Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Positive interactions of major-effect QTLs with genetic background that enhances rice yield under drought

Abstract

To improve the grain yield of the lowland-adapted popular rice variety Samba Mahsuri under reproductive-stage drought (RS) and to understand the interactions between drought QTLs, two mapping populations were developed using marker-assisted selection (MAS) and marker-assisted recurrent selection (MARS). The mean grain yield of pyramided lines (PLs) with qDTY 2.2  + qDTY 4.1 in MAS is significantly higher under RS and irrigated control than lines with single QTLs. Among MARS PLs, lines with four qDTYs (qDTY 1.1  + qDTY 2.1  + qDTY 3.1  + qDTY 11.1 ) and two QTLs (qDTY 1.1  + qDTY 11.1 ) yielded higher than PLs with other qDTY combinations. The selected PLs showed a yield advantage of 0.3–2.0 t ha−1 under RS. An allelic profile of MAS PLs having same qDTY combination but with different yields under drought was studied. Hierarchical clustering grouped together the selected lines with high yield under drought. Epistasis test showed the interaction of qDTY 4.1 and qDTY 9.1 loci with qDTY 7.1 significantly increased yield under drought and all the lines with higher yield under drought possessed the conserved region of qDTY 7.1 on chromosome 7. The positive interactions among QTLs, effectiveness of QTLs in different backgrounds, introgression of DTY QTLs together with resistance to biotic stresses shall help enhance grain yield under RS.

Introduction

The increasing population, declining water availability with increasing demand, climate change and abiotic stresses are serious threats to world food security. Global rice consumption is reported to increase 8.8% from 2011 to 2020 and about 32.7% by 20501. Drought is a recurring global, climatically induced calamity that affects rice production in arid, semi-arid, and humid areas as well. Tackling drought can provide excellent returns to rice research and development investments. In India, severe drought in 2002 and 2009 caused a 20% and 16% reduction in food grain, respectively, leading to higher prices and food security concerns2. In 2004, severe drought affected the crop on more than 2 million ha in Southeast Asia2. An effective breeding approach to develop drought-tolerant rice varieties could lead to food security under situations of accelerating food demand, depleting resources, and predicated climatic variability3.

Various strategies such as conventional hybridization and selection procedures, ideotype breeding, heterosis breeding, wide hybridization, molecular breeding3, and new genomics tools and technologies can be used to increase yield potential. The marker-assisted breeding program at IRRI has led to the identification of 12 major drought yield QTLs (qDTY 1.1 , qDTY 2.1 , qDTY 2.2 , qDTY 2.3 , qDTY 3 . 1 , qDTY 3.2 , qDTY 4.1 , qDTY 6.1 , qDTY 6.2 , qDTY 9.1 , qDTY 10.1 and qDTY 12 . 1 ) in the background of high yielding varieties-IR64, MTU1010, Swarna, Sabitri, TDK1, and Vandana4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. Seven DTY QTLs-qDTY 1 . 1 6, qDTY 2.2 11,13, qDTY 3 . 1 5,6, qDTY 3.2 9, qDTY 4 . 1 13, qDTY 6 . 1 6, and qDTY 12 . 1 4,11 have shown large effects across two or more genetic backgrounds and under both transplanted lowland and direct seeded upland environments.

The use of different genotyping approaches6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14, the identification of traits of interest, and major genetic regions associated with the targeted traits have opened new opportunities to successfully introgress/pyramid genes/QTLs in different genetic backgrounds using marker-assisted backcrossing4,5,6,7,8,9,15,16,17 and marker-assisted recurrent selection18. To achieve the desirable phenotypic level of variation for a quantitative trait, pyramiding QTLs may be an effective approach19. The effect of identified genetic loci in a pyramiding program is not always as expected because of the complexity of gene networks, epistasis, pleiotropy, and linkage interactions among/between genetic regions as well as haplotype groups with the environment20,21. QTL pyramiding will not only help in understanding the interactions among genetic loci but also improve the efficiency of marker-assisted selection for desirable loci in rice breeding programs. Under severe drought stress, a grain yield advantage of 0.8–1.0 t ha−1 was reported in a QTL introgression program involving popular high-yielding variety IR64 through the introgression of two QTLs (qDTY 2.2 and qDTY 4.1 )13. Positive QTL interactions with a significant increase in grain yield under drought stress without a yield penalty under control conditions were reported by Dixit et al.22 and Shamsudin et al.23.

Marker-assisted selection can generate an improved version of an existing elite genotype as it involves the transfer of favorable alleles from a donor to a recipient parent. Breeding approaches such as marker-assisted recurrent selection (MARS) involve taking advantage of elite alleles coming from two or more parental lines can be a viable alternative. MARS, a practice of improvement of low heritability traits24,25, involves the consideration of selection intensity to increase the frequency of favorable superior genes21 and genetic drift to maintain diversity to carry on further improvement26. MARS has the potential to expand the gene pool of present cultivars and to expedite the development of new varieties. MARS involves selecting genotypes based on their favorable allele combinations and intermating them to produce the next generation27,28,29,30. Repeated intermating of heterozygous populations helps in successfully maintaining and escalating the genetic gain and variability31,32,33,34 resulting from the optimum complement from both parents. Validation of the effects of QTLs that showed large and consistent effects in one background will promote their extensive use across different genetic backgrounds for increasing yield under drought. In the present study, two mapping populations were developed following marker-assisted breeding and marker-assisted recurrent selection using rice variety Samba Mahsuri as the recipient parent. The objectives of the study were to (1) evaluate the effects of qDTY 2.2 and qDTY 4.1 in a Samba Mahsuri background using the MAB approach, which had earlier shown effects in an IR64 background; (2) understand the interactions of drought grain yield QTLs qDTY 1 . 1 , qDTY 2 . 1 , qDTY 3 . 1 , and qDTY 11 . 1 in a Samba Mahsuri background using the MARS breeding approach; and (3) develop high-yielding blast-and drought-tolerant Samba Mahsuri PLs for cultivation by farmers.

