Article | Open | Published:

Transcriptional profiling of long non-coding RNAs in mantle of Crassostrea gigas and their association with shell pigmentation

Scientific Reportsvolume 8, Article number: 1436 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play crucial roles in diverse biological processes and have drawn extensive attention in the past few years. However, lncRNAs remain poorly understood about expression and roles in Crassostrea gigas, a potential model organism for marine molluscan studies. Here, we systematically identified lncRNAs in the mantles of C. gigas from four full-sib families characterized by white, black, golden, and partially pigmented shell. Using poly(A)-independent and strand-specific RNA-seq, a total of 441,205,852 clean reads and 12,243 lncRNA transcripts were obtained. LncRNA transcripts were relatively short with few exons and low levels of expression in comparison to protein coding mRNA transcripts. A total of 427 lncRNAs and 349 mRNAs were identified to differentially express among six pairwise groups, mainly involving in biomineralization and pigmentation through functional enrichment. Furthermore, a total of 6 mRNAs and their cis-acting lncRNAs were predicted to involve in synthesis of melanin, carotenoid, tetrapyrrole, or ommochrome. Of them, chorion peroxidase and its cis-acting lincRNA TCONS_00951105 are implicated in playing an essential role in the melanin synthetic pathway. Our studies provided the first systematic characterization of lncRNAs catalog expressed in oyster mantle, which may facilitate understanding the molecular regulation of shell colour diversity and provide new insights into future selective breeding of C. gigas for aquaculture.

Introduction

The large proportion of a eukaryotic genome is transcribed to produce a huge array of RNA molecules differing in protein-coding capability, size, and abundance1. Over the past decade, with the development of next-generation sequencing techniques, genome-wide transcriptome analysis, it was discovered that the genomes of eukaryotes encode a vast range of non-protein coding RNAs (ncRNAs)2,3. ncRNAs comprised of different types of small RNA (sRNA) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) that have been implicated in transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression or in guiding DNA modification4. Thousands of lncRNAs have been characterized in a limited number of eukaryotes. lncRNAs showed generally lower expression level, shorter length compared with counterpart mRNAs2,3,5,6. As expected for regulatory molecules, lncRNAs display specific spatiotemporal expression patterns, high tissue specificity and can regulate expression of genes in close genomic proximity (cis-acting) or at distance (trans-acting)3,7.

Many lncRNAs have been shown to play crucial roles in diverse biological processes5,7. Emerging evidence indicated that lncRNAs may have important roles in pigmentation. For example, the whole transcriptome analysis of pigmented and non-pigmented skin suggests a possible functional relevance of lncRNA in the modulation of pigmentation processes both in bovine8 and goat9. In goat, the impact of lncRNAs on its target genes in cis and trans was investigated, indicating that these lncRNAs have a strict tissue specificity and functional conservation9. Study on lncRNAs and their cis-target genes in melanocytes suggested the role in the melanogenesis10.

The fabulous and diverse colours of molluscan shells are generally believed to be determined by presence of biological pigments. The widely recognized shell colour diversities have been appreciated for hundreds of years by collectors and scientists alike11. However, characterization of the shell pigments and identification of molecular pathways involved in their synthesis in Mollusca lag behind the large numbers of studies undertaken on plants, vertebrates and insects12,13,14,15,16,17. At present, the main shell pigments found in Mollusca are carotenoids, melanin and tetrapyrroles, including porphyrins and bile pigments11,18. The molecular processes involved in the synthesis of pigment have been studied in only a few molluscs19,20,21,22,23,24. Of that, the regulatory mechanism for melanin synthesis is better known in cephalopods, involving in the activation of tyrosinase and increased melanin synthesis in the ink gland25. And it is noteworthy, some of the shell pigments have been shown to be produced via the highly conserved pathways. For instance, the tyrosinase enzyme, which plays extensive roles in eukaryotes, has been identified as the key enzyme in the pathway for melanin production in mollusks26.

The Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas, is a widely distributed and economically important species, belonging to Mollusca. Owing to its economical, biological and ecological importance, the biology and genetics of the Pacific oyster have been extensively studied, which enables C. gigas to be a potential model organism for marine mollusca studies27. Through successive family selection and breeding, we have developed four full-sib families characterized by shell colours (white, golden, black and partially pigmented). Digital gene expression profiling (DGE), which observed the abundance of a particular transcript as a count, discovered some differentially expressed genes and enriched pathways potentially involved in pigmentation, using those four shell colour variants20. The recently released genome sequence of C. gigas enabled us to develop a pipeline to identify 11,668 long intergenic non-coding RNAs (lincRNAs) from different tissues and developmental stages, based on RNA-seq resources available2. However, the whole lncRNAs catalog of C. gigas is not well characterized in any tissue, let alone their association with pigmentation.

