Isolated spherical carbonate concretions observed in marine sediments are fascinating natural objet trouve because of their rounded shapes and distinct sharp boundaries. They occur in varied matrices and often contain well preserved fossils. The formation process of such concretions has been explained by diffusion and rapid syn-depositional reactions with organic solutes and other pore water constituents. However, the rates, conditions and formation process of syngenetic spherical concretions are still not fully clear. Based on the examination of different kinds of spherical concretions from several locations in Japan, a diffusion based growth diagram was applied to define the generalized growth conditions of spherical concretions formed around decaying organic matter. All analytical data imply that the spherical concretions formed very rapidly, at least three to four orders of magnitude faster than previously estimated timescales. The values indicate that spherical concretions are preferentially grown within clay- to silt-grade marine sediments deposited in relatively deep (a few tens of metres) environments dominated by diffusive solute transport, very early in diagenesis.
Spherical, isolated carbonate concretions occur throughout the world in marine argillaceous sedimentary rocks of widely varying geological ages. These concretions are characteristically highly enriched in CaCO3 compared to the surrounding sedimentary rock matrices and are typically separated from these rock matrices by sharp boundaries1,2,3. These sharp boundaries mean that the isolated carbonate concretions are readily identifiable and both geologists and non-scientists alike have been motivated to consider how such concretions could have formed.
It is also known that many of these concretions have various kinds of well-preserved fossils at their centres3. Isotopic analyses have been used to identify the source of carbon that formed the concretions4,5,6 and to understand the diagenetic processes, including microbial activity, that occurred during sediment burial and concretion formation1,7,8. However, even though there have been many studies of concretions over several decades, there still remain questions regarding concretion formation9,10,11. The remaining questions include: How rapidly do concretions grow? Why are the concretions often spherical with sharp boundaries? and Why does the localization of Ca and CO3, and consequently concretion growth, stop? These questions can be answered by determining the relationship between the formation conditions of the spherical concretions, the mass transport processes in the sedimentary matrix, and the concretion growth rates. However, this relationship has yet to be described precisely.
For several decades, the formation of spherical concretions has been explained by diffusion accompanied by carbonate inter-conversion reactions12,13 and also by very slow three dimensional advection of water when cementation conditions are isotropic9,14. These processes give rise to a spherical morphology in homogeneous sediments or sedimentary rocks. The process is basically accepted, but previously proposed models cannot explain the steep chemical gradients (notably of Ca) that occur across the margins of almost all concretions, and also the constant calcite (CaCO3) concentration3,15 and constant porosity within the body of a concretion16,17, as determined by thin section analysis and porosity measurements3. Such a steep boundary occurs as the reaction front on the concretion surface (Fig. 1) is developed by reactions between HCO3− and Ca2+ ions as concretions grow outwards, and has a certain characteristic width ‘L’ where CaCO3 has been precipitated. This front is developed in any kind of carbonate-rich spherical concretion formed syn-genetically during burial of marine sediments with organic carbon sources in the concretions3,18,19. In this case, the relationship between ‘L’, diffusion coefficient ‘D’ of HCO3− and growth rate of the concretion ‘V’ is: ‘L = D/V’. This relationship can be illustrated using a ‘Diffusion-growth rate cross-plot’, which was developed to explain detailed observations on concretions at a single locality in Japan3. Here, we extend the theory of the ‘cross-plot diagram’ by applying it to concretions of different ages at several localities to develop a general model for the formation conditions of spherical carbonate concretions in marine sediments. The outcome of the analysis is also used to answer the above remaining questions about syn-genetically formed spherical carbonate concretions and to build on the previous study, which only investigated concretions from a single locality.
The widths of reaction fronts (L) at the margins of spherical carbonate concretions of various sizes were measured to determine the relationship between ‘L’ and concretion diameter (R). The widths ‘L’ of three different kinds of spherical concretions from Japan were determined by using an X-ray analytical microscopy (SXAM) method to determine the Ca distribution and concentration profile between the body of each concretion and the surrounding clay to silt matrix. The examined calcium carbonate concretions are Teshio concretions (numbers of analysed samples, n = 20) from Cretaceous sediments, Yatsuo tusk-shell concretions (n = 24) and Morozaki ‘ghost-shrimp’ concretions (n = 10) from Oligocene sediments (Fig. 2) (Supplementary Table 1). The host sediments of the spherical carbonate concretions at these three localities are all of marine origin and are composed of clay to silty facies composed of very fine grains. The characteristics of these facies are consistent with a relatively deep seabed depositional environment (a few tens of metres20,21,22,23), without rapid flow of water.
