluated and compared to resident activated cells in mouse freshly isolated myofibres³⁸. Cellular migration speed was reduced in both the anucleate myofibre preparations, when compared to activated MuSCs on freshly isolated myofibres (Fig. 7e). Nevertheless, analysis of movement of cells along the length of the fibres indicated comparable diffusive movement among the 3 conditions, showing similar cellular displacement along the fibre in the first 700 minutes of migration (Supplementary Fig. 7). This was associated to comparable blebbing dynamics (extension, stabilisation and retraction), lifespan, shape and size between fresh and anucleate seeded myofibres (data not shown). Next to their ability in activating cell migration with blebbing formation, LatB- and SDS-anucleate myofibres also supported MuSCs proliferation, reproducing what normally occurs in freshly isolated single fibres. Moreover, SDS-myofibres showed a higher ability to preserve cells expressing the key transcription factor Pax7, compared to LatB-anucleate myofibres (Fig. 7g,h).

Migration of SCs in a decellularised skeletal muscle require fibroblasts

Despite MuSCs showed the ability to be cultured on single acellular fibres in vitro, we also evaluated their potential when cultured into 3D decellularised muscle. Indeed, the more complex and constrained culture environment that MuSCs found when cultivated into acellular matrix, in respect to the single fibre culture system, may influence MuSC behaviour. Moreover, this in vitro model better mimicked the hypothetical in vivo condition, in which myogenic cells had to migrate across the implanted scaffolds for its repopulation. We decided to perform the following studies only on SDS-scaffold based on the similar regenerative potential observed among of the three scaffolds in vivo and the results obtained in the single anucleated fibre experiments in vitro. Firstly, murine SCs were isolated and amplified as MuSCs only for 1 passage in proliferating medium, characterized before seeding into the scaffolds. As expected, stripped SCs grew in culture as colonies and, when dissociated as single cells, MuSCs were able to be expanded in proliferating supporting medium and to differentiate into myotubes in culture (Supplementary Fig. 8a). After two passages of expansion and just before seeding, MuSCs were characterized in terms of proliferation and expression of myogenic markers (Supplementary Fig. 8b,c). The majority of MuSCs was proliferating and showed high expression of Pax7 (71%) and the myogenic regulatory factor MyoD (75%). In contrast, only a small percentage of cells expressed the early differentiating transcription factor Myogenin (MyoG, 14%) and the late differentiating protein embryonic myosin heavy chain (eMyHC, 9%; Supplementary Fig. 8c). In line with published work³⁹, the majority of Pax7⁺ cells co-expressed MyoD (89%; Supplementary Fig. 8c). In agreement with this fact and the low percentage of early differentiating cells (i.e. MyoG⁺), the majority of MyoD⁺ cells was still expressing Pax7 (80%, Supplementary Fig. 8c). Moreover, almost all the cells expressing Pax7 or MyoG were in a proliferating phase (93% and 85%, respectively; Supplementary Fig. 8c). Altogether, these results indicate that the MuSC cultures, that were used to repopulate the scaffolds, are constituted of proliferating myogenic cells that retained expression of the stem cell marker Pax7. Having confirmed their myogenic potential, we tested the ability of MuSCs to repopulate the decellularised SDS-scaffold.