In this study, we compiled the first genome-wide catalog of lncRNAs in mantle of C. gigas characterized by shell colour using poly(A)-independent and strand-specific RNA-seq. This comprehensive database of lncRNAs could serve a valuable framework that can be applied to further large-scale lncRNAs screen in C. gigas. Our study provides a valuable resource for studying lncRNAs in mantle of C. gigas, as well as contributes to better understanding the shell pigmentation.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection and preparation

Four kinds of C. gigas lines of full-sib families, named as the white shell (WS), black shell (BS), golden shell (GS), and normal or partially pigmented shell (NS) full-sib families were established. These families were developed by six-generation successive family selection and exhibited steadily hereditary shell colour traits. The original parents of white, black, golden and normal C. gigas were selected from locally cultured populations in Weihai, Shandong, China. In 2015, we respectively sampled six oyster individuals of five-month-old from four full-sib families for RNA-seq. Left mantle was dissected and stored in RNA store (Dongsheng Biotech) before RNA extraction. Four mantle samples, respectively named the black shell oyster mantle (BSM), the golden shell oyster mantle (GSM), normal or partially pigmented shell oyster mantle (NSM), and the white shell oyster mantle (WSM), were used for RNA-seq.


RNA isolation, library preparation and sequencing

The mantle from each individual was lysed in 1 ml of Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for total RNA extraction according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA quality and contamination was checked on 1% agarose gels. RNA purity, concentration, integrity were checked using the NanoPhotometer® spectrophotometer (IMPLEN, Westlake Village, CA), Qubit® RNA Assay Kit in Qubit® 2.0 Flurometer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), and the RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit of the Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA), respectively.

At least 3 µg of total RNA was pooled proportionally from six individuals within each family, a total of four samples were used for library construction. Firstly, ribosomal RNA was removed by Epicentre Ribo-zeroTM rRNA Removal Kit (Epicentre, Madison, WI), and rRNA free RNA sample was cleaned up by ethanol precipitation. Subsequently, sequencing libraries were generated using the rRNA-depleted RNA by NEBNext® UltraTM Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (NEB, Ipswich, MA). In order to select cDNA fragments of preferentially 150~200 bp in length, the library fragments were purified with AMPure XP system (Beckman Coulter, Beverly, MA). Finally, the library quality was assessed on the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system. The clustering of the index-coded samples was performed on a cBot Cluster Generation System using the TruSeq PE Cluster Kit v3-cBot-HS (Illumina). After cluster generation, the libraries were sequenced on an Illumina Hiseq. 4000 of the Novogene Bioinformatics Institute (Beijing, China), and 150 bp paired-end reads were generated.


Quality control and transcriptome assembly

The RNAseq data were cleaned by removing reads containing adapter or poly-N and low quality reads from raw data. A total of 441,205,852 clean reads were obtained after quality filter from a total of 465,803,034 raw 150-bp paired-end reads. And the downstream analyses were based on the clean data with high quality. Q20, Q30, and GC contents of the clean data were calculated. The complete dataset was deposited into NCBI’s Sequence Read Archive (PRJNA381520/SUB2554964).

Reference genome and gene model annotation files were downloaded from genome website (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/Crassostrea_gigas). Index of the reference genome was built using Bowtie v2.0.6 and paired-end clean reads were aligned to the reference genome using TopHat v2.0.9. The mapped reads of each sample were assembled by Cufflinks (v2.1.1) in a reference-based approach28.


Identification and characterization of lncRNAs

We developed a stringent filtering pipeline designed to remove transcripts with evidence for protein-coding potential based on current approaches: (i) Filter out single-exon transcripts nearest distance ≤500 bp with other transcripts, which might be extended exons of annotated protein-coding genes2. (ii) Remove transcripts with short lengths (<200 bp). (iii) Select single-exon transcripts with FPKM ≥ 2 and multiple-exon transcripts with FPKM ≥ 0.5. (iv) Filter out transcripts that belong to tRNA, rRNA, snoRNA, snRNA, pre-miRNA, and pseudogenes by cuffcompare. (v) The remaining transcripts were blasted with known mRNA and completed the preliminary screening. (vi) Classify candidate lncRNAs into three subtypes (lincRNA, intronic lncRNA, and antisense lncRNA) using information of calss_code of cuffcompare. (vii) The tools of CPC (Coding Potential Calculator), CPAT (Coding-Potential Assessment Tool), Pfamscan were used to detect putative protein encoding transcripts, potential lncRNA transcripts were retained which are not detected in any tool. (viii) Select putative lncRNAs which can be detected in at least three libraries.


Characterization and quantification of transcripts

RepeatMasker (http://www.repeatmasker.org) was used with default parameters to identify various TE components in oyster.

Cis role is lncRNA acting on neighboring target genes. For the cis action of lncRNAs, we searched for protein-coding genes 100 kb upstream and downstream of the lncRNAs, respectively. Cuffdiff (v2.1.1) was used to calculate FPKMs of both lncRNAs and coding genes transcripts in each sample28. Transcripts with P-adjust < 0.05 and the absolute value of log2 (Fold change) >1 were described as differentially expressed between any two shell colours, which were profiled as differentially expressed transcripts (DETs). Differentially expressed mRNA assemblies (DEM)20 were also independently analyzed and recorded in six pairwise groups, which were detected from the same four shell colours oyster lines. Shared differentially expressed genes from the same two pairwise groups were retained.


Functional enrichment analysis

Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes or lncRNA target genes was implemented by the GOseq R package, in which gene length bias was corrected. GO terms with corrected P value less than 0.05 were considered significantly enriched by differential expressed genes.

KEGG is a database resource for understanding high-level functions and utilities of the biological system. We used KOBAS software to test the statistical enrichment of differentially expressed genes or lncRNA target genes in KEGG pathways. Hypergeometric P value < 0.05 was considered significant.


Validation of gene expression by quantitative PCR analysis

To validate the RNA-seq data, 16 differentially expressed transcripts of interest were selected for quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis. Total RNA was extracted separately from the same 24 samples used for RNA sequencing. Then cDNA was synthesized from RNA, which was used for qPCR, using Prime Script TM RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Specific primers for qPCR were designed using Premier Primer 5 (Supplementary Table S1) and verified by NCBI primer-BLAST. Elongation Factor was used as an endogenous control29. The amplification was performed on the LightCycler 480 real-time PCR instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Burgess Hill, UK) using SYBR® Premix Ex TaqTM (TaKaRa). Cycling parameters were 95 °C for 5 min, then 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, 60 °C for 20 s. Melting curve analyses were performed following amplifications to verify specific amplication. Relative gene expression data was analyzed using the comparative threshold cycle (CT) method30. Data were examined for homogeneity of variances (F text), and were analyzed by t test using software SPSS 13.0 with P < 0.05. Eight oysters, typically having black for the left shell and white for the right shell, were also picked up for qPCR.

Results

Identification and characterization of lncRNAs in oyster mantles

The number of RNA-seq reads, quality of the reads, and the mapping rate for each of the four libraries sequenced are summarized (Table 1). A total of 99,092 transcripts were assembled by the Cufflinks, which were used for subsequent analysis. Using the criteria shown in Fig. 1a, 12,243 lncRNAs transcripts expressed in mantle were identified from at least three of the four samples analyzed. They consist of 8,226 lincRNAs, 387 antisense lncRNAs, and 3,630 intronic lncRNAs (Fig. 1b). These lncRNA transcripts correspond to 11,637 lncRNA gene loci. In addition, 45,393 protein-coding transcripts were also identified.

Table 1 Basic characteristic of reads in four libraries and data of sequencing reads mapping to the reference genome.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Identification and classification of Crassostrea gigas lncRNAs. (a) Overview of the computational filtering pipeline used for the identification of oyster lncRNAs. See main text and Materials and Methods for details. Ellipse box highlights the final number of transcripts that passed all filters and were considered high-confidence oyster lncRNAs. (b) Number of lncRNAs in each of the three main classes defined by their genomic location relative to protein-coding genes. A schematic representation of lncRNAs (colour) position relative to protein-coding genes (black) is shown on the top. lncRNAs with “antisense exonic overlap” (red) have at least one exon that overlaps with an exon of a protein-coding gene on the opposite strand. lncRNAs with “intronic overlap” (green) are defined as transcripts that have overlap with another protein-coding gene but no exon–exon overlap (no overlap with exons of the overlapping genes). “Intergenic” lncRNAs (blue) have no overlap with any protein-coding gene.

The exon number, sequence length, open reading frame length, and expression levels were characterized for the obtained 12,243 lncRNAs and 45,393 mRNAs. Our results indicated that most of lncRNAs contained fewer exons (one or two) than mRNAs (Fig. 2a). The distribution of transcript length was obviously different. The average length of lncRNAs was shorter than that of mRNAs (Fig. 2b), and the lncRNAs in our dataset tend to be shorter in open reading frame length than mRNAs (Fig. 2c). In addition, lncRNAs exhibited a lower level of expression than mRNA (Fig. 2d). With the absence of lncRNAs data in Mollusca, we failed to properly evaluate the conservation of lncRNAs in the oyster.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Comparison of the identified lncRNAs and mRNAs. (a) Distribution of the number of exons in the mRNAs and lncRNAs. (b) Distribution of transcript lengths in the mRNAs and lncRNAs. (c) Distribution of open reading frame lengths in the mRNAs and lncRNAs. (d) Expression level analysis in the mRNAs and lncRNAs.

Furthermore, we identified differences in Transposable element (TE) components between lncRNAs and mRNAs, as well as among the three lncRNA subtypes. Our analysis revealed TE component characteristics that distinguished the four transcripts subtypes (Fig. S1; Supplementary Table S2). At the global level, Class II DNA transposons, minisatellite, and rollingcircle helitron (RC/Helitron) were the three most abundant known repetitive elements to overlap with oyster transcripts. Significant differences in the percentage of TE components were observed between mRNAs and the individual subtype of lncRNAs. A total of 23, 396 TEs were found in 8, 281 lncRNAs, which account for 67.64% (8, 281/12, 243) of the total number of lncRNAs. A total of 521, 392 TEs were found in 40, 120 mRNAs, which account for 88.38% (40, 120/521, 390) of the total number of mRNAs. The results revealed that TE percentage in oyster is considerably lower for lncRNAs (67.64%) than for protein-coding genes (88.38%).

Analysis of differentially expressed transcripts

The expression levels of lncRNA and mRNA transcripts were estimated by fragments per kilobase per million fragments mapped (FPKM). The differentially expressed transcripts were detected between any two samples. As a result, a total of 427 differentially expressed lncRNA transcripts were identified among six pairwise groups, of which 183 lncRNA transcripts were differentially expressed in black oyster relative to white oyster (Supplementary Tables S3 and S4). The 427 differentially expressed lncRNA transcripts corresponded to 411 lncRNA gene loci. Cluster analysis of differentially expressed lncRNAs was revealed by a heat map, which showed four samples clustered separately (Fig. S2a).

A total of 1, 289 differentially expressed mRNAs (DEMs) were identified among six pairwise groups using cutoff of log2 (fold_change) >1 and q-value < 0.05 (Supplementary Tables S3 and S5), DEMs in these four samples showed the consistent cluster pattern with differentially expressed lncRNA transcripts (Fig. S2b). By integrating two DEMs assemblies from six pairwise comparison groups of four different shell colour oyster families, there were 94, 79, 140, 53, 118, and 79 DEMs were identified, respectively (Supplementary Tables S3 and S5), resulting in a total of 349 significantly DEMs (Supplementary Tables S3 and S6). A total of 6 mRNAs were confirmed by qPCR (Supplementary Table S1). These 6 genes are known to play essential roles in pigment biosynthesis of melanin, tetrapyrrole, carotenoid, and ommochrome (Table 2; Fig. 3).

Table 2 LncRNAs and their potential cis-acting genes that are involved in pigmentation.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Common pathways of melanin biosynthesis in animals and its related pathways. Enzymes are abbreviated as follows: tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), phenoloxidase (PO), DOPA decarboxylase (DDC), dopachrome tautomerase (DCT), dopachrome conversion enzyme (DCE), dopachrome rearranging enzymes (DRE). Pigment precursors are shown in blue, enzyme are shown in red. Some signaling pathways are indicated around melanin biosynthesis, which were significantly identified in this study and reported to regulate melanin biosynthesis in animals. Some metabolism pathways are also indicated around melanin biosynthesis, which are significantly identified here and reported to involve in other pigments biosynthesis.

GO and KEGG analyses were also performed on 349 significantly differentially expressed mRNA. As the results, we derived 13 highly enriched GO terms (Supplementary Table S7) and 10 significantly enriched KEGG pathways (Supplementary Table S8). Importantly, we also observed several pigment biosynthesis related terms, such as “tyrosine metabolism”, “tryptophan metabolism”, and “retinol metabolism” in the data from KEGG analyses (Fig. 4).

Figure 4
Figure 4

KEGG enrichment analysis of differentially expressed transcripts. The y-axis represented the KEGG enriched pathways, the x-axis represented the enrichment factor, which was calculated by ratio of the number of differentially expressed transcripts divided by the number of annotated transcripts in this pathway. The potential pigmentation-related pathways were underlined by red line.

Among the significantly differentially expressed lncRNA and mRNA transcripts, a total of 16 transcripts, including 6 lncRNAs and 10 mRNAs, were selected to confirm the utility of RNA-seq for quantitative analyses using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The results show that these transcripts were differentially expressed among different shell colours oysters and generally exhibited consistent with RNA sequencing data (Supplementary Table S1). Using oysters of asymmetric shell pigment pattern, we found that peroxidase, TCON_00924022, and TCON_00951105 showed a higher expression level in left mantle representing black shell than in right mantle representing white shell. Other six transcripts showed no significantly difference.

The cis role of lncRNAs in target genes

To investigate the function of lncRNAs, we performed bioinformatics analysis identifying the potential targets of lncRNAs in cis. Our analysis included 11,157 lncRNAs that are associated with 24, 057 protein-coding genes within a range of 100 kb. We identified 427 differentially expressed lncRNA genes potentially targeting to 2,088 protein coding genes. GO analysis of the lncRNA cis-acting mRNA targets revealed two over-represented terms including RNA methyltransferase activity and tRNA methyltransferase activity that are primarily involved in regulation of gene expression (Supplementary Table S7). Pathway analysis showed that these lncRNAs cis-acting target genes were mainly enriched in six KEGG pathways involved in ECM-receptor interaction, Ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis, Jak-STAT signaling pathway, Notch signaling pathway, Homologous recombination and other types of O-glycan biosynthesis (Supplementary Table S8).

Through GO survey using lncRNAs cis-acting target genes in six pairwise groups, only one GO term of “Cysteine-type endopeptidase inhibitor” was significantly enriched when comparing BS with WS (Supplementary Table S7). In addition, 16 enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways were detected (Supplementary Table S8). Of these pathways, four pathways have been reported to be implicated in biomineralization31,32,33, including ECM-receptor interaction, Other types of O-glycan biosynthesis, Ubiquitin mediated proteolysis, and Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis. Five pathways have been previously reported to regulate pigmentation, including the Jak-STAT signaling pathway34,35, Endocytosis20,36, FoxO signaling pathway37,38, and Notch signaling pathway22 (Fig. 3). It is noteworthy that several pigment biosynthesis related terms, such as “Tryptophan metabolism”, and “Porphyrin and chlorophy II metabolism” were also identified (Figs 3 and 4). Taken together, data from these functional enrichment analyses showed that these cis-acting genes of lncRNAs mainly involved in regulation of biomineralization and pigmentation.

Association study

To further ascertain that lncRNA-protein-coding gene pairs exhibited DNA co-localization (for cis-acting) and expression correlation relationships, detailed examination was conducted. To deepen our understanding of the relationship between lncRNAs and pigmentation, first, we selectively analyzed pairs, in which the lncRNAs and their target genes were significantly differentially expressed between any two shell colours (Table S9). At the same time, gene annotation was used to identify the lncRNA-protein-coding gene pairs associated with pigment biosynthesis. According to these selective criteria, we found that chorion peroxidase, a potential pigment synthesis gene, and its cis-acting lincRNA TCONS_00951105 were detected to higher expression levels in pigmented oysters compared to white shell oysters, which were also confirmed in asymmetric oysters (Supplementary Table S1). We predicted that this lincRNA was probably involved in shell pigmentation. However, uncovering the definitive function of the predicted lncRNA requires additional verification studies.

Discussion

In this study, we represented the first long non-coding transcripts catalog expressed in C. gigas mantle and analyzed their association with shell pigmentation. Our study not only enriched the knowledge of lncRNAs in marine invertebrate, but also provided new insights into potential functions of lncRNAs in molluscs. These RNA-seq data might provide molecular targets assisting the selective breeding of C. gigas.

These lncRNAs share many characteristics of their eukaryotic counterparts: such as shorter length, fewer exons, lower levels of expression compared with mRNAs. Conservation is missing because the lncRNA catalog in other molluscs is unaccessible. A previous study has estimated the relatively low conservation of lincRNA in C. gigas2. The same characteristics were also detected in lncRNAs found in sponge, goat, and other eukaryotes1,3,9. These common factors of lncRNAs in eukaryotes perhaps indicate their essential regulation during development. In addition to the preliminary examination of lncRNAs, we performed an extensive characterization to reveal major differences in transposon element (TE) components among mRNAs, lincRNAs, intronic lncRNAs, and anti-sense lncRNAs, which may be responsible for the observed differences in their evolution and function. TEs are mobile genetic elements that are capable of movement and proliferation within the genome. TEs are also considered as one of three evolutionary scenarios involved in the origin of lncRNAs39. TE coverage in C. gigas is considerably lower for lncRNAs than for protein-coding mRNAs. Thus, although little is known about repetitive elements in oyster, our findings are consistent with TEs being the origin of protein-coding genes than lncRNAs in C. gigas, which has also been proposed in Amphimedon3.

Unlike mRNA sequences that could provide potential information regarding their function, the sequence motifs of lncRNA are usually uninformative for predicting lncRNA function given that lncRNA functions are highly complex and diverse40. We predicted the potential function of lncRNAs in oyster mantle by analyzing their cis-acting protein-coding gene targets. Although this may not be the most appropriate model to explain the function of lncRNAs, GO analysis of all differentially expressed lncRNA cis-acting mRNAs identified two overrepresented terms of RNA methyltransferase activity and tRNA methyltransferase activity. RNA methylation has been reported to play a vital role in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression41,42. Our studies were focused on the characterization of differentially expressed lncRNAs and their cis-acting mRNAs, and uncovering their potential functions by GO and KEGG analyses.

It has been reported in mollusk that shell colour is regulated by shell matrix proteins (SMPs) expressed in different shell layers11. While some of these proteins may have a role in shell colour determination, it is possible that these genes may play other roles in shell construction24. Notably, GO functional annotation analysis showed that only one GO term, namely Cysteine-type endopeptidase inhibitor, was significantly enriched, which were extensively characterized in SMPs11,32. It has been suggested that cysteine-type endopeptidase inhibitor might inhibit cysteine-type endopeptidase to degrade shell matrix proteins43,44. Our studies also revealed several enriched pathways that have been implicated in biomineralization, including ECM-receptor interaction, other types of O-glycan biosynthesis and ubiquitin mediated proteolysis31,32,44. Thus, a close relationship between the differentially expressed lncRNAs and biomineralization was observed.

Although pigmentation is a multifactorial phenotypic traits, only a small numbers of pathways regulating pigmentation have been validated to date9. Of that, Jak-STAT signaling pathway34,35, Endocytosis20,36, and Notch signaling pathway20,22 have been identified in our study. It is worth noting that several pigment biosynthesis related terms, such as tryptophan metabolism and porphyrin and chlorophy2 metabolism were identified in the GO analysis. Tryptophan is used to synthesize ommochrome and substitute for tyrosine as an oxidizable substrate for melanin16,45,46. Porphyrin, a tetrapyrroles, was one of the shell pigments found in Mollusca. Therefore, data from our functional enrichment analysis suggest a close correlation between the differentially expressed lncRNAs and pigmentation.

Comparison of two RNA-seq datasets identified 349 protein-coding transcripts that were shared between DET and DEM. These mRNAs could be used as auxiliary materials to further investigate the pigmentation associated lncRNAs. A total of 6 mRNAs are selected to function in pigments biosynthesis involving in melanin, tetrapyrrole, carotenoid and ommochrome (Table 2). Melanin is the end-product of complex multistep transformation of tyrosine15, extensively existing in the organism kingdom. Tyrosinase is the key enzyme in pigment synthesis, initiating a cascade of reactions converting tyrosine to the melanin biopolymer47. In insects, multiple enzymes are identified to directly involve in melanogenesis including peroxidase, phenoloxidase (PO), dopachrome conversion enzyme (DCE)26,48. Furthermore, two types of insect POs have been identified in some insect species, that can be identified as tyrosinase-like and laccase-type26. In cephalopod, the melanin-producing pathway in the ink gland includes three main enzymes of tyrosinases, peroxidase and dopachrome rearranging enzymes49. Porphyrins, termed as cyclic structure tetrapyrroles, are found in bacteria, plants, and animals and are synthesized via the haem pathway11. Carotenoids can be transformed to apocarotenoids such as retinoids, whose metabolic were reported to be mediated by Cytochrome P450s50,51,52,53. Kynurenine 3-monooxygenase catalyses the hydroxylation of kynurenine to 3-hydroxykynurenine, which has a key role in tryptophan catabolism and synthesis of ommochrome pigments54,55.

Several studies indicate that the intricate mechanisms of pigmentation require a coordinated posttranscriptional regulatory network of genes expression. However, our knowledge on the role of lncRNAs in pigmentation is very limited40,56. Our studies demonstrated that chorion peroxidase and its cis-acting lincRNA TCONS_00951105 showed the highest expression level in black shell oyster. Chorion peroxidase was initially identified from Drosophila melagaster and reported to relate to eggshell chorion harden involving protein crosslinking and melanization in insects57,58. Moreover, higher levels of expression were found in left black mantle relative to right white mantle of oysters with asymmetric pattern of shell colour. Peroxidase has been suggested to serve in an alternative melanogenic pathway in insect and cephalopod. Peroxidase is associated with melanosomes in the ink gland, where it is thought to catalyze the formation of eumelanin49,59. Peroxidase has been identified in many DGE datasets20,24, strongly suggesting its role in shell pigmentation. Phylogenetic tree using 26 peroxidase in C. gigas showed the chorion peroxidase LOC105324712 (CGI 10011763) clustered with peroxidases in insect and cephalopod, which have been implicated in melanin biosynthesis33. Altogether, our studies suggest that chorion peroxidase and its cis-acting lincRNA TCONS_00951105 may play an important role in melanin synthesis and shell colour regulation (Fig. 3).

Conclusion

This study provided a catalog of lncRNAs in mantle of five-month-old Pacific oysters and profiled their expression in four shell colours variants. We identified a total of 12,443 lncRNAs, encoded by 11,637 gene loci, consisting of 8,226 lincRNAs, 387 antisense lncRNAs, and 3,630 intronic lncRNAs. LncRNA transcripts showed a relatively short length with fewer exons and low expression relative to their counterpart protein coding RNA (mRNA) transcripts. We identified 427 lncRNA transcripts that are differentially expressed among six pairwise groups based on one replicate per sib family. Functional enrichment of differentially expressed lncRNA and mRNA transcripts showed that they are potentially associated with biomineralization and shell pigmentation. And a total of 6 mRNAs are identified to influence pigment biosynthesis including melanin, carotenoid, tetrapyrrole, and ommochrome. Finally, we selectively analyzed lncRNAs and target gene pairs, in which the lncRNAs and their target genes were differentially expressed between any two shell colours variants. Chorion peroxidase, a pigmentation associated gene, was found to be the cis-acting target of lincRNA (TCONS_00951105) simultaneously. Collectively, our studies of C. gigas mantle lncRNAs and their association with pigmentation might facilitate the selection of elite oyster lines with desired coloration patterns.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Ponting, C. P., Oliver, P. L. & Reik, W. Evolution and Functions of Long Noncoding RNAs. Cell 136, 629–641 (2009).

  2. 2.

    Yu, H., Zhao, X. & Li, Q. Genome-wide identification and characterization of long intergenic noncoding RNAs and their potential association with larval development in the Pacific oyster. Scientific Reports 6 (2016).

  3. 3.

    Gaiti, F. et al. Dynamic and widespread lncRNA expression in a sponge and the origin of animal complexity. Molecular biology and evolution 32, 2367–2382 (2015).

  4. 4.

    Eddy, S. R. Non–coding RNA genes and the modern RNA world. Nature Reviews Genetics 2, 919–929 (2001).

  5. 5.

    Dong, X. et al. Comprehensive Identification of Long Non-coding RNAs in Purified Cell Types from the Brain Reveals Functional LncRNA in OPC Fate Determination. PLOS Genetics 11 (2015).

  6. 6.

    Karlic, R. et al. Long non-coding RNA exchange during the oocyte-to-embryo transition in mice. DNA research: an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes (2017).

  7. 7.

    Quinn, J. J. & Chang, H. Y. Unique features of long non-coding RNA biogenesis and function. Nature Reviews Genetics 17, 47–62 (2016).

  8. 8.

    Weikard, R., Hadlich, F. & Kuehn, C. Identification of novel transcripts and noncoding RNAs in bovine skin by deep next generation sequencing. BMC genomics 14, 789 (2013).

  9. 9.

    Ren, H. et al. Genome-wide analysis of long non-coding RNAs at early stage of skin pigmentation in goats (Capra hircus). BMC genomics 17, 67 (2016).

  10. 10.

    Zeng, Q. et al. Analysis of lncRNAs expression in UVB-induced stress responses of melanocytes. Journal of Dermatological Science 81, 53–60 (2016).

  11. 11.

    Williams, S. T. Molluscan shell colour. Biological Reviews (2016).

  12. 12.

    Nijhout, H. F. Molecular and physiological basis of colour pattern formation. Advances in insect physiology 38, 219–265 (2010).

  13. 13.

    Braasch, I., Schartl, M. & Volff, J.-N. Evolution of pigment synthesis pathways by gene and genome duplication in fish. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7, 74 (2007).

  14. 14.

    Grotewold, E. The genetics and biochemistry of floral pigments. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 57, 761–780 (2006).

  15. 15.

    Slominski, A., Tobin, D. J., Shibahara, S. & Wortsman, J. Melanin pigmentation in mammalian skin and its hormonal regulation. Physiological Reviews 84, 1155–1228 (2004).

  16. 16.

    Christensen, B. M., Li, J., Chen, C. & Nappi, A. J. Melanization immune responses in mosquito vectors. Trends in Parasitology 21, 192–199 (2005).

  17. 17.

    Zou, Z., Shin, S. W., Alvarez, K. S., Kokoza, V. & Raikhel, A. S. Distinct melanization pathways in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Immunity 32, 41–53 (2010).

  18. 18.

    Comfort, A. The pigmentation of molluscan shells. Biological Reviews 26, 285–301 (1951).

  19. 19.

    Sun, X. et al. Integration of Next Generation Sequencing and EPR Analysis to Uncover Molecular Mechanism Underlying Shell Color Variation in Scallops. PloS one 11, e0161876 (2016).

  20. 20.

    Feng, D., Li, Q., Yu, H., Zhao, X. & Kong, L. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of the Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas Characterized by Shell Colors: Identification of Genetic Bases Potentially Involved in Pigmentation. PLOS ONE 10 (2015).

  21. 21.

    Ding, J. et al. Transcriptome Sequencing and Characterization of Japanese Scallop Patinopecten yessoensis from Different Shell Color Lines. PloS one 10 (2015).

  22. 22.

    Yue, X., Nie, Q., Xiao, G. & Liu, B. Transcriptome Analysis of Shell Color-Related Genes in the Clam Meretrix meretrix. Marine Biotechnology 17, 364–374 (2015).

  23. 23.

    Mann, K. & Jackson, D. J. Characterization of the pigmented shell-forming proteome of the common grove snail Cepaea nemoralis. BMC genomics 15, 1 (2014).

  24. 24.

    Lemer, S., Saulnier, D., Gueguen, Y. & Planes, S. Identification of genes associated with shell color in the black-lipped pearl oyster, Pinctada margaritifera. BMC genomics 16, 568 (2015).

  25. 25.

    Palumbo, A. & d’Ischia, M. Nitric oxide biogenesis, signalling and roles in molluscs: the Sepia officinalis paradigm. Advances in Experimental Biology 1, 45–451 (2007).

  26. 26.

    Vavricka, C. J. et al. Tyrosine metabolic enzymes from insects and mammals: A comparative perspective. Insect Science 21, 13–19 (2014).

  27. 27.

    Zhang, G. et al. The oyster genome reveals stress adaptation and complexity of shell formation. Nature 490, 49–54 (2012).

  28. 28.

    Trapnell, C. et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nature protocols 7, 562–578 (2012).

  29. 29.

    Renault, T., Faury, N., Barbosa-Solomieu, V. & Moreau, K. Suppression substractive hybridisation (SSH) and real time PCR reveal differential gene expression in the Pacific cupped oyster, Crassostrea gigas, challenged with Ostreid herpesvirus 1. Developmental & Comparative Immunology 35, 725–735 (2011).

  30. 30.

    Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001).

  31. 31.

    Aguilera, F., McDougall, C. & Degnan, B. M. Co-option and de novo gene evolution underlie molluscan shell diversity. Molecular Biology and Evolution, msw 294 (2017).

  32. 32.

    Kocot, K. M., Aguilera, F., Mcdougall, C., Jackson, D. J. & Degnan, B. M. Sea shell diversity and rapidly evolving secretomes: insights into the evolution of biomineralization. Frontiers in Zoology 13, 23 (2016).

  33. 33.

    Feng, D., Li, Q., Yu, H., Kong, L. & Du, S. Identification of conserved proteins from diverse shell matrix proteome in Crassostrea gigas: characterization of genetic bases regulating shell formation. Scientific Reports 7 (2017).

  34. 34.

    Buggy, J. Binding of alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone to its G-protein-coupled receptor on B-lymphocytes activates the Jak/STAT pathway. Biochemical Journal 331, 211 (1998).

  35. 35.

    Choi, H. et al. IL-4 Inhibits the Melanogenesis of Normal Human Melanocytes through the JAK2–STAT6 Signaling Pathway. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 133, 528–536 (2013).

  36. 36.

    Raposo, G., Tenza, D., Murphy, D. M., Berson, J. F. & Marks, M. S. Distinct Protein Sorting and Localization to Premelanosomes, Melanosomes, and Lysosomes in Pigmented Melanocytic Cells . The Journal of cell biology 152, 809–824 (2001).

  37. 37.

    Shakhmantsir, I., Massad, N. L. & Kennell, J. A. Regulation of cuticle pigmentation in drosophila by the nutrient sensing insulin and TOR signaling pathways. Developmental Dynamics 243, 393–401 (2014).

  38. 38.

    Kim, J., Choi, H., Cho, E. & Lee, T. R. FoxO3a Is an Antimelanogenic Factor that Mediates Antioxidant-Induced Depigmentation. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 134, 1378–1388 (2014).

  39. 39.

    Kapusta, A. et al. Transposable elements are major contributors to the origin, diversification, and regulation of vertebrate long noncoding RNAs. PLoS Genet 9, e1003470 (2013).

  40. 40.

    Zhang, S. et al. Systematic Analysis of Long Noncoding RNAs in the Senescence-accelerated Mouse Prone 8 Brain Using RNA Sequencing. Molecular Therapy—Nucleic Acids 5, e343 (2016).

  41. 41.

    Holoch, D. & Moazed, D. RNA-mediated epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Nature Reviews Genetics 16, 71–84 (2015).

  42. 42.

    Fu, Y., Dominissini, D., Rechavi, G. & He, C. Gene expression regulation mediated through reversible m6A RNA methylation. Nature Reviews Genetics 15, 293–306 (2014).

  43. 43.

    Rawlings, N. D., Barrett, A. J. & Bateman, A. MEROPS: the peptidase database. Nucleic Acids Research 38, 325–331 (2010).

  44. 44.

    Liu, C. et al. In-depth proteomic analysis of shell matrix proteins of Pinctada fucata. Scientific reports 5 (2015).

  45. 45.

    Chauhan, P. et al. De novo transcriptome of Ischnura elegans provides insights into sensory biology, colour and vision genes. BMC Genomics 15, 808–808 (2014).

  46. 46.

    Wright, T. R. The genetics of biogenic amine metabolism, sclerotization, and melanization in Drosophila melanogaster. Advances in Genetics 24, 127–222 (1987).

  47. 47.

    Marmol, V. D. & Beermann, F. Tyrosinase and related proteins in mammalian pigmentation. FEBS Letters 381, 165–168 (1996).

  48. 48.

    Kronforst, M. R. et al. Unraveling the thread of nature’s tapestry: the genetics of diversity and convergence in animal pigmentation. Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research 25, 411–433 (2012).

  49. 49.

    Derby, C. D. Cephalopod Ink: Production, Chemistry, Functions and Applications. Marine Drugs 12, 2700–2730 (2014).

  50. 50.

    Zheng, H. et al. Total carotenoid differences in scallop tissues of Chlamys nobilis (Bivalve: Pectinidae) with regard to gender and shell colour. Food chemistry 122, 1164–1167 (2010).

  51. 51.

    Von Lintig, J. Colors with functions: elucidating the biochemical and molecular basis of carotenoid metabolism. Annual review of nutrition 30, 35–56 (2010).

  52. 52.

    White, J. A. et al. Identification of the human cytochrome P450, P450RAI-2, which is predominantly expressed in the adult cerebellum and is responsible for all-trans-retinoic acid metabolism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97, 6403–6408 (2000).

  53. 53.

    Zhang, Q., Dunbar, D. & Kaminsky, L. S. Human Cytochrome P-450 Metabolism of Retinals to Retinoic Acids. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 28, 292–297 (2000).

  54. 54.

    Linzen, B. The Tryptophan → Omrnochrome Pathway in Insects. Advances in Insect Physiology 10, 117–246 (1974).

  55. 55.

    Han, Q. et al. Analysis of the wild-type and mutant genes encoding the enzyme kynurenine monooxygenase of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Insect Molecular Biology 12, 483–490 (2003).

  56. 56.

    Koch, L. Functional genomics: Screening for lncRNA function. Nature Reviews Genetics (2017).

  57. 57.

    Mindrinos, M. N., Petri, W. H., Galanopoulos, V. K., Lombard, M. F. & Margaritis, L. H. Crosslinking of theDrosophila chorion involves a peroxidase. Wilhelm Roux’s archives of developmental biology 189, 187–196 (1980).

  58. 58.

    Li, J., Hodgeman, B. A. & Christensen, B. M. Involvement of peroxidase in chorion hardening in Aedes aegypti. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 26, 309–317 (1996).

  59. 59.

    Palumbo, A. Melanogenesis in the Ink Gland of Sepia officinalis. Pigment Cell Research 16, 517–522 (2003).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (31772843), Shandong Province (2016ZDJS06A06), and Industrial Development Project of Qingdao City (17-3-3-64-nsh).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China

    • Dandan Feng
    • , Qi Li
    • , Hong Yu
    •  & Lingfeng Kong
  2. Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production Processes, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266237, China

    • Qi Li
  3. Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States

    • Shaojun Du

Authors

  1. Search for Dandan Feng in:

  2. Search for Qi Li in:

  3. Search for Hong Yu in:

  4. Search for Lingfeng Kong in:

  5. Search for Shaojun Du in:

Contributions

D.D.F. did the experiment, analyzed the data and wrote the paper. Q.L., H.Y., L.F.K. and S.J.D. conceived and designed the study.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi Li.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19950-6

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.