Results

Marker-assisted introgression for qDTY 2.2  + qDTY 4.1 in Samba Mahsuri background

The mapping population was developed from crosses of drought-tolerant donor IR 87728-75-B-B possessing qDTY 2.2 and qDTY 4.1 with drought-susceptible Samba Mahsuri in DS 2011 (DS: dry season) to introgress and pyramid QTLs for grain yield under drought. The earlier reported markers for qDTY 2.2 (RM236, RM279, RM109) and qDTY 4.1 (RM335, RM551, RM518) in an IR64 background13 were used to genotype the population. Foreground and recombinant genotyping was used to identify true F1 in WS 2011 (WS: wet season). The grain type of the selected marker assisted lines is provided in Supplementary Fig. S1. The complete scheme for the development of Samba Mahsuri pyramided lines and number of plants selected based on genotyping, phenotyping involving plant type, visual yield under drought stress and non-stress, and bacterial blight resistance is provided in Supplementary Fig. S2.

Marker-assisted recurrent selection for qDTY 1.1 , qDTY 2.1 , qDTY 3.1 , and qDTY 11.1 in Samba Mahsuri background

A mapping population was developed from crosses of drought-tolerant donor IR55419-04 possessing qDTY 1.1 , qDTY 2.1 , qDTY 3.1 , and qDTY 11.1 with drought-susceptible high-yielding Samba Mahsuri in DS 2008 followed by one backcross in WS 2008 to introgress and pyramid QTLs for grain yield under drought. The lines were advanced in DS 2009, WS 2009, and DS 2010. A total of 500 BC1F4 lines were selected based on plant type and Samba Mahsuri grain type in WS 2010 and advanced in DS 2011. A total of 686 panicles with Samba Mahsuri grain type were selected and advanced in WS 2011. The lines with different QTL combinations and the highest phenotypic similarity to the recipient parent and good grain yield under drought stress and non-stress were selected in the BC1F6 population and intercrossed in DS 2012. In WS 2012, 15641 F1 seeds were produced. In each intercross F2 generation, selection was done based on grain type similar to the recipient type, blast resistance (Magnaporthe oryzae) and bacterial blight (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae) resistance, and foreground and recombinant selection were practiced using the peak and other foreground markers RM212 and RM486 (chromosome 1), RM525 and RM221 (chromosome 2), RM16 and RM520 (chromosome 3), and RM287 (chromosome 11) to select plants segregating for the respective introgressed drought QTLs in DS 2013. Plants fixed for different combinations of QTLs, grain type (Supplementary Fig. S1), plant type and visual yield were selected in each generation and advanced to F8 generations. The scheme for the development of Samba Mahsuri PLs using partial marker-assisted recurrent selection is provided in Supplementary Fig. S3.

Phenotypic evaluation of populations

The average days to flowering (DTF) of PLs in the marker-assisted backcross experiment varied from 79 to 88 days in the NS trials and from 82 to 98 days in the reproductive-stage (RS) drought stress trials (Table 1). At maturity, plant height (PHT) varied from 62 to 71 cm in the reproductive-stage drought stress trials and from 81 to 105 cm in the NS trials (Table 1). Plant height and DTF were severely affected by drought stress as reflected by the reduction of 19 to 34 cm in height and delayed flowering by 3 to 10 days. Grain yield (GY) varied from 114 to 1366 kg ha−1 in the RS drought stress experiments and from 2376 to 8133 kg ha−1 in the NS experiments (Table 1). The grain yield reduction of 83% to 95% under drought stress compared with NS (control) indicated the severity of reproductive-stage drought stress faced by PLs. In the marker-assisted recurrent selection experiment, the average DTF of PLs varied from 80 to 97 days in the NS trials and from 85 to 116 days in the RS trials (Table 1). Plant height varied from 99 to 113 cm in the NS trials and from 73 to 85 cm in the RS drought stress trials (Table 1). Plant height decreased by 26 to 28 cm and flowering was delayed by 5 to 19 days. Grain yield ranged from 126 to 1751 kg ha−1 in the RS experiments and from 3131 to 5824 kg ha−1 in the NS experiments (Table 1). The PLs IR 102818-10-266-3-2-2-6, IR 102818-10-276-1-2-2-9, IR 102818-10-227-1-2-1-9, IR 102818-10-227-1-2-1-6, IR 99734:1-33-69-1-39-6, IR 99734:1-33-69-1-12-8, and IR 99734:1-33-69-1-12-9 showed resistance to blast (Magnaporthe oryzae). The PLs IR 99734:1-33-304-1-5-10 and IR 99734:1-33-304-1-5-8 showed resistance to bacterial blight (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae) and mild resistance to blast (Magnaporthe oryzae).

Table 1 Means for agronomic traits of pyramided lines (PLs) compared with recipient parent under lowland reproductive-stage drought stress (RS) and non-stress (NS) conditions using marker-assisted selection and marker-assisted recurrent selection approaches.

QTL class analysis of PLs

The mean grain yield of PLs with single and different QTL combinations for marker-assisted backcross (QTL class – A, B, and C) and marker-assisted recurrent selection experiments (QTL class – A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, and L) together with the check (CH) and parents (X, P1, P2) is shown in Table 2, Supplementary Fig. S4 (A,B) and Table 3, Supplementary Fig. S4 (C,D) respectively.

Table 2 QTL class analysis of grain yield (kg ha−1) under reproductive-stage drought stress (RS) and irrigated non-stress (NS) control conditions in marker-assisted backcross experiment conducted at IRRI, Philippines, and Hyderabad, India.
Table 3 QTL class analysis of grain yield (kg ha−1) under reproductive-stage drought stress (RS) and irrigated non-stress (NS) control conditions in marker-assisted recurrent selection experiment conducted at IRRI, Philippines.

The mean grain yield of PLs with qDTY 2.2  + qDTY 4.1 (class C) is significantly higher than in lines with a single QTL in DS 2016 (Table 2). Among the lines with a single qDTY, lines with qDTY 4.1 (class B) outperformed the lines with qDTY 2.2 (class A) under RS and NS conditions (Table 2). In marker-assisted recurrent selection experiments, PLs with four qDTYs (qDTY 1.1  + qDTY 2.1  + qDTY 3.1  + qDTY 11.1 ) + blast resistance (class A) and two qDTYs (qDTY 1.1  + qDTY 11.1 ) + blast resistance (class J) yielded higher under RS and NS conditions than other PLs with two and three qDTYs (Table 3). Among the three qDTY PLs, lines having qDTY 1.1  + qDTY 2.1  + qDTY 11.1  + blast resistance (class F) performed better under both conditions compared to other QTL combinations (Table 3). Among the Samba Mahsuri PLs with two qDTYs, qDTY 1.1  + qDTY 11.1  + blast resistance (class J) and qDTY 1.1  + qDTY 2.1  + blast resistance (class H) showed better yield advantage under both RS and NS conditions compared to other QTL class with two qDTYs (Table 3).

