Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Syngenetic rapid growth of ellipsoidal silica concretions with bitumen cores


Isolated silica concretions in calcareous sediments have unique shapes and distinct sharp boundaries and are considered to form by diagenesis of biogenic siliceous grains. However, the details and rates of syngenetic formation of these spherical concretions are still not fully clear. Here we present a model for concretion growth by diffusion, with chemical buffering involving decomposition of organic matter leading to a pH change in the pore-water and preservation of residual bitumen cores in the concretions. The model is compatible with some pervasive silica precipitation. Based on the observed elemental distributions, C, N, S, bulk carbon isotope and carbon preference index (CPI) measurements of the silica-enriched concretions, bitumen cores and surrounding calcareous rocks, the rate of diffusive concretion growth during early diagenesis is shown using a diffusion-growth diagram. This approach reveals that ellipsoidal SiO2 concretions with a diameter of a few cm formed rapidly and the precipitated silica preserved the bitumen cores. Our work provides a generalized chemical buffering model involving organic matter that can explain the rapid syngenetic growth of other types of silica accumulation in calcareous sediments.


Spherical or ellipsoidal, isolated silica concretions occur throughout the world in calcareous sedimentary rocks of widely varying geological ages. These concretions are harder than the surrounding rock due to being more highly enriched in SiO2 and typically have sharp boundaries1,2. Owing to their morphological and material characteristics, silica concretions have fascinated both geologists3 and non-scientists who have been motivated to consider how such concretions could have formed. Silica concretions also had a critical role in human history as they provided suitable raw material (commonly known as flint) for making stone tools, which was a fundamental industry in the lives of Paleolithic foragers, Mesolithic hunter-gatherers and Neolithic farmers4,5.

Previously, isotopic analyses have been used to understand the diagenetic processes that occurred during sediment burial and the formation of silica concretions6,7. Some of the concretions contain well-preserved fossils suggesting the possibility of involvement of biogenic processes during concretion formation2,8,9,10. Such silicification with preservation of delicate skeletal materials11 and silicified peats12 have also been reported and suggest that silicification occurred rapidly to preserve the detailed textures inside. Indeed, the occurrences of fossils in silica concretions have been widely known among archaeologists through their observations of prehistoric stone artifacts made of flint13. However, although many studies of silica concretions have been carried out over several decades, questions still remain regarding the syngenetic formation process and the rate of concretion growth3,14. In particular, why do many concretions have spherical shapes and sharp boundaries? and why does the localized enrichment of SiO2 eventually stop and the concretion stop growing? These questions are basically related to the mass transport processes and the concretion growth rates in the sedimentary matrix. However, this relationship has not been described precisely.

In a general sense, commonly observed enrichment of Si to form silica concretions has been explained by diffusion accompanied by silica super-saturation in the pore-water3,15. A related process is diffusion dominated, three dimensional migration of aqueous solutes when cementation conditions are isotropic as recognized also in many carbonate concretions16,17,18,19,20. Carbonate concretions that are morphologically similar to silica concretions have been found to contain organic material at their centres and micro-organisms, especially chemosynthetic anaerobes, have been shown to play an important role in concretion formation21,22,23,24,25. These processes give rise to a spherical or ellipsoidal morphology in relatively homogeneous sediments.

Carbonate concretions often exhibit analogous features to those observed in silica concretions: oval shapes, sharp boundaries, constant cement content and uniform stable isotope composition throughout the concretion body. Raiswell and Fisher19 suggested that such features are readily explained by a pervasive model of concretionary growth and this model is now widely accepted. However, they note that these features can also be explained by a diffusive growth model and that it can be difficult to distinguish the two models from observations made on concretions. Bojanowski and Clarkson26 proposed a diffusive model driven by chemical gradients to explain siderite concretions developed around central organic remains. Such concretions can be considered analogous to silica concretions developed around organic-rich cores. Based on these models for analogous carbonate concretions, both pervasive and diffusive growth models need to be considered as possible explanations for such silica concretions. In this paper we present detailed analyses of silica concretions from the Eocene Green River Formation in Utah, U.S.A. in order to shed light on their nature and rates of the processes involved in their formation.

Geological setting and studied materials

Lower to middle Eocene lacustrine organic-rich carbonate and siliceous mudstone deposits of the Green River Formation are well-known oil source rocks27,28,29,30 and the process of bitumen formation in them due to burial diagenesis has been well described31,32. The organic-rich carbonaceous formation is widely distributed in the central United States, such as in the Greater Green River Basin in Wyoming, the Uinta Basin in northern Utah, and the Piceance Creek Basin in Colorado33,34. The thickness of the Green River Formation varies in each basin, but is about 900 m thick in the Indian Canyon section. Deposition of the lacustrine sediments occurred over a period of 9 Ma, between ca. 52 and ca. 43 Ma34,35. Based on the vitrinite reflectance of about 0.5–0.6 %Ro in the Indian Canyon section29,30, the maximum estimated burial depth of the formation is about 200–600 m. The maximum geothermal temperature is estimated at about 100 °C, which corresponds to the bitumen generation stage36.

Within the Green River Formation, there are facies dominated by calcareous sediments with intercalated bedded cherts. Silica concretions are mainly found in the upper part of the formation in the Indian Canyon section, western Uinta Basin (Fig. 1a). The Indian Canyon section is subdivided into six stages based on the lithology37; the fluvio-lacustrine, fluctuating deep-lake, stable lake, evaporation-dominant, fluctuating shallow-lake, and fluvio-lacustrine stages in ascending stratigraphic order. Previous studies revealed that silica-rich beds of the Green River Formation are characterized by the enrichment of Si, Mg, and Na38,39 and were deposited in a highly alkaline (pH > 9), saline-lake palaeo-environment37.