Interestingly, when MuSCs were injected into SDS- scaffolds and cultured in vitro for 7 days, a number of multinucleated myotubes expressing eMyHC were present at the injection site (Fig. 8a). These results indicated the ability of MuSCs to maintain the myogenic commitment and to undergo late muscle differentiation when cultivate into 3D acellular scaffolds (Fig. 8a). However, overall scaffold repopulation with MuSCs was unsuccessful, since cells were found only at the area of injection (Fig. 8). This was clearly different from the in vivo finding in which host cells repopulated the all implanted scaffolds and it was probably related to the fact that multiple cells orchestrate organization of scaffold colonization after transplantation. In particular, muscle fibroblasts (FBs) are known to play a key role in ECM remodelling and to regulate SC proliferation and differentiation during muscle regeneration^28,31,40,41. Based on this established concept, we hypothesized that fibroblasts could be responsible of the efficient regeneration observed in vivo and they could therefore improve scaffold repopulation and myogenesis when seeded into the acellular muscles together with MuSCs in vitro. FBs were therefore isolated from mouse EDL and expanded in culture before being used for seeding experiments. Primary FBs displayed typical morphology and expressed vimentin and the nuclear factor Tcf4, but were negative for α-SMA expression (Supplementary Fig. 8d)^35,42. Moreover, the majority of the cells were proliferating and did not expressed desmin, confirming the absence of contaminating myogenic cells into the FBs primary culture (Supplementary Fig. 8d).

To elucidate the influence of FBs on scaffold repopulation and myogenesis, a comparison of SDS scaffolds seeded with MuSCs or FBs or the combination of both MuSCs and FBs was performed after 7 days of culture (Fig. 8). Firstly, scaffold repopulation and cell migration from the site of injection were evaluated. FBs migrated readily within the scaffold and clearly affected the colonization of myogenic cells, which was strongly improved when MuSCs were seeded together with FBs. This was highlighted both by immunofluorescence (Fig. 8a,c) and identification of viable cells with MTT (Fig. 8d). Furthermore, differentiated myogenic cells (eMyHC-positive) were completely absent when FBs were seeded alone (Fig. 8a). Since FBs have been shown also to improve terminal differentiation of newly formed fibres in vivo^42,43,44, SDS scaffolds seeded with MuSCs or MuSCs-FBs were analyzed in terms of cross-sectional area (CSA) of multinucleated myotubes. As observed in vivo^42,43,44, myogenic cells infiltrating into acellular scaffolds generated large myotubes in presence of FBs (Supplementary Fig. 9). The maturation of myotubes after 7 days in 3D culture was further demonstrated by the spontaneous twitching of myotubes present in SDS scaffolds seeded with MuSCs and FBs (Supplementary Movie 1).

Starting from these data, SDS scaffolds cultivated with MuSCs-FBs were further analysed for the presence of FBs, myogenesis and cell proliferation (Fig. 9). Seven days after culture, proliferating stem cells (ki67⁺Pax7⁺), committed myogenic cells, differentiated cells and myotubes (MyoG⁺) were found in SDS scaffolds, as showed by immunofluorescence analysis (Fig. 9a). Moreover, a population of Tcf4⁺ cells was also detected (21.8 ± 24% on total number of cells), some of which were proliferating (ki67⁺; Fig. 9a). The percentage of Pax7⁺ stem cells calculated on the total number of Tcf4⁻ cells was 67.5 ± 23.3% (Fig. 9b). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis revealed complex network of interaction created between seeded cells and ECM and confirmed the presence of multinucleated myotubes embedded into the ECM of the scaffolds. Furthermore, cells appeared to align following the 3D organization of the ECM that formed a track generated with the decellularisation process that removed the majority of the pre-existing myofibres (Fig. 9c). To understand if decellularised scaffolds could also allow cell maintenance and support myogenesis for a longer period of culture, MuSCs co-seeded with FBs were grown in culture for 14 days (i.e. 2 days in proliferating media and 12 days in differentiating media). Interestingly, prolonged cell culture increased scaffold repopulation, permitted the maintenance of myotube and the Pax7⁺ cell population and preserved cell proliferation (Fig. 9d,e).