Effect of QTL pyramiding on agronomic traits

The Samba Mahsuri PLs with either single or multiple qDTYs produced higher yield than the recipient parent in both marker-assisted backcross and marker-assisted recurrent selection experiments even under severe drought stress (Supplementary Fig. S5). The severity of drought stress can be assessed by the water table level8,9 (Supplementary Fig. S6). The performance of the most promising drought-tolerant PLs in the marker-assisted backcross experiments at IRRI (Philippines), Hyderabad (India) and in the marker-assisted recurrent experiment at IRRI (Philippines) is presented in Tables 4 and 5, respectively. These lines were selected after phenotypic selection, genotypic selection, selection based on grain type, and stable performance under RS and NS conditions. DTF of selected promising lines with qDTY 2.2  + qDTY 4.1 varied from 74 to 88 days and from 77 to 94 days under NS and RS conditions, respectively, at IRRI, Philippines (Table 4), and from 87 to 114 days and from 89 to 111 days under NS and RS conditions, respectively, at Hyderabad, India (Table 4). The PHT of selected promising lines with qDTY 2.2  + qDTY 4.1 did not vary much from that of Samba Mahsuri under RS and NS conditions (Table 4). The selected promising PLs in the marker-assisted recurrent selection experiment flowered earlier than the recipient parent but the variability of PLs ranged from 53 to 100 days in NS and from 72 to 119 days under RS (Table 5). The PHT of promising PLs in the marker-assisted recurrent selection experiment ranged from 86 to 122 cm and from 64 to 95 cm under NS and RS, respectively (Table 5). The performance of PLs is dependent on season and level of stress (Tables 4 and 5). The grain yield advantage of selected promising PLs over Samba Mahsuri in MAB and MARS experiments is shown in Supplementary Tables S1 and S2, respectively. The grain yield advantage ranged from 297 to 4232 kg ha−1 and from 127 to 1299 kg ha−1 under NS and RS, respectively, in MAB experiments. The grain yield advantage ranged from 1467 to 5312 kg ha−1 and from 81 to 2585 kg ha−1 under NS and RS, respectively, in MARS experiments except for the yield of IR 102818-10-266-3-2-2-6 and IR 102821-19-233-2-1-1-10 in DS 2014 and IR 102818-10-227-1-2-1-2 in WS 2014 under NS conditions.

Table 4 Performance of promising PLs with qDTY 2.2  + qDTY 4.1 in terms of data on days to 50% flowering (days), plant height (cm), and grain yield (kg ha−1) under reproductive-stage drought stress (RS) and irrigated non-stress (NS) conditions at IRRI, Philippines and Hyderabad, India.
Table 5 Performance of promising PLs with four qDTYs (qDTY 1.1 , qDTY 2.1 , qDTY 3.1 , and qDTY 11.1 ) in terms of data on days to 50% flowering (days), plant height (cm), and grain yield (kg ha−1) under reproductive-stage drought stress (RS) and irrigated non-stress (NS) conditions.

Background genotyping and genetic similarity studies of MAB lines

The PLs with qDTYs qDTY 2 . 2  + qDTY 4 . 1 , qDTY 2 . 2 , and qDTY 4 . 1 , showed a consistent grain yield advantage under drought stress and non-stress conditions over Sambha Mahsuri. However, variability in yield among the pyramided lines with the same QTL combination was observed (Supplementary Table S3). To study the allelic constitution of PLs with the same QTLs combination but showing variation in yield, background genotyping was carried out on the 65 selected PLs, two parents, and one check (IR 87707-445-B-B-B) in WS 2015 using 99 polymorphic markers well distributed across the genome. Allele statistics for donor, recipient, heterozygous, and recombinant allele frequency were calculated (Supplementary Table S3). Hierarchical clustering based on the Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) using DARwin 6.0.013 (Dissimilarity Analysis and Representation win35) divided the PLs into six groups (Fig. 1). These six groups were created with 19, 13, 18, 9, 4, and 5 PLs in groups 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively. PL 6 (IR 99734:1-33-304-1-5-8) and PL 47 (IR 99734:1-33-304-1-5-10) grouped with donors IR 87728-75-B-B and IR 87707-445-B-B-B (IR64 introgressed line with qDTY 2.2 and DTY 4 . 1 , released in India, Nepal, and Myanmar). Samba Mahsuri was classified in Group 3. PLs with qDTYs in one group were grouped together and the mean GY of each group class was calculated under RS and NS conditions (Supplementary Table S4). The PLs in Groups 1 and 5 showed a higher grain yield advantage under RS in WS 2015 and DS 2016 (Supplementary Table S4). Visualization analysis of molecular marker scores was done using GGT 2.0 software36 and colored chromosome bar segments representing allelic distribution are shown in Fig. 2. The PLs in Groups 1 and 5 that had shown better performance across seasons were reported to have a conserved region near RM21510 on chromosome 7. This region is also present in the IR64 introgressed line with qDTY 2.2 and qDTY 4.1 , IR 87707-445-B-B-B (Fig. 2). The PLs with a conserved genetic region on chromosome 7 had shown a yield advantage over PLs without the conserved genetic region under NS and severe reproductive-stage drought stress (Supplementary Table S5). Supplementary Fig. S6 validates the severity of reproductive-stage drought stress in WS 2015 and DS 2016.

Figure 1
figure1

Unrooted neighbor-joining dendrogram of 65 PLs, donor (IR 87728-75-B-B), recipient (Samba Mahsuri), and drought-tolerant check (IR 87707-445-B-B) using SSR fingerprint data sets. Green color circle: PLs with qDTY  2.2 + qDTY 4.1 , blue color circle: PLs with qDTY 4.1 , brown color circle: PLs with qDTY 2.2 , red color circle: group, black color circle: donor, recipient parent, and drought-tolerant check, *data from one PL only in DS 2016. The numeric number represents the PLs. The designation details of the PLs are shown in Supplementary Table S3.