Figure 1

Occurrence of silica concretion with bitumen core. (a) Location map showing the sampling point in Green River Formation in the Indian Canyon section, western Unita Basin. (b-1–2) Occurrence of a silica concretions and the surrounding calcareous rock showing sedimentary layers bending around a concretion, but undeflected layers preserved inside a concretion (b-3). The terms used to describe parts of the concretions are also shown here (b-2,3). (c-1,2) Photomicrograph of a bitumen core and silica rich concretion containing euhedral quartz (Qz) crystals. (d-1–3) Dense accumulation of organic microspheres in the bitumen core. Well-preserved organic spheres observed under a microscope with plane polarised light (d-1,2) and by fluorescence microscopy (d-3). Scale bars in (b) is 1 cm, (c) is 0.5 mm and (d) is 0.1 mm. All photographs shown here were taken by H. Yoshida and R. Kuma.

Ellipsoidal silica concretions with bitumen cores are observed in the carbonate-rich fine sedimentary rocks and occur mainly in the fluctuating shallow-lake stage. The axial dimensions of the concretions vary from 3 to 6 cm and all are readily distinguished from the surrounding calcareous layered rock by their sharp boundaries. The bitumen cores of all concretions are brownish to dark coloured and also ellipsoidal in shape with longer axial dimensions of 1 –2 cm in the centre (Figs. 1b-1–b-3, Supplementary Fig. S1).


All silica concretions are very hard and are laterally elongated parallel to the fine layers of the calcareous sedimentary rocks (Figs. 1b-1,b-2, 2a). The bitumen core of each silica concretion is surrounded by a dense silica enriched zone which is well preserved and readily identified in the surrounding layered sedimentary rocks (Figs. 1b-1,b-2). The terms for the parts of a concretion used in this text are also shown in Fig. 1 (b-2, b-3, Supplementary Fig. S1). Sedimentary laminae in the surrounding rocks are bent around the concretions (Fig. 1b-2, 2a), but horizontal sedimentary layers are identified within the concretions (Fig. 1b-3: showing sedimentary layers in a concretion). These features show that the concretions were probably hardened before compaction of the sediment was completed and therefore must have formed in an early stage of diagenesis. Within the concretions, chemically distinct parallel zones occur around the bitumen core (Fig. 2, Supplementary, Fig. S4) and suggest the concretion grew outward from the core.

Figure 2

Si and Ca distributions in and around a silica concretion. (a) View of a plane cut through the centre of a silica concretion and the surrounding sedimentary rock. (b,c) Si (b-1,2) and Ca (c-1,2) distribution maps and concentration profiles (dotted line) across a silica concretion measured by SXAM (cnt: X-ray intensity; count per second). ‘L’ shown in the Si profile (b-2) is the width of the reaction front developed during concretion formation. Photograph (a) shown here is taken by H. Yoshida.

SEM examination of the concretion between the bitumen core and the concretion rim, are composed of fine (c. 10 µm) silica crystals which are equidimensional and show no significant variation in size and shape across the concretion (Supplementary Figs. S2a–d). A very small number of very fine rhombohedral dolomite crystals probably pre-date the concretion40 and became incorporated in the silica that formed the concretion, with no dissolution occurring (Supplementary Fig. S2).

A combination of results from XRD and XRF analyses can be used to deduce mineralogical differences between the concretion and the surrounding rock. The XRD traces show no discernible peaks of calcite and dolomite in the organic core of a concretion, while clear peaks of calcite and dolomite occur in the surrounding calcareous rocks (Supplementary Fig. S3). Only very small calcite and dolomite peaks are seen in the silica concretion. The concentrations of calcite and dolomite in the concretion are therefore apparently smaller than in the surrounding rock. The XRD traces were not calibrated and therefore cannot be used to estimate the absolute quantities of calcite and dolomite in the samples. However, considering the much smaller height of the highest dolomite peak given by the concretion, when compared to the surrounding rocks, the concentration of dolomite in the concretion must be considerably smaller than the concentration in the surrounding rocks. Furthermore, in the case of the surrounding rock the highest dolomite peak is much higher the highest calcite peak, whereas in the concretion these peaks are roughly the same height. These differences indicate that relative to calcite there is a much reduced proportion of dolomite in the concretion compared to the surrounding rock.

This interpretation from the XRD results is consistent with the compositional differences between the concretion and surrounding sedimentary rock as determined by XRF (Supplementary Table S1). The mean molar Ca/Mg ratio is 2.65 in the concretion and 1.22 in the surrounding rock (Supplementary Table S1). The CaO contents of the concretion and surrounding rock are 9.95 wt% and 22.26 wt% respectively, while the MgO contents of the concretion and surrounding rock are 2.70 wt% and 13.09 wt% respectively. These differences can be explained by calcite and dolomite having lower concentrations in the concretion than in the surrounding rock, but the ratio calcite/dolomite being larger in the concretion than in the surrounding rock.

Optical observation of thin-sections revealed that euhedral quartz crystals are distributed in the bitumen cores. However, very fine quartz grains form a dense silica enriched zone (i.e. silica concretion) around the bitumen core (Figs. 1b-3,c-1, 2) and separate it from the surrounding fine-grained calcareous (calcite and dolomite filling) sedimentary rock (Figs. 1b-1, 2).