Discussion

VML represents still a clinical challenge and a definitive therapeutic solution has not yet been described. ECM components have been shown to play important role for promoting proper muscle regeneration and maintenance of SC stemness^35,39,45,46. Decellularised matrices have the advantage of mimic architecture and organization of the native tissue and ideally presents the same biochemical composition, cell homing activation, biomechanical and angiogenic properties of the tissue of interest^31,40,41. Since the decellularisation procedure can alter the ECM, compromising its biochemical, biomechanical and structural properties, we optimized and compared three different protocols previously published on non-perfusion decellularisation for skeletal muscles^{29,30,31,32,33}. We obtained three different homogenous decellularised skeletal muscles that showed comparable ECM components, but with different preservation of myofibre structure. LatB and DET-scaffolds maintained fine myofibre structure and could therefore described as enucleated instead of decellularised. Myofibres were largely absent following SDS treatment, which was mainly constituted by ECM. For reasons of clarity and direct comparison to other published studies, scaffolds were still referred to as decellularised. Although the importance of ECM components has been demonstrated for in vivo scaffold repopulation by host cells⁵, the possible role of sarcolemmal proteins and other components remains under debate. Despite the similarity with LatB-acellular muscles discussed above, DET-scaffolds showed almost complete absence of all the proteins located at the sarcolemma analysed. Interestingly, SDS-scaffolds partially preserved α- and β-dystroglycans, suggesting that sarcolemmal proteins could still be retained, probably through the connection to the ECM components.

Besides preservation of proteins and tissue architecture, efficient regeneration depends also on the ability of the graft to maintain specific chemokines known to be important in promoting angiogenesis and cellular migration while reducing inflammation to facilitate repopulation and local regeneration^5,27. Among those, we focused on VEGF and IGF, which are respectively involved in promoting vessel formation and in supporting muscle growth, regeneration and maintenance⁴⁷. LatB-, DET- and SDS-acellular muscles all showed maintenance of IGF1. Differently, only DET- and SDS-acellular muscles showed the maintenance of VEGF, while LatB scaffolds did not preserve a detectable amount of VEGF, showing reduce ability to attract vessels in CAM assay. This suggest that other mechanisms rather than VEGF could be involved in the promotion of vessel formation by LatB-scaffolds upon implantation.

Despite the varying degrees of muscle micro-architecture preservation in our scaffolds, we found extensive muscle regeneration two months after implantation in all implanted scaffolds. We observed correct deposition of matrix around newly formed myofibres, formation of functional myofibres, together with blood vessels, invasion of nerves and functional NMJ, with no differences among the three different scaffolds. Importantly, all the implanted scaffolds allowed the homing of SCs –i.e Pax7⁺ cells in sublaminal position. Functional recovery of the treated muscles was confirmed by the ability of artificial muscles to contract and generate force in ex vivo physiological activity tests. Despite SDS-regenerated muscles showed reduced muscle area when compared to the other implants, we did not observe functional differences in the recovery of the transplanted muscle. All artificial muscles displayed altered myofibre CSA and myofibre major axis length together with increased presence of connective tissue, when compared to untreated contralateral EDL muscles. These features, together with the reduced number of functional NMJ observed in the artificial muscles, could explain the reduction in force production observed in the implants, when compared to untreated contralateral muscles. At deeper investigation, in vivo muscle remodelling activated by LatB-, DET- and SDS-implants gave rise to muscles with different characteristics, which could have implications on large VML repair. SDS-muscles displayed a myofibre type ratio similar to untreated EDL muscles together with bigger myofibre major axis length, when compared to LatB- and DET-implants. In addition, the SDS-regenerated muscles were the only implants in which the number of SCs was found to be comparable to untreated contralateral EDL muscles. Different hypotheses could explain the contrasting results obtained with LatB-, SDS- and DET-scaffolds. For example, it is possible that the presence of the cytoplasm of myofibres in LatB- and DET-scaffolds caused a mechanical obstacle during scaffold repopulation, which did not allow the right orientation of the newly formed myofibres and/or myofibre type profile, as well as correct restoration of SC pool. Based on these findings, we can conclude that myofibre preservation in decellularized skeletal muscles do not improve host cell response. Instead, the use of a harsher decellularization that removes myofibre content but maintaining the ECM 3D organization and composition –i.e. SDS-scaffolds, was found to be more efficient in promoting muscle regeneration and cell homing in vivo. In SDS-implants, the presence of the remodelling ECM can allow the formation of better aligned myofibres with right specification, together with proper SC pool preservation, which can potentially permit further cycles of muscle regeneration.

