Article | Open | Published:

Canagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, attenuates the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in a mouse model of human NASH

Scientific Reportsvolume 8, Article number: 2362 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, an antidiabetic drug, promotes urinary excretion of glucose by blocking its reabsorption in the renal proximal tubules. It is unclear whether SGLT2 inhibition could attenuate nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and NASH-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. We examined the preventive effects of an SGLT2 inhibitor canagliflozin (CANA) in Western diet (WD)-fed melanocortin 4 receptor-deficient (MC4R-KO) mice, a mouse model of human NASH. An eight-week CANA treatment attenuated hepatic steatosis in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice, with increased epididymal fat mass without inflammatory changes. CANA treatment for 20 weeks inhibited the development of hepatic fibrosis in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice. After one year of CANA treatment, the number of liver tumors was significantly reduced in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice. In adipose tissue, CANA suppressed the ratio of oxidative to reduced forms of glutathiones (GSSG/GSH) in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice. Treatment with GSH significantly attenuated the H2O2-induced upregulation of genes related to NADPH oxidase in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, and that of Il6, Tgfb, and Pdgfb in RAW264.7 cells. This study provides evidence that SGLT2 inhibitors represent the unique class of drugs that can attenuate or delay the onset of NASH and eventually hepatocellular carcinoma, at least partly, through “healthy adipose expansion”.

Introduction

In recent decades, metabolic syndrome has become increasingly prevalent, with an increased incidence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)1,2. NAFLD is a clinical and pathologic term describing a disease spectrum ranging from simple steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma3. Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are recognized as important risk factors for NAFLD; the prevalence of NAFLD is 4.6-times higher in the obese population than in normal individuals4, and 33–50% of T2DM patients have NAFLD5. Additionally, DM is moderately associated with deaths from cancers of the liver6, suggesting the clinical significance of preventive intervention for NAFLD. The insulin-sensitizing agent pioglitazone7, GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide8, and farnesoid X receptor agonist obeticholic acid9,10 reportedly improve histological parameters in human NASH. However, their efficacy and safety in long-term studies and preventive effects on NASH-associated carcinogenesis have not been confirmed.

Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a new class of oral hypoglycemic agents that work by decreasing glucose reabsorption in the renal proximal tubules. The net effect of increased renal glucose excretion has dual effects of insulin-independent glycemic control and caloric loss. Various animal models of NAFLD treated with SGLT2 inhibitors have demonstrated a protective effect on steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis11,12,13,14,15,16,17. We recently reported that the SGLT2 inhibitor ipragliflozin promotes fat accumulation in epididymal fat without deteriorating adipose inflammation and prevents ectopic fat accumulation in the liver18. This suggests that SGLT2 inhibitors prevent hepatic steatosis not only via its insulin-independent glucose-lowering effect and caloric loss but also via modulating energy homeostasis and balance in adipose and non-adipose tissues. However, whether SGLT2 inhibitors can be effective in an animal model that closely reflects the liver condition of human NASH has not been addressed thus far. Moreover, it remains unknown whether SGLT2 inhibitors can prevent NASH-associated hepatocellular carcinoma.

We have developed an experimental mouse model of NASH; melanocortin 4 receptor-deficient (MC4R-KO) mice fed a western diet (WD) develop a liver condition like human NASH, in association with obesity, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia19. Using these mice, here we demonstrate that an SGLT2 inhibitor canagliflozin (CANA) attenuates the development of hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis. CANA induced adipose expansion without deteriorating inflammation or fibrosis, referred to as “healthy adipose expansion.” We also confirmed that CANA altered glutathione metabolism to reduce oxidative stress in adipose tissue. It suggests that CANA prevented ectopic fat accumulation in the liver via promoting healthy adipose expansion and inhibited the development of hepatic fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Our findings with the MC4R-KO mice suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors have a significant clinical impact on human NASH and NASH-associated hepatocellular carcinoma.

Materials and Methods

Details and additional information of the MATERIALS AND METHODS are included in the Supplementary Information.


Drugs and diets

CANA was synthesized at the Medicinal Chemistry Laboratory at Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation (Toda-shi, Saitama, Japan) and was mixed at 0.03% (w/w) with WD (WD/CANA). The dose of CANA was determined based on a previous report showing that 4-week treatment of 30 mg/kg/day CANA significantly increased urinary glucose excretion and decreased blood glucose in diet-induced obese mice20. The average amount of CANA consumed during the study was 20–30 mg/kg/day. Standard diet (SD, CRF-1; 357 kcal/100 g, 14% energy as fat) and western diet (WD, D12327; 460 kcal/100 g, 40% energy as fat) were purchased from Oriental Yeast. Co. Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan) and Research Diets. Inc. (New Brunswick, NJ, USA), respectively. Food consumption was calculated by subtracting remaining food, including any spilled food in cages, from a weighed aliquot at indicated intervals. Energy intake was then calculated on the basis of diet formula.


Animals and experimental protocol

The MC4R-KO mice on the C57BL/6J background were a gift from Dr. Joel K. Elmquist (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA)21. We obtained male C57BL/6J mice (controls) from CLEA Japan, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). Both WT and MC4R-KO mice were fed a SD until 8-week-old with free access to water. After that, MC4R-KO mice were fed a WD or a WD/CANA for 8, 20, or 52 weeks. Wild-type mice were fed a SD throughout the experiments. Eight- and 20-week treatment protocols were conducted at the Medicinal Chemistry Laboratory at Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, and 52-week treatment protocol was conducted at the Tokyo Medical and Dental University. For measurement of blood glucose levels during CANA treatment, blood was obtained at indicated intervals by tail vein puncture from non-fasted conscious mice around 2 pm. After 8-, 20-, and 52-week of CANA treatment, blood samples and tissues were obtained by cardiac puncture around 10am from non-fasted mice under intraperitoneal pentobarbital anesthesia (60 mg/kg). Only for measurement of HOMA-R and Adipo-IR, blood samples were obtained after an 18-hour fast. Spot urine was collected in the fed state around 10am; the mouse was held at the dorsal position and urinated, and the urine was collected in the sterile petri dish. All the animals were housed under conventional conditions of temperature, humidity, and light (12 h light: 12 h dark). The Tokyo Medical and Dental University Committee on Animal Research and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation approved the protocols and procedures used in this study. All methods involving animals were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.


Biochemical assays

Blood glucose levels were measured using a glucometer (Glutest PRO R (Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho Co., Ltd., Aichi, Japan) for a 52-week treatment protocol, or Autokit Glucose C2 (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan) for 8- and 20-week treatment protocols. Urine glucose and creatinine levels were analyzed with enzymatic assays in a laboratory of Oriental Yeast Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) and triglyceride (TG) were measured using NEFA C-Test Wako (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan) and TG E-Test Wako (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan), respectively.


Metabolomic analysis of epididymal adipose tissue

Epididymal fat from MC4R-KO mice fed a WD or WD/CANA for 8 weeks was used for metabolomic analysis (n = 7). Metabolomic analysis was performed at the Human Metabolome Technologies (HMT), Inc. (Tsuruoka, Japan).


Cell culture

3T3-L1 pre-adipocytes and RAW 264.7 cells were purchased from ATCC. 3T3-L1 pre-adipocytes were grown and differentiated to adipocytes as previously described22. Fully differentiated adipocytes or RAW 264.7 cells were washed with PBS, and incubated in a serum-free DMEM containing 0.25% bovine serum albumin with or without 1 mM GSH ester (G1404, Sigma-Aldrich Japan, Tokyo, Japan). After 1 h, hydrogen peroxide (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.) was added to the culture medium to attain a final concentration of 200 μM and incubated for 18 h.


Quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from mice tissues using the Sepasol reagent (Nacalai Tesque, Inc., Kyoto, Japan) and performed the first-strand cDNA synthesis using ReverTra Ace (Toyobo Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) and Random Primer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using StepOnePlus Real-time PCR System with Fast SYBR Green Master Mix Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Primers are listed in Table S1. The relative gene expression was determined using the comparative CT method and normalized to the 36B4 levels.


Western blotting

The mice liver tumor tissues were homogenized in a lysis buffer (2% SDS, 4 M Urea, 1 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris; pH 8.0), centrifuged, separated the samples using 8% SDS-PAGE, and transferred to PVDF membranes. Phospho (Ser473)-Akt (Cat. #9271, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) and a total Akt antibody (Cat. #9272, Cell Signaling Technology) were used for immunoblotting. Immunoblots were detected with ECL Prime Western Blotting Detection Reagent and ImageQuant LAS 4000 mini (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) and quantified using NIH ImageJ software.


Statistical analysis

All datasets were tested for Gaussian distribution using a Kolmogorov‐Smirnov test. For normally distributed values, statistical analysis was performed with the Student’s t test for unpaired observations, or analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni post hoc test, and data are given as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Repeated measure based parameters were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test. For non-Gaussian distributed values, data are expressed as box-and-whisker plots with median values and 10, 25, 75, and 90 percentiles. Nonparametric statistical analysis was performed with the Mann‐Whitney or Kruskal‐Wallis test with Dunn post hoc test. In post hoc analyses, MC4R-KO/WD and MC4R-KO/WD/CANA, or H2O2 and H2O2 + GSH was pre-selected as a subset of means or medians to compare. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad PRISM, 6.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.

Results

CANA improves hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and hepatic steatosis in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice

We examined whether CANA inhibits the development of insulin resistance- and obesity-associated metabolic phenotypes in MC4R-KO mice on a WD feeding regimen. CANA significantly improved hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia with increased urinary excretion at 8 weeks of treatment in non-fasted MC4R-KO mice fed a WD (Fig. 1a, Table 1, and Supplementary Figure 1a). CANA significantly increased serum TG levels, but did not affect serum total- or active-GLP-1, or NEFA levels in non-fasted WD-fed MC4R-KO mice (Table 1). In fasted WD-fed MC4R-KO mice after 8 weeks of CANA treatment, hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia were markedly improved (Supplementary Figure 1b). Consequently, HOMA-R and Adipo-IR, indices of systemic and adipose insulin resistance23,24, respectively, were significantly reduced by CANA treatment (Supplementary Figure 1c). Four and eight weeks of CANA treatment increased their energy intake along with hyperphagia (Fig. 1b) and their body weight (Fig. 1c), respectively. Whereas eight weeks of CANA treatment significantly decreased liver weight (Fig. 1d), 8 and 20 weeks of CANA treatment increased epididymal fat weight in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice (Fig. 1e). CANA significantly attenuated hepatic lipid deposition and/or TG content (Fig. 1f and g) associated with a reduced expression of de novo lipogenic genes such as acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 (Acc1), stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (Scd1), and fatty acid synthase (Fasn) in the liver of WD-fed MC4R-KO mice (Fig. 1h). Accordingly, CANA suppressed the elevation of serum ALT levels (Fig. 1i) and upregulated the expression of the gluconeogenic genes, glucose-6-phosphatase (G6pc) and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (Pck1), in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice (Supplementary Figure 2a).

Figure 1
Figure 1

CANA attenuates hepatic steatosis in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice. The changes in (a) blood glucose level, (b) food intake, and (c) body weight during CANA treatment for 20 weeks. Weights of the (d) liver and (e) epididymal fat after 8 and 20 weeks of CANA treatment. (f) Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining and (g) triglyceride (TG) content of the liver. (h) Expression levels of lipogenesis-related genes in the liver. (i) Serum ALT levels. WT, wild type; SD, standard diet; WD, Western diet; CANA, canagliflozin. Original magnification, x200. Scale bars, 100 μm. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs MC4R-KO/WD. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way (a,b and c) or one-way ANOVA (d,e,g,h and i) followed by Bonferroni post hoc test; MC4R-KO/WD and MC4R-KO/WD/CANA was pre-selected as a subset of means to compare. n = 15.

Table 1 Metabolic parameters of non-fasted WD-fed MC4R-KO mice after CANA treatment for 8 and 20 weeks.

SGLT1 gene (Slc5a1) was expressed in various organs such as the liver, lung, and pancreas (Supplementary Figure 2b). Among hepatocytes, Kupffer cells, and stellate cells, it was expressed mainly in hepatocytes. In contrast, SGLT2 gene (Slc5a2) was expressed mainly in the kidneys among the various organs (Supplementary Figure 2b). In the liver, SGLT1 protein was expressed in the biliary tract, and SGLT2 protein was expressed in the central vein and biliary tract (Supplementary Figure 2c).

CANA inhibits hepatic inflammation and fibrosis in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice

We next examined whether CANA prevents the development of hepatic inflammation and fibrosis in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice. Hepatic inflammation was demonstrated by an elevated expression of the common macrophage marker F4/80 gene (Emr1), which was inhibited by 20 weeks of CANA treatment (Fig. 2a). Twenty weeks of CANA treatment downregulated the gene expression of tumor-necrosis factor-α (Tnfa), and pro-inflammatory M1 macrophage marker Cd11c in the liver of WD-fed MC4R-KO mice, without affecting the anti-inflammatory M2 macrophage marker Cd206 (data not shown). We histologically assessed the severity of liver injury with the NAFLD Activity Score (NAS); whereas 20 weeks of CANA treatment did not affect the steatosis score in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice (Supplementary Figure 3), the scores for lobular inflammation and hepatocyte ballooning were reduced by CANA treatment. As a result, CANA lowered the overall NAS in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice (Fig. 2b).

Figure 2
Figure 2

CANA inhibits hepatic inflammation and fibrosis in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice. (a) Expression levels of inflammation-related genes in the liver. (b) NAFLD activity score (NAS). (c) F4/80 immunohistochemical analysis of the liver. (d) Quantification of the number of hepatic crown-like structure (hCLS) in the liver. (e) Sirius red staining of the liver sections and (f) quantification. (g) Expression levels of fibrosis-related genes in the liver. Original magnification, ×200. Scale bars, 100 μm. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs MC4R-KO/WD. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA (a,b,d and g) or Kruskal‐Wallis test (e) followed by Bonferroni or Dunn post hoc test, respectively; MC4R-KO/WD and MC4R-KO/WD/CANA was pre-selected as a subset of means or medians to compare. n = 15.

We previously reported the unique histological structure, hCLS, in the liver from MC4R-KO mice, where dead hepatocytes were surrounded by macrophages and suggested that hCLS serves as an origin of hepatic inflammation and fibrosis during the progression from simple steatosis to NASH25. In this study, MC4R-KO mice developed hCLS during the 20-week WD-feeding, as assessed by immunostaining for a macrophage marker F4/80, which was markedly reduced by CANA treatment (Fig. 2c and d). Consistent with this observation, 20 weeks of CANA treatment significantly reduced liver fibrosis in MC4R-KO mice (Fig. 2d and e), associated with the suppression of fibrogenic genes such as Col1a1, Acta2, Tgfb1, and Timp1 (Fig. 2f).

CANA reduces adipose tissue inflammation and fibrosis in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice

Consistent with the increase in epidydimal fat mass in CANA-treated mice, histological analysis revealed that CANA promoted adipocyte hypertrophy as assessed by cell size in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice (Fig. 3a and b). Despite adipocyte hypertrophy, the number of crown-like structures (CLS), where macrophages are considered to scavenge the residual lipid droplets of dead or dying adipocytes26, was markedly decreased by eight weeks of CANA treatment (Fig. 3c). Expression of Tnfa and Cd11c were upregulated in the epididymal fat of WD-fed MC4R-KO mice compared with SD-fed WT mice, which were inhibited by eight weeks of CANA treatment (Fig. 3d). In accordance with decreased number of CLS, eight weeks of CANA treatment significantly prevented WD-induced fibrosis in adipose tissue (Fig. 3e and f), associated with a reduced expression of Col6a1 and Col6a3 (Fig. 3g). Whereas expression of adipogenic (Pparg and Cebpa), and hypoxic/angiogenic genes (Hif1a and Vegfa) were unaffected by CANA (Supplementary Figure 4a), expression of brown adipocyte-selective genes (Ucp1, Prdm16, and Cidea) were suppressed by CANA in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice (Supplementary Figure 4b).

Figure 3
Figure 3

CANA reduces inflammation and fibrosis in adipose tissue of WD-fed MC4R-KO mice. (a) F4/80 immunohistochemical analysis of epididymal fat. (b) Adipocyte area in epididymal fat. (c) Quantification of the number of crown-like structure (CLS) in epididymal fat. (d) Expression levels of inflammation-related genes in epididymal fat. (e) Sirius red staining of epididymal fat and (f) quantification. (g) Expression levels of collagen genes in epididymal fat. Original magnification, ×200. Scale bars, 100 μm. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs MC4R-KO/WD. Statistical analyses were performed using Kruskal‐Wallis test (b and f) or one-way ANOVA (c,d and g) followed by Dunn or Bonferroni post hoc test, respectively; MC4R-KO/WD and MC4R-KO/WD/CANA was pre-selected as a subset of means or medians to compare. n = 15.

These data indicate that an increase in the epididymal fat mass in CANA-treated MC4R-KO mice does not deteriorate macrophage accumulation, inflammation, or fibrosis.

CANA decreases oxidative stress in epididymal fat of WD-fed MC4R-KO mice

Recent evidence suggest that reduced lipid storage in obese adipose tissue contributes to ectopic lipid accumulation in non-adipose tissues such as the liver, skeletal muscle, and pancreas, where lipotoxicity impairs their metabolic functions27. To investigate the mechanisms by which CANA does not deteriorate inflammation or fibrosis in epididymal fat of WD-fed MC4R-KO mice, we performed metabolomic analysis of epididymal fat in MC4R-KO mice treated with CANA for eight weeks. Principal component analysis revealed that CANA had a substantial effect on the metabolite profile in epididymal fat (Supplementary Figure 5a), and that a pathway of glutathione metabolism was enriched as the most altered metabolic pathway by CANA (Fig. 4a). Whereas eight weeks of CANA treatment markedly increased the content of reduced glutathione (GSH) in the epididymal fat of WD-fed MC4R-KO mice (Fig. 4b), the content of oxidized glutathione (GSSG) was significantly reduced by CANA. As a result, CANA markedly suppressed the ratio of GSSG to GSH, an indicator of oxidative stress28,29, in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice (Fig. 4b). The ratio of GSSG to GSH in liver also showed a trend of decrease by CANA treatment (Supplementary Figure 5b). Whereas genes related to GSH metabolism such as Cse, Cbs, Gclc, and Gclm were unchanged by CANA treatment (data not shown), the induction of the NADPH oxidase complex genes in the epididymal adipose tissue of WD-fed MC4R-KO mice, such as gp91phox, p22phox, and p67phox were inhibited by CANA (Supplementary Figure 5c). Furthermore, pretreatment with GSH significantly attenuated the H2O2-induced upregulation of genes related to NADPH oxidase in 3T3-L1 adipocytes (Fig. 4c). As well, pretreatment with GSH significantly inhibited the H2O2-induced upregulation of Il6, Tgfb, and Pdgfb in RAW264.7 cells (Fig. 4d). Pretreatment with CANA also suppressed the H2O2-induced Tgfb upregulation in RAW264.7 cells (data not shown).

Figure 4
Figure 4

CANA increases GSH content in epididymal fat of WD-fed MC4R-KO mice. (a) The pathways enriched among the upregulated (>2.0-fold) metabolites in the epididymal fat of MC4R-KO mice treated with CANA for 8 weeks compared to those without treatment. The results are expressed as −log (p value). Metabolite concentrations of (b) GSH and GSSG, and (c) GSSG/GSH ratio of the epididymal fat. Data are mean ± SEM, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs MC4R-KO/WD; Student’s t test. n = 7. (d) Expression levels of NADPH oxidase complex genes in differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes treated with 200 µM H2O2 for 18 h after pretreatment with or without 1 mM GSH for 1 h. (e) Expression levels of inflammation-related genes in RAW 264.7 cells treated with 200 µM H2O2 for 18 h after pretreatment with or without 1 mM GSH for 1 h. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs H2O2. Statistical analyses were performed using Mann-Whitney (b), non-paired Student’s t (c), or one-way ANOVA (d and e) followed by Bonferroni post hoc test; H2O2 and H2O2 + GSH was pre-selected as a subset of means to compare. n = 4.

These data indicate that expanded adipose tissue in CANA-treated MC4R-KO mice is accompanied by an increase in GSH content and decrease in oxidative stress. Increased GSH may contribute to reduction in the H2O2-induced upregulation of NADPH oxidase in adipocytes, and inflammatory and fibrotic gene induction in macrophages.

CANA attenuates the development to hepatocellular carcinoma in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice

We finally analyzed whether long-term treatment of CANA could prevent NASH-associated carcinogenesis in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice, which developed hepatocellular carcinoma after feeding on high-fat diet for one year19. During 52 weeks of treatment, a mouse from both CANA- and vehicle-treated groups died of liver tumors. Although their blood glucose profile during CANA treatment were not comparable to those on a 20-week CANA treatment protocol, possibly due to the differences in the method of glucose measurement and/or their breeding condition, CANA did suppress the glucose levels in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice (Fig. 5a). After 52 weeks of treatment CANA did increase the body weight change in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice (Fig. 5b), and all the animals from both groups developed liver tumors; however, 52-week CANA treatment significantly reduced the number of tumors in the liver of WD-fed MC4R-KO mice with a trend towards a reduction in maximum tumor size (Fig. 5c and d). Whereas CANA did not attenuate hepatic TG content in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice after treatment for 52 weeks (Fig. 5e), CANA significantly reduced liver fibrosis (Fig. 5f and g) and serum ALT levels (Fig. 5h). CANA treatment for 52 weeks also reduced expression of Myc and Afp in the tissues from tumor and/or non-tumor sites (Fig. 5i). CANA did not affect the serum insulin and hepatic Akt phosphorylation levels (Supplementary Figure 6a and b). These observations demonstrate that, along with hepatic steatosis and fibrosis, CANA can attenuate the progression to hepatocellular carcinoma in a mouse model of human NASH.

Figure 5
Figure 5

CANA attenuates the development to hepatocellular carcinoma in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice. The changes in (a) blood glucose levels and (b) body weight during CANA treatment for 52 weeks. n = 8–9. (c) Representative images of livers. Arrows indicate tumors. (d) Tumor numbers and maximum size. (e) Triglyceride content of the liver tissues from non-tumor sites. (f) Sirius red staining of the liver sections and (g) quantification. (h) Serum ALT levels. (i) Expression levels of Myc and Afp genes in the liver tissues from non-tumor (NT) or tumor (T) sites. Original magnification, ×100. Scale bars, 100 μm. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs MC4R-KO/WD. Statistical analyses were performed using non-paired Student’s t (a,d,e,h and i) or Mann-Whitney (g) test. n = 7–8.

Discussion

The present study demonstrated that CANA could effectively attenuate the development to hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis, in a mouse model of human NASH19. In addition to therapeutic effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on liver dysfunction, steatosis and/or steatohepatitis in humans30,31,32 and mice11,12,13,14,15,16,17, our observation suggests that SGLT2 inhibitors have preventive effects on a full spectrum of NAFLD in conditions of obesity, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia. Our previous report showed that approximately 20% of patients treated with an SGLT2 inhibitor ipragliflozin for 24 weeks did not achieve more than 1% of body weight reduction18, probably due to enhanced appetite33. We therefore consider that CANA-treated mice reflect such T2DM patients with small or no body weight reduction by compensatory hyperphagia under treatment of SGLT2 inhibitors.

Based on the “multiple parallel hit” hypothesis, NAFLD pathogenesis is considered as a sequence of events from simple steatosis to hepatic inflammation toward fibrosis and NASH-associated hepatocellular carcinoma34. Whereas CANA suppressed hepatic TG accumulation at 8-week of CANA treatment, it did not at 20- and 52-week. It appears that CANA treatment delay or slow hepatic TG accumulation. Nonetheless, along to the “multiple parallel hit” hypothesis, the reduced hepatic TG accumulation by 8-week of CANA treatment could be considered to attenuate subsequent hepatic inflammation/fibrosis, and NASH-associated hepatocellular carcinoma as observed at 20- and 52-week of CANA treatment, respectively.

The adipose tissue can serve as energy storage reservoirs against calorie overload. Beyond its storage capacity, the excess calorie that is consumed results in ectopic fat accumulation in non-adipose tissues, such as the liver, skeletal muscle, and pancreas—where lipotoxicity leads to their metabolic dysfunctions and histopathologic changes35. Earlier we demonstrated that an SGLT2 inhibitor ipragliflozin promoted fat accumulation in the epididymal fat and prevented ectopic fat accumulation in the liver18; interestingly, the adipose expansion induced by ipragliflozin did not accompany an increase in inflammation or fibrosis, which may be referred to as “healthy adipose expansion”36. Correspondingly, CANA also attenuated hepatic steatosis in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice, after treatment for eight weeks, along with healthy adipose expansion, suggesting that the preventive effect on hepatic steatosis was due to the class effect(s) of SGLT2 inhibitors.

In addition to ectopic fat accumulation in the liver, de novo lipogenesis, which could be enhanced by hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia, is largely involved in inducing hepatic steatosis37,38. In the present study, as well as ipragliflozin18, 8 weeks of CANA treatment attenuated hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia, and suppressed the induction of genes involved in de novo lipogenesis of the liver. It therefore suggests that suppression of de novo lipogenesis, probably due to improved glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance, also contributes to attenuate hepatic steatosis in CANA-treated MC4R-KO mice. Considering low expression levels of SGLT2 (Slc5a2) in the liver and cellular component of the liver, CANA is unlikely to have direct effects on these cells to attenuate either hepatic steatosis or the subsequent pathologic changes.

As we previously reported18, one possible mechanism to promote healthy adipose expansion is improvement of insulin sensitivity in adipose tissue, which was assessed by Adipo-IR in the present study23. Based on the observation, the phenotypes of CANA-treated mice are similar to those of adipocyte-specific inducible phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-knockout mice, which exhibit enhanced adipocyte insulin signaling39; they gained more weight and adipose tissue during high-fat diet feeding, and showed enhanced insulin sensitivity, improved hepatic steatosis, and reduced adipose tissue inflammation. Thus, we consider that enhanced insulin sensitivity in adipose tissue can explain, at least partly, the increased lipid-storage capacity in adipocytes of CANA-treated mice. In addition, others and we have reported that fibrosis of white adipose tissue also limits its lipid-storage capacity via inhibiting adipocyte hypertrophy, which has a role in ectopic lipid accumulation in the liver22,40. It therefore suggests that reduced fibrosis of epididymal fat by CANA could additionally contribute to healthy adipose expansion in CANA-treated mice.

CANA markedly increased urinary glucose excretion in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice at 8 week of treatment; estimated from daily creatinine excretion of 24-week-old male C57BL/6j mice in a previous report41, daily glucose excretion at 8 week of CANA treatment was approximately 169 mg (0.68 kcal) in WD-fed MC4R-KO mice. Nonetheless, CANA did not reduce blood glucose levels of WD-fed MC4R-KO mice after treatment for 12 weeks in a 20-week treatment protocol. SGLT2 inhibitors have been shown to activate counter-regulatory responses that could compensate for its glucose-lowering effect; SGLT2 inhibitors increase plasma glucagon level to enhance endogenous glucose production in subjects with type 2 diabetes42,43, and enhance appetite in patients with T2DM33 and mice18. Given that CANA did not increase plasma glucagon levels in the present study, increased food intake may contribute to offsetting glucose-lowering effect of CANA after 12 weeks treatment. It is unclear as yet how SGLT2 inhibitors enhance appetite. It is assumed that the hyperphagia may represent an adaptive or compensatory response to involuntary glucose excretion, inasmuch as it occurs not immediately after the initiation of treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor33. In recent years, there have been an increasing number of papers reporting that hypothalamic neurons have the capacity to sense fluctuations in local nutrient concentrations and to modify the activity in response to that sensation44. Taken together, the hyperphagia may be a consequence of physiological and adequate hypothalamic adaptations to changes in the energy sources, such as ketones and glucose, which vary according to the fasting state.

It is noteworthy that eight weeks of CANA treatment could significantly affect glutathione metabolism in the epididymal fat to decrease oxidative stress, as assessed by the ratio of GSSG to GSH. In 3T3-L1 adipocytes, hyperglycemia increases oxidative stress to cause inflammation and insulin resistance45. In erythrocytes from patients with type 2 diabetes, GSSG/GSH ratio were increased as compared to control subjects, which was reduced by insulin treatment in vitro46,47, suggesting that activation of insulin signaling decreases GSSG/GSH ratio. Although the precise mechanisms still remain unclear, improvement of both hyperglycemia and insulin sensitivity by CANA could contribute to decreasing GSSG/GSH ratio in adipose tissue.

Fat accumulation correlates with systemic oxidative stress in humans and mice, and ROS production was selectively increased in adipose tissue of obese mice, accompanied with augmented expression of NADPH oxidase48. Previous reports suggest that GSH could enhance adipose expansion, and inhibit inflammatory responses in adipocytes in vitro; buthionine-sulfoximine, a GSH inhibitor, inhibits adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 adipocytes49, and decreases adipose mass in mice50. Furthermore, hydrogen peroxide induces inflammatory responses in 3T3-L1 adipocytes48. In consistent with these reports, the present study demonstrated that GSH suppressed oxidative stress-induced upregulation of NADPH-oxidase, inflammatory responses, and fibrotic gene inductions in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Taken together, it is conceivable that increase of GSH in adipose tissue of CANA-treated mice plays causal roles in adipose tissue expansion without deteriorating inflammation.

Whereas CANA suppressed NASH-associated hepatic carcinogenesis, it did not significantly reduce maximum tumor size. The observation is similar to a previous report using a thiazolidinedione; pioglitazone decreased the number of hepatic tumors in a mouse model for NASH, whereas it did not affect the maximum tumor size51. Of note, similar to CANA, thiazolidinediones have reported to attenuate hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis associated with increased fat mass in human7,52. It therefore suggests that, at least in a mouse model of NASH, mechanisms of NASH-associated hepatic tumor growth may be distinct from those of carcinogenesis. Furthermore, agents that increase both insulin sensitivity and adiposity, like CANA and thiazolidinediones, may have preventive effects only on NASH-associated hepatic carcinogenesis.

Human observational studies have reported increased cancer mortality in those with obesity and T2DM, which may be at least in part explained by hyperinsulinemia, elevated insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), or potentially both53,54,55. However, because 20 and 52 week of CANA treatment did not affect serum insulin levels and/or Akt activity in the liver, improvement of hyperinsulinemia does not appear to be a main or direct mechanism to attenuate hepatocellular carcinogenesis in the present study. In addition, although the method of glucose measurement in a 52-week treatment protocol was different from that in 8- and 20-week treatment protocols, CANA did not attenuate hyperglycemia in WD-fed MC4R-KO throughout 52-week of WD feeding. It suggests that, even though it is assumed that CANA consistently enhances glucose excretion during entire 52 weeks, attenuation of hyperglycemia is also unlikely as a consistent factor to inhibit the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Understanding the detailed molecular mechanisms by which CANA inhibits carcinogenesis, and generating clinical evidence to investigate whether SGLT2 inhibitors could prevent NASH-associated hepatocellular carcinoma in humans, require further studies.

In conclusion, CANA attenuated the development of hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic steatosis, and fibrosis in a mouse model of NASH. The present study could provide new insight into the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors, not only as a glucose lowering agent, but also as a modulator of metabolic organ network, such as kidney, liver, adipose tissue, and possibly more. SGLT2 inhibitors can be considered as an optional treatment for T2DM patients with hepatic steatosis and NASH.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Rinella, M. E. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review. JAMA 313, 2263–2273, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.5370 (2015).

  2. 2.

    Brunt, E. M. et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers 1, 15080, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.80 (2015).

  3. 3.

    Neuschwander-Tetri, B. A. & Caldwell, S. H. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: summary of an AASLD Single Topic Conference. Hepatology 37, 1202–1219, https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2003.50193 (2003).

  4. 4.

    Dunn, W. & Schwimmer, J. B. The obesity epidemic and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 10, 67–72 (2008).

  5. 5.

    Matteoni, C. A. et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a spectrum of clinical and pathological severity. Gastroenterology 116, 1413–1419 (1999).

  6. 6.

    Emerging Risk Factors, C. et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose, and risk of cause-specific death. N Engl J Med 364, 829–841, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1008862 (2011).

  7. 7.

    Belfort, R. et al. A placebo-controlled trial of pioglitazone in subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N Engl J Med 355, 2297–2307, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa060326 (2006).

  8. 8.

    Armstrong, M. J. et al. Liraglutide safety and efficacy in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (LEAN): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study. Lancet 387, 679–690, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00803-X (2016).

  9. 9.

    Mudaliar, S. et al. Efficacy and safety of the farnesoid X receptor agonist obeticholic acid in patients with type 2 diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 145, 574–582 e571, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2013.05.042 (2013).

  10. 10.

    Neuschwander-Tetri, B. A. et al. Farnesoid X nuclear receptor ligand obeticholic acid for non-cirrhotic, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (FLINT): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 385, 956–965, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61933-4 (2015).

  11. 11.

    Honda, Y. et al. The Selective SGLT2 Inhibitor Ipragliflozin Has a Therapeutic Effect on Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in Mice. PLoS One 11, e0146337, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146337 (2016).

  12. 12.

    Obata, A. et al. Tofogliflozin Improves Insulin Resistance in Skeletal Muscle and Accelerates Lipolysis in Adipose Tissue in Male Mice. Endocrinology 157, 1029–1042, https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2015-1588 (2016).

  13. 13.

    Nakano, S. et al. Remogliflozin Etabonate Improves Fatty Liver Disease in Diet-Induced Obese Male Mice. J Clin Exp Hepatol 5, 190–198, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jceh.2015.02.005 (2015).

  14. 14.

    Qiang, S. et al. Treatment with the SGLT2 inhibitor luseogliflozin improves nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in a rodent model with diabetes mellitus. Diabetol Metab Syndr 7, 104, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-015-0102-8 (2015).

  15. 15.

    Hayashizaki-Someya, Y. et al. Ipragliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, exhibits a prophylactic effect on hepatic steatosis and fibrosis induced by choline-deficient l-amino acid-defined diet in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 754, 19–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.02.009 (2015).

  16. 16.

    Watanabe, Y. et al. Beneficial effects of canagliflozin in combination with pioglitazone on insulin sensitivity in rodent models of obese type 2 diabetes. PLoS One 10, e0116851, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116851 (2015).

  17. 17.

    Tahara, A. et al. Effects of SGLT2 selective inhibitor ipragliflozin on hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, hepatic steatosis, oxidative stress, inflammation, and obesity in type 2 diabetic mice. Eur J Pharmacol 715, 246–255, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.05.014 (2013).

  18. 18.

    Komiya, C. et al. Ipragliflozin Improves Hepatic Steatosis in Obese Mice and Liver Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Irrespective of Body Weight Reduction. PLoS One 11, e0151511, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151511 (2016).

  19. 19.

    Itoh, M. et al. Melanocortin 4 receptor-deficient mice as a novel mouse model of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Am J Pathol 179, 2454–2463, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.07.014 (2011).

  20. 20.

    Liang, Y. et al. Effect of canagliflozin on renal threshold for glucose, glycemia, and body weight in normal and diabetic animal models. PLoS One 7, e30555, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030555 (2012).

  21. 21.

    Balthasar, N. et al. Divergence of melanocortin pathways in the control of food intake and energy expenditure. Cell 123, 493–505, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.035 (2005).

  22. 22.

    Tanaka, M. et al. Macrophage-inducible C-type lectin underlies obesity-induced adipose tissue fibrosis. Nature communications 5, 4982, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5982 (2014).

  23. 23.

    Groop, L. C. et al. Glucose and free fatty acid metabolism in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Evidence for multiple sites of insulin resistance. J Clin Invest 84, 205–213, https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI114142 (1989).

  24. 24.

    Sondergaard, E., Espinosa De Ycaza, A. E., Morgan-Bathke, M. & Jensen, M. D. How to Measure Adipose Tissue Insulin Sensitivity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102, 1193–1199, https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2017-00047 (2017).

  25. 25.

    Itoh, M. et al. Hepatic crown-like structure: a unique histological feature in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in mice and humans. PLoS One 8, e82163, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082163 (2013).

  26. 26.

    Cinti, S. et al. Adipocyte death defines macrophage localization and function in adipose tissue of obese mice and humans. J Lipid Res 46, 2347–2355, https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M500294-JLR200 (2005).

  27. 27.

    Shulman, G. I. Ectopic fat in insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and cardiometabolic disease. N Engl J Med 371, 1131–1141, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1011035 (2014).

  28. 28.

    Wu, G., Fang, Y. Z., Yang, S., Lupton, J. R. & Turner, N. D. Glutathione metabolism and its implications for health. The Journal of nutrition 134, 489–492 (2004).

  29. 29.

    Kobayashi, H., Matsuda, M., Fukuhara, A., Komuro, R. & Shimomura, I. Dysregulated glutathione metabolism links to impaired insulin action in adipocytes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 296, E1326–1334, https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.90921.2008 (2009).

  30. 30.

    Seko, Y. et al. Effects of canagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, on hepatic function in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: pooled and subgroup analyses of clinical trials. J Gastroenterol, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-017-1364-8 (2017).

  31. 31.

    Stenlof, K. et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin monotherapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise. Diabetes Obes Metab 15, 372–382, https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12054 (2013).

  32. 32.

    Bailey, C. J., Gross, J. L., Pieters, A., Bastien, A. & List, J. F. Effect of dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycaemic control with metformin: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 375, 2223–2233, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60407-2 (2010).

  33. 33.

    Ferrannini, G. et al. Energy Balance After Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibition. Diabetes Care 38, 1730–1735, https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-0355 (2015).

  34. 34.

    Cohen, J. C., Horton, J. D. & Hobbs, H. H. Human fatty liver disease: old questions and new insights. Science 332, 1519–1523, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204265 (2011).

  35. 35.

    Byrne, C. D. & Targher, G. Ectopic fat, insulin resistance, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: implications for cardiovascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 34, 1155–1161, https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.303034 (2014).

  36. 36.

    Kusminski, C. M., Bickel, P. E. & Scherer, P. E. Targeting adipose tissue in the treatment of obesity-associated diabetes. Nat Rev Drug Discov 15, 639–660, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2016.75 (2016).

  37. 37.

    Wang, Y., Viscarra, J., Kim, S. J. & Sul, H. S. Transcriptional regulation of hepatic lipogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16, 678–689, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm4074 (2015).

  38. 38.

    Brown, M. S. & Goldstein, J. L. Selective versus total insulin resistance: a pathogenic paradox. Cell Metab 7, 95–96, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2007.12.009 (2008).

  39. 39.

    Morley, T. S., Xia, J. Y. & Scherer, P. E. Selective enhancement of insulin sensitivity in the mature adipocyte is sufficient for systemic metabolic improvements. Nature communications 6, 7906, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8906 (2015).

  40. 40.

    Khan, T. et al. Metabolic dysregulation and adipose tissue fibrosis: role of collagen VI. Mol Cell Biol 29, 1575–1591, https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01300-08 (2009).

  41. 41.

    Takahashi, N., Boysen, G., Li, F., Li, Y. & Swenberg, J. A. Tandem mass spectrometry measurements of creatinine in mouse plasma and urine for determining glomerular filtration rate. Kidney Int 71, 266–271, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5002033 (2007).

  42. 42.

    Ferrannini, E. et al. Metabolic response to sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition in type 2 diabetic patients. J Clin Invest 124, 499–508, https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI72227 (2014).

  43. 43.

    Merovci, A. et al. Dapagliflozin improves muscle insulin sensitivity but enhances endogenous glucose production. J Clin Invest 124, 509–514, https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI70704 (2014).

  44. 44.

    Moran, T. H. Hypothalamic nutrient sensing and energy balance. Forum Nutr 63, 94–101, https://doi.org/10.1159/000264397 (2010).

  45. 45.

    Lin, Y. et al. The hyperglycemia-induced inflammatory response in adipocytes: the role of reactive oxygen species. J Biol Chem 280, 4617–4626, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M411863200 (2005).

  46. 46.

    Bravi, M. C. et al. Insulin decreases intracellular oxidative stress in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism 55, 691–695, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2006.01.003 (2006).

  47. 47.

    Rizvi, S. I. & Zaid, M. A. Intracellular reduced glutathione content in normal and type 2 diabetic erythrocytes: effect of insulin and (-)epicatechin. J Physiol Pharmacol 52, 483–488 (2001).

  48. 48.

    Furukawa, S. et al. Increased oxidative stress in obesity and its impact on metabolic syndrome. J Clin Invest 114, 1752–1761, https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI21625 (2004).

  49. 49.

    Vigilanza, P., Aquilano, K., Baldelli, S., Rotilio, G. & Ciriolo, M. R. Modulation of intracellular glutathione affects adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells. J Cell Physiol 226, 2016–2024, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.22542 (2011).

  50. 50.

    Lettieri Barbato, D. et al. Glutathione Decrement Drives Thermogenic Program In Adipose Cells. Scientific reports 5, 13091, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13091 (2015).

  51. 51.

    Kawai, D. et al. Hydrogen-rich water prevents progression of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and accompanying hepatocarcinogenesis in mice. Hepatology 56, 912–921, https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.25782 (2012).

  52. 52.

    Promrat, K. et al. A pilot study of pioglitazone treatment for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology 39, 188–196, https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.20012 (2004).

  53. 53.

    Tilg, H., Moschen, A. R. & Roden, M. NAFLD and diabetes mellitus. Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology 14, 32–42, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2016.147 (2017).

  54. 54.

    Haas, J. T., Francque, S. & Staels, B. Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Annu Rev Physiol 78, 181–205, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-021115-105331 (2016).

  55. 55.

    Dongiovanni, P., Rametta, R., Meroni, M. & Valenti, L. The role of insulin resistance in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and liver disease development–a potential therapeutic target? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 10, 229–242, https://doi.org/10.1586/17474124.2016.1110018 (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation and in part by grants-in-aid for scientific research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. K.T. is the recipient of funding from the Yokoyama Foundation for Clinical Pharmacology and Japan Research Foundation for Clinical Pharmacology. Y.O. is the recipient of funding from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (AMED-CREST), grant number JP17gm0610011h0003), and Uehara Memorial Foundation.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular Endocrinology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan

    • Kumiko Shiba
    • , Kyoichiro Tsuchiya
    • , Chikara Komiya
    • , Yasutaka Miyachi
    • , Kentaro Mori
    • , Noriko Shimazu
    • , Shinobu Yamaguchi
    • , Naomi Ogasawara
    •  & Yoshihiro Ogawa
  2. Department of Diabetes, Yamanashi-Kosei Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan

    • Kyoichiro Tsuchiya
  3. Medical Science Department Ikuyaku, Integrated Value Development Division, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Tokyo, Japan

    • Makoto Katoh
  4. Department of Organ Network and Metabolism, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan

    • Michiko Itoh
  5. Department of Molecular Medicine and Metabolism, Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan

    • Takayoshi Suganami
  6. Department of Molecular and Cellular Metabolism, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan

    • Yoshihiro Ogawa
  7. Department of Medical and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

    • Yoshihiro Ogawa
  8. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, CREST, Tokyo, Japan

    • Yoshihiro Ogawa

Authors

  1. Search for Kumiko Shiba in:

  2. Search for Kyoichiro Tsuchiya in:

  3. Search for Chikara Komiya in:

  4. Search for Yasutaka Miyachi in:

  5. Search for Kentaro Mori in:

  6. Search for Noriko Shimazu in:

  7. Search for Shinobu Yamaguchi in:

  8. Search for Naomi Ogasawara in:

  9. Search for Makoto Katoh in:

  10. Search for Michiko Itoh in:

  11. Search for Takayoshi Suganami in:

  12. Search for Yoshihiro Ogawa in:

Contributions

T.S. and Y.O. were involved in concept and design; K.S., K.T., C.K., Y.M., K.M., N.S., S.Y., N.O., M.K. and M.I. were involved in experiments and procedures; K.S., K.T. and Y.O. were involved in writing of article. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Competing Interests

M.I. is the recipient of research funding from Shionogi & Co., Ltd.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kyoichiro Tsuchiya or Yoshihiro Ogawa.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19658-7

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.