In the bitumen core, a dense accumulation of microscopic organic spheres (micrometres to decamicrometres in size) is observed (Fig. 1d-1). Spherical green algae ‘Botryococcus buanui’ have been widely reported from the Green River Formation41, and the observed organic spheres probably originated as green algae42. Within the same part of the Green River Formation, many fish coprolites containing similar highly concentrations of spherical organic algae have been identified (Figs. 1d-2, 3). This suggests that the origin of the bitumen cores43,44,45,46 is coprolite containing ‘Botryococcus buanui’47. The δ13C, elemental contents of N, S, and C, and carbon preference index (CPI) of the bitumen cores, silica concretion and surrounding rock were analysed (see “Methods” section). High contents of total organic carbon (ca. 10 wt%) and nitrogen (ca. 0.2 wt%) in the bitumen core have been measured, and the δ13Ccarb and δ13Corg of the bitumen core, concretion and the surrounding rock have been determined (Supplementary Table S2). Both δ13Ccarb and δ13Corg are lower in the bitumen cores and silica concretion than in the surrounding rocks. TOC is very high in the bitumen cores, high in the surrounding rocks and low in the concretion. N-paraffin analysis also indicates that bitumen cores have relatively high contents of C, N, and S in the organic fraction, with high maturity shown by the CPI48 (Supplementary Table S2). The δ13Ccarb value of the concretion (average 0.87‰) could be explained by the inorganic carbon in the silica concretion being about 9.3% derived from the organic carbon in the core (− 28‰) and about 90.7% derived from sedimentary carbonate40 (3.85‰) (Supplementary Table S2).

Figure 3

Formation process of silica concretion. Schematic illustration of the process of silica concretion formation after burial of algal organic spheres to form bitumen cores in calcareous lake sediments. (a) Concentric algal organic spheres initially grew in calcareous sediments in a shallow and highly alkaline lake rich in dissolved Si. (b) Subsequently, the algal organic spheres, probably ‘Fish coprolite’, decomposed and the pH of pore water in the sediment around the organic spheres decreased. The decreased pH of the pore waters then caused the abundant dissolved silica to precipitate around the decomposed organic spheres. (c) Conceptual view of the features of ellipsoidal silica concretions and relevant elemental (Si, Ca) profiles. The Si profile across the concretion formed in rather stable conditions under which solutes diffused continuously, driven by pH buffering and associated silica precipitation.

SXAM mapping has allowed one-dimensional elemental profiles of Si, Ca and other elements to be produced along sections perpendicular to the concretion rim (Figs. 2b-1–c-2, Supplementary Fig. S4). This mapping revealed that Si is concentrated in the concretion while Ca is concentrated in the surrounding rock. XRF analysis also shows contrasting Si contents between the concretion (up to 78 wt%) and the surrounding sedimentary rock (ca. 25 wt%) respectively (Supplementary Table S1).


Formation process of ellipsoidal silica concretions

Any model for the formation of these concretions must explain several key features: (1) the accumulation of silica around the bitumen cores; (2) the almost uniform concentration of SiO2 between the bitumen cores and the rims of the concretions; (3) the steep SiO2 concentration gradient across the rims of the concretions, from higher concentrations internally, to much lower concentrations externally; (4) very fine and almost uniform grain size (c. 10 µm) and crystal morphology of silica between the bitumen core and the concretion rims; (5) chemical zoning, with zones parallel to the margins of the concretion; (6) lower concentrations of calcite and dolomite, but higher calcite/dolomite ratios in the concretion than in the surrounding sedimentary rock; (7) carbon isotopic signatures of carbonate samples from between the bitumen core and the rim of the concretion that are intermediate between those of the bitumen and carbonate in the sedimentary rock surrounding the concretion; (8) deviation of sedimentary layers in the surrounding rock around the concretions; and (9) the ellipsoidal shapes of the concretions.

The following process of ellipsoidal silica concretion formation can explain these features. Firstly, many pellets formed from green algal accumulations (presumably ‘Fish coprolite’)26,46,47 distributed in the lake sediment (Fig. 3a). After burial in the calcareous lake sediments, which contained alkaline (pH > 9) pore-water, the organic matter in the pellets started to decompose38,39. This decomposition produced relatively lower pH pore-water in and around the algal matter (pH < 3–4 in the organic matter; Fig. 3b)49,50. The solubility of silica in water increases markedly with increasing pH above c. 9.5. The solubility of amorphous silica is an order of magnitude lower at pH 9.5 than at pH 11 in both fresh water and brine51 Acidity diffused out from the bitumen and caused the solubility of silica to decrease, leading to precipitation of silica from the pore water. A precipitation front was formed where silica became over-saturated. Across this front a Si concentration gradient developed, with Si concentration decreasing from the surrounding calcareous sediments towards the surface of the decomposing pellet (which eventually formed the bitumen core), owing to the concentration of organic acids increasing with decreasing distance to the pellet. This concentration gradient caused Si to diffuse towards the decomposing algal pellet, effectively supplying additional Si from the outside (Fig. 3c).

In the proposed model, the precipitated silica fills both pre-existing pores and porosity generated by the acid dissolving the carbonate in the surrounding sediments. Concretion growth by diffusion of acid porewater from the decaying organic core can explain the observations whatever the proportion of primary and secondary porosity are filled by silica.

Silica precipitation in open pore space would have contributed to a decrease in the concentrations of pre-existing dolomite and calcite. However, this dilution process alone cannot explain the apparent changes in calcite and dolomite concentrations, because it does not account for the different calcite/dolomite ratios in the concretion and in the surrounding rock. Possible explanations for these different ratios are: (1) initial dissolution of dolomite and calcite during concretion formation, followed by late diagenetic precipitation of calcite in the small amount of residual pore space within the concretion; (2) formation of the concretion within calcite-rich sediment, followed by dolomitization of the surrounding sediment or sedimentary rock (depending on whether the sediment had lithified) and possibly precipitation of primary dolomite, with only a small amount of dolomite forming in the concretion owing to the low interconnected porosity of the concretion. Dedolomitisation of residual dolomite within the concretion is an unlikely explanation since this process would require elevated Ca/Mg ratios in the concretion compared to the surrounding rock and there is no obvious mechanism by which such ratios could occur.

The XRF analyses of paired samples from the concretion and the immediately adjacent surrounding rock show that the mean Al2O3 concentration in a concretion on a mass basis is about 28% of that in the surrounding rock, with a range between 24.8 and 30.5% (XRF analyses, Supplementary Table S1). As Al2O3 is probably present in minerals that are much less soluble in water than carbonate minerals, it can be assumed that this difference in Al2O3 concentration is due mostly to dilution by precipitated silica. To achieve this dilution would require the initial intergranular porosity to be between 70 and 75%.

If the initial porosity was 75% and it was filled with precipitated silica, the resulting overall silica concentration due to pore-filling silica would be about 70 wt%. However, adding the silica in the original carbonate-dominated sediment, which is ca. 5 wt% of the silica in the concretion, accounting for the assumed 75% initial porosity, gives a total silica concentration similar to the maximum analysed silica concentration in a concretion of 78 wt%.

Primary porosities as high as 75% are feasible only if the concretions formed very close to the sediment–water interface (c.f. compaction data for carbonate sediments in Fabricus52; Bjørlykke et al.53). On the other hand, release of acid from the organic matter must have dissolved at least some carbonate minerals. The isotopic data are also consistent with some carbon from the organic matter being incorporated into the residual carbonate minerals within the concretion.

The precipitated silica occluded the porosity and reduced the diffusive fluxes of solutes between the surrounding rock matrix and the concretion. Furthermore, carbonate dissolution results in pH increase and a decrease in the degree of oversaturation of silica, with a consequent decrease in the rate of silica precipitation. Carbonate mineral dissolution caused a reduction in the solid Ca and C concentration between the organic core and the concretion rim, as shown in Ca profiles across a concretion and TOC (Figs. 2c-1, 2, Supplementary Table S1). However, porosity generation by carbonate dissolution increases the diffusivity and hence supply of acid and silica, while porosity occlusion by silica precipitation reduced the diffusivity, with the opposite effects on acid and silica supply. Overall, there is a complex non-linear coupling between diffusion of organic acids outwards, porosity generation and consumption of acidity by carbonate dissolution, and diffusion of Si inwards with accompanying silica precipitation. These non-linear processes give rise to the chemical zoning seen in the concretions. Isotopic exchange between the carbon in the organic acids and the carbon in the carbonates can explain the carbon isotopic signatures of the residual carbonate phases inside the concretion.

Initially, silica was probably precipitated as a colloidal or gel aggregate of hydrous sodium silicate, and became crystalline over time54,55, resulting in the very fine, almost uniform grain sizes seen across the concretions. Although there is a possibility that the euhedral quartz crystals in the cores of the concretions grew during diagenesis, the timing of crystalline quartz growth is not known (Figs. 1c-1, 2). However, the distribution of major elements observed with SXAM and the zoning observed macroscopically suggest the concretions growing outward due to an H+ front (reaction front) diffusing from the decomposing algal pellets26. During reaction front development, within the front, concentration and precipitation of SiO2 continued until the supply of acidity by diffusion from the algal pellet terminated.

Within such fine layered sediments, the horizontal diffusivity of silica parallel to the layers, would have been higher than the diffusivity of silica perpendicular to the layers. This anisotropy could explain the ellipsoidal shapes of the concretions. Such deviation of sedimentary layers in the sedimentary matrix around the concretions is also strong evidence that the concretions became solid at an early stage of diagenesis before compaction caused by burial was complete.

Throughout concretion formation there would have remained at least a small amount of connected porosity through which organic acids and silica could diffuse. At any time prior to the termination of acid production, the pH of porewater would decrease from the rims of the concretion towards its core. Therefore, silica would be less soluble near the core of the concretion than at the rim of the concretion, producing a silica concentration gradient from the concretion rim towards the core. The result is that transport of silica towards the organic pellet could continue throughout the volume of the concretion. That is, there were elements of both diffusive growth, which determined the overall size and shape of the concretion, and pervasive concretion growth as proposed by Raiswell and Fisher19.

Bedded cherts in the Green River Formation were also formed by a similar mechanism involving pH changes in a relatively high pH environment. These pH changes occurred during the decomposition of algal organic micro-spheres28 and resulted in a ready supply of silica from the pore water within surrounding calcareous sediments. However, the chert is bedded owing to the algal organic matter being almost homogeneously distributed in the sediment beds, unlike in the concretions, in which higher localized concentrations of algal organic matter occur as fish coprolites. Reflecting its lower average concentration, the organic matter of algal micro-spheres in the bedded cherts was completely decomposed, and almost no residual organic matter remains. In contrast the higher localized organic concentrations in the concretions were not entirely broken down.

After deep burial (ca. 200–600 m) the geothermal temperature increased to between 50 and 100 ℃ and produced the preserved bitumen core32,56 which could not migrate readily owing to the dense silica concretion. It is noteworthy that the bitumen cores are well preserved within the silica concretions (Fig. 1b-3, Supplementary Fig. S1) compared to bitumen in the surrounding rocks. Although this is a very distinctive example of silica concretion formation associated with organic matter decomposition, other isolated silica concretions or accumulations observed in other places in calcareous sediments12,57 are also possibly formed by the same kind of pH buffering process in very early diagenesis. Published organic geochemical studies carried out on other concretions58,59 show that n-alkylated and phytanyl arenes were enhanced in the concretions, relative to the host sediment. These findings also support a very early diagenetic (syngenetic) microbial source for alkylated and phytanyl arenes derived from the microbial ecosystem mediating concretion formation. In contrast, aromatic compounds formed by thermal maturation.

Growth rate estimation by ‘diffusion–reaction cross plot’

During concretion growth, acidity diffused outwards from the organic core of a concretion and a steep pH gradient formed at the concretion surface (rim) due to a buffering reaction between organic acid and SiO2(aq). Corresponding to this pH gradient there is a presently-observed solid phase SiO2 concentration gradient with characteristic width ‘L’ (Figs. 2, 3). This width ‘L’ does not reflect weathering after concretion formation, since weathering would also affect the surrounding rock, for example by depleting Ca; such weathering effects are not observed in the surrounding rock. The width ‘L’ reflects the diffusion rate of SiO2(aq) and rapid SiO2 precipitation due to the pH change at the front in the early diagenesis (Fig. 3c).