Different studies demonstrate that upon implantation, acellular tissues can be invaded by host cells and be remodelled, allowing host progenitor and stem cells to populate the new matrix^{5,25,27,31,40,48}. Muscle-derived scaffolds obtained with protocols similar to those described in this study have shown to activate an immune modulatory host response that leads to scaffold degradation and new tissue formation. According with this and based on the histology observed in artificial muscles, we can hypothesize that this is also happening in our implanted scaffolds which have been remodeled and replaced by new tissue. How the enucleated myofibers are degraded –i.e. in LatB- and DET-implants, and the possible preservation of donor extracellular matrix components remain matters of further investigation. The degradation of the ECM-derived scaffolds has shown to have a positive influence on tissue regeneration since it induces the release of bioactive molecules that modulate macrophage polarization phenotype and activate local stem cells^49,50,51. Despite further analysis need to be done to clarify the role of different cell types in the development of artificial muscles in vivo, the presence of SCs in implanted muscles and the in vitro results demonstrated the involvement of MuSCs in the promotion of muscle regeneration observed in LatB-, DET- and SDS-artificial muscles. The importance of MuSCs in promoting tissue regeneration, vascularization and innervation of decellularised matrix implants revealed in our study have been suggested also from others^{5,25,27,31,33,40,48,52,53}. According to in vivo results, our in vitro studies demonstrated the ability of acellular muscles to support MuSCs adhesion, proliferation, maintenance of Pax7 expression and differentiation. Despite MuSCs were able to migrate along decellularised isolated fibers, the more complex 3D environment required the presence of fibroblasts to achieve MuSC colonization and myogenesis into acellular muscles. Fibroblasts have a crucial role on secreting key components of the extracellular matrix, such as collagen VI and fibronectin, which are essential for SC maintenance^35,46. Moreover, fibroblasts also directly influence the dynamics of MuSCs during regeneration and their absence lead to the inability of MuSCs to proliferate and efficiently regenerate the site of injury following cardiotoxin injection⁴³. Such cross-talk between MuSCs and FBs was also evident in our analysis, since the two cell population do not undergo to a selection process under the specific culture conditions used, respecting approximatively the ratio used at the seeding. We can therefore speculate that the process by which our scaffolds promote in vivo muscle progenitor migration involved various pathways, but it maybe ultimately guided by fibroblasts.

Xenogeneic scaffolds derived from other tissues rather than skeletal muscle coupled with physical therapy have been shown to partially ameliorate force outcome of a cohort of patients affected by VML²⁴. A recent study demonstrate that acellular matrix derived from small-intestine submucosa and urinary bladder matrix failed to recover in a porcine model of VML⁵⁴. Therefore, it still remains a matter of discussion whether the use of tissue specific acellular muscles could improve the overall clinical outcome of treated patients. Among limitations in applying acellular skeletal muscles scaffolds in clinic, decellularisation procedure represents per se a challenging aspect for this tissue, since its great thickness represent a limiting step for obtaining good quality and reproducible scaffolds. Indeed, studies involving the use of acellular skeletal muscle only refer to their application in animal models of VML. The majority of these studies used acellular muscles obtained by immersion protocols of decellularisation and often in combination with cell therapy^{25,40,41,48,52,55,56,57}. In particular, a recent study reported the ability of MuSCs in combination with muscle resident cells (MRCs) pre-seeded in acellular skeletal muscles to restore structure and function of muscles with acute and chronic VML injuries, which can be further improved by a regimen of exercise²⁵. Despite the VML model used in our study differed from what reported above²⁵, the added value of our work resides in the demonstration that acellular skeletal muscles obtain with our perfusion protocols allow the development of functional artificial muscles without the implementation of donor cells in severe VML model and also in a xenogeneic model. Considering the well-known limitations of cell therapy approaches, the consequence that this aspect can have for future clinical application of such scaffolds as device to treat VML is extremely important. Devices based on decellularised muscles do not require expensive and potentially dangerous autologous cell harvesting and expansion and therefore facilitate clinical translation of VML treatment. Moreover, the ability of acellular muscles not coupled with cell therapy to promote functional muscle regeneration has been poorly investigated. Zhang et al. reported absence of innervation and scattered muscle formation upon implantation of acellular muscles derived by perfusion methods of decellularisation²⁶. Differently, we demonstrated with three different perfusion methods of decellularisation that acellular muscles can promote extensive myogenesis, as well as functional innervation. Moreover, we show here for the first time, by comparing different method of decellularization, that myofibre preservation in decellularized skeletal muscles may be irrelevant for regeneration, which appears to be mainly driven by ECM 3D organization and composition. In conclusion, we strongly believe that these findings are of great importance in the design of new therapies based on tissue-engineering technology and may influence the design of scaffolds for engineering skeletal muscle tissue, as well as in the future application of decellularised muscles as in vitro models to investigate cell interplay during myogenesis.

References

Mauro, A. Satellite cell of skeletal muscle fibers. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 9, 493–5 (1961).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Sambasivan, R. et al. Pax7-expressing satellite cells are indispensable for adult skeletal muscle regeneration. Development 138, 3647–56 (2011).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Lepper, C., Partridge, T. A. & Fan, C.-M. An absolute requirement for Pax7-positive satellite cells in acute injury-induced skeletal muscle regeneration. Development 138, 3639–3646 (2011).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Garg, K. et al. Volumetric muscle loss: Persistent functional deficits beyond frank loss of tissue. J. Orthop. Res. 33, 40–46 (2015).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Fuoco, C., Petrilli, L. L., Cannata, S. & Gargioli, C. Matrix scaffolding for stem cell guidance toward skeletal muscle tissue engineering. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 11, 86 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gattazzo, F., Urciuolo, A. & Bonaldo, P. Extracellular matrix: A dynamic microenvironment for stem cell niche. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Gen. Subj. 1840, 2506–2519 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Langer, R. & Vacanti, J. P. Tissue engineering. Science 260, 920–6 (1993).
Article ADS PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Teodori, L. et al. Native extracellular matrix: A new scaffolding platform for repair of damaged muscle. Front. Physiol. 5 JUN, 1–9 (2014).
Juhas, M. & Bursac, N. Engineering skeletal muscle repair. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 24, 880–886 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Keane, T. J., Swinehart, I. T. & Badylak, S. F. Methods of tissue decellularization used for preparation of biologic scaffolds and in vivo relevance. Methods 84, 25–34 (2015).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Macchiarini, P. et al. Clinical transplantation of a tissue-engineered airway. Lancet 372, 2023–2030 (2008).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Ott, H. C. et al. Perfusion-decellularized matrix: using nature’s platform to engineer a bioartificial heart. Nat. Med. 14, 213–221 (2008).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sullivan, D. C. et al. Decellularization methods of porcine kidneys for whole organ engineering using a high-throughput system. Biomaterials 33, 7756–7764 (2012).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Goh, S.-K. et al. Perfusion-decellularized pancreas as a natural 3D scaffold for pancreatic tissue and whole organ engineering. Biomaterials 34, 6760–6772 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Mirmalek-Sani, S.-H. et al. Porcine pancreas extracellular matrix as a platform for endocrine pancreas bioengineering. Biomaterials 34, 5488–5495 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Petersen, T. H. et al. Tissue-Engineered Lungs for in Vivo Implantation. Science (80-.). 329, 538–541 (2010).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Ott, H. C. et al. Regeneration and orthotopic transplantation of a bioartificial lung. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2193 (2010).
Uygun, B. E. et al. Organ reengineering through development of a transplantable recellularized liver graft using decellularized liver matrix. Nat Med 16, 814–820 (2010).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Caralt, M., Velasco, E., Lanas, A. & Baptista, P. M. Liver bioengineering: from the stage of liver decellularized matrix to the multiple cellular actors and bioreactor special effects. Organogenesis 10, 250–9 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Patil, P. B. et al. Recellularization of acellular human small intestine using bone marrow stem cells. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2, 307–15 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Elliott, M. J. et al. Stem-cell-based, tissue engineered tracheal replacement in a child: A 2-year follow-up study. Lancet 380, 994–1000 (2012).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Totonelli, G. et al. A rat decellularized small bowel scaffold that preserves villus-crypt architecture for intestinal regeneration. Biomaterials 33, 3401–3410 (2012).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Moran, E. C. et al. Whole-organ bioengineering: Current tales of modern alchemy. Transl. Res. 163, 259–267 (2014).
Article ADS PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Dziki, J. et al. An acellular biologic scaffold treatment for volumetric muscle loss: results of a 13-patient cohort study. npj Regen. Med. 1, 16008 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Quarta, M. et al. Bioengineered constructs combined with exercise enhance stem cell-mediated treatment of volumetric muscle loss. Nat. Commun. 8, 15613 (2017).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, J. et al. Perfusion-decellularized skeletal muscle as a three-dimensional scaffold with a vascular network template. Biomaterials 89, 114–126 (2016).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sicari, B. M., Dziki, J. L. & Badylak, S. F. Strategies for functional bioscaffold-based skeletal muscle reconstruction. Ann. Transl. Med. 3, 256 (2015).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gillies, A. R., Smith, L. R., Lieber, R. L. & Varghese, S. Method for decellularizing skeletal muscle without detergents or proteolytic enzymes. Tissue Eng. Part C. Methods 17, 383–389 (2011).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Qing, Q. & Qin, T. Optimal method for rat skeletal muscle decellularization. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 23, 836–9 (2009).
PubMed Google Scholar
Lin, C.-H., Yang, J.-R., Chiang, N.-J., Ma, H. & Tsay, R.-Y. Evaluation of decellularized extracellular matrix of skeletal muscle for tissue engineering. Int. J. Artif. Organs 37, 546–555 (2014).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Fishman, J. M. et al. Immunomodulatory effect of a decellularized skeletal muscle scaffold in a discordant xenotransplantation model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14360–5 (2013).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gillies, A. R. & Lieber, R. L. Structure and function of the skeletal muscle extracellular matrix. Muscle Nerve 44, 318–31 (2011).
PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Piccoli, M. et al. Improvement of diaphragmatic performance through orthotopic application of decellularized extracellular matrix patch. Biomaterials 74, 245–255 (2016).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Blaauw, B. et al. Inducible activation of Akt increases skeletal muscle mass and force without satellite cell activation. FASEB J. 23, 3896–3905 (2009).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Urciuolo, A. et al. Collagen VI regulates satellite cell self-renewal and muscle regeneration. Nat. Commun. 4, 1964 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Pasut, A., Oleynik, P. & Rudnicki, M. A. Isolation of Muscle Stem Cells by Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting Cytometry. Methods Mol. Biol. 798, 53–64 (2012).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Collins-Hooper, H. et al. Age-Related Changes in Speed and Mechanism of Adult Skeletal Muscle Stem Cell Migration. Stem Cells 30, 1182–1195 (2012).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Otto, A., Collins-Hooper, H., Patel, A., Dash, P. R. & Patel, K. Adult skeletal muscle stem cell migration is mediated by a blebbing/amoeboid mechanism. Rejuvenation Res. 14, 249–60 (2011).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Dumont, N. A., Bentzinger, C. F., Sincennes, M.-C. & Rudnicki, M. A. Satellite Cells and Skeletal Muscle Regeneration. Compr. Physiol. 5, 1027–1059 (2015).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Perniconi, B. et al. The pro-myogenic environment provided by whole organ scale acellular scaffolds from skeletal muscle. Biomaterials 32, 7870–7882 (2011).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Wolf, M. T., Daly, K. A., Reing, J. E. & Badylak, S. F. Biologic scaffold composed of skeletal muscle extracellular matrix. Biomaterials 33, 2916–2925 (2012).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Mathew, S. J. et al. Connective tissue fibroblasts and Tcf4 regulate myogenesis. Development 138, 371–84 (2011).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Murphy, M. M., Lawson, J. A., Mathew, S. J., Hutcheson, D. A. & Kardon, G. Satellite cells, connective tissue fibroblasts and their interactions are crucial for muscle regeneration. Development 138, 3625–3637 (2011).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Merrell, A. J. et al. Muscle connective tissue controls development of the diaphragm and is a source of congenital diaphragmatic hernias. Nat. Genet. 47, 496–504 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Quarta, M. et al. An artificial niche preserves the quiescence of muscle stem cells and enhances their therapeutic efficacy. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 752–9 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Bentzinger, C. F. et al. Fibronectin Regulates Wnt7a Signaling and Satellite Cell Expansion. Cell Stem Cell 12, 75–87 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Borselli, C. et al. Functional muscle regeneration with combined delivery of angiogenesis and myogenesis factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 3287–3292 (2010).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Fishman, J. M., Ansari, T., Sibbons, P., De Coppi, P. & Birchall, M. A. Decellularized rabbit cricoarytenoid dorsalis muscle for laryngeal regeneration. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 121, 129–38 (2012).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Brown, B. N., Valentin, J. E., Stewart-Akers, A. M., McCabe, G. P. & Badylak, S. F. Macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcomes in response to biologic scaffolds with and without a cellular component. Biomaterials 30, 1482–1491 (2009).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Beattie, A. J., Gilbert, T. W., Guyot, J. P., Yates, A. J. & Badylak, S. F. Chemoattraction of Progenitor Cells by Remodeling Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds. Tissue Eng. Part A 15, 1119–1125 (2009).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sicari, B. M. et al. The promotion of a constructive macrophage phenotype by solubilized extracellular matrix. Biomaterials 35, 8605–12 (2014).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Piccoli, M., Trevisan, C., Maghin, E., Franzin, C. & Pozzobon, M. Mouse Skeletal Muscle Decellularization. Methods Mol. Biol., https://doi.org/10.1007/7651_2017_28 (2017).
Valentin, J. E., Turner, N. J., Gilbert, T. W. & Badylak, S. F. Functional skeletal muscle formation with a biologic scaffold. Biomaterials 31, 7475–7484 (2010).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Greising, S. M. et al. Unwavering Pathobiology of Volumetric Muscle Loss Injury. Sci. Rep. 7, 13179 (2017).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Merritt, E. K. et al. Functional assessment of skeletal muscle regeneration utilizing homologous extracellular matrix as scaffolding. Tissue Eng. Part A 16, 1395–405 (2010).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Conconi, M. T. et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of acellular diaphragmatic matrices seeded with muscle precursors cells and coated with VEGF silica gels to repair muscle defect of the diaphragm. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 89A, 304–316 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
De Coppi, P. et al. Myoblast-acellular skeletal muscle matrix constructs guarantee a long-term repair of experimental full-thickness abdominal wall defects. Tissue Eng. 12, 1929–36 (2006).
Article PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

PDC is supported by NIHR. LU was supported by NIHR and The OAK Foundation. SE is supported by Great Ormond Street Hospital Children’s Charity. This study was supported by The GOSH Charity and Sparks (Grant 16ICH01) and NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre. Thanks to Nicola Elvassore for the critical review of the manuscript and to Prof Paolo Bonaldo for the technical support.

Author information

Anna Urciuolo and Luca Urbani contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Section, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
Anna Urciuolo, Luca Urbani, Silvia Perin, Panagiotis Maghsoudlou, Federico Scottoni, Asllan Gjinovci, Stavros Loukogeorgakis, Athanasios Tyraskis, Silvia Torelli, Mario Enrique Alvarez Fallas, Carla Julia-Vilella, Simon Eaton & Paolo De Coppi
Venetian Institute of Molecular Medicine, Via Orus 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
Anna Urciuolo & Bert Blaauw
Institute of Hepatology London, Foundation for Liver Research, 111 Coldharbour Lane, London, SE5 9NT, UK
Luca Urbani
Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
Luca Urbani
School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, RG6 6UB, Reading, UK
Henry Collins-Hooper & Ketan Patel
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
Elena Germinario & Bert Blaauw
Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 3, 35128, Padova, Italy
Anna Urciuolo

Authors

Anna Urciuolo
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Luca Urbani
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Silvia Perin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Panagiotis Maghsoudlou
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Federico Scottoni
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Asllan Gjinovci
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Henry Collins-Hooper
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Stavros Loukogeorgakis
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Athanasios Tyraskis
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Silvia Torelli
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Elena Germinario
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Mario Enrique Alvarez Fallas
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Carla Julia-Vilella
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Simon Eaton
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Bert Blaauw
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ketan Patel
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Paolo De Coppi
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.U., L.U., S.P., P.M., F.S., A.G., A.T., M.E.A.F. and C.J.V. were involved in designing and performing the decellularisation. A.U., L.U., P.M. and A.T. performed the characterization of the decellularised scaffolds. L.U., P.M. and A.T. performed histology of scaffolds and quantification of ECM components. A.U., L.U., S.P., P.M., H.C.H., S.T., M.E.A.F. and C.J.V. performed immunofluorescence stainings. L.U., P.M. and M.E.A.F. performed the CAM assay. A.U., L.U., F.S. and S.L. implanted the scaffolds in the VML surgical model. A.U., E.G. and B.B. performed the post-implantation analysis of muscle force. A.U., and S.P. performed histology and quantifications in samples harvested post-implantation. A.U., L.U., S.P., H.C.H., M.E.A.F. and C.J.V. performed primary cell isolation and culture. L.U., H.C.H. and K.P. performed anucleate fibre isolation, culture and analysis. A.U., L.U., S.P., and C.J.V. performed cell seeding in scaffolds and their analysis. A.U., L.U., S.E. and P.D.C. designed the study. A.U., L.U., S.P. and P.M. collected and assembled data. A.U., L.U., S.P., P.M., S.E., H.C.H. and K.P. contributed to data analysis and interpretation. P.D.C. supervised the study. A.U., L.U., S.P., K.P. and P.D.C. wrote the manuscript. All the authors reviewed and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo De Coppi.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Movie 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Urciuolo, A., Urbani, L., Perin, S. et al. Decellularised skeletal muscles allow functional muscle regeneration by promoting host cell migration. Sci Rep 8, 8398 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26371-y

Download citation

Received: 31 October 2017
Accepted: 06 April 2018
Published: 30 May 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26371-y

This article is cited by

Transcriptome profiling of a synergistic volumetric muscle loss repair strategy
- Kevin Roberts
- John Taehwan Kim
- Jeffrey C Wolchok
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (2023)
Decellularized Extracellular Matrix-Derived Hydrogels: a Powerful Class of Biomaterials for Skeletal Muscle Regenerative Engineering Applications
- Mohammed A. Barajaa
- Debolina Ghosh
- Cato T. Laurencin
Regenerative Engineering and Translational Medicine (2023)
The jam session between muscle stem cells and the extracellular matrix in the tissue microenvironment
- Mafalda Loreti
- Alessandra Sacco
npj Regenerative Medicine (2022)
Customized bioreactor enables the production of 3D diaphragmatic constructs influencing matrix remodeling and fibroblast overgrowth
- Edoardo Maghin
- Eugenia Carraro
- Martina Piccoli
npj Regenerative Medicine (2022)
Firearms-related skeletal muscle trauma: pathophysiology and novel approaches for regeneration
- Anselmo Moriscot
- Elen H. Miyabara
- T. Scott Bowen
npj Regenerative Medicine (2021)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.