Figure 2
figure2

Graphical representation of allelic distribution of 65 PLs (numerical number on left hand side) and drought-tolerant check (*IR 87707-445-B-B) across 12 chromosomes using Graphical Genotypes software (GGT 2.0). A: donor allele, B: recipient allele, H: heterozygous allele, R: recombinant allele. The designation details of the PLs (numerical number on left hand side) are shown in Supplementary Table S3.

Epistasis interaction

PLs with the same QTL combinations showing variability for grain yield, grouping of all selected high-yielding promising PLs in one group (Fig. 1) and the GGT map showing a conserved region in all the selected PLs on chromosome 7 (Fig. 2), supports the possibility of interaction among contributing alleles/QTLs. Two dimensional genome scan revealed epistasis interaction of qDTY 7.1 (RM21510-RM320, on chromosome 7) with two loci, qDTY 4.1 (RM518-RM16368, on chromosome 4) and qDTY 9.1 (RM296-RM566, on chromosome 9) with an additive by additive effect of 18.7 (p ≤ 0.01) and 33.5% (p ≤ 0.0001) of the population mean, respectively (Supplementary Table S6, Fig. 3). The heritability of the additive x additive effect ranged from 1.4 (qDTY 7.1 with qDTY 4.1 ) to 6.4 (qDTY 7.1 with qDTY 9.1 ). The PLs with the donor (IR 87728-75-B-B) allele at qDTY 4.1 , qDTY 7.1 and qDTY 9.1 loci showed the higher mean grain yield under stress over the lines not possessing the donor allele for three loci. It is worth mentioning that the qDTY 7.1 and qDTY 9.1 on chromosome 9 were not targeted in the introgression program but detected during epistasis interaction study.

Discussion

In the present study, bacterial blight-/blast-tolerant, lowland-adapted but drought-susceptible, high grain and cooking quality line, Samba Mahsuri was used as a recipient parent to improve its yield under drought. Pre-breeding lines possessing major-effect qDTYs showing high grain yield under drought were used as donor parents. The yield advantage under drought of PLs possessing earlier identified large and consistent-effect qDTYs, qDTY 2.2 and qDTY 4.1 (IR64 background13), qDTY 1.1 (Swarna, IR64, and MTU1010 background6), qDTY 2.1 (Swarna background5), and qDTY 3.1 (Swarna and TDK1 background5,17) in current marker-assisted selection and recurrent selection breeding programs indicates the suitability of these loci in improving drought tolerance in the Samba Mahsuri background.

The development of PLs with positive interaction of QTLs has provided yield advantage of 1.0–1.2 t ha−1 under RS as well as stable grain yield under NS. The increase in yield under RS of PLs possessing single or combinations of qDTYs indicate the suitability of the qDTYs in increasing yield under RS. The increase in yield of single and multiple qDTY PLs in different backgrounds reported earlier (Vandana, IR64, Swarna, TDK1, MTU101037, and MRQ7423) as well as the present study validates the success of QTL introgression in increasing yield under drought stress. These successful examples should encourage use of qDTYs in breeding programs targeting yield improvement under drought.

As shown earlier in IR64 background (Swamy et al.13), in the current study also, qDTY 2.2 , qDTY 4.1 combination showed higher yield advantage under drought over single QTLs in Samba Mahsuri background indicating the effectiveness as well as positive interactions between these two QTLs in multiple genetic backgrounds. The release of IR64 PLs with qDTY 2.2  + qDTY 4.1 in India, Nepal, and Myanmar, validate the effect of these QTLs in reducing yield loss under reproductive-stage drought stress in variable environments (Sandhu et al.38).

This is the first study in rice comparing the yield advantage under severe reproductive stage drought achieved through MAS and MARS strategies. Severe and cyclic drought stress exposure to the population in the present study assisted in identifying true drought-tolerant lines39 with different growth duration40. The grain yield advantage in selected promising PLs over the recipient parent is high in MARS compared to MAS. The superiority of MARS lines may be because of accumulation of higher proportion of drought tolerant alleles during recurrent selection process as compared to the lines developed through MAS. MARS in sweet corn41,42, soybean and sunflower43, maize18,21,43,44,45,46,47, wheat48, and cucumber24,25,49 has proven to be effective in increasing the frequency of favorable alleles with improvement in grain yield, grain yield-related traits, and drought tolerance.

Drought stress in general occurs together with a high prevalence of biotic stresses such as bacterial blight, blast, and brown spot. The development of high-yielding drought-tolerant rice varieties with tolerance of biotic stress could considerably help to control heavy yield losses. However, very few molecular breeding studies have been undertaken to study the combined effect of abiotic and biotic stress tolerance simultaneously in mapping populations. The present study reports an integrated strategy of QTL pyramiding to develop PLs with high grain yield under reproductive-stage drought stress together with tolerance of biotic stress. We observed that early generation-systematic screening of large F2 population for biotic stress tolerance may provide opportunity to select lines for the second targeted trait (high grain yield under RS) in reduced time span. The developed PLs having tolerance to both biotic and abiotic stresses may help to identify, exploit and understand the mechanism of potential QTLs/genes providing tolerance to multiple stresses. It may also serve as useful resource for crop improvement program directed toward improving agronomic traits and multiple stress resistance.

The GY advantage of the PLs with qDTY 1.1 and qDTY 11.1 either single or in combination with other QTLs under RS and NS indicates the superiority of qDTY 1.1 and qDTY 11.1 in marker-assisted introgression programs over other QTLs. qDTY 1.1 has been reported to be associated with increased yield under multiple conditions (dry direct seeded, drought, non-stress) and multiple backgrounds (Swarna, IR64, MTU1010)6,12,50. Dixit et al.17 reported the performance of qDTY 11.1 in a Swarna background. In this study, across the PLs with two, three, four QTLs combinations, qDTY 1.1 showed positive interaction with qDTY 11.1 as lines possessing these two combinations of QTLs outyielded lines with other QTLs combinations. The study indicates that the breeding programs targeting MAS of qDTY 1.1 should also include qDTY 11.1 for higher yield advantage under both NS and RS.

The use of donors having qDTY 9.1 (qDTY 9.1 ; IR 77298-5-6-B-18)13 supported the presence of qDTY 9.1 in the Samba Mahsuri background in the current MAS QTL introgression program. The presence of qDTY 9.1 in Samba Mahsuri (Fig. 3) and IR64 background13 under reproductive-stage drought stress conditions indicates the effectiveness of the genetic region in different backgrounds. The stable performance of selected PLs in the Philippines and Hyderabad, India (Supplementary Table S1), indicates the effectiveness of qDTY 9.1 in different backgrounds (Samba Mashuri, IR64) and environments.