The porewater in the surrounding sediment was alkaline, and therefore organic acid from decaying algal matter diffused towards the concretion rim where silica precipitated within the reaction front ‘L’. The width of the reaction front ‘L’, diffusion coefficient of SiO2(aq) ‘D’ and concretion growth rate ‘V’ have a relationship: ‘L = D/V’ that can be shown on a simple diagram (Fig. 4)18,20.

Figure 4

Diffusion–growth rate cross-plot. Relationship between effective diffusion coefficient (D; cm2/s) and rate of movement of the reaction front (V; cm/s) defined by dimension analysis. The field over which the silica concretions most likely formed is defined by the width of the reaction front (L = 0.3 cm) and the effective diffusion coefficient of SiO2(aq) in similar kinds of marine sediments60,61. A very rapid minimum growth rate of the reaction front, in the order of 10−6 cm/s, is consistent with the formation of cm sized concretions within 10 years.

The acid diffusion timescale required to generate the width L is L/V. At the same time, silica ions diffuse inward, towards the decomposing organic matter from the surrounding sediments outside the concretion. The saturation index of silica in the sediments drastically increases at a front some distance from the organic matter, due to pH buffering shown by the following chemical equations.

$${\text{Si}}\left( {{\text{OH}}} \right)_{{3}} {\text{O}}^{ - } + {\text{ H}}^{ + } = {\text{ Si}}\left( {{\text{OH}}} \right)_{{4}} \left( {{\text{aq}}} \right),$$
$${\text{Si}}\left( {{\text{OH}}} \right)_{{4}} \left( {{\text{aq}}} \right) \, = {\text{ SiO}}_{{2}} + {\text{ 2H}}_{{2}} {\text{O }}\left( {\text{l}} \right).$$

Between this front and the decomposing organic material the solubility of silica is much reduced compared to greater distances from the organic material than the front. The precipitation threshold is exceeded at the front and Si precipitates there, causing the front to move outwards, away from the core. The time required to exceed the saturation threshold is given by the diffusion timescale of width L, given by L2/D. Equating these two timescales leads to:

$${\text{L }} = {\text{ D}}/{\text{V}}.$$

The penetration rate (V) at any time would be constant in a fine sediment, since this sediment is homogeneous and there is a negligible temperature gradient across it. Although the diffusion coefficients would be slightly decreased due to the silica precipitation in the sediments, the width ‘L’ should change due to variations in the diffusion coefficient of SiO2(aq) in the matrix of sedimentary rocks. This means that a wider L is developed if the matrix has a higher value of D and a narrower L is produced where the matrix has a lower value of D. From the presently observed ‘L’ from the SXAM measurement, we can determine L (= 3 mm). The growth rate of the silica concretion can be used to estimate the value of each ‘L’. A growth timescale τ is given by:

$$\tau \, = {\text{ R}}/{\text{V}},$$

where R is the radius of a silica concretion.

From Eqs. (3) and (4), we can constrain the diffusion rate of relevant ions through the calcareous sediments, and the timescale taken for a silica concretion to form, as shown in a ‘Diffusion–reaction rate cross-plot’ (Fig. 4). Published values of effective Si ion diffusion coefficients (in the order of 10–7 cm2/s) in fine sedimentary rocks with similar characteristics to those studied here60,61, can be used to estimate the minimum formation rate of ‘L’. If the value of 3 mm is used, the expected formation time of ‘L’ would be within several years. Therefore silica concretions with sizes of a few cm would have formed within 10 years. Although this diagram can be applied only to etimate the rate of reaction front development, such rapid silica concentration and precipitation is also consistent with estimates based on studies of petrified wood62 as well as experimantal work to demonstrate the silicification of trees63. The timescales may provide a new perspective for interpreting formation of silica concretions in sedimentary rocks.


The formation of ellipsoidal silica concretions with bitumen cores, found in the Green River Formation of Utah, can be explained by outwards diffusion of organic acids from coprolite precursors of the bitumen, and inwards diffusion of silica from the surrounding calcareous sediments, accompanied by pH-buffering due to carbonate mineral dissolution. The rims of a concretion represent the limit at which the pH was low enough to cause silica to become sufficiently supersaturated to precipitate. However, the model does not preclude pervasive precipitation of silica throughout the pore space. Since at any time pH would have decreased towards the bitumen core from the concretion rim, the solubility of silica would also have progressively decreased towards the core. This would have caused a diffusive flux of silica inwards, throughout the residual porosity in the concretion, which would never have been completely sealed. Complex non-linear coupling between the transport and mineral precipitation/dissolution reactions produced observed chemical zoning in the concretions. The precipitated silica probably filled both primary pore space and pore space generated by dissolution of pre-existing carbonate minerals.

A ‘Diffusion–reaction rate cross-plot’ shows that the solute transport history during silica concretion growth was of rather short duration and led to the preservation of bitumen in the concretions’ cores. Parametric analysis of transport processes shows that silica concretions are only formed when diffusion occurs in combination with relatively rapid silica precipitation by pH buffering within a time scale of up to a few years for concretions with diameters in the order of cm. The cross-plot also shows the conditions that are most appropriate for the formation of ellipsoidal silica concretions in early diagenesis.


First of all, the microscopic occurrences of the silica concretions and bitumen cores were observed in thin-sections by optical microscope and fluorescent microscope. Then, the microscopic textures of the concretions (between the bitumen cores and the surrounding sedimentary rocks) were analysed by SEM with an electron beam of 15 kV/1.75 A (TM-3000, Hitachi Co.). The mineralogy of the concretions and their cores were determined by X-ray diffractometer (XRD; Multiflex, Rigaku Co.) using crushed and powdered samples and Cu-Kα radiation (the Cu being subjected to an electron beam of 20 kV/20 mA).

Concretions were also sliced to produce plane surfaces through their bitumen cores. The spatial distributions of elements across these surfaces were then measured, the measurements spanning both the concretions and surrounding sedimentary matrices. In particular, the 2-D spatial distributions of Si, Ca and other chemical constituents in these planes were carefully analysed semi-quantitatively by X-ray fluorescence analyzer (SXAM). The results were used to determine the widths of the edges (L) of concretions quantitatively. ‘L’ are the widths of the concretions’ thin marginal layers, or ‘reaction front’s’. A value of ‘L’ is the distance along a SiO2 concentration profile from the closest point to the core of a concretion where there is a background concentration, to the first point within the concretion where the highest SiO2 concentration is attained. The width of a concretion’s margin (L) should reflect the rate of growth and reaction as well as the overall formation time of the concretion in the sediments after burial. To measure L, the SXAM analyses were carried out using an X-ray fluorescence analyzer (XGT-5200V Horiba Japan) at Nagoya University Museum, Aichi, Japan. A high-intensity continuous X-ray beam (Rh anode 50 kV 1 mA), 100 μm in diameter, was focused with a guide tube and irradiated the surface of the sample perpendicularly. The sample was placed on a PC-controllable X–Y stage. X-ray fluorescence from the sample surface was analyzed with the hp-Si detector of an energy-dispersion spectrometer64.

XRF analyses were undertaken to measure the contents of Ca and other major elements using a Rigaku ZSX Primus II equipped with a Rh X-ray tube in the Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University, Japan. Glass beads were prepared by mixing a portion of each sample, which was ignited at 950 °C to decompose carbonates, with anhydrous lithium tetraborate flux and then fusing. Measurements were calibrated with rock reference samples issued by the Geological Survey of Japan (GSJ: Geochemical Reference Sample Data Base, GSJ: The estimated analytical uncertainties were 1% to 2% for SiO2 and CaO and 5% for other major elements18,20.

Carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur contents of concretion samples were measured with an elemental analyzer (Elementar Vario EL cube in Nagoya University). Measurements were made on 10 mg powder samples wrapped in tin capsules. We used sulfanilamide (NH2C6H4SO2NH2) as a standard for the measurement of C, N, and S contents (wt%). Measurement errors are several percent. The data are given in percentage by weight of bulk samples.

The δ13C of the concretions were also examined to determine the origin of the carbon in the carbonate. In this study, total carbon (TC), total inorganic carbon (TIC), and total organic carbon (TOC) fractions of concretion samples were analyzed. For TC analysis, about 10 mg of powdered samples were wrapped in tin capsules, and combusted in an elemental analyzer (Themo Fisher Scientific Flash EA1112). The CO2 gas evolved in the reaction was then carried into an isotope-ratio mass spectrometer (IR-MS; Thermo Fisher DELTA V Plus) in a He carrier gas and δ13C was measured. For TOC analysis, separated sub-samples were leached three times with 2 mol/L HCl following washing by Milli-Q water in an ultrasonic bath at room temperature, and about 10 mg of the residue was wrapped in tin capsules, and measured δ13C by the same method as above18.

For TIC analysis, about 20 mg of each sample was reacted under vacuum with 5 mL of 100% phosphoric acid under vacuum over night at 80 °C. This process extracted CO2 evolved from carbonate in the sample. The CO2 extracted was collected and purified cryogenically. Next, the sample-acid mixture was centrifuged and the residue was washed repeatedly with Milli-Q water to remove all phosphoric acid before being lyophilized. About 10 mg of the residue was combusted with CuO in a sealed vacuum quartz tube at 850 °C for 3 h to produce CO2. The TOC gas extracted was then cryogenically purified to CO2 by removing H2O using ethanol slush traps (ca. − 90 °C) and liquid nitrogen traps under a vacuum line. The CO2 was measured for δ13C by an IRMS with a dual inlet system (Delta-V Advantage; Geological Survey of Japan). All of the δ13C data were represented with respect to Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB) standardized by NBS-19. The measurement errors were less than ± 0.1‰ for δ13C18,20.

N-paraffins in each 2 g sample were extracted twice by ultrasonication with 10 mL of dichloromethane. The extract was applied to a silica gel column with activated 0.5 Al2O3 and 2.0 g silica gel. A fixed amount of mixed standard (C11H23COOCH3, C16H33COOOCH3, and C28H57COOCH3) was added to the n-paraffin fraction eluted by 5 mL hexane. The fraction was analyzed by flame ionization detector- gas chromatograph (FID-GC; Shimadzu GC-2014 in Nagoya University). FID-GC analysis used helium as a career gas and equipped HP-5 column (Agilent Technologies, 30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 µm film thickness). The temperature program was from 50 °C for 3 min to 225 °C at 3.5 °C/min., and 325 °C for 10 min at 5 °C/min. The identification of each organic compound was based on relative retention times against dodecyl-, octadecyl- and triacontyl-acetate obtained by FID-GC.


  1. 1.

    Bromley, R. G. & Ekdale, A. A. Flint and fabric in the European chalk. In The Scientific Study of Flint and Chert (eds de Sieveking, G. & Hart, M. B.) 71–82 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bromley, R. G. & Ekdale, A. A. The chemical environment of flint formation in Upper Cretaceous chalks. In The Scientific Study of Flint and Chert (eds de Sieveking, G. & Hart, M. B.) 43–54 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hesse, R. Silica diagenesis: Origin of inorganic and replacement cherts. Earth Sci. Rev. 26, 253–284 (1989).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lycett, S. J. & Chauhan, P. R. (eds) New Perspectives on Old Stones: Analytical Approaches to Paleolithic Technologies (Springer, Berlin, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Shea, J. Stone Tools in the Paleolithic and Neolithic Near East: A Guide (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Knauth, L. P. & Epstein, S. Hydrogen and oxygen isotopic ratios in nodular and bedded cherts. Geochem. Cosmochem. Acta 40, 1095–1108 (1976).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Land, L. S. Chert-cjalk diagenesis: The Miocene island slope of north Jamaica. J. Sedimentol. 49, 223–232 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hatfield, C. B. Replacement of fossils by length-slow chalcedony and associated dolomitization: Discussion. J. Sediment. Petrol. 45, 951–952 (1975).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hesse, R. Selective and reversible carbonate-silica replacements in lower cretaceous carbonate-bearing turbidities of the Eastern Alps. Sedimentology 34, 1055–1077 (1987).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Nicolo, I., Luca, M., Stefano, M. B., Gianreto, M. & Axel, G. Silica-rich septarian concretions in biogenic silica-poor sediments: A marker of hydrothermal activity at fossil hyper-extended rifted margins (Err nappe, Switzerland). Sed. Geol. 378, 19–33 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Butts, S. H. Silicification. In: Reading and writing of the fossil record: Preservational pathways to exceptional fossilization. Marc Laflamme, James D. Schiffbauer, and Simon A. F. Darroch (eds.). Paleontol. Soc. Pap. 20, 15–33 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Knoll, A. H. Exceptional preservation of photosynthetic organisms in silicified carbonates and silicified peats. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 311, 111–122 (1985).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Luedtke, B. E. An Archaeologist’s Guide to Chert and Flint (University of California, Los Angeles, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Xiao, S., Schiffbauer, J. D., McFadden, K. A. & Hunter, J. Petrographic and SIMS pyrite sulfur isotope analyses of Ediacaran chert nodules: Implications for microbial processes in pyrite rim formation, silicification, and exceptional fossil preservation. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 297, 481–495 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hesse, R. Early diagenetic sediment-water interactions: Modern offshore basins. Geosci. Can. 13, 165–196 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Seilacher, A. Concretion morphologies reflecting diagenetic and epigenetic pathways. Sed. Geol. 143, 41–57 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mozley, P. & Davis, J. M. Internal structure and mode of growth of elongate calcite concretions: Evidence for small-scale, microbially induced, chemical heterogeneity in groundwater. GSA Bull. 117, 1400–1412 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yoshida, H. et al. Early post-mortem formation of carbonate concretions around tusk-shells over week-month timescales. Sci. Rep. 5, 14123. (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Raiswell, R. & Fisher, J. Mudrock-hosted carbonate concretions: A review of growth mechanisms and their influence on chemical and isotopic composition. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 157, 239–251 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Yoshida, H. et al. Generalized conditions of spherical carbonate concretion formation around decaying organic matter in early diagenesis. Sci. Rep. 8, 6308. (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Grice, K., Holman, A. I., Plet, C. & Tripp, M. Fossilised biomolecules and biomarkers in carbonate concretions from Konservat-Lagerstätten. Minerals. 9, 158. (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Melendez, I. et al. Biomarkers reveal the role of photic zone euxinia in exceptional fossil preservation: An organic geochemical perspective. Geology 41, 123–126 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Melendez, I., Grice, K. & Schwark, L. Exceptional preservation of Palaeozoic steroids in a diagenetic continuum. Sci. Rep. 3, 2768. (2013).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Plet, C. et al. Palaeobiology of red and white blood cell-lile structures, collagen and cholesterol in an ichthyosaur bone. Sci. Rep. 7, 13776. (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lengger, S., Melendez, I., Summons, R. E. & Grice, K. Mudstones and embedded concretions show differences in lithology-related, but not source-related biomarker distributions. Org. Geochem. 113, 67–74 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bojanowski, M. & Clarkson, E. N. K. Origin of siderite concretions in microenvironments of methanogenesis developed in a sulfate reduction zone: An exception or rule? J. Sediment. Res. 82, 585–598 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Horsfield, B. et al. Organic geochemistry of freshwater and alkaline lacustrine sediments in the green river formation of the Washakie Basin, Wyoming, U.S.A.. Adv. Org. Geochem. 22, 415–440 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Tänavsuu-Milkeviciene, K. & Sarg, J. F. Evolution of an organic-rich lake basin–stratigraphy, climate and tectonics: Piceance Creek basin, eocene green river formation. Sedimentology 59, 1735–1768 (2012).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Johnson, R. C., Birdwell, J. E., Mercier, T. J. & Brownfield, M. E. Geology of Tight Oil and Potential Tight Oil Reservoirs in the Lower Part of the Green River Formation, Uinta, Piceance, and Greater Green River Basins, Utah, Colorado, and Wyoming (US Geological Survey, Utah, 2016).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Tong, Y., Ibarra, D. E., Caves, J. K., Mukerji, T. & Graham, S. A. Constraining basin thermal history and petroleum generation using palaeoclimate data in the Piceance Basin, Colorado. Basin Res. 29, 542–553 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Vandegrift, G. F., Winans, R. E. & Horwitz, E. P. Treatment of Green River oil shale by carbon dioxide and water: Evidence for association of bitumen ans carbonate materials. Fuel 59, 634–636 (1980).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Collister, J. W., Lichtfouse, E., Hieshima, G. & Hayes, J. M. Partial resolution of sources of n-alkanes in the saline portion of the Parachute Creek Member, Green River Formation (Piceance Creek Basin, Colorado). Org. Geochem. 21, 645–659 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Carroll, A. R., Chetel, L. M. & Smith, M. E. Feast to famine: Sediment supply control on Laramide basin fill. Geology 34, 197–200 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Smith, M. E., Carroll, A. R. & Singer, B. S. Synoptic reconstruction of a major ancient lake system: Eocene green river formation, western United States. GSA Bull. 120, 54–84 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Smith, M. E., Chamberlain, K. R., Singer, B. S. & Carroll, A. R. Eocene clocks agree: Coeval 40Ar/39Ar, U-Pb, and astronomical ages from the green river formation. Geology 38, 527–530 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Feng, Y., Le Doan, T. V. & Pomerantz, A. E. The chemical composition of bitumen in pyrolyzed Green River oil shale: Characterization by 13C NMR spectroscopy. Energy Fuels 27, 7314–7323 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kuma, R. et al. Biogenically induced bedded chert formation in the alkaline palaeo-lake of the Green River formation. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–8 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Jagniecki, E. A., Lowenstein, T. K., Jenkins, D. M. & Demicco, R. V. Eocene atmospheric CO2 from the nahcolite proxy. Geology 43, 1075–1078 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lowenstein, T. K. et al. The Green River salt mystery: What was the source of the hyperalkaline lake waters? Earth Sci. Rev. 173, 295–306 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Last, W. M. Lacustrine dolomite—An overview of modern, Holocene, and Pleistocene occurrences. Earth-Sci. Rev. 27, 221–263 (1990).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Herrmann, M. Palaeoecological reconstruction of the late Oligocene Maar Lake of Enspel, Germany using lacustrine organic walled algae. Palaeobiodivers. Palaeoenviron. 90, 29–37 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Bradley, W. H. Origin and microfossils of the oil shale of the Green River formation of Colorado and Utah. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 168, 58 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Al-bassam, K. & Halodova, P. Fossil bacteria in Cenomanian-Turonian phosphate nodules and coprolites, Bohemian Cretaceous Basin, Czech Republic. Ann. Soc. Geol. Poloniae 88, 257–272 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ferber, C. T. & Wells, N. A. Paleolimnology and taphonomy of some fish deposits in “Fossil” and “Uinta” Lakes of the eocene green river formation, Utah and Wyoming. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 117, 185–210 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Wells, N. A., Ferber, C. T. & Ohman, J. Discriminant analysis of fish-bearing deposits in the eocene green river formation of Utah and Wyoming. Palaios 8, 81–100 (1993).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Woolly, D. A. Fish preservation, fish coprolites and the green river formation. J. Creat. 15(1), 105–111 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Richter, G. & Baszio, S. Traces of a limnic food web in the Eocene Lake Messel—A preliminary report based on fish coprolite analyses. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 166, 345–368 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Anders, D. E. & Robinson, W. E. Cycloalkane constituents of the bitumen from Green River Shale. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 35, 661–678 (1971).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Appelo, C. A. J. & Postma, D. Geochemistry, Groundwater and Pollution 536 (A.A.Bakema, Rotterdam, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Buchheim, H. P. Eocene fossil lake, green river formation, Wyoming: A history of fluctuating salinity: Sedimentology and geochemistry of modern and ancient saline lakes. SEPM Spl. Publ. 50, 239–247 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Alexander, G. B., Heston, W. M. & Iler, K. R. The solubility of amorphous silica in water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 75, 453–455 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Fabricius, I. L. Chalk: composition, diagenesis and physical properties. Bull. Geol. Soc. Denmark 55, 97–128 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Bjørlykke, K., et al. Sediment compaction and rock properties. In AAPG International Conference and Exhibition (2009).

  54. 54.

    Eugster, H. P. Hydrous sodium silicates from Lake Magadi, Kenya: Precursors of bedded chert. Science 157, 1177–1180 (1967).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Lundell, L. L. & Surdam, R. C. Playa-lake deposition: Green river formation, piceance creek basin, Colorado. Geology 3, 493–497 (1975).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Birdwell, J.E., et al. Geological, geochemical and reservoir characterization of the Uteland Butte member of the Green River Formation, Uinta Basin, Utah. In Hydrocarbon Source Rocks in Unconventional Plays, Rocky Mountain Region, 352–374 (2016).

  57. 57.

    Geeslin, J. H. & Chafetz, H. S. Ordovician Aleman ribbon chert: An example of silicification prior to carbonate lithification. J. Sediment. Petrol. 52, 1283–1293 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Maslen, E., Grice, K., LeMetayer, P., Dawson, D. & Edward, D. Stable carbon isotopic compositions of individual aromatic hydrocarbons as source and age indicators in oils from western Australian basins. Org. Geochem. 42, 387–398 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Plet, C. et al. Aromatic hydrocarbons provide new insight into carbonate concretion formation and the impact of eogenesis on organic matter. Org. Geochem. (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Fanning, K. A. & Pilson, M. E. Q. The diffusion of dissolved silica out of deep-sea sediments. J. Geophys. Res. 79, 1293–1297 (1974).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Li, Y. H. & Gregory, S. Diffusion of ions in sea-water and in deep-sea sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 38, 703–714 (1974).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Mustoe, G. E. Wood petrifaction: A new view of permineralization and replacement. Geoscience. 7, 119. (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Ballhaus, C. et al. The silicification of trees in volcanic ash—An experimental study. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 84, 62–74 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Katsuta, N., Takano, M., Okaniwa, T. & Kumazawa, M. Image processing to extract sequential profiles with high spatial resolution from the 2D map of deformed laminated patterns. Comput. Geosci. 29, 725–740 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank K. Yamamoto and K. Mimura of Nagoya University for helpful discussions and supporting the geochemical anlyses. We are also grateful to T. Oji of Nagoya University for fossil identification in stone tools, S. Yogo of Nagoya University for preparing rock thin-sections, and A. Umemura for SXAM mapping, SEM observation and elemental analyses. Two anonymous reviewers are thanked for their helpful comments. The research was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant 18H03893.

Author information




H.Y. planned the research, and H.Y., R.K., H.H. and S.N. carried out the field observations, specimen characterization and experiments. They wrote the manuscript together with M.M., S.S., S.K. and R.M.. N.K. and N.T. contributed the analysis of SXAM geochemical maps and mass balance calculation, and M.M., R.K. and R.M. carried out all other geochemical and isotopic analysis and interpretation. S.K. also contributed archaeological descriptions. All authors contributed and discussed the results and provided inputs on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hidekazu Yoshida.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoshida, H., Kuma, R., Hasegawa, H. et al. Syngenetic rapid growth of ellipsoidal silica concretions with bitumen cores. Sci Rep 11, 4230 (2021).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing