Article | Open | Published:

Sudden emergence of human infections with H7N9 avian influenza A virus in Hubei province, central China

Scientific Reportsvolume 8, Article number: 2486 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

There have been five waves of H7N9 avian influenza virus (AIV) infection in humans since its initial emergence in China in 2013, posing a significant threat to public health. Hubei province was free local transmission during the first four waves of H7N9 AIV. However, multiple cases of human H7N9 infection were reported in Hubei during January 2017. To understand the molecular epidemiology that underlies this sudden emergence, we collected samples from 14 human cases of H7N9 influenza virus from Hubei province, along with environmental samples from different locations in Hubei. Our analysis revealed that the newly emerged human H7N9 viruses were all from persons exposed to poultry and shared the same origin as the environmental sampled viruses in the Yangtze River lineage of H7N9. Notably, we also documented an earlier and distinct importation from Jiangsu province that may have established a local environmental reservoir. Our study highlights the need for continued surveillance of H7N9 in both human and avian populations in central China.

Introduction

Avian influenza viruses (AIVs) pose an important and continuous threat to public health. Since the first human infection with H7N9 AIV was identified in March 20131, there have been five outbreak waves in China during 2013–2017. As of 28th June 2017, there have been 1568 confirmed cases of human H7N9 infection and 599 deaths (http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/programmes/en/empres/H7N9/situation_update.html). With the exception of the first wave (February 2013–September 2013), all H7N9 AIV outbreaks have occurred during the winter–spring seasons, beginning in October, with cases increasing in number in late December, and peaking in January of the following year2,3. However, in the fifth wave the epidemic began one month earlier, with a sharp increase in human cases at the start of 20173,4. Importantly, human infection with highly pathogenic H7N9 AIV in Guangdong province, China, was also reported during the fifth wave, with an insertion of multiple basic amino acids at the HA cleavage site associated with enhanced virulence5,6,7.

According to previous phylogenetic analyses, two lineages of H7N9 have been established in China, the Yangtze River Delta lineage (Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Anhui provinces and Shanghai municipality) and the Pearl River Delta lineage (Guangdong province, Hong Kong and Macao special administrative region), with the former widely distributed and the original source of the H7N9 outbreaks in humans8. No avian, human, nor environmental infections with H7N9 AIVs were documented in the first four waves in Hubei province despite annual surveillance performed by the Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), with the exception of two imported infections in 2015 and 2016. However, since January 2017 several H7N9 strains have been isolated from both human (n = 12) and environmental samples in Hubei province by the Hubei CDC. We performed phylogenetic analyses on these human and environmental samples to determine their origins and evolution.

Materials and Methods

H7N9 AIVs data collection

Human samples (n = 12) were collected from the respiratory tract of the suspected H7N9 infection in Hubei province, China, during January 2017–Febuary 2017. To these samples we added A/Hubei1/2016, an imported case in which the patient was infected in Jiangsu province in 2016, and A/Hubei/34007/2015 which was downloaded from GISAID (platform.gisaid.org), with the patient infected by chickens imported from Anhui province during 2015. All patients (n = 14, Table 1) with H7N9 infection experienced severe pneumonia.

Table 1 H7N9 viruses sampled from humans in Hubei province, China.

A total of 1189 environmental samples, comprising those from poultry drinking water or from cleaning poultry sewage, were collected from live poultry markets, poultry farms, poultry slaughterhouses, decentralized households, and wild bird habitats in Hubei province. Consequently, eight samples from environment (Table 2) were identified as positive for H7 subtype AIVs.

Table 2 H7N9 viruses sampled from the environment in Hubei province, China.

All samples were tested by real-time RT-PCR and inoculated into 9 to 11-day-old specific pathogen-free embryonated hens’ eggs in a biosafety level 3 laboratory at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCs) where the influenza network laboratories distribute in Hubei province. All H7N9 sequences obtained in this study have been submitted to the GISAID database (platform.gisaid.org), with accession numbers listed in Table S1 in the Supplementary Material.


Ethical approval

All experimental protocols including the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay and virus genome sequencing were performed according to the WHO and the China CDC protocols (detailed methods provided upon request), and were approved by the Laboratory Management Committee of the Hubei CDC. Hubei CDC is legally tasked with data collection on patients in the course of a public health investigation during an emerging infectious disease outbreak. Therefore, informed consent was waived.


Phylogenetic analysis

All available HA (n = 1022 sequences; length = 1695 nt) and NA (n = 1018; 1398 nt) gene sequences of H7N9 (complete coding region) were downloaded from the GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) and GISAID databases (data collected on 27 March 2017). These sequences were aligned using MAFFT (v7.149)9. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenies of the HA and NA sequences were estimated using the GTR + I + Γ nucleotide substitution model in PhyML (v3.1)10. Node support was determined using the Shimodaira-Hasegawa (SH) approximate likelihood ratio test. All trees were rooted using the earliest sampled H7N9 avian influenza virus (A/Shanghai/1/2013) and visualized in FigTree (v1.4.3) (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/).

Results

Characteristics of human H7N9 infections

In total, 14 human H7N9 cases in Hubei province (Tables 1 and 3) were studied, two of which were imported cases. All of the infected individuals had prior exposure to live poultry and experienced severe pneumonia and other symptoms commonly associated with H7N9 including fever, cough and shortness of breath. Ten of the infected individuals were exposed to live poultry markets (LPMs) or poultry transported from LPMs (two were poultry workers), while the remaining four cases were confirmed to have been exposed to backyard poultry.

Table 3 The epidemiological characteristics of 14 human cases of H7N9 virus infection in Hubei province.

Evolutionary relationships among H7N9 AIVs

Tracing the origin of the H7N9 virus is of importance for effective prevention and surveillance strategies. We collected all available HA and NA gene sequences of H7N9 AIVs from GenBank and GISAID and performed a large-scale phylogenetic analysis. The HA (Figs 1; S1) and NA phylogenies (Fig. S2) revealed that the Hubei strains, including viruses isolated from both humans and the environment, generally clustered together and with H7N9 viruses from Zhejiang, Jiangsu and Anhui provinces sampled during wave 5, indicating that these viruses originated from the Yangtze River lineage.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree of the HA gene of H7N9 influenza A viruses and their origins. (A) Viruses isolated from different Chinese provinces are distinguished by colors. The first column represents the five waves of H7N9 marked with different colors, while the second and last columns denote those viruses collected from humans and specifically from Hubei province. Those H7N9 viruses in Hubei (excluding strain A/Hubei/34007/2015 which was isolated in 2015) province are shown in detail in the dotted boxes and were colored in red. Box 1, the majority of isolates in Hubei province; box 2, the imported strain A/Hubei/1/2016 (highlighted) and its closely related environmental strain (A/Environment/Hubei/12167/2017) from 2017. The tree was rooted with virus A/Shanghai/1/2013. (B) A partial map indicating the routes of viral movement leading to the outbreak in Hubei province. Abbreviations are: HB, Hubei province; AH, Anhui province; JS, Jiangsu province; and ZJ, Zhejiang province. Blue arrow, Hubei strains mainly derived from Zhejiang, Jiangsu and Anhui provinces sampled in wave 5.

Imported H7N9 AIVs

Notably, the H7N9 virus A/Environment/Hubei/12167/2017 was phylogenetically distinct from the other Hubei strains, and clustered with human strains isolated in neighboring Anhui province, suggesting movement from Anhui to Hubei. In addition, it is striking that A/Environment/Hubei/12167/2017 was also related to human strain A/Hubei/1/2016 in both the HA and NA phylogenetic trees (Figs S1 and S2). A/Hubei/1/2016, sampled on March 2016 during, was isolated from a poultry worker in Nanjing city, Jiangsu province, who returned to Hubei and showed symptoms of influenza infection. Notably, the six internal genes of A/Hubei/1/2016 were closely related to A/Chicken/GZ79/2016 (H7N9) isolated from chickens in Ganzhou city, Jiangxi province (nucleotide identity, 99.56% for PB2, 99.25% for PB1, 99.95% for PA, 99.20% for NP, 99.59% for MP and 99.90% for NS). It therefore seems likely that an earlier H7N9 was imported into Hubei where it could establish itself in the local environment. Another clear example of importation into Hubei was A/Hubei/34007/2015, which clustered with H7N9 viruses from Anhui and Hunan provinces collected during wave 3 (Fig. 1; Figs S1 and S2). Interestingly, these viruses were isolated from a poultry seller who, in 2015, had sold birds imported from Anhui province into Hubei province.

Amino acid substitutions in the Hubei H7N9 AIVs

We also investigated the molecular signatures of all the H7N9 AIVs isolated in Hubei province (Table 4). Mutations associated with resistance to oseltamivir or zanamivir, including E119V, I222L and R292K were not found in the NA proteins, such that all these viruses remain susceptible to these antivirals8,11,12. However, all viruses were resistant to amantadine because of the S31N mutation in M2 protein8. With respect to host-specificity, mutations T160A, G186V and Q226L, were observed in the HA protein of all 22 human and environmental samples, suggesting that the H7N9 viruses collected from Hubei province preferentially bind to human-type influenza receptors8,11. The majority of viruses isolated from humans acquired the E627K mutation in PB2 protein, which increases virulence in mice8,11,13. Similarity, the P42S mutation associated with virulence in H5N114 was also identified in all viruses. Of note, the I368V mutation which would increase viral transmission in ferrets15 was present in the PB1 protein of all of the H7N9 viruses.

Table 4 Occurrence of amino acid substitutions associated with human adaptation of avian influenza viruses, increased virulence and antiviral drug resistance in the Hubei H7N9 strains.

Discussion

Hubei province, central China, did not experience in situ transmission during the first four waves of infection by H7N9 avian influenza virus. However, human H7N9 cases began to be reported in Hubei in January 2017, including several fatalities. This abrupt emergence of H7N9 influenza during wave 5 has attracted considerable attention. Our study documented that the sudden increase of human cases of H7N9 in Hubei in 2017 was due to one single importation event originating from the Yangtze River lineage. Notably, however, that one environmental sample from 2017 contains a virus that is closely related to a human virus from 2016 (March) suggests that the environmental viral gene pool may be complex, and that H7N9 viruses could have circulated in the local environment prior to the 2017outbreak. Finally, it is striking that all the human cases had exposure to live poultry, indicating that control measures with a focus on hygienic management of LPMs and cross-regional transportation should be strengthened.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

  • 10 May 2018

    A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has been fixed in the paper.

References

  1. 1.

    Liu, D. et al. Origin and diversity of novel avian influenza A H7N9 viruses causing human infection: phylogenetic, structural, and coalescent analyses. Lancet 381, 1926–1932, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60938-1 (2013).

  2. 2.

    Huo, X. et al. Significantly elevated number of human infections with H7N9 virus in Jiangsu in eastern China, October 2016 to January 2017. Euro Surveill 22, https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.13.30496 (2017).

  3. 3.

    Zhou, L. et al. Sudden increase in human infection with avian influenza A(H7N9) virus in China, September–December 2016. Western Pac Surveill Response J 8, 6–14, https://doi.org/10.5365/WPSAR.2017.8.1.001 (2017).

  4. 4.

    Wang, X. et al. Epidemiology of avian influenza A H7N9 virus in human beings across five epidemics in mainland China, 2013–17: an epidemiological study of laboratory-confirmed case series. Lancet Infect Dis, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30323-7 (2017).

  5. 5.

    Ke, C. et al. Human Infection with Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H7N9) Virus, China. Emerg Infect Dis 23, https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2308.170600 (2017).

  6. 6.

    Zhang, F. et al. Human infections with recently-emerging highly pathogenic H7N9 avian influenza virus in China. J Infect, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2017.04.001 (2017).

  7. 7.

    Zhou, L. et al. Preliminary Epidemiology of Human Infections with Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H7N9) Virus, China, 2017. Emerg Infect Dis 23, https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2308.170640 (2017).

  8. 8.

    Wang, D. et al. Two Outbreak Sources of Influenza A (H7N9) Viruses Have Been Established in China. J Virol 90, 5561–5573, https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.03173-15 (2016).

  9. 9.

    Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30, 772–780, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010 (2013).

  10. 10.

    Guindon, S. et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 59, 307–321, https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq010 (2010).

  11. 11.

    Gao, R. et al. Human infection with a novel avian-origin influenza A (H7N9) virus. N Engl J Med 368, 1888–1897, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1304459 (2013).

  12. 12.

    Lin, P. H. et al. Virological, serological, and antiviral studies in an imported human case of avian influenza A(H7N9) virus in Taiwan. Clin Infect Dis 58, 242–246, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit638 (2014).

  13. 13.

    Yang, J. R. & Liu, M. T. Human infection caused by an avian influenza A (H7N9) virus with a polybasic cleavage site in Taiwan, 2017. J Formos Med Assoc 116, 210–212, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2017.02.011 (2017).

  14. 14.

    Herfst, S. et al. Airborne transmission of influenza A/H5N1 virus between ferrets. Science 336, 1534–1541, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213362 (2012).

  15. 15.

    Jiao, P. et al. A single-amino-acid substitution in the NS1 protein changes the pathogenicity of H5N1 avian influenza viruses in mice. J Virol 82, 1146–1154, https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01698-07 (2008).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFD0500201 to J.C., 2016FYC1200800 to D.L.), the CAS Pioneer Hundred Talents Program to J.C., and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31471253 to D.L., 81470096 to W.S.), and the “Taishan Scholar” project of Shandong Province (ts201511056 to W.S.). ECH is supported by an NHMRC Australia Fellowship (GNT1037231). We acknowledge the authors, originating and submitting laboratories of the sequences from GISAID’s EpiFlu Database. All submitters of data may be contacted directly via the GISAID website www.gisaid.org.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jiafa Liu, Junqiang Xu, Linlin Liu and Xiaoman Wei contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, 430079, China

    • Jiafa Liu
    • , Junqiang Xu
    • , Linlin Liu
    • , Yi Song
    • , Bin Fang
    • , Xiao Yu
    • , Xiang Li
    •  & Guojun Ye
  2. CAS Key Laboratory of Special Pathogens and Biosafety, Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430071, China

    • Xiaoman Wei
    • , Yingying Du
    • , Mingyue Chen
    •  & Jie Cui
  3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    • Xiaoman Wei
  4. Institute of Pathogen Biology, Taishan Medical College, Taian, Shandong, 271000, China

    • Weifeng Shi
  5. Center for Influenza Research and Early-Warning (CASCIRE), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China

    • Di Liu
  6. CAS Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China

    • Di Liu
  7. Savid Medical School, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 101408, China

    • Di Liu
  8. Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, Charles Perkins Centre, School of Life and Environmental Sciences and Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

    • Edward C. Holmes

Authors

  1. Search for Jiafa Liu in:

  2. Search for Junqiang Xu in:

  3. Search for Linlin Liu in:

  4. Search for Xiaoman Wei in:

  5. Search for Yi Song in:

  6. Search for Bin Fang in:

  7. Search for Xiao Yu in:

  8. Search for Xiang Li in:

  9. Search for Guojun Ye in:

  10. Search for Yingying Du in:

  11. Search for Mingyue Chen in:

  12. Search for Weifeng Shi in:

  13. Search for Di Liu in:

  14. Search for Edward C. Holmes in:

  15. Search for Jie Cui in:

Contributions

J.L., J.X. and J.C. designed the study. L.L., X.W., Y.S., B.F., X.Y., X.L., G.Y., Y.D. and M.C. performed the field and laboratory experiments. X.W. and J.C. analyzed and interpreted the data. W.S., D.L. and E.C.H. commented on this study. X.W., E.C.H. and J.C. wrote the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Cui.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20988-9

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.