Figure 3
figure3

Epistasis interactions among qDTY4.1, qDTY7.1, and qDTY 9.1 in marker-assisted backcrossing experiment. A: additive effect, AE: additive × environment interaction effect, I: epistatic main effect, IE: epistasis × environment interaction effect, with only epistatic main effect (I).

The presence of the conserved allelic region on chromosome 7 (marker RM21510) in selected promising PLs showed higher yield advantage and its absence showed lower yield advantage under RS even if the other qDTYs were present (Fig. 2, Supplementary Table S3). The introgressed QTLs do not explain the entire phenotypic variation of the PLs for GY, this potentially indicates the importance of capturing the positive digenic interaction of qDTY 7.1 with qDTY 4.1 and qDTY 9.1 (Fig. 3, Supplementary Table S6). The epistasis interactions of these loci suggest their importance in elucidating the genetic basis of GY in high yielding PLs under RS. Understanding the genetic composition of these identified loci and their effect on GY may allow us to use these loci to achieve maximum GY advantage under RS. Earlier, Dixit et al.22 reported the positive interaction of qDTY 2.3 and qDTY 3.1 with qDTY 12.1 and a significant effect on grain yield increase under RS drought stress. Unlike Dixit et al.22 where in interactions between two identified QTLs were reported, in the present study, even if no QTLs for grain yield under drought near RM10 on chromosome 7 has been detected, the effect of the interaction of this region with qDTY 4.1 and qDTY 9.1 has significantly enhanced the yield under drought. In an earlier study, genetic loci for grain yield under drought stress, plasticity for root dry weight and total water uptake, and total root length were identified49 located near qDTY 7.1 and qDTY 9.1 , respectively. The broad understanding of the interactions identified in the present study and introgression of such specific combinations of a few QTLs may be more effective in increasing yield than random combinations of many QTLs. The complexity of effect and interaction among the most favorable alleles or haplotypes controlling the trait of interest, differential expression of expressed regions under variable conditions, and increase in frequency of positive alleles over negative contributing alleles may be responsible for the differential behavior of PLs having the same QTLs.”

Previously identified QTLs and genes in qDTY4.1, qDTY 7.1 and qDTY 9.1 may provide insights as to why the QTLs identified in the present study contribute to grain yield advantage under RS. The QTLs associated with germination51, panicle length (sp2(t))52, tiller number (tp7(b))53, days to flowering (dth7.1)54 and rice stripe virus resistance (Rurm1)55 were identified in qDTY 7.1 region. Various genes related to stress-signaling, stress-responses and signaling, growth and development processes, and hormonal regulation and transcription factors were reported within qDTY 4.1 and qDTY 9.1 by Swamy et al.13. The upstream region of qDTY 7.1 (15603452-18640879 bp) found to be associated with the gene responsive to phosphate uptake efficiency (Li et al. 201456) and downstream region with gene conferring resistance to blast and bacterial late blight (Calmodulin-Binding Transcription Factor; oscbt; 18865438-18878266 bp; http://qtaro.abr.affrc.go.jp/ogro/entry/show/660; Koo et al. 200857). There could be a probability that the genomic region (15414191-18878266) on chromosome 7 may be involved in providing tolerance to multiple stresses involving increasing nutrient uptake to increase yield under drought and biotic stress resistance. Further detailed studies on targeted genomic region on chromosome 7 may reveal additional information.

Conclusions

The results reported in the present study indicate the effectiveness of introgressed QTLs, interaction of QTLs with other loci, to further enhance GY under reproductive-stage drought stress while following MAS and MARS approaches. The GY advantage achieved is more in MARS than in MAS. Drought-tolerant Samba Mahsuri PLs with a grain yield advantage of 0.5–1.0 t ha−1 under reproductive-stage drought stress were developed. The PLs showing similar grain type and plant type as Samba Mahsuri together with the tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress may act as a candidate to replace the variety Samba Mahsuri. The positive interaction of introgressed QTLs with other QTL/genetic region and genetic background as reported in the present study could be one of the possible reason for the variable effect of introgressed QTLs in PLs. Identification of these positive interactions, allele mining and complete sequencing of promising PLs could reduce to a certain extent QTL x genetic background interactions often observed under RS.

Materials and Methods

Plant material, phenotyping, and management

The study was conducted at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines. To evaluate the effect of QTLs that had earlier shown an effect in the IR64 background under drought, two approaches were used. The popular rice variety Samba Mahsuri (occupying 3.3% of rice growing area in India), was used as a recipient to develop mapping populations through marker-assisted breeding and marker-assisted recurrent selection approaches. Samba Mahsuri is a medium-tall (90–100 cm) variety with 140–145 days duration, superfine grain with excellent grain and cooking quality, hulling percentage of 70%, head rice recovery of 75%, kernel length of 5.45 mm, kernel breadth of 1.97 mm, L/B ratio of 2.7, elongation ratio of 1.85, alkali spreading value of 5.5, and amylose content of 24.8%. Samba Mahsuri is a very popular variety, preferred for its fine slender premium grain and excellent cooking quality. The drought-tolerant indica rice varieties/pre-breeding lines developed at IRRI, IR 87728-75-B-B possessing qDTY 2.2 and qDTY 4.1 and IR55419-04 possessing qDTY 1.1 , qDTY 2.1 , qDTY 3.1 , and qDTY 11.1 , were used as donors in marker-assisted backcross and marker-assisted recurrent selection approaches, respectively. The scheme of developing the Samba Mahsuri PLs and number of selected plants in each subsequent generation using MAB and partial MARS approaches is shown in Supplementary Figs S2 and S3, respectively. The lines were screened under lowland transplanted control and lowland reproductive-stage drought stress conditions. Screening of PLs was conducted using an α-lattice or randomized complete block design (RCBD) or augmented RCBD along with drought-tolerant and susceptible checks and donor/recipient parents in 1–4-row plots 3–5 m in length, with 0.20–0.25-m row-to-row spacing and 2.0–2.5 g seed per linear meter. For all the trials, the seeds were sown in a raised bed nursery and 21–25-day-old seedlings were transplanted to the main field. Inorganic fertilizers NPK (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) were applied @ 120:30:30 kg ha−1. Weeds, insect pests, and snails management was done as described by Venuprasad et al.5. For non-stress, the trials were conducted under irrigated, transplanted, flooded, puddled, and anaerobic conditions with no drought stress. The reproductive-stage drought stress experiments were carried out in an automated rainout shelter facility at IRRI.