The Teshio concretions are found in northern Hokkaido close to Wakkanai city in Late Cretaceous clay to silty sedimentary rocks of the Saku Formation24. This formation belongs to the Ezo Group20, which is distributed in and around the northern part of Hokkaido. The concretions occur mainly in silty facies and are distinguished by their spherical shape with diameters of ca. 1 to 2 cm (Fig. 2A). The fabric shows bending of sedimentary laminae around the concretions due to compaction. These concretions contain circular patterns at their centres, suggesting the past presence of non-skeletal organic material (Fig. 2A-1).
Yatsuo tusk-shell concretions are found in the Kurosedani Formation of the Yatsuo Group, which is distributed in Toyama Prefecture, central Japan (Fig. 2B). The sizes of the concretions vary from 1.5 to 3 cm. All tusk-shell concretions are formed around the mouths of shells situated in the concretions’ centres3. The Kurosedani Formation consists of argillaceous sedimentary rocks that have been determined to be of Miocene age (17–15 Ma) using diatoms and planktonic foraminifera21. In outcrops the tusk-shells (Fissidentalium spp.)22 are seen to lie in the compacted clay matrix almost parallel to the microscopic sedimentary fabric. However, the very fine fabric around the concretions is bent due to compaction after concretion formation3.
The Morozaki ‘ghost-shrimp’ concretions are found in the Morozaki Formation, which is distributed in the Chita peninsula of Aichi prefecture, central Japan (Fig. 2C). The concretions are known to have formed around ‘ghost shrimp’ claws within tuffaceous and clayey sediments deposited in relatively deep (a few tens of metres) environments23, which based on diatom stratigraphy are estimated to have been deposited between 15–18 Ma23. All the concretions are formed around a central claw of a Callianassa spp.25 which is typically 3 to 7 cm across. Sedimentary fabrics are also bent around ‘ghost-shrimp’ concretions showing that the spherical concretions formed before consolidation and compaction of the sediment.
The relationship between the width of reaction front ‘L’, diffusion coefficient ‘D’ of HCO3− and growth rate of the concretion ‘V’, L = D/V, suggests that the ‘L’ will increase almost linearly with increasing growth time and hence increasing diameter (R) of a concretion. In order to evaluate the general applicability of this relationship, other ‘L’ values for larger concretions, for example concretions from the Lower Lias of Dorset, southern England (where the concretions are known as ‘Coinstones’)26, ‘Curling Stones’ from the Upper Lias, Lower Jurassic sediments exposed on the NE coast of Yorkshire, England15 and ‘Moeraki boulders’ observed in the mudstone formation from New Zealand27,28 were also estimated based on reported CaCO3 contents.
All concretions have sharp boundaries between the cemented bodies and surrounding matrices, allowing their spherical shapes to be seen readily at outcrop (Fig. 2). All the kinds of concretions examined were determined by X-ray diffraction to be composed of calcite (Fig. 2D). With these concretions, the widths of reaction fronts ‘L’ of the Teshio, Yatsuo and Morozaki concretions, as defined by the Ca profiles and the distributions of Fe and Mn analysed by SXAM, are shown in Fig. 3A–C. Ca concentrations were found to be similar across a broad width of a concretion, but decreased rapidly across the rim of the concretion. Fe and Mn concentrations vary inversely with respect to one another. The profiles of all concretions show that the Ca concentrations are almost flat inside a concretion then tail to the concentrations in the surrounding rock matrix across a thin layer with width ‘L’. The profiles also show that Fe concentrations are elevated in the volume originally occupied by an organism, but Mn concentrations are relatively low in this zone. Outside this zone, Fe concentrations are relatively low, but Mn concentrations increase towards the margin of the concretion.
Chemical compositions of the spherical concretions measured by XRF are shown in Table 1. All concretions have a high concentration of Ca, from several times to 20 times higher than surrounding matrices. P is also remarkably concentrated in the concretions, while the content of Si is lower. Almost the same variations in elemental concentrations are observed in the larger concretions, ‘Coinstones’26, ‘Curling Stones’15 and ‘Moeraki boulders’28, from sites outside Japan.
SXAM mapping and XRF measurements clearly show that all concretions measured have quite similar reaction front widths, ‘L’, readily defined by a steep change of Ca concentration, from a higher and almost constant concentration within the concretion (CaO: 30~60 wt%) to a lower background level (CaO: 1~12 wt%) into the matrix. Based on the measured Ca profiles across the concretions, ‘L’ varies as follows. The smallest concretions i.e. Teshio concretions, (Fig. 3A) give Ca profiles that indicate ‘L’ of about 1 mm for concretions with diameters of 1 to 2 cm. Yatuso tusk-shells concretions (Fig. 3B) have diameters of 1.5 to 3 cm and give ‘L’ of 2 to 3 mm. The slightly larger Morozaki ‘ghost shrimp’ concretions (Fig. 3C) have diameters of 3 to 7 cm and wider ‘L’ of 3 to 6 mm.
δ13CPDB data of all concretions are also shown in Table 2. The values of all measured concretions are relatively low (Teshio: −21.9~−15.6‰; Yatuso: −19.2~−15.9‰; Morozaki: −16.1 ~ −7.3‰) and the larger concretions described in published literature also have low δ13C (Coinstone: −17.5~−10.5‰; Curling stones: −15.4~−13.7‰; Moeraki boulders: −30.8~−15.2‰) suggesting an organic origin of the carbon15,26,28.
The carbon source of concretions with lower δ13C values are consistent with the HCO3− that precipitated as calcite being a byproduct of fatty acid (R-COOH) decomposition that originates in decaying organisms within concretions3. This suggests that the concretions have been formed by reaction between carbon supplied by this organic source and Ca2+ in the surrounding seawater-derived pore-water. Therefore, steep Ca concentration profiles cross the margin of a concretion must be controlled by the rates of diffusion of HCO3−, from inside towards the margin, and of Ca2+ from pore-water within the surrounding marine sediments towards the concretion. The HCO3− has a higher concentration within the concretion than outside it, as well as a higher apparent diffusion coefficient than Ca2+ 29. The reaction front at the margin of the concretion is therefore characterised by rapid precipitation of CaCO3 due to super saturation and a pH increase at the cementation front30. The Fe and Mn profiles across the concretions could be explained by the conditions towards the margin of the concretion being less reducing and more alkaline than those near the decaying organism; the stability field of Mn-carbonate extends to higher pH and Eh than the stability field of Fe-carbonate31.
Although calcite (CaCO3) precipitated preferentially within the initially relatively large pores in the matrix, micro-pores within the concretion continued to function as migration paths for HCO3− at the reaction front. Due to this, concentrations of both HCO3− and Ca2+ in the pore-water were decreased within the reaction front and the changed concentration gradients drove further supply of Ca2+ to the reaction zone until the HCO3− concentration decreased to a level controlled by CaCO3 equilibrium and all the organic carbon was consumed. The concretions therefore continue to grow until there is no more carbon of organic origin remaining within the concretion. Concretion formation then stops and the concentrations of Ca2+ in the pore-water at the reaction front remain at the levels of surrounding seawater-derived pore-water.
A tusk-shell concretion contains almost the same mass of C (Vc) as the mass of organic C estimated to have occurred initially in the cone shaped tusk-shell (Vt), based on the simple mass balance calculation below, using measured data3. This mass balance supports the conclusion that the C source was provided by decaying organic matter.
The mass of C within a tusk-shell spherical concretion is given by: Vc = 4/3πrc3 · d(c) · nc, where rc is the radius of a concretion (mean value; 0.75 cm), d(c) is the average density of a concretion (1.7 g/cm3) and nc (0.07) is the proportion of C in the concretion. Using the measured values for the various parameters gives Vc ≃ 0.20 g.
The mass of organic C within a tusk-shell can be estimated by treating a tusk shell as if it is a cone: Vt = 1/3πrt2 · l · d(o) · no, where rt is the radius of a tusk-shell’s mouth (mean value; 0.25 cm), l (6 cm) is the average length of a Yatsuo tusk-shell, d(o) is the density of living Crustacea (1.1~1.3 g/cm3)32 and no (0.4) is the proportion of organic C in the living tusk-shell. Using the measured values for the various parameters gives Vt ≃ 0.17~0.20 g, which is almost the same as calculated for Vc.
As the organic matter decays diffusion is driven by the changing HCO3− concentration gradient during the consumption of the organic carbon source. ‘L’ will be thinner at the beginning of concretion formation, but become wider as the carbon source is consumed and the concretion grows (hence larger concretions have greater ‘L’). The correlation between ‘L’ and ‘R’ can be clearly seen in Fig. 4 with measured values (L1~L3) and the estimated values (L4~L6) of larger concretions (Supplementary Table 1 and Figs 1 and 2).
The least squares fitting of Fig. 4 gives L = aRb, where a = 0.0807 ± 0.0105 and b = 0.992 ± 0.017. It can be seen that there is a strong positive correlation between the thickness L and the diameter of a concretion R. This correlation can be explained as follows. CaCO3 molecules precipitate through reaction of Ca2+ and CO32−. If the rate of precipitation is high, the concentration of Ca2+ ion at the concretion surface is very low. Assuming the concentration of Ca2+ ion is quite low at the surface of CaCO3 concretion, the distribution of Ca2+ ion c(r) quickly relaxes to the steady-state distribution given by33;
where c0 is the concentration of Ca2+ ion far from the concretion. Precipitation of CaCO3 proceeds if c(r) exceeds a threshold cc, which is determined by the solubility product.
Equating Eq. (1) and cc, the location of the outer edge of precipitation rc is given by;
Then the thickness of the reaction front, rc − R is written as;
Equation (3) clearly shows that the thickness of reaction front L is proportional to the size of concretion R. Because the constant b is close to unity, the constant a can be written by;
From this formula, we can obtain the threshold concentration cc = c0 = 0.075.
The correlation suggests that all examined concretions were formed under similar, relatively stable sedimentary environments in which solute transport was diffusive until formation of the concretion was completed. The relation described here between values for ‘L’ and diameters ‘R’ of concretions shows that a sharp interface is only developed when diffusion occurs in combination with rapid carbonate mineral precipitation, limited by the boundary conditions shown in Fig. 5.
A ‘Diffusion-growth rate cross plot’ (Fig. 5) enables the growth rate of spherical concretions to be deduced, as bounded by the diffusion coefficients of varied sediments (D) and the width of a reaction front (L). First of all, ‘L’ observed at the margins of concretions within marine sediments in the field ranges from a few mm to about 10 cm, as shown in Fig. 4. Diffusion coefficients can be bounded by the results of published experiments in similar sediments to those in which the studied concretions formed and by the diffusivity of solutes in seawater.
Diffusion coefficients of fine to clayey sediments, which are generally deposited on continental shelf seabeds, are in the order of 10−6 cm2/s29. The most reliable effective HCO3− diffusion coefficients measured in Miocene clayey formations (e.g. Boom clay in Belgium) with similar characteristics to the sediments studied here, is (6 ± 3) ×10−7 cm2/s34. This latter value was measured during experiments carried out in-situ in an underground laboratory using radio-labelled carbonate (H14CO3−) under strictly defined conditions to evaluate the diffusivity35.
The Boom Clay, is a somewhat consolidated, plastic clay sediment (“stiff clay”)35,36. Therefore the diffusion coefficients measured for the Boom Clay can be used to estimate the minimum growth rates of concretions in the even less well-consolidated argillaceous sediments, within which the studied concretions are interpreted to have formed (Supplementary Table 2). On the other hand, the diffusion coefficient of dissolved concretion constituents in seawater is in the order of 10−5 cm2/s29.
The published measured diffusion coefficients for poorly consolidated sediments and clay, combined with the diffusivities of solutes in seawater imply that the effective diffusion coefficient of the sediment during concretion growth varied between the orders of 10−5 to 10−7 cm2/s. By taking a mid-range diffusion coefficient of 10−6 cm2/s and the mean value of measured ‘L’, it can be estimated that the growth rate of a reaction front varied between 10−5 and 10−8 (cm/s) (Fig. 5). These values, based on ‘L’, can be used to estimate the minimum growth rate (and hence the maximum growth time) of each spherical concretion. The estimated growth rates are at least three to four orders of magnitude faster than previously estimated timescales of concretion formation27,28.
The distribution of ‘L’ values on the ‘Diffusion-growth rate cross plot’ also suggests that the conditions of solute transport under which the spherical concretions formed in finer marine sediments were relatively restricted and controlled by the diffusive properties of the sediments. In particular, finer or clay rich sediments are necessary to provide lower diffusivity and permeability even with high porosity, due to the high tortuosity of the pore structures34. Such properties will cause slow migration of the solutes and hence ensure that HCO3− concentrations rise sufficiently within a reaction front to provide conditions suitable for precipitation of CaCO3. This is the reason why concretions are observed in the field to be spherical and to have sharp boundaries that clearly distinguish them from the surrounding matrix. In coarser, porous and more permeable sediments, with higher hydraulic gradients and higher permeabilities than those of the sediments for which measured ‘L’ are reported here, it is possible that concretions may still form. However, such conditions could result in transport of solutes by porewater advection. Eventually they will have more diffuse boundaries and not such an elevated concentration of CaCO3 due to the fast dilution of HCO3− produced by the decomposition of organic matter. A consequence is that such ‘concretions’ will be more difficult to recognize.
Based on the investigation of several spherical concretions of different ages, the general applicability of a ‘Diffusion-growth rate cross-plot’ has been demonstrated for constraining the formation conditions of isolated spherical concretions that are widely distributed in marine argillaceous rocks deposited in relatively deep (several tens of metres) seabed environments. It has been shown that spherical concretions of different ages from different localities formed under a narrow range provided by similar clay to silt facies. All analytical data shown here imply that the spherical concretions formed very rapidly, at least three to four orders of magnitude faster than previously estimated timescales. They also maintained their characteristics, with well-preserved fossils at their centres or textures indicative of the original presence of organic matter. Simple mass balance calculations also demonstrate that the carbon fixed in the carbonate concretions came predominantly from the organs of organisms inside the concretions. Spherical carbonate concretions formed in marine sediments and having reaction fronts at their outer margins with widths, ‘L’, can be generally explained by decaying organic matter producing carbonate that then diffuses from the inside to the outside of the concretion down a concentration gradient, before being precipitated as calcite in the marginal zone. The reported method for estimating the growth rates of concretions is applicable to any syn-genetic concretion within fine marine sediments that formed due to the diffusion-controlled supply of reactants in very early diagenesis.
Spherical carbonate concretions collected from several locations in Japan have been analyzed by the following methods. First of all, the widths of reaction fronts ‘L’ were measured on polished sections extended from the centres of these concretions and into the surrounding rock matrices. The sections were used to determine the Ca profiles across the concretions and into the matrices. In each case the marginal zone of the concretion, across which ‘L’ was measured, was identified using an X-ray fluorescence analyzer (SXAM: XGT-2000V Horiba Japan) at the Department of Education, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan. SXAM intensity maps of Teshio, Yatuso and Morozaki concretions were reduced to one-dimensional element profiles in a direction perpendicular to the concentric ring patterns identified in Ca, Mn and Fe maps of the carbonate concretions, using the lamination trace technique37. In the measurement, a high-intensity continuous X-ray beam (Rh anode 50 kV 1 mA), 100μm in diameter, was focused with a guide tube perpendicular to the surface of a sample, which was located on a PC-controllable X-Y stage. X-ray fluorescence from the sample surface was analyzed with the hp-Si detector of an energy-dispersion spectrometer. The results showed semi-quantitatively the two-dimensional distribution of Ca, Fe and Mn elements across the whole surface of each sample.
Mineralogical compositions of all kinds of concretions were also determined with an X-ray diffractometer (XRD; Multiflex, Rigaku Co.) using crushed and powdered samples and Cu Kα radiation (the Cu being subjected to an electron beam of 40 kV/20 mA).
XRF analyses were undertaken to measure Ca and other major elements content using a Shimadzu SXF-1200 equipped with a Rh X-ray tube. Glass beads were prepared by mixing a portion of each sample, which was ignited at 950 °C to decompose carbonates, with anhydrous lithium tetraborate flux and then fusing. Measurements were calibrated with rock reference samples issued by the Geological Survey of Japan (GSJ: Geochemical Reference Sample Data Base, http://www.aist.co.jp/RIODB/db012/welcome.html).
The δ13C of the concretions were also examined to determine the origin of the carbon in the carbonate. Samples were each placed in a reaction container and purged by He gas. Each sample was then reacted with H3PO4 that was introduced by a syringe. The CO2 gas evolved in the reaction was carried into an IR-MS (Thermo Fisher DELTA V Plus) in a He carrier gas and the stable carbon isotopic ratio was measured and reported as δ13CV-PDB.
Raiswell, R. The microbiological formation of carbonate concretions in the Upper Lias of NE England. Chemical Geology 18, 227–244 (1976).
Dix, G. R. & Mullins, H. T. Shallow, Subsurface growth and burial alteration of Middle Devonian calcite concretions. Jour. Sedimentary Petology 57, 140–152 (1987).
Yoshida, H. et al. Early post-mortem formation of carbonate concretions around tusk-shells over week-month timescales. Scientific Reports 5, 14123, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14123 (2015).
Curtis, C. D., Coleman, M. L. & Love, L. G. Pore water evolution during sediment burial from isotopic and mineral chemistry of calcite, dolomite and siderite concretions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 50, 2321–2334 (1986).
Mozley, P. & Burns, S. J. Oxygen and carbon isotopic composition of marine carbonate concretions: An overview. Jour. Sedim. Petrol. 63, 73–83 (1993).
Raiswell, R. & Fisher, Q. J. Mudrock-hosted carbonate concretions. a review of growth mechanisms and their influence on chemical and isotopic composition. Jour. Geological Society, London 157, 239–251 (2000).
Irwin, H., Curtis, C. & Coleman, M. Isotopic evidence for source of diagenetic carbonates formed during burial of organic-rich sediments. Nature 269, 209–213 (1977).
Coleman, M. L. Microbial processes: Controls on the shape and composition of carbonate concretions. Marine Geology 113, 127–140 (1993).
Seilacher, A. Concretion morphologies reflecting diagenetic and epigenetic pathways. Sedimentary Geology 143, 41–57 (2001).
Wilson, D. D. & Brett, C. E. Concretions as sources of exceptional preservation, and decay as a source of concretions: examples from the Middle Devonian of New York. Palaios 28, 305–316 (2012).
Mccoy, V. E., Young, R. T. & Briggs, D. E. G. Sediment permeability and the preservation of soft-tissues in concretions: an experimental study. Palaios 30, 608–612 (2015).
Berner, R. A. Rate of concretion growth. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 32, 477–483 (1968a).
Wilkinson, M. & Damper, M. D. The rate of growth of sandstone-hosted calcite concretions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 54, 3391–3399 (1990).
Mozley, P. & Davis, J. M. Internal structure and mode of growth of elongate calcite concretions: Evidence for small-scale, microbially induced, chemical heterogeneity in groundwater. GSA Bulletin 117, 1400–1412 (2005).
Coleman, M. L. & Raiswell, R. Carbon, oxygen and sulphur isotope variations in concretions from the Upper Lias of NE England. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 45, 329–340 (1981).
Raiswell, R. The growth of Cambrian and Liassic Concretions. Sedimentology 17, 147–171 (1971).
Curtis, D. C., Petrowski, C. & Oertel, G. Stable carbon isotope ratios within carbonate concretions: a clue to place and time of formation. Nature 235, 98–100 (1972).
Berner, R. A. Calcium carbonate concentrations formed by the decomposition of organic matter. Science 159, 195–197 (1968b).
Coleman, M. L. & Raiswell, R. Source of carbonate and origin of zonation in pyritiferous carbonate concretions: evaluation of a dynamic model. American Journal of Science 295, 282–308 (1995).
Takahashi, A., Hirano, H. & Sato, T. Stratigraphy and fossil assemblage of the Upper Cretaceous in the Teshionakagawa area, Hokkaido, northern Japan. Journal of Geological Society of Japan. 109(2), 77–95 (2003).
Yanagisawa, Y. Diatom biostratigraphy of the lower to middle Miocene sequence in the Yatsuo area, Toyama Prefecture, central Japan. Bull. Geol. Surv. Japan 50, 139–165 (1999).
Itoh, Y., Yanagisawa, Y. & Watanabe, M. Magnetostratigraphy and diatom biostratigraphy of Neogene rocks distributed in the Yatsuo area, central Japan. Bull. Geol. Surv. Japan 50, 215–223 (1999).
Kondo, Y. & Kimura, I. Geology of the Morozaki district: Geological Sheet Map at 1: 50000, Geological Survey of Japan (in Japanese with English abstract) (1987).
Matumoto, T. Cretaceous Formation in Hokkaido area, Japan (No. 2). Journal of Geological Society of Japan, 296–297 (1939).
Nagao, T. On some fossil Crustacea from Japan. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido Imperial University. 4, 85–100 (1941).
Hesselbo, S. P. & Palmer, T. J. Reworked early diagenetic concretions and the bioerosional origin of a regional discontinuity within British Jurassic marine mudstones. Sedimentology 39, 1045–1065 (1992).
Boles, J. R., Landis, C. A. & Dale, P. The Moeraki boulders – anatomy of some septarian concretions. Jour. Sedimentary Geology 55, 398–406 (1985).
Thyne, G. D. & Boles, J. R. Isotopic evidence for origin of the Moeraki septarian concretions, New Zealand. Jour. Sedimentary Geology 59, 272–279 (1989).
Li, Y. H. & Gregory, S. Diffusion of ions in sea-water and in deep-sea sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 38, 703–714 (1974).
Lebron, I. & Surez, D. L. Calcite nucleation and precipitation kinetics as affected by dissolved organic matter at 25 °C and pH 7.5. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 60, 2765–2776 (1996).
Barnaby, R. J. & Rimstidt, J. D. Redox conditions of calcite cementation interpreted from Mn and Fe contents of authigenic calcites. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 101, 795–804 (1989).
Spaargaren, D. H. Hydrodynamic properties of benthic marine Crustacea. I. Specific gravity and drag coefficients. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1, 351–359 (1979).
Carslaw,H. S. & Jaeger,J. C. Conduction of Heat in Solids Published by Oxford University Press, United Kingdom, ISBN 10: 0198533683 ISBN 13: 9780198533689 (1986).
Maes, N. et al. Determination of the diffusion coefficient of ionic species in Boom clay by electormigration. feasibility study. Radiochim. Acta 82, 183–189 (1998).
Aertsens, M. et al. Vertical distribution of H14CO 3- transport parameters in Boom Clay in the Mol-1borehole4 (Mol, Belgium) and comparison with data from independent measurements. External Report SCK·SEN-ER-66 (2010).
European Atomic Energy Agency Community (EURATOM) Effects of cement on clay barrier performance – phase II (ECOCLAY II). EC CONTRACT No FIKW-CT-2000-00028 Final Report (2003).
Katsuta, N., Takano, M., Okaniwa, T. & Kumazawa, M. Image processing to extract sequential profiles with high spatial resolution from the 2D map of deformed laminated patterns. Computers & Geosciences 29, 725–740 (2003).
We are very grateful for helpful discussions with Profs. I.Maruyama, Y.Asahara, Y.Yamaguchi of Nagoya University, H.Hasegawa of Kochi University and T.Ohe of Tokai University for model calculation, and Dr. S.Nishimoto of Nagoya City Science Centre for XRD measurement. We are also grateful for Profs. A.Ujihara of Nagoya University and T.Ichihara of Nagoya Bunri University providing background geological information about the tusk-shells and the paleontological identification. Mr. S. Yogo is also thanks for preparation of samples for optical examination in thin-sections, SXAM mapping and SEM-EDS analyses. The research was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant 15H052227 and Sekisui Kagaku ‘Monozukuri’.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Yoshida, H., Yamamoto, K., Minami, M. et al. Generalized conditions of spherical carbonate concretion formation around decaying organic matter in early diagenesis. Sci Rep 8, 6308 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24205-5
Sedimentary Geology (2020)
Spherical carbonate concretions and deep-sea fossils in the Miocene Morozaki Group, Chita Peninsula, central Japan
The Journal of the Geological Society of Japan (2020)
Aromatic hydrocarbons provide new insight into carbonate concretion formation and the impact of eogenesis on organic matter
Organic Geochemistry (2020)
Over 13,000 elements from a single bonebed help elucidate disarticulation and transport of an Edmontosaurus thanatocoenosis
PLOS ONE (2020)
GEOCHEMICAL JOURNAL (2020)