For reproductive-stage stress, transplanted experiments were maintained as described by Sandhu et al.58. The drought stress was initiated at 32 days after transplanting. After the inception of the stress, the soil water potential was measured using tensiometers (30 cm depth) in DS 2013 and DS 2014 (only). The plots in the reproductive stage drought stress treatments were rewatered when the soil water potential dropped to −50 to −70 kPa (tensiometer). The decline in water table depth was measured on a daily basis with a meter scale inserted into a 1.1-m polyvinyl chloride pipe in the experimental fields at regular intervals in all RS treatments. The pipes were placed at 1.0-m depth with 10 cm of pipe remaining above the soil surface. The plots were rewatered when water table level reached 100 cm below the soil surface and most lines were wilted and exhibited severe leaf drying. This cyclic reproductive stage drought stress allows the effective screening of broad range growth duration PLs40.

Data on days to 50% flowering (days) were recorded when 50% of the plants in the plot started flowering. At maturity, when 80–85% of the panicles turned golden yellow, plant height (cm) was measured as the mean height of three plants per plot from the base to the tip of the tallest panicle. The grains were harvested from each plot, dried to a moisture content of 14%, and weighed. Grain yield data were normalized as per moisture content for yield computation (kg ha−1). Visual observation on grain type similar to that of the recipient parent was made in the field per plot during plot selection and per plant during panicle selection. Blast (caused by Magnaporthe oryzae) and bacterial blight (caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae) screening was done twice first at F2 and then at F8 stage. Mixed inoculum for races present in Philippines was used for blast inoculation. Genes pik-s, pi2, pi5(t), pi9 showed resistance against the mixed inoculum. For bacterial blight inoculation race 1 (PXO61) and race 2 (PXO86) was used. Inoculation and scoring for bacterial blight were done at maximum tillering stage as described by Kauffman et al.59. Inoculation for blast screening was done 10 days after seeding in the blast nursery and, after an exposure of 22 days, scoring was done based on the SES scale (0: highly resistant, 1–2: resistant, 3–4: moderately resistant, 5–6: moderately susceptible, 7–8: susceptible, 9: highly susceptible)60,61. Phenotypic selection was used for biotic screening. Selection for resistance genes against blast and bacterial blight was not targeted in the present study.

Genotyping

Molecular marker work was carried out in the Molecular Marker Application Laboratory of IRRI. Fresh young leaves from all lines were collected, freeze-dried, and the DNA extracted using the modified CTAB protocol62. A total of 112 SSR markers linked to two qDTY regions were tested for polymorphism in the marker-assisted breeding experiment. The markers linked to qDTY 2.2 (RM236, RM279, RM109) and qDTY 4.1 (RM335, RM551, RM518) were found to be polymorphic in the Samba Mahsuri background and were used for foreground selection. The lines having the same QTL combination were found to be segregating for yield components. To study the allelic pattern of these lines, a total of 650 SSR markers distributed across the rice genome were tested for polymorphism. A total of 99 polymorphic markers were used for the background study. In the marker-assisted recurrent selection experiment, a total of 200 markers linked to four qDTY regions were tested for polymorphism. Foreground and recombinant selection were carried out using RM212 and RM486 (chromosome 1), RM525 and RM221 (chromosome 2), RM16 and RM520 (chromosome 3), and RM287 (chromosome 11) polymorphic markers. Amplification was carried out using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and PCR products were resolved in non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (6% or 8%) depending on product size. Gels were stained with SYBR SafeTM DNA, viewed after 20 min, and DNA profiles were scored based on parent allelic profile. Stepwise selection involving phenotyping and genotyping was used to select and advance the desirable plants in every generation.

Statistical analysis

Mean and standard error of difference of the experiments with alpha lattice were calculated using the linear mixed model of CROPSTAT version 7.2.3 considering replications and blocks within replication as random effects and lines as fixed effects.

$${y}_{ijk}=\mu +{g}_{i}+{r}_{j}+{b}_{lj}+{e}_{ijk},$$

where μ is the overall mean, g i is the effect of the ith genotype, r j is the effect of the jth replicate, b lj is the effect of the lth block within the jth replicate, and e ijk is the error.

For the RCBD, the model used was:

$${y}_{ijk}=\mu +{g}_{i}+{r}_{j}+{e}_{ijk}$$

where μ is the overall mean, g i is the effect of the ith genotype, r j is the effect of the jth replicate, and e ijk is the error.

For the augmented RCBD, the model used was:

$${y}_{ijk}=\mu +{g}_{i}+{b}_{l}+{e}_{ilk}$$

where μ is the overall mean, g i is the effect of the ith genotype, b l is the effect of the lth block, and e ilk is the error.

Class analysis for qDTY PLs

Class analysis for qDTY PLs was performed using SAS v9.2 (SAS Institute Inc. 2009), considering the effects of QTLs and genotypes within the QTL as fixed effects and replicate and blocks within replicate as random effects. The model used to see the performance y ijkl of the jth genotype nested within the ith QTL class in the lth block within the kth replicate is as follows:

$${y}_{ijkl}=\mu +{r}_{k}+b{(r)}_{kl}+{q}_{i}+g{(q)}_{ij}+{e}_{ijkl}$$

where μ is the population mean, r k is the effect of the kth replicate, b(r) kl  + q i is the effect of the lth block within the kth replicate, q i is the effect of the ith QTL, g(q) ij is the effect of the jth genotype nested within the ith QTL, and e ijkl is the error63. ANOVA and F test using SAS v9.2 (SAS Institute Inc. 2009) were used to see whether the QTL classes differed significantly from each other.

Graphical representation of the genome

Graphical representation of molecular marker data was performed using the software Graphical Genotypes (GGT 2.0)36. The homozygous donor allele, homozygous recipient allele, heterozygous allele, and recombinant allele were scored as ‘A’, ‘B’, ‘H’, and ‘R’, respectively. The estimated proportion of the A, B, H, and R alleles in each PL was calculated using GGT 2.0.

Diversity studies of PLs segregating for grain yield

DARwin 6.0.013 software was used to compute a pairwise distance matrix by calculating a dissimilarity matrix35. An Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) followed by bootstrap analysis with 1000 permutations was used to construct a neighbor joining tree.

Q x Q interactions

Detection of QTL x QTL interactions in the marker-assisted pyramided population was performed in QTL Network 2.1 based on a mapping methodology summarized by Yang et al.64. A two-dimensional genome scan with 1000 permutation was performed to identify additive x additive interaction. Determination of the QTLs intervals, detection of Q x Q interactions, and their additive x additive effect were considered as significant at P ≤ 0.01.

References

  1. 1.

    Rejesus, R. M., Mohanty, S. & Balagtas J. V. Forecasting global rice consumption. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University (2012).

  2. 2.

    Pandey, S., Bhandari, H. S. & Hardy, B. editors. Economic costs of drought and rice farmers’ coping mechanisms: a cross-country comparative analysis. Int. Rice Res. Inst. (2007).

  3. 3.

    Khush, G. S. What it will take to feed 5.0 billion rice consumers in 2030. Plant Mol. Biol. 59(1), 1–6 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bernier, J., Kumar, A., Ramaiah, V., Spaner, D. & Atlin, G. A. large-effect QTL for grain yield under reproductive-stage drought stress in upland rice. Crop Sci. 47(2), 507–516 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Venuprasad, R. et al. Identification and characterization of large-effect quantitative trait loci for grain yield under lowland drought stress in rice using bulk-segregant analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 120(1), 177–190 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Vikram, P. et al. qDTY 1.1 , Drought susceptibility of modern rice varieties: an effect of linkage of drought tolerance with undesirable traits. Nat. Sci. Rep. 5, 14799 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Dixit, S. et al. Fine mapping of QTLs for rice grain yield under drought reveals sub-QTLs conferring a response to variable drought severities. Theor. Appl. Genet. 125(1), 155–169 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Mishra, K. K. et al. qDTY12.1: a locus with a consistent effect on grain yield under drought in rice. BMC Genet. 14, 1 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Yadaw, R. B. et al. A QTL for high grain yield under lowland drought in the background of popular rice variety Sabitri from Nepal. Field Crops Res. 144, 281–287 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Sandhu, N., Jain, S., Kumar, A., Mehla, B. S. & Jain, R. Genetic variation, linkage mapping of QTL and correlation studies for yield, root, and agronomic traits for aerobic adaptation. BMC Genet. 14, 104–119 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sandhu, N. et al. Identification and mapping of stable QTL with main and epistasis effect on rice grain yield under upland drought stress. BMC Genet. 15, 1 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sandhu, N. et al. Traits and QTLs for development of dry direct seeded rainfed rice varieties. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 225–244 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Swamy, B. P. M. et al. Genetic, physiological, and gene expression analyses reveal that multiple QTL enhance yield of rice mega-variety IR64 under drought. PLoS One 8, e62795 (2013).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Huang, X. et al. Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nat. Genet. 42, 961–966 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Begum, H. et al. Genome-wide association mapping for yield and other agronomic traits in an elite breeding population of tropical rice (Oryza sativa). PLoS ONE 10(3), e0119873, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119873 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Palanog, A. D. et al. Grain yield QTLs with consistent-effect under reproductive-stage drought stress in rice. Field Crops Res. 161, 46–54 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Dixit, S. et al. Multiple major QTL lead to stable yield performance of rice cultivars across varying drought intensities. BMC Genet. 15, 16 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ribaut, J. M. & Ragot, M. Marker-assisted selection to improve drought adaptation in maize: the backcross approach, perspectives, limitations, and alternatives. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 351–360 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Nagai, K. et al. Two novel QTLs regulate internode elongation in deepwater rice during the early vegetative stage. Breed Sci. 62(2), 178–185 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bovill, W. D. et al. Pyramiding QTL increases seedling resistance to crown rot (Fusarium pseudograminearum) of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Theor. Appl. Genet. 121(1), 127–136 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Xu, Y. & Crouch, J. H. Marker-assisted selection in plant breeding: from publications to practice. Crop Sci. 48, 391–407 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Dixit, S. et al. Increased drought tolerance and wider adaptability of qDTY 12.1 conferred by its interaction with qDTY 2.3 and qDTY 3.2 . Mol. Breed. 30, 1767–1779 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Shamsudin, N. A. A. et al. Pyramiding of drought yield QTLs into a high quality Malaysian rice cultivar MRQ74 improves yield under reproductive stage drought. Rice 9, 21, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-016-0093-6 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Cramer, C. S. & Wehner, T. C. Fruit yield and yield component means and correlations of four slicing cucumber populations improved through six to ten cycles of recurrent selection. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 123, 388–395 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wehner, T. C. Breeding for improved yield in cucumber. Plant Breed Rev. 6, 323–359 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bernardo, R. Breeding for Quantitative Traits in Plants. Stemma Press (Woodbury, M. N., 2002).

  27. 27.

    Hospital, F., Moreau, L., Lacoudre, F., Charcosset, A. & Gallais, A. More on the efficiency of marker-assisted selection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95, 1181–1189 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Knapp, S. J. Marker-assisted selection as a strategy for increasing the probability of selecting superior genotypes. Crop Sci. 38, 1164–1174 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Lande, R. & Thompson, R. Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics 124, 743–756 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Moreau, L., Charcosset, A., Hospital, F. & Gallais, A. Marker assisted selection efficiency in populations of finite size. Genetics 148, 1353–1365 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ragot, M., Gay, G., Muller, J. P. & Durovray, J. Efficient selection for the adaptation to the environment through QTL mapping and manipulation in maize. (eds Ribaut, J. M. & Poland, D.) Molecular approaches for the genetic improvement of cereals for stable production in water-limited environments. Mexico, DF: CIMMYT. 128–130 (2000).

  32. 32.

    Johnson, G. R. Marker assisted selection. (ed. Janick, J.) Plant Breed. Rev. 24(1), 293–310 (Hoboken, N. J.: John Wiley & Sons, 2004).

  33. 33.

    Eathington, S. Practical applications of molecular technology in the development of commercial maize hybrids. In: Proceedings of the 60th Annual Corn and Sorghum Seed Research Conferences. Washington, DC: American Seed Trade Association (2005).

  34. 34.

    Crosbie, T. M. et al. Plant breeding: past, present, and future. (eds Lamkey, K. R. & Lee, M.) Plant breeding: the Arnel R. Hallauer international symposium. Ames, IA: 350 (Blackwell Publishing, 2006).

  35. 35.

    Perrier, X. & Jacquemoud-Collet, J. P. DARwin software http://darwin.cirad.fr/ (2006).

  36. 36.

    Van Berloo, R. GGT: software for the display of graphical genotypes. J. Hered. 90, 328–329 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kumar, A. et al. Breeding high-yielding drought-tolerant rice: genetic variations and conventional and molecular approaches. J. Exp. Bot. eru 363 (2014).

  38. 38.

    Sandhu, N. & Kumar, A. Bridging the Rice Yield Gaps under Drought: QTLs, Genes, and their Use in Breeding Programs. Agronomy 7(2), 27 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kumar, A., Bernier, J., Verulkar, S., Lafitte, H. R. & Atlin, G. N. Breeding for drought tolerance: direct selection for yield, response to selection and use of drought-tolerant donors in upland and lowland-adapted populations. Field Crops Res. 107, 221–231 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lafitte, H. R., Price, A. H. & Courtois, B. Yield response to water deficit in an upland rice mapping population: associations among traits and genetic markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109, 1237–1246 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Edwards, M. & Johnson, L. RFLPs for rapid recurrent selection. In Analysis of molecular marker data. Joint Plant Breed Symposium Ser Am Soc Hort Sci, CSSA, Madison, WI, 33–40 (1994).

  42. 42.

    Weyhrich, R. A., Lamkey, K. R. & Hallauer, A. R. Responses to seven methods of recurrent selection in the BS11 maize population. Crop Sci. 38, 308–321 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Eathington, S. R., Crosbie, T. M., Edwards, M. D., Reiter, R. S. & Bull, J. K. Molecular markers in a commercial breeding program. Crop Sci. 47, S154–S163, https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0015IPBS (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Beyene, Y. et al. Genetic gains in grain yield through genomic selection in eight bi-parental maize populations under drought stress. Crop Sci. 55, 154–163, https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2014.07.0460 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Beyene, Y. et al. Improving maize grain yield under drought stress and non-stress conditions in sub-Saharan Africa using marker-assisted recurrent selection. Crop Sci. 55, 154–163 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Beyene, Y. et al. Performance and grain yield stability of maize populations developed using marker-assisted recurrent selection and pedigree selection procedures. Euphytica 208, 285–297, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-015-1590-1 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Semagn, K. et al. Quantitative trait loci mapping and molecular breeding for developing stress resilient maize for sub-Saharan Africa. Crop Sci. 55(1), 55, https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2014.09.0646 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Charmet, G. et al. Marker assisted recurrent selection for cumulating QTLs for bread-making related traits. In Wheat in a Global Environment (pp. 211–217). Springer Netherlands.

  49. 49.

    Robbins, M. D. & Staub, J. E. Comparative analysis of marker-assisted and phenotypic selection for yield components in cucumber. Theor. Appl. Genet. 119(4), 621–634 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Ghimire, K. H. et al. Identification and mapping of a QTL (qDTY 1.1 ) with a consistent effect on grain yield under drought. Field Crops Res. 131, 88–96 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Hou, M. Y., Jiang, L., Wang, C. M. & Wan, J. M. Detection and analysis of QTLs for low temperature germinability in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Rice Genetics Newsletter 20, 52–55 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Yoshimura, A., Takano-Kai, N. & Anno, C. Linkage mapping of genes for short panicle and awn in rice. Rice Genetics Newsletter 21, 17–19 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Li, J. X. et al. Analyzing quantitative trait loci for yield using a vegetatively replicated F2 population from a cross between the parents of an elite rice hybrid. Theor. App. Genet. 101, 248–254 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Jang, L. et al. The inheritance of early heading in the rice variety USSR5. J. Genet. Genom. 34, 46–55 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ding, X. L., Sun, D. Z., Zhang, Y. X., Cheng, X. N. & Wan, J. M. QTL analysis for resistance to rice stripe disease using backcross inbred lines. Rice Genetics Newsletter 21, 60–62 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Li, S., Wang, C., Zhou, L. & Shou, H. Oxygen deficit alleviates phosphate overaccumulation toxicity in OsPHR2 overexpression plants. Journal of plant research 127(3), 433–440 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Koo, S. C. et al. The calmodulin-binding transcription factor OsCBT suppresses defense responses to pathogens in rice. Molecules and cells 27(5), 563–570 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Sandhu, N. et al. Rice root architectural plasticity traits and genetic regions for adaptation to variable cultivation and stress conditions. Plant Physiol. 171, 2562–2576 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Kauffman, H. E. et al. An improved technique for evaluating resistance of rice varieties to Xanthomonas oryzae. Plant Dis. Rep. 57, 537–541 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) Standard Evaluation System for Rice (4th edn) International Rice Research Institute, Manila, the Philippines (1996).

  61. 61.

    Narayanan, N. N. et al. Molecular breeding for the development of blast and bacterial blight resistance in rice cv. IR50. Crop Sci. 42(6), 2072–2079 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Murray, M. G. & Thompson, W. F. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 8, 4221–4235 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Knapp, G. Variance estimation in the error components regression model. Commun. Stat. Theor. Met. 31, 1499–1514 (2002).

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Yang, J., Zhu, J. & Williams, R. W. Mapping the genetic architecture of complex traits in experimental populations. Bioinformatics 23, 1527–1536 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) and the Generation Challenge program (GCP). Authors thank BMGF and GCP for the financial support to the study.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N.S. was involved in conducting the experiment, analysis, interpretation of the data, and drafting the manuscript. S.D., B.P.M.S., and P.V. were involved with the design of the experiment as well as with conducting the experiment during some seasons. C.V. was involved in conducting the experiment in Hyderabad, India. M.C. was involved in genotyping. A.K. conceived the study and was involved in critical revision of the manuscript and final approval of the version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arvind Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sandhu, N., Dixit, S., Swamy, B.P.M. et al. Positive interactions of major-effect QTLs with genetic background that enhances rice yield under drought. Sci Rep 8, 1626 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20116